LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

December 10/16

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletin16/english.december09.16.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
The works that the Father has given me to complete, the very works that I am doing, testify on my behalf that the Father has sent me
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 05/31-36/:"‘If I testify about myself, my testimony is not true. There is another who testifies on my behalf, and I know that his testimony to me is true. You sent messengers to John, and he testified to the truth. Not that I accept such human testimony, but I say these things so that you may be saved. He was a burning and shining lamp, and you were willing to rejoice for a while in his light. But I have a testimony greater than John’s. The works that the Father has given me to complete, the very works that I am doing, testify on my behalf that the Father has sent me."

For Christ is the end of the law so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes.
Letter to the Romans 10/01-13/:"Brothers and sisters, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for them is that they may be saved. I can testify that they have a zeal for God, but it is not enlightened. For, being ignorant of the righteousness that comes from God, and seeking to establish their own, they have not submitted to God’s righteousness. For Christ is the end of the law so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes. Moses writes concerning the righteousness that comes from the law, that ‘the person who does these things will live by them.’ But the righteousness that comes from faith says, ‘Do not say in your heart, "Who will ascend into heaven?" ’ (that is, to bring Christ down) ‘or "Who will descend into the abyss?" ’ (that is, to bring Christ up from the dead). But what does it say? ‘The word is near you, on your lips and in your heart’ (that is, the word of faith that we proclaim); because if you confess with your lips that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For one believes with the heart and so is justified, and one confesses with the mouth and so is saved. The scripture says, ‘No one who believes in him will be put to shame.’ For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; the same Lord is Lord of all and is generous to all who call on him. For, ‘Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.’"

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on December 09-10/16
Lebanon’s Long Governmental Wait/Eyad Abu Shakra/Asharq Al Awsat/December 09/16
What Iran without Ayatollahs mean/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya/December 09/16
Amnesty International Attacks Democracies, Forgives Islamist Tyrannies/ Giulio Meotti/Gatestone Institute/December 09/16
Saudi journalist, Abdulrahman Al-Rashed, suggests ties with Israel improve if Israeli Arabs come work in Saudi Arabia/oi Kais/ Ynetnews/December 09/16
Reaction of Geert Wilders to His Conviction/ Geert Wilders/Gatestone Institute/December 09/16
No “Trump” Sign on Obama’s Ziggurat/Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/December 09/16
Distortion of historical facts by a Nobel /Dr. Ali Al-Ghamdi/Al Arabiya/December 09/16

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on December 09-10/16
Lebanon ‘closer to repealing’ controversial rape law
Israel Army Says Hizbullah Map was Just 'Illustration'
Hezbollah denies it promised Russia no attacks on Israel
Hezbollah’s Nasrallah: Lebanon must not await regional developments
Hizbullah Says Made No Pledge not to Retaliate against Israel
Report: Aoun, Berri Keeping Mum on New Efforts to Help Cabinet Line-Up
Report: Aoun, Berri Keeping Mum on New Efforts to Help Cabinet Line-Up
Hariri Says Berri 'Very Keen' on Govt. Formation, Line-Up May be Announced 'Very Soon'
Mashnouq: Ministry Ready to Organize Parliamentary Polls 'within Legal Deadlines'
Zahra: Aoun's Tenure an Opportunity to Implement Taef Accord
Plastic Surgeon Reported Missing Found Dead in Sidon
On International Human Rights Day Shorter Welcomes Human Rights Commission
Assad: Lebanon cannot continue with self-distancing policy
2 killed, 4 injured in car crash on Batroun highway
Labor Minister reveals international community adamant about settling Syrian refugees in Lebanon
Lebanon’s Long Governmental Wait

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on December 09-10/16
Heavy Syrian army shelling hits rebel Aleppo'
Coalition Air Strike Destroys 168 IS Oil Trucks in Syria
Kerry Says U.S.-Russia Talks Saturday in Bid to 'Save' Aleppo from Destruction
U.N. Says Hundreds Reported Missing after Fleeing East Aleppo
IS Kills 15 Syria Regime Fighters near Palmyra
50,000 ISIS fighters killed’ since 2014
UN votes in favor of an immediate Syria ceasefire
Mursi’s son arrested as part of Rabaa sit-in dispersal case
Explosion in Egypt’s Giza kills six policemen
Johnson Says Britain Committed to Gulf Security
Turkey Court Drops Case against Israelis over Ship Storming
S. Korea Parliament Impeaches Scandal Hit President

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on December 09-10/16
 
Hizballah top dog: “Christians and Muslims together oppose the challenges presented to them by Israel and the infidels”.
Jihad bombing near Pyramids, 6 Egyptian police killed.
Dutch Secret Service investigated Geert Wilders over his “ties to Israel and their possible influence on his loyalty”.
Wilders found guilty of “hate speech,” tells judges “truth and liberty are stronger than you”.
SPLC includes Orlando jihad massacre among “radical-right terrorist plots”.
Nigeria: Two schoolgirl jihad-martyrdom suicide bombers murder 56 at crowded market.
Obama: Rise of the Islamic State caught me by surprise.
Italy deports Muslim who was planning jihad bombing in the Vatican.
Ellison bolts New York Times interview to avoid questions about his ties to the Nation of Islam.
UK: Muslim migrant and serial rapist who dodged deportation after claiming to be a child is jailed for 18 years.
UK cops deny political correctness involved in missed opportunities to stop Muslim rape gang.
Germany: “100s of young Muslim men treated women as objects to hunt down….they’re considered fair game and can be raped”.
Question for Megyn Kelly: Is it “hateful” to stand for the freedom of speech?.
Netherlands: On day Wilders convicted of “hate speech,” Muslim arrested with loaded AK-47 and Islamic State flag.
Sharia Germany: Court says Muslim girls must take swimming classes because “no binding rules in Islam” about swimwear.
“Go ahead and cut my head off. It’s ok. Cut my head off. I’m not racist.”

Links From Christian Today Site for on December 09-10/16
Refugees From Syria Have Been Through Some Of Worst Suffering In World, Says Archbishop Of Canterbury
British Government Has Failed The Christians Of Syria And Iraq, Senior Clergy Say
Victory In Sight For Syrian Army In Aleppo
Christian Charity Compassion International Could Be Forced Out Of India
Apps Of The Apostles: Do Millennials Read The Bible In The Digital Age?
Franklin Graham Slams Time Magazine For Comparison Of Hillary Clinton To Moses
Donald Trump Chooses Climate Sceptic and Committed Christian Scott Pruitt For Top Environment Job
Christian Politician Faces Controversial Blasphemy Trial In Indonesia
Muslims Face 'A Lot' Of Discrimination In America - Pew
Churches Report 'Dramatic' Loss In Confidence Over Youthwork
Orthodox Christians In Russian Town Protest Against New Condom Factory
Musician Convicted Of Child Abuse Beaten To Death In Church
Two Critical After Pastor Gave Congregation 'Liquid Substance' To Drink
Life In Your Twenties: Two Questions You Need To Ask

Latest Lebanese Related News published on December 09-10/16
Lebanon ‘closer to repealing’ controversial rape law
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Friday, 9 December 2016/After several campaigns by women’s rights activists, several members of parliament in Lebanon have agreed to work to revoke a nearly 70-year-old law allowing rapists to avoid prosecution if they marry their victim. Many Lebanese women, dressed as brides in white wedding dresses stained with fake blood and bandages, gathered last week outside government buildings in Lebanon’s capital to protest against the law. Article 522 of the Lebanese penal code states: “In the event a legal marriage is concluded between the person who committed [crimes including rape, kidnapping and statutory rape] and the victim, prosecution shall be stopped and in case a decision is rendered, the execution of such decision shall be suspended against the person who was subject to it.”“We reject this violation of women regardless of their age, background, environment, whether they have special needs or the circumstances of the rape,” said Ghida Anani, head of Abaad, a local NGO campaigning against the law.  (With the AP)

Israel Army Says Hizbullah Map was Just 'Illustration'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 09/16/The Israeli army acknowledged Friday that a "declassified map" it released earlier this week showing alleged armed deployment by Hizbullah across southern Lebanon was merely an illustration. The army said that the map, which Israeli media said was circulated to foreign diplomats as evidence of alleged Hizbullah hostile intentions, was not based on any new intelligence. The admission came after the data it contained was picked apart by online activist Judge Dan. Asked by AFP if the map was an illustration or based on specific information, the army said it was "an illustration of Hizbullah's intentional abuse of the civilians of Lebanon."The army released the map on Tuesday with symbols showing alleged Hizbullah rocket launchers, infantry positions and tunnels in almost every village in south Lebanon. An accompanying Tweet accused the Lebanese group of "hiding behind Lebanon's civilians, adding: "This is a war crime." A U.N. ceasefire resolution that ended a devastating 2006 war between Israel and Hizbullah required the Lebanese army to deploy to south Lebanon, including areas which had previously been the militant group's exclusive preserve. Hizbullah agreed that its fighters south of the River Litani would not display weapons, but the area remains a stronghold of the group. A decade after the conflict, Israel remains deeply sensitive to Hizbullah's arsenal and has vowed to take military action if necessary to prevent deliveries of heavy weaponry. It has carried out sporadic air strikes against Hizbullah targets inside Syria where the group has deployed thousands of fighters in support of President Bashar Assad's regime. 

Hezbollah denies it promised Russia no attacks on Israel
Jerusalem Post/December 09/16/Hezbollah said on Friday that there is no truth to reports it assured Russia there would be no military response to the alleged Israeli strikes on its forces in Syria on Wednesday, according to a Hezbollah statement read out on its Al-Manar TV station. The terror organization said the reports were an "invention.""These reports are a total lie and fabrication," the statement read. Despite the strong denials, Hezbollah did not explicitly promise an attack, leaving doubt as to whether one will be forthcoming. The Syrian regime accused Israel of firing surface-to-surface missiles targeting the Mezzeh Air Base near Damascus on Wednesday, causing damage but no casualties. Hezbollah’s Al-Maydeen television channel said the group “was almost certain” that the Israel Air Force carried out the strikes from Lebanese airspace. If Hezbollah does strike at Israel, it would not be for the first time since the end of the 2006 Second Lebanon War. In January 2015, following a reported Israeli air strike on a convoy of Hezbollah and Iranian operatives who were constructing a terrorist base in the Syrian Golan, Hezbollah retaliated, firing a volley of Kornet guided missiles an IDF convoy, killing a soldier and commander in their D-Max vehicle. The attack was launched from five kilometers away on the Lebanese side of the border with Israel. Russia is heavily backing the Assad regime in the Syrian Civil War, which relies also on the manpower of the Lebanese terror group, in addition to other foreign allies on the ground such as Iran's Al Quds Force. If true, the rumors that Hezbollah might refrain from attacking Israel would insinuate the giving of orders from Moscow to Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah to show restraint. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has regularly visited and held telephone conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin in the past year in order to try and secure Israel's interests in the region. With Russia stationing S-300 anti-aircraft missiles in Syria, Israel has been keen to ensure that the system is not used against Israeli planes. Israel, which usually neither confirms nor denies responsibility for alleged strikes, is “working primarily to protect the security of our citizens, defend our sovereignty, and prevent the smuggling of sophisticated weapons, military equipment and weapons of mass destruction from Syria to Hezbollah,” Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman said on Wednesday, following the claims by the Assad regime.
In April, Netanyahu admitted for the first time that the IDF had carried out strikes in Syrian territory.
Anna Ahronheim and Ariel Whitman contributed to this report.

Hezbollah’s Nasrallah: Lebanon must not await regional developments

Now Lebanon/09 December/16/
“Do not wait for regional developments for Lebanon to go on,” Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said in a Friday evening television address.
BEIRUT - Hezbollah’s leader has called on Lebanese politicians to not wait for the result of regional developments and instead break the political impasse in the country. “Do not wait for regional developments for Lebanon to go on,” Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said in a Friday evening television address, adding that “whatever is happening in Aleppo should not affect Lebanon.”The Hezbollah chief stressed the importance of forming a new government, following the election of President Michel Aoun in late October, and the formulation of a new electoral law to guide the parliamentary elections slated to be held next year. “All political parties should take part in formation of government,” Nasrallah said, while stressing his conviction that no side is seeking to prolong the government-formation process which has already gone on for over a month amid squabbles over ministerial appointments. He also reiterated his party’s support for a proportional electoral law, saying it “is the only valid option if we are looking to achieve true representation.” Worries have mounted over the parliamentary vote set for May 2017 as the country’s feuding parties have yet to agree on a new electoral law, which prompted the postponement of the elections on two previous occasions. Narallah touted his ties with Aoun and said that Hezbollah was in daily contact with the newly-elected president’s Free Patriotic Movement. “We have not had a single issue with Aoun,” he explained, adding that rumors of a potential rift were utterly unfounded. Nasrallah added that he also supported Aoun’s ties with any foreign state, other than Hezbollah’s arch-foe Israel, and welcomed the president visiting Saudi Arabia, another regional rival of the Shiite party.
The Hezbollah chief’s one-hour long speech focused solely on Lebanese politics and made no mention of recent events in the region, including Israel’s reported strikes on targets, including Hezbollah ones, in Syria in the past week. “The region has reached a new stage, there are new projects that will be defeated,” Nasrallah hinted, but added that he would “not talk about them now.”NOW's English news desk editor Albin Szakola (@AlbinSzakola) wrote this report.

Nasrallah Says No One Obstructing Govt. Formation, Hails 'Excellent' Relation with Aoun

Naharnet/December 09/16/Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah stressed Friday that “no political party in Lebanon” is trying to block the formation of the new government, while emphasizing that his party's relation with President Michel Aoun is “excellent.”“Hizbullah does not have media, political or parliamentary sources or sources close to the party that speak to the press. Anything attributed to Hizbullah sources is unreliable... We also do not depend on so-called March 8 sources,” Nasrallah said in a televised address, referring to recent media reports about alleged tensions between Hizbullah and Aoun. “We in Hizbullah do not endorse the approach of sending messages through sources, journalists, articles or embassies. We talk directly to our friends and allies. We do not use this approach and this is to respond to what has been attributed to Hizbullah about alleged messages to the new presidential tenure,” Nasrallah added. And underlining that Hizbullah's relation with Aoun and the Free Patriotic Movement is “excellent and built on mutual respect and deep trust,” Nasrallah noted that his party is “not worried” by the rising FPM-Lebanese Forces alliance. “We communicate on near-daily basis with President Aoun, FPM chief Jebran Bassil and the FPM's leadership... We might have different viewpoints over some issues but this is positive in discussions,” Hizbullah's supremo added. He emphasized that “it is not true that Hizbullah has asked the FPM to renounce its alliance with the LF or to choose between allying with Hizbullah or allying with the LF.”
“Some are trying to give the impression that Hizbullah is preoccupied with the issue of the LF's relation with the FPM. This is not to underestimate the LF, which is an essential force in Lebanon, but everyone knows that we are busy somewhere else... We are busy in a place that will shape the region's future,” Nasrallah added, referring to Hizbullah's military role in Syria. “We do not have a negative evaluation of the Christian alliance and this alliance can resolve a lot of domestic problems in Lebanon,” he said.
Moreover, Nasrallah denied that Hizbullah is “dismayed” by the president's foreign relations or the latest visit to Lebanon by a senior Saudi delegation. “We were not dismayed. It is not true that we would be dismayed if the president chooses Saudi Arabia for his first visit, seeing as the president has the right to travel to any country and we do not have the right to put a veto on the president's trip to Saudi Arabia, the same as no one has the right to veto his travel to Iran or Syria,” he added.
Turning to the issue of the formation of the new government, Nasrallah stressed to the Lebanese that “no political party in Lebanon is trying to block the formation of the new government,” be it an ally or a rival. “Claims that Speaker (Nabih) Berri, Hizbullah or (Marada Movement chief) MP Suleiman Franjieh are obstructing the formation of the cabinet are baseless, false and unjust,” Hizbullah's chief said. As for the parties' shares in Cabinet and whether the Hizbullah-led March 8 forces are trying to clinch at least a third of the seats in order to have a veto power, Nasrallah stressed that Aoun is "more than a 'guaranteeing third' in any Cabinet.” “Most of the portfolios have been allocated and the problem today is revolving around one or two portfolios,” he said. “This is a transitional government and its mission is to organize the elections,” Nasrallah noted. “No one should try to stir discord between Hizbullah, AMAL Movement and the FPM,” he added. Nasrallah also hoped that the relation between its allies the FPM and Marada Movement will be restored soon.
As for the issue of the electoral law, Nasrallah said he backs recent calls for “separating the issue of the electoral law from the cabinet formation process.”He also reiterated his party's stance that “the only law that can lead to building a State is one fully based on proportional representation and on turning Lebanon into a single electorate or several large electorates.”

Hizbullah Says Made No Pledge not to Retaliate against Israel
Naharnet/December 09/16/Hizbullah has slammed as “baseless” reports alleging that the party has pledged not to retaliate against Israeli strikes that hit inside Syria, LBCI reported Friday.
“Media reports quoted Israeli enemy alleging that Hizbullah made a pledge to Russia not to respond to Israeli airstrikes inside Syria...are baseless and unfounded,” Hizbullah media office said in a statement on Friday. On Wednesday, several Israeli missiles struck near the Mazzeh airbase outside Damascus without causing any casualties. The Jewish state has sought to limit its involvement in the five-year conflict in Syria, but has carried out sporadic sorties against Hizbullah inside Syria.Israel's Channel 10 had reported later that “Russia has received pledges from Hizbullah and Iran not to respond to Israeli strikes that hit targets inside Syria.” Several thousand Hizbullah fighters are fighting alongside President Bashar Assad's forces across war-torn Syria. The party argues that its intervention in Syria, which is controversial in Lebanon, is necessary to protect the Lebanese from the threats posed by extremist jihadist groups such as Islamic State and al-Nusra Front.

Report: Aoun, Berri Keeping Mum on New Efforts to Help Cabinet Line-Up
Naharnet/December 09/16/Serious efforts to ease the differences hampering the formation of a new cabinet are underway between President Michel Aoun and Speaker Nabih Berri, media reports said on Friday. Sources following up closely on the formation process, said the two sides have committed to maintain silence as for this endeavor so it won't be hampered, paving the way for its formation within ten-day limit. Considering the formation of a 30-minister cabinet is very likely from Aoun's perspective, although Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri still adheres to a 24-minister cabinet, added the sources. As for the share to be allotted to the Marada Movement chief Suleiman Franjieh, discussions continue between Berri and Hariri in that regard. Franjieh says he has the right to be represented in the cabinet similar to other political parties. Aoun's election as president and Hariri's appointment as premier-designate have raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees.
But Aoun and Hariri are still struggling to put together a new cabinet amid conflicting demands from the political forces that are seeking to join the unity government. Horsetrading is still revolving around the so-called services-related ministerial portfolios, mainly public works and telecommunications. Speaker Nabih Berri, who is negotiating on behalf of the Hizbullah-led March 8 camp, is clinging to the finance and public works portfolios while also insisting that the Marada Movement must get a key portfolio.

Berri: Preparations for Parliamentary Elections Behind Time

Naharnet/December 09/16/In light of stalled efforts to line-up a new cabinet, Speaker Nabih Berri warned that Lebanon is behind time as for the preparations needed to hold the parliamentary elections as scheduled in June 2017, An Nahar daily reported Friday.
“The tenure of the current parliament ends on June 20, 2017, and the elections must be staged two months ahead. The door closes on the nominations three months before the parliament's tenure ends. The commission overlooking the elections must be formed six months in advance, that is at the beginning of the year,Berri told his visitors. “All these preparations need to be completed if the elections are to be staged on the basis of the (controversial) 1960 electoral law. Lack of commitment puts the elections at a challenge,” Berri has warned.
The Speaker noted that his words must not be marked as backing the thorny 1960 electoral law, but as a warning that the time factor is pressing. He added that Caretaker Prime Minister Tammam Salam can implement the tasks shall Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri fail to line-up a new cabinet. Premier-designate Hariri is still facing obstacles bringing together a line-up that balances Lebanon's delicate sectarian-based political system.Wrangling over the distribution of ministerial portfolios is at stake. The political parties are also bickering over amending the current election law which divides seats among the different religious sects. The current parliament has failed to amend the law, and has extended its mandate twice amid criticism. Hizbullah has repeatedly called for an electoral law based on proportional representation but other political parties, especially al-Mustaqbal Movement, have rejected the proposal and argued that the party's controversial arsenal of arms would prevent serious competition in regions where the Iran-backed party is influential. Mustaqbal, the Lebanese Forces and the Progressive Socialist Party have meanwhile proposed a hybrid electoral law that mixes the proportional representation and the winner-takes-all systems. Speaker Nabih Berri has also proposed a hybrid law. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.

Hariri Says Berri 'Very Keen' on Govt. Formation, Line-Up May be Announced 'Very Soon'
Naharnet/December 09/16/Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri announced after talks with Speaker Nabih Berri on Friday evening that the parliament speaker is “very keen” on a speedy formation of the new government, noting that the line-up of the cabinet might be finalized “very soon.”“Speaker Berri is very keen on speeding up the formation of the cabinet and resolving all obstacles. The atmosphere is certainly positive and God willing things will move forward and we will reach a happy ending very soon,” Hariri said after the meeting in Ain el-Tineh. Asked whether the new Cabinet will be formed before Christmas, Hariri said: “God willing.”“President (Michel) Aoun is keen on the formation of the cabinet and today we found Speaker Berri very keen on finalizing the line-up and I hope everyone will facilitate the process... We talked about everything and things are positive,” added Hariri. Asked whether Berri has agreed to give up a certain ministerial portfolio, the PM-designate said he agreed with him that “everyone should cooperate.”“He was very positive,” Hariri added. Hariri was accompanied by his adviser Nader Hariri and the meeting was held in the presence of Berri's adviser, caretaker Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil. Media reports have said that Berri and Aoun have launched efforts aimed at resolving the obstacles that are hindering the formation of the new cabinet. Berri and Hariri were expected to discuss the ministerial portfolio that will be offered to Marada Movement chief MP Suleiman Franjieh, “knowing that Hariri did not make any offer to the Marada chief during their meeting two days ago,” the reports said. Franjieh's demand to get a key ministerial portfolio is one of the main declared obstacles that are delaying the formation of the new cabinet. Franjieh has announced that Marada will not join the new cabinet if it does not get one of three so-called important portfolios – public works, energy or telecommunications. Berri, who is negotiating on behalf of the Hizbullah-led March 8 forces, has backed Franjieh's demand and insisted that Marada should be represented in the government with an important portfolio.

Mashnouq: Ministry Ready to Organize Parliamentary Polls 'within Legal Deadlines'
Naharnet/December 09/16/Caretaker Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq announced Friday that his ministry is ready to organize the 2017 parliamentary polls within “the deadlines stipulated by law.”Mashnouq voiced his remarks during a meeting with U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Elizabeth Richard. State-run National News Agency said Mashnouq and Richard stressed the need to form the new government quickly to enable Lebanon to confront the various security, political and economic challenges. Mashnouq had recently warned that there is not much time left to pass a new electoral law while reassuring that the ministry is ready to organize the 2017 polls under the 1960 law. Hizbullah and its allies have repeatedly called for passing an electoral law based on the proportional representation system but other parties, especially al-Mustaqbal Movement, have rejected the suggestion, arguing that Hizbullah's controversial arsenal of arms would prevent serious competition in regions where the Iran-backed party is influential. Al-Mustaqbal Movement, the Lebanese Forces and the Progressive Socialist Party have meanwhile proposed a hybrid electoral law that mixes the proportional representation and the winner-takes-all systems. Hizbullah's ally Speaker Nabih Berri has also proposed a hybrid law. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate.

Zahra: Aoun's Tenure an Opportunity to Implement Taef Accord
Naharnet/December 09/16/Lebanese Forces bloc MP Antoine Zahra said on Friday his party has always carried the project of building the State, noting that “the LF seeks partnership as stipulated by the Taef Accord.”In an interview on LBCI, Zahra said his party saw in President Michel Aoun a chance to re-implement the Taef agreement “as originally drafted and not as previously applied.”“The LF has participated in three governments and has never been accused of suspicious behavior,” he argued, assuring that the distribution of quotas is not his party's mission. “We demanded a sovereign ministerial portfolio and the reply came that we only get the vice Premier portfolio and three others, based on which we nominated our ministers.” “We are interested in facilitating things, but we are not concerned with providing concessions,” Zahra assured. “When we requested a key portfolio, we were told that the situation is not suitable now,” since the upcoming government is temporary and will live for six months until the parliamentary elections are held, after which another government will be lined-up. On a different note, Zahra said: “We will resist peacefully and politically, any attempt for Syrian interference in Lebanon.”Referring to the latest visit of Grand Mufti of Syria to Lebanon, Zahra said: “I wonder why Patriarch Rahi received the Mufti of Syria, who is dancing on the graves of the dead, while leaders of other communities did not receive him.”

Plastic Surgeon Reported Missing Found Dead in Sidon

Naharnet/December 09/16/The body of a man who has been reported missing 40 days ago was found in the southern city of Sidon with a driver's license next to him carrying his name and place of residence, the National News Agency reported Friday. The body which carried clear signs of torture, belongs to citizen Haitham Ali Raad (from Bednayel, born in 1965) residing in Beirut's southern suburbs, NNA added. The man is a plastic surgeon and he had been missing for 40 days. A coroner inspected the body and revealed that it was shot several times in the chest and neck, and signs of torture were obvious on the man's body. The driver's license found next to the body belongs to the victim's son. Security forces kicked off investigation into the case.

On International Human Rights Day Shorter Welcomes Human Rights Commission
Naharnet/December 09/16/Ambassador Hugo Shorter has welcomed the new Human Rights Commission, in a speech to civil society, Lebanese officials and the international community. In the speech, which Shorter delivered at a reception to mark Human Rights Day, the British Ambassador also noted the importance of the upcoming elections to renew Lebanon’s democracy. Finally, he welcomed the role of civil society, including a free media, in contributing to a “healthy” democracy, and urged strong partnerships between civil society and government. On the Human Rights law passed by Parliament in October, he said “This is a positive step for Lebanon, which after all was one of the nations which drafted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Key for the Commission’s success will be that it is transparent, that it leads to greater accountability, and that qualified, committed individuals are nominated.” Referencing the elections, Shorter said “Civil society can put positive pressure on the government, including before and during the elections, which I hope and expect will take place on time next year - with much-needed technical improvements, such as pre-printed ballot papers.” But he also noted that “the government has a duty to allow civil society, and the media, to continue their work unimpeded, in freedom and liberty.”The evening also highlighted the British Embassy’s partnerships with civil society and government on a wide range of Human Rights projects, including on women’s rights; combating torture; promoting civil society; supporting the elections; protecting migrant workers; and helping build a professional police force and army that are better able to fight terrorism. Concluding his speech, Shorter said, “Let’s not forget that open, inclusive societies are prosperous societies. Almost no significant or sustainable economic or social progress happens without the free exchange of ideas, innovation and experimentation. Similarly, no society can fully reach its potential when half the population – I’m talking about women of course – are not able to participate fully in public life. Because together, we can make each other better”. 

Assad: Lebanon cannot continue with self-distancing policy
MEM/December 9, 2016/“Lebanon cannot be immune from the fires that flare up around it and adopt a ‘self-distancing policy’,” Syrian regime President Bashar Al-Assad said.
Speaking to Syria’s semi-official Al-Watan news agency yesterday, Al-Assad remarked on the election of General Michel Aoun as president of Lebanon saying: “The ability to elect a president is a victory for Lebanon and the election of someone who enjoys consensus is also a victory for Lebanon.”“When there is someone like General Michel Aoun who knows the danger of terrorism on Lebanon and its citizens, it will also be a victory for Lebanon and a victory for Syria,” Al-Assad added. When asked if he had invited Aoun to visit Syria, Assad said: “No, not yet, now they are busy with forming a government.” Lebanon adopted a “self-distancing policy” in the wake of the Syrian civil war which began in 2011. However, Shia Hezbollah joined the Assad regime forces in 2013.

2 killed, 4 injured in car crash on Batroun highway
 Fri 09 Dec 2016/NNA - Two were killed and four were injured in a deadly car accident that took place on the eastern side of Batroun highway this evening, National News Agency correspondent reported on Friday. The deceased were identified as Maher Abdul Qader Obeid and Yehia Khalil
 
Labor Minister reveals international community adamant about settling Syrian refugees in Lebanon
Fri 09 Dec 2016/NNA - Caretaker Minister of Labor, Sejaan Azzi, revealed on Friday that the international community was determined to settling over one million displaced Syrians as refugees in Lebanon. "The recent visits to Lebanon by international [officials] only confirmed the international community's determination to settle the Syrian displaced; this is what drove the President of the republic and the Foreign Minister to take their national stance against that headway," Azzi told a news conference at his office.
Accordingly, he suggested establishing residential areas inside Syria to host the displaced and secure a safe return for them. "War is not taking place on the entire Syrian territory."
"The international community and organizations, as well as influential states, must provide protection to those areas.""Unfortunately, the entire international community and all visitors to Lebanon did propose that Syrians stay in Lebanon until the war ends and a settlement takes place next door," he revealed. "Lebanon cannot bear more than 1.7 million Syrians," he reminded. 

Lebanon’s Long Governmental Wait
Eyad Abu Shakra/Asharq Al Awsat/December 09/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/09/eyad-abu-shakraasharq-al-awsat-lebanons-long-governmental-wait/
Against the background of Syria’s debacle, Lebanon continues to wait for the birth of its first government (cabinet) under its new president Michel Aoun.
Yet, Lebanon, long regarded by Hafez Al-Assad, and later Bashar Al-Assad, until 2011 as ‘Syria’s soft belly’, looks in better shape than its ‘Older Sister’. There is no fully-fledged destructive war here. No declared and systematic sectarian displacement carried out by force with official international blessings. And no need for the East and West to call a common strategy for confronting extremist groups, operating in territories controlled and occupied by militias unopposed by regional and international powers, as a result of limiting the anathema of terror and terrorism to a single confessional strain while overlooking others.
 Thus, Lebanon looks ‘great’ compared with Syria; however, this should not mean that things are really moving in the right direction, especially in the light of the failure of Prime Minister-designate Saad Al-Hariri to form a new government.
 When Hezbollah nominated Aoun, head of the Free Patriotic Movement, as Lebanon’s presidential candidate, and forced a presidential ‘vacuum’ for almost two and a half years until it got its way, opinions were divided on its choice of candidate, its suspension of the elections process, and the way it would deal with ‘President’ Aoun!
 Initially, before the February 2006 ‘agreement’ between the two sides, Hezbollah was not a great fan of Aoun, and neither did the hard-line Christian Maronite leader believe much in Hezbollah’s policies of ‘Resistance’. Later, however, both decided to bury the hatchet and enter a ‘marriage of convenience’ against the anti-Tehran and anti-Damascus ‘14 of March’ loose coalition, born in the aftermath of the assassination of the former Prime Minister Rafic Al-Hariri in February 2005 against what was described as the ‘Lebanese-Syrian Security Regime’, and Hezbollah’s open support of the Al-Assad regime- then widely accused of carrying out the assassination.
 Since February 2006, Aoun has been providing almost full backing to Hezbollah’s policies and actions, inside and outside Lebanon; while the latter has turned its ‘agreement’ with Aoun into a blueprint of its dealings with Lebanon’s religious sects. Hezbollah through its leaders and mouthpieces has been citing its ‘respect of the powerbase’s wishes’ within the Christian communities for Aoun to justify its all-out support for him; and thus regarding Aoun as the ‘most popular Christian Lebanese leader’ the Shi’ite powerful militia claimed it was abiding with the spirit of the country’s unwritten ‘National Pact’.
 This however, has been rarely practiced by Hezbollah toward other sects, namely the Sunnis and Druze. The pro-Iran powerful militia brought down the national unity cabinet headed by the leading Sunni Saad Al-Hariri in January 2011, and formed an alternative cabinet with poor Sunni cover. On the Druze front, it not only pushed to ‘neutralise’ the supreme Druze leader Walid Jumblatt, but also ‘invented’ alternatives even to his traditional competitor Emir Talal Arslan, in case Arslan decided to side with Jumblatt on issues vital to their small community.
 The Syrian Uprising, then civil war and international intervention, were bound to profoundly affect the Lebanese. As the weak independent capabilities of Bashar Al-Assad’s regime became clear for all to see, Iran’s plans for regional and sectarian hegemony became clearer; best manifested in Hezbollah’s direct involvement in combat duties inside Syria under the guidance of Iran’s IRGC. Later on, the regional and international picture became clearer still with the signing of JCPOA (i.e. the Iran – American nuclear deal), and Russia’s direct military intervention in support of Al-Assad with Washington’s silent approval.
 In such a scenario, Lebanon became a ‘side show’, a refuge for the displaced, and a land controlled by the illegitimate forces of the ‘Status Quo’ which until recently were – along with their sponsor, Iran – accused of aiding and perpetrating terrorism.
 Furthermore, the crippling of political activity entwined with economic collapse and acute Shi’i – Sunni polarization, both inside and outside Lebanon, have necessitated some sort of a political deal. However, Lebanon’s internal problems neither disappeared by making Aoun president and Al-Harari prime minister, nor has the state’s wellbeing been assured given the fact that some local players continue to reject the ‘Taif Accords’ and conspire against them.
 Hence, Lebanon remains a ‘soft belly’ although its fragility has now spilled over across its border and spread into its region. This is making more difficult the job of a political class that proves everyday it does not believe in coexistence, is not brave enough to be frank about it, is unable to read the changing scene and seems unable to learn from past mistakes.

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on December 09-10/16
Heavy Syrian army shelling hits rebel Aleppo
AFP, Beirut Friday, 9 December 2016/Syrian government artillery bombarded the fast-shrinking rebel enclave in the heart of Aleppo on Friday despite its ally Russia’s announcement of a new humanitarian pause, a monitor said. Air strikes halted on Thursday evening following Moscow’s announcement but shelling continued throughout the night and into the morning, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said. An AFP correspondent in the rebel-held enclave reported hearing the boom of artillery through the night.
“There was heavy shelling of several besieged districts and fierce fighting, particularly in Bustan al-Qasr,” one of the biggest districts still in rebel hands after the army’s blistering three-week offensive, Observatory chief Rami Abdel Rahman told AFP. After talks with US Secretary of State John Kerry in the German city of Hamburg on Thursday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announced a pause in the army’s assault to allow for the evacuation of some of the tens of thousands of civilians trapped in the now tiny rebel enclave. The army has recaptured 85 percent of the eastern sector of the city which the rebels had held since summer 2012. “I can tell you that today combat operations by the Syrian army have been halted in eastern Aleppo because there is a large operation under way to evacuate civilians,” Lavrov said. “There is going to be to a column of 8,000 evacuees.” In Washington, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Lavrov’s announcement was “an indication that something positive could happen.”The army’s bombardment of rebel-held districts killed at least 18 civilians on Thursday, according to the Observatory, a Britain-based monitoring group which has a wide network of sources on the ground. Kremlin: US easing of arms embargo for Syrian rebels risky
The Kremlin said on Friday a US decision to lift some restrictions on arms deliveries to Syrian rebels was risky because weapons might end up in the hands of “terrorists.”
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on a conference call that such a scenario, if it came to pass, would pose a threat to the Middle East and to Russian forces in Syria. Commenting on US-Russian efforts to strike a deal to facilitate the safe passage of Syrian rebels from eastern Aleppo, Peskov said the Kremlin hoped an agreement could be reached, but said talks on the subject were complex and kept faltering due to decisions taken by the United States.

Coalition Air Strike Destroys 168 IS Oil Trucks in Syria
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 09/16/A U.S.-led coalition air strike destroyed a fleet of 168 oil tankers being used by the Islamic State group to ferry illicit fuel in Syria, the coalition said Friday. Thursday's strike occurred near the ancient desert city of Palmyra. The coalition said it is systematically targeting the oil infrastructure used by IS, and Thursday's strike resulted in estimated lost revenue of more than $2 million. "Stopping or severely hampering (IS) cash flow degrades their ability to fund the war effort in Iraq and Syria and terrorist attacks around the world," the coalition said in a statement. IS took Palmyra in May last year, and systematically destroyed temples and tower tombs at the town's UNESCO World Heritage site, before being pushed out by government forces. Strikes on IS oil enterprises occur under Operation Tidal Wave II, named after a World War II mission to bomb oil refineries.

Kerry Says U.S.-Russia Talks Saturday in Bid to 'Save' Aleppo from Destruction
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 09/16/U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said that U.S. and Russian officials would meet on Saturday in a bid to stop the Syrian city of Aleppo "being absolutely, completely destroyed."Kerry arrived in Paris Friday pushing for a ceasefire in the city, home to retreating rebels backed by the United States which face an onslaught from Syrian forces supported by Russia.

U.N. Says Hundreds Reported Missing after Fleeing East Aleppo
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 09/16/Hundreds of men may have gone missing after fleeing into government-controlled parts of Aleppo, the U.N. warned Friday, saying armed groups were reportedly blocking civilians from leaving the shrinking areas under their control. As Syrian government artillery pummeled the rebel territory in Aleppo, the U.N. rights office said both sides appeared to be operating in "flagrant violation of international humanitarian law", and that civilians were paying the price."While it's very difficult to establish the facts in such a fluid and dangerous situation, we have received very worrying allegations that hundreds of men have gone missing after crossing into government-controlled areas," spokesman Rupert Colville told reporters in Geneva.
He said the men were between the ages of 30 and 50, and their family members said they had lost contact with them after they fled opposition-controlled areas of Aleppo around a week or 10 days ago. "Given the terrible record of arbitrary detention, torture and enforced disappearances by the Syrian government, we are of course deeply concerned about the fate of these individuals," Colville said. His comments came as Syrian government artillery bombarded the fast-shrinking rebel enclave in the heart of Aleppo on Friday.
The army has recaptured 85 percent of the eastern sector of the city which the rebels had held since summer 2012. More than 400 civilians, including 45 children, have been killed in eastern Aleppo since the latest offensive began on November 15, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, while rebel fire into the government-controlled west is reported to have killed more than 100 people, including 35 children. The assault has also prompted a mass exodus from east Aleppo where at least 80,000 people have fled their homes, according to the monitor. Colville warned that "there have been allegations of reprisals against civilians who are perceived to have supported armed opposition groups" as they fled into government-held areas. He said some 150 activists remained stranded inside opposition-controlled Aleppo due to fears of being detained by government forces if they attempt to leave. It is unclear how many civilians remain in rebel territory, but there were an estimated 250,000 in east Aleppo before the latest offensive.
Colville said Friday that more than 100,000 people were believed to remain inside the areas controlled by the opposition in east Aleppo, but warned the situation was very fluid and the numbers were unclear.
- Civilians used 'as pawns' -
He said armed Syrian opposition groups were reportedly blocking civilians from leaving their shrinking enclave, and had allegedly abducted and killed people who protested their presence. "Civilians are being used as pawns and prevented from leaving, in blatant violation of the obligation to take all feasible precautions to protect civilians from the effects of attack," Colville said. He warned that "the war crime of hostage taking is also possibly being committed."Over the last two weeks, he said armed groups, including Fateh al-Sham, the former al-Qaida affiliate previously known as al-Nusra Front had allegedly "abducted and killed an unknown number of civilians who requested the armed groups to leave their neighborhoods, to spare the lives of civilians." In addition, the groups had reportedly "demanded that activists inform them of civilians attempting to leave, along with the names of those who participated in protests" against their presence in several neighborhoods, Colville said.

IS Kills 15 Syria Regime Fighters near Palmyra
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 09/16/Islamic State group jihadists killed 15 Syrian soldiers and allied fighters near Palmyra Friday, taking the government's losses in 24 hours of clashes to at least 49, a monitor said. The jihadists' advance brought them to within four kilometers (two and half miles) of the desert city, which government forces recaptured in March after IS had wrought huge destruction on its famed ancient monuments, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said. IS fighters launched simultaneous attacks on several government positions in the eastern desert of Homs province on Thursday, including areas near the Mahr and Shaar oil and gas fields. It has seized government checkpoints, silos and the village of Jazal, northwest of Palmyra, in the ongoing assault, the Observatory said. The army has brought in reinforcements and carried out air strikes against IS in a bid to retake lost territory. The jihadists too have suffered losses, the Observatory said, although it had no immediate figure. IS once held several key towns in Homs province, including Palmyra. It overran the town in May last year, and systematically destroyed temples and tower tombs at the town's UNESCO World Heritage site, before being pushed out by government forces. It is still present in parts of the east of the province, and has carried out hit-and-run attacks on government positions in recent months. But Observatory director Rami Abdel Rahman said the current assault was the first to see IS seize territory since it was pushed out of most of the province.

50,000 ISIS fighters killed’ since 2014
AFP, Washington Friday, 9 December 2016/At least 50,000 ISIS militants have been killed by the US-led coalition since it began operations in Iraq and Syria in late 2014, a senior US military official said Thursday. A relentless operation using planes and drones from a dozen or so members of the anti-ISIS coalition since August 2014 has conducted some 16,000 air strikes against the militants in Iraq and Syria - two-thirds of them in Iraq.
In addition, the coalition has provided training and weapons to local forces fighting ISIS.
“I am not into morbid counts but that kind of volume matters, that kind of impact on the enemy,” the official said, calling the 50,000 number a conservative estimate.
The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the air campaign had been the "most pristine" ever in terms of avoiding civilian casualties, with almost all the bombs dropped so far being smart weapons that can be steered to a precise target. The coalition tally of civilians killed in the operations is 173 - though critics say the real figure is far higher.
The official said the coalition had diminished ISIS's ranks to such a level that the simultaneous attacks being waged on Mosul in Iraq and Raqa in Syria - the ISIS last remaining major power centers - have been possible. Coalition spokesman Colonel John Dorrian said earlier that in Mosul, ISIS was turning to adolescent fighters as its hardcore warriors got wiped out. “As this effort goes on with each passing day, Daesh has fewer fighters and fewer resources at their disposal,” Dorrian said in a videocall, using an Arabic ISIS acronym. He added the militants appeared to have run out of armored suicide car bombs, and estimated “many hundreds” of fighters had been killed in Mosul.
“It doesn't mean that it's not still an extraordinarily dangerous situation. They are not going to go quietly, but they are going to go.”The coalition has previously said it "does not use a casualty count as a measure of effectiveness in the campaign to ultimately defeat (ISIS) in Iraq and Syria".Despite this assertion, such figures are periodically announced.
Airwars, a London-based collective of journalists and researchers, uses local sources, photographs and media accounts to keep a detailed list of every known coalition air strike.
They have praised Pentagon efforts at accountability compared with other actors in Syria such as Russia and the regime of President Bashar al-Assad. But the group says the number of likely civilian deaths from coalition strikes is 1,957 at a bare minimum.

UN votes in favor of an immediate Syria ceasefire
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Friday, 9 December 2016/The UN General Assembly has voted in favor of an an immediate ceasefire in Syria and access for humanitarian aid during a session on Friday. The voting came after many speeches from key players in the Syrian conflict with 122 members voting in favor of the resolution, 13 against while 36 members abstained from voting either way. Canada had drafted the text as part of the 193-nation assembly’s attempt to break the deadlock over Syria at the Security Council.
Speaking from New York, Al Arabiya's Talal Al-Haj said that the General Assembly resolution expected the resolution to pass but reported that it would likely not make much difference on actions on the ground. "it is worth noting that the resolution will have little to no effect unless the Security Council can act as today's resolution is non-binding," he added. Russia and China this week vetoed a draft Security Council resolution calling for a seven-day cease-fire in Aleppo, the Syrian city that is on the verge of falling to government forces. It was the sixth time that Moscow, a close ally of Syrian President Bashar Assad, has used its veto in the council to block action over Syria. The General Assembly is expected to adopt nonbinding text that demands a “complete end to all attacks on civilians” and the lifting of all sieges. “Sadly, I suspect it will be too little too late,” British Ambassador Matthew Rycroft told AFP news agency.

Mursi’s son arrested as part of Rabaa sit-in dispersal case
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Friday, 9 December 2016/Security forces arrested Osama Mursi, the son of ousted Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi, at his home on Thursday.
Mursi has been named as one of 739 defendants in the Rabaa sit-in dispersal case, which dates back to August 2013 and includes other senior Brotherhood members.The prosecution charged the defendants with “unauthorized assembly, the use of force, premeditated murder, and the possession of weapons and explosives” during the violent sit-in protest for the over throwing of former president Mursi. A source to the Arabic site of Al Arabiya News Channel said charges against him include, incitement against the state and the army, advocating organizations to commit acts of violence and riots after the overthrow of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Explosion in Egypt’s Giza kills six policemen
Ashraf Abdelhamid, AlArabiya.net Friday, 9 December 2016/An explosion on a main Cairo square has killed six policemen and wounded another two on Friday, in an attack claimed by Egyptian militant group calling themselves the Hasm Movement.
A security source confirmed to Al Arabiya that that militants targeted the police in front of the Salam Mosque at the Madkour Square in the Giza Governate by placing an explosive device near their location. Security forces have closed down the area and have brought sniffer dogs and explosives experts to scan the area for any more improvised explosive devices. Insurgents have carried out a number of attacks in Egypt since the 2013 when Islamist president was ousted in a military coup. The violence has been concentrated in the northern Sinai Peninsula, but there have also been several attacks on the mainland, including in the capital.A photo sent to AlArabiya.net's Ashraf Abdelhamid shows the scene of the attack just moments after the explosive device was detonated.
 
Johnson Says Britain Committed to Gulf Security

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 09/16/Britain "is back" in the Gulf region and stepping up its security commitment, Foreign Minister Boris Johnson told regional policymakers on Friday. "Britain is back East of Suez," he told the annual Manama Dialogue security forum, as his country prepares to leave the European Union after a shock referendum vote in June to quit the bloc. "This is about building on and intensifying old friendships," Johnson said. "Britain has been part of your story for the last 200 years, and we will be with you for the centuries to come." He stuck close to themes touched on by Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May two days earlier at a summit with Gulf leaders, after Downing Street had to pull him back into line over comments about Britain's ally Saudi Arabia. At a conference in Rome last week, Johnson accused the kingdom of engaging in "proxy wars". A video of his comments was posted on the Guardian website. Returning from the Gulf summit, May's office said Johnson's comments reflected his "personal position."May and the Gulf leaders had agreed at their Bahrain summit to form a "strategic partnership" to foster defense and other ties. "We're spending three billion pounds (3.5 billion euros) on our military commitment in the Gulf over the next 10 years," Johnson said at the forum, organized by the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

Turkey Court Drops Case against Israelis over Ship Storming
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 09/16/An Istanbul court on Friday dropped a case against four top former Israeli commanders who were being tried in absentia over the 2010 deadly storming of a Turkish ship bound for Gaza that caused an over half-decade crisis in ties.Ten Turkish citizens lost their lives as a result of the raid that saw Israeli commandos storm the Mavi Marmara ship. But dropping the charges was a key pillar of a deal agreed between Israel and Turkey this June to normalize bilateral ties.
The deal had been keenly supported by Turkey's NATO ally the United States which has always supported the key alliance between Israel and overwhelmingly Muslim Turkey. An arrest warrant for the four charged was also withdrawn, Gulden Sonmez, a lawyer for the victims, wrote on Twitter after a closed door hearing in Istanbul.  Mustafa Ozbek, a spokesman for the Humanitarian Relief Foundation (IHH) charity which organized the bid in 2010 to break Israel's Gaza blockade, confirmed to AFP that the case had been withdrawn. Prosecutors had been seeking life sentences for the alleged involvement of former Israeli military chief of staff Gabi Ashkenazi, former navy chief Eliezer Marom, former military intelligence head Amos Yadlin and former air force intelligence chief Avishai Levy, who went on trial in absentia in 2012. The decision had been expected after the prosecutor told the Istanbul court last week that the case against the Israelis should be dropped because of the agreement.Before the verdict was read out, tumult erupted in the courthouse as lawyers and supporters of the victims denounced what they said was a travesty of justice. Lawyers and families walked out of courtroom shouting "damn Israel" and "Mavi Marmara our honor"."No matter what court decides about those who committed the crime... we believe that they were convicted by both the law and the conscience of the people," said the victims' lawyer Yasin Samli. "We were thrown out of the court room," added Cigdem Topcuoglu whose husband was killed on board the Mavi Marmara, adding: "We want justice, nothing else."
'Trampling on the law'
Turkey and Israel agreed the normalization after they held long-running secret talks in third countries with Israel offering an apology over the raid and $20 million in compensation. Israel also agreed to allow Turkish aid to reach Gaza as part of the agreement.
Under the terms of the deal, both sides also agreed individual Israeli citizens or those acting on behalf of the Israeli government would not be held liable -- either criminally or financially -- for the raid. "Political considerations are outside the scope of this case. To decide based on political motives amounts to trampling on the law," said Mehmet Sari, head of the Turkish lawyers' association. One of the final key elements of returning to normal relations was the exchange of ambassadors. Israel's envoy Eitan Naeh presented his credentials to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan earlier this week. Meanwhile, Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim's policy adviser Kemal Okem will start work as Turkey's ambassador to Israel in the next days. But the two sides are already working to bring cooperation back to former levels and are holding talks on building an ambitious pipeline project to pump Israeli gas to Turkey and Europe. Nevertheless, considerable tensions remain with Erdogan presenting himself as a champion of the Palestinians and regularly meeting with Hamas chief Khaled Meshaal. Israel, the United States and the European Union all view Hamas, which governs the Gaza Strip, as a terrorist organization. Ankara has also loudly condemned a bill being discussed in the Israeli parliament to limit the volume of calls to prayer at mosques.

S. Korea Parliament Impeaches Scandal Hit President
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 09/16/South Korean lawmakers on Friday passed an impeachment motion against President Park Geun-Hye, stripping away her sweeping executive powers over a corruption scandal that paralysed her administration and triggered massive street protests. The National Assembly ballot transfers Park's authority to the prime minister, pending a decision by the Constitutional Court on whether to ratify the decision and permanently remove the president from office. A ruling could take up to six months, during which time Park will remain in the presidential Blue House while the country faces an extended period of political uncertainty and policy paralysis. The motion was adopted by 234 votes to 56, easily securing the required two-thirds majority in the 300-seat chamber.
"I declare that the bill to impeach President Park Geun-Hye has just been approved," announced speaker Chung Se-Kyun. "Whether you support or oppose it, all lawmakers and South Korean people who are watching this grave situation unfold must feel so miserable and heavy at heart," he added. "I deeply wish that such tragedy in our constitutional history will not be repeated ever again."The anonymous paper ballot was conducted against the background din of hundreds of slogan-chanting protesters outside the assembly building, screaming "Impeach Park."
The result marked a startling fall from grace for a politician who had run for the Blue House as an incorruptible candidate, declaring herself beholden to nobody and "married to the nation".
- Fall from grace -After just under four years in power, she now faces the prospect of going down in history as the first democratically-elected South Korean president to be kicked out of office. The impeachment motion had accused Park of constitutional and criminal violations ranging from a failure to protect people's lives to bribery and abuse of power. Supported by all 171 opposition and independent lawmakers, its adoption was made possible by an anti-Park faction within the president's Saenuri party.
The entire opposition had threatened to resign their seats immediately if the motion was defeated. The push for impeachment was driven by massive protests that have seen millions take to the streets of Seoul and other cities in recent weeks, demanding Park's ouster.
The scandal that has engulfed the president and paralysed her administration has focused on her friendship with long-time confidante Choi Soon-Sil. Choi has been charged with meddling in state affairs and using her Blue House connections to force dozens of conglomerates to donate around $70 million to two foundations she controlled.
In a first for a sitting South Korean president, Park has been named a "suspect" by prosecutors investigating the case. - History of corruption -High-level corruption has long been a stain on South Korea's democratic credentials and the presidential Blue House is no stranger to allegations of cronyism. Since South Korea's first free and fair election in 1987, every president has faced graft investigations after leaving office and one -- Roh Moo-Hyun -- committed suicide as a corruption probe closed in on his family.
Their cases often involved family members who were able to leverage links to the president in a society where political influence has traditionally had a very close and unhealthy rapport with business success. Park, the daughter of military strongman Park Chung-Hee who led the country from 1961 to 1979, was meant to be different. Both her parents were assassinated and, estranged from her two siblings, unmarried and childless, she promoted herself as invulnerable to nepotism. "I have no family to look after nor children to inherit my property ... I want to devote myself to the nation and the people," she said in a speech during the 2012 presidential campaign. The image of duty and self-sacrifice played well with the conservative base of her ruling Saenuri Party, especially older voters who saw her as a virtuous survivor of personal tragedy. All the more shocking then were the revelations of the extraordinary influence Choi wielded over the president -- from selecting her wardrobe to vetting the appointment of top officials.

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on December 09-10/16
What Iran without Ayatollahs mean?
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya/December 09/16
On Iran’s Student Day, students from various universities from all over the country took to the streets to protest. Disenchantment with the ruling Shiite clerics in the Islamic Republic is high. Iran has a very young population - approximately 60 percent of Iran’s 80 million population is under 30 years old.
This means the majority of the population was born after the Islamic Revolution of 1979. Many are highly-educated, technologically savvy, secular, Westernized, as well as disaffected and disenchanted with the current cleric political establishment in the Islamic Republic.
They have aspirations for a representative, inclusive and democratic system of government where the Shiite cleric establishment plays no role in the destiny, major decision-making and political affairs of their nation. Many Iranians argue that a democratic system of governance will significantly improve their living standards, social justice, human rights, rule of law, and their global image.
This issue begs the question, what does an Iran without the cleric’s governing mean regionally and globally, from the geopolitical, strategic, and economic landscapes?
Better ties between Iran and the US would mean closer ties between the EU and Iran as well. Specifically, when it comes to trade and economy, European nations will find more reasons to rely on Iran’s energy sector (gas and oil) rather than Russia’s
Any successful and fundamental shift in Iran’s political system would heavily reverberate across the region and the world; it would affect Iran-Arab, Iran-Israel, Iran-US, and Iran-Asia relationships. It would influence the regional and global balance of power.
Middle East: Israel and Iran-Arab ties
When it comes to its policies towards other Arab nations and the Muslim world, Iran follows six major pillars: Sectarian (Sunni versus Shiite), ethnic (Arab versus Persian), revolutionary (exportation of Shiite Islam), including economic, strategic and geopolitical parameters.
The interactions between these six pillars explain the heightened tensions between Tehran and other countries in the region.
In an Iranian government where the clerics do not control the political establishment, two major pillars of Iran’s regional policies would change; Sectarianism (Sunni versus Shiite), and revolutionary (exportation of Shiite Islam). Subsequently, this will alter Iran’s geopolitical, strategies and economic calculations as well.
When sectarianism and revolutionary principles are taken out of the foreign policy equation, tensions between Tehran and other Arab and Muslim countries will significantly diminish. Regional conflicts and internal wars in several countries-such as Syria and Iraq where Iran plays a critical role in directing and influencing the war- will more likely subside dramatically.
Iran would not see that it is in its best interest and national agenda to export Shiism to other Sunni nations, to project itself as a victim based on the Shiite theology, to resist, to rebel, and to compete religiously with the rest of the Muslim world. Iran’s priorities would not also be anchored in supporting, arming, and financing to Shiite militia groups and proxies across the region.
That would mean less interference in the domestic affairs of other countries in the region and less instigation of Shiite communities in Bahrain, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Lebanon.
In addition, Iran would anchor and prioritize its relationships with other Arab nations based on economic and geopolitical interests rather than ideological and religious ones. It is accurate to argue that the old Persian-Arab rivalry might remain at some levels, nevertheless there is no chance that this phenomenon would lead to tensions such as the current ones, because Iran would still prioritize its national and economic interests.
When it comes to Iran-Israel relationships, one of the key ideals of the ruling clerics’ revolutionary principles is opposition to Israel, or the “little Satan”. Without the Shiite political system, Iran-Israel ties will more likely reverse into a strong robust alliance due to convergence of geopolitical and strategic interests and due to the fact that both nations have other common interests and similarities such as being minorities (Persians, Shiite and Jewish communities) in the larger Middle East.
Iran-US, Iran-EU, Iran-Russia, and Iran-Asia ties
One of the key foreign policy, religious and revolutionary pillars of Iran’s Shiite political establishment is opposing the US, or “the Great Satan”.
Without this crucial pillar of the Ayatollahs’ foreign policy- and considering the fact that Iran has one of the most pro-American and Westernized societies in the region, as well as a technologically savvy population that values advanced nations- Iran and the US will most likely build one of the staunchest geopolitical, economic, and strategic alliances in the region.
Better ties between Iran and the US would mean closer ties between the EU and Iran as well. Specifically, when it comes to trade and economy, European nations will find more reasons to rely on Iran’s energy sector (gas and oil) rather than Russia’s.
These factors will influence the current close ties between Iran-Russia and it will impact the Iranian-Russian-Chinese axis. In other words, Moscow will lose a powerful country in the region, which was in many ways assisting and empowering Russia’s stranglehold in the Middle East such as by undermining US influence in the region and supporting Assad. This will tip the balance of power between US-Russia and US-China in favor of Washington.
An Assad without Iran’s military, economic and intelligence support, would more likely mean a change in Syria’s political system, which would most likely strip Russia of its sole Mediterranean base in Latakia, Syria. In other words, Russia will lose considerable amount of influence in the Middle East.
An Iran without the Shiite ruling clerics, and without the mullahs and ayatollahs in power, will reverberate domestically, regionally and globally. It will not only impact the domestic and socio-political dynamics of Tehran, but will significantly influence Iran-Arabs, Iran-Israel, Iran-US, Iran-Russia, Iran-China relationships affecting the regional and global balance of powers.

Amnesty International Attacks Democracies, Forgives Islamist Tyrannies
 Giulio Meotti/Gatestone Institute/December 09/16
 http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/09/giulio-meottigatestone-institute-amnesty-international-attacks-democracies-forgives-islamist-tyrannies/
 https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9342/amnesty-international-tyrannies
 "Morally bankrupt." — Salman Rushdie, author with a $600,000 bounty from Iran's regime on his head, speaking of Amnesty International.
 Amnesty sponsored a rally in Brussels, where Islamist speakers celebrated the 9/11 attacks, denied the Holocaust and demonized gays and Jews.
 It seems that Amnesty turned its back on the battle of human rights in favor of a grotesque anti-Western bias. The Economist accused Amnesty of "reserving more pages to human rights abuses in Britain and the United States than in Belarus and Saudi Arabia."
 Amnesty's secretary general compared Soviet forced-labor camps, where millions died of hunger, cold and executions, to a US military base where no prisoner has died, and which has prevented countless innocent civilians from being blown up.
 "Canada is obliged to arrest and prosecute Bush for his responsibility for crimes under international law including torture", said Susan Lee, Amnesty International's Americas programme director. Amnesty also charged Obama of "war crimes."
 Alan Dershowitz summarizes Amnesty's definition of Israel's "war crimes": "Whatever Israel does to defend its citizens."
 A report by NGO Monitor detailed Amnesty's "systematic flaws in the reporting of human rights abuses; limited understanding of armed conflict leading to erroneous claims and incorrect analysis; and violation of the universality of human rights, including a consistent institutionalized bias against Israel through double-standards." There are even Amnesty's officials who called the Jewish State "a scum state."
 According to Amnesty International, the centers that host migrants arriving in Italy, known as "hotspots," are like concentration camps. This is what you learn from Amnesty International's new report, which accuses Italy of nothing less than "torturing" migrants. The report features a sequence of testimonies, never proven, that describe methods worthy of a South American military junta.
 The report validates Salman Rushdie's accusation against Amnesty International: "Morally bankrupt." The Wall Street Journal added two more charges against the famous Western non-governmental organization (NGO): "Anti-American fervor and intellectual confusion".
 In the new Amnesty International report, a "witness," under the name of only "Adam," speaks of "a kind of clamp with three ends" by which Italian policemen allegedly grabbed his testicles. Evidence? Medical reports attesting to this violence? The version of the Italian police? Not in the wonderful world of Amnesty International, where a Western democracy can be safely accused of "torture" with flimsy, sub-standard, unverifiable "evidence" -- the same as Amnesty's many spurious charges against Israel. The Italian police and Interior Ministry denied all the charges, calling them ridiculous.
 Already in February 2016, Antonio Marchesi, president of the Italian section of Amnesty, said: "Those in Italy who have committed acts of torture can sleep soundly." A month ago, Amnesty issued a similar report on the immigration centers in Australia, another democracy denounced as a "torturer" by this now badly-degraded NGO that won the now badly-degraded Nobel Peace Prize in 1977.
 The world owes a debt of gratitude to Amnesty -- it fought hard to free political prisoners held by Communist regimes during the Cold War, and those held by South Africa's Apartheid regime. But those days are gone. Now Amnesty keeps betraying its symbol: the light of its small candle trapped in barbed wire.
 In 2005, Irene Khan, then secretary general of Amnesty, described the American detention center in Guantanamo Bay as "the Gulag of our time." She compared the Soviet forced-labor camps, where three million people died of hunger, cold and executions, to a US military base where no prisoner has died, and which has prevented countless innocent civilians from being blown up.
 It seems that Amnesty International abandoned the battle of human rights in favor of a grotesque anti-Western bias. This shift is why the British weekly, The Economist, accused Amnesty International of "reserving more pages to human rights abuses in Britain and the United States than in Belarus and Saudi Arabia." This is the same muddled moral equivalence that probably led Amnesty International to use the same language for Italian "hotspots" as for the Saydnaya prison in Syria, run by the regime of Bashar al Assad.
 If Guantanamo is the new Gulag, why not demand the arrest of its commander-in-chief? This is precisely what Amnesty did two years ago, when it asked Canada to arrest George W. Bush. "Canada is obliged to arrest and prosecute Bush for his responsibility for crimes under international law including torture", said Susan Lee, Amnesty International's Americas programme director. Amnesty's also charged Obama of "war crimes". The Western "war on terror"? According to Amnesty, "it is sowing fear". US drone strikes? A "war crime."
 The NGO has also accused Israel of "war crimes." Alan Dershowitz summarizes Amnesty International's definition of Israel's "war crimes": "Whatever Israel does to defend its citizens." A report by NGO Monitor detailed "Amnesty's repeated examples of "lawfare"; systematic flaws in the reporting of human rights abuses; limited understanding of armed conflict leading to erroneous claims and incorrect analysis; and violation of the universality of human rights, including a consistent institutionalized bias against Israel through double-standards". There are even Amnesty's officials who called the Jewish State "a scum state."
 In the name of "protecting human rights," Amnesty International has even excused Islamic extremism. The secretary general of Amnesty, Claudio Cordone, said that "defensive jihad" is not "antithetical" to the struggle for human rights. He said this in response to a petition on Amnesty's relationship with CAGE (formerly CagePrisoners), the NGO founded by Islamic extremist Moazzam Begg that campaigns for the release of acclaimed jihadists.
 One prominent leader of Amnesty, Karima Bennoune, author of the book Your Fatwa Does Not Apply Here, wrote:
 "During my years at Amnesty I shared the concerns about torture in Algeria, but I could not understand the organization's paltry response to the violence of fundamentalist groups."
 She is not the first Amnesty official who has flung criticism at her own organization. Amnesty suspended one of its senior officers, Gita Sahgal, for having expressed some concerns. "To be appearing on platforms with Britain's most famous supporter of the Taliban, whom we treat as a human rights defender is a gross error of judgment," she wrote.
 There was a time when Amnesty International defended the victims of ideological repression, such as the wife of Soviet writer Boris Pasternak, Olga Ivinskaya, who spent years under arrest and persecuted for her husband's refusal to bow down to the Kremlin. Now, the Times of London has documented links between Amnesty International officials and Islamists.
 Today, Amnesty evidently considers freedom of expression something to use with "responsibility," as Amnesty claimed during the Mohammed cartoons crisis. Is freedom of speech the right to say whatever you like, about any topic, whenever you want? Not according to Amnesty International, the watchdog group that today would apparently have lectured the great Soviet dissidents to write with "responsibility."
 Amnesty International sponsored a rally in Brussels, where Islamist speakers celebrated the 9/11 attacks, denied the Holocaust, and demonized gays and Jews. Before that, Amnesty refused to punish an official, Kristyan Benedict, Amnesty's UK campaign manager, who tweeted: "Israeli regimes [sic] response to our Gaza report: Amnesty is 'a propaganda tool for Hamas & other terror groups' (#JSIL?)." The hashtag "#JSIL" is used on Twitter to compare Israel with the Islamic State terrorist organization by replacing "Islamic" with "Jewish" in the group's common alias, ISIL. Amnesty also sponsored a speaking tour of Bassem Tamimi, a Palestinian militant who promotes anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
 Given Amnesty International's embarrassing record, it is at least doubtful that the Italian police and authorities are "torturing" migrants whom they have so generously been rescuing at sea for more than two years.
 Some in the Western "human rights establishment" have crossed the red line that separates the defense of human rights, even for terrorists, from complicity and collusion with repressive totalitarian ideas.
 Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.
 © 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Saudi journalist, Abdulrahman Al-Rashed, suggests ties with Israel improve if Israeli Arabs come work in Saudi Arabia
oi Kais/ Ynetnews/December 09/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/09/roi-kaisynetnews-saudi-journalist-abdulrahman-al-rashed-suggests-ties-with-israel-improve-if-israeli-arabs-come-work-in-saudi-arabia/
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4890656,00.html
Top Saudi journalist Abdulrahman Al-Rashed is interviewed by Jewish journalist Joseph Braude in the US Hudson Institute, suggesting that an initial step could be made to allow Israeli Arabs to work in Arab countries, beginning in Saudi Arabia; 'Without resolving the Palestinian-Israeli issue, it’s not possible to address this problem substantively,' warns Al-Rashed. However, when discussing Arab Israeli employment, he adds that 'From a Saudi perspective, the case for doing so can be made openly in terms of the virtue of empowering all Palestinians, on either side of the Green Line.'In an interview with US conservative think tank the Hudson Institute, journalist Joseph Braude interviewed Saudi journalist Abdulrahman Al-Rashed, who suggested that hiring Israeli Arabs in Arab countries could be a positive step toward establishing official relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia. Al-Rashed was the editor of London-based Arab paper Asharq al-Awsat and had previously run Saudi-owned, pan-Arab television news channel Al Arabiya. In his interview, he spoke about how Saudi Arabia should take a more tolerant and open position toward non-Muslim residents within its borders who reside in the country for work. When Braude asked him whether his position also extends to Jews, Al-Rashed reflected on Saudi-Israeli relations, stipulating that in order to achieve warmer, official ties between the two countries, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict must first be settled.
"To begin with, without resolving the Palestinian-Israeli issue, it’s not possible to address this problem substantively. I see the brunt of the issue as political and not religious: Before Jews and Israelis were our obsession, there was anti-Portuguese sentiment in the eighteenth century, anti-Turkish sentiment in the nineteenth century, and anti-British sentiment in the twentieth century. As the underlying conflicts were resolved politically, the cultural clashes subsided," said Al-Rashed.
Al-Rashed also said that "Without a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian issue, prospects to do so are severely constrained. A resolution of that conflict, whether along the lines of the “Arab Peace Initiative” presented by the late King Abdullah or some other approach, will make it much easier to improve relations among Saudis, other Arabs, Jews generally, and Israelis.
Reflecting on how to progress relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel, Al-Rashed suggested a creative, economic-based incentive that could also work to make the ties between both countries more official, through incorporating Israeli Arabs into the Arab world's work force. "If the question is specifically what can be done now—before the conflict is resolved—to increase connectivity, perhaps a new step would be for Saudi Arabia to formally lift its ban on work visas for Israel’s Arab citizens, and for Israel to welcome and foster Arab Israelis’ professional deployment to any Arab country. From a Saudi perspective, the case for doing so can be made openly in terms of the virtue of empowering all Palestinians, on either side of the Green Line. In seeking out the most qualified Arabs in Israel to work anywhere in the Gulf, moreover, we will inevitably find those who have achieved success in the mainstream of Israel’s economy and society—the tech sector, manufacturing, medicine, and so on. When they travel to the GCC states (Gulf Cooperation Council —ed.), their human networks and professional partnerships will effectively travel with them. Thus, they can serve as a human bridge, as Israel moves toward a political solution, gradually enabling partnerships between the broader populations of both sides."
"Normalization with Arab Israelis should be initiated by the Arab League in Cairo, which historically has been the lion’s den of resistance to normalization," continued Al-Rashed. "To them we might say that, after all, many Jewish Israelis hold dual citizenship and are free to work almost anywhere in the region with their non-Israeli passport. Meanwhile, most Arab Israelis are banned from working in Arab countries because they hold only Israeli citizenship. In a similar vein, many Israeli companies are already exporting goods to Arab markets through foreign corporate entities, while Arab farmers in Israel cannot sell their tomatoes in the Gulf market."
The interview has already garnered interest from certain bodies in Israel. Officials within the Israeli Peace Initiative, which aims to help develop relationships in the form of a conciliatory agreement between Israel, the Palestinians and other countries in the region, said that the idea of beginning to legitimize Israeli-Saudi relations is a refreshing change. The added that now is the time to signal Israelis and neighboring people to carefully progress forward with a diplomatic process, and that such creative ideas are a good way in which this could be achieved.
 
 Reaction of Geert Wilders to His Conviction
 Geert Wilders/Gatestone Institute/December 09/16
 https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9530/geert-wilders-conviction
 Dear friends, I still cannot believe it, but I have just been convicted. Because I asked a question about Moroccans. While the day before yesterday, scores of Moroccan asylum-seekers terrorized buses in Emmen and did not even had to pay a fine, a politician who asks a question about fewer Moroccans is sentenced. The Netherlands have become a sick country. And I have a message for the judges who convicted me: You have restricted the freedom of speech of millions of Dutch and hence convicted everyone. No one trusts you anymore. But fortunately, truth and liberty are stronger than you. And so am I. I will never be silent. You will not be able to stop me. And you are wrong, too. Moroccans are not a race, and people who criticize Moroccans are not racists. I am not a racist and neither are my voters. This sentence proves that you judges are completely out of touch. And I have also a message for Prime Minister Rutte and the rest of the multicultural elite: You will not succeed in silencing me and defeating the PVV. Support for the Party for Freedom is stronger than ever, and keeps growing every day. The Dutch want their country back and cherish their freedom. It will not be possible to put the genie of positive change back in the bottle.
 And to people at home I say: Freedom of speech is our pride. And this will remain so. For centuries, we Dutch have been speaking the unvarnished truth. Free speech is our most important possession. We will never let them take away our freedom of speech. Because the flame of freedom burns within us and cannot be extinguished. Millions of Dutch are sick and tired of political correctness. Sick and tired of the elite which only cares about itself and ignores the ordinary Dutchman. And sells out our country. People no longer feel represented by all these disconnected politicians, judges and journalists, who have been harming our people for so long, and make our country weaker instead of stronger. But I will keep fighting for you, and I tell all of you: thank you so much. Thank you so much for all your support. It is really overwhelming; I am immensely grateful to you. Thanks to your massive and heartfelt support, I know that I am not alone. That you back me, and are with me, and unwaveringly stand for freedom of expression.
 Today, I was convicted in a political trial, which, shortly before the elections, attempts to neutralize the leader of the largest and most popular opposition party. But they will not succeed. Not even with this verdict. Because I speak on behalf of millions of Dutch. And the Netherlands are entitled to politicians who speak the truth, and honestly address the problems with Moroccans. Politicians who will not let themselves be silenced. Not even by the judges. And you can count on it: I will never be silent.
 And this conviction only makes me stronger. This is a shameful sentence, which, of course, I will appeal. But I can tell you, I am now more vigorous than ever. And I know: together, we aim for victory.
 Standing shoulder-to-shoulder, we are strong enough to change the Netherlands.
 To allow our children to grow up in a country they can be proud of.
 In a Netherlands where we are allowed to say again what we think.
 Where everybody can safely walk the streets again.
 Where we are in charge of our own country again.
 And that is what we stand for. For freedom and for our beautiful Netherlands.
 **Geert Wilders is a member of the Dutch Parliament and leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV).
 © 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
 
 No “Trump” Sign on Obama’s Ziggurat
Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/December 09/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/09/amir-taheriasharq-al-awsat-no-trump-sign-on-obamas-ziggurat/
An old Persian proverb says: If the first brick is badly laid, the whole wall will rise to the heavens slanted. This is what is happening with the so-called nuclear deal that President Barack Obama claims he has concluded with the mullahs of Tehran. The whole thing started as a political lie to build a papier-mâché ziggurat of diplomatic deception. It now risks full exposure because the man who orchestrated the swindle is leaving the White House. Obama’s successor, Donald Trump has indicated that he will not continue the outgoing president’s game of deceit.
This means that the so-called “Iranian nuclear problem” which began over a decade ago remains intact, still begging for a solution. Obama and his Sancho Panza, John Kerry, are trying desperately to foment a fog of confusion under which they could head for the exit still claiming a great diplomatic victory, leaving their successors with the task of defusing what is a ticking bomb. For their part, Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani and his “New York Boys” are also trying to prevent full exposure at least until after next spring’s presidential election in Iran. They are also trying to cast “Supreme Guide” Ali Khamenei as their partner in deception despite the fact that he repeatedly warned against “hasty and imprecise arrangements.”
Just as Rouhani is trying to implicate Khamenei, who has also been deceived by him and his “New York Boys”, Obama is trying to put a “Trump” sign on his ziggurat.
In his meeting with the President-elect last month, Obama spent half of the time trying to sell the so-called “nuke deal” to Trump.
Obama made that clear in a long interview published on 28 November by the New Yorker Magazine. In it he admitted that the “deal” had not changed “some of the more obnoxious behavior of Iran” and cited two “reasons” why Trump should let the “deal” stand.
The first reason that Obama cited was what he claimed was “over a year of proof” without specifying of what nature and in what context. He cannot have meant any “proof” furnished by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which only last month reported that Iran had broken the limit set for its “heavy water” accumulation.
In any case, the IAEA isn’t in a position to certify Tehran’s full compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), not to mention the seven resolutions of the United Nations’ Security Council all of which Tehran has declared to be null and void. In the past year, IAEA inspectors, though carefully approved by Iran to make sure there are no citizens of “hostile powers” such as the US, the UK and Canada among them, have been allowed access to only six of Iran’s 32 listed nuclear centers.
Iranian officials repeatedly assert that the Obama” deal” has made absolutely no difference to the nuclear project. “All we did was to agree not to do what we did not want to do, weren’t doing and couldn’t do any way,” says Ali-Akbar Salehi the head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Agency. “Our project will be in full gear with the turn of a screw.”
Rouhani, for his part, lied to the Iranians by telling them that “all sanctions will be lifted” on the day that the “deal” starts. The truth is that no sanction has been lifted, although some have been suspended by Obama’s presidential decree. The second “proof” Obama cited was the “Israeli military and intelligence community” supposedly “acknowledging that the deal has worked.”
This is rich coming from a man who has been claiming for years that the Israelis were trying to “mislead opinion” about Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Obama does not say what that “community” consists of and why it has the authority to approve or disapprove of US policy. It is also interesting that the President of the United States is unable to cite his own country’s “military and intelligence community” in support of his diplomatic folie.
Finally, Obama claims that his “deal” means that Iran does not now have “breakout capacity” – the ability to build a weapon in a “short window of time.” Obama’s babbling is etymologically challenged. How could a window be short? And how short is a “breakout capacity” to make a bomb?
Having woven that cobweb of deception, Obama makes a sales pitch worthy of any peddler of snake oil. He says “So, given that proof, I don’t think that it is inconceivable that Republican leaders look and say: ‘Obama is no longer in office. This is not something that our base is hankering to undo, and we may quietly leave it in place’.”
In other words, Republicans, especially President Trump might endorse the fiction that Obama composed and imposed on the world, becoming his partners in deception.
Rather than fudging the Iran nuclear issue, however, the world should try to find a true solution to the problem in the interests both of the people of Iran and the outside world.
The first step in that direction is to accept that the problem remains intact and that the “deal” Obama is so desperately trying to sell to Trump does not exist except in his imagination.
The second step is to expose the full-scale of the deception and the fact that the P5+1 group that supposedly negotiated the deal with Tehran has no legal existence and no authority to make any deal and are answerable to no one.
The third step is to make it clear that no one has signed anything and that the so-called Comprehensive Joint Plan of Action (CJPOA), a press release issued last year in Lausanne, has many versions full of contradictions.
The fourth step is to publish all the secret and confidential memos and additional notes associated with the murky deal, something that President-elect Trump has promised to do.
Once Obama’s ziggurat is pulled down, one could initiate a process based on transparency, goodwill and international law. The seven resolutions of the Security Council provide an excellent framework for such a process. They demand that Iran does a number of things in exchange for which the international community will take corresponding steps in favor of Iran.
Trump should avoid falling into the trap of making this a problem between Iran and the United States. It is a problem that Iran has with the entire international community. The US, to be sure must play a leadership role in whatever process emerges but not in Obama’s style of shady bazaar deals.
**Amir Taheri was the executive editor-in-chief of the daily Kayhan in Iran from 1972 to 1979. He has worked at or written for innumerable publications, published eleven books, and has been a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat since 1987. Mr. Taheri has won several prizes for his journalism, and in 2012 was named International Journalist of the Year by the British Society of Editors and the Foreign Press Association in the annual British Media Awards.
 
Distortion of historical facts by a Nobel Laureate
Dr. Ali Al-Ghamdi/Al Arabiya/December 09/16
Elie Wiesel, who died on 2 July 2016, was an American Zionist writer, professor, Nobel Laureate and Holocaust survivor. He was infamous for distorting facts and falsifying history and was adept in transforming the victim into a criminal and vice versa.
The best example for this was a statement he issued against Palestinians in which the observations were totally unacceptable, unreasonable and unfair. Sara Roy, a senior research scholar at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Harvard University, replied to this statement. The reply of Roy, whose mother and father were Holocaust survivors, was published in the American magazine ‘CounterPunch’.
I think it is appropriate and relevant to republish her reaction, titled ‘A Response to Elie Wiesel,’ which exposes the real situation and the extent of distortion and fabrication made by the Zionist academic who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
I present to the readers Roy’s reply to Wiesel without any addition or deletion.
Mr. Wiesel,
I read your statement about Palestinians, which appeared in The New York Times on August 4, 2014. I cannot help feeling that your attack against Hamas and stunning accusations of child sacrifice are really an attack, carefully veiled but unmistakable, against all Palestinians, their children included. As a child of Holocaust survivors—both my parents survived Auschwitz—I am appalled by your anti-Palestinian position, one I know you have long held. I have always wanted to ask you, why? What crime have Palestinians committed in your eyes? Exposing Israel as an occupier and themselves as its nearly defenseless victims? Resisting a near half century of oppression imposed by Jews and through such resistance forcing us as a people to confront our lost innocence (to which you so tenaciously cling)?
Unlike you, Mr. Wiesel, I have spent a great deal of time in Gaza among Palestinians. In that time, I have seen many terrible things and I must confess I try not to remember them because of the agony they continue to inflict. I have seen Israeli soldiers shoot into crowds of young children who were doing nothing more than taunting them, some with stones, some with just words. I have witnessed too many horrors, more than I want to describe. But I must tell you that the worst things I have seen, those memories that continue to haunt me, insisting never to be forgotten, are not acts of violence but acts of dehumanization.
There is a story I want to tell you, Mr. Wiesel, for I have carried it inside of me for many years and have only written about it once a very long time ago. I was in a refugee camp in Gaza when an Israeli army unit on foot patrol came upon a small baby perched in the sand sitting just outside the door to its home. Some soldiers approached the baby and surrounded it. Standing close together, the soldiers began shunting the child between them with their feet, mimicking a ball in a game of soccer. The baby began screaming hysterically and its mother rushed out shrieking, trying desperately to extricate her child from the soldiers’ legs and feet. After a few more seconds of “play,” the soldiers stopped and walked away, leaving the terrified child to its distraught mother.
Now, I know what you must be thinking: this was the act of a few misguided men. But I do not agree because I have seen so many acts of dehumanization since, among which I must now include yours. Mr. Wiesel, how can you defend the slaughter of over 500 innocent children by arguing that Hamas uses them as human shields? Let us say for the sake of argument that Hamas does use children in this way; does this then justify or vindicate their murder in your eyes? How can any ethical human being make such a grotesque argument? In doing so, Mr. Wiesel, I see no difference between you and the Israeli soldiers who used the baby as a soccer ball. Your manner may differ from theirs—perhaps you could never bring yourself to treat a Palestinian child as an inanimate object—but the effect of your words is the same: to dehumanize and objectify Palestinians to the point where the death of Arab children, some murdered inside their own homes, no longer affects you. All that truly concerns you is that Jews not be blamed for the children’s savage destruction.
Despite your eloquence, it is clear that you believe only Jews are capable of loving and protecting their children and possess a humanity that Palestinians do not. If this is so, Mr. Wiesel, how would you explain the very public satisfaction among many Israelis over the carnage in Gaza—some assembled as if at a party, within easy sight of the bombing, watching the destruction of innocents, entertained by the devastation? How are these Israelis different from those people who stood outside the walls of the Jewish ghettos in Poland watching the ghettos burn or listening indifferently to the gunshots and screams of other innocents within—among them members of my own family and perhaps yours—while they were being hunted and destroyed?
You see us as you want us to be and not as many of us actually are. We are not all insensate to the suffering we inflict, acceding to cruelty with ease and calm. And because of you, Mr. Wiesel, because of your words—which deny Palestinians their humanity and deprive them of their victimhood—too many can embrace our lack of mercy as if it were something noble, which it is not. Rather, it is something monstrous.
**This article first appeared in the Saudi Gazette on December 7, 2016