LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
July 01/15

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins05/english.july01.15.htm

Bible Quotation For Today/Curing Miracle of the Canaanite Daughter
Matthew 15/21-28: "Jesus left that place and went away to the district of Tyre and Sidon. Just then a Canaanite woman from that region came out and started shouting, ‘Have mercy on me, Lord, Son of David; my daughter is tormented by a demon.’ But he did not answer her at all. And his disciples came and urged him, saying, ‘Send her away, for she keeps shouting after us.’He answered, ‘I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.’But she came and knelt before him, saying, ‘Lord, help me.’He answered, ‘It is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.’She said, ‘Yes, Lord, yet even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters’ table.’Then Jesus answered her, ‘Woman, great is your faith! Let it be done for you as you wish.’ And her daughter was healed instantly."

Bible Quotation For Today
/You son of the devil, you enemy of all righteousness, full of all deceit and villainy, will you not stop making crooked the straight paths of the Lord?
Acts of the Apostles 12/25.13,1-12: "Then after completing their mission Barnabas and Saul returned to Jerusalem and brought with them John, whose other name was Mark. Now in the church at Antioch there were prophets and teachers: Barnabas, Simeon who was called Niger, Lucius of Cyrene, Manaen a member of the court of Herod the ruler, and Saul. While they were worshipping the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, ‘Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.’Then after fasting and praying they laid their hands on them and sent them off. So, being sent out by the Holy Spirit, they went down to Seleucia; and from there they sailed to Cyprus. When they arrived at Salamis, they proclaimed the word of God in the synagogues of the Jews. And they had John also to assist them. When they had gone through the whole island as far as Paphos, they met a certain magician, a Jewish false prophet, named Bar-Jesus. He was with the proconsul, Sergius Paulus, an intelligent man, who summoned Barnabas and Saul and wanted to hear the word of God. But the magician Elymas (for that is the translation of his name) opposed them and tried to turn the proconsul away from the faith. But Saul, also known as Paul, filled with the Holy Spirit, looked intently at him and said, ‘You son of the devil, you enemy of all righteousness, full of all deceit and villainy, will you not stop making crooked the straight paths of the Lord? And now listen the hand of the Lord is against you, and you will be blind for a while, unable to see the sun.’ Immediately mist and darkness came over him, and he went about groping for someone to lead him by the hand. When the proconsul saw what had happened, he believed, for he was astonished at the teaching about the Lord.

Latest analysis, editorials from miscellaneous sources published on June 30. July 01/15
Dr. Walid Phares: For change in Iran, back the Resistance, not the regime/NCRI/June 30/15
Khamenei's 'Red Lines' Speech/MEMRI/June 30/15
Turkey and Jordan said preparing buffer zones inside Syria. Israeli air support mooted. Putin issues warning/DEBKAfile/June 30/15
What do Israel's Druze want/Reda Mansour /Ynetnews/June 30/15

Lebanese Related News published on June 30. July 01/15
Cabinet meet to offer space for discussion: Salam 
Salam Calls for Keeping Army 'Away from Politics', Urges Govt. Parties to 'Put Aside Thorny Issues'
Change and Reform Ministers to Attend Cabinet Meeting to 'Tackle Absence of Appointments Issue'
FPM won't sit quietly at Cabinet meet: Kanaan 
Personal Disputes Leave 3 People Dead in Beirut and Bint Jbeil
Mustaqbal Dismisses 'Christian Poll' Idea as Attempt to 'Invent New Norms
Qahwaji Inspects Troops Around Arsal as Army Arrests 8 Suspected Syrian Terrorists
'We are not ashamed:' Saudi envoy on leaks 

Hostage families to block roads during Cabinet meet 
 
2 Syrians reportedly kidnapped in e.Lebanon released 
Hakim targets HRC to secure farmers aid 
Hezbollah prepares attack on Syria’s Zabadani 
Tunisia has become a terrorism exception 

Miscellaneous Reports And News published on June 30. July 01/15
Obama warns Iran in eleventh hour nuclear negotiations
Obama: I will walk away from Iran talks if its a bad deal
Iran nuclear talks deadline extended to July 7: US
Iranians arrive in Vienna to seal the deal; interim agreement extended 7 days
Iran admits to 400 funerals for Syria fighters 
Shin Bet chief says Palestinian terror attacks up 50% since 2012
Obama warns Iran in eleventh hour nuclear negotiations
Three US churches consider BDS measures against Israel in upcoming vote
Israeli man wounded in West Bank terror shooting dies in Jerusalem hospital
Audacious U.S. deceit 
Israel: Assad may be left with rump state
Putin urges all to fight ISIS, backs Assad
Year after Gaza war, Hamas remains entrenched
IS Re-Enters Syria's Tal Abyad, Takes District
ISIS makes gains in Tal Abayad, losses in Hassakeh
Around 1,200 escape from Yemen prison
Tunisia says resort gunman was trained in Libya
Tunisia has become a terrorism exception 
Turkey seeks to calm speculation over Syria invasion
Greece has offered to suspend referendum: report
ISIS beheads two Syria women for 'sorcery': activists

Jehad Watch Latest Reports And News
Islamic State beheads two women for “sorcery”
France: Muslim who placed severed head between Islamic flags denies jihad motive
Robert Spencer in PJM: Is free speech about Islam still possible in the US?
UAE: Muslima sentenced to death for jihad murder of American teacher
Indonesia: Muslim cleric gets 4 years for funding jihad terror training camp
Tunisia: Beach jihad murderer trained in Libya with museum jihad murderer
Egypt: Islamic jihadists murder top public prosecutor with car bomb
Islamic State storms Syrian town on Turkish border
US having trouble finding moderate Syrians willing to fight the Islamic State
New Jersey: Another Muslim arrested for trying to aid the Islamic State
Netanyahu to Gaza flotilla: Surely you got lost, meant to help butchered Syrians

2 Syrians reportedly kidnapped in e.Lebanon released
The Daily Star/June. 30, 2015/BEIRUT: Two Syrian men purportedly kidnapped by unidentified gunmen in east Lebanon were released several hours later, the National News Agency said Tuesday. The report said Mohammad Zakaria Yehya, 28, and Ismail Fahed Noureddine, 31, were released shortly before midnight. NNA had said the two men were kidnapped Monday morning by gunmen in a Jeep Cherokee on Al-Masnaa road near Tuffaha Bakeries. The Daily Star could not confirm the authenticity of the report.
Despite the security plan launched in east Lebanon last year, authorities have been unable to prevent kidnappings in the Bekaa Valley, an area known for hosting a large number of mafias and gangs.

Hostage families to block roads during Cabinet meet

The Daily Star/June. 30, 2015/BEIRUT: The families of Lebanon's Islamist-held hostages vowed Tuesday to block roads across Lebanon during Thursday's Cabinet meeting to pressure the government to take action to secure their release.
Seif Zebian, the brother of one of nine servicemen being held hostage by ISIS, said Tuesday that the families are set to block “most” of the country’s “vital roads” during the Cabinet session. The move, Zebian said, served to capture the attention of ministers on the need to resolve the 10-month-long ordeal. The announcement comes two weeks after Nizam Mgheit, the brother of another ISIS captive, led a protest of hostage families who blocked a north Lebanon highway for four hours. The protest was sparked after rumors emerged that ISIS killed its hostages. Other rumors said the hostages had been moved outside of Arsal's outskirts into Syria. ISIS is believed to be holding nine of the 25 hostages, while the rest are with the Nusra Front. The hostages have been held on the outskirts of the northeastern town of Arsal since August, when the Army clashed with militants from both groups in the town. The original number of captives was 37, but the Nusra Front has since released eight and shot dead two, while ISIS beheaded two.

Salam Calls for Keeping Army 'Away from Politics', Urges Govt. Parties to 'Put Aside Thorny Issues'
Naharnet/June 30/15/Prime Minister Tammam Salam on Tuesday called on the political parties to keep the military institution “away from politics,” amid a row over the appointment of a new army chief, as he urged the members of the coalition government to “put aside the thorny issues.”“We reassure the Lebanese that security is fine inside the country and on the borders. It is in the safe hands of the army command and soldiers and the national duty requires continued support for the military force through funds and equipment,” said Salam during a Ramadan iftar banquet organized by Dar al-Aytam al-Islamiya. The military institution “must be kept away from politics and its achievement must not be insulted,” the PM stressed. The controversial issue of security and military appointments had prompted Salam to suspend cabinet sessions for more than three weeks. However, the premier has called on the cabinet to convene Thursday, saying he could no longer wait for the rival political parties to resolve their disputes. In his speech on Tuesday, Salam insisted that his call for a cabinet session is in line with the powers vested in him by the Constitution. “I call on everyone to return to their consciences and to act responsibly by putting aside the thorny issues and embarking on addressing people's affairs, away from obstruction and paralysis,” Salam said. He noted that “a lot of vital and extremely important issues are pending.” The prime minister also called for the resumption of the parliament's legislative sessions and for the speedy election of a new president. The Free Patriotic Movement had threatened to boycott cabinet sessions if the agenda is not topped with the appointment of high-ranking security and military officials. However, it announced Tuesday that it will attend Thursday's session in order to address the absence of this topic from its agenda. FPM leader MP Michel Aoun has been lobbying for political consensus on the appointment of Commando Regiment chief Brig. Gen. Chamel Roukoz, his son-in-law, as army chief as part of a package for the appointment of other top security officers. Roukoz's tenure ends in October while the term of army commander Gen. Jean Qahwaji expires at the end of September.

Salam Says he Called Cabinet Meet for Being Unable to Wait
Naharnet/June 30/15/Prime Minister Tammam Salam has said that he called for a cabinet session next Thursday because he could no longer wait for the rival political parties to resolve their disputes. Salam was quoted as saying by his visitors “I could no longer wait.” The PM invited the cabinet to convene, saying the agenda would be carried over from the last time the government met on June 4. The controversial issue of security and military appointments is not on the agenda of the session, Salam, whose remarks were published in al-Mustaqbal newspaper on Tuesday, said. The premier suspended sessions earlier this month when Free Patriotic Movement ministers warned that they would boycott any session whose agenda is not topped with the appointments of the high-ranking officials.
Al-Akhbar daily quoted the PM as saying that “the interests of people need to be addressed.”He also revealed that he is “aware FPM ministers could boycott Thursday's session, which could be the last before the (Eid al-Fitr) holidays, but things can no longer be left the way they are.”Education Minister Elias Bou Saab, who is an FPM member, reiterated, however, that the party's representatives will attend any session that Salam calls for. “But because we are not able to impose on any side the military and security appointments, the other party cannot impose on us any other clause,” he told al-Joumhouria daily. “The solution should come through understanding and consensus among the different factions that make up the cabinet,” said Bou Saab. A ministerial source told al-Akhbar that Salam had the blessing of Speaker Nabih Berri when he called for the session. His invitation is aimed at pressuring all sides to reach a solution by the end of the holy month of Ramadan and to revive the work of the government, said the source. The two leaders met over the weekend.

Qahwaji Inspects Troops Around Arsal as Army Arrests 8 Suspected Syrian Terrorists
Naharnet/30 June/15/Army chief Gen. Jean Qahwaji inspected on Tuesday Lebanese soldiers who are deployed around the northeastern border town of Arsal to stop the infiltration of militants.
Qahwaji was accompanied by Defense Minister Samir Moqbel. They arrived by helicopter to Labweh from where they headed to Arsal. Their visit came as the Lebanese army announced the arrest of eight Syrians on suspicion of belonging to terrorist organizations. Syrian Walid Ahmed Youssef was apprehended on Monday night in an area between Labweh and Arsal for belonging to a terrorist group, the military said in a communique It also said that “seven Syrians were arrested on suspicion of belonging to terrorist organizations spread on the outskirts of Arsal.”The military has beefed up its measures in and around Arsal and other eastern border villages to stop the infiltration of fighters from Syria. Soldiers have frequently clashed with jihadists from al-Nusra Front and the Islamic State group, whose threat rose in August last year when they overran Arsal and took with them troops and policemen as captives.

Mustaqbal Dismisses 'Christian Poll' Idea as Attempt to 'Invent New Norms'
Naharnet/June 30/15/Al-Mustaqbal parliamentary bloc on Tuesday reiterated its call for the speedy election of a new president, warning against any attempt to “invent new legal norms” in this regard. “The priority remains the speedy election of a president, which must be the top priority in this critical period that Lebanon and the region are going through,” said the bloc in a statement issued after its weekly meeting. “It is necessary to abide by the Constitution and refrain from inventing new legal norms that would obstruct the election of a new president,” it added. As a suggestion to resolve the presidential crisis, Free Patriotic Movement leader MP Michel Aoun has recently proposed organizing a survey to determine which Christian party or parties are the most influential in the country. His idea has garnered the support of Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea and Marada Movement chief Suleiman Franjieh amid reservations by the Kataeb Party.But Mustaqbal stressed Tuesday that efforts must be exerted to elect a president through a parliamentary vote, describing it as “the only constitutional mechanism.”The bloc also urged adherence to “Article 27 of the Constitution,” saying it “makes every MP a representative of the entire nation” and “stipulates that Lebanese lawmakers should not be confined by any restrictions or conditions as they perform their duties.” Aoun's Change and Reform bloc had noted earlier in the day that the suggested survey would “mark a positive precedent in Lebanon and serve as a reminder that the people exist.”“The disregard of the people has led us to the situation that we are in now,” Change and Reform said. Commenting on Prime Minister Tammam Salam's call for a Thursday cabinet session, Mustaqbal voiced support for his move, pointing out that it comes after “premeditated obstruction that was practiced by several political parties.” It accused those parties of “harming the interests of Lebanese citizens and subjecting them to futile adventures over personal and family interests.”

Personal Disputes Leave 3 People Dead in Beirut and Bint Jbeil
Naharnet/June 30/15/A man was killed overnight in a dispute between drug dealers in Farhat neighborhood that lies behind Beirut Camille Chamoun Sports City, the state-run National News Agency said on Tuesday. According to reports, the dispute erupted between Lebanese and Palestinian drug-dealer gangs. No further information has been released so far. In another report, a young man was shot to death by his neighbor in the southern town of Bint Jbeil against the backdrop of a personal dispute. Twenty-year-old Mokhtar Mohammed Wizani from the town of Shaqra in Bint Jbeil district was shot in the chest at dawn when a personal dispute erupted with Hussain Mahmoud Zeeb who did not think twice about shooting him. Witnesses said that the father of the deceased was shocked when he saw his son lying dead in a pool of blood and at once died of a heart attack. Bodies of the two men were transferred to a hospital and security forces arrested Zeeb and opened investigation in the case.

Change and Reform Ministers to Attend Cabinet Meeting to 'Tackle Absence of Appointments Issue'

Naharnet/ June 30/15/The Change and Reform bloc deemed on Tuesday the omission of the security appointments file from cabinet's session on Thursday as a “legal and constitutional violation.”MP Ibrahim Kanaan said after the bloc's weekly meeting: “Our ministers will attend the meeting to address the absence of this matter from its agenda.”He declared that the absence of the controversial file disregards the principle of rotation of power in Lebanon, “which is needed given the situation the country is passing through.”Furthermore, the bloc tackled the recently proposed survey to determine which Christian party or parties are the most influential in the country. Kanaan explained that the majority of the Christian parties he had recently toured, except for the Kataeb, had supported the suggestion.“We have taken its objection into consideration, but we believe that it does not violate the constitution and it should be held,” he emphasized. “We must hold the survey because it will mark a positive precedent in Lebanon and serve as a reminder that the people exist and that we should turn to them,” explained the MP. “The disregard of the people has led us to the situation that we are in now,” he added. “We should no longer ignore the people or let them down,” he stressed. Kanaan had held talks on Monday with Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea, Marada Movement leader MP Suleiman Franjieh, and Kataeb chief MP Sami Gameyel to garner support for the survey. “It is a democratic necessity to explore the choices of Christians whenever the need arises and there is no need to give this issue other dimensions or to claim that it violates the legal norms,” Kanaan added. “It is unacceptable to keep Christians outside the equation at every juncture. We are supposed to be in a country that respects (sectarian) balance, partnership and the National Pact,” he underlined. “The survey is aimed at setting the choices of Christians to consolidate them and tell everyone that we have candidates for the presidency,” Kanaan added. He did not rule out the possibility of covering non-Christian parties in future surveys. Baabda Palace has been vacant since the term of President Michel Suleiman ended in May last year. The rivalry between Free Patriotic Movement chief MP Michel Aoun and Geagea is partly to be blamed for the presidential deadlock. The two leaders had announced earlier this month a declaration of intent, which as a first step, will likely be put into effect through the implementation of Aoun's proposal to carry out the poll.

Saudi ambassador to Lebanon responds to WikiLeaks: 'We are not ashamed of anything'
Nizar Hassan/The Daily Star/June. 30, 2015/BEIRUT: Saudi Arabia is not ashamed of any of the information revealed in the secret documents published by WikiLeaks earlier this month, which included revelations of financial support to Lebanese politicians and media who promised to promote Riyadh's interests, the Saudi ambassador to Lebanon said Tuesday. On June 19, Wikileaks published more than 60,000 secret cables from Saudi embassies around the world, including its mission in Beirut, in which Saudi officials speak bluntly about their goals and interests in Lebanon. “Saudi Arabia’s policy is known to everyone, and when it supports any political side or party, it is serving Lebanon’s interests,” Saudi Ambassador Ali Awad Asiri told reporters after a meeting with former President Michel Sleiman Tuesday. “[We] did not support building any militias in Lebanon, nor did we conspire against the Lebanese or trick them,” he added.
The leaked documents, which the kingdom had urged media and individuals against publishing, revealed that prominent Lebanese politicians and media had sought millions of dollars from Riyadh, with many promising to push Saudi policies in return. “Saudi’s Arabia’s policy is about doing good for Lebanon, be it in secret or in public. This is why we are not ashamed of anything,” Asiri said. Asiri voiced pride in Riyadh's economic support to Lebanon after the country's civil war, and the humanitarian aid it is currently channeling to the more than 1 million Syrian refugees it hosts today. Saudi officials never explicitly challenged the authenticity of the documents, and Asiri's comments Tuesday indicated that they are in fact genuine. WikiLeaks says the batch of documents released earlier this month was only the first of about half a million it had obtained. Among the documents leaked so far was a 2012 letter that said Lebanese Forces chief Samir Geagea was ready "to do what the kingdom asks him to do” in exchange for money. Geagea, who has not commented on the leaks since they emerged, had pleaded for financial assistance from Saudi Arabia when his party was going bankrupt. In the letter, then-Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal recommended to the late-King Abdullah that Geagea receive the money requested since he pledged to “work under the kingdom’s instructions.”
A separate document dated Jan. 2, 2013 said Lebanese MP Boutros Harb was planning to split from the March 14 political camp to launch his own group after the parliamentary elections, which were eventually cancelled that year. In a meeting with Faisal, Harb “hoped that the kingdom would support this [new political] gathering morally, politically and financially,” but on the condition that the aid would not be channeled through Future Movement chief Saad Hariri. Another document revealed that Michel Mouawad, the son of former minister Nayla Mouawad and late-President Rene Mouawad, requested a meeting with the Saudi king. However, their request was turned down and they were only given an appointment six months later with the deputy foreign minister. During the meeting, Mouawad asked Saudi Arabia for “urgent assistance” ahead of the elections that were supposed to be held in 2013 to win back seats lost during the previous election.
Another document revealed that then-Kataeb Party chief Amine Gemayel was seeking Saudi Arabia’s permission to visit Syria and accept the Syrian government’s efforts to restore relations with his party. The document - a letter from Asiri to Faisal - mentioned that Gemayel would abide by the “king’s personal instructions” and would not take any action except "under King Abdullah’s command.” It said that his party’s relations with Syria would follow the “standard” set by the kingdom. Other cables were focused on the money dynamics between Saudi Arabia and Lebanese media. One document showed that the kingdom accepted to fund Lebanese TV channel MTV with $2 million in four installments of $500,000. The funding would be accompanied by an action plan to ensure the station would “serve the kingdom’s causes” against “opposing media in Lebanon and elsewhere,” according to the document.
LBC, another prominent Lebanese channel, was also the subject of two leaked document. In one of them, the Saudi Foreign Ministry requested information about Iran’s willingess to fund Pierre Daher, the company’s chairman. Another letter from Faisal to royal authorities included a warning about a report aired on LBC that claimed former President Michel Sleiman had asked Faisal to mediate an end to Israel’s occupation of the Shebaa Farms. The letter, quoting Asiri, said that LBC could “go to the extreme” in its stances against the kingdom. To prevent that would require them to exert "pressure [on] the channel," Asiri said. Such pressure should be applied through the Choueiri Group, “which is a Lebanese advertising company that has wide interests in the kingdom, and controls a large part of the Lebanese advertising market," Asiri recommended.
The document also revealed the possibility of blocking LBC’s satellite broadcasting through legal procedures to punish it for the Shebaa Farms report. In other leaked documents, Asiri discusses ways to “deal with” Nasri al-Sayegh, a journalist who wrote an opinion piece criticizing Saudi foreign policy for As-Safir newspaper. Among the methods discussed to punish him was increasing support to pro-saudi newspapers in Lebanon, including An-Nahar, Al-Joumhouria and Al-Mustaqbal. Sayegh was described as a “left-leaning Christian who belongs to the Syrian Social Nationalist Party,” noting that his daughter was married to a Shiite Muslim. Another document also showed how Lebanese media personality May Chidiac requested Saudi funding for her Media Academy. Aouni al-Kaaki, the editor-in-chief of Al-Sharq newspaper, also asked for financial assistance, according to another cable, saying he was $3 million in debt and had refused offers of assistance from Qatar, Syria and Iran. Kaaki, who was elected to head the Lebanese Press Federation earlier this year, said that “Iran supports Hezbollah with $1 billion per year and possesses a dangerous agenda targeting Lebanon and the whole region including Israel.”

Next Cabinet meet to offer 'space for discussion': Salam

The Daily Star/June 30/15/BEIRUT: The next Cabinet session would be a “space for discussion between rival political parties," Prime Minister Tammam Salam said Tuesday, calling for ministers to act responsibly. “Because I am convinced that the Cabinet should not stop steering the state’s wheel ..., and acting on [my] prerogatives stated by the Constitution... I called yesterday for a Cabinet session this Thursday, after the sessions had been halted for three weeks.”“I wanted it to be a space for discussion.”Free Patriotic Movement ministers announced one month ago they would prevent the Cabinet from making any decision before discussing successors to the country’s security chiefs, prompting Salam to cancel three consecutive sessions. FPM leader Michel Aoun supports his son-in-law, Commando Regiment chief Brig. Gen. Shamel Roukoz, to succeed Army Commander Gen. Jean Kahwagi, who is set to retire in September. Speaking at an Iftar dinner held by an Islamic charity group, Salam called on “everyone to return to their consciences and act responsibly by transcending partisan interests and sidelining controversial maters.”“I believe in the highly patriotic sense of all components of the Cabinet... and their ability to provide the best environment for productive work, away from disruption and paralysis,” the premier said.
In a response to Salam's decision, FPM's top MP Ibrahim Kanaan said his party would continue insisting that security appointments should top the Cabinet's agenda for this week’s session despite the risk of paralysis.

FPM ministers won't be silent over appointments at Cabinet meet: Kanaan

The Daily Star/The Daily Star/June 30/15/BEIRUT: Free Patriotic Movement ministers will continue to insist that security appointments should top the Cabinet's agenda for this week’s session despite the risk of paralysis, a top party MP said Tuesday. “We announce our commitment to our position,” Ibrahim Kanaan said after a weekly meeting for the party’s parliamentary bloc. The FPM lawmaker lamented the exclusion of the issue of security appointments from the agenda for Thursday’s meeting, describing the move as a “legal and constitutional violation.” Neglecting the issue of appointments, according to the MP, is a “dangerous” move that reinforces the choice of extending mandates for all important posts. The FPM’s position, however, will not lead ministers to withdraw from government, he said, noting that the party’s representatives in Cabinet will continue to exercise their rights in determining what topics should be discussed. Kanaan’s comments come one day after Prime Minister Tammam Salam set a Cabinet session for Thursday, ending three weeks of paralysis over the issue of security appointments. But Salam’s decision did not herald an agreement on the thorny issue, as FPM ministers continue to insist that appointments should top the session’s agenda. The Cabinet has not convened since June 4 due to the disagreement. FPM leader Michel Aoun supports his son-in-law, Brig. Gen. Shamel Roukoz, chief of the Army’s Commando Regiment, to succeed Army commander Gen. Jean Kawhagi, set to retire in September. He is backed by his allies in Hezbollah, the Tashnag Party and the Marada Movement. The four groups have six ministers in the 24-member national unity government. The FPM MP also reiterated his party's call on the government to take action to liberate the volatile border town of Arsal from the threat of Syrian extremist groups entrenched along Lebanon's border with Syria. He urged the government to reveal the practical steps and measures that have been taken since ministers last month tasked the military with taking measures to distance the threat from the northeastern town.

Iranians arrive in Vienna to seal the deal; interim agreement extended 7 days
J.Post/30 June/15/VIENNA -- Iran's full delegation arrived in Vienna on Tuesday to complete a final, comprehensive agreement with world powers that will govern its nuclear program going forward. Tuesday was originally the self-imposed deadline for that deal, however the P5+1 group of world powers and Iran agreed to formally extend the terms of the interim agreement by seven days to buy time for a comprehensive deal. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif was accompanied by Ali Akbar Salehi, the country's chief technical expert at the talks, as well as Iranian President Hassan Rouhani's brother and several of their aides. Zarif told Iranian press that he had been in Tehran for consultations on Monday. But arriving at the Coburg Palace here in the Austrian capital, he rejected that he had traveled back to Iran for 24 hours to receive a mandate to close the deal from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. "I didn't go to get a mandate," he said. "I already had a mandate to negotiate. And I'm here to get a final deal, and I think we can."
During Zarif's bilateral meeting with US Secretary of State John Kerry— which lasted an hour— Khamenei sent out a message on Twitter blessing his negotiating team. "I recognize our negotiators as trustworthy, committed, brave and faithful," he said, along with a photo of the team in white lab coats and the hashtag, "#IranTalks."On Monday, a senior Obama administration official said that negotiations could go on for days, but that this was the final round— and that it might prove to be a rollercoaster. "There wasn't paper out of Lausanne. You didn't have a text. You had parameters," the official said, on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the talks. The official was referring to a framework for a nuclear deal agreed upon in Lausanne, Switzerland, back on April 2. Agreements in principle from Lausanne are now being put to paper, and the official said that, in doing so, the devil has proven to be in the details. "You are going to have a text," the official added, noting the "staggeringly consequential" nature of the deal they are about to broker. "It will be evident to everyone what has been agreed." A rally was held on Tuesday in Tehran, attended by supporters of the supreme leader's conditions for a nuclear deal. Those include a rejection of all access to its military sites sought by international inspectors, and immediate sanctions relief upon the signing of a deal. But US negotiators say there will be no "signing." Instead, a deal will involve a phase of adoption, a phase of implementation, and then a phase when all provisions of the deal go live.Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, as well as Germany Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, also arrived in Vienna on Tuesday. They both plan on meeting with Kerry and Zarif.

Obama warns Iran in eleventh hour nuclear negotiations
J.Post/June 30/15/VIENNA -- US President Barack Obama is warning Tehran not to walk away from agreements made in principle in Lausanne, Switzerland, back in April, as diplomats try to reach a common, final text of an historic nuclear deal based on those agreements. In Lausanne on April 2, world powers and Iran announced a series of political settlements they said would ultimately govern a comprehensive nuclear accord. Negotiators from those countries are now in Vienna to hammer out that final deal. But Obama, speaking from the East Room of the White House on Tuesday, said that "a lot of talk on the other side from the Iranian negotiators" in recent days suggested they were straying from the framework. "The framework agreement that was established at Lausanne was one that, if implemented," he said, "would in fact achieve my goal." But if Iran cannot abide by the framework, the US president said, "that's going to be a problem." "I will walk away from the negotiations if, in fact, its a bad deal," he said. "If the verification regime is inadequate, then we're not going to get a deal." Speaking to a small group of reporters in the Austrian capital on Monday, one senior administration official said— in English and in Farsi, through an aide— that the Lausanne framework could not be edited as negotiations entered their final stage. "There wasn't paper out of Lausanne. You didn't have a text. You had parameters," the official said, on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the talks. "You are going to have a text," the official added, noting the "staggeringly consequential" nature of the deal they are about to broker. "It will be evident to everyone what has been agreed."The United States, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany are negotiating with Iran to cap, restrict, monitor and partially roll back its nuclear program for a finite period, in exchange for sanctions relief. Obama made his remarks in a joint press conference in Washington with President Dilma Rousseff of Brazil.
"Ultimately, this is going to be up to the Iranians," Obama said.


Turkey and Jordan said preparing buffer zones inside Syria. Israeli air support mooted. Putin issues warning

DEBKAfile Special Report June 30, 2015/The Turkish and Jordanian armies were reported on June 30 to be getting ready to cross into Syria for the first time since war engulfed that country in 2011, and set up security buffer zones. Both are impelled to fight ISIS, oppose the Assad regime and anxious to stem the flow of refugees, but there are also differences in their objectives and it is not clear if they are coordinated. Turkey has prepared 18,000 troops to carve out a buffer zone in northern Syria and use its air force to impose a no-fly zone against Syrian flights. Middle East sources report that the Jordanian army is also on the ready to cross into southern Syria. Jordan and Israel are reported to be planning joint air cover and the creation of a parallel no-fly zone in the south.
These preparations prompted Russian President Vladimir Putin to pledge his support for the Assad regime .On Monday, June 29, Putin summoned Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem to his Kremlin office from a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to tell him that Russia’s "policy to support Syria, the Syrian leadership and the Syrian people remains unchanged."
Putin has repeatedly warned Western governments against military intervention in the Syrian war or any attempt to oust Bashar Assad, warning that if foreign troops go into Syria, Moscow will respond in kind.
The Russians have not spelled out what action is contemplated, but they have options: they maintain naval and marine forces in the Mediterranean and Black Sea regions able to reach Syria at short notice. South Russian air force bases are also close enough to interfere with no-fly zones being setup over Syria.
Possible outside military intervention in Syria was the dominant topic in the phone call the Russian president put through to President Barack Obama on June 26. The communiqués in Moscow and Washington both referred to the “dangerous situation” in Syria. The two presidents also discussed the prospects of the nuclear accord shaping up with Iran, and the two issues may have been linked. The White House later stated that President Obama had stressed the need for the world powers to hold to a united stand in the negotiations with Iran. Sources in Ankara claim that President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has already given Turkish units their orders to go into Syria, although this is not confirmed. Others use the term “Western intervention” - suggesting that US and NATO are involved in the Turkish initiative. This may refer to US Air Force squadrons based in southern Turkey possibly providing air cover.
Western and Middle East sources report that the Jordanian plan entails a joint operation with Syrian rebel forces to carve out a security zone in southern Syria running from Jabal Druze and Suwayda in the east running west through the town of Deraa and up to the intersection of the Jordanian-Syrian-Israeli borders. Fierce fighting has been raging in this part of Syria in recent days as the rebels battle Syrian-Hizballah forces in an attempt to push them out and capture southern Syria. So far they have not made it.
The never-ending refugee problem from Syria is a major headache for the two governments. Turkey hosts some two million refugees and Jordan more than a million and a half. Stemming this flow is not the least of the goals of their buffer zone plans.

Dr. Walid Phares: For change in Iran, back the Resistance, not the regime -
NCRI/Tuesday, 30 June 2015 15:01
http://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/iran-resistance/18621-for-change-in-iran-back-the-resistance-not-the-regime-expert
Dr. Walid Phares advises members of the US Congress on the Middle East and teaches international relations at universities in Washington D.C.
Many United States luminaries are advocating for the U.S. government to open up "direct, collaborative talks" with the Iranian Resistance, according to top Middle East expert Dr Walid Phares.
"It represents the very thing that U.S. policy in the Middle East should be focused on—but isn’t, namely the empowerment of moderate and progressive Muslim groups for the sake of delegitimizing and marginalizing the all-too-common extremist element," Dr Phares wrote in Forbes on Monday.
A number of former US officials and foreign policy experts recently issued a statement to the US government calling for four specific policy initiatives, he said:
1) the application of stricter demands in the nuclear negotiations with Iran; 2) confrontation of Iran’s destructive and destabilizing role in the Middle East; 3) increased attention to the abysmal Iranian record on human rights; and 4) to help facilitate action on the first three points by engaging in “respectful dialogue with the Iranian opposition, consistent with our country’s policy of dialogue with all political groups.”
"A copy of the statement was presented to Maryam Rajavi, president-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran and its main constituent organization the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran, at a gathering of Iranians in Paris with more than 100,000 participants," he added.
This statement, Dr Phares argued, is significant for a number of reasons:
"First, witness the combination of the signatories which included senior former US officials and military leaders with knowledge on national security and foreign policy. And at a time of unprecedented partisan politics in Washington (particularly regarding Iran), the Policy Initiative includes both senior Democrats and Republicans."
"Second, it has identified lack of communication and dialogue with the Iranian democratic opposition by both Democratic and Republican leadership as the missing part of U.S. policy on Iran."
"Third, it offers a practical approach on nuclear negotiations with Iran as well as the crisis in the region by recognizing that Tehran’s leadership has shown no desire for abandoning its nuclear program. The regime is part of the problem—not the solution."
"Fourth, the core of the new Policy Initiative is the recommendation to 'break the stalemate' and to 'side with 80 million Iranian people and their desire, along with people everywhere, for freedom and popular sovereignty based on democratic principles' and 'engaging with the Iranian opposition.' In this respect the bipartisan collation also recognizes the role of 'Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, as a Muslim woman advocating a tolerant and democratic interpretation of Islam.'"
"The message delivered at this rally is one of broad-based change in Iran—away from the religious fascism of the current regime and towards true democracy, rule of law, respect for the rights of women and minorities, and other similar principles outlined in Mrs. Rajavi’s 10-point plan for the future of the country."
Current US policies, Dr Phares said, seem to embrace an "inaccurate and limiting narrative about the Middle East which views radicalism as a necessary element of regional culture and politics. We can see this, for instance, in the Obama administration’s efforts to encourage Iranian influence in Iraq in hopes of playing off the Shiite theocracy against the Sunni militants of the Islamic State."
"But there are few real distinctions between those two groups, and any outcome of a conflict between them is a net loss for Western interests in the Middle East. The recent policy statement makes it clear that its American signatories understand this. The document points out that the Islamic Republic of Iran is effectively the prototype for Middle East, state-sponsored Islamist extremism. It says, 'If ISIS succeeds, what the world will get is a Sunni version of Khomeini’s Iran.'"
"Conversely, even if Iran succeeds—an outcome explicitly endorsed by the Obama administration—what we will be left with in Iraq and Syria is a series of proxies under the control of the Shiite version of ISIS. While ISIS beheads its enemies and seeks to establish a region-wide caliphate, Tehran hangs political dissenters for the sake of an Islamist political system whose founder mandated the expansion of Iranian power to unify and dominate the Muslim world."
"We should not be satisfied with these alternatives. In either case we are left with a Middle East that is less stable than it might be, owing to the constant presence of sectarian discord. This has been Iran’s legacy in the region, and it will be the legacy of the continuation of a policy that embraces Iran’s extremism in opposition to another brand of extremism. The signers of the statement know this and point out that they have been warning of Iran’s sectarian influence for some time."
"So too has the Iranian resistance. This fact alone should encourage Western policymakers to recognize the resistance as a non-sectarian, moderate alternative to our current short list of prospective partners in the Middle East and the Muslim world. What’s more, its Western-friendly ideologies also provide it with popular support from among the educated, progressive population of Iran, giving the group great power."
"The significance of that power should be clear in the issues and threats to Western security behind the other three policy recommendations offered. Still, the U.S. government has evidently been loath to seriously confront Iran on its nuclear program, its actions in Yemen. Bahrain and Syria, and its constant hangings and political imprisonments. Why? Because the current administration fears the consequences of poor relations with both sides of the sectarian divide."
"But this is nothing to fear as long as we recognize that there is an alternative—and there is. The Iranian resistance stands ready to help us in putting pressure on our enemies instead of engaging them in conciliatory negotiations. It stands ready to promote Western democratic ideals in places where some policymakers seem to think they cannot soon take hold."
"The recommendations in that document do not just represent a better way forward for U.S. policy in the Middle East; they urge the fundamental realignment of a policy in favor of freedom and democracy, instead of half-measures and unprincipled pragmatism."
**Dr. Phares advises members of the US Congress on the Middle East and teaches international relations at universities in Washington D.C.

ISIS scores up gains and losses in Syrian fighting
Sylvia WestallSuleiman al-Khalidi| Reuters/The Daily Star/June 30/15/AMMAN: ISIS fighters stormed the Syrian town of Tal Abyad on the Turkish border Tuesday and captured a neighborhood from the Syrian Kurdish YPG militia, but suffered setbacks in the northeastern city of Hassakeh, activists and the army said. ISIS has launched simultaneous attacks against Syrian government and Kurdish militia this past week in the multi-sided Syrian civil war after losing ground to Kurdish-led forces near the capital of its "caliphate."
Backed by U.S.-led airstrikes, the YPG militia has advanced deep into the militants' stronghold province, Raqqa, capturing key positions from the jihadis, including Tal Abyad. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights group that monitors the war said there were heavy clashes Tuesday around Tal Abyad, which serves as a border crossing, and that militants had taken control of an area in the eastern part of the town. YPG spokesman Redur Xelil said clashes were ongoing with the militants who had infiltrated a village on the outskirts of the town. "They are encircled ... this will be mass suicide for them," he told Reuters. The British-based Observatory, which tracks violence across Syria through sources on the ground, said ISIS had deployed scores of fighters across several villages. The ultra-radical group, which holds large tracts of Syria's thinly populated east, launched a lighting assault on the strategic northeastern city of Hassakeh last Thursday in a bid to capture government-held districts. But in the last two days, the Syrian army has been able to regain most of the areas of the city the militants had seized. The Syrian army's ability to hold on to Hassakeh and also separately repel a major rebel assault on the provincial capital of the southern province of Deraa on the border with Jordan, stands in stark contrast to a string of recent setbacks.
Hassakeh is important for all sides, because it sits between ISIS-held territory in Syria and in nearby Iraq.
Syrian state television said in a newsflash the army had retaken most of Ghwyran district, the largest populated area in the city, and one of several districts that were recently overrun by insurgents. In the Aziziya neighborhood, further east of Hassakeh, the army had gained the upper hand with help from Kurdish-led forces, residents said. On Monday, the army said it took back most of Nashwa district. The Islamist insurgents have deployed scores of suicide bombers against army checkpoints in Hassakeh, enabling them to move into positions deeper inside the city. Hassakeh has been divided into areas run separately by Syrian President Bashar Assad's government and regional Kurdish authorities, and has an ethnically and religiously mixed population of Arabs and Kurds. Although the militants had been mainly driven out, fighting continued in some streets where they had taken up sniper positions, locals said. "Islamic State (ISIS) had withdrawn from most of the districts but did not leave it completely and their snipers in some areas are preventing the full advance of the army," said Ali Hreith, a Hassakeh resident on the Turkish-Syrian border. State television said the army had destroyed a fire engine laden with explosives that the militants had sought to ram into an army post inside the city's Nashwa district.

Around 1,200 escape from Yemen prison, including Al-Qaeda suspects
Reuters/The Daily Star/June 30/15/SANAA: Around 1,200 prisoners, including Al-Qaeda suspects, escaped during clashes at a jail in central Yemen on Tuesday, officials said. The incident is the biggest in a series of prison breaks that have freed Yemeni militants in recent years and signals the further erosion of the state amid a raging civil war. "Groups of Al-Qaeda supporters ... today attacked the central prison in the city of Taiz and more than 1,200 of the dangerous prisoners escaped," state news agency Saba quoted a security official as saying. Another local official told Reuters some of the escapees were "suspected of belonging to Al-Qaeda" but said they left amid heavy clashes between warring militias in the city. Shiite Muslim Houthi fighters entered Taiz in March, in a southward push from their base in the capital Sanaa that drew military intervention from a Saudi Arabian-led coalition. But three months of airstrikes have yet to push back the group and units in Yemen's army that are loyal to Houthi ally Ali Abdullah Saleh, the country's ex-president. The security official said army forces linked to Saleh allowed the prisoners to escape as the militiamen, dubbed "popular committees" by their supporters, advanced. "Heavy fighting took place near the central prison and the popular committees approached and seized control of the area, but Saleh's forces opened the prison doors," the official said. Another group of Al-Qaeda militants escaped from a prison in the eastern city of Mukalla in April after army forces suddenly quit the city. Al-Qaeda and other hardline Sunni groups condemn the Houthis as apostates worthy of death, and the two groups are fighting each other in several areas in central Yemen.

Tunisia says resort gunman was trained in Libya

Ines Bel Aiba| Agence France Presse/The Daily Star/June 30/15
TUNIS: The gunman who killed 38 tourists in Tunisia received weapons training from jihadis in Libya, a top official said Tuesday, as the president admitted security services were unprepared for the attack. On Friday, a student identified as 23-year-old Seifeddine Rezgui pulled a Kalashnikov assault rifle from inside a beach umbrella and went on a bloody rampage at the five-star Riu Imperial Marhaba hotel in Port El Kantaoui near Sousse. Secretary of state for security Rafik Chelli told AFP Rezgui had been in Libya at the same time as the two authors of a March attack at the National Bardo Museum in Tunis that killed 21 tourists and a policeman. Both attacks were claimed by ISIS, which controls large swathes of Iraq and Syria. "It is confirmed that he (Rezgui) went to Libya illegally. He was trained in Sabratha (west of Tripoli)," Chelli said. "They were away at the same time ... In Sabratha, there is only one camp that trains young Tunisians," he said, although he could not confirm whether they had trained together. The camp was run by the jihadi Ansar al-Shariah group, Chelly added. His statement came after French radio broadcast an interview with President Beji Caid Essebsi, who said security had been boosted after the museum attack in other areas for the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. But authorities had not expected Tunisia's beaches to be targeted, he said. "It is true that we were surprised by this incident. Arrangements were made for the month of Ramadan, but they never thought (measures) had to be taken on the beaches," Essebsi told Europe 1.After the Bardo attack, jihadis threatened further violence, with ISIS sympathisers tweeting under the hashtag #IWillComeToTunisiaThisSummer. "It's not a perfect system," Essebsi said, vowing disciplinary action "if there were failings." Tunisia is expected to deploy 1,000 armed officers Wednesday to reinforce tourism police - who will also be armed - at beaches and attractions. There were no signs yet of increased security at the scene of Friday's shootings, with no police visible at the hotel or in the surrounding area, an AFP journalist said. Police and vehicles deployed Monday during a visit by the interior ministers of Britain, France and Germany were gone by Tuesday morning. Several witnesses said the attack lasted more than 30 minutes before the gunman was shot dead, but officials say they were on the scene within minutes.
Thousands of frightened tourists have fled the country since Friday, including at least 4,000 who flew home to Britain, the country hardest hit. Tunisian health authorities have now identified 33 of the victims, 25 of them Britons, with British officials warning the number is expected to rise to at least 30. British Prime Minister David Cameron's spokeswoman told reporters that the first bodies of British victims were expected to be repatriated Wednesday. It was Britain's worst loss of life in a jihadi attack since the July 2005 London bombings. Tunisia's crucial tourism industry was already suffering from the upheaval that followed the 2011 overthrow of ex-dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali and other jihadi attacks. But officials said Friday's massacre may do the most damage yet. "We can count, at least, with regards to the impact on gross domestic product (GDP), on a loss of earnings of a billion dinars ($515 million/460 million euros)," Tourism Minister Selma Elloumi Rekik told reporters late Monday."I think that's just the minimum, but it's still an estimate."Tourism accounts for seven percent of Tunisia's GDP and employs around 400,000 people. "If tourism collapses ... the economy falls apart," the minister warned, announcing government plans to provide exceptional loans to help tourism businesses. France's travel agency union said Monday that 80 percent of package holidays booked for July had been canceled, with customers rushing to other destinations. Some, however, have not changed their plans. "I think we need to help our Tunisian friends," said Christiane, a French tourist arriving at Monastir airport near Port El Kantaoui. In a separate development, the trial of 24 people accused of links to the February 2013 assassination of prominent Tunisian opposition figure Chokri Belaid began and was adjourned to October 30. Belaid, gunned down outside his home, was a staunch leftwing critic of the then-ruling Ennahda party, a moderate Islamist movement. Jihadis claimed the killing and the authorities announced in February 2014 that Belaid's assassin had been killed in a police raid on "terrorist" suspects. But Belaid's family has repeatedly demanded to know the full truth behind the murder.

Iran nuclear talks deadline extended to July 7: US
Agence France Presse/The Daily Star/June 30/15/VIENNA: Iran and major powers Tuesday effectively gave themselves until July 7 to reach a nuclear deal, the U.S. said as a midnight deadline approached in talks in Vienna with no agreement in sight. "The P5+1 and Iran have decided to extend the measures under (a 2013 interim deal) ... until July 7 to allow more time for negotiations to reach a long-term solution," State Department spokesperson Marie Harf said. A senior State Department official added that this meant that the talks were effectively extended until that date. The official added however that this did "not necessarily mean they will go until the 7th or end on the 7th."Under the November 2013 interim deal between major powers and Iran, Tehran froze parts of its nuclear program in exchange for minor relief from painful sanctions. Iran and the P5+1 - the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany - have been trying since then to turn this interim deal into a more ambitious and lasting agreement. After missing two deadlines in July and November 2014, in April 2015 they agreed in Lausanne, Switzerland the main outlines of the final deal and gave themselves until June 30 to finalize it. Tuesday's announcement came as talks continued in the Austrian capital involving U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, their Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov and others.

Turkey seeks to calm speculation over Syria invasion
Agence France Presse/The Daily Star/June 30/15/ANKARA: Turkey sought to calm speculation Tuesday it was planning to invade Syria, saying it would not act unilaterally but has a right to protect its borders. "To interpret our border security measures as 'Turkey is going to war'... is not very rational," presidential spokesman Ibrahim Kalin told a press conference in Ankara. "A country has a natural right to protect its borders," he said. Kalin added that Turkey would not take any "unilateral steps" and would continue to act in line with the international community in efforts to resolve the Syrian crisis. Pro-government media outlets had claimed that the government was planning a cross-border operation in Syria, which would involve 18,000 ground troops and include the creation of a 110-kilometer (68-mile) long buffer zone within Syria. Turkey's top security body, chaired by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, held a meeting Monday and released a statement that voiced concerns over recent developments in Syria. However, it made no mention of immediate military action. On Saturday, two days after an attack by ISIS that left more than 200 civilians dead in the Syrian city of Kobani, Kurdish forces drove the militants out of the highly symbolic border town which Kurds had wrested from ISIS in January. The ISIS attack was widely seen as vengeance for a series of defeats at the hands of Kurdish militias, particularly the jihadis' loss of Tal Abyad, another Syrian border town further east, on June 16. The Kurds' advance has alarmed Turkish officials, who accuse the Kurdish militiamen of seeking to unite the Kurdish-majority areas of Syria. Authorities fear the growing power of Kurdish forces will embolden Turkey's 15-million strong Kurdish minority. Kalin again denied persistent claims by Kurds of Turkish collusion with the jihadis, saying that Turkey "has never had and will never have any relations" with the jihadis. Turkey is one of the fiercest opponents of Bashar Assad's regime in Damascus and has taken in more than 1.8 million refugees since the war in Syria began. Turkey has repeatedly called for the creation of a security zone inside Syria to protect its borders. But the idea has received lukewarm support from its Western allies. Main opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) leader Kemal Kilicdaroglu warned the government not to "drag Turkey into trouble" by taking military action in Syria, saying it would have a "high cost." But Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu Tuesday responded to Kilicdaroglu by saying: "If some people attempt to change the map (our borders), we will react." "We won't let Turkey be exposed to a fait accompli, or be dragged into trouble," Davutoglu said Tuesday.

Khamenei's 'Red Lines' Speech

June 30, 2015 Special Dispatch No.6088/MEMRI
At a meeting of regime officials marking Ramadan, and a week before the June 30, 2015 deadline for a nuclear deal, Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei explained in detail the red lines and conditions that Iran would demand in order for an agreement to be reached. Khamenei reiterated yet again that there would be no inspection of Iran's military installations or questioning of scientists, that nuclear research and development would continue throughout the duration of the agreement, that the sanctions on Iran would be lifted simultaneously with the signing of the agreement and not after the IAEA confirms that Iran has met its obligations under the agreement, and that the agreement duration proposed by the Americans is unacceptable to Iran (for a detailed list of Iran's red lines as tweeted on June 24, 2015 by Khamenei's office, see Appendix).[1]
Also at the meeting, Khamenei laid out the sequence of events that had led to the negotiations with the Americans, saying that it began with President Obama's 2009 proposal to him during the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and not after President Hassan Rohani took office in 2013, as the U.S. administration claims. He said that President Obama had promised to lift the sanctions within six months and to recognize Iran as a nuclear power.
Negotiating with the Americans, Khamenei said, had further solidified his understanding that they never keep their word, and that their entire aim is to destroy Iran's nuclear industry. He added that his position on Iran's red lines has been expressed to the Iranian nation publicly and also to the Iranian negotiating team in private conversations; this explanation was likely in response to American officials' claims that Khamenei's anti-U.S. and anti-nuclear deal statements were purely for domestic purposes. Khamenei also clearly expressed his support for the Iranian negotiators, and called the U.S. the common enemy of all Iranian factions from both the ideological and pragmatic camps.
Khamenei began his speech with an explanation of his political and economic worldview and his vision for Iran's status in the world. Again presenting his model of a "resistance economy," which he said is a culture, as the only one that could promote Iran politically, culturally, and economically vis-à-vis the West. The main thrust of this model, he said, was that the national infrastructure must be properly utilized by the internal forces of Iranian society – that is, educated young people and scientists – and that this must be attained through religious piety and faith, determination, and strict adherence to the principles of the regime of the Islamic Revolution. This contrasts with the economic model promoting foreign investment, privatization, and the boosting of the private sector, which is championed by pragmatic camp leaders Hashemi Rafsanjani and President Hassan Rohani. Rejecting the cultural and economic orientation towards Europe and the West – which he termed "the easier path" – Khamenei urged regime heads and apparatuses to convey regime values to the public, especially the younger generation; this, he said, was the difficult but correct path to achievement.
The following is Khamenei's June 23, 2015 speech; the Appendix includes the official list of Iran's red lines for a comprehensive nuclear agreement as tweeted on June 24, 2015 by Khamenei's office:
"Resistance Economy" – A Model To Move Iran Towards Significant Economic Achievements
"Society's religious piety in economic issues is the same 'resistance economy' that protects the country from upheavals stemming from international events or from the poisoned arrows of the international policy that opposes [the Iranian regime]. In recent years, I have reiterated the need to strengthen the country in light of the [Western] forces' economic takeoff. During these years, [regime] officials have exerted commendable efforts, in accordance with their capabilities; however, all capabilities and potential in the country must be utilized in order to promote and actualize the resistance economy.
"The resistance economy model has been implemented in other countries, and has impacted them positively. At the center of the resistance economy is introspection. This internal focus does not mean aspiring to insularity, but reliance on domestic capabilities and potential by means of looking outward. The creation of the resistance economy was a product of collective wisdom and lengthy consultation. Many economists supported it after it was declared, and at this point the resistance economy has already become part of the country's ongoing rhetoric and economic culture.
"This model of resistance economy is pitted against the old model, which was dictated by the superpowers to third world countries... Some might say that the resistance economy model is desirable but not viable. But I say clearly that implementing this model in the country's current situation, taking into account the potential that exists, is absolutely possible.
"One of the blessings of the Revolution is the existence of young educated forces in the country – as long as a mistaken policy [i.e. population control] does not bring [in its wake] an aging society and a decline in these young forces.
"Today there are 10 million university graduates, and over four million students – 25 times more than at the start of the Revolution. This number of young, educated, expert forces is the pride of the Islamic regime [and it embodies] a very great opportunity.
"According to international statistics, the Islamic Republic of Iran's economy ranks 20th worldwide. If we utilize our unrealized potential, we can climb to 12th. Iran is first in the field of oil and gas reserves. Its unique geographic location connects North with South and East with West. Its 15 neighbors, with a total population of 370 million, constitute an open-air market that is very close by, in addition to the large-scale domestic market of over 70 million in Iran. This is additional potential, and if we pay attention to this domestic market, the manufacturing situation will change.
"There is further potential in the country's basic infrastructure of energy, transportation, communications, reactors, and dams, and also in the cumulative administrative experience in the country. We must use this potential properly and correctly, because Iran's problem is not a lack of the right plans or the right declarations and expertise. The main problem, which is widespread even among the elites, is the improper use of the right plans and declarations.
"Some problems stem from domestic challenges. Iran's greatest challenge is negligence in implementation and a shallow, superficial view of the problems. Philosophical discussions are not going to move this matter forward; there is a need for movement and for long-term measures to solve the problems.
"It may be that large-scale projects will take a generation to succeed. When there was talk of a scientific movement at Iranian universities, maybe [at that time] no one believed that 10 or 15 years later the country's scientific movement would reach its current situation, by virtue of the efforts of the talented professors and young people. Today, in contrast to those years, we are witness to significant progress, and even, in several fields, astounding progress.
"Sometimes it is possible to provide some goods and services via two paths: The first, easier one is through Europe; and the second, more difficult one is not through Europe [but is through relying on ourselves]. The first path would distress anyone, enfeebling his friends and strengthening his enemies.
"Another domestic challenge stems from the gravest and most fundamental mistake of all: There are those who think that all roads will open [to Iran] after we distance ourselves from the foundations of our faith and the principles of the Islamic regime. It is the government officials who believe in the foundations and principles of the Revolution – I have no complaints to address to them. But in the group of those involved [in the issue], there are some who believe that abandoning principles will open gates. However, in recent years, we have already seen the results of this grave mistake, in several countries. The only way forward is to stand fast and to insist on the foundations and principles.
"Yet another domestic challenge is the belief of some that the people cannot tolerate the problems [any longer]. If the truth is explained to the people, with the necessary sincerity and in the proper way, the people will stand fast and show resistance. Another challenge is having doubts about the country's domestic capabilities. We must have confidence in our young scientists and in the people in economic matters, and must utilize their capabilities.
"Determination, refraining from sloppiness and from seeking convenience, and reliance on jihad-oriented management are the main conditions for actualizing the resistance economy. Jihad-oriented management is achieved through reliance on God and on using wisdom and logic, while firmly promoting matters without fear of foreigners.
"All media, officials, and Friday preachers, and those whose statements influence the people, are duty-bound to spread the culture of the resistance economy. In order to implement the policy of the resistance economy, it is essential to be frugal, to prefer local products, particularly in the government apparatuses, to determinedly fight against unreasonable importation and smuggling, to pay special attention to [nurturing] small and medium manufacturing plants, and to reexamine monetary policy and banking arrangements. Empathy, consensus, and internal unity are the main conditions for implementing all this. Everyone must assist the government and the officials. Engaging in marginal matters, on the part of any faction, is unacceptable, and must be avoided. We can carry out great work on the economic front and we can get past this sensitive phase."
Obama Offered To Resolve The Nuclear Issue By Recognizing Iran As A Nuclear Power
"Whatever I say at public meetings is exactly what I say in private sessions with the [Iranian] president and with other relevant officials. That is why it is a lie to say that in private meetings [I] disregard several official red lines.
"The negotiating team puts forth efforts in a large number of issues and data [provided by] the opposite side, while showing national pride, absolute accuracy, and the intent to solve the problems and promote the country, and expresses its opinions fairly and courageously. Anyone who is up to date on the details of the negotiations will acknowledge everything that is said about the negotiating team. Obviously, it is possible for them [the team] to make a mistake in identifying [problems] and in its actions, but they are pious and zealous people.
"I do not object to criticism. I see it as necessary and helpful. The truth is that it is easier to criticize than to act... My words should not prevent the continuing criticism [by the ideological circles of the negotiating team], but we must note that the negotiating team is aware of several issues that are subject to criticism. However, for some [of these issues], necessity is pushing it [i.e. the negotiating team to go] several steps [farther].
"The issue of negotiating with the Americans is linked to the era of the previous government [i.e. president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad], and to the dispatching to Tehran of a broker to ask for negotiations. At that time, I received a visit from a distinguished individual from the region acting as mediator [i.e. Sultan Qaboos of Oman] who said specifically that the U.S. president [Obama] had asked him to come to Tehran and present the American request for talks. The Americans told this mediator: 'We want to resolve the nuclear issue and lift sanctions within six months, while recognizing Iran as a nuclear power.' I told this mediator that I did not trust the Americans and their words, but I agreed, on his insistence, to reexamine this issue, and the negotiations began.
"In any diplomatic match, there are two arenas worth noting. The main arena is that of reality, action, and creating assets. The diplomatic and policy arena is the [second] arena where the assets are transformed into advantages and into what secures national interests. Being empty-handed in this first arena will make any country less flexible in the second arena According to this logic, Iran entered into the talks with strong and important achievements, one of which was the ability to produce nuclear fuel [enriched to] 20%. All the nuclear powers refused to sell Iran fuel enriched to this level for nuclear medicine at the Tehran reactor, and even prevented other countries from doing so. But Iran's young scientists, in whom we take pride, manufactured it and formed it into fuel rods, and the opposing side was checkmated.
"In addition to nuclear fuel [enriched to] 20%, Iran had other significant achievements. In essence, Iran's strategy of steadfastness under pressure bore fruit, and the Americans realized that the sanctions were not achieving their desired result and that they must find another way.
"Iran has a skeptical view of the Americans. Nevertheless, I agreed that if the Americans stood behind their words and their obligations [as conveyed] by this broker from the region, then we would also pay a price, because in negotiations, one can backtrack on the basis of wisdom and calculations. However, shortly after the negotiations [began], they [the Americans] began showing their greed and violating their obligations.
"A good agreement for Iran is one that is just and fair. During the negotiations, the Americans changed their promise [on when they would] lift the sanctions, from six months to one year, and later, due to their recurring greed, they stretched out the negotiations, and even threatened to intensify the sanctions, and spoke of militarization and [implementing the options both] on the table and under the table.
"A look at the Americans' demands shows that their goal is to uproot Iran's nuclear industry, destroy Iran's nuclear essence, and turn Iran into a caricature, a [mere] symbol with no substance. Iran has a genuine, proven need for 20,000 megawatts of nuclear power. They [the Americans] intend to keep pressuring Iran in some way and to maintain the sanctions, while attempting to destroy [Iran's] nuclear industry and deny Iranians the many benefits of this industry. If they succeed in attaining their goals in the negotiations, it will be a major victory for them, because they will have vanquished the independence-loving Iranian nation, and defeated a country that can be a role model for other countries. All their violations of their obligations and their haggling are aimed at attaining these goals.
"From the beginning of the negotiations until today, Iran has made reasonable demands. We said that we wanted the sanctions lifted and that in return we were willing to give some things, as long as our nuclear industry does not stop and does not suffer a blow."
Iran's Red Lines
"In contrast to what the Americans are insisting on, we do not accept long-term restrictions for 10 to 12 years. We have told them how many years we are willing to accept restrictions for.
"[Iran's] research, development, and construction will continue, even during the restrictions. They say 'don't do anything for 12 years,' but these are particularly violent words, and a gross mistake.
"The economic, financial and banking sanctions – whether related to the [UN] Security Council or to the American Congress and administration – must be lifted immediately with the signing of the agreement. The remainder of the sanctions will also be lifted within a reasonable timeframe. The Americans are presenting a complex, convoluted, bizarre, and stupefying formula for [removing the] sanctions, and it is unclear what will emerge from it, but we are clearly stating our demands.
"The lifting of the sanctions must not depend on Iran carrying out its obligations. Don't say, 'You carry out your obligations and then the IAEA will approve the lifting of the sanctions.' We vehemently reject this. The lifting of the sanctions must take place simultaneously with Iran's meeting of its obligations. We oppose the delay of the implementation of the opposite side's obligations until the [release of] the IAEA report [verifying that Iran has met its obligations], because the IAEA has proven repeatedly that it is neither independent nor fair, and therefore we are pessimistic regarding it.
"They say, 'The IAEA should receive guarantees [on the nature of Iran's nuclear program].' What an unreasonable statement[!] They will be secure only if they inspect every inch of Iran. We vehemently reject special inspections [that are not customary for any country except Iran], questioning of Iranian personnel, and inspection of military facilities.
"Everyone in Iran – including myself, the government, the Majlis, the judiciary, the security apparatuses, and the military, and all [regime] institutions – want a good nuclear agreement, an agreement that is dignified and fair, and that is in accordance with Iran's interests.
"Although we wish the sanctions lifted, we see them as [having brought us] a particular kind of opportunity, because they made us pay more attention to domestic forces and domestic potential."[2]
Appendix: List Of Iran's Red Lines As Tweeted By Khamenei's Office
On June 24, 2015, Khamenei's office tweeted a list of Iran's red lines for a comprehensive nuclear agreement:[3]
Endnotes:
[1] See MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis Series Report No. 1167, Nuclear Negotiations At An Impasse: Leader Khamenei Rejects Agreement Reached On Token Inspection Of Military Sites And Questioning Of Scientists; U.S. Willing To Close IAEA Dossier On Iranian PMD, To Settle For Inspecting Declared Nuclear Sites Only, And To Rely On Intelligence; EU Objects, June 11, 2015; and Inquiry & Analysis Series Report No. 1171, U.S. Secretary Of State Kerry: 'We Have Absolute Knowledge' About 'Certain Military Activities' The Iranians 'Were Engaged In'; Iran Rejects Outright U.S. Terms For Future Inspection – For Example, Inspection Of Military Sites, June 24, 2015.
[2] Leader.ir, June 23, 2015.
[3] Twitter.com/Khamenei_ir, June 24, 2015.

What do Israel's Druze want?
Reda Mansour /Ynetnews
Published: 06.30.15, 21:06 / Israel Opinion
Op-ed: We don’t want a single Israeli soldier to set foot in Syria in order to save the Druze, but we do expect Israel to stop providing medical care to Syrian rebels who have murdered Druze in cold blood.
Some of the Jewish Israelis don’t understand what the Druze in Israel want. Do they really want Israel to intervene in the civil war in Syria in order to save the country's Druze? Do they want Israel to open up its borders and let hundreds of thousands of Druze refugees in?
The Jewish reader asks himself, and rightfully so: Don't we have enough trouble? Hamas is on the fences in the south, Hezbollah is on the fences in the north, and the spirit of the Iranian nuclear program hovers above it all.
The Druze never had external backing like the Christians or Sunnis and Shiites. They always knew how to defend themselves even at the cost of tens of thousands of casualties. That is one of the reasons why we remain only a million and a half Druze after 1,000 years.
The Druze don't want Israel to open up the fence and take in hundreds of thousands of Syrian Druze either. You can rest assured that there won't be hundreds of thousands of Druze refugees. Just like we didn't flee Israel in 1948 in view of Palestinian gunmen's daily attacks on our villages, and just like the Druze in Lebanon didn't flee in the 1967 civil war after being stormed by militias and foreign armies, the Druze will not flee Suwayda. If they leave, it will be after tens of thousands are killed in battle, and they will return with a counterattack, and the majority of survivors will not move from their homes.
So what do we really want from the State of Israel and from our Jewish friends in it? First of all, we expect empathy. Showing understanding means, for example, halting the medical care being given in Israel to members of Jabhat al-Nusra (an organization affiliated with al-Qaeda), especially after they massacred 20 Druze people in cold blood.
We don’t have to explain to the Jews what it means to be a minority which is connected with all its heart on one side of the world to the members of its religion and people on the other side of the world. This feeling should be clear to the Israelis, who supported their people behind the iron curtain in the Soviet Union or sent planes to bring Jews from villages in Ethiopia.
We have reached a situation of complete emotional solidarity with you. Not just through 400 fallen IDF soldiers or tens of thousands of Druze who have already served in the IDF, but solidarity in its deepest sense, which includes Druze officers and students who participate in the March of the Living in Auschwitz every year at their own request, and Druze diplomats who work diligently to maintain the Jewish continuity in the Diaspora and strengthen the connection of Jews abroad to Israel. I believe I have visited more synagogues and taken part in more Kabalat Shabbat ceremonies than any secular Jew in Israel.
We would like you to show some consideration towards our distress. Regardless of what you decide to do, don't choose to stain the Druze on the other side of the border as an excuse. Despising all the Druze in Lebanon because of the actions of a despicable murderer like Samir Kuntar is like staining all the Jews in Israel because of Baruch Goldstein.
Instead of inciting, you should remember that during the first Lebanon War and thanks to the intervention of the Druze in Israel, the IDF managed to cross the entire Chouf Mountains without a single gunshot being fired at it.
To those who respond to articles here I would like to say: Don't write that you don't care about the Druze in the Golan Heights and in Syria and that they can all be slaughtered because they have declared their support for Syrian President Bashar Assad. These Druze are trying to survive, and their other choices are the Islamic State and al-Qaeda's Jabhat al-Nusra. They are no different from the leaders of Iran's Jewish community, who declare their "animosity towards the Zionist enemy" every week at the parliament in Tehran, and who did it even during the Mahmoud Ahmadinejad era.
We would also like you to know that the Druze were never ungrateful. We understand very well that free protests of tens of thousands of Druze on the streets of our villages in Israel should not be taken for granted. This happened only in the Israeli democracy, while the Druze in Lebanon and Jordan remained in their homes. Moreover, we understand that it is only thanks to the standard of living in Israel that we were able to collect $3 million within one week and transfer it to the Druze in Syria.
Finally, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot's declarations of support for us moved us and are engraved in our memory. As you know, minorities have a good memory. The State of Israel and the IDF are a warm home and family and we won't do anything which could get them entangled in adventures beyond the border.
How many of you can say, like I can, that they come from a family which already has four or five generations of fighters in the IDF? My grandfather was a combat officer in the War of Independence and my son is serving in a combat unit these days.
But beyond this restriction, we will remain loyal to our tradition and help our Druze brothers in any way and anywhere as we have been doing for 1,000 years now and as you have been doing for 2,000 years now. This isn't something you are not familiar with.
**Dr. Reda Mansour is the Israeli ambassador to Brazil. His doctoral thesis focused on Syria's modern history.