LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

February 10/17

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins17/english.february10.17.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
‘The kings of the Gentiles lord it over them; and those in authority over them are called benefactors. But not so with you; rather the greatest among you must become like the youngest, and the leader like one who serves.
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 22/24-30/:"A dispute also arose among them as to which one of them was to be regarded as the greatest. But he said to them, ‘The kings of the Gentiles lord it over them; and those in authority over them are called benefactors. But not so with you; rather the greatest among you must become like the youngest, and the leader like one who serves. For who is greater, the one who is at the table or the one who serves? Is it not the one at the table? But I am among you as one who serves.
‘You are those who have stood by me in my trials; and I confer on you, just as my Father has conferred on me, a kingdom, so that you may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and you will sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel."

For the time is coming when people will not put up with sound doctrine, but having itching ears, they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own desires, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander away to myths

Second Letter to Timothy 04/01-08/:"In the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and in view of his appearing and his kingdom, I solemnly urge you: proclaim the message; be persistent whether the time is favourable or unfavourable; convince, rebuke, and encourage, with the utmost patience in teaching. For the time is coming when people will not put up with sound doctrine, but having itching ears, they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own desires, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander away to myths. As for you, always be sober, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, carry out your ministry fully. As for me, I am already being poured out as a libation, and the time of my departure has come. I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith. From now on there is reserved for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will give to me on that day, and not only to me but also to all who have longed for his appearing."
 
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 09-10/17
Saint Maroun and remembering Maronite historical events/Dr Walid Phares/Face Book/February 09/17
Hezbollah's war in Aleppo: Victory at any cost, even to civilians/Mona Alami/Middle East Eye/Thursday 9 February 2017
The Islamic Jihad and Peace with Jews/ Bassam Tawil/Gatestone Institute/February 09/17
Jihadist Groups in the US: What Next/ Benjamin Weingarten/Gatestone Institute/February 09/17
Is Iona Community Sabotaging Itself by Embracing Kairos/ Denis MacEoin/Gatestone Institute/February 09/17
Khomeini’s revolution and CIA declassified documents/Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/February 09/7
The wise men of Al-Awamiyah/Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/February 09/7
From Atta’s Father to Hamahmy’s Father/Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/February 09/7
Is the right to abortion more important than Iranian terror/Mamdouh AlMuhaini/Al Arabiya/February 09/7
Of lies and slippery slopes/Trisha de Borchgrave/Al Arabiya/February 09/7

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 09-10/17
Saint Maroun and remembering Maronite historical events
Dr Walid Phares/Face Book/February 09/17
Saint Maroun mass kicks off in presence of head of State and government
Riachi Says Hybrid Electoral Law to be Reached 'within 10 Days'
Marada Slams FPM-LF Alliance as 'Christian Sykes-Picot Agreement'
Hariri Shows Openness to Electoral Law Devised by Miqati's Government
Cautious Calm in al-Laylaki after Armed Clash between Families
Man Plotting Bomb Attack Reportedly Arrested in Choueifat
Waste Incineration 'Serious Choice' as Ministerial Panel Holds 1st Meeting
Mashnouq: President, PM Say New Electoral Law before End of February
French Health Minister visits Hotel Dieu Hospital: Symbol of common LebaneseFrench humanity cause
Frangieh convenes with Sabhan in Bnachii
Turkish Ambassador meets heads of Lebanese, Turkish associations over bilateral relations
Clash escalates into shooting in Lailaky
Lebanese, French armies hold military exercises
Salary scale a social and economic necessity
EU Ambassadors meet with the Minister of Interior and Municipalities to discuss the forthcoming parliamentary elections
Hezbollah's war in Aleppo: Victory at any cost, even to civilians

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 09-10/17
United Nations preparing invitations to Syria peace talks
Russia to give Syrian army high-precision weapons
There’s One Thing Pope Francis Wants Christians To Give Up For Lent And Trump may want to consider it.
Iraqi Hezbollah leader killed
US may sanction Iran over Yemen, Hezbollah and Iraq
Is Trump Preparing An Anbush
Israel Strikes Syrian Position after 'Stray' Tank Shell
Fierce Fighting 20 Kilometers from IS Bastion in Syria
U.S. Says It Killed Veteran Qaida Leader in Syria
Syria Rebel Fire Kills Three in Red Crescent Center
Two Palestinians Killed in Egypt after Rocket Fire on Israel
Explosion at French Nuclear Plant, No Contamination Risk
Putin, Erdogan Agree to Up Coordination after Russia Raid Kills 3 Turks in Syria
Israeli Settlers in West Bank Top 421,000
Palestinian Gunman Wounds Six Israelis near Tel Aviv
Mass Graves Found in Western Iraq
Canada's Trudeau to Visit the White House Monday
U.S. General Says NATO Has Shortfall of Troops in Afghanistan
Canada: Statement by Minister of Foreign Affairs on adoption of Regulation Law
Canada witnesses population jump due to immigrants
Egypt FM: Relations with Saudi Arabia ‘deeply rooted’

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on February 09-10/17
Two Muslims arrested in Slovenia on way to join the Islamic State — while under house arrest in France
Hard-Left appeals court rules against national security, Trump’s immigration ban
Venezuela selling passports to Iraqis, may have sold them to jihadis
The End of Countering Violent Extremism, the Start of Countering Islamic Jihad
“Aren’t You Tired of Writing Your Stupid Articles?” Georgetown Prof Jonathan Brown Expels Critic From Lecture
Merkel to spend billions on foreign aid despite facing $87,000,000,000 Muslim migrant bill
Europeans increasingly opposed to Muslim immigration
Hollywood talent agency UTA cancels Oscar party, will hold refugee rally instead
Bangladesh: Hindu vendor arrested for “insulting Islam” on Facebook
Paris spending $22,000,000 to build wall around Eiffel Tower to stop jihad terror attacks
Arizona: Muslim gets 30 years for role in jihad terror attack on Garland Muhammad cartoon contest
Daily Beast crows that Sean Spicer “makes up Atlanta Islamist terror attack”

Links From Christian Today Site for on February 09-10/17
Archbishop Of Canterbury Slams Government As It Abandons Plans To Help Lone Child Refugees
Hope And Struggle For Iran's Underground Christians: 'A Persecuted, Vulnerable Church'
John Smyth Stripped Of Church Leadership Role In South Africa After Channel 4 Christian Teen Beatings Investigation
Lib-Con Coalition To Block Church's Stance On Gay Marriage
White Supremacist David Duke Celebrates Appointment Of Jeff Sessions As Attorney General
Anglican Evensong To Be Celebrated For First Time Ever In Vatican
President' Means 'President': Why The Speaker Of The House Of Commons Should Welcome Donald Trump
Violence, John Smyth And The Gosp
Is Divorce An Unforgivable Sin? Billy Graham Answers
Twitter Goes Wild After Christian Virgin Compares Sex To A Can Of Soup On Hit TV Show

Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 09-10/17
Saint Maroun and remembering Maronite historical events

 Dr Walid Phares/Face Book/February 09/17
 Today February 9, the Maronite community in Lebanon and in the diaspora celebrate Saint Maroun Day. While celebrations are essentially spiritual and ecclesiastic, many within the community have tried in the past, and the deeper past, to achieve collective goals on the cultural, political and historical levels. The history of the community is long and rich in events, most of which have taken place in and around Mount Lebanon, since the early Church migrated from northern Syria to the Lebanese mountain range. The history of the Maronites evolved dramatically from the 7th century AD to the 20th with high crest during the Marada era, to tragic lows under the Mameluks, back to ascendency under the Emirate and the Mutasarifiah. The Maronites entered the modern era of Lebanon from the 1920s to the 1970s, with what they thought was prominence, while their diaspora has achieved successes around the world. A new sad era began in 1975 and despite hopes and leaps of optimism, the community -and most other Lebanese- never recaptured the golden age of tranquility. Today's politics within the community are at their lowest, according to the feelings of its silent majority. But hopes can never be eradicated. The length of 13 centuries of struggle makes it impossible for most Maronites to accept that their identity would one day vanish. But if they don't revive it and live, it could vanish, or mutate into a something else, unrecognizable...
For that purpose some have dedicated time and efforts, that is years and sacrifices, over decades, to insure that the cultural and historical identity of the community are preserved and redeveloped. The World Maronite Union (WMU), founded in Mexico in 1979 was one of these community institutions launched to maintain and defend the collective identity, not just on the spiritual level, which is a Church mission, but on the socio-cultural level, which is a people's responsibility. These two photos, released from archives, were taken in September 1988 in Limassol, Cyprus, at a WMU conference where Sheikh Sami Khoury was elected President and I was elected Secretary General. The story of the WMU is long and rich with testimonies, both inside Lebanon and throughout the Diaspora. Unknown from much of the public, this history will be soon published as memoirs. Meanwhile, happy Saint Maroun Day, not just to the members of the community but to all Lebanese and friends of Lebanon around the world.

Saint Maroun mass kicks off in presence of head of State and government
Thu 09 Feb 2017/NNA - The mass celebrating Saint Maroun began on Thursday morning in Mar Maroun Church in Beirut's Gemmayze, headed by Archbishop Boulos Matar. The mass is attended by President Michel Aoun, Premier Saad Hariri and other officials.Matar during the sermon reiterated that with love and trust we could overcome challenges and empower our internal unity."Let us be one hand, for Lebanon's sake, and make it able to embrace all the Lebanese society," Matar concluded.

Hezbollah launches donation campaign: 'Arm the Jihadist'
Roi Kais|/Ynetnews/February 09/17/Hoping to raise funds for their combatants, particularly in their war efforts in Syria and against Israel, the terrorist group Hezbollah has launched a campaign appealing to the public to donate money. The Lebanese terrorist group Hezbollah has launched a widespread campaign in recent days calling on member of the public to help finance its combatants and military activities. Under the slogan of "Money for Jihad is a Must", that was hashtagged and publicized on social media, Hezbollah is leading a campaign that has been dubbed "The Initiative to Arm Jihadists."In a video circulated on the group's twitter account, one of its members can be seen equipping himself and attempting to encourage the public to donate money to the cause . Whoever arms a fighter is considered to have fought," the group said as per the Islamic tradition and even added phone numbers to be used for the donations.  In a video circulated on the group's twitter account, one of its members can be seen equipping himself and attempting to encourage the public to donate money to the cause. Another slogan from the video says: "You help; resist." The group's website states that "Jihadists who fight in the resistance need clothes and military equipment. This initiative allows you to help equip them…"
Readers are then given the option to donate money online, and are even given the choice of making payments in installments, for those wishing to give generous sums of money. Religious leaders also feature in the videos as the appeals are made.
One of the news website based in the city of Tyre even added a form that can be used to donate. The appeals include detailed photos of the equipment that could be purchased with donation funds. The pictures were also uploaded to social networks
This is not the first time Hezbollah has launched a campaign of such sort. However, when compared with its last efforts, the present crowd-funding round is far more widespread and intensive. The extent of the campaign raises questions about the financial difficulties the group may be suffering flowing from the fighting in Syria against the rebels and other Jihadist groups which is draining them of precious military equipment. Excerpts of an interview of Hezbollah Deputy Secretary-General Naim Qassem that is expected to be released in full on Friday were published today in the Al-Binaa newspaper. In it, Qassem said that "Hezbollah is not concerned to calm Israel or relieve its fears. Our message is uniform and unchanging and it is that we are willing to pay the price of the conflict. Are you?"Qassem also added remarks belittling the reports that Turkey is demanding that Hezbollah retreat back to Lebanon as part of its arrangement with Syria, saying: "Hezbollah's retreat from Syria is not part of the equation of Syria's political solution."

Riachi Says Hybrid Electoral Law to be Reached 'within 10 Days'
Naharnet/February 09/17/Information Minister Melhem Riachi has announced that a new electoral law will be reached “in the next ten days.”In an interview with the German Press Agency (DPA) published Thursday, the minister noted that the new law will be a hybrid one mixing the winner-takes-all and proportional representation systems, ruling out a return to the controversial 1960 electoral law. “There will be a new electoral law in the next ten days... and there is no need to worry that some parties might try to pass time in order to return to the 1960 law,” Riachi, who is also a Lebanese Forces official, said. “It is impossible to return to the 1960 law, not even with some amendments,” he stressed. Riachi also noted that “the law will correct Christian representation without harming Muslim representation.” “It will end injustice against all Lebanese components,” he added. President Michel Aoun and Prime Minister Saad Hariri told ministers during a Cabinet session on Wednesday that a new electoral law will be passed “before the end of February.” While Hariri's al-Mustaqbal Movement has rejected that the electoral law be fully based on proportional representation, arguing that Hizbullah's arms would prevent serious competition in the party's strongholds, Druze leader MP Walid Jumblat has totally rejected proportional representation, even within a hybrid law, warning that it would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah, Mustaqbal, AMAL Movement, the Free Patriotic Movement and the LF are meanwhile discussing several formats of the so-called hybrid law. The country has not organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature has instead twice extended its own mandate. The last polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next vote is scheduled for May.

Marada Slams FPM-LF Alliance as 'Christian Sykes-Picot Agreement'
Naharnet/February 09/17/A senior Marada Movement official has slammed the rising Free Patriotic Movement-Lebanese Forces alliance as a “Christian Sykes-Picot Agreement” aimed at eliminating the other Christian political forces in the country. “Their agreement is a Christian Sykes-Picot aimed at splitting gains between the FPM and the LF and attempting to impose what resembles a 'political mandate' on the Christian arena,” the Marada official told ad-Diyar newspaper in remarks published Thursday. The Sykes-Picot Agreement was a secret 1916 agreement between Britain and France under which the two world powers agreed to divide Ottoman-held Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Palestine into various French- and British-administered areas. “They are trying to monopolize the Christian arena and prevent the emergence of a significant bloc that opposes them,” he added. “This exclusionary scheme will not be allowed to happen and it will be confronted,” the Marada official vowed. The official noted that the current “behavior” of the FPM-LF alliance “will automatically push all the affected Christian parties to align in one front to counter the elimination attempt that they are facing.”“Marada supports proportional representation, because it is the only way to protect political diversity and establish cross-regional alliances,” the official went on to say.“The FPM and the LF are seeking to implement the winner-takes-all system in the regions that they think are their strongholds while seeking to implement proportional representation in regions where they are weak,” the official charged. And noting that Marada chief MP Suleiman Franjieh is “not worried” about the fate of the parliamentary seats dedicated to the Zgharta district seeing as “he can win them under any electoral law and regardless of the strength of the FPM-LF alliance,” the Marada official pointed out that “the Marada chief is keen on securing the best possible circumstances for the other Christian parties to engage in fair elections, from Akkar to Jezzine and from Zahle to Mount Lebanon.” The official also said that Hizbullah will likely reject “any electoral law that threatens its Christian allies and friends who are not part of the Rabieh-Maarab agreement,” noting that “Hizbullah has no interest in seeing (LF leader) Samir Geagea winning a large number of Christian political seats under the excuse of his alliance with (President Michel) Aoun.”“The electoral law should be based on unified standards that apply to all parties,” the official stressed.

Hariri Shows Openness to Electoral Law Devised by Miqati's Government
Naharnet/February 09/17/Prime Minister Saad Hariri has shown “openness” to discussing an electoral law fully based on proportional representation that had been devised by Najib Miqati's government, a media report said on Thursday. “President (Michel) Aoun, backed by Hizbullah and AMAL Movement, is insisting on an electoral law fully based on proportional representation, but in the worst situation he would accept the proportional representation system that was proposed by Najib Miqati's government -- which is based on 13 electoral districts -- after introducing some amendments,” al-Akhbar newspaper quoted informed political sources as saying. “Hariri's choices are narrowing: he either accepts proportional representation under the Miqati law or else the president would carry out his threats that lead to vacuum and an open crisis,” the sources added. Citing Hariri's “concessions” in the presidential elections and the formation of the government, and the “latest change” in Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq's stance after the contacts between Aoun and the premier, the sources said that Hariri “will likely bow to the president's vision in order to prevent a total loss of the current political formula” in the country. Moreover, “high-ranking political sources have revealed that the latest dialogue session between Hizbullah and al-Mustaqbal Movement in Ain el-Tineh had witnessed a major shift in Mustaqbal's stance on proportional representation,” al-Akhbar said. “For the first time ever, the director of the premier's office, Nader Hariri, expressed his willingness to discuss the proposal of Miqati's government,” the daily added. “Nader Hariri asked why the Minieh-Dinniyeh district was joined with Akkar not Tripoli, why the city of Sidon was joined with the Shiite-majority districts of Tyre, al-Zahrani and Jezzine, and why Western Bekaa was separated from Zahle,” the sources said. While Mustaqbal had previously rejected that the electoral law be fully based on proportional representation, arguing that Hizbullah's arms would prevent serious competition in the party's strongholds, Druze leader MP Walid Jumblat has totally rejected proportional representation, even within a hybrid law, warning that it would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah, Mustaqbal, AMAL, the Free Patriotic Movement and the Lebanese Forces are meanwhile discussing several formats of a so-called hybrid electoral law that mixes proportional representation with the winner-takes-all system. The country has not organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature has instead twice extended its own mandate. The last polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next vote is scheduled for May.

Cautious Calm in al-Laylaki after Armed Clash between Families
Naharnet/February 09/17/A dispute between the Zoaiter and Rahil families escalated into an armed clash Thursday in the Beirut southern suburb of al-Laylaki, state-run National News Agency reported. The violence, reportedly over the elopement of a young woman from the Rahil family, damaged several vehicles and houses in the neighborhood, NNA said. “Gunmen withdrew from the streets after they learned that security forces were heading to the area as a state of cautious calm engulfed the region,” the agency added.

Man Plotting Bomb Attack Reportedly Arrested in Choueifat
Naharnet/February 09/17/General Security agents arrested overnight in the Choueifat area a Syrian young man suspected of plotting to carry out an act of terror, a media report said on Thursday. “The detainee was working as a delivery boy for one of the restaurants and he was plotting to prepare an explosive device,” al-Akhbar newspaper reported. On Wednesday, General Security announced the arrest of two Islamic State-linked men suspected of planning a suicide attack in central Beirut, confirming earlier media reports. The arrests come two weeks after an attempted suicide attack at Hamra's Costa cafe. Al-Akhbar reported Tuesday that the Lebanese man held over the central Beirut plot was in charge of security cameras in the district. He "confessed that he monitored the movements and addresses of political figures and their convoys crossing the city center," General Security said in its statement on Wednesday. He had worked with a Palestinian operative to plan a suicide attack in the center of the capital, it said. Prime Minister Saad Hariri is a prominent resident of the area. Lebanon's security services claim to have prevented several attacks in recent months. The country has been hit by several suicide bombings linked to jihadist groups fighting in neighboring Syria since war broke out there in 2011. Some of the most deadly attacks took place in strongholds of Hizbullah, which is fighting alongside President Bashar Assad's forces.The last attack carried out in Lebanon was in November 2015. In June 2016, the army said it had arrested IS fighters who were preparing attacks against various parts of the Lebanese capital.

Waste Incineration 'Serious Choice' as Ministerial Panel Holds 1st Meeting
Naharnet/February 09/17/A ministerial committee tasked with devising a new waste management plan on Wednesday held its first meeting at the Grand Serail under Prime Minister Saad Hariri, as a panel member said the incineration waste treatment approach has surfaced as a “serious” alternative to landfills. “Another meeting has been scheduled for February 18 to continue the discussions,” Environment Minister Tareq al-Khatib said after the talks. Industry Minister Hussein al-Hajj Hassan said “the current inclination is to endorse the choice of incinerators to resolve the waste problem.”Prior to the meeting Hajj Hassan had described incineration as “a serious choice,” noting that “it is implemented by the most important countries in the world.”The panel also comprises Deputy Premier and Health Minister Ghassan Hasbani, Minister of Interior and Municipalities Nouhad al-Mashnouq, Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil, Public Works Minister Youssef Fenianos, Energy Minister Cesar Abi Khalil and State Minister for Administrative Development Enaya Ezzeddine.
The meeting was also attended by Council for Reconstruction and Development chief Nabil al-Jisr and Cabinet Secretary-General Fouad Fleifel. Activists who took to the streets in angry protests during the 2015 unprecedented garbage crisis had rejected both the incineration and land-filling of unsorted and untreated garbage, calling instead for eco-friendly solutions based on sorting and recycling. The unprecedented crisis had erupted after the closure of the central Naameh landfill on July 17, 2015. The crisis saw the country's streets overflowing with waste and the air filled with the smell of rotting garbage for several weeks. Experts have urged the government to devise a comprehensive waste management solution that would include more recycling and composting to reduce the amount of trash going into landfills. A judge has recently ordered the permanent closure of the Costa Brava rubbish dump near Beirut airport after warnings that birds attracted by the garbage were threatening aircraft safety. Costa Brava was opened in March last year as one of three "temporary" tips intended to provide an interim solution after the closure of the Naameh landfill. The dumps were eventually intended to have waste processing facilities, but that has not happened. As a result, garbage has piled up in Costa Brava, on the coastline close to the airport runways, reaching nine meters in some places. A permanent solution for the waste produced by Beirut and its surroundings has yet to be found. The issue is one of many outstanding challenges for Lebanon's new government, which was formed on December 18 after two and a half years of political deadlock.

Mashnouq: President, PM Say New Electoral Law before End of February
Naharnet/February 09/17/President Michel Aoun and Prime Minister Saad Hariri told ministers during Wednesday's Cabinet session that “the new electoral law will be finalized before the end of February,” Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq said. “There is no choice but to hold the parliamentary elections and I don't have any doubt that they might not be held, seeing as one cannot talk about democracy in Lebanon except through holding elections,” Mashnouq added, during a meeting at the ministry with the ambassadors of the European Union and EU Member States. “A course of constitutional regularity started in the country with the election of a new president and the formation of a new government, and it cannot become complete except after the election of a new parliament, which would enable constitutional institutions to address the problems and challenges facing Lebanon,” the minister went on to say. As for security, Mashnouq reassured that “the situation is under control and there are no security concerns regarding the elections.” “Security agencies proved their competency during the latest municipal and mayoral polls,” he added. While al-Mustaqbal Movement has rejected that the electoral law be fully based on the proportional representation system, arguing that Hizbullah's arms would prevent serious competition in the party's strongholds, Druze leader MP Walid Jumblat has totally rejected proportional representation, even within a hybrid law, warning that it would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah, Mustaqbal, the Free Patriotic Movement, AMAL Movement and the Lebanese Forces are meanwhile discussing several formats of a so-called hybrid electoral law that mixes proportional representation with the winner-takes-all system. The country has not organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature has instead twice extended its own mandate. The last polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next vote is scheduled for May.

French Health Minister visits Hotel Dieu Hospital: Symbol of common LebaneseFrench humanity cause
Thu 09 Feb 2017/NNA - French Minister of Health and Social Affairs, Marisol Touraine, visited on Thursday evening, along with her accompanying delegation and French Ambassador Emmanuel Bonn, Hotel Dieu Hospital in Ashrafieh where she had a closer look at the new services provided by the Hospital's various departments, as well as the educational and academic exchange programs between Lebanon and France within the medical field. Touraine stressed on the "strength of the relation between France and Hotel Dieu Hospital," noting that her visit is an indication of said relation. Touraine highlighted the need "to further develop bilateral ties between both countries in the medical and health sector," considering that "Hotel Dieu Hospital symbolizes the common humanity cause shared between Lebanon and France.""Humanitarian service and patient care rank amongst the top priorities of a proper society," Touraine underscored. She also stated that "France will develop new legislations to facilitate and assist in the development of the health sector, and is ready to welcome Lebanese students to its universities.""We ought to think about the relationship between Lebanon and France for the future," Touraine concluded.

Frangieh convenes with Sabhan in Bnachii
Thu 09 Feb 2017/NNA - Head of Marada Party, MP Suleiman Frangieh, convened on Thursday with Saudi Minister of State for Arabian Gulf Affairs, Thamer Al-Sabhan, at his Bnachii residence.

Turkish Ambassador meets heads of Lebanese, Turkish associations over bilateral relations
Thu 09 Feb 2017/NNA - Turkish Ambassador to Lebanon, Cagatay Erciyes, met on Saturday at his office with the heads of Lebanese-Turkish associations. Ambassador Erciyes thanked the associations for their positive role in developing the Lebanese-Turkish bilateral relations and in consolidating bonds of brotherhood between the two countries through social and cultural activities. The associations' representatives thanked the diplomat for the developmental programs carried out by the agency of cooperation and coordination in various areas. The delegations also stressed on the special and historical relations between the two countries.

Clash escalates into shooting in Lailaky
Thu 09 Feb 2017/NNA - A squabble on Thursday between men from Zoayter family and others from Raheel family in Beirut's southern suburb (Dahyeh) escalated into a shooting, leaving cars and property in the Lailaky area damaged.

Lebanese, French armies hold military exercises
Thu 09 Feb 2017/NNA - Naval units from the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) and visiting French frigate Montcalm held training exercise off the shore of Beirut seaport. The training is part of the cooperation between the armies of both nations. The exercise included firefighting, aiding wounded people, and lifting gear and personnel from boats via military choppers.

Salary scale a social and economic necessity
Thu 09 Feb 2017/NNA - Deputy Abdul Majid Saleh said that the salary scale will be issued within the 2017 budget, adding that all the political components are in favor of this matter due to its social and economic importance. The Deputy noted that everybody was onboard developing political life and issuing an electoral law.

EU Ambassadors meet with the Minister of Interior and Municipalities to discuss the forthcoming parliamentary elections
Wed 08 Feb 2017/NNA - The Ambassadors of the European Union and EU Member States were received today by Minister of Interior and Municipalities, H.E. Nouhad al-Machnouq, to discuss the advancement of preparations for the forthcoming elections.
The EU Ambassadors stressed that after the election of a president and the formation of a national unity government, the timely, transparent and peaceful holding of parliamentary elections will be another step towards consolidating the normal functioning of democratic institutions in Lebanon. The EU Ambassadors highlighted that the successful holding of municipal elections in May 2016 showed not only the importance that the Lebanese attach to the right to elect and to be elected, but also served as a reminder that Lebanon is in a position of holding peaceful and democratic elections as legally foreseen.The EU and its Member States encouraged all Lebanese parties to engage constructively on the issues of electoral reform and the holding of timely elections. It is of key importance to agree on reforming the existing electoral law in a consensual and inclusive way. While the agreement on a new electoral law could lead to a technical postponement of the elections, it is important that such a possible postponement causes only the shortest delay possible.
The EU remains the largest and most essential donor in Lebanon in the field of electoral reform, providing support to the government to implement reforms, and to civil society to advocate and monitor for a better electoral framework. A new or amended electoral law would provide a good opportunity to introduce reforms of the electoral process such as pre-printed ballot papers and a quota for women as per the recommendations of the 2009 EU Election Observation Mission. The EU highlighted its willingness to continue supporting Lebanon in this regard including by deploying an Election Observation Mission, as stated by the EU High Representative Federica Mogherini during her visit to Lebanon in January 2017.

Hezbollah's war in Aleppo: Victory at any cost, even to civilians
Mona Alami/Middle East Eye/Thursday 9 February 2017
 http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/hezbollahs-aleppo-victory-any-cost-1412427712
 DAHIEH, Lebanon - It was a battle like no other fought by Hezbollah. Commanders were ordered to capture Aleppo at any cost to themselves and the city, and headed to the frontlines preparing their troops for martyrdom.
 When the Syrian city finally fell two months ago, the Lebanese guerilla movement found itself in the role of an occupying army, controlling vast tracts of a shattered urban landscape, justifying its role in the deaths of thousands of civilians and holding together fragile alliances surrounding Syria's president, Bashar al-Assad.
 In interviews with Middle East Eye from the Lebanese stronghold of Dahieh, Hezbollah commanders recounted their roles and experiences in the battle, and what it meant for the future of the organisation.
 "Before the battle, Hezbollah's general secretary, Hassan Nasrallah, instructed 200 of his military commanders to capture the city in a swift battle, even if that meant the loss of 10,000 men," said one of the commanders, going under the name Abou Ali.
 And fighters were willing to respond to the call: "Death is the greatest gift God could bestow upon me," said Abou Ali. Many Hezbollah fighters had already lost their lives in Syria.
 "We increased pressure on the terrorists by slowly diminishing the territory they held," says Abou Ali. "We worked with the Syrians, the Iranians and the Russians directly.”
 "However by the end of the siege, clashes dwindled and there was no real battle in Aleppo, because of the Russian-Iranian-Turkish deal, the opposition did not put in the last days much resistance."
 For Hezbollah, no distinction was made between the political opposition, rebels, Islamic State and al-Qaeda affiliate the Nusra Front, now known as Jabhat Fateh Sham.
 "All of the Syrian opposition are terrorists," argues Abou Ali. "Don’t they visit Tel Aviv or the Gulf capitals?" he asks.
 Hezbollah fighters moved through rebel-held areas in three waves, he said - an offensive team to secure the area, a demining team following in its path and finally, a "Tathbeet" - or "stabilisation" team - that could stay in strategic areas of the city anywhere between two months to two years, says Abou Ali.
 "Hezbollah is operating there not only as a guerilla force but as well as a conventional army," he boasts, adding that his men are trained on the latest Iranian weapons including the Toophan anti-tank missile, the Karrar - or "striker" - armed drone, and heat-seeking missiles.
 And with the capture of Aleppo, Hezbollah has now a presence in Syria’s strategic areas and needs manpower to maintain it. The group has created several major training centres - a total of 120,000 fighters have passed through its training camps, including in Qussayr on the border with Lebanon, said Abou Ali.
 That figure included 80,000 earmarked for a new fighting force. The commander was silent on what that new force - the size of the current British army - was being prepared for.
 Abou Ali’s estimation may nonetheless be an exaggeration. A Hezbollah trainer also interviewed by Middle East Eye put the figure at a conservative 10,000 for the Qussayr area.
 "The training takes from three days to several months depending on capabilities ranging from combat, sniper shooting, handling explosives, reconnaissance work, special operations or manning tanks among many others," says the trainer on condition of anonymity.
 Hezbollah’s growing presence in Syria is not without consequences, however. Sources close to the organisation report increasing clashes and growing resentment from Syrian officers toward Hezbollah fighters.
 Yet, Abou Ali attributes the mistrust between the two parties to Syrian soldiers abandoning their positions during battle. "Syrian soldiers are mistreated by their superiors, which translates into a lack of loyalty to the army. Things are now looking much better though, with the military institution being restructured," he adds.
 Clashes were not limited however to their Syrian counterparts. Abou Ali's comrade, who calls himself Abu Hassan, said that there had been battles with Iranian forces and Hezbollah, although they are rarer.
 "There was a recent incident in Tell Eiss, when a disagreement between Hezbollah fighters and Iranian forces over their insufficient backing during battle escalated into a bloody confrontation when a Hezbollah fighter called Zulfikar killed several Iranians," said Abu Hassan.
 Abou Ali’s view of Russia's involvement is tempered with pragmatism: "Moscow is not our ally but a faction involved like us in the war. It is the partner of President Assad, but like any other country it has its own agenda, and our agendas meet for now in Syria," he said.
 Russia provides Hezbollah with air support, as well as intelligence gathering, according to the commander.
 With Iran, Hezbollah’s relation is symbiotic as they are at "one with one another", says Abou Ali.
 And with Iran’s help, Hezbollah is also expanding its footprint across the region: namely Iraq.
 "We have deployed experts in Mosul as well as trainers but have no fighters on the ground," he says.
 Civilians die in every war. Ask France about what they did in Algeria, ask Israel about what they did in Lebanon
 "Hezbollah experts are also present in the Quneitra region alongside Iranians who have deployed soldiers there," says Abou Ali.
 Quneitra lies on the border of the Golan Heights, a plateau located in south-western Syria, which has a strategic significance. Israel seized the Golan Heights from Syria in the 1967 War.
 For Iran and Hezbollah, the war in Syria is existential, as the fall of the regime would mean the end of the "sacred" alliance between Dahieh, Tehran and Damascus.
 And finally, on the subject of civilian deaths in Aleppo under months of government and Russian bombing and ground assault, Abou Ali has no regrets - the deaths have been sidelined under the label of the "war on terror".
 "Civilians die in every war. Ask France about what they did in Algeria, ask Israel about what they did in Lebanon."
 The last comment is followed by a heavy silence as the small group around him ponders on the fact that Hezbollah now needs to invoke war crimes committed by its staunch enemy in Lebanon to justify the validity of its endless war in Syria

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 09-10/17
United Nations preparing invitations to Syria peace talks
AFP, United Nations Thursday, 9 February 2017/UN envoy Staffan de Mistura will send invitations to Syria peace talks in the coming days, the UN spokesman said Wednesday – seemingly allowing the opposition to bypass a deadline to agree on its negotiators.
De Mistura had warned the opposition that he would pick their delegates to the talks opening in Geneva on February 20 if they could not decide by Wednesday on who would represent them. The envoy however appears to have backtracked on the ultimatum.
Also read: Fierce fighting 20km from ISIS bastion in Syria. “The invitations will go out in the coming days,” UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric told reporters. “We all know that these processes are rather complex, demand a lot of discussion and consultation with various people.”“So Mr De Mistura and his team are continuing on that track.” De Mistura’s threat to appoint the negotiating team drew a sharp response from the opposition, which said it was not the UN envoy’s “business” to pick delegates to peace talks.

Russia to give Syrian army high-precision weapons
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report/February 08/17
Moscow signaled on Wednesday, February 8, that it has started - or is about to start - supplying precision weapons to the Syrian military in order to boost its capabilities against the Islamic State organization. It came in an announcement by Ilyas Umakhanov, deputy chairman of the Russian Federation Council, who said, "Russia will continue an asymmetrical response (to terrorism) in Syria, which may include the regrouping of forces and means…and of course the supply of high-precision weapons to the Syrian government." He added that “It is impossible to defeat terrorism only by efforts of one country. Terrorism has assumed a global character and, having achieved obvious victory in one place, there is no reason to create additional vacuums where terrorists can resume military operations.”
It is clear that Umakhanov was referring to two main topics:
1. Military cooperation by the US, Russia, Syria and Turkey in the war against ISIS, with the first signs already visible on the fronts in northern and eastern Syria.
2. Russian estimation of the need to supply the Syrian military with the most advanced weapons to ramp up its capabilities to the same level as those of the other militaries taking part in the war against ISIS in Syria.
According to Russian media reports on Feb. 8, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said recently that more than 160 types of advanced weapons have been tested in the course of Moscow’s military intervention in Syria, which started in September 2015. The reports did not specify where or when Shoigu made the comment.
debkafile’s military and intelligence sources reveal the types of weapons that the Russians have decided to send the Syrian army.
They include small drones armed with precision bombs; shoulder-fired, laser-guided antitank and antiaircraft missiles; “loitering munitions” which follow their targets after being dropped from planes; small unmanned vehicles for clearing tunnels; advanced night vision equipment; laser and infrared sights; intelligence systems for locating targets; and long-range sniper rifles.
Loitering munitions combine the traits of missiles, drones and bombs. They are dropped from a plane and then controlled by a soldier on the ground or in the air. They can fly for many hours as long as they have enough fuel and electricity. The munitions use a GPS system to show their precise location, and are usually fitted with a video camera which shows targets in real time in high resolution, even in poor weather conditions or at night, via remote control.
As soon as the target is identified, the bomb is directed to its target, such as the window of a building, an armored vehicle or a group of fighters. In addition to the target, all of the bomb’s sensors are destroyed when the bomb explodes.
Russia’s announcement was a complete surprise to the highest levels of the Israeli government and military. During the six years of the Syrian civil war, the IDF, particularly its intelligence bodies and its air force, made great efforts to prevent the flow of such precision weapons to the Syrian military and to the Iranian and Hizballah forces in Syria.
But now that the Russians have announced that they will provide those weapons to the Syrian military, it is obvious that some of the arms are bound to fall into the hands of the Iranians and Hizballah.

There’s One Thing Pope Francis Wants Christians To Give Up For Lent And Trump may want to consider it.

Antonia Blumberg/The Huffington Post/February 09/17/
In his Lenten address, Pope Francis urged Christians to give up the “love of money” and care for their fellow human beings. Many Christians and casual Lent observers give up things like chocolate and Twitter for the 40-day fast before Easter. But Pope Francis has something else in mind for this year’s fast.In his Lenten message, released by the Vatican on Tuesday, the pontiff urged Christians to abandon “the love of money” that leads to indifference towards other people. “Instead of being an instrument at our service for doing good and showing solidarity towards others, money can chain us and the entire world to a selfish logic that leaves no room for love and hinders peace,” the pope said. Francis used the harrowing Biblical parable of the rich man and Lazarus to illustrate the dangers of forsaking the poor and vulnerable in favor of power and wealth. The parable presents the character of Lazarus, who is poor and ill, feeding off the crumbs of the rich man’s table. The unnamed rich man, by contrast, drapes himself in fine robes and lives like a god on Earth. Both men eventually die. And when they meet in the afterlife, their roles have reversed. The rich man is humbled by the realization of his greed and wishes to warn others leading similarly sumptuous lives of the false security their wealth affords them. “At the root of all his ills was the failure to heed God’s word,” Pope Francis said. “When we close our heart to the gift of God’s word, we end up closing our heart to the gift of our brothers and sisters.” The pope has frequently criticized the “idolatry of money,” even at times directing his attacks at Catholic leaders. “The devil,” he told bishops last fall, “has two weapons: the main one is division; the other is money.”
Even the scourge of global terrorism is fueled by the lust for money and power, Francis told reporters last year. The pontiff’s statements reminding Christians to think of the poor and marginalized before their pocketbooks occasionally seem directed at one singularly wealthy and powerful person: President Donald Trump. Days after Trump signed a sweeping order dramatically restricting the number of refugees and foreign nationals allowed to enter the United States, Francis called on his flock to pray that the “poor, refugees, and marginalized” would find “welcome and comfort in our communities.” He mentioned “skyscrapers” and “real estate deals” ― two things the president is intimately acquainted with ― among the things that lead Christians away from helping others.
“We live in cities that throw up skyscrapers and shopping centers and strike big real estate deals but they abandon a part of themselves to marginal settlements on the periphery,” he said in the video published on February 2. “The result of this situation is that great sections of the population are excluded and marginalized: without a job, without options, without a way out. Don’t abandon them.” This Lent, Francis said, Christians should choose a different path: “Let us pray for one another so that, by sharing in the victory of Christ, we may open our doors to the weak and poor.”

Iraqi Hezbollah leader killed
By Staff writer Al Arabiya News English Thursday, 9 February 2017/The secretary of Iraqi Shiite militia Kataib Hezbollah (Hezbollah Brigades) has been killed according to Iraqi security source. Bassem al-Mousawi died of wounds at a hospital in central Basra after attackers boarding a pickup truck shot at his vehicle, seriously wounding him and another companion, Gen Raid Hamrani, who was quoted by local news outlets. Nobody has so far claimed responsibility for the attack. Kataib Hizbollah is a part of Hashd al-Shaabi (Popular Mobilization) militias. The group was founded in 2010 and has ties with Lebanese influential militia Hezbollah enjoy generous support from Iran in terms of finances and training, according to many reports. The United States brands Kataib Hizbollah as a terrorist group.
 Last Update: Thursday, 9 February 2017 KSA 11:52 - GMT 08:52
 
US may sanction Iran over Yemen, Hezbollah and Iraq
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Thursday, 9 February 2017/The new United States administration, under President Donald Trump, is believed to be exerting pressure for imposition of new sanctions against Iran in response to their activities in the Middle East and fueling instability in the region. The administration is said to be studying several aspects for the sanctions, which one includes the Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and their meddling in other countries in the region, specifically Syria and Iraq. US officials were cited by Reuters news agency and the New York Times on Wednesday as saying that the Trump administration is considering a proposal for sanctions that mentions the Revolutionary Guards on the list of terrorist organizations, alongside the Muslim Brotherhood. The plan to place sanctions on Iran has strong support within the White House. It is expected that the final plan will reviewed by US Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson. Many US officials have accused the Revolutionary Guards of supporting proxy wars in the Middle East.
 Hezbollah, Houthis and Iraq
 The next step may be to impose sanctions on Iran for its support to some terrorist groups. A senior US official involved in the review of policy towards Tehran revealed that the new administration considers Iran a threat to US interests and is looking for ways to put pressure on them. The official added that the White House could revoke the nuclear deal to punish Tehran for its support to groups in the Middle East such as Lebanon’s Hezbollah and the Houthis in Yemen besides other Shiite organizations in Iraq. Trump has said that the Iran nuclear deal, which ended a diplomatic standoff between Iran and six world powers over the country’s nuclear policy and opens the way for western investment, was “the worst deal ever negotiated.”
 
Is Trump Preparing An Anbush
Michael Wilner/Jerusalem Post/February 09/17
WASHINGTON – Knesset authorization of a land law in Area C of the West Bank — which is outside its purview — sparked outrage worldwide this week, but drew virtual silence from the White House, where the president’s team is preparing for a critical visit from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday. The Trump administration had two convenient excuses to defer comment: The prime minister’s upcoming visit and the likelihood that the bill will die on arrival at Israel’s High Court, which has ruled repeatedly against Knesset jurisdiction in the Palestinian territories.  Trump officials were aware that this legislation was in the works throughout the presidential transition period, prompting outgoing President Barack Obama to condemn Israeli lawmakers and reconsider his stance at the UN Security Council on settlement activity. They knew this bill was coming down the pipe when Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman suggested in December that a vote should be deferred until after Donald Trump’s inauguration on January 20. Liberman made this suggestion based on the assumption that Trump, once in office, would allow the move to go unpunished. But that assumption no longer holds water. Given the law would retroactively legalize roughly 4,000 units, its enforcement would amount to a rebuke of the Trump administration, now that the White House has called on the Israeli government to cease the construction of new settlements or the expansion of existing ones.That statement, originally made to The Jerusalem Post, shocked Israelis and Americans alike who expected leniency from the new president on the settlement matter. But Trump administration officials were hoping for time and space to formulate their policy on settlements before Netanyahu’s visit. A relentless stream of developments may be affecting that policy-making process. Trump plans to sit Netanyahu down on February 15 for a “long conversation” focused on Middle East peace, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer says – not specifically on Iran, as surely Netanyahu would prefer. The Trump administration has vowed a publicly respectful relationship with the Israeli government and people. But Netanyahu may be walking into a similar meeting as he did in 2009 when he first met with Obama in the Oval Office – and found himself caught off guard by that administration’s policy ideas, including a total freeze on settlement activity. That 2009 meeting was dubbed “the ambush” in Israel, as Netanyahu had no forewarning of Obama’s dramatic request. With Trump officials expressing concern with settlements, strong interest in a peace process and frustration with Israel’s recent actions, the prime minister may be in for another surprise.
 Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin
 
Israel Strikes Syrian Position after 'Stray' Tank Shell
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 09/17/The Israeli army said it struck a Syrian army position on the Golan heights late Wednesday to retaliate for a tank shell that landed on the Israeli side of the zone's demarcation line. The shell was probably a stray round that came from the fighting in Syria and did not cause any casualties, Israeli military officials said.The Israeli army responded by targeting a "government position" on the Syrian side of the Golan, they said. Israel seized 1,200 square kilometers (460 square miles) of the Golan from Syria in the Six-Day War of 1967 and later annexed it in a move never recognized by the international community. Around 510 sq. km. of the Golan are under Syrian control. The two countries are still technically at war, though the border had remained largely quiet for decades until 2011, when the Syrian conflict broke out. The Israeli side of the border is sporadically hit by what are usually deemed to be considered stray rounds, and Israel has recently taken to firing in retaliation.

Fierce Fighting 20 Kilometers from IS Bastion in Syria
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 09/17/Fierce fighting took place on Wednesday between jihadist militants and U.S.-backed Syrian rebels just 20 kilometers (12 miles) from the Islamic State's self-proclaimed capital of Raqa, an AFP reporter saw.
On Saturday, the rebels -- a coalition of Arab and Kurdish fighters known as the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) -- announced a new phase in a bid to capture Raqa, and mounted an attack from north and northeast. An AFP reporter at Bir Fawaz, 20 km north of Raqa, heard machine-gun fire all day Wednesday as SDF attacked IS positions in the neighboring village of Maayzila. The village also came under repeated attack by at least three anti-IS coalition warplanes, and heavy smoke could be seen billowing from there. "There has been heavy fighting since the morning. Many IS fighters are holed up inside Maayzila," the local SDF commander, Ararat Kojer, told AFP. Twelve villages have fallen to the rebels in the latest phase of the offensive, which was launched on November 6. "Progress is slow because IS are putting up a ferocious resistance and placed mines around the approaches to many villages," Rami Abdel Rahman of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which is monitoring the conflict, told AFP. The SDF, which has been lobbying for weapons to help them carry out the offensive, has recently received armored SUVs from the United States. A U.S.-led coalition has been carrying out air strikes on IS in Syria and neighboring Iraq since 2014. The SDF's offensive is being supported by 500 US troops, including demining teams, military trainers and members of the special forces. Earlier Wednesday, a spokesman for the coalition predicted that the IS bastion would soon be almost cut off. Although it will not be completely encircled, "it will be very difficult to get into or out of the city," Colonel John Dorrian said in a video conference from Baghdad. "What we would expect is that within the next few weeks the city will be nearly completely isolated," Dorrian said. U.S.-backed Iraqi forces have wrested part of the Iraqi city of Mosul from IS control, although the city's western districts have yet to be retaken. Raqa is the coalition's next big objective. But the issue of who exactly will carry out the assault has not yet been worked out. Turkey has expressed interest in taking part in the operation, with Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu indicating that his country is ready to deploy special forces to take part in the battle. Turkey opposes giving added weight to SDF, viewing it as little more than a front for the Kurdish YPG militant group, which Ankara considers a terror organization.

U.S. Says It Killed Veteran Qaida Leader in Syria
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 09/17/The U.S. military said Wednesday that it had killed eleven al-Qaida operatives, including a veteran leader and suicide bombing pioneer, in a bombing raid in Syria. The Pentagon said Abu Hani al-Masri, the Qaida veteran, was one of those killed in the precision airstrikes near Idlib carried out on February 3-4. Al-Masri was an early official in al-Qaida, overseeing the group's training camps in Afghanistan in the 1980s and 1990s as he worked with Qaida founder Osama bin Laden and current leader Ayman al-Zawahiri. There "he recruited, indoctrinated, trained and equipped thousands of terrorists who subsequently spread throughout the region and the world," the Pentagon said in a statement. They said he also helped found Egyptian Islamic Jihad "he first Sunni group to use suicide bombers in their terror attacks.""These strikes disrupt al-Qaida's ability to plot and direct external attacks targeting the U.S. and our interests worldwide," said Pentagon spokesman Jeff Davis. The U.S. has mostly focused its attacks in Syria on the Islamic State group. But in recent months, U.S. forces have also launched several attacks against its al-Qaida rivals. Idlib province is largely occupied by the former Syrian branch of al-Qaida, Fateh al-Sham, which has been allied to several Syrian rebel groups fighting the government.

Syria Rebel Fire Kills Three in Red Crescent Center
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 09/17/Rebel fire on an aid distribution center in Syria's Aleppo city has killed three people, including a Red Crescent volunteer and a child, a monitor said Thursday. The Syrian Arab Red Crescent (SARC) and the International Committee of the Red Cross confirmed the volunteer's death in Wednesday's incident. "One SARC staff member was killed. Seven SARC volunteers and staff were injured, three of them severely," a statement said. "Two beneficiaries who had come to the center to receive humanitarian aid also died, and several others were injured." The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor identified those two killed as a woman and a child. The rocket fire hit a SARC distribution center in the Hamdaniyah neighborhood of the city, which was fully recaptured by government forces in December after a months-long siege and heavy fighting. The Observatory also reported five children were killed Wednesday when unexploded ordnance detonated in the Bustan al-Qasr neighborhood, a rebel-held district recaptured by government forces in December. Families who fled formerly rebel-held east Aleppo during the fighting in December, or earlier, have been returning to devastated neighborhoods like Bustan al-Qasr to start the slow work of rebuilding. Syrian government forces have carried out operations to clear explosives from east Aleppo and authorities have encouraged civilians to return to their homes. Aleppo was once Syria's economic powerhouse and a tourist draw for its ancient markets and famed citadel. But it was ravaged by fighting from mid-2012, when rebels seized the eastern portion of the city. Years of conflict ended after a devastating siege and heavy assault saw government forces reclaim full control of Aleppo on December 22. More than 310,000 people have been killed since the Syrian conflict began with anti-government demonstrations in March 2011.

Two Palestinians Killed in Egypt after Rocket Fire on Israel
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 09/17/An Israeli air strike killed two Palestinians on the Egyptian side of the border with Gaza early Thursday following rocket fire from the area into Israel, the territory's Islamist rulers Hamas said. Israel denied it had carried out any strikes over the border into Egypt's restive Sinai Peninsula in response to the rockets, which caused no casualties. The spokesman of Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry, Ashraf al-Qudra, named the two men killed as Hossam al-Sufi, 24, and Mohammed al-Aqra, 38.
Their deaths came just hours after a volley of rockets fired from the Sinai targeted the Israeli Red Sea resort of Eilat, a rare assault from Egypt, which is one of just two Arab states that have signed a peace treaty with Israel. Three rockets were intercepted by Israel's Iron Dome air defense system and a fourth fell short of the town. The Sinai is a stronghold of jihadists loyal to the Islamic State group who have waged a long-running insurgency against the Egyptian security forces but attacks on Israel are rare. In the past, a labyrinth of smuggling tunnels linked the Sinai with Gaza. But since the 2013 overthrow of Islamist president Mohammed Morsi after a single year in power, Egyptian authorities have moved to destroy them and have set up a wide no-go zone on the Gaza border. Qudra said five people were also wounded in what he said was an Israeli strike. Israeli army chief spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Peter Lerner said: "Military officials denied Israel Defense Force involvement in the reported strike."Under the 1979 peace treaty between Egypt and Israel, there are restrictions on military deployments on the Sinai border monitored by international peacekeepers.But since the jihadists launched their deadly insurgency in the wake of Morsi's ouster, Egypt has poured troops and police into the peninsula with the blessing of Israel and Western governments. Hundreds of Egyptian security personnel have been killed, particularly in the north Sinai near the Gaza border. There have been periodic attacks into Israel. In 2011, assailants who came from the Sinai killed eight Israelis in a triple ambush north of Eilat. Pursuing Israeli forces killed seven attackers and five Egyptian police. In 2013, four jihadists were killed by an Egyptian air strike as they were about to fire a rocket at Israel, according to the Egyptian military. And in 2014, two patrolling Israeli soldiers were wounded by unidentified men who fired an anti-tank weapon from the Sinai during an attempted drug-smuggling operation, according to the Israeli military. In 2015, rockets fired from Sinai hit southern Israel without causing casualties. IS claimed responsibility.

Explosion at French Nuclear Plant, No Contamination Risk
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 09/17/An explosion at a nuclear power station in northern France on Thursday caused minor injuries but happened outside the plant's nuclear zone and posed no risk of contamination, authorities said. "It is a significant technical event but it is not a nuclear accident," senior local official Olivier Marmion told AFP following the blast at the Flamanville plant 25 kilometers west of Cherbourg.

Putin, Erdogan Agree to Up Coordination after Russia Raid Kills 3 Turks in Syria
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 09/17/Three Turkish soldiers were accidentally killed and 11 wounded on Thursday when a Russian war plane struck a building in Syria where the troops were deployed, the Turkish army said. The plane had been seeking to hit targets of Islamic State (IS) jihadists but "by accident three of our heroic soldiers were martyred when a building was bombed where our units were," it said. Russian President Vladimir Putin had already reached out to Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan to express his "sadness and condolences." "Russian officials have said that the incident was an accident and have passed on their sadness and condolences," the army said, adding an investigation is being carried out by both sides. It said that of the 11 injured, one was badly wounded.
In Moscow, the Kremlin said Putin had offered Erdogan his condolences and that the leaders had "agreed to enhance military coordination" going forward in the fight against IS in Syria. Turkey on August 24 began an unprecedented campaign inside Syria against IS and Kurdish militia which initially made rapid progress but has become mired in a deadly fight for the IS held town of Al-Bab since December. While Turkey gave no details over the location of the deadly incident, Moscow said that it took place around Al-Bab where Russian forces have also been conducting air strikes. Before Thursday's casualties were reported, the Dogan news agency said 66 Turkish soldiers have now been killed in the Syria operation since it began in August, mostly in attacks by IS. Turkey and Russia have been on sharply opposing sides in the Syria conflict, with Moscow supporting the regime of President Bashar Assad but Ankara pushing for his ouster as the key to peace. Relations reached a dangerous low in November 2015 when Turkish warplanes shot down a Russian fighter jet over the Syrian border. But a normalization deal was reached over the summer and the two sides have been working ever more closely over the Syrian conflict. They secured a deal to evacuate Syrians from Aleppo after the city was retaken by Assad backed by his Russian allies. The two sides have since backed a process in the Kazakh capital Astana to search for peace to end the almost six-year civil war in Syria. Meanwhile, separate operations by Turkey and Assad's forces, backed by Moscow, were trapping the jihadists inside Al-Bab. Al-Bab has been besieged since Monday, when Assad's forces advancing from the south cut off a road leading into the town.

Israeli Settlers in West Bank Top 421,000
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 09/17/The number of Israeli settlers living in the occupied West Bank surged past 421,000 in 2016, a settler group said Thursday. The Yesha council said the number of settlers in the territory had grown by 3.9 percent since 2015, twice the rate of population growth inside Israel.Its figures exclude residents of settlements in annexed east Jerusalem, home to more than 200,000 Israelis. It said growth had slowed slightly since 2012 because of building freezes by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government under international pressure, particularly from the Obama administration. The Israeli parliament passed a law Monday allowing the Jewish state to expropriate private Palestinian land for Jewish settler outposts. The law prompted international outcry -- although U.S. President Donald Trump's administration was conspicuously silent. It legalizes dozens of wildcat outposts and thousands of settler homes in the occupied West Bank. Settlement watchdog Peace Now said it covers over 50 rogue outposts built on at least 800 hectares (2,000 acres) of Palestinian private land. International law considers all settlements to be illegal, but Israel distinguishes between those it has authorized and those built without official permission. Most of the international community considers settlements an obstacle to peace between Israel and the Palestinians.

Palestinian Gunman Wounds Six Israelis near Tel Aviv

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 09/17/Six Israelis were wounded Thursday when a Palestinian man stabbed and shot at market-goers in central Israel, police said. The attack in the city of Petah Tikva, outside Tel Aviv, was carried out by a Palestinian assailant, Israeli police said, calling it a "terrorist" attack. Police said initial indications were the attacker, 19, was from the Nablus governorate in the north of the occupied West Bank. The man was arrested uninjured while still carrying the gun, they added. The wounded were taken to hospital, with none of their injuries described as life threatening.The United Hatzalah medical group said one man was beaten by the crowd who had apparently mistaken him for the attacker. Since a wave of violence broke out in October 2015, more than 250 Palestinians, 41 Israelis, two Americans, a Jordanian, an Eritrean and a Sudanese have died. Most of the Palestinians killed were carrying out knife, gun or car-ramming attacks, according to Israeli authorities, with others were killed during protests, in clashes or Israeli air raids on Gaza. The rate of attacks has declined significantly in recent months.

Mass Graves Found in Western Iraq
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 09/17/Iraqi soldiers have discovered two shallow graves containing the bodies of people executed by the Islamic State group in the western desert town of Rutba, officials said Thursday. "The Iraqi army found two mass graves in Rutba containing the bodies of members of the security forces and of civilians," a captain in the army's 1st division told AFP. He said the first indications suggested the victims had been executed by IS when the jihadist group took control of the town in mid-2014. Rutba, a small town of significant strategic value, lies on the road to Jordan, about 390 kilometers (245 miles) west of Baghdad. The mayor of the town, which was retaken from IS in May last year, said one grave was found on a plot in a central neighborhood that had been used to dump hospital waste while the other was located on Rutba's southern edge. "The bodies we have seen have bullet impacts... We don't know the exact number of bodies because we are leaving this work to a forensic team but we expect there are about 25," Imad Meshaal said. Rutba is very isolated in the desert of Anbar, a vast western province that has long been a Sunni insurgent stronghold and has borders with Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria. IS militants have attacked the town several times since the security forces retook control of it. Dozens of mass graves have been found across areas of Iraq that IS seized in 2014 and have since been retaken by the security forces.

Canada's Trudeau to Visit the White House Monday
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 09/17/U.S. President Donald Trump will host the Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in Washington Monday, the White house said, amid stark disagreements between the North American neighbors over trade and immigration."President Trump and Prime Minister Trudeau look forward to a constructive conversation on strengthening the relationship between our two nations," press secretary Sean Spicer said in a statement.

U.S. General Says NATO Has Shortfall of Troops in Afghanistan
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 09/17/The commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan said Thursday that the coalition had a shortfall of a "few thousands" of troops in the country. General John Nicholson was testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee about the force training and advising Afghan troops in the fight against the Taliban. NATO now has about 13,300 troops in the country, about half of them from the United States. Nicholson said he had raised the shortfall with his superiors in the military, including with Defense Secretary James Mattis, and that the issue will also be on the agenda at a meeting of NATO defense ministers next week in Brussels, he said.U.S.-led NATO troops stopped leading patrols and stepped into an advisory and support role at the end of 2014.But Afghan army and police forces face continual assaults from a well-funded and well-armed Taliban, with casualties in their ranks up 35 percent last year compared to 2015, according to a US government report. Allegations over Russia and Iran's deepening ties with the Taliban have ignited concerns of a renewed "Great Game" of proxy warfare in Afghanistan that could undermine U.S.-backed troops and push the country deeper into turmoil. Nicholson reiterated those concerns before the Senate committee. "I do remain concerned about the influence of certain external actors particularly Russia, Pakistan and Iran," he said. This influence, he said, continues "to legitimize and support the Taliban and undermine the afghan effort to create a stable Afghanistan."

Canada: Statement by Minister of Foreign Affairs on adoption of Regulation Law
February 9, 2017 - Ottawa, Ontario - Global Affairs Canada
The Honourable Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Foreign Affairs, today issued a statement following the adoption by the Israeli Knesset of the Settlement Regulation Law:
“As a steadfast friend and ally of Israel, Canada is deeply concerned by the announced expansion of settlements and the retroactive legalization of settlers’ outposts, which are illegal under international law.
“The passing of the ‘Settlement Regulation’ Law, which allows for the legalization of settlements built on privately owned land, is unhelpful to the advancement of the peace process in the region. Canada calls on all parties to refrain from unilateral actions that prejudge the outcome of direct negotiations and jeopardize the prospects for a two-state solution.
Canada has a long-standing commitment to the goal of a comprehensive, just and lasting peace, including Israel’s right to live in peace with its neighbours within secure boundaries and free of terrorism, and the creation of a sovereign, viable Palestinian state.”

Canada witnesses population jump due to immigrants
 AFP, Montreal Thursday, 9 February 2017/Thanks to a large influx of immigrants, Canada had the largest population growth of all Group of Seven countries over the past five years, government statistics showed Wednesday. The first data available from last year’s census shows that Canada now has a population of more than 35 million – 1.7 million (or five percent) more than in the 2011 census. About two-thirds of this population increase can be attributed to immigration, with natural population growth representing the other third, according to Statistics Canada. “In the coming years, population growth in Canada is projected to be increasingly linked to migratory increase rather than natural increase, mainly because of low fertility and an aging population,” the statistics agency said.
 In the fall, the government set a ceiling on immigration at 300,000 people a year. The birth rate in Canada hit 1.6 children per woman in 2016, as compared with 2.9 children per woman in the mainly Inuit territory of Nunavut, which recorded the highest rate of population growth of all Canadian provinces and territories at 12.7 percent. Canada had already led the G7 in terms of population growth for the previous periods of 2001-2006 and 2006-2011. The three largest cities in Canada are Toronto at 5.9 million, Montreal at four million and Vancouver at 2.4 million.

Egypt FM: Relations with Saudi Arabia ‘deeply rooted’
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Thursday, 9 February 2017/Egypt's Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry stressed that relations with Saudi Arabia are strong and “deeply rooted”, denying claims of tensed ties between Cairo and Riyadh. Shoukry said both countries are able to carry on with positive relations, as he spoke during a press conference in Amman, adding that communication channels between both countries had never closed, as quoted by AhramOnline. Last year, just before Kins Salman’s trip to Egypt, Shoukry said that Saudi Arabia and Egypt have coordinated efforts in combatting multiple issues, especially on security. Saudi Arabia signed a $20 billion deal last year to finance Egypt’s petroleum needs for the next five years and a $1.5 billion deal to develop its Sinai region.

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 09-10/17
The Islamic Jihad and Peace with Jews
 Bassam Tawil/Gatestone Institute/February 09/17
 https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9891/islamic-jihad-jews
 On the face of it, the anti-normalization campaign appears driven by political motivations. However, it turns out that there is also a powerful Islamic angle to this campaign of hate, which is aimed at delegitimizing Israel and demonizing Jews.
 The Palestinian anti-normalization "enforcers" do their utmost to conceal the Islamic aspect of their campaign. They are not eager for the world to know that Islam supplies much of the ideology and justification for their anti-Israel activities.
 Fatwas (Islamic religious decrees) and statements issued by leading Muslim scholars and clerics have long warned Muslims against normalization with the "Zionist entity." Such normalization, they have made it clear, is considered an "unforgivable crime." The authors of these hate messages are not opposed to normalization with Israel because of settlements or house demolitions, but rather because they believe Jews have no rights at all to any of the land.
 In 1989, more than 60 eminent Muslim scholars from 18 countries ruled that it was forbidden for Muslims to give up any part of Palestine.
 The vicious campaigns to boycott Israel and Jews, while political in dress, are in fact deeply rooted in Islamic ideology.
 These campaigns are patently not a legitimate protest. They are not even part of an effort to boycott Israeli products or politicians and academics. The real goal of the campaigns is revealed in the words of the Muslim leaders: that Jews have no rights whatsoever to the land, and must be targeted through jihad as infidels and enemies of all Muslims and Arabs
 Settlements, checkpoints and fences are irrelevant; Muslim scholars want Jews off what they define as sacred Muslim land. Supporters of BDS and the anti-normalization movement would do well to consider this fact. Failing to do so is tantamount to aiding and abetting Muslims to destroy Israel, and kill as many Jews as possible in the process.
 Muslim scholars have feverishly citing chapter and verse from the Quran and the hadith, the words of the Prophet Mohammed, in their efforts to encourage Arabs and Muslims to avoid normalization with Jews.
 The Quran and hadith have also been leveraged to promote boycotts against Israel and Jews -- thereby refuting claims by anti-Israel activists that their campaigns are just about politics.
 Palestinians have long maintained that their campaign to ban normalization with Israel is mainly directed against the Israeli "occupation" of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem. The Palestinian anti-normalization movement, which continues to target Israeli and Palestinian peace activists who hold -- horrors! -- public meetings, has in recent years gained momentum, largely thanks to the ongoing anti-Israel campaign of incitement and indoctrination in the Palestinian media and mosques.
 In recent years, Palestinian anti-normalization activists have managed to foil several meetings between Israelis and Palestinians, under the pretext that such encounters cause damage to the Palestinians. The activists justify their disruption by citing what they see as Israeli practices against Palestinians, and violently object to any meetings with Israelis, including those who wholeheartedly support the Palestinians and oppose the policies of the Israeli government.
 The most recent incident occurred at the Ambassador Hotel in East Jerusalem, where Israeli and Palestinian activists gathered to talk about peace and coexistence. Shortly after the meeting began, a number of anti-normalization activists stormed the conference hall to protest the meeting.
 "Meeting with Zionists is an act of treason," one of the protesters shouted. "There are no solutions. Palestinian must be freed, from the (Jordan) River to the (Mediterranean) Sea. Shame on you!"
 The protesters claimed that they were opposed to the meeting because Israel was "demolishing Arab houses and killing Palestinians."
 Palestinian "anti-normalization" activists disrupt an unofficial Israeli-Palestinian peace conference Jerusalem's Ambassador Hotel, in 2104.
 Hind Khoury, a Christian woman who has previously served as Palestinian Authority ambassador to France, received the brunt of their anger. Khoury's attempts to persuade the protesters that the meeting was not about normalization, but about achieving a just and comprehensive peace, fell on deaf ears. Ironically, it was the intervention of the Israeli Police that allowed Israeli and Palestinian activists to proceed with their conference.
 Such scenes have become commonplace at the East Jerusalem hotel, a preferred site for unofficial peace conferences organized by Israelis and Palestinians. Anti-normalization activists raid the conference hall several times a year in their attempts to disrupt such gatherings.
 The anti-normalization activists have also been vocal in Ramallah and other Palestinian cities. The Palestinian newspaper Al Quds, which recently published an interview with Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman, has also come under attack. For these Palestinians, conducting an interview with an Israeli government official is engaging in "media normalization."
 "The newspaper must apologize to the Palestinians," the protesters demanded.
 On the face of it, the anti-normalization campaign appears driven by political motivations. However, it turns out that there is also a powerful Islamic angle to this campaign of hate, which is aimed at delegitimizing Israel and demonizing Jews. The Palestinian anti-normalization "enforcers" do their utmost to conceal the Islamic aspect of their campaign. They are not eager for the world to know that Islam supplies much of the ideology and justification for their anti-Israel activities.
 Fatwas (Islamic religious decrees) and statements issued by leading Muslim scholars and clerics have long warned Muslims against normalization with the "Zionist entity." Such normalization, they have made it clear, is considered an "unforgivable crime."
 The authors of these hate messages are not opposed to normalization with Israel because of settlements or house demolitions, but rather because they believe Jews have no rights at all to any of the land.
 "Normalization with the Zionist enemy means turning the presence of Jews in Palestine to something normal," explained one scholar, Adnan Adwan. "Normalization means accepting the right of the Zionist entity to Arab lands and Palestine."
 In response to an inquiry from Palestinians about the perspective of Islam regarding peace and normalization with Jews, a group of leading Muslim scholars issued a fatwa stating that this was completely haram (forbidden). They even went farther by ruling that any form of peace with Jews was also haram, despite the fact that Prophet Mohammed signed a treaty, known as the Constitution of Medina, with Jews and other non-Muslims shortly after his arrival at Medina from Mecca in 622 CE.
 In their fatwa, the Muslim scholars wrote: "It is true that Prophet Mohammed signed a treaty with the infidels, including the Quraysh tribe and the Jews, but he did not make concessions that are contrary to Islam." They pointed out that Prophet Mohammed did not strike the deal with the infidels in order to allow them to stay in their homes permanently. Nor did the prophet promise to abandon jihad (holy war) as a result of this treaty, they added in their fatwa. "There is no evidence whatsoever that the Prophet or any of his successors had made peace with infidels controlling Islamic lands," the fatwa clarified.
 To support their argument, the scholars quote verses from the Quran which -- they maintain -- prohibit Muslims from making peace or ever placing their confidence in Jews. One verse which they claim refers to Jews is taken from Surah Al-Anfal (The Spoils of War): "And if they intend to deceive you, then verily, Allah is All-Sufficient for you. He it is Who has supported you with His Help and with the believers." (62) According to the fatwa, this verse from the Quran refers specifically to Jews.
 The scholars continue with another verse from the same Surah Al-Anfal to explain why Muslims must continue to fight against Jews:
 "O Prophet (Mohammed)! Urge the believers to fight. If there are twenty steadfast persons amongst you, they will overcome a two hundred, and if there be a hundred steadfast persons they will overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are people who do not understand." (65)
 Yet a further verse from the Quran is then cited to substantiate their ideology of war against the Jews -- verse 7 from Surah At-Taubah (The Repentance):
 "How can there be a covenant with Allah and with His Messenger for the Mushrikin (polytheists, idolaters, pagans, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah) expect those with whom you made a covenant near Al-Masjid al-Haram (at Makkah)? So long, as they are true to you, stand you true to them. Verily, Allah loves Al-Muttaqun (the pious)."
 According to the fatwa, the "treacherous" Jews have since failed to "repent" (presumably, convert to Islam) and that is why it is forbidden to make peace with them.
 The Muslim scholars also point to several fatwas prohibiting peace and normalization with Jews issued in the past century. The ban dates back to 1935, when a group of Muslim scholars and clerics ruled during a conference in Jerusalem that it was forbidden for Muslims to sell Arab-owned lands to Jews. A year later, scholars from Egypt's Al-Azhar University, one of the first Islamic universities in the Arab world, ruled that it was the duty of all Muslims to engage in jihad "to salvage Palestine." In 1989, more than 60 eminent Muslim scholars from 18 countries ruled that it was forbidden for Muslims to give up any part of Palestine.
 Other Muslim scholars have referred to another verse in the Quran to justify banning normalization with Jews. In Surah Al-Mumtahinah (The Woman to be examined), verse 1 states: "O you who believe! Take not My enemies and your enemies as friends, showing affection towards them, while they have disbelieved in what has come to you of the truth." They also quote the following hadith (a saying attributed to Prophet Mohammed) to support their claim against making peace with Jews: "Those who side with the unjust to assist them in their injustice, while knowing that they are unjust, walk out of Islam."
 The vicious campaigns to boycott Israel and Jews, while political in dress, are in fact deeply rooted in Islamic ideology.
 The anti-normalization activists and those promoting boycotts, divestment and sanctions (BDS) against Israel perceive Jews as the enemies of Allah and Prophet Mohammed. These campaigns are patently not a legitimate protest. They are not even part of an effort to boycott Israeli products or politicians and academics. The real goal of the campaigns is revealed in the words of the Muslim leaders: that Jews have no rights whatsoever to the land, and must be targeted through jihad as infidels and enemies of all Muslims and Arabs.
 Muslim scholars have left no room for doubt about their view of the true nature of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Settlements and checkpoints and fences are irrelevant; Muslim scholars want Jews off what they define as sacred Muslim land. BDS and anti-normalization movement supporters might do well to consider this fact. Failing to do so is tantamount to aiding and abetting Muslims to destroy Israel, and kill as many Jews as possible in the process.
 **Bassam Tawil is a scholar based in the Middle East.
 © 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
 
 Jihadist Groups in the US: What Next?
 Benjamin Weingarten/Gatestone Institute/February 09/17
 https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9908/jihadist-groups-cair
 Meanwhile, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) continues freely to operate in America. In the wee hours of election night 2016, in fact, its Los Angeles office leader called for the overthrow of the U.S. government.
 The Trump administration has stated its commitment to fighting Islamic supremacism, including the Muslim Brotherhood itself.
 To what lengths would America's leaders go to protect a group that the United Arab Emirates (UAE) deemed a terrorist organization?
 A bombshell new report from the Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) reveals the alarming answer.
 It involves a man who in his almost 50 years of public life has done more for America's enemies -- first of the Communist variety and later of the jihadist brand -- than perhaps any other: Iran lobbyist-in-chief John Kerry.
 In the most recent case, he did so in secret, apparently well aware of the political consequences of exposing the potentially catastrophic policy he was pursuing to the light of day.
 As IPT's report details, Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim American Society (MAS) were classified as terrorist groups by the UAE in 2014, as two of the 83 entities identified as such for their ties to the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood.
 Furious at such a charge, CAIR pushed Secretary of State Kerry to lobby on its behalf. Kerry's State Department reportedly complied, meeting with UAE officials regularly to plead CAIR's case.
 State signaled such a stance publicly almost from day one. As IPT notes:
 At a daily State Department press briefing two days after UAE released its list, a spokesman said that State does not "consider CAIR or MAS to be terrorist groups" but that it was seeking more information from UAE about their decision. He added that "as part of our routine engagement with a broad spectrum of faith based organizations, a range of U.S. government officials have met with officials of CAIR and MAS. We at the State Department regularly meet with a wide range of faith based groups to hear their views even if some of their views expressed at times are controversial."
 "Controversial" is an interesting way of describing the views of a group that makes common cause with jihadists and jihadist sympathizers. There is an irony, as IPT recounts:
 Just days before the UAE's 2014 designation of CAIR as a terrorist group in the organization's San Francisco chapter bestowed its "Promoting Justice" award to Sami Al-Arian and his family. Al-Arian secretly ran an American support network for the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) terrorist group in the late 1980s and early 1990s. PIJ was responsible for terrorist attacks which killed dozens of Israelis and several Americans.
 CAIR's jihadi ties are numerous and longstanding, involving not only the links of its founders and present leaders to Hamas, and as critics say, apologists for Islamic terrorism, but also for impeding counterterrorism efforts. Lawyers in a class-action lawsuit representing the family of slain former FBI counterterrorism official John P. O'Neill -- who perished in the 9/11 attacks at the World Trade Center -- named CAIR part of a criminal conspiracy to promote "radical Islamic terrorism," and declared that CAIR has
 "actively sought to hamper governmental anti-terrorism efforts by direct propaganda activities aimed at police, first-responders, and intelligence agencies through so-called sensitivity training. Their goal is to create as much self-doubt, hesitation, fear of name-calling, and litigation within police departments and intelligence agencies as possible so as to render such authorities ineffective in pursuing international and domestic terrorist entities."
 More directly, as jihad expert Daniel Pipes noted in a 2014 expose, "At least seven board members or staff at CAIR have been arrested, denied entry to the U.S., or were indicted on or pled guilty to (or were convicted of) terrorist charge."
 Because of the litany of actions that CAIR has taken on behalf of and in association with Islamic supremacists -- as was unearthed during the Holy Land Foundation trial, which represented the largest terror financing case in U.S. history and in which CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator -- back in 2008 the FBI officially ceased contact with the group.
 During the Obama years, however, groups like CAIR were embraced under the jihad-enabling "countering violent extremism" (CVE) paradigm. CVE outsourced "de-radicalization" efforts to "peaceful Islamist," Muslim Brotherhood-tied groups. CVE was the antithesis of the comprehensive counterjihadist program America required.
 With respect to John Kerry's efforts on behalf of CAIR in particular, the story gets worse:
 In December 2014, CAIR met with top officials of the State Department, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Justice Department, asking them to pressure the UAE to remove them from the list, according to reliable sources intimately familiar with the communications. On December 22, 2014, CAIR issued a press release asserting that "the two American Muslim organizations and the U.S. government pledged to work together to achieve a positive solution to the UAE designations."
 In response to a letter sent by CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad sent to Secretary Kerry protesting the UAE designation, Kerry responded on May 5, 2015 in a letter to Awad stating, "Let me reiterate, first, that the U.S. government clearly does not consider CAIR to be a terrorist organization. As your letter noted, the Department of State rejected this allegation immediately after the UAE designations were announced in November, and we will continue to do so....U.S. officials have raised the issue of CAIR's inclusion on the UAE's terror list with UAE officials on multiple occasions..."
 That portion of the letter now appears on CAIR's website. But at the time that the letter was sent to CAIR, according to knowledgeable sources, there was an agreement between CAIR and the State Department to keep the letter secret. An excerpt from it was posted on CAIR's website only in May 2016, a year after it was received. The IPT has learned that Kerry and CAIR made this agreement to keep the letter secret...to protect Kerry from public embarrassment. In light of CAIR's numerous ties to Hamas and other unsavory aspects of its record, Kerry had good reason to believe that the letter could cause a public relations disaster for him.
 Kerry's efforts proved unsuccessful; the UAE did not budge.
 The lifelong leftist enabler of America's foes, whose public career commenced with propagandistic testimony to the U.S. Senate on the Vietnam War, redounding to the Communist's benefit, and closed with his support for Islamists including CAIR -- not to mention the mullahs in Iran -- never paid a price for such efforts.
 Meanwhile, CAIR continues freely to operate in America. In the wee hours of election night 2016, in fact, its Los Angeles office leader called for the overthrow of the U.S. government.
 The Trump administration has stated its commitment to "eradicating" Islamic supremacism, including challenging the Muslim Brotherhood itself, which represents the tip of the Sunni jihadist spear. This stance is reflected not only in policy speeches delivered during the presidential campaign, but in the testimony, past public remarks and actions of the principal members of President Trump's National Security Council.
 The Muslim Brotherhood may very may very well come under scrutiny in the near-term, as will the efforts of those who oppose the group, as Senator Ted Cruz has re-upped a bill that calls upon the Secretary of State to submit a report on its designation as a foreign terrorist organization.
 That bill's text provides helpful background on just why it is that the Muslim Brotherhood deserves such a classification, noting:
 The many countries that have declared the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization or barred it from operating
 The explicit calls for violent jihad, with the end goal of imposing Islamic law over all the world of the group's founder and spiritual leader Hassan al-Banna, and the consistently violent Islamic supremacist content of the Brotherhood's core membership texts
 The terrorist efforts of numerous jihadist groups explicitly tied to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the efforts of individual Muslim Brotherhood members designated as terrorists by the U.S. government themselves
 The litany of terrorist financing cases involving the Muslim Brotherhood, including the aforementioned Holy Land Foundation case, whereby:
 Department of Justice officials successfully argued in court that the international Muslim Brotherhood and its United States affiliates had engaged in a widespread conspiracy to raise money and materially support the terrorist group Hamas. HLF officials charged in the case were found guilty on all counts in November 2008, primarily related to millions of dollars that had been transferred to Hamas. During the trial and in court documents, Federal prosecutors implicated a number of prominent United States-Islamic organizations in this conspiracy, including the Islamic Society of North America [ISNA], the North American Islamic Trust [NAIT], and the Council on American-Islamic Relations [CAIR]. These groups and their leaders, among others, were named as unindicted co-conspirators in the case.
 According to a July 2008 Justice Department court filing:
 "The mandate of these organizations [ISNA, NAIT and CAIR], per the International Muslim Brotherhood, was to support HAMAS, and the HLF's particular role was to raise money to support HAMAS' organizations inside the Palestinian territories."
 Should the Trump administration challenge the Muslim Brotherhood, it is reasonable to think that it may threaten its offshoots, one of which is the very Islamic organization in CAIR that the Obama administration specifically sought to protect.
 Should CAIR come under fire, it is a safe bet that the Left will close ranks, arguing that conservatives are on a witch hunt akin to the Red Scare to snuff out peaceful Muslims in America.
 Those who wish to triumph over the global jihad must challenge this narrative fearlessly.
 The argument against CAIR and similar groups is simply this: If you aid, abet or enable to jihadists, you will be prosecuted, and swiftly. You are standing with those who wish to kill innocent Americans, and the government's first job is to protect the life and limb of its citizens.
 Efforts to rid America of jihadists, shut down their funding networks and punish those who give them aid and comfort are about defending the homeland against a subversive ideology of conquest that seeks to undermine our Constitutional system and supplant it with a totalitarian one based in Islamic law, Sharia.
 "Liberals" or "Progressives" might seek to use CAIR as a cudgel to argue that "conservatives" wish to trample on the rights of Muslims. The task of the rest of us will be to expose a supposed civil liberties group as a cleverly-designed front for a theocratic, political Islamic supremacist movement that seeks to overtake the civil liberties of all Americans.
 That is all the more reason why it is important to bring it to light.
 © 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
 
 Is Iona Community Sabotaging Itself by Embracing Kairos?
 Denis MacEoin/Gatestone Institute/February 09/17
 https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9811/iona-community
 At the heart of its call for peace and justice, however, lies a profound imbalance. We might say that Ionians, like Quakers and many other Christian groups, are naïve innocents let loose in the real world. There is a role for idealists in limited situations. But problems arise when such do-gooders do not properly understand what lies behind mutual hatred, enduring antagonism between people, and conflicts in the name of one cause or another. And here, the Iona Community falls down spectacularly.
 Kairos is built on an Islamic, not a Christian narrative. Under Islamic law, territory once conquered by Muslim armies becomes sacrosanct and can never be forfeited to non-believers. If non-Muslims take control of formerly Muslim land (for example, Spain or Portugal), then Muslims are bound to reconquer it through renewed military action.
 Kairos, significantly, does not refer to the fact that Jews lived in and ruled in the region long before the Arab conquests.
 When Christians choose to ignore the rights of Jews, they deny their own origins in the land. Jesus was a Jew. The first Christian community was made up of Jews who adhered to Jewish law. All Christian churches recognize the Jewish Bible as part of their own scriptural, and the New Testament is a clear record of Jewish existence in the first Christian century.
 There never was a "historic Palestine", and it is disturbing to find a Christian community buying into the modern Islamic narrative. and the "Palestinian" inhabitants of the Mandate are a combination of the descendants of the 7th-century Arab invaders.
 In Israel, Jewish, Arab, Christian, Druze and other citizens, regardless of race or religion or any other circumstance, have exactly the same rights under law to form political parties, serve in parliament, seek employment. Why does the Iona Community single Israel out?
 Why is the Iona Community seemingly uninterested in the fate of their fellow Christians in the Palestinian territories yet determined to accuse Israel of enormities, when in fact, Israel is the only country in the Middle East where the Christian population, instead of diminishing, has grown since the establishment of the state?
 Why, then, does the Iona Community join forces, not with the people who support Christians but with Palestinian Muslims who seek to destroy Israel and who will, in due course, treat the Christians as badly as they are treated in other Arab Muslim states?
 The Israelis have never stalled in the peace process: they have made offers and the Palestinians have turned them all down. There has never been peace because Israel has no partners for peace. That a so-called Christian organization should misrepresent history in this way is an appalling dereliction of truth and honesty on its part.
 When will the Iona Community come to terms with its far-left bias, its anti-Semitism, its own reputation, and the harm it is doing to any real hope in the Holy Land for peace?
 The Iona Community is a famous ecumenical Christian community with three centers in Scotland, two on the island of Iona in the beautiful Inner Hebrides off the west coast of Scotland and another on the nearby Isle of Mull. But the community is also a far-flung body, with members across the globe. These include people from many denominations, from Presbyterians and Anglicans to Lutherans, Roman Catholics and Quakers, not forgetting members who do not belong to any church.
 Apart from ecumenism and a broad dedication to prayer, meditation, and commitment to its own liturgical practices and Rule, the Community holds it to be central to its ethos that members pursue issues relating to peace and justice. Among other things, its Rule holds:
 that the Gospel commands us to seek peace founded on justice and that costly reconciliation is at the heart of the Gospel;
 that work for justice, peace and an equitable society is a matter of extreme urgency;
 that social and political action leading to justice for all people and encouraged by prayer and discussion is a vital work of the Church at all levels
 Members are enjoined, among other activities, to
 engage in forms of political witness and action, prayerfully and thoughtfully, to promote just and peaceful social, political and economic structures;
 celebrate human diversity and actively work to combat discrimination on grounds of age, colour, disability, mental wellbeing, differing ability, gender, race, ethnic and cultural background, sexual orientation or religion;
 work for the establishment of the United Nations Organisation as the principal organ of international reconciliation and security, in place of military alliances;
 support and promote research and education into nonviolent ways of achieving justice, peace and a sustainable global society;
 work for reconciliation within and among nations by international sharing and exchange of experience and people, with particular concern for politically and economically oppressed nations.
 act in solidarity with the victims of environmental injustice throughout the world, and support political and structural change in our own countries to reduce our over-consumption of resources.
 Apart from a naïve trust in the peace-making powers of the anti-democratic United Nations, this call for social and political action puts members of Iona in a broadly liberal and lightly socialist position. Certainly, its ideals do not much set it apart from the beliefs and standards of other liberal churches. The Iona Community does not seem to engage in down-to-earth work beyond talking, encouraging, meditating, and summoning its dispersed flock to act in line with the prescriptions set out in its Rule. One might see it as a spiritual community that carries on the monastic message preached on the Isle of Iona for centuries during the Middle Ages. That is perfectly agreeable so far as it goes.
 At the heart of its call for peace and justice, however, lies a profound imbalance. We might say that Ionians, like Quakers and many other Christian groups, are naïve innocents let loose in the real world. That may seem harsh. The work of reconciliation does from time bring people together and is certainly preferable to careless violent action. There is a role for idealists in limited situations. But problems arise when such do-gooders do not properly understand what lies behind mutual hatred, enduring antagonism between people, and conflicts in the name of one cause or another. And here, the Iona Community falls down spectacularly.
 In December 2016, Iona published its "Position Statement of the Iona Community on Kairos Palestine". In this 776-word declaration – itself an update of "The Iona Call 2012" – the community stated that "We fully endorse the 2009 Kairos Palestine document A Moment of Truth [A word of faith, hope and love form the heart of Palestinian suffering]. A few lines later, they declare: "We embrace Kairos Palestine's challenge to support Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel, reflecting Palestinian Christian calls to nonviolent resistance to Israeli oppression."
 By declaring this, the community has wittingly or unwittingly stumbled into the grasp of one of the most controversial anti-Israel and anti-Semitic alliances any Christian group could choose to enter. But it will help to examine the Kairos Palestine document. There is no room here for a detailed overview of this notorious summons to the Christian world, but readers can turn to a longer overview. There is also a lengthy document produced by a Protestant and Catholic body entitled, "Cautions to U.S. Churches Regarding the Kairos Palestine Document". The Cautions document begins by saying that "U.S. Churches cannot adopt this narrative without bringing a critical eye and ear to bear upon it and without similarly listening to an Israeli narrative which also has its truth."
 Kairos is built on an Islamic, not a Christian narrative. Under Islamic law, territory once conquered by Muslim armies becomes sacrosanct and can never be forfeited to non-believers. If non-Muslims take control of formerly Muslim land (for example, Spain or Portugal), then Muslims are bound to reconquer it through renewed military action. Southern Syria (out of which Jordan, Israel, the West Bank and Gaza were carved) was conquered in 634 in a series of battles with Byzantine troops, an invasion recorded in detail in Islamic sources.
 Rifat Odeh Kassis, co-author and general coordinator of the Kairos Palestine initiative, is pictured above giving an interview to Al-Manar TV, the official TV channel of Lebanon's Hezbollah terrorist organization. (Photo source: Kairos Palestine)
 In the Kairos document, the land that was southern Syria under a succession of Islamic empires (culminating in the Ottoman empire) is described anachronistically as Palestinian land. Since 93% of Arab "Palestinians" are Muslim and only 3% in Gaza and the West Bank are Christians, the idea that Jews have taken "Palestinian" land does not refer to Christian biblical assumptions but to Muslim claims to priority and absolute right to the territory. There were, in fact, no Muslims in the area (or anywhere, for that matter) until the seventh century, long after King David came to Jerusalem (ca. 1000 BC) and Jesus to Bethlehem. Kairos, significantly, does not refer to the fact that Jews lived in and ruled in the region long before the Arab conquests.
 When Christians choose to ignore the rights of Jews, they deny their own origins in the land. Jesus was a Jew. The first Christian community was made up of Jews who adhered to Jewish law. All Christian churches recognize the Jewish Bible as part of their own scriptural canon, and the New Testament is a clear record of Jewish existence in the first Christian century. It is disconcerting to find the Iona Community accepting the Kairos document's distorted view of history and the use of that distortion to rule out a modern Jewish presence in the Holy Land.
 There are other serious concerns with Kairos. Should Christians not be concerned by the following statement in the Kairos Palestine document?
 "The Palestinian people... also engaged in peaceful struggle, especially during the first intifada."
 Peaceful struggle? The first intifada, like the second and third (the recent "stabbing intifada"), involved massive violence against Israeli civilians and soldiers as well as large-scale attacks on innocent Palestinians by their own death squads.
 One of the authors of the Kairos Palestine document, Theodosias Atallah Hanna, was the Archbishop of Sebastia from the Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem and a former spokesman of the Orthodox Church of Jerusalem and the Holy Land. He is certainly not a man of peace. "The suicide bombers who carry out their activities in the name of religion are national heroes and we're proud of them," he has allegedly said, according to the ASSIST News Service. He also said, in a speech in Dubai, "Some freedom fighters adopt martyrdom or suicide bombing, while others opt for other measures. But all these struggles serve the continued intifada for freedom. Therefore, we support all these causes." (See Gulf News, June 20, 2002. See also here and here.)
 Is the Iona Community blind to facts? To claim to be a community dedicated to peace while upholding a document that praises violence is not what Iona should want to be known for.
 At this juncture, it is time to look closely at Iona's Position Statement on Kairos. This too makes disturbing reading from both a Jewish and Christian point of view. Let us start here:
 We believe that a just peace for Israelis and Palestinians is only possible through ending the 'settler colonial' project of the state of Israel and the establishment throughout historic Palestine of equal rights, irrespective of religious and ethnic background and identity.
 This is flamboyantly not a Christian statement. The use of the phrase "settler colonial" project comes straight from the handbook of the far-left, with distinct echoes of Soviet enmity towards the "imperial and colonialist powers". It is also ridiculous. First, southern Syria and the entire area were themselves colonies of the Ottoman Empire: the creation of Israel, Jordan, and (if it were accepted) a Palestinian state would mean de-colonialization, not the opposite. If Israel had wanted to colonize Gaza or the West Bank, it could have done so when it drove Egypt and Jordan out of their illegal occupation of both territories after both countries started yet another war with it. Building settlements in the West Bank does not breach the original decolonizing terms of the League of Nations Palestine Mandate, which allows for the close settlement of Jews on the Mandate territory (a freedom curtailed by the British Transjordan Memorandum, which created an Arab state (Jordan) closed to Jews, taking 77% of the Mandate.
 It is also worth asking what is meant here by "historic Palestine". This too is not a Christian statement – Christian scriptures and histories do not refer to a place called "Palestine" ­ – it is an invention of Muslim Palestinians. The Bible speaks only of "the Kingdom of Judah", Judaea and Samaria (Shomron in modern Hebrew). Jesus was born "in Bethlehem of Judaea" (Matthew 2:1). There has never been a state of Palestine in history, and the "Palestinian" inhabitants of the Mandate are a combination of the descendants of the 7th-century Arab invaders, some of the Christian inhabitants present when the Muslim armies took control, mixed inhabitants from the Ottoman period, and incomers from Egypt, northern Syria, Transjordan, and Iraq from the late 19th century. There never was a "historic Palestine", and it is disturbing to find a Christian community buying into the modern Islamic narrative.
 Equally thought-provoking is the second part of that opening statement: "the establishment throughout historic Palestine of equal rights, irrespective of religious and ethnic background and identity". What does this mean? In Israel, Jewish, Arab, Christian, Druze and other citizens, regardless of race or religion or any other circumstance, have exactly the same rights under law, to form political parties, serve in parliament, seek employment as judges, doctors, academics, scientists, or teachers, study in the universities, operate their own businesses, join the police force and army, marry anyone, and so on. There may be occasional discrimination in Israel, but never from the top -- Arabs are even exempt from serving in the military unless they wish to -- and there is discrimination in the United States, the UK, France and most other countries, as well. Why does the Iona Community single Israel out?
 And why does Iona Community seem to be ignorant of the fact that non-Muslims have never had equal rights in any Islamic state in history and that in Gaza and the West Bank Christian numbers have been shrinking (as elsewhere in the Middle East) because of the inequalities they face? In 1990, Christians made up a majority of Bethlehem's residents; today they make up only about 15%. Why is the Iona Community seemingly uninterested in the fate of their fellow Christians in the Palestinian territories yet determined to accuse Israel of enormities, when in fact, Israel is the only country in the Middle East where the Christian population, instead of diminishing, has grown since the establishment of the state? According to Jonathan Adelman of the University of Denver,
 By contrast [with elsewhere in the Middle East], the 160,000 Israeli Christians live as citizens in a democratic First World country with freedom of religion, rule of law and open elections. Christians can move anywhere, even building a number of churches recently in Tel Aviv. The government safeguards the Christian holy places and is lenient on the right of return of Christian refugees. Since 1967 Christian, Islamic and Jewish holy sites are open to pilgrims of all religions. The Christian churches own a significant part of Jerusalem, including the land on which the Knesset sits.
 Why, then, does the Iona Community join forces, not with the people who support Christians but with Palestinian Muslims who seek to destroy Israel and who will, in due course, treat the Christians as badly as they are treated in other Arab Muslim states?
 Here is another problem in the Position Statement:
 We oppose any theology which privileges one religion or belief system and discriminates against adherents of others, or provides theological justification for the exclusive right of any group of people to the land. We condemn Christian Zionism in particular as a distortion of the Christian faith, in its abuse of scripture to oppress Palestinian people.
 Where to begin? Is the Iona Community mentally numb to the fact that, out of all the major religions and theologies, it is Islam alone that privileges itself above all others without exception, and it is radical Muslims who call most other Muslims apostates and behead and crucify them? Islamic supremacism, which entails a mission to conquer and rule over the rest of mankind may be found in the Qur'an, the ahadith, relevant sections of Islamic law (shari'a), and throughout the imperial history of Islam. The current wave of Muslim terrorism is simply a renewal of jihad activism that has continued for over fourteen centuries. Non-Muslims are kuffar, infidels who may be killed or enslaved without guilt. Jews and Christians are merely tolerated as "People of the Book", subject to all manner of fiscal and other oppression, whose lives are spared on the payment of a "protection" tax [jizya]. None of this has ever been a secret, yet Iona chooses to condemn, not Islamic discrimination but fellow Christians whose only sin is to care for the Jewish people and the state of Israel.
 As for the view that Jews claim "the exclusive right of any group of people to the land", this flatly contradicts reality. The Jewish people certainly have a right to a homeland in Israel (and, frankly, the West Bank – Judaea and Samaria – too), but they have never insisted that they and only they have the exclusive right to live there. Twenty percent of Israel's population is made up of Muslim and Christian Arabs. Israelis accept that in any future peace deal, something like 98% of the West Bank will be Arab with about 2% for Jews – far fewer than for Arabs in Israel proper. The vast majority of the Palestinian refugees who left Israel in 1948 did so under their own volition or instructions from their leaders, in the course of a war that they themselves had started. There was no Israeli plan to expel the Arab population.
 Since the rejected partition plan of 1947, the Palestinian Arabs have called for the expulsion and even genocide of the Jews. In 2013, Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority president, declared that there would be no Jews in a future Palestinian state. In addition, all Palestinian organizations, from Hamas in Gaza to the PLO, have long ago insisted that their future state will cover all the territory from the river Jordan to the Mediterranean Sea -- without Israel -- and, in their own formulation, no Jews. What is wrong with the Iona Community that it does not know that this has been the situation for about a century?
 Again, the Position Statement distorts the truth horribly:
 Successive, fruitless peace processes have allowed Israel to stall for time as it seeks to complete the takeover of Palestinian land and the forced removal of its inhabitants through its continuing colonial policy of building and expanding settlements.
 This deeply irresponsible language covers up an uncomfortable fact: Israel has made generous peace offers since the UN partition plan of November 1947, which the Israelis accepted and the Arabs rejected. Many more such offers have been presented, and each time the Palestinians have walked away. In 2000, Yasser Arafat walked away from a near-perfect deal offered by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak during a summit presided over by US President Clinton at Camp David. According to Dennis Ross, the American envoy and principal negotiator at the meeting, the failure of the summit was down to Arafat's failure to sign. Ross later said that all Arafat had ever wanted was "a one-state solution. Not independent, adjacent Israeli and Palestinian states, but a single Arab state encompassing all of Historic Palestine". Shortly after his return to the West Bank, Arafat initiated the second (al-Aqsa) intifada, an uprising in the course of which 731 Israeli civilians and 332 members of the Israeli security services were killed, as well as several massacres carried out by Palestinian terrorists.
 Several similar rejections of peace have taken place since then. The Israelis have never stalled in the peace process: they have made offers and the Palestinians have turned them all down. This is not a matter of conjecture. It is a matter of recorded fact. There has never been peace because Israel has no partners for peace. That a so-called Christian organization should misrepresent history in this way is an appalling dereliction of truth and honesty on its part. It ignores Israel's rights in the West Bank under the Palestine Mandate, UN resolutions 242 and 338, and the Oslo Accords. It ignores the fact that, following Israel's total withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in 2005 in order to advance peace, the territory was violently taken over by the radical Islamic group Hamas, which has since then started three wars with Israel by firing rockets into Israeli civilian centers.
 When will the Iona Community come to terms with its far-left bias, its anti-Semitism, its own reputation, and the harm it is doing to any real hope in the Holy Land for peace?
 **Dr. Denis MacEoin specializes in the Islamic world, the Middle East and Israel. He has taught Arabic, Persian and Islamic Studies and is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Gatestone Institute.
 © 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
 
Khomeini’s revolution and CIA declassified documents
Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/February 09/7
I read some of the documents which the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) declassified from the period of the Iranian revolution in the end of the 1970s. Ash-Sharq al-Awsat newspaper published some of these documents. This was a turbulent phase of history and continues to stir academic controversy. Most of the political developments we witness today, from the rise of Islamist extremism, both in the regional and internationally, the sectarian struggle, failure of peace processes, major regional wars and efforts to possess advanced weapons such as nuclear and chemical arms, are linked to the Iranian Revolution and to the year 1979.
The newspaper published few of these documents and I did not find anything in them that helps understand events from inside this political and security institution, i.e. the CIA, which is supposed to have had good relations with the Shah’s government. Unlike some allegations, the CIA’s estimates in terms of understanding the tactic of the new regime in Tehran were not wrong. The CIA’s analysts predicted that after Khomeini’s rise in power, and after the war with Iraq erupted in 1980, the Iranian regime will resort to using religion, and particularly sectarianism, as a weapon. Their predications stipulated that Ayatollah Khomeini will use religious slogans to incite the region’s people against their regimes. They estimated that he will succeed in mobilizing the sectarian divide in Iraq and will fail in Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Gulf countries.
On reviewing the eight years of war between Iraq and Iran, one cannot underestimate the massive propaganda which Saddam Hussein government led to stop the Iranian sectarian incitement from infiltrating Iraq. Iran pictured the conflict as a Sunni-Shiite war while Baghdad saw it as a nationalist war between Arabs and Persians. The CIA’s estimates as to when the war will end were wrong for a clear reason as the decision to stop it was in Khomeini’s hands. He insisted on the continuation of the conflict for three years despite the failures as he thought a popular revolution may alter the balance of war in his favor in Iraq. At the time of the Iranian Shah’s fall, policymakers in Washington had preferred to accept the religious rise of Khomeini at the expense of leftist parties which had a role in the onset of the Iranian revolution
Religious revolution
One of the issues which was not addressed in the recently declassified analyses and secret correspondences, and which was not even tackled in the media or in specialized periodicals, is awareness of the threats which the extremist religious revolution in Iran could pose on the region and the world. This may be due to the domination of the national and leftist rhetoric back then. Former National Security Advisor of the United States Zbigniew Brzezinski made a famous trip to Pakistan and adopted the policy of Islamic jihadist religious war to liberate Afghanistan. This approach was adopted in addition to using advanced weapons against the forces of the “Soviet Union.” The 1o-year war ended in the liberation of Afghanistan and more than 15,000 troops from the Soviet Union and its allies were killed while more than 400 Soviet jets were downed. We cannot ignore the relation between Khomeini’s revolution and Afghanistan’s war. At the time of the Iranian Shah’s fall, policymakers in Washington had preferred to accept the religious rise of Khomeini at the expense of leftist parties which had a role in the onset of the Iranian revolution. However, there is nothing that indicates that someone at the time predicted what will happen in the region after Khomeini’s rise or anticipated how the prevailing ideologies in the region will change especially with the dissolution of leftist ideology with the collapse of the Soviet camp. The new Iranian regime back then used religious slogans and later limited these slogans to its sectarian designs and succeeded in using them politically in Lebanon, Palestine and later in Iraq. These slogans are what destroyed the region during more than three decades and they still pose the biggest threat on the region.
 **This article was first published in Asharq Al-Awsat on February 09 2017.
 
The wise men of Al-Awamiyah
Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/February 09/7
 Generalizing is a mistake which some people commit against a sect or a town or an entire society. Terrorism, whether Sunni or Shiite, has killed and harmed people and all forms of terrorism must be condemned. The Saudi village of Al-Awamiyah has witnessed some developments due to terrorists but many wise men have adopted an approach that combines intellectual and social resistance against criminal acts. This was manifested in the statements and speeches which are made now and then. The most recent was a statement issued by more than 100 leading figures who condemned the criminal acts committed in the village. They condemned the series of criminal incidents committed by vandals and outlaws. The presence of reasonable voices that advocate peaceful approach and try to heal wounds through their wisdom and insight makes us more reassured about our countries
Rejecting crime
“Al-Awamiyah is a peaceful society and rejects any crime, particularly crime related to violence and the use of arms. This harms civil peace and creates circumstances of the law of the jungle, which contradicts with the sharia,” they said.The presence of reasonable voices that advocate peaceful approach and try to heal wounds through their wisdom and insight makes us more reassured about our countries.All cities, from Buraydah, Riyadh, Dammam, Abha to Al-Awamiyah, Qatif and Saihat, must expel the malice of terrorism without embracing it and without providing any cover for it. This is the honest voice of the country.**This article was first published in Okaz on February 9, 2017.
 
From Atta’s Father to Hamahmy’s Father
Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/February 09/7
The statement of the father of the Egyptian suspect in the Louvre attack, Abdullah Hamahmy, reminded me of that of Mohammed Atta’s father, one of the executors of the September 11 attacks. The father, a former police officer, told al-Arabiya.net it is impossible that his son who used to work at a legal consulting firm in Sharjah would harbor terrorist thoughts. Gen. Ridha Rifai’i al-Hamahmy said his 29-year-old son is completely innocent and has evidence to support it. During the interview, Hamahmy said that his son wore casual clothing and always listened to music. He added that Abdullah never had any political affiliations and didn’t follow any religious movement. We hope the Egyptian young man is innocent. Who wouldn’t want that anyway? But it is hard to imagine that involvement in a shooting incident with Paris police, which Paris prosecutor’s office spoke of, is fictional. The father’s sentiments are understandable, and his son may be innocent. But what is remarkable in his interview is his indication that Abdullah didn’t show signs of extremism or tendency to ISIS’ ideologies. Abdullah’s tweets revealed an ISIS mentality despite the father’s rejection that this account belongs to his son. Access to unsupervised social media, the main recruiting platform of terrorists, can be critical even if the loving eyes assumed it was seeing otherwise. Love could be the blindfold!
 The Louvre attack
 Nonetheless, two security sources had already confirmed to Reuters that the Egyptian Ministry of Interior received a confirmation from the Egyptian embassy in Paris that the suspect of the Louvre attack is an Egyptian national. Going back to Mohammed Atta’s father, he was known for his denial of his son’s relations to al-Qaeda and the September 11 attacks. The father, who is also a lawyer, said that his son is a gentle sweet educated young man. During an interview with a German newspaper, Atta said that his son is in a disclosed location to protect him from being killed by the US secret intelligence. This reveals the capabilities of the ISIS militant now, Qaeda back then, in hiding, deceiving and then attacking at the right moment. Access to unsupervised social media, the main recruiting platform of terrorists, can be critical even if the loving eyes assumed it was seeing otherwise. Love could be the blindfold! This is an important lesson to all parents. **This article was first published in Asharq al-Awsat.
 
Is the right to abortion more important than Iranian terror?
Mamdouh AlMuhaini/Al Arabiya/February 09/7
The Americans, like other people, have their local bitter struggles which we don’t know much about. When it comes to economy, the Republicans and Democrats argue over the size of the government and tax rates. Republicans want smaller government and lesser taxes while Democrats want bigger government and support raising taxes on the rich. Republicans believe that a man can build himself and achieve his dream by depending on himself and they always remind everyone that this is what made America, which became independent in 1776 and which is still a young country although it’s more than 200 years old. They mock Democrats who want a government with the characteristics of an affectionate mother that feeds them and takes care of them from cradle to grave. They also say Democrats are secretly “socialists” who want to turn America into another France where lazy people care about nothing other than gossip in cafes, taste cheese and plan their sacred summer vacations. Democrats also mock the Republicans and hurl accusations at them. They say that Republicans are very greedy and selfish and accuse them of benefitting from government services without benefiting others. They also say Republicans are boastful and snobbish and claim that Republicans weaved a web of lies to get wealthy when in fact rich families keep getting richer while the rest descend into poverty. They accuse them of racism and of contempt toward minorities and black people. The Democrats view themselves as more ethical than the Republicans due to their social justice demands and suppression of corporate greed which created the financial crisis that shook the world in 2008. We can understand why Islamic radicals, Muslim Brotherhood and supporters of Iran hate Trump’s administration and we can see why they’ve launched a fierce war against it and falsely accuse it of hostility toward Muslims
American exceptionalism
Politically speaking, Republicans are hawks who believe in American exceptionalism and in America’s role as leader of the free world and as the country capable of punishing evil parties and maintaining international system which they established following World War II after the defeat of fascism and Nazism. Unlike them, the isolationist Democrat doves do not believe in intervention and hate playing the role of the cop and protector of the global system and they doubt the rationality and morality of American exceptionalism. They ended promoting the idea of a multipolar world in order to unburden the US from the responsibility of guarding the world and its values.
On the religious level, the Republicans maintain conservative Christian values and include them in their speeches and conversations. They also believe in teaching religion in schools and including it in the curricula and abhor Darwin’s theory of evolution and the Big Bang theory. The Republicans accuse the liberals of turning universities into leftist barracks that graduate revolting students who despise America and see nothing in it except the invading power that’s stained with the blood of weak people from the Red Indians to the Iraqi people.
 The Democrats, however, strongly oppose teaching religion in schools and reiterate the excuse of what religion is to be taught when students belong to different religions and sects. They strongly support science and are more preoccupied with global warming than with terrorism. They think Republicans and conservatives are merely fools who believe in myths which scientific facts debunk.
 The battle rages more on the social front due to controversial issues such as abortion and same-sex and transgender marriage. Republicans oppose abortion and maintain that it’s a crime to kill the fetus as a woman has the right to kill herself but does not have the right to kill her fetus. They oppose same-sex marriage because it destroys families which are the basis of natural communities and because it violates religious values and social norms.  Democrats, on the other hand, support abortion because they believe women have the right to make decisions about their own bodies. Celebrities and media personalities who are Democrats are the biggest supporters of LGBT rights and argue about this when addressing the values of sexuality and individual freedom. They’ve made movies on these subjects and turned their symbols into legends, heroes and fighters.
 This is an old dispute and increased when George Bush Jr. became president. The dispute raged during Barack Obama’s term and it has now further escalated with Donald Trump in power. Journalists, Hollywood celebrities, talk show commentators are mostly Democrats and liberals with a leftist mentality. They mock Trump because he defeated them, won the elections and humiliated their presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. The most important reason behind their cruel campaign is that they oppose him regarding all the local controversial affairs we mentioned, i.e. the size of the government and its role, sexual freedoms, abortion, education and others.
 Trump angers them because he does not keep silent but responds to them through his Twitter account. He describes their media as “dishonest,” “piece of garbage” and “failing” as he repeatedly described the New York Times which has been hostile to him since day one. They want to destroy him because he opposes their values, principles and dreams and don’t care about America’s role on the global arena – or rather this does not even cross their mind!
 Iranian terror
 Abortion, for example, is more important than halting Iranian terrorism which destroyed our countries in the Middle East. This is normal as in the end they are American people who care about their own lives and they are not Egyptians, Lebanese or Saudis.
 But why do we get carried away in internal battles which we have nothing to do with and bid on the American themselves when criticizing Trump although his administration’s vision harmonizes with our interests on the two most important affairs – fighting the Iranian regime and destroying terrorist outfits? We can understand why Islamic radicals, Muslim Brotherhood and supporters of Iran hate Trump’s administration and we can see why they’ve launched a fierce war against it and falsely accuse it of hostility toward Muslims.
 Their aim is to increase fanaticism because Trump’s administration is against their political and intellectual plans. The latter was the reason behind their soft speeches during the Obama administration. But why does the majority of us, from those who want to get rid of Iranian militias and ISIS groups which destroyed our countries and destabilized them and committed massacres against our children, curse him? Why do we throw stones at those who want to punish our enemies? Do we do so because we don’t like the color of his hair or because he does not gently hold his wife’s hand, like Obama does? Or is it because we do not like his Twitter posts or because he does not know how to talk during press conferences?
 It’s confusing and the only interpretation I’ve got is that we do not distinguish between internal and foreign struggles and we are easily and emotionally dragged into the battles launched by the media and politicians and participate in their partisan short-sighted battles that are against our interests on the long run. According to them, they have their logical reasons but what are our reasons? My only interpretation is participating in the wrong battle against the wrong rival at the wrong time. Is there another interpretation? I don’t know.
 **This article is also available in Arabic.
 
Of lies and slippery slopes

Trisha de Borchgrave/Al Arabiya/February 09/7
Donald Trump’s use of deceit to further his political ambitions is not only saturating his supporters with an opiate-high sense of righteousness, it is also permeating America with authoritarian methods of governance. Trump legitimized his lying accusation that “crooked” Hillary Clinton’s three million more popular votes were cast by illegal immigrants with the truth that his voters “feel the same way I do”. He paired his lie that two policemen were shot and killed in Chicago in the same hour as Obama’s farewell speech with the reality of the city’s gun violence, which in turn validated his threat to “send in the Feds.” And Trump’s adviser, Kellyanne Conway, attributed her fallacy that two Iraqis had carried out a massacre - that never happened on American soil - as an “honest mistake”. The use of language plays a crucial role in how people think, whether it is the juxtaposition of terrorist and refugee, refugee and poisoned candy, illegal and immigrant, or blacks and crime. And when full-fat, artery clogging lying comes across as the virtuous finger raised against the entitled establishment, it hoodwinks those who are looking for refuge in authority
The bottom line
Trump’s lies have become the price tag that many Republicans as well as big and small business leaders are willing to accept in order to catch the economic bones promised in his political platform. Trump has tailored his message to his bottom-feeder’s perspective of the bottom line; that all alliances are transactions, that everything has a price and anyone can be bought and sold. Under authoritarian regimes, it is the grain of resonance with core supporters that first lets in the dictator. Lies are then fed and watered by taking given facts – a president’s parentage or the existence of terrorism – and applied to a made-up scenario – Obama was a Muslim born outside the United States and therefore unqualified for office, and Muslims cheered at the collapse of the twin towers on the streets of New Jersey. What follows logically is a ban on Muslim immigrants in order to put “in place the safety of the American people”. This is how the lies of the manipulator evolve into the will of the people. Those who stand up for the rule of law are “so-called” judges who “betray” their country, and a free press is accused of “delegitimizing” the president and should “keep its mouth shut”. “Draining the system” is nothing more than an old-style purge of the democratic institutions that uphold the country’s constitution.
 Trump’s knee-jerk lies on Twitter are now being moderated by his chief strategist Steve Bannon, who is calibrating their dosage to sedate a country
 Reckless rhetoric
 What is emerging in America today through its president’s methodology and reckless America First rhetoric is the hijacking of a nation’s identity in the name of fulfilling his promises to his electoral base. And Trump’s Republican agenda of tax reform, financial and environmental de-regulation and the dismantling of union rights is tempting business to ignore the lies and bully-tactics of his governing style. There was no market plunge following Trump’s ban on the entry of refugees, nor as a result of his executive orders withdrawing health insurance for those who could not otherwise afford it, or funds for women’s health services in Planned Parenthood, or cancelling “all wasteful climate change spending”.  Big business might not have greased Trump up the pole of power, but it may help to keep him there. One cool-headed and intelligent oil executive who voted for him just wants his Twitter account removed. But 20 million followers is the oxygen that will further inflate his existing delusions of absolute power.Convulsing public sentiment.  Moreover, Trump’s knee-jerk lies on Twitter are now being moderated by his chief strategist Steve Bannon, who is calibrating their dosage to sedate a country. A big lie and its consequences might convulse public sentiment, but a drip-feed of smaller ones, like incremental doses of arsenic in one’s daily coffee, could sleepwalk people’s perception of “alternative facts” into general knowledge. One might agree with Trump’s economic and political goals, but his outright lying is too corrosive a price for a superpower democracy to exact on its long-term health, especially if it incubates non-thinking, gung-ho obedience to non-civic behavior. This is not, as Newt Gingrich asserts, about Trump being “different”, and having to get used to his personality. Authoritarianism should never become part of the way to run a western democracy, particularly given the hindsight of history. In today’s hyper-connected, interdependent global environment, true democracy – government legitimized by an open, well-informed electoral process, operating under the rule of law which protects civil liberties – is the only option capable of delivering opportunity and prosperity as well as human dignity. Over the last thirty years, democracy has been gaining a significant foothold in other parts of the world; some argue that it now stands at a crossroads. Its stalwart must not be allowed to fail.