LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

February 11/17

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins17/english.february11.17.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
Very truly, I tell you, servants are not greater than their master, nor are messengers greater than the one who sent them
 Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 13/13-17/:"You call me Teacher and Lord and you are right, for that is what I am. So if I, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another’s feet. For I have set you an example, that you also should do as I have done to you. Very truly, I tell you, servants are not greater than their master, nor are messengers greater than the one who sent them. If you know these things, you are blessed if you do them." 
 
A bishop, as God’s steward, must be blameless; not arrogant or quick-tempered or addicted to wine or violent or greedy for gain; but he must be hospitable, a lover of goodness, prudent, upright, devout, and self-controlled.
 Letter to Titus 01/01-09/:"Paul, a servant of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ, for the sake of the faith of God’s elect and the knowledge of the truth that is in accordance with godliness, in the hope of eternal life that God, who never lies, promised before the ages began in due time he revealed his word through the proclamation with which I have been entrusted by the command of God our Saviour, To Titus, my loyal child in the faith we share: Grace and peace from God the Father and Christ Jesus our Saviour. I left you behind in Crete for this reason, that you should put in order what remained to be done, and should appoint elders in every town, as I directed you: someone who is blameless, married only once, whose children are believers, not accused of debauchery and not rebellious.  For a bishop, as God’s steward, must be blameless; he must not be arrogant or quick-tempered or addicted to wine or violent or greedy for gain; but he must be hospitable, a lover of goodness, prudent, upright, devout, and self-controlled. He must have a firm grasp of the word that is trustworthy in accordance with the teaching, so that he may be able both to preach with sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict it."

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 10-11/17
Perils of Doing a De Gaulle in Lebanon/Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/February 10/17
Ali Al-Amin: The Recent Clashes Between South Lebanon Residents And UNIFIL Forces Are A Message From Iran To The U.S./MEMRI/February 10/17
Defiant Assad tells Yahoo News torture report is 'fake news'/Michael Isikoff /Yahoo/February 10/17
A Fixed Way of Looking at the World/Michael Devolin/Jihad Watch/February 10, 2017
Analysis: Trump presidency heralds new era of US-Egypt ties/Reuters/February 10, 2017
Muhammad’s Sexual Fantasies of Virgin Mary/Raymond Ibrahim/February 10/17
Iran’s lobbyists and spies in our midst/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya/February 10/17
Is the Arab world truly independent/Khaled Almaeena/Al Arabiya/February 10/17
Syria’s suffering must remain on our conscience/Fawaz Turki/Al Arabiya/February 10/17
Gratified absurdity and secrets of mysterious overestimation/Fahad Suleiman Shoqiran/Al Arabiya/February 10/17
Jenadriyah festival showcases best of Arab heritage, culture/Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/February 10/17
The Muslim Council of Britain's Little Problem/Miqdaad Versi and Dodgy Facts/Douglas Murray/Gatestone Institute/February 10/17
Question: "How should Christians view refugees?/GotQuestions.org/ February 10/17


Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 10-11/17
Aoun: We are working to secure minorities' representation
Raffoul from Tripoli Serail: New electoral law to see light soon
Arslan Adheres to Proportional Electoral Law, Says 1960 Law Unfair for Druze
Mustaqbal MP: Electoral Law Devised by Miqati Govt. 'Out of Question'
Report: Efforts Seek to Mend Hariri-Rifi Ties
Jumblat Hopes Lebanon's Judicial System Same as US, Wahhab Lashes out at Him
Group of Women Assault ISF Patrol in Baalbek
Report: Lebanon Facing Political Crisis if Electoral Law Debate Fails
Cautious Calm in al-Laylaki after Armed Clash between Families
Hasbani, Audi tackle local developments
Social Affairs Minister meets Ambassadors of Norway, Sweden, and Turkey
Hariri offers condolences to Geagea on his late mother
US Ambassador reaches Bsharri for condolences on Geagea's mother
Sarraf, Armenian Ambassador hold talks
Abi khalil, US ambassador hold talks
Majdalani: Mixed election law closest formula to consensus
Iranian Embassy celebrates 38th anniversary of Islamic revolution's victory, Fathali highlights Iran's support for Lebanon
Perils of Doing a De Gaulle in Lebanon
Ali Al-Amin: The Recent Clashes Between South Lebanon Residents And UNIFIL Forces Are A Message From Iran To The U.S.

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 10-11/17
Iranians celebrate 1979 revolution with rallies/
France thwarts attack, arrests ISIS supporting teen
Trump tells Xi Jinping will respect ‘one China’ policy
Russian bombing in Syria kills three Turkish soldiers
Syria War Seethes Despite Cease-Fire
Saudi King Salman receives phone call from US secretary of state
Iran's Rouhani Warns those Using 'Threatening Language'
Trump Says Israel Settlement Growth not 'Good for Peace'
Pen: French Jews Will Have to Give Up Israeli Citizenship
Containing Iran Should Start With Blacklisting the Revolutionary Guards
Iran Regime's Lobby in U.S. Serving Khamenei and IRGC Interests
Iranian Revolution's 38th Anniversary, 38 Years of Media Repression
Bahrain Foils Attempt to Smuggle Fugitives to Iran - Reports
Iran: Metro Wall Collapses in Qom; Workers Buried Under Debris
Iran Regime's Most Fundamental Vulnerability Is Domestic Instability
UK House of Commons condemns Israeli settlement activity
Yemen Loyalists Retake Historic Port of Mokha
Egyptian Louvre attack suspect 'acted alone'


Links From Jihad Watch Site for
on February 10-11/17
Georgetown prof Jonathan Brown responds to Robert Spencer’s acceptance of his debate challenge: “my God you’re ugly”
Hugh Fitzgerald: Islam and the Propaganda War (Part I): In Print and Online
Appeals court decision blocking Trump ban doesn’t even mention law empowering President to restrict immigration
Trump administration releases list of terror suspect cases from travel ban countries
Pakistani government officials deny that blasphemy laws target Christians
Quebec imam prays: “O Allah, destroy the accursed Jews…O Allah, kill them one by one”
Raymond Ibrahim: Muhammad’s Sexual Fantasies of the Virgin Mary
The Islamic State chops off children’s hands for refusing to execute prisoners
A Fixed Way of Looking at the World
Raymond Ibrahim: Muhammad and Forced Conversions to Islam
Germany: Muslim migrant screams “Allah” as he slashes man’s face with knife on bus
Syria’s Assad: Some refugees are “definitely” terrorists
Two Muslims arrested in Slovenia on way to join the Islamic State — while under house arrest in France
Hard-Left appeals court rules against national security, Trump’s immigration ban
Venezuela selling passports to Iraqis, may have sold them to jihadis
The End of Countering Violent Extremism, the Start of Countering Islamic Jihad

Links From Christian Today Site for on February 10-11/17
Senators Warn Against Trump's Plan To Omit White Supremacists From Extremism Programme
Archbishop Of Canterbury: Ministers Are Condemning Kids To Brothels - Or Death
Most Americans Support Gay Marriage – Most White Evangelicals Oppose It
Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali Says Secularism Is Spectacular Failure When It Comes To People Of Faith
Science And Faith Projects Get New Church Funding
Ministers U-Turn On Refugees Challenged In High Court
Lib-Con Coalition To Block Church's Stance On Gay Marriage
White Supremacist David Duke Celebrates Appointment Of Jeff Sessions As Attorney General
Anglican Evensong To Be Celebrated For First Time Ever In Vatican
Theresa May Praises Archbishop Of Canterbury's Anti-Slavery Initiative
Cash God Inside Howbow Dah? - Church Sign Goes Viral
'There Is Corruption In The Vatican,' Says Pope, Calls Clerical Sex Abuse An 'Illness'
These Are The Five People In Your Church Who Might Deserve A Valentine's Day Card
Church Teaching On Sexuality Is Driving Mental Health Problems In Gay People, Says Oasis
'Christianity Theme Park' In China Sparks Outrage From Devotees Of Chairman Mao

Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 10-11/17
Aoun: We are working to secure minorities' representation
Fri 10 Feb 2017/NNA - President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, stressed that efforts are conducted to secure minorities' representation, whether community or a minority within the community, as a means to "achieve justice."President Aoun was speaking on Friday in front of a visiting delegation of the Lebanese Democratic Party, led by Minister Talal Arslan. "No one wants to annul any side because if we lost one of our social and political components, we abolish the Lebanese character of our existence," the President noted. Aoun underlined that all currently proposals in the issue of the poll law come in compliance with the Taef Accord, which stipulates an electoral law that respects national coexistence.
 
Raffoul from Tripoli Serail: New electoral law to see light soon
Fri 10 Feb 2017/NNA - North Governor, Judge Ramzi Nohra, received on Friday at Tripoli Serail State Minister for Presidency Affairs, Minister Pierre Raffoul, who said following the meeting that the new electoral law would see the light in a week or two. Minister Raffoul pointed out that the petroleum richness in the Lebanese offshore was estimated by experts at around USD 1700 billion. Raffoul said that the new era led by President Michel Aoun, Speaker Nabih Berri, and PM Saad Hariri would not allow anyone to seize or violate such wealth.
 
Arslan Adheres to Proportional Electoral Law, Says 1960 Law Unfair for Druze
Naharnet/February 10/17/Minister for the Displaced Talal Arslan stressed on Friday that the 1960 electoral law does not provide just representation for the Druze community while proportional representation does, the National News Agency reported.“The 1960 electoral law does not achieve justice for Druze lawmakers,” said Arslan during a meeting with President Michel Aoun. Heading a delegation from the Lebanese Democratic Party, Arslan added: “The 1960 law gives the Druze community two MP seats at the parliament while the proportional representation gives us 8 MP seats.” Arslan's position comes to contradict a stance made by influential Druze leader MP Walid Jumblat. Jumblat had said that proportional representation marginalizes the Druze which constitutes a major component of the Lebanese community. While al-Mustaqbal Movement had previously rejected that the electoral law be fully based on proportional representation, arguing that Hizbullah's arms would prevent serious competition in the party's strongholds, Jumblat has totally rejected proportional representation, even within a hybrid law, warning that it would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah, Mustaqbal, AMAL, the Free Patriotic Movement and the Lebanese Forces are meanwhile discussing several formats of a so-called hybrid electoral law that mixes proportional representation with the winner-takes-all system. The country has not organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature has instead twice extended its own mandate. The last polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next vote is scheduled for May.
 
Mustaqbal MP: Electoral Law Devised by Miqati Govt. 'Out of Question'
Naharnet/February 10/17/MP Ammar Houri denied on Friday reports claiming that al-Mustaqbal Movement has shown “openness” to discussing an electoral law fully based on proportional representation that had been devised by Najib Miqati's government. “Reports circulating that Mustaqbal has reached a format close to the so-called hybrid law is but the same format it has earlier agreed on with the Lebanese Forces and the Progressive Socialist Party,” Houri clarified in an interview with the VDL (100.5). The Mustaqbal MP stressed that Mustaqbal will not take into consideration the so-called Miqati law saying: “The Miqati election law is out of question because it calls for staging the elections under a full proportional representation.”On Thursday, media reports said that Prime Minister and Mustaqbal chief Saad Hariri has shown “openness” to discussing Miqati's law. While Mustaqbal had previously rejected that the electoral law be fully based on proportional representation, arguing that Hizbullah's arms would prevent serious competition in the party's strongholds, Druze leader MP Walid Jumblat has totally rejected proportional representation, even within a hybrid law, warning that it would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah, Mustaqbal, AMAL, the Free Patriotic Movement and the Lebanese Forces are meanwhile discussing several formats of a so-called hybrid electoral law that mixes proportional representation with the winner-takes-all system. The country has not organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature has instead twice extended its own mandate. The last polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next vote is scheduled for May.
 
Report: Efforts Seek to Mend Hariri-Rifi Ties
Naharnet/February 10/17/Endeavors to ease the strained relations between Prime Minister Saad Hariri and Resigned Justice Minister Ashraf Rifi have surfaced lately, the Kuwaiti al-Anbaa daily reported on Friday. The daily said that efforts have “focused on a reconciliation between the two men in a bid to re-embrace the northern city of Tripoli (of a Sunni majority) back under al-Mustaqbal Movement on the anniversary of slain ex-PM Rafik Hariri," Saad's father.Relations between al-Mustaqbal Movement chief Hariri and Rifi, once-close allies, have been strained since February 2016 over a number of issues that led to Rifi's resignation from the cabinet. The resigned minister has especially criticized Hariri's decision to nominate Marada Movement chief MP Suleiman Franjieh for the presidency.
 In one of his statements, Rifi claimed that Hariri has lost his influence among the Sunni community, noting that “Saad Hariri is finished and the Sunnis are awaiting a new Hariri.”Boasting about his own rising influence in the Sunni community, Rifi had said: “I am strong in Tripoli and my influence is spreading to Akkar in which I will have candidates (in the parliamentary elections). I also have presence now western and central Bekaa and I'm rivaling Hariri in Beirut's third electoral district.”Rafik Hariri was assassinated in a huge explosion in Beirut that destroyed his motorcade on February 14, 2005. He was killed together with a score of other people including innocent bystanders. His memory is annually commemorated.
 
Jumblat Hopes Lebanon's Judicial System Same as US, Wahhab Lashes out at Him
Naharnet/February 10/17/Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat said on Friday that Lebanon must develop a judicial system similar to the one in the United States after it refused to reinstate President Donald Trump's ban on refugees. “I wish that the judicial system in Lebanon resembles that of the United States which suspended a draft law issued by Trump against immigration,” said Jumblat in a tweet. “The American judiciary dealt a slap in the face to Trump's chaotic policy,” added Jumblat. He went on and asked: “When will we see a similar governing body in the Arab world?” On January 27, Trump issued a decree that summarily denied entry to all refugees for 120 days, and travelers from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen for 90 days. Refugees from Syria were blocked indefinitely. A US court on Thursday unanimously refused to reinstate Donald Trump's ban on refugees and nationals from seven Muslim-majority countries, dealing the new president and his controversial law-and-order agenda a major defeat. For his part, former Minister Wiaam Wahhab --a Druze rival of Jumblat—criticized the latter's tweets and said: “Lebanon can witness such a judicial system only when people like you stop pressuring the it into the continued detention of Bahij Abou Hamzah.” Abou Hamzah, ex-Jumblat aide and businessman, was sentenced to jail on charges filed by Jumblat. “You must stop hypocrisy because when Lebanon develops a judiciary similar to that in the US, you will be become work-less,” added Wahhab.
 
Group of Women Assault ISF Patrol in Baalbek
Naharnet/February 10/17/The Internal Security Forces confiscated on Friday massive amounts of hashish they found in a warehouse in the Bekaa town of Shmestar, the National News Agency reported on Friday. NNA said, the ISF patrol was assaulted by a group of women when they tried to raid the warehouse in the said town. Security enforcements arrived at the scene and the hashish was confiscated.
 
Report: Lebanon Facing Political Crisis if Electoral Law Debate Fails
Naharnet/February 10/17/A new political crisis could be looming in Lebanon amid concerns that political parties might fail to agree on a new law for the parliamentary polls, and President Michel Aoun's insistence not to sign a request calling the electoral bodies to stage the elections under the current 1960 electoral law, the Kuwaiti As-Seyasah daily reported on Friday. The matter is a serious one, said the daily. Only ten days separate Lebanon from February 21, the deadline to call the electorate bodies. Meanwhile an agreement on a new electoral law does not seem possible in light of contending political interests. Some political parties support a proportional representation system, others back a hybrid law and another group wants the polls be staged under the current 1960 majoritarian law.
 The situation as is, does not seem to be heading towards a solution as stated by prominent parliamentary sources of al-Mustaqbal Movement, said the daily. Concessions must be made first in favor of the so-called hybrid electoral law which does not trigger any provocations. The interests of the country must be the major concern, it added. Political parties must understand that raising the ceiling of their demands does not serve the country's best interest, and they must not permit any vacuum at the level of the parliament.
 Moreover, ministerial sources close to President Michel Aoun said the political parties have no choice but to agree on a new law and to turn the page on the 1960 law. The president is optimistic in that regard, because there is an understanding between politicians that Lebanon and the Lebanese' interests press the need for devising a new law to stage the elections during Spring, the daily concluded. Political parties are bickering over devising a new law for the parliamentary polls scheduled in May. While Mustaqbal had previously rejected that the electoral law be fully based on proportional representation, arguing that Hizbullah's arms would prevent serious competition in the party's strongholds, Druze leader MP Walid Jumblat has totally rejected proportional representation, even within a hybrid law, warning that it would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah, Mustaqbal, AMAL, the Free Patriotic Movement and the Lebanese Forces are meanwhile discussing several formats of a so-called hybrid electoral law that mixes proportional representation with the winner-takes-all system. The country has not organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature has instead twice extended its own mandate. The last polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next vote is scheduled for May.
 
Cautious Calm in al-Laylaki after Armed Clash between Families
Naharnet/February 10/17/A dispute between the Zoaiter and Rahil families escalated into an armed clash Thursday in the Beirut southern suburb of al-Laylaki, state-run National News Agency reported. The violence, reportedly over the elopement of a young woman from the Rahil family, damaged several vehicles and houses in the neighborhood, NNA said. “Gunmen withdrew from the streets after they learned that security forces were heading to the area as a state of cautious calm engulfed the region,” the agency added.
 
Hasbani, Audi tackle local developments
Fri 10 Feb 2017/NNA - Metropolitan bishop of the Greek Orthodox Church, Elias Audi, met on Friday with Vice Prime Minister, Health Minister Ghassan Hasbani. Minister Hasbani said in the wake of the meeting that technical discussions regarding the electoral law were underway and would be soon finalized. Minister Hasabani stressed the importance of fair representation and refused denominational tensions.
 
Social Affairs Minister meets Ambassadors of Norway, Sweden, and Turkey
Fri 10 Feb 2017/NNA - Minister of Social Affairs, Pierre Bou Assi, held on Friday a series of meetings with ambassadors accredited in Lebanon, with whom he tackled the bilateral ties and the reverberations of Syrians' displacement. Bou Assi held talks with Ambassadors Leben Lind of Norway, Peter Semneby of Sweden, Cagatay Erciyes of Turkey, and Wojciech Bozek of Poland. Talks reportedly touched on the exchange of expertise and the means to bolster trade. Conferees also dwelt on the Syrians' displacement issue, with the diplomats renewing their countries' support for Lebanon in that respect. Separately, Bou Assi met with delegations of Arsal and Majsal Anjar municipalities, with whom he discussed an array of development-related demands.
 
Hariri offers condolences to Geagea on his late mother
 Fri 10 Feb 2017/NNA - Prime Minister Saad Hariri offered condolences to Lebanese Forces leader, Samir Geagea, on the passing away of his mother. On emerging, Premier Hariri said in reply to a question that work is underway to pass a new election law.
 
US Ambassador reaches Bsharri for condolences on Geagea's mother
 Fri 10 Feb 2017/NNA - NNA field reporter in Bsharri region on Friday said that US Ambassador Elizabeth Richard reached Saint Saba Cathedral in Bsharri to offer condolences to head of Lebanese Forces Samir Geagea on the death of his mother.
 
Sarraf, Armenian Ambassador hold talks
Fri 10 Feb 2017/NNA - Defense Minister, Yacoub Sarraf, met on Friday noon at his ministerial office with Armenian Ambassador to Lebanon, Samvel Mkrtchian.Both sides discussed ways to boost and develop cooperation between both countries. Sarraf stressed need "to boost cooperation at the military and civilian levels."
 
Abi khalil, US ambassador hold talks
Fri 10 Feb 2017/NNA - Energy and Water Minister, Ceasar Abi Khalil, met on Friday noon with the US Ambassador to Lebanon, Elizabeth Richard, with talks featuring high on cooperation between both countries. Discussions touched as well on the oil, gas and electricity issues and the Syrian refugees' crisis and ways to help to reduce the burden on Lebanon.
 
Majdalani: Mixed election law closest formula to consensus
Fri 10 Feb 2017/NNA - Member of Parliament, Atef Majdalani, said on Friday that a mixed electoral law was the closest formula to be agreed upon by Lebanese politicians. "There should be taken into consideration unified standards at the level of administrative divisions," the lawmaker told the Voice of Lebanon radio station. "There are no disagreements concerning the new law, but discussions might take some time because this is a critical, yet not impossible, mission," Majdalani added. On another level, the lawmaker said that endorsing the salary scale should not be a problem for as long as financing resources are ensured in a way that would not negatively affect the national economy.
 
Iranian Embassy celebrates 38th anniversary of Islamic revolution's victory, Fathali highlights Iran's support for Lebanon
Fri 10 Feb 2017/NNA - The Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Lebanon organized a reception at BIEL on the occasion of the 38th anniversary of the victory of the Islamic revolution, attended by Minister of State for Presidency Affairs, Pierre Raffoul, representing both the President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, and the Prime Minister, Saad Hariri, as well as by MP Ayoub Hmayed representing Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, and ranking political, diplomatic and religious figures. Iranian Ambassador Mohammad Fathali delivered a speech in which he said "it is a pleasure and an honor to welcome you to this blessed gathering on the occasion of the 38th anniversary of the victory of the Islamic Revolution in Iran led by Imam Khomeini who paved the way towards freedom, sovereignty and independence away from domination and subordination to the forces of authoritarianism and arrogance in the world... This revolution was and still is the glimpse of hope for vulnerable people who suffer oppression, injustice and occupation.""The Iranian people have sought, over the past years, to achieve the principles contained in the slogan of the revolution (...) and, today, the Islamic Republic of Iran is headed with steady pace and determination towards significant progress on the political, economic, cultural and scientific levels," he said, stressing that his country will always be an advocate of right and justice as well as of dialogue and unity. "We will remain the true supporter and the strategic force for the peoples who stand proud in the face of the Zionist occupation and the Takfiri terrorism, particularly in Palestine, Syria and Lebanon to whom we have utmost respect and appreciation," the ambassador said, reiterating Iran's permanent support for Lebanon against all challenges and conspiracies. He concluded his speech by addressing the President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, and congratulating him "on the achievements made thanks to the unity of the people, the army and the resistance," in the hope for further development of fraternal relations between the Lebanese and the Iranian peoples for the good and prosperity of both countries.

Perils of Doing a De Gaulle in Lebanon
Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/February 10/17
“Lebanon’s De Gaulle!” This was the sobriquet that Parisian political circles used for General Michel Aoun as he arrived in France as an asylum-seeker in 1991.
The sobriquet was not totally fanciful.
Like De Gaulle, Aoun was a soldier, in his case having one star more than de Gaulle in 1940. Risking his own life, Aoun had led Lebanese resistance to Syrian occupation while De Gaulle had launched the French resistance against the Nazis from a safe-haven in Carlton Terrace, London.
Also like De Gaulle, Aoun belonged to a political party and tried to stand above rival factions by emphasizing what united rather than what divided the Lebanese.
The careers of the two generals had other similarities. Nazi occupation of France ended when Allied forces, led by the U.S., smashed the Hitler war-machine, enabling General Leclerc, De Gaulle’s envoy, to march into Paris in triumph.
In the case of Lebanon, U.S. pressure on Bashar al-Assad forced the despot of Damascus to end Lebanon’s occupation.
In the post-occupation period, Aoun – like De Gaulle – enjoyed a brief period of glory before being sidelined by factions that wielded real power on the ground. Both men had to spend years in the proverbial political desert before they could don the mantle of presidency.
There, however, similarities between the two generals end.
De Gaulle was invited to assume leadership by a rare consensus among France’s political forces, from right to left, and without pressure by any foreign power. He returned as the symbol of French unity.
If anything, we now know that both the United States and Great Britain were less happy to see De Gaulle back in helm in Paris because they feared the general’s idiosyncratic attachment to “national independence.”
Aoun, however, owes his presidency to strong support from the Islamic Republic in Tehran which uses the Lebanese branch of Hezbollah as its cat’s-paw in Beirut.
De Gaulle owed nothing to any foreign power while Aoun has repeatedly acknowledged his debt of gratitude to Iran.
De Gaulle created his party after he had won power and garnered nationwide support for a new Constitution that created the Fifth Republic.
Aoun, in contrast, reached the presidency after becoming leader of a political faction which, judging by last election’s results, enjoyed the support of some 11 per cent of the Lebanese.
Those who know Aoun’s temperament, especially his extremely high opinion of himself, know that, in private at least, he resents the fact that he owes his presidency to Iran and its allies in Beirut.
It was, perhaps, that sentiment that Aoun wished to convey in a number of recent meetings with foreign visitors, including political and media figures from France.
“Aoun is a genuine Lebanese patriot,” a mutual French friend who met him recently claims. “The last thing he wants, deep down, is to be beholden to his former enemies.”
Visitors claim that Aoun told them that his “principal aim” was to “restore Lebanon to full sovereignty”. Does it mean he is trying to develop a situation in which decisions regarding Lebanon are taken in Beirut rather than in General Qassem Soleimani’s office in downtown Tehran? It was telling that Soleimani was the first senior “foreign visitor” to meet Aoun for what Tehran sources claimed was “broad coordination of strategies.”
According to the reading suggested by mutual French friends, Aoun is also less than willing to risk Lebanon’s future by letting his nation be dragged further into the Syrian quagmire in the hope of keeping Assad, head of any enemy power, in place for a bit longer.
 From what we know of Aoun, and the inner workings of Lebanese politics, we find it hard to take the retired general’s profession of pure patriotism at face value. There is nothing so far to back the claim that Aoun wants to be his own master or that he wishes to foster a national strategy to keep Lebanon, a mosaic of communities, out of the war of sectarians in the Middle East.
 To be fair, Aoun has not been in office long enough to make a full reading of his intentions possible. Despite his advanced age he may well be playing a long hand in contrast with the quickened tempo of Lebanese politics in recent years.
 And, yet, some disturbing signs could already be detected.
 President Aoun has made a number of moves clearly designed to settle personal scores with political rivals inside and outside the Lebanese Maronite community.
 He has also joined the Iranian scheme aimed at promoting within various Lebanese communities a “new leadership” loyal to Tehran.
 Part of Aoun’s game plan is to parody another aspect of De Gaulle’s style by proposing a referendum.
 De Gaulle held his first referendum to secure national approval for a new Constitution and won because the overwhelming majority of the French saw him as the only leader capable of ending the war in Algeria and re-uniting the nation.
 With an eye on securing greater, perhaps unchallenged, powers for himself, Aoun hopes to impose a presidential system through a new Constitution. But Lebanon is not France. France was rooted in centuries of classical nationhood and Colbertiste centralization. Lebanon, however, owes its existence, and its ability to weather so many storms, to a diversity that produces unity without uniformity.
 De Gaulle believed that his presidential system is based on “the meeting of a man and a nation”, something that worked between 1958 and 1968 when the May “revolution” forced the general to flee to West Germany to seek protection from French army units stationed there. Once the mini-“revolution” had petered out, De Gaulle returned but, realizing that things wouldn’t continue as before, decided to hold another referendum to secure a new endorsement for his “a man-and-nation” formula. When he lost that referendum, the general, a keen student of history, knew that it was time to throw the towel in.
 For his part “Lebanon’s De Gaulle” may well lose any referendum he holds. It is not at all certain that he would secure the support even of the Maronite community of which he is the current top political representative. Even if he is backed by Hezbollah he cannot be sure of mobilizing the Shi’ite community. Rather than strengthening unity, his referendum would put divisions in Lebanon in sharp relief as it is certain to be opposed by Sunni Muslim, and Druze communities as well as Shi’ites, maybe even a majority of them, who feel unhappy about Iranian domination.
 Aoun’s best bet is to drop being “the next De Gaulle” that could transform him into a caricature of the original, but to wait and see how things turn out in a region currently gripped by rapid fissiparous tendencies.
**Amir Taheri was the executive editor-in-chief of the daily Kayhan in Iran from 1972 to 1979. He has worked at or written for innumerable publications, published eleven books, and has been a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat since 1987. Mr. Taheri has won several prizes for his journalism, and in 2012 was named International Journalist of the Year by the British Society of Editors and the Foreign Press Association in the annual British Media Awards.

Ali Al-Amin: The Recent Clashes Between South Lebanon Residents And UNIFIL Forces Are A Message From Iran To The U.S.
MEMRI/February 10/17
In South Lebanon on Friday, February 3, 2017, local residents clashed, in two separate but simultaneous incidents, with UNIFIL patrol units, one of them Slovenian and the other Italian, stationed there as part of UN Security Council Resolution 1701; as a result, both units withdrew from the area. These two incidents followed a relatively long period of calm between the sides, leading to speculation regarding the instigators' motives and aims.
On February 5, 2017, in reaction to the clashes, 'Ali Al-Amin, an anti-Hizbullah Shi'ite Lebanese journalist and editor of the website Janoubia, attributed the events to the recent increase in Iran-U.S. tensions, arguing that Hizbullah was directing the local residents according to orders from Iran as a way of conveying a message to the U.S. and the West. He noted that UNIFIL, Lebanon, and Israel are now bargaining chips and hostages in Iran's fight against the U.S.
The following are excerpts from Al-Amin's article:[1]
Clash between UNIFIL force and residents in South Lebanon (image: Janoubia.com, February 5, 2017)
 "After years with no incidents or instigated clashes between 'Hizbullah supporters' and international forces, Lebanese circles, particularly those in South Lebanon, were surprised when two instigated clashes took place on the same day and at the same time, two days ago on Friday [February 4, 2017]. What were the aims of these incidents, and the reasons for them?
 "It has been some time since we heard of any confrontations between UNIFIL forces and [South Lebanon] residents – [the last] confrontations took place following [the adoption of UN Security Council] Resolution 1701 during the 2006 war [with Israel]. During that year, and the two years that followed, there were several incidents in the areas where international forces were deployed south of the Litani River, because of known disputes surrounding the implementation of UNSCR 1701. The term 'the residents' was a secret code for groups belonging to Hizbullah that interfered with UNIFIL's execution of its missions, by mobilizing ordinary citizens, meaning women, children, and elderly, to stop UNIFIL soldiers from entering areas where Hizbullah did not want them to be. At that time, Hizbullah told people that the international forces were passing on to Israel information about Hizbullah [members'] residences and [Hizbullah] centers; [for this reason] a number of voices demanded, at that time, that the UN forces leave Lebanon.
 "We were [recently] reminded [of this by] the incident that took place in the area between the towns of Majdel Zoun and Al-Mansouri, in the western sector of Tyre governorate, on Friday [February 4]. At that time, according to UNIFIL sources, a patrol from the Slovenian [unit] of the international forces that included three vehicles was ambushed by 'residents,' and at the same time, there was a similar clash between an Italian patrol and residents of the town of Al-Mansouri.
 "According to another version [of the events], the [Slovenian] patrol entered the Majdel Zoun area [alone,] without a Lebanese army patrol, prompting suspicious residents to confront it. A group gathered in front of the UN patrol and the [soldiers] became frightened and fled towards Al-Mansouri. But as they fled, the UNIFIL vehicles collided with and damaged three civilian vehicles, increasing the tension between them and the residents. [In the second incident,] an Italian patrol unit happened to be at Al-Mansouri, and a clash ensued between its soldiers and the residents.
 "This [situation] raises questions about the ramifications of these events. The UN [issued a statement] clearly explaining that there was no justification for what happened, and that as far as it is concerned someone instigated the problem with the [two] UNIFIL patrols. While the two incidents did not cause loss of life, and the damage was only material, the incident needs to be addressed now in light of the escalating U.S.-Iran [tension]...
 "These events, which some [Lebanese] officials were careful to call incidental, could have gone unaddressed if not for the language of the statement by UNIFIL [command] regarding 'two UNIFIL patrols... obstructed by groups of aggressive men.'[2] This indicates the possibility of a renewal of tension between UNIFIL and the so-called 'residents,' as there was in the past, primarily because the signs of the escalation in Iran-U.S. tension are manifested in provocations of various kinds, and South Lebanon will undoubtedly be one of the arenas for sending messages. This is because Hizbullah is one of the linchpins of stability in South [Lebanon] – [stability] which benefits residents of the Galilee [in Israel] as well as the residents of South [Lebanon] – and is a main factor in maintaining this stability.
 "These two incidents may have been incidental or may have been planned. Either way, either [event] could be a message to the relevant parties that any U.S.-Iran conflict will have implications for Lebanon, the international force [UNIFIL] and the Israeli enemy.
Brandishing the card of the south [that is, threatening to escalate tensions in South Lebanon], or, more precisely, shifting the present balance of power, depends on how the Iran-U.S. relationship develops. It should be noted that any explosion on the southern front will be close to suicide, or to a martyrdom operation, as Hizbullah refers to suicide operations based on a fatwa by [Iran's ruling] jurisprudent.
"The 'Trumpist' escalation of the tension with Iran has been manifested in South [Lebanon]. UNIFIL is once again a Hizbullah 'hostage'. The upcoming period, leading up to Beirut's announcement of the [parliamentary] elections, will decide whether Lebanon [is headed for] anarchy or for bleak stability.
 [1] Janoubia.com, February 5, 2017.
 [2] The statement by UNIFIL command read: "This morning, two UNIFIL patrols in the general area of Al-Mansouri-Majdel Zoun (Sector West) were obstructed by groups of aggressive men who attempted to cause physical harm to the peacekeepers and UN assets.' It continued: "While exercising utmost restraint, UNIFIL patrol vehicles had to push aside some civilian vehicles used as roadblocks in order to safely pull out from the locations." Unifil.unmissions.org, February 3, 2017. 

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 10-11/17
Iranians celebrate 1979 revolution with rallies
By AMIR VAHDAT Associated Press/February 10/17
Iranians began a nationwide celebration Friday to commemorate the 38th anniversary of the 1979 revolution with rallies around the country, and President Hassan Rouhani called the new U.S. administration "a problem."Demonstrators in Tehran chanted traditional slogans against the U.S. and Israel. The rallies come at a time when new U.S. President Donald Trump has already engaged in a war of words with Iran's leadership and put Tehran "on notice" over a recent ballistic missile test. Among other places, hundreds of thousands of demonstrators marched toward Tehran's Azadi Square, where Rouhani addressed the crowd. He called the new U.S. administration "a problem" and said Iran will strongly answer any threat from its enemies. "All of them should know that they must talk to the Iranian nation with respect and dignity," he urged the world. "Our nation will strongly answer to any threat. (Iranians) will resist before enemies until the end."Rouhani called Iran the home of "lions" but said the country does not seek hostility. "We are not after tensions in the region and the world," he said. "We are united before bullying and any threat."
In downtown Tehran, thousands of people marched, some carrying the Iranian flag, some with banners and posters with revolutionary slogans. Printed U.S. flags and pictures of current and former U.S. presidents were flattened on the road and trampled by some participants.
Iran and the U.S. have not had diplomatic relations since 1979, when Iranian students stormed the American Embassy and took 52 Americans hostage for 444 days.
The rallies commemorate Feb. 11, 1979, when followers of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini ousted the U.S.-backed Shah Reza Pahlavi. The United States helped orchestrate the 1953 coup that overthrew Iran's popular prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, which brought Pahlavi to power and set the stage for decades of mistrust between the countries. Some posters distributed in English read: "Thanks to American people for supporting Muslims." Another one with a picture of Trump said: "Thanks Mr. Trump ... for revealing the face of the U.S.," a reference to remarks Tuesday by Iran's supreme leader in which he said the "newcomer" Trump had shown the "real face" of the United States. Some people threw balls and darts targeting pictures of Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Some demonstrators burned an American flag. Semi-official ILNA news agency reported that some demonstrators burned an Israeli flag. Many ranking officials attended the ceremony in Tehran, including Qassem Soleimani, a general who heads the Iranian Revolutionary Guard's elite Quds Force that focuses on foreign operations like the war in Syria.
President Rouhani told reporters prior to addressing the crowd that Iranians will make the U.S. regret using threatening language, according to the semi-official ISNA news agency.
"Anyone who speaks the language of threat to this nation, the Iranian nation will make him regret" it, he said, without elaborating. "This presence (of demonstrators) is a response to wrong comments by new leaders in the White House, and they announce with their presence to the world that they should talk with respect and not use threatening language to the Iranian nation."State television aired footage of commemorations in Tehran and other cities and towns across the country, many of them in sub-zero temperatures.
Tehran resident Mohammad Soufi, 33 a medical lab technician, said Trump's recent stance encouraged him and his wife to participate in the rally this year. "We did not participate in the rally for more than 10 years," he said. This year my wife told me let's to go out to show to the world, particularly Trump, that we love our county despite differences." Sorraya Khalili , a 44-year-old hairstylist, said she was out to support the government and object to U.S. bullying of Iran. "Why people like Trump think they can make decisions for entire world? Iran is an independent country like the United States. I wish Americans get to visit Iran to find out we are similar to them; we warmly welcome our guests and respect them," she said.
Nation & World

France thwarts attack, arrests ISIS supporting teen
The Associated Press, Paris Friday, 10 February 2017/Anti-terrorism forces arrested four people Friday in southern France, including a 16-year-old girl, and uncovered a makeshift laboratory with the explosive TATP and other ingredients for fabricating a bomb. France’s top security official said the raid thwarted an “imminent attack.”A police official said the teen had pledged loyalty to the ISIS group in a recent video. The prosecutor’s office said around 70 grams (2.5 ounces) of TATP were seized in the Montpellier-area home of a 20-year-old man, along with a liter each of acetone, oxygenated water and sulfuric acid. TATP, which can be made from readily available materials, was used in the deadly November 2015 attacks in Paris and the March 2016 attack in Brussels carried out by Islamic State extremists. Two other men were arrested, a 33-year-old and a 26-year-old, along with the teenage girl, according to the prosecutor’s office, which handles terrorism investigations in France. The police official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the investigation, said one of the suspects was believed to be planning a suicide attack but that the investigation had not yet uncovered a specific target. He said person in the group had tried to reach Syria in 2015 and was known to intelligence services. The group - notably the girl - attracted new attention with their social media postings, he said. Interior Minister Bruno Le Roux said the arrests in three locations in the Montpellier area “thwarted an imminent attack on French soil.” The country’s prime minister praised the work of anti-terror investigators. “Faced with the heightened threat, there has been an extremely strong mobilization of our intelligence services to ensure the French are protected to the utmost,” said Prime Minister Bernard Cazeneuve.
 France is still under a state of emergency after several deadly attacks in 2015 and 2016.

Trump tells Xi Jinping will respect ‘one China’ policy
 AFP, Washington Friday, 10 February 2017/President Donald Trump on Thursday told Chinese President Xi Jinping he would respect the “One China” policy, the White House said, in their first conversation since the US leader came to power. “President Trump agreed, at the request of President Xi, to honor our ‘One China’ policy,” the White House said in a statement, adding that the two leaders had “extended invitations to meet in their respective countries.”In a swift response, Xi embraced the announcement on the highly sensitive issue which had cast a pall over relations after Trump suggested it was up for negotiation. “Xi Jinping appreciates Trump’s emphasis on the American government’s commitment to the One China policy and pointed out that the One China principle is the political foundation of US-China relations,” official broadcaster CCTV reported. The White House called the phone discussion – which came on the eve of Trump’s meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe – “extremely cordial,” saying the leaders “look forward to further talks with very successful outcomes.” The billionaire president had seemed intent on adopting a hard line against the Asian giant on a wide range of issues from trade to security. The White House said earlier that Trump had sent a letter to Xi, weeks after receiving a letter of congratulations from the leader of the Asian giant. Trump said in the missive that he looked forward to developing “a constructive relationship that benefits both the United States and China,” his spokesman Sean Spicer said in a statement Wednesday. Soon after winning the November election, Trump provoked Beijing’s ire by accepting a congratulatory call from Taiwan's President Tsai Ing-wen, in what was seen as a breach of protocol. Washington cut formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, recognizing the Communist mainland rulers in Beijing as the sole government of “One China.” 

Russian bombing in Syria kills three Turkish soldiers
Reuters, Amman/Ankara Friday, 10 February 2017
Russian air strikes on Thursday accidentally killed three Turkish soldiers during an operation against ISIS in Syria, the Turkish military said, highlighting the risk of unintended clashes between the numerous outside powers in a complex war.
“During an operation by a Russia Federation warplane against ISIS targets in the region of the Euphrates Shield operation in Syria, a bomb accidentally hit a building used by Turkish Army units,” the Turkish military said in a statement. Eleven others were wounded.
 Also read: Syria safe zones: Why, where and at what cost? The Kremlin also said Russian President Vladimir Putin had called Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan and expressed his condolences, blaming the incident on poor coordination between Moscow and Ankara. Besides Russia and Turkey, the foreign powers embroiled in Syria’s increasingly convoluted six-year-old war include members of a US-led coalition fighting ISIS as well as Lebanon’s Hezbollah and other Iranian-backed militias.
 US Vice President Mike Pence also expressed condolences for the Turkish casualties in a call with Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim, in which they discussed cooperation in the fight against terrorism, Yildirim’s office said.
 Closing in on Al-Bab
 Turkish-backed Syrian rebels pursued a major offensive against the ISIS-held Syrian city of al-Bab, 30 km south of the border with Turkey. The advance risks putting them in direct conflict with Syrian government forces who are closing in on the city from the south.
 A rebel commander said fighters of the Free Syrian Army (FSA), working with Turkish commanders, were moving forward from territory near the western gates of al-Bab, which they had stormed on Wednesday. “The battles began a short while ago to complete what had been achieved yesterday,” said a commander of a leading FSA group fighting in al-Bab, who requested anonymity. The capture of the town would deepen Turkey’s influence in an area of northern Syria where it has created a de facto buffer zone. It launched its Euphrates Shield operation in August, backing Syrian rebels with special forces, tanks and aircraft to sweep ISIS from its border area and stop the advance of a Kurdish militia.
 Also read: UN peace talks on Syria delayed until February 20
 The Turkish military said it had killed 44 militants in aerial and artillery strikes and clashes in northern Syria. Five Turkish soldiers were killed in the clashes, the private Turkish news agency Dogan said. The Turkish-backed rebels said clashes took place for the first time with the Syrian army in the Abu Zandayn village south west of al Bab, where they were advancing. The army aided by Iranian-backed militias made rapid gains in recent days from the south of the city seizing more than thirty villages from the militants, bringing them close to their Turkish and rebel enemies.
 
Syria War Seethes Despite Cease-Fire
Associated Press/Naharnet/February 10/17/Syria's fronts are on fire despite a cease-fire reached in December between the rebels and the government. Though the two sides sat face-to-face in the Kazakh capital of Astana a month later, the government has pressed offensives against rebels around the capital, Damascus, and recently escalated its air campaigns in Homs and Idlib. The war's January toll — some 2,000 dead, about a third of them civilians, according to the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group — is the lowest it has been in four years. But that may be because the government wrapped up operations for Aleppo, the country's largest city, last year.
Rebels, for their part, struck at government positions in central Hama province, though they have been mostly occupied by infighting in Idlib that calls into question the direction of their insurrection. In the midst of all this, the Islamic State group has renewed its crusade for the remote eastern city of Deir el-Zour, while holding onto the culturally cherished site of Palmyra. At the same time, Turkish troops and the rival Syrian military are both closing in on the IS-held town of al-Bab, as U.S.-backed Kurdish forces bear down on the extremist's self-declared capital, Raqqa. Though small and out of the way, al-Bab is shaping up to be the weather vane for the rest of the conflict as the U.N. plans to convene Syria peace talks in Geneva on Feb. 20. The government and rebels have converged on the town with clashes breaking out between the two sides for the first time on Thursday. Separately, a Russian airstrike killed three Turkish troops in what Russia said was an accident. It is now up to Turkey, Russia and Iran to demonstrate whether they can mediate a stable outcome for the town, or whether the front will dissolve into open warfare. Turkey is backing the rebels and has deployed several thousand troops to fight the Islamic State in al-Bab, while Russia and Iran support the government's side. Here's a look at the fighting around Syria:
DAMASCUS
Despite a rebel ultimatum delivered in Astana against further aggression around the capital, Syrian government forces along with Lebanon's Hezbollah militant group pressed on with an offensive against rebels holding Damascus's primary water source, and defeated them one week later. About 2,000 rebels, opposition activists and their families chose exile from the Barada valley rather than remaining under government authority. This has become the hallmark of the government's strategy — to squeeze its opponents through siege then offer them exile. Hundreds of thousands have fled their homes from bombardment across the country, with thousands more fleeing to northwestern Idlib province instead of submitting to government rule. Opponents call the strategy "forced displacement." Government forces have also intensified their assault on the eastern Ghouta region outside Damascus. Home to some 400,000 people, the area has hardly seen a day without fighting since the rebels expelled the government in 2012. The government justifies its attacks, saying those areas include fighters from the al-Qaida branch in Syria, although the rebels deny that.
Rebel factions are fighting back with tank, artillery, and other heavy weapons fire.
IDLIB
This province in northwestern Syria is now almost entirely under rebel control and has been overwhelmed by hundreds of thousands of people displaced by fighting there and elsewhere.
But it is hardly safe. Multinational aircraft are constantly raiding the province, striking al-Qaida-linked rebels as well as civilian positions. U.S. coalition aircraft are believed to have killed more than 100 al-Qaida-linked fighters on the last day of Barack Obama's presidency, according to the Pentagon, while government or Russian aircraft are believed to be behind a string of raids on the provincial capital, also called Idlib, that killed at least 26 civilians and more than a dozen militants earlier this week, according to the Observatory.
Rebels, meanwhile, are fighting one another in the province as they divide into competing camps over whether to engage in the diplomatic process in Geneva and Kazakhstan. On the one side are groups aligned with the al-Qaida-linked affiliate, Fatah al-Sham, while on the other are an array of Western- and Turkish-backed rebels, led by the ultraconservative Ahrar al-Sham.
CENTRAL SYRIA
Pro-government forces have intensified their bombardment of al-Waer, the only enclave for the opposition in the country's third-largest city, Homs. Nine people were killed in shelling and airstrikes on Wednesday, according to local activists. Osama Abu Zeid, a resident, said he believes the government is trying to force the neighborhood to surrender and activists like him into exile. Rebels, meanwhile, are raiding towns and villages loyal to the government in neighboring Hama province.
ISLAMIC STATE TERRITORY
The Islamic State group seized Palmyra and its ancient ruins on Dec. 11 and has maintained its grip on it ever since. It has gone so far as to threaten the government's position at the strategic T4 air base in central Syria, but the military has so far stood up to the test. The group has seized and destroyed several natural gas fields and facilities, with consequences for the national economy for years to come. The extremists also stepped up their campaign for Deir el-Zour, which has been under siege since 2015, and for a nervous two weeks in January forced the U.N. food agency to abandon its air drops due to safety fears. The U.N. estimates more than 90,000 civilians are trapped inside. Government troops and loyal militias are fighting back. With the U.N. planning to convene peace talks in Geneva on Feb. 20, hopes for success hinge on the intentions of the three powers closest to the conflict — Turkey, Russia and Iran — who together pledged to guarantee the tenuous cease-fire. And nowhere will their intentions crystallize more clearly than in al-Bab, where each side has a stake —Turkey fighting alongside the Syrian rebels, and Russia and Iran backing the Syrian government and allied Shiite militias. The outcome in al-Bab — whether it is ultimately taken by the government or the rebels, and whether the front between the two sides stabilizes or dissolves into all-out warfare — will set the direction of future talks and any settlement.

Saudi King Salman receives phone call from US secretary of state
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Friday, 10 February 2017/Saudi Arabia’s King Salman bin Abdulaziz has received a phone call from the United States Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. King Salman began the conversation by congratulating Tillerson who in turn applauded Saudi Arabia’s efforts in promoting stability across the region, a statement on Saudi Press Agency confirmed. America’s top diplomat also spoke of the importance in increasing cooperation between the two countries in combatting extremism and terror activities in the region. Both also spoke of enhancing economic ties.Tillerson and King Salman also reviewed the historic special relation between the US and Saudi Arabia encompassing the economic, security and strategic fields.

Iran's Rouhani Warns those Using 'Threatening Language'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 10/17/Iranian President Hassan Rouhani warned Friday that those using "threatening language" against Tehran would regret it as the regime faces increasingly hawkish rhetoric from the new US administration. Rouhani was speaking at a march attended by hundreds of thousands of people in the capital marking the anniversary of the 1979 Islamic revolution. "This turnout is a response to false remarks by the new rulers in the White House and the people are telling the world through their presence that the Iranian people must be spoken to with respect," Rouhani said. "Iranians will make those using threatening language against this nation regret it," he said."Anyone threating Iran's government and armed forces should know that our nation is vigilant."US President Donald Trump has taken an increasingly strident line towards Iran since taking office last month, warning that it was "playing with fire" and "on notice". Last week, he imposed sanctions on Iran over a January 29 ballistic missile test and officials warned more might follow. Last weekend, new Pentagon chief James Mattis described Iran as "the single biggest state sponsor of terrorism in the world." Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Tuesday that Trump's policies showed "the real face of America", a country long derided by the regime as the "great Satan".

Trump Says Israel Settlement Growth not 'Good for Peace'

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 10/17/US President Donald Trump does not believe Israeli settlement growth in Palestinian territories is "good for peace", he told a paper Friday, in his most direct comments on the matter since inauguration. In the interview published in Hebrew by the Israel Hayom newspaper, Trump also said he was thinking "seriously" about moving the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, a move fiercely opposed by the Palestinians. Speaking to the newspaper ahead of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Washington next week, Trump was quoted as saying he was "not someone who believes that advancing settlements is good for peace". The international community considers settlements in the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem illegal and says they risk destroying hopes for peace with the Palestinians. Trump's administration, however, has been largely silent as Israel has announced more than 6,000 new homes in settlements in recent weeks, in stark contrast to criticism from predecessor Barack Obama. Trump was also quoted by Israel Hayom as saying he was "studying" plans to move the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. He said he was thinking "very seriously" about the controversial relocation, which he committed to before taking office, stressing it was not an "easy decision". No English transcript of the interview was published.

Pen: French Jews Will Have to Give Up Israeli Citizenship

Haaretz Feb 10, 2017/Leading contender in French election tells interviewer she won't allow dual citizenships with non-European countries. Asked specifically about Jews and Israel, she said: 'Israel isn't an EU member.'
'We just want to preserve our identity - like Israel and Trump,' Le Pen party official tells Haaretz
Russian media fuels gay affair rumor about French presidential candidate Macron
In a France ruled by the far-right Marine Le Pen, Jewish citizens will be forced to give up their Israeli citizenship, the Front National party leader said on Thursday.
Get all updates on Israel and the Jewish World: Download our free App, and Subscribe
Le Pen, a leading contender in the upcoming French presidential contest, told France 2 TV that if elected, she will not allow French citizens to hold on to any citizenship in a non-European country. When asked specifically about Israel and Jews, who form a large community in France, the Front National party leader responded: "Israel isn't a member of the European Union, and doesn't consider itself as such," and therefore a dual French-Israeli citizenship will not be allowed.
Le Pen said that the ban will also apply to citizens of the U.S. and North African countries, but that citizens of the EU, or of what she termed as the "Europe of nations," which includes Russia, will be exempted.
A recent poll showed Le Pen advancing to the second round of balloting in May but still losing handily to front-runner Emmanuel Marcon. Her political party, the National Front, was founded by her father, Jean-Marie Le Pen, who routinely minimized the Holocaust.
The younger Le Pen has sought to move the party past her father’s controversies, but French Jewish leaders still consider the National Front anti-Semitic.
For the frequent travelers, the symptoms of jet lag are all too familiar. While you may not be able to stop jet lag when ...
Last week, Le Pen said French Jews should give up the wearing of yarmulkes as part of the country’s struggle to defeat radical Islam.
In an interview with Israel’s Channel 2, Le Pen expressed support for banning the wearing of yarmulkes as part of her broader effort to outlaw religious symbols in public.
 “Honestly, the dangerous situation in which Jews in France live is such that those who walk with a kippah are in any case a minority because they are afraid,” Le Pen said, using the Hebrew word for yarmulke. “But I mainly think the struggle against radical Islam should be a joint struggle and everyone should say, ‘There, we are sacrificing something.’”
 Referring to French Jews, Le Pen added: “Maybe they will do with just wearing a hat, but it would be a step in the effort to stamp out radical Islam in France.”
 read more: http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/europe/1.770915 
 
Containing Iran Should Start With Blacklisting the Revolutionary Guards
NCRI Iran News/Friday, 10 February 2017/The Obama administration provided a period described by an Iranian regime figure as the “golden era”, and Tehran took advantage to extend its foothold across the Middle East. The status quo in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Lebanon are undeniable proof in this regard. Wrote Heshmat Alavi in the ‘Daily Caller’ on February 9, 2017, the article continues as follows. As a new team takes the helm in Washington, recent signs indicate the road ahead for Iran will be a major challenge. The Trump White House, less than a month in action, has proven to the mullahs the deep contrast in respects to its Middle East doctrine, and especially, in comparison to its predecessor’s failed appeasement policy. U.S. National Security Advisor Michael Flynn lashed back at Iran’s January 29th ballistic missile test launch with an “on notice” warning, followed by new sanctions, placing 25 Iranian individuals and entities with ties to Tehran’s ballistic missile program in its crosshairs. This made it crystal clear the U.S.-Iran policy had undergone a major overhaul.
 Tehran’s missile launch was a testing of the new U.S. administration. Yet this gamble backfired when President Trump and his team reacted with a series of measures, informing the mullahs how their variety of adventuristic measures–including a suicide boat attack against a Saudi frigate conducted by Iran-supported Houthis in Yemen–will no longer go tolerated. Senior Iranian regime officials are seriously concerned as President Trump’s tweets made it crystal clear the end of Obama’s “kind” attitude. Defense Secretary James Mattis added insult to injury by describing the mullahs’ regime as “the biggest state sponsor of terrorism.” Such a tough tone adopted by the new White House can lead us to conclude that Tehran chose to back-off from a second ballistic missile test planned for as early as Friday, February 3rd, involving a missile design consisting of components similar to that of an intercontinental ballistic missile.
 Interestingly, while Europeans are not famous for any tough talk, especially regarding Iran, they have chosen to react in line this time around.
 Iran’s ballistic missile tests “give reason for serious concern” and are considered incompatible with United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231, according to the German Foreign Ministry. Taking into notice Iran’s 35-year history of engulfing the entire Middle East into horrific turmoil, the appropriate response only lies in a tough approach. And this does not spell launching another U.S.-led war in the region. Iran took advantage of the spiritless Obama Middle East doctrine to inflict and spread its lethal disease, consisting of a deadly involvement in Syria, establishing and backing Shiite proxies in Iraq, the Houthis in Yemen and the Lebanese Hezbollah. Former senior Iranian foreign ministry official Hossein Mousavian, a significant figure in the Iran nuclear talks, recently wrote, “During the Obama years I openly said and wrote the Obama-Biden-Kerry-Moniz line-up is an opportunity for Iran.”
 Despite the Iran nuclear deal curbing the mullahs’ nuclear drive to some extent, Tehran misused the Obama tenure to pursue its treacherous ballistic missile program. Now, the mullahs are most definitely weighing the Trump administration’s strong response and evaluating their next move after such drastic setbacks. “It’s a sign that for Iran, the days of wine and roses—and blind-eye treatment—are over. And perhaps an even more welcome sign that tough talk, combined with tough action, really does work,” according to The New York Post Editorial Board. To add to Iran’s nightmares, the Trump administration is now considering the option of designating Iran’s Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) as a foreign terrorist organization.Considering the IRGC’s leading role in Iran’s nuclear program, ballistic missile drive, foreign military intervention and domestic crackdown, this is the next step in hammering nails in the mullahs’ coffin. For years now the Iranian opposition National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) has been advocating such an initiative, pinpointing the fact that Iran’s major policies are pursued through the IRGC. The NCRI is a coalition of a slate of dissident groups, especially the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK), and has welcomed Washington’s new sanctions against Tehran. “Banning all deals and trade with IRGC-affiliated companies” are measures proposed by NCRI President Maryam Rajavi, a charismatic leader who has devoted her life struggle to establishing a free and democratic Iran based on a 10-point-plan. If the Trump administration is seeking a silver-bullet to bring an end to Iran’s belligerence not only in the Middle East but across the globe, the first step in such a roadmap is to blacklist the IRGC. This message will be damning for the mullahs, and the Iranian people will quickly realize that America, under its new administration, stands with them shoulder to shoulder in their effort to realize their ambitions of a democratic and prosperous Iran.
 
Iran Regime's Lobby in U.S. Serving Khamenei and IRGC Interests
NCRI Iran News/|Friday, 10 February 2017
Iran’s lobbyists and spies in our midst?
The recent Executive Order affecting immigration by citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries has prompted fierce discussion from all quarters, including arguments on who does or does not actually endanger the national security of the United States. As we wait to see how that debate plays out in the weeks and months ahead, there is a sense that we may be closing the proverbial barn door after the horse has run. Wrote Dr. Majid Rafizadeh on Friday, 10 February 2017 in Al Arabiya, the article continues as follows:
Some believe that there are people already in the US, whose words and deeds on behalf of foreign powers critically threaten America and its allies. Iran is one of the countries named in the President’s Executive Action. It goes without saying that the Islamic Republic of Iran remains the number one state sponsor of terrorism.
However, more fundamentally, some think that the focus should also be on the threat coming from a well-knit group and gilded circle of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s operatives or lobbyists, who are determined to cajole, prod and persuade US policy-makers into believing that appeasement and a soft touch is the only peaceful means to contain the top state sponsor of terrorism.
Serving Khamenei and IRGC interests
 Many argue that some of Iran’s lobbyists work in plain sight and had access to top officials at the White House and State Department; they lobbied for the lifting of sanctions against the Islamic Republic, top state sponsor of terrorism, and subsequently lifting of sanctions against Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corp (IRGC), while demonizing Iranian-Americans who called for firmness against Iran’s ruling clerics and ayatollahs. In addition, some ask, although the US law, the lobbying disclosure act, requires anyone who is lobbying and gaining money to register for the sake of transparency, how come some of pro-Iran lobbyists appear to have managed to ignore the law? It seems that to its discredit, the Obama administration listened to Iran’s lobbyists and bought the “no popular opposition” part, which explains why it was so surprised and then stood silent when in 2009 millions of Iranians took to the streets. On the other hand, others believe that another category of Iran’s lobbyists or operatives act less conspicuously and they are now ensconced in almost every critical sector of the American society including academic, universities, and non-academic arenas such as think tanks. Ali, a policy analyst, pointed out that “They have their work cut out for them”, adding that this category include some of the former regime insiders.
 As Frank Figliuzzi, the former assistant director for counterintelligence for the FBI, previously told Bloomberg ‘We have intelligence and cases indicating that US universities are indeed a target of foreign intelligence services.’
 Many believe that no one can, with any credibility, defend their paymasters’ export of terrorism, military adventurism, meddling in other countries’ affairs, vicious abuses of human rights or persecution of religious and ethnic minorities. Over the years, Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence has developed sophisticated modus operandi, whereby its advocates first acknowledge, whether grudgingly or with all sorts of excuses about “cultural differences” or “Western preconceptions,” the ruling regime’s antipathy to democratic freedoms.
 Cutting to the chase, it seems that the lobbyists and advocates for the Islamic Republic, next dismiss anyone suggesting the US should respond to this appalling conduct with firmness as a warmonger. But nobody appears to want, or ask for, armed conflict with Iran, so that is not an option.
 It also seems that the way to improve Iran’s behavior, according to them, is to make nice – ignore the regional meddling, human rights abuses, arrests of activists and journalists, abuse of Sunni, Baha’is and other religious minorities, and mass executions. Offer incentives to entice the mullahs to stop enabling Assad’s carnage in Syria, or halt their supply of arms to Hezbollah, or cease test-firing missiles. But that has not worked, any reasonable observer will interject. Why not study other options?
 There are none, those talking heads appear to insist. There is no popular opposition, they appear to say, and the organized resistance to the regime, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) and its main component, the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), is demonized as cult-like.
 Obama’s failure: Listening to Iran’s covert lobby
 Let’s take a closer look. It seems that to its discredit, the Obama administration listened to the Islamic Republic of Iran’s lobbyists and bought the “no popular opposition” part, which explains why it was so surprised and then stood silent when in 2009 millions of Iranians took to the streets and called for the theocracy’s overthrow. US policy-makers watched helplessly with the rest of the world as unarmed protesters were killed. It appeared that that massive popular movement was an expression of the overwhelming sentiment of Iran’s people, coalescing in the NCRI, which serves as the parliament-in-exile from its headquarters outside Paris.
 The NCRI’s main component, the MEK, has been described by bi-partisan majorities in the House of Representatives and a significant number of Senators as “a legitimate resistance movement,” and “a prominent anti-fundamentalist organization adhering to a tolerant Islam,” and “a major player in confronting this ominous phenomenon and terrorism emanating from it.”The longest-standing political coalition in Iran’s history (36 years), the NCRI’s annual convention is regularly attended by leading bi-partisan political, military and diplomatic officials from around the world, who speak to crowds of mostly Iranian-exiles exceeding 100,000. As far back as 2001, nearly three-dozen Senators wrote: “US policy should reach out to those working to establish a democratic and pluralistic system in the country. In this context, support for the democratic goals of the National Council of Resistance of Iran and its President-elect, Maryam Rajavi, whose objectives are supported by the majority of Iranians, can contribute to peace, human rights and regional stability.”
 Why haven’t our policy-makers listened? Some who ask the question believe that this is because some of those superficial and so-called Iran experts and scholars – subtle, often sophisticated, well- heeled and well trained – who are likely working for the Islamic Republic of Iran and Iran’s Intelligence Ministry have been spoon-feeding them the Iranian regime’s gruel. They add that they can ill-afford to allow their presence among them, and in particular their access to our politicians and officials. And finally, they believe that Iranian agents pose a real and present danger and they should be dealt with swiftly and decisively.
 _______________________
 Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, an Iranian-American political scientist, is president of the International American Council. Harvard-educated, Dr. Rafizadeh serves on the board of Harvard International Review at Harvard University.
 
Iranian Revolution's 38th Anniversary, 38 Years of Media Repression
NCRI Iran News/Friday, 10 February 2017
Iran is one of the world’s biggest prisons for media personnel
Reporters Without Borders February 9, 2017
Media freedom was one of the key demands of the revolution that toppled the Shah and swept Ayatollah Khomeini to power 38 years ago, in February 1979, but it is a promise that has never been kept and Iran is now one of the world’s biggest prisons for media personnel, with a total of 29 journalists and citizen-journalists detained.
The Islamic Revolution has seen a succession of leaders during the past 38 years but the persecution of journalists has never stopped. Only the methods used to silence them have evolved. The revolution’s first ten years were marked by massive arrests and the execution of several journalists who supported the Shah’s regime, including Ali Asgar Amirani, Simon Farzami and Nasrollah Arman. The deaths of left-wing journalists Said Soltanpour and Rahman Hatefi-Monfared followed. After the official executions of the “dark years,” extra-judicial executions were used to eliminate journalists. Late 1998 saw a series of murders. Journalist and editor Ebtekar Ebrahim Zalzadeh’s body was found with 15 stab wounds. Potassium was used to murder Majid Charif, a journalist with the magazine Iran-e-Farda. Journalists and writers Mohammad Mokhtari and Mohamad Jafar Pouyandeh were strangled to death. No one ever found the body of Pirouz Pirouz Davani, a newspaper editor who had been abducted in 1997.
 Letting journalists die slowly
 The revolution has adopted a different strategy during the past 15 years, one that is less visible but no less effective in throttling freedom of information. By holding journalists for years in prison, where they are subjected to torture, mistreatment and denial of medical care, the regime lets them die slowly. The blogger Sattar Beheshti was tortured to death at the headquarters of the FTA (Iran’s cyber-police) in 2012 for daring to criticize the regime on Facebook. The photojournalist Zahra Kazemi and the young blogger Omidreza Mirsayafi also died as a result of being mistreated while in detention. Detained journalists have often put their lives at risk by going on hunger strike in protest again prison conditions or the deaths of fellow journalists in detention. They include Hoda Saber, an Iran-e-Farda writer who died in detention in 2011.
 Arbitrary arrests
 The run-up to the revolution’s anniversary brought no relief for journalists this year. In fact, the persecution has clearly intensified because of the presidential election due to be held in May. The past two months have been marked by another series of arbitrary arrests under procedures that deny journalists the right to due process, have no basis in Iranian law and constitute a flagrant violation of the Universal Declaration of Human rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
 The blogger Baran Mehdi Khazali was arrested for the eighth time since 2009 on 5 February, after openly criticizing the regime in interviews for Voice of America and DorTV. He was one of the first to question the official reason for former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani’s death and to suggest he might have been murdered by drowning. Now held in Tehran’s Evin prison, Khazali was given a 14-year jail sentence in 2011.
 Zeniab Karimian, a woman journalist who hosts a programme on Iran’s 3rd TV channel, and Saleh Deldam, a young filmmaker, were arrested at their home on 23 January by plainclothesmen and were taken to an unknown location. Since then, their families have been told nothing of their fate. Borna News social affairs editor Tahereh Riahi was arrested at her workplace on 27 December and was placed in solitary confinement in Section 209 of Evin prison. According to the information obtained by RSF, she is now in very poor physical and psychological health.
 Prison or flogging
 Prison is not the only method used to silence journalists. Under the Islamic penal code, corporal punishment can often be applied. The various penalties available to judges include flogging in addition ot stoning, torture and death. Under articles 609 and 698, criticizing government officials or publishing false news is punishable by 74 lashes. Although inhuman, degrading and primitive, this punishment has often been used during the past ten years.
 Five journalists were sentenced to be flogged from 2000 to 2005. And since 2009 (and the protests against President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s controversial reelection in June of that year), no fewer than 40 journalists and citizen-journalists have been sentenced to a total of 2,000 lashes.
 The tendency to use this cruel and humiliating punishment has increased of late. In 2016, journalist and documentary filmmaker Kaivan Karimi was sentenced to 223 lashes, the journalist Mohammad Reza Fathi was sentenced to 459 lashes and Shahrood News website editor Mostafa Sharif was sentenced to 40 lashes. Gilan Novin and Gilan Noo news website editors Mostafa Brari and Arash Shoa Shargh were sentenced at the end of last month to 114 lashes and 40 lashes respectively. In their case, the sentences have yet to be carried out. But Najafabad News website journalist Hossein Movahedi was administered 40 lashes on 4 January – his sentence for allegedly publishing false information.
 Iran is ranked 169th out of 180 countries in RSF’s 2016 World Press Freedom Index.
 
Bahrain Foils Attempt to Smuggle Fugitives to Iran - Reports
NCRI Iran News/Friday, 10 February 2017Bahrain’s security forces have foiled an attempt to smuggle by sea to Iran the fugitives who escaped from the Jaw prison in Manama on January 1, Gulf News reported on Thursday. The Media Centre of Bahrain’s Interior Ministry said in a tweet that security forces foiled the attempt during a joint operation carried out at dawn on Thursday. A preliminary investigation indicates that the boat carrying the fugitives was heading to Iran, the centre said in another tweet. Agence France-Presse reported that Bahrain forces killed three 'fugitives' on Thursday as they tried to flee by boat to Iran. AFP quoted the Interior Ministry as saying that seven other people on the boat were arrested in connection with the jailbreak, which freed 10 people serving long sentences for terrorism.
 
Iran: Metro Wall Collapses in Qom; Workers Buried Under Debris
NCRI Iran News/Friday, 10 February 2017On Thursday February 9, 2017, the southern wall of Metro, in the City of Qom (Southwest of Tehran) collapsed, six injured workers have been transferred to hospital, and more people are buried under the debris, according to the head of Iran’s Emergency Services in an interview with the state run Fars news agency. The director of Qom province's Red Crescent Society also said: We have two sniffer dogs at the Metro side wall searching, and two other dogs are being dispatched.
 So far, the details and causes of the accident remains unknown, there are people trapped beneath the rubble and one person has been pulled out of the rubble, according to another report published by the IRGC affiliate ‘TASNIM news agency’.
 
Iran Regime's Most Fundamental Vulnerability Is Domestic Instability
NCRI Iran News/Friday, 10 February 2017
Time to turn up the heat on Iran
 By testing their ballistic missiles in a provocative act last month, Iran's ayatollahs also tested the resolve of the new U.S. president.
 National Security Advisor Michael Flynn’s promise of swift action should violations continue has turned the Obama administration’s era of appeasement on its head, at least in spirit. Wrote Ali Safavi on THE HILL on February 9, 2017, the article continues as follows:
 Given Tehran’s military saber-rattling, including a second missile launch this week and continued support for international terrorism, the time for action may come soon. There are a number of reasonable options for the Trump administration to turn up the heat without immediate, full-scale military engagement.
 First, the U.S. should officially designate the regime’s terrorist arm, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRCG), as a foreign terrorist entity and ramp up targeted sanctions against it.
 Not only is the IRGC, along with Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence, a crucial component in the regime’s crackdowns and human rights abuses at home, it functions as a regional terror production factory.
 As Gen. Flynn acknowledged in his forceful denunciation of Iran’s destabilizing role in geopolitics, they have sown chaos throughout the Middle East by supporting the Houthis in Yemen, Bashar al-Assad in Syria, Shia militias in Iraq, and the Hezbollah in Lebanon, among others.According to U.S. intelligence analysts and court rulings, the IRGC was directly involved in the bombings of the Jewish Community Center in Argentina and the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, as well as in the development and deployment of roadside bombs that killed hundreds of American soldiers in Iraq. The IRGC is embedded in a strictly-managed kleptocracy aimed at enriching those in power at the expense of the Iranian population. Controlling an enormous business empire consisting of key national industries, including energy and real estate, the ICRG is reaping the benefits of the lifting of sanctions by the Obama administration.
 By tightening capital flows and sanctioning key IRGC personnel, the Trump administration can diminish some of Iran’s greatest threats to regional stability. It should also work with regional partners to marginalize and evict the regime’s forces and militias from Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and other countries in the Middle East.
 Strategically speaking, however, applying sanctions and confronting the export of terror is not sufficient. To effectively undermine and confront the regime, Washington needs to target Tehran’s most fundamental vulnerability — domestic instability.
 The main enemies of the theocratic regime are the Iranian people, who yearn for a democratic, representative and secular government. Brutally suppressed by the mullahs for decades, they have risen up a number of times, including in 2009, when millions poured onto the streets to protest the velayat-e faqih (absolute clerical rule).  Trump’s initial Iran policy, including the imposition of new sanctions this month, has already been welcomed by the organized opposition movement, the National Council of Resistance in Iran (NCRI), a broad coalition of political groups and personalities committed to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and a democratic, free, secular, and non-nuclear Iran.
 The principal member, Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), exposed the regime’s clandestine nuclear program in 2002 for the first time, which triggered the IAEA inspections of Iran’s nuclear sites.
 The MEK, which also exposed the terror network of the Iranian regime in the region, is considered an “enemy of state” by the mullahs, with thousands of its supporters having been brutally massacred.
 Standing with the Iranian people as they strive for democratic change would give America greater leverage in dealing with Iran. In addition, it would signal an overdue shift in the approach and policy vis-à-vis the ruthless clerics, critical to curbing Tehran’s regional bullying and nuclear ambitions.
 Dialogue and engagement by previous administrations had the opposite result.
 Condemning Tehran’s human rights abuses at every turn, including at the U.N. Security Council, will send a clear message to the Iranian people that the era of the mullahs’ unchecked and malicious conduct in the region is over.
 It will show that the United States is no longer turning a blind eye to the terror, and that those seeking a free, open, and democratic future for their nation are not alone.
 As it partners with the Iranian people, the Trump administration must step away from the regime’s multimillion-dollar public relations apparatus, which has an unsettling grip on the imagination of the pundits and media inside the Beltway.
 For years, Tehran apologists and lobbyists have staged the discussion under the cloak of realpolitik — options are limited to kissing the Ayatollah’s hand or engaging in all-out, nihilistic warfare.
 It is a carefully curated, fear-driven propaganda campaign that glosses over a multitude of options and regime vulnerabilities. Keeping opposition groups and the Iranian people at arm’s length has been central to that misleading narrative.
 The Iranian people have always welcomed the opportunity to forge a strategic alliance against the terrorist mullahs, to bring about the free and democratic Iran, the prerequisite to a secure and tranquil region.
 A policy reset on Iran enables the new administration to make the change that will facilitate democratic change in Iran, and that will make the world a safer place.
 Ali Safavi (@amsafavi) is a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) and president of Near East Policy Research, a research and policy analysis firm in Washington, D.C.

UK House of Commons condemns Israeli settlement activity
Tovah Lazaroff, Adam Rasgon/Jerusalem Post/February 09/17
The UK was one of 14 countries, out the UNSC 15 member body, that voted in support of Resolution 2334.
The United Kingdom House of Commons passed a resolution on Thursday that condemned Israeli settlement activity and affirmed United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334 that call on Israel to halt such action.
Although the debate had been pre-scheduled it came during a week when European government, including the United Kingdom have spoken out against the Knesset's authorization of the Settlements Law, which retroactively legalizes 4,000 settler homes private Palestinian property.
With passage of that law, a “dangerous threshold was cross,” Minister for the Middle East Tobias Ellwood told the House of Commons.
The UK was one of 14 countries, out the UNSC 15 member body, that voted in support of Resolution 2334.
Member of Parliament John Howell from the Conservative Party took issue with the focus on settlements as a stumbling bloc to peace. “Why are we picking on settlements, when there are a whole rang elf issues,” Howell said.
The UNSC resolution, he said, is part of the internationalization of the peace when what is needed is for Israelis and Palestinians to hold direct talks without pre-conditions. Unfortunately, he said, the Palestinians “come up with pre-conditions each and every time and it usually involves the release of more terrorists.”
 He detailed the steps Israel had taken against settlement activity, including 10-month moratorium on new settler housing starts that run from November 2009 to September 2010.
 He also pointed to the 2008 Annapolis process in which Israel offered to withdraw from 94% of the West Bank. “At the moment all Israel has received is a denial of its right to exist and an intensification of violence,” he said.
 The Palestinian Authority, he warned, is scared to hold elections, because it fears it will be replaced by ISIS.
 MP Simon Danczuk of the Labour party said that Israel’s “perpetual land grabs are immoral and illegal and a barrier to peace.”
 Why should the Palestinians believe that Israel is committed to peace when they see these homes go up,” he said.
 MP Helen Goodman of the Labour party urged the United Kingdom to impose “personal sanctions” on those people who promote and benefit from the settlements.
 In the late afternoon, the House of Commons passed a resolution that condemned settlement activity.
 In Belgium, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas spoke against Israeli settlement activity when he met with Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel. He had held a similar conversation just two days earlier with French President Francois Hollande.
 “What Israel did in passing a law in the Knesset a few days ago legalizes the theft of private Palestinian land owned by Palestinians for the benefit of settlers,” Abbas said.
 Israeli settlement activity, he said, “is an assault against our people, a violation of international law, and a wanton challenge to international law, which has been expressed through UNSC resolution 2334."
 “We will confront [these acts] in all international bodies and we will continue our work with international courts to protect our existence and survival on Palestine’s land,” he said. “We call on the international community including Belgium and all European states to help us implement UNSC resolution 2334 before too much time passes.”
 “We need to not allow for the reinforcement racist discrimination, apartheid,” Abbas said.
 He also spoke by telephone with EU Foreign Policy Chief Federica Mogherini who is in Washington D.C. meeting with politicians. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is expected to travel to Washington next week to meet with US President Donald Trump. West Bank settlement activity is expected to be part of their discussion.
 On Thursday the residents of the Amona outpost called on Netanyahu to approve the new settlement he promised them prior to departing. Trump has been largely silent on the issue of West Bank settlement activity but two weeks ago, the White House issued a statement asking Israel to refrain from unilateral action such as the creation of new settlements. 
 
Yemen Loyalists Retake Historic Port of Mokha

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 10/17/Yemeni government forces took full control of the historic Red Sea port of Mokha on Friday after weeks of deadly fighting with Shiite rebels and their allies, a spokesman said. "We have done with the Battle of Mokha," armed forces spokesman Mohammed al-Naqib told AFP, adding that the rebels had been forced to flee the town. Another loyalist military source confirmed that government forces were in "full control". The rebels had put up fierce resistance in the town. Twenty-four rebels and eight loyalist troops were killed in fighting on Wednesday alone. Mokha was once Yemen's main port serving as the export hub for coffee grown in the highlands. But it was overtaken in the 19th century by Hodeida further north, which remains in the hands of the rebels, and the southern port of Aden, which is the headquarters of the government. The capital Sanaa is held by the rebels. Before the government launched a major offensive on January 7, the rebels controlled virtually all of Yemen's 450 kilometre (280 miles) Red Sea coastline. But with the support of a Saudi-led coalition the loyalists have made steady gains.
More than 400 combatants have been killed since the offensive began.
 
Egyptian Louvre attack suspect 'acted alone'
By AFP, Paris Thursday, 9 February 2017/A 29-year-old Egyptian arrested after a machete attack at the Louvre in Paris last week has said he acted on his own and was not under orders from ISIS, a source close to the probe said Wednesday.
 Police have confirmed him as Abdallah El-Hamahmy, a sales manager resident in Dubai, who has denied being guided by the extremist group during interrogations. He said that he “acted on his own will” and planned only to damage artworks as a symbolic assault on France, the source said, asking not to be named. Although his backpack contained spray paint which could have been used to deface artwork, investigators believe he appears to have “a certain sympathy for the ideas of IS,” the source said, referring to ISIS using a different acronym. In Friday’s attack at the world’s busiest museum, Hamahmy was shot after lunging at four soldiers with machetes in the underground ticketing area while shouting “Allahu Akbar” (God is Greatest). Hamahmy, who is recovering in hospital, is likely be charged once medical staff say he is well enough to appear before a judge. The son of a retired policeman entered France legally on January 26 on a flight from Dubai and was staying in an apartment rented by the week in an expensive Paris district near the Champs-Elysees, sources say. Investigators are examining a Twitter account thought to his which sent out a dozen messages in Arabic between 9:27 am and 9:34 am, just minutes before the attack.“In the name of Allah... for our brothers in Syria and fighters across the world,” one said. Another post asked: “Why are they afraid of the creation of a state for Islam? Because the state of Islam defends its resources and the honor of Muslims.” Hamahmy’s father Reda El-Hamahmy, a retired police officer, had previously given media interviews – including with Al Arabiya – saying his son was innocent. But speaking in Cairo he told AFP that his son had shown no sign of having been radicalized.He said the family was relatively well off, with Abdallah earning a law degree in the Nile delta city of Mansoura in 2010 before moving to Dubai to become a sales manager. The father said the suspect’s wife was pregnant with the couple’s second child and was currently in Saudi Arabia. The Louvre assault revived fears of violence in France, which suffered a string of attacks that killed 238 people between January 2015 and July 2016. (Additional editing by Al Arabiya English)

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 10-11/17
EXCLUSIVE: Defiant Assad tells Yahoo News torture report is 'fake news'
Michael Isikoff /Yahoo/February 10/17
Confronted with new evidence of torture and mass hangings in one of his military prisons, Syrian President Bashar Assad said in an exclusive interview with Yahoo News that the allegations were the product of a “fake news era” and charged that a human rights group, Amnesty International, had fabricated evidence to discredit his embattled government.
“You can forge anything these days,” Assad said when asked about a new Amnesty International report estimating that between 5,000 and 13,000 prisoners were killed in a “calculated campaign of extrajudicial execution” at a military prison outside of Damascus between 2011 and December 2015. “We are living in a fake news era.”
Assad, combative and unyielding, also insisted the United States had no grounds to condemn Syria for human rights abuses, pointing to the invasion of Iraq and to American support for Saudi Arabia, a country that beheads prisoners. “The United States is in no position to talk about human rights,” he said. Challenged over the issue, Assad grew contentious, saying at one point, “You own the questions. I own the answers.”
The Syrian president was also confronted for the first time with chilling photographs taken by a former regime photographer, code named Caesar, depicting rows of emaciated, brutally beaten bodies of detainees — many of them believed to be political protesters — at his military prisons. The photographs — which U.S. officials have likened to images from Nazi concentration camps — were the basis for a landmark lawsuit filed in Spain’s National Court last week accusing nine senior Syrian intelligence and security officials of international human rights crimes.
Assad at first suggested the photos may have been edited and “Photoshopped.” Shown an FBI report concluding that the photos were not manipulated and appeared to depict “real people and events,” Assad dismissed it. “If the FBI say something, it’s not evidence for anyone, especially for us,” he said. “The most important thing: If you take these photos to any court in our country, could they convict any criminal regarding this? Could they tell you what this crime is, who committed it? If you don’t have this full picture, you cannot make judgment. It’s just propaganda.”
Assad made the comments during a 34-minute interview, his first since the inauguration of Donald Trump — recorded by five presidential cameramen in one of his offices in Damascus. It comes at a pivotal moment in Syria’s six-year-long civil war. Assad — after years of resisting U.S. pressure to step down — has become increasingly emboldened in the wake of military gains, including the recapture of eastern Aleppo, with the help of Russian air strikes. Assad pointed to the slow restoration of civilian life in Damascus, where the streets are bustling and shops in the old city souk are jammed with customers — albeit with military troops and checkpoints throughout the city and the booms of occasional mortar fire in the suburbs still audible in the evenings.
“As you can see, Damascus is safe today — it’s nearly normal life, not completely,” he said.
Assad warned the Trump administration about placing new troops inside Syria to fight the Islamic State without his approval and rejected an idea advocated by Trump for “safe zones” in his country. The proposal, he said, was “not a realistic idea at all.” He did hold out hope for cooperation with the Trump administration, but only following “a rapprochement between the Russians and Americans.”
Assad also appeared to lend support to one of the Trump administration’s arguments for its controversial executive order suspending the settlement of Syrian refugees in the United States and temporarily banning the entry of any citizens from Syria and six other predominantly Muslim countries. There were, Assad said, “definitely” terrorist sympathizers embedded among Syria’s 4.8 million refugees. He cited photographs showing Syrian rebels, “holding the machine gun or killing people,” who later resurfaced in Western Europe. Asked if he believed there were a “significant” number of terrorists among the Syrian refugee population, he responded, “It’s not about significant, because you don’t need a significant number to commit atrocities.” While he said it was not his place to weigh in on the domestic U.S. debate over the executive order, Assad said his priority was to encourage refugees to return to Syria.
The man credited with smuggling 50,000 photos said to document Syrian government atrocities, a Syrian army defector known by the protective alias Caesar (disguised in a hooded blue jacket), prepares to speak to the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Capitol Hill in July 2014.
In Assad’s account, Syria’s civil conflict — which American officials blame on his brutal suppression of protests during the Arab Spring demonstrations of 2011 — resulted from American and Saudi support for a rebellion that was hijacked by Islamic extremists. “So, who supported ISIS?” he asked. “We didn’t create it. You created it — the United States created all this mess. Who supported the rebels and called them ‘moderate rebels’ while they became ISIS and al-Nusra in Syria? We didn’t. So, it’s not a conspiracy. These are facts, this is reality.”
He was dismissive of U.S. efforts to combat ISIS in Iraq and Syria. “This is a cosmetic campaign against ISIS,” he said. The terror group’s advances weren’t halted, he said, until his ally, Russia, entered the conflict with its own aerial bombing campaign. “It [ISIS] started shrinking after the Russian intervention, not the American one,” Assad said. “How could they use our oil fields and export with thousands of … trucks to Turkey without being seen by your drones and by our satellites while the Russians could be able to do so and attack them and destroy them?” Assad acknowledged he is in frequent contact with his Russian allies, including talking to President Vladimir Putin “a few weeks ago” about the “advancement of the Syrian army in Syria.”
While he has had no communications with the new U.S. president, Assad said he finds Trump’s public comments about fighting terrorism “promising.” But any prospect that the U.S. might work with Assad’s government is complicated by persistent reports of human rights abuses, including the damning new Amnesty International report. The report on the Saydnaya military prison — entitled “Human Slaughterhouse” — described how prisoners, some of them political opponents of Assad’s government, were sentenced to death in secret military trials that lasted one to three minutes. The condemned prisoners were blindfolded and taken in the middle of the night to a basement, where they were hanged 20 to 50 at a time, and their bodies were then dumped in mass graves, Amnesty International charged. The report was based on interviews with 84 people, including 31 former detainees at the prison, four prison officials or guards, three former Syrian judges and three doctors who worked at a military hospital.
Assad claimed there was not a “shred of evidence” for the report. Told that it was based in part on interviews with former Syrian prison officials and guards, judges and doctors, Assad replied, “It means nothing. … When you need to make a report, you need concrete evidence. You can make any report. You can pay money to anyone like Qatar did last year. They paid money for such a report, and they brought their own witnesses, and they made a report.”
“Do you know what goes on in that prison? Have you been there?”
“No, I haven’t been. I’ve been in the presidential palace, not in the prison.”
The Syrian president defended the execution of prisoners as “part of the Syrian law.” Asked if secret trials with no lawyers present was also part of Syrian law, he answered: “Why do they need it, if they can make it legally.”
Assad has admitted that his troops have made “mistakes” in pursuing his campaign against rebels, saying “there are always mistakes in any action.” But he vigorously denied that his forces have bombed hospitals in Aleppo.
“Why to bomb a hospital? Can you convince your audience that we have interest in bombing hospitals? … The proof that it was a lie, every time they talk about bombing hospitals, every time they say this is the last hospital in eastern part of Aleppo, and the second time they talk about another hospital and they say the same ‘they bombed the last hospital.’
“So it’s lies and lies and lies.”
 
A Fixed Way of Looking at the World

By Michael Devolin/Jihad Watch/February 10, 2017
“A myth is a fixed way of looking at the world which cannot be destroyed because, looked at through the myth, all evidence supports that myth.” — Edward de Bono
In a recent article in the Huffington Post, Thomas Woodley tells his readers that “Islamophobia” is defined as a “dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force.” My question is, Who says I have to like Islam or even Muslims? I don’t like Trotskyites, nor do I like Montreal Canadiens (on or off the ice), and I sure as hell don’t like Liberal Party of Canada members, especially not our Prime Minister. Is my dislike of all these people some sort of phobia? The Liberal Party of Canada is also a “political force,” and I am nauseated at the very thought of any of their members coming to my door around election time, asking for my vote. But is my dislike for these people and this “political force” somehow immoral, even so much as to deserve the imposing attention of the state?
The anti-Islamophobia petition in Canada is being presented with the premise that Islam is, and of itself, a salubrious ideology and constructive for Western society. But I don’t see it that way. I have heard many people echo the overused argument that “the terrorists have hijacked Islam” and that, of itself, Islam is a “religion of peace.” Well, I am not writing this article to go into all the proofs against such naive and grossly imprudent views. Been there, done that. My point here is that if I should boast that I live in a democratic country, I must also have the freedom – as an inherent right – to voice my objections to the many obtrusions of Muslims and their imperialistic cultural whims into Western societies, both in Europe and North America.
Omar Alghabra is now one of PM Justin Trudeau’s top advisors. This is a man who, as Paul Lungen reports in the Canadian Jewish News, condemned “CanWest newspapers for labelling Hamas and Hezbollah terrorist organizations.” Lungen goes on to reveal of Alghabra that, during an interview with B’nai Brith’s Jewish Tribune back in 2006, “he declined to condemn suicide bombers; he said he didn’t believe Hamas was dedicated to Israel’s destruction; and he claimed UN Resolution 242 required Israeli withdrawal from all captured territories, which the clause itself leaves indeterminate, and that he’d criticized Toronto’s police chief for taking part in a charity walk for Israel. He also said he mourned the death of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. And when Ontario declined to permit the use of sharia law in Ontario, Alghabra said he was disappointed.” So, I must ask the question: am I commanded by the new anti-Islamophobia law to “like” Omar Alghabra and to condone his views on the terrorist entities Hamas and Hizballah simply because he is a Muslim (and a member of the Liberal Party of Canada)?
I haven’t noticed any petition condemning Judeophobia. During my time in the Jewish Defense League, I have seen many placards on the opposite of the street calumniating Jews, Zionism, and the State of Israel. Apparently such calumniation, if it’s directed at the Jewish people and the State of Israel, is permissible in Canada’s diminishing democracy. And after all, as many Jewish friends have told me over the years, the non-Jewish world (and especially the Muslim world) is quite comfortable with shameless and insouciant hatred of Jews and Judaism and the State of Israel. Funny thing is, though, the Western world is suddenly offended by certain perceptive individuals (i.e. Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller) pointing out the blatantly obvious connections between Islam and Jew-hatred, between Islam and today’s scourge of terrorism. Accusing Jews of every evil under the sun, condemning “Jewish settlers” for realizing their indigenous rights in their ancestral homeland, is permitted the Muslim, but conversely, pointing out the imperialistic sermons and barbaric tendencies of some imams residing in Canada is now prohibited by law with the threat of prosecution. How is this any different from 1933 Nazi Germany, where any public dissent against Adolf Hitler’s fascist regime was enough to land one in Dachau as a “political prisoner”?
The anti-Islamophobia bill will become a veritable rooftop podium from which Canadian Muslim groups supportive of Hamas and Hezbollah and other terrorist entities such as al-Qaeda and ISIL will push their anti-Israel and anti-democratic/pro-sharia agendas with an invigorated impunity. Anyone who opposes their views, who dissents from what always was and always will be their imperialistic objective; anyone who points out the intention of many Muslim advocacy groups, which is to obtrude their religiously embedded cultural practices into Western societies; will be prosecuted by the state and labelled as racist and “Islamophobic.”
The myth Canadians are now being forced to accept is that Islam is an innocuous and salubrious religion: Muslims do not have a history of violent imperialistic tendencies; and they really do like Jews, regardless what their Quran says. The way things are looking for Canadians right now, thanks to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party and Thomas Mulcair’s NDP, this myth will not be destroyed anytime soon, as any voice of dissent, any public objection to their myth, will be met with the full force of the courts. Welcome to Canada. Welcome to 21st century fascism.
 
Analysis: Trump presidency heralds new era of US-Egypt ties
Reuters/February 10, 2017
Egyptian and US officials say the Trump administration will likely seek to lift or ease conditions imposed under Obama on the payment of $1.3 billion in US military aid a year. CAIRO/WASHINGTON - Friendly phone calls, an invite to the White House, a focus on Islamic militancy and what Donald Trump called "chemistry" have set the tone for a new era of warmer US-Egyptian ties that could herald more military and political support for Cairo.
The mutual admiration dates back to a UN meeting in September, when then-presidential candidate Trump found common ground with President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi's hard line on extremism. Trump described the ex-general, who rights groups criticize as authoritarian and repressive, as a fantastic guy".
Sisi, the first foreign leader to congratulate Trump on his election victory, returned the favor last month after the newly inaugurated president barred citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States.
Egypt, not on the list, refrained from speaking out against the ban on behalf of Muslim countries that often look to it for leadership. That silence spoke volumes about the changing tone of its relationship with the United States.
For Trump, Sisi appeals as an uncompromising leader who came to power by overthrowing the Muslim Brotherhood and is fighting Islamic State in northern Sinai and on his border with Libya.
For Sisi, Trump appeals as a US leader who unlike Barack Obama is not interested in berating an old ally on human rights.
"The rhetoric alone of this Trump administration is much more forward leaning in its support towards Sisi than Obama," said one US official, who declined to be named. "I expect it to be a much closer relationship."
Egypt is one of Washington's closest Middle East allies, and US military aid has long cemented its historic 1979 peace deal with Israel. Home to the Suez Canal, one of the world's busiest waterways, the stability of the Arab world's most populous state is a US priority, but the strategic relationship hit a low under Obama who briefly froze aid after Sisi overthrew an elected president.
In contrast, weeks into Trump's presidency, the White House has already discussed declaring the Brotherhood a terrorist group - sure to be welcomed by Sisi, who was condemned by Obama for his crackdown on Egypt's oldest Islamist group.
 Egyptian and US officials say the Trump administration will likely seek to lift or ease conditions imposed under Obama on the payment of $1.3 billion in US military aid a year.
 Officials and analysts do not expect a major jump in the size of US military aid overnight, but describe a relationship that is more aligned and mutually supportive.
 "During the Obama's administration there were difficulties," said an Egyptian government official, who declined to be named.
 "When the administrations have common goals it makes cooperation easier. The military is the backbone of the relationship. We have a common enemy, which is terrorism."
 MILITARY SUPPORT
 Obama froze aid for nearly two years after Sisi overthrew president Mohamed Morsi, an elected Brotherhood official, in mid-2013 after mass protests.
 Though Sisi went on to win an election and the aid was restored in March 2015, new rules were introduced to ensure it was used for counter-terrorism and border security and Sinai.
 Congress also made aid dependent on the US Secretary of State certifying that Egypt was moving to govern democratically.
 That experience has left a bitter taste among some in Egypt's military who saw their overthrow of the Brotherhood as part of the broader war on terrorism.
 "What interests Egypt now is economic and military aid and this is what Egypt will try to benefit from in light of the closeness between Sisi and Trump," an Egyptian intelligence official said. "In return, America is seeking to benefit from Egypt as an ally in the Middle East and the fight against terrorism."
 The Egyptian government official said the overall size of the aid package had barely changed in decades, but it would weigh any request for increases carefully.
 What Egypt gets depends partly on Congress, where some oppose loosening restrictions due to concerns over Sisi's crackdown on dissent.
 "(The administration) could ask Congress to no longer impose conditions on the funds and they could request increases in certain types of assistance," said Tim Rieser, a foreign policy aid to Senator Patrick Leahy, the Democratic vice chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
 "But President Trump's positive statements offer President Sisi a kind of affirmation and encouragement to continue what he is doing, which in some ways is worth more than dollars."
 NEW ERA
 Egypt has witnessed years of upheaval since the 2011 uprising helped to end Hosni Mubarak's 30-year rule, a change ultimately supported by the Obama administration.
 When the ensuing elections saw Islamists win parliament and presidency, Obama engaged them in an effort to encourage democratization in the aftermath of the Arab Spring uprisings.
 But Egypt banned the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization shortly after Sisi seized power. His security forces killed hundreds of Morsi supporters and thousands of activists have been jailed, prompting criticism from the United States and the aid suspension. By contrast, Trump has backed Egypt's approach.
 "The (Trump) administration has signaled repeatedly that it sees the Muslim Brotherhood as virtually indistinguishable from groups like al Qaeda or even Islamic State," said Eric Trager, a fellow at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
 "This is something Cairo is very excited about and Arab partners favor as well."
 On the street, Trump's victory was met with delight by Sisi supporters, who saw in Hillary Clinton an extension of Obama. The early invitation to the White House is seen by Egyptian officials as a sign they will again be heard.
 But while Egyptian officials like Trump's more aggressive approach to Islamic State they say they have yet to see detailed policies. "The warmth of the rhetoric is definitely something that's different, that makes the Egyptians feel very comfortable," said H.A. Hellyer senior non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council in Washington. "But nobody likes an unpredictable, erratic, variable in the mix and Trump is a very erratic variable."
 
Muhammad’s Sexual Fantasies of Virgin Mary
Raymond Ibrahim/February 10/17
At a time when Western people are constantly warned to speak respectfully of Muhammad, or else offended Muslims might respond with violence—to the shame and blame of those who exercise their freedom of expression—consider what Muslims regularly say about the things non-Muslims hold dear.
Recently during his televised Arabic-language program, Dr. Salem Abdul Galil—previously deputy minister of Egypt’s religious endowments for preaching—gleefully declared that, among other biblical women (Moses’ sister and Pharaoh’s wife), “our prophet Muhammad—prayers and peace be upon him—will be married to Mary the Virgin in paradise.” (Note: the Arabic word for “marriage” denotes “legal sexual relations” and is devoid of Western, “romantic,” or Platonic connotations.)
Where did Galil—this governmental official who also holds that Muslims can wear the hated crucifix to deceive Christians—get this idea? As usual, from Muhammad himself. In a hadith that was deemed reliable enough to be included in the renowned Ibn Kathir’s corpus, Muhammad declared that “Allah will wed me in paradise to Mary, Daughter of Imran”[1] (whom Muslims identify with Jesus’ mother).
If few modern Christians are aware of this Islamic claim, medieval Christians living in Muslim-occupied nations were not. There, Muslims regularly threw this fantasy in the face of Catholic and Orthodox Christians who venerated Mary as the “Eternal Virgin.”
Thus, Eulogius of Cordoba, an indigenous Christian of Muslim-occupied Spain, once wrote, “I will not repeat the sacrilege which that impure dog [Muhammad] dared proffer about the Blessed Virgin, Queen of the World, holy mother of our venerable Lord and Savior. He claimed that in the next world he would deflower her.”
As usual, it was Eulogius’ offensive words about Muhammad—and not the latter’s offensive words about Mary—that had dire consequences: he, as well as many other Spanish Christians vociferously critical of Muhammad, were found guilty of speaking against Islam and publicly tortured and executed in “Golden Age” Cordoba in 859.
Not only do many Western academics suppress or whitewash such historical anecdotes of Muslim persecution of Christians, but some—whether intentionally or out of ignorance—warp them in an effort to portray Christian victims of Islam as Christian persecutors of Islam. Thus, after quoting Eulogius’ aforementioned lament against Muhammad, John V. Tolan, a professor and member of Academia Europaea, writes:
 This outrageous claim [that Muhammad will marry Mary], it seems, is Eulogius’s invention; I know of no other Christian polemicist who makes this accusation against Muhammad. Eulogius fabricates lies designed to shock his Christian reader. This way, even those elements of Islam that resemble Christianity (such as reverence of Jesus and his virgin mother) are deformed and blackened, so as to prevent the Christian from admiring anything about the Muslim other. The goal is to inspire hatred for the “oppressors” …. Eulogius sets out to show that the Muslim is not a friend but a potential rapist of Christ’s virgins (Saracens: Islam in the Medieval European Imagination, p.93).
 As already seen, however, it was Muhammad himself—not any “Christian polemicist”—who claimed that Mary would be his eternal concubine. But facts apparently don’t matter to academics like Tolan, who are more eager to demonize Eulogius in an effort to exonerate the “offended” Muslims who slaughtered him.
 Putting real or feigned history aside, let’s return to modern day Egypt and consider why Dr. Galil—a governmental official described as a “moderate,” a bridge-builder between Muslims and Christians—would openly say what he knows millions of Orthodox Christians in Egypt will find repugnant: that Christ’s mother would be given to—and have sex with—what Christians deem a false prophet?
 To be sure, many Egyptian Christians did express outrage, including on social media, though none responded with violence. Had a leading Christian cleric, or even a little Coptic boy, claimed that Aisha—Muhammad’s favorite wife, who holds a venerated place in Sunni tradition—will be married to and have sex with a false prophet, he would’ve been beaten and, if not killed in the process, imprisoned under Egypt’s “anti -defamation of religions” law, which supposedly protects both Islam and Christianity.
 But as every Muslim and Christian knows, Egypt’s “anti-defamation of religions” law—which has been responsible for the arrest and punishment of many Copts accused of mocking Islam on social media—is in reality an anti-defamation of Islam law. Things held sacred by Christians are free game—including, apparently, for “moderate” governmental officials.
 After all, Islam—beginning with its prophet and all throughout its scriptures—is built on defaming non-Muslims and their religions, Judaism and Christianity in particular. So how can repeating what Islam holds to be true ever be deemed blasphemous by Muslims—sensitivities of infidels be damned?
 [1] From al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr, an early collection of hadith compiled by Imam Tabarani.

Iran’s lobbyists and spies in our midst?
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya/February 10/17
The recent Executive Order affecting immigration by citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries has prompted fierce discussion from all quarters, including arguments on who does or does not actually endanger the national security of the United States. As we wait to see how that debate plays out in the weeks and months ahead, there is a sense that we may be closing the proverbial barn door after the horse has run. Some believe that there are people already in the US, whose words and deeds on behalf of foreign powers critically threaten America and its allies. Iran is one of the countries named in the President’s Executive Action. It goes without saying that the Islamic Republic of Iran remains the number one state sponsor of terrorism. However, more fundamentally, some think that the focus should also be on the threat coming from a well-knit group and gilded circle of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s operatives or lobbyists, who are determined to cajole, prod and persuade US policy-makers into believing that appeasement and a soft touch is the only peaceful means to contain the top state sponsor of terrorism.
Serving Khamenei and IRGC interests
Many argue that some of Iran’s lobbyists work in plain sight and had access to top officials at the White House and State Department; they lobbied for the lifting of sanctions against the Islamic Republic, top state sponsor of terrorism, and subsequently lifting of sanctions against Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corp (IRGC), while demonizing Iranian-Americans who called for firmness against Iran’s ruling clerics and ayatollahs. In addition, some ask, although the US law, the lobbying disclosure act, requires anyone who is lobbying and gaining money to register for the sake of transparency, how come some of pro-Iran lobbyists appear to have managed to ignore the law? It seems that to its discredit, the Obama administration listened to Iran’s lobbyists and bought the “no popular opposition” part, which explains why it was so surprised and then stood silent when in 2009 millions of Iranians took to the streets. On the other hand, others believe that another category of Iran’s lobbyists or operatives act less conspicuously and they are now ensconced in almost every critical sector of the American society including academic, universities, and non-academic arenas such as think tanks. Ali, a policy analyst, pointed out that “They have their work cut out for them”, adding that this category include some of the former regime insiders.
As Frank Figliuzzi, the former assistant director for counterintelligence for the FBI, previously told Bloomberg ‘We have intelligence and cases indicating that US universities are indeed a target of foreign intelligence services.’
Many believe that no one can, with any credibility, defend their paymasters’ export of terrorism, military adventurism, meddling in other countries’ affairs, vicious abuses of human rights or persecution of religious and ethnic minorities. Over the years, Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence has developed sophisticated modus operandi, whereby its advocates first acknowledge, whether grudgingly or with all sorts of excuses about “cultural differences” or “Western preconceptions,” the ruling regime’s antipathy to democratic freedoms.
Cutting to the chase, it seems that the lobbyists and advocates for the Islamic Republic, next dismiss anyone suggesting the US should respond to this appalling conduct with firmness as a warmonger. But nobody appears to want, or ask for, armed conflict with Iran, so that is not an option.
It also seems that the way to improve Iran’s behavior, according to them, is to make nice – ignore the regional meddling, human rights abuses, arrests of activists and journalists, abuse of Sunni, Baha’is and other religious minorities, and mass executions. Offer incentives to entice the mullahs to stop enabling Assad’s carnage in Syria, or halt their supply of arms to Hezbollah, or cease test-firing missiles. But that has not worked, any reasonable observer will interject. Why not study other options?
There are none, those talking heads appear to insist. There is no popular opposition, they appear to say, and the organized resistance to the regime, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) and its main component, the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), is demonized as cult-like.
Obama’s failure: Listening to Iran’s covert lobby
Let’s take a closer look. It seems that to its discredit, the Obama administration listened to the Islamic Republic of Iran’s lobbyists and bought the “no popular opposition” part, which explains why it was so surprised and then stood silent when in 2009 millions of Iranians took to the streets and called for the theocracy’s overthrow. US policy-makers watched helplessly with the rest of the world as unarmed protesters were killed. It appeared that that massive popular movement was an expression of the overwhelming sentiment of Iran’s people, coalescing in the NCRI, which serves as the parliament-in-exile from its headquarters outside Paris. The NCRI’s main component, the MEK, has been described by bi-partisan majorities in the House of Representatives and a significant number of Senators as “a legitimate resistance movement,” and “a prominent anti-fundamentalist organization adhering to a tolerant Islam,” and “a major player in confronting this ominous phenomenon and terrorism emanating from it.”The longest-standing political coalition in Iran’s history (36 years), the NCRI’s annual convention is regularly attended by leading bi-partisan political, military and diplomatic officials from around the world, who speak to crowds of mostly Iranian-exiles exceeding 100,000.
As far back as 2001, nearly three-dozen Senators wrote: “US policy should reach out to those working to establish a democratic and pluralistic system in the country. In this context, support for the democratic goals of the National Council of Resistance of Iran and its President-elect, Maryam Rajavi, whose objectives are supported by the majority of Iranians, can contribute to peace, human rights and regional stability.”Why haven’t our policy-makers listened? Some who ask the question believe that this is because some of those superficial and so-called Iran experts and scholars – subtle, often sophisticated, well- heeled and well trained – who are likely working for the Islamic Republic of Iran and Iran’s Intelligence Ministry have been spoon-feeding them the Iranian regime’s gruel.
They add that they can ill-afford to allow their presence among them, and in particular their access to our politicians and officials. And finally, they believe that Iranian agents pose a real and present danger and they should be dealt with swiftly and decisively.

Is the Arab world truly independent?
Khaled Almaeena/Al Arabiya/February 10/17
The number of foreign journalists coming to our part of the world is on the rise. However, what is noticeable is the replacement of seasoned journalists by younger and less experienced reporters. Gone are the days of David Hirst, Peter Mansfield, David Lamb, Carlye Murphy and many others. Now we have those who are more tech-savvy and are somewhat quicker to jump to conclusions. Unfortunately, they do not always have the same political and social insight as their predecessors. Moreover, they are also sometimes blinded by their prejudices and mindset. They ask many questions and, of course, it is their job to do so. Those journalists of the past did not ask questions for which they already knew the answer. However, a couple of days ago, a young journalist asked me a question that made me think deeply. “Is the Arab world truly independent?” he asked. Frankly speaking, this took me by surprise as I remember having written about this some time ago. It was a good question and my reply to him was: No, you cannot be independent until the major elements of national power are all in place. You cannot be truly independent when food and water security depend on external sources.
To be totally independent, we have to have homegrown solutions that come from within and are not based on what others expect of us
You cannot be independent when there are obstacles that prevent free thought and which sow the seeds of self-destruction. Military coups, revolutions and the importing of foreign ideas contribute to all of this. In order to be fully independent, we have to work hard and relentlessly pursue monetary and financial stability. I truly mean it when I say that unless we have a holistic approach in evaluating our present situation, we will not get out of the quagmire we are in.
The fourth estate
For this, we need the fourth estate – a vibrant media not influenced by political parties or religious groups. We need a media that focuses on societal development and good governance and is a platform for understanding. It should not be a divisive media. To be totally independent, we have to have homegrown solutions that come from within and are not based on what others expect of us. Look at Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan and others in Asia and take a leaf out of their notebooks. We sometimes tend to look up to those who scoff at us and insult us. Let us take from and learn from those with whom we have some shared valued. However, to be totally independent, we have to work hard and be able to produce. There is no alternative to that. Let us resolve then to shed the mindset of servility and dependency. We have a strong, young talent of men and women who have the resolve to liberate us from the shackles of the past. Let us, therefore, concentrate on state building based on self-reliance, self-dependency and human rights.
This article was first published in the Saudi Gazette on February 08, 2016.

Syria’s suffering must remain on our conscience
Fawaz Turki/Al Arabiya/February 10/17
Tired though you may by now be after six years of reading about Syria’s seemingly unending travails, you still cannot but turn away in nauseated disbelief at the news, widely reported in the international media earlier this week, that the Syrian government has executed up to 13,000 people in mass hangings in just one of its prisons, a military correctional facility outside Damascus known as Saydnaya, between the start of the uprising against President Bashar Al-Assad’s regime in 2011 and December 2015. Amnesty International, which released the report about the hangings last Monday, claimed that its findings were based on interviews with 84 people, including former detainees, guards, judges and officials at the prison, and that the executions had been authorized at the highest levels of government. Details in the report, grotesque to the extreme, show how every week, and often twice a week, groups of between 20 and 50 prisoners were executed in total secrecy at the facility. Before execution, the victims were brought to a military court for “trials” that lasted only a few minutes. No defense. No lawyer. No appeal. And lest we forget, last August, Amnesty International reported that an estimated 17,723 people had additionally died as a result of torture, or of deprivation of food, water and medical care, between March 2011 – the outset of the uprising – and the end of December 2015. Predictably, the Syrian government disputed all this, with the Justice Ministry in Damascus saying that claims by Amnesty International were completely false, “intended to harm Syria’s international reputation.” Now one wonders why Amnesty International would stand to gain in harming Syria’s sterling international reputation. But the human rights group has not been the only watchdog to take the government in Damascus to task for its excesses over the last six years.
Deaths on massive scale
In an article on the BBC’s website last Thursday, the British broadcasting body quoted several human rights experts who had gone on record last year saying that witness accounts strongly suggested that “tens of thousands of people” were being detained and that “deaths on a massive scale” were occurring in custody. While at the beginning of the conflict these detainees were primarily protesters, later the target became journalists, social critics, intellectuals, academics, lawyers and others, snatched from the country’s streets, homes and workplaces, and later taken to official or secret detention facilities – from there to vanish without a trace, presumed “disappeared.” The term “disappeared” or “forced disappearance” gained currency first in Chile after the country’s 1973 coup, when thousands of dissidents became “desperados” after getting captured by Augusto Pinochet’s intelligence services. The term, along with the term’s context, later became naturalized into English and other languages.
Beyond the law, beyond UN statutes, beyond Amnesty International, lies the impact on the mind and soul of those who survived the noose, the sadistic beating, the unattended wounds, the starvation, hearing the eerie screams of fellow-prisoners being tortured – and now are free to live in the outside world
In international human rights law, a “forced disappearance” occurs when a person is secretly abducted with the authorization, support or acquiescence of a state, followed by a refusal to acknowledge that person’s fate and whereabouts. The practice is thus vehemently proscribed. According to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed at any civilian population, a “forced disappearance” qualifies as a “crime against humanity.” No mincing of words here.
Beyond the law, beyond UN statutes, beyond Amnesty International, lies the impact on the mind and soul of those who survived the noose, the sadistic beating, the unattended wounds, the starvation, hearing the eerie screams of fellow-prisoners being tortured – and now are free to live in the outside world.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
The consequence of experiences like that reach far beyond the immediate pain the victim feels while incarcerated, for survivors go on to suffer the ravages of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, whose symptoms, well known to the therapeutic community, include flash-backs, severe anxiety, insomnia, nightmares, depression and memory lapses. Therapists – being therapists, and thus imbued with a penchant for wanton psychologizing – see all that as a normal human response to an abnormal human condition. Torturing prisoners – in this case, before hanging them in batches of 20 to 50 once or twice a week – is not only a dreadful act but is also, at a seminal level of relating to it, an ironic act. For to silence, incarcerate or torture to death a man because you disagree with his views is to pay tribute – a sinister tribute to be exact, but tribute nevertheless -- to the value of ideas in human affairs. Let’s face it, torture has been practiced throughout human history, from slow death in the desert sun in ancient Egypt to slow death by crucifixion in imperial Rome; from slow death on the rack during the Inquisition to slow death by electric shock in “French” Algeria in recent decades Still, torture is torture, even where the methods employed are different in kind and in degree, in locale and in era. Torture inflicts pain on human beings for the perverse purpose of fulfilling a torturer’s desire to extract information, force a confession or derive sadistic gratification. We mourn the horrible deaths of those 13,000 or so victims who perished in the prison yards of Saydanya, as we feel with the tens of thousands of others who remain behind bars and who, should they survive their ordeal and be released, will need years to heal. These folks’ only crime, really, was that, by a trick of fate, they lived in modern-day Syria, where, as Voltaire opined about intolerant regimes, “It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.” Meanwhile, the suffering of that tormented country we call Syria should not be allowed to slip from our conscience.

Gratified absurdity and secrets of mysterious overestimation
Fahad Suleiman Shoqiran/Al Arabiya/February 10/17
There was a time when absurdity was a failure in interpreting what is said; this was either due to weakness in entailment, ignorance of its proper meaning or a pure desire to turn serious things into absurdity. Since the emergence of smartphones and tablets, some authors and writers have delightfully decided to stop being intellects as they considered that they have shined and have now their own platform as popular journalists or writers who believe that technology has given a medium for everyone. However, the problem of social absurdity is that it is a stale copy of a thoughtful text, similarly to what happened in France when Sartre was turned into mere fashion and was limited to clothes, hair style and wicked behavior. The sidewalks became runways for young men and women obsessed with trivial and worthless fashion that had nothing to do with existential philosophy, for Kierkegaard and Gabriel Marcel, or atheism, Heidegger and Sartre. It was a juvenile rebellion, where some existential ideas were abused, but on the intellectual level, they were trivial and can only be actualized through absurdity.
Social technology
This social technology phenomenon triumphed over everyone. It was a sweeping deluge and denouncing it would not weaken it. The hardest task was to try to consolidate the root of absurdity or search for its cause and condition. Talking about this phenomenon and the breakdown of centers and references getting everyone back to their corner, gives the circumstances more depth than they deserve. However, we can tackle this problematic on two levels: first, the technical rise and its technological vogue. This began ever since the world was amazed by the atomic bomb. A philosopher like Heidegger looked into the manufacturing technique, and called it ‘the era of metaphysics’. He wrote an essay in 1953 titled ‘The Question of Technology’, where he wrote: “I am trying to understand what is technology”, and in the answer, he saw that “Technology is the first emergence of a much deeper mystery” that he calls ‘event’. “You should understand that you cannot talk about technology resistance or condemnation, but rather about the nature of technology and the technological world,” he explained. We must raise awareness in order to limit gossiping because its invasion and turning everything into absurdity will make everything superficial
‘The postmodern condition’
Another idea was put forward by François Léotard in a book that was published in the 30s of the 20th Century. It was an extension of Heidegger’s idea about ‘undermining’. The book titled ‘The Postmodern Condition’ has made this snowball bigger and it initiated debates on how to ‘overtake’ modernity at the level of art, architecture, philosophy, literature and others. It has also initiated a debate about technology, its rise and its connections with capitalism, borders, cultures and centers. Habermas, who was against Léotard’s ideas, elaborated this concept in his book ‘Science and Technology as Ideology’. Despite the criticism that was based on socialist grounds, Terry Eagleton was not wrong when he considered that the emerging modernity and its goals go against the depth, centers, roots and foundations.
It is a “reflexive, self-meditated, etymological, eclectic and pluralistic art, that destroys the boundaries between fine and popular cultures, and between art and the daily experiences.” That was the first level, and technology is surely a phenomenon that is manifested through explosions and revolutions in industry, medicine and humanities. As for the second level, it is based on diagnosis and practice. Technology has resulted in people who mastered education and lectures. They have scientific careers sometimes, which may be useful. I will only criticize the ‘absurd stars’ who rise on platforms and impose themselves as role models for current and future generations.They emerge like fungus, without root or basis. They talk about trivial issues and get overwhelmed by the shallow mass surrounding them. This social phenomenon has engendered a lack of manners, propagation of insults and tampering of social morals. Unfortunately, these names are presented on platforms as valuable, but in fact, they are a state of organized ignorance.
Indulging in absurdity
Students ditched their books and got addicted to social platforms. Technology proliferated into self-doping and unreal overestimation. This phenomenon can only be diagnosed as ‘absurd’ and here, absurdity is not an insult but a neutral, decent description for people who interfere in things that they do not know.Etymologically, absurdity is derived from the act of being dull or tasteless. In the Hadith, the absurd person was “the one who speaks about trivial issues” and was part of Anas bin Malek story that was narrated by Ahmad in his musnad and later on corrected by Albani. This social phenomenon is not linked to a certain meaning and does not achieve a goal. We must raise awareness in order to limit gossiping, because its invasion and turning everything into absurdity will make everything superficial.
Beauty in artistic, literary and linguistic levels can only be seen in depth. Giving everyone the opportunity to talk about findings, facts and dogmatism while labeling themselves as inspirational, conversant and experts, is a major catastrophe that destroys all beauty. It is a decline, collapse and madness. I do condemn this phenomenon.
This article was first published in Asharq al-Awsat on February 09, 2017.

Jenadriyah festival showcases best of Arab heritage, culture
Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/February 10/17
The Jenadriyah festival is being held in the Saudi capital Riyadh for the 31st time. It is now more than a quarter of a century-old, loaded with interesting politics, culture and heritage.Late King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz was the first to organize this festival. He fostered it and developed it to become the top Arab festival that tackles the local heritage of all Arabian Peninsula regions as well as the Saudi Arabian heritage. It has also become a platform of ideas, debates and discussions. It is an annual opportunity for a deep-rooted traditional race, which is the camel annual race. Who could ever forget how late Sheikh Zayed Al Nahyan and late King Khalid used to eagerly watch the race, cheering for the camel riders. It is an annual opportunity for a deep-rooted traditional race, which is the camel annual race. Who could ever forget how late Sheikh Zayed Al Nahyan and late King Khalid used to eagerly watch the race, cheering for the camel riders. As for the most beautiful scene in the festival, it is the Ardha dance: The war and pride dance, as the kings and soldiers dance.
The festival also features poetry reading panels loaded with Jenadriyah spirit, and no one can beat the poetry of the Saudi desert man and I mean here, Khalaf bin Hazal al-Otaibi, may God protect him. The perfect capper can only be through the great operetta, combining the finest art and artists in Saudi Arabia. Unfortunately, this big show will be missed this year!
The Jenadriyah, with all its scenes, seminars and markets, is a rich cultural showcase for Saudi Arabia, the Gulf, and the whole Arab region. Who can ever forget the debates over the second Gulf War and the radical Sahwa current controversies with its antagonists? Those were the days! The Jenadriyah is not just that! It is a market in the largest sense of the word. Many artisans and national heritage product sellers await this market as it witnesses a large trading movement. There also old women who come from rural areas and the countryside to display their Jenadriyah seasonal products. We are talking about old Arab markets like Okaz, Zhi Majaz, Mijana, Dumat ak-Jandal, Marbad, Aden and Sohar. From the mentioned names, you notice how Arabs used to geographically spread their markets all over the Arabian Peninsula, from the north to the south. I think that the Jenadriyah audio-visual archive is important and useful for researchers as they might find many unexpected surprises.
Happy Jenadriyah festival!
**The article was first published in Asharq Al-Awsat
 
The Muslim Council of Britain's Little Problem/Miqdaad Versi and Dodgy Facts
Douglas Murray/Gatestone Institute/February 10/17
 https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9889/muslim-council-britain-miqdaad-versi
 The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) presented themselves in the manner of debt collectors: standing beside a big bruiser stressing how sorry they were to have to demand this payment, but that they were only just holding back their big, angry friend.
 Unfortunately for them, during the last Labour government in Britain the MCB's behaviour and beliefs were exposed by the more progressive Muslim voices who were by then coming along, and also by a wider society which had become wise to the tricks of these self-appointed "community leaders."
 The Daily Mail issued an apology, allowing supporters of the radical National Union of Students president to pretend that she was the victim of a smear campaign by self-confessedly inaccurate media reports rather than a nasty anti-Semite whose back was being covered by a full-time pedant with dodgy facts.
 Miqdaad Versi is happy to apply rigorous standards to others, but holds exceedingly lax standards himself so long as he can carry on his own campaigning work against the UK government's counter-terrorism and counter-extremism programmes.
 Sadly for Versi, the British public's security concerns are not caused by very slightly inaccurate media reports but rather by the deadly accurate bomb blasts and shooting attacks around the world which nobody needs to make up and nobody can fully cover over.
 When considering the roles that various people worldwide play in advancing various causes, a lot of attention is paid to the people who blow themselves up. A fair amount of time is spent on the victims of such people. But relatively little time is spent focusing on the people whose role is clearly to tire everyone to death.
 In this regard, it is worth introducing to a wider audience the existence of a man called Miqdaad Versi. This man works for the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), an organisation which enjoyed a certain amount of access to the British government after the Satanic Verses affair, 9/11, 7/7 and other atrocities. During those years, they presented themselves in the manner of debt collectors: standing beside a big bruiser stressing how sorry they were to have to demand this payment, but that they were only just holding back their big, angry friend.
 Unfortunately for them, during the last Labour government in Britain, the MCB's behaviour and beliefs were exposed by the more progressive Muslim voices who were by then coming along, and also by a wider society which had become wise to the tricks of these self-appointed "community leaders." The Labour government took a strong exception to the MCB's then-Deputy Secretary General, Daud Abdullah, signing the 'Istanbul Declaration'. As Home Office Minister Hazel Blears said at the time, it "supports violence against foreign forces -- which could include British naval personnel... and advocating attacks on Jewish communities all around the world."
 In the years since then, the MCB has had a problem. Its self-appointed task is to act as an interlocutor with the government, but the government will not speak to them, a state of affairs which leaves the leadership of the MCB with a lot of time on their hands. Happily, the group's Assistant Secretary General, Miqdaad Versi, has found a way to fill that time. Last year he hit the headlines in Britain for an especially observant piece of mid-morning television watching. While filling up his day, Mr Versi noticed that a piece of paper, on which the lead character in a children's cartoon, called "Fireman Sam," at one point slipped, appeared to resemble a page of Arabic writing.
 By watching the clip over and over again, Mr Versi discovered that the page of writing resembled a passage from chapter 67 of the Quran. As a result, the makers of "Fireman Sam" were forced to issue a statement assuring the world that a full-scale investigation was underway into how this happened, and that, in addition:
 "We are taking immediate action to remove this episode from circulation and we are reviewing our content production procedures to ensure this never happens again."
 Then last month -- thanks to the BBC -- we got an update on Miqdaad Versi's activities. In January, the Victoria Derbyshire show ran a special feature on Mr Versi. The article -- "The man correcting stories about Muslims" -- portrayed Versi as an intrepid crusader for truth. In particular, it focussed on his work of systematically and continually complaining to the UK's new press regulator, Ipso, whenever he thinks that a story in the British media contains inaccurate reporting on Islam or Muslims.
 The BBC report described, for instance, how Versi had managed to get a major correction from the Sunday Times. In a front-page piece on a recent report into the state of integration in Britain by Dame Louise Casey, the Sunday Times had run the headline "Enclaves of Islam see UK as 75% Muslim." The contents of the report were wholly accurate -- the headline writer at the Sunday Times had merely wrongly extrapolated one point in the story and wrongly recounted the fact that pupils at one school featured in Casey's report had said they thought the UK was between 50 and 90 percent "Asian." The Sunday Times subsequently ran a correction. On another occasion, Versi had managed to get a correction from the Daily Mail which he presented as "huge." The correction was that in a story about the President of the National Union of Students, Malia Bouattia, the paper had reported that Bouattia had said that young Muslims were going to join ISIS "because of government cuts to education" and had referred to a Birmingham university as a "Zionist outpost" because "it had a large Jewish society."
 Versi's complaint about this piece centred on claiming that Bouattia had not said that cuts were the "only" reason people were joining ISIS, and that her suggestion that a British university was a "Zionist outpost" was not "because" of its large Jewish society. Both claims were highly disputable. Versi also complained that a use of the word "groups" should have been the singular, "group." On the basis of this, the Daily Mail issued an apology, allowing supporters of the radical National Union of Students' (NUS) President to pretend that she was the victim of a smear campaign by self-confessedly inaccurate media reports rather than a nasty anti-Semite whose back was being covered by a full-time pedant with dodgy facts.
 One interesting aspect of Mr Versi's work, and the hagiographic write-up he received from the BBC, is that Versi is not immune from a bit of inaccuracy himself. He often seems, in fact, given to a considerable level of inaccuracy himself.
 On the day that the BBC were giving Versi his rave review, he was on social media sharing an untrue story claiming that the government's Prevent counter-radicalisation strategy was forcing King's College London to monitor all student emails. The story was wholly bogus (KCL's policy of reserving the right to monitor all emails on their system came a year before such a policy became a legal duty). But the fact that Versi was sharing this story was typical of the double-ledger he runs when it comes to facts. He is happy to apply rigorous standards to others, but holds exceedingly lax standards himself, so long as he can carry on his own campaigning work against the UK government's counter-terrorism and counter-extremism programmes -- or continue to exercise his own low standards in trying to cover for people who are designated as "extremists" by the UK government . Or indeed, in belonging to an organisation correctly identified as an "enabler" of prejudice against the minority Ahmadiyya community.
 None of this came up in the BBC's report, nor would any observer have particularly expected it to. The story of this double book-keeper would certainly make a more interesting story. But it would be less exciting than the story of the lone, caped crusader whose meaningless pedantry appears to be exercised in the hope of boring everyone else into submission. Sadly for Miqdaad Versi, the British public's security concerns are not caused by very slightly inaccurate media reports but rather by the deadly accurate bomb blasts and shooting attacks around the world -- attacks which nobody needs to make up and nobody can fully cover over.
 **Douglas Murray, British author, commentator and public affairs analyst, is based in London, England.
 © 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Question: "How should Christians view refugees?"
GotQuestions.org/ February 10/17
Answer: One of the things that have marked the 21st century so far is the global refugee crisis caused by warfare, genocide, and oppression in various places around the world. Some estimates place the number of displaced people at close to 60 million globally. Syria has endured a civil war since 2011, displacing nearly 14 million people from their homes; nearly 5 million Syrians have fled to other countries. The United States admitted almost 85,000 refugees from all over the world in 2016. With the refugees come opportunities, risks, and debates over what the Christian response to refugees should be.
First, all Christians should be able to agree that the issues surrounding the refugee crisis are more complex than the rhetoric on social media would have us believe. There are Christians who, in the name of compassion, believe we should open all borders and take in all refugees, no matter what. There are other Christians who, in this era of terrorism, believe we should close all borders and refuse most refugees. For one group to malign the other as “un-Christian” or “unloving” or “racist” is wrong. To insist that one’s own view on refugees is the only possible view for a Christian to have is neither helpful nor realistic. It’s not as simple as “love vs. hate” or “compassion vs. security.” There are nuances to consider. There may, in fact, be more than one Christian view on the matter of refugees.
Second, still laying the groundwork for considering the refugee crisis, we should acknowledge that forming personal convictions concerning refugees is a separate matter from setting governmental policy. Christians have many shared priorities, but the practical outworking of those priorities can vary from person to person. A government, even when informed by Christian principles, has different priorities. Governments must be concerned with national security, even if Christians give no thought to personal security. An individual Christian may be willing to risk everything in order to assist refugees, but that same Christian cannot demand that his neighbors share that risk. We must strike a balance between our (God-given) personal responsibility to show compassion and the (God-given) state responsibility to protect its citizens.
It’s good to look to Scripture for some examples of displaced people. Jacob and his family could be considered refugees in Egypt, fleeing the famine in Canaan (Genesis 46:1–4). When Moab faced destruction at the hands of the Assyrians, the Moabites pleaded for Israel to take in their refugees (Isaiah 16:3). Edom was condemned, in part, for refusing to help Jewish refugees (Obadiah 1:14). Psalm 146:9 says, “The Lord watches over the foreigner.” Ruth, who was more of an immigrant than a refugee, was welcomed in Judah, but note, in her words to Naomi, her willingness to assimilate into Jewish culture: “Your people will be my people and your God my God” (Ruth 1:16).
The Old Testament Law contained this instruction pertaining to refugees and immigrants in Israel: “Do not oppress a foreigner; you yourselves know how it feels to be foreigners, because you were foreigners in Egypt” (Exodus 23:9). This principle is reiterated in Leviticus 19:3, “When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them.”
The New Testament does not give any specific command concerning nations admitting refugees. The New Testament was not written to be a civic handbook or legal charter. What we do find in the New Testament are specific commands concerning individual treatment of others. Jesus said the greatest commandment, right after the command to love God, is “Love your neighbor as yourself” (Mark 12:31). And in one of the end times’ judgments, Jesus will commend those who helped the hungry, the thirsty, and the stranger (Matthew 25:35). So, without a doubt, Christians have a mandate to show compassion to the needy.
The Christian response to refugees must include love. And it’s worth pointing out that biblical love always includes risk. It’s impossible to love someone the way Christ loves us and not face a certain amount of risk. And that factor—risk—is what necessitates that Christian compassion be tempered with caution when implementing national policy. Any nation that brings in refugees opens itself to the possibility that terrorists have infiltrated the ranks of displaced internationals. The Paris attacks in November 2015 and the Boston Marathon bombing in 2013 are grim reminders of the deception employed by terrorists to gain entrance into a country.
So, a Christian forming a biblical response to the refugee crisis will do several things:
1) Commit to administering care and compassion to refugees. Christians should welcome refugees into their homes and churches as a way to show God’s love and share the gospel. Standing before the throne of the Lamb one day will be those “from every nation, tribe, people and language” (Revelation 7:9).
2) Pray for our nation’s leaders. Governing authorities have a divine responsibility to “bring punishment on the wrongdoer” (Romans 13:4) and to ensure “that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness” (1 Timothy 2:2). Pray that our leaders would have the wisdom of a Daniel or a Joseph.
3) Support ministries that assist refugees. Many Christian ministries exist to help refugees in relocation, job training, language skills, and cultural adjustment.
4) Promote government policies that are effective in screening refugees to prevent those with evil intent from entering. We must show compassion to those in need; at the same time, we must show compassion to our fellow citizens and not place them at undue risk.
5) Pray for the refugees, their families, and their troubled homelands. “Be exalted, O God, above the highest heavens! May your glory shine over all the earth” (Psalm 57:5).
6) Research the best ways to help the displaced. From “safe zones” abroad to Christian ministries at home, there are many options that deserve serious consideration.
Jesus told us to go into all the world and preach the gospel (Matthew 28:18– 20). With the surge of refugees, the mission field is coming to us, and many of those who come are from nations closed to traditional missions. Wouldn’t it be just like God to turn a bad situation into something good and full of glory?
Recommended Resource: Seeking Refuge: On the Shores of the Global Refugee Crisis by Bauman, Sorens, & Smeir