LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

January 01/17

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletin16/english.january01.17.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006


Bible Quotations For Today
Did you not know that I must be in my Father’s house
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 02/41-52/:"Every year his parents went to Jerusalem for the festival of the Passover. And when he was twelve years old, they went up as usual for the festival. When the festival was ended and they started to return, the boy Jesus stayed behind in Jerusalem, but his parents did not know it. Assuming that he was in the group of travellers, they went a day’s journey. Then they started to look for him among their relatives and friends. When they did not find him, they returned to Jerusalem to search for him. After three days they found him in the temple, sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions. And all who heard him were amazed at his understanding and his answers. When his parents saw him they were astonished; and his mother said to him, ‘Child, why have you treated us like this? Look, your father and I have been searching for you in great anxiety.’ He said to them, ‘Why were you searching for me? Did you not know that I must be in my Father’s house?’ But they did not understand what he said to them. Then he went down with them and came to Nazareth, and was obedient to them. His mother treasured all these things in her heart. And Jesus increased in wisdom and in years, and in divine and human favour.

You are a priest for ever, according to the order of Melchizedek.
Letter to the Hebrews 07/11-19/:"If perfection had been attainable through the levitical priesthood for the people received the law under this priesthood what further need would there have been to speak of another priest arising according to the order of Melchizedek, rather than one according to the order of Aaron? For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well. Now the one of whom these things are spoken belonged to another tribe, from which no one has ever served at the altar. For it is evident that our Lord was descended from Judah, and in connection with that tribe Moses said nothing about priests. It is even more obvious when another priest arises, resembling Melchizedek, one who has become a priest, not through a legal requirement concerning physical descent, but through the power of an indestructible life. For it is attested of him, ‘You are a priest for ever, according to the order of Melchizedek.’ There is, on the one hand, the abrogation of an earlier commandment because it was weak and ineffectual (for the law made nothing perfect); there is, on the other hand, the introduction of a better hope, through which we approach God."

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 01/17
Resolutions & Prayers For The New Year/Elias Bejjani/December 31/16
Propping up US-Iraqi Mosul flop exposed Baghdad/DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis December 31/16,
Now empowered, Iran will take a bolder approach in the region/Majid Rafizadeh/The National/December 31/16
Opinion: 2016 – The Year of Aleppo/Amir Taheri/ASharq Al Awsat/December 31/16
Britain's Little Lies/Douglas Murray/Gatestone Institute/December 31/16
Blocking peace/Ben-Dror Yemini/Ynetnews/December 31/16
Britain and Australia more supportive of Israel than Obama and Kerry/Alan M. Dershowitz/Gatestone Institute/December 31/16
The Saudi vision and population growth/Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/December 31/16
Saudi defense industry is a national priority/Samar Fatany/Saudi Gazette/December 31/16


Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on January 01/17
Resolutions & Prayers For The New Year
Turkey's Foreign Minister: Hezbollah Must Leave Syria and Go Back to Lebanon
Hariri visits Defense Ministry, Helou Army Barracks: Investing in security is vital and has special priority
Report: Lebanon Escapes Terror Attack Plots
Ibrahim: Lebanese Mediator to Negotiate Release of Servicemen Abducted by IS
Report: Preparations for Parliamentary Polls Going in Two Parallel Lines
Hariri: Govt. to Tackle Oil Decrees Wednesday, Aoun's Saudi Trip Boosts Tourism
Lahham: Let's all be peacemakers in 2017!
Building collapses in Baisariye, Kheir gives instructions for instant shelter allowances to its inhabitants
Sarraf urges Lebanese to adhere to security forces' guidance instructions
Kabbara in memory of Karami: We are still in need of his influential personality
Kanaan hopes for visionary understanding for the State
Lebanese Army Intelligence raids Syrian encampments in Saida, Zahrani

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on January 01/17
Revelers Bid Adieu to a Year of Conflicts, Celebrity Deaths
UN Security Council to vote on Syria ceasefire
Member of the Syrian Opposition Coalition: Ceasefire in Syria Sends a Warning Message to Iran Regime
Iran: Arash Sadeghi's Father Stages Hunger Strike to Support His Son
Maryam Rajavi Appeals to the Nation to Help Iran's Homeless in the Cold Season
Trump Administration Should Hold Iran Accountable for Executions
Russia Seeks UN Backing for Syria Truce
UN backs Russian-Turkish Syria peace plan
Trump Praises 'Very Smart' Putin for Holding Off on Reprisals Against US
Central Baghdad Blasts Kill Dozens
Caution marks Iraqi army advance against ISIS north of Mosul
Gunshot kills Saudi citizen in Qatif
Ban Ki-moon ‘feels like Cinderella’ as he bids UN farewell
Merkel’s message to terrorists in New Year’s address
Maryam Rajavi's Message to FIFCJ Conference in Argentina
Roadside bomb kills police officer, soldier in Egypt
Egypt Begins Handing over MS804 Crash Victims' Remains

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on January 01/17
Hamas-linked CAIR finally finds a Jewish group it likes
Russia: 7 Muslims arrested for plotting New Year’s jihad massacres in Moscow
Islamic State widows from Spain arrested trying to return to Europe
Robert Spencer, PJM: CAIR-LA Chief Wishes More Had Been Killed in Russian Plane Crash
Italy: “They’ll lynch us!” Church pleads with cops for help in evicting Muslim migrants
Austria: Muslim migrant stabs Christian woman for reading Bible in migrant center
Sweden: Five Muslims convicted of gang-raping boy, but won’t be deported
Islamic State urges Western “sons of Islam” to launch brutal New Year’s attacks
Democrat Congressman: “Few limits” on what Trump can do to fight jihadis
Muslim migrants were employed as security guards in Cologne on New Year’s Eve

Links From Christian Today Site for on January 01/17
Brexit Stalemate, Early Election, Fury Over Trump: 15 Political Predictions For 2017
Incredible Escape By Yazidi Woman From Islamic State After Being Held For Two Years In Iraq
At least 25 Dead In Biggest Baghdad Bombs In Months

Latest Lebanese Related News published on January 01/17
Resolutions & Prayers For The New Year

Elias Bejjani/December 31/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/31/elias-bejjani-resolutions-prayers-for-the-new-year/
With this New Year, We ask Our Father, Almighty God, with reverence to shower on all people and all countries graces of faith, hope, love, peace and meekness.
With this new year, we call on every one to pray from the depth of their hearts for all those who are in danger, deprived of their basic rights and encountering any sort of pain, persecution, problems or hardships.
We, call on every one to pray and ask almighty God to cure them and every body else from all evilness thinking and deeds.
We pray that Almighty God shall grant all people holy gifts of forgiveness and the strength to keep loving others, specially those that are their rivals and adversaries.
While welcoming the New Year No one should forget that our life on this earth is too short, and that we must be righteous to deserve the eternal dwelling in Heaven where there will be no pain or fights, but happiness and peace.
(Corinthians 2:2-10: "But, as it is written, "What no eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor the heart of man imagined, what God has prepared for those who love him"--these things God has revealed to us through the Spirit. For the spirit searches everything, even the depths of God".)
With the new year, let us all pray to be genuinely positive, hopeful, joyful, and relaxed.
Hopefully people all over the world shall welcome the new year by putting their burdens of pain, sickness, deprivation, persecution, separation, broken hearts, disappointments, frustrations, bereavements, injustice, abandonment, and anger in the hands of Almighty God.
Our Father, Almighty God, with his gracious wisdom and abundant generosity, shall definitely see in every way possible that we safely overcome all our hardships and difficulties.
Let us all trust Him and recognize that we are all His beloved children that He has created us in his image.
(Romans 8:16-19: "The Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God, and if children, then heirs--heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, provided we suffer with him in order that we may also be glorified with him. For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worth comparing with the glory that is to be revealed in us. For the creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the sons of God.")
No one should question or doubt God's deep love for each and every one of us. How could He not, as He sent his only son, Jesus Christ to defeat death, give us the eternal life, suffer and be crucified so we, His children, can become purified from the original sin and be helped to walk safely the path of salvation.
(John 3:2 : "Beloved, we are God's children now, and what we will be has not yet appeared; but we know that when He appears we shall be like Him, because we shall see Him as He is".)
Let us welcome this new year by asking Almighty God to help us live in peace and harmony with ourselves and others, lead our steps into the righteous paths, grant us the strength of endurance and hold us back from the sin of hurting or hating others.
Let us ask Almighty God to give us the graces of love, meekness, humbleness, transparency, honesty, forgiveness, and maintain our hearts and minds pure, and free from hatred, grudges and selfishness.
With the start of this New Year we are ought to always remember that vengeance is evil and forgiveness is a Godly grace.
Let us make a resolution that we shall not allow vengeance to take control of our lives.
With this coming New Year we are ought to solidify our mere trust in God's justice, wisdom, love and keep on forgiving all those who hurt or hate us.
(Matthew 13/43: "Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. He who has ears, let him hear".)
Let one of our New Year resolution be to hold on to God's teachings and never allow vengeance to take us hostages.
(Romans 12/19-21: "Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord. To the contrary, if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by so doing you will heap burning coals on his head.” Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.")
With the New Year Let us all pray and ask Almighty God to keep us all around the year fully aware that our life on this perishable earth is temporary, and that on The Day of Judgment we shall be accountable for all our deeds be good or bad.
(Daniel 12:2-3: "And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. And those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the sky above; and those who turn many to righteousness, like the stars forever and ever".)
Happy New Year

Turkey's Foreign Minister: Hezbollah Must Leave Syria and Go Back to Lebanon
NCRI/December 31/16/Turkey’s foreign minister, Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu, in an interview with Turkey’s TV called for removal of Hezbollah militants, affiliated to the mullahs’ regime ruling Iran, from Syria and emphasized: “All foreign militias must leave Syria. Hezbollah must go back to Lebanon.”According to Turkish Anadolu news agency, Turkey’s foreign minister rejected negotiation with Assad regime and added: “Turkey rules out talks with Assad ... We continue to believe the Syrian regime, which led the death of 600 thousand people, cannot realize the political transition.”Çavuşoğlu (Chavushoglu) welcomed the ceasefire and said terrorist organizations, designated by the UN Security Council, are not subject to this agreement. Turkey’s foreign minister in his statement published in the ministry’s official site said: “The parties of the agreement are committed to stop all attacks, including air strikes, and refrain from expanding the territories under their control...”According to Associated Press (AP), the Syrian National Coalition announced that they support the nationwide ceasefire and the Syrian combatants adhere to the agreement, but they will defend themselves if Assad regime and its allies violate the ceasefire. Ahmad Ramazan of the Syrian Opposition Coalition told AP the agreement includes airstrike and shelling. In addition, legal advisor of the Syrian Free Army said: “The nationwide ceasefire does not exclude any areas controlled by combatants or any other groups. Osama Abu Zeid told reporters in Turkey that 13 armed organizations have announced the cease-fire agreement. “Peace talks will be conducted on the basis of the 2012Geneva Declaration... and (Bashar) al-Assad will have no place in the future of Syria,” he added.

Hariri visits Defense Ministry, Helou Army Barracks: Investing in security is vital and has special priority
Sat 31 Dec 2016/NNA - Prime Minister Saad Hariri visited, on Saturday, the Ministry of Defense headquarters in Yarze, where he was briefed on the security measures adopted to ensure citizens' peace and comfort throughout New Year's Eve. Greeted by Defense Minister, Yacoub Sarraf, and Army Commander, General Jean Kahwaji, Hariri was given details on all security measures implemented by the Army on various Lebanese territories to ensure tranquility. "Investing in security is vital and has special priority," said Hariri, praising the exerted efforts to maintain security on all Lebanese lands. He stressed on supporting the Army and military forces with all possible means, so as to enable them to carry out their duties to the fullest. Hariri also paid a visit to el-Helou Army Barracks, where he was greeted by Interior and Municipalities Minister, Nuhad el-Mashnouq, and Internal Security Forces Director General, Major General Ibrahim Basbous, and Beirut Police Chief, Brigadier General Mohammad Ayoubi. Hariri was briefed on the full measures to ensure citizens' safety during the New Year's celebrations. "We, as a government, will try to do everything in our power to equip security forces and facilitate security work in the future," vowed Hariri.

Report: Lebanon Escapes Terror Attack Plots
Naharnet/December 31/16/ The Army Intelligence Directorate obtained, after thorough monitoring, some “accurate and credible” information that terror cells are taking action in the northern city of Tripoli according to instructions delivered to them from Islamist fugitive Shadi al-Mawalai, who is taking refuge in the southern Palestinian refugee camp of Ain el-Hilweh, As Safir daily reported Saturday. “The cell was preparing to stage terror acts inside Lebanon,” a well-informed source told the daily on condition of anonymity. “At 11:00 p.m. on Thursday, upper class Army Intelligence Units together with military units in Tripoli, were able to bust a 3-member terror cell. The militants were taken to the Defense Ministry in Yarzeh for interrogation. They made initial confessions that made the Directorate expand the circle of raids and tracking, and succeeded at busting a second cell composed of two terrorists bringing the total to five,” added the source. “The detainees in custody were identified with their initials as Lebanese R.M., A.S., B.S., A.S and Palestinian W.A. They have all confessed to having links to al-Mawlawi who supplies them with information and instructions, while hiding in Ain el-Hilweh, the latest plan was to carry out attacks during the holiday season,” said the source. The army seized “a ready for use explosive belt provided with explosive substances capable of causing mass killing in case the terrorist tried to sneak through a crowd, in addition to guns with silencers, rocket-propelled grenades and large amounts of weapons and ammunition.”“The cell's initial confessions showed that it was planning to carry out the attack by first throwing rocket-propelled grenades and hand grenades to be followed by heavy gunfire .. on a final stage when people gather to save the wounded, a suicide bomber would blow himself up among the crowd,” he added. However the source did not disclose the attackers' targets, and only hinted saying: “Aren't we in a festive season starting with the birth anniversary of Prophet Mohammed, then the birth of Jesus Christ down to the New Year's celebrations? Ain't these celebrated in mosques and churches, public places, cafes and hotels? Hasn't the southern suburb of Beirut been one of the terrorist's targets?” The source went to say, “there are significant security measures, visible and invisible, to protect all places. There is no cause for panic or fear. Citizens are required to continue their festive nightlife program without any modification.”
 
Ibrahim: Lebanese Mediator to Negotiate Release of Servicemen Abducted by IS
Naharnet/December 31/16/General Security chief Maj. Gen. Abbas Ibrahim reiterated on Saturday that he is determined to find a solution for the file of servicemen abducted by the Islamic State, as he revealed that security forces were able to thwart a suicide bombing plot in Sidon. “We are determined to end the file of servicemen kidnapped by the IS,” Ibrahim told LBCI TV station in a phone conversation. “There are serious efforts being exerted through a Lebanese mediator for the release of the servicemen,” he went on to say.
 “Efforts will continue till the end to free them.” Later during the day, President Michel Aoun invited to the Presidential Palace two relatives of the servicemen. He met with brother of captive soldier Ibrahim Mgheit, Nizam, and Hussein Youssef the father of soldier Mohammed Youssef. The IS group and al-Nusra Front, which re-branded itself as Jabhat Fateh al-Sham in July when it split from the al-Qaida movement, abducted over 30 servicemen in clashes with the Lebanese army in the northeastern border town of Arsal in August 2014. Sixteen held by the Jabhat Fateh al-Islam were freed in December last year through a Qatari-mediated deal that also included a prisoner swap to release a number of inmates from Lebanese jails. The two groups had previously executed four of the hostages. Nine hostages are still being held by the IS and their families do not know much about their fate. On the other hand, Ibrahim pointed out that coordination between the security forces are ongoing to preserve stability. He revealed that a suspect was arrested in the southern city of Sidon with plans to carry out a suicide terror attack.
 
Report: Preparations for Parliamentary Polls Going in Two Parallel Lines
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 31/16/committee tasked with overlooking the upcoming parliamentary elections and providing the needed funds for the Interior Ministry to stage the elections on time, will be conducted before February 10, which marks the beginning of the constitutional deadline, An Nahar daily reported Saturday. Official sources told the daily on condition of anonymity that “an undisclosed political agreement was reached to gear up for the elections in two parallel line. The first would be setting up the preparations for staging them based on the current 1960 electoral law, in conjunction with a similar workshop to reach a new electoral law. “Shall it be agreed to stage the polls based on a new law, it would include a technical postponement for the elections in order to update the mechanisms, and hence hold them in June instead of May,” they told the daily. Lebanon's political parties are bickering over amending the current election law which divides seats among the different religious The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017. Hizbullah has repeatedly called for an electoral law based on proportional representation but other political parties, especially al-Mustaqbal Movement, have rejected the proposal and argued that the party's controversial arsenal of arms would prevent serious competition in regions where the Iran-backed party is influential. Mustaqbal, the Lebanese Forces and the Progressive Socialist Party have meanwhile proposed a hybrid electoral law that mixes the proportional representation and the winner-takes-all systems. Speaker Nabih Berri has also proposed a hybrid law.
 
Hariri: Govt. to Tackle Oil Decrees Wednesday, Aoun's Saudi Trip Boosts Tourism
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 31/16/ Prime Minister Saad Hariri announced Friday that the executive decrees necessary for oil and gas exploration will be on the agenda of a cabinet session that will be held Wednesday, as he noted that President Michel Aoun's upcoming visit to Saudi Arabia will “greatly contribute to the return of tourists to Lebanon.”“From now on, it is prohibited to return to the political rift, seeing as it turns out that the political rift is only useful to garner a few electoral votes,” Hariri told a delegation from the country's Economic Committees and private sector. “The presence of a country advancing economically is beneficial for everyone, and even the democratic and political game will become better and the political rhetoric will differ drastically,” the premier added.
 “All political parties must ease their rhetoric to preserve this atmosphere,” he urged. Hariri added: “We have a cabinet session on Wednesday and the executive decrees of the oil sector will be on its agenda.”
 
Lahham: Let's all be peacemakers in 2017!
Sat 31 Dec 2016/NNA - Patriarch of Antioch, Levant, Alexandria and Jerusalem for Greek Melkite Catholics, Gregory III Lahham, hoped that the New Year would be one of peace, solidarity and cooperation. "Let us all be peacemakers in 2017," he said, speaking from the Egyptian capital, Cairo. Lahham considered that the ceasefire in Syria has sent out a signal of hope. "By praying and eliminating violence from our hearts, words and behavior, we can build a world free of enmity," he concluded, raising prayers to the Lord to grant peace and prosperity to the world at large.
 
Building collapses in Baisariye, Kheir gives instructions for instant shelter allowances to its inhabitants
Sat 31 Dec 2016/NNA - As a result of the heavy rains, a 4-floor building collapsed on Saturday in the town of Baisarieh in the district of Sidon, NNA correspondent reported. Immediately, Higher Relief Commission Secretary-General, Maj. Gen. Mohammed Kheir, rushed to the scene to inspect the damages accompanied by experts and engineers. Kheir gave instructions to pay shelter allowances to the building's residents with no delay.
It is to note that the town has witnessed slides in soil over the past months, which caused cracks in several buildings.
 
Sarraf urges Lebanese to adhere to security forces' guidance instructions
Sat 31 Dec 2016/NNA - National Defense Minister, Yacoub Sarraf, held a press conference at his Yarze office on Saturday, during which he congratulated the Lebanese on the occasion of the New Year, while urging them to abide by the instructions of security forces and fully cooperate with them. Sarraf thanked the President of the Republic and the Prime Minister for closely following-up on the security situation in the country. He also commended all security forces deployed across the Lebanese territories and along the borders under difficult climate conditions, as well as the Civil Defense and Red Cross units, for their relentless efforts and sacrifices for the sake of ensuring citizens' security and stability. Sarraf also reminded citizens of the following hotline numbers:
 - 1701 Ministry of National Defense
 - 125 Civil Defense
 - 175 Fire Brigade
 - 140 Red Cross
 
Kabbara in memory of Karami: We are still in need of his influential personality
Sat 31 Dec 2016/NNA - In a statement marking two years since the passing away of former PM Omar Karami, Labor Minister Mohammad Kabbara deemed, on Saturday, that Tripoli has lost with his absence a "national figure who furiously defended Tripoli's rights, dignity and presence in political life." "We are still in need of his influential personality," added Kabbara.
He concluded by saying: "Tripoli will never forget PM Karami, whose memory remains firm in the minds of its people, despite his absence."
 
Kanaan hopes for visionary understanding for the State
Sat 31 Dec 2016/NNA - "Change and Reform" Parliamentary Bloc Member, MP Ibrahim Kanaan, hoped via "Twitter" on Saturday that: "In 2017, we would move from understandings to a visionary understanding for the State, so as to complete the strong mandate's impossible accomplishments."
 
Lebanese Army Intelligence raids Syrian encampments in Saida, Zahrani
 Sat 31 Dec 2016/NNA - Army Intelligence Units raided on Saturday gatherings for Syrian refugee camps in Ghaziyya, east of Saida and Akibiyya in Zahrani, National News Agency correspondent reported.  

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on January 01/17
Revelers Bid Adieu to a Year of Conflicts, Celebrity Deaths
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 31/16/ As 2016 draws to a close, revelers around the world are bidding a weary adieu to a year filled with political surprises, prolonged conflicts and deaths of legendary celebrities. How people are ushering in the new year:
AUSTRALIA
After a year that saw the deaths of a seemingly endless parade of entertainers, Sydney will honor some of the most beloved. The city's famed fireworks display over the harbor will pay homage to Prince and David Bowie, and will be set to a music medley inspired by the late singers. "We are hoping to make it rain purple this year for the first time, not only off the barges, but also off the Sydney Harbour Bridge," fireworks director Fortunato Forti said, referencing Prince's hit "Purple Rain." The 7 tons of fireworks launched from barges on the harbor will also include a "Willy Wonka moment" in tribute to the late actor Gene Wilder's most famous role, fireworks co-producer Catherine Flanagan said. And there will be a nod to the Bowie classic "Space Oddity," with Saturn, moon and star-shaped fireworks. Bowie lived in Sydney for about 10 years during the 1980s and '90s. "This year, sadly, we saw the loss of many music and entertainment legends around the world," Flanagan said. "So celebrating their music as part of Sydney New Year's Eve fireworks displays is an opportunity to reflect on the year that has been and what the future may hold." Around 1.5 million revelers are expected to ring the harbor to join in the festivities. An extra 2,000 police will be on duty and buses will be used to block off certain pedestrian areas following the deadly truck-driving attacks in Berlin and Nice, France.
 Officials urged residents to carry on celebrating as normal, despite the threats of extremist attacks across the globe and in Australia. On Friday, a man was arrested after police say he posted threats on social media related to Sydney's New Year's Eve celebrations. New South Wales police said he was acting in isolation and had no known links to extremist groups.
 "Ultimately the best way that we can respond to the threats around the world is to fight for our freedoms, enjoy our freedoms, and part of that is ensuring that we go about and celebrate New Year's Eve," state Premier Mike Baird said.
 LAS VEGAS
 More than 300,000 visitors are expected to descend on Las Vegas for an extravagant New Year's Eve celebration. Nightclubs are pulling out all the stops with performances from DJ Calvin Harris, rappers T-Pain and Kendrick Lamar and artists Drake and Bruno Mars. The city's celebrity chefs have crafted elaborate prix fixe menus complete with caviar and champagne toasts. An eight-minute fireworks show will kick off at the stroke of midnight, with rockets launching from the tops of half a dozen casinos. Federal officials have ranked the celebration just below the Super Bowl and on par with the festivities in Times Square. FBI and Secret Service agents will work alongside local police departments that are putting all hands on deck for the big night.
 JAPAN
 Temple bells will echo at midnight as families gather around noodles and revelers flock to shrines for the biggest holiday in Japan. "I feel this sense of duality," said Kami Miyamoto, 21, an economics student at Meiji University in Tokyo, who traveled home in Hakusan, Ishikawa prefecture, for the holiday. "The world is heading toward conservative insular policies," she said of the U.S. election, Brexit and what she believes lies ahead for elections in Europe in 2017. "We learned about how valuable it is to get correct information."One of the most memorable experiences for Miyamoto in 2016 was a three-week study program in South Korea. She was surprised and moved by the friendship she formed with South Korean students, and she has decided to focus her studies on relations with South Korea. "Studying about the U.S. and Europe seems to be about looking at the past, but East Asian studies are focusing on the future," she said. Miyamoto's mother is preparing soba noodles, a standard New Year's Eve dish in Japan, except in their home it will be filled with green onions and shrimp. As the new year rolls in, the entire family, including her younger brother and sister, will drive to a nearby shrine, which, like temples all over Japan, will be filled with those praying for good fortune in the Year of the Rooster, according to the Chinese zodiac.
 CHINA
 Residents in Beijing and Shanghai, China's two largest cities, will pass New Year's Eve in a relative state of security lockdown, according to Chinese media reports citing police.
 The Bund waterfront in Shanghai will not have any celebrations, authorities announced this week, while the sale, use and transportation of fireworks in central Shanghai will be prohibited altogether. Large buildings that often display light shows will also stay dark. More than 30 people died two years ago in a deadly stampede on Shanghai's waterfront, where 300,000 people had gathered to watch a planned light show. Beijing police also said countdowns, lightshows, lotteries and other organized activities will not be held in popular shopping districts such as Sanlitun and Guomao. Beijing police advised citizens to avoid crowded areas, closely watch elderly relatives and children, and be aware of exit routes in venues.
 SOUTH KOREA
 Hundreds of thousands of South Koreans will usher in the new year with a massive protest demanding the resignation of disgraced President Park Geun-hye. It will be the 10th straight weekend of protests that led to Park's impeachment on Dec. 9 over a corruption scandal.
 The evening rally will overlap with Seoul's traditional bell-tolling ceremony at the Bosinkgak pavilion at midnight, which was also expected to be a political statement against Park.
 The city's mayor, Park Won-soon, invited as guests a man whose teenage son was among more than 300 people who died during a 2014 ferry sinking, and a woman who was forced into sexual slavery by Japan's World War II military. Park came under heavy criticism over the way her government handled the ferry disaster. "So many unbelievable things happened in 2016. It didn't feel real; if felt like a movie," protester Lee Huymi said about the bizarre scandal that brought Park down. "So I hope 2017 brings a movie-like ending to the mess. Everything getting solved, quickly and all at once, leaving us all happy."
 INDIA
 For most people in India, New Year's Eve is a time for family. In New Delhi and many other cities, newspapers are full of big advertisements for lavish parties at upscale hotels and restaurants. The big draws at the hotel parties are song and dance performances from Bollywood and television stars. Police with breath analyzers check for drunk driving, and security is tightened in malls and restaurants. The western city of Mumbai will host big street parties with thousands of people at the iconic Gateway of India, a colonial-era structure on the waterfront overlooking the Arabian Sea. There'll be music and dancing and occasional fireworks.

UN Security Council to vote on Syria ceasefire
The Associated Press, United NationsSaturday, 31 December 2016/The UN Security Council will vote Saturday on a resolution that would endorse the cease-fire agreement in Syria brokered by Russia and Turkey, and reiterate support for a roadmap to peace that starts with a transitional government. The resolution also calls for "rapid, safe and unhindered" access to deliver humanitarian aid throughout the country. And it looks forward to a meeting in late January between the Syrian government and opposition in Kazakhstan's capital Astana "as an important part of the Syrian-led political process facilitated by the United Nations." Russia and Turkey are on opposing sides of the Syrian conflict: Moscow along with Iran provides crucial military support to Syrian President Bashar Assad, while Turkey has long served as a rear base and source of supplies for the rebels. Divisions in the Security Council between Russia and the veto-wielding Western powers - the US Britain and France who support the moderate opposition and demand that Assad steps down - have blocked action to end the war, now in its sixth year. Russia and Turkey sent the cease-fire agreement and the draft resolution to Security Council members Thursday night. After closed discussions in the council Friday morning, Russia's UN Ambassador Vitaly Churkin circulated a revised draft, urged council members to support it, and called for a vote on Saturday. The Security Council needs to participate "in this important process," Churkin said.
 The council is scheduled to meet at 11 a.m. EST. Russia's UN Mission said members would hold closed consultations and then vote. The cease-fire agreement, if it holds, would mark a potential breakthrough in a conflict that began in 2011 with an uprising against decades of rule by President Bashar Assad's family and has left over 250,000 dead and more than 13.5 million people in need of urgent assistance, and triggered a refugee crisis across Europe. The draft resolution reiterates "that the only sustainable solution to the current crisis in the Syrian Arab Republic is through an inclusive and Syrian-led political process based on the Geneva communique of June 30, 2012," which was endorsed by the Security Council. The communique, adopted by key nations, calls for the formation of a transitional government with full executive powers "on the basis of mutual consent" and steps leading to elections.
 Churkin told reporters "there is no competition" between the talks in Astana and negotiations that the UN special envoy for Syria, Staffan de Mistura, hopes to arrange between the government and opposition in Geneva on Feb. 8. "As you know Staffan de Mistura had trouble reconvening the talks, so Russia and Turkey obviously decided to give the United Nations a hand in pushing things forward, and this is what we see happening," Churkin told reporters.
 He said de Mistura has been in contact with the Russian government and "indicated his eagerness to help organize the Astana meetings. ... So we expect the United Nations to be fully involved in the preparations of the meetings."Churkin said Russia's understanding is that seven major rebel groups have joined in the cease-fire, representing 60,000 fighters, "and they control a large chunk of the territory of Syria."As with previous failed cease-fire attempts, the current agreement excludes both the al-Qaeda-affiliated Fatah al-Sham Front, which fights alongside other rebel factions, and ISIS. If the Astana meetings are successful, Churkin said, "they could move on to Geneva as far as I am concerned, so we don't see any competition there or overlapping of the two processes." Churkin said Russia and Turkey have made clear they want other countries to participate in the Astana meetings. He said Iran will definitely participate "actively" in preparing the Astana meeting and in Russia's view Egypt can also join the preparatory process right now. Churkin said there are other very important players who are welcome including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar - and "we do expect the Trump administration after it comes into the White House on Jan. 20 will be an important participant."
 The United States was left out of the cease-fire agreement, reflecting the deterioration of relations between Moscow and the Obama administration after the failure of US-Russian diplomatic efforts to halt the fighting in Aleppo and elsewhere in Syria

Member of the Syrian Opposition Coalition: Ceasefire in Syria Sends a Warning Message to Iran Regime
NCRINCRIDecember 31/16/ “The ceasefire agreement between Russia and Turkey sends a warning message to the regime in Iran that it must take practical measures in the process of ceasefire in Syria and also remove its militias from Syria in the near future,” Nasr Hariri, member of the Syrian opposition coalition said. In an interview with Al Arabiya on December 30, Nasr Hariri said: “Russia doesn’t want to show itself as a partner in what is happening in Syria and has tried to keep itself away from this role (involvement in the carnage and massacre of Syrian people) and wants to play the role of guardian and take a supervisory role. Russia wants to abandon (let go) the regime in Iran and also Assad regime as the parties responsible for the killings and crimes in Syria. So, Russia and Turkey are playing the role of guardian or mediator and placing Iran and Assad regimes and also Syrian opposition on a side where they have to give commitment and this is a clear sign and a warning message to Iran regime that it must take some actions for implementation of the ceasefire and in the future the regime must start removing its militias from Syria.”

Iran: Arash Sadeghi's Father Stages Hunger Strike to Support His Son
NCRIDecember 31/16/ Hossein Sadeghi, father of political prisoner Arash Sadeghi, staged hunger strike to support his son. Mr. Sadeghi said: “My son Arash in his 67th day of hunger strike is xperiencing moment to moment struggle with death. On Monday, December 26, Arash was urgently transferred to Taleghani hospital in Tehran due to his deteriorating health condition and underwent medical examination. The hospital’s doctors said my son was in extremely dire health condition and in a written report warned about my son’s «dangerous heart condition and risk of cardiac arrest, and danger of coma and even death».”The suffering father continued: “Now, since last Friday, December 23, I staged a hunger strike to protest the authorities lack of attention to address the demands of my child, and to protest keeping him incommunicado and denying him visit with his wife, and also to support his hunger strike and legitimate demands. I demand his dire condition be addressed and his demands be met. I call on all to be the voice of my son, his wife and other imprisoned loved ones (political prisoners).”It should be mentioned that political prisoner Arash Sadeghi staged an indefinite hunger strike on November 24 to protest unjustified arrest of his wife, Golrokh Ebrahimi Iraie, and unlawful process of their (himself and his wife) arrest and trial. He is now in critical health condition after 67 days of hunger strike but reiterates on continuing his hunger strike until his rights are respected and his demands are met.

Maryam Rajavi Appeals to the Nation to Help Iran's Homeless in the Cold Season
NCRI Statements/December 31/16/The Iranian Resistance's President-elect Maryam Rajavi said, "It is a national catastrophe with rare precedent in Iran's history, when the poor and drug addicts take shelter in cemeteries around the capital."
She blamed the ruling clerical regime and the criminal, unscrupulous mullahs for this tragedy and added, "This news provoked vast social outrage, indicating the Iranian people's hatred of a regime that every hour of its rule is tantamount to the devastation of numerous people and to further destruction and dissipation of the country."Despite its deplorable and shocking impact on society, the tragedy of the homeless poor who sleep in graves is just one out of countless calamities inflicted on the people of Iran by Khamenei, Rouhani and other leaders of the regime and their children who are directly involved in multi-billion-dollar embezzlements and pocket astronomical salaries. The 18 to 20 million people who live in 2700 shanty towns and illegal dwellings, particularly around major capitals, the rampant phenomenon of trafficking of young women and girls to other countries, the rising number of women who post ads on the walls to sell their infants, and the 30 per cent of the population who according to the admissions of the regime's officials are starving, are but a few examples indicating how the Iranian people's lives have been destroyed under the repressive rule of the Velayat-e Faqih, Khamenei. Such devastation coupled with incessant executions and daily arrests of some two to three thousand people comprise the security the mullahs claim they have provided for the people of Iran by engaging in the slaughter of the people of Syria, Iraq and other countries in the region. Maryam Rajavi appealed to her compatriots, and all humanitarian and benevolent people and youths of Iran to help the hungry and the homeless in this cold winter. She said, "Contrary to the callous mullahs, the people should create a national movement of humanitarian solidarity to save the victims of the clerical regime. Such compassion and charity are deeply rooted in the Iranian culture and in the teachings of Islam and the criminal mullahs are the greatest enemy of both," Mrs. Rajavi stressed. "Suppression, corruption and belligerence are inherent to the Velayat-e Faqih regime," Mrs. Rajavi pointed out and added, "so long as this clerical regime rules Iran, the Iranian people's poverty and destitution will endure. The ultimate solution for putting an end to all these tragedies is regime change in Iran and establishment of freedom, democracy and popular sovereignty," Maryam Rajavi reiterated.
The Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/December 30, 2016

Trump Administration Should Hold Iran Accountable for Executions
NCRI Statements/December 31/16/Highlighting the ongoing violations of Human Rights in Iran, Dr. Ali Safavi a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Council of Resistance of Iran and president of the Near East Policy Research wrote an article in ‘The Hill’ on December 30, the following is the full text: Nearly a year after the implementation of the nuclear deal with Iran, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), and the ensuing fanfare regarding the possibility of an age of reform within a feeble theocracy, Tehran’s behavior has taken a turn for the worse. The most tangible evidence of this can be seen in its treatment of the Iranian people.
By any measure, the human rights situation in Iran has dramatically deteriorated. Indeed, in December 2016, the United Nations condemned Iran’s abuses for the 63rd time.
This should encourage the new U.S. administration to take on a much more vocal and active role regarding the regime’s unbridled rights violations, including the placement of the dossier on the U.N. Security Council’s agenda.
Consider the facts. The Iranian regime has stepped up executions dramatically in recent years. Amnesty International has called it a “staggering execution spree” while underscoring that Iran has the highest number of executions per capita in the world.
Over 2,700 executions have been carried out since Hassan Rouhani took office in 2013, the most in the past 25 years. Victims include political dissidents like Gholamreza Khosravi, an activist of Iran’s principal opposition, the Mujahedin-e Khalq (PMOI/MEK), who was hanged in 2014 simply for providing financial assistance to a satellite television station.
On Dec. 19, the U.N. General Assembly expressed "serious concern at the alarmingly high frequency of the imposition and carrying-out of the death penalty by the (Iranian regime)… including executions undertaken for crimes that do not qualify as the most serious crimes, on the basis of forced confessions or against minors and persons who at the time of their offence were under the age of 18.”
The U.N. censure resolution also called on the Iranian regime “to ensure, in law and in practice, that no one is subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”
Iran has the shameful status of being the world’s last official executioner of child offenders,” Amnesty International stated.
“Execution of two juvenile offenders in just a few days makes a mockery of Iran’s juvenile justice system,” AI announced on Oct. 14, 2015.
Imprisoned activists are routinely subjected to torture and ill treatment by the regime. Many female activists are deprived of medical treatment as a form of psychological and physical torture.
Maryam Akbari Monfared, for example, is one of the prominent prisoners who is suffering from serious illnesses in the Iranian regime's jails, but is deliberately deprived of treatment. She called for an investigation into the killing of thousands of prisoners in 1988.
Women are treated worse than second-class citizens. Since 2014, the Majlis (parliament) has adopted four legislations further limiting women’s rights, restricting access to employment and education.
According to Reporters without Borders, Iran is still one of the world’s most oppressive countries with respect to freedom of information.
moderate, “the overall situation has worsened” with regard to human rights in Iran.
Most shockingly, in August, an audio tape was released which gave more clues about a large-scale massacre that killed as many as 30,000 political prisoners in Iran.
In the audio tape, the late Ayatollah Hossein-Ali Montazeri, at the time slated to become the next supreme leader, tells a group of senior judicial and intelligence officials, “In my opinion, the greatest crime committed during the Islamic Republic, for which history will condemn us, has been committed by you.”
Among the executed were pregnant women and girls as young as 15, as underscored by Montazeri.
According to the Washington Post, “Maryam Rajavi, head of the National Council of Resistance of Iran opposition group, urged international prosecutors to use the tape as further evidence that can be used to press charges for the political slayings of the late 1980s.”
One of the officials involved in the 1988 massacre was Mostafa Pourmohammadi, now, paradoxically, Rouhani’s justice minister. He has publicly said he is “proud” of having carried out “God’s commandment” in executing thousands of political opponents.
In September, a resolution (H.Con.Res.159) was introduced in the U.S. Congress condemning the mass executions of 1988. It urged U.N. authorities “to create a Commission of Inquiry to fully investigate the massacre and to gather evidence and identify the names and roles of specific perpetrators with a view towards bringing them to justice.”
The new U.S. administration should echo this call. At a time when Islamic extremism continues to expand, it is time for Washington and the world to hold the number one state-sponsor of terrorism to account for its monstrous crimes against humanity.
The deep resentment that the Iranian people feel toward the turbaned tyrants should strengthen this resolve. The dossier of the regime’s egregious rights violations, especially the 1988 massacre of political dissidents, should be referred to the U.N. Security Council.

Russia Seeks UN Backing for Syria Truce
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 31/16/Russia is pushing for a UN Security Council vote Saturday to support the ceasefire it helped broker in Syria, where the truce remained largely intact on its second day despite sporadic clashes. Moscow says it wants the United Nations to be involved in peace talks between Damascus and rebels in Kazakhstan in January, although the UN is negotiating its own separate peace efforts. Rebel supporter Turkey and key regime ally Russia, which brokered the truce, say the talks in the Kazakh capital Astana aim to supplement UN-backed peace efforts, rather than replace them. They want to involve regional players like Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Jordan. Russia's UN ambassador Vitaly Churkin voiced hope that the council would vote Saturday on the draft resolution -- which also endorses the planned talks in Kazakhstan -- "and adopt it unanimously".Diplomats however said they did not see how a quick UN weekend vote could occur as the resolution needed to be "seriously studied" and hinted Russia might be hard-pressed to muster the nine votes needed for it to pass. Washington is conspicuously absent from the new process, but Moscow has said it hoped to bring US President-elect Donald Trump's administration on board once he takes office in January. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a British-based monitor of the war, said that most of the country remained calm on Saturday. But limited clashes continued in some areas including Wadi Barada near Damascus and the southern city of Daraa where one opposition fighter was killed. The fighting in Wadi Barada has led to water shortages that have affected four million people in the capital, with the two sides trading blame. Observatory director Rami Abdel Rahman said that five rebel fighters were killed on Friday in the opposition bastion of Eastern Ghouta near Damascus and in Wadi Barada where helicopters carried out raids on rebel positions. A civilian was also killed by regime sniper fire in Eastern Ghouta while another died in shelling in Wadi Barada, he said. The forces in Wadi Barada include former Al-Qaeda affiliate Fateh al-Sham Front, previously known as Al-Nusra Front, which Syria's government says is excluded from the ceasefire. - 'Real opportunity' -Syria's government and its ally Iran have both welcomed the ceasefire deal. Damascus called it a "real opportunity" to find a political solution to the war, which has killed more than 310,000 people since it began in March 2011 with protests against the regime of President Bashar al-Assad.
 Despite being left out of the process, Washington described the truce as "positive".
 Analysts were cautious but said the involvement of Russia, Iran and Turkey could be important. Sam Heller, fellow at The Century Foundation, said there was "real interest and urgency" from Moscow and Ankara, but expressed doubts about whether Tehran and Damascus were on board. "All indications are that Iran and the regime want to continue towards a military conclusion," he said. - Talks in Astana -Russian President Vladimir Putin said Friday he would now reduce Moscow's military contingent in Syria, which has been fighting to bolster the government since last year. But he added Russia would continue to fight "terrorism" and maintain its support for President Bashar al-Assad's government. Despite backing opposite sides in the conflict, Turkey and Russia have worked increasingly closely on Syria, brokering a deal this month to allow the evacuation of tens of thousands of civilians and rebel fighters from Aleppo. Their ceasefire deal calls for negotiations over a political solution to end the conflict that has killed more than 310,000 people and forced millions to flee. UN peace envoy Staffan de Mistura has said he hoped the agreement would "pave the way for productive talks", but also reiterated he wants negotiations mediated by his office to continue next year. In an interview published Saturday, de Mistura said a UN resolution that foresees a political transition in Syria was also still on the table, although the focus had shifted following territorial gains by the regime. "We now have before us another scenario: a negotiation between the Assad regime and the rebels," he told the Italian daily Corriere della Sera. The Security Council held closed-door consultations on the Russian-proposed resolution early Friday and Moscow later amended the draft at the request of several member states. The latest version of the resolution, a copy of which was seen by AFP, includes a reference to the talks being led by de Mistura.

UN backs Russian-Turkish Syria peace plan
Staff writer, Al Arabiya EnglishSaturday, 31 December 2016 Text size A A A
The United Nations Security Council has unanimously backed a Russian-Turkish initiative over a ceasefire and new negotiations on Syria. The Security Council began closed-door consultations on Saturday as several factions among the Syrian opposition released a statement denouncing the regime’s continued violations of an ongoing ceasefire. The opposition said that there should be no exceptions made to the ceasefire and all parties should stick to the terms agreed upon. The statement released by the Free Syrian Army, the opposition’s military wing, was provided to AlArabiya.net in full. As with previous failed ceasefire attempts, the current agreement excludes both the al-Qaeda-affiliated Fatah al-Sham Front, which fights alongside other rebel factions, and ISIS. Russia, Iran vow to continue Syria coordination.  Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Iran's President Hassan Rowhani agreed in a telephone conversation on Saturday to continue their close coordination in trying to end the Syria crisis, the Kremlin said in a statement. The two men agreed on the importance of a new ceasefire agreement in Syria brokered by Russia and Turkey and plans for peace talks in the Kazakh capital Astana, the Kremlin said. 
 
Trump Praises 'Very Smart' Putin for Holding Off on Reprisals Against US
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 31/16/US President-elect Donald Trump on Friday praised Russian President Vladimir Putin for not quickly hitting back at Washington for the punitive measures imposed over alleged interference in the November election. "Great move on delay (by V. Putin) - I always knew he was very smart!" Trump tweeted. Russia's embassy in Washington quickly retweeted the comment, which Trump pinned so it would appear at the top of his feed for several hours. Trump's tweet enraged his Democratic foes as well as some members of his own Republican Party."@realDonaldTrump alternates between embracing Russian subversion & downplaying it, but his support for Putin is constant. We must know why," wrote Evan McMullin, who ran as an independent presidential candidate after serving as policy director for the House Republican Conference. Claire McCaskill, a Democrat who serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee, wrote: "Our ENTIRE cyber intel community,best in world btw, agrees that this guy tried to mess in our election & the Russians are RT TrumpPutin love."Earlier, the Russian leader ruled out any immediate tit-for-tat expulsions of American officials in the row over what Washington says were "efforts to harm US interests" in connection with the November 8 election won by the Republican. Putin's own foreign ministry had recommended that he eject 35 American officials to counterbalance US President Barack Obama's move on Thursday to expel 35 Russian intelligence operatives and shut down two Russian compounds in the US. - Russians 'playing' US media? -Trump, who succeeds Obama on January 20, has repeatedly praised Putin and made a number of cabinet picks with ties to Russia. The FBI and CIA have concluded that Russian intelligence agencies oversaw the hacking and leaking of emails from Democratic Party organizations under Kremlin orders this year in order to benefit Trump's campaign against Hillary Clinton. In the past, the president-elect has ridiculed US intelligence about Russia's cyber-meddling, saying it was not clear who conducted the attacks. He has long treated such accusations as a thinly veiled effort by a Democratic president to delegitimize a Republican victory. Later Friday, Trump went on to mock two US television networks, apparently over their coverage of the US-Russia jousting, tweeting that "Russians are playing @CNN and @NBCNEws for such fools -- funny to watch, they don't have a clue! @FoxNewstotally gets it!"On Wednesday, he issued a call for the country to "move on to bigger and better things," but said he would meet with US intelligence leaders next week to be "updated on the facts of this situation." While Trump has already received intelligence briefings about the election and substantial evidence is in the public sphere, his pledge to meet with intelligence chiefs could provide a face-saving opportunity to further soften his stance. Also next week, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper will appear before lawmakers to testify about foreign cyber threats to the United States -- a possible opportunity for him to expand on Russia's activities.
 
Central Baghdad Blasts Kill Dozens
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 31/16/Twin blasts ripped through a busy market area in central Baghdad Saturday, police said, shattering a relative lull in attacks in the capital and marring preparations for New Year celebrations. Two suicide bombers attacked the Al-Sinek area, killing at least 27 people and wounding 53, a police colonel said. An officer in the interior ministry and a hospital official confirmed the toll. "Many of the victims were people from the spare parts shops in the area, they were gathered near a cart selling breakfast when the explosions went off," said Ibrahim Mohammed Ali, who owns a nearby shop. Torn clothes and mangled iron were strewn across the ground in pools of blood at the site of the wreckage near Rasheed street, one of the main thoroughfares in Baghdad, an AFP photographer said. "Twin terrorist attacks were carried out by suicide bombers in Al-Sinek neighbourhood," an official from Baghdad operations command told AFP. The area is packed with shops, workshops and wholesale markets and usually teeming with delivery trucks and labourers unloading vans or wheeling carts around. The attack was claimed by the Islamic State jihadist group via its propaganda agency Amaq, which reported the "martyrdom operation" in Al-Sinek neighbourhood. Baghdad has been on high alert since the start on October 17 of an offensive, Iraq's largest military operation in years, to retake the northern jihadist stronghold of Mosul. IS has tried to hit back with major diversionary attacks across the country but has had little success in Baghdad. Saturday's twin bombings were the deadliest in the capital since the start of the Mosul offensive. - Mosul slog -Huge crowds were expected to gather on Saturday evening in Baghdad's streets to celebrate the New Year for only the second time since the lifting in 2015 of a years-old curfew. Last year revellers turned out for celebrations that lasted most of the night despite an already tense security backdrop. A year on, the IS jihadist group appears to be on its last legs and is defending its last bastions in Iraq but the going has been tough for the tens of thousands of Iraqi forces on the ground. Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi had vowed earlier in 2016 that his forces would rid the country of IS by the end of the year but the Mosul operation has been slower moving that expected. This week he told a televised news conference that Iraqi forces would now require at least another three months. The jihadists are vastly outnumbered in Mosul but they have had more than two years to build up their defences in the city where Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi proclaimed a "caliphate" in June 2014. The Pentagon said Friday Baghdadi and was still alive and leading the organisation and stressed that the coalition was actively hunting down the Iraqi-born jihadist supremo. "We're doing everything we can. This is something we're spending a lot of time on," spokesman Peter Cook told CNN. Air support by the US-led coalition has been hampered by the continued presence of hundreds of thousands of civilians inside Mosul. Elite Iraqi forces have battled their way into the city mostly from the eastern side, going house-to-house in densely-populated areas but they barely control half of the city's eastern sector more than 10 weeks into the offensive. One of the top Iraqi commanders in the Mosul area announced on Thursday that the offensive to reconquer the eastern bank of the Tigris in Mosul had entered a new phase.
 
Caution marks Iraqi army advance against ISIS north of Mosul

Reuters, Sada, Iraq/Saturday, 31 December 2016/The earth shook three times with the impact of air strikes targeting ISIS positions north of Mosul. Only then did the Iraqi troops assemble on the edge of the small farming village advance. The army had gathered on Friday afternoon in a muddy street that showed signs of heavy fighting with extremists from a day earlier: store fronts shorn off, electricity poles pulled down, bullet casings carpeting the ground. A rooftop sentinel kept watch. The Iraqis’ tan-colored Humvees, reinforced with steel plates around the wheels to guard against sniper fire, were dwarfed by four MRAPs (mine-resistant ambush-protected vehicles) manned by US military advisers. The second phase of the operation to retake Mosul, ISIS’s last major stronghold in Iraq, began on Thursday after several weeks of deadlock in the most complex operation in the country since the 2003 US-led invasion. Conventional US forces deploying more extensively in this phase are now visible very close to the front lines. They are backing Iraq’s army, federal police and counter-terrorism service (CTS), whose levels of training and experience vary widely. Since the offensive began 10 weeks ago, CTS punched into Mosul from the east and took a quarter of the city, but regular army troops like those in Sada have made slower progress advancing from the north and south, slowing the operation.
 
Gunshot kills Saudi citizen in Qatif
Staff writer, Al Arabiya EnglishSaturday, 31 December 2016/A gunshot coming from an unknown source has hit and killed a citizen in Saudi Arabia’s Qatif, media spokesman for the Eastern District police Col. Ziad Alrqaiti reported.  The spokesman stated that Qatif police had reported the arrival of a body to Qatif Central Hospital on Friday evening. Investigations lead to the discover that the citizen had died from a gunshot wound from an unknown source while he was outside one of his relatives’ house in the area.  

Ban Ki-moon ‘feels like Cinderella’ as he bids UN farewell
The Associated Press, United NationsSaturday, 31 December 2016/Ban Ki-moon joked to hundreds of diplomats and UN staff as he left United Nations headquarters Friday for the last time as secretary-general that he feels “like Cinderella — tomorrow at midnight, everything changes.” Flanked by the presidents of the General Assembly and the Security Council, the native South Korean thanked UN workers for their hard work and commitment over the course of his 10-year tenure, which ends at midnight Dec. 31. “Tomorrow night on the eve of the new year, I’ll be in Times Square for the ball drop. Millions of people will be watching as I lose my job,” he said with a broad smile. He told his colleagues he had two words for them: “Thank You.”As the top UN official over the last decade, Ban fostered a global agreement to combat climate change and new UN goals to combat poverty and inequality. However, he leaves amid continuing conflicts from Syria and Yemen to South Sudan and Libya. Ban urged staff members to stay focused on advancing UN development goals and working to address issues ranging from climate change to gender empowerment. “Keep the focus on people — on people’s rights and people’s dignity,” he told them. Ban will be succeeded by former Portuguese prime minister Antonio Guterres, who begins a five-year term on Sunday. Ban was thronged by UN staff as he made his way out of United Nations headquarters for the last time. At the top of the escalator leading out of the building, a line of staffers held up signs saying “We We Love Love You You SG and Madam,” using the initials for secretary-general and paying tribute to his wife Yoo Soon-taek. At the bottom, a line of top UN officials said farewell, many receiving hugs from Ban. The visibly emotional secretary-general, when asked about the sendoff before walking out the door and getting into his car, said: “It’s very moving. I’m so grateful for the support and friendship that they have shown me. ... I’m honored to have served this great organization.”Ban returns to South Korea amid widespread speculation he will be a candidate to replace the country’s president, who has been impeached.

Merkel’s message to terrorists in New Year’s address
AFP, BerlinSaturday, 31 December 2016/Chancellor Angela Merkel called on Germans Saturday to hold firm to democratic values in the face of militant terror, urging them to counter "murderers who are full of hate" with compassion and cohesion. In her New Year's address delivered less than two weeks after a Tunisian suspect rammed a truck into a crowded Christmas market in Berlin, killing 12 people, Merkel acknowledged it was "bitter and sickening" that the attack and others in July were carried out by asylum seekers. Nevertheless, she defended her decision in September 2015 to let in tens of thousands fleeing war from mostly Arab and Muslim nations. "When we look at the images of bombed out Aleppo in Syria, we have to say once again how important and right it was for us to have helped those who needed our protection to find their way here and to integrate," she said. Merkel said it was through such values of humanity and openness that Germany should face down those who espouse hate. "As we go on with our lives and work, we tell the terrorists: You are murderers full of hate, but you will not determine how we live and want to live. We are free, compassionate and open," she said. Merkel has been under fire over her liberal refugee policy, as the arrival of around a million people over the past two years has deeply polarized society.
 Two other attacks carried out in July by asylum seekers, and the December 19 assault have emboldened right-wing populist critics. The German leader promised that the government will in 2017 "swiftly put in place and implement any necessary political or legal changes" to close down any security gaps, after the Berlin truck attack exposed serious failures. But she cautioned against placing certain groups of people under a blanket of suspicion. Without naming populists, Merkel hit out at those who she said present a "distorted" picture of democracy.
 But she said the system is "strong, it allows everyone to act, participate. "It accepts, no, it demands contradictions and criticisms. "Criticism that peacefully and respects individuals, that seek solutions and compromises and does not exclude entire groups," she said, urging politicians not to forget these guiding principles in the run-up to elections in 2017. 

Maryam Rajavi's Message to FIFCJ Conference in Argentina
NCRI Statements/December 31/16/A conference was held by the International Federation of Women in Legal Careers (FIFCJ) from November 14 to 17, 2016, in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Prominent jurists and legal experts from North America, Latin America, Africa, and Europe participated in this conference. A delegation from the Women's Committee of the National Council of Resistance of Iran was also invited to the conference. Participants in the conference, discussed and examined the reasons for inequality in different countries, from legal and practical standpoints. They also addressed women's basic rights and different legal solutions for their problems. Maryam Rajavi sent a message and lauded the FIFCJ initiative for holding the conference.
The message reads:
Madam President, My dear sisters, On behalf of Iranian women who struggle to gain freedom from the bondage of a fundamentalist tyranny, I salute you all. I would like to thank Ms. Maria Elena Elverdin, President of the International Federation of Women in Legal Careers, and the Association of Argentine Jurist Women for this excellent initiative. Your valuable efforts encourage all women in achieving a 50-50 planet. The focus of this conference, namely a woman's right on her body, is an inherent right related to the emancipation of mankind. Likewise, depriving women of this right is the central nucleus of a backward ideology that enchains women and humanity. In the contemporary times, Islamic fundamentalism targets women more than anyone else. From Boko Haram, to the Taliban, to Afghanistan, and to Daesh (ISIS/ISIL). The epicenter of production and promotion of fundamentalism in the Middle East, is the mullahs' regime ruling Iran. The regime is identified with terrorism and its bomb-making program. The essential element for the regime is its religious compulsion which relies on shedding women's fundamental rights. Violence against women has been institutionalized in the most important laws of Iran, such as the Civil Code and the Penal Code. Among them, decreasing girls' legal age of marriage to 13, the husband's unilateral right to divorce, the husband's right to prevent employment of his wife, the husband's control on his wife's movement out of the house, declaring the value of women's blood money as being half of men's, and exonerating the father and grandfather from retribution for the murder of their daughter. These laws have paved the way for fierce violence against women, including honor killings where girls become victims of the wrath and suspicion of the men in their families. No wonder that the clerical regime has so far refused to sign the Convention for the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. Two years ago, a young woman by the name of Reyhaneh Jabbari was executed. Her crime was standing up to an Intelligence services' official against sexual assault, and murdering him while defending herself. Perhaps you have heard the terrifying phrase of stoning of women. This is a punishment which belongs to many millenniums ago, but was revived in the end of the 20th Century and then spread them to the laws of some Islamic countries. Veil is compulsory for women. They must wear it at the work place, in the classroom, at the hospital, and when shopping or driving, otherwise they would be fined, flogged and imprisoned. To impose the veil, the regime's agents in Isfahan splashed acid in the faces of numerous women in the streets, two years ago. The mullahs have created many obstacles on women's way to enter the job market; they are reducing the number of women in universities and have stepped up their policy of gender segregation in universities.
Such systematic misogyny and persistent reproduction of male-domination are the mechanism by which they control the society and preserve their power. Nevertheless, the women of Iran have not surrendered. Since the onset of the mullahs' rule, women have played a key role in resistance against this regime. The women's pioneering role in the Resistance movement has spread the idea of equality in society. We advocate women's equal participation in political leadership in a free Iran. The mullahs have so far tortured and executed tens of thousands of women for their participation in the struggle. A number of these women were hanged in the course of the massacre of 30,000 political prisoners in summer 1988. Today, there is an ongoing Justice Seeking Movement that seeks international prosecution of the Iranian regime's leaders for this horrendous crime. I appeal to the conference of the International Federation of Women in Legal Careers in Buenos Aires to support this Justice Seeking Movement and the Iranian women's struggle against the barbaric regime ruling Iran.
Source: http://www.maryam-rajavi.com/en/remarks/messages/item/maryam-rajavi-message-to-the-conference-of-women-in-legal-careers-in-argentina-november-2016

Roadside bomb kills police officer, soldier in Egypt
 Sat 31 Dec 2016/Reuters/NNA - A police officer and a soldier were killed by a roadside bomb in Egypt's northern Sinai peninsula on Saturday, security sources said. The bomb was detonated remotely when the victims' armored vehicle passed by during a security operation, the sources said. There was no immediate claim of responsibility, but an Islamist insurgency in the Sinai has gained pace since the military toppled President Mohamed Mursi of the Muslim Brotherhood in 2013 following mass protests against him. The militant group staging the insurgency pledged allegiance to Islamic State in 2014 and adopted the name Sinai Province. It is blamed for killing hundreds of Egyptian soldiers and police since then.--Reuters
 
Egypt Begins Handing over MS804 Crash Victims' Remains
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 31/16/Egyptian authorities on Saturday started handing the remains of those killed in the crash of EgyptAir flight 804 to their families, the airline said. The Airbus A320 had been flying from Paris to Cairo on May 19 when it crashed into the southeast Mediterranean killing all 66 on board, including 40 Egyptians and 15 French nationals. EgyptAir said Saturday it had begun "overseeing the handover of the remains of the MS804 plane crew members" to their families.
Officials will start handing over the Egyptian passengers' remains on Sunday and the bodies of French passengers and other nationalities will follow, it said, without specifying a timeline. The airliner had been carrying two Iraqis, two Canadians and one passenger each from Algeria, Belgium, Britain, Chad, Portugal, Saudi Arabia and Sudan. Egypt's aviation ministry said on December 15 that traces of explosives were found on victims' France's air safety agency said it was not possible to determine what caused the crash but aviation experts have said there is little chance that a mechanical fault was responsible. The plane only entered service in 2003, making it relatively new for an aircraft that tends to have an operational life of 30 to 40 years. Investigators determined that a fire broke out in or near the cockpit before the plane crashed between Crete and the coast of northern Egypt. The disaster came as Cairo was still investigating the October 2015 crash of a Russian passenger plane filled with tourists flying home over the Sinai The Islamic State jihadist group claimed responsibility for bombing the Airbus A321 that crashed soon after takeoff from a Sinai resort, killing all 224 passengers and crew. There has been no such claim linked to May's EgyptAir crash.

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 01/17
Propping up US-Iraqi Mosul flop exposed Baghdad
DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis December 31/16,
 The US-backed Iraqi campaign launched in October to liberate Mosul from the clutches of the Islamic State is on its last legs, although the Obama administration and Iraqi Prime Minister Haydar al-Abadi are making every effort to disguise the debacle.
 AS debkafile has been reporting for three weeks, the Iraqi army’s Mosul operation has run aground, despite solid US military backing, giving the advantage to Islamic State fighters occupying Iraq’s biggest city since the summer of 2015.
 This development has major security ramifications - not only for Iraq, but also for Syria, Jordan, Israel and the West at large.
 The jihadists staunched the Iraqi army’s advance by releasing in its path hundreds of suicide killers in waves on foot and in bomb cars. This tactic has inflicted crippling losses on the two elite Iraqi divisions leading the offensive, the Golden Division, which is the backbone of Iraq’s Special Operations forces, and the 9th Armored Division. Devastating losses forced both to pull back from the battlefield.
 This week, another 1,700 US special operations forces and 4,000 members of the Iraqi federal police and counter-terrorism service (CTS) were urgently sent out to reinforce the crumbling front lines. Their deployment was officially characterized as marking the launch of “the second phase of the operation to retake Mosul.”
 Their real function was to prop up the few positions Iraqi forces have captured so far and save the Mosul offensive from crashing.
 Western military observers noted Saturday, Dec. 31, that more and more American troops are to be seen on the embattled city’s front lines. US combatants are therefore fighting face to face with ISIS jihadists, a development the Obama administration is loath to admit, never having released the number of American lives lost in the Mosul offensive.
 Our military sources add that the Iraqi counter-terrorism force sent to Mosul was previously posted in Baghdad to secure the capital against Islamist terrorist operations and ISIS attempts to seize the center and Iraqi’s national government centers. Its transfer to Mosul, 356km to the north, exposed central Baghdad to terror.
 And, inevitably, on Saturday, two suicide bombers blew themselves up on a main street of the capital, killing 28 people and inuring 40 in their first major attack there in three months since the onset of the Mosul offensive..
 This happened the day after the Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook released an unwelcome report that US security agencies “do think [Abu Bakr al] Baghdadi is alive and is still leading” the Islamic group and the battle for Mosul.
 ISIS for its part issued a menacing new communiqué that jacked up its threat against neighboring Jordan’s King Abdullah II and his security forces, in the wake of its terrorist-cum-hostage assault earlier this month on the southern town of Karak, in which 10 people were killed and 29 injured. The communiqué reads:“All Jordanian soldiers, police, mosque preachers, information activists and regime supporters are legitimate targets for the muhahideen’s bullets and knives. All of Jordan is an open battlefield!”
 ISIS is informing the world of its coming targets, say debkafile’s counterterrorism sources, which are:
 1. The overthrow of the Hashemite king and his rule, and
 2. The seizure of southern Jordan.
 If Baghdadi succeeds in this scheme, he will gain control of a large stretch of land adjacent to Israel and Egyptian Sinai to the west and Saudi Arabia to the south, thereby bringing both under threat and placing itself close enough to block the port of Aqaba, Jordan’s only outlet to the sea.From the desert region of southern Jordan, ISIS will also achieve proximity to the Sinai desert – through Israeli and Egyptian Bedouin – and be able to control the main Middle East arms-smuggling route and the Sinai center of operations of this illicit and enormously profitable trade 

Now empowered, Iran will take a bolder approach in the region
Majid Rafizadeh/The National/December 31/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/31/majid-rafizadehthe-national-now-empowered-iran-will-take-a-bolder-approach-in-the-region/
Iran’s economic, geopolitical, strategic and military prospects in 2017 look bright for Tehran’s ruling politicians, but the situation is bleaker as far as regional tensions are concerned.
Iran’s economic status and regional influence, as well as its deployment of hard power and military expansion, will probably escalate. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) will have a much larger function this year.
 After last year’s nuclear deal, Iran – the world’s last and largest untapped emerging market – will further reintegrate into the global economy. Iran is the second largest economy in the Middle East and North Africa with an estimated $1.35 trillion (Dh4.9tn) of purchasing-power parity, which makes it the world’s 18th largest economy. It also has the second-largest population of the region after Egypt, and is the 16th most populous nation, with about 82.8 million people.
 The moderates in Tehran will continue leading the country towards more business at the state level, but the hardliners – primarily the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and the senior cadre of the IRGC – will ensure they maintain a mono­poly over the political and economic systems. The major beneficiaries of Iran’s improving economic status are the gilded circle of Mr Khamenei, the IRGC, the Quds Force, the ministry of intelligence (Etela’at), the Basij military force and Iran’s allies – including Bashar Al Assad in Syria and Tehran’s proxies across the region.
 However, the economic status and living standards of ordinary people in Iran will probably deteriorate. Unemployment has reached a record high despite sanctions relief. Corruption, nepotism, economic mismanagement, prioritisation of military expansion and the pursuit of regional hegemonic ambitions all play crucial roles.
 Iran is ranked 136th out of 175 countries in Transparency International’s corruption perceptions index. The middle class is shrinking and the government’s extra revenues are not trickling down to the majority, just to those who are connected to the political establishment.
 This means that the people’s disenchantment, disaffection and grievances with the government will increase.
 Since Iran’s improving economic conditions mean more investment in the military and interference in other countries’ domestic affairs, regional tensions, insecurities, humanitarian tragedies and conflicts will probably increase.
 In other words, Iran’s increasing financial revenues will not alter the fundamental pillars of its regional and foreign policies.
 With more cash in the treasury, the IRGC will expand its military, financial, advisory and intelligence assistance to its staunchest allies. This will increase sectarianism, enlarge the Shia-Sunni divide and empower fundamentalist groups such as ISIL.
 Since the United States and other western powers do not seem to have a clear agenda to address the Syrian war or other conflicts in the region, Iran is likely to take a bolder military role. This suggests that Iran and Russia will increase their strategic cooperation and more robustly pursue their shared regional ambitions.
 It’s worth noting that while Iran’s regional influence and military role will probably increase, Tehran will be less capable of totally tipping the balance of power in Iraq, Syria or Yemen in its favour. One of Iran’s main challenges will be the billions of dollars that it haemorrhages on Mr Al Assad’s forces and Shia fighters, as well as the fighters that it loses in the battles.
 The nuclear deal will probably remain intact. Even if the new US administration has issues with it, the other six parties – China, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Iran – are likely to stick by the agreement. Several European countries are eagerly welcoming the increased trade with Iran, especially in the gas and oil sectors.
 The only change in the US-Iran relationship will probably be heightened rhetorical tension, but this is unlikely to translate into geopolitical, strategic or economic repercussions that damage Iran’s interests.
 Then there is the issue of a possible succession to the supreme leader, who is said to be ill. It is realistic to expect that the senior generals of the IRGC and Mr Khamenei are already grooming a cleric who shares their ideals. This means that the next supreme leader will probably be a hardliner who will preserve the core pillars of the Islamic Republic’s political establishment, prioritising its revolutionary ideals and giving more power to the IRGC to pursue its militaristic ambitions.
 Domestic reforms are less likely to occur at a fundamental level, meaning that social justice, human rights and the rule of law will not improve.
 We are unlikely to witness a significant domestic fracture across Iran’s political spectrum because the hardliners have been successful at suppressing domestic political opposition. The moderates have also allowed the hardliners to lead to survive politically.
 Iran’s presidential election will be conducted in June. Despite the hardliners’ criticisms of president Hassan Rouhani, he still enjoys high popular support. He also has the support of Mr Khamenei, who has reportedly told former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad not to run. This seemingly clears the way for another term for Mr Rouhani.
 **Dr Majid Rafizadeh is an Iran­ian-American political scientist, Harvard University scholar and president of the International American Council

Opinion: 2016 – The Year of Aleppo?
Amir Taheri/ASharq Al Awsat/December 31/16
In classic cultures, each year, instead of being designated by a number, was given a name. It could be the name of a major battle such as The Elephant when Abyssinians invaded the Arabian Peninsula, an exceptional natural disaster, The Locust which marked the beginning of the end for Sumer, or even an obscure river north of Rome, the Rubicon, the crossing of which by Caesar triggered the civil war that led to the death of the Roman Republic and the emergence of the Empire.
As various cultures established calendars and learned how to use them, the practice of baptizing each year with a name fell into disuse. In 1937 the French writer, later politician, Andre Malraux, revived the tradition by suggesting that year be named after Guernica, a small Basque town in northwest Spain which had been subjected to the first instance of carpet-bombing in the history of war by Nazi Germany’s Luftwaffe and Fascist Italy’s Aviazione Legionnaria.
In the context of the Spanish Civil war, then in its second year, the aerial crucifixion of Guernica was of little military value. In symbolic terms, however, it marked a turning point in the struggle which, as subsequent events proved, concerned the whole of Europe beyond the Spanish backwater. Some Western intellectuals, among them the already-mentioned Malraux and the British writer George Orwell identified the event as the end of the tentative peace established in the continent at the end of the First World War.
Guernica sealed the fate of the League of Nations, a precursor of the United Nations as the guarantor of some international law. More importantly, perhaps, Guernica was to morph into the prologue to the Second World War as the greatest fight between dictatorship and democracy in the history of the blood-soaked continent.
The attack introduced a new form of warfare in which the aim was no longer to weaken or destroy an armed opponent, but to kill as many civilian non-combatants as possible. That was a dress rehearsal, albeit on a small-scale, for the carpet-bombing of London, and later Dresden and Berlin, above and beyond any justification in purely military terms.
Throughout history, war had meant a clash of two rival armed groups with civilians simply required to submit to the winner at the conclusion of the conflict. In Guernica, however, the aim was to terrorize the civilian population even before the end of the conflict.
The Western democracies, notably Great Britain and France, rubbed their hands and watched as the tragedy unfurled thus signaling to the Axis Powers that their dream of world conquest would run into little resistance.
With all that in mind, would it be outrageous to wonder whether 2016 couldn’t be named as the year of Aleppo? The Syrian city, crucified by carpet-bombing by the Russian Air Force and ceaseless artillery barrages by the remnants of President Bashar Al-Assad’s army backed by the Iranian military and their Lebanese, Afghan and Pakistani mercenaries, is far bigger and more populous than tiny Guernica. There, the number of victims is also larger. But we live in an age in which everything is bigger and larger and, often, more horrible.
Beyond that, the resemblance between the two events is staggering. In Guernica, German and Italian bombers deliberately targeted hospitals, schools and even markets and bazaars, exactly as Russia and its allies did in Aleppo.
In both cases, the attackers didn’t allow humanitarian aid to reach the people trapped in the inferno of the targeted city. German and Italian planes knocked out a small convoy of relief organized by volunteers from France and Britain. In Aleppo, Russian planes destroyed a similar convoy despite the fact that it had obtained the approval of the United Nations and the International Red Cross.
Before Guernica, the conflict in Spain had been a civil war with rival factions also enjoying some backing from outside powers. Guernica transformed that into a broader fight over who would dominate the European continent, indeed the whole world.
Aleppo may well signal a similar turn of events with a civil war becoming a broader struggle for domination in the Middle East, the Mediterranean and beyond.
Aleppo looks like the end of the line for many things. One might wonder whether the UN isn’t going to share the fate of the League of Nations. After all, what is the good of an organization that cannot even allow a verbal condemnation of mass killing of civilians by one of its veto-holding members? Worse still, the other veto-holding members have either clung to carefully calibrated clichés or kept their mouths shut.
Russia and China vetoed a scheme to allow humanitarian aid to reach Aleppo. Britain and France shed crocodile tears but refused to even contemplate air-drops of food and medical supplies to the besieged population as the Russian went for the kill. The United State, under the Nobel peace laureate Obama, did even worse by harping about “consulting our Russian partners to find a solution.”
Aleppo debunked the shameless claims of the so-called Anti-War Coalition that is always ready to march in London, Paris and New York against even a threat of action against despotic regimes such as the Islamic Republic in Iran or the Castrist outfit in Cuba but cares not a farthing about slaughter in Aleppo.
Aleppo also exposed the true face of the Khomeinist regime in Tehran, exposing it as an opportunist and power-hungry Mafia that, though using a pseudo-Islamic lexicon, is more than ready to play second fiddle to an ambitious “Infidel” power in slaughtering defenseless Muslims.
By the time this column appears, the Moscow-Tehran axis may well be celebrating “victory” in Aleppo just as Berlin and Rome did after putting Guernica to death. But just as Guernica did not guarantee strategic victory for the Nazi-fascist Axis, the crucifixion of Aleppo is unlikely to advance Moscow and Tehran’s empire-building ambitions.
This does not mean that today, though gone rogue, Russia and Iran, are the same as Germany and Italy in 1937. What is clear, however, is that they are using similar tactics- tactics that should no longer be tolerated in a post-Communist, post-Fascist world.
Whatever happens next in this war, one thing is certain: 2016 will be remembered as the Year of Aleppo, Syria’s hero-martyr city.

Britain's Little Lies
Douglas Murray/Gatestone Institute/December 31/16
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9685/britain-little-lies
This is a serious category error for a Prime Minister to make. It puts critics of a religion on the same plane as people wanted for terrorism. It blurs the line between speech and action, and mixes people who call for violence with those who do not.
Only now, a fortnight later, has the true duplicity of Theresa May's speech been exposed. For now the world has learned what diplomacy the British government was engaged in even as May was making her speech. At the same time as the Prime Minister was talking about "true friendship" in front of friends of Israel, her government was conspiring with the outgoing Obama administration to kick that friend in the back. The British government was exposed as being one of the key players intent on pushing through the anti-Israel UNSC Resolution 2334. British diplomats were revealed to have been behind the wording and rallying of allies for the resolution.
The British government, whilst saying that it remains committed to a peace deal that comes as a result of direct negotiations between the two sides, has its own preconditions for peace: a freeze on the building of what it calls "settlements." They maintain this line despite the fact that settlements have nothing to do with the Israeli-Palestinian problem. Before the June 1967 Six Day War, there were no such things as "settlements." Palestinians were trying to destroy and displace Israel anyhow. The core problem is not, and never was, "settlements," but the right of Israel (or any non-Muslim nation) to exist inside any borders in that part of the world.
If you take a stand that is based on a lie, then that stand cannot succeed. If you try to oppose anti-Semitism but pretend it is the same thing as "Islamophobia," then the structure on which you have made your stand will totter and all your aspirations will fail. If you try to make a stand based on the idea that settlement construction rather than the intransigence of the Palestinians to the existence of a Jewish state is what is holding up a peace deal, then facts will keep on intruding.
On December 12, the Conservative Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Theresa May, gave a fulsome speech to the annual Conservative Friends of Israel lunch. Before a roomful of 800 pro-Israel Conservative MPs and party supporters, she lavished praise on the Jewish state. She praised Israel's achievements and castigated its enemies. She said that Britain would be marking the centenary of the Balfour declaration "with pride." She also stressed that cooperation and friendship between Britain and Israel was not just for the good of those two countries, but "for the good of the world."
For many of the people listening in the room, there were just two discordant notes. The first was related to the focus on anti-Semitism in May's speech. As she used the opportunity rightly to lambaste the Labour party for its anti-Semitism problem, she extended the reach of her own claims for herself. While boasting of her success as Home Secretary in keeping out the prominent French anti-Semite Dieudonné and finally deporting the Salafist cleric Abu Qatada al-Filistini back to his native Jordan, she also used the opportunity to congratulate herself for banning Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer and Pastor Terry Jones from coming to the UK. "Islamophobia comes from the same wellspring of hatred" as anti-Semitism, she explained.
This is a serious category error for a Prime Minister to make. It puts critics of a religion, such as Geller and Spencer, on the same plane as people wanted for terrorism (Qatada). It blurs the line between speech and action, and mixes people who call for violence with those who do not. The comparison also fails to follow the consequences of its logic to its own illogical conclusion. The comparison fails to recognise that anyone who objects to Islamic anti-Semitism is immediately known as an "Islamophobe." Therefore, someone hoping to come to Britain would have to accept being attacked by Muslim extremists for fear of being banned from entering the UK. These are serious and basic misunderstandings for a Prime Minister to propagate.
There was, however, a clear political sense to them. A Prime Minister in a country such as 21st Century Britain might believe that he or she has to be exceptionally careful not to appear to be criticising any one group of people or praising another too highly. So for the time being in Britain, a moral relativism continues to stagnate. If the Jewish community complains of anti-Semitism, then you must criticise anti-Semitism. If the Muslim community complains of "Islamophobia," then you must criticise "Islamophobia." To make value judgements might be to commit an act of political folly. Wise leaders in increasingly "diverse" societies must therefore position themselves midway between all communities, neither castigating nor over-praising, in order to keep as many people onside as possible.
UK Prime Minister Theresa May speaks at the annual Conservative Friends of Israel lunch, December 12, 2016. (Image source: Conservative Friends of Israel)
The same tactic brought the other discordant moment at the Prime Minister's lunch -- the same tactic brought to the discussion of the Israeli-Palestinian dispute. For the other discordant note in May's speech came when she mentioned Israeli settlement building. It was carefully placed in the speech, after a passage in which May congratulated her own Department for International Development (DfID) Minister, Priti Patel. In the days before the lunch, Patel had announced that DfID would carry out an investigation to determine whether British taxpayer money being sent to what May called "the Occupied Palestinian Territories" was being used to fund salaries for Palestinians convicted of terrorism offences against Israelis. Following this May said:
"When talking about global obligations, we must be honest with our friends, like Israel, because that is what true friendship is about. That is why we have been clear about building new, illegal settlements: it is wrong; it is not conducive to peace; and it must stop."
The comment was received in silence and May moved on.
But this comment fitted in closely with the strategy of her other comment. For having lavished praise on Israel, a castigation apparently seemed necessary. It is wrong, but hardly possible for a British Prime Minister currently to do otherwise. If there are terrorists receiving funds from British taxpayers thanks to the largesse of the UK government, then this may -- after many years of campaigning by anti-terrorism organisations -- finally be "investigated." However, throughout any such investigation, the British government, whilst saying that it remains committed to a peace deal that comes as a result of direct negotiations between the two sides, has for years announced its own preconditions for peace: a freeze on the building of what it calls "settlements." They maintain this line despite the fact that settlements have nothing to do with the Israeli-Palestinian problem. Before the June 1967 Six Day War, there were no such things as "settlements." Palestinians were trying to destroy and displace Israel anyhow -- in 1948, 1956, and 1967. The core problem is not, and never was, "settlements," but the right of Israel (or any non-Muslim nation) to exist inside any borders in that part of the world.
At the time of May's speech, these two issues seemed like minor cavils to some and gained little notice. Only now, a fortnight later, has the true duplicity of the speech been exposed. For now the world has learned what diplomacy the British government was engaged in even as May was making her speech.
At the same time as the Prime Minister was talking about "true friendship" in front of friends of Israel, her government was conspiring with the outgoing Obama administration to kick that friend in the back. In the wake of the collapse of the Egyptian-sponsored initiative at the UN, the British government was exposed as being one of the key players intent on pushing through the anti-Israel UN Security Council Resolution 2334. British diplomats were revealed to have been behind the wording and rallying of allies for the resolution.
The most obvious interpretation of this fact is simply a reflection that friends do not kick friends in the back. Especially not in the world's foremost international forum for kicking that particular friend. But some people are putting a kinder interpretation on the facts. The kindest to date is that the May government believes that a sterner line on the issue of Israeli settlements would give the British government more leverage with the Palestinians.
If that is so, then it seems that the May government will have to learn abroad the same lesson that they must learn at home. Both will come about because of the same strategic mistake: a reliance on the short-term convenience of what must seem at first to be only convenient little lies. The problem is that such little lies, when tested on the great seas of domestic and international affairs, have a tendency to come to grief with exceptional rapidity and ease.
Politicians are keen on taking stands. But if you take a stand that is based on a lie, then that stand cannot succeed. If you try to oppose anti-Semitism but pretend it is the same thing as "Islamophobia," then the structure on which you have made your stand will totter and all your aspirations will fail. If you try to make a stand for Israel while simultaneously conniving at the UN to undermine Israel, then your duplicity will be exposed and admiration for this and other stands will falter. If you try to make a stand based on the idea that settlement construction rather than the intransigence of the Palestinians to the existence of a Jewish state is what is holding up a peace deal, then facts will keep on intruding. They have before -- at home and abroad -- and they will again.
**Douglas Murray, British author, commentator and public affairs analyst, is based in London, England.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Blocking peace
Ben-Dror Yemini/Ynetnews/December 31/16
Op-ed: Both Kerry's speech this week and the UN Security Council resolution last week enabled Palestinian intransigence. But Netanyahu's response to the resolution causes just as much damage—by undermining Israel's relations with important countries and doing BDS's work for them.
 he Palestinians have been presented with three proposals to establish a Palestinian state on 95 percent—more or less—of the land Israel currently controls. They said 'no' three times.
 To understand the Palestinian logic, one must listen to the comments made, for example, by Abbas Zaki, one of the PLO's senior officials, about five years ago: "When we say that the settlement should be based upon (the 1967) borders, President (Abbas) understands, we understand, and everybody knows that the greater goal cannot be accomplished in one go ... If Israel withdraws from Jerusalem, evacuates the 650,000 settlers, and dismantles the wall – what will become of Israel? It will come to an end ... Netanyahu, Lieberman, and Obama ... All those scumbags ... If one says that one wants to wipe Israel out... C'mon, it's too difficult. It's not (acceptable) policy to say so. Don't say these things to the world. Keep it to yourself."
 Zaki didn't keep this strategy to himself. He presented it in an interview with Al-Jazeera. It may not be the position of the entire leadership at the Palestinian Authority, but he's obviously representing a lot more than we think.
 John Kerry's speech this week included no mention of the Palestinian intransigence. Not even a word. To those who aren't familiar with the history of the negotiations from the Oslo Accord to this very day, it must seem like a commendable speech. Kerry knows how to get the message across. He's in favor of peace and in favor of a Jewish state. He's against the settlements, which were mentioned in his speech more than anything else. His speech explained that therein lies the rub, and no other issue is as grave.
 This was also his explanation for the UN Security Council Resolution 2334. Except that there is a difference. In his speech, Kerry spoke about land swaps. The Security Council's version was entirely different. It was a resolution calling to return to the 1967 lines. The Obama administration has given it its stamp of approval. It was a shot of encouragement to the peace refusniks on the Palestinian side.
 The cheers coming from the Palestinian camp following the vote at the UN Security Council were the result of the success of the strategy Abbas Zaki was talking about. The demand to return to the 1967 lines—without any compromises, without Israel keeping its settlement blocs—has turned into a tool used against the very existence of Israel.
 Kerry's farewell speech on Israeli-Palestinian conflict
 One must admit, though, that here and there, different voices were heard. There are moderate Palestinians. There was willingness, like the Geneva Initiative, to reach a compromise based on two states for two peoples, while including the settlement blocs in Israeli territory.
 But it appears the "Eradicate Israel" camp has the upper hand. And that's exactly what Kerry's problem is: he's following the action pattern of the world's "forces of progress." These "forces of progress" absolve the Palestinians of any responsibility. The Palestinian incitement was hardly mentioned. Their intransigence doesn't exist. Kerry's speech was a biased, lacking in any integrity and one-sided indictment against Israel and only Israel.
 The Palestinians' move at the UN was not meant to promote any kind of peace agreement. It was meant to block one. Just like the Palestinians' appeals to parliaments and governments around the world to gain recognition for a Palestinian state. A slew of useful idiots, led by Israeli diplomat Alon Liel, became the main instrument of their strategy. Liel and his ilk joined the struggle to convince parliaments around the world to accept the Palestinian demand. After all, these useful idiots don't require anything of the Palestinians: Not letting go of the "right of return" fantasy nor stopping the incitement against Israel.
 The document that was leaked to an Egyptian newspaper this week is reminiscent of a fateful meeting that took place in the White House on March 17, 2014. During that meeting, President Obama presented Mahmoud Abbas with Kerry's second peace framework, which is similar to the one Kerry himself presented in his speech this week. The Palestinian team rejected the framework and negotiator Saeb Erekat was rewarded with a juicy curse word from National Security Advisor Susan Rice.
 The Americans should have realized back then who they were dealing with. But that didn't happen. Unlike Bill Clinton, who pointed to Yasser Arafat as the one who thwarted his generous proposal, Obama and Kerry chose the opposite direction. Abbas told them no, but they never said a word about it. Silence. Complete silence. Deceit. Even an editorial in the Washington Post—which is not exactly a conservative newspaper—accused Obama this week, using harsh words, of serial failure.
 All of this still doesn't justify Netanyahu's retaliation. When the prime minister of Israel cancels a visit by the prime minister of Ukraine, a meeting with the British prime minister, and cooperation with African nations, there is no other option but to say that he has gone off the rails. After all, Theresa May has recently delivered one of the more important pro-Israel speeches. But his response to May is rather similar to his response to journalist Ilana Dayan. This isn't how a prime minister responds. This isn't national pride. It's megalomania. And mostly, what the BDS couldn't even dream of doing to Israel—Netanyahu is doing. Netanyahu didn't climb up such a high tree even during his campaign against the Iran deal.
 It appears that throughout almost the entire affair, his position was just. He had excellent reasons to come out against the president of the United States, who turned Iran into a regional superpower that cultivates violence and terrorism. And there is no doubt that the nuclear deal is ten times worse than the UN Security Council's resolution about the settlements. And it is precisely because of this that Netanyahu's response raises questions. What's going on with him? For years now that Israel's enemies have been trying to undermine its relations with important nations. And now Netanyahu, he and no other, has decided to do their work for them.
 The Zionist Union and Yesh Atid released harsh statements against the UN Security Council resolution. On the other side was the camp of Zehava Galon, Ahmad Tibi, the useful idiots, B'Tselem and Haaretz, who encouraged the resolution and welcomed it. So the division on this issue is not between the Right and the Left. It's between the radical Left and everyone else—the Zionist Left, the center and the Right. But for the post-truth Netanyahu, the picture is entirely different. In his mind, anyone who questions his response belongs to the radical Left that seeks to harm Israel.
 On January 20, Netanyahu's close associates say, everything is going to change. A new president and a new administration in the US. What a delusion. Is Trump going to change Ukraine or Britain's positions? Can the State Department tell the campuses in America what to do? Is this what's going to stop the campaign of hate against Israel? Of course not. And more importantly: Not everyone out there hates Israel. Far from it. Obama and Kerry enabled Palestinian intransigence. Netanyahu is enabling Israel's haters.
 It was a bad week for anyone who still hopes that one day, we'll have a peace agreement. It was a week of deceit and radicalization. Obama, Kerry and Netanyahu are this week's heroes. Or rather, its anti-heroes

Britain and Australia more supportive of Israel than Obama and Kerry
Alan M. Dershowitz/Gatestone Institute/December 31/16
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9686/britain-and-australia-more-supportive-of-israel
When the British Prime minster and the Australians foreign minister both criticize the Obama administration for being unfair to Israel, you can be sure that something is very wrong with what President Obama and Secretary Kerry have been doing. This is what Theresa May said:
"We do not believe that it is appropriate to attack the composition of the democratically elected government of an ally. [W]e are also clear that the settlements are far from the only problem in this conflict. In particular, the people of Israel deserve to live free from the threat of terrorism, with which they have had to cope for too long."2
This is what Julie Bishop, the foreign minister of Australia, said in explaining why Australia would not have voted for the U.N. Security Council resolution:
"In voting at the UN, the [Australian] Coalition government has consistently not supported one-­sided resolutions targeting Israel."
And these are only the public criticisms. In private several other countries have expressed dismay at the problems caused by the last minute moves of the lame duck Obama administration.
Initially, the New York Times failed to report these important international developments,
presumably because they disagree with them. Only after other media featured the British and Australian criticism did they decide to cover it. They did immediately report that the Jewish community – both in the United States and Israel – is divided between right-­wing Jews who oppose the Obama administration's moves and liberal Jews who support them.3 This is simply fake news: Israel is not divided over the Security Council's resolution and the Kerry speech. All Israeli leaders and the vast majority of its citizens opposed these developments. This is true even of the Israeli leftists and centrists who are critical of Israel's settlement policies. The same is true with regard to American Jews, despite the New York Times reporting to the contrary. Many liberal Jews and non-­
Jews, including Senators Schumer, Blumenthal, Gillibrand, and Wyden have been vocally critical. So have numerous liberal congressmen and pundits.4 I certainly count myself as a liberal Democrat, who opposes Israel's settlement policies, but who is strongly critical of the Obama/Kerry moves.
Only J Street -­ which carries Obama's water -­ has expressed support, along with a few handfuls of hard-­left reform rabbis and professional Israel bashers, who the Times reporter quoted as if they
were representative of the larger Jewish community.
In contrast to the relative uniformity of the Israel's leaders and citizens in opposition to the Obama/Kerry initiatives, the Obama administration itself and the Democratic Party are divided.
Most who have expressed views have been critical, but we have not yet heard from several leading Democrats, especially Keith Ellison who is seeking the chairmanship of the DNC. This is an issue on which silence is not a virtue. It is important for all Democrats to stand up and be counted.
There is actually some good news growing out of the Kerry speech. Arab leaders have expressed support for his proposal, which would require the Palestinian Authority to recognize Israel as a Jewish state (or as I prefer to put it "the nation state of the Jewish people.") Despite this implicit support for such recognition from Arab leaders, the Palestinian Authority adamantly persists in refusing to recognize Israel's Jewish character.
This is the phony excuse Hanan Ashwari, the official spokesperson for the Palestinian Authority, gave for why it would be "against our principles" to recognize Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people:
If you want to give religion to states, then this is against our principles. I don't recognize Islamic states. I don't recognize Christian states. I don't recognize Jewish states. A state is a state for all its citizens. It has to be Democratic, inclusive, tolerant, and has to be genuinely representative of all its people. You cannot give added value to any people because of their religion or ethnicity."5
This statement may win the award for Ashwari as hypocrite of the year. The Palestinian Authority, which she officially represents, has the following in its Constitution:
"Islam is the official religion in Palestine.... The principles of Islamic Shari'a shall be the main source of legislation."6
Moreover, the Palestinian Authority recognizes Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan, which are all countries that define Islam as their state religion and discriminate against non-­believers in their particular brand of Islam.
Is Ashwari really saying that the principles of the Palestinian Authority require it to renounce their own Constitution and to withdraw recognition from all their Muslim allies? What about from Great Britain, which has an official state religion? If so, I challenge her to say that explicitly!
Israel is the only state in the Middle East that grants religious equality to all its citizens as a matter of law.7 Israeli Arabs enjoy more rights than do Arabs (let alone Jews) of any Arab state. They serve in all branches of government, including the Knesset and the Supreme Court. They have their own religious authorities recognized by the state.
Contrast this to the Palestinian leadership that has vowed that "not a single" Israeli Jew will be able to reside in the future Palestinian state.8 Furthermore Israeli Jews are banned from Palestinian universities and other institutions.9
So let's have three cheers for Great Britain and Australia, a cheer and a half for Arab leaders, and a big raspberry for the hypocrisy of Hanan Ashwari and her Palestinian Authority.
1Alan M. Dershowitz, Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus and author of Taking the Stand: My Life in the
2 Michael Birnbaum, British Leader Theresa May Breaks with John Kerry's Condemnation of Israel, Washington
3 Adam Nagourney& Sharon Otterman, American Jews Divided Over Strain in U.S.-­Israel Relations, New York Times, Dec. 29, 2016. See also Peter Baker, In 'Red' and 'Blue' Israel, Separate Lives and Divergent Narratives, New York Times, Dec. 29, 2016
4 Rebecca Kheel, Obama Faces Widespread Backlash After Abstaining from UN Israel Vote, The Hill, Dec. 23, 2016.
See e.g. Eli Lake, Obama Fulfills His Prophecy on Israeli Settlements, Bloomberg View, Dec. 27, 2016.
5 CNN New Day with Don Lemon, Dec. 27, 2016.
62002 Basic Laws, Art. 4, available at http://www.palestinianbasiclaw.org/basic-­law/2002-­basic-­law
7 Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel, May 14, 1948
8 Abbas: 'Not a single Israeli' in future Palestinian state,' Jerusalem Post, July 30, 2013, available at http://www.jpost.com/Middle-­East/Abbas-­wants-­not-­a-­single-­Israeli-­in-­future-­Palestinian-­state-­321470 9Amira Hass, When A Haaretz Journalist Was Asked To Leave A Palestinian University, Sept. 28, 2014
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute. 

The Saudi vision and population growth
Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/December 31/16
The world's population explosion is one of the biggest obstacles hindering the train of development and creating exhausting competition between the pace of development and the demands of the increasing population. Saudi Arabia has now launched a new phase of its march based on revolutionizing its economic identity by recreating it through the state’s guarantee of welfare, launching a giant private sector and diversifying national income. All the details and plans of these ambitious and future terms were explained by Vision 2030. This was practically explained through the recent budget announced last week. The Saudi department of statistics announced that the population in Riyadh reached 8 million – 4.5 million are Saudis while 3.4 million are residents. The population of the entire kingdom is 31.74 million according to 2016 estimates.
All this means that the rate of Saudi population growth is increasing at a worrying pace. When we talk about population growth, we are not only talking about citizens but also about residents, considering the increase of number of refugees from Arab countries and other countries as a result civil wars.
Saudi Arabia has now launched a new phase of its march based on revolutionizing its economic identity. This is in addition to the fact that the Saudi labor market tempts Arab and non-Arab workers from all over the world, particularly from Asia. Of course what further tempt them to go work in Saudi Arabia are the cheap general services and cheap livelihood costs. What does uncontrolled population growth mean for the general economy?
It means a lot of pressure on services, goods, energy, general resources, such as those related to hospitalization, education and transportation etc. But when does population growth become useful?
It becomes useful “when this increase is met with a result in term of the state’s real production, and when this increase leads to decrease in poverty and increase of the average income. Population growth must not lead to the deterioration of the quality of life or to the decrease of essential services or deterioration of these services’ quality. Population growth must not harm the environment or drain natural resources.” (Muntser Abu al-Hajjaj al-Aqsri, al-Ahram) Finally, the religious debate about the issue is not conclusive. Some prohibit family planning and some allow it as it has its benefits. This debate by various sources is available for anyone who wants to check it out. Speaking of jurisprudence, it's worth noting that that the four imams of the Sunni sect did not have many children. Imam Abu Hanifa only had one son, Hammad, Imam Shafii had two sons, Othman and Mohammed, Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal had two sons, Saleh and Abdullah and Imam Malik had one son, Yahya. What can be seen is that population growth is not adding to market production or expertise as the opposite is happening. Therefore, the situation must be bravely confronted and programs that encourage family planning must be devised so the new Saudi train moves forward without any obstructions. *This article was first published in Asharq al-Awsat on December 26, 2016.

Saudi defense industry is a national priority
Samar Fatany/Saudi Gazette/December 31/ 2016
The Sultanate of Oman’s decision to join the Saudi-led anti- terrorism coalition is a welcome development and a major boost to the 40-nation Islamic Military Alliance created on Dec. 15, 2015 to enhance regional security. ISIS, Al-Qaeda and affiliates continue to take advantage of the fragile political and security climate across the region to gain more influence and territorial control. Major General Mansour Al-Turki, an Interior Ministry spokesperson, recently told reporters that more than 2,000 Saudis are currently fighting in the ranks of terrorists abroad and that over 70 percent of them are stationed in Syria. The report is an alarming reminder of the urgent need for military preparedness to combat the threat of terrorism within Saudi Arabia and abroad.
 Deputy Crown Prince Muhammad Bin Salman, second deputy premier and minister of defense, stated that Saudi Vision 2030 includes plans to boost the military industry and to raise the level of security services within the Saudi army. He stated that the Kingdom would be restructuring many military deals to be linked to Saudi manufacturing.
 He also added, that the Kingdom is in the process of establishing a holding company for military industries. He said, “It will be later in the Saudi market, also for ‘transparency’, so a citizen can know the military deals, the company’s performance, sales, deals and industries very clearly.” Developing a strong Saudi defense industry is a national priority.
 Foreign military assistance
 In line with the new vision and the alarming threat of terrorism, seeking military cooperation with major industrial powers is critical to prevent dangerous situations. The drive for self-dependency and the setting up of our own parameters of defense is a step in the right direction. It is time we build our own defense mechanisms. For years, we have been entirely dependent on foreign military assistance and that has weakened our status in the global community and has allowed many to take advantage of our vulnerability. The new vision opens doors for us to import and develop our own indigenous technology to suit our needs and environment.
 The official visit of the high-level delegation of the Italian frigate Nave Carabiniere on Dec. 28 to the Jeddah Chamber of Commerce and Industry presented an opportunity for our business community to view state-of-the-art naval ships and products. The commanding officer Francesco Pagnotta explained that the purpose of the visit was to foster cooperation and to demonstrate the newest and most advanced navy projects that are not only for military purposes but also for civilian tasks that include providing power and water supply, humanitarian assistance, hospital services and logistic support with medical care capacity.
 Members of the delegation included ship building business leaders who offered services to provide technology transfer of the latest naval ships and electronic warfare and defense equipment. They shared their expertise in surveillance and cyber intelligence systems with the aim of deterring the threat of terrorists or other illegal activities.
 Our region must work on a strategy for the efficient transfer of military technology and the creation of policies to foster relations to build partners and not remain recipients in the evolution of technology. If we do not develop our military mechanism and spend wisely on defense, we will be easy prey for warmongers and terrorist organizations.
 Saudi Arabia and the Islamic military alliance have an important task ahead not only to train their armed forces, but also to develop a stronger military industry with advanced weapons to defend Muslim territories. The Middle East can no longer afford to be at the mercy of the superpowers that control the sales of arms and exercise their hegemony over our region.
 **This article was first published in the Saudi Gazette on December 31, 2016.