LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

December 03/16

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletin16/english.december03.16.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick; I have come to call not the righteous but sinners to repentance
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 05/27-32/:"After this Jesus went out and saw a tax-collector named Levi, sitting at the tax booth; and he said to him, ‘Follow me.’And he got up, left everything, and followed him. Then Levi gave a great banquet for him in his house; and there was a large crowd of tax-collectors and others sitting at the table with them. The Pharisees and their scribes were complaining to his disciples, saying, ‘Why do you eat and drink with tax-collectors and sinners?’Jesus answered, ‘Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick; I have come to call not the righteous but sinners to repentance.’"
 

I therefore, the prisoner in the Lord, beg you to lead a life worthy of the calling to which you have been called, with all humility and gentleness

Letter to the Ephesians 04/01-07/:"I therefore, the prisoner in the Lord, beg you to lead a life worthy of the calling to which you have been called, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in love, making every effort to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called to the one hope of your calling, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is above all and through all and in all. But each of us was given grace according to the measure of Christ’s gift."

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on December 02-03/16
No Life for a Regime That Stacks Its People’s Corpses/By Ahmad El-Assaad December 01, 2016
Lebanon halts work as Palestinians reject wall around refugee camp/Haytham Mouzahem/Al Monitor/December 02/16
Man of the year: Vladimir Putin/Dr. Azeem Ibrahim/Al Arabiya/December 02/16
Iran hardliners celebrate forthcoming years/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya/December 02/16
Marine Gen James Mattis is next US Defense Secetary/DEBKAfile Special Report December 02/16
U.S. professor, Ivan Sascha rejects misinformation against People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran/NCRI/Friday, 02 December 2016
George Sabra: The Disaster of Aleppo Is on Russians and Iran and Those Who Were Silent About Such Crime/NCRI/December 20/16
Sisi's support for Syrian regime threatens to harm Cairo-Riyadh ties/Pascale el-Khoury/Al Monitor/December 02/16
Why Iraq's Sunnis fear new PMU law/Omar Sattar/Al Monitor/December 02/16
Self-Censorship: Free Society vs. Fear Society/ Giulio Meotti/Gatestone Institute/December 02/16
Iranian Shabnam Madadzadeh, a former political prisoner reveals Iran regime atrocities/NCRI/December 02/16
Top Muslim university rejects reform, stands by “terrorist curriculum”/Raymond Ibrahim/FrontPage Magazine/December 02/16

 

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on December 02-03/16
Turkish FM in Beirut, Holds Talks with Senior Officials
LF Says Aoun Adheres to Approach of Founding a State Based on Constitution
Report: Aoun Defies Difficulties Hampering Cabinet Line-Up
Bassil Says Lebanon, Germany Engaged in Fight against Terrorism
UK Ambassador: International Community Wants a Strong Partner in Lebanon
General Security Arrests Lebanese with Terror Links
No Life for a Regime That Stacks Its People’s Corpses
Turkey supports all Lebanese: Cavusoglu
Canadian Foreign Minister arrives in Beirut
AlShamsi: ties with Lebanon have reached level of strategic partnership in many areas
Hajj Hassan sponsors opening of International Motor Show in Jbeil
Kanaan: Holding parliamentary polls based on 1960 law unacceptable
Hariri meets delegation of Lebanese businessmen
Siniora, Steinmeier tackle situation in Lebanon
Siniora discusses Ain el Helweh situation with Palestinian Security Committee
Lebanese president extends hand to political rivals
Lebanon halts work as Palestinians reject wall around refugee camp

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on December 02-03/16
Aleppo army break siege and ready for urban warfare
Civil society groups urge UN General Assembly action on Syria
Syria Rebels Mount Fierce Defence of Key Aleppo District
Congress Passes Iran Sanctions Extension, Bill Goes to Obama
Obama to sign Iran Sanctions Act extension into law
Militias Clash in Libya's Tripoli, Worst Violence in 2 Years
200,000 Muslims Protest In Jakarta To Demand Jail For Christian Governor
Yemen: 172 killed in Taiz from militia fire last month
Saudi king issues royal decrees reshuffling religious and Shoura councils
Iran diplomats face charges in Kenya for filming Israeli embassy
Iran regime’s provocations stem from its weakness
Who Prevents, Prosecution of Public Treasury Looters in Iran?
Iran: Continuous Export of Crisis, to Cover Its Social Explosiveness
Journalist found shot dead in Iraqi Kurdistan

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on December 02-03/16
Keith Ellison: Israel controls U.S. foreign policy.
UK: Muslim teacher condones Charlie Hebdo jihad massacre in classroom.
UK: 96% of Muslims do not believe al Qaeda was behind 9/11 jihad attacks.
Trump: “People are pouring in from the Middle East. We have no idea who they are…we’re going to stop that dead”.
Iranians face terrorism charges after filming Israeli embassy in Kenya.
Top Muslim university rejects reform, stands by “terrorist curriculum”.
Video: Christine Williams on the ignoring of the genocide of Christians in the Middle East.
Aisha Tubman, Mahmoud Douglass, and the Straight Path Railroad.
Hugh Fitzgerald: “A President Should Not Say That”.
McCain and Graham seek to gut 9/11 bill and immunize foreign governments funding terrorists.
Indonesia: 150,000 Muslims demand arrest of Christian governor for “blasphemy”.
Georgetown University prof: “Islamophobia” causes jihad terror, white supremacists greater threat than jihadis.
Toronto university Muslim groups block passage of motion to hold Holocaust Education Week.

Links From Christian Today Site for on December 02-03/16
Thousands Fleeing ISIS At Risk As Temperatures Plummet Near Mosul
Archbishop Of Canterbury: British Values Are Based On 'Threat And Fear'
Faith Schools No Better Than Secular Schools Says New Report
200,000 Muslims Protest In Jakarta To Demand Jail For Christian Governor
If America Was A Village Of 100 People, 89 Of Them Would Believe In God
We Cannot Ignore The Culture Of Sex Abuse We Have Created
The World Is In A Mess. The Common Good Offers A Way Out
Religious Freedom 'Deteriorated Tremendously' In 2016
Bishop: Church Too Middle Class, Must Listen To Poor Communities
Archbishop Of Nigeria To Settle Row Between Bishop And His Church After They Locked Him Out
Is This The Face Of Jesus Christ Himself? Scientists Believe It Could Be.

Latest Lebanese Related News published on December 02-03/16
Turkish FM in Beirut, Holds Talks with Senior Officials
Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu kicked off a visit to Beirut on Friday where he held meetings with senior Lebanese officials. Cavusoglu first held a meeting with newly elected President Michel Aoun at the Presidential Palace. He conveyed a message from Turkish President Recep Tayyib Erdogan congratulating the Lebanese Head of State on his election, and reiterating the importance of strengthening the Turkish-Lebanese relations. The Turkish FM emphasized that “stability is an important factor in Lebanon.” Touching on the influx of Syrian refugees in Lebanon and the repercussions of the Syrian exodus on Lebanon, Aoun highlighted the “need for reaching a political solution in Syria.” Cavusoglu later held a meeting with caretaker PM Tammam Salam at his residence in al-Msaytbeh. The Turkish diplomat later met with FM Jebran Bassil and stressed in a joint press conference “the importance of stability in Lebanon.” He added that Syrian President Bashar Assad “can't stay in power and no one can deny his responsibility for the death of thousands of Syrian civilians.”He also called for a political solution in Syria and for the eradication of terrorism, as he hailed Lebanon's role in receiving the displaced Syrians, he said: “Syria's stability and security must be strengthened. There is a joint understanding on the need for a ceasefire and announce a truce in Syria because the situation in Aleppo is worrisome and a political solution is appropriate.”
 
LF Says Aoun Adheres to Approach of Founding a State Based on Constitution
Naharnet/December 02/16/The Lebanese Forces urged the political parties, without naming them, which it blames for delaying the cabinet formation, to stop their endeavors because “they will be proven futile,” al-Joumhouria daily reported Friday. LF sources called on the political parties reportedly hampering the formation of the cabinet to quit the obstruction since “this method proved ineffectiveness with President Michel Aoun, and with Prime Minister-designate Saad al-Hariri.”The sources went on to say “if they expect Aoun to alter his national approach and practices that rely on the Constitution, they will wait for long and will bear the responsibility of prolonged disruption.”“The new approach adopted by Aoun does not target anyone. It is intended to enforce the Constitution. The actual problem lies in those who are trying to blow this approach and obstruct it from the beginning. Their efforts will prove useless,” they concluded. Wrangling over the distribution of ministerial portfolios lingers among the conflicting political parties, and has delayed the formation of a cabinet after aspirations that it would be lined before Independence Day on November 22. In October, the parliament elected Aoun, a former general, as president ending a two-and-half-year deadlock that left Lebanon without a president. Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri was designated on November 3 to form a new government under the tenure of Aoun but he is still facing obstacles bringing together a line-up that balances Lebanon's delicate sectarian-based political system. At stake is the distribution of the most powerful portfolios like the defense ministry and other key portfolios including the public works.
 
Report: Aoun Defies Difficulties Hampering Cabinet Line-Up
Naharnet/December 02/16/The presidential palace resumed in the last hours the activation of its contact channels in a bid to contribute to the facilitation of the obstacles that have so far hampered the formation of a new cabinet under the tenure of President Michel Aoun, al-Mustaqbal daily reported Friday. Baabda Palace sources told the daily that efforts were intensified on Thursday with all political parties to solve the hurdle relating to the ministerial portfolio that will be allotted to the Marada Movement chief MP Suleiman Franjieh.
Having stressed that Aoun is keen to “stop the waste of time and drain the Lebanese hopes for the new tenure,” the sources preferred not to dwell on what is being said about a deadline for the formation of the cabinet, saying “the President is concerned to have the government formed as fast as possible without further delay.”They added that the President will spare no effort in contributing to the process of resolving the government obstacle, revealing that the “presidential efforts resumed momentum in the last hours and there are great efforts being made with Hizbullah, the AMAL Movement and Marada in an attempt to reach an alternative satisfactory option to the issue of Franjieh's insistence to be given one of three portfolios the telecommunications, energy or public works in the new line-up. The discussions are ongoing, added the source and the results are supposed to crystallize in the coming hours.
 
Bassil Says Lebanon, Germany Engaged in Fight against Terrorism
Naharnet/December 02/16Caretaker Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil, said that Lebanon and Germany agreed on the fight against terrorism and the need to prevent its funding resources. Bassil's stance came on Friday during a joint press conference with German Foreign Minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier. He hailed Berlin's important role in ensuring stability and security that could only be anchored through the eradication of terrorism. "Lebanon suffers from a shortage of resources while it is receiving the largest number of refugees," Bassil said thanking Germany for its help in this context. For his part, the German Minister said that Lebanese people managed to overcome political obstacles in order to build a better future for their country. He said that the assistance of Lebanon in assuming the burden of refugees is persisting, announcing a contribution of 10 million Euros to deal with this crisis. Steinmeier highlighted the importance of reaching a solution to the Syrian war.
 
UK Ambassador: International Community Wants a Strong Partner in Lebanon

Naharnet/December 02/16/British Ambassador Hugo Shorter held a meeting with Speaker Nabih Berri on Friday where talks focused on the situation in Lebanon and the need to address the challenges facing the country. Following the meeting Ambassador Shorter said: “I hope government formation can conclude soon. Lebanon needs a dynamic government now, setting to work to address the many challenges facing the country: public services, economic stagnation, security.”The Ambassador went on to say: “The International community wants a strong partner in Lebanon, to resist the impact of turmoil in the region, to manage the high number of refugees here, and to help vulnerable Lebanese communities as well as Syrians cope with the big challenges they are facing.”Touching on the upcoming parliamentary elections, he said: “We also discussed next year's Parliamentary elections. Important for the Lebanese people, and Lebanon's credibility as a democracy, that they go ahead on time.”
 “I hope that the next election will be a stronger, more transparent, more representative election. In particular, key measures on pre-printed ballot papers and secret voting should be implemented. And I hope measures can be taken to significantly improve the representation of women in Parliament, whether through law or by the parties themselves,” he concluded.
 
General Security Arrests Lebanese with Terror Links
Naharnet/December 02/16/In the framework of tracking sleeping terror cells, the General Security arrested a Lebanese national on suspicion of having involvement with a terrorist organization, the General Directorate of the General Security said in a statement Friday.
During interrogation the detainee, identified as A.A., confessed to having been active with a terrorist organization at the logistical level, and transporting arms and ammunition, all in favor of terrorists based in the outskirts of the northeastern town of Arsal.
The detainee was transferred after the interrogations to the related judicial authorities for further investigations. Meanwhile, efforts remain underway to arrest the rest of the suspects.

No Life for a Regime That Stacks Its People’s Corpses
By Ahmad El-Assaad December 01, 2016
Some people in Lebanon are still, unfortunately, waging on the field developments in Syria, and designing their moves and positions based on the current fight-or-flight currently taking place there.
The painful thing is that the sight of corpses thrown aside in the streets of Aleppo, that city turned “giant graveyard” by the brutality of the Syrian regime et. al., has motivated the said Lebanese parties to wage on the comeback of Assad’s regime. What is worse, is that they are grounding their illusions on a change in the international scene, based on the results of the US presidential elections, and the projections of the upcoming French elections.
As usual, these wages are wrong. That regime, that’s been slaughtering its own people for the past five years, cannot by any logic rule again, not on piles of dead bodies; it cannot go back in time, not by the force of war, massacres, or destruction, and not by any form of foreign assistance.
Any goal achieved by this axis in Aleppo, on the expense of its people and rebels, will only be a defeat to be translated sooner or later with the eventual victory of the Syrian people. What they think they will achieve in Aleppo is what has been dubbed “Useful Syria”—which will be quite the opposite for the Syrian regime, because it will not allow for the latter to last at the head of a people who has suffered for decades from its terrorists, and from its mercenaries for the past three years of its last revolution.
Waging on Assad to stay in power, despite the massacres he’s done and the misery he’s inflicted to his people, and despite destroying entire cities and villages across Syria, is nothing but a losing bet that will not change the course of history; because history rejects all despotic regimes, sooner or later.
 
Turkey supports all Lebanese: Cavusoglu
The Daily Star/December 02, 2016ظBEIRUT: Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu Friday expressed support to all Lebanese factions, highlighting the positive political breakthrough in the country.  Cavusoglu said he believed his visit to Beirut would “be a turning point in ties between the two countries.”  Speaking at a news conference with his Lebanese counterpart, caretaker FM Gebran Bassil, he stressed that Turkey “doesn’t distinguish” between different Lebanese sects and seeks to build stronger ties with the country as a whole.  “Turkey fully supports the political process in Lebanon, as stability in the country has an enormous impact on the region,” he said, highlighting the need for the Lebanese to resume dialogue. He also congratulated Aoun on his election on behalf of Erdogan, citing it as a positive “We hope that the compromise continues and we see the formation of the Cabinet,” Cavusoglu said.  Aoun was elected as the country’s head of state on Oct. 31. Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri is seeking to form an all-inclusive Cabinet, but overlapping demands of rivals is delaying the formation of a new government.  Cavusoglu hailed Lebanon's efforts in hosting Syrian refugees and called on the international community to share the burden.  Bassil called for the return of refugees to stable and safe zones in Syria “during and after a political solution in Syria.""We need to prepare circumstances for their safe return to safe zones and secure the required conditions." Turkey has been a main entry point for people fleeing the ongoing conflict in Syria, with three million refugees estimated to be living in the country.  Meanwhile, Lebanon has hosted over 1.1 million Syrian refugees since the outbreak of the Syrian conflict in 2011. This huge influx of refugees has put a strain on the country’s infrastructure and economy, leading the Lebanese government to reject any alleged attempts by the international community to maintain a permanent Syrian presence.  Cavusoglu's visit seeks to highlight the Syrian refugee crisis and its impact on both countries. The Turkish FM also discussed means to improve bilateral ties during the course of his trip. The Turkish FM will also meet with senior officials including Speaker Nabih Berri and Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri.  He met separately with Aoun and caretaker Prime Minister Tammam Salam earlier in the day. The visits follows recent trips by Qatari FM Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdel-Rahman al-Thani, a Saudi delegation, Egyptian FM Sameh Shoukry and Iran's FM Mohammad Javad Zarif last month.The flurry of diplomatic activity comes in light of Aoun's election in October, which ended more than two years of a crippling presidential vacuum.  German FM Frank-Walter Steinmeier arrived in Beirut Friday for a one-day official visit for the same purpose and Canada's Foreign Affairs Minister Stephane Dion is also expected to travel to Lebanon.

Canadian Foreign Minister arrives in Beirut
Fri 02 Dec 2016/NNA - Canada's Foreign Minister, Stephane Dion, accompanied by two Canadian MPs of Lebanese origin, Eva Nassif and Marwan Tabara, arrived on Friday night in Beirut on a three-day visit. The Canadian Minister is scheduled to meet with the Lebanese President Michel Aoun to congratulate him on his election as a president. Later he will meet with Speaker of the House, Nabih Berri, Caretaker PM, Tammam Salam, Prime Minister-designate, Saad Hariri and Caretaker Foreign and Expatriates Minister, Gebran Bassil, to tackle the current situation in Lebanon and the region, as well as bilateral ties between Lebanon and Canada. On the other hand, German Expatriates Minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, left Beirut on Friday night heading to Germany on a private plane. Also, Turkish Foreign Minister, Mevlut Cavusoglu, left Beirut on Friday night heading to Turkey on a private plane.

AlShamsi: ties with Lebanon have reached level of strategic partnership in many areas
Fri 02 Dec 2016/NNA - The Ambassador of UAE, Mohamad Saed Al Shamsi, held on Friday a reception in Hilton Hotel on the occasion of UAE's National Day and in the presence of officials. Al Shamsi praised bilateral ties between UAE and Lebanon.
"Ties between UAE and Lebanon are based on the principles of cooperation, mutual respect and non-interference in the internal affairs of states. Ties have reached in recent years the level of strategic partnership in many fields," the Ambassador stressed, hoping to reach wider cooperation in the near future. On the other hand, Al Shamsi said that the United Arab Emirates has achieved positive economic rates, and was able to absorb and overcome the effects of the global financial crisis. "The UAE economy continues its way towards growth and the achievement of the overall development and the development of the industrial sector in the country at an accelerating pace to be a strong global competitor," he concluded.

Hajj Hassan sponsors opening of International Motor Show in Jbeil
Fri 02 Dec 2016/NNA - Minister of Industry, Hussein Hajj Hassan, sponsored on Friday the opening of the International Motor Show in Mastita-Jbeil, in the presence of the Iranian Ambassador to Lebanon, Mohammed Fateh Ali and dignitaries. The minister hoped that political and security stability will prevail in the new era, wishing a swift cabinet formation and the approval of new and just electoral law. The minister refused to hold the parliamentary elections base on the 1960 law."We ask president Michel Michel Aoun and the new cabinet to pay attention to the economy in all sectors, especially industry and agriculture, through an economic plan and a clear program so that we can increase the size of economy," the minister concluded.

Kanaan: Holding parliamentary polls based on 1960 law unacceptable

Fri 02 Dec 2016/NNA - "Change and Reform" bloc Secretary, Deputy Ibrahim Kanaan, said on Friday that "we should not use the delay in the process of forming the government as a pretext for the adoption of the 1960 electoral law".Kanaan said in an interview to "LBC" TV, the adoption of the 1960 law is "unacceptable", neither on the constitutional nor the political level. As for the government, he finally demanded respect for the prerogatives of the President of the Republic and the Prime Minister-designate on this subject.

Hariri meets delegation of Lebanese businessmen

Fri 02 Dec 2016/NNA - Prime Minister-designate, Saad Hariri, met Friday evening at the "Center House" a delegation of Lebanese businessmen from the United Arab Emirates, in the presence of Lebanon's Ambassador to Abu Dhabi, Hassan Saad.

Siniora, Steinmeier tackle situation in Lebanon
Fri 02 Dec 2016/NNA - Former Prime Minister, Fouad Siniora met on Friday afternoon at his Bliss residence the German Foreign Minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier. Both men discussed the situation in Lebanon and the region.

Siniora discusses Ain el Helweh situation with Palestinian Security Committee
Fri 02 Dec 2016/NNA - Former Prime Minister, Fouad Siniora, met on Friday at his office in Sidon with a delegation of senior Palestinian Security Committee supervising the security of the camps in Lebanon. Discussions touched on the situation of the Palestinians in Lebanon, particularly in Ain el Helweh camp, as well as the wall that has been built around the camp. Siniora stressed the need "to boost dialogue between the Palestinian forces and the Lebanese Army".

Lebanese president extends hand to political rivals
The Daily Star/December 02/16/BEIRUT: President Michel Aoun extended his hand to political rivals Friday, saying he was ready to work with all sides for the benefit of the Lebanese people. Aoun said he would work with all parties to safeguard the Constitution and achieve equitable representation in government, according to a statement released by the office of the presidency. The president and founder of the Free Patriotic Movement said he would welcome any Lebanese leader, politician or official to the Presidential Palace for talks, so long as the goal of the discussions was to uphold national interests. Rival political parties in Lebanon have been jockeying for positions in the new Cabinet under Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri. The formation of Hariri's Cabinet has been delayed as a result of competition for key portfolios such as Telecommunications, Energy, Finance and Public Works.
 
 Lebanon halts work as Palestinians reject wall around refugee camp
Haytham Mouzahem/Al Monitor/December 02/16
US President-elect Donald Trump's plan for a wall along the US-Mexico border isn't the only one raising controversy these days.
The Lebanese government’s decision to build a wall at the southern Palestinian refugee camp of Ain al-Hilweh sparks angry reactions from Palestinian factions.
Construction began — and halted — last month on a wall at Ain al-Hilweh Palestinian refugee camp in southern Lebanon. The Lebanese army said the 6-foot-tall cement wall, which is intended to help keep terrorists and criminals from passing into and out of the camp, supposedly had the approval of senior Palestinian faction officials. But construction stopped when condemnation arose from numerous quarters.
 Residents of the camp and some Palestinian factions staged a demonstration last week, rejecting the idea of encircling and isolating the camp from its surroundings, turning it into “one big prison.” They also deny longstanding claims that the camp threatens Lebanon’s security, and allegations that about 200 extremists from Jabhat Fatah al-Sham and the Islamic State (IS) reside inside the camp’s neighborhoods. But the camp has a history of widespread, deadly infighting among various factions.
 Informed security sources told Al-Monitor that the security situation has been deteriorating in the camp since 2013. There have been dozens of clashes between some radical groups and Palestinian factions, and dozens of killings. In 2014, Minister of Interior and Municipalities Nouhad al-Machnouk said, “It is no longer acceptable that the camp remains a hotbed where fugitives flee from justice.”
 Maj. Gen. Munir al-Maqdah, commander of the joint Palestinian security force in the camp, told Al-Monitor by phone that a meeting was held Nov. 24 between delegates of the camp's Palestinian security committee and Brig. Gen. Khoder Hammoud, head of the Lebanese army intelligence branch in the south. The parties agreed to halt work on the wall until the concerned factions come up with an alternative — within two weeks.
 Maqdah added that the Palestinian factions had held another meeting and issued a statement “squarely rejecting said wall, which would harm historical relations and the common struggle of the brotherly peoples of Lebanon and Palestine.”
 Raafat Morra, a Hamas media officer in Lebanon, told Al-Monitor the Hamas movement is against any action aimed at isolating the Palestinian presence in Lebanon or viewing them as a security threat. He said the various factions have made concerted efforts for five years to minimize conflicts in the camps. “We managed to pull this off, as camps have seen relative calm and have cooperated with the Lebanese authorities to maintain security,” he said.
 The Lebanese army issued a statement Nov. 25 saying that the “security wall” is “merely a protective fence in some sectors that doesn't overlook residential areas” of the camp and that aims to “prevent the infiltration of terrorists from and into it.” The statement added that the wall will help close off tunnels that fugitives in the camp use to access nearby agricultural fields.
 The Lebanese army was surprised by Palestinian objections to the wall, since intelligence officials and senior Palestinian faction officials said they had "previously agreed on the matter," according to the army statement.
 Critics of the wall say that rather than providing security, the barrier would promote division and provoke refugees, while harming them psychologically.
 Marwan Abdul Al, an official in the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) in Lebanon, told Al-Monitor, “The [proposed] wall will not serve its goal of maintaining security. We fear that it would harm the image of the camp and turn into a metal scarecrow in the mind of the public, promoting the culture of estrangement and hatred instead of communication and dialogue.”
 He also said comprehensive security can be achieved by promoting “the sovereignty of the Lebanese state and justice for Palestinians, according to the equation of rights and duties.”
 A Palestinian journalist residing in the camp, who asked not to be named, told Al-Monitor, “The wall would turn the camp into a cage, and people inside would be like animals in a zoo.”
 Hassan Hoballah, who handles Palestinian issues for Hezbollah, told Al-Monitor the party "rejects any act involving injustice or persecution, or a racist act against the Palestinian people in Lebanon, as they are our brothers and our guests.”
 Hoballah called for finding security alternatives to the wall based on cooperation between the Lebanese army and the Palestinian factions to prevent the infiltration of terrorist groups.
 Other Lebanese officials, political parties and groups also issued statements condemning the wall.
 Islamic legal scholar Sheikh Selim Sussan, the mufti of Sidon and its districts, on Nov. 24 bluntly rejected the wall, which he said would "turn the camp into one big prison for our Palestinian brothers and further stir feelings of hatred and discrimination against them.”
 He added, “I do not know who was behind the idea of building this wall” that separates “the people of Sidon and Palestinians who share several bonds together” at the national, religious and family levels.
 There's no doubt a new approach is needed to address Lebanese-Palestinian relations, an approach that would lead to more social and economic rights for Palestinian refugees in terms of work and residence, as well as better living conditions in the camps scattered in most of the Lebanese provinces. This new approach could also take into account Lebanese concerns of the resettlement of Palestinian refugees on one hand, and the perils of any infiltration by terrorist organizations inside camps and the resulting security threat on the other.
Ain al-Hilweh camp is the largest camp for Palestinian refugees in Lebanon in terms of both population and area. Estimates of its area range from only about 1 square kilometer (0.4 square mile) to 2 square kilometers. Population estimates range from 60,000 to 80,000.
 
Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on December 02-03/16
Aleppo army break siege and ready for urban warfare
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Friday, 2 December 2016/Rebels in Aleppo have agreed to form a new military alliance headed by “Abu AbdulRahman Nour,” to protect the city they control from the brutal assaults by the regime and its allies. The new alliance would be called the Aleppo Army and would be led by the commander of the Jabha Shamiya rebel faction, one of the major groups fighting in northern Syria under the Free Syrian Army. A commander at the Jabha Shamiya told Reuters that the new coalition will help in the centralization of the decision-taking process. The situation in Aleppo is escalating, with the regime forces seizing more than 40% of Eastern Aleppo, 15 days after the eruption of the massive assault to restore the second biggest city in Syria. The UN had said that Russia is working on setting up four humanitarian corridors to evacuate the wounded victims and provide medical and food supplies for the trapped civilians in East of Aleppo. The scene in Aleppo is tragic; dead bodies all around the neighborhoods that are controlled by the opposition after the assaults led by the regime. The majority have fled the city and those who chose to stay there, are living without the bare necessities. International reporters and journalists are all describing the situation in Aleppo as hopeless amid the constant attacks from the regime forces.
 *This article can be viewed in Arabic on AlArabiya.net
 
Civil society groups urge UN General Assembly action on Syria
AFP Friday, 2 December 2016/More than 200 humanitarian and human rights groups called Thursday for the UN General Assembly to address Syria’s deadly conflict, citing the Security Council’s paralysis in dealing with the crisis. In a declaration published in New York, the 223 signatories said the Security Council “has failed Syrians” and particularly pointed out its inability to stop the Syrian regime’s offensive against east Aleppo. They called for the 193 member nations of the United Nations “to request an emergency special session of the UN General Assembly to demand an end to all unlawful attacks in Aleppo and elsewhere in Syria, and immediate and unhindered humanitarian access” to besieged civilians. The UN members also should find a way to bring those responsible for serious crimes under international law in Syria to justice, the declaration said.

Syria Rebels Mount Fierce Defence of Key Aleppo District
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/December 02/16/Rebels put up fierce resistance on Friday in a key district of Syria's battered Aleppo, where a regime offensive has left bodies in the streets and sparked a global outcry. The government assault on the northern city has spurred a mass exodus of tens of thousands of residents from the opposition-held east and prompted fresh calls by Russia for aid corridors. President Bashar al-Assad's forces captured the city's northeast this week and were focused on seizing Sheikh Saeed, a large district on the city's southeast edges. But anti-government fighters put up a strong defence there overnight, rolling back recent government gains, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. "The regime and allied fighters... wanted to take this neighbourhood at any cost, because capturing it would allow them to target all remaining rebel-held districts," said Observatory head Rami Abdel Rahman. "But rebels put up ferocious resistance, because they knew they would be trapped if Sheikh Saeed fell," Abdel Rahman added.  The head of the Britain-based monitor said opposition forces were now once again in control of at least 70 percent of the neighbourhood. Sheikh Saeed borders the last remaining sections of Aleppo still in rebel hands -- a collection of densely populated residential neighbourhoods where thousands have sought refuge from advancing regime forces. In preparation for street-by-street fighting in these districts, hundreds of fighters from Syria's elite Republican Guard and Fourth Division arrived in Aleppo on Friday, according to the Observatory. - Rocket fire, clashes -More than 300 civilians, including dozens of children, have been killed in east Aleppo since the government began its offensive on November 15, according to the Observatory. Retaliatory rocket fire by the rebels on government-held western areas of the city has killed 55 civilians, the monitor says. According to Syrian state news agency SANA, one civilian was killed and three were wounded Friday in rebel rocket attacks. An AFP correspondent could hear steady rocket fire on west Aleppo overnight and into Friday morning. Intermittent clashes on Friday rocked a block of residential buildings on the city's eastern edges, where advancing regime forces have sought to secure the road leading towards Aleppo's airport.
 The escalation of violence in Aleppo has been met with international outrage, including a warning by the UN that the city's east could become "a giant graveyard." Russia on Thursday proposed setting up four humanitarian corridors into east Aleppo to bring in aid and evacuated severely wounded people. Moscow has announced several humanitarian pauses in Aleppo to allow civilians to flee, but until the recent military escalation, only a handful did so. Its support for Assad, including launching a bombing campaign in support of his forces in September 2015, means many residents of east Aleppo have been wary of such offers in the Since Saturday more than 50,000 people have poured out of east Aleppo into territory controlled by government forces or local Kurdish authorities, according to the Observatory.
 - No end to deadlock -Many are transported to temporary shelters outside the city, where they register with Syrian authorities to receive food, blankets, and mattresses. For many, the hot meals they receive at these shelters are their first in months, after a suffocating regime siege since July on Aleppo's rebel-held districts. The loss of east Aleppo -- a rebel stronghold since 2012 -- would be the biggest blow to Syria's opposition in more than five years. More than 200 civil society groups on Thursday appealed to the UN's General Assembly to take action on Syria's five-year war because "there is no sign that the Security Council deadlock will end anytime soon." "This is why we, a global coalition of 223 civil society organisations, urgently call upon UN member states to step in and request an Emergency Special Session of the UN General Assembly to demand an end to all unlawful attacks in Aleppo and elsewhere in Syria, and immediate and unhindered humanitarian access so that life-saving aid can reach all those in need."Syria's conflict erupted in March 2011 with protests calling for Assad's ouster, but it has since evolved into a bloody and highly globalised war. The violence has killed more than 300,000 people and forced more than half the country's pre-war population out of their homes.
 
Congress Passes Iran Sanctions Extension, Bill Goes to Obama
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/December 02/16/The US Senate on Thursday approved a 10-year extension of sanctions against Iran, a bipartisan measure that would have expired at year's end but now goes to President Barack Obama's desk. The Iran Sanctions Act passed the Senate 99-0, after easily clearing the House of Representatives in November. Obama is expected to sign the measure, a White House official said, adding that the administration does not believe the extension violates the nuclear agreement that was reached last year with Iran. The legislation does not directly address the nuclear pact. But some say the restrictions in the bill go against the spirit of the agreement, under which Tehran curbed its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief from the United States and other nations. Senate Democrats Dianne Feinstein and Tim Kaine, who both backed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran, said that while the president is currently waiving some sanctions as part of the agreement, "sanctions legislation must remain in place to allow an immediate 'snap-back' should Iran violate the JCPOA."The extension signals congressional commitment to vigorously enforce the pact, and would "make clear that there will be immediate consequences should Iran break the terms of the agreement, including the re-imposition of sanctions," they said. The bill includes penalties against Iran's banking sector, as well as its energy and defense industries. Last month Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned that the Islamic republic would "react against" the new sanctions extension if it becomes law. US President-elect Donald Trump heavily criticized the pact as he campaigned for the White House over the past year. Several fellow Republicans remain vehemently opposed to the nuclear deal and have called for its termination. Extending the sanctions "ensures President-elect Trump and his administration have the tools necessary to push back against the regime's hostile actions," said Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Bob Corker, who Trump has been considering as a possible pick for secretary of state.

Obama to sign Iran Sanctions Act extension into law
Reuters Friday, 2 December 2016/US President Barack Obama is expected to sign US legislation extending sanctions against Iran for 10 years into law, the White House said on Friday. “We believe the Iran Sanctions Act extension is not necessary, but we also believe it won’t interfere with the Iran deal,” spokesman Eric Schultz told reporters at a daily press briefing. “I would expect the president to sign this piece of legislation.”The US Senate passed a 10-year extension of existing sanctions against Iran on Thursday. It passed the House of Representatives nearly unanimously in November, and congressional aides said they expected Obama would sign it when it reached his desk. Iran’s Foreign Ministry said on Friday that the US Senate’s vote violated a historic nuclear deal reached between the country and six major powers in 2015.
 
Militias Clash in Libya's Tripoli, Worst Violence in 2 Years
Associated Press/Naharnet/December 02/16/Clashes are continuing for the second day among heavily-armed militias in the Libyan capital Tripoli in what appears to be the worst outbreak of violence there in two years. Witnesses on Friday say gun battles are rocking the southeastern Nasr Forest district and adjacent neighborhoods between militias vying for power and control over the city. The clashes started on Thursday and reportedly left eight dead. During a lull of violence late Thursday night, panicked residents lined up in front of area gas stations. Tripoli has been held hostage by various unruly militias since Moammar Gadhafi, Libya's ruler for 42 years, was ousted and killed in 2011.

200,000 Muslims Protest In Jakarta To Demand Jail For Christian Governor
Carey Lodge/Christian Today Journalist/December 02/16/At least 200,000 Muslims poured into Jakarta on Friday to demand that the Christian governor of the city be jailed after allegedly insulting the Qur'an. According to ABC News, the protest ended peacefully, though 10 people were arrested. A similar demonstration held in November turned violent, with one person killed and dozens injured. The protesters were calling for Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, who is known as Ahok, to be arrested following a complaint of blasphemy lodged against him in October. Ahok, who is an an ethnic Chinese Christian, is alleged to have delivered a speech in September during which he accused his rivals of using the Qur'an to deceive voters. This speech was then posted online, where his words were edited to make it look as though he was directly criticising the Islamic holy book. The Islamic Defenders Front, a hard-line group that campaigns for Sharia law, demanded his arrest. Blasphemy is a criminal offence in Indonesia and dozens of people have been convicted in the last decade, some sent to prison for as long as five years. Police have confirmed they are investigating the allegation and Ahok is not allowed to leave the country, though he has not been detained. According to Reuters, a sea of protesters dressed in white today filled downtown Jakarta, chanting, praying and holding banners demanding that Ahok is jailed. Sponsored Watch Your Favorite Christian Films, 24/7.  President Joko Widodo, who has accused hardliners of using the anger over Ahok's alleged blasphemy to destabilise his government, addressed the rally. "Thank you and safe travels on your return from where you came from. God bless you," he told the crowd. Ahok, a long-time ally of the President, is running for re-election in February against two Muslim candidates. The contest has generated high political tension for weeks, with rumours of plots to undermine Widodo and scupper his chances of winning a second term in 2019. Indonesia has the world's biggest Muslim population but recognizes six religions and is home to dozens of ethnic groups, some of which follow traditional beliefs. Additional reporting by Reuters.

Yemen: 172 killed in Taiz from militia fire last month
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Friday, 2 December 2016/At least 172 people were killed in the Yemeni city of Taiz due to indiscriminate fire from Houthi militias and forces loyal to ex-president Ali Abdullah Saleh last month. “Many of those killed in November were women and children. They were killed by either sniper fire or rocket attacks from Houthi militias and Ali Abdullah Saleh forces on residential neighborhoods of Taiz,” a spokesperson from the coalition’s humanitarian assistance in Taiz was quoted by Saudi Press Agency as saying. Yemen’s news agency reported that last month 143 men were killed and 504 injured, 23 children died and 130 others were wounded while six women were killed and 52 others injured. A coalition statement also documented 65 houses and commercial buildings were damaged by rocket attacks, while nine houses were destroyed because of improvised explosive devices. The statistics come a day after United Nations envoy Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed left Aden in Yemen heading to Riyadh after meeting with Yemeni President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi and the leaders of the government. The SABA news agency said that the UN envoy quoted Hadi saying during the meeting that he is “keen on the peace negotiations and that he looks forward to a serious peace process that would end any emerging war and would pave the way for a secure future for Yemen and future Yemeni generations.”

Saudi king issues royal decrees reshuffling religious and Shoura councils
 Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Friday, 2 December 2016/Saudi Arabia’s King Salman al-Saud issued several royal decrees, one of which would be the reformation of the kingdom’s Shoura Council a reshuffle of the kingdom's top religious body, the Council of Senior Scholars. The Secretary General of the Shoura Council Mohammed bin Abdullah Al-Aomar was relieved of his duties on Friday with the announcement that Abdullah Al-Ashiekh as the consultative council’s next head. In other royal decrees announced on the same day, Ali bin Nasser al-Afis was appointed as Labor and Social Development minister replacing Mufraj Al-Haqabani. Saudi Custom’s Director Saleh bin Manee al-Khelaiwi was also relieved from position. Another decree also appointed Abdulrahman bin Mohammed al-Sadhan as a special adviser to the Royal Court in the position of minister.
 
Iran diplomats face charges in Kenya for filming Israeli embassy
Reuters Friday, 2 December 2016/Two Iranians and their Kenyan driver, who worked for the Iranian embassy in Nairobi, were charged on Thursday with collecting information for a terrorist act after filming the Israeli embassy, lawyers said. Sayed Nasrollah Ebrahimi, Abdolhosein Ghola Safafe and driver Moses Keyah Mmboga “were found taking video clips of the Israeli embassy ... for the use in the commission of a terrorist act”, according to a charge sheet produced in court. The three men were in a car belonging to the Iranian embassy when they were arrested on Tuesday, the court papers said. The diplomatic status of the two Iranians was unclear. The Iranian embassy did not respond to requests for comment. “My clients pleaded not guilty and have been detained by the ATPU (Kenya’s Anti Terrorism Police Unit) for further interrogation,” defense lawyer Cohen Amanya told Reuters after the men’s court appearance. Prosecutor Duncan Ondimu said the two Iranians were visiting Kenya but gave no further details. Kenya has suffered repeated militant attacks in recent years but those were mainly carried out by ethnically Somali militants who would be hostile to Iran because of sectarian differences. In 2002, 15 people died when an Israeli-owned hotel was bombed in the coastal town of Mombasa at the same time two missiles were fired at an Israeli jet, narrowly missing it. In 2013, a Kenyan court jailed two Iranians for life on terrorism-related charges, including possessing explosives. The sentence was reduced to 15 years on appeal.  

Iran regime’s provocations stem from its weakness
Friday, 02 December 2016/NCRI - The head of the strategic research center in Kuwait, Sami Faraj says Iran regime's military capacity is very limited and weak particularly in the navy in comparison with Arab countries, although they are looking for expansionism in the region. Sky News TV on November 29, 2016 reports: Iran's regime openly seeks to stabilize its power in countries of the region.  Iran regime’s Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces, Mohammad Bagheri stated, Iran is trying to establish naval bases in Yemen or Syria because the naval bases have more value than strategic nuclear power in terms of military. This issue specifies the strategy of the Iranian regime. This regime is practically meddling in Syria by dispatching para military forces there. They also support the Houthi militias in Yemen and prevent the legitimate government to retake the power.
Sami Faraj further esxplained:
"The statements of the Iranian leaders is indicative of their intention. Nevertheless, their intention amounts to no criterion for us. We have to estimate the real power of the Mullahs' regime. Does the regime have the ability to dominate this region? I take an example here. During Ahmadinejad's presidency, a commercial ship of the Iran regime was hijacked by pirates, to rescue the hijacked ship Iranian navy needed one year to prepare several ships. Consequently, the navy is not able to extend and establish Marine bases even in the Persian Gulf. The navy does not even have very much power in comparison with other countries of the region."
Sky News TV: why does the Chief of Staff for the Armed Forces of Iran state that the Marine bases are more important to them than the nuclear technology?
‘Domination Seeking’ is a major issue. It stems from a hostile policy. If you want to protect your country from non-conventional powers, you must have non-conventional armaments like the nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons. Iran regime is now thinking about the nuclear power but is facing limitations and these constraints make it difficult for them to expand their power.
Iran's missile power is only flamboyant, and when their missiles cannot reach their enemies' base, they are desperatelyt seeking bases close to the borders of Turkey and Israel. 

Who Prevents, Prosecution of Public Treasury Looters in Iran?
Friday, 02 December 2016/NCRI - On Tuesday 29th November 2016, the state-run newspaper, Resalat published an article entitled "who is protecting public treasury?" disclosing another part of the systematic corruption of Iran regime. This newspaper writes: “the Supreme Audit Court of Iran is an observatory body that can dismiss the supreme authorities and return the stolen funds to the treasury and ultimately it can prosecute the financial crimes such as embezzlement, theft, and the unlawful possession of public funds. It can also send the case to the judiciary not for any revision but for prosecution. The president of the Supreme Audit Court of Iran presented a report to the Parliament two months ago regarding the far-fetched amount of salaries and he hoped that all stolen money would be returned to the treasury by of November21st.
Today is November21st. No report has been issued regarding that and no question has been answered concerning such aristocratic approach that threatens the country's bureaucracy."Resalat Newspaper then frames a question regarding those who obstruct the implementation of justice. The article reads: “the spokesman of the Judiciary said that the government and Supreme Audit Court have not yet delivered any report regarding the mind-boggling amount of salaries. By the way, how this puzzle could be solved? Who is obstructing the administration of justice in this regard? Who disagrees to prosecute and punish those who were encroaching on the treasury of Muslims?" The article mentions about the confessions of Hajibabai who is the chairman of the Committee for integrating the sixth plan of Parliament. The article reads: “to this day, no one has ever talked about the government's revenue from the subsidy reform plan. The figure of subsidies income reaches to $25 billion and in the previous year the amount was about $21 billion of which only $11 billion has been paid to the people."Hajibabai also admitted that “according to the plan, each person should receive $15 monthly but as the inflation increased this year, this amount is now equal to $8. However, the cost of electricity consumption has increased 5 times since the subsidizing plan has started."Finally, Resalat Newspaper asks” according to the constitution, parliament has to follow the case through the Supreme Audit Court. Then, why are the parliament and the Supreme Audit Court of Iran silent on this matter?

Iran: Continuous Export of Crisis, to Cover Its Social Explosiveness
NCRI Iran News/ Friday, 02 December 2016 /Recently intercepted weapons shipments in the Arabian Sea appear to prove that Iran has been supplying the Houthi rebels in Yemen.  The weapons, seized by Australian, French and U.S. warships, were Russian and Iranian; some of them had markings similar to those used by the Houthi fighters according to an independent report.  The Conflict Armament Research (CAR) report gives us the most concrete evidence to date that Iran is supporting the Houthis. Vice Admiral Kevin M. Donegan, the commander of U.S. Naval Forces in the region, announced that five weapons shipments had been seized since April 2015.  CAR’s report focuses on three shipments recovered in early 2016 by the crews of the HMAS Darwin, FS Provence, and USS Sirocco, who were operating as a part of a multinational Combined Maritime Force task force.  It states: “CAR’s analysis of the seized material … suggests the existence of a weapon pipeline extending from Iran to Somalia and Yemen, which involves the transfer, by dhow, of significant quantities of Iranian-manufactured weapons and weapons that plausibly derive from Iranian stockpiles.” On one ship headed for Yemen, the French crew who searched the boat found around 2,000 Kalashnikov-style rifles with sequential serial numbers.  The CAR report noted that the rifles were “characteristic of Iranian manufacture” and were shipped alongside 64 Hoshdar-M sniper rifles also bearing sequential serial numbers, and nine Russian Kornet antitank guided weapons.  In February, the Austrailian ship intercepted a boat with 2,197 weapons including roughly 100 Iranian-made RPG-7-style rocket launchers, whilst in March, the American ship found over 1,500 rifles in addition to rocket launchers and 12.7mm heavy machine guns.  The findings are limited but the report suggests evidence of a weapons pipeline from Iran to Somalia and Yemen.

Journalist found shot dead in Iraqi Kurdistan
Fri 02 Dec 2016/NNA - A journalist has been found shot dead in Iraq's autonomous Kurdish region, police and political party officials said Friday. Shoukri Zeneldin had been working in Dohuk for KNN, a local television channel owned by the Goran (Change) movement, one of the region's main political parties. "His family informed us that his body was found Thursday after he disappeared four days ago," Goran spokesman Abdul Razak Sharif said. The 40-year-old journalist's body was found in a desert village in the Amadiya region, north of Dohuk, said police spokesman Hayman Atroushi. Goran lawmaker Hoshyar Abdallah called the journalist's death "a real threat to the truth" and a "setback for democracy." Goran has 24 MPs in the autonomous region's 111-seat parliament, having emerged as a third force to challenge the traditional parties. It is now one of the region's top three parties, along with the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) and the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) of regional leader Massud Barzani. Iraq is among the most dangerous places in the world for journalists.--AFP  

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on December 02-03/16
Man of the year: Vladimir Putin
Dr. Azeem Ibrahim/Al Arabiya/December 02/16
2016 has been a rotten year. At least it has been so for anyone who likes Western liberal values. It has been the year when the core of the Anglo-Saxon sphere, the United States and the United Kingdom, the foremost champions of liberal values, have democratically decided to give up on those values. The United Kingdom has decided by referendum that it cares more about keeping hard-working European immigrants out of the country than it cares about its place in the world. And the United States has decided in a presidential election that the liberal world order it has built since WW2 and which has underpinned American power for over 70 years should end, because paranoid navel-gazing was more important.
But on the other side of this culture war, reactionary populists, wherever they are found, have much to celebrate. Just as the conference halls of Washington DC were resounding of chants of “Heil Trump” last month, the extreme right across the world was celebrating. In the Phillipines, President Rodrigo Duterte, a self-confessed murderer can now happily continue the orgy of extra-judicial killings in his country without having to suffer the censure of some “b******” like Obama. In Hungary, President Victor Orban will soon be able to get back to his pogroms against the Roma, because everyone else will be too busy to stop him. In Austria, a neo-Nazi is well within reach of winning the upcoming presidential election. In France, fascist Marine le Pen is fancying her chances in the presidential election next year. In the Netherlands, Geert Wilders’ mob of merry racists is tipped to become the largest party in next year’s general election. Almost everywhere we look, the former stallwarts of Western civilisation are opting, democratically, for barbarism.
No one has had more cause to celebrate this year than Russia’s Vladimir Putin. As the countries of the NATO sphere of influence are ripping themselves apart in this culture war, just about everything is going Mr Putin’s way
Hostile to Nato
But no one has had more cause to celebrate this year than Russia’s Vladimir Putin. As the countries of the NATO sphere of influence are ripping themselves apart in this culture war, just about everything is going Mr Putin’s way. He has, throughout the year, managed to outmanoeuvre the outgoing liberal president of the US in Syria and the broader Middle East. As we speak, resistance to his Syria campaign in Aleppo is crumbling and the end of the Syrian civil war is in sight with just the ultimate result he was hoping for.
He has helped along the election of a man in his own image for the incoming President of the United States in Donald Trump - a man that is almost as hostile to the NATO world order and the post-war defence arrangements of Europe as he is. In doing so, he has neutered much of the opposition to his foreign-policy designs in the Middle East and Eastern Europe. And he continues to successfully wage war against Western institutions and Western cultural infrastructure, with wave after wave of cyber-attacks and an extremely efficient propaganda machine. What is most remarkable about all this, however, is that President Obama’s analysis of Putin’s position was in fact correct: Putin is fighting from a position of weakness. The Russian economy has been in disarray ever since the Western-imposed sanctions in the wake of the invasion of Crimea. Putin can scarcely afford his military adventures even as he is attempting to upgrade his capabilities, not least his nuclear arsenal. And all is not well on the domestic front either. The extended period of economic hardship is taking its toll on the legitimacy of his government, and the only thing carrying him over for the time being is his success in foreign affairs. He has had to carry out extensive purges of old allies to maintain his grip on power, but the vultures are still circling, and they are patiently waiting for him to trip up.
But he has not tripped up. He has successfully balanced the tightrope, and has come out as the biggest winner of 2016. He has much to celebrate this holiday season, and yet more to look forward to in the new year. And we largely have ourselves to blame for it.

Iran hardliners celebrate forthcoming years
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya/December 02/16
Iran’s Hardline newspapers and officials write and speak of good and advantageous years in the near future for the Islamic Republic due to fundamental and permanent changes in the regional and global order.
The final decision makers in Iran’s domestic and foreign policy- who are the hardliners, primarily the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the senior cadre of Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps- argue that Iran’s expanding influence inevitable.
Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Iran’s Shiite Proxies
The fate of the Alawite state and Bashar Al Assad is a matter of national security for Iranian leaders. Any change in the political system of Damascus will significantly alter the regional power of power. That is why Tehran has invested billions of dollars, resources and military forces to keep Assad in power. From the hardliner’s perspective, the West will not intervene militarily in Syria because the stakes are too high. Iran’s hardliners strongly believe that the West is more than willing to allow Russia and Tehran to handle the Syrian war.
In addition, although Iran is ranked the top sponsor of international terrorism, Iran’s hardliners believe that they have effectively sold the international community on the idea that Tehran is the single most important partner to fight ISIS, and that the West needs Iran to fight terrorism. Any change in the political system of Damascus will significantly alter the regional power of power. That is why Tehran has invested billions of dollars, resources and military forces to keep Assad in power. On Iraq, Iran hardliners view their power to have effectively penetrated the security, military, political, and religious institutions. When it comes to Iran’s proxies, Iran’s hardliners make certain that their increasing revenues ensure the survival of these proxies. Tehran is also giving birth to other Shiite militia groups and turning them in political realities which would make it impossible for other powers to counter Tehran’s increasing regional influence.
The Nuclear Deal
For hardliners, they have achieved their major objectives from the nuclear agreement. They argue that the four rounds of the UN Security Council Resolutions have been lifted and that the likelihood of snapping those sanctions back is zero because of Russia’s and China’s veto power. They hold the belief that the increasing oil sales and trades with the West as irreversible. Iranian officials make the argument that the European countries are dependent on Iran’s oil and gas for decades to come because they would rather find other alternatives to Russia for energy supplies. Approximately 29 percent of Iran’s crude oil is being exported to European countries including Spain, Greece, and France. Hardliners believe that the export to European nations will definitely increase as Iran expands its output.
For Iran, the continuation of the extra revenue is critical and inevitable. Iran’s oil revenue has currently increased approximately 380 percent, in only a year after sanctions were lifted. This revenue is based on the current low prices of oil, and selling roughly 3.9 million a barrel a day, and trade with Asia and Europe (not the US). This means that, even at the current low oil prices, if Tehran reaches the goal of exporting 4.2 million barrel a day,

Marine Gen James Mattis is next US Defense Secetary
DEBKAfile Special Report December 2, 2016
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/02/marine-gen-james-mattis-is-next-us-defense-secretary/
Retired Marine General James Mattis, 66, whom President-elect Donald Trump has picked as his secretary of defense, is famous for his rough-and-tough stance toward America’s adversaries. From 2010 to 2013, Gen. Mattis was head of the Central Command that oversees US military operations across the Middle East, replacing Gen. David Petraeus (now one of the candidates for secretary of state).
He earned the “Mad Dog Mattis” handle as a battlefield commander in Iraq when he said: “If you f-k with me, I’ll kill you all.”
So no one expects the incoming defense secretary to be a desk warrior. Reputed to be the most brilliant and influential military strategic thinker America has produced since WWII, Mattis was also popular with the officers and men who fought under his command.
No yes-man, he has been described by a former Pentagon official as “a warrior, scholar and straight shooter who would certainly speak the truth to the new commander in chief.”It will be interesting to see how they get along. .Mattis is only the second former general to step into a cabinet post in the 68 years since President Truman appointed Gen. George C. Marshall as secretary of state. He is seen as reaching the pinnacle of a career that covered more than four decades in the Marine Corps. Sometimes criticized as overly aggressive, Mattis is also reputed for encouraging his subordinate officers to stretch their minds and think outside the box. A voracious book-reader himself, stories are told about him handing out book lists to his officers in Afghanistan and Iraq and making sure they were read. The incoming president believes he has picked the right man to oversee the discharge of his campaign pledge to rebuild American armed forces, which his White House predecessors “depleted” - with special reference to the air force and navy. Mattis will have a multibillion dollar budget to administer and funds he will no doubt spend on innovations in the various corps and novel combat methods and weaponry.
The Marine stamp on the new administration is further accentuated by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Joseph Dunford hailing from the same celebrated unit.
Mattis left a strong impression on the Middle East during his stint as chief of CENTCOM up until three years ago. His tough, straight-shooting style did not always go with the temperament and nature of the generals he worked with in the region, including some Israeli officers.
Mattis was sometimes at odds with Israeli leaders when he criticized their settlement policy and conduct in the region. But since his name came up as the leading nominee for defense, some of his friends have made an effort to present Mattis as essentially a friend of Israel.
Most recently, Mattis commented that responding to “political Islam” is the main security issue facing America. He has also called the Iranian regime as “the single most enduring threat to stability and peace in the Middle East.”

U.S. professor, Ivan Sascha rejects misinformation against People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran
NCRI/Friday, 02 December 2016
Dr. Ivan Sascha Sheehan highlights in an op-ed for Foreign Policy Association his assessment of the discredited nature of the misinformation being touted in the media against the main Iranian opposition group, the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI or MEK). The following is the text of his article which was published by the FPA on December 2, 2016:
The MEK advocates for a non-nuclear Iran with free, democratic, and secular values, much in line with our own. Since 2012, they have been exiled to Camp Liberty in Iraq, where they have the official backing of the United States. However, with the President-elect a vocal opponent of the nuclear deal with Tehran, charges against the dissident group and its many defenders—the stock and trade of the mullahs in Tehran—are conveniently resurfacing across the U.S. media.
As an academic and author of three empirical, peer-reviewed journal articles that examine the MEK—in addition to writing the foreword for an independent 2013 study undertaken by Ambassador Lincoln P. Bloomfield Jr. that addressed the misinformation campaign directed at Western government policies toward the Iranian opposition group—I feel that it is critical to set the record straight.
The US Department of State did not add the MEK to its list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO) until 1997. The purported basis was the killings of six American military personnel and defense contractors in Iran in the early 1970s. The State Department would later allege that the MEK played a key role in the February 1979 occupation of the US embassy in Tehran and that after fleeing to Paris, and then Iraq in the early 1980s, it conducted terrorist attacks inside Iran. Such claims, never verified with credible terrorism incident data, were formally debunked by French judicial review.
Two years later, in 1999, the United States went a step further by alleging that the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), a political organization made up of several Iranian opposition groups that reject clerical rule, was a front for the MEK and designated it too as a terrorist group. Martin Indyk, then Assistant Secretary of State for Near East Affairs, indicated that the State Department added the National Council of Resistance (NCR) as an alias for the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) because “The Iranian government had brought this to our attention. We looked into it and saw that there were good reasons for designating the NCR as an alias for the MEK.” The United Kingdom (UK) and European Union (EU) followed suit, pinning the MEK (though not the NCRI) to their terror lists.
The evidence, however, demonstrates that the US military officers and contractor killings that formed the basis of the original designation were carried out by a secular hard-left splinter group, with no ties to MEK leadership; that there was no proof that the MEK played a role in the 1979 embassy takeover; and that the armed resistance carried out by the MEK from Iraq was an insurgency directed at official regime targets, not innocent civilians, at a time that their relatives and sympathizers were being jailed, tortured and executed en masse.
There is also overwhelming evidence that Iran lobbied hard to get the United States and other Western governments to designate the MEK as terrorists, even though the allegations were baseless. Only a day after the US added the MEK to its FTO list in October 1997, one senior Clinton administration official said inclusion of the MEK was intended as a ‘goodwill gesture’ to Tehran and its newly elected moderate president Mohammad Khatami. Five years later, the same official told Newsweek: “[There] was White House interest in opening up a dialogue with the Iranian government. At the time, President Khatami had recently been elected and was seen as a moderate. Top administration officials saw cracking down on the [MEK]—which the Iranians had made clear they saw as a menace, as one way to do so.”
Across the Atlantic, similar political considerations operated. In 2006, then British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw admitted that the UK designation of the MEK in 2001 was specifically issued in response to demands made by the Iranian regime. That same year, classified documents, later unclassified by a UK court, revealed that senior foreign service officials were concerned about possible adverse foreign policy consequences if the terrorist designation was lifted since the Iranian regime prioritized “tough legal and political measures” against the organization. The EU too is now known to have bowed to pressure in designating the MEK in 2002.
Supporters of removing the terrorist designation took their case to courts. These efforts met with strong resistance, not only from spokespersons for Iran but also from representatives of a new Iran-tilting government in Iraq. By 2006, seven European courts had ruled that the group did not meet lawful criteria for terrorism. They also ruled that the terrorist designation should have been moot after 2001, when the group’s leadership ceased armed resistance to focus on a political and social campaign to bring about democratic change in Iran.
In the United States, where the courts similarly ruled repeatedly in favor of the MEK, and as many as 200 members of Congress signed statements endorsing its cause, the process was stalled until America’s second highest court granted the writ of mandamus filed by the MEK, and ordered the Secretary of State to take action or it would delist the group. Secretary Hillary Clinton, having been provided no credible basis for re-listing by the intelligence community, revoked the designation in September 2012.
Overwhelming evidence demonstrates that the MEK is a natural ally of the United States, one to which we have pledged our support. Unfortunately, if people are to believe the misleading media storm, it could have a dire influence on the selection of our next Secretary of State and the future of US-Iran policy.
/Dr. Ivan Sascha Sheehan, Associate Professor of Public and International Affairs, is director of the graduate program in Global Affairs and Human Security at the University of Baltimore. Follow him on Twitter @ProfSheehan.

George Sabra: The Disaster of Aleppo Is on Russians and Iran and Those Who Were Silent About Such Crime
NCRI/December 20/16
NCRI - Al-Arabiya TV, November 29, 2016:
In addition to the bombings and the Russian's urge, Assad's regime is also affiliated with the Iranian regime to attack the east of Aleppo. Considering these incidents, what opportunity does the Opposition get?
The member of supreme negotiators of the Syrian Opposition, George Sabra said:
There is only one chance to avail. Although the war of Aleppo is full-scale, volatile and dangerous, the fate of the Syrian revolution is not related to the results of the war in Aleppo. There have been a battle and escape for the past week. The soldiers attacked Assad's stances in the west of Aleppo and they penetrated into defensive lines of the regime as well as their allies.
Note that the revolutionary forces are present in all regions in Syria including the capital, Damascus. The forces are still dominating on one of the neighborhoods of Damascus known as Jobar. Assad's regime has failed to evict them from the neighborhood for more than four years. In addition to the danger of war in Aleppo, the Russians are still trying to disconnect Aleppo from outside world as well. They have exterminated all the necessities of life during the past 95 days.
It has been 3 months since no loaf of bread could be found in the city. Even a syringe, medication and not even a drop of oil have been found in Aleppo. What makes our hearts hurt is the increasing number of victims of this calamity. Most injured people do not find a place for treatment since the Russians have destroyed all hospitals and health centers in a brutal military operation and with barbarism.
Many UN experts admit that such happenings in Aleppo are unprecedented in the history. Indeed, this conflict is not bilateral. The Russians, their allies in Tehran and sectarian militias have viciously attacked and launched a campaign in Syria. The Syrian people and the citizens are disturbed.
Al-Arabia TV:
The world witnesses the massacre in Aleppo while no one reacts upon it. Nothing is found in the city, not even a pill or syringe. Some authorities called for holding a meeting in the Security Council while the results of talks are known to them in advance.
The food supplies could not be sent by airplane and thrown over Aleppo since these aircraft cannot fly over the skies of Aleppo as long as Russian planes are occupying the space. The question is when would be the time to resist and oppose in the east of Aleppo?
George Sabra:
The resistance still exists in Aleppo. The clashes still continue on the streets of Aleppo. Currently, over 25 percent of the city is in control of our warriors. The military situation is in the hands of our children who defend Aleppo. They have been successful over the past four years. But regarding the crimes committed in Aleppo, the observers are not the only ones who are discussing it. The Syrians also speak of an international conspiracy as well.
The Russians, the Iranian regime, and Assad are not the only ones who cause war crimes against humanity, including the use of chemical weapons, missiles, and cluster bombs. All of those who cannot do anything to stop the killing and are ignoring the issue are also responsible for such crimes. The international community does not only hold moral responsibilities but also legal duties as well.

Sisi's support for Syrian regime threatens to harm Cairo-Riyadh ties
Pascale el-Khoury/Al Monitor/December 02/16
CAIRO — Relations between Saudi Arabia and Egypt have recently grown tense in light of their conflicting views on the Syrian crisis. On Oct. 8, the United Nations Security Council considered two draft resolutions (one sponsored by France, the other by Russia) on the situation in Aleppo. Egypt voted in favor of both resolutions, drawing criticism from Saudi Arabia, who supported the French draft. Egypt's vote in favor of the French and Russian draft resolutions on Syria at the UN Security Council has created a rift in its ties with Saudi Arabia.
 Saudi ambassador to the UN Abdullah al-Mouallimi described the Egyptian stance in favor of the Russian resolution as painful. Saudi media also bashed Egypt’s stance, while Saudi social media users urged their government to halt oil supplies to Egypt.
 Egyptian Oil Minister Tariq al-Mulla told the media Nov. 8 that the Saudi Arabian Oil Co. has suspended its oil shipments to Egypt, even though the two countries signed a five-year agreement in April whereby Saudi Arabia would provide Egypt with petroleum products.
 On Nov. 15, King Salman bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud received Ahmed Aboul Gheit, former Egyptian foreign minister and current secretary general of the Arab League, in the Saudi capital of Riyadh, where they discussed the general Arab situation and the role of the Arab League in promoting Arab unity. The visit seemed to be an attempt by the Arab League to reconcile the views of Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
 Ayman Samir, expert on international relations and former editor of Egyptian newspaper As-Siyassa, believes Aboul Gheit’s visit to Riyadh could ease tensions, especially since the secretary general has strong ties with Gulf states and was an Egyptian minister of high caliber.
 “Saudi Arabia must reconsider its position in order to mend its ties with Egypt, especially since the crisis stirred by Egypt’s vote at the Security Council has been amplified in the media in both countries," said Samir. "The Egyptian stance on the Syrian crisis is not new. Egypt believes that the implementation of the 2012 Geneva I declaration is paramount and that state institutions must be preserved in Syria.”He added, “While Egypt believes that it must maintain good relations with the Syrian regime's allies to resolve the crisis, Saudi Arabia wants to end the [Bashar al-]Assad regime and is supplying the opposition with weapons. Some Saudi politicians act according to the 'If you're not with us, you're against us' mentality.”Free Syrian Army (FSA) military sources told Al-Arabiya in 2013 that the FSA uses anti-tank missiles supplied by Saudi Arabia. In October 2015, Saudi Arabia provided the FSA with 500 TOW anti-tank missiles. The BBC reported that “Saudi Arabia is responding to the recent Russian airstrikes on Syrian rebels by stepping up its arms supplies," quoting a Saudi source as saying that “the weapons would go to the FSA and other small rebel groups.”
 Saudi Brig. Gen. Ahmed Asiri, adviser to Saudi Arabia’s defense minister, told Egyptian Dream TV channel in May 2016, “Saudi Arabia’s position on the Syrian regime is clear. We support the opposition politically, militarily and financially to protect the Syrian people.”
 Samir said that Egypt does not want to break ties with Saudi Arabia. He expects that special bilateral relations will soon resume between the two countries, as they both need each other.Al-Azab Tayeb al-Tahir, who covers the Arab League for Al-Ahram newspaper, told Al-Monitor that Aboul Gheit’s visit to Riyadh was positive on two levels: The visit mended the relationship between the Arab League and Saudi Arabia, and also put Egyptian-Saudi relations on the right track, preventing their deterioration.
 “Relations between Saudi Arabia and the Arab League under the mandate of former Secretary General Nabil Elaraby from May 2011 to July 2016 were cold because of the constant disagreement between Elaraby and Ahmed Qattan, the Saudi ambassador to Egypt and permanent representative of Saudi Arabia to the Arab League," said Tahir. "The two had converging political and economic stances within the league, since the Saudi representative wanted to reduce administrative expenses, close some representation offices and impose salary cuts."He added, “The Saudi king appreciated the efforts exerted by the Arab League to reunify Arab ranks, and Aboul Gheit’s visit was the result of joint efforts with the United Arab Emirates.”
 Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi Mohammed bin Zayed visited Cairo Nov. 11 to meet with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. According to a statement issued by the Egyptian presidency, the meeting discussed the reunification and solidarity of Arab ranks and the need to keep a vigilant eye on all attempts to stir up a row between Arab countries in a bid to destabilize the region.
 After the visit, bin Zayed headed directly to Riyadh, in what seemed to be a mediation process between Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Tahir said, “The UAE is making great efforts alongside the Arab League for the reunification of Arab ranks, especially since the UAE wants to maintain its triangle of stability with Egypt and Saudi Arabia in the region.”Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Moallem said in a Nov. 20 press conference in Damascus that "Syrian-Egyptian relations are progressing.""A small step is still needed, and things will go back to normal," said Moallem. "When Syria and Egypt are together, the Arab nation would be fine. Egypt, with its great people and army, cannot stand idly by watching what is happening in Syria. Syria also cannot help but sympathize with the Egyptian army fighting terrorism in the Sinai [Peninsula].”
 Two days after Moallem's comments, Sisi told Portugese TV, “It is better to support national armies to impose their control over their territories and preserve stability. This applies to the national armies of Libya, Syria and Iraq.”
 As-Safir reported Nov. 24 that 18 Egyptian pilots have started operating at Syria’s Hama military air base. But an Egyptian Foreign Ministry spokesman said Nov. 27 that Egypt has no military forces in Syria, denying Arab news reports and calling such claims false allegations. In any event, Egypt has always emphasized the need to preserve the institutions of the Syrian state and stop the Syrian bloodletting to reach a political settlement. However, Sisi’s recent announcement stressing the need to support the Syrian army in its war on terrorism may give the impression that Egypt is now siding with the Assad regime, which threatens to sour relations more between Cairo and Riyadh, regardless of any regional efforts for Arab reunification.
 
Why Iraq's Sunnis fear new PMU law
Omar Sattar/Al Monitor/December 02/16
BAGHDAD — After the Iraqi parliament passed a law Nov. 26 establishing a new security force independent of the Iraqi army — consisting of the predominately Shiite militias of the Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) under the leadership of the General Commander of the armed forces — the Sunni bloc walked out of the legislature as a show of its opposition. The predominantly Shiite National Alliance supported the law. A new law that will turn Shiite militias of the Popular Mobilization Units into an official security force has sparked fierce opposition from Sunni parliamentarians. According to the parliament’s Security and Defense Committee, the law turning the PMU into an official security institution would be structured similarly to the anti-terrorism apparatus. The PMU law stipulates limiting fighters to 50,000, of which 15,000 are to be Sunni. Current figures indicate that there are 150,000 fighters in the PMU's ranks. The 2017 budget, however, includes funding for 110,000 fighters, pointing to the possibility of only 40,000 fighters being demobilized.
The aim is to turn the PMU into a national institution that includes all components and sects, rather than being confined to one component of the Iraqi people,” Deputy Security and Defense Committee Chairman Iskandar Watout told Al-Monitor. “The law provides for the preservation of the moral and material rights of PMU members, much like the members of the Iraqi army, as well as for the rights of the families of the martyrs.”
 Watout emphasized, “This is the least [the government] can do for the PMU factions that have sacrificed a lot to liberate Iraq from terrorism.”
 The Shiites in the PMU consist primarily of three groups: professional factions, most of which formed during the US military presence in Iraq, notably Saraya al-Salam (Peace Brigades), Asaib Ahl al-Haq and the Badr Organization; unaffiliated volunteers who joined after the fatwa issued by Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani on June 13, 2014; and the Abbasi and Husseini Shiite factions, which are indirectly supported by Sistani and include the Abbas Battle Group, Liwa’ Ali al-Akbar and the Imam Ali Troop, to name a few. The Sunni PMU militias can be divided into two factions: the tribes of Anbar and Salahuddin as well as the National Mobilization, established by former Gov. of Ninevah province Atheel al-Nujaifi and consisting of fighters from Ninevah.
 The important question is how will all these sections, with their different ideologies, be integrated under a single institution and leadership, especially in light of the Sunnis’ unsatisfied demand to pass a law to turn organized fighters in Sunni provinces into National Guard forces to protect those provinces. In addition, the majority of Sunni parties opposed the PMU law in part because they feel the government is being selective in not including Sunni tribal factions under the new PMU institution, while accepting most Shiite groups.
 PMU spokesman Ahmed al-Asadi told Al-Monitor, “All PMU factions will be completely separated from their current political and religious affiliations as well as group names in order to become a new security institution with an official leadership and single authority under the General Command of the armed forces.”
 He added, “The mobilization institution will not be confined to a single component. This is why the word “popular” was not mentioned in the law, in order not to have any future discrimination between the fighters of the popular mobilization, the tribal mobilization and others.”
 Asadi claimed that there is no conflict between the PMU and the National Guard, noting that in regard to the latter, it “can have a law of its own to protect [Sunni] provinces, but the PMU will turn into a centralized, federal institution.” Sunni politicians, however, are afraid a sectarian army will emerge from the transformed PMU, given that Shiite fighters greatly outnumber Sunni fighters in the organization.
 In this regard, Ninevah representative Ahmed Madloul told Al-Monitor about the Sunni-Shiite parliamentary divided over the PMU law, saying, “Some blocs want a law that preserves the rights of the PMU and appreciates the sacrifices it made in the fight against the Islamic State, while others believe it would be wrong to have a third institution in addition to the army and police, especially since they think it will be hard to integrate all PMU factions under one institution.”
 Madloul added, “The [Sunni] tribal mobilization has a small number of fighters and does not have enough equipment and weapons like the [Shiite] PMU, which is split into several factions that cannot be easily unified.” He concluded, “The best possible solution is to integrate PMU members into the army and police forces.”
 The PMU law will remain a controversial subject as long as the Sunni blocs oppose it. The post-IS period will be the true test of the Shiite and Sunni factions’ ability to integrate and transition into official and institutional operations.
 
 Self-Censorship: Free Society vs. Fear Society
 Giulio Meotti/Gatestone Institute/December 02/16
 https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9459/self-censorship
 "The drama and the tragedy is that the only ones to win are the jihadists." — Flemming Rose, who published the Mohammed cartoons in 2005, as cultural editor of Jyllands-Posten newspaper.
 "Why the f*ck did you say yes to appear on stage with this terrorist target, are you stupid? Do you have a secret death wish? You have grandchildren now. Are you completely out of your mind? It's okay if you want to die yourself, but why are you taking the company though all this?" — The managers of Jyllands-Posten, to Flemming Rose.
 "We are also aware that we therefore bow to violence and intimidation." — Editorial, Jyllands-Posten.
 "I do not blame them that they care about the safety of employees. I have bodyguards 24 hours a day. However, I believe that we must stand firm. If Flemming shuts his mouth, democracy will be lost." — Naser Khader, a liberal Muslim of Syrian origin who lives in Denmark.
 In the summer of 2005, the Danish artist Kåre Bluitgen, when he met a journalist from the Ritzaus Bureau news agency, said he was unable to find anyone willing to illustrate his book on Mohammed, the prophet of Islam. Three illustrators he contacted, Bluitgen said, were too scared. A few months later, Bluitgen reported that he had found someone willing to illustrate his book, but only on the condition of anonymity.
 Like most Danish newspapers, Jyllands-Posten decided to publish an article about Bluitgen's case. To test the state of freedom of expression, Flemming Rose, Jyllands-Posten's cultural editor at the time, called twelve cartoonists, and offered them $160 each to draw a caricature of Mohammed. What then happened is a well-known, chilling story.
 In the wave of Islamist violence against the cartoons, at least two hundred people were killed. Danish products vanished from shelves in Bahrain, Qatar, Yemen, Oman, the UAE and Lebanon. Masked gunmen stormed the offices of the European Union in Gaza and warned Danes and Norwegians to leave within 48 hours. In the Libyan city of Benghazi, protesters set fire to the Italian consulate. Political Islam understood what was being achieved and raised the stakes; the West did not.
 An Islamic fatwa also forever changed Flemming Rose's life. In an Islamic caricature, his head was put on a pike. The Taliban offered a bounty to anyone who would kill him. Rose's office at the newspaper was repeatedly evacuated for bomb threats. And Rose's name and face entered ISIS's blacklist, along with that of the murdered editor of Charlie Hebdo, Stéphane Charbonnier.
 Less known is the "white fatwa" that the journalistic class imposed on Rose. This brave Danish journalist reveals it in a recently published book, "De Besatte" ("The Obsessed"). "It is the story of how fear devours souls, friendships and the professional community," says Rose. The book reveals how his own newspaper forced Rose to surrender.
 "The drama and the tragedy is that the only ones to win are the jihadists," Flemming Rose told the Danish newspaper Weekendavisen.
 The CEO of Jyllands-Posten, Jørgen Ejbøl, summoned Rose to his office, and asked, "You have grandchildren, do not you think about them?"
 The company that publishes his newspaper, JP/Politikens Hus, said: "It's not about Rose, but the safety of two thousand employees."
 Jorn Mikkelsen, Rose's former director, and the newspaper's business heads, obliged him to sign a nine-point diktat, in which the Danish journalist accepted, among other demands, "not participating in radio and television programs", "not attending conferences", "not commenting on religious issues", "not writing about the Organization of the Islamic Conference" and "not commenting on the cartoons".
 Rose signed this letter of surrender during the harshest time for the newspaper, when, in 2010-2011, there were countless attempts on his life by terrorists, and also attempts on the life of Kurt Westergaard, illustrator of a cartoon (Mohammed with a bomb in his turban) that was burned in public squares across the Arab world. Westergaard was then placed on "indefinite leave" by Jyllands-Posten "for security reasons."
 Is democracy lost? Eleven years after Jyllands-Posten published the Mohammed cartoons, the newspaper has a barbed-wire fence two meters high and one kilometer long. Kurt Westergaard, the illustrator who drew one of the cartoons (left), lives in hiding in a fortress, and Flemming Rose (right), the editor who commissioned the cartoons, has fled to the United States.
 In his book, Rose also reveals that two articles were censored by his newspaper, along with an outburst from the CEO of the company, Lars Munch: "You have to stop, you're obsessed, on the fourth floor there are people who ask 'can't he stop?'".
 Rose then drew more wrath from his managers when he agreed to participate in a conference with the equally targeted Dutch parliamentarian, Geert Wilders, who at this moment is on trial in the Netherlands for "hate speech." Rose writes:
 He starts yelling at me, "Why the f*ck did you say yes to appear on stage with this terrorist target, are you stupid? Do you have a secret death wish? You have grandchildren now. Are you completely out of your mind? It's okay if you want to die yourself, but why are you taking the company though all this?"
 Jyllands-Posten also pressured Rose when he decided to write a book about the cartoons, "Hymne til Friheden" ("Hymn to Freedom"). His editor told him that the newspaper would "curb the harmful effects" of the book by keeping its publication as low-key as possible. Rose was then threatened with dismissal if he did not cancel two debates for the tenth anniversary of the Mohammed cartoons (Rose, in fact, did not show up that day at a conference in Copenhagen).
 After the 2015 massacre at Charlie Hebdo, Rose, no longer willing to abide by the "diktat" he was ordered to sign, resigned as the head of the foreign desk of Jyllands-Posten, and now works in the U.S. for the Cato Institute think-tank. The former editor of Jyllands-Posten, Carsten Juste, who was also blacklisted by ISIS, confirmed Rose's allegations.
 Rose writes in the conclusion of his book: "I'm not obsessed with anything. The fanatics are those who want to attack us, and the possessed are my former bosses at Jyllands-Posten."
 Rose's revelations confirm another familiar story: Jyllands-Posten's surrender to fear. Since 2006, each time its editors and publishers were asked if they still would have published the drawings of Mohammed, the answer has always been "no." This response means that the editors had effectively tasked Rose with writing the newspaper for fanatics and terrorists thousands of kilometers away. Even after the January 7, 2015 massacre at the weekly Charlie Hebdo in Paris, targeted precisely because it had republished the Danish cartoons, Jyllands-Posten announced that, out of fear, it would not republish the cartoons:
 "We have lived with the fear of a terrorist attack for nine years, and yes, that is the explanation why we do not reprint the cartoons, whether it be our own or Charlie Hebdo's. We are also aware that we therefore bow to violence and intimidation."
 A Danish comedian, Anders Matthesen, said that the newspaper and the cartoons were to blame for the Islamist violence -- the same official position as the entire European political and journalistic mainstream.
 A year ago, for the 10th anniversary of the affair, instead of the cartoons, Jyllands-Posten came out with twelve white spaces. These white spaces represent what Rose, in his previous book, called "Tavshedens tiranni" ("The Tyranny of Silence"). Naser Khader, a liberal Muslim of Syrian origin who lives in Denmark, wrote:
 "I do not blame them that they care about the safety of employees. I have bodyguards 24 hours a day. However, I believe that we must stand firm. If Flemming shuts his mouth, democracy will be lost."
 Is democracy lost? The headquarters of Jyllands-Posten today has a barbed-wire fence two meters high and one kilometer long, a door with double lock (as in banks), and employees can only enter one at a time by typing in a personal code (a measure that did not protect Charlie Hebdo). Meanwhile, the former editor, Carsten Juste, has withdrawn from journalism; Kurt Westergaard lives in hiding in a fortress, and Flemming Rose, like Ayaan Hirsi Ali, fled to the United States.
 Much, certainly, looks lost. "We are not living in a 'free society' anymore, but in a 'fear society'", Rose has said.
 **Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.
 © 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Iranian Shabnam Madadzadeh, a former political prisoner reveals Iran regime atrocities
NCRI/December 02/16
NCRI – Shabnam Madadzadeh, a former political prisoner who secretly left Iran few months ago revealed atrocities of the Iranian regime inside prisons. She was 21 when arrested for her activities in a university in Tehran.
Madadzadeh spoke at a conference held in Paris on Saturday, 26 November 2016.
Below is the text of her speech at the conference:
My name is Shabnam Madadzadeh. I left Iran a few months ago.
I was a 21-year-old student and in my third year of studying computer science at Tehran’s Teacher’s Training University. My studies were cut short when the Iranian regime’s intelligence agents arrested me and my brother Farzad and took us to the notorious Evin Prison.
I spent three months in solitary confinement, undergoing some of the most brutal forms of psychological and physical torture in Evin’s Ward 209. The worst of it all was when they tortured my brother Farzad in front of me.
Later, I was sentenced to five years in prison by the regime and exiled to the dreadful Gohardasht Prison in Karaj.
I spent time in Evin, Gohardasht, and the horrid Qarchack Varamin prisons. On several occasions that lasted a total of eight months, I was not permitted any visits or phone calls.
But, we found solace in the proud resistance of the residents of Camp Ashraf. We were inspired by their perseverance and resoluteness even as we faced some of the most difficult times of our lives, like experiencing the execution of my dear friend and Kurdish activist Shirin Alam Houli.
The entire story began with two words.
These words were initially written in my high school and university books: We “can” and we “must.”
Every year, the words “we can and we must” were written more eligibly and more beautifully in my books.
These words ignited inspiration in me. They turned into courage, bravery and an unyielding declaration in the campus as I stared in the eyes of the regime’s security agents.
They turned into courage when I defended with all my might the last bastions of freedom, shoulder-to-shoulder with my colleagues. These words gave me the ability to speak about freedom and the right to live.
They enabled and empowered me during the horrifying attacks by agents against our university protests and gatherings.
These were the words that inhabited my entire being. They nurtured confidence and were the key to my perseverance in solitary confinement.
“We can and we must” – these were the source of my strength when I faced the loud shouts and violence of the regime’s interrogators.
They gave me the conviction and faith as I sat down on the interrogation chair while five to six guards circled around me, talking about executions and torture.
Each day of my five-year prison term, these were the words that showed me the promise of light and the coming of liberty.
When the walls seemed to grow taller and when barbed wire surrounded me, these two words, “can” and “must”, were like wings that allowed me to fly higher.
Yes, Mrs. Rajavi, I found the strength to grow wings and fly thanks to your empowering words: “we can and we must.”
And, now, I am here still relying on your presence and leadership, which is the symbol of the words “we can and we must.” Like a dewdrop coming from the ocean of your piercing eyes, which glow with conviction and certainty, I have now joined the vigorous sea of the Mujahedin so I can grow even more.
Mrs. Rajavi: I have come to you from the depressed and repressed streets of Iran, filled with cranes that execute citizens.
I join you carrying a huge weight of suffering of the Iranian people, especially the women and girls of our homeland;
With flowers and wreaths and greetings and hope offered by the suppressed people of Iran.
I come to you from the ranks of activist and unrelenting university students, who have sent you messages.
I carry numerous messages to you from the innocent women and girls languishing in Evin, Gohardasht and Qarchak prisons.
The same innocent Iranian girls, who as you have put it, are like beautiful flowers that fade without having the chance to blossom first.
I have seen the Reyhanehs, hundreds and hundreds of Reyhanehs. I have come here to tell you about their stories of suffering and the injustices that they have faced.
They told me they had no safe refuge; they told me of the times when they were tortured, when they were held in illegal detention centers, and when they were raped by torturers.
For years, these women and girls have spent their lives under some of the worst circumstances, carrying with them their death sentences. They are experiencing a gradual death in the regime’s torture chambers.
I spoke to a woman who had returned from a world of death; girls that were arrested on phony or insignificant charges, only to be pulled into a world of corruption, death and drugs created by the mullahs.
I talked to a 27-year-old woman who was arrested at 17 on the fabricated and mullah-inspired charge of having “illegitimate relations.” 10 years later, she was addicted to drugs and had murdered someone.
Dear Mrs. Rajavi,
I have brought all this pain in front of you to see because you are the only answer to these pains.
Mrs. Rajavi, I have carried all those years, all that hurt, all the tears and the anguish on my shoulders and as a consequence I always feel the gravity of my responsibility.
I will continue my efforts and struggle until my last breath, promising to try to take you to the land of the Lion and the Sun, Iran.
Dear friends,
Today, I stand in front of you to echo voices that seek justice and human rights, the voices of the activist and perseverant political prisoners in Iran, the voice of the resilient women in prisons.
The voice of my dear sister and my hero Maryam Akbari Monfared; an innocent mother of three who has spent more than 7 years in the regime’s prisons.
When they arrested her, her daughter Sara was only four. But, even in the darkest and most difficult days, Maryam refused to surrender.
Since the day of her arrest until now, she has consistently stood up to the regime’s guards and interrogators, seeking justice for the killings of her sister and brothers.
When she grew restless and her heart was aching to hug her small daughter Sara or to talk or console her teenage daughters, she used to tell me: now I know what pain my late sister Roqieh felt in 1988 when they separated her from her toddler daughter, but she still stood firm and defended her cause.
She used to always tell me that if there is one thing she believes, it is the innocence, honesty and purity of all the martyrs of the massacre of 1988, and that the PMOI are the only light shining in a world full of injustice. She used to say that this is the only reason why I am still persevering and resisting.
I have to tell my friend Maryam from this podium that as I said during our last conversation, I promise to always be on your side and to echo your voice as you seek justice. I promise to tell her story for the world. Remembering all the sweet and bitter moments in prison, I vow to be with the justice seeking movement led by Mrs. Rajavi, which is now growing and expanding, so that we can bring the brutal mullahs to justice for massacring thousands of innocent people.
To all the European countries and international institutions, I say that you must listen to the voice of the Iranian people, the voice of grieving mothers of martyrs, the voice of the families of the victims of the 1988 massacre, the voice of political prisoners in Iran.
The Iranian people have had enough suffering and suppression at the hands of the mullahs. They do not care about any of their factions. They see one regime, with one color, which is red with the blood of thousands of innocents.
The Iranian people condemn any form of relation or deals with the regime and they say that by continuing such contacts and remaining quiet about the regime’s violations, there will be new gallows set up in Iran’s streets. Your deals come at a price: the blood and lives of human beings.
The Iranian people are convinced that the Iranian regime, which has vowed to destroy humans and humanity, will be toppled by the PMOI and the NCRI.
Dear Massoud Rajavi,
When I entered cell #15 in Evin’s Ward 209 and after the steel door was shut the first day, I recalled you repeating the famous words of Imam Ali, who said ‘even if the mountains tremble, never budge an inch’. I wrote this in large letters on my cell wall.
Dear Massoud, when I was in solitary confinement, I tried to remember your teachings so I could stay proud.
We flourish in your presence
We flourish with your books
And in defense of your smile
Now, by relying on Mrs. Rajavi’s teachings, in the fight against the regime, I hoist the flag once held by Mahdieh and Akbar and I vow to work hard to free the Iranian people and our homeland. I will remain a PMOI activist until my last breath.

Top Muslim university rejects reform, stands by “terrorist curriculum”
Raymond Ibrahim/FrontPage Magazine/December 02/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/02/raymond-ibrahimfrontpage-magazine-top-muslim-university-rejects-reform-stands-by-terrorist-curriculum/
There’s nothing like knowing Arabic—that is, being privy to the Muslim world’s internal conversations on a daily basis—to disabuse oneself of the supposed differences between so-called “moderate” and “radical” Muslims.
Consider the case of Egypt’s Dr. Ahmed al-Tayeb. Hardly one to be dismissed as a fanatic who is ignorant of the true tenets of Islam, Tayeb’s credentials and career are impressive: he holds a Ph. D in Islamic philosophy from the Paris-Sorbonne University; formerly served as Grand Imam of Egypt, meaning he was the supreme interpreter of Islamic law; formerly served for seven years as president of Al-Azhar University, considered the world’s leading institution of Islamic learning, and is currently its Grand Imam. A 2013 survey named Tayeb the “most influential Muslim in the world.”
He is also regularly described by Western media and academia as a “moderate.” Georgetown University presents him as “a strong proponent of interfaith dialogue.” According to The National, “He is considered to be one of the most moderate and enlightened Sunni clerics in Egypt.” In February 2015, the Wall Street Journal praised him for making “one of the most sweeping calls yet for educational reform in the Muslim world to combat the escalation of extremist violence.”
Most recently he was invited to the Vatican and warmly embraced by Pope Francis. Al Azhar had angrily cut off all ties with the Vatican five years earlier when, in the words of U.S. News, former Pope Benedict “had demanded greater protection for Christians in Egypt after a New Year’s bombing on a Coptic Christian church in Alexandria killed 21 people. Since then, Islamic attacks on Christians in the region have only increased.”
Pope Francis referenced his meeting with Tayeb as proof that Muslims are peaceful: “I had a long conversation with the imam, the Grand Imam of the Al-Azhar University, and I know how they [Muslims] think. They seek peace, encounter.”
How does one reconcile Tayeb’s benevolent image in the West with his reality in Egypt?
For instance, all throughout the month of Ramadan last June, Tayeb appeared on Egyptian TV explaining all things Islamic—often in ways that do not suggest that Islam seeks “peace, encounter.”
During one episode, he reaffirmed a phrase that is almost exclusively associated with radicals: in Arabic, al-din wa’l-dawla, meaning “the religion and the polity”—a phrase that holds Islam to be both a religion and a body of rules governing society and state.
He did so in the context of discussing the efforts of Dr. Ali Abdel Raziq, a true reformer and former professor at Al Azhar who wrote a popular but controversial book in 1925, one year after the abolition of the Ottoman caliphate. Titled, in translation, Islam and the Roots of Governance, Raziq argued against the idea of resurrecting the caliphate, saying that Islam is a personal religion that should no longer be mixed with politics or governance.
Raziq was vehemently criticized by many clerics and even fired from Al Azhar. Concluded Tayeb, with assent:
Al Azhar’s position was to reject his position, saying he forfeited his credentials and his creed. A great many ulema—in and out of Egypt and in Al Azhar—rejected his work and its claim, that Islam is a religion but not a polity. Instead, they reaffirmed that Islam is both a religion and a polity [literally, al-din wa’l-dawla].
The problem with the idea that Islam must govern the whole of society should be obvious: Sharia, or Islamic law, which is what every Muslim including Tayeb refer to when they say that Islam is a polity, is fundamentally at odds with modern notions of human rights and, due to its supremacist and “anti-infidel” aspects, the source of conflict between Muslims and non-Muslims the world over.
That this is the case was made clear during another of Tayeb’s recent episodes. On the question of apostasy in Islam—whether a Muslim has the right to abandon Islam for another or no religion—the “radical” position is well known: unrepentant apostates are to be punished with death.
Yet Tayeb made the same pronouncement. During another Ramadan episode he said that “Contemporary apostasy presents itself in the guise of crimes, assaults, and grand treason, so we deal with it now as a crime that must be opposed and punished.”
While his main point was that those who do not follow Islam are prone to being criminals, he especially emphasized those who exhibit their apostasy as being a “great danger to Islamic society. And that’s because his apostasy is a result of his hatred for Islam and a reflection of his opposition to it. In my opinion, this is grand treason.”
Tayeb added what all Muslims know: “Those learned in Islamic law [al-fuqaha] and the imams of the four schools of jurisprudence consider apostasy a crime and agree that the apostate must either renounce his apostasy or else be killed.” He even cited a hadith, or tradition, of Islam’s prophet Muhammad calling for the execution of Muslims who quit Islam.
Meanwhile, when speaking to Western and non-Muslim audiences, as he did during his recent European tour, Tayeb tells them what they want to hear. Speaking before an international forum he asserted that “The Quran states that there is no compulsion in religion,” and that “attempts to force people into a religion are against the will of God.” Similarly, when meeting with the Italian Senate’s Foreign Policy Commission Pier Ferdinando Casini and his accompanying delegation, Tayeb “asserted that Islam is the religion of peace, cooperation and mercy…. Islam believes in freedom of expression and human rights, and recognizes the rights of all human beings.”
While such open hypocrisy—also known as taqiyya—may go unnoticed in the West, in Egypt, human rights groups often call him out. The Cairo Institute for Human Rights recently issued a statement accusing Al Azhar of having two faces: one directed at the West and which preaches freedom and tolerance, and one directed to Muslims and which sounds not unlike ISIS:
In March 2016 before the German parliament, Sheikh al-Tayeb made unequivocally clear that religious freedom is guaranteed by the Koran, while in Cairo he makes the exact opposite claims…. Combating terrorism and radical religious ideologies will not be accomplished by directing at the West and its international institutions religious dialogues that are open, support international peace and respect freedoms and rights, while internally promoting ideas that contribute to the dissemination of violent extremism through the media and educational curricula of Al Azhar and the mosques.
At any rate, if Tayeb holds such draconian views on apostasy from Islam—that is, when he’s speaking in Arabic to fellow Muslims—what is his position concerning the Islamic State? Last December, Tayeb was asked why Al Azhar refuses to issue a formal statement denouncing the genocidal terrorist organization as lapsing into a state of kufr, that is, of becoming un-Islamic, or “infidel.” Tayeb responded:
Al Azhar cannot accuse any [Muslim] of being a kafir [infidel], as long as he believes in Allah and the Last Day—even if he commits every atrocity…. I cannot denounce ISIS as un-Islamic, but I can say that they cause corruption on earth.
As critics, such as Egyptian talk show host Ibrahim Eissa pointed out, however, “It’s amazing. Al Azhar insists ISIS are Muslims and refuses to denounce them. Yet Al Azhar never ceases to shoot out statements accusing novelists, writers, thinkers—anyone who says anything that contradicts their views—of lapsing into a state of infidelity. But not when it comes to ISIS!”
This should not be surprising considering that many insiders accuse Al Azhar of teaching and legitimizing the atrocities that ISIS commits. Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah Nasr, a scholar of Islamic law and Al Azhar graduate once exposed his alma mater in a televised interview:
It [Al Azhar] can’t [condemn the Islamic State as un-Islamic]. The Islamic State is a byproduct of Al Azhar’s programs. So can Al Azhar denounce itself as un-Islamic? Al Azhar says there must be a caliphate and that it is an obligation for the Muslim world [to establish it]. Al Azhar teaches the law of apostasy and killing the apostate. Al Azhar is hostile towards religious minorities, and teaches things like not building churches, etc. Al Azhar upholds the institution of jizya. Al Azhar teaches stoning people. So can Al Azhar denounce itself as un-Islamic?
Similarly, while discussing how the Islamic State burns some of its victims alive—most notoriously, a Jordanian pilot—Egyptian journalist Yusuf al-Husayni remarked on his satellite program that “The Islamic State is only doing what Al Azhar teaches.” He went on to quote from textbooks used in Al Azhar that permit burning people—more specifically, “infidels”—alive.
Meanwhile, Tayeb—the face of and brain behind Al Azhar—holds that Europe “must support all moderate Islamic institutions that adopt the Al-Azhar curriculum,” which “is the most eligible one for educating the youth.” He said this during “a tour [in Germany and France] to facilitate dialogue between the East and the West.”
As for the ongoing persecution of Egypt’s most visible non-Muslim minorities, the Coptic Christians, Tayeb is renowned for turning a blind eye. Despite the well-documented “severe persecution” Christians experience in Egypt; despite the fact that Muslim mobs attack Christians almost “every two to three days” now—recent examples include the burning of churches and Christian homes, the coldblooded murder of a Coptic man defending his grandchild from Muslim bullies, and the stripping, beating, and parading in the nude of a 70-year-old Christian woman—Tayeb recently told Coptic Christian Pope Tawadros that “Egypt represents the ultimate and highest example of national unity” between Muslims and Christians.
Although he vociferously denounces the displacement of non-Egyptian Muslims in Buddhist Myanmar, he doesn’t have a single word for the persecution and displacement of the Copts, that is, his own Egyptian countrymen. Instead he proclaims that “the Copts have been living in Egypt for over 14 centuries in safety, and there is no need for all this artificial concern over them,” adding that “true terrorism was created by the West.”
Indeed, far from speaking up on behalf of Egypt’s Christian minorities, he has confirmed that they are “infidels”—that same label he refused to describe ISIS with. While he did so in a technical manner—correctly saying that, as rejecters of Muhammad’s prophecy, Christians are infidels [kafir]—he also knows that labeling them as such validates all the animosity they feel and experience in Egypt, since the mortal enemy of the Muslim is the infidel.
This is consistent with the fact that Al Azhar encourages enmity for non-Muslims, specifically Coptic Christians, and even incites for their murder. As Egyptian political commentator Dr. Khalid al-Montaser once marveled:
Is it possible at this sensitive time — when murderous terrorists rest on [Islamic] texts and understandings of takfir [accusing Muslims of apostasy], murder, slaughter, and beheading — that Al Azhar magazine is offering free of charge a book whose latter half and every page — indeed every few lines — ends with “whoever disbelieves [non-Muslims] strike off his head”?
The prestigious Islamic university—which co-hosted U.S. President Obama’s 2009 “A New Beginning” speech—has even issued a free booklet dedicated to proving that Christianity is a “failed religion.”
One can go on and on. Tayeb once explained with assent why Islamic law permits a Muslim man to marry a Christian woman, but forbids a Muslim woman from marrying a Christian man: since women by nature are subordinate to men, it’s fine if the woman is an infidel, as her superior Muslim husband will keep her in check; but if the woman is a Muslim, it is not right that she be under the authority of an infidel. Similarly, Western liberals may be especially distraught to learn that Tayeb once boasted, “You will never one day find a Muslim society that permits sexual freedom, homosexuality, etc., etc., as rights. Muslim societies see these as sicknesses that need to be resisted and opposed.”
To recap, while secular Western talking heads that don’t know the first thing about Islam continue squealing about how it is being “misunderstood,” here is arguably the Muslim world’s leading authority confirming many of the cardinal points held by ISIS: he believes that Islam is not just a religion to be practiced privately but rather is a totalitarian system designed to govern the whole of society through the implementation of its human rights abusing Sharia; he supports one of the most inhumane laws, punishment of the Muslim who wishes to leave Islam; he downplays the plight of Egypt’s persecuted Christians, that is, when he’s not inciting against them by classifying them as “infidels”—the worst category in Islam’s lexicon—even as he refuses to denounce the genocidal Islamic State likewise.
Yet this well credentialed and respected scholar of Islam is considered a “moderate” by Western universities and media, from Georgetown University to the Wall Street Journal. He is someone whom Pope Francis trusts, embraces, and quotes to reassure the West of Islam’s peacefulness.
In all fairness of course, Tayeb is neither a “moderate” nor a “radical.” He’s merely a Muslim trying to be true to Islam. Put differently, he’s merely a messenger.
Critics would be advised to take it up with the Message itself.