LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

December 04/16

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletin16/english.december04.16.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
On the eighth day they came to circumcise the child, and they were going to name him Zechariah after his father.But his mother said, ‘No; he is to be called John

Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 01/57-66/:"Now the time came for Elizabeth to give birth, and she bore a son. Her neighbours and relatives heard that the Lord had shown his great mercy to her, and they rejoiced with her. On the eighth day they came to circumcise the child, and they were going to name him Zechariah after his father. But his mother said, ‘No; he is to be called John.’They said to her, ‘None of your relatives has this name.’Then they began motioning to his father to find out what name he wanted to give him. He asked for a writing-tablet and wrote, ‘His name is John.’ And all of them were amazed. Immediately his mouth was opened and his tongue freed, and he began to speak, praising God. Fear came over all their neighbours, and all these things were talked about throughout the entire hill country of Judea. All who heard them pondered them and said, ‘What then will this child become?’ For, indeed, the hand of the Lord was with him."

 

Rejoice, you childless one, you who bear no children, burst into song and shout, you who endure no birth pangs; for the children of the desolate woman are more numerous than the children of the one who is married

Letter to the Galatians 04/21-03-01.05,01/":Tell me, you who desire to be subject to the law, will you not listen to the law? For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by a slave woman and the other by a free woman. One, the child of the slave, was born according to the flesh; the other, the child of the free woman, was born through the promise. Now this is an allegory: these women are two covenants. One woman, in fact, is Hagar, from Mount Sinai, bearing children for slavery. Now Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children. But the other woman corresponds to the Jerusalem above; she is free, and she is our mother. For it is written, ‘Rejoice, you childless one, you who bear no children, burst into song and shout, you who endure no birth pangs; for the children of the desolate woman are more numerous than the children of the one who is married.’ Now you, my friends, are children of the promise, like Isaac. But just as at that time the child who was born according to the flesh persecuted the child who was born according to the Spirit, so it is now also. But what does the scripture say? ‘Drive out the slave and her child; for the child of the slave will not share the inheritance with the child of the free woman.’ So then, friends, we are children, not of the slave but of the free woman. For freedom Christ has set us free. Stand firm, therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery."

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on December 03-04/16
"Nothing to do with Islam"/Judith Bergman/Gatestone Institute/December 03/16

Self-Censorship: Free Society vs. Fear Society/Giulio Meotti//Gatestone Institute/December 03/16

In defense of the much-maligned US mainstream media/Hisham Melhem/Al Arabiya/December 03/16

Russia the New Regional Policeman/Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al Awsat/December 03/16

Trump May Find Nothing More to Offer Putin/Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/December 03/16

Don’t Ignore This Jobs Report/Mohamed A. El-Erian/Asharq Al Awsat/December 03/16

 

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on December 03-04/16
Canadian Foreign Minister to Meet Senior Lebanese Officials
Aoun Media Office: President Determined to Address Concerns of All
Report: Cabinet Line-Up Close after President 'Extends Hand' to Political Parties
Caretaker Minister of Environment, Mohammad Machnouk representing Salam: Lebanon safeguarded by its unity
Sami Gemayel: Problem lies in approaching the government like sharing a piece of candy, solution would be through practicing moderation in demands
Ambassador Bonne launches France Alumni Liban
Army: Syrian referred to justice for belonging to Daesh
LAF: Syrian affiliated with ISIS in hands of Judiciary
Lebanese hospitals reject bodies of two Ethiopians who suffocated to death
Bassil Says Lebanon, Germany Engaged in Fight against Terrorism
Syrian Detained in Rashaya over Forged Documents
Two Ethiopians Suffocate Due to Coal Heating System
Rahi convenes with Ambassadors of Germany and China
Sleiman: to share responsibilities, duties within Constitutional authorities
Siniora: without alternatives to Taef Agreement, Lebanon faces chaos

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on December 03-04/16
Abadi Rejects Army’s Strategy in Mosul
Syria Army Seizes New Rebel District in Aleppo
EU Says Fall of Aleppo won’t End Syria War as Rebels Lose more Ground
Morocco Police Arrest 8-Member Terrorist Cell
Coalition of Humanitarian Relief in Taiz: 893 Casualties in November
Egypt Drafting U.N. Statement to Denounce ‘Government’ Formation in Sana’a
Trump Sets Stage for Iran Sanctions
Trump Upends US Foreign Policy with Taiwan Call
China Lodges Protest over Trump Taiwan Call
Tehran Says it has ‘Appropriate Response’ to U.S. Sanction Renewal
25 Million Gulf Citizens Benefit from Eased Regional Travel in 2015

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on December 03-04/16
UK: Police hunting for veiled woman who stabbed teenager to death.
International Qur’anic Studies Association scholars: Qur’an only describes violence, doesn’t command it.
UK: 72-year-old Muslim jailed for grooming, repeatedly raping nine-year-old girl.
UK judge says woman sexually assaulted by Muslim migrant was “foolish” for drinking too much.
Netherlands: Government-funded watchdog says it’s ok for Muslims to send death threats to gays.
Germany: Muslim group sets up Islam information stand at Christmas market.
Finland: Politician fined for criticizing Islam.
UK: Muslima who works for government’s counter-terrorism unit supports pro-jihad group.
Tunisian President: “Tunisia is determined to prove that Islam is not incompatible with democracy”.
European Commission top dog: “We must distinguish between Islam and terrorism”.

Links From Christian Today Site for on December 03-04/16
Bodies of Chapecoense Plane Crash Victims Returned To Grieving Brazilian Home Town.
The Calais Refugee 'Problem' Has Merely Been Displaced, Not Solved.
Bishop: Church Too Middle Class, Must Listen To Poor Communities.
Malaysia says Myanmar violence against Muslim Rohingya 'ethnic cleansing'.
South Koreans march close to presidential Blue House demanding Park resign.
The World Is In A Mess. The Common Good Offers A Way Out.
We Cannot Ignore The Culture Of Sex Abuse We Have Created.
Why I've Given Up Singing Worship Songs.
After Trump, What Now For Christians In America? Obama Faith Advisor Speaks Out.

Latest Lebanese Related News published on December 03-04/16
C
anadian Foreign Minister to Meet Senior Lebanese Officials
Naharnet/December 03/16/Canadian Foreign Minister Stephane Dion, who arrived in Beirut on Friday is scheduled to kick start his meetings with senior Lebanese officials, the National News Agency reported. Dion who is accompanied by two Canadian MPs of Lebanese origin, Eva Nassif and Marwan Tabbara, arrived Friday night on a three-day visit. The Canadian Minister is scheduled to meet with Lebanese President Michel Aoun to congratulate him on his election as a president. Later he will meet with Speaker Nabih Berri, Caretaker PM Tammam Salam, Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri and Caretaker Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil, to tackle the current situation in Lebanon and the region, as well as bilateral ties between Lebanon and Canada. On the other hand, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier left Beirut Friday night heading to Germany on a private plane. Also, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu flew from Beirut Friday night heading to Turkey on a private plane.
 
Aoun Media Office: President Determined to Address Concerns of All
Naharnet/December 03/16/In light of various media reports that tackled the position of President Michel Aoun as for the formation of a cabinet and the distribution of ministerial portfolios, the office of the presidency issued a statement assuring that the President is determined to address the concerns of all politicians and invited them to meet with him at Baabda Palace. “Explaining the reports published in media outlets over the past days, President Michel Aoun confirms his commitment to the concerns of everyone and his determination to address them all,” said the statement issued Friday. It added: “He therefore invites each official or politician to meet with him at the Presidential Palace to ease his fears. The President is entrusted to implement the constitution, to achieve just representation in the constitutional authorities and on the proper implementation in accordance with the provisions of the constitution as along as the goal is the supreme national interest.”
 
Report: Cabinet Line-Up Close after President 'Extends Hand' to Political Parties
Naharnet/December 03/16/An appeasing statement issued by the presidential palace came in parallel with indications that political parties might have reached an agreement over the thorny issue of distribution of ministerial portfolios, heralding the formation of a new cabinet soon, al-Joumhouria daily reported Saturday. The presidential message came at a time when the cabinet line-up is almost complete, sources from Baabda Presidential Palace told the daily. The presidential statement is supposed to be a road map that leads to easing some difficulties hampering the formation of a new cabinet. In a statement released by his media office Friday, President Michel Aoun extended his hand to political parties and expressed readiness to work with all sides for the benefit of Lebanon. Wrangling over the distribution of ministerial portfolios lingers among the rival political parties, which has delayed the formation of a cabinet after aspirations that it would be lined-up before Independence Day on November 22. In October, the parliament elected Aoun, a former general, as president ending a two-and-half-year deadlock that left Lebanon without a president. Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri was designated on November 3 to form a new government under the tenure of Aoun, but he is still facing obstacles bringing together a line-up that balances Lebanon's delicate sectarian-based political system. At stake is the distribution of the most powerful portfolios like the defense ministry and other key portfolios including the public works.

Caretaker Minister of Environment, Mohammad Machnouk representing Salam: Lebanon safeguarded by its unity
 Sat 03 Dec 2016/NNA - Caretaker Minister of Environment, Mohammad Machnouk, represented caretaker PM Tammam Salam on Saturday during a workshop dedicated to fortifying national pact document and discussing Constitutional loopholes. The conference held in Hilton Hotel was called upon by former President Michel Sleiman and attended by top officials. "Experiences have proven that the unity of Lebanon is the country's sole security against those wishing to tamper with its system and seeking a federal or confederate regime...while we seek the unity of citizenry in Lebanon," said the Minister. Machnouk lauded Sleiman's initiative and hoped it would open new horizons to bolstering Lebanon's unity away from the confessional game. "The National Pact Document stems from a commitment to a united state where all citizens, regardless of their sect, equally share the rights and responsibilities governed by the Constitution and Pact," noted Machnouk, adding that many of the Document's articles were not implemented, such as abolishing sectarianism from politics. "The ethos of the National Pact ended the Lebanese war and set forth the framework for a Constitutional state of institutions and a democratic parliamentary system that guards the balance among various factions. Any transgression upon this philosophy means falling into the maze of seeking a new political contract among Lebanese powers that have different goals and agendas, some of which might contradict the spirit of the Taef's Constitution."
 
Sami Gemayel: Problem lies in approaching the government like sharing a piece of candy, solution would be through practicing moderation in demands
Sat 03 Dec 2016/NNA - Kataeb Party Head, MP Sami Gemayel, deemed on Saturday that "the prevailing problem at this stage is in dealing with the new government like sharing a piece of candy," adding that "the ideal solution would be through each side decreasing its demands and pre-conditions.""I hope we can reach an electoral law that secures healthy representation in Parliament," added Gemayel, expressing regret that no focus is being given to the work program of the future government instead of sharing cabinet seats.
However, he considered that "despite the huge difficulties, we are strong believers, and we shall keep believing and dreaming of a better country."Gemayel's words came during the inaugural ceremony of the "Christmas Festival" event organized by the Municipality of Bikfaya, under the patronage of former President Amin Gemayel. After lighting the Christmas tree, President Gemayel signaled the beginning of the festival by ringing the Christmas bells and saying, "We are ringing the bell of peace, and we hope that the new mandate would carry goodness at all levels."
 
Ambassador Bonne launches France Alumni Liban
 Sat 03 Dec 2016/NNA - French Ambassador to Lebanon Emmanuel Bonne launched on Saturday the France Alumni Liban's digital platform, designed to unify, inform and activate a network of Lebanese who have pursued their studies in France. This platform also offers exchange of experiences with France, its universities and companies supervised by the French Embassy and focuses on five themes: Justice, Arts, Economics, Science and Media. This initiative was instituted by the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Developments. The event was patronized by the Chairman and CEO of the Renault-Nissan Alliance, Carlos Ghosn, in presence of political, cultural and intellectual figures. "Nearly 5000 Lebanese students are pursuing their studies in France," the French Ambassador added. Bonne noted that "France is the 3rd educational destination for foreign students with the equivalent of 300,000 scholars." The diplomat praised the Lebanese-French bilateral relations by saying "France is an important country for Lebanese students, in view of the deep friendship between our two countries."
 
Army: Syrian referred to justice for belonging to Daesh
 Sat 03 Dec 2016/NNA - In an issued statement by the Lebanese Army Command Orientation Directorate on Saturday, it indicated that: "the Army Intelligence Directorate has referred to the concerned court the Syrian national, Ahmed Abdel Razzaq Jassim al-Mohammad, on charges of belonging to Daesh terrorist organization and for being involved in the killing of dozens of civilians in Syria."
 
LAF: Syrian affiliated with ISIS in hands of Judiciary
 Sat 03 Dec 2016/NNA - The Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) Orientation Directorate issued on Saturday the following statement: "The Intelligence Directorate referred to the Judiciary Syrian national Ahmad Abdul Razzak Jassem Al Mohammad for belonging to ISIS and actively participating in the slaughter of tens of Syrian civilians in Syria."
 
Lebanese hospitals reject bodies of two Ethiopians who suffocated to death
Sat 03 Dec 2016 /NNA - The bodies of two Ethiopian domestic workers who perished in an unfortunate accident in their room in Blat Jbeil locality were denied admission into any hospital in Jbeil and were returned to the residence where they were found. The two Ethiopians reportedly suffocated to death due to a malfunction in a coal heating system. A third woman was also found next to them in critical condition. The Red Cross rushed the woman to a Jbeil hospital for emergency treatment. The two dead Ethiopians were taken by the Civil Defence to Bouar Governmental Hospital, but the hospital declined to take them in. This prompted the Civil Defence team to roam over all other private hospitals in Jbeil and were faced with the same rejection. Without a hospital to take them in, the two bodies were returned to their room, while security forces and Civil Defence continue to seek a solution to this dilemma.
 
Bassil Says Lebanon, Germany Engaged in Fight against Terrorism
Naharnet/December 03/16/Caretaker Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil, said that Lebanon and Germany agreed on the fight against terrorism and the need to prevent its funding resources. Bassil's stance came on Friday during a joint press conference with German Foreign Minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier. He hailed Berlin's important role in ensuring stability and security that could only be anchored through the eradication of terrorism. "Lebanon suffers from a shortage of resources while it is receiving the largest number of refugees," Bassil said thanking Germany for its help in this context. For his part, the German Minister said that Lebanese people managed to overcome political obstacles in order to build a better future for their country. He said that the assistance of Lebanon in assuming the burden of refugees is persisting, announcing a contribution of 10 million Euros to deal with this crisis. Steinmeier highlighted the importance of reaching a solution to the Syrian war.
 
Syrian Detained in Rashaya over Forged Documents
Naharnet/December 03/16/General Directorate of State Security arrested a Syrian national on Saturday suspected of forging documents, the state-run National News Agency reported. The suspect identified as M.S. was arrested in the southern town of Rashaya, NNA said. He is accused of high-skilled ability to forge Syrian identification papers, it added. The detainee was referred to the related authorities.
 
Two Ethiopians Suffocate Due to Coal Heating System
Naharnet/December 03/16/Two Ethiopian female workers were found dead in an area north of Beirut on Saturday due to suffocation from a coal heating system, the National News Agency reported. The two females, in their thirties, were found in a room in the northern neighborhood of Blat Jbeil, NNA added. A third female was found in a critical condition. She was transported to a nearby hospital by the Red Cross rescue team for treatment, added the agency. Police patrol and a forensic doctor arrived at the scene.  With the arrival of this season's first winter storm two days ago, the Internal Security Forces called on citizens and refugees to take precautionary measures to prevent cases of suffocation resulting from gas or coal heating systems, which killed 18 people and injured dozens last year.

Rahi convenes with Ambassadors of Germany and China
 Sat 03 Dec 2016/NNA - Maronite Patriarch Cardinal Beshara Rahi received at Bkikry on Saturday the Ambassador of Germany Martin Huth. He told the press after the meeting that Germany was keen on preserving diversity and stability of Lebanon. "We wished for the formation of a Cabinet the soonest possible," said Huth, adding that he confirmed his country's willingness to cooperate with Lebanese institutions. Ambassador of China and Jordanian Minister of Public Works also held a meeting with Rahi.
 
Sleiman: to share responsibilities, duties within Constitutional authorities
Sat 03 Dec 2016/NNA - "Let's share responsibilities and duties within the Constitutional authorities and not fight over power," former President Michel Sleiman said on Saturday during a conference at Hilton Hotel dedicated to immunizing the Taef Accord."
"By boosting the Republic's foundations through the immunization of the National Pact, the enforcement of the Constitution and by relying on the Declaration of Baabda we remove the need for Constituent conferences," Sleiman told the attendees.
  
Siniora: without alternatives to Taef Agreement, Lebanon faces chaos
 Sat 03 Dec 2016/NNA - Former Prime Minister Fouad Siniora spoke on Saturday at the Hilton Hotel during the conference on "Immunization of the Taef Agreement and the discussion of constitutional gaps". He said that "without alternatives to the Taef Agreement, Lebanon will plunge into a state of chaos", stressing that full implementation of the stipulations of the agreement could limit the need to resort to amendments. "This document has played an essential role in ending the civil war ... and must be taken into consideration as it adopts the formula of coexistence," Siniora said. 
 
Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on December 03-04/16
Abadi Rejects Army’s Strategy in Mosul
Asharq Al-Awsat/Asharq Al Awsat/December 03/16/Mosul- As Iraqi forces and ISIS fight in a fierce urban warfare in Mosul, the leaders of Iraq are discussing the possibility of changing their strategy to help the more than one million civilians flee the city and give the army a free hand to strike the jihadists. The proposal, a sign of frustration at slow progress in the six-week campaign against ISIS in Mosul, was ultimately dismissed by Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi and his generals, military sources told Reuters in interviews. Abadi and his advisers feared that fleeing residents could be massacred by the militants who still control three-quarters of the city, and that authorities and aid agencies were in no position to handle a mass exodus. According to Reuters, the military sources and a government official stated there are increasing fears that Iraqi forces might get drifted to a war of attrition in Mosul. The military campaign to regain control over Mosul is considered the biggest land operation in Iraq in more than ten years and includes a coalition of around 100,000 fighters against thousands of extremists. A report published by Reuters showed that the battle is expected to continue until next year—this actually jeopardizes the city with a genuine humanitarian crisis during the winter not to mention the enormous losses in the army. Iraqi leaders reported that, at least, one thousand fighters of ISIS were killed in the attempt to force out the organization from the city. Also, the Iraqi army disclosed that the Mosul battle has represented the toughest challenge throughout the past two years. John Dorian, an air force colonel and a spokesperson of the coalition supporting Iraqi troops, announced his support to the Iraqi government in protecting civilians, adding the battle has become harder.

Syria Army Seizes New Rebel District in Aleppo
 Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 03/16/Karam al-Masri/Syria's army advanced overnight deeper into east Aleppo where it now controls more than half of the former rebel stronghold after a fierce assault that has sparked an international outcry.
 Tens of thousands of civilians have fled eastern neighbourhoods of the battered city since President Bashar al-Assad's regime began its latest offensive in mid-November.
 Overnight, government troops and allied forces seized the district of Tariq al-Bab where heavy fighting had raged a day earlier, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said Saturday. The government has now recaptured around 60 percent of eastern parts of the city that the rebels overran in mid-2012, according to the Britain-based monitor.
 The advance opens the road leading from the government-controlled west of the city to the international airport just outside Aleppo to the east, which is also held by the regime.
 And it has prompted more civilians to flee, heading either further south into remaining rebel-held districts or crossing into government-held territory or areas under Kurdish control. Assad's forces have made swift gains in east Aleppo, and its loss would be the biggest blow yet to Syria's opposition in the more than five-year-old war. More than 300,000 people have been killed since the conflict started with anti-government protests in March 2011, and over half the country's population has been displaced.
 - 'Over 300 killed' -The government has trumpeted its advances, and state television on Saturday showed buses full of residents going from west Aleppo back to their homes in neighbourhoods retaken by the army. More than 300 civilians have been killed in the government's assault on east Aleppo since November 15, according to the Observatory.
 The monitor says nearly 65 civilians have been killed in the same period by rebel fire on government-held west Aleppo, including nine on Friday. Rebels have struggled to hold back government ground forces, who have advanced backed by air strikes, barrel bombs and artillery fire.
 On Friday, they rolled back some regime gains in the Sheikh Saeed district on Aleppo's southeastern outskirts, but it was unclear how long they could hold that line.Sheikh Saeed borders the last remaining parts of Aleppo still in rebel hands -- a collection of densely populated residential neighbourhoods where thousands have sought refuge from advancing regime forces. In preparation for street-by-street fighting in these districts, hundreds of fighters from Syria's elite Republican Guard and Fourth Division arrived in Aleppo Friday, the Observatory said. The fighting has prompted more than 50,000 people to leave east Aleppo for territory controlled by either the government or Kurdish forces.
 On Friday, as the army advanced in Tariq al-Bab, an AFP correspondent said residents had emptied out of neighbouring Shaar district, anticipating the arrival of fighting there.
 He said just a few rebels could be seen in the district, manning positions in front of shuttered shops and bakeries. Vegetable stalls that had been selling the most meagre of supplies after more than four months of government siege were lying shattered in one street by artillery fire.
 On Saturday, the Observatory said three people were killed and at least 10 others wounded in air strikes on Shaar, and that raids were targeting several other eastern neighbourhoods in the city. The escalating violence has been met with international outrage, including a UN warning that east Aleppo could become "a giant graveyard".
 - 'Race again time' -Moscow, a staunch ally of the regime, has proposed setting up four humanitarian corridors into east Aleppo. "We have informed the UN in New York and Geneva that there is no longer a problem with the delivery of humanitarian cargo to eastern Aleppo," Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Friday.
 He said the UN was coming up with a plan and approval from Syrian authorities remained essential. Moscow has announced several humanitarian pauses in Aleppo to allow civilians to flee, but until the recent escalation, only a handful did so. Many civilians in the east previously expressed fear of leaving to government-held areas or through passages run by Moscow, which began a bombing campaign in support of Assad's forces in 2015.
 But Damascus and Moscow accuse rebels of holding civilians hostage and using them as "human shields."Of those who have fled in the east in recent days, nearly 20,000 are children, according to estimates by the UN's children's agency UNICEF.
 "What is critical now is that we provide the immediate and sustained assistance that these children and their families desperately need," UNICEF spokesman Christophe Boulierac said. "It's a race against time, as winter is here and conditions are basic."
 
 EU Says Fall of Aleppo won’t End Syria War as Rebels Lose more Ground
Asharq Al-Awsat English/Asharq Al Awsat/December 03/16/European Union foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini is convinced the fall of rebel-held areas of the Syrian city of Aleppo to the regime would not end the war in the country, she said on Saturday. “I’m convinced the fall of Aleppo will not end the war,” Mogherini said during a panel discussion at a conference in Rome war with U.N. Syria envoy Staffan de Mistura. As for de Mistura, he hoped “some type of formula” could be found to avoid a “terrible battle” in Aleppo. Speaking at the conference, he indicated the battle for Aleppo would not last that much longer, saying “the fact is that Aleppo is not going to stay that long”. “I was feeling it would be a terrible battle ending up by Christmas-New Year. I hope the battle will not take place, that there will be some type of formula,” he said. Her statement came as Syrian regime and allied forces advanced overnight seizing Aleppo’s Tariq al-Bab neighborhood from rebels as they press an offensive to recapture the entire city, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said on Saturday. The capture of the neighborhood means the regime has now retaken around 60 percent of the east of the city, which the rebels overran in mid-2012. However, a Turkey-based official with one of the rebel groups in Aleppo said regime forces had advanced in the area but rebels were repelling them. The regime’s attack on Tariq al-Bab came after ferocious clashes that sent civilians flooding out of the adjacent neighborhood of Al-Shaer. The Observatory said at least three people were killed in an air strike on the al-Shaer. The civil defense rescue service in eastern Aleppo said a gathering of displaced people had been struck and put the death toll at more than six. More than 300 civilians have been killed in east Aleppo since the regime resumed its offensive to oust the rebels on November 15. The United Nations has warned that the sector risks becoming a “giant graveyard” for the 250,000-plus civilians who were trapped there just last week. Tens of thousands have since fled. The latest developments on the battlefield were accompanied by a stern stance from rebels. A rebel official said that rebel commanders will not surrender eastern Aleppo to regime forces after Russia claimed it was ready for talks with the United States on the withdrawal of all rebels from the area. “I asked the factions, they said ‘we will not surrender’,” said Zakaria Malahifji, the head of the political office of the Aleppo-based Fastaqim faction, speaking from Turkey. “The military commanders in Aleppo said ‘we will not leave the city. There is no problem with corridors for civilians to leave, but we will not leave the city’,” he said.

Morocco Police Arrest 8-Member Terrorist Cell
Asharq Al-Awsat/Asharq Al Awsat/December 03/16/Rabat- Morocco’s Central Bureau of Judicial Investigation has arrested eight men with alleged ties to ISIS active in the cities of Fez and Tangiers, the interior ministry said on Friday. A rifle, ammunition “and documents inciting towards jihad” were seized during the operation on Thursday, the ministry said in a statement, a copy of which was received by Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper. It said two of the cell’s members had been previously arrested on terror charges. They were active in a terrorist cell – led by a French citizen – plotting attacks inside and outside the kingdom. An initial investigation pointed towards the eight men having ties with ISIS in Syria and Iraq, “recruiting and sending Moroccan volunteers” there. They will be referred to the judiciary once their questioning by the Central Bureau of Judicial Investigation is over. Morocco’s Interior Ministry announced on July 19 that security forces launched a major campaign to confront terrorist groups that target the country’s security and stability. Police arrested 143 suspects for being part of cells linked to ISIS. The arrests represented the largest group detained among numerous suspected cells dismantled in recent years. Since 2002, Moroccan security forces have arrested more than 159 terrorist cells, including 38 networks in 2013 alone. Those cells have been closely linked with terrorist groups in Syria and Iraq. There are more than 1,579 Moroccan fighters in Syria and Iraq – 758 of them have joined ISIS while the rest are fighting alongside other extremist groups.

Coalition of Humanitarian Relief in Taiz: 893 Casualties in November
Asharq Al-Awsat/Asharq Al Awsat/December 03/16/Taiz-The Coalition of Humanitarian Relief in Taiz has revealed in a report that Houthis and Saleh militias continue to commit more violations in the city, killing and displacing civilians from their houses and villages. According to the report, there were 893 casualties in November – 172 of them were killed while 721, including men, women and children, were wounded. “Sixty five houses, facilities, shops, schools, mosques, government buildings and public services were bombed over the past month (November) in addition to around 40 houses that were totally and partially damaged in different neighborhoods of the city by indiscriminate shelling,” added the report. “Seven educational facilities and students also were targeted by shelling while one mosque was bombed and another two were shelled”, the report of the coalition mentioned. At least “752 families were displaced due to battles and shelling—the displaced families found no shelter but some schools and other families hosted them in Taiz and other provinces,” it added. The Coalition of Humanitarian Relief in Taiz warned of “starvation that might lead to a prominent humanitarian disaster in Taiz especially that public employees are not being paid their salaries.”In the same context, Staff Brigadier General Abdulrahman al-Shamsani said that the Yemeni army is fully ready to defend Taiz and liberate Yemen of militias. He added that the army is defending the nation. The Staff Brigadier General called on the deceived individuals to get back to the right track and the pro-militias armed forces to join the national army forces and take the honor of purging the country of militias.

Egypt Drafting U.N. Statement to Denounce ‘Government’ Formation in Sana’a

Badr Al-Qahtani/Asharq Al Awsat/December 03/16/London- Two diplomats have revealed to Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper that Egypt is drafting a U.N. Security Council statement to denounce the unilateral steps taken by rebels in Yemen in forming a “government.”Saudi Ambassador to the U.N. Abdullah al-Mouallimi said in a phone call that the statement is expected to be issued on Friday or Saturday. He said there is a Russian objection to the statement, and negotiations with parties are ongoing. Mouallimi added that the objection is over certain sentences and paragraphs that need to be amended. This is a normal thing at the U.N. Yemeni Ambassador to the U.S. Ahmed Awad bin Mubarak said, however, that Russia showed no objection to the step itself. Meanwhile, the Yemeni government has delivered its remarks on the U.N. peace map to U.N. Special Envoy for Yemen Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed. A Yemeni official summarized the government’s remarks with three points: the political and security sequence in the map, weakening the constitutional powers of the president and restricting rebels’ withdrawal to Sana’a by excluding other vital regions. The Yemeni diplomat said: “We insist that security arrangements be clear and specific in ways that cover all vital areas of Yemen, including Sana’a.”He continued that the scheduling in the map contradicts with U.N. Security Council Resolution 2216 because it starts with political steps followed by the withdrawal from Sana’a. “They aren’t aware of the historical, geographic and social nature of Sana’a—withdrawing from it means nothing because it can be attacked at any time,” he added.

Trump Sets Stage for Iran Sanctions
Heba El Koudsy/Asharq Al-Awsat/December 03/16/Washington- U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s term in office will likely be the most difficult for Tehran amid a report that his transition team is examining proposals for sanctions on Iran separate from its nuclear program. The Financial Times quoted congressional sources as saying that transition officials have begun sounding out Republicans in Congress about the options for sanctions that might not technically breach the 2015 nuclear deal. They could include measures that focus on Iran’s ballistic missile program or its human rights record, the sources said. Although the Trump team is a long way from deciding how it will approach the nuclear deal, its Iran policy work is being led by an expert on sanctions legislation, said the newspaper. “They are already looking closely at their options — and that very much includes non-nuclear sanctions,” said one congressional official who has been in touch with the transition team. According to the Financial Times, Bob Corker, chairman of the Senate foreign relations committee and a candidate to be Trump’s secretary of state, introduced a bill this year to impose sanctions on more officials involved in Iran’s ballistic missile program and the Iranian Revolutionary Guards. Lindsey Graham, Republican senator from South Carolina, has said he would introduce a bill that applies sanctions on sectors of the economy connected to the missile program. Kevin McCarthy, House majority leader, has put forward three bills that would add new sanctions on Iran, the report said. Some of these proposed bills might also win support from senior Democrats. Chuck Schumer, the incoming Senate minority leader, and Ben Cardin, the leading Democrat on the Senate foreign relations committee, opposed the 2015 Iran deal. During his election campaign, Trump described the nuclear agreement as the “worst deal ever negotiated” and alternated between saying he would tear it up and that he would renegotiate it. Meanwhile, the Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, said he expected the Trump administration and the new Congress to “undertake a total review of our overall Iran policy.” “Given Iran’s continued pattern of aggression and the country’s persistent efforts to expand its sphere of influence across the region, preserving these sanctions is critical,” he added. Republicans have been arguing for new sanctions on Iran — not for its nuclear activities, but over human rights violations, terrorism and the support of the so-called Hezbollah.

Trump Upends US Foreign Policy with Taiwan Call
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 03/16/US President-elect Donald Trump broke with decades of foreign policy to speak with the president of Taiwan, prompting Beijing Saturday to accuse Taipei of a ploy but saying the move would not affect US-China ties. It was not immediately clear whether Trump's telephone call with President Tsai Ing-wen marked a deliberate pivot away from Washington's official "One China" stance, but fuelled fears he is improvising on international affairs. China regards self-ruling Taiwan as part of its own territory awaiting reunification under Beijing's rule, and any US move that would imply support for independence would likely trigger fury. During Friday's discussion, Trump and Tsai noted "the close economic, political and security ties" between Taiwan and the United States, according to the president-elect's office. "President-elect Trump also congratulated President Tsai on becoming President of Taiwan earlier this year," it said.
 China -- the target of much bombastic rhetoric during Trump's election campaign -- labeled the call a "ploy by the Taiwan side that simply cannot change... the One China framework". "I do not think it will change the one-China policy that the US government has insisted on applying over the years," Foreign Minister Wang Yi told Hong Kong's Phoenix TV, in a muted response. "The One China principle is the cornerstone of the healthy development of Sino-US relations, and we do not want any interference or disappearance of this political foundation." As he came under fire for the move, Trump defended his decision to speak with Tsai, saying the island's president initiated the call and brushed off the resulting criticism. "Interesting how the U.S. sells Taiwan billions of dollars of military equipment but I should not accept a congratulatory call," Trump tweeted.
 - 'One China' -President Barack Obama's White House said the outgoing US administration had not changed its stance. "There is no change to our longstanding policy on cross-Strait issues," National Security Council spokeswoman Emily Horne told reporters. "We remain firmly committed to our 'One China' policy," she added. "Our fundamental interest is in peaceful and stable cross-Strait relations."
 Washington cut formal diplomatic relations with the island in 1979 and recognizes Beijing as the sole government of "One China" -- while keeping friendly, non-official ties with Taipei. But since coming to office this year, Tsai has refused to accept the "One China" concept, prompting Beijing to cut off all official communication with the island's new government. Tsai's Democratic Progressive Party government (DPP) defeated the Kuomintang (KMT), which had much friendlier ties with Beijing, in a landslide election victory in January. Even before the call with Taiwan, Trump's unorthodox diplomatic outreach has raised eyebrows. Until Thursday, State Department officials told reporters that Trump had not asked for official briefing on current policy from US diplomats before making the contacts. On Friday, department spokesman John Kirby said the outgoing US administration has now helped with "some foreign communications that the transition team has gone forward with." But he referred reporters to Trump's office for details and would not say whether the president-elect himself had requested any background briefings before making or taking any calls. Asked whether Trump was among those on the transition team who received such help, a senior US official would only say that Vice President-elect Mike Pence has also made foreign calls.
 - 'The right way' -The incident comes as Philippine leader Rodrigo Duterte said Trump approved of Manila's ongoing deadly drug war, saying the crackdown in which some 4,800 people have been killed was being conducted in "the right way".The comments were made during a phone conversation between the Philippine president and Trump late Friday. Traditional US ally Britain was also embarrassed when Trump tweeted a request that it replace its ambassador to Washington with his friend, euroskeptic leader Nigel Farage. But for some critics, in extending his hand to Taiwan, Trump crossed a dangerous line. "What has happened in the last 48 hours is not a shift. These are major pivots in foreign policy without any plan. That's how wars start," tweeted Democratic Senator Chris Murphy.
 - Cabinet posts -Murphy, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, urged Trump to speed up his search for a nominee to become secretary of state and coordinate US foreign policy. Trump has met with several senior political, diplomatic and military figures in recent days and his pick for Washington's next chief diplomat is keenly anticipated. Reports suggest that former Massachusetts governor and defeated 2012 presidential candidate Mitt Romney is a frontrunner, along with former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani. Former CIA chief and general David Petraeus has also been cited as a candidate, as have Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker and former senior diplomat John Bolton. During the campaign, Trump repeatedly accused China of manipulating its currency to harm US manufacturing and threatened to impose tariffs on some of its exports. Transition officials have told reporters not to expect more nominations for cabinet-level posts before next week.
 
China Lodges Protest over Trump Taiwan Call
Asharq Al-Awsat English/December 03/16/China lodged a diplomatic protest with the U.S. on Saturday over a phone call between President-elect Donald Trump and Taiwanese leader Tsai Ing-wen, but blamed the self-ruled island Beijing claims as its own for the “petty” move. The 10-minute telephone call with Taiwan’s leadership was the first by a U.S. president-elect or president since President Jimmy Carter switched diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China in 1979, acknowledging Taiwan as part of “one China”. China’s Foreign Ministry said: “We have already made solemn representations about it to the relevant U.S. side. It must be pointed out that there is only one China in the world. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China’s territory.”The statement urged the careful handling of the Taiwan issue to avoid any unnecessary disturbances in ties. “The one China principle is the political basis of the China-U.S. relationship,” it said. The wording implied the protest had gone to the Trump camp, but the ministry provided no explanation. Speaking earlier, hours after Friday’s telephone call, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi pointedly blamed Taiwan for the exchange, rather than Trump, a billionaire businessman with little foreign policy experience. “This is just the Taiwan side engaging in a petty action, and cannot change the ‘one China’ structure already formed by the international community,” Wang said at an academic forum in Beijing, China’s Foreign Ministry quoted him as saying. “I believe that it won’t change the longstanding ‘one China’ policy of the United States government.”In comments at the same forum, Wang noted how quickly President Xi Jinping and Trump had spoken by telephone after Trump’s victory, and that Trump had praised China as a great country. During Friday’s discussion, Trump and Tsai noted “the close economic, political and security ties” between Taiwan and the U.S., according to the president-elect’s office. Despite cutting formal diplomatic ties, Washington keeps friendly and non-official relations with Taipei. But since coming to office this year, Tsai has refused to accept the “One China” concept, prompting Beijing to cut off all official communication with the island’s new government. As he came under fire for the move, Trump defended his decision to speak with Tsai, saying the island’s president initiated the call and brushed off the resulting criticism.
 
Tehran Says it has ‘Appropriate Response’ to U.S. Sanction Renewal
Asharq Al-Awsat/December 03/16/London- Iran threatened on Friday to retaliate against a U.S. Senate vote to extend the Iran Sanctions Act (ISA) for 10 years, saying it violated last year’s deal with six major powers that curbed its nuclear program. “As repeatedly stated by high-ranking Iranian officials, the recent bill passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate to renew sanctions against Iran is against the (nuclear deal),” Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Bahram Ghasemi said. “Iran has proved that it sticks to its international agreements but it also has appropriate responses for all situations.”The Iran Sanctions Act passed the Senate 99-0 on Thursday, after easily clearing the House of Representatives last month. President Barack Obama is expected to sign the measure, the White House said on Friday. “We believe the Iran Sanctions Act extension is not necessary, but we also believe it won’t interfere with the Iran deal,” spokesman Eric Schultz told reporters at a daily press briefing. “I would expect the president to sign this piece of legislation.” The legislation does not directly address the nuclear pact. But some say the restrictions in the bill go against the spirit of the agreement, under which Tehran curbed its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief from the United States and other nations. The bill includes penalties against Iran’s banking sector, as well as its energy and defense industries. Senate Democrats Dianne Feinstein and Tim Kaine, who both backed the nuclear deal, said that while the president was currently waiving some sanctions as part of the agreement, “sanctions legislation must remain in place to allow an immediate snap-back” in the event of any violation by Iran. The head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, Ali Akbar Salehi, said the U.S. sanctions legislation “does exist but its effect has been currently neutralized by the U.S. president”. “If it becomes operational again, it’s a clear violation,” he told state television. Supreme leader Ali Khamenei said last month that he considered the sanctions bill a breach of the nuclear deal and warned Iran would “react against it”. U.S. President-elect Donald Trump heavily criticized the pact as he campaigned for the White House over the past year. The ISA had been due to expire on Dec. 31. In a related development, Iranian MP Mohamad Reda Tabesh said he drafted a bill on Friday to ban import of consumer goods from the U.S. in response to the extension of the sanctions. “Members of parliament prepared a draft bill, which will ban a purchase [by Tehran] of any U.S. consumer goods in response to the decision of the U.S. Senate to extend sanctions against Iran,” he said. “The bill would be brought to the parliament for consideration,” he added.
 
25 Million Gulf Citizens Benefit from Eased Regional Travel in 2015
Asharq Al-Awsat/Asharq Al Awsat/December 03/16/Riyadh- Initial statistics published by the information sector for The Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf show that at least 25 million Gulf citizens have travelled within Gulf States in 2015. Gaining a dashing 89 percent increase compared to the 2006 statistics, which registered 13 million inter-Gulf travelers. Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and UAE have ranked top as traveler destinations. Regional visitors rocketed after border rules and residency regulations have been eased for citizens from the Gulf Cooperation Council states. Around 12 million Saudis benefited from eased border procedures, 4.4 million Omanis have seized the opportunities. Three million Kuwaitis and three million Bahrainis have used regional travel as well. Statistics provided by the GCC General Secretariat showcased steady increase in the number of inter-regional private sector working citizens. At least 16,000 employees have been recorded working at a regional Gulf State in 2015. Kuwait ranked first in being home to non-local Gulf nationals working in the private sector during 2015, at a rate of 66 percent, where the number of workers amounted to ten thousand employees.Both UAE and Saudi Arabia ranked second and third respectively, in which the number of non-local Gulf workers reached 1,893 and 1,887 employees correspondingly. The number of workers in the Gulf state of Qatar recorded 959 employees. The number of GCC employees in Bahrain and Oman’s civil sector amounted to 512 and 163 respectively.

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on December 03-04/16
"Nothing to do with Islam"?
Judith Bergman/Gatestone Institute/December 03/16
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9444/nothing-to-do-with-islam
"Until religious leaders stand up and take responsibility for the actions of those who do things in the name of their religion, we will see no resolution."
The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby.
"The Islamic State is a byproduct of Al Azhar's programs... Al Azhar says there must be a caliphate and that it is an obligation for the Muslim world. Al Azhar teaches the law of apostasy and killing the apostate. Al Azhar is hostile towards religious minorities, and teaches things like not building churches... Al Azhar teaches stoning people. So can Al Azhar denounce itself as un-Islamic?" — Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah Nasr, a scholar of Islamic law and graduate of Egypt's Al Azhar University.
The jihadists who carry out terrorist attacks in the service of ISIS, for example, are merely following the commands in the Quran, both 9:5, "Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them..." and Quran 8:39, "So fight them until there is no more fitna [strife] and all submit to the religion of Allah."
Archbishop Welby -- and Egypt's extraordinary President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi -- has finally had the courage to say in public that if one insists on remaining "religiously illiterate," it is impossible to solve the problem of religiously motivated violence.
For the first time, a European establishment figure from the Church has spoken out against an argument exonerating ISIS and frequently peddled by Western political and cultural elites. The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, speaking in France on November 17, said that dealing with the religiously-motivated violence in Europe
"requires a move away from the argument that has become increasingly popular, which is to say that ISIS is 'nothing to do with Islam'... Until religious leaders stand up and take responsibility for the actions of those who do things in the name of their religion, we will see no resolution."
Archbishop Welby also said that, "It's very difficult to understand the things that impel people to some of the dreadful actions that we have seen over the last few years unless you have some sense of religious literacy".
"Religious literacy" has indeed been in short supply, especially on the European continent. Nevertheless, all over the West, people with little-to-no knowledge of Islam, including political leaders, journalists and opinion makers, have all suddenly become "experts" on Islam and the Quran, assuring everybody that ISIS and other similarly genocidal terrorist groups have nothing to do with the purported "religion of peace," Islam.
It is therefore striking finally to hear a voice from the establishment, especially a man of the Church, oppose, however cautiously, this curiously uniform (and stupefyingly uninformed) view of Islam. Until now, establishment Churches, despite the atrocities committed against Christians by Muslims, have been exceedingly busy only with so-called "inter-faith dialogue." Pope Francis has even castigated Europeans for not being even more accommodating towards the migrants who have overwhelmed the continent, asking Europeans:
"What has happened to you, the Europe of humanism, the champion of human rights, democracy and freedom?... the mother of great men and women who upheld, and even sacrificed their lives for, the dignity of their brothers and sisters?"
(Perhaps the Pope, before rhetorically asking Europeans to sacrifice their lives for their migrant "brothers and sisters" should ask himself whether many of the Muslim migrants in Europe consider Europeans their "brothers and sisters"?)
A statement on Islam is especially significant coming from the Archbishop of Canterbury, the senior bishop and principal leader of the Anglican Church and the symbolic head of the Anglican Communion, which stands at around 85 million members worldwide, the third-largest communion in the world.
The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby (left), recently said that dealing with the religiously-motivated violence in Europe "requires a move away from the argument that has become increasingly popular, which is to say that ISIS is 'nothing to do with Islam'... Until religious leaders stand up and take responsibility for the actions of those who do things in the name of their religion, we will see no resolution." (Image source: Foreign and Commonwealth Office)
Only a year ago, commenting on the Paris massacres, the Archbishop followed conventional politically correct orthodoxy, pontificating that, "The perversion of faith is one of the most desperate aspects of our world today." He explained that Islamic State terrorists have distorted their faith to the extent that they believe they are glorifying their God. Since then, he has clearly changed his mind.
Can one expect other Church leaders and political figures to heed Archbishop Welby's words, or will they be conveniently overlooked? Western leaders have noticeably practiced selective hearing for many years and ignored truths that did not fit the "narrative" politicians apparently wished to imagine, especially when spoken by actual experts on Islam. When, in November 2015, Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah Nasr, a scholar of Islamic law and graduate of Egypt's Al Azhar University, explained why the prestigious institution, which educates mainstream Islamic scholars, refused to denounce ISIS as un-Islamic, none of them was listening:
"The Islamic State is a byproduct of Al Azhar's programs. So can Al Azhar denounce itself as un-Islamic? Al Azhar says there must be a caliphate and that it is an obligation for the Muslim world. Al Azhar teaches the law of apostasy and killing the apostate. Al Azhar is hostile towards religious minorities, and teaches things like not building churches, etc. Al Azhar upholds the institution of jizya [extracting tribute from non-Muslims]. Al Azhar teaches stoning people. So can Al Azhar denounce itself as un-Islamic?"
Nor did Western leaders listen when The Atlantic, hardly an anti-establishment periodical, published a study by Graeme Wood, who researched the Islamic State and its ideology in depth. He spoke to members of the Islamic State and Islamic State recruiters and concluded:
"The reality is that the Islamic State is Islamic. Very Islamic. Yes, it has attracted psychopaths and adventure seekers, drawn largely from the disaffected populations of the Middle East and Europe. But the religion preached by its most ardent followers derives from coherent and even learned interpretations of Islam".
In the United States, another establishment figure, Reince Priebus, Chairman of the Republican National Committee and Donald Trump's incoming White House Chief of Staff, recently made statements to the same effect as the Archbishop of Canterbury. "Clearly there are some aspects of that faith that are problematic and we know them; we've seen it," Priebus said when asked to comment on incoming National Security Adviser former Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn's view that Islam is a political ideology that hides behind being a religion.
In much of American society, Flynn's view that Islam is a political ideology is considered controversial, despite the fact that the political and military doctrines of Islam, succinctly summarized in the concept of jihad, are codified in Islamic law, sharia, as found in the Quran and the hadiths. The jihadists who carry out terrorist attacks in the service of ISIS, for example, are merely following the commands in the Quran, both 9:5, "Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them..." and Quran 8:39, "So fight them until there is no more fitna [strife] and all submit to the religion of Allah."
The question becomes, then, whether other establishment figures will also acknowledge what someone like Archbishop Welby -- and Egypt's extraordinary President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi -- has finally had the courage to say in public: that if one insists on remaining "religiously illiterate," it is impossible to solve the problem of religiously motivated violence.
**Judith Bergman is a writer, columnist, lawyer and political analyst.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Self-Censorship: Free Society vs. Fear Society
Giulio Meotti//Gatestone Institute/December 03/16
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9459/self-censorship
"The drama and the tragedy is that the only ones to win are the jihadists." — Flemming Rose, who published the Mohammed cartoons in 2005, as cultural editor of Jyllands-Posten newspaper.
"Why the f*ck did you say yes to appear on stage with this terrorist target, are you stupid? Do you have a secret death wish? You have grandchildren now. Are you completely out of your mind? It's okay if you want to die yourself, but why are you taking the company though all this?" — The managers of Jyllands-Posten, to Flemming Rose.
"We are also aware that we therefore bow to violence and intimidation." — Editorial, Jyllands-Posten.
"
I do not blame them that they care about the safety of employees. I have bodyguards 24 hours a day. However, I believe that we must stand firm. If Flemming shuts his mouth, democracy will be lost." — Naser Khader, a liberal Muslim of Syrian origin who lives in Denmark.
In the summer of 2005, the Danish artist Kåre Bluitgen, when he met a journalist from the Ritzaus Bureau news agency, said he was unable to find anyone willing to illustrate his book on Mohammed, the prophet of Islam. Three illustrators he contacted, Bluitgen said, were too scared. A few months later, Bluitgen reported that he had found someone willing to illustrate his book, but only on the condition of anonymity.
Like most Danish newspapers, Jyllands-Posten decided to publish an article about Bluitgen's case. To test the state of freedom of expression, Flemming Rose, Jyllands-Posten's cultural editor at the time, called twelve cartoonists, and offered them $160 each to draw a caricature of Mohammed. What then happened is a well-known, chilling story.
In the wave of Islamist violence against the cartoons, at least two hundred people were killed. Danish products vanished from shelves in Bahrain, Qatar, Yemen, Oman, the UAE and Lebanon. Masked gunmen stormed the offices of the European Union in Gaza and warned Danes and Norwegians to leave within 48 hours. In the Libyan city of Benghazi, protesters set fire to the Italian consulate. Political Islam understood what was being achieved and raised the stakes; the West did not.
An Islamic fatwa also forever changed Flemming Rose's life. In an Islamic caricature, his head was put on a pike. The Taliban offered a bounty to anyone who would kill him. Rose's office at the newspaper was repeatedly evacuated for bomb threats. And Rose's name and face entered ISIS's blacklist, along with that of the murdered editor of Charlie Hebdo, Stéphane Charbonnier.
Less known is the "white fatwa" that the journalistic class imposed on Rose. This brave Danish journalist reveals it in a recently published book, "De Besatte" ("The Obsessed"). "It is the story of how fear devours souls, friendships and the professional community," says Rose. The book reveals how his own newspaper forced Rose to surrender.
"The drama and the tragedy is that the only ones to win are the jihadists," Flemming Rose told the Danish newspaper Weekendavisen.
The CEO of Jyllands-Posten, Jørgen Ejbøl, summoned Rose to his office, and asked, "You have grandchildren, do not you think about them?"
The company that publishes his newspaper, JP/Politikens Hus, said: "It's not about Rose, but the safety of two thousand employees."
Jorn Mikkelsen, Rose's former director, and the newspaper's business heads, obliged him to sign a nine-point diktat, in which the Danish journalist accepted, among other demands, "not participating in radio and television programs", "not attending conferences", "not commenting on religious issues", "not writing about the Organization of the Islamic Conference" and "not commenting on the cartoons".
Rose signed this letter of surrender during the harshest time for the newspaper, when, in 2010-2011, there were countless attempts on his life by terrorists, and also attempts on the life of Kurt Westergaard, illustrator of a cartoon (Mohammed with a bomb in his turban) that was burned in public squares across the Arab world. Westergaard was then placed on "indefinite leave" by Jyllands-Posten "for security reasons."
Is democracy lost? Eleven years after Jyllands-Posten published the Mohammed cartoons, the newspaper has a barbed-wire fence two meters high and one kilometer long. Kurt Westergaard, the illustrator who drew one of the cartoons (left), lives in hiding in a fortress, and Flemming Rose (right), the editor who commissioned the cartoons, has fled to the United States.
In his book, Rose also reveals that two articles were censored by his newspaper, along with an outburst from the CEO of the company, Lars Munch: "You have to stop, you're obsessed, on the fourth floor there are people who ask 'can't he stop?'".
Rose then drew more wrath from his managers when he agreed to participate in a conference with the equally targeted Dutch parliamentarian, Geert Wilders, who at this moment is on trial in the Netherlands for "hate speech." Rose writes:
He starts yelling at me, "Why the f*ck did you say yes to appear on stage with this terrorist target, are you stupid? Do you have a secret death wish? You have grandchildren now. Are you completely out of your mind? It's okay if you want to die yourself, but why are you taking the company though all this?"
Jyllands-Posten also pressured Rose when he decided to write a book about the cartoons, "Hymne til Friheden" ("Hymn to Freedom"). His editor told him that the newspaper would "curb the harmful effects" of the book by keeping its publication as low-key as possible. Rose was then threatened with dismissal if he did not cancel two debates for the tenth anniversary of the Mohammed cartoons (Rose, in fact, did not show up that day at a conference in Copenhagen).
After the 2015 massacre at Charlie Hebdo, Rose, no longer willing to abide by the "diktat" he was ordered to sign, resigned as the head of the foreign desk of Jyllands-Posten, and now works in the U.S. for the Cato Institute think-tank. The former editor of Jyllands-Posten, Carsten Juste, who was also blacklisted by ISIS, confirmed Rose's allegations.
Rose writes in the conclusion of his book: "I'm not obsessed with anything. The fanatics are those who want to attack us, and the possessed are my former bosses at Jyllands-Posten."
Rose's revelations confirm another familiar story: Jyllands-Posten's surrender to fear. Since 2006, each time its editors and publishers were asked if they still would have published the drawings of Mohammed, the answer has always been "no." This response means that the editors had effectively tasked Rose with writing the newspaper for fanatics and terrorists thousands of kilometers away. Even after the January 7, 2015 massacre at the weekly Charlie Hebdo in Paris, targeted precisely because it had republished the Danish cartoons, Jyllands-Posten announced that, out of fear, it would not republish the cartoons:
"We have lived with the fear of a terrorist attack for nine years, and yes, that is the explanation why we do not reprint the cartoons, whether it be our own or Charlie Hebdo's. We are also aware that we therefore bow to violence and intimidation."
A Danish comedian, Anders Matthesen, said that the newspaper and the cartoons were to blame for the Islamist violence -- the same official position as the entire European political and journalistic mainstream.
A year ago, for the 10th anniversary of the affair, instead of the cartoons, Jyllands-Posten came out with twelve white spaces. These white spaces represent what Rose, in his previous book, called "Tavshedens tiranni" ("The Tyranny of Silence"). Naser Khader, a liberal Muslim of Syrian origin who lives in Denmark, wrote:
"I do not blame them that they care about the safety of employees. I have bodyguards 24 hours a day. However, I believe that we must stand firm. If Flemming shuts his mouth, democracy will be lost."
Is democracy lost? The headquarters of Jyllands-Posten today has a barbed-wire fence two meters high and one kilometer long, a door with double lock (as in banks), and employees can only enter one at a time by typing in a personal code (a measure that did not protect Charlie Hebdo). Meanwhile, the former editor, Carsten Juste, has withdrawn from journalism; Kurt Westergaard lives in hiding in a fortress, and Flemming Rose, like Ayaan Hirsi Ali, fled to the United States.
Much, certainly, looks lost. "We are not living in a 'free society' anymore, but in a 'fear society'", Rose has said.
**Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

In defense of the much-maligned US mainstream media
Hisham Melhem/Al Arabiya/December 03/16
In recent years the mainstream media in the United States has fallen on bad times. Conservatives bemoan its alleged built-in liberal biases, while progressives and liberals lament its corporate ownership and its heavy reliance on official sources.
‘Corporate media’ has become an epithet. The digital revolution, the immense proliferation and influence of social media and the limitless space of the blogosphere were supposed to be the great equalizers, thus empowering individuals and small entities to provide the alternative media to the stale profit-driven corporate media. The blogosphere, the social media and the iPhone have opened up new vistas of human possibilities, and their liberating aspects, particularly in autocratic societies are undeniable. But this seemingly brave new world is also rife with pitfalls, where sharing of information and facts, go hand in hand with spreading of myths, deceptive stories, fake news, cyber aggression, and the spreading of manufactured realities.
The rise of cable television, talk radio and online media in general heralded the era of explicitly opinionated journalism, further blurring the lines between the traditional fact-based journalism and loud political advocacy directed at niche constituencies. But while it is true that the media landscape has been irrevocably changed, it is evidently clear that old claims that the mainstream media has lost its relevance are patently false.
Most of the major stories and serious investigative journalism in recent years have been the result of painstaking traditional reporting and not the work of the new media. And while it is true that the mainstream media in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq failed in raising serious doubts and questions about the existence of Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction, it nonetheless recouped relatively quickly.
Trump’s outrageous lies, his ceaseless dabbling with conspiracy theories and his brazen deceptions, have forced journalists and fact-checkers to hold him accountable.
It was The New Yorker magazine and CBS television that uncovered the abomination called Abu Ghraib. It was the Washington Post that uncovered the secret system of Black Sites, which were detention facilities around the world controlled by the CIA where alleged enemy combatants were harshly interrogated and some were allegedly tortured. It was The New York Times that first uncovered that the Bush Administration had secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans to search for evidence of terrorist activities, without the court-approved warrants that are required for domestic spying. In the current war on the so-called ‘Islamic State’ ISIS, publications like the Atlantic Monthly, The Washington Post, The New York Times and television networks and the National Public Radio have published and aired excellent investigative reports. The war in Syria claimed the lives of a number of intrepid and courageous American and European journalists working for mainstream media.
Over the years I have heard numerous complaints from Middle Easterners and Europeans about what they see as the American mainstream media’s problematic coverage of things Arab and Muslim. They cite information, statistics and findings to buttress their arguments, unaware of the irony that the sources of their information are the same mainstream media. I check some Arab publications for editorials and the opinions of very few columnists, but not for news reports, since there is at best a dearth of original reporting. The mainstream American media print and television remains my primary source of news and information from the Arab countries.
A two-pronged attack
The mainstream media in 2016 was subjected to a two-pronged attack, first by Donald Trump who sought to punish and boycott Journalists and their networks and publications if he deemed that they were too critical of him and the second by Russia using paid human ‘trolls’, websites, social media, and Russian-financed television stations to spread fake news, and misleading information to alter the course of the campaign, and to improve Trump’s chances of winning the race.
Russian trolls, according to US intelligence agencies, hacked the site of the Democratic National Committee, and Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta and selectively leaked some of the emails. Clint Watts, co-author of a study titled ‘Trolling for Trump: How Russia is Trying to Destroy Our Democracy’ said that "Russia's propaganda mechanisms primarily aim for "alt-right and more traditional right-wing and fascist parties."
Watts told CNN that, Russia's goal wasn't just to elect Trump. "The goal is to erode trust in mainstream media, public figures, government institutions -- everything that holds the unity of the Republic together."
American presidents and candidates seeking the highest office in the land have had problematic and at times tense relations with the media, particularly in times of conflicts or domestic scandals. But Trump is not simply engaging the media in hot debates, he is waging an unprecedented war on the very legitimacy of the American mainstream media, and more dangerously on the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights which guarantee freedom of expression. The man who was democratically elected, wants to exercise autocratic powers that the very constitution that he will put his hand on and take the oath to protect and defend come next January the 20th, does now allow him to do
Trump is fond of talking repeatedly about the Second Amendment, which states “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." But Trump rarely if ever spoke publicly or approvingly of the much more important First Amendment which guarantee the rights of the free exercise of religion, the freedom of speech, and the freedom of the press.
Trump was very clear when he said few months ago that one of his goals is to change the legal system so that he could hound the media unencumbered: “I am going to open up our libel laws,” he added “so when they write purposely negative and horrible and false articles, we can sue them and win lots of money”.
In fact, Mr. Trump ran two parallel campaigns, one against his competitors and adversaries, and the second a vendetta against the “crooked media” or the “rigged media” where on many occasions he would double down on his two bête noire media outlets, The New York Times and CNN. Trump, diabolically exploited the existing American distrust of the media in general, to chip away incessantly on its legitimacy. In what was billed as his “thank you” tour, Trump was unabashedly triumphalist; he boasted endlessly about his victories, while insulting the “dishonest” politicians, and gloating about defeating Hillary Clinton. But he reserved his most potent venom for the “extremely dishonest press,” eliciting loud boos of approval, before he lashed out against a female television anchor who he claimed cried on the air when he won the presidency.
No American president before Trump has dared to obliquely attack the First Amendment by attacking the media. In his rallies, Trump would single out reporters, labeling them as “terrible”, “scum” and “illegitimate”, and he used to revel in the sight of his supporters hurling insults against the reporters. These are indeed perilous times for the American media.
Jefferson rebukes Trump
Trump’s war on the media, is ultimately a war on the constitution. Trump is fond of talking repeatedly about the Second Amendment, which states “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." But Trump rarely if ever spoke publicly or approvingly of the much more important First Amendment which guarantee the rights of the free exercise of religion, the freedom of speech, and the freedom of the press…Just as he does not discuss or defend Human Rights overseas.
Trump’s outrageous lies, his ceaseless dabbling with conspiracy theories and his brazen deceptions, have forced journalists and fact-checkers to hold him accountable, something he deeply resents.
He may have been required to read the Constitution in high school, but it is doubtful that he had read this most American of all American political documents in recent years. Thomas Jefferson, a very complex and immensely intelligent man harboring conflicting visions of human possibilities and potentials, had also a radical and prescient streak. For Jefferson, a free press is absolutely crucial for safeguarding the people’s liberty and to keep the government in check. In a letter he sent from Paris to Edward Carrington whom Jefferson sent as a delegate to the Continental Congress, he concludes that if he had to choose between “a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter”.

Russia the New Regional Policeman?
Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al Awsat/December 03/16
Closed negotiations held between Syrian rebels and Russians have recently been made public, especially concerning discussions on Aleppo’s siege.
The Syrian opposition has relentlessly fought to oust regime authoritarian Bashar Al-Assad, a close ally to Russia.
Not only that, Russian intermediation has been handed over the OPEC production cut agreement, as U.S. President-elect Donald Trump also publicly reiterated his great agreement concerning the Syria crisis with Russia’s ‘strong leader,’ a label Trump often uses to refer to Russia’s Vladimir Putin.
Cairo has also been seeking a greater alliance with Russia, seizing a given opportunity to change around the long-registered disregard for Cairo by the West.
Iranians, unenthusiastically and cautiously, strike mutual interest alliances with Russia. A few days ago Libya’s military Marshal Khalifa Haftar flew to Moscow, in hopes of receiving military aid from the federation.
Connecting the dots, a question on Russia’s instatement as regional cop surfaces. Can Moscow truly realize a balance and manage to fill the gaps left behind by President Barack Obama’s policies?
Obama’s strategies based, on leading from behind, viewed harmful reluctance for the region—added to his hasty pullout from Iraq, which left the country in chaos. More so, Obama’s stances, especially his endorsement of the Iran nuclear deal has unnecessarily added to Iran’s arrogant behavior, a country that until this very day is considered a terror sponsor state.
If the assumption on the United States taking an inactive regional approach due to the current transition between its presidencies-which believed to extend into the first few months of a Trump presidency’s installation- was true, then why is the U.S. congress still moving towards escalation with Iran, with a majority vote at the Senate pushing for the extension of Iran sanctions for another decade?
The inactiveness during transition shown by the astonishing fact that the U.S. administration, according to the Financial Times, was not brought in on secret negotiations held between the Russian administration and Syrian rebels—based on that many project a U.S. arguable withdrawal from the region, which is then countered by its will to step up sanctions against Iran.
Congress moving towards escalation with Iran is not a mere backlash to an Obama presidency, but also a prop up for a Trump leadership. The defiance and bills brought forward by congress is in preparation for a Trump administration which campaigned under slogans of amending the terms or even rolling back on the nuclear deal.
Intensifying events occurring in Washington are a direct strike to the cleric-led regime in Tehran, a recently acquired ally of Russians. Based on that logic, how would a Russian super power come to effectively control regional regulation given the escalating tensions between Tehran and Washington? A U.S.-Iran breakdown would reshuffle the regional situation.
The current balance shows several support points scattered across the region for a Russian rise to power, however the same strength points would overturn breaking the balance should Iran drag Russia to a vicious opposition with the U.S.
It is not mere wishful thinking, but the deepened reading into facts shows that Russian exceptionalism shines best at playing on the chords of disagreement and not stability and resolution.
‘Logic’ is not a label found in Russian policies in each of Syria, Ukraine, and even Europe.
What Russians do to the region is simply turning it into a ticking bomb, ready to detonate at any given moment, as soon as Washington shows again on the platform, or even reviews the Iran deal.

Opinion: Trump May Find Nothing More to Offer Putin
Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/December 03/16
During the United States’ recent presidential campaign, one charge levelled against the Republican nominee Donald Trump was that he may be a sort of “Manchurian candidate” for Russian leader Vladimir Putin, pulling the strings from the Kremlin. The Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton even dropped hints that Moscow may mobilize its army of hackers to alter the election results in Trumps’ favor.
This comical version of the sinister McCarthyism of the 1950s was largely based on a brief boast by Trump that, being a master in the art of negotiation, he would “get along fine with Vladimir Putin.”
We don’t know how Trump might “get along” with Putin and on what terms. What we know is that he has not yet offered the family silver to the master of Kremlin. What we know is that part of Putin’s recent rogue behavior may well be due to President Barack Obama’s appeasement-plus approach to the United States’ rivals, adversaries and enemies.
Obama’s appeasement-plus approach encouraged the mullahs of Tehran to intensify their quest for hegemony in the Middle East by encouraging the revolt in Yemen, supporting a sanguinary despot in Syria, creating a parallel army in Iraq and imposing a protégé of Hezbollah as President of Lebanon.
The same approach persuaded China that Obama’s tenure provided a window of opportunity for Beijing to flex its muscles in the South China Sea and adjacent regions in preparation for the coming Great Game in the Pacific.
North Korea was also encouraged by Obama’s appeasement-plus policy. As US direct and indirect aid to the starving Communist nation almost doubled, Pyongyang speeded up the building of its nuclear arsenal, convinced that Obama would do no more than a little bit of huffing and puffing.
But it was precisely Putin who exploited Obama’s appeasement-plus policy with greater determination. When Obama entered the White House, Russia was beginning to contemplate the cost of its invasion of Georgia in August 2008. Though focused on the American presidential election campaign, the lame-duck Bush administration had managed to mobilize international support against the invasion, forcing Moscow to accept a process of consultations to restore Georgia’s territorial integrity at least in form.
One of Obama’s first moves was to shut down that process as a show of goodwill to Moscow. A further sign that Obama intended to relieve pressure on Russia came soon afterwards with the notorious “re-set” gadget that symbolized the new administration’s resolve to “de-Bushify” American policy towards Russia.
As if those two concessions were not enough, Obama soon offered Moscow a third gift by scrapping a US plan to install defensive missile sites in the Czech Republic and Poland, something the Russians had vehemently opposed during the Bush era with no success.
In her memoirs, Hilary Clinton’s then Obama’s Secretary of State, recalls how the president insisted that the US show “goodwill” to Russia by granting concrete concessions. Clinton claims she was opposed to “giving something for nothing” but was overruled by Obama.
So, the next present to Moscow was a freezing of plans to enlarge the North Atlantic Treaty organization (NATO) plans for enlargement. Talks with some of Russia’s “near neighbors”, notably Ukraine, Georgia and Uzbekistan were abruptly terminated without Moscow offering anything in return. Obama also scrapped another NATO plan for forging ties between NATO and six Arab states in North Africa and the Middle East in view to their associate membership in the future.
At the same time, the US closed down its logistics bases in Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, two former Soviet republics, and threw its local political allies overboard, enabling pro-Moscow elements to strengthen their positions in Tashkent and Bishkek. The US also terminated the military mission it had in Armenia and Azerbaijan, two other former Soviet republics, in the context of preventing a revival of armed conflict in the disputed enclave of High-Gharabagh (Nogorno Karabakh). Russia lost no time in forcing its own military presence on Yerevan in the shape of a 20,000-man garrison assigned the task of keeping the peace in Transcaucasia.
When Washington’s European allies protested that Obama’s appeasement-plus policy was encouraging Russia’s aggressiveness, Obama did all he could to prevent the imposition of meaningful sanctions on Moscow. As if all those gifts were not enough, towards the end of his first mandate Obama was overheard telling Dmitry Medvedev, Putin’s understudy as President, that , freed from problems of re-election, a second Obama administration would offer more goodies to Russia.
With a string of political and military provocations and concrete moves, Putin tested possible American reactions to his step-by-step plan against Ukraine for more than a year before concluding that the way was open for his big land-grab in the share of invading and annexing the Crimean Peninsula and carving a Russian-controlled enclave in Donbass.
Obama’s appeasement-plus policy reached a new low of cynicism when Washington granted Moscow an equal status in monitoring the so-called nuclear deal with the Islamic Republic in Iran. Then it went even lower when John Kerry, Obama’s Secretary of State after Clinton, spoke of the role that “our Russian partners” were supposed to play in persuading Syrian despot Bashar Al-Assad not to kill his own people with chemical weapons. As the Moscow daily Kommersant wrote at the time, Washington was acknowledging Russia’s status as the principal foreign power in Syria.
Putin lost no time to interpret that as carte blanche for Russian military intervention including the systematic killing of Syrian civilians in air attacks on half a dozen cities, notably Aleppo. Obama’s appeasement-plus caused occasional concern among some of his aides, including successive Defense Secretaries Robert Gates, Leon Panetta and Chuck Hagel who argued that American policy might increase Putin’s appetite for further adventures.
Obama’s Defense Intelligence Agency chief General Michael Flynn even resigned in protest to the president’s appeasement-plus policy. Seen from the point of view of US national interests and America’s leadership role on the global scene, Obama has already sold the family silver. It is hard to imagine what else a President Trump could find in the family heirloom to offer as gift to Vladimir Putin.

Don’t Ignore This Jobs Report
Mohamed A. El-Erian/Asharq Al Awsat/December 03/16
The monthly U.S. jobs report for November that will be released on Friday is unlikely to be so bad that the Federal Open Market Committee would upset market expectations and refrain from hiking interest rates in mid-December.
Instead, the data are likely to validate what fixed-income markets have already priced in when it comes to short-term interest rates.
The report, however, could contain insights that help shed light on the subsequent path of policy interest rates.
Since the FOMC last met in early November, the balance of risks to the U.S. economy has shifted to the upside, for both growth and inflation. This has been accompanied by signs of further strength in the labor market, which is getting a lot closer to “full employment,” and from stock markets that are trading at (or very close to) record highs. In addition, the economic and financial headwinds from abroad have significantly abated.
It is not surprising then that markets have taken the probability of a December rate hike to a virtual certainty, despite the cloud associated with the Dec. 4 Italian referendum. Indeed, short of a huge European dislocation, the November employment snapshot would have to be truly awful to dissuade the Fed from hiking for the second time in 10 years.
By “awful” I mean some combination of low monthly job creation (50,000 or less), large downward revisions to the employment data of previous months, a deceleration in annual wage growth to below 2 percent, and a participation rate that, by increasing by 0.3 percentage points or more, signals significant remaining slack in the labor market.
That combination is very unlikely, particularly given the information about the economy from other recently released indicators, including this week’s data on consumer sentiment, third-quarter gross domestic product, the Chicago Purchasing Managers’ Index and the ADP numbers). What’s much more likely is a jobs report that validates strong and widespread expectations that the Fed will move on rates in a couple of weeks.
This does not mean, however, that the monthly jobs report has lost its ability to influence policy and market prices. Although the timing of the next rate hike holds little mystery, what comes after remains uncertain.
Despite the recent widening in yields, markets continue to expect a path of higher rates that is slower than the pace implied by the Fed’s “blue dots,” which represent the expectations of individual members of the Open Market Committee. Whether convergence occurs (as well as when and at what level) will be determined by inflationary expectations. And these will be heavily influenced by the tightness of the labor market, particularly when it comes to wage growth.
At least for now, some of the anticipation and excitement has been taken away from the highly watched data release on the first Friday of the month. Don’t let that fool you. The employment report remains an important input for assessing the future of monetary policy.