LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

December 07/16

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletin16/english.december07.16.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
So also the Son of Man is about to suffer at their hands
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew 17/09-13/:"As they were coming down the mountain, Jesus ordered them, ‘Tell no one about the vision until after the Son of Man has been raised from the
dead.’And the disciples asked him, ‘Why, then, do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?’He replied, ‘Elijah is indeed coming and will restore all things; but I tell you that Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but they did to him whatever they pleased. So also the Son of Man is about to suffer at their hands.’
Then the disciples understood that he was speaking to them about John the Baptist."

So then he has mercy on whomsoever he chooses, and he hardens the heart of whomsoever he chooses.
Letter to the Romans 09/14-18/:"What then are we to say? Is there injustice on God’s part? By no means! For he says to Moses, ‘I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion. ’So it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God who shows mercy. For the scripture says to Pharaoh, ‘I have raised you up for the very purpose of showing my power in you, so that my name may be proclaimed in all the earth. So then he has mercy on whomsoever he chooses, and he hardens the heart of whomsoever he chooses."

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on December 06-07/16
A Donald Trump Anti-ISIS Campaign That Spares Assad Would Only Empower Hezbollah/David Daoud/Newsweek/December 06/16
Stubbornness, procrastination in Cabinet, election law/Ghinwa Obeid|/The Daily Star/December 06/16
The Hopes, Fears and Lost Role of Lebanon’s Christians/Dalal Saoud/The Arab Weekly/December 06/16
The West's Politically Correct Dictatorship/It Has Blinded Us to the Real Danger: Radical Islam/Giulio Meotti/Gatestone Institute/December 06/16
Erdogan's Gritted-Teeth Peace with Israel/Equates IDF with Hitler/Burak Bekdil//Gatestone Institute/December 06/16
Is Assad the Author of ISIS? Did Iran Blow Up Assef Shawkat?/Ehsani2/For Syria Comment/December 06/16
Qatari Writer, Dr. 'Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari,: Religious Extremism's Roots Are In Muslim Society, Not External Elements/MEMRI/December 06/16
How does the ‘mad dog’ think/Mamdouh AlMuhaini/Al Arabiya/December 06/16
Let’s make Saudi Vision 2030 a reality/Khaled Almaeena/Al Arabiya/December 06/16

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on December 06-07/16
Aoun Has No 'Fears' over Cabinet Delay, Vows to Confront 'Parties Benefiting from Corruption'
Bassil Says Alliance with Hizbullah 'Firm', Rejects 1960 Electoral Law, Extension
Zahra: No One Has Right to Determine Share of LF in Cabinet
Al-Rahi Hopes New Govt. Will be 'Christmas Gift' to Lebanese
Mustaqbal Stresses Importance of 'Facilitating PM-Designate's Mission'
Beirut-Bound Traveler Held in Abidjan over Large Cocaine Haul
Cellphone Dealer Kamel Ahmaz Released on Bail
Hariri Emphasizes Lebanese Back Army and Security Forces
General Security Arrests Syrian over Links to Terror Group
Army Searches for Culprits behind Bqaa Sifrin Attack
Aoun to guard strategic agreements: FPM MP
Rifi calls Kahwaji, offers condolences over martyrdom of soldier
Hariri's press office: Visit of Khayat journalists did not tackle financial issue
Aoun, family light Christmas tree at Baabda Palace
Embassy of Sudan: Lebanese President receives credential papers of Ambassador Ali Sadek
Fadlallah: Communication Committee concludes discussion on new Lebanese Information law
Mikati presses for full implementation of Taef
A Donald Trump Anti-ISIS Campaign That Spares Assad Would Only Empower Hezbollah
Stubbornness, procrastination in Cabinet, election law
Minister Dion announces significant support for peace, security and stability in Lebanon
The Hopes, Fears and Lost Role of Lebanon’s Christians
Lebanese Women Protest against Rape Law
2 Million Israelis Exposed to Rocket Fire, Says Report

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on December 06-07/16
Syria Government Says no Aleppo Ceasefire without Rebel Exit
Merkel Says Situation in Aleppo is a 'Disgrace' for West
Kerry Denies U.S. Stalling on Aleppo Talks with Russia
Aleppo 'Twitter Girl' Safe after Family Flees Army Advance
Regime Seizes Five New Rebel Districts in Syria's Aleppo
Head of Radio Station Murdered in Iraq's Kirkuk
Israeli Far Right Hails Bill to Legalize Settler Homes
Bernard Cazeneuve Named French PM after Valls Quits
Egypt Says International Organs Trade Network Arrested
Suspected IS Jihadists Arrested in Yemen's Aden
Saudi Sentences 15 to Death for Spying for Iran
Two Wounded as Hamas Clashes with Gaza Hardliners
Iran Regime Fears the Aftermath of U.S. Elections and New Sanctions Law
Iran: Anti-government slogans in Tehran and Saveh universities
Iran: Students' protests in various cities on the occasion of 'Student Day'
Despite the Lifting of Sanctions, Why Iran's Economy Has Plunged Into Recession? – Part 2
Iran: No News About the Fate of a Political Prisoner
Iran: The Internet Contributes to Rebellion and Attraction to the MEK
Presidential Election Example of Iran-Saudi Cooperation
Rouhani: Sanctions Renewal Shows US Still 'Enemy'

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on December 06-07/16
Angela Merkel calls for burqa ban, says refugee crisis “must never be repeated”.
Palestinian Authority TV: “Slice open the enemy’s chest – slice it!”.
Jimmy Carter, Lord Caradon, the Palestine Mandate, and U.N. Resolution 242 (Part III).
French town orders removal of Virgin Mary statue, but burkini okay.
UK government’s solution to integration problem: have Muslims swear allegiance to UK.
St. Louis Muslim told coworkers he was in ISIS, could blow up their job site.
Obama administration fails to check immigrants against FBI databases, approves citizenship.
Ohio: At sentencing for Capitol bomb plot, Muslim screams “Allah is in control, not this judge!”.
Detroit: Muslim “intended to use explosives to kill, injure people”.
Robert Spencer: If Trump Proposal Had Been In Place, OSU Jihad Attack Wouldn’t Have Happened.

Links From Christian Today Site for on December 06-07/16
Notional Christian' Vote Was The Key To Donald Trump Election Victory.
Burqa Ban In Germany 'Wherever Legally Possible', Says Merkel.
Too Many Left Behind By Globalisation, Says Bank Of England's Mark Carney.
World Council Of Churches Activist Refused Entry To Israel And Deported.
MP Abused By Man On Trial For Alleged Anti-Semitic Abuse.
Trump Administration Will Herald Creationism And Climate-Change Scepticism In Schools, Critics Warn.
Muslim Groups Criticise 'Unfair' Focus On Islam In Casey Report.
Archbishop Of York Urges Churches To Join Christmas Appeal.
You Must End Your Brawling, Pope's Doctrine Chief Tells Cardinals.
Mexico 'In Denial' Over Thousands Of Evangelicals Forced Out Of Homes.
US Church Sprayed With Bible Verse About The Killing Of 185,000 Assyrian Christians.
Some Peers Want Bishops To Lose Their Seats In The Lords. Are They Right?.

Latest Lebanese Related News published on December 06-07/16
Aoun Has No 'Fears' over Cabinet Delay, Vows to Confront 'Parties Benefiting from Corruption'
Naharnet/December 06/16/President Michel Aoun announced Tuesday that he is not concerned over the ongoing delay in the cabinet formation process as he pledged anew to fight the rampant corruption in state institutions. “We do not have fears over the delay in the cabinet formation process, this is a minor issue, and we hope it will be formed soon so that we achieve the goals we have declared, topped by fighting corruption,” Aoun said. “We hope the coming days will be promising and we hope we'll be able to improve the situations... Of course there are parties who were benefiting from the situation and they won't accept change easily,” the president added. But he vowed to “engage in a battle with these parties,” while noting that “they will stir a political crisis or other crises in order to sway public opinion and push it to reject our thoughts and actions.” “However, we must resist and urge people to back our approach and not to endorse misconceptions,” Aoun added. Aoun's election after two and a half years of presidential void and Saad Hariri's appointment as premier-designate have raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees. In addition to pledges of economic growth and security, Aoun said in his oath of office that Lebanon must work to ensure Syrian refugees "can return quickly" to their country. Aoun also pledged to endorse an "independent foreign policy" and to protect Lebanon from "the fires burning across the region."

Bassil Says Alliance with Hizbullah 'Firm', Rejects 1960 Electoral Law, Extension
Naharnet/December 06/16/ Free Patriotic Movement chief Jebran Bassil stressed Tuesday that the alliance between the FPM and Hizbullah is still “firm,” as he voiced rejection of a new extension of the parliament's term or the adoption of the 1960 electoral law. The alliance with Hizbullah is “among our firm principles and our alliance is the result of honesty, commitment, sacrifice, efforts and blood,” Bassil said after the weekly meeting of the Change and Reform bloc, reassuring that “there will not be a Shiite-Christian rift, neither now nor in the future.”“We will not renounce it over syndical, parliamentary or presidential elections or over any government. It is prohibited to harm this understanding and our relation with Hizbullah is firmer than ever,” Bassil added. As for the FPM's rising alliance with the Lebanese Forces, which has alarmed several parties especially AMAL Movement, Bassil reassured that the Christian rapprochement is not aimed at “eliminating anyone.” “The proof is that we are calling for an electoral law based on proportional representation,” he noted. “We agreed with the LF on the return of Christians to the State, not on the return of the State to Christians,” he added. As for the stalled cabinet formation process, Bassil said the discussion over the cabinet “goes beyond ministerial portfolios because we are witnessing a new political situation -- although some are refusing to acknowledge this.” “We call for the representation of everyone in the government – Kataeb (Party), Marada (Movement), Syrian Social National Party, (MP Talal) Arslan and March 8's Sunnis – even in a 24-member cabinet,” Bassil emphasized. He also underlined that the FPM “will not allow anyone to kill the new momentum in Lebanon.”“We have discussed the idea of separating the issue of the government from the electoral law,” Bassil said. “We'll embark on this through contacting all political forces in order to reject any extension of the parliament's term and to reject the 1960 law and to push for a law based on proportional representation,” Bassil added.

Zahra: No One Has Right to Determine Share of LF in Cabinet
Naharnet/December 06/16/Lebanese Forces MP Antoine Zahra said on Tuesday no body has the right to determine the share to be allotted to the LF in the new cabinet or stage a veto against its representation. “Nobody is allowed to identify the Lebanese Forces share in the cabinet and stage a veto against it,” said Zahra in an interview on Tele Liban. “House Speaker Nabih Berri hasn't established the public works ministry at his home. We made concessions when needed to do, we stepped aside also when needed for that, yet this time we won't abandon our rights and demands,” stressed Zahra. Zahra was referring to the fight over the public works portfolio between the LF and Speaker Nabih Berri. “The peak of the iceberg concerning the cabinet formation issue is the distribution of portfolios, not the challenge over obtaining the portfolios,” he added, indicating that all political forces want an approval on a new electoral law. Wrangling over the distribution of ministerial portfolios among Lebanon's political parties has so far delayed the cabinet line-up. Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri was designated on November 3 to form a new government, a task that has proven to be thorny in light of fight over the so-called sovereign and key portfolios.

Al-Rahi Hopes New Govt. Will be 'Christmas Gift' to Lebanese
Naharnet/December 06/16/Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rahi called on the political parties on Tuesday to form the new government before Christmas.
Lebanon overcame a difficult period through the election of a president and we hope the government will be formed before Christmas so that it be the Christmas gift,” al-Rahi said. Michel Aoun's election as president and Saad Hariri's appointment as premier-designate have raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees. But Aoun and Hariri are still struggling to put together a new cabinet amid conflicting demands from the political forces that are seeking to join the unity government. Horsetrading is still revolving around the so-called services-related ministerial portfolios, mainly public works and telecommunications. Speaker Nabih Berri, who is negotiating on behalf of the Hizbullah-led March 8 camp, is clinging to the finance and public works portfolios while also insisting that the Marada Movement must get a key portfolio.

Mustaqbal Stresses Importance of 'Facilitating PM-Designate's Mission'

Naharnet/December 06/16/Al-Mustaqbal parliamentary bloc on Tuesday called on the political parties to facilitate the formation of the new government, warning that any further delay would impede the momentum that started after the election of President Michel Aoun. In a statement issued after its weekly meeting, the bloc called for “facilitating the mission of the premier-designate” so that the new government can start “addressing the country's affairs, especially amid the tense and deteriorating situations in the region.”It also warned that procrastination in forming the government would prevent a “strong start” for the new presidential tenure. Aoun's election as president and Hariri's appointment as premier-designate have raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees. But Aoun and Hariri are still struggling to put together a new cabinet amid conflicting demands from the political forces that are seeking to join the unity government. Horsetrading is still revolving around the so-called services-related ministerial portfolios, mainly public works and telecommunications. Speaker Nabih Berri, who is negotiating on behalf of the Hizbullah-led March 8 camp, is clinging to the finance and public works portfolios while also insisting that the Marada Movement must get a key portfolio.

Beirut-Bound Traveler Held in Abidjan over Large Cocaine Haul
Naharnet/December 06/16/A man, likely Lebanese, was arrested Tuesday by Ivory Coast's authorities at Abidjan's airport after a large haul of cocaine was found in his luggage, Lebanon's National News Agency reported. He was captured before the departure to Beirut of a Middle East Airlines plane that he was supposed to board, NNA said. The flight, which was scheduled to take off at 11:00 am local time, was delayed to 2:00 pm, as the passengers, most of them Lebanese, were forced to wait inside the plane before being interrogated by the airport authorities, the agency added.

Cellphone Dealer Kamel Ahmaz Released on Bail
Naharnet/December 06/16/Top cellphone dealer Kamel Ahmaz who was detained in November on charges of smuggling mobile cellphone was released Tuesday on a LL15 million bail, media reports said. Amhaz was arrested following the detention of a number of airport security personnel on charges of turning a blind eye to suitcases containing smuggled cellphones in return for bribes. Amhaz and two accomplices, Issam Amhaz and Abdullah, were arrested on charges of smuggling phones into the country. The U.S. Treasury Department had in July 2014 slapped sanctions on Kamel and Issam Amhaz and their Beirut-based Stars Group Holding for electronics on charges of “procuring sophisticated military equipment for Hizbullah.”According to the U.S. Treasury, Stars Group Holding is based in Beirut and has subsidiaries in China and the UAE.

Hariri Emphasizes Lebanese Back Army and Security Forces
Naharnet/December 06/16/Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri assured on Tuesday that the Lebanese will stay united behind the army in its confrontation against aggression following an attack at an army position in north Lebanon that killed one soldier and wounded another. “We will remain united to face any assault on our army and security forces,” said Hariri via Twitter. His comments came after an armed attack targeted an army checkpoint in the northern Dinniyeh district that left one soldier dead and another wounded. Hariri extended “warm condolences to the family of the deceased soldier Amer al-Mohammed, to the families in his hometown Mashta Hassan and to the army leadership.” Unknown gunmen attacked an army position in the Bqaa Sifrin town in Dinniyeh. Al-Mohammed, was killed and another soldier, Abdul Kader Naaman was wounded.

General Security Arrests Syrian over Links to Terror Group
The Directorate of General Security arrested a Syrian national suspected of having links to a terror group, the directorate said in a statement on Tuesday. “In line with efforts to track the activities of terror groups and sleeper cells, the General Security detained Syrian national Aa.M. against the backdrop of having links to terror groups,” said a General Security statement. Upon investigations with him the suspect admitted his links and his accomplice in the suicidal dual explosion that hit Bourj al-Barajneh on November 12, 2015, and another explosion in Dimas Yaafour in Syria on December 18 of the same year. The detainee was referred to the competent judiciary and investigations are still underway to pursue other involved individuals.

Army Searches for Culprits behind Bqaa Sifrin Attack
Naharnet/December 06/16/Lebanese army units carried out extensive raids in north Lebanon in search of perpetrators involved in the armed attack against an army checkpoint in the Dinniyeh town of Bqaa Sifrin that left one soldier killed and another wounded. “The army is running investigations to uncover the circumstances and the end of the terrorist attack at this particular timing. We do not deal lightly with this aggression. We consider it dangerous. It puts the army in front of the duty to increase readiness to prevent terrorists from achieving their goals to spread chaos in Lebanon starting from the north area,” a military source told al-Joumhouria daily on condition of anonymity. “The army gave directions to its troops to take the highest level of readiness and alert, to uncover the perpetrators, nail them and bring them to justice. We will not allow terrorists to inflict harm on our security we will track them to their hideouts,” added the source. Another security source told the daily that the army has already “detained seven suspects linked to the Islamic State organization.”The source slammed reports circulating in media outlets which claimed that the attack was a reaction to a raid carried out by the army troops in the town, he said: “The army is determined to resolve the case.”On Monday, unknown gunmen attacked an Infantry Brigade in the town of Bqaa Sifrin killing Amer Mustafa al-Mohammed and wounding Abdul Kader Naaman.

Aoun to guard strategic agreements: FPM MP
The Daily Star/December 06/16/BEIRUT: Lebanese President Michel Aoun will respect and safeguard national agreements with key allies, Free Patriotic Movement MP Ibrahim Kanaan said Tuesday. Kanaan said via Twitter that strength of Aoun’s presidency and his political strategy "were based on his extraordinary capability to gather and safeguard his national understandings, in particular Mar Mikhael and Maarab, and not the other way around." Mar Mikhael refers to a memorandum of understanding between the FPM and Hezbollah. It eventually became strategic alliance between the two groups that was signed in 2006 by Aoun and Hezbollah chief Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah at the Mar Mikhael church in Beirut’s southern suburb of Chiyah. Maarab refers to the understanding reached between the FPM and the Lebanese Forces in January 2016, ending years of division and political feuds between the Christian parties. Aoun was elected on Oct. 31, ending 2-1/2 years of presidential deadlock. He then tasked Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri with forming a Cabinet.
However, Hariri’s mission has faced challenges due to overlapping demands from rival parties over appointments to key ministries.

Rifi calls Kahwaji, offers condolences over martyrdom of soldier
 Tue 06 Dec 2016/NNA - Caretaker Justice Minister, Ashraf Rifi, contacted on Tuesday Army Chief, Jean Kahwaji and offered condolences over the martyrdom of the Army soldier, Amer Moustafa. "This terrorist act targets stability," Rifi said, stressing the need to support the military institutions. 

Hariri's press office: Visit of Khayat journalists did not tackle financial issue
 Tue 06 Dec 2016/NNA - "The visit of Karma and Karim Khayat to Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri did not touch on financial issue," the press office said in a statement on Tuesday. "The aim of the visit was to invite Hariri to take part in a social and humanitarian program prepared by "Al-Jadeed" during the holidays," the statement concluded.
 
Aoun, family light Christmas tree at Baabda Palace
 Tue 06 Dec 2016/NNA - President of the Republic, Michel Aoun lit the Christmas tree on Tuesday at Baabda Palace with his family. The ceremony was held for the first time since December 2013, and in the presence of the senior staff of the Directorate-General in the presidency and the workers.
 
Embassy of Sudan: Lebanese President receives credential papers of Ambassador Ali Sadek
 Tue 06 Dec 2016/NNA - "The Lebanese President, Michel Aoun, received on Tuesday at Baabda Palace the credential papers of the Ambassador Ali Sadek and in the presence of Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil," the Embassy of Sudan in Lebanon said in a statement on Tuesday. In response to a question from Aoun about the situation in Darfur, the Ambassador said "the security and humanitarian situation and the political reconciliations are going well".
 
Fadlallah: Communication Committee concludes discussion on new Lebanese Information law
 Tue 06 Dec 2016/NNA - MP Hassan Fadlallah said on Tuesday that the Information and Communication Committee concluded discussion on the new Lebanese Information law and approved all its articles, awaiting the General Authority’s ratification. MP Fadlallah’s words came during the committee’s meeting at the parliament in presence of MPs Ammar Houri, Kamel Al Rifai and Hani Kobeissi, Director General of the Ministry of Information, Hassan Falha, and other concerned dignitaries. "We say now to all Lebanese media that we have a new unilateral law," he added. "This Committee worked hard since 2011 to reach today a new law that contains important and basic contents for the media in Lebanon."
 
Mikati presses for full implementation of Taef
Tue 06 Dec 2016/NNA - Former Prime Minister Najib Mikati on Tuesday stressed that The Taef accord should be fully implemented, prior to making any judgment on its content. "Imperfections in Taef Accord have never been in the content of this accord but rather in its practice and application," Mikati said in his delivered word at a dialogue gathering organized by University Professors Forum and "Azem Youth" titled: "Taef ... An opportunity which should not be lost" at the Faculty of Law and Political Science at the Lebanese University (Branch III), in the presence of academic figures and university students. "The political practice in the post-Taef phase was not sound in all its manifestations," Mikati remarked, underlining the dire need for the building of a state on proper and truthful fundamentals set in the Taef Accord, which laid the foundations for a nation bringing all the Lebanese together and constituted a prelude to a genuine national partnership.

A Donald Trump Anti-ISIS Campaign That Spares Assad Would Only Empower Hezbollah
David Daoud/Newsweek/December 06/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/06/david-daoudnewsweek-a-donald-trump-anti-isis-campaign-that-spares-assad-would-only-empower-hezbollah/
http://www.newsweek.com/trump-anti-isis-campaign-spares-assad-will-only-empower-hezbollah-528559
In late October, Hezbollah scored an achievement by pushing through its favored candidate, Michel Aoun, to the Lebanese presidency. Six thousand miles away, the group now stands to indirectly benefit from the results of another election: America’s.
It’s not that President-elect Donald Trump has any love for the militant group Islamic State (ISIS)—which has spilled the blood of hundreds of Americans—or for its Iranian patron. On the contrary, he has promised to cripple the group by “starving” its funding. But during his stormy presidential election campaign, Trump consistently cast doubt over the wisdom of deposing Bashar al-Assad—Hezbollah’s second-leading benefactor after Tehran—in Syria’s civil war.
And despite the clear threat ISIS poses to U.S. citizens and interests, Trump’s strategy of fighting ISIS to the exclusion of countering Assad would inadvertently place Hezbollah in a position of unprecedented strength in its home base of Lebanon.
The group already scored a coup in Lebanon with Aoun’s recent election. Aoun, a Maronite Christian, had earned the Shiite organization’s friendship by consistently adopting policies favoring its domestic and regional ambitions. Hezbollah repaid the favor by shutting down Lebanon’s political process for two years, until his opponents acquiesced to electing him president. Now, even after the election, Hezbollah appears to be obstructing the formation of pro-Western prime minister Saad Hariri’s new cabinet until it achieves sufficient concessions guaranteeing its control of the government.
And just like Hezbollah got its choice of president in Beirut, it is committed to maintaining the rule of his counterpart in Damascus. In that, Trump—in spite of his promises to punish Hezbollah and its Iranian masters—may end up the group’s inadvertent partner.
The president-elect has said ISIS is a greater threat to the U.S. than Assad. That view appears to overlook the Syrian leader’s alliance with Iran, and the Shiite militias operating in Syria that have the blood of hundreds of American soldiers on their hands. Trump cites the precedents of Iraq, Libya and Egypt to suggest that ISIS or other extremists would replace the ruler if he were deposed, and therefore opposes military action against his regime. Assad has been unsurprisingly receptive to the remarks, calling the president-elect a “natural ally,” with his officials signaling readiness to cooperate with the incoming administration.
Likewise, Hezbollah’s fortunes stand to improve. To preserve its military and political supremacy in Lebanon—and indeed, its very survival—Hezbollah has backed Assad during the five-and-a-half years of the Syrian Civil War. Throughout, it has fought tenaciously, and—along with Iran’s Revolutionary Guard—facilitated the influx of thousands of Iranian proxy fighters into the country. Since 2013, Hezbollah has lost 1,600 fighters in Syria, compared with its approximately 1,200 fatalities against Israel between 1985 and 2000. Once the darling of the Arab world for confronting the Jewish state, its support of Assad has made it a pariah, with the Arab League and Gulf Cooperation Council sanctioning it as a terror organization.
Those sacrifices, painful as they are, have not deterred Hezbollah, as the costs to the group would be far higher should Assad fall and be replaced by a hostile, presumably Sunni-majority, Syrian government.
Damascus serves as Hezbollah’s lifeline to Iran ensuring Tehran’s flow of weapons to it and acting as a hub for fighters traveling to the Islamic Republic for advanced training. Syria is also Hezbollah’s gateway into Iraq, where for over a decade the group’s Unit 3800 has created Shiite militias to further Iran’s regional project—and which have killed hundreds of American soldiers. As a critical part of Iran’s ‘Axis of Resistance,’ Assad shields Hezbollah from regional adversaries like Israel and Sunni Arab states, as well as pro-Western Lebanese political forces.
Moreover, for over two decades, Damascus has acted as the guarantor of Hezbollah’s hegemony over Lebanon, and as the group’s strategic depth beyond its home country’s narrow borders. Even after the withdrawal of Syrian forces from Lebanon in the 2005 Cedar Revolution, Assad used his intelligence apparatus, assassinations and political pressure to weaken the Shiite party’s opponents. Today, it continues supplying the group with Russian and domestically produced weapons and bases for arms storage.
Assad’s victory would end the existential threat Syria’s war poses for Hezbollah, freeing up the immense resources the organization has devoted to that conflict. Its dominance in Lebanon now secured with Aoun’s election, Hezbollah could better devote its energy to threaten Washington’s allies and erode its regional interests to further Iran’s—much as it has already in Iraq and Yemen.
ISIS has murdered Americans domestically and abroad, undermined U.S. interests and threatened U.S. allies like Egypt, Israel, Saudi Arabia and Jordan. Trump’s objective of using American military power to defeat the group is therefore sound. However, doing so while allowing Assad to remain in power would turn the laudable goal of ISIS’s destruction into a net strategic loss for Washington. Instead of starving Hezbollah, it would empower that implacable enemy of the United States—one which has already proven itself a formidable threat to Americans.
***David Daoud is an Arabic-language research analyst focusing on Lebanon and Hezbollah at the Washington, D.C.-based think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

Stubbornness, procrastination in Cabinet, election law
Ghinwa Obeid|/The Daily Star/December 06/16
BEIRUT: Stubbornness of Lebanese politicians still hinders Cabinet’s formation while officials Monday escalated verbal battles over a proposed replacement for the electoral system, warning that using the current 1960 law would constitute a blow to fair representation. Political sources told The Daily Star that both the Free Patriotic Movement and the Marada Movement are still standing on ceremony over a possible meeting between the leaders of both groups.
“It appears that no concession will be made by either side,” one source said. “It seems that it is now a matter of stubbornness by some leaders.” President Michel Aoun has issued a statement urging all parties with concerns over government formation to meet with him to resolve outstanding issues.The statement was seen as an implicit invitation to Marada Movement head MP Sleiman Frangieh to visit Baabda Palace but didn’t specifically name him.The movement rebuffed the conciliatory gesture by the FPM founder and new president and said it was waiting on a formal invitation before Frangieh would visit the president. However, Aoun appeared unwilling to make the general invitation specific by formally inviting Frangieh. Neither side has signaled a willingness to concede over the impasse.
Aoun’s general invitation came a day after caretaker Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil met with Hezbollah’s senior security official Wafiq Safa to discuss ways to bring Frangieh on board with the new Cabinet.
Hezbollah, according to the sources, is attempting to solve the differences and is placed to mediate given that the party is allied with both Aoun and Frangieh.Aoun was elected on Oct. 31, ending two and a half years of presidential deadlock. He then tasked Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri with forming a Cabinet.However, Hariri’s mission has been challenged by appointments to the coveted key ministries. The Marada Movement insists on being represented in the new government with one of three important ministerial posts – Telecommunications, Energy or Public Works. So far this has held-up the formation of a new government. Both the Amal Movement and Hezbollah also insists the Marada Movement is represented.
Another hurdle is the ongoing dispute between Speaker Nabih Berri and the Lebanese Forces over who should get the Public Works Ministry. Berri has long insisted his Amal Movement retain control of both the Finance and Public Works ministries. However, the LF, which is allied with the FPM and Hariri’s Future Movement, is also demanding the Public Works Ministry along with other portfolios.Separately, various parties expressed strong views over the electoral law governing upcoming parliamentary elections, scheduled for spring 2017. The issue is over using the winner-take-all 1960 electoral vote used in the 2009 election versus finding a new system. Most parties publicly endorse holding the vote with a new electoral law.
In a statement denouncing media reports that accuse the LF of flip-flopping on the electoral issue, the party said it one of the main opponents of the 1960 law. The LF, the statement added, was the first to call for a new electoral law after 2009’s parliamentary elections.
The party expressed surprise that some have accused it of backing the 1960 law and stressed that the party considers the struggle for a new electoral law the “the mother of all battles.”“The LF had fought, and is fighting, the fiercest political battle in order to drop the current law that leads to distortion in the Parliamentary representation across the country,” the statement explained. The 1960 law splits the country by administrative districts.
Lebanese parties are divided between adopting proportional representation or hybrid electoral laws that include aspects of the proportional and majoritarian systems. The LF, Progressive Socialist Party and Future Movement have proposed a hybrid electoral law that would see 60 MPs elected on proportional representation and the remaining 68 MPs on the current 1960 law. The Amal Movement has proposed its own version that would equally divide MPs elected by each system at 64 each. The LF statement added that the position presented by the LF, PSP and the Future Movement comes from the its insistence on a new voting system. The LF then accused those behind the claims of orchestrating a systematic campaign against the party since Aoun’s election.
The Kataeb Party also called for a more fair and balanced alternative to the 1960 law. “The Kataeb Party demands – and urgently – the burial of the 1960 law that ... eliminates a large part of the Lebanese [electorate],” the party said in a statement, issued after its political office held a meeting chaired by leader MP Sami Gemayel. The party also expressed its surprise that there were disputes over Cabinet formation and over ministries. “The party calls ... for hastening the formation of government that’s priority is to pass an electoral law and budget,” the statement read.
In a televised interview this week, Change and Reform bloc MP Ghassan Moukheiber called on lawmakers to come together to discuss a new electoral law. “But, if no Cabinet is formed soon and therefore no new electoral law is achieved, then unfortunately there is no choice but to hold the Parliamentary elections based the 1960 law,” Moukheiber added, according to El-Nashra news agency. Meanwhile Monday, a Chinese delegation met at Hariri’s Downtown residence to discuss the ongoing situation in Syria.
China and Lebanon are friends and have good cooperation on international and regional affairs. They also have good coordination on the Syrian issue,” China’s special envoy to Syria Xie Xiaoyan, said in a statement.
Xiaoyan explained that the fight against terrorism was vital and stressed that China and Lebanon will continue their discussions over Syria.“China has provided aid to the Syrian people, including the Syrian refugees in Lebanon, totaling [$64.3 million],” Xie said. “At the beginning of this year during the tour of the Chinese president in the Middle East, he announced additional aid to the people of this region totaling [$30.7 million].” 

Minister Dion announces significant support for peace, security and stability in Lebanon
Minister Dion announces $8 million in security, defence and stabilization assistance for Lebanon as he concludes a successful five-day visit
December 5, 2016 – Beirut, Lebanon - Global Affairs Canada
The Honourable Stephane Dion, Minister of Foreign Affairs, today concluded a productive five-day visit to Lebanon and announced new support Canada will be providing to reinforce the country’s security and stability. The announcement includes projects to help Lebanon cope with the pressures associated with the significant influx of refugees that is a result of the brutal conflict in Syria. The funding also supports Lebanon’s new government to build its own capacity to provide critical services to all Lebanese people.
Canada’s assistance will help foster social stability by engaging Lebanese and Syrian women and will contribute to Lebanon’s security by preventing the expansion of Daesh into the country. It will also directly support the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), reduce crime and empower youth against extremism. These projects are funded by Global Affairs Canada and are delivered in partnership with Canada’s National Defence, the United Nations and other organizations.
While in Lebanon, Minister Dion held productive meetings with Michel Aoun, Lebanon’s president, and with Saad Hariri, Lebanon’s prime minister-designate, and held extensive discussions with his counterpart, Gebran Bassil, Lebanon’s Minister of Foreign Affairs and Emigrants. The meetings focused on the political and security developments in the region and on Canada’s support for enhancing economic, social and political resilience in Lebanon. Minister Dion also met with representatives of multilateral organizations that Canada is supporting to hear how assistance and support are provided to both refugees and host communities in Lebanon.
During his visit, Minister Dion visited two informal tented settlements for which Canada is providing humanitarian assistance to help meet the basic education, food, health, water, shelter and protection needs of Syrian and Palestinian refugees.
He also visited the Rayak Air Base and the LAF Land Border Regiment along the border with Syria, where he announced Canada’s contribution of winter and mountain gear for the LAF so they can protect the border with Syria, and reinforced Canada’s support and appreciation for the LAF’s efforts in protecting Lebanon’s stability and security.
Quotes
Canada and Lebanon have a strong and deeply rooted relationship, and our two countries continue to work closely together to achieve peace, security and stability in the Middle East.
We hope Canada’s support will help Lebanon and its host communities build resilience and cope with the ongoing crisis in the region.”
- Stéphane Dion, Minister of Foreign Affairs
Quick facts
Lebanon has the highest number of refugees per capita in the world, representing close to a quarter of its population. There are more than 1 million UNHCR-registered refugees in Lebanon, with the vast majority originating from Syria.
Canada has resettled more than 35,000 Syrian refugees in Canada since November 2015, almost half of them coming from Lebanon.

The Hopes, Fears and Lost Role of Lebanon’s Christians
Dalal Saoud/The Arab Weekly/December 06/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/06/dalal-saoudthe-arab-weekly-the-hopes-fears-and-lost-role-of-lebanons-christians/
http://www.thearabweekly.com/News-&-Analysis/7235/The-hopes%2C-fears-and-lost-role-of-Lebanon%E2%80%99s-Christians
Beirut — Now that strong Christian leader Michel Aoun is settled in the presidential palace, a general feeling of hope has engulfed Lebanon’s Christians for he is the one who has long promised to restore their rights and end their growing frustration for having been marginalised since the end of the 1975-90 civil war.
The Christians have seen their presence, influence and role decline in the tiny multi-confessional country. Their political dominance came to an end with the 1989 Taif accords, the national reconciliation agreement that ended the country’s civil war and established equal power-sharing between Christians and Muslims.
The redistribution of powers under the Saudi-brokered Taif accords put in place a fairer formula by introducing constitutional reforms long demanded by the Muslims. But that left the Christians bitter. With such a political confessional system, no sect would be eternally happy and each one would attempt to tilt the balance of power once gaining enough strength.
The Lebanese suffered a long and destructive war but failed to get rid of their sectarian system and establish a civil state. As late prime minister Rafik Hariri told this reporter shortly before he took power in 1992: “Look around you (the Arab region), this is the best we could achieve.” He was referring to the Taif agreement, which is seen by some today as a good model to stop the raging wars in Syria, Yemen and Libya.
“We stopped counting,” Hariri, a Sunni Muslim, then said and kept repeating until he was killed in a massive explosion that targeted his convoy in Beirut on February 14, 2005. By that, he meant whatever demographic changes would occur; the Christians and Muslims would keep on having an equal share of power.
Hariri’s assassination and popular demonstrations that broke out forced Syria to pull its troops out of Lebanon on April 26, 2005, ending 29 years of heavy-handed control of the country. Shortly afterwards, Christian strongmen made a long-awaited comeback, with Aoun returning to the country from 15 years in exile and Samir Geagea, leader of the Lebanese Forces militia, pardoned and released from prison after spending 11 years in solitary confinement.
With Syria’s influence almost out of the equation, the Lebanese found themselves trapped in a struggle over who would rule the country and how to do so, being divided between the emerging pro-Syria/Iran March 8 and pro-Saudi/US March 14 alliances.
“From 1990 till 2005, one cannot speak of power sharing in Lebanon because the country was under Syrian rule,” said Bassel Salloukh, an associate professor of political science at the Lebanese American University in Beirut. “It was really after the Hariri assassination and the withdrawal of the Syrian troops that we started discovering the problem of post-war power-sharing, which was supposed to have been resolved with Taif but wasn’t.”
Salloukh explained that although both March 8 and March 14 were multi-sectarian alliances, the struggle was in reality between “the two most powerful actors” in these two coalitions: Shia Hezbollah and the Sunni Future Movement.
Aoun sided with Hezbollah and Geagea with Hariri’s Future Movement before they recently joined hands to create what they described as the strongest Christian force that led — when Hariri finally endorsed him — to Aoun’s election as president. Such a new emerging Christian force and a possible Christian- Sunni alliance seem to unnerve the powerful Shia Hezbollah-Amal bloc.
Despite their dwindling numbers, the Christians maintained their privileges, preserving the posts of president of the republic, army commander, Central Bank governor and army intelligence chief, in addition to their 50% quota of parliamentary seats. According to various unofficial statistics, the Christians constitute 30-40% of Lebanon’s population.
“The Christians are over-represented given their demographics but this is not the issue,” said Salloukh. He referred to the electoral laws under which “around 50% of Christian MPs are elected in Muslim-majority electoral districts”. With the increased sectarian tension, “that has exacerbated feelings among the Christian political elites of being increasingly marginalised and one has to understand this,” Salloukh said. “You have to give the Christians some kind of credibility in the system. It is not just about numbers.”
Any attempt by the Christians to return to the pre-Taif times “is impossible”, said Fares Souaid, March 14secretary-general, himself a Christian. He pointed to the Lebanese constitution, which “is the only such constitution in the Arab world where Muslims and Christians share power” and to the Muslim-Christian coexistence, which “is a message to the West that Islam is able to coexist with non-Muslims”. The Christians of Lebanon, he said, can play a positive role if they drop their fears and “return to their nationalistic speech” and “read well what’s going on in the region”. “If they act as frightened minorities looking for outside protection and minority alliances, I think they will lose the battle sooner or later,” Souaid said.
Absorbed by their own fears, divisions and interests, the Christians have probably missed a golden opportunity to try reconcile Lebanon’s Shias and Sunnis and be the driving force behind establishing a civil state.
**Dalal Saoud is the Deputy Editor-in-Chief of The Arab Weekly. She is based in Beirut.
Copyright ©2016 The Arab Weekly

Lebanese Women Protest against Rape Law
Associated Press/Naharnet/December 06/16/A dozen Lebanese women, dressed as brides in white wedding dresses stained with fake blood and bandages, gathered Tuesday outside government buildings in the capital Beirut to protest a law that allows a rapist to get away with his crime if he marries the survivor. The law, in place since the late 1940s in Lebanon, is currently being discussed in parliament after a lawmaker called for it to be repealed.  Standing before a banner that reads: "White won't cover rape," the activists are taking advantage of a reinvigorated Lebanese political life following parliament's election of a president after a two-and-half-year paralysis. They are calling on lawmakers who meet Wednesday to discuss the law to repeal it altogether. "If they don't put themselves in our shoes and feel what we feel, nothing will change," said Hayam Baker, one of the protesters, dressed in a white gown and leaning on crutches. Baker said she was sexually harassed by a male nurse several years ago as she lay in a hospital bed recovering from a life-threatening injury. "Imagine if he had raped me?" Baker said. "If my children ask how did I meet their father, what do I say? 'I married the person who raped me!' "After years of campaigning against articles dealing with violence against women, activists said they are optimistic they may be able to change them. The law states that rapists are punishable by up to seven years. If the survivor is a person with a special need, physical or mental, the penalty is increased. Article 522 then added that if the violator marries the survivor, criminal prosecution is suspended. "We reject this violation of women regardless of their age, background, environment, whether they have special needs or the circumstances of the rape," said Ghida Anani, head of Abaad, a local NGO campaigning against the law. Some supporters of the law argue that the marriage will salvage the honor of the woman and her family. During parliament discussions, some lawmakers proposed amending it and leaving the marriage option as a choice for families, Anani said. "This is like saying the victim is a victim twice, a daily victim because she has to share her life with a person that violated her, and is hence raped every day," she said.

2 Million Israelis Exposed to Rocket Fire, Says Report

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 06/16/More than two million Israelis lack adequate shelter in case of rockets fired from Gaza to the south or from Lebanon or Syria to the north, an official report said Tuesday. State comptroller Yossef Shapira, who is in charge of assessing state policies and the use of public funds, said in the report that Israel had not learned its lesson from the July-August 2014 Gaza war, when Palestinian groups fired thousands of rockets at Israel. The Israeli military believes the Palestinian Islamist movement Hamas which controls the Gaza Strip, and its allies, still have some of their arsenal and are also working to rearm. In Lebanon, Israel estimates Hizbullah has more than 100,000 rockets and missiles capable of reaching most of Israeli territory.
 "Although the military has envisaged a scenario in which Israel would be the target of thousands, or even tens of thousands of rockets and missiles, it is doubtful whether it has adequate capacity to defend the country properly," media reports quoted Shapira's report as saying. The report says it was estimated in 2012 that 27 percent of Israelis -- more than two million people -- had no protection in the event of war. But according to the comptroller, the figure was likely higher because some public shelters were unusable.
 His report criticizes the government for not having organized meetings on the protection and evacuation of civilians since the 2014 war. It also regrets that Bedouin communities in the desert within reach of rockets from Gaza have practically no protection.
 In another chapter, it criticizes the army for still not having provided a more effective early warning system for areas near Gaza, where residents during the 2014 war had just 15 seconds to find shelter. That conflict killed 2,251 people on the Palestinian side, including 551 children, and 73 people including 67 soldiers on the Israeli side, according to the U.N. Shapira is also expected to submit in coming weeks the final version of an audit reportedly on Israel's lack of readiness in the face of the threat from tunnels used in 2014 by Palestinians to infiltrate Israel. 

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on December 06-07/16
Syria Government Says no Aleppo Ceasefire without Rebel Exit
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 06/16/Syria's government on Tuesday said it would not agree to a ceasefire in Aleppo unless it guarantees a full withdrawal of rebel factions from the city. "Syria will not leave its citizens in east Aleppo to be held hostage by terrorists, and will exert every effort to liberate them," said a foreign ministry statement carried by state news agency SANA. "It therefore rejects any attempt by any side to reach a ceasefire in east Aleppo that would not include the exit of all terrorists." Since launching an all-out assault to retake Aleppo three weeks ago, Syrian government forces have seized two-thirds of the former rebel stronghold in the city's east. Tuesday's statement said the Syrian government "appreciated" the double veto by Russia and China on Monday of a UN Security Council resolution calling for a seven-day ceasefire in Aleppo. It said such a draft "grants these terrorists the opportunity to regroup and commit their crimes again." Monday's vote marked the sixth time Russia has blocked a council resolution on Syria since the conflict began in March 2011, and the fifth for China. Syria's government refers to all opponents of President Bashar al-Assad as "terrorists".

Merkel Says Situation in Aleppo is a 'Disgrace' for West
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 06/16/German Chancellor Angela Merkel said Tuesday that it was a "disgrace" that the international community had been unable to alleviate the suffering in Syria's besieged city of Aleppo. "Aleppo is a disgrace," she said in a speech to her conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party."It is a disgrace that we have been unable to establish a humanitarian corridor, but we must continue to fight for one."

Kerry Denies U.S. Stalling on Aleppo Talks with Russia
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 06/16/U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday rejected Russian charges Washington was stalling talks on a rebel withdrawal from the Syrian city of Aleppo in order to buy them time. "I'm not aware of any specific refusal," Kerry said when asked about Moscow's charges as he attended a NATO foreign ministers meeting in Brussels. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov earlier Tuesday accused the United States of bad faith over Aleppo where President Bashar Assad's forces have gained significant ground in a Moscow-backed offensive. "It looks like an attempt to buy time for the rebels to have a breather, take a pause and replenish their reserves," Lavrov said. Moscow had the impression "a serious discussion with our American partners isn't working out," he added. Lavrov on Monday said Russia and the U.S. would meet in Switzerland on either Tuesday or Wednesday to discuss a proposal put forward by Kerry last week on a complete rebel withdrawal from eastern Aleppo. The rebels dismissed any withdrawal, prompting Lavrov to warn that "they will be destroyed" if they stay. Russia and China on Monday vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution calling for a seven-day ceasefire in Aleppo. Lavrov and Kerry have met repeatedly to try and find a solution to the Syrian conflict but to no avail.

Aleppo 'Twitter Girl' Safe after Family Flees Army Advance
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 06/16/A seven-year-old Syrian girl whose Twitter account from Aleppo gained international attention has fled her home amid heavy fighting, but she and her family are safe for now, her father told AFP Tuesday. With her mother's help, Bana al-Abed had been posting heart-rending tweets in English on life in the besieged eastern districts of Syria's Aleppo. But as Syrian government forces edged closer to their home in recent days, the Abed family fled and the Twitter updates slowed. "Our house was damaged in bombardment," her father Ghassan said by phone from east Aleppo, two-thirds of which has been seized by advancing government forces. "The army got really close to our neighborhood. We fled to another part of east Aleppo and the family is doing well," he said, adding that "the internet connection is very weak here." Since late September, Bana and her mother Fatemah have garnered more than 211,000 followers by tweeting regular updates on battered Aleppo. Pictures of massive white columns of smoke, captioned "Aleppo right now. We (are) so scared," are interspersed with shots of Bana reading or scrawling in a notebook. The account captured the attention of novelist JK Rowling, who responded to a picture of Bana poring over an electronic copy of the "Harry Potter" series. On November 29, Bana's account tweeted a photograph of a heavily damaged building, with the caption: "This is our house, My beloved dolls died in the bombing of our house. I am very sad but happy to be alive." Several days later, Bana wrote that she was sick: "I have no medicine, no home, no clean water. This will make me die even before a bomb kill me." Many of the tweets have included cries for help, but the messages grew increasingly desperate at the weekend. On Sunday night, Fatemah posted: "We are sure the army is capturing us now. We will see each other another day dear world. Bye." The account fell silent for 24 hours, prompting concerned followers to launch a #WhereisBana hashtag. An update followed on Monday night, reading: "Under attack. Nowhere to go, every minute feels like death. Pray for us. Goodbye - Fatemah."
Online supporters of President Bashar Assad have bashed the account and sent Bana and her mother death threats. And in an October interview with Danish broadcaster TV2, Assad alleged that footage posted by Bana was "promoted by the terrorists or their supporters."
"It's a game now, a game of propaganda, it's a game of media. You can see anything, and you can be sympathetic with every picture and every video you see. But our mission as a government is to deal with the reality," he said.

Regime Seizes Five New Rebel Districts in Syria's Aleppo
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 06/16/Syrian government troops seized five new districts of eastern Aleppo on Tuesday, including the strategic Shaar neighborhood, a monitoring group said. According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, the fresh advance puts the government in control of more than 70 percent of the former rebel stronghold in Aleppo's east "Regime forces took full control of Shaar, Dahret Awad, Juret Awad, Karam al-Beik, and Karam al-Jabal," the Britain-based monitor said on Tuesday. "The regime is cornering the rebels even further," Observatory head Rami Abdel Rahman told AFP. Backed by allied militia, Syrian troops have waged a fierce three-week assault on eastern Aleppo, a rebel bastion since 2012. Their rapid advance has left rebels reeling in their shrinking enclave in southeast Aleppo. Abdel Rahman told AFP the government could now wage a "war of attrition" on encircled rebel groups. Syrian state news agency SANA confirmed that Syrian troops overran Shaar and several other districts on Tuesday. The fall of eastern Aleppo would deal the biggest blow yet to rebel forces since Syria's conflict erupted in March 2011. The regime's campaign has been met with global outrage, but Damascus and its steadfast ally Moscow have said any ceasefire must include a guarantee that all rebel fighters leave the city.

Head of Radio Station Murdered in Iraq's Kirkuk
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 06/16/Gunmen killed the head of a local radio station in the Iraqi city of Kirkuk on Tuesday, the latest in a string of such murders in the troubled country. "Unidentified gunmen driving a white car assassinated Mohammed Thabet al-Obeidi," a Kirkuk police colonel told AFP, adding that the journalist was on his way to work in the city center when he was shot. The 38-year-old was in charge of a radio station called Baba Gurgur that broadcasts in Arabic, Kurdish and Turkmen, and also worked for the state-run Iraqi Media Network. Obeidi's colleague from the state-run Iraqiya channel, Roji Anwar, confirmed the killing. Ziad Ajili, from the Journalistic Freedoms Observatory, said Obeidi's killing may be politically motivated, but did not elaborate. Kirkuk is an ethnic tinderbox in an oil-rich region on the country's new political fault line. It is theoretically under the authority of the Baghdad government but is controlled by Kurdish forces. Obeidi's death came a few days after another Iraqi journalist was found dead near Dohuk, in Iraq's northern autonomous region of Kurdistan

Israeli Far Right Hails Bill to Legalize Settler Homes
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 06/16/Israeli far-right politicians on Tuesday welcomed initial approval of a bill to legalize some 4,000 settler homes in the West Bank, calling it a step towards annexation of most of the Palestinian territory. The bill was given preliminary approval by parliament late on Monday despite a chorus of international criticism that it was an illegal land grab with dangerous implications for Middle East peace. The bill must pass three more votes in parliament before it becomes law, with the first likely to be held on Wednesday. Preliminary approval had been expected following an agreement between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and a right-wing rival, though Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit has said he will not be able to defend it before the courts. The bill has severely tested Netanyahu's coalition, seen as the most right-wing in Israeli history. Strong supporters of the bill, including those who outright oppose a Palestinian state, rejoiced in the initial vote and said they hoped it could lead to eventual Israeli annexation of most of the occupied West Bank. The bill's main backer, Education Minister Naftali Bennett, said Israel should tell its international allies that it was in the West Bank to stay. An agreement between Netanyahu and Bennett has allowed the bill to move forward. "It's time to say: 'Friends, we plan on staying in Maale Adumim, the Jordan Valley and Ofra and Ariel forever, because this is our land,'" he told army radio, naming settlement areas, some of them deep inside the West Bank. Bennett has advocated annexing most of the territory, like other Israeli religious nationalists who point to the Jewish connection to the land from biblical times. "With this law, the state of Israel has moved from the path leading to the creation of a Palestinian state to the path leading to (Israeli) sovereignty" over most of the West Bank, Bennett said on Monday. Others from his party voiced similar sentiments, with Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked saying the bill was "deepening our hold on our beloved land."
Netanyahu says he still supports a two-state solution to the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
'Most dangerous law'
The international community considers all settlements in the West Bank, including Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem, to be illegal, whether they are authorized by the government or not. The Israeli government distinguishes between those it has approved and those it has not.
The U.N. envoy for the Middle East peace process, Nickolay Mladenov, warned of the bill's implications. He said it "has the objective of protecting illegal settlements and outposts built on private Palestinian property in the West Bank." "If adopted, it will have far-reaching legal consequences for Israel, across the occupied West Bank and will greatly diminish the prospect of Arab-Israeli peace," Mladenov said. Walid Assaf, the Palestinian minister responsible for monitoring Israeli settlements, called the bill "the most dangerous law issued by Israel since 1967." Israeli occupied the West Bank in the Six-Day War of 1967 and subsequently annexed east Jerusalem in a move never recognized by the international community. Speaking on Sunday, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry accused right-wing Israelis of deliberately thwarting efforts to broker a peace deal. He said "more than 50 percent of the ministers in the current government have publicly stated they are opposed to a Palestinian state and that there will be no Palestinian state." The agreement that has led to the bill moving forward saw a wildcat Jewish outpost in the West Bank, known as Amona, removed from its provisions. Amona, where around 40 families live, is under a court order to be evacuated by December 25 since it was built on Palestinian land. Some members of Netanyahu's coalition said they could not support the bill if Amona remained part of it because of the court ruling against it. The agreement will instead see Amona residents temporarily moved to nearby land that Israeli officials describe as abandoned. Human rights groups, however, say that land too is owned by Palestinians and that the move would violate international law. According to settlement watchdog Peace Now, the bill, excluding Amona, would legalize some 3,881 housing units. Most of the homes are in Israeli-approved settlements but were built on Palestinian land. Around 750 are located in outposts which Israel has not yet approved, Peace Now says. Kerry said there are currently around 100 wildcat outposts in the West Bank and the bill would give retrospective Israeli approval to 54 of them. Some 400,000 Israeli settlers live in the West Bank, excluding east Jerusalem. The territory is home to around 2.6 million Palestinians.

Bernard Cazeneuve Named French PM after Valls Quits

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 06/16/French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve was appointed as the new prime minister on Tuesday after Manuel Valls resigned to seek the Socialist nomination in next year's presidential election. Cazeneuve, who has overseen the security forces' reaction to a string of jihadist attacks that have killed more than 230 people in France over the past two years, will take control of the Socialist government until May's election. He was named prime minister after President Francois Hollande accepted Valls's resignation early Tuesday. Valls, who had been prime minister for the past two and a half years, announced on Monday he would step down to try to rally the fractured French left ahead of a primary in January. In a combative speech, the 54-year-old Valls vowed to take the fight to the conservative opposition and the far-right National Front, who are both ahead of the Socialists in the polls. His announcement came four days after Hollande said he would bow out after a single term, paving the way for Valls to try to become the left's new standard bearer. "My candidacy is one of reconciliation," Valls, himself a former interior minister, said in a speech from his political base in the tough Paris suburb of Evry. He warned of the risk of far-right leader Marine Le Pen pulling off a repeat of France's 2002 electoral upset when her father Jean-Marie Le Pen edged out the Socialist candidate for a place in the presidential runoff. Le Pen's nationalist policies would "ruin the working class", he said.Polls show Marine Le Pen winning or coming second in the opening round of the election on April 23 but being defeated by the conservative candidate Francois Fillon in May's second round. Valls attacked the self-declared Thatcherite Fillon, accusing him of rehashing "the old recipes of the 1980s" by promising to cut spending and social programmes. "We're told that Francois Fillon is the next president of the Republic. Nothing is set in stone," he said defiantly. Crowded field -The Barcelona-born Socialist is a polarising figure. Many on the left see him as too rightwing after he used decrees to force through labour reforms and called for dual-national terror convicts to be stripped of their French nationality. His stern line on secularism and Islam has also turned off many lifelong Socialists, with some party veterans saying they might not support him. Last summer, he waded into the debate on the Islamic "burkini", declaring the full-body swimsuit "not compatible" with French values. But the blackest mark on his candidacy could be his government's bleak economic record. Le Pen has dismissed him as the unpopular Hollande's "double". Valls faces a challenge from at least seven other candidates in the two-round primary on January 22 and 29. Polls show him winning the nomination but trailing in the presidential race, dragged down by competition from business-friendly former economy minister Emmanuel Macron, an independent, and the fiery hard-left Jean-Luc Melenchon. When Valls last sought the Socialist nomination five years ago, he garnered only 5.6 percent.

Egypt Says International Organs Trade Network Arrested
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 06/16/Egyptian authorities announced Tuesday the arrest of 25 members of an international network allegedly trafficking in human organs, including university professors and doctors. "Today at dawn, the largest international network for trading human organs has been captured," the country's Administrative Control Authority said in a statement on its website. The network "is made up of Egyptians and Arabs taking advantage of some of the citizens' difficult economic conditions so that they buy their human organs and sell it for large sums of money," it said. The authority, which is responsible for tracking corruption cases in state institutions, said 25 people were arrested including university professors, doctors, medical workers, owners of medical centres, intermediaries and brokers. They were found in possession of "millions of dollars and gold bullion", it said. Ten medical centres and laboratories had been searched and the authorities had found documents related to the charge and computers with trading information. Egypt's parliament passed a law in 2010 banning commercial trade in organs as well as transplants between Egyptians and foreigners, except in cases of husband and wife. A World Health Organisation coordinator at the time, Luc Noel, named Egypt that year as one of the top five countries in illegal organ trade. The law aimed to regulate organ transplants in a bid to curb illegal trafficking and tourism for such operations. According to the United Nations, hundreds of poor Egyptians sell their kidneys and livers each year to be able to buy food or pay off debts. In 2012, then UN refugee agency chief Antonio Guterres said some migrants in Egypt's Sinai peninsula were being "killed for the traffic of organs".

Suspected IS Jihadists Arrested in Yemen's Aden
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 06/16/Yemeni authorities have arrested eight suspected Islamic State group jihadists implicated in a spate of attacks targeting security personnel in second city Aden this year, police said. Police in the southern port city, headquarters of Yemen's internationally recognised government, also seized silenced pistols and letters from IS leaders in Iraq and Syria, a statement said late on Monday. There have been a spate of deadly gun attacks in Aden this year as government forces have struggled to restore security in the city after driving out Shiite rebels and their allies in July 2015. The insecurity prompted the cabinet to move to neighbouring Saudi Arabia last year only returning in September. IS and its jihadist rival Al-Qaeda have taken advantage of the conflict between the government and the rebels, who control the capital Sanaa, to bolster their presence across much of the south. In the southeastern province of Hadramawt, government troops seized four tonnes of explosives and arrested five suspects in the port of Shihr, the army said. With the support of special forces from a Saudi-led coalition, government troops drove the jihadists out of provincial capital Mukalla in April, but they are still present in other parts of the vast province.

Saudi Sentences 15 to Death for Spying for Iran
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 06/16/A Saudi court Tuesday sentenced 15 people to death for spying for the kingdom's rival Iran, local media and a source close to the case said, in a move likely to heighten regional tensions. The source told AFP that most of the 15 Saudis were members of the kingdom's Shiite minority. Their trial opened in February, a month after Riyadh cut diplomatic ties with Tehran over the burning of the Saudi embassy and a consulate by Iranian demonstrators protesting the kingdom's execution of Shiite cleric Nimr al-Nimr. The most serious charge levelled against them was high treason. Prosecutors also alleged the accused had divulged defence secrets, tried to commit sabotage, to recruit moles in government departments, to send coded information, and supported "riots" in the Shiite-dominated eastern district of Qatif, Saudi media reported. The 15 were among a group of 32 people tried over the espionage allegations, Alriyadh newspaper said on its website. Some of the defendants were accused of meeting Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The death sentences will be appealed, said the source close to the case, who cannot be identified due to its sensitivity. Two of the group were acquitted while the rest received jail sentences of between six months and 25 years. Apart from one Iranian and an Afghan, all of the defendants were Saudis. The source said that one of the two acquitted was a foreigner. Adam Coogle, a Middle East researcher for New York-based Human Rights Watch (HRW), told AFP that the trial was "flawed from the beginning."- Syria, Yemen tensions -It was tainted by allegations that the accused did not have access to lawyers during interrogation, Coogle said. They were also charged with offences that do not resemble recognisable crimes, including "supporting demonstrations," attempting to "spread the Shia confession," and "harming the reputation of the kingdom," he said. "Criminal trials should not be merely legal 'window-dressing' where the verdict has been decided beforehand," he said. HRW earlier cited a lawyer who represented some of the accused until March as saying the timing of the case "may relate to ongoing hostility between Iran and Saudi Arabia". All but one of the accused had been detained since 2013. The region's leading Shiite and Sunni powers are at odds over a range of issues including the wars in Syria and Yemen. Saudi Arabia has also expressed concern over an international agreement that lifted sanctions on Iran in exchange for guarantees it would not pursue a nuclear weapons capability. Riyadh fears the pact will lead to more Iranian "interference" in the region. With relations at a low, Iranian pilgrims in September -- for the first time in nearly three decades -- did not attend the annual hajj in Saudi Arabia after the two countries failed to agree on security and logistics. Nimr, the executed cleric whose case sent tensions soaring, was a driving force behind protests that began in 2011 among the Shiite minority, most of whom live in the kingdom's east, which faces Iran across the Gulf.The protests developed into a call for equality in the Sunni-dominated kingdom, where the Shiites have long complained of marginalisation. Nimr was convicted of terrorism and executed in January alongside 46 other people -- mostly Sunnis -- found guilty of the same crime. Rights activists say more than two dozen other Shiites are on death row in Saudi Arabia.

Two Wounded as Hamas Clashes with Gaza Hardliners
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 06/16/A police officer and a youth were hospitalised on Tuesday after Hamas forces clashed with hardline Islamists in the Gaza Strip, a medical source and witnesses said. Both men suffered bullet wounds during an attempt by Gaza security forces to arrest two men from a Salafist group, followers of an ultra-conservative form of Islam, a witness said. The young man, believed to be a Salafist, was in serious condition, while the policeman's condition was not life threatening, the medical source said. The witness said a grenade was thrown at security forces raiding a house in Al-Fukhari in the southern Gaza Strip, sparking clashes. Hamas, which rules Gaza, is an Islamist party but is frequently criticised by more conservative Islamists, including hardliners who sympathise with the Islamic State group. The hardliners sporadically fire rockets at Israel, prompting retaliation against Hamas targets. Israel holds Hamas responsible for all rocket fire from Gaza, regardless of who launches it. In an unrelated incident, a fighter of Hamas's military wing, the Al-Qassam Brigades, was killed accidentally."Ahmad Mansour, 30 and from Jabalia in northern Gaza, died on Monday night when a grenade exploded by accident," a Qassam statement said.

Iran Regime Fears the Aftermath of U.S. Elections and New Sanctions Law
Tuesday, 06 December 2016/NCRI - In an interview with Channel one TV, the Iranian regime’s former ambassador to Italy and Afghanistan expressed the regime’s fears regarding consequences of elections in the United States and Obama signing the sanctions law. He said: “Their (Americans’) goal in the issue of JCPOA was not just the nuclear issue. They are pursuing longer-term goals and see Iran (regime) as a sustained threat.”Abolfazl Zohrevand referring to unanimous adoption of the resolution (sanctions law) in the U.S. Senate (by vast majority) with no vote against it, said: “It is very interesting that not even one person opposed this resolution and Mr. Obama is going to sign the bill on the ground that more than two third (of the Senators and Representatives) voted for it. “Therefore, he is neither going to veto it nor his veto will be useful. “Definitely, if Mr. Trump did not win, we would face a different situation with Mrs. Clinton, but Mr. Trump and his team, all of them, are known to be anti-Iranian (regime). “They are working on a new scenario and a new program (against the regime)… Adoption of D'Amato (Iran Sanctions Act, ISA) is switching on a new scenario that would definitely include violation of JCPOA.”

Iran: Anti-government slogans in Tehran and Saveh universities
NCRI Statements/ 06 December 2016/Distribution of leaflets saying "why 1988 (massacre)?" and chanting slogan: "Death to dictator"
Hundreds of students of Tehran University turned the Student Day ceremony to a scene of protest against the repressive policies of the regime.
This protest move was coincident with the presence of mullah Rouhani at the university auditorium and despite widespread security measures by the agents of suppression organs including the Intelligence Ministry and special guard unit of the university. The students, who were prevented from entering the auditorium, marched across the campus. During the march they sang "Yar-e Dabestani" and chanted:
"political prisoner must be freed", "student dies but does not accept humiliation", "Noble students! Support, support", "student prisoners must be freed" and "University Security should be abolished".
They also protested against monetary law of university and the law called 'Sanavat (years)' enacted in order to extort money from students. They also distributed leaflets saying: "University is not garrison!", "Prison is not a place for students", and "why 1988 (massacre)"?
Suppressive measures of Basij forces to disperse students led to confrontation, and the students managed to force Basij forces to escape. Despite the massive presence of repressive and anti-riot forces inside Tehran University and in front of its entrance gate and streets leading to the university, the student managed to stage their protest gathering. Police cars blocked the university entrance preventing the people to join protesting students. Students of "Allameh Tabatabi" University in Tehran also chanted "Political prisoner must be freed" and "worker prisoners must be freed" in their protest gathering. The regime's intelligence agents called "Harasat" in Azad University of Saveh attacked and assaulted the students to prevent them from entering the campus. The regime's mercenaries attack turned into a confrontation with students. The students chanted: "University is not garrison" and" Death to dictator".
Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/December 6, 2016

Iran: Students' protests in various cities on the occasion of 'Student Day'
NCRI Statements/ 06 December 2016/Students chanted: "Student dies, but does not accept humiliation", "political prisoners must be freed"On the occasion of Student Day (December 6th) students of universities in various cities staged demonstrations and protest gatherings to express their anger towards the mullahs' regime. In Tabriz, the students staged a gathering in front of the university despite the widespread presence of intelligence and plainclothes agents of the regime. They chanted, "Our last message to the incompetent regime: the freedom- loving nation is ready to rise up!" Zahedan university students also chanted in the ceremony held on December 5: "Student dies, but does not accept humiliation" and "political prisoner must be freed". State officials prevented free entry of the students in order to prevent the formation of student protests. On the same day, the students of Tehran 'Tarbiat Modarres" University repeatedly interrupted the speech of Ma'soumeh Ebtekar, head of the Department of Environment of Rouhani, and chanted: "Political prisoner must be freed". In protest at the catastrophic situation of air pollution in various cities, the students presented oxygen cylinder to Ma'soumeh Ebtekar. Students of 'Khajeh Nasir University' in Tehran wrote on large banners that were installed on the walls of the amphitheater: "University is not a garrison, our university is alive", "political prisoner must be freed".
Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/December 6, 2016

Despite the Lifting of Sanctions, Why Iran's Economy Has Plunged Into Recession? – Part 2
Tuesday, 06 December 2016/NCRI - A year after signing the nuclear deal, while significant problems such as export restrictions and the prohibition of the international bank transfer (swift) have been resolved a transparent atmosphere is created to identify the radical economic problems of Iran. In part one, to answer the main question: “why the recession is becoming deeper while the sanctions are lifted and the international transaction with Iran has been opened.” We started with examining ‘Internal issues’ like, ‘the lack of security and stability’ and the domination of the Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist in the country, the following is Part 2.
B. The power struggle
The large gap in power, the prospect of Khamenei's death and the succession dispute, which has been accentuated two times by Khamenei, has created an unstable political situation for the regime. Simultaneously, the shadow of Presidential Election that is scheduled to be held in the spring of 2017, has drastically affected the economy of the country. The disclosure of payroll records of the bank managers, insurance companies, and the government seniors revealed that their salaries reach to hundred thousand dollars each. These issues although characterize the chronic corruption in regime’s bureaucracy but in fact is a manifestation of the power struggle between the two factions of the regime. The detention of director of the largest bank of IranMellat Bank’ by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards. The formal request by the Revolutionary Court to pass the life imprisonment sentence against the brother of regime’s President Hassan Rouhani and so on. Are the issues which have foreclosed an assuring atmosphere for any economic activities. This struggle is also going on in the field of economic dealings. Signing new oil contracts by the government is turned into a battleground, between military and political forces. The military commanders believe that the Ministry of Petroleum has ignored the national security and the right of ownership of these contracts while the Minister of Petroleum, Bijan Zangeneh states that his opponents are worried about losing their own benefits. The Minister of Petroleum started his tenure by sacking a wide range of managers since he took the office. He immediately dismissed 60 directors and assigned his former colleagues into office.The government's approach, especially in the field of oil and related industries, was opposed strongly by the IRGC with its affiliated political groups. Some MPs intended to reopen the controversial Crescent oil contract in which Bijan Zangeneh had a significant role in previous years. The dispute continued to an extent that Bijan Zangene implicitly stated that he would voluntarily resign from the Oil Ministry by the end of the current government. In order to make a concession to the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, the government has assigned one of the senior commanders, Rostam Ghasemi as the vice president. He is the former head of a giant contracting cartel of Khatam Brigade. Nevertheless, on February 1, 2016, the government decided to dismiss Rostam Ghasemi since he actively prevented the implementation of oil contracts. Two days earlier, a number of IRGC and Basij forces rallied in front of the Ministry of Petroleum and protested against the new agreements on oil projects which have been signed between Iran and the West.38 protesters were arrested and then released. It was clear that the oil contracts are the centre of dispute between the sides. After several months, Rouhani's government finally surrendered and approved the Persian Oil Company (the subdivision of Khamenei's foundations) and Khatam Brigade as the Iranian companies which partake with foreign companies in new oil contracts.
In June 2016, Rouhani gave another concession to the IRGC for handing over 50 development projects to Khatam Brigade.

Iran: No News About the Fate of a Political Prisoner
Tuesday, 06 December 2016/NCRI - A family member of a political prisoner, expressing concern about the status of their son after he was transferred to Gohardasht prison, said: “After his mother informed (the media) about the way his son was arrested, she was threatened via a phone call by a security institution that this issue will cause trouble for her son.”According to a close relative of the family, “Currently the family of political prisoner, Asou Rostami, is extremely concerned about the fate of their son because Asou during a contact with his family said that they threatened him and said ‘we will send you to a place where your previous place (prison cell) seems a hotel for you.’ He was transferred to Gohardasht prison on Saturday November 4 and there is no news about his condition ever since.”The political prisoner, Asou Rostami, has been sentence to two years imprisonment by the mullahs so-called courts on the charges of “Cyberspace (social media) activity and publishing criticizing content on human rights situation and executions in Iran, empathy and solidarity with the families of political prisoners and families of prisoners sentenced to death, participating in a rally in defense of Kobani (in Syria), sympathy with the families of the victims of 2009 (uprising) events, connection with human rights activists, assembly and collusion against the regime and insulting the leadership.

Iran: The Internet Contributes to Rebellion and Attraction to the MEK

Tuesday, 06 December 2016/NCRI - Mullah Movahedi Kermani, head of the Staff for ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prohibition of Vice’, expressed the Iranian regime's fear from the expansion of social networks in Iran and the youths' attraction to the Iranian opposition, PMOI/MEK. He said, "The internet… contributes to rebellion and attraction to the PMOI, creating conceptual perversion."The Iranian state media cited Movahedi Kermani on Sunday, December 4, 2016, as saying, "Today, the cyber space has priority over the election and veiling (of women). The issues of election and veil are the second and third priorities. Unfortunately, some of the officials have been treacherous in introducing the internet. Many officials have not done a good job in presenting the internet. They have presented the positive and negative impacts of the internet as being equal while this is not true. There are more negative consequences… Therefore, we must pay attention to this issue that has entangled us today."He continued his remarks by expressing fear of the internet and its popularity among the people. "Today, our wives and children, young and old, are targeted by this cultural invasion. For example, if you go to a relative's party, you would see that everyone, young and old, are busy with their mobile phones. Has it ever struck us what is happening in these cellphones and what these people are watching?"He added, "I received some material from the Assembly of Experts which explained the dangers of the cyber space. I found out that the internet has the power to uproot the religion and Islam. Mal-veiling is bad but the internet is a hundred folds worse."

Presidential Election Example of Iran-Saudi Cooperation
Associated Press/Naharnet/December 06/16/Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman says the Islamic Republic and its regional rival Saudi Arabia can and should cooperate to resolve regional crises. Bahram Ghasemi told reporters in his weekly briefing that the recent OPEC agreement to cut oil production and the Lebanese presidential election were both recent examples of Iran-Saudi cooperation. Despite initial reluctance Tehran signed on to an OPEC agreement to cut oil production in order to drive up slumping petroleum prices. In November, the Lebanese parliament elected President Michel Aoun, an Iran ally, after a 29-month vacuum in the country's top post. He designated Saad Hariri, a close ally of Saudi Arabia, as prime minister. Iran and Saudi have no diplomatic relations and support opposite sides in wars in Syria and Yemen.

Rouhani: Sanctions Renewal Shows US Still 'Enemy'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 06/16/Iran's President Hassan Rouhani said Tuesday that Congress's decision to renew US sanctions for 10 years would elicit a "harsh reaction" and proved the United States was still an enemy. "America... is our enemy, we have no doubt about this. The Americans want to put as much pressure on us as they can," Rouhani said in a speech to students at Tehran University. The Iran Sanctions Act passed the US Senate 99-0 last week, after easily clearing the House of Representatives in November. President Barack Obama is expected to sign the measure into a law, a White House official said, adding that the administration does not believe the extension violates last year's nuclear deal between major powers and Iran. Obama has suspended sanctions related to Iran's nuclear programme since the agreement went into effect at the start of the year. But Iran says that even if the nuclear sanctions remain suspended, just keeping them on the books amounts to a breach of the agreement. "If this is implemented... it would be a blatant and clear breach of the JCPOA (nuclear agreement) and would face a very harsh reaction from us," Rouhani said. The actual language in the agreement could be interpreted in different ways. It calls on the US to "cease the application of... all nuclear-related sanctions". It does not specify whether Washington can keep them in reserve for possible use in the future. At a press conference on Tuesday, conservative parliament speaker Ali Larijani said parts of the deal were "rushed". "Some of the sections of the JCPOA should have been written with more precision to stop differing interpretations," Larijani said. "I believe Iran should file a complaint in regard of the Americans' breach of the JCPOA," he added. Rouhani and other top officials are due to meet on Wednesday to discuss the issue. Rouhani, who is expected to run for a second term in May, has faced a barrage of criticism from conservatives who say his team made too many concessions in the nuclear deal for minimal economic gain. In Tuesday's speech, he emphasised that his team had not acted alone and that supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was closely involved at every stage of the negotiations. "We took no step on the JCPOA issue without consulting the honourable leader," Rouhani said. Although Iran has managed to significantly ramp up its oil exports since the deal, it has struggled to rejoin the international financial system because major Western banks remain reluctant to do business for fear of remaining non-nuclear US sanctions.The result has been that Iran has been unable to attract the huge foreign investment which Rouhani has said is necessary to rekindle the country's battered economy.

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on December 06-07/16
The West's Politically Correct Dictatorship/It Has Blinded Us to the Real Danger: Radical Islam
Giulio Meotti/Gatestone Institute/December 06/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/06/giulio-meottigatestone-institute-the-wests-politically-correct-dictatorshipit-has-blinded-us-to-the-real-danger-radical-islam/
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9491/politically-correct-dictatorship
The brave work of the artist Mimsy was removed from London's Mall Galleries after the British police defined it "inflammatory."
In France, schools teach children that Westerners are Crusaders, colonizers and "bad." In their efforts to justify the repudiation of France and its Judeo-Christian culture, schools have fertilized the soil in which Islamic extremism develops and flourishes unimpeded.
No one can deny that France is under Islamist siege. Last week, France's intelligence service discovered another terror plot. But what is the priority of the Socialist government? Restricting freedom of expression for pro-life "militants."
Under this politically correct dictatorship, Western culture has established two principles. First, freedom of speech can be restricted any time someone claims that an opinion is an "insult." Second, there is a vicious double standard: minorities, especially Muslims, can freely say whatever they want against Jews and Christians.
There is no better ally of Islamic extremism than this sanctimony of liberal censorship: both, in fact, want to suppress any criticism of Islam, as well as any proud defense of the Western Enlightenment or Judeo-Christian culture.
Twitter, one of the vehicles of this new intolerance, even formed a "Trust and Safety Council." It brings to mind Saudi Arabia's "Council for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice."
Under this political correctness, the only "win-win" is for political Islam.
It might look like a golden age for free speech: more than a billion tweets, Facebook posts and blogs every day. But beneath this surface, freedom of expression is dramatically retreating.
Students at the City University of London, home to one of Britain's most respected schools of journalism, voted to ban three newspapers from its campus: The Sun, Daily Mail and Express. Their "crime", according to the approved motion, is to have published stories against migrants, "Islamophobic" articles, and "scapegoating the working classes that they so proudly claim to represent." City University, supposedly a place dedicated to openness and questioning, became the first Western educational institution to vote for censorship, and ban "right wing newspapers."
The filmmaker David Cronenberg called this self-censorship, after the massacre at Charlie Hebdo: "a weird, serpentine political correctness." It is one of the most lethal ideological poisons of the 21st century. It is not only closed-minded and ridiculous, it makes us blind to the radical Islam that is undermining our mental and cultural defenses.
The countless attacks by Muslim extremists testify that the multicultural world to which we have been led is a fiction. Political correctness simply encourages the Islamists to raise the stakes to win the war they are advancing. The resulting tension has been fed by the Western elites with their sense of guilt for "colonialism" in the Third World.
"ISIS Threaten Sylvania" -- an art exhibition featuring cute little stuffed animals picnicking on a lawn, and unaware of other cute little stuffed animal terrorists carrying assault rifles on a knoll just behind them -- is the work of the artist known as Mimsy (she hides her identity). The protagonists of this series of light box tableaux are a family of stuffed animal dolls that inhabits an enchanted valley. Gunmen, dressed like the Islamic State henchmen, strike the innocent inhabitants of the valley, at school and on the beach, at a picnic or in a gay pride parade. It looks like an updated version of Maus by Art Spiegelman, a graphic novel depicting Nazi cats and Jewish mice during the Holocaust.
Those wishing to see this artistic panel at the Mall Galleries, in London, will now have to console themselves with the work of Jamie McCartney, "The Great Wall Vagina," nine meters of female genitalia, less important and less provocative.
The brave work of Mimsy, after the British police defined it "inflammatory," has been eliminated from the program of this London cultural event. Its organizers informed the gallery owners that if they wanted to put it on display, they would have to shell out £36,000 ($46,000) to "secure the venue" for the six days of the exhibition.
The brave work of the artist Mimsy, satirizing the brutality of ISIS, was removed from London's Mall Galleries after the British police defined it "inflammatory." (Image source: Mimsy)
Under this politically correct dictatorship, Western culture has established two principles. First, freedom of speech can be restricted any time someone claims that an opinion is an "insult." Second, there is a vicious double standard: minorities, especially Muslims, can freely say whatever they want against Jews and Christians.
And so it came to pass that the most famous Spanish football team, Real Madrid, removed the cross from its crest after a commercial deal with Gulf emirate of Abu Dhabi. The Christian symbol was quickly ditched to please the Islamic Gulf sponsors.
Perhaps soon the West will be soon asked to change the flag of the European Union -- twelve yellow stars on a blue background -- because it contains a Christian message in code. Arsène Heitz, who designed it in 1955, was inspired by the Christian iconography of the Virgin Mary with a crown and twelve stars on her head: what a heartless "Western Christian supremacist" message!
Political correctness is also having a huge impact on big business: Kellogg's withdrew advertising from Breitbart for being "not aligned with our values" and Lego dropped advertising with Daily Mail, to mention just two recent cases.
It should not cause alarm if companies want to decide where to advertise their products, but it is very alarming when it happens due to "ideology." We have never read about companies abandoning a newspaper or website because it was too liberal or "leftist." If the Arab-Islamic regimes were follow these views, why should they not ask their companies to stop advertising in Western newspapers that publish articles critical of Islam, or which publish pictures of half-naked women?
Libraries on US campuses are now putting "trigger warnings" on works of literature: students are advised, for example, that Ovid's sublime Metamorphosis "justifies" rape. Stanford University even managed to exclude Dante, Homer, Plato, Aristotle, Shakespeare and other giants of Western culture from the academic curricula in 1988: supposedly many of their masterpieces are "racist, sexist, reactionary, repressive." This is the vocabulary of Western surrender before totalitarian Islamic fundamentalism.
France has removed great figures, such as Charlemagne, Henry IV, Louis XIV and Napoleon, from schools, to replace them, for instance, with studying the history of Mali and other African kingdoms. At school, children are taught that Westerners are Crusaders, colonizers and "bad." In purportedly justifying the repudiation of France and its Judeo-Christian culture, schools have fertilized the soil in which Islamic extremism develops and flourishes unimpeded.
It is a question of priorities: no one can deny that France is under Islamist siege. Last week, France's intelligence service discovered another terror plot. But what is the priority of the Socialist government? Restricting freedom of expression for pro-life "militants." The Wall Street Journal called it "France's War on Anti-Abortion Speech." France already has one of the most permissive and liberal bodies of legislation on abortion. But political correctness makes one blind and ideological. "In four and a half years, the Socialists have reduced our freedom of expression and attacked public freedoms," commented Riposte Laïque.
In the US, academia is rapidly closing its doors to any debate. At Yale, professors and students these days are very busy with a new cultural emergency: "renaming." They are changing the name of buildings to erase all traces of slavery and colonialism -- a revisionism out of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
Everywhere in the US and in the UK, an air of hostility is spreading against opinions and ideas that could cause even a hint of distress in students. The result is the rise of what a writer such as Bret Easton Ellis called "Generation Wuss".
The jihadists surely grin at this Western political correctness, since the result of this ideology will be the abolition of the Western critical spirit and a surreal reeducation of the masses through the annihilation of our history and a hatred of our truly liberal past.
Bristol University in the UK just came under fire for attempting to "no-platform" Roger Scruton for his views on same-gender marriage. Meanwhile, British universities are giving a platform to radical Islamic preachers. In the politically correct universe, conservative thinkers are more dangerous than ISIS supporters. London's former mayor, Boris Johnson, called this dystopia "the Boko Haram of political correctness."
Students and faculty at the Rutgers University in New Jersey cancelled a speech by former US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice. Students and professors at Scripps College in California protested the presence of another former Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, who, according to the protesters, is a "war criminal."
A New York University professor, Michael Rectenwald, who attacked political correctness and the coddling of students, was recently booted from the classroom after his colleagues complained about his "incivility". The liberal studies professor was forced to go on paid leave. "It's an alarming curtailment of free expression to the point where you can't even pretend to be something without authorities coming down on you in the universities," Rectenwald told the New York Post.
There is no better ally of Islamic extremism than this sanctimony of liberal censorship: both, in fact, want to suppress any criticism of Islam, as well as any proud defense of the Western Enlightenment or Judeo-Christian culture.
Censorship is happening not only in the liberal enclaves on the coasts of the United States, but also in France. The Eagles of Death Metal -- the American band that was performing at Paris' Bataclan Theater when ISIS terrorists murdered 89 people there on November 13, 2015 -- were banned by two music festivals: Rock en Seine and Cabaret Vert. The reason? Jesse Hughes, the band's frontman, gave a very politically incorrect interview:
"Did your French gun control stop a single f*cking person from dying? I think the only thing that stopped it was some of the bravest men that I've ever seen charging head-first into the face of death with their firearms. I think the only way that my mind has been changed is that maybe until nobody has guns everybody has to have them. Because I've never seen anyone that's ever had one dead, and I want everyone to have access to them, and I saw people die that maybe could have lived, I don't know."
After the jihadist massacre at Orlando's Pulse gay nightclub, Facebook enforced the pro-Islamic injunction and banned a page of the magazine Gaystream, after it had published an article critical of Islam in the wake of the bloodbath. Gaystream's director, David Berger, had heavily criticized the director of the Gay Museum in Cologne, Birgit Bosold, who had told German media that gays should be more frightened of white bigoted men than of Islamic extremists.
Jim Hoft, a gay journalist who is the creator of the popular Gateway Pundit blog, was suspended from YouTube. Twitter, one of the vehicles of this new intolerance, suspended the account of Milo Yiannopoulos, a prominent gay critic of Islamic fundamentalism -- but probably not the accounts of Islamic fundamentalists who criticize gays. Twitter even formed a "Trust and Safety Council." It brings to mind Saudi Arabia's "Council for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice." Could it be an inspiration for the liberal mullahs?
Yes, it might have looked like a golden age for free speech. But under this dictatorship of political correctness, the only "win-win" is for political Islam.
*Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Erdogan's Gritted-Teeth Peace with Israel/Equates IDF with Hitler
Burak Bekdil//Gatestone Institute/December 06/16
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9484/erdogan-turkey-israel
In Istanbul, where a majority of Turkey's 17,000 Jews live, unknown people recently started hanging posters in a posh district. The posters call on Muslims "not to be fooled by the missionary activities of Jew-servant Jehovah's Witnesses." They say: "These people are trying to destroy the religion of Islam." Signed: Sons of Ottomans.
Erdogan's ideological hostility to the Jewish state and his ideological love affair with Hamas have not disappeared.
Erdogan thinks that Israel's military action in response to Hamas's rockets indiscriminately targeting Israeli citizens is no different than the murder of six million Jews by a lunatic. "There is no point in comparing and asking who is more barbaric," Erdogan concluded. In other words, Erdogan thinks that Hitler and the Israel Defense Forces are "equally barbaric."
Yes, blessed are the peacemakers. Nevertheless, the Turkish-Israeli "peace" may not be easy to sustain.
Modern Turkey has never been so disconnected from its Western allies. Its Islamist president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, recently accused the West of helping the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). His evidence? Because, he said, ISIS is fighting with Western weapons -- overlooking, of course, that they were probably captured or stolen.
This dislike and hostility is not unrequited. On November 24, the European Parliament voted overwhelmingly for a motion calling to suspend Turkey's membership talks with the European Union (EU), citing "disproportionate, repressive measures" taken by Erdogan's government. The motion, although non-binding, passed 479 to 37 in favor. In retaliation, Erdogan threatened that "if the EU goes further," Turkey will open its border gates and let refugees stream toward Europe.
The Turks, too, are distancing themselves from the idea of EU membership. According to a survey by the pollsters ANDY-AR, 75.3% of Turks believe that their country is drifting away from accession, while only 19.9% believe it is not. Forty-four percent think freezing membership talks would be a positive development.
Confirming the growing anti-Western mood, Erdogan's spokesman, Ibrahim Kalin, wrote in a newspaper column: "With its internal problems, micro-nationalisms and the Brexit process, Europe is narrowing down its strategic outlook and losing its relevance."
Against this backdrop, Turkey is normalizing its relations with Israel -- in theory, at least. Ankara and Jerusalem agreed to appoint ambassadors to each other's country after an absence of more than six years. Two prominent career diplomats, Kemal Okem and Eitan Na'eh, will struggle to improve ties in Tel Aviv and Ankara, respectively. They will have a hard job. The diplomats may be willing, but with Erdogan's persistent Islamist ideological pursuits, they would seem to have only a slim chance of succeeding.
Turkey's dwindling Jewish community is uneasy over increasing signs of anti-Semitism in an increasingly Islamized country. In Istanbul, where a majority of Turkey's 17,000 Jews live, unknown people recently started hanging posters in a posh district. The posters call on Muslims "not to be fooled by the missionary activities of Jew-servant Jehovah's Witnesses." They say: "These people are trying to destroy the religion of Islam." Signed: Sons of Ottomans.
Feeling unsafe, more than 2,500 Turkish Jews have recently applied for Spanish citizenship, and hundreds applied for Portuguese citizenship. Only last year, 250 Turkish Jews emigrated to Israel. That being the case, Islamist Turks are warning their fellow Muslims against missionary activities of Jehovah's Witnesses who are, according to them, "servants of Jews."
This is not surprising. Erdogan has pragmatically agreed to shake hands with Israel, but his ideological hostility to the Jewish state and his ideological love affair with Hamas have not disappeared.
The ups and downs of Turkey's relations with Israel. Left: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (then Prime Minister) shakes hands with then Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, on May 1, 2005. Right: Erdogan shakes hands with Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh on January 3, 2012.
Only a week after Turkey and Israel officially resumed full diplomatic relations, in an interview with Israel's Channel 2 television, Erdogan refused to back down from his earlier comments equating Israel's military action in Gaza in 2014 to Hitler's atrocities.
Erdogan said: "I don't agree with what Hitler did and I don't agree with what Israel did in Gaza." Erdogan thinks that Israel's military action in response to Hamas's rockets indiscriminately targeting Israeli citizens is no different than the murder of six million Jews by a lunatic. "There is no point in comparing and asking who is more barbaric," Erdogan concluded. In other words, Erdogan thinks that Hitler and the Israel Defense Forces are "equally barbaric."
What else? Erdogan said that he is in constant contact with Hamas officials and that he does not believe Hamas is a terrorist organization. What, then is Hamas? According to Erdogan, Hamas is a "political movement born from the national resurrection."
During the interview, Erdogan was asked if he was aware of the shock his reference to Hitler caused among Jews. He replied: "I'm very well aware ... But is the Jewish community aware of what is done (in Gaza)?"
Much of Erdogan's hostile sentiment over Israel is religious. So is his admiration of Hamas. There is a point of irony, too, in this equation. The total amount of humanitarian aid Turkey has ever sent to Gaza is worth about half of the value of goods, measured at about 400 trucks, that Israel sends to Gaza each and every day.
In other remarks, Erdogan accused Israel of restricting Muslim worship. He called on all Muslims to embrace the "Palestinian cause and protect Jerusalem" -- which he seems to think is a Muslim city.
Yes, blessed are the peacemakers. Nevertheless, the Turkish-Israeli "peace" will not be easy to sustain.
**Burak Bekdil, based in Ankara, is a Turkish columnist for the Hürriyet Daily and a Fellow at the Middle East Forum.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Is Assad the Author of ISIS? Did Iran Blow Up Assef Shawkat?
 By Ehsani2/5 December 2016/For Syria Comment
 http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/06/is-assad-the-author-of-isis-did-iran-blow-up-assef-shawkat/
 http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/assad-author-isis-iran-blow-assef-sawkat-tall-tales-ehsani2/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Syriacomment+%28Syria+Comment%29
 Credibility of the Sources:In a three-part series, Pulitzer Prize winning reporter Roy Gutman relies on a number of Syrian opposition members to make the central claim that “the Syrian regime’s collusion with the terrorists of the so-called Islamic State goes back a decade.” This is not the first time that Assad has been accused of complicity in the horrors of ISIS. But the claims have renewed urgency because the Syrian opposition is worried that Donald Trump’s anti ISIS strategy will come at the expense of U.S. support for the Syrian opposition. They worry that Washington will “shift policy in the Syria conflict from one of support for the moderate opposition to collaboration with the regime of President Bashar al-Assad.”
 The article is based on testimonies from what Mr. Gutman refers to as political activists, defectors, Islamists from Hama province, former State officials and diplomats (asking for political asylum in the U.S), and former head of the Syrian Opposition coalition.
 Bassam Barabandi, a former employee of the now closed Syrian Embassy in Washington, DC.
 Bassam Barabandi, a former employee of the now closed Syrian Embassy in Washington, DC.
 One key source whose name seems to appear often throughout the article is Bassam Barabandi. Mr. Barabandi is a 41 year-old ex-diplomat who worked at the Syrian Embassy in Washington. He defected to the opposition after he used his position as a consular officer to issue Syrian passports to a number of opposition figures whose travel documents had expired. Back in 2014, he wrote an article, entitiled “Inside Assad’s Playbook: Time and Terror with Tyler Jess Thompson who is a director at United for a Free Syria and is a regular contributor at the Middle East Institute. This was an early attempt to link President Assad to Islamist terror groups. Had Mr. Gutman known anything about Syria, he would have been more suspicious of Mr. Barabandi based on a preposterous single claim he makes in the article. Supposedly, during a visit from Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki, Mr. Barabandi remembers being huddled with Deputy Vice President Mohammad Nasif and “taking notes, monitoring interactions, disrupting conversations and altering room dynamics.” Mr. Barabandi quickly concludes that “no detail is too small for the Assad regime to overlook. There is always a plan, opportunities are never missed, and there are no accidents: the rise of ISIS is no exception to this rule.” Barabandi’s story about sitting in the Four Season’s Hotel with Syria’s Deputy Vice President is unbelievable for several reasons. The most obvious is that Nassif, an elderly man and top security chieftain would not be hanging out with Barabandi, a young 30 something civil servant who had yet to take up a post of any consequence. Moreover, Nassif would certainly not explain to him the inner-most secrets of the regime, nor demonstrate to him how the secret service operates behind one-way mirrors to manipulate foreign dignitaries. This account is absurd.
 When reading this article, one is reminded of Frontline’s Martin Smith when he confronted Ahmad Chalabi in Baghdad following the U.S invasion. Smith challenged Chalabi to provide the evidence of that he had promised existed to prove the existence of chemical weapons and Saddam’s links to Al-Qaida. Chalabi simply looked at Martin Smith with consummate distain and brushed off his nagging with the suggestion that such details were no longer important. He simply stated, “We are in Baghdad now.” For Chalabi, any number of fabrications were well worth the result. Saddam was destroyed and America had returned Iraq’s opposition to Baghdad where they could hope to take power. Chalabi’s smug dismissal of Martin Smith was well warranted because the date was 2003, before the Iraq insurgency had been able to organize, before al-Qaida had spread from one end of Iraq to the other, and before hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis had been killed and millions more driven from their country.
 The sources of Mr. Gutman’s articles read like mini versions of Iraq’s Ahmad Chalabi connections. They are advocates for the rebel cause, who will say whatever they believe will convince the United States to invade Syria and depose Assad. They see no problem in stretching the truth if it can lead to foreign military action. After all, they have concluded that only U.S. military action can remove Assad and bring victory to the opposition. Mr. Gutman meets most of his opposition contacts at a coffee shop in Istanbul; they spent hours offering him spectacular details on how the government bombed its own capital, assassinated its highest government security officials, and trained lethal Islamists to run terror organizations that have killed thousands of his best soldiers. All of this in order to convince the world that ISIS and al-Qaida are not products of the Sunni opposition but rather the Frankensteins of Assad’s invention. “Kill Assad,” they seem to be saying, “and you will kill the jihadists and win the war on terror.” This is all too good to be true, of course. They insist that Assad’s war against jihadists is fake. Faithful to his sources, Roy Gutman argues that President Assad is not only in cahoots with ISIS, but that he “built ISIS.”
Gutman relates that one opposition source explained that President Bashar al-Assad himself issued an order to remove roadblocks in Damascus so that a car bomber, claiming to be Nusra, could have easy access to a Damascus neighborhood, set off his huge explosion and make it look like the capital was being attacked by jihadists. This explosion was a false flag operation, Gutman argues, masterminded by Assad himself in order to deceive the world into believing that jihadists were a menace when they were not. Never mind that James Clapper, the director of U.S. National Intelligence, told Congress in mid-February that the explosions “had all the earmarks of an al Qaeda-like attack and so we believe al Qaeda in Iraq is extending its reach into Syria.” Never mind that Abu Muhammad al-Jawlani, the head of al-Qaida’s surrogate in Syria, the al-Nusra terrorist group, claimed responsibility for the explosion. Gutman insists that his source is telling the truth and everyone else, including the intelligence services of the United States are deceived by Assad propaganda. Why would U.S. news services publish these assertions? They make no sense. They reek of conspiracy theory, are transparently self-serving, and defy logic.
 screen-shot-2016-12-05-at-9-59-54-amAssassination of Assef Shawkat, the President’s Brother-in-Law, 18 July 2012
 Mr. Gutman’s sources are convinced that Iran, Syria’s closest ally, ordered the killing of Assad’s top security team. Not only do they speculate on who was behind the Damascus explosions, but they also attempt to deconstruct one of the most spectacular bombings that struck the inner circle of the Syrian leadership. On 18 July 2012 Assad’s Crisis Management Group was meeting at the heavily guarded National Security building in Rawda Square in central Damascus. Those killed included top members of Assad’s Crisis Group: Defense Minister Gen. Dawoud Rajha, his deputy, Assaf Shawkat, who was Assad’s brother-in-law, Major General Hisham Ikhtiyar, a top national security adviser to the president, and Gen. Hassan Turkmani, a former defense minister.
 Gutman explains that Syrian Interior Minister Shaar placed a brief case against the wall in the room in order to blow up the security group. None of this makes sense, of course. Mr. Shaar stayed in the building, rather than escape. He blew himself up, severely injuring himself in the blast. He spent almost 40 days at Chami hospital in intensive care.
 Ali Mamlouk, head of the Syrian intelligence apparatus
 Ali Mamlouk, head of the Syrian intelligence apparatus
 If this is not crazy enough, Mr. Gutman offers an even more preposterous story to explain why Iran would blow up its ally’s leading security chieftains. Gutman, once again quoting sources “within Assad’s entourage” insists that Iran killed Shawkat, the President’s relative, in order to place their own man, Ali Mamlouk, as the head of intelligence. All of this is preposterous. It includes stories about Assad’s mother and brother, who are part of this great plot. They are intimately involved in this family intrigue. How could Gutman’s low level defectors possibly know the details of this Assad family saga? The simple answer, of course, is they couldn’t. Gutman repeatedly expresses outrage and consternation at the perfidy and incompetence of the CIA for not debriefing his Syrian opposition contacts to find out the deepest secrets of the Assad regime that he has found out. The Daily Beast, which publishes Gutman’s revelations, shares his outrage. Little wonder that so many Americans are having a hard time figuring out how to evaluate the “post-truth” age, when their news organs feed them such pablum. How in the world could Iran, Assad and Hizbollah be winning this regional war against Turkey, the Gulf States, Israel and a large array of Sunni rebel militias if Iran were blowing up the leadership of its closest ally? Certainly, it is comforting to believe that one’s enemies are incompetent, malevolent killers, but could they really have maintained a thirty-five year alliance if they were busy killing off family members and security chieftains of each other? These sorts of explanations for what is happening in Syria beggar belief. Such conspiracy theories are attractive in the absence of facts. Here is what I can reconstruct from a few sources who in a position to know.
 The Real Perpetrators of the Bombing of the Assad’s Crisis Group 
 The only truth that Mr. Gutman’s sources told was that no one was “allowed to get close” to the investigation after the bombing. As we will see below, this would become an important factor in confirming the identity of the real perpetrators of the bombing.
 The crisis group regularly assembled at the office of the National Security inside the Qiyade Qutriye (Central Command building) and not at Turkmani’s office as Mr. Gutman’s article posits. Nearly 3 months before the July 18th bombing, an insider placed Mercury Cyanide inside the lentil soup that was offered to members of the crisis group. The poison almost killed Interior Minister Shaar and Turkmani. Asef Shawkat declined the soup dish and was not harmed. Following the incident, a decision was made to heighten security by regularly changing the meeting location. The offices of Hisham Ihtiyar and the Defense Minister became alternative venues for the meeting.
 Nearly 7 months after the bombing, European diplomats, the identity of whom I have been asked not to disclose, called a meeting between a Syrian official and an opposition figure who insisted that he had been behind the assassination of Assef Shawkat. The reason that the European diplomats called for the meeting was to pressure President Assad and his generals to resign. They believed that the success of the opposition figure in assassinating so many top government officials would intimidate Assad and convince him to leave Syria. The opposition figure asked the Syrian official with whom he was meeting to relay to President Assad and his men that the opposition could assassinate him as surely as it has assassinated Assef Shawkat and the other principals of the regime.
 In order to establish his credibility, the opposition figure explained in great detail how and where the bomb had been planted in the National Security building in Rawda. His details matched the evidence that was being uncovered by the regime investigation of the bombing and convinced its officials that the opposition figure was not bluffing. He knew that the bombs were placed in a suspended or drop ceiling that had been installed in the National Security room years earlier. A total of 5 explosives were placed inside the drop ceiling. One of the five did not explode. Such details were impossible for anyone outside the inner circle in Damascus to verify. It was clear that the opposition figure knew what he was talking about. The Syrian official quickly concluded that the opposition member, a Damascene
 Syrian Defence Minister General Daoud Rajha
 Syrian Defence Minister General Daoud Rajha
 financier, had been involved in the bombing that killed the President’s brother-in-law. He went on to explain how Saudi Arabian officials had promised him a large sum of money that he later collected once the bombing had been successfully carried out. This was further confirmed when he described how he was able to recruit an Armenian officer who worked at Major General Hisham Ikhtiyar’s office to smuggle the explosives inside the building and use the adjacent office from which he was able to insert the bombs into the ceiling and have them placed into Mr. Ikhtiyar’s office, directly above the table around which the group convened. Fifteen minutes before the explosion, the Armenian officer left the building, claiming that he had to empty the garbage. He never returned. He had placed a timer in his office that triggered the explosion. He has never been seen again. His reward was $2 million out of the total of $7 million that was paid to the group. In 2012, barely a year into the Syrian crisis, the idea that the Syrian state might be the next government to fall in the Arab Spring was gaining momentum. With the probability of state collapse on the rise, it made sense for an Armenian officer and others like him to accept a $2 million payment in the hope starting a new life overseas.
 Recall that officials from a European capital witnessed the meeting in which the Syrian financier explained to Syrian officials how he had executed the assassination of Asef Shawkat. They can confirm this entire account. Contrary to the speculations of Mr. Gutman’s sources, Iran was not involved in the bombing. The regime was not turning on itself. Assad’s closest ally was not assassinating Assad family members in order to gain control over Syria.
 Iraq and the Jihadi Nexus:
 Almost immediately after 9/11, Assad authorized his intelligence services to share many of their files on the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria and Europe. Late in 2002, Syrian intelligence helped disrupt an attack by al-Qaida on the headquarters of the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet in Bahrain. Assad then also agreed to house suspected terrorists for the CIA in Syrian prisons. This developing collaboration between Damascus and Washington based on having al-Qaida as a common enemy was soon to go cold after Assad begun to publicly oppose the Iraq war. George W. Bush soon responded by linking Syria to an ‘axis of evil’ containing Iraq, Iran and North Korea. With the Iraq invasion gathering force, both the Syrian leadership and their Islamist enemies started to plan for the possibility that Damascus could be next after Iraq. The Syrian Islamist militants started to move to the north east of the country ahead of the American invasion of Iraq. They planned to fill the void should the Syrian state become the next target of the U.S. The Syrian state was becoming equally convinced of the American plans towards Syria. It was the head of one of the Intelligence agencies who soon saw an opportunity in infiltrating those Islamists moving to the border and then organizing them to move into Iraq rather than wait for the Americans to cross into Syria. This plan meant that those who cross into Iraq to fight are known to Syrian intelligence when they cross back into Syria. It was through this system that Syrian prisons saw a nearly 10 fold increase in jihadist ranks. These hardened fighters were to spread their ideology throughout an overcrowded and largely mismanaged Syrian prison system infecting the minds of many none jihadist Syrians in the process.
 Flirting With the Islamists:
 Since fighting an earlier war with the Moslem Brotherhood in the early 1980’s, Syrian jails have been home to many Islamists. Syrian security agencies have traditionally trumped the Syrian justice system when it comes to the final say on the length of stay of those arrested. Often, when the justice system sentenced a person, the security services had the authority to ignore the end of the sentence by invoking “national security” concerns. This meant that many of those in prison were there beyond their legal stay. Scores of families never got to see their loved ones even after their original legal sentences were over.
 Zahran Alloush, Leader of the Islamic Army.
 Zahran Alloush, Leader of opposition militia, the Islamic Army. See this article about his ideology and beliefs
 As the events in Daraa unfolded, the President invited key figures from the town to see what can be done to calm the demonstrations. One such figure was cleric Sayasneh. One of the consistent demands of such meetings was the release of prisoners. It was no different when Douma joined the uprising. Foreign Embassies were also pushing the Syrian State to release what it called political prisoners. People like Zahran Alloush were sentenced to seven years in prison when he was arrested with a group of 40 people on the charge of promoting Wahhabi ideology and gun possession. They had not killed anyone or even fired a shot. Yet, they were sent to prisons like Sednaya and kept there beyond the end of their sentence on the whim of one of the security agencies. It was in this context when the residents of Douma demanded the release of prisoners from their districts. The Syrian leadership was under intense pressure to calm the crisis. The people of Douma promised to do their job at calming their own streets if some of those prisoners were released. Zahran and many others like him were released under this rationale. This is not too dissimilar to the way the American prisons in Iraq worked. Zarqawi, Baghdadi and Golani were all released from those prisons either when their terms ended or when the local populations demanded their release. Just like in Syrian prisons, the prisoners in American jails were also indoctrinated with jihadist ideology. Syria erred by releasing Alloush and Abboud who would go on to form Jeish al Islam and Ahrar just like the U.S. erred when it released Baghdadi who would go on to form ISIS.
 The Aleppo Central Prison:
 One of the longest standoffs between the Syrian Army and armed groups was at the Aleppo prison complex. Nearly 3,000 inmates and 500 Syrian police and soldiers were trapped inside the prison for close to 3 years by armed militias that regularly shelled it. Like so many similar regime-opposition standoffs, intense negotiations were regularly attempted between the two sides. Mr. Fedaa Majzoub, an Australian citizen, was the point man in the negotiations between the two sides. One of the key demands of al-Nusra and Ahrar al Sham, the two militias that led the seige of the Aleppo prison, was the release of 80 jihadist comrades that were amongst the 3000 inmates. Had Damascus been following a strategy of releasing jihadists from Al Qaeda and the like onto Syrian streets to change the image of the uprising as suggested by the sources of Mr. Gutman’s article, there was never a better opportunity to do so by Assad. Instead of yielding to the demands of the negotiator to release the 80 jihadists, the Syrian leadership chose instead to defend the complex for resulting in a standoff that lasted nearly three years.
 Almost since the start of the Syrian crisis, the debate on the timing of the radicalization of the conflict still rages on. Supporters of the Syrian opposition refer to articles like Mr. Gutman’s to portray a peaceful uprising that Damascus desperately tried to radicalize through all means possible. Such sinister attempts were thought to include colluding with terrorists and releasing from their jails as well as bombing its own capital to prove a point. Loyalists and leadership insiders, on the other hand, believe that the uprising was radicalized very early on after the initial events were quickly hijacked by Islamists who had sat waiting for decades for this moment to start. Based on extensive personal conversations with ex White House officials, there seems to be a consensus that the defining moment of this debate was the incident that occurred at the town of Jisr al –Shugour in June of 2011. This is when 120 soldiers were killed between 3 and 6 June. Opposition activists say it was one part of the army firing on another for refusing to kill protesters. Thousands of miles away in Washington, American officials were already eavesdropping on Syrian opposition and others. On Friday June 3rd, White House officials knew that those soldiers were shot and killed by the opposition as the latter used various communication devices to boast about the incident. One particular official became convinced that the response of Damascus will be swift and devastating. He therefore decided to be at his desk over the weekend to monitor the situation. The weekend passed with no such response by Damascus. By Monday, officials at the White House were pleasantly surprised. Their worst fears of a harsh crackdown were never materialized. Over the coming weeks and months those early thoughts turned to be wishful thinking as Syria soon descended into its black tunnel.
 [End]
 Joshua Landis and Roy Gutman debate the notion that Assad helped create ISIS and planned false flag operations to bomb Damascus on “NPR’s To The Point” 

Qatari Writer, Dr. 'Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari,: Religious Extremism's Roots Are In Muslim Society, Not External Elements
MEMRI/December 06/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/06/memri-qatari-writer-dr-abd-al-hamid-al-ansari-religious-extremisms-roots-are-in-muslim-society-not-external-elements/
http://www.memri.org/reports/qatari-writer-religious-extremisms-roots-are-muslim-society-not-external-elements
On September 7, 2016, Qatari writer and intellectual Dr. 'Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari, former dean of Islamic law at Qatar University, wrote in his column in the UAE daily Al-Ittihad that the Arabs must stop thinking that external elements such as the West or economic woes are to blame for Islamic religious extremism. The Arabs, he said, should examine themselves and their school curricula, raise the younger generation to be tolerant and open, and fight political Islam and prevent mosque pulpits from being used to spread extremist ideas.
Following are excerpts from his column:[1]
"Religious extremism is not, as many believe, a new phenomenon or the result of current events. It has accompanied Arab societies throughout Islamic history, but was [at first] limited to individuals, not to [entire] groups and organizations – until the arbitration between 'Ali and Muawiya, [which led] to the Kharijites'[2] breakaway [from Islam]. They were the first armed terrorist organization, and their violent attack was against the best Muslim society [of all] – the righteous caliphs and the righteous caliphate state – [and was launched] under the slogan of 'there is no rule but Allah's.' This [Kharijite] slogan gave rise to Al-Mawdudi's, and later Sayyid Qutb's, espousal of perception of hakimiyya,[3] which forms the ideological lynchpin of all subsequent extremist organizations.
"Had the Kharijites been satisfied with armed rebellion, had not accused the Companions of the Prophet of apostasy and made [taking] their blood [i.e. lives] and property permissible, we would have said that they were like all separatist rebel groups that gnaw away at the united Muslim corpus. But the Kharijites were known for their aggressive religious extremism that did only accuse their political rivals of apostasy, but also declared their blood, property, and honor [permissible] – and today this is what we call terrorism.
"I oppose the politicization of religious extremism, or justifying it on the grounds of political oppression, suppression of liberties, and the spread of tyranny. I also [oppose] blaming religious extremism on economic factors such as unemployment and poverty; attributing it to international conflicts such as the problems in Palestine, Kashmir, and Chechnya, or to the American presence in the region and the American occupation in Iraq; or [claiming] that Muslims have been the target of an external plot. These and other excuses are spread by various media outlets, a large portion of writers and intellectuals, pan-Arabist preachers, left-wingers and Islamists, and especially political Islam preachers, who justify religious extremism by calling it a response to oppressive international policy and the result of totalitarian Arab regimes and secular [desecration] of religious symbols.T hey even tie religious extremism to the torture inflicted on Muslim Brotherhood [members] in the prisons.
"In my opinion, all these explanations and excuses serve one purpose: politically exploiting terrorism for the benefit of various groups' partisan agendas (pan-Arabist, leftist, and Islamist), by means of winning over public opinion, stirring it up, and inciting it against the regimes.
"Thus, extremism, just like [religious] fanaticism, is the result of internal causes and elements that are rooted in a misguided, unilateral, and closed-minded education that does not foster critical thinking and is not open to humanistic cultures. [It is the result of] religious discourse aimed strictly at depicting the world as plotting against Muslims, [the result of] media that incites against the other and sows hatred in the hearts and minds of young people, and [the result of] of an unwise policy that discriminates among citizens, and fails to establish an egalitarian 'embracing citizenship' for all elements of society.
"How do we deal with religious extremism?
"If we want to tackle the causes of religious extremism, we must first reexamine early childhood upbringing methods – because as education and psychology research has shown, most extremists are the product of a failed upbringing that is the result of unfettered [population] growth or the breakdown of the family. Furthermore, we [must] overhaul school curricula, teaching methods, and the teaching environment as a whole – and not only develop and improve curricula and textbooks. One of the most important things in this context is to remove extremists and hate preachers from the educational environment... We must also oversee the pulpits from which religious sermons are delivered, and classify as a crime their use for any purpose besides the legitimate roles they are meant to play, such as exploiting them for a partisan agenda or [in order to spread] extremist ideas.
"The mosque pulpits of all religious schools of thought and trends must unite and not divide, and must stress commonalities and foster the sublime Islamic principles and values... We should also develop the religious discourse so that it is open to the other and to shared human values, and should work to limit the religious establishment's influence and shatter its custodianship of society... along with banning fatwas that accuse others of apostasy, that incite, and that question the beliefs of others.
"Ultimately, extremism is the symptom of a disease, and if we truly want to tackle extremism, we must first dry up its sources and remove its roots that reach deep into the social soil – because the foundation of extremism is an ideology that drives its proponents to think that they possess the ultimate truth and that others [believe] in mistaken things..."
[1] Al-Ittihad (UAE), September 7, 2016.
[2] In 657 CE, Muawiya I fought a battle with Caliph 'Ali bin Abi Talib in an attempt to topple him. When the battle ended with no clear victor, it was decided that the two would undergo a process of arbitration to determine the leader, after which Muawiya was appointed caliph. A group of Ali's supporters objected to the results of the arbitration, arguing that the transfer of leadership is solely in the hands of Allah. This group therefore set itself apart from the rest of the Muslims and received the name Khawarij (Kharijites).
[3] The view that rule is Allah's alone, which is not the case in modern Muslim societies, which rely on man-made laws. The ideological fathers of radical Islam such as Al-Mawdudi and Sayyid Qutb claimed that the absence of hakimiyya takes Muslims back to the pre-Islamic jahiliyya (ignorance) period, in which people did not honor the rule of Allah.

How does the ‘mad dog’ think?
Mamdouh AlMuhaini/Al Arabiya/December 06/16
The next US Secretary of Defense James Mattis has been nicknamed the “mad dog.” This is not an insult but praise. He is an enthusiastic hound who is passionate about work and detail oriented. It’s said that he does not like this nickname but he is also described as the “warrior monk” because he never married, has more than 7,000 books in his library and can quote the most famous philosophers and war veterans. When asked why he carried a book with him to the battlefield, he said that technological progress had not changed the nature of war that much as the lesson for winning past wars fought with swords and spears is the same for wars fought with tanks and drones. You must understand your enemy well to defeat him.
This is why Mattis nicely criticizes his superiors in the civilian sphere who did not understand their enemies well and did not specify their targets, thus thwarting major military efforts. During the Iraqi war, US troops succeeded in achieving a swift victory in only three weeks; however, political goals were not clear or realistic and Iraq thus slipped into chaos. Out of the five wars which the US fought after emerging victorious over Nazism in World War II, it only won one. It failed in the Korean, Vietnamese, Afghan and recent Iraqi war and won Operation Desert Shield. Then-political leader George Bush Sr. clearly specified that his political aims were to liberate Kuwait and not to topple Saddam Hussein and he did not involve military commanders in a war which end they were not familiar with.
Mattis is well-known for some famous statements such as: “Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.” However, these sound bites are crafted for media promotion and consumption and the way he actually thinks is more strategic as he has a clearer idea about the role of the US and the biggest evils which threaten the world. This is why he disagreed with President Barack Obama’s vision.
Knowing how the “mad dog,” who joined the army at the age of 18, thinks is necessary to understand the next US administration’s approach under the leadership of President Donald Trump, especially when it comes to predicting the future. Truth be told, the features of the next American administration’s policy has begun to become clearer thanks to Trump’s cabinet picks. The choices indicate a belief in a bigger role for the US in the world and actually oppose Trump’s fiery electoral promises that called for isolation and for making allies pay for the services provided to them.
Mattis aspires to restore American influence in the region and he believes in the perfect moral vision for the world
According to the “mad dog,” the regime in Tehran poses the biggest threat. He was once asked about the biggest evils which threaten the Middle East and he repeatedly said: “Iran... Iran... Iran.” Contrary to the views of Obama and his officials who believe in the policy of declawing the mullahs’ regime and dragging it into the international system, Mattis confirms that the Iranian regime does not believe in this liberal system and neither thinks nor acts as states do but operates according to the concepts of revolution and expansion. Confronting Iran is one of the major issues which this veteran general has in mind. In one interview, he said militarily subjugating Iran is not difficult. According to him, it is not Iran but the Quds Force, Qassem Soleimani and terrorist militias which Tehran has established and supported which seek to attain nuclear weapons. His vision of the Iranian role in the world is bigger and more realistic and historic than the vision of analysts and journalists who keep repeating statements about the fallacies of the Saudi-Iranian struggle in the Middle East. During an exclusive interview, he asked one of the journalists a question which the region’s people know the answer to. He asked: “What is the one country in the Middle East that has not been attacked by ISIS?” He did not wait for an answer and said: “One. That is Iran. That is more than happenstance, I’m sure.”
The second threat to Mattis after Shiite political Islam is Sunni political Islam and all the movements which have emerged from it. Once again, his analysis comprehends the roots of the intellectual crisis which is deeply-rooted in history. Extremism is not product of our times but dates back to bygone centuries. The US can militarily defeat al-Qaeda, Taliban and ISIS members but defeating their ideology is not easy and Americans or Westerners cannot perform this task, but Muslims themselves can. Mattis speaks in a friendly manner about moderate Sunni governments and confirms that he’s fought by their side and emphasizes their major future role in defeating terrorism through launching a fierce war on fanatics’ ideas which represent the ideological source of violence and terrorism which distorted the image of Islam and harmed Muslims. When it comes to Iran, his war with a regime that exports terrorism and that does not commit to international standards is a matter of fate and he says that practically, war with the Iranians has been ongoing since 1979. When it comes to Arabs, he supports moderate states in eliminating extremists and instigators.
General Mattis’ character enjoys respect and appreciation. After years of Obama’s term, which is described as a phase of weakness or American withdrawal, a commentator satirically said: “It’s good that the defense minister’s nickname is ‘mad dog’ to scare Iran and Russia.” Mattis aspires to restore American influence in the region and he believes in the perfect moral vision for the world. His biggest confrontation will thus be with Vladimir Putin who disagrees with him on almost everything.
**This article was first published on AlArabiya.net on Dec. 6, 2016.

Let’s make Saudi Vision 2030 a reality
Khaled Almaeena/Al Arabiya/December 06/16
According to a report in a local newspaper, the government will start paying contractors within the next two weeks and up to 80 percent of the money owed will be paid by the end of this year.
Fahd al-Hammadi, head of the National Contractors Committee at the Council of Saudi Chambers, said that around SR 40 billion has already been disbursed to construction firms and asked that the rest be distributed as per the directives of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques. His request can be fully appreciated as delays have caused untold hardship to workers, business owners, suppliers and banks. Our national economy has suffered and our image abroad has been damaged.
This culture of delayed payments has prevailed for some time and was even the case when oil prices were high. It stems from irregularities, corruption, mismanagement and a lack of empathy among those in the world of business and finance. At times the attitude of bureaucrats, even minor ones, could make or break a major project.
It is important at this critical juncture when oil prices are down and reserves have taken a hit that the Ministry of Finance manages a cash flow that helps streamline the economy.
Another report in a local daily states that Saudi reserves can cover the budget deficit for the next seven years. However, we need not wait for that to happen! And it should not happen. After all we have oil exports as well as some non-oil exports, and there are other sources of revenue, as well.
Let us usher in a positive atmosphere by modernizing our ministries and making Saudi Vision 2030 a goal and a reality
Saudi Vision 2030 is clear. However, what is needed is a balanced budget, fiscal responsibility, an end to waste and a proper costing of projects. International standards should be applied. Furthermore, while in the past major conglomerates were in control, the business scene should change to allow small- and medium-sized enterprises to participate in the national economy.
Let us usher in a positive atmosphere by modernizing our ministries and making Saudi Vision 2030 a goal and a reality. History will not forgive us if we do not do so.
*This article was first published in the Saudi Gazette on December 4, 2016.