LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

December 13/16

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletin16/english.december13.16.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
Those who speak on their own seek their own glory; but the one who seeks the glory of him who sent him is true, and there is nothing false in him."
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to
Saint John 07/11-18/:"The Jews were looking for him at the festival and saying, ‘Where is he?’And there was considerable complaining about him among the crowds. While some were saying, ‘He is a good man’, others were saying, ‘No, he is deceiving the crowd.’ Yet no one would speak openly about him for fear of the Jews. About the middle of the festival Jesus went up into the temple and began to teach. The Jews were astonished at it, saying, ‘How does this man have such learning, when he has never been taught?’ Then Jesus answered them, ‘My teaching is not mine but his who sent me. Anyone who resolves to do the will of God will know whether the teaching is from God or whether I am speaking on my own. Those who speak on their own seek their own glory; but the one who seeks the glory of him who sent him is true, and there is nothing false in him." 
 
God gave them a sluggish spirit, eyes that would not see and ears that would not hear, down to this very day
Letter to the Romans 11/01-12/:"I ask, then, has God rejected his people? By no means! I myself am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, a member of the tribe of Benjamin. God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew. Do you not know what the scripture says of Elijah, how he pleads with God against Israel? ‘Lord, they have killed your prophets, they have demolished your altars; I alone am left, and they are seeking my life.’But what is the divine reply to him? ‘I have kept for myself seven thousand who have not bowed the knee to Baal.’So too at the present time there is a remnant, chosen by grace. But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works, otherwise grace would no longer be grace. What then? Israel failed to obtain what it was seeking. The elect obtained it, but the rest were hardened, as it is written, ‘God gave them a sluggish spirit, eyes that would not see and ears that would not hear, down to this very day.’And David says, ‘Let their table become a snare and a trap, a stumbling-block and a retribution for them; let their eyes be darkened so that they cannot see, and keep their backs for ever bent.’So I ask, have they stumbled so as to fall? By no means! But through their stumbling salvation has come to the Gentiles, so as to make Israel jealous. Now if their stumbling means riches for the world, and if their defeat means riches for Gentiles, how much more will their full inclusion mean!". 

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on December 12-13/16
T
o Hell With Assad’s Criminal Victories/Elias Bejjani/December 12/16
Egypt’s Deadliest Church Attack/Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute/December 12/16
There is life left in OPEC after all/Dr. Mohamed A. Ramady/Al Arabiya/December 12/16
Post-Brexit, May seeks to shape a new British profile in the Gulf/Talmiz Ahmad/Al Arabiya/December 12/16
Europe: Illegal to Criticize Islam/Judith Bergman/Gatestone Institute/December /16
Why Donald Trump Should Focus on Africa/Ahmed Charai/Gatestone Institute/December12/16
As Aleppo's Fall To Assad Regime Seems Assured, Regime Is Certain Of Its Victory And Future International Influence – And Opposition Recognizes Defeat/N. Mozes and M. Terdiman/MEMRI/December 12/2016

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on December 12-13/16
To Hell With Assad’s Criminal Victories
Franjieh Says Ready for Cooperation or Confrontation with Aoun
Report: Parties Mull Holding a Spiritual Summit to Support Aoun
Ministry of Foreign Affairs Condemns Istanbul and Cairo Bombings
Kanaan: Progress Recorded at Government Formation Level
LF 'Not Concerned' with Franjieh's Ain el-Tineh Remarks as Hariri Meets Khalil, Riachi
FPM, Hizbullah MPs Say Proportional Representation is 'Best' Electoral Law
Kataeb Slams Ministerial Portfolio Spat, Says Dissociation Policy 'Protected Lebanon'
Hariri, Finance Minister dwell on Cabinet formation headway
Change and Reform MPs visit Maarab, confirm no return to 1960 law
Rae, Mashnouq hold closed door meeting, illuminate Christmas tree
ISTL Registrar arrives in Beirut
Rahi offers Pope Tawadros heartfelt condolences on Coptic Church fallen victims
Arslan meets FPM delegation, renews calls for proportionality

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on December 12-13/16
Identity of Cairo suicide bomber revealed
Netanyahu wants to discuss Iran deal options with Trump
Israel urges Egypt to ‘fight terrorism together’
Assad sweeps Aleppo, rebels offered ‘safe’ exit
Syria Army Takes Aleppo District, Battle in 'Final Phase'
France Accuses Russia of 'Lying' about Syria
Death Toll after Turkey Blasts Rises to 44
Turkey Detains over 100 Pro-Kurdish Party Officials
Mosul Doctors Struggle to Save Civilians on Iraq Front Line
Bahrain Upholds Jail Sentence for Opposition Chief
Saudi Says British FM's 'Proxy War' Comment Misconstrued
Internet, a Scourge to the Iran Regime
Austrian MEP urges recognition of democratic opposition led by Maryam Rajavi
Iran: Execution of 10 prisoners to coincide with International Human Rights Day
Message of Maryam Rajavi to the Conference at the US Senate
U.S. Lawmakers Endorse Resolution to Bring to Justice Perpetrators of Iran’s 1988 Massacre of MEK Political Prisoners


Links From Jihad Watch Site for on December 12-13/16
Trinidad: Highest rate of Islamic State recruitment in Western hemisphere
Italy: Priest bans Nativity scene for fear of offending Muslims
What is Really Behind Canada’s Anti-Islamophobia Motions?
Raymond Ibrahim: Egypt’s Deadliest Church Attack
Saudi religious police arrest woman for going out in public unveiled
Pope: Christmas reminds us that Jesus was a migrant
Europe: Illegal to criticize Islam
Robert Spencer in FrontPage: Muslims Bomb Cairo Coptic Cathedral
Gay activist who got “Brady Bunch” star Susan Olsen fired excoriates her for saying “Koran is a political tract”
UK Home Office allows jihad preacher banned in Pakistan to preach in UK mosque (but even mosque bans him)
Tolerance of Islamic intolerance is now the British government’s cardinal doctrine
Egypt: Jihad-martyrdom suicide bomber carried out attack in Cairo cathedral, four jihad plotters arrested
The Qur’an Teaches That All Human Beings Are Equal”: Sex (Part II)
Raymond Ibrahim: The Ugly Truth about Muslim Grievances

Links From Christian Today Site for on December 12-13/16
Archbishop Of Canterbury: Churches Are Changing Lives Through Debt Counselling
Cairo Attack on Christians: State Funeral For Victims As Sisi Declares Three Days Of Mourning
Syrian Rebels Offered Chance To Quit Aleppo, Jihadists Retake Palmyra
Miraculous Story Of Drug Addict Who Found Jesus, Got Clean And Is Now Successful Businessman
Christian Pastor In Turkey Imprisoned And Accused Of Armed Terrorism Links
Teen Girl In Intensive Care And Boy Under Arrest After Stabbing At Christian School
Attack On Cairo Cathedral Kills At Least 25
Earthquakes And Migrant Drownings Recalled In Vatican Nativity Scene
UK Adopts Official Antisemitism Definition
BBC Admits To Unbalanced Report On What Wartime Pope Did To Save Jews
Nigeria Orders Probe After Dozens Die When Church Roof Caves In
'ISIS Is Here To Stay': What Next For Christians in Qaraqosh?
Christian Nurse Sues For Unfair Dismissal After Talking About Jesus At Work

Latest Lebanese Related News published on December 12-13/16
To Hell With Assad’s Criminal Victories

Elias Bejjani/December 12/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/12/elias-bejjani-to-hell-with-assads-criminal-victories%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B3-%D8%A8%D8%AC%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AA%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%B3%D8%AF/
Is it really a victory for Syria’s dictator, president Bachar Al Assad when he is murdering his own people, forcing them into exile, destroying their homes and humiliating them. To hell with such a bloody, criminal and evil victory. ’Meanwhile this hungry for blood, Dracula, murderer and butcher had the guts to enter one of Syria’s Mosques to pray and by his side his mouthpiece, Mufti Hassoun..Yes the same Hassoun that was welcomed few days ago in our Lebanese presidential Palace as well as in our Maronite Patriarchate. By the way, Hassoun spent his night in occupied Lebanon at Waeam Wahab’s palace as a great and honourable guest . In conclusion, We are sadly living in an era where all that is human, dignity, honour, fear of God, faith and conscience are all pushed aside and downtrodden.

Franjieh Says Ready for Cooperation or Confrontation with Aoun
Naharnet/December 12/16/Marada Movement chief MP Suleiman Franjieh escalated his rhetoric on Monday and stressed after a meeting with Patriarch al-Rahi that he is ready for a confrontation as well as for cooperation with President Michel Aoun depending on the latter's messages. “We refuse Aoun's punishment as a way to deal with us. We are ready to stand by Aoun if he wishes to have new relations with us, but we are also ready for a confrontation is he chooses to fight,” said Franjieh after a meeting he held with al-Rahi.
 Franjieh's meeting with the Patriarch came as part of a Bkirki initiative that aimed, according to media reports, to pave the way for Franjieh's meeting with Aoun to ease the differences hampering the formation of a new cabinet. Although Franjieh's comments were tense, but he hailed Rahi and said: “The Patriarch is the keeper of dignities and we are ready for a meeting with Aoun the way that the Patriarch sees appropriate.”“Things are on their way to a solution and we will soon meet with (Speaker Nabih) Berri.”Media reports said on Sunday that the Patriarch is seeking to mend ties between Franjieh and Aoun. The patriarch had visited Baabda last week to put Aoun in the picture of his endeavor “and it seems that he heard a positive answer from the president,” the reports said. But on Monday a Marada source told MTV during Franjieh's meeting with Rahi: “There will be no visit to Baabda. Franjieh has not taken a decision yet.”Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah had on Friday announced that the party wants ties to be restored between its two main Christian allies – the Free Patriotic Movement and Marada. Ties between Aoun and Franjieh were strained after the latter was nominated for the presidency by al-Mustaqbal Movement leader Saad Hariri in late 2015.
 
Report: Parties Mull Holding a Spiritual Summit to Support Aoun
Naharnet/December 12/16/Media reports said that parties are mulling calls to hold a spiritual Christian-Islamic summit with the aim of backing President Michel Aoun and the new tenure, in order to provide atmospheres appropriate for the new government to function properly, the Kuwaiti As-Seyasah daily reported Monday. The daily said that the summit has the aim of helping the government implement “the required including an agreement on devising a new electoral to hold the parliamentary polls.” The political parties are bickering over amending the current election law which divides seats among the different religious sects. The current parliament has failed to amend the law, and has extended its mandate twice amid criticism. New elections are scheduled for May 2017.
 As-Seyasah added that contacts are underway to ensure the success of the summit and provide the proper conditions in compatibility with the ministerial statement to avoid any objections to it.
 
Ministry of Foreign Affairs Condemns Istanbul and Cairo Bombings
Naharnet/December 12/16/Lebanon's Foreign Affairs Ministry strongly condemned in a statement on Monday, the terrorist bombings which targeted the Turkish city of Istanbul on Saturday evening leaving several killed and wounded. “The ministry offers its condolences to the Turkish leadership, people and to the families of the victims who died in the convicted crime that targeted the institutional legitimacy in Turkey,” said the statement. “The war against terrorism is the common cause of the entire civilized world, and it is not overridden by any other priority in today's world. It requires united efforts in order to defeat expeditious obscurantism,” the statement added. Twin attacks ripped through Istanbul late on Saturday killing 38 people, mostly police. The bloodshed saw a car bomb exploding outside the home stadium of football giants Besiktas and less than a minute later, a suicide attacker blew himself up by a group of police at a nearby park. Most of the dead were police officers, who accounted for 30 of the victims. Seven civilians also died, along with one person whose identity was unclear, officials said. Around 150 people were wounded in the blasts. The Ministry also condemned the Cairo bombing that targeted a church near Cairo's Coptic cathedral during a service Sunday, killing 23 people and wounding 49. “The Ministry offers its condolences to the leadership of the Egyptian Republic, people and families of the innocent victims. It affirms that Lebanon stands today shoulder to shoulder with Egypt, and stresses the necessity to unify international and regional efforts to support national armies in their battles against terrorism,” said the statement.
 
Aoun Offers Condolences to Sisi, Tawadros over Church Blast Victims

Naharnet/December 12/16/President Michel Aoun held phone talks Sunday with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi to offer him condolences over the victims of a bomb attack that killed at least 25 people inside a Cairo church in the deadliest attack in recent memory on Egypt's Christian minority. “This horrific crime that has shaken the conscience of humanity proves that terrorism is not deterred by any moral or religious considerations and that it is the peak of criminality,” Aoun told Sisi. He also expressed the solidarity of the Lebanese president and people with “the brotherly Egyptian people,” state-run National News Agency said. Aoun also called the spiritual leader of the Coptic Orthodox community in Lebanon Father Orshalimi Roweis to offer condolences to Coptic Pope Tawadros II. There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the bombing but Coptic Christians, who make up about 10 percent of Egypt's population, have been previously targeted in jihadist attacks. At least 31 people were also wounded in the blast, the health ministry said, as the attack drew condemnation from political and religious leaders and led President Sisi to declare three days of national mourning.
 
Kanaan: Progress Recorded at Government Formation Level
Naharnet/December 12/16/Change and Reform bloc MP Ibrahim Kanaan said the negotiations happening at the level of forming a new cabinet “have recorded a clear progress,” and the latest contacts gave the “stalled formation a push forward.” “There is clear progress in the negotiations happening at the governmental level, but the final visualization is to expressed by Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri. No doubt that the latest contacts gave the formation a push forward,” said Kanaan in an interview to VDL (100.5). As for the number of ministers in the new cabinet, he said: “Until this moment we are still considering a 24-minister cabinet. As for the obstacle of the public works and health portfolios, it is being addressed between Speaker Nabih Berri and Marada chief MP Suleiman Franjieh, and all the other blocs with the PM designated to form the cabinet.”On the prospects for the Lebanese Forces to accept being given the health portfolio instead of the public works, the MP said: “We must not rush things because the issue depends on the positions of the blocs in question. Today the contacts will resume and the LF is the party concerned to give an answer in this regard. “On our part, we have a tour today where we will meet with Loyalty to the Resistance bloc and the Lebanese Forces to discuss the electoral law, of course there is a possibility to discuss many other issues.”Kanaan concluded: “The starting point for the bloc to discuss will be the proposal of the Orthodox electoral law which was suggested by us, and the proportional representation based on 15 districts which was approved in Bkirki. We are open to any law that provides parity and convergence between the blocs.”The political forces are seeking to reach a settlement over the distribution of the ministerial portfolios that are still a subject of contention so that the new cabinet can be formed soon.  The sought settlement will re-distribute the public works, health and education ministerial portfolios and one of them is supposed to be offered to Marada, media reports had said.

LF 'Not Concerned' with Franjieh's Ain el-Tineh Remarks as Hariri Meets Khalil, Riachi
Naharnet/December 12/16/The Lebanese Forces is “not concerned” with what Marada Movement chief MP Suleiman Franjieh announced in Ain el-Tineh about Speaker Nabih Berri offering him the public works ministerial portfolio, LF sources announced on Monday.
LF leader Samir Geagea “has not received any phone call from the president or the premier-designate about the developments,” the sources told LBCI television in the evening. “We're waiting to be officially briefed by the relevant officials on any developments in the cabinet formation process and, accordingly, we consider that the old distribution of portfolios has not changed until the moment,” the sources added. Earlier in the day, Franjieh said Berri had officially offered him the public works ministerial portfolio and that “an agreement is still needed over other portfolios.”“Our candidate for this ministry is Youssef Finianos and we're awaiting the stances of the other parties, and we hope others, topped by President Michel Aoun, will show openness,” he added. Later on Monday, Berri's aide Ali Hassan Khalil visited the Center House for talks with PM-designate Saad Hariri. "Things have moved forward in a positive manner," Khalil told reporters after the meeting. A statement issued by Hariri's office said the meeting tackled “the current political developments, especially the outcome of the contacts regarding the cabinet formation process.” Shortly after Khalil left the Center House, LF official Melhem Riachi arrived for talks with Hariri. "The atmosphere is always excellent with PM-designate Hariri," Riachi said after the meeting. Hariri later delegated his adviser ex-MP Ghattas Khoury to Maarab for talks with Geagea. Marada's demand to get one of three key portfolios – public works, telecommunications or energy – is one of the main obstacles that are hindering the formation of the new government.
 
FPM, Hizbullah MPs Say Proportional Representation is 'Best' Electoral Law
Naharnet/December 12/16/A Free Patriotic Movement delegation comprising MPs Alain Aoun, Ziad Aswad and Naamtallah Abi Nasr visited the headquarters of Hizbullah's Loyalty to Resistance bloc on Monday as part of an FPM initiative aimed at pushing for the adoption of a new electoral law. The Haret Hreik meeting was attended by MPs Mohammed Raad, Ali Ammar, Ali Fayyad and Nawwar al-Saheli on Hizbullah's side. “The meeting was extensive and we discussed in it a roadmap for reaching a modern electoral law based on proportional representation,” said Aoun after the talks, noting that the two parties are in agreement over “all the aspects” of this law. “This is the best law for preserving the Lebanese society's political and sectarian pluralism... It is also the law that leads to the most correct representation of the people and that law that we aspire for to achieve political and electoral reform,” Aoun added. He noted that the FPM's meetings with the political parties “will continue in a bid to break the years-long deadlock over this issue.”Fayyad for his part said Hizbullah and the FPM “agree that the most ideal choice is a law fully based on proportional representation.”Warning that the deadlines for passing a new electoral law “have started to expire,” Fayyad called on the political forces to “respond to the requirements of the Lebanese formula in terms of fair and correct representation.”“Listen to what the Lebanese society wants,” he added. Caretaker Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq had recently warned that there is not much time left to pass a new electoral law while announcing that the ministry is ready to organize the polls under the 1960 law. Hizbullah has repeatedly called for an electoral law fully based on proportional representation but other political parties, especially al-Mustaqbal Movement, have rejected the proposal and argued that the party's controversial arsenal of arms would prevent serious competition in regions where the Iran-backed party is influential. Mustaqbal, the Lebanese Forces and the Progressive Socialist Party have meanwhile proposed a hybrid electoral law that mixes the proportional representation and the winner-takes-all systems. Speaker Nabih Berri has also proposed a hybrid law. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.
 
Kataeb Slams Ministerial Portfolio Spat, Says Dissociation Policy 'Protected Lebanon'

Naharnet/December 12/16/The Kataeb Party on Monday called for “resolving the obstacles that are hindering the formation of the government,” noting that the new cabinet must shoulder the responsibility of “addressing citizens' affairs and preparing a new electoral law.”“The scramble for ministerial portfolios under unconstitutional excuses is obstructing and threatening the parliamentary elections, especially that the new government will only serve for a few months,” Kataeb's politburo warned in a statement issued after its weekly meeting.
Separately, the party responded to recent remarks by Syrian President Bashar Assad about Lebanon's so-called dissociation policy.“One of the most important achievements of the successive governments was the adoption of the dissociation policy, which is in line with the party's struggle for neutralism that has been running since the 1950s and was enshrined in the Baabda Declaration,” Kataeb said. “This policy is what has protected Lebanon from the regional blazes,” the party noted. In an interview with Syria's al-Watan newspaper, Assad has noted that “Lebanon cannot dissociate itself from the blazes that are raging around it.” “It cannot endorse 'the policy of no policy' or what has been called the dissociation policy,” Assad said. Although the Lebanese state has officially adopted the dissociation policy, Hizbullah has sent thousands of fighters into the neighboring country to help Assad fight an Islamist-led uprising. The party has argued that its controversial intervention was necessary to protect Lebanon from extremist groups.

Hariri, Finance Minister dwell on Cabinet formation headway
Mon 12 Dec 2016/NNA - Prime Minister-designate, Saad Hariri, met, at his Center House on Monday, with Caretaker Minister of Finance, Ali Hassan Khalil, over most recent political developments in the country, particularly the outcome of contacts regarding the Cabinet formation.
 
Change and Reform MPs visit Maarab, confirm no return to 1960 law
Mon 12 Dec 2016/NNA - Lebanese Forces leader, Samir Geagea, met, at his Maarab residence on Monday, with a delegation of the Change and Reform bloc's lawmakers, comprising MPs Ibrahim Kanaan, Neemtallah Abi Nasr, Alain Aoun, Ghassan Mkhaiber, and Ziad Aswad, in presence of MP Antoine Zahra. Following the meeting, Kanaan told reporters that the meeting with the LF was part of the bloc's initiative to separate the course of the endorsement of a new election law from that of the Cabinet formation.
"There is no possibility to extend the mandate of the current Parliament, and there is no possibility to return to the 1960 election law," he said, adding that the delegation will meet with other blocs as well. For his part, MP Zahra hailed Change and Reform bloc's initiative, highlighting the necessity to reach an election law that would secure correct representation. Separately, Geagea met today with Portuguese Ambassador to Lebanon, Joao Perestrello, over the situation in the country and the broader Arab region.
 
Rahi, Mashnouq hold closed door meeting, illuminate Christmas tree
Mon 12 Dec 2016/NNA - A closed door meeting took place on Monday in Bkirki between Maronite Patriarch Cardinal Bechara Boutros Rahi and Interior and Municipalities Minister, Nuhad Mashnouq, to deliberate over the latest political developments, notably government formation efforts. In the wake of the closed door meeting, Patriarch Rahi and Minister Mashnouq moved to Daroun woodland which witnessed a huge fire, where they planted three pine trees and illuminated a Christmas tree set in that place. Rahi and Mashnouq were greeted by Dr Fadi Mhanna representing Agriculture Minister, Akram Shehayeb, Civil Defense Director General Raymond Khattar, and local dignitaries.
 The initiative was organized by the Civil Defense Directorate General.
 
STL Registrar arrives in Beirut
 Mon 12 Dec 2016/NNA - Registrar of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, Daryl Mundis, arrived on Monday in Beirut coming from Paris.
 
Rahi offers Pope Tawadros heartfelt condolences on Coptic Church fallen victims
Mon 12 Dec 2016/NNA - Maronite Patriarch Cardinal Bechara Boutros Rahi fervently deplored in a statement the terrorist bombing that rattled St. Peter church near St. Mark Cathedral and the pontifical seat of Orthodox Copts in Cairo Sunday morning which claimed the lives of 24 people and injured dozens. Patriarch Rahi offered heartfelt condolences to the Coptic Church Pope Tawadros II, martyrs' families and the Egyptian people, saying that criminality and terrorism shall not undermine the martyrdom of fallen innocent people and they are virtuous in the heavenly kingdom. Rahi expressed "full solidarity with the Coptic Church in this tragedy," and commissioned Cairo Archdiocese Bishop George Shehan, to represent him at the funeral service. He also wished the fallen victims eternal heavenly life and the wounded speedy recovery.
 
Arslan meets FPM delegation, renews calls for proportionality
Mon 12 Dec 2016/NNA - Head of the Lebanese Democratic Party, MP Talal Arslan, welcomed, at his Khalda residence on Monday, a delegation of the Free Patriotic Movement, with whom he discussed latest developments, particularly the election law.
"We visited MP Arslan to dwell on the election law. We both agreed on full proportionality which is the best solution to representing everybody," MP Alain Aoun, accompanied by lawmakers Ziad Aswad and Neemtallah Abi Nasr, told reporters following the meeting.
"This wide alliance for proportionality must include a Druze reference in the country that expresses this key community," he indicated. "We must not surrender to the 1960 de facto law," he maintained. For his part, Arslan reiterated utter rejection of the 1960 law, renewing calls for proportionality. 
 
Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on December 12-13/16.
Identity of Cairo suicide bomber revealed
Staff writer, Al Arabiya Monday, 12 December 2016/Egyptian President, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, has revealed the identity of the suicide bomber who blew himself up inside a church during Sunday mass in Cairo. Al-Sisi said the bomber, 32-year-old Mohammed Shafiq Mohammed, was accompanied by three other young men and a woman, the Al Arabiya News Channel reported. During a funeral service organized for the victims al-Sisi explained that Mohammed blew his explosive belt inside the chapel. According to the reports coming in, security service agents are still recovering body parts from the accident site. The president vowed to bring those responsible to justice.

Netanyahu wants to discuss Iran deal options with Trump
AFP, Washington Monday, 12 December 2016/Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wants to discuss with US President-elect Donald Trump ways to get rid of the Iran nuclear deal, he said in an interview to be broadcast Sunday. “I think what options we have are much more than you think. Many more,” Netanyahu said in the interview with CBS’s “60 minutes.”Netanyahu gave no details on what he will be proposing when he meets with Trump, but minimized the downside of Washington backing out of an accord that includes other world powers, including its European allies. Also read: Israeli government trumps up the new US president “There are ways, various ways of undoing it,” he said. “I have about five things in my mind.” Netanyahu has been an ardent opponent of the 2015 agreement, which places curbs on Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for relief from US and other international sanctions. He alienated the administration of outgoing President Barack Obama by denouncing it in an address to a joint meeting of the US Congress. Trump has criticized the nuclear agreement as a “disastrous deal,” but has stopped short of saying he would rip it up, instead suggesting he would renegotiate or dismantle it. Also read: Trump’s promise to move embassy to Jerusalem rattles Palestinians. His pick for defense secretary, retired general James Mattis, considered a hawk on Iran, has advocated working closely with allies to enforce its terms.

Israel urges Egypt to ‘fight terrorism together’
AFP, Jerusalem Monday, 12 December 2016 /Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday called on Egypt to “fight terrorism together” after a bombing killed 25 people in a Coptic Christian church in Cairo. “Israel condemns the reprehensible terrorist attack at the Coptic cathedral in Cairo,” a statement from the premier’s office said. “Israel shares in the grief of the families of the victims and of the Egyptian people. We must unite forces and fight terrorism together.”Sunday’s was the deadliest attack on Coptic Christians in Egypt since 2011, when more than 20 were killed outside a church in the northern coastal city of Alexandria. Media in Israel say the Jewish state and Cairo cooperate in the struggle against jihadists fighting Egyptian security forces in the Sinai Peninsula. Israel gave its green light for the Egyptian army to use tanks, aircraft and infantry against jihadists in the Sinai, which was demilitarized under the peace treaty the two countries signed in 1979.

Assad sweeps Aleppo, rebels offered ‘safe’ exit
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Monday, 12 December 2016 /Syria’s army seized a major district on Aleppo’s southeastern edges Monday, putting it in control of 90 percent of areas once held by rebels in the city, a monitor said. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad seized the Sheikh Saeed district early Monday after fierce clashes ongoing since the previous afternoon. “The army is now in full control of Sheikh Saeed,” Observatory head Rami Abdel Rahman told AFP. “Syrian regime forces are now in control of 90 percent” of the one-time rebel areas in Aleppo’s east, he said. On Sunday Syrian rebels received a US-backed proposal to leave Aleppo along with civilians under safe passage guaranteed by Russia, rebel officials said as government forces closed in, but Moscow denied a deal had been reached. Three officials with insurgent groups in Aleppo told Reuters that a letter outlining the proposal had been received, offering an “honorable” departure for the rebels to a place of their choice. Rebel groups have yet to respond. But if fully accepted, the proposal would give Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his military coalition of Russia, Iran and Shiite militias their greatest triumph in the civil war against the rebels who have fought for nearly six years to unseat him. However, the sudden recapture by the ISIS of the ancient desert city of Palmyra on Sunday after a much-trumpeted army victory there in March has shown how difficult Assad may find it even after Aleppo to restore his rule across Syria. Asked whether they had been contacted by the United States and Russia over talks between the two powers in Geneva to find a way out of the crisis, one of the officials with rebel groups that are present in Aleppo said: “They sent us a letter, they are saying to safeguard the civilians ... you can leave in an honorable way to any place you choose and the Russians will pledge publicly that nobody will be harmed or stopped,” said one of the officials. “We have yet to give a response.”A second official said a document “is being proposed to the factions, the fundamental thing in it is the departure of the all the fighters in an honorable way”.
 However, Russia swiftly said it had not reached any agreement with the United States on a proposal to withdraw fighters from Aleppo and added that the Geneva talks were continuing. (With AFP and Reuters) 

Syria Army Takes Aleppo District, Battle in 'Final Phase'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 12/16/The Syrian army recaptured a major district of Aleppo on Monday, leaving rebel fighters cornered in a small pocket as the battle for the city entered its "final phase". President Bashar al-Assad's forces held more than 90 percent of the onetime opposition stronghold of east Aleppo, a monitor and military official said, and appeared on the verge of retaking the entire city. A Syrian military official in Aleppo told AFP the "operation in eastern neighbourhoods is entering its final phase", as fierce clashes were reported in the few districts of the city left under rebel control. The fall of Aleppo would deal the rebels their worst defeat since the beginning of Syria's conflict in 2011, and leave the government in control of the country's five major cities. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group reported early on Monday that the army had captured the large Sheikh Saeed district in southeast Aleppo. Syrian official media confirmed the retaking of Sheikh Saeed, with state television showing what it said was live footage from the neighbourhood. Only the districts of Mashhad and Sukkari remained fully under opposition control, said the Britain-based Observatory, with others divided between the opposition and advancing army troops. "The areas still under opposition control are very small, and they could fall at any moment," Observatory director Rami Abdel Rahman said. Overnight and into Monday morning, government warplanes and artillery pounded the remaining rebel-held territory in the east of the city. An AFP correspondent in the government-held west of Aleppo said the bombardment could be heard from there and was some of the heaviest in recent days. Terrified residents have poured out of rebel-held neighbourhoods as the army advanced since beginning its operation on November 15.
- Thousands more flee -The Observatory said Monday another 10,000 people had fled rebel areas in the previous 24 hours, bringing the total number of those who have left -- mostly to government-held territory -- to 130,000. On Sunday alone, state news agency SANA said, 8,000 people fled rebel districts through government-run crossings.
It said about half were transferred to temporary shelters, while the rest were staying with relatives in west Aleppo. And at least 3,500 civilians left east Aleppo neighbourhoods on Monday, SANA reported. Syria's rebels seized control of east Aleppo in 2012, a year into an uprising that began with anti-government protests but spiralled into a civil war after a regime crackdown. The war has become a complex multi-front conflict, drawing in proxy powers and jihadists like the Islamic State group, which on Sunday overran the city of Palmyra nine months after being expelled. IS began a new offensive in the desert east of Homs province last week, seizing government positions and oil fields before advancing on Palmyra. It was briefly forced back from the city early Sunday, after heavy Russian air strikes and the arrival of Syrian troop reinforcements. But despite the efforts, the Observatory said Sunday afternoon that the group had recaptured all of the city. - IS executions in Palmyra -IS held Palmyra between May 2015 and March 2016, carrying out a campaign of destruction against ancient ruins in the city that are a UNESCO World Heritage site. On Monday, the jihadists were advancing south and west of Palmyra, fighting with the army near the town of Al-Qaryatain, the monitor said, as Russian warplanes carried out fresh strikes. Four civilians, including two children, were killed by IS gunfire in the city as the group carried out "clearing operations" on Sunday, the Observatory said. After taking control of the city, IS also carried out execution-style killings of eight people accused of being regime fighters or supporters in Palmyra, it said. More than 300,000 people have been killed in Syria's war, and over half the country displaced. The government assault on Aleppo has killed at least 415 civilians since mid-November, according to the Observatory. Another 130 civilians have been slain in rebel fire on the west of the city in the same period, it says. Diplomatic efforts to bring an end to the conflict have repeatedly failed. Russia last week said talks were underway with US officials on securing a ceasefire in Aleppo and the withdrawal of all rebel forces from the city.
But despite a series of high-level meetings there was no progress in halting the fighting.

France Accuses Russia of 'Lying' about Syria
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 12/16/France on Monday accused Russia of constantly lying over its role in Syria, saying it was claiming to battle IS group militants when it was only interested in backing Bashar al-Assad. Another round of Russia-US talks on ending the bloody conflict made no progress at the weekend as the Syrian president's forces closed in on the last pockets of rebel resistance in Syria's second city, Aleppo. French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault said the talks failed "because there is double-talk and a sort of permanent lie" on the part of Russia. "On the one hand they say: let's talk, let's talk and get a cease-fire," Ayrault said as he arrived for a regular meeting of European Union foreign ministers in Brussels. "On the other hand, they continue the war and this war is a total war, aimed at saving Assad and capturing Aleppo," he said. Ayrault said Russia had concentrated so much effort on Aleppo that it had allowed IS jihadis to recapture the ancient city of Palmyra, revealing Moscow's real priorities in a conflict which has cost more than 300,000 lives. IS overran Palmyra on Sunday, nine months after being expelled by Assad forces backed by massive Russian air attacks.

Death Toll after Turkey Blasts Rises to 44
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 12/16/The death toll from the Istanbul twin bombings near a major football stadium has risen to 44, Turkish Health Minister Recep Akdag said Monday. The late Saturday attacks saw a car bomb explode outside the home stadium of football giants Besiktas and less than a minute later, a suicide bomber blew himself up near a group of police at a nearby park. "It is very painful that we lost 36 of our police officers and eight civilians in a bloody attack," Akdag told parliament, Dogan news agency reported. The blasts also injured 166 people and were claimed by the Kurdistan Freedom Falcons (TAK), which is seen as a radical offshoot of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). Turkey has been hit by multiple attacks this year blamed on Kurdish militants and Islamic State jihadists. The TAK group has claimed three major strikes this year. Two were in Ankara: one on February 17 that left 28 dead and another on March 13 that killed 34; as well as a car bombing in Istanbul on June 7 in which 11 people died.

Turkey Detains over 100 Pro-Kurdish Party Officials
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 12/16/Turkish police detained more than 100 pro-Kurdish Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP) officials on Monday over alleged links to Kurdish militants in a country-wide operation, state media reported. The early-morning raids saw 118 HDP officials rounded up on suspicion of belonging to the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) or producing propaganda for the group, state news agency Anadolu said. Part of an anti-terror probe, the sweeping arrest operation came after weekend attacks killed 38 people in Istanbul, mostly police, which were claimed by the Kurdistan Freedom Falcons (TAK), seen as a radical offshoot of the PKK. According to Anadolu, 20 officials in Istanbul -- including the HDP’s provincial head in the city, Aysel Guzel -- were taken into custody while another 17 were detained in the Turkish capital, among them the party's Ankara chief Ibrahim Binici. The other detentions took place in the southern provinces of Adana and Mersin, Manisa in western Turkey as well as Sanliurfa in the country's restive southeast. Last month, 10 HDP lawmakers -- including co-leaders Selahattin Demirtas and Figen Yuksekdag -- were arrested, causing international alarm. They are also accused of PKK membership or of promoting the group and are being held in pre-trial detention. The PKK, which is proscribed as a terrorist organisation by Ankara, Brussels and Washington, has been waging an insurgency against the Turkish state since 1984. Since the collapse of a ceasefire in July last year, Ankara has vowed to wipe out the PKK and has conducted several military operations against the group. There have been frequent clashes between security forces and PKK militants and almost daily attacks on the military carried out by the group's fighters in the southeast.

Mosul Doctors Struggle to Save Civilians on Iraq Front Line
Associated Press/Naharnet/December 12/16/A crowd of men rushed through the narrow hallway of Mosul's al-Zahra clinic carrying a slight 10-year-old boy. Yousef Oday's face was covered in blood. A team of doctors quickly gathered around his cot. "What happened to you?" one of the men asked. "I have no idea. I was bleeding on one side," the boy said. He didn't make another sound, lying motionless as a doctor put an IV into his arm. His eyes were wide and pupils dilated. Oday was hit in the side of his head with a stray bullet as he was waiting in line to gather water from a well in eastern Mosul. Two other young men waiting with him were also shot. Dr. Ahmed Hussam methodically tended to Oday's wounds. "He's in shock," he explained. While Iraqi forces announce daily advances, the city's civilians continue to be killed and maimed by indirect fire, clashes and counterattacks. The Mosul front line in the city's east is being pushed forward in two columns: one led by the Iraqi army's 9th Division and the other by the special forces. In some places, Iraqi forces are just over two kilometers (1.2 miles) from the Tigris River that splits the city. But along the main highway that cuts through the center of Mosul's eastern half, Iraqi forces have made hardly any advances at all. The jagged edge leaves troops vulnerable to counterattacks, but also thousands of civilians exposed to ongoing clashes as the operation slowly grinds forward. Oday was shot in al-Zahra, a neighborhood declared liberated nearly a month ago. Since then, Iraqi forces have captured nearly half a dozen other neighborhoods and districts, but have not managed to completely secure al-Zahra so that aid groups and supply trucks can access the hundreds of civilians still living there.
"This is nothing," whispered one of the nurses in the emergency room where Oday was being treated. "We have people who come in here without any arms or legs," she said, asking to only be identified by her first name, Malkiya, out of concern for her safety.
Doctors in the small clinic in eastern Mosul say that since the operation to retake the city began nearly two months ago, they've only received intermittent deliveries of supplies. Nurses say they're running out of basic items like clean bandages. In a hallway that's been converted into an emergency room, doctors say all they have are bottles of saline solution, gauze and iodine. Like nearly all of Mosul, the clinic also lacks running water. Hundreds of other patients also filled the dim hallways waiting for antibiotics, cough syrup, allergy medicine or insulin. A woman and her three daughters said they walked 3 kilometers (1.8 miles) across a front line to reach the clinic to obtain antibiotics. Since the operation to retake Mosul began, temperatures have dropped and, without electricity or fuel, her children have all gotten sick.
The women spoke on condition of anonymity as they were still living in a Mosul neighborhood controlled by IS. "We have no protection," the mother said, walking inside the examination room and lifting the black veil she wore to travel to the clinic. He youngest daughter screamed as the nurse gave her an immunization shot. During the first few battles of the Mosul operation, IS fighters largely fled the villages around the city, giving Iraqi and coalition commanders hope they would do the same inside the city. But as the battle reached the city's edge, intense resistance has repeatedly stalled advances and at times forced Iraqi forces to retreat. Unlike in past fights where civilians were moved out of the way of front-line clashes, in Mosul, Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has asked civilians to stay in their homes. The move prevents massive displacement — Mosul is still home to an estimated one million people — but it also leaves thousands in harm's way and thousands more out of reach of aid organizations wary of operating close to the front.
The clinic inside Mosul estimates it has treated at least 800 severely wounded civilians since Iraqi forces first pushed into the city in early November.
"All we can do is work as a stabilization unit," said Dr. Muhammad Hassan Ali, explaining that without the ability to perform surgery, most of the emergency cases he receives need to be transferred to a hospital in Irbil more than an hour's drive away across bad roads and through half a dozen checkpoints. Oday, the young boy, lost his left eye, but the doctors at the clinic were able to bandage his wound and slow the bleeding. As quickly as he was rushed into the building, he was carried out into an ambulance bound for Irbil. "He'll live," said Hussam, the doctor who treated him. "He's very lucky."

Bahrain Upholds Jail Sentence for Opposition Chief

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 12/16/Bahrain's appeals court on Monday upheld a nine-year jail sentence against opposition chief Sheikh Ali Salman, a judicial source said, the latest move in a crackdown on the Shiite majority. The sentence against Salman, for inciting hatred and calling for regime change by force, had been overturned by the court of cassation in October. Salman, 51, is considered a moderate who has pushed for a constitutional monarchy in Bahrain, unlike hardline groups who have demanded the toppling of the Sunni Al-Khalifa dynasty. His arrest in December 2014, in connection with speeches he had given, sparked protests in Shiite-majority Bahrain. Human Rights Watch said he was arrested and charged "despite the fact Salman renounced violence and called for peaceful protest in his speeches". The charismatic Shiite cleric was sentenced in July 2015 to four years in jail after being convicted of inciting hatred in the Gulf kingdom. But the appeals court in May more than doubled his jail term to nine years after reversing an earlier acquittal on charges of calling for regime change by force. The court of cassation overturned that sentence on October 17 and ordered a retrial before the appeals court. It also rejected a request to release the cleric. In July, a court ordered the dissolution of Salman's Al-Wefaq movement for "harbouring terrorism", inciting violence and encouraging demonstrations which threatened to spark sectarian strife. The decision drew strong criticism from UN chief Ban Ki-moon, Bahrain's allies in Washington and London, and Shiite-dominated Iran.
Al-Wefaq had the largest bloc in parliament before lawmakers walked out in February 2011 in protest over a deadly crackdown on Arab Spring-inspired protests. - Jails 'filled' -Bahrain has harshly cracked down over the past five years on dissent by the Shiite majority, which they accuse of being manipulated by Iran. The number of arrests and trials have spiralled. The kingdom stripped 31 Shiite activists of their nationality in October 2012 for breaching state security, and Human Rights Watch says most of them have been left stateless. Bahrain has repeatedly arrested and detained other opposition leaders, including Nabil Rajab, the founder of the Bahrain Centre for Human Rights. Rajab was most recently arrested on June 13 for comments on his Twitter account that criticised the kingdom's role in Saudi Arabia-led military operations in Yemen, according to HRW. The New York-based rights watchdog on Monday issued a statement calling for Rajab's immediate release, saying the charges against him "inherently violate the right to free expression".
It has in the past criticised the silence of Bahrain's Western allies as the kingdom has "filled its jails with the people who hold the key to the political solution the UK and US claim to support". Salman holds a bachelors degree in mathematics from Saudi Arabia and in 1987 headed to Iran's holy city of Qom to study Islamic Studies at the Shiite school of clerics. He was widely considered one of the leaders of an uprising in the 1990s and he was arrested several times by the authorities. After six years in exile, he returned to Bahrain in 2001 under a general amnesty. Upon his return home, Salman set up Al-Wefaq National Islamic Society with other Shiite opposition figures and was elected secretary general in 2006. Al-Wefaq boycotted elections in 2002 but ran in 2006, winning almost half the seats of the 40-member parliament. It held onto its seats in the next polls in 2010, but Al-Wefaq lawmakers withdrew in 2011 in protest at the "repression" of the Shiite-led protests.
The movement is appealing against its dissolution.

Saudi Says British FM's 'Proxy War' Comment Misconstrued
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 12/16/The press took out of context comments by Britain's foreign secretary about "proxy wars" waged by longtime ally Saudi Arabia, the Saudi foreign minister said Sunday, deeming the matter closed. In a video reported last week, Boris Johnson at a conference in Rome accused Saudi Arabia and its regional rival Iran of "puppeteering" and "playing proxy wars". A video of his comments was posted on the Guardian website."I have no doubt that his comments as reported in the press were misconstrued," Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir told reporters at a joint news conference with Johnson in Riyadh. "If you look at the actual video of what was said, it was not as implied in the press," Jubeir said. The British minister was on an official visit to the kingdom, during which he met King Salman. The Guardian report came on Thursday, a day after British Prime Minister Theresa May attended a summit with the leaders of Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states in Bahrain. Downing Street had to pull Johnson back into line, saying the comments reflected his "personal position.""There are no mixed messages that we are getting from Britain," Jubeir said, noting that Saudi-British ties go back more than a century. "We don't have any doubt in where Britain stands, and Britain has no doubt in where we stand," he said as Johnson sounded agreement. "I believe that the matter is closed," the Saudi minister said. Johnson thanked Jubeir for his comments. A former mayor of London less than six months into his ministerial job, Johnson is a colorful and captivating speaker who has made a series of diplomatic blunders.
'Positive things'
Asked at the press conference if he would apologize, Johnson said he was "here to emphasize the friendship" between the two countries. But he added: "We believe in a candor in our relationship," emphasizing the word "candor." "And now, if you don't mind, is the time for us to talk about the positive things that we're doing together," Johnson continued. May and the Gulf leaders agreed at their Bahrain summit to form a "strategic partnership" to foster defense and other ties. Sunni-majority Saudi Arabia and Shiite-dominated Iran support opposite sides of the war in Syria and also in Yemen, where Riyadh has since March last year led a coalition bombing campaign against Iran-backed Huthi rebels. On Saturday, Tehran summoned the British ambassador to protest against "interference" by May, over comments she made at the GCC summit. She said her country would help "push back against Iran's aggressive regional actions."In a joint statement, GCC states and Britain said that they "oppose and will work together to counter Iran's destabilizing activities."Iran and Britain reopened their respective embassies in 2015 following an international agreement to curb Iran's nuclear programmin exchange for the lifting of sanctions. Johnson on Sunday echoed May's comments supporting the agreement with Iran, while also cautioning that the world needs to be "clear-eyed" and vigilant about Iran's role in the region.
 
Internet, a Scourge to the Iran Regime
Monday, 12 December 2016/NCRI - The increased tendency among people, especially youth, towards social networks has now turned into a security crisis for the Iranian regime. According to figures, despite regime’s measures to censor, filter and control the internet, nearly 22 million Iranians have joined the Telegram social network alone. In this regard, the Iranian state website ‘Hamshahri’ reported on 15 August 2015 on the latest number of Iran’s internet users. “If Iran’s population is assumed to be 75 million, the latest studies show that nearly 55.5 million people are internet users while 37.5 million have an internet subscription. The ADSL penetration rate has reached 20.72 percent, whereas the mobile internet has the highest share of internet connections with a penetration rate of 31.83 percent, accounting for nearly 24 million users”, according to the website. Undoubtedly, the increase in the number of internet users which is directly related to the amount of regime’s repression and suffocation, can by no means be harnessed by regime’s oppressive bodies. The more the internet users are put under pressure by regime’s judiciary and security forces, the more people turn to online sources, especially those belonging to Iran’s resistance and PMOI. And by such measures the regime has only one objective in mind, to prevent people from having access to reliable and free information. If we take a look at the government figures, we will find out well that the issue of ‘the internet vs. the Iranian regime’ is reminiscent of the old story ‘The Goblin vs. In The Name of God’.
 As acknowledged by regime’s Attorney General in this regard, “unfortunately, the cyberspace is being used by many foreign (intellectual) currents as a path to hit the system. The enemy is taking advantage of the internet to inflict on us various types of social harms, including blasphemy (insulting Mullahs). A soft war has been waged against us in this regard (Terrorist Quds Force’s Tasnim news agency, December 7, 2016)
 Mullah Mohammad Jafari then acknowledges regime’s oppressive policies regarding widespread censorship of the internet and social networks and adds: “considering the Attorney General’s responsibility, there is a close relationship with the Cyber Police with regard to the internet, so that 13-14 thousand websites are blocked each week due to violations.”The fact is that many internet service providers refuse any kind of collaboration with the Iranian regime to transfer their servers to Iran, as deploying the servers in Iran means allowing the regime’s oppressive security and intelligence bodies to have access to users’ identities as well as a collection of other information available on social networks. The last instance in this regard relates to the popular Telegram social network, which has refused to have any kind of collaboration with the Iranian regime. While helplessly complaining about this fact, regime’s Attorney General says that: “one of the reasons for (regime’s) inability to cope with the social networks is that their servers are not located in Iran.” These statements are translated into failure of regime’s policies and huge investments to deal with an increasing number of social network users, who in addition to challenging the whole system, have now turned into important sources of information from inside the country.
 
Austrian MEP urges recognition of democratic opposition led by Maryam Rajavi
Monday, 12 December 2016/NCRI - “Europe’s lawmakers, have a responsibility and cannot close our eyes on tragic things happening and the aggressive role of this Iranian regim.” and “cannot just go on condemning the actions,” Mr Heinz Becker, member of European Parliament from Austria told a meeting at the European Parliament. He urged MEPs “to become proactive and take steps to show the mullahs that we mean everything serious and we are serious” adding “the first step must be the recognition of the democratic opposition to the mullahs in Iran which is the National Council of Resistance of Iran led by Mrs. Maryam Rajavi.”
 Below is the text of speech by Mr Heinz Becker on Wednesday, 7 December 2016:
 We have gathered here on an important occasion, it’s the European and the International Day of Human Rights. It is therefore very timely to look at the situation in Iran today and the record of the recent years. Since nearly four years ago there have been some false hopes in Europe fanned by the Iranian regime and its lobbies in the West that the current president Rouhani is going to deliver some reform and that he is a moderate. We were told in the West that Rouhani and his foreign minister Zarif who conducted the nuclear talks are aiming to also improve human rights. But Iran under Rouhani remains the number one executioner per capita in the world. More minors are executed in Iran than in any other country of the world. And the people of Iran are denied their most important right to have a free and fair election. Rouhani’s true face was not a secret to the Iranians but after four years it has also become clear for all of us beyond any doubt that he is a real cruel dictator! He is certainly not the moderate face for people in the region, in particular for his open support for Syria’s dictator Bashar Assad. The regime’s forces are openly engaged in massacres in Syria of women and children and boast their presence in Syria. Leaders of Iran must be held accountable for war crimes. As I stated in my today’s list for this occasion, I address the European negotiators on economic deals that making business must end when thousands and thousands and thousands human beings die. We, as Europe’s lawmakers, have a responsibility and cannot close our eyes on tragic things happening and the aggressive role of this Iranian regime. We cannot just go on condemning the actions. We have to become proactive and take steps to show the mullahs that we mean everything serious and we are serious. Therefore, the first step must be the recognition of the democratic opposition to the mullahs in Iran which is the National Council of Resistance of Iran led by Mrs. Maryam Rajavi… I had the honor to meet Mrs. Rajavi in Paris and I was totally impressed and delighted to see here today in the European Parliament. Finally, I should say that as an Austrian I was delighted that Rouhani had to cancel his trip to Vienna because of a rally, a demonstration by supporters of Mrs. Rajavi. He had immediately asked to stop this demonstration, to cancel this demonstration, but Austrian authorities strictly said no. So Rouhani who was only afraid of this opposition so he decided not to go one day before arrival. Let us understand that we have to stand consequently on human rights and our principles, the European values, and let us communicate with all EU political labels to understand this easy clear message that we support your national council Madam President, to reach a Free Iran for the Iranian people.
 Thank you.
 
Iran: Execution of 10 prisoners to coincide with International Human Rights Day
Monday, 12 December 2016/The mullahs' anti-human regime on International Human Rights Day transferred 11 prisoners in Gohardasht prison to solitary confinement for execution and at dawn on Sunday December 11 hanged 10 of them. At least 52 prisoners were executed in Iran in November. Among them, Shaban Ranjbar, after 20 years imprisonment in Rasht Central Prison and Gholam Hossein Beigi, after 18 years imprisonment in Khomein, were hanged on November 23 and 26 respectively. Kazem Gharib Abadi, deputy head of the so-called international human rights unit of the regime, in support of this barbaric punishment said: "In some issues, Westerners want to impose their statements. For instance they do not accept the execution of drug dealers and say because we don’t have execution, others should not have it either. Is our situation of human rights worse than other countries that they put this much pressure? Our principled position on Country Special Rapporteur on Iran is that to reject the rapporteur". (State run Mehr news agency December 11). Ignoring the catastrophic situation of human rights in Iran by the international community and silence about mass and arbitrary executions has emboldened the religious fascism ruling Iran to continue its crimes. Any deal with this illegitimate regime must be contingent upon a halt to executions. Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/21 Persian date Azar 1395 (December 11, 2016)
 
Message of Maryam Rajavi to the Conference at the US Senate
NCRI Statements/Monday, 12 December 2016
Washington, D.C. - In a briefing held at the Senate Kennedy Caucus Room, senior senators and former national security officials condemned the flagrant violations of human rights in Iran and the clerical regime's meddling in the region. They stressed on the need to adopt a firm policy on the religious dictatorship ruling Iran. The briefing entitled, "New Administration and Iran Policy Options", was sponsored by the Organization of Iranian-American Communities, OIAC. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) and chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee; Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ), ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee; former Senator Joseph Lieberman, the first U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security and Governor of Pennsylvania Tom Ridge, and Ambassador Mitchell Reiss, former director of policy planning at the State Department, addressed the meeting. Members of Washington-based diplomatic missions as well as representatives of the American and international mass media attended the briefing.
 In a video message to the briefing, Maryam Rajavi said:
 Dear friends,
 This Christmas, in celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ, the messenger of peace and solidarity, I wish all of you, who have gathered for today’s meeting, health and prosperity. First, let me offer my warmest appreciation to U.S. senators and distinguished personalities for supporting the cause and struggle of the Iranian people for freedom, democracy and the rule of law. I would also like to sincerely thank the elected representatives of the American people for their support for the freedom fighters of Ashraf and Liberty and for shielding them from danger and relocating them to Europe. The 37-year-old experience of the destructive and murderous mullahs’ regime in my country has shown that no degree of political and economic concessions, which have been carried out at the expense of the Iranian people, have led to a change of behavior or policies of the Iranian regime either inside or outside of Iran.
 Quite the contrary, the situation has been worsening in every aspect.
 During Rouhani’s so-called “moderate” presidency, more than 2,600 people have been executed. According to the United Nations, this marks the largest number of executions in the past 25 years. In order to create an atmosphere of repression and fear in society, the clerical regime has been executing a large number of victims, in public places. At least 70 women have been hanged during Rouhani’s term. Despite a decline in sanctions and transferring a considerable amount of cash to the mullahs’ pocket, the Iranian economy is suffering from recession. Bureaucratic and government corruption, and astronomical stealing by regime officials, appear to be endless. The Iranian economy is under the control of the regime’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
 They are the only one who will benefit from trade with Iran and not the Iranian people. The clerical regime has been continuing its ballistic missile tests in violation of UN Security Council resolution 2231.
 In the region, the regime has used all its might to save the criminal dictator of Syria. Currently, more than 70,000 regime forces, including the IRGC and its agents are involved in the massacre of innocent people in Syria, especially in Aleppo. These days, the regime is talking about establishing naval bases in Yemen while continuing its sectarian policies in Iraq. Under such circumstances, there is no doubt that fighting fundamentalism and extremism under the banner of Islam either Shiite or Sunni, can only be made possible through confronting the Iranian regime which is the godfather of fundamentalism and terrorism. In other words, fighting against ISIS cannot be separated from confronting this regime. When the clerical regime is pushed back in the region the world will get that much closer to destroying ISIS. The only path to democratic change in Iran is to rely on the Iranian people and their organized resistance. The Iranian resistance is fighting with all its power to establish this goal and we hope that the United States congress will continue its support for the Iranian people in their quest for a free Iran. The dossier of the flagrant human rights abuses in Iran, especially the case for the massacre of 30,000 political prisoners in 1988, must be referred to the UN Security Council for the adoption of binding punishments. Nuclear and missile program is against Iranian people’s interest and must be stopped. The clerical regime must be evicted from Syria, Iraq, and, the IRGC must be placed on the list of terrorist organizations. The Iranian people, with more than a century-long struggle for democracy and liberty, deserve a government that respects their fundamental rights. These rights include the freedom of expression, free elections, gender equality and equal rights for religious and ethnic minorities. Such a country would be the herald of peace and tranquility in the Middle East. This is our vision for Iran’s tomorrow.
 Thank you.
 
U.S. Lawmakers Endorse Resolution to Bring to Justice Perpetrators of Iran’s 1988 Massacre of MEK Political Prisoners
NCRI Iran News/Monday, 12 December 2016/The bi-partisan support is growing for a U.S. House of Representatives resolution introduced by Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX), the Homeland Security Committee Chair, Eliot Engel (D-NY), House Foreign Affairs Committee (HFAC) ranking member and Ed Royce (R-CA), the HFAC chairman. The resolution condemns the deteriorating situation of human rights in Iran and the Iranian regime “for the 1988 massacre, and for denying the evidence of this manifest set of crimes against humanity.”H.Con.Res.159, co-sponsored by some 50 House members, urges the United Nations “to create a Commission of Inquiry to fully investigate the massacre and to gather evidence and identify the names and roles of specific perpetrators with a view towards bringing them to justice.”The measure notes that “the massacre was carried out pursuant to a fatwa, or religious decree, issued by then-Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, that targeted…the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq (MEK),” quoting Amnesty International, “between 27 July 1988 and the end of that year, thousands of political prisoners [in Iran], including prisoners of conscience, were executed in prisons nationwide.”While stressing, “the majority of those killed were supporters of the PMOI [MEK],” the resolution emphasizes that “in a recently disclosed audiotape, the late Hussein Ali Montazeri, a grand ayatollah who served as Khomeini’s chief deputy, noted the regime’s efforts to target the MEK and said that the 1988 mass killings were ‘the greatest crime committed during the Islamic Republic, for which history will condemn us.’”On November 27, 2016, an Iranian regime court sentenced Ahmad Montazeri, the 60-year-old cleric son of Ayatollah Montazeri to 21 years in prison for releasing the tapes. Representatives from both sides of the aisle equally cosponsored the resolution, which states, “those personally responsible for these mass executions include senior officials serving in the current Government of Iran.” Hassan Rouhani’s Justice Minister Mostafa Pour-Mohammadi who had earlier denied the massacre ever took place, boasted that he was “proud” of having carried out “God’s commandment” to execute MEK members. “This is an important legislation which needs to be followed up with policy steps by the U.S. Administration in standing with the victims of repression and with those who want to establish democracy in Iran,” said Soona Samsami, the U.S. Representative of the National Council of Resistance of Iran. The resolution urges “the Administration and United States allies to publicly condemn the massacre, and pressure the Government of Iran to provide detailed information to the families of the victims about their loved ones and their final resting places.”

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on December
Egypt’s Deadliest Church Attack

Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute/December 12/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/12/raymond-ibrahimgatestone-institute-egypts-deadliest-church-attack/
The worst attack on Egypt’s Christian minority in recent years occurred yesterday, Sunday, December 11, 2016. St. Peter Cathedral in Cairo, packed with worshippers celebrating Sunday mass, was bombed; at least 27 churchgoers, mostly women and children, were killed and 65 severely wounded. As many of the wounded are in critical condition, the death toll is expected to rise.
As usual, witnesses say that state security was not present and that police took an inordinate amount of time to arrive after the explosion. Preliminary investigations point to a bomb placed inside an unattended lady’s purse on one of the rear pews of the women’s section.
Mutilated bodies were strewn along the floor and pews of the cathedral. “I found bodies, many of them women, lying on the pews. It was a horrible scene,” said one witness.
“I saw a headless woman being carried away,” said Mariam Shenouda: “Everyone was in a state of shock. We were scooping up people’s flesh off the floor. There were children. What have they done to deserve this? I wish I had died with them instead of seeing these scenes.”
In death toll and severity, this attack surpasses what was formerly considered the deadliest church attack in Egypt: a New Year’s Day bombing of a church in Alexandria that killed 23 people in 2011.
Yesterday’s attack was also symbolically more significant: St. Peter’s Church is attached to and used by St. Mark’s Cathedral, the seat of Egypt’s Coptic Orthodox Christian church and home to its leader, Pope Tawadros II.
It is to President Sisi’s shame that the deadliest church attack in Egypt occurred on his watch. Yet it is also unsurprising considering how little has really changed for Egypt’s Christians since Sisi ousted Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood in 2012. For starters, although Western and English language media do not report them, there have been several minor and unsuccessful terror attacks on churches in Egypt in recent weeks and months. Last November, a man hurled an improvised bomb at the entrance of St. George Church in Samalout, Egypt. Had the bomb detonated—it was dismantled in time—casualties would have been high, as the church building was packed with thousands of worshippers congregating for a special holiday service.
Instances of angry Muslim mobs attacking and killing Christians on the mere rumor that they are trying to build a church, or are meeting to pray in a house church, are also on the rise. Last summer in Minya—the same place where a 70-year-old Christian woman was stripped naked, savagely beaten, spat on, and paraded in the streets to jeers, whistles, and yells of “Allahu Akbar”—rioting Muslims burned down 80 Christian homes on the rumor that Christians were trying to build a church.[1] “No one did anything and the police took no pre-emptive or security measures in anticipation of the attacks,” said Bishop Makarios—who is also on record saying that Christians are attacked “every two or three days” in Minya and that the authorities are always turning a blind eye, if not actually aiding or enabling the attacks.
Even the much touted new law that purports to allow Christians to build churches has been criticized by Coptic clergy, activists, local human rights groups, and Christian members of parliament. They say it still continues to discriminate against Christians, including with security provisions that subject decisions on whether or not a church can be built to the whims of violent mobs.
A reflection of this recently took place in the village of Naghameesh, where the building Christians were using to hold church services was torched by angry Muslims. Afterwards, a “reconciliation meeting” was held by top officials. As usual, the “brotherhood of all Egyptians”—Christians and Muslims—was the theme, but when it came to the question of giving their fellow Christian brothers the same right to worship that Egypt’s Muslims enjoy, the majority of Muslim leaders and family members refused to permit the local Christians a place to pray in. Authorities acquiesced and did nothing to support the Christians.
“We don’t understand what is so dangerous about the Copts praying and exercising their legal rights in this matter,” one local Christian said.
Adding insult to injury, the Egyptian government just boasted last week that it is opening 10 new mosques every week; that there are 3,200 closed mosques that need renovating, and that the government is currently working on 1,300 of them; that it will take about 60 million Egyptian pounds to renovate them, but that the government has allotted ten times that much, although a total of three billion is needed; and that the Egyptian government is dedicated to spending that much—for “whoever abuses public funds [which should be used for Islamic worship], enters a war with Allah, ” to quote Dr. Muhammad Mukhtar Gom‘a, Minister of Awqaf, or endowments.
But when the nation’s more than 10 million Christian minority seeks to build a church—and pay for it from their own pockets—all is woe in Egypt.
That nothing has changed for Egypt’s Christians was even asserted by Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayeb, the nation’s highest Muslim authority and Grand Imam of Al Azhar University, the Muslim world’s most prestigious madrassa in Cairo. During a recent televised interview, al-Tayeb defended Al Azhar’s reliance on books written in the Medieval era, which reformers are eager to see eliminated from the school’s curriculum because they support the most radical expressions of Islam—including killing apostates, burning infidels, and persecuting Christians.
Tayeb further mocked the notion of “changing religious discourse”—a phrase made popular by Sisi, who in 2015 called on Al Azhar and its top instructors to reform their teachings. Although Tayeb appeared sitting in the front row, he is now dismissing Sisi’s call for reform as “quixotic”: “Al Azhar doesn’t change religious discourse—Al Azhar proclaims the true religious discourse, which we learned from our elders,” said Egypt’s highest Muslim authority.
And the law that the elders of Islam, the ulema, bequeathed to Egypt’s Muslims holds that all conquered indigenous inhabitants — in Egypt’s case, infidel Christians — must not be permitted to build churches, must not complain or ask for equal rights, and must be grateful merely for being allowed to live.
In short, not only has nothing changed for Egypt’s Christians, but the deadliest church attack in modern history has just taken place, not under Mubarak or Morsi, but under Sisi. What, if anything, does he propose to do about it?
[1] Among the rioters were women and children shouting “Allahu Akbar!” and “We’ll burn the church, we’ll burn the church.” Even though Muslims were attacking Christians, Egyptian television portrayed it as a “sectarian clash.” After arriving, the police stood back and allowed the mob to continue rioting, plundering and setting more Christian homes and vehicles on fire. The Muslims then performed their afternoon prayers outside those Christians’ homes they had not destroyed — with loudspeakers pointed at their doors. 

There is life left in OPEC after all
Dr. Mohamed A. Ramady/Al Arabiya/December 12/16
The demise of OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) has long been proclaimed and its obituary was written long before the historic OPEC and non-OPEC producers managed to pull off one of the least expected agreements in Vienna on December 10. They managed to coordinate a joint production cut between the two groups.
The meeting between OPEC and 21 non-OPEC countries resulted in a supply reduction commitment by 12 non-OPEC countries of 558,000 bpd cuts – slightly less than envisaged at the OPEC meeting on November 30 for six months starting from January 2017. The oil-producing countries that agreed to the deal were Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bolivia, Brunei, Equatorial Guinea, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Mexico, Oman, Russia, Sudan and South Sudan.
The significance of the non-OPEC cuts lays not in the final production cut figure, which came slightly lower than the 600,000 bpd that OPEC had expected, but in the diversity of countries making the production pledges. These included Azerbaijan (35,000), Bahrain (12,000), Brunei (7,000), Kazakhstan (50,000), Malaysia (35,000), Mexico (100,000) and Oman (45,000) besides Russia, which reconfirmed its 300,000 bpd cut. Other surprising token cuts were pledged by Sudan and South Sudan, Bolivia and Equatorial Guinea.
If fully met, these non-OPEC cuts would take the total pledged cuts by OPEC and non-OPEC to 1.8 million bpd, and far more than the initial August Algiers OPEC agreement of under 1 million bpd, and would indeed have a significant element in helping to restore a semblance of balance between supply and demand. Of more significance is that Saudi Arabia is once more in control of a disparate OPEC cartel and has even hinted of yet greater production cuts over and above the agreed 30 November target of 486,000 barrels per day it committed to.
What is also going to underpin current market prices comfortably above the $50 pb levels was the news that after some initial conflicting reports, Saudi Arabia and other Arab OPEC Gulf states have officially notified their clients that they will indeed cut oil shipments from January 2017 to comply with the latest OPEC agreement, and analysts expect, the reductions in delivery to be more for the North American markets rather than the Asian, specifically the Chinese market, where Saudi Arabia sells more than 60 percent of its crude.
There could still be surprises along the way to unhinge the historic agreements made, such as the news that Kuwait and Saudi Arabia would start production from their joint Neutral Zone when both countries had committed to cuts at the November 30 Vienna meeting. Last month, former Kuwaiti oil minister Al-Saleh and Saudi energy minister Khalid Al-Falih had an initial agreement to resume output from Wafra and Khafji shared fields, without agreeing on a date for the resumption. Both countries hold equal shares of production and reserves at Wafra and Khafji, which have a combined output capacity of more than 500,000 barrels a day.
Some put this down to last minute strategy from the Saudis to make everyone come on board the OPEC agreement. However, others felt that the Saudi output from the Neutral Zone was to compensate for production cuts from older fields.
The November 30 OPEC meeting has taken many by surprise and the OPEC and non-OPEC meeting even more so because of the cynical view that no agreement would take place in this organization.
Russia onboard
Russia’s participation, however, whether in a production freeze or an actual cut was always the major issue for OPEC, and specifically for Saudi Arabia, which had seen repeated Russian promises made but no action taken. The apparent Russian commitment to a production cut, whether from current production levels or via technical maintenance field shut downs has taken everyone by surprise.
However, Russia seems to have been convinced that this time OPEC would indeed come to an agreement, especially with Iran, so as to allow it to join in the new production targets and this had always been the argument put forward by Russian Energy Minister Novak.
The news that Qatar and Glencore are acquiring a 19.5 percent stake in Russia’s largest private oil company Rosneft might have been coincidental, but seemed to have focused Russian minds about cooperating with OPEC. This is given that Rosneft Chief Igor Sechin was always lukewarm at best in his commitment to join in any Russian freeze or cut, as Rosneft was not a national oil company like OPEC member’s state controlled oil company entities. It would not be surprising to see further investments in the Russian energy sector also by Saudi Arabia, given that several high level MOUs have been signed between the two countries by President Putin and Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
The November 30th OPEC meeting has taken many by surprise and the OPEC and non-OPEC meeting even more so because of the cynical view that no agreement would take place in this organization. Repeated attempts to get OPEC to speak in one voice have failed since 2008 and there exists a perception that the organization has passed its use-by date.However, OPEC seems to have reinvented itself now, albeit with some rough patches along the way. The crucial point of these meetings – independently monitored by the IEA – is that for the first time some serious inter-group negotiations and dialogue has taken place and borne fruit, as evidenced by the willingness of Mexico, one of the largest non-OPEC producers to change its mind and join in the planned production cut when it had declined all along.
The major unknown factor that still remains is the speed with which the US shale will come back on-stream and add to the missing barrels. This time, however, there is certainly a palpable feeling of seriousness among OPEC countries to cooperate – despite geo-political differences between Saudi Arabia and Iran. There also exists close working relationship between energy ministers of the two largest oil producers representing OPEC and non-OPEC blocs – i.e. Saudi Arabia and Russia – which have made this agreement possible. This indicates that a certain level of trust has been established.
This is important as a key hurdle to overcome going forward is verification and there is the belief that even if there was some non-compliance taking place, it will be minimal and mostly from countries who had argued that their production cuts should be based on their own primary sources rather than secondary sources. As an old saying goes: “where there is a will, there is a way” it certainly indicates that there is a large element of willingness this time from both OPEC and non-OPEC producers to give this agreement a chance to succeed. The markets will be watching like hawks for compliance from February onwards once the January production figures are released. Moreover, long before OPEC’s next meeting in June 2017 the world will have either witnessed the birth of a long lasting cooperative mechanism between the two blocs or a collapse in such efforts, with major producers reverting to maximizing their market share strategy at the expense of countries with little spare capacity, high production costs and fiscal stressed economies.
Everyone stands to gain by abiding, as much as they can, to the current production cut agreements, otherwise indeed the demise of OPEC will be very real.

Post-Brexit, May seeks to shape a new British profile in the Gulf

Talmiz Ahmad/Al Arabiya/December 12/16
The population of London, its politicians, officials, financiers and bankers, and its corporate leaders, were stunned by the popular vote in favor of “Brexit”, that is, public support for the UK to snap its economic and political links with the European Union (EU).
Prime Minister David Cameron had rather indiscreetly initiated the referendum and then had not done enough to win the vote. He quickly resigned and handed the baton to Theresa May in July to steer the country out of the EU and shape a new role for Britain in world affairs, focusing on the opportunities thrown up by the debacle rather than the challenges that suffuse the island nation. May has been upbeat from the outset, speaking of a “new global role” for the UK, without the limits placed on it by its membership of a continental union where it was not necessarily the most influential or even the most congenial member. In her first weeks, she embarked on a “diplomatic blitz”, interacting with EU leaders in an attempt to obtain the best arrangements the UK could obtain from the untidy mess, wanting access to a single market but with restrictions on migration, a tall order in the view of several European commentators. And, then, she has engaged with UK’s major economic partners. Not surprisingly, these first interactions have been with countries with which the UK had forged close ties during the colonial era. Thus, she was in India in November, recalling earlier relations and defining new ties.
The region calls for “clear-eyed” statesmanship and leadership: UK, with its eyes fixed on economic advantage, is hardly in a position to contribute positively in this regard. The visit to Bahrain to meet Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) leaders on 6-7 December was the logical next step. The UK had been the hegemonic power in the region for nearly 200 years, dominating the region’s politics, economics, military and even education and culture. And, as it withdrew from the most of the region “east of Suez” from the late 1960s, UK also defined the national borders of the Gulf countries, set up new governmental structures, retained a role in the defense of the region, and generally steered the new nations into the complex realities of late 20th century regional and global affairs.
But, as British power declined and its global role diminished, the UK began to prioritize its role in the EU, and left the responsibility for regional security to the US. Sadly, the sophisticated rapier was replaced by a harsh bludgeon: US military interventions, rarely thought through or planned for the day after, have left the region shattered, deeply divided, and prey to the scourges of sectarianism and extremism.
Threads of relationship
In her first visit to the Gulf, May met the leaders of the GCC in Bahrain at dinner and then addressed the GCC Summit. May’s agenda was to pick up the threads of the relationship that ended about 45 years ago and impart to it a new resonance and validity in light of prevailing challenges. Thus, on arrival, May recalled the “longstanding and very good relations” the UK had had with the countries in the region and promised to build on them for mutual benefit: “Gulf security is our security, Gulf prosperity is our prosperity”, she asserted. She noted that the GCC countries were collectively the biggest investors in the UK and the second biggest non-European export market.
Prime Minister May’s principal interest was the boosting of economic ties: UK media mentioned the UK pursuing deals of about GBP 30 billion, covering energy, education, infrastructure, healthcare and even space technology, and obtaining GCC investment for the rejuvenation of rundown urban centers across the UK. She also announced that UK would participate in Dubai’s EXPO-2020 event, even as a UK-GCC joint working group has been setup to fine-tune the contours of post-Brexit trade ties.
But, given the conflicts and instability in the region, political issues were uppermost in the minds of her GCC interlocutors. An interviewer reminded her that the UK had turned its back on the region in 1971 and wanted to know what message she now had for GCC leaders, given that Iran, in the GCC view, was “interfering” in the affairs of the GCC countries.
Iran’s ‘malign activities’
May categorically stated that the UK was “clear-eyed” about Iran’s “malign activities” and, after the Iranian nuclear weapons program had been terminated with the P5+1 agreement, it was now necessary to check Iran’s “malign activities” in “other areas”. She reminded the interviewer that the UK had a security partnership with the GCC countries but not with Iran, and that the UK would be setting up its permanent military presence in the Gulf by stationing its warships at a base in Bahrain. According to British reports, the UK will maintain about 1,500 military personnel in the Gulf and spend about GBP 3 billion on Gulf defense annually.
May echoed these views in her remarks at the GCC Summit when she promised British help “to push back against Iran’s aggressive regional actions”. The UK-GCC joint statement pledged that the two sides would “oppose and will work together to counter Iran’s destructive activities”. Clearly, May needed to take a tough pro-GCC position on the Iran question if she wishes to sew up the economic deals she desperately needs after the Brexit setback. But, she will find in time that the regional security issues are complex and cannot be addressed through rhetoric, however easily it might flow. For, the region needs to find answers to the ongoing bitter and destructive conflicts in Syria and Yemen. Regional stability demands that Iraq and Lebanon be shaped into unified entities that accommodate multi-ethnic and multi-cultural values. The Iranian foreign office, on its part, described May’s remarks as “irresponsible, provocative and divisive”. The region calls for “clear-eyed” statesmanship and leadership: UK, with its eyes fixed on economic advantage, is hardly in a position to contribute positively in this regard.

Europe: Illegal to Criticize Islam
Judith Bergman/Gatestone Institute/December /16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/12/judith-bergmangatestone-institute-europe-illegal-to-criticize-islam/
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9525/europe-illegal-criticize-islam
While Geert Wilders was being prosecuted in the Netherlands for talking about "fewer Moroccans" during an election campaign, a state-funded watchdog group says that threatening homosexuals with burning, decapitation and slaughter is just fine, so long as it is Muslims who are making those threats, as the Quran tells them that such behavior is mandated.
"I am still of the view that declaring statistical facts or even sharing an opinion is not a crime if someone doesn't like it." - Finns Party politician, Terhi Kiemunki, fined 450 euros for writing of a "culture and law based on a violent, intolerant and oppressive religion."
In Finland, since the court's decision, citizens are now required to make a distinction, entirely fictitious, between "Islam" and "radical Islam," or else they may find themselves prosecuted and fined for "slandering and insulting adherents of the Islamic faith."
As Turkey's president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, said, "These descriptions are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that's it." There are extremist Muslims and non-extremist Muslims, but there is only one Islam.
It is troubling that Western governments are so eager to crack down on anything that vaguely resembles what has erroneously been termed "Islamophobia," which literally means an irrational fear of Islam.
Considering the violence we have been witnessing, for those Westerners who have studied Islam and listened to what the most influential Islamic scholars have to say, there are quite a few things in Islam of which one legitimately ought to be fearful.
Several European governments have made it clear to their citizens that criticizing European migrant policies or migrants is criminally off-limits and may lead to arrest, prosecution and even convictions. Although these practices constitute police state behavior, European governments do not stop there. They go still farther, by ensuring that Islam in general is not criticized either.
Finland is the European country most recently to adopt the way that European authorities sanction those who criticize Islam. According to the Finnish news outlet YLE, the Pirkanmaa District Court found the Finns Party politician, Terhi Kiemunki, guilty of "slandering and insulting adherents of the Islamic faith" in a blog post of Uusi Suomi. In it, she claimed that all the terrorists in Europe are Muslims. The Court found that when Kiemunki wrote of a "repressive, intolerant and violent religion and culture," she meant the Islamic faith.
During the trial, Kiemunki was asked why she did not make a distinction between Islam and radical Islam. She replied that she meant to refer to the spread of Islamic culture and religion, and that she "probably should have" spoken of radicalized elements of the religion instead of the faith as a whole. Kiemunki was fined 450 euros. Her lawyer has appealed the verdict.
Kiemunki issued a press release after the verdict, in which she said: "I am still of the view that declaring statistical facts or even sharing an opinion is not a crime if someone doesn't like it... I wrote that I don't want our country to be overtaken by a culture and law based on a violent, intolerant and oppressive religion."
According to YLE, she added that her essay did not generalize about Muslims, but pointed out that not all Muslims are terrorists. "In these times, specifically in the recent past and today, all of the perpetrators of terrorist acts have turned out to be Muslim," she said.
In Finland, Terhi Kiemunki, a Finns Party politician, was found guilty by a court of "slandering and insulting adherents of the Islamic faith." (Image source: YouTube video screenshot)
So in Finland, since the court's decision, citizens are now required to make a distinction, entirely fictitious, between "Islam" and "radical Islam," or else they may find themselves prosecuted and fined for "slandering and insulting adherents of the Islamic faith." As Turkey's President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan said, "These descriptions are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that's it." There are extremist Muslims and non-extremist Muslims, but there is only one Islam.
It is a pity that Kiemunki did not present the court with quotes from the Quran, such as, "Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them..." (9:5), and "So fight them until there is no more fitna [strife] and all submit to the religion of Allah." (8:39). Perhaps, then, the court could have at least tried to explain to the public in more concrete detail the differences between "Islam" and "radical Islam."
In the Netherlands, a state-funded hotline, run by the anti-discrimination bureau MiND, said that it could not act on a complaint about death threats against homosexuals posted to an online forum, in which the Muslim poster called for homosexuals to be "burned, decapitated and slaughtered." The reason why this anti-discrimination watchdog group could not act on the complaint was that, "The remarks must be seen in the context of religious beliefs in Islam, which juridically takes away the insulting character." MiND concluded that the remarks were made in
"the context of a public debate about how to interpret the Quran... some Muslims understand from the Quran that gays should be killed... In the context of religious expression that exists in the Netherlands there is a large degree of freedom of expression. In addition, the expressions are used in the context of the public debate (how to interpret the Koran), which also removes the offending character."
So, while Geert Wilders was prosecuted in the Netherlands for talking about "fewer Moroccans" during an election campaign, a state-funded watchdog group says that threatening homosexuals with burning, decapitation and slaughter is just fine, so long as it is Muslims who are making those threats, as the Quran tells them that such behavior is mandated. This might be one of the most astounding examples of voluntary submission to sharia law in the West thus far.
A spokesman for the MiND hotline later admitted that, after "further research" on the issue, it had concluded that the complaint had been "unjustly assessed" -- after Dutch MPs called for the hotline to be stripped of public funding.
In February 2016, a Danish district court found a man guilty of making statements on Facebook that the court found to be "insulting and demeaning towards adherents of Islam." The man had written:
"The ideology of Islam is as loathsome, disgusting, oppressive and as misanthropic as Nazism. The massive immigration of Islamists into Denmark is the most devastating thing to happen to Danish society in recent history."
He was fined for "racism." The High Court subsequently overturned the verdict in May 2016. The court found that the man was in fact innocent of racism, as his statements were "directed at the ideology of Islam and Islamism."
It is troubling that Western governments are so eager to crack down on anything that vaguely resembles what has erroneously been termed "Islamophobia," which literally means an irrational fear of Islam. Considering the violence we have been witnessing, it would be irrational not to have fear of its threats. As Shabnam Assadollahi recently pointed out in an open letter to Canadian Members of Parliament, there are quite a few things in Islam of which one legitimately ought to be fearful.
All these governments need to do is consult the speeches of one of the most influential living Islamic scholars of Sunni Islam, the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Yusuf al-Qaradawi. Qaradawi hosts one of Al Jazeera's most popular programs, Sharia and Life, which reaches an estimated 60 million viewers worldwide. Already in 1995, Qaradawi told a Muslim Arab Youth Association convention in Toledo, Ohio, "We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through the sword, but through dawa [outreach]."
Dawa, the Islamic call to conversion, is the Islamic summons for the non-violent conquest of non-Muslim lands, including Europe. As explained by Qaradawi in a recording from 2007, the aim of the conquest consists mainly the introduction of sharia law. According to Qaradawi, sharia law should be inserted gradually, over a five-year period in a new country, before implementing it in full. This sharia law includes chopping off hands for theft; killing apostates and homosexuals, denigrating and oppressing women, as in polygamy, beating them as a means of "disciplining" them, and so on. For those Westerners who have studied Islam and listened to what the most influential Islamic scholars have to say, there is quite a bit to be "phobic" about. It would be refreshing to hear the views of European leaders and courts on these aspects of sharia law instead of their almost ritual condemnations of those who have actually studied Islamic sources and seek to raise awareness of the nature of sharia law.
While prosecuting and sanctioning people who criticize Islam is becoming more common in Europe, this practice used to be reserved only for Muslim countries officially governed by sharia law, such as Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, where it is forbidden to insult Islam.
It is a pity that European courts and other state bodies have begun taking their cues from Islamic law. Apparently, European judges and politicians are no longer capable of appreciating the immense freedoms that used to be the norm on the continent, and which they seem all too willing, of their own free will, to abolish.
*Judith Bergman is a writer, columnist, lawyer and political analyst.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Why Donald Trump Should Focus on Africa

Ahmed Charai/Gatestone Institute/December12/16
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9522/trump-africa-focus
President-elect Trump has the opportunity to make a historic course correction, and to do so in a manner consistent with his administration's stated goals. By renegotiating the U.S. African Growth and Opportunity Act, which was first initiated by the Clinton Administration, he can strengthen American exports, create new export-related jobs and foster development-oriented investment on the continent. By reforming U.S. humanitarian aid to Africa, he can cut considerable bureaucratic waste, effectively increasing assistance without upping the cost.
What's a three-word foreign policy agenda President-elect Donald Trump can pursue that will create American jobs, reduce terrorism, challenge China and set him apart from the failings of his predecessor? Promote African development.
On the one hand, the world's poorest continent is rife with socioeconomic problems that have paved the way for some lands to become hubs of international terrorism, posing a threat to their own populations as well as to distant countries, including the United States. Of the eighteen ISIS branches deemed fully operational by the National Counterterrorism Center, eight are in Africa. According to the latest edition of the Global Terrorism Index, the world's deadliest terrorist group by sheer volume of lethality is not ISIS but the Nigerian Boko Haram.
These clear and present threats were built on a continent's suffering — from example, drought in Somalia and throughout East Africa, and totalitarianism and corruption across the continent — breeding weak, failing and failed states that prove commodious to jihadist operations. Dictators in the mold of Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe continue to terrorize their own populations. And the Democratic Republic of Congo risks deteriorating into civil war should the head of state, Joseph Kabila, continue on his path to authoritarian rule. In a country rich in natural resources, the population remains destitute. These diverse factors help explain why the campaign to roll back terror on the continent is inseparable from African development needs.
On the other hand, some parts of Africa are among the world's bright spots: According to the World Bank, six of the thirteen countries with the highest compound growth annually are on the continent. Among them, Rwanda provides an example of a country that has overcome one of the continent's bloodiest conflicts in recent memory to empower women, fight corruption and attract international investment. Similar positive trends are visible in the democracies of Senegal, Cote d'Ivoire and even terror-plagued Nigeria — all of which are part of a larger pro-American bloc, stretching up to Morocco in the north, that stand with the United States in its struggle against terrorism. For Moroccan King Mohammed VI, the struggle against terrorism is inextricable from the challenge of developing the African continent. He has devised a holistic strategy to pursue both goals in tandem. And multinational bodies on the continent such as the African Union, after decades in a Cold War deep-freeze, are newly invigorated, as these like-minded African nations assert a greater leadership role within them.
One U.S. president in particular made a meaningful contribution to mitigating some of these problems: George W. Bush. He is widely viewed on the continent as a hero: His signature Africa initiative, "the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief" (PEPFAR), saved millions of lives, and also drew praise on both sides of the American partisan divide. He launched the single greatest initiative to fight malaria on the continent to date, and, as a private citizen together with his wife Laura, has since been committed to the struggle against cancer in Africa.
By contrast, President Obama's legacy has been more hot air than action. It began with a preachy speech in Ghana early in his presidency, in which he called on African youth to succeed where their parents had failed. Laden with identity politics, it married Obama's personal narrative to the symbolic choice of the city of Accra — through which countless slaves passed en route to the Americas — to send a message that was as much about domestic American politics as the real challenges and promise of Africa.
Obama's policies have since fallen flat: A U.S. Government initiative to power up the continent with electricity, promising 30 thousand megawatts of power, came up 26 thousand megawatts short. American commerce with the continent, via a free trade agreement dating back to the Clinton years, remains largely limited to the importation of natural resources from countries in which the extraction of those resources is itself a source of conflict — not in keeping with any responsible plan to develop the continent or fight terrorism. The President's "Africa Youth Summit," a large student exchange program, has not been successful in attracting members of the young political class in any African country, upon whom so much of the continent's hopes are placed. Nor has the U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit, convened repeatedly and with great fanfare during the second half of Obama's second term, shown tangible effect on relations among the participating countries.
China has meanwhile exploited this vacuum to become the dominant foreign player in Africa. It has invested more than $100 billion in infrastructure and manufacturing, become the continent's largest trading partner and even begun to flex military muscle: Earlier this year, Chinese armed forces began the construction of a base in Djibouti, a stone's throw from USAFRICOM's Camp Lemonnier. It is the first time in modern history that China established a base beyond its "near-abroad."
Kenyan military personnel meet with U.S. military personnel at Camp Lemonnier, in Djibouti, on March 14, 2011. (Image source: U.S. Army)
President-elect Trump has the opportunity to make a historic course correction, and to do so in a manner consistent with his administration's stated goals. By renegotiating the U.S. African Growth and Opportunity Act, which was first initiated by the Clinton Administration, he can strengthen American exports, create new export-related jobs and foster development-oriented investment on the continent. By reforming U.S. humanitarian aid to Africa, he can cut considerable bureaucratic waste, effectively increasing assistance without upping the cost.
Meanwhile, Trump's commitment to strengthening U.S. military capacities can and must include due attention to AFRICOM — both in terms of the resources it needs, and with respect to the need to partner with indigenous militaries, which should become the world's first line of defense from terror based in Africa. All these measures — in benefiting Americans, winning goodwill among Africans and strengthening U.S. military capacities in the area — will in turn challenge China's dominance of Africa, gaining America leverage as it moves to challenge Beijing in other ways.
Donald Trump will find that helping Africans achieve their dreams is a cause that smartly complements his plans and goals to benefit the United States.
*Reprinted with the kind permission of the author.
*Mr. Charai, a Moroccan publisher, is on the board of directors of the Atlantic Council, the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the Center for the National Interest.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

As Aleppo's Fall To Assad Regime Seems Assured, Regime Is Certain Of Its Victory And Future International Influence – And Opposition Recognizes Defeat

By: N. Mozes and M. Terdiman/MEMRI/December 12/2016
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/12/n-mozes-m-terdimanmemri-as-aleppos-fall-to-assad-regime-seems-certain-of-its-victory-future-international-influence-opposition-recognizes-defeat/
Introduction
After six years of war in Syria, the regime of Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad seems to have the upper hand over the rebel forces. Massive assistance from allies Iran, Russia, and Hizbullah has enabled it to almost completely crush its opponents and push them out of stronghold after stronghold. This is done by besieging rebel-held areas and preventing the delivery of humanitarian aid to their residents, while carrying out massive airstrikes, including with barrel-bombs, and artillery attacks. The regime's main efforts are now concentrated on Aleppo, where it has already recaptured more than two thirds of the east of the city. At the same time, the regime's Russian allies are focusing their attacks on Idlib, now a major stronghold for opposition forces that had arrived there from other locations across the country, under "reconciliation agreements" with the regime that nevertheless do not prevent the Russians from targeting them as part of the regime offensive.[1]
The regime's numerous military victories, especially in Aleppo, are coming at a time of political change in some of the Western superpowers that have led the anti-Assad camp. Donald Trump's presidential triumph, the anticipated French presidential win of Francois Fillon, and statements by both indicating their willingness to work together with Assad in the fight against ISIS have led the Syrian regime to expect shifts in its favor in U.S. and French policy vis-a-vis the Syria crisis. They have also increased the regime's belief that its cause is just and that it will prevail, and encouraged it to continue to strive for total victory, with no negotiations.
Throughout the war, even when its battlefield and diplomatic situations were at their nadir, the Syrian regime never wavered, maintaining confidence that it would triumph in the end.[2] Today its sense of victory is paralleled by an equal measure of despondency among the opposition and its supporters, with mounting losses on the battlefield, growing division in its ranks, and increasingly numerous voices that are beginning to acknowledge a coming Assad victory.
This paper will describe the Assad regime's and its allies' sense of victory, as reflected by top regime officials' statements and by articles published by the state and pro-regime newspapers. It will also review the frustration and despair of the opposition and its supporters, as seen in articles in the Syrian and Arab press expressing recognition of the coming defeat.
Assad Regime: Victory Is On The Horizon, Will Change Power Balance Not Only Locally But Also Internationally
As stated, in the past weeks the Syrian regime has been encouraged by its achievements on the ground and by changes in the international arena that, it believes, will allow it to remain in power and also position it as a major player not only on the regional level but on the global one. This is evident from statements by Syrian officials and articles in the government and pro-regime press.
The Terrorists Face A Choice Between Surrender And Death
Having recaptured about two thirds of Aleppo by besieging the residents and withholding humanitarian aid from them while carrying out indiscriminate airstrikes and artillery attacks, including on hospitals, the regime is more determined than ever to eliminate the remaining pockets of resistance in the city, and rejects out of hand any arrangement other than a complete surrender of the rebel forces. In a December 8, 2016 interview with the pro-regime daily Al-Watan, Assad stressed his determination to retake Aleppo: "The decision to liberate all of Syria, including Aleppo, was taken from the very beginning [of the war]. We never thought to leave any part [of Syria] unliberated."[3]
Muhriz Al-'Ali, a columnist for the pro-regime daily Al-Thawra, wrote: "Uprooting terror is a top priority, and the only choice the terrorists [now] have is between death and surrender, because the decision to purge Aleppo and all of Syria of the filth of terror and terrorist has already been made, and this is the foremost goal of all Syrians, no matter how many sacrifices [it takes]."[4]
Al-Thawra columnist Nasser Mundhir wrote in a similar vein that the battle for Aleppo "will cause all the regional and international considerations to change in favor of the resistance axis in the region... Thanks to the [Syrian] army, Aleppo is now achieving the final victory over terrorism and its supporters. It will not accept anything less than victory and a defeat of the aggression. Freed from terrorism, it will pave the way to victory in many other places and open the door to the political solution that the army is already outlining on the ground..."[5]
Cartoon in Saudi daily: "Bashar" targets Syrians with barrel bombs, "Russia" with missiles, "Iran" with guns and "ISIS" with knives (Al-Iqtisadiyya, Saudi Arabia, December 7, 2016)
Aleppo – A Turning Point In The Syria War: Our Steadfast Position Changes The International Balance Of Power
As the Syrian regime sees it, its military successes across the country, specifically in Aleppo, and its ability to stand fast throughout the crisis, have shifted the balance of power not only in Syria but also in the world. Assad told Al-Watan in an interview that while domestic issues were a factor in the changes in Western countries, the changes were also the result of external elements, such as terrorism and immigration, that are directly linked to the events in Syria. According to Assad, it was the warnings by the Syrian regime throughout the years of the conflict that helped "expose the Western deception [regarding the state of affairs in the Middle East] in the media, in politics, and in institutions and lobbies tied to [the West], and they [these warnings] played a part in fomenting popular demand for change in Western countries... If not for the steadfast position of the Syrian people and state, the Western citizens would have believed these lies to be true..."[6]
Bouthaina Sha'aban, political advisor to Assad, was more forceful, saying: "Syria's steadfastness, and the support from its allies, have shifted the regional and international balance [of power]... The recent developments in the international arena are bringing the countries of the region face to face with a new world, which requires additional thought and action in order to formulate strategic political and informational plans on the regional and global levels."[7]
Hizbullah Executive Council Chairman Hashem Safi Al-Din said in a similar vein that after the army recaptures eastern Aleppo, "the power-balances will change not only in Syria but in the entire region, and that will be the beginning of the end of the world war that was launched against Syria and the resistance."[8]
Ahmad Hassan, a columnist for the Syrian state daily Al-Ba'th, compared the battle for Aleppo to the battle of El Alamein in World War II. He wrote: "The outcomes of the battle there [in Aleppo], which will be decided sooner rather than later in favor of the Syrian regime,... can be compared to the outcomes of the famous battle of El Alamein, which was a major turning point that helped decide the ultimate outcome of World War II... The objective significance of what is happening now [in Aleppo], is that the stage following [the victory] in Aleppo starts [right now], at this very moment... The battle continues and will continue until all the neighborhoods [of Aleppo] are purged and every part of the city is returned to the bosom of the Syrian state. The military action continues and will continue on every piece of land that terror has contaminated, no matter the price..."[9]
Al-Ba'th columnist 'Imad Salem wrote: "The world is on the verge of a strategic transformation that will transform [various] alliances, so that countries that dream of keeping their long tentacles in distant places will be forced to withdraw back into their own borders... The contours of the victory of the Syrian army and its allies in World War III [i.e., the Syria war] are becoming clear, and we shall reap the fruit of the steadfastness and the sacrifices. There is no better proof of this than [the fact that] some countries – chief among them Trump's U.S. and Marine Le Pen's France – are rushing towards Russia. This means that Syria will be a major player not only in the region but in the world, and the agents [of the U.S.] should get ready to reap what they sowed..."[10]
Rif'at Al-Badawi, a columnist for the pro-regime Syrian daily Al-Watan, claimed that in today's world, anyone who wishes to win a presidential election must recognize the important role of the Syrian regime. In a column titled "Syria and the Road to the Presidency," he wrote: "[U.S. president-elect Donald] Trump's power stems from the fact that he rebelled against the mechanism that produces presidents [in the U.S.] and had no need for the large corporations... [In addition,] he declared his wish to cooperate with Russia under President Putin, and [said] that he supports President Bashar Al-Assad staying in power and helping him in his war against terror... In France, Nicolas Sarkozy's defeat in [his party's] presidential primaries was a punishment [he received] after his role in the plot against Libya and Syria was exposed... [Conversely,] Francois Fillon declared his intention to hold direct talks with Russia and Iran in order to find a political solution for Syria and fight terrorism there, [stressing] that the wishes of the Syrian people must be respected... The result is that Fillon is managing to advance towards [winning] the French presidency. In Lebanon, General Michel 'Aoun, the ally of Syria and Hizbullah, has [already] managed to attain the title of 'Honorable President'... The world is changing and alliances are reforming, and Syria is at the heart of this new world. The way to the presidency passes through Syria, and whoever wants to win must recognize the role of the Syrian leadership and respect the will of the Syrian people."[11]
Contempt For U.S., UN: The Americans' Threats Are Meaningless, de Mistura Must Go
This perception of the Assad regime that the developments on the ground and in the international arena are in its favor is also reflected in statements by Syrian officials and articles in the pro-regime press expressing open contempt for the U.S. administration and for UN Special Envoy to Syria Staffan de Mistura.
In an interview with Al-Watan, President Assad attacked outgoing U.S. administration, saying: "In the last year, the U.S. administration has been behaving [just] like the armed factions in Syria, struggling for loot and achievements... The declarations [it] makes in the morning differ from the policies [pursued] in the evening, and the latter are different from the actions of the following day... You feel there is no consistent policy, but [only] struggles [between factions within the administration]."[12]
Criticism at the U.S. administration was also expressed in press articles, especially after National Security Advisor Susan Rice said, following the escalation of the attacks on Aleppo, that "the Syrian regime and its allies, Russia in particular, bear responsibly for the immediate and long term consequences these actions have caused in Syria and beyond."[13] The articles stated that this was mere bluster, like the U.S. administration's threats in 2013 to attack in Syria if it were proved that the regime had used chemical weapons, and that this bluster only proved that the U.S. administration supports the terrorists. Al-Thawra columnist 'Ali Nasrallah wrote: "The latest U.S. warnings are meaningless... They are [only] another indication of the Obama administration's concern for [the safety of] its mercenaries, which it tried to defend by means of [UN Special Envoy to Syria Staffan] de Mistura... and expose an administration that is detached from reality and full of delusions... Neither Russia nor Syria currently feel the need to remind the present U.S. administration that the final decision to free Aleppo from the Wahhabi [i.e., Saudi] mercenaries has already been taken and is not up for discussion or reassessment under any excuse, and that no U.S. opposition will affect the unfolding and development of events..."[14]
Amin Hatit, a Lebanese columnist and analyst for Al-Thawra, wrote: "When Obama threatened to attack Syria in 2013 [following reports that the regime had used chemical weapons], we knew this was [mere] bluster and that he would never dare to act on it, in light of what would await him on Syrian soil [if he did]... The American warnings and threats have no effect on decisions in Syria and Iraq... The American warning is nothing but a political and propaganda [tactic]..."[15]
A similar attitude was expressed towards Staffan de Mistura, who was received coldly during his November 20, 2016 visit to Damascus. A particularly insulting article in Al-Watan, which is close to the regime, published the same day, stated that Syria had repeatedly rejected de Mistura's requests to visit the country, and speculated that his visit would be very brief to reflect "Damascus's dissatisfaction" with his "recent string of provocative and unfair remarks, which are not in line with the UN special envoy's role of mediator in resolving the crisis." It added that Donald Trump's election victory had dealt "a harsh blow to de Mistura" and placed him "in an unenviable position."[16]
Al-Watan's assessment turned out to be correct. Following de Mistura's visit, which lasted only a few hours and which included a meeting with Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Al-Mu'allem, the minister held a solo press conference in which he rejected out of hand de Mistura's proposal for a ceasefire in Aleppo in exchange for the departure of Jabhat Fath Al-Sham (formerly Jabhat Al-Nusra) fighters from eastern Aleppo and local opposition forces' establishment of some kind of autonomous governance. Al-Mu'allem called the proposal "totally unacceptable, as it harms our national sovereignty and rewards terrorism," and added that it was inconceivable that the UN would present such an initiative. De Mistura, he said, had not met expectations, had not discussed a renewal of intra-Syrian dialogue, and had provided no guarantees that the ceasefire would be respected by countries that support terrorism.[17]
Articles in the Syrian press likewise accused de Mistura of supporting terrorists and overstepping the bounds of his position, and called on him to resign. An article in Al-Thawra stated: "The UN has never [before involved itself] so bluntly as a direct side [in the conflict] by means of its envoy, who is not just biased in favor of the terrorists but has worked to violate the UN charter and principles... It appears as though the UN envoy does not want to end his role before using his influence to consolidate the terrorist plan and allow its supporters to retain a foothold [in Syria]..."[18]
Al-Watan columnist Samer 'Ali Dahi wrote: "After [de Mistura's visit to Damascus] today, it will come as no surprise if Damascus demands to replace the international mediator [de Mistura], who has so far failed in his task... His trip to Damascus was to no avail and he returned empty-handed."[19]
Al-Thawra columnist 'Abd Al-Halim Sa'ud wrote similarly: "De Mistura's efforts to defend some 7,000 terrorists in eastern Aleppo while disregarding some 2,000,000 residents who suffer because of them is an outrageous [act by] the UN that cannot be passed over in silence or allowed to continue, and it [also] constitutes a blatant overstepping of the bounds of [de Mistura's] role. Perhaps de Mistura, who is so committed to [the safety of] the terrorists in eastern Aleppo, should have persuaded them to emigrate to the West and used his vast experience to persuade the Western countries who support them to take them in..."[20]
Assad Opponents, Demoralized And Defeated, Are Recognizing That Assad Has Won
The Assad regime's current sense that victory is at hand is now, for the first time, being echoed by some members of the opposition, as is seen in recent articles published inside and outside Syria that express despair and recognition of defeat.
Military, Political Opposition Bodies Criticized For "Hijacking Our Revolution"
One of the main factors in the opposition's defeat both on the ground and in the political arena is the rift between the political and the military opposition, which dates back to the onset of the revolution. The rift is the result of the lack of a single, agreed-upon leadership – a weakness skillfully exploited by the regime and its allies. One notable manifestation of this of this state of affairs was the absence of representatives from both the National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces and from the Syrian High Negotiations Committee, both of which claim to represent the Syrian opposition, from the December 2016 Turkey-sponsored talks in Ankara between representatives from some of the factions fighting in eastern Aleppo and Russian military personnel.[21]
The opposition's repeated defeats on the ground, particularly in Aleppo, led many regime opponents to criticize the poor functioning of the political and military opposition and of the many splits among them. Some claimed that these bodies did not represent them. Syrian journalist 'Ali Safar wrote in an article titled "Who Gave You Our Voices? Why Do You Speak in Our Name?": "In the last six years, no political or military body emerged that enjoys a Syrian consensus and can be trusted to accelerate the political process and end the disgraceful reality in which all [Syrians] live, inside and outside the country... An armed group takes the fate of an entire region into its hands, claiming to speak for its residents, and the regime continues to do the exact same thing... and the political opposition [also] does the same thing, by other means. All these elements... bear no relation to democracy and have never asked a single Syrian if he agrees to their involvement in his life..."[22]
Syrian journalist Khalil Al-Miqdad wondered: "Do we not have the right to ask these [opposition] leaders about the reasons for the division [among them] and the defeats on the ground, the price of which has been paid by hundreds of thousands of people [?]... Have our people been killed and forced to emigrate, and have our villages been destroyed, [just] so that instead of one thief a [whole] gang of thieves and mercenaries will rule [the country], living at the expense of our people's blood?"[23]
Syrian oppositionist Rima Fleihan denounced the elements she said had "stolen the revolution" and turned it into an armed sectarian conflict, and called to save the revolution from certain death by returning to non-violent measures. She wrote: "Our strength drained away when we allowed [all sorts of] wretches to steal our revolution right before our eyes, while we paid no heed, thinking that they shared our opinion and goal. Our strength drained away when they destroyed the non-violent character [of the revolution]..., and when the national discourse of the revolution turned into inciting sectarian discourse due to foolish, despicable resentful people who were not even ashamed to annihilate us using various methods and to remove the mantle of the revolution from its true sons... Our strength drained away when we believed that there was someone in the world who truly cared about our pain and wanted us to extricate ourselves from the quagmire of dictatorship [and gain] freedom and human dignity... Our strength drained away when we believed that our Arab and Muslim brothers would pay attention to anything beyond their personal interests and maintaining their rule [over their countries]...
"Only restoring the original purity of the revolution, and its initial perception and non-violent character, will restore [the vigor of] our youth... The only thing that will save us from death – which seems inevitable in light of the rise of extremism, the hateful discourse, the rise of the extremists to power in most of the countries involved [in the Syria crisis], and the cruelty of those who attack us and our land – is a comprehensive national program for fixing all the mistakes we Syrians have made. That will happen only when we can finally learn from our mistakes... and stop rejoicing at one another's death..."[24]
In addition to criticizing the performance of opposition bodies, some articles by Syrian oppositionists and supporters of the opposition in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere reflected recognition of the opposition's impending defeat and despair of achieving the main goal of the revolution, i.e., toppling the Assad regime.
Muhammad Rushdi Sharbaji, a Syrian writer living in Germany, wrote: "The revolution has few options. In light of the regime advances on all fronts, even the best option is a bitter one. In my opinion, the revolution's strategic goal should be survival – to survive, even on a small piece of Syrian soil, which will grant it status in any future political arrangement... It is no longer conceivable to bring down the regime in the current way. Continuing on the present path means destroying the revolution's circles of support, and creating new problems involving immigration and refugees. This is a bitter truth that is hard to swallow after hundreds of thousands of dead and millions of emigres..."[25]
George Sama'an, a Lebanese columnist for the London-based Saudi daily Al-Hayat, was even more pessimistic, arguing that the opposition had no chance of victory in Aleppo and should consider its next move: "In the coming days, the opposition will have no choice but to accept Aleppo's fate: either the model of Grozny, which spells total destruction, or the model of Beirut, where Israel [first] besieged and cornered the PLO and [then] removed it from its headquarters and from the streets of the city, [sending it] to a far-flung diaspora... Can the Syrian opposition, which could not topple the [Assad] regime for a thousand objective and subjective reasons, successfully fight the Russian and Iranian militaries, which are armed with all manner of heavy weapons? The challenge is great. Many just revolutions throughout history have failed, but other revolutions succeeded, because they knew how to adjust their political and military strategies..."[26]
Hazem Saghieh, a Lebanese columnist for Al-Hayat, complained about the improvement in Assad's global standing despite his crimes against the Syrian people. He wrote: "The claim that more and more people are keen on Bashar Al-Assad, or at the very least prefer him to his rivals, is gaining momentum. In recent months, this growing list of names has seen the addition of [president-elect] Donald Trump in America and of [leading presidential candidate] Francois Fillon in France... while Bashar Al-Assad, along with his two biggest allies, Vladimir Putin and Ali Khamenei, continues the destruction and murder in Aleppo. Nobody blames him for this terrible disaster... and almost everyone agrees that he is part of the solution and of the future..."[27]
Some articles focused on what comes after an Assad's victory and on what has been learned from the revolution in Syria. Al-Hayat columnist Elias Harfouche wrote: "Tomorrow or the next day, Bashar Al-Assad will celebrate his victory over the residents of Aleppo, just like his previous [celebration of] defeat of the Syrians in Homs, Hama, and other cities, and his sending of the fortunate among them to refugee camps or exile and the less fortunate to their graves... Assad, therefore, is going to win, while the world stands by and watches the massive death and destruction... Assad is marching towards a victory that will benefit only the Iranians, the Russians, and the fighters in Hizbullah and other Shi'ite militias coming out of Iraq, Afghanistan, or any place with mercenaries [for hire]... In such a situation, [how] can we describe the nature of the Syrian country and regime that remain after this war? Assad will continue to head the state, but the Russians and Iranians will control the area, as is the right of the victor. [Complete] sponsorship of Syrian decision-making [by them] is predicted... But they will control a country that is half dead. Syria will remain an open wound to the eyes of the world – a country half of whose population has emigrated inside or outside Syria, whose cities have become rubble, whose citizens survive on weeds and bread crumbs mixed with rainwater... an economy that has hit rock bottom. This is the Syria that Bashar Al-Assad will defeat in his war...
"Assad will win. Fine. But he is defeating his own people, and history teaches us that such a victory is unsustainable."[28]
Former Egyptian MP Mustafa Al-Nagar, who served in the Egyptian parliament in 2012-2013 during Muhammad Mursi's presidency, expressed concern that following an Assad victory, other tyrants could deal with their own opponents the same way he did: "The big tragedy of the Syrian revolution's failure is that it will create a historic model in support of tyranny and extermination as a way of controlling people against their will. Our Arab region has given birth to a bloody model, the Bashar model, which provides tyrants with a roadmap for survival – according to which you kill your people mercilessly if they rise up against you. The more you kill, the better you ensure the survival of your regime. Aleppo will fall in weeks or months. The flag of the revolution will come down, and Bashar's flag will fly..."[29]
Anti-Assad Syrian Journalist: "I Want The Dictator Back"
The depth of the despair felt by the camp opposing Assad is evident in an article by Dr. Faisal Al-Qassem, a senior Syrian journalist working for the Qatar-based Al-Jazeera TV and a fierce opponent of the Assad regime. He argued that in light of what happened after the regimes in Iraq and Libya were brought down, leaving Assad in power would be better than the inevitable emergence of hundreds of tyrants instead of just one:
"Let us examine why the situation in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Libya deteriorated after their revolutions... Do the factions fighting the armies in Syria, Yemen, Libya, and Iraq truly want to topple tyrants and dictatorial regimes there, or do they merely want to take their place? Did the peoples rise up to replace one tyrant with [many] tyrants, or one dictatorial regime with [many] dictatorial regimes?... Did they rise up to replace Bashar Al-Assad with Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi?
"Just look at what happened to the Iraqis after they got rid of Saddam Hussein... Despite the drawbacks of that horrid dictatorship, it was dozens of times better for the Iraqis than the American democracy, which rode in on tanks... Instead of transitioning to true democracy, all the opposition elements sought to take Saddam's place. So we got 20 Shi'ite Saddams, 40 Sunni Saddams, and 50 Kurdish [Saddams], and people began to miss having only one dictator...
"We want freedom, but freedom with security, not freedom accompanied by chaos, murder, robbery, looting, and militias. I was an avowed supporter of democracy, but now I want the dictator back, in order to at least keep people alive... The Iraqi scenario has spread to Libya, Syria, and Yemen. How many Qadhafis are there in Libya now? How many 'Ali Abdallah Salehs are there in Yemen? How many Bashar Al-Assads in Syria?...
"How many factions are fighting the regime [in Syria]? One oppositionist spoke of some 2,000 factions. Just imagine – 2,000 factions, each with its own agenda, trends, statements, leaders, personal interests, budgets, and borders... Do these factions want security, stability, and prosperity for the Syrian people, or do they want to split the country up amongst themselves?"[30]
* N. Mozes and Dr. M. Terdiman are research fellows at MEMRI.
Endnotes:
[1] See MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis No. 1221, Local Ceasefire Agreements In Syria: Capitulation To Regime's Siege-And-Starvation Strategy Under UN Sponsorship, January 12, 2016.
[2] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 6322, In Recent Speech, Assad Expresses Confidence In Regime's Victory, Says Crisis Will Be Resolved Through War On Terror, Local Ceasefires, February 24, 2016; Special Dispatch No. 5332, Bashar Al-Assad To 'Al-Akhbar': The Western Game In Syria Is About To End; We Have Rejected Attractive Western Proposals To Finance Syria's Reconstruction, June 11, 2013; Special Dispatch No. 6422, Syrian Regime And Its Mouthpieces: Aleppo Campaign Will Continue Until Final Victory; U.S. And Its Regional Proxies Responsible For Aleppo Crisis, May 9, 2016.
[3] Al-Watan (Syria), December 8, 2016.
[4] Al-Thawra (Syria), November 14, 2016.
[5] Al-Thawra (Syria), November 30, 2016.
[6] Al-Watan (Syria), December 8, 2016.
[7] SANA (Syria), November 28, 2016.
[8] Al-Safir (Lebanon), November 29, 2016.
[9] Al-Ba'th (Syria), November 29, 2016.
[10] Al-Ba'th (Syria), November 20, 2016.
[11] Al-Watan (Syria), November 28, 2016.
[12] Al-Watan (Syria), December 8, 2016.
[13] Whitehouse.gov, November 19, 2016.
[14] Al-Thawra (Syria), November 21, 2016.
[15] Al-Thawra (Syria), November 21, 2016.
[16] Al-Watan (Syria), November 20, 2016.
[17] SANA (Syria), November 20, 2016.
[18] Al-Thawra (Syria), November 22, 2016.
[19] Al-Watan (Syria), November 21, 2016.
[20] Al-Thawra (Syria), November 22, 2016.
[21] Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), December 3, 2016.
[22] Orient-news.net, November 22, 2016.
[23] Orient-news.net, December 6, 2016.
[24] All4Syria.info, December 3, 2016.
[25] Enabbaladi.net, December 4, 2016.
[26] Al-Hayat (London), December 5, 2016.
[27] Al-Hayat (London), December 3, 2016.
[28] Al-Hayat (London), December 4, 2016.
[29] Arabi21.com, December 5, 2016.
[30] Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), December 3, 2016.