LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

December 16/16

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletin16/english.december16.16.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
Let anyone who is thirsty come to me, and let the one who believes in me drink. As the scripture has said, "Out of the believer’s heart shall flow rivers of living water."
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 07/37-44/:"On the last day of the festival, the great day, while Jesus was standing there, he cried out, ‘Let anyone who is thirsty come to me, and let the one who believes in me drink. As the scripture has said, "Out of the believer’s heart shall flow rivers of living water." ’Now he said this about the Spirit, which believers in him were to receive; for as yet there was no Spirit, because Jesus was not yet glorified. When they heard these words, some in the crowd said, ‘This is really the
prophet.’Others said, ‘This is the Messiah.’ But some asked, ‘Surely the Messiah does not come from Galilee, does he? Has not the scripture said that the Messiah is descended from David and comes from Bethlehem, the village where David lived?’ So there was a division in the crowd because of him. Some of them wanted to arrest him, but no one laid hands on him."

For by the grace given to me I say to everyone among you not to think of yourself more highly than you ought to think, but to think with sober judgement, each according to the measure of faith that God has assigned.

Letter to the Romans 12/01-08/:"I appeal to you therefore, brothers and sisters, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your minds, so that you may discern what is the will of God what is good and acceptable and perfect. For by the grace given to me I say to everyone among you not to think of yourself more highly than you ought to think, but to think with sober judgement, each according to the measure of faith that God has assigned. For as in one body we have many members, and not all the members have the same function, so we, who are many, are one body in Christ, and individually we are members one of another. We have gifts that differ according to the grace given to us: prophecy, in proportion to faith; ministry, in ministering; the teacher, in teaching; the exhorter, in exhortation; the giver, in generosity; the leader, in diligence; the compassionate, in cheerfulness."

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on December 15-16/16
Dr. Geagea Has Abandoned all that is LF historical stances, convictions and sacrifices/Elias Bejjani/December 15/16
Is tacit Aoun-Berri struggle blocking Cabinet formation/Hasan Lakkis|/The Daily Star/December 16/16
Lebanese Cabinet on ice for now as previous grudges surface/Nazih Osseiran/The Daily Star/December 15/16
U.S. Money Transferred To Iran Used To Expand Iran's Military Budget/By: Dr. Nimrod Raphaeli/MEMRI/December 15/16
Usud Al-Cherubim: A Pro-Assad Christian Militia/Aymenn Al-Tamimi/Syria Comment/December 15/16
To the Muslim Brotherhood: Quit Shouting Islamophobia and Quit Attacking Muslim Families/Saied Shoaaib/Gatestone Institute/December 15/16
Iran Breaks Nuclear Deal and UN Resolutions/Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/December 15/16
Egypt: Christians Still Denied Churches While Government Opens 10 Mosques Every Week/ Raymond Ibrahim/Coptic Solidarity/December 15/16
Stop calling the Syrian conflict a ‘civil war.’ It’s not./Hanin Ghaddar/Wahington Post/December 14
Turkey’s Slide into Authoritarianism/Burak Bekdil/Middle East Quarterly/Winter 2017

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on December 15-16/16
Dr. Geagea Has Abandoned all that is LF historical stances, convictions and sacrifices
Lebanon: Hezbollah’s Insistence on 30-Member Cabinet Further Freezes Agreement
Is tacit Aoun-Berri struggle blocking Cabinet formation?
Aoun confirms plan to visit Saudi Arabia
Major General Beary chairs tripartite meeting with LAF and IDF
Aoun: Renewed Arab and international trust in Lebanon incentive to start change trend
Berri, Jumblat Push for 30-Member Cabinet to Include all Parties
Geagea Says No Vetoes but LF Won't Give Any of Its Govt. Seats to Other Parties
AMAL MP: Efforts Ongoing to Form Cabinet before Holidays
Cabinet Line-Up Shuffled, Formation Back to Square One
Mustaqbal Urges 'Cooperation' in Govt. Formation, Clings to Hybrid Electoral Law
Arslan Warns against Undermining Druze Share in Cabinet
Hizbullah Bloc Says Proportional Representation 'Obligatory Path' for 'State Rise'
Berri and EU Ambassador Launch Parliament's New Bill Tracking System and Mobile Application
U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Visits the Bekaa Valley
Ambassador Shorter: The UK Has Not Forgotten Akkar
Jumblatt, Hariri meet
Laham meets Czech parliamentary delegation
Indian Ambassador arrives in Beirut
State Security Member Shot in Akkar
Qatari Embassy cancels National Day ceremony in Beirut
Mundis leaves Beirut to Paris
Bomb explodes in Ain El Helwe
Christmas tree lit up in Tripoli, Pharaon hopes for year of stability
Lebanese Cabinet on ice for now as previous grudges surface

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on December 15-16/16
Hundreds Leave Aleppo under Rebel Withdrawal Deal
50,000 People Still Trapped in Eastern Aleppo, Says U.N. Envoy
Evacuation Convoy Heads for Syria Villages under Rebel Siege
Russia not Meeting its Commitments on Aleppo
With Aleppo Advance, Syria Army Sweeps Up Conscripts
Putin's Victory? Russia's Role in Recapturing Aleppo
Russia Pledges Fighting Pause in Idlib during Aleppo Evacuations
Explosive Traces Found on EgyptAir 804 Victims
Iraqi Children Battle Trauma after Life under IS Rule
Yemen's al-Qaida Condemns 'Deviant' IS Rivals
Egypt Executes Convicted Jihadist
Iranian Regime's MP: Government Subsidies Are Monopolized by a Mafia of 250
Iran: Fear of Corruption, Reason for the Reluctance of Foreign Investors
Latest Labor Protests Across Iran
EU Policy Has Encouraged Iran Regime's Internal Repression and Crimes in Syria
Iran: Critically Sick Political Prisoner on Hunger Strike in Danger
Why Mrs. Mogherini Has Failed to Condemn the Appalling Human Rights Violations in Iran?
First on CNN: Adviser says Russia crucial to Trump's Middle East plans
Obama Allows Iran Sanctions Renewal Without Signing Bill


Links From Jihad Watch Site for on
December 15-16/16
Germany: Muslim migrant accused of sexually assaulting boy 68 times calls it “love affair”.
UK to train “moderate” Syrian opposition forces to target the Islamic State.
France: 10,000 troops on streets as Islamic State threatens Christmas jihad massacres.
DC: Former Metro Transit cop indicted for trying to aid the Islamic State.
Robert Spencer in PJ Media: Gay activist hits Brady Bunch star for saying Qur’an is political.
Intel report: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar supporting jihadis in Germany.
Islamic State recaptures Palmyra, displays severed heads of Assad forces.
Yasmin Seweid’s lies show mainstream media is chief purveyor of “fake news”.
Hamas top dog calls for Israel’s destruction: “Every inch of Palestine is just ours”.
German probe: 2,000 Muslim migrants assaulted 1,200 women in Cologne New Year’s Eve.
Hugh Fitzgerald: The Confusions of Tony Blair, Part I.
DHS knew OSU jihadi was terror recruitment target, let him into U.S. anyway.
Minnesota: Muslim state rep claims “Islamophobic” harassment, doesn’t report it to cops.
Video: Thousands of Muslims screaming “Allahu akbar” march in London, demand caliphate.
UK Armed Forces top dog says jihadis “hiding in plain sight” among Muslim migrants.
Germany: Muslim migrant who murdered teen had attempted murder conviction abroad.
NYC: Muslima made up “Islamophobic” attack by Trump supporters to avoid punishment for missing curfew.
Islamophobia” reporter hired at Buzzfeed.
Austria: Muslims attack demon Krampus in traditional Christmas parade.
UK: Nurses flown in to perform FGM, parties follow.

Links From Christian Today Site for on on December 15-16/16
Evacuation Of Aleppo Begins As Ambulances Come Under Fire.
Charleston Church Massacre Survivor Describes Terrible Night 9 Were Shot Dead During Bible Study.
Twitter and Facebook Unite To Oppose Trump's Plan For Muslim Database.
Three-Parent Babies' Approved In UK As Campaigners Warn Of 'Designer' Babies.
Thousands To Pray In London For Persecuted Ahmadi Muslims.
Christians Condemn German Arms Sales To Repressive Regimes.
Could Non-Catholics Share Communion With Catholic Spouses At Last? This Cardinal Thinks So.
Pagan Priest Wins Right To Wear Horns In Driver's Licence Photo.
Thousands Demand Turkey Release US Pastor Jailed On Terrorism Charges.

Latest Lebanese Related News published on on December 15-16/16
Dr. Geagea Has Abandoned all that is LF historical stances, convictions and sacrifices
Elias Bejjani/December 15/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/15/elias-bejjani-dr-geagea-has-abandoned-all-that-is-lf-historical-stances-convictions-and-sacrifices/
What is devastating and sad at the same time, is that Dr. Samir Geagea, the chief of the Lebanese Forces Party (LF) is not any more the kind of that strong, loud, sincere and patriotic leader that he used for years to portray himself…
In summary, the man did not change politically or strategically President Micheal Aoun or his Free Patriotic Movement Party after forging an alliance with both of them. Practically, Geagea did no bring president Aoun or his followers politically and stances wise to the Middle as he proudly, but falsely alleges.
He also he did not move Aoun an inch from where he went in 2006 after his alliance with Hezbollah.. the Iranian armed terrorist and denominational proxy. Instead, Dr. Geagea himself and definitely based on very wrong grandiose personal, and patriotic calculations he and against all odds joined president Aoun and his party in their Hezbollah alliance.
Geagea in reality and practicality has abandoned all that is Lebanese Forces historical stances, convictions and sacrifices.. The dilemma here lies in the unfortunate fact that his followers with very few muted exceptions worship him and where ever he goes they blindly follow and glorify his wisdom!! Yes, and for sure it is a sad reality, but it is the reality that we are living and witnessing at the present time.
In conclusion, Samir Geagea is now in the same limbo and bizarre position that he and again based on wrong calculations put himself and his party and the Christian community after accepting the “Taef Accord” in year 1989, when willingly he dismantled the strong and influential LF militia and handed over its weapons to the Lebanese-Syrian armies, while Hezbollah remained fully intact political and militarily.
Currently, Geagea is a hostage of his own deviated stances and can not go back to where he was after burning with Saad Al Hariri their ships and destroying the 14th of March alliance. At the same time he and Hariri are not and can not making any difference where they are.
Both, Geagea and Hariri by destroying and dismantling the sovereign and patriotic 14th of march Alliance not only lost themselves, the cause and their free decision making process, but directly or in directly they have totally succumbed to and accepted unconditionally the Iranian occupation of Lebanon.
Practically they became mere tools in Hezbollah’s leadership hands.

Below is a comment that Roger Bejjani posted on his face Book on December 13/16…It describes honestly how many Lebanese patriotics envisage the current choices of Dr. Samir Geagea

(I wish I would see the LF (Lebanese Forces) and Geagea above the fray, différentiant in the eyes of the Lebanese not compared to the rest of the politicians cheese eaters. Unfortunately, 45 years of resistance, military, intellectual and moral seem to have had reason to the intrepid hakim who suddenly decided to join the club of politicians cheese eaters, despised once both by Bachir that by him. As we bend the spine once and/or we dial once with Hezbollah terrorists and/or we dive head the snout first in the dish of rotten cheese, we can no longer recover. The cries of victory has the con we nagging with the poor idiots stirring their sectarian instincts the most primitive are effective in the short term. In May the snow will melt and what will be will be very visible.My disappointment in the LF and in hakim makes me sad. Never before 18 January 2016, I had lost faith in this organization in general and in Geagea in particular. Unfortunately Hakim seems to have lost his references.)
*Elias Bejjani
Canadian-Lebanese Human Rights activist, journalist and political commentator
Email phoenicia@hotmail.com
Web sites 
http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com & http://www.10452lccc.com & http://www.clhrf.com
Tweets on 
https://twitter.com/phoeniciaelias
Face Book 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/128479277182033 & https://www.facebook.com/elias.y.bejjani

Lebanon: Hezbollah’s Insistence on 30-Member Cabinet Further Freezes Agreement
Caroline Akoum/Asharq Al Awsat/December 15/16/Beirut – Despite prevailing optimism over the imminent formation of the Lebanese Cabinet, the latest political developments have contradicted all expectations, as sources said that Hezbollah’s insistence on an expanded 30-member government has hampered all efforts in this regard. Following a meeting at the presidential palace on Wednesday, Prime Minister-designate Saad al-Hariri told reporters that the “matter still requires further consultations”. Sources said that Hariri discussed with President Michel Aoun the Cabinet’s formation and latest political stances in this regard. Meanwhile, during a meeting with various MPs and officials, Speaker Nabih Berri said: “There is no excuse for delaying the formation of the Cabinet and to issue decrees after the problem of portfolio allocation have been solved.”He added that he has offered all facilitations to speed up government’s formation. However, Berri’s optimism was soon met with less positive expectations as Hariri left the presidential palace on Wednesday. Lebanese Forces Media Officer Charles Jabbour told Asharq al-Awsat newspaper that Hezbollah and Amal Movement were insisting on forming a Cabinet of 30 ministers. He noted that adding six ministers to the Cabinet would not improve its efficiency, but would guarantee the March 8 Movement’s “vetoing third”.
For his part, Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblatt called for a balanced representation that would include the Marada Movement, the Lebanese Forces and the Kataeb Party. Meanwhile, MP Alain Aoun headed an FPM delegation on Wednesday to visit Marada Movement leader MP Suleiman Franjieh, in an attempt to ease tensions between the two political parties. In remarks following the meeting, Aoun said that both parties have agreed on the need to draft an electoral law that would be based on the proportional system, adding that the FPM was not seeking to marginalize any political party.

Is tacit Aoun-Berri struggle blocking Cabinet formation?
Hasan Lakkis|/The Daily Star/December 16/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/15/hasan-lakkisthe-daily-star-is-tacit-aoun-berri-struggle-blocking-cabinet-formation/
Contrary to wide expectations following a wave of optimism that a solution to the 6-week-old Cabinet standoff was at hand, white smoke did not rise from the meeting between President Michel Aoun and Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri heralding the birth of a new government.
Statements made in the past few days by Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and MP Sleiman Frangieh over solving the problem of the Marada Movement’s representation in the government, as well as remarks by caretaker Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil, had raised hopes that a Cabinet lineup would be announced following Hariri’s meeting with Aoun at Baabda Palace Wednesday.
However, no Cabinet lineup was announced and there are no serious indications that a new government will be born soon, raising doubts that new hurdles might have popped up, hindering its formation.
Following the Wednesday meeting with Aoun, Hariri told reporters that the “matter still requires further consultations.”
Matters were heading in a positive direction when agreement was reached to allocate the Public Works Ministry to Frangieh, and the Lebanese Forces, which had insisted on taking control of this ministry, was persuaded to drop this demand, while the Free Patriotic Movement and other political powers did not oppose this solution, sources close to the Cabinet formation process said.
What complicated the situation and brought the Cabinet formation back to square one was not the dispute over whether the government should include 24 or 30 members, but the way in which the announcement over the Cabinet deal was made by Frangieh following his meeting with Berri at Ain al-Tineh, the sources said.
Frangieh declared after his meeting with Berri Monday that the speaker had agreed to concede the Public Works Ministry to the Marada Movement. Berri also said his move was aimed at facilitating the Cabinet formation.
Frangieh’s statement was probably interpreted by sources close to Aoun as a sign of victory by one side against another and [Berri’s Ain al-Tineh residence] as a mandatory path to ensure the success of the Cabinet lineup, the sources said.
Media outlets had reported that Aoun was displeased with Frangieh’s statement, which according to the sources, can only be construed as a means of presenting the president with a fait accompli, even though everyone knows very well that Aoun does not like such a method.
In the meantime, sources close to the FPM said they doubted all the positive elements that emerged from Ain al-Tineh, adding that they still believe that the Parliament speaker is working to drive a wedge between the FPM and the LF, or that he plans to stir up a Christian-Shiite problem despite the denial issued by Hezbollah chief Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah and Bassil, the FPM leader, in this respect.
The sources noticed the absence of any meeting between Bassil and Berri despite the fact that the former heads a political movement represented in Parliament with about 20 MPs, in addition to his being the president’s son-in-law.
Such a meeting should have taken place had there been intentions that the outcome of the presidential election has become a thing of the past, the sources said.
Before knowing the fate of the Cabinet lineup, the sources underlined the need to clarify some facts, the most important of which is whether the FPM is convinced that any divergent viewpoints between the Amal Movement and Hezbollah will not lead to unraveling their alliance over the Cabinet deadlock.
The sources said that Berri must know that it is difficult for him to bring Hezbollah to his side in order to settle scores with the FPM.
Until this picture is crystallized, the government’s birth will remain in the freezer unless an agreement is reached between the president and the prime minister-designate on issuing the Cabinet formation decrees, making it difficult for any side to reject it, regardless of how Berri’s relations will develop with the FPM, the sources said. The sources added that the FPM’s bid to separate the Cabinet formation process from attempts to approve a new electoral law might be linked to the formation path and is also meant to provide proof that the FPM is serious about reforms and that the government will see the daylight sooner or later, regardless of the ministerial portfolio that will be allocated to Frangieh, and whether it will be a 24- or 30-member body.

Aoun confirms plan to visit Saudi Arabia
The Daily Star/December 16/16/BEIRUT: President Michel Aoun said Thursday that he plans to visit Saudi Arabia to advance the normalization of bilateral ties. “The Lebanese-Saudi relations have improved, becoming great. ... This will culminate in a visit to Saudi Arabia, where we will meet with Saudi officials, as well as diaspora Lebanese,” Aoun said in a statement after meeting with a delegation of Lebanese businessmen working in the kingdom. Aoun commended the Lebanese businessmen for their work in Saudi Arabia, calling on them to apply their expertise in their homeland as well. “You are called to come to your homeland and work, especially since there are positive signs now and we will work diligently to begin development projects because we want increased investments in our land,” he added. 

Major General Beary chairs tripartite meeting with LAF and IDF
Thu 15 Dec 2016/NNA - The UNIFIL Head of Mission and Force Commander Major General Michael Beary today chaired a regular tripartite meeting with senior officials from the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) at the UN position at Ras Al Naqoura. Discussions focused on issues related to the implementation of UNIFIL's mandate, including the situation along the Blue Line and its ongoing visible marking, incidents of violations of resolution 1701 (2006) and related UNIFIL investigations, as well as air violations and the pending withdrawal of Israeli Forces from northern Ghajar. Noting the general calm in UNIFIL's area of operations, Major General Beary thanked both sides for their constructive engagement with UNIFIL and expressed hope that this could be built upon to further reinforce the security infrastructure along the Blue Line. "All efforts at this forum are ultimately aimed at maintaining the cessation of hostilities," Major General Beary said, "And in this context our centre of gravity is the Blue Line." He urged the parties to not allow any extraneous factors or public rhetoric to distract them from this focus. He underlined the importance of UNIFIL's liaison and coordination mechanism that is founded on the trust UNIFIL has been able to build with both the parties through its impartial handling of issues relating to resolution 1701 and to the Blue Line, whether it's marking or violations or efforts to resolve contentious issues. "This mechanism under UNIFIL's umbrella has served us all so well and we all have a common interest in protecting and strengthening it," he said.
 
Aoun: Renewed Arab and international trust in Lebanon incentive to start change trend
Thu 15 Dec 2016/NNA - President of the Lebanese Republic, General Michel Aoun, on Thursday confirmed that the renewed Arab and international trust in Lebanon that started with the presidential election formed an essential incentive to begin a new trend of change in favor of treating the economic, social and developmental situations within a comprehensive economic plan for reforms taken as a base. Baabda Palace witnessed today before noon a series of interlocutors who came to discuss with President Aoun many files, mostly imbuing the feature of economy and development. Among the visitors had been Head of the Kuwaiti Fund, Abdul Wahhab Al Badr, Head of Arab Banks Union, Mohammad Al Jarah Al Sabbah, and others.
 
Berri, Jumblat Push for 30-Member Cabinet to Include all Parties
Naharnet/December 15/16/The formation of a 24-member cabinet is disapproved by the Hizbullah, AMAL and the Progressive Socialist parties because they prefer to have bigger shares in the new cabinet and to include all political parties, An Nahar daily reported Thursday.
AMAL Movement leader Speaker Nabih Berri dispatched his political aid and Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil to Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri a day earlier, asking him to widen the cabinet into 30 members in order for the Shiite parties to get five ministerial portfolios instead of four that include the finance, agriculture, economy for the AMAL and the industry and youth and sports for Hizbullah, according to the daily. Hizbullah and Berri want to broaden their participation so it would include MP Talal Arslan, Asaad Hardan of the Syrian Social National Party and the Kataeb party. For his part, PSP leader MP Walid Jumblat voiced calls on Wednesday to form a cabinet of 30 ministers with a balanced share for the Marada Movement and the Lebanese Forces.
 
Geagea Says No Vetoes but LF Won't Give Any of Its Govt. Seats to Other Parties

Naharnet/December 15/16/Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea stressed Thursday that the LF “does not have a veto on anyone” while emphasizing that his party is not willing to give up any of its declared ministerial portfolios. “We do not have a veto on anyone at all and we do not have a problem with any cabinet format,” Geagea said during a Maarab educational seminar. “Some are claiming that the LF is vetoing some candidates and I openly tell everyone that we do not have a veto on anyone but meanwhile we will not accept to give up any of our ministerial seats in favor of a candidate from another party,” Geagea added. “We in the LF do not have a problem if the cabinet is consisted of 24 or 30 ministers and we will not raise hell under both scenarios,” the LF leader went on to say. Geagea however noted that a smaller cabinet would be more “productive and effective,” pointing out that “it is not a representative body” like parliament. After a settlement was reached under which the Marada Movement would be given the public works portfolio and the LF would get the health portfolio, the cabinet formation process ran into new obstacles in the wake of the parties' decision to raise the number of seats from 24 to 30. The parties are reportedly bickering over the six new candidates amid reservations over some controversial figures as well as over the shares of some parties.
 
AMAL MP: Efforts Ongoing to Form Cabinet before Holidays
Naharnet/December 15/16/AMAL Movement MP Qassem Hashem announced on Thursday that contacts have intensified in order to form a new cabinet before the holidays and denied claims that the process has lapsed “Discussions and contacts have intensified to speed up the formation of the government before the holidays. The deliberations did not go back to square one because it's in no one's interest to put obstacles in front of its formation,” said Hashem in an interview to VDL 93.3. Commenting on the 30-member cabinet, he said: “the 30-member cabinet is better than 24 as it will include all the Lebanese factions.”
 
Cabinet Line-Up Shuffled, Formation Back to Square One
Naharnet/December 15/16/Hopes faded Wednesday when the anticipated formation of a new cabinet saw new obstacles some linked to the number of ministers and another related to the names suggested for some ministries, media reports said Thursday. Stakes grew the day before that a cabinet comprised of 30 ministers will be formed which sent hopes surging that it will be completed and that all the problems have been eased. Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri visited President Michel Aoun at the Baabda Palace on Wednesday carrying a “flexible” government formula comprised of 24 ministers in addition to six new candidates who would be appointed state ministers. But after the meeting Hariri said that more consultations were needed. According to An Nahar daily, Aoun rejects the formation of a 30-minister cabinet. Sources following up closely on the process told As Safir daily: “A 24-member cabinet has the disadvantage of not having chance for the representation of the Kataeb party, the Syrian Social National party and Talal Arsal, in light of the insistence of AMAL and Hizbullah to have their allies represent in the cabinet.”The formation process made major progress on Monday and Tuesday after the political parties reached a settlement over the thorny issue of the public works portfolio. Under the settlement, the Marada Movement will be given the public works portfolio while the Lebanese Forces will get the health portfolio.
 
Mustaqbal Urges 'Cooperation' in Govt. Formation, Clings to Hybrid Electoral Law
Naharnet/December 15/16/Al-Mustaqbal parliamentary bloc on Thursday urged the political parties to show “cooperation” so that the new cabinet can be formed as soon as possible, while reiterating its called for a so-called “hybrid” electoral law. Lauding “the efforts that the Prime Minister-designate is exerting,” the bloc said in a statement issued after its weekly meeting that “the cabinet line-up cannot be announced in the absence of cooperation from the majority of the parties.” “There is a need to stop the practices that some parties might be exercising to impose crippling conditions that have so far delayed the formation of the cabinet, which is a loss for everyone,” the bloc added. Turning to the issue of the electoral law, Mustaqbal reminded of its “firm stance that clings to a hybrid formula that mixes the winner-takes-all and proportional representation systems.”“This is the temporary and possible formula that allows a transition to the implementation of a law fully based on proportional representation after the State extends its sole authority across all Lebanese regions,” the bloc said. Earlier in the day, Hizbullah's Loyalty to Resistance bloc reiterated its call for a law fully based on proportional representation. Mustaqbal has repeatedly rejected Hizbullah's proposal, arguing that the party's arsenal of arms would prevent serious competition in regions where the Iran-backed party has clout. Mustaqbal, the Lebanese Forces and the Progressive Socialist Party have meanwhile proposed a hybrid electoral law that mixes the proportional representation and the winner-takes-all systems. Speaker Nabih Berri has also proposed a hybrid law. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate.The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.
 
Arslan Warns against Undermining Druze Share in Cabinet
Naharnet/December 15/16/Head of the Lebanese Democratic Party MP Talal Arslan warned on Thursday against any attempts to undermine the Druze community's share in the upcoming cabinet line-up. “We will not accept any disrespect with regard to the portfolio to be allotted to the Druze,” said Arsalan on Twitter. “I hereby ask the Prime Minister-designate to seriously look into this matter and to respect the current position of the Druze and their historic position in the country,” added the MP. Arslan's comments came after reports said that one of two ministerial portfolios (justice or educations) will be given to a Druze minister while a state portfolio will be given to Arslan. OTV said on Wednesday that the Druze leader, MP Walid Jumblat, has accepted to take the education ministry instead of the justice ministry, amid other reports saying otherwise. President Michel Aoun and Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri are still struggling to put together a new cabinet amid conflicting demands from the political forces that are seeking to join the unity government. Horsetrading is still revolving around the so-called services-related ministerial portfolios.
 
Hizbullah Bloc Says Proportional Representation 'Obligatory Path' for 'State Rise'
Naharnet/December 15/16/Hizbullah's Loyalty to Resistance parliamentary bloc announced Thursday that the proportional representation electoral system is an “obligatory path” for change and reform in Lebanon. “What Hizbullah Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah has proposed about endorsing an electoral law fully based on proportional representation in a single electorate or several large electorates is an obligatory path for the rise of a State that can achieve change and reform in the country,” said the bloc in a statement issued after its weekly meeting. “Finalizing the electoral law, in parallel with the efforts to form a new cabinet, is something necessary,” the bloc added, stressing that it rejects the 1960 electoral law and that it wants the elections to be held “on time.”Separately, the bloc said the recapture of the Syrian city of Aleppo by President Bashar Assad's forces and their allies “is a pivotal achievement that puts an end to any scheme seeking to partition Syria.” Caretaker Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq has recently warned that there is not much time left to pass a new electoral law while announcing that the ministry is ready to organize the polls under the 1960 law. Hizbullah has repeatedly called for an electoral law fully based on proportional representation but other political parties, especially al-Mustaqbal Movement, have rejected the proposal and argued that the party's controversial arsenal of arms would prevent serious competition in regions where the Iran-backed party is influential. Mustaqbal, the Lebanese Forces and the Progressive Socialist Party have meanwhile proposed a hybrid electoral law that mixes the proportional representation and the winner-takes-all systems. Speaker Nabih Berri has also proposed a hybrid law. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.
 
Berri and EU Ambassador Launch Parliament's New Bill Tracking System and Mobile Application
Naharnet/December 15/16/Speaker Nabih Berri and the Head of the Delegation of the European Union to Lebanon, Ambassador Christina Lassen, officially launched Thursday the Parliament's Bill Tracking System and mobile application that have been developed with the support of the European Union. The launch took place at Berri's Ain el-Tineh residence in the presence of Lebanese MPs, ministers, Parliament staff, as well as representatives of embassies, public administration and professional bodies. Through the EU-funded “Support to Parliamentary Development in Lebanon” project, which is implemented by International Management Group (IMG), the Lebanese Parliament has received technical assistance to improve its legislative process through updating and re-launching the Bill Tracking System, which has been inactive since 2008. This tracking system will allow MPs and Parliament staff to have online access to all the legislative proposals which are in procedure in the Parliament. The mobile application, which is part of the update package of the tracking system, will allow MPs, Parliament staff and the public to easily access information about the activities of the Parliament, thus “facilitating the lobbying and advocating activities between parliamentarians and the Lebanese citizens,” a European Delegation statement said. Speaking during the event, Ambassador Lassen said: "A successful and sustainable democracy requires not only the existence of democratic institutions, but – above all – their efficient and transparent functioning. In this regard, the European Union believes that supporting democratic institutions worldwide is a priority.""The project under which the Bill Tracking System and the mobile application have been devised is strengthening the Lebanese Parliament's staff professional skills in key areas such as legislative drafting, scrutiny analysis and information management," she added.
Speaker Berri said: "Today's meeting is an opportunity to thank the European Union for supporting the parliamentary development support program in Lebanon. This program has contributed to accomplishing a series of crucial achievements especially in supporting the IT committee and other committees, and in applying solutions to new issues related to the intranet, as well as e-mail solutions and digital solutions for recording the plenary sessions."
Since 2014, the EU has been providing assistance to the Lebanese Parliament to help it enhance its efficiency in carrying out its functions and responsibilities.
 
U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Visits the Bekaa Valley

Naharnet/December 15/16/U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Anne Patterson visited the Bekaa Valley on Thursday and inspected a UNHCR Informal Tented Settlement on the outskirts of Zahle, highlighting “U.S. humanitarian assistance to Lebanon and Syrian refugees,” the U.S. Embassy said. While there, she met with Syrian refugees, toured U.S. assistance projects, and received a briefing about the humanitarian situation from UNHCR officials. Throughout her visit, she reaffirmed the “unwavering U.S. support to Lebanese communities that are struggling to cope with the effects of the Syrian crisis,” the embassy said in a statement. “I’m visiting from the U.S. with my colleague Ambassador Elizabeth Richard to show our support for the government of Lebanon and the Lebanese people, as they have very generously received over a million Syrian refugees into their country, and to also show support for the Syrian people, who are living in very dire conditions and who have been driven from their homeland,” Patterson said in a speech at the informal settlement. “The United States of America will continue its commitment to assist Lebanon and the Syrian refugee population. We’re the largest donor to Lebanon and indeed to the Syrian refugees in other countries and we will continue our support,” she added. According to an embassy statement, the United States has provided nearly $1.2 billion in humanitarian assistance to host communities and Syrian refugees in Lebanon since the crisis began.
 
Ambassador Shorter: The UK Has Not Forgotten Akkar
Naharnet/December 15/16/On his first visit to Akkar’s municipal projects under the Lebanon Host Communities Support Program, in partnership with the Ministry of Social Affairs and the United Nations Development Program, British Ambassador to Lebanon Hugo Shorter inaugurated Thursday UK funded projects in Bani Sakher and Halba, and met with 13 mayors from various municipalities in Akkar which are receiving UK funding for infrastructure projects. He was accompanied by Luca Renda, Country Director UNDP, and Suheir El Ghali, the National Coordinator of LHSP Program at the Ministry of Social Affairs. In Amayer, Shorter met with mayors of nine municipalities of Wadi Khaled area: Amayer – Al Fared – Wadi Khaled - Khat El Petrol - Bani Sakher - El Ramah – Moqaybleh – Hisheh and Awada. He visited two irrigation canals extending across 2200m in Bani Sakher and met with the farmers and land owners. The project has helped farmers increase their income by enabling them to diversify their crop production to include more water-rich crops such as eggplants, beans, and peanuts as well as decreasing operations costs. It is also helping improve health and sanitation in the local community by reducing risks of water contamination with wastewater and solid waste. In the town of Halba, Ambassador Shorter inaugurated the newly established Halba market, in presence of Akkar Governor Imad Labaki and listened to heads of El Hissa, Tell Meayan, Bebnine, Tell Abbas Gharbi and Halba municipalities who shared their hopes about the future of the region. Set in 6,000m2 of public space, the market has the capacity to accommodate around 390 traders yearly that come from 216 villages in Akkar. Located in the center of Halba and easily accessible for residents living in the Akkar governorate, the public market facility will be operational seven days a week serving all residents of the area.
 “Today, I want to say: the UK has not forgotten Akkar. Seeing is believing. Seeing the mayors of 14 municipalities in Akkar, farmers, land owners, individual producers, women cooperatives from various villages in Akkar, all working together with pride and doing their bit to improve the livelihoods of their communities, I believe that Lebanon with its resilience and with the UK standing by your side, will make a success out of the current crisis. It makes me proud to see how the UK is supporting you on the ground with actions, not just words,” Shorter said. “The Akkar district, like many regions in Lebanon, has been affected by the presence of very large numbers of Syrian refugees, hosted generously by your communities with limited resources, creating unprecedented challenging circumstances for many of your municipalities. We recognize the difficulties and we have responded with projects that match your needs. We have funded 19 municipality projects in Akkar since 2015. A public market in Halba that serves over half a million residents, with 390 traders coming from 216 villages in Akkar. Over 2200m of irrigation canals for better crops, and water management,” he added. According to the British Embassy, Lebanon is the second largest recipient of UK aid in the Middle East and the second largest recipient of UK aid per head in the world.
 “Our total support to Lebanese stability, prosperity and security has reached £436m since 2011,” the embassy said in a statement.
 
Jumblatt, Hariri meet
 Thu 15 Dec 2016/NNA - Democratic Gathering leader, MP Walid Jumblatt, received at his Clemenceau residence Prime Minister-designate, Saad hariri, accompanied by Nader Hariri and former MP, Ghattas Khoury. Attending the meeting were Jumblatt's two sons and his wife, as well as Minister of Public health Wael Abou Faour, MPs Marwan Hamadeh and Ghazi Aridi, and former MP Ayman Choucair.
 
Laham meets Czech parliamentary delegation
Thu 15 Dec 2016/NNA - Patriarch of Antioch and All the East for the Greek Melkite Catholic, Patriarch Gregory III Laham, met in Damascus with a parliamentary delegation from the Czech Republic. During the meeting, Laham said "our czech friends have expressed their admiration to the churches in Syria, and their intention to submit to the European Parliament in Brussels a petition carrying pictures and signatures of one million and forty thousand children demanding a halt to the war in Syria." "They will pass on what is really happening in Syria to their country and the world, particularly the Syrian people's insistence on the continuation of life and the defense of their homeland," he went on.
 
Indian Ambassador arrives in Beirut
Thu 15 Dec 2016/NNA - The newly appointed Indian Ambassador to Lebanon, Sanjiv Arora, just arrived to Beirut, coming from Dubai. The Ambassador will present his credentials to Lebanese top officials prior to beginning his diplomatic mission in Beirut.
 
State Security Member Shot in Akkar
 Naharnet/December 15/16/Unidentified gunmen opened fire at the vehicle of State Security Sergeant, Mohammed H., while driving along the Bibnine-Birqayel highway in Akkar showering the car with bullets, the National News Agency said on Thursday. The wounded Sergeant was wounded in his right thigh, NNA added. He was rushed to a hospital in Tripoli for treatment and his condition was reported stable. Security forces launched an investigation into the incident and efforts continue in search of the culprits.
 
Qatari Embassy cancels National Day ceremony in Beirut
 Thu 15 Dec 2016//NNA - Expressing solidarity and sympathy with Aleppo that is still witnessing war, the Qatari Embassy in Beirut decided to cancel the ceremony it arranged for on Qatar's National Day occasion in Lebanon. The ceremony was scheduled to take place on Sunday, December 18, 2016, at Phoenicia Hotel in Beirut. The embassy's stance came abiding by the instructions made by Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim Bin Hamad Al Thani who even called for cancelling the national event in Qatar itself.
 
Mundis leaves Beirut to Paris
 Thu 15 Dec 2016/NNA - STL Registrar, Daryl Mundis, left on Thursday Beirut heading to Paris.
 
Bomb explodes in Ain El Helwe
 Thu 15 Dec 2016/NNA - A bomb exploded on Thursday evening inside Ain El Helwe camp, with no casualties reported, according to the NNA correspondent.
 
Christmas tree lit up in Tripoli, Pharaon hopes for year of stability
 Thu 15 Dec 2016/NNA - Head of the association "Akid Fina Sawa", Mrs. Violette Safadi, announced on Thursday the launching of the end of year celebrations at the Rachid Karamé International Fair in Tripoli during a ceremony in which a Christmas tree was lit up, in the presence of Mufti of Tripoli and the North, Sheikh Malek Chaar, Bishop of Tripoli and the North for the Melkite Greek Catholics, Edward Daher, and Archbishop of Tripoli and Koura for the Orthodox Greeks, Ephram Kiriakos. Outgoing Minister of Tourism, Michel Pharaon, hoped that the year 2017 will be a year of stability and that the army will preserve the sovereignty of the Lebanese territory, "so that Lebanon remains the lighthouse of the region."For his part, the United Nations Special Coordinator for Lebanon and the United Nations Development Program representative, Philippe Lazzarini, said that the UN was ready to support the city of Tripoli, stating that the best way to do so is by increasing the participation of young people in the city's public life and decision-making. 

Lebanese Cabinet on ice for now as previous grudges surface
Nazih Osseiran/The Daily Star/December 15/16
 http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/15/nazih-osseiranthe-daily-star-lebanese-cabinet-on-ice-for-now-as-previous-grudges-surface%D8%B9%D9%88%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D9%88%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B2-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%AD%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%AF-%D8%AA/
 http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Lebanon-News/2016/Dec-15/385441-cabinet-on-ice-for-now-as-previous-grudges-surface.ashx
 BEIRUT: The Cabinet will not be formed this week due to standing grievances between major political powers, sources told The Daily Star Wednesday but Free Patriotic Movement President Gebran Bassil expected it to be resolved before Christmas. “We expect the Cabinet’s birth before the holidays,” Bassil said in a statement. “Despite it being a transient government [the new administration will] follow up on reform and combat corruption, which should reflect on the ministers.”
 Sources from the presidential palace are skeptical over formation.
 “There will be no Cabinet anytime soon, the issue has become much larger than its formation, as previous grudges are surfacing,” a source from Baabda said.
 During an hourlong meeting at the presidential palace Wednesday, Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri and President Michel Aoun discussed Cabinet’s progress. As he was leaving the palace, Hariri told reporters that the “matter still requires further consultations.”
 So far, politicians have failed to agree on the lineup and the allocation of portfolios. Even the exact number of ministers included remains contentious. Hariri has previously called for a 24-member administration.
 Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblatt has called for an expanded 30-member Cabinet with balanced representation for the Marada Movement, the Lebanese Forces and the Kataeb Party. This would fortify Lebanon “amid the [region’s] moving sands” he said via Twitter Wednesday.
 Source said that the issue is now beyond the number of ministers.
 “It doesn’t matter anymore if it’s 24 or 30 [members]. What matters is [Speaker] Berri’s relationship with the FPM and not his relationship with [Marada Movement head MP Sleiman] Frangieh,” the source explained. “This is why the Cabinet’s formation is being hampered and Hariri is very bothered by this.”The source pointed to previous tensions between the Speaker and Aoun and cited them as the reason for delays.
 “Berri and Aoun are portraying to the media as if they are the ones forming Cabinet, but that won’t happen if Frangieh only gets the Culture Ministry,” the source said.
 Marada’s share in the administration is the main hurdle preventing its formation. Frangieh insists on managing one of three key portfolios – Telecommunications, Public Works or Energy – before he agrees to join the Cabinet.
 Berri had attempted to give up the Public Works portfolio to Frangieh. Aoun in turn demanded that a Shiite minister be allocated as part of his team, which Berri rejected and thus created another stalemate.
 The source revealed that all parties bar one remained skeptical that the Cabinet would be formed anytime soon, however he refused to reveal which group was hopeful.
 Berri, during a meeting with various MPs and officials, expressed optimism. “There is no excuse for delaying the formation of the Cabinet and to issue decrees after the hurdles of portfolio allocation have been solved,” he said, adding that he and the FPM agree on the need to formulate a new parliamentary law based on proportional representation to replace the current 1960 law used in the previous elections in 2009.
 FPM MP Ibrahim Kanaan also met with Jumblatt to discuss the law that would govern the upcoming parliamentary elections.
 Maronite Patriarch Beshara Rai attempted to reconcile Frangieh and Aoun Tuesday, but also failed. As Rai and Frangieh met, he called the president so the two could chat. However, Aoun snubbed Frangieh and refused to take his call, further marring attempts to reach a consensus.
 MP Alain Aoun headed an FPM delegation Wednesday to visit Frangieh at his home in Bneshaai, in a move aimed at diffusing tensions between the two. The discussion also revolved around the parliamentary electoral law.
 Another source close to the Cabinet formation process said that the “final touches are being put to the Cabinet lineup as efforts and contacts are now geared toward solving the substitute portfolio [for the Amal Movement].”
 Yet sources also revealed that Hariri would not be going to the presidential palace Thursday, indicating that the process remains frozen. 

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on on December 15-16/16
Hundreds Leave Aleppo under Rebel Withdrawal Deal
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 15/16/Hundreds of civilians and rebels left Aleppo on Thursday under an evacuation deal that will allow Syria's regime to take full control of the city after years of fighting. The rebel withdrawal began a month to the day after President Bashar Assad's forces launched a new offensive to recapture Aleppo and will hand the regime its biggest victory in more than five years of civil war. In a video message to Syrians, Assad said the "liberation" of Aleppo was "history in the making." A revived agreement on a ceasefire and the evacuations was announced on Thursday, after an initial plan for civilians and fighters to leave rebel-held parts of the city collapsed the previous day amid renewed clashes.
 The evacuation began with a convoy of ambulances and buses crossing into a government-held district in southern Aleppo around 2:30 pm (1230 GMT). A Syrian military source told AFP that 951 evacuees, including 108 wounded, were in the convoy. Most were civilians but about 200 rebel fighters were among them, the source said. The vehicles arrived just over an hour later in opposition territory about five kilometers (three miles) west of the city, and they followed by a second convoy of 15 buses, state media and a doctor at the scene said. "The wounded will be transferred to... nearby hospitals for treatment," said Ahmad al-Dbis, who heads a unit of doctors and other volunteers coordinating the evacuation of wounded people. State television earlier showed images of the convoys' blinking lights moving through the government-held Ramussa neighborhood.
 'We will return'
 The evacuees spent hours gathering earlier at a staging area in Aleppo's southern al-Amiriyah district. An AFP correspondent there saw people piling onto the green buses, filling seats and even sitting on the floor, with some worried there would not be another chance to evacuate. Many were in tears and some hesitated to board, afraid they would end up in the hands of regime forces. On the dusty window of one of the buses someone had written "One day we will return". Each bus carried a member of the Syrian Red Crescent wearing the organization's red uniform, riding at the front next to the driver. Ingy Sedky, the International Committee of the Red Cross's spokeswoman in Syria, said the first convoy included 13 ambulances and 20 buses carrying civilians. State television reported that at least 4,000 rebels and their families would be evacuated. A first evacuation attempt on Wednesday morning fell apart, with artillery exchanges and resumed air strikes rocking the city until the early hours of Thursday. But the agreement, brokered by Syrian regime ally Moscow and opposition supporter Ankara, was revived following fresh talks. The defense ministry in Moscow said Syrian authorities had guaranteed the safety of the rebels leaving the city. The head of the U.N.-backed humanitarian taskforce for Syria, Jan Egeland, told reporters in Geneva that most of those evacuated from Aleppo would head to opposition stronghold Idlib, in Syria's northwest. France on Thursday requested urgent closed-door consultations at the U.N. Security Council on the evacuation of civilians and plans for aid deliveries to Aleppo, with Paris's envoy calling for international observers to monitor operations.
 Ambulance 'fired on'
 The evacuation was going ahead despite reports earlier Thursday of pro-regime forces firing on an ambulance transporting the injured to al-Amiriyah, wounding three people including a member of the White Helmets civil defense organization. On Wednesday, cold and hungry civilians had gathered for the initial planned evacuation but were instead sent running through the streets searching for cover as fighting resumed. Russia accused the rebels of having violated the ceasefire while Turkey accused Assad's regime and its supporters of blocking the evacuation. Iran, another key Assad backer, was reported to have imposed new conditions on the agreement, including the evacuation of some civilians from two Shiite-majority villages in northwestern Syria under rebel siege. On Thursday, nearly 30 vehicles were headed to Fuaa and Kafraya to evacuate sick and wounded residents, the governor of neighboring Hama province, Mohamed al-Hazouri, told state news agency SANA. A Syrian source on the ground told AFP that "1,200 injured and sick people and their families will be evacuated."
 Backed by foreign militia forces including fighters from Lebanon's Hizbullah, the advance launched last month made rapid gains, leaving the rebels cornered in a tiny pocket of the territory they had controlled since 2012. More than 465 civilians died in east Aleppo during the assault and another 149 were killed by rebel rocket fire on government-held areas, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group.
 Shrinking rebel territory
 More than 310,000 people have been killed since the Syrian conflict began, and over half the population has been displaced, with millions becoming refugees. The United States and other Western nations, Turkey, and Gulf Arab states all backed opposition forces during the war but their support was limited. The conflict, which began in 2011 with anti-government protests that were brutally put down, saw a turning point last year when Russia launched an air war in support of Assad. With Aleppo out of rebel hands, the largest remaining rebel bastion is Idlib province, which is controlled by an alliance dominated by former al-Qaida affiliate Fateh al-Sham Front. British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson on Thursday summoned the Russian and Iranian ambassadors to convey what he said on Twitter was his "profound disquiet" over the violence in Aleppo. Diplomatic efforts -- including several rounds of peace talks in Geneva -- failed to make headway in resolving the conflict. After upping its involvement by brokering the Aleppo deal, Turkey said it would meet with Russia and Iran in Moscow on December 27 to discuss a political solution to the entire conflict.

50,000 People Still Trapped in Eastern Aleppo, Says U.N. Envoy
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/December 15/16/Around 50,000 people, the majority civilians, were still trapped in eastern Aleppo even as an evacuation deal was under way, the U.N. peace envoy for Syria and French foreign minister said on Thursday. "There are 50,000 people, including 40,000 civilians unfortunate enough to live in that part of the city. The rest are fighters, numbering between 1,500 and 5,000, and their families," the U.N.'s Staffan de Mistura told reporters in Paris, alongside France's Jean-Marc Ayrault. Turkey had earlier said 80,000 to 100,000 civilians were likely still trapped in eastern Aleppo. "Our priority is for our U.N. colleagues to be present with the people (who have been evacuated) and that the fighters be respected under the terms of this deal," De Mistura said. Under the terms of the evacuation agreement negotiated by regime backer Russia and rebel supporter Turkey, the people currently being evacuated from eastern Aleppo will be taken to the northwestern province of Idlib, an opposition bastion. "We don't know what will happen in Idlib. If there is no political agreement and a ceasefire, Idlib will become the next Aleppo," De Mistura said. Ayrault meanwhile repeated France's call for "the deployment, as quickly as possible, of U.N. observers, of all U.N. personnel who are already on the ground, and who can be deployed in the coming hours."A U.N. Security Council meeting requested by France, and which is expected to take place on Friday, "will specifically examine the deployment of observers in order to ensure there are no abuses, no acts of revenge, and that the civilian population is protected."He added: "This can be done extremely quickly." Ayrault meanwhile urged "a ceasefire for the whole country and for a return to negotiations." Hundreds of people were evacuated from eastern Aleppo on Thursday, after a devastating month-long regime offensive carried out with the backing of Russian war planes.

Evacuation Convoy Heads for Syria Villages under Rebel Siege

Naharnet/Agence France Presse/December 15/16/Vehicles were en route Tuesday to two government-held villages under rebel siege in Syria's Idlib province to evacuate sick and wounded residents, a Syrian official told state media. The evacuation is set to take place as a fragile deal to allow the departure of civilians and fighters from the last rebel-held part of Aleppo was getting underway. "Twenty-nine buses and ambulances, and medical teams, have been sent to the besieged villages of Fuaa and Kafraya in Idlib province to evacuate humanitarian cases and a number of families," the governor of neighboring Hama province, Mohamed al-Hazouri, told state news agency SANA. A Syrian source on the ground told AFP that buses and ambulances had begun moving from the Qalaat al-Madiq area in the northwest of Hama province towards the two villages. The source said "1,200 injured and sick people and their families will be evacuated." The Syrian government and its ally Iran had reportedly pushed for evacuations from Fuaa and Kafraya to be included in the deal to allow the departure of the remaining civilians and fighters in east Aleppo. That evacuation had been due to begin on Wednesday, but was postponed after objections from the government, including over the involvement of Fuaa and Kafraya, a source close to the regime told AFP. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based monitor, also reported the evacuation of sick and wounded from Fuaa and Kafraya was expected to begin on Thursday. Observatory chief Rami Abdel Rahman said the evacuees were expected to go to the government stronghold of Latakia province. "The deal is linked to the evacuation happening in Aleppo," he said, Fuaa and Kafraya have been besieged by rebels since spring 2015.

Russia not Meeting its Commitments on Aleppo
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/December 15/16/French President Francois Hollande hit out on Thursday at Russia's role in the ongoing siege of Aleppo, saying that Moscow had broken a promise to aid trapped civilians. "Russia is making commitments that it is not keeping. There's a moment where you have to answer with action," Hollande told reporters as he arrived for an EU summit overshadowed by events in the besieged city where Syrian and Russian forces are forcing out rebels. Hollande, citing both Russia and Iran, warned that "if there lacks effort in the coming hours, the regimes that support (Syrian leader) Bashar al-Assad will take the responsibility for this extremely serious situation for the population."The French leader also hit back at criticism that he failed to fully engage with Russia, which has emerged as a crucial broker in the Syrian conflict through its unabashed support of Asssad. "I speak all the time with Russia. Russia makes commitments that it does not meet so now it is time that we have this truce and urgent humanitarian aid if necessary," he said.

With Aleppo Advance, Syria Army Sweeps Up Conscripts
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/December 15/16/After Mohammed Walo's Aleppo neighborhood was recaptured by Syria's army, he crossed into the well-stocked government-held west for groceries. On the way back, he was stopped at a checkpoint and conscripted.
"I was passing through an army checkpoint, and on my way back, they told me I was wanted for the army reserves," Walo told AFP. It was the first time the 35-year-old technician had left his Haluk neighborhood since rebel groups overran it four years ago. "I have to come back to serve in the army for my son who is very dear to my heart, so that he can inherit a country that isn't in ruins," Walo said, with tears in his pale green eyes. He is one of hundreds of men who have been swept up to perform their compulsory service or enter the army reserves since the government began recapturing territory in east Aleppo from rebels. After a month-long assault, Syria's army and allied militias are closing in on the shrinking enclave still held by rebels, with tens of thousands of residents streaming into government-controlled zones. The flows have boosted Syria's army reserves, according to General Habib Safi, who runs the military police station where Walo and more than 200 other new conscripts are being debriefed. In Syria, males above 18 years of age are required to complete up to two years of military service, after which they are automatically enlisted in the army reserves. Exemptions are issued for students, males who are the only child, sole breadwinners for families, and anyone with handicaps. The army's 300,000-strong pre-war force has been halved by deaths, defections and draft-dodging. President Bashar Assad, in an interview Wednesday, said it was "obvious the Syrian army is not to be as strong as it was before. But what we have is determination to defend our country. This is the most important thing."
'Allegiance to homeland'
Gesturing to the new conscripts in west Aleppo's Feid district, Safi said: "The displacement is providing the army with groups of men. This is just part of those that are here."Around 700 men had been recruited into the armed forces since the escalation in Aleppo, "and the number is growing," the general said. As families exit east Aleppo into regime-controlled territory, men undergo background checks to identify anyone wanted for draft-dodging, desertion or any other violations. Any person eligible then spends a week at government "collection centers" while the recruitment process is finalized. "We monitor his inclinations and his competencies, as well as his allegiance to his homeland. When this is genuine, he is immediately admitted into the ranks of the armed forces." The United Nations has raised concerns that hundreds of Syrian men may have gone missing after heading from east Aleppo into government-controlled zones. The U.N.'s Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria said it had reports of "enforced disappearances and forced conscription", with men of military age appearing to be most at risk. New recruits who spoke to AFP near Syrian security officials said they were being treated well, including Mohammed Ali, 19, who told AFP he fled eastern Aleppo last Saturday. "I knew that I still had to do my military service, but I was too scared. After witnessing the clashes, I decided to hand myself in," the young man said. "I never carried arms (against the government). I just sold water from a cistern fixed on top of my car."
Families crowd outside
Ahmad al-Qassem, 23, told AFP he was forced to join a rebel group in Aleppo under threat of torture, and that he was taught to fear Syrian regime forces for many years. "They told me, 'They will kill you.' But I saw on television that a lot of people were getting their status regularized," he said. He and other men from his neighborhood handed themselves in to the army earlier this week, and he hasn't seen his family since. Outside the police station, dozens of people -- mostly women and children -- waited impatiently to see their recently-recruited relatives inside. "I'm waiting to see my son Ahmad, who's inside the center," said Iftikhar, 45, who left the Tariq al-Bab district of east Aleppo two weeks ago. "We didn't know that he had to go into the reserves," she said, pulling her black headscarf tighter around her in the December cold.
"God protect him." Amin Derzi, 50, came to the station to check on his son, who was detained when the family left the Salhin district several days ago. Derzi's 27-year-old son was wounded two years ago in a rocket attack that left him without fingers on one hand. "We got him treated, but it wasn't enough... I haven't seen him since yesterday, and I want to check on him and give him his medication," he said.

Putin's Victory? Russia's Role in Recapturing Aleppo
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/December 15/16/When Russian President Vladimir Putin launched the Kremlin's bombing campaign in Syria last year to back up leader Bashar Assad, the regime's forces were being pushed back. Now Damascus is celebrating its biggest victory in over five years of war after recapturing control of the rebel bastion in the east of the city and dealing a hammer blow to those looking to oust Assad. Here's how Russia helped break the stalemate:
Turning the tables
Russian warplanes played a central role in bludgeoning rebel-held parts of Aleppo towards defeat with a brutal campaign that stirred memories of Putin's destruction of the Chechen capital Grozny in 1999-2000. Although Assad's opponents finally gave up after Moscow said it halted air strikes on the city in October, Russia's bombers had already pulverized rebel defenses for months, allowing the Syrian leader's forces to tighten their siege. "Without Russia, nothing would have happened with Aleppo," said Alexei Malashenko, an analyst at the Carnegie Center in Moscow. "Everything was focused on Aleppo."While Moscow insists its troops are not fighting on the frontlines, it admits it has military advisers on the ground supporting Assad's forces. Malashenko said Russian advisers had played their role in helping the ground operation, noting that the death of a Russian army tank commander in Aleppo suggested Moscow might have drafted in some of its big guns to help out. In addition to helping turn the tide militarily, Russia's presence also made sure of one thing: there would be no intervention from the West in Aleppo -- despite an outcry over the bloodshed. As the operation intensified, Moscow demonstratively bolstered its hi-tech air defenses in the skies over Syria and sent more warships -- including its only aircraft carrier -- to patrol the shores off the war-torn country.
A pyrrhic victory?
For the Kremlin, victory in Aleppo can be seen as a stunning triumph to crown Moscow's first intervention outside the former Soviet region since the disastrous Afghanistan campaign.  Russia has helped thrust Assad into a position of strength while breaking the back of more moderate rebels groups supported by Washington and its allies. Putin now appears the undisputed kingmaker in Syria and a key player across the entire Middle East. And he cut the U.S. and Europe out of the loop on Aleppo by dealing directly with Turkey's Recep Tayyip Erdogan. But the ferocious bombardment of Aleppo saw the West leveling accusations of war crimes that clearly stung the Kremlin and further strained its fragile ties with the West. That was a blow for what many saw as one of the major initial aims of Putin's intervention in Syria: trying to ease his isolation over the Ukraine crisis. "The main goal of the operation has been to force the West to speak to Putin," independent military expert Alexander Golts said.
"The situation has come full circle: Russia is now isolated because of the victory in Syria."
Blistering international criticism did eventually see Russia claim to halt its Aleppo strikes in October in the move the Kremlin called a "manifestation of goodwill."But the damage was done and any chance of pushing the U.S. to coordinate forces in Syria evaporated. On the military side, the show of strength in Aleppo did not always go smoothly. Moscow's aging Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier suffered two embarrassing mishaps within a month with two jets ending up in the drink.
What's next?
Just as Russia was about to hail the fall of Aleppo, bad news emerged from elsewhere. As Assad's troops focused Syria's second city, Islamic State group jihadists seized back control of the ancient city of Palmyra eight months after Damascus and Moscow retook it. The loss was both a major blow for Putin -- for whom the capture of the World Heritage site had been a major propaganda coup -- and a potentially worrying sign of things to come. The shock IS advance highlighted how tough Assad's forces will find it to keep a lid on areas they control -- and showed that Syria's protracted war is still far from over. "With Palmyra captured for a second time, it's difficult to imagine that Aleppo will instantly turn into a peaceful city," Malashenko said. "This big city will need to be controlled and there will need to be a huge Syrian army contingent with permanent Russian support."The defeat of the rebels in Aleppo has so far not been accompanied by any progress towards a negotiated end to the conflict. An emboldened Assad may now prove even more difficult for Moscow to bring to the table, which could hamper any efforts to scale back Russian operations there. Key for the Kremlin will be how U.S. President-elect Donald Trump approaches the Syria conflict when he takes power in January. With the capture of Aleppo now a fait accompli, Putin and Assad may be hoping Trump stays true to his word and prioritizes cooperation against IS over all else.

Russia Pledges Fighting Pause in Idlib during Aleppo Evacuations
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/December 15/16/Russia has promised there will be a pause in fighting in Syria's Idlib province as people are evacuated there from Aleppo, a top U.N. official said Thursday. The head of the U.N.-backed humanitarian taskforce for Syria, Jan Egeland, told reporters in Geneva that "most" of those evacuated from Aleppo will be headed to opposition stronghold Idlib, in Syria's northwest. Egeland said the U.N. has two humanitarian hubs set up in the province. "Russians and others assure us that there will be a pause in the fighting... when we assist the evacuation," Egeland said. Russia is Syria's key military ally and Moscow's backing helped secure the regime's victory over rebels in Aleppo. Egeland said that evacuees arriving in Idlib will be registered "and directed to the assistance that (the U.N.) can provide." He stressed that the U.N. was not part of the deal agreed to halt to the brutal fighting in Aleppo. "This is not an agreement mediated by the United Nations," he said. "We were only invited to monitor (the evacuations) this morning."Egeland and the World Health Organization have confirmed that WHO staff were the first U.N. personnel on the ground at the evacuation staging area in what was previously rebel-held eastern Aleppo. The WHO will assist the International Committee of the Red Cross and Syrian Arab Red Crescent with medical evacuations from the staging area, the U.N. health agency's spokesman Tarik Jasarevic said. Egeland said the U.N. was drawing up contingency plans for up to 100,000 displaced people to move to Idlib and was working with opposition ally Turkey to set up large scale camps. But figures for the total number of people displaced from Aleppo remain difficult to establish, Egeland added.

Explosive Traces Found on EgyptAir 804 Victims
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/December 15/16/Traces of explosives have been detected on remains of victims of an EgyptAir plane crash last May that killed all 66 people on board, the aviation ministry announced Thursday. An official investigative committee which made the discovery has referred the case to Egypt's state prosecution, it added in a statement. Under Egyptian law, the prosecution takes over "if it becomes clear to the investigative committee that there is criminal suspicion behind the accident," the ministry said. EgyptAir MS804 was en route from Paris to Cairo when it disappeared from radar over the Mediterranean. Investigators determined that a fire broke out in or near the cockpit of the Airbus A320 before it crashed between Crete and the coast of northern Egypt. Among the 66 people on board were 40 Egyptians, including the 10-member crew, and 15 French nationals. Egypt's aviation minister had said a terrorist attack was the most likely cause of the crash.

Iraqi Children Battle Trauma after Life under IS Rule
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/December 15/16/Years of life under jihadist rule and war have left thousands of Iraqi children old beyond their years and in desperate need of playtime to overcome their trauma. Malak, 11, says she has "come back from hell". She huddles in a long black coat at the Hasansham displacement camp where thousands of people have lived since fleeing their homes in Mosul where Iraqi forces are fighting to oust the Islamic State group from its stronghold. "Now that we are here, my dad is doing better," Malak says. In this camp, between classes and play sessions, these young Iraqis are "becoming children again", says Maulid Warfa of the U.N.'s children agency UNICEF. "They have seen destruction, they have seen death, they've lived in the middle of fierce fighting, they've seen enormous explosions. All that has an impact on children's psychological and social wellbeing." Children make up half the Iraqi population and a similar proportion of those displaced from Mosul. Many have seen their childhood cut short as they take on the responsibility of supporting impoverished, bereaved and displaced families. "They need to leave their tents and speak to people who will listen to them, rather than hearing their parents talking about war," said Suzdar Saleh, a psychologist from the NGO Terre des Hommes.
Back to school
In the camp's alleyways, girls help their mothers wash laundry while boys wrapped in sodden woollen clothes help their fathers carry food packages distributed by aid groups. Faysal, also 11 and the oldest of five children, says life here is tough. "We want to go home, my father can't find work, we're cold here and we eat badly," he says as heavy rain pounds on the U.N. tent that has become his new school. Many of the children have not been to regular school since IS jihadists took over their region in 2014. Malak attends classes at the UNICEF center every day. She says she wants to be a journalist or a doctor, despite having spent two years out of school. IS fighters ran schools in her village near Mosul, but it was expensive, and girls had to wear a long black veil. "They didn't teach us anything so we could become engineers or doctors, but only 'one machine gun plus one machine gun equals two machine guns'," she says. Iraq once led the region in terms of children's access to healthcare and education. Today, at least one in three Iraqi children is in need of humanitarian aid and more than 3.5 million are out of school, UNICEF says. Since it took over much of northern Iraq and declared Mosul the capital of its "caliphate", IS has forcefully recruited young men and forced girls into sexual slavery. Malak, who lived with her five siblings and her parents, was constantly afraid under the jihadists' rule. "My dad was a policeman before, and IS came and threatened to cut his throat," she says.
Never-ending noise
Despite the cold and hardship of life under canvas, she says the family is happier now, especially her father. "Dad and mum play with us, they make us laugh so we will forget, because we got our lives back after leaving hell," she says. Faysal says he can't forget "the explosions, the planes, the bombs" that forced his family to flee their house and seek refuge with relatives on the edge of Mosul. "The noise was never-ending, we couldn't sleep," he says, his eyes constantly moving. Saleh says noise is a constant theme in her therapy sessions with the children. "Sometimes, they hear a plane fly over and they think the things they've been through are starting again," she says. The children need to express themselves in order to get over their traumas, she says. On top of their own fear, "they have inherited the fear transmitted by their parents", she says. "When they speak, they push out some of the suffering inside them."It will be a long time before Faysal overcomes his trauma, but he has already passed through a crucial step.
"I'm happy," he says. "Now I can sleep."

Yemen's al-Qaida Condemns 'Deviant' IS Rivals

Naharnet/Agence France Presse/December 15/16/Al-Qaida in Yemen has labeled the rival jihadist Islamic State group "deviant" and distanced itself from an IS-claimed suicide attack in Aden last week that killed dozens of soldiers. "We explicitly declare that we were not involved in any way in this operation," Ansar al-Sharia, al-Qaida's branch in Yemen, said in a statement received Thursday by AFP. The December 10 attack in Aden targeted a crowd of soldiers gathered to collect their monthly pay at a barracks in al-Sawlaban near the southern city's international airport. The attack left 48 soldiers dead and 29 wounded, a health department chief said. "At the request of the Ba Kazem tribe, which lost many of its sons in the attack, we are issuing this statement to prevent anyone trying to... sow discord between the tribes and their sons, the warriors of Ansar al-Sharia," the group said. "We see IS as a deviant group... that has shown its enmity towards Ansar al-Sharia and other Islamic groups," it said. The statement stressed that al-Qaida has repeatedly said it is determined to fight "Americans and their allies" while avoiding "the shedding of any Muslim blood." Al-Qaida and IS have exploited a conflict between the Yemeni government -- backed by a Saudi-led coalition -- and Shiite Huthi rebels who control the capital Sanaa, to bolster their presence across much of the south. The rival jihadists have carried out a spate of attacks in Aden, Yemen's second city and headquarters of the internationally recognized government whose forces retook the southern port from the Huthis last year.

Egypt Executes Convicted Jihadist

Naharnet/Agence France Presse/December 15/16/Egyptian authorities on Thursday executed a jihadist convicted of involvement in a 2013 gun attack on police in the Sinai Peninsula, state media reported. Adel Habara was hanged in a Cairo prison days after a court upheld his death sentence. He was convicted of involvement in a shooting that killed 25 policemen, days after police killed hundreds of demonstrators in Cairo protesting against the army's overthrow and detention of Islamist president Mohamed Morsi. His execution came days after the Islamic State group claimed responsibility for a deadly Cairo church bombing that sparked renewed calls for speedier punishment of Islamist militants. IS is waging an insurgency in the Sinai that has killed hundreds of policemen and soldiers since Morsi's overthrow. Egyptian courts have sentenced hundreds of Islamists to death in the past three years, but many, including Morsi, have appealed and won retrials, frustrating government hardliners. Habara had become a symbol for them of a slow appeals process. He had been sentenced to death in an initial trial but was granted a retrial on appeal. President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, who toppled Morsi when army chief, had ordered changes to the law to speed up the judicial process after a car bomb killed the country's top prosecutor in 2015. Habara is the eighth convicted militant whose execution has been announced since Morsi's overthrow.

Iranian Regime's MP: Government Subsidies Are Monopolized by a Mafia of 250
Thursday, 15 December 2016/NCRI - Speaking about ‘justice shares’ plan, a type of subsidy which, according to regime, is aimed at reducing social class differences an helping the low-income population, a member of regime’s parliament said in an interview with regime’s TV on Sunday December 11 that “today, an undecided wealth has been formed in Iran’s economy which neither people are aware of nor is it being seriously monitored by the government.”Mohammad-Reza Pour-Ebrahimi speaks in the interview of a plan called ‘liberalization of justice shares’ which took two years to be prepared in regime’s parliament, but was rejected due to government’s disapproval, which practically led to the continued uncertainty of justice shares.”“Due to the very same uncertainty, people are now having sheets in hand which are of no use”, added the regime’s MP. Pour-Ebrahimi then pointed to the corruption in the ‘Justice Shares Project’ and said that “there are a number of people who, in the name of justice shares, are non-transparently managing a large part of Iran’s economy… assets with a portfolio value of 96 thousand billion tomans are being monopolized by an economic mafia of 250 people.”“This mafia is managing the whole assets in an extremely deplorable way, and part of the corruption in economic entities is due to the lack of supervision on the justice shares plan”, added Pour-Ebrahimi. He added that “people have no part in justice shares; they don’t participate in the assembly, they don’t receive dividends, and are not authorized to elect the board or the CEO, either.”“Nearly 45 million people are holding justice shares, but if you ask them which assembly they attended or which voting they took part or how much dividend they received, they have no idea”, said Pour-Ebrahimi. It should be pointed out that the legislation to assign justice shares was approved in 2005, following which the shares have been assigned to 45 million Iranians so far.
 
Iran: Fear of Corruption, Reason for the Reluctance of Foreign Investors
Thursday, 15 December 2016/NCRI - Unbridled corruption in Iran is one of the most important factors in the regime’s failure to attract foreign investment, head of Tehran’s Chamber of Commerce on Tuesday December 13 in an interview with state-run Ebtekar newspaper stated and added: “Foreign trade delegations are concerned about corruption in Iran's government agencies.”He also said “Out of 160 foreign trade delegations that came to Iran this year, more than 60 delegations had worry about corruption in the government institutions which led to negative growth in foreign investment in the country since 2011 and we have been witnessing capital outflows and unable to attract a major foreign investor ever since,” he admitted. Massoud Khansari added: “In the past 30 years, corruption has always had an upward trend and all these offences imply that there is a problem in the country’s (infrastructure) system and if is not found soon, we will not have a good future.”Head of Tehran’s Chamber of Commerce said: “Currently, there is an atmosphere in the country to fight corruption by arresting and executing a few people. While this is dealing with the cause, as long as the political and social structure (infrastructure) has problem, fighting corruption is like a superstructure work.”Meanwhile, Massoud Daneshmand, member of Tehran’s Industries and Mines and Chamber of Commerce, in an interview with the same newspaper said: “We rank low on the corruption index (due to high corruption) and this raises investment risk.”“The investor spends a lot of money for manufacturing, marketing and sale of goods. On the other hand, if similar merchandise is smuggled into the country, the investors in such circumstances would definitely fear to enter the economy,” he continued. The newspaper continues: “Administrative corruption is a problem that will affect all sectors of the economy. This systemic corruption, according to some experts, has deep historical roots in the country. In addition, it also leaves a negative impact on the country in the world ranking which will affect the attitude of foreign investors.”According to the newspaper, experts believe that corruption can be expected with the arrival of any government if the administrative structure is corrupt and defective.
 
Latest Labor Protests Across Iran
Thursday, 15 December 2016/NCRI - The protest gathering of the workers of polyacryl factory. In the morning of Tuesday December 13th 2016, more than 400 workers of polyacryl factory of Isfahan rallied in front of the Governor-general office of the city and protested against the 6-month overdue salaries. The workers were holding placards on which was written:" we are the workers of polyacryl factory of Iran. We don’t have even a bread to eat. How long shall we wait? We have not received the 6-month overdue salaries."
In addition to the workers of polyacryl factory, a group of workers of DMT Company, which is the subdivision of polyacryl factory and the producer of textile raw material, also participated in the rally. They have also lodged a protest against the 7-month overdue salaries.
The workers of Marun Petrochemical Complex protested for the second day in a row. On December 14th 2016, a group of workers of Marun Petrochemical Complex located in Khuzestan Province (South West of Iran) protested against their working conditions in the plant area for the second day in a row. One of the workers participating in the rally said:"2500 workers are employed in Marun Petrochemical Complex. The workers protested since the plan of job's classification was not implemented in this industry unit and the complex continuously recruits the non-native workers." The worker also discussed the wage conditions:"to this day, there has been no salaries unification. The increase in the wages does not correlate with the job experience of the workers who are working hard in this industrial unit."
At the end of his talk, he pointed out that some authorities have promised to address the demands of the workers in the next coming year whereas already these kind of promises have been made but no action has followed to solve the issues.
The workers of Meymeh dam project gathered in front of the governor office of Dehloran,Ilam
As ILNA news agency reports, a group of workers of Meymeh dam project rallied in front of the governor office of Dehloran (located in Ilam Province) to protest against the overdue salaries on 12th December 2016.
One of the workers said:"the protesters are workers who have lost their job and yet they could not manage to get their overdue receivables. The workers of Meymeh dam project have not yet received the 5-month overdue salaries. Consequently, the workers are suffering a severe economic hardship."The worker also claimed that the prime contractor of Meymeh dam project has not yet paid the receivables of sub-contractors for a year due to lack of funds.
 
EU Policy Has Encouraged Iran Regime's Internal Repression and Crimes in Syria
Thursday, 15 December 2016/NCRI - On the eve of the Human Rights Day, European lawmakers held a conference at the European Parliament on Wednesday December7. They strongly condemned the violations of human rights in Iran and urged the EU High Representative, Federica Mogherini and Member States to condition the expansion of relationships with Iran to the halt of executions. This meeting was held by the initiative of the Friends of a Free Iran intergroup at the European Parliament, which has support of some 300 MEPs from different political groups. The keynote speaker was the Iranian opposition leader, Maryam Rajavi who heads the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI).
 A number of MEPs from various European countries spoke at the event, the following are opening remarks and speech by Ms. Anthea McIntyre, MEP from UK:
 Ladies and Gentlemen, welcome and thank you all very much for coming here today. This meeting has been organized by the Friends of a Free Iran at the European Parliament and we know, we enjoy the support from about 300 MEPs from different political groups and from many countries. We have gathered on the occasion of the International Human Rights Day, and we are absolutely delighted to have Mrs Maryam Rajavi with us, who as you all know is President of the National Council of Resistance of Iran. I think you all know Madam Rajavi is regarded as the number one enemy of the mullahs. Because she leads an anti-fundamentalist movement which believes in a tolerant and democratic Islam, a secular government for a free future for Iran and the abolition of the dath penalty which is very important for us here in Europe. Now, ladies and gentlemen, for years we have been told that there are moderates and there are hardliners in Iran and that we should support the moderates in order to improve human rights situation in Iran.
 The nuclear accord with Iran was also presented as the beginning of a new era which would lead to respect for human rights situation in Iran and an end to their meddling in the region. And that assumption has been at the heart of EU policy on Iran.
 However, my friends, we should take a very close look at the record of the last 3 years under Rouhani: More people have been hanged under the so called “moderate” Rouhani than during the time of Ahmadinejad. Rouhani has not said a word against these executions. Indeed, he defends the death sentences as the rule of God. Religious and ethnic minorities are suppressed more than ever before. And Iran has increased its participation in the massacre of Syrian people.
 But EU policy makers have completely ignored these realities. They’re advocating more trade and more business deals with this regime. Let us not forget that most of Iran’s economy is run by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards NOT by ordinary Iranian businessmen.
 So the EU policy has encouraged the mullahs to continue their internal repression and to carry on crimes in Syria in support of Bashar Assad.
 Just one example is the complete failure of the international community to deal with the mass executions in Iran and in particular the massacre of 30,000 political prisoners, mainly from the PMOI in 1988. Those responsible are still holding key positions. The current minister of Justice in Rouhani’s cabinet was a member of the “Death Commission” which was responsible for thousands of executions. And Pour Mohammadi says that he is proud of his role in executing thousands of PMOI members in prison.
 This frankly shames the free world. It is totally unacceptable for the EU to remain silent and continue business as usual with such a regime.
 Our High Representative Mrs. Mogherini must condemn the 1988 massacre as a crime against humanity. The EU should put firm conditions on its future relations with Iran. We must demand a stop to the executions of children. We must demand justice for women. We must demand respect for human rights. The people of Iran expect us from Europe to stand up for them, and not to ignore their suffering. We should side with the people of Iran and not with the brutal dictators in Iran. And that I think is the clear message that should go out from us here today. So it gives me enormous pleasure now to ask Madam Rajavi to address us. She is a woman of enormous dignity, of resilience, of strength for whom we have enormous respect. So Maryam, we look forward to hearing from you.
 
Iran: Critically Sick Political Prisoner on Hunger Strike in Danger
NCRI Iran News/Thursday, 15 December 2016/Spending his 10th day of hunger strike, the severely weakened political prisoner Behnam Mousivand was taken to Gohardasht prison’s medical unit, and from there to a hospital outside the prison on Tuesday December 13.
While in his wheelchair, waiting to be dispatched in a room in front of the prison warden’s (Mohammad Mardani), Mousivand was severely beaten by a number of prison staff for not wearing prison uniform, handcuffs and shackles. He was then transferred to Karaj’s Rajaee Hospital in that same battered state. Once in the hospital, a law enforcement officer prevents Mousivand from performing his medical tests, holding him in his wheelchair for more than six hours. Without receiving any kind of treatment, Mousivand is taken back to prison. Back in the prison, Mousivand was kept for several hours in inspection room for no reason, while being in his wheelchair and unable to walk. Due to being beaten by prison staff, the blood on Behnam Mousivand’s clothes was clearly visible, according to reports.
Gohardasht political prisoners in Karaj have written a letter to Behnam Mousivand in this regard, asking him to stop his hunger strike:
“Dear Behnam,
you have proved your honesty and loyalty... We learned today that your mother has become aware of your situation and has come to meet you, but loses consciousness and falls to the ground in the meeting hall, …seriously, sincerely, we ask you to stop your hunger strike because of your mother’s dangerous heart disease.
Peace be upon you.
 Your friends and ward-mates in hall 12 of Gohardash Prison.”
 
Why Mrs. Mogherini Has Failed to Condemn the Appalling Human Rights Violations in Iran?
Thursday, 15 December 2016/NCRI - On the eve of the Human Rights Day, European lawmakers held a conference at the European Parliament on Wednesday December7. They strongly condemned the violations of human rights in Iran and urged the EU High Representative, Federica Mogherini and Member States to condition the expansion of relationships with Iran to the halt of executions. This meeting was held by the initiative of the Friends of a Free Iran intergroup at the European Parliament, which has support of some 300 MEPs from different political groups. The keynote speaker was the Iranian opposition leader, Maryam Rajavi who heads the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI).
A number of MEPs from various European countries spoke at the event, the following is the speech of Mr Richard Ashworth, MEP from UK :
Madam Rajavi, my lords, ladies and gentlemen.
It’s good that we have so many people here today on International Human Rights Day. And I’m extremely pleased therefore that Mrs. Rajavi is with us because she brings with her demands for justice and accountability of the 1988 massacre. We as Europeans hold dear our values of promoting the principles of democracy, human rights and rule of law. And so as parliamentarians, it’s our duty to demand justice over the massacre of more than 30,000 political prisoners. Particularly we send that message to the EU High Representative, Federica Mogherini. We would expect of her that she represents those very values of democracy, rule of law and human rights that we hold so dear. So therefore, we want to know why Mrs. Mogherini in the past year has failed to condemn the appalling human rights abuses taking place in Iran. She should know that the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights of situation in Iran has reported that last year executions in Iran surged to nearly 1,000. And that is the highest level in more than a quarter of a century.
According to Amnesty International, 60% of all registered executions in the world took place in Iran last year. Iran holds the infamous title of Top State Executioner per capita. And it has consistently held the hideous record of Top Executioners of Minors. Actually, Mrs. Mogherini should know that Iran hanged 10 prisoners including three women, during the period of her visit to Tehran in April this year. I think it’s a matter of deep regretting shame that she chose to remain silent on those appalling human rights violations while she was there.
So I urge the EU High Representative, I urge the UK Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, not to allow the mullahs regime to get away with such atrocities as the 1988 massacre. Let us not degrade and devalue our founding principles. We’re proud to support the millions of Iranians demanding democracy and humanity. We should press the United Nations to establish a commission of inquiry in order to bring the perpetrators of the 1988 massacre to justice. Thank you.

First on CNN: Adviser says Russia crucial to Trump's Middle East plans
CNN Digital Expansion DC Elise Labott
By Elise Labott, CNN/December 15, 2016
Washington (CNN)President-elect Donald Trump's push for greater ties to Russia will help in key administration priorities in the region, starting with ending the civil war in Syria, a transition advisor told Middle East diplomats on Wednesday. Walid Phares, a foreign policy adviser to the Trump transition, met with Arab ambassadors Wednesday to brief them about the incoming Trump administration's policy toward the Middle East. "We invited him as an adviser to President-elect Trump," one of the ambassadors said about the meeting at the Arab League offices in Washington. "We wanted to know what Trump's vision is for the region."Phares is a foreign policy adviser to the transition, a title he has used in foreign media interviews and briefings to diplomats and think tanks around Washington and overseas.
According to four diplomats who participated in the meeting, Phares laid out a broad outline of the President-elect's priorities.
He named Syria as the top priority, starting with the campaign against ISIS but also ending the Syrian civil war and alleviating the humanitarian suffering in Syria. Iraq was another priority, although large gains on the battlefield by Iraqi forces have made it less acute than Syria.
That was followed by Libya, where successes by government forces against ISIS and efforts by the internationally supported Government of National Accord -- of which the Obama administration was a key architect -- to impose order in the country continue to be threatened by warning militias. European leaders have voiced concern that the conflict in Libya, if not addressed, could risk another European migrant crisis.
Yemen's two-year war rounded out the list of immediate priorities. The conflict has been eclipsed by Syria but is a humanitarian catastrophe as well, killing more than 10,000, displacing 3 million and causing widespread food shortages.
On the Iran nuclear deal, Phares said that Trump would review the agreement, push for stronger implementation on some areas and seek to negotiate certain changes, comments similar to the ones he made in an interview with BBC last month.
The sources said Phares did not have a firm answer for how he planned to strengthen ties with Russia but increase pressure on Iran at the same time -- two policy goals many diplomats have said would be difficult to square.
However, he did suggest a better relationship with Moscow could help solve outstanding conflicts in the Middle East, pointing to Trump's appointment of Rex Tillerson as secretary of state as potentially facilitating better cooperation with Moscow because of his tight relationships with Russian President Vladimir Putin and other top officials.
The sources said that Mideast peace was not listed as one of the immediate issues that would be tackled, but Phares did tell the group that Trump was personally interested in trying to make inroads on a peace deal between Israelis and Palestinians.
He said that he expected Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, to be intimately involved on the issue, while mentioning that his daughter Ivanka was expected to be involved on climate change policy.
Phares hedged when asked about pledges by Trump and members of his transition to move the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, according to those in the room, saying that such a move was "complex" and, if undertaken, would be part of a "process" that would take a long time. He noted that previous presidents had studied moving the embassy. Last month he told the BBC moving the embassy would happen under "consensus," but not right way.
He didn't have a firm answer when pressed about Trump's views on Islam and his suggestion there could be a Muslim registry, the diplomats said.
All in all, diplomats said Phares was careful not to go into too much detail on any potential policies, saying they were still being developed and that he didn't have clear direction from the transition.
"Personally, I didn't think we learned anything we didn't already know," one diplomat said. "He was beating around the bush a lot."

Obama Allows Iran Sanctions Renewal Without Signing Bill
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 15/16/President Barack Obama allowed US sanctions against Iran to be renewed on Thursday, but in a surprise move declined to actually sign the legislation that brings the sanctions into force.
"The extension of the Iran Sanctions Act is becoming law without the president's signature," White House spokesman Josh Earnest said in a statement. The president, who had previously been expected to sign the measure, symbolically let slide a midnight deadline to ink his name on the legislation -- which he has called unnecessary -- meaning the 10-year sanctions renewal will automatically become law. Under the Iran nuclear deal signed in July 2015, world powers agreed to lift international sanctions in exchange for curbs to Iran's nuclear program.
Obama has said that passage of the US sanctions renewal would make no difference to the agreement because the White House will continue to suspend all the sanctions linked to Iran's nuclear program. The language in the nuclear agreement makes it unclear whether renewing the sanctions -- and keeping the nuclear ones suspended -- amounts to a violation. "This administration has made clear that an extension of the Iran Sanctions Act, while unnecessary, is entirely consistent with our commitments in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)," Earnest said, referring to the nuclear deal by its formal name. Iran's President Hassan Rouhani on Tuesday ordered the country's scientists to start work on nuclear-powered ships in response to the expected renewal of sanctions, criticizing the US move as a breach of the nuclear accord. International analysts said the announcement was likely just a bluff, since it would be an extremely costly effort for little strategic gain. US Secretary of State John Kerry said Thursday that continued implementation of the Iran nuclear deal remained "a top strategic objective" for the United States. Kerry echoed the White House's assertion that the legislation was unnecessary, stating that with or without the renewed sanctions, the United States would still be able to address any Iranian breach of the nuclear deal or snap back sanctions should Iran fall short of its commitments. "The administration has, and continues to use, all of the necessary authorities to waive the relevant sanctions, to enforce those that are outside the scope of the JCPOA, and to re-impose sanctions if necessary in the event that Iran should fail to perform its commitments under the JCPOA," Kerry said in a statement.
 
Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on on December 15-16/16
U.S. Money Transferred To Iran Used To Expand Iran's Military Budget
By: Dr. Nimrod Raphaeli/MEMRI/December 15/16
The government of Iranian President Hassan Rohani has submitted to the Majlis (parliament) a draft budget for the fiscal year March 2017-March 2018 for a total of $99.7 billion equivalent. The budget envisages a growth in expenditure of 13.9 percent over the preceding year, but a sharp increase of 39 percent, or $10.3 billion, in funds earmarked for defense, including a big increase in the budget of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
Notwithstanding political, economic and social conflicts between the Rohani government and the IRGC, foreign policy is closely coordinated by the two bodies. Upon reaching power, the Rohani government declared two key priorities: reforming the national economy, and reaching agreement with the West on the nuclear program. The government has shown no objection to the role of the IRGC, a potent military force accountable to the Supreme Leader, in regional politics, and particularly in Syria and Iraq. A branch of the IRGC, the Qods Force Brigade, commanded by Gen. Qasem Soleimani, is responsible for spreading Iran's subversive and, often, terrorist activities across the Middle East and beyond.
Growth Of Iran's Defense Budget
Overall, Iran's defense budget has increased from $6 billion in 2013 during the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to $8 billion in 2014, and in access of $10 billion for the next Iranian fiscal year. However, the section of the military budget earmarked for the IRGC has registered a far greater increase than the military budget as a whole. The budget allocation for the Revolutionary Guards was $3.3 billion in 2013, increased to $6 billion in 2015, declined to $4.5 billion in 2016 but increased by 53 percent to $6.9 billion for 2017 which translated into 77 percent of the total defense budget. In fact, under the Rouhani presidency, the total allocations to the military, the IRGC, the Organization for the Mobilization of the Oppressed (Basij), and the General Staff of the Armed Forces all rose to almost 80 percent since mid-2013 when Rohani assumed the presidency.
Apart of its dominant share in the national defense budget, the IRGC derives vast revenues from its control over energy, construction, banking, and marketing (as well as smuggling of contraband.) Much of these economic activities are carried out by a company known as Khatam Al-Anbiya ("Seal of the Prophet") established by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in the late 1980s as the economic arm of the IRGC. Upon the withdrawal of the major oil companies such as Shell Oil (Anglo-Dutch) and Total (French) from Iran's oil sector following the international sanctions, ownership of the oil and gas fields vacated by these companies was transferred to Khatam Al-Anbiya.[1]
The Ultimate Destiny Of The U.S.-Transferred Cash To Iran
In seeking to strengthen the policy of rapprochement with Iran, the Obama administration (though its Treasury Department) has surreptitiously transferred to Rohani’s government two tranches, in cash, for a total of $1.7 billion, allegedly as the cumulated interest on Iran’s deposits, made during the Shah regime before the 1979 revolution, for the purchase of American weapons
It is a commonly accepted premise that money is fungible. While we cannot establish whether the money transferred from the U.S. went directly into the expanded defense budget, it, at a minimum, enabled the government to release an equal amount of money for defense purposes. It is noteworthy that the increase in the proposed defense budget for 2017 is approximately equal to the amount transferred by the U.S. Whatever the source of the defense budget increase, the IRGC will have ample resources to expand its nefarious activities far beyond the borders of the Islamic Republic.
*Dr. Nimrod Raphaeli is Senior Analyst (emeritus) at MEMRI.
[1] Al-Quds al-Arabi, December 10, 2016

Usud Al-Cherubim: A Pro-Assad Christian Militia
Aymenn Al-Tamimi/Syria Comment/December 15/16
http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/usud-al-cherubim-pro-assad-christian-militia/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Syriacomment+%28Syria+Comment%29
In a post in February 2016, a pro-Assad Christian page called Junud al-Massih (“Soldiers of Christ”) wrote: “Syria is beautiful in its Assad. At your service in soul and blood, my lord President Bashar al-Assad. We began with 5 groups on the ground and today we have become more than 15 armed Syrian Christian factions.” Though that post did not name any specific groups, perhaps the most recognisable Christian militia of pro-Assad orientation has been the Sootoro group in Qamishli in northeast Syria, a group I have discussed multiple times previously. However, there are much more obscure Christian formations that the Junud al-Massih page likely has in mind in its counting in that post, one of those groups being Usud al-Cherubim (“Lions of the Cherubim”). The word “cherubim” in the militia’s name can be seen as a double entendre. In the Bible, there are multiple references to the cherubim as beings associated with God (e.g. Ezekiel 10:2). Yet looking at the Arabic orthography for the word “cherubim” in the case of the militia’s name, there is in fact also an allusion to the Deir al-Cherubim (“The Cherubim Monastery,” with Arabic spelling: دير الشيروبيم) near Saydnaya, which is best known as the site of the prison that housed many Islamists who were released in an amnesty in 2011 and went on to found key rebel groups like Ahrar al-Sham and Jaysh al-Islam. A fighter in Usud al-Cherubim confirmed to me that the group’s name derives from Deir al-Cherubim.
According to this fighter, Usud al-Cherubim was formed in 2013 during “the terrorist attack on the monastery” and the group lost a fighter called Joseph al-Kibba “in the battles of the monastery in defence of the monastery.” For context, Joseph al-Kibba is a widely renowned Christian ‘martyr’ of the Saydnaya area who was born in 1989 and killed on 26 November 2013. His funeral was promoted in a video uploaded by the official channel of the National Defence Forces, which were reported to have played a role at the time alongside the Syrian army in fending off the attacks on Deir al-Cherubim. For their part, pro-rebel media during this period accused the regime of deliberately placing tanks near the monastery to bombard neighbouring areas, thereby attempting to score a propaganda victory against the rebels in their response to the bombardment.
Public references to Usud al-Cherubim appear to go back as far as January 2014. Though the militia can be seen as initially having been set up as a local ‘monastery defence’ force, the group has subsequently participated in a number of military engagements beyond the Saydnaya area. According to the Usud al-Cherubim fighter, engagements have included “all the battles of East Ghouta, Darayya, Homs countryside, the battles of al-Qalamoun, and in Jobar in Damascus.” In addition, Usud al-Cherubim has a “contingent in the north Hama countryside participating in the battles of honour.” Some of these expeditions have been promoted on social media. For example, in September 2015, Usud al-Cherubim reportedly helped capture the hills surrounding the Christian locality of Maarouneh in the Damascus countryside, driving back the rebels to the Harasta highway and handing the hills to the Syrian army. In November 2015, the group was reported to be operating in areas of the Homs desert near al-Qaryatayn such as Mahin and Sadad, fighting against the Islamic State (IS). A number of other groups participated in the efforts to push back IS in the area, including the Syrian Social Nationalist Party’s Nusur al-Zawba’a and Sootoro. Below is some photo and other media output associated with Usud al-Cherubim’s operations.
Operations Battalion- Usud al-Cherubim- at your service Syria, at your service, ya Adra.” Though Adra is the name of a town in the wider Damascus area, the invocation ‘Ya Adra’ normally refers to the Virgin Mary. Note the logo design featuring the cross in the top-left.
Operations Battalion- Usud al-Cherubim in Darayya.” The participation in the Darayya operations was partly framed as “liberating its churches” (in a similar way, Shi’i militia participation in the Darayya operations was portrayed as defending/liberating the Sayyida Ruqayya shrine in the area). The idea of holy struggle is also conveyed in the frequent self-description as “mujahideen of the cross.”
Usud al-Cherubim graffiti in Shebaa, East Ghouta. The graffiti, marked with the date 4 May 2016, reads: “Usud al-Cherubim: we are the descendants of Georgius [St. George]. We were not created to die, but rather we were created for eternal life.”
In total, the fighter from Usud al-Cherubim told me that the group has 3 ‘martyrs’ and 12 wounded thus far. One therefore ought to keep the scale of the group’s military contributions in perspective. As for the militia’s affiliation, the source stated that Usud al-Cherubim is affiliated with the air intelligence, with which a number of pro-regime militias have links/affiliation, including the elite Tiger Forces and the Suqaylabiyah-based Christian militia Quwat al-Ghadab. Indeed, a key to realizing the affiliation of Usud al-Cherubim with the air intelligence is that the group is referred to on social media as being part of Hurras al-Fajr (“Guardians of the Dawn”), which is a collection of primarily Christian militias affiliated with air intelligence.
“Air Intelligence Administration: Guardians of the Dawn Groups. A homeland that we do not protect is one we do not deserve to live in.” Like many pro-regime militias, Guardians of the Dawn has sought to recruit through Facebook, urging those wishing to join the ranks to correspond for inquiry and further information.
According to the fighter from Usud al-Cherubim, the Guardians of the Dawn conglomeration was set up around a year ago, and Usud al-Cherubim joined it. In other words, Usud al-Cherubim may have initially been its own independent faction having sprung up from the notion of local monastery defence, but eventually became air intelligence affiliated. As the source put it, “We had been working with many sides. Later we remained as air intelligence.” The Guardians of the Dawn conglomeration, though consisting of primarily Christian militias, promotes a nationalist image in the slogan “a homeland we do not protect is one we do not deserve to live in,” as can be observed above. Besides Usud al-Cherubim, the constituent groups of Guardians of the Dawn have included:
– Ararat Group
– Usud al-Wadi (referring to Wadi al-Nasara in Homs province)
– Usud al-Hamidiya (referring to the Hamidiya neighbourhood of Homs)
– Intervention Regiment
– Usud Dwel’a (referring to the Dwel’a neighbourhood of Damascus)
Of these groups, one should note that Usud al-Hamidiya-led by Rami Marina from Homs– appears to have left Guardians of the Dawn, and is now affiliated with the military intelligence under the formation of Fawj Maghawir al-Ba’ath (“Ba’ath Commandos Regiment”) led by Jihad Barakat.
According to an account by Guardians of the Dawn leader Fadi Abd al-Massih Khouri written in September 2016, the Guardians of the Dawn conglomeration was formally established on 11 September 2015, and Usud al-Cherubim had a key involvement in events that led to its establishment. According to this account, Usud al-Cherubim issued a distress call to Khouri on Thursday night on 10 September 2015, warning that the locality of Maarouneh was under assault by Jaysh al-Islam, that the situation was difficult and that these rebels were threatening to seize the international highway. This prompted Khouri to make connections with the other groups (i.e. the constituents of what became the Guardians of the Dawn conglomeration) and set up the Intervention Regiment in particular. By 12 September 2015, Khouri claims to have set out with a contingent of fighters to provide relief. All this, he writes, is based on the idea that the groups should work to help each other out in times of distress as their villages come under assault.
Although there is a nationalist line of rhetoric included in the account, with the affirmation that “all the land of Syria is our people and everyday someone seeks our help and of course we will heed the call,” all the actual instances of relief provision named are Christian areas, “from Maarouneh to Sadad to Mahrada.” Mahrada is a Christian town in Hama province that was threatened by some rebel advances earlier this year, prompting a mobilization including Guardians of the Dawn to defend it.
Like many people involved with the militias on the ground, Khouri attempted to push for political influence by running as a parliamentary candidate for the April 2016 elections. However, unlike Liwa al-Baqir’s Omar al-Hassan, he was unsuccessful.
Social media graphic: “Ararat Group: Dir’ al-Watan Groups.” Dir’ al-Watan (“Homeland Shield”) appears to have been the initial name for Khouri’s conglomeration of militias, though having the same air intelligence affiliation. In relation to the Sadad operations in November 2015, Sootoro wrote: “Dir’ al-Watan. Entering Sadad. Big thanks from all the groups to Ustadh Fadi Khouri for his support and great work.” Thus, this Dir’ al-Watan should not be confused with the Dir’ al-Watan of the al-Bustan Association, or the Dir’ al-Watan in Suwayda’. As an actively used and promoted brand on social media for Khouri’s conglomeration of militias, Guardians of the Dawn does not seem to appear initially until March 2016.
Ararat Group, using a slight variant on the Guardians of the Dawn slogan: “A homeland you do not protect is one you do not deserve to live in.”
In short, the case of Usud al-Cherubim provides an interesting case of evolution from a local initiative to an affiliate of a wider militia conglomeration attached to the air intelligence. The existence of Usud al-Cherubim also illustrates that notions of defence of holy sites as rallying calls are by no means limited to the Shi’a alone. Indeed, as the case of the Syriac Military Council demonstrates, the idea of defending churches and other holy sites from desecration and destruction has been an important talking point among Christians in the east of the country as well.
Of course, Usud al-Cherubim goes beyond mere defence of the Deir al-Cherubim monastery, and has been actively fighting for the regime elsewhere in western Syria. The developments surrounding Guardians of the Dawn also point to wider trends among pro-Assad militias: namely, a desire to assert political influence (while not threatening Assad’s position as president of Syria) and competition for power on the ground (which, in the case of the various intelligence agencies in particular, also represents continuity with the past).

To the Muslim Brotherhood: Quit Shouting Islamophobia and Quit Attacking Muslim Families
Saied Shoaaib/Gatestone Institute/December 15/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/15/saied-shoaaibgatestone-institute-to-the-muslim-brotherhood-quit-shouting-islamophobia-and-quit-attacking-muslim-families/
Islamists, including Majzoub, have a long history of dragging prominent people and organizations into their arguments about extremism, terrorism and radicalization. These Islamists do not use their influence to drain the resources of Islamic terrorism in Canada and elsewhere, nor do they seek to stop young Canadians from joining ISIS. They do not use their knowledge or money to dismantle the infrastructure of extremism, nor do they attempt to dismantle the historical and religious arguments in favor of terrorism. Rather than do any of this, they instead make it their priority to intimidate, harass or sue those who speak out against Islamist extremism and its accompanying terrorism.
The prevailing religious interpretation of groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood and its adherents is that anyone who objects to their interpretation of Islam is to be considered a disbeliever. Because of their disbelief, they deserve to be killed in the present life and should then suffer the punishment of Allah in the next life. If killing them in this life is not an option, then spreading hate and anger against them is acceptable.
The other main problem the Parliamentary action against "Islamophobia" is that it gives the false impression that groups such as the Canadian Muslim Forum or the Muslim Brotherhood can speak for Muslims. In fact, they do not. In the UK, it was recently revealed that only about 2% of UK Muslims feel that the Muslim Council of Britain represents them.
It is not just that they have extremist literature in Canadian schools and mosques, it is that in some instances they have nothing but extremist literature. The Ottawa Public Library, for instance, has nothing but extremist literature in its Arabic language collection.
The first victims of this will be secular and modernist Muslims who oppose extremism -- and their families.
Islamist front groups in Canada and the West have dragged the media and the political "elites" into their extremist messaging. Rather than learning about why extremism and terrorism come out of their religion, Islamists instead concentrate on preventing the victims of their violence from speaking out. They do this by shouting "Islamophobia" at every opportunity, and do so most loudly at modernist or secular Muslims.
The Parliament of Canada, for example, passed an "anti-Islamophobia" motion on October 26, 2016. Samer Majzoub, the president of the Canadian Muslim Forum, was the person behind the Parliamentary petition against "Islamophobia"; it generated some 70,000 signatures. The sponsor of the motion in the House of Commons was MP Frank Baylis.
Both Majzoub and the Canadian Muslim Forum have a rather long list of dubious connections to Islamist groups and the foreign money used to support them. This includes the Muslim Brotherhood.
What is the real intent of Samir Majzoub, the Canadian Muslim Forum and its exploitation of the over-hyped concept of "Islamophobia"? As noted, Islamists, including Majzoub, have a long history of dragging prominent people and organizations into their arguments about extremism, terrorism and radicalization. These Islamists do not use their influence to drain the resources of Islamic terrorism in Canada and elsewhere, nor do they seek to stop young Canadians from joining ISIS. They did not stop suicide bombers in Canada such as Aaron Driver or Calgary-based Salma Ashrafi, who became a suicide bomber in Iraq. They do not use their knowledge or money to dismantle the infrastructure of extremism, nor do they attempt to dismantle the historical and religious arguments in favor of terrorism. Rather than do any of this, they instead make it their priority to intimidate, harass or sue those who speak out against Islamist extremism and its accompanying terrorism.
Samir Majzoub (left), the Islamist president of the Canadian Muslim Forum, was the person behind the recent Canadian Parliamentary petition against "Islamophobia." Both Majzoub and the Canadian Muslim Forum have a long list of dubious connections to Islamist groups and the foreign money used to support them. This includes the Muslim Brotherhood. (Image sources - Majzoub: Canadian Muslim Forum video screenshot; Parliament: Saffron Blaze/Wikimedia Commons)
Why should life be dangerous for Muslims, their families and others who reject the charges of Islamophobia?
The prevailing religious interpretation of groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood and its adherents is that anyone who objects to their interpretation of Islam is to be considered a disbeliever. Because of their disbelief, they deserve to be killed in the present life and should then suffer the punishment of Allah in the next life. If killing them in this life is not an option, then spreading hate and anger against them is acceptable.
The side effects of the supposed "Islamophobia" activity is an increased threat to Muslim families in Canada and the USA. Modernist and secular Muslims are afraid to speak out against extremism, for fear of being labelled as traitors to their own community. They also fear for their businesses and their children, who may come under verbal and physical attack. Because of petitions and Parliamentary actions such as those in Canada, modernist and secular Muslims and their families are forced either to agree with the false precepts of "Islamophobia" as advanced by extremist front groups, or to disagree with them but remain silent. Unfortunately, disagreeing with the Muslim Brotherhood and its front groups can be dangerous and even fatal.
The other main problem with the Parliamentary action against "Islamophobia" is that it gives the false impression that groups such as the Canadian Muslim Forum or the Muslim Brotherhood can speak for Muslims. In fact, they do not. Groups such as the Canadian Muslim Forum or the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) have little evidence to show they have anything approaching majority support. In the UK, it was recently revealed that only about 2% of UK Muslims feel that the Muslim Council of Britain represents them. Moreover, CAIR, despite its claims of moderation, was declared to be a terrorist entity by the United Arab Emirates.
With no mandate to speak on behalf of Muslims, Islamists such as Majzoub should not be regarded as "leadership" figures. They intimidate other Muslims and work to silence anyone who speaks against them. This is a sort of intellectual fraud: no one elected them to speak on behalf of Muslims. From an Islamic religious perspective, it should be noted that Allah has no agents or representatives on Earth, so their claim to speak on behalf of Muslims is theologically weak, at best.
At the same time, these Islamists do all they can to hide their finances; they refuse to show how much money they receive from Saudi Arabia or Qatar. They are constantly caught financing terrorism and their front-group members are often charged with criminal offences related to extremism and terrorism.
In Canada, Islamist-run schools use extremist literature from the Middle East to teach their children. It is not just that they have extremist literature in Canadian schools and mosques; it is that in some cases they have nothing but extremist literature. It is also not just Islamist-run schools and mosques that are the problem. The Ottawa Public Library, for instance, has nothing but extremist literature in its Arabic language collection.
Conclusions
The Parliamentary motion condemns all forms of "Islamophobia," without making any attempt to define what that means. As Judith Bergman put it:
The questions need to be asked: What exactly are they condemning? Criticism of Islam? Criticism of Muslims? Debating Mohammed? Depicting Mohammed? Discussing whether ISIS is a true manifestation of Islam? Is any Canadian who now writes critically of Islam or disagrees with the petitioners that ISIS "does not reflect in any way the values or the teachings of the religion of Islam now to be considered an "Islamophobe"?
The Canadian Parliamentary motion on "Islamophobia" is indeed a large stick that is designed to be swung at anyone who makes even the vaguest criticism of extremist Islam and its front groups. Rather than draining the extremist swamp or defunding their centers of activity, motions such as this are intended to weaponize words so that critics can be silenced by criminalizing anything that varies from political correctness, as in the clearly politically-motivated conviction of Dutch MP Geert Wilders last week.
The first victims of this will be secular and modernist Muslims who oppose extremism -- and their families.
**Saied Shoaaib is a journalist and author originally from Egypt. He was the editor and manager of the Alyoum7 news website and the manager of "United Journalist." In 2007, a leader of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt raised questions about his work in the Egyptian Parliament. The questions were specifically aimed at the Attorney General of Egypt. For many years, his life and his family have been at risk because of constant threats aimed at his writings against and Islamists, terrorism and Islamic extremism. He has written several books on extremist Islam, journalism and the electronic media.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute. https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9577/muslim-brotherhood-shouting-islamophobia

Iran Breaks Nuclear Deal and UN Resolutions
Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/December 15/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/15/majid-rafizadehgatestone-institute-iran-breaks-nuclear-deal-and-un-resolutions/
"We will have a new ballistic missile test in the near future that will be a thorn in the eyes of our enemies." – Iranian President Hassan Rouhani.
The range of existing Iranian ballistic missiles has grown from 500 miles to over 1,250 miles (roughly 2,000 kilometers), which can easily reach Eastern Europe, as well as countries such as Israel.
In addition, Iranian Defense Minister Brig. Gen. Hossein Dehqan said that there would be no limit for the range and amount of missiles that Iran will develop.
The nuclear agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Agreement (JCPOA) -- effective, as of October 18, 2015, according to the State Department - clearly and distinctly stipulates that Iran should not undertake any ballistic missile activity "until the date eight years after the JCPOA Adoption Day or until the date on which the IAEA submits a report confirming the Broader Conclusion, whichever is earlier."
Not only is Iran avoiding honoring this stipulation, but also Iran's ballistic missile operations have significantly ratcheted up. More importantly, there has been no criticism at all from the Obama administration or other involved parties regarding this critical violation.
As cited by Iran's state-owned Fars News Agency, Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, Iran's commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force, said in Tehran on Dec 6, 2016:
"In addition to enhancing the precision-striking power and quality of ballistic missiles, the Iranian authorities and experts have used innovative and shortcut methods to produce inexpensive missiles, and today we are witnessing an increase in production [of ballistic missiles]."
Iran is bragging about it.
In addition, Iranian Defense Minister Brig. Gen. Hossein Dehqan said that there would be no limit for the range and amount of missiles that Iran will develop. He boasted:
"90 percent of the country's defense systems have reached an acceptable standard and enjoy competitive quality compared with the weapons of advanced countries; production of the national individual weapons and efforts to improve the quality and precision-striking power of ballistic missiles are among the defense ministry's achievements in the defense field."
Fars News reported on a December 6, 2016 statement from Iran's Defense Minister:
"His remarks came as the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) fired 2 home-made 'Qadr H' ballistic missiles from the Eastern Alborz Mountains at a target in Iran's Southeastern Makran seashore some 1400km away... The missiles were fired on the sidelines of the main stage of the IRGC drills in Central Iran and various parts of the country."
One missile, which was launched on March 2016, had a clear message written on it that said in the Hebrew language: "Israel should be wiped off the Earth". Fars Agency adds:
"Qadr is a 2000km-range, liquid-fuel and ballistic missile which can reach territories as far as Israel... The missile can carry different types of 'Blast' and 'MRV' [Multiple Reentry Vehicle] payloads to destroy a range of targets. The new version of Qadr H can be launched from mobile platforms or silos in different positions and can escape missile defense shields due to their radar-evading capability."
Iran has repeatedly test-fired, long-range ballistic missiles and laser-guided surface-to-surface missiles. For example, on March 2016, Iran tested a new ballistic missile, capable of carrying multiple warheads. More recently, Iran fired a test missile with an accuracy within 25 feet, which is characterized as "zero error," according to Brig. Gen. Ali Abdollahi, the Iranian military's deputy chief of staff, and Iran's semi-official Tasnim news agency.
The range of existing Iranian ballistic missiles has grown from 500 miles to over 1,250 miles (roughly 2,000 kilometers), which can easily reach Eastern Europe, as well as countries such as Israel.
According to a previous report obtained by the Associated Press, the launches are "destabilizing and provocative" and the Shahab-3 medium-range ballistic missile and Qiam-1 short-range ballistic missile fired by Iran are "inherently capable of delivering nuclear weapons."
In addition to violating the nuclear agreement, provoking and threatening other nations, and destabilizing the region, Iran is breaching two UN Security Council Resolutions. Security Council resolution 2231 (section 3 of Annex B) "calls upon Iran not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology."
The second United Nations Security Council resolution, 1929, states:
"Iran shall not undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using ballistic missile technology, and that States shall take all necessary measures to prevent the transfer of technology or technical assistance to Iran related to such activities."
Iran has the largest ballistic missile arsenal in the Middle East. It is also the most diversified one. No country, other than Iran, has acquired long-range ballistic missiles before obtaining nuclear weapons. Ballistic missiles can be used for offensive or defensive purposes, but sophisticated missiles are more likely developed as delivery vehicles for nuclear weapons.
These missiles have the capability of carrying multiple nuclear warheads. Iran Tasnim news agency reported:
"Defense Minister Brigadier General Hossein Dehqan praised the country's military might...saying the Islamic Republic can mass produce ballistic missiles with any range and destructive power... In the missile sphere, Iran has been able to maximize the accuracy of projectiles, as emphasized by Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei, with reliance on the local forces, Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh said at an academic ceremony in Tehran on Tuesday."
Iran is also is increasingly provoking other countries in the region, and has made it clear that the ballistic missiles are aimed at targeting other nations. Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, said previously to FARS news agency that "Iran has built missiles that can hit targets at 2,000 Km. They are designed to hit Israel at such a distance." He added that Islamic countries have surrounded Israel and "its [Israel's] life is short. So it will collapse in any given war -- long before a missile is even fired."
Iran also exports these missiles to its proxies across the region. Tasnim news agency quoted General Hossein Salami as saying:
"Hezbollah has 100,000 missiles that are ready to hit Israel to liberate the occupied Palestinian territories if the Zionist regime repeats its past mistakes... today, the grounds for the annihilation and collapse of the Zionist regime are (present) more than ever."
In addition, Gen. Salami warned Israeli leaders that if they make the "wrong move," Israel would come under attack.
It is crucial to point out that both Iran's so-called "moderates" and hardliners are on the same page when it comes developing ballistic missiles. When his country was unveiling a new missile, Fateh 313, President Hassan Rouhani pointed out that "we will have a new ballistic missile test in the near future that will be a thorn in the eyes of our enemies."
The Obama administration, the international community, a major global power, or a coalition of nations need robustly to confront these provocations, threats, and violations of the nuclear deal and UN Security Council Resolutions by Iran.
**Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, political scientists and Harvard University scholar is president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He can be reached at Dr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute. https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9584/iran-breaks-nuclear-deal
 
Egypt: Christians Still Denied Churches While Government Opens 10 Mosques Every Week
 Raymond Ibrahim/Coptic Solidarity/December 15/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/15/raymond-ibrahimcoptic-solidarity-egypt-christians-still-denied-churches-while-government-opens-10-mosques-every-week/
 One week before the bombing of St. Peter’s cathedral which left at least 25 Christians dead, hostility for Christian churches was being shown in the usual, less spectacular way. Egyptian authorities and politicians held a meeting sponsored by Al Azhar, the nation’s topmost authority on Islam, in the village of Naghameesh, Sohag. Those present included leading authorities, such the governor of Sohag and the security service.
 The topic of discussion was the latest round of attacks on the Coptic Christian minorities of the village—who were beat and their properties looted and burned—because they were “illegally” praying and worshipping in a building that they had long used as the Church of St. George, before authorities shut it down.
 As usual, the meeting highlighted the “brotherhood of all Egyptians”—Christians and Muslims—the need for them to get along, etc. But when it came to the question of giving their fellow Christian brothers the same right to worship that Egypt’s Muslims enjoy—especially now, when Coptic Christians are looking forward to celebrating Christmas mass—the majority of Muslim leaders and family members staunchly refused to permit the local Christians to assemble, pray and worship in the building, which must remain shut down.
 They cited the well-known law of Islam that forbids the building and even renovation of churches wherever Islam holds sway. As usual, the governor of Sohag and other leading authorities did nothing to support the Christians and acquiesced.
 One local Christian explained how they had been “using this building to pray in and offer charitable services for some time,” and how they had submitted all the necessary paperwork to register the building as a church, “but instead they illegally shut it down.” Wondered the unnamed Christian: “We don’t understand what is so dangerous about the Copts praying and exercising their legal rights in this matter.”
 The Copts of Naghameesh are just one of many Christians who face countless legal restrictions and red tape bureaucracy designed to deny them the right to build a church to pray in. And on those very rare occasions when they do get the necessary paperwork signed off, Muslim mobs riot and attack Christians and burn their homes, which local authorities cite as reason to revoke the permit and keep peace in the village.
 Soon after the meeting, Egyptian governmental figures boasted of how they are opening 10 new mosques every week; that 3,200 mosques are closed and in need of renovation and the government is currently working on 1,300 of them; that it will take about 60 million Egyptian pounds to renovate them and the government has allotted ten times as much, although a total of 3 billion will eventually be needed; and that the Egyptian government is dedicated to spending that much—for “whoever abuses public funds [which should be used for Islamic worship], enters a war with Allah,” in the words of Dr. Muhammad Mukhtar Gom‘a, Minister of Awqaf, or endowments.
 But when the nation’s more than 10 million Christian minority seeks to build a church to worship in—and pay for it from their own pockets—all is woe in Egypt.
 It should be remembered: the animus that always causes large Muslim mobs to form and torch buildings on the mere rumor that they are being used as churches, is the same animus that causes more “pious” Muslims to bomb churches.

Stop calling the Syrian conflict a ‘civil war.’ It’s not.
Hanin Ghaddar/Wahington Post/December 14
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/15/hanin-ghaddarwahington-post-stop-calling-the-syrian-conflict-a-civil-war-its-not/
In the past five years, Syria has become many things: a refugee crisis, a regional quagmire, a western nightmare, a terrorist haven, a Russian power play and the core of Iran’s ambitions. To the international community, however, it’s a civil war. The United Nations, Western governments, media and European Union all refer to the Syrian conflict this way. In December 2015, Secretary of State John F. Kerry emphasized the need to “end the nation’s civil war.” In September this year, the New York Times published a long explainer on the conflict, answering, among other questions, “What is the Syrian civil war?”
These simplifications are inaccurate and dangerous. They absolve the international community of responsibility, and give Bashar al-Assad a veneer of legitimacy. They liberate Russia and Iran — actively involved with troops in the conflict — from culpability. And they allow internal terrorist groups to justify their involvement and violence.
There is no doubt that civil war is one of the many layers of the Syrian conflict. Local factions are fighting each other. In truth though, this is a war on the people of Syria, carried out by the Assad regime and his allies.
We see that in the violence. According to the Syrian Network for Human Rights, Assad’s forces have killed 95 percent of Syrian victims. Additionally, Assad controls the army, including tanks, planes and barrel bombs. He has shelled areas that witnessed peaceful protests. Assad has used chemical weapons against his own people. He controls the intelligence, security and military apparatus that have diligently and systematically worked since 2011 to arrest, torture and kill all nonviolent activists.
[If we took ‘Gamergate’ harassment seriously, ‘Pizzagate’ might never have happened]
Assad also released dangerous Islamists from prison and allowed them to organize and build armed groups. He did this not by accident, but as a part of a strategy to create a civil war and radicalize what remained of the revolution. His strategy has been to shift the narrative from reform to sectarianism by emphasizing Islamic terrorism, thereby presenting himself as a partner in the global war on terror.
It’s also hard to square the civil war claim with the vast amount of external interference. Faced with a strong resistance from the armed opposition groups, Assad allowed both Iran and Russia in to help him and his regime survive. In fact, Assad’s army is barely fighting today. The fighting force on the ground is mostly Shiite militias, with some Syrian Arab Army battalions — all reporting to Hezbollah and the IRGC and aided by Russian air bombing. Without Iran and Russia, Assad would have been long gone.
'Are you truly incapable of shame?': Samantha Power slams Syrian ambassador
The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, spoke out strongly Dec. 13 on the deteriorating situation in Syria. After Syria's ambassador denied any mass executions or revenge attacks in the city of Aleppo, Power asked,"Is there literally nothing that can shame you?" (AP)
How can we call this conflict a civil war when the Syrian opposition is rarely fighting Syrian loyalists and instead battling with foreign fighters in its own country? Is it a civil war when all of Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United States, and other assorted NATO nations are involved in one way or another?
Calling it a civil war has serious implications on policy. It protects Assad. Assad may be an obnoxious dictator, the logic goes, but a stabilizing one. It also gives the impression that this is an internal conflict, allowing Western powers and international organizations not to take sides. As a result of this inaction, the world witnessed the exodus of Syrian refugees, the castration of U.S. efforts by Russia and Iran and terrorist attacks in European cities.
Equating the killer with the victim has a moral challenge that eventually legitimizes the regime’s crimes against humanity. It also subdues the modern history of Syria that brought Hafez al-Assad to power where the Baath Party and eventually the ruling family refused to allow anyone else in Syria to participate in politics. This regime has always resorted to military solutions and has never chosen negotiations over violence. Today, with Iran commanding the battles in Syria and Russia negotiating with the international community on the future of Syria, what is left of the regime is an image that is only needed to preserve other states’ interest.
This is not a civil war. Only when we stop calling it a civil war, we might be able to understand the history and strategy of the regime, the various layers of the Syrian people, the interests of those who are already intervening, and the significance of accountability.
***Hanin Ghaddar is the inaugural Friedmann Visiting Fellow at The Washington Institute.
Follow @haningdr
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/12/14/stop-calling-the-syrian-conflict-a-civil-war-its-not/?postshare=9731481769464932&tid=ss_tw-bottom&utm_term=.ee11581dc625 

Turkey’s Slide into Authoritarianism
Burak Bekdil/Middle East Quarterly/Winter 2017 (view PDF)
http://www.meforum.org/6398/turkey-slide-into-authoritarianism
Tanks and soldiers closed the Bosphorus bridge and surrounded the Turkish parliament in Istanbul as Turkey was plunged into chaos for a few days in July 2016 when an attempted coup threatened to overthrow the Erdoğan government.
On the evening of July 15, 2016, the inhabitants of Ankara and Istanbul left their dinner tables in panic and rushed to their windows and balconies. What they saw was shocking and surreal, if not apocalyptic: tanks closing the Bosphorus bridge in Istanbul[1] and encircling the parliament;[2] rival F-16 raids against government and coup forces;[3] military brass being taken hostage by their aides;[4] combat between the military and the police,[5] followed by soldiers attacking civilians;[6] and finally civilians lynching soldiers who had supported the coup.[7]
 All of this happened at a time when no one was expecting a putsch, even in a country torn by ethnic strife, perpetual terror attacks, and deep ideological polarization.
 Turkish Coups in Brief
 Turks soon learned that the coup attempt had not been staged by the military’s top brass but by dissident officers.[8] A similar attempt on May 27, 1960, had succeeded, leaving behind the bodies of the executed prime minister and foreign minister.[9] When in 1971 the military issued an ultimatum to the government of Prime Minister Süleyman Demirel, the prime minister resigned.[10]
 The military intervened again in 1980, but Gen. Kenan Evren, elected president after the coup, resumed parliamentary democracy in 1983. Things would go smoothly until 1997 when the generals, deeply annoyed by the coalition government of Turkey’s first Islamist premier, Necmettin Erbakan, forced him out, not by sending tanks into the street but by masterminding political intrigues that led to the collapse of his government.[11]
 In 2007, Turkey’s top general issued a statement on the military’s website, warning the Islamist government of then-prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan against any move that might undermine Turkey’s secular regime. Erdoğan did not retreat. Instead, he launched a full-scale struggle “against military tutelage” and had his long-time Islamist associate, Abdullah Gül, elected president of the country.[12] In 2011, the entire military leadership, including Chief-of-Staff Isik Kosaner, resigned in protest over a slew of trials that put hundreds of officers in jail on fabricated evidence of planning a coup. Since then, the top command has been loyal to Erdoğan.[13]
 The perpetrators of the July 15 coup attempt are widely believed to be a coalition of officers: members of the “Gülen” group, who had infiltrated military ranks and successfully hidden their ideological leanings, often by drinking alcohol publicly and showcasing wives without Islamic headscarves; Kemalists loyal to the republican tradition of modern Turkey’s founding father, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, and opportunists. Fetullah Gülen, a Muslim preacher, self-exiled in Pennsylvania since 1999 and once Erdoğan’s staunchest political ally, has emerged as the prime suspect.[14]
 A Turkish Intra-Islamist Fight
 After coming to power in parliamentary elections in November 2002, Erdoğan, fearing that his government could face the typical end of Islamist regimes in the Middle East—a military coup—quickly allied with Gülen, whose powerful network would help to shore up Erdoğan against the staunchly secular military establishment.
 After coming to power in parliamentary elections in November 2002, Erdoğan (left) quickly allied with Fetullah Gülen (right), a Muslim preacher with a powerful network of followers. But the two leaders have since fallen out, and following the attempted coup, Erdoğan accused his former ally of masterminding the uprising.
 For many years, the Erdoğan-Gülen alliance was a marriage made in heaven. But when, at the end of 2013, Erdoğan decided to break it up, a secretive Gülenist network in state bureaucracy (mostly in police and judiciary) moved to accuse him, his family, four cabinet ministers, bureaucrats, and prominent businessmen of corruption amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars. A flurry of audio tapes revealing massive fraud was leaked to social media—apparently by Gülenists who had vigorously collected material for years—in an attempt to slash Erdoğan’s popularity ahead of local elections in March 2014.[15] The plan failed as Turks shrugged off embarrassing revelations, and Erdoğan’s Justice and Development Party (AKP) won the elections with 43 percent of the vote. Erdoğan then won three more elections: the presidential elections in August 2014 and two parliamentary elections in June and November 2015.[16] As Erdoğan lamented after the July 15 failed coup:
 I am saddened for not having been able to unmask this treacherous organization [Gülenists] a long time ago. For that [failure], I am liable to God and to my nation. May God and our nation forgive us … We tolerated them because they spoke of God … We failed to see that this structure which we viewed as having a common range [goal] through different ways could be one with different intentions and sinister goals.[17]
 That common goal was to Islamize Turkey.
 A Suspicious Putsch?
 Post-coup analyses, including confessions from suspects, pointed to Gülen as the mastermind. But there were reports that the suspects might have made statements under torture, and the main question is, who benefits? According to Howard Eissenstat of St. Lawrence University, Erdoğan
 comes out of this tremendously strengthened … This has remobilized a base that was getting sort of tired of him. It gave him at least a moment in which he unified all elements of society against a clear threat.[18]
 Unsurprisingly, Erdoğan has used the failed coup to go after, not just the Gülenists, but everyone he suspected to be hostile to him, including Kurds, leftists, and secularists.
 To some extent, the failed Turkish coup looked like the “Reichstag fire,” the arson attack on the German parliament building in Berlin in 1933. A young Dutch communist, Marinus van der Lubbe, was arrested for the crime, pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to death. But more broadly, though the true origins of the fire remain unclear, the episode was used as a pretext by the nascent Nazi government against its communist rivals whom it accused of plotting against it.[19]
 The Purge
 The crackdown following the coup attempt has been brutal, frequently violating basic principles of Turkish law. Under the state of emergency, it is dangerous to question whether July 15 was a hoax, orchestrated or tolerated by Erdoğan for political gains. Justice Minister Bekir Bozdag (above) stated that anyone questioning the coup’s authenticity “likely had a role.”
 Erdogan’s actions following the attempted coup closely resemble historical purges by the Nazis and Soviets. In the days before July 2, 1934, Nazi Germany undertook the “Röhm-Putsch,” a series of systematic political executions and arrests of alleged coup plotters within the Sturmabteilung, the Nazi paramilitary group, in order to consolidate Hitler’s absolute hold on power. With many social democrats and communists already imprisoned, Hitler also went after conservatives.[20] Just a few years later, in 1937–38, Stalin carried out a massive purge in the Soviet Union. Some estimates place the number of murdered or imprisoned at more than a million people. The purge was Stalin’s effort to eliminate past and future opposition groups, real and imaginary.[21]
 In some ways, the Turkish post-July 15 purge does not look much different. There have been no executions or labor camps, but millions are suffering on suspicion of links with the Gülen movement. During the month and a half after July 15, the Turkish government purged more than 100,000 civil servants and arrested tens of thousands, including nearly half of Turkey’s active duty generals and admirals and thousands of judges and prosecutors. Others targeted were journalists, academics, teachers, pilots, doctors, businessmen—even small shop owners. Some of Turkey’s biggest companies were seized. Private property was aggressively confiscated.[22] A Turkish cabinet minister said that by September the government had seized more than US$4 billion worth of assets belonging to suspected Gülenists.[23]
 The crackdown was brutal and often violated basic principles of law. Under the state of emergency, it is dangerous in Turkey to question whether July 15 was a fake coup, orchestrated or tolerated by Erdoğan for longer-term political gains. Turkish prosecutors are currently investigating people who have alleged on social media that the coup attempt was in fact a hoax, with Justice Minister Bekir Bozdag warning: “Anyone who suggests the coup attempt was staged ‘likely had a role’ in the insurrection.”[24]
 More than 10,000 people have been arrested in Turkey, and there are serious allegations of torture.
 On October 30, the government passed a new emergency law allowing judges to ban a suspect meeting with his defense lawyers for up to six months, prompting an immediate denunciation of the move as unlawful by the president of the Turkish Bar Association.[25] More than 10,000 people have been arrested, and there are serious allegations of torture. Witnesses told Amnesty International that captured military officers were raped by police; hundreds of soldiers were beaten, and some detainees were denied food and water and access to lawyers for days.[26] The Turkish authorities also arrested sixty-two young cadets aged 14-17 from Kuleli Military school in Istanbul and charged them with treason, reportedly throwing them in jail and denying them access to their parents.[27] In September, prominent journalist Ahmet Altan and his brother, academic and columnist Mehmet Altan, were detained for questioning. Their alleged crime? Passing “subliminal messages suggesting a military coup” during a recent television debate.[28] In yet another case, the police detained an elderly woman in a wheelchair because they failed to find her son-in-law.[29]
 Other political enemies were also swept up in the purges. On a single day, September 8, the government suspended more than 11,000 schoolteachers for suspected links with the militant Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK).[30] Three days later, the government appointed trustees to twenty-eight municipalities across the country’s predominantly Kurdish southeast on the grounds that local officials had provided support to both the PKK and the Gülen network. Elected mayors, too, were suspended without court rulings.[31]
 Thorbjorn Jagland, secretary-general of the Council of Europe, demanded that Ankara produce clear evidence against coup participants and avoid targeting teachers and journalists simply because they worked for firms run by the alleged mastermind. Otherwise, he said, these actions might be challenged in the European Court of Human Rights,[32] a threat that may further damage Turkey’s strained relations with the EU.
 The insanity also took on absurd forms. In August, the government began to investigate motorists on terror charges if their car number plates featured the letters “FG”—an alleged reference to Fetullah Gülen.[33]
 Only two months after the coup attempt, the number of Turks traumatized by the purge was estimated between one million and two million. Some 163 years after Tsar Nicholas I told the British ambassador to St. Petersburg that the Ottoman Empire was “a sick man—a very sick man,” modern Turkey was again the “Sick Man of Europe.”[34]
 Damaged Ties with the West
 In the early years of Erdoğan’s government, the West offered him unconditional support, mistakenly thinking that this supposed Muslim reformist would strengthen democracy in Turkey. Here, Erdoğan (3nd from left) meets with U.S. president George W. Bush and members of the administration at the White House, January 28, 2004.
 The government of Turkey often boasts it has NATO’s second biggest army. It also boasts of progress on indigenous weapons programs, including missiles, a fighter jet, corvettes and frigates, helicopters, satellites, and drones. But immediately after July 15, more than 8,000 officers, including 157 of the 358 generals and admirals in the Turkish military’s ranks, were discharged—44 percent of the top command structure.[35] The coup attempt also prompted the government to transfer military shipyards and weapons production units to civilian authority. Military high schools and war academies were shut at a time when Turkey must fight several asymmetrical wars and militarily engage jihadists in Syria after an incursion launched in August 2016.[36]
 With Gülen on U.S. territory, Erdoğan challenged Washington for the exile’s quick extradition. “We want a terrorist from you … And you still resist … What court for a terrorist? Is it too difficult to cancel a Green Card?” the Turkish president said after a visit to New York, in remarks highlighting his limited understanding of American democracy.[37] The U.S.-Turkish tension over Gülen came at a time when the two NATO allies also diverged widely on the issue of the Syrian Kurds, whom Ankara views as terrorists and Washington as potential allies in a ground operation against the Islamic State. Erdoğan even claimed that remarks by U.S. Gen. Joseph Votel, who voiced concerns over the “longer-term impact” of the coup on the Pentagon’s relations with the Turkish military, were evidence that the U.S. military was siding with the coup plotters.[38]
 Indeed, Erdoğan and his men did not shy away from publicly accusing NATO and, in particular, the United States, of possible roles in the failed coup. Turkish defense minister Fikri Isik stated that NATO should sit down and think where it went wrong in response to the coup attempt.[39] According to Justice Minister Bozdag, Washington would be sacrificing its alliance with Ankara to “a terrorist” [Gülen] if it were to refuse to extradite him.[40]
 Following the coup attempt, Erdoğan’s government has reached out to the Russians and moved farther from an alliance with Europe. Here Erdoğan joins Russian president Vladimir Putin (right) for a news conference, August 9, 2016, following their meeting in St. Petersburg.
 Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoğlu even threatened that Turkey might look outside NATO for defense cooperation.[41] Then, after the coup attempt, Turkey normalized its deeply strained ties with Russia, signaling NATO that it may change course. Erdoğan apologized to President Vladimir Putin for shooting down a Russian military aircraft on November 24, 2015, which allegedly had violated Turkish airspace along the border with Syria. After the incident, Putin had ordered punishing economic sanctions, imposed a travel ban on Russian tourists visiting Turkey, and suspended all government-to-government relations.[42]
 Turkey’s newfound love affair with Russia not only pleases Putin but also Tehran, his partner in the Syrian civil war, and puts Ankara on the side of the Russian-Iranian-Assad coalition in the five-year-old conflict.
 Turkey’s newfound love affair with Russia pleases Putin and his partner in the Syrian civil war, Tehran.
 Erdoğan’s response to the failed coup further weakened Turkey’s already damaged links with the West. As Western leaders called on Ankara to respect civil liberties and democracy, Erdoğan insisted he would consider reinstating the death penalty. “The people have the opinion that these terrorists should be killed,” he said in an interview with CNN. “Why should I keep them and feed them in prisons for years to come?”[43] In response, Federica Mogherini, the European Union’s foreign policy chief, warned that if Ankara reintroduced the death penalty, it would not be joining the EU: “Let me be very clear on one thing … No country can become an EU member state if it introduces [the] death penalty.”[44] For his part, German foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmaier expressed serious concern about mass arrests and said that German-Turkish relations were so bad that the two countries had virtually “no basis” for talks and were like “emissaries from two different planets.”[45]
 Erdoğan then threatened that Italy’s relations with Turkey could deteriorate if Italian prosecutors continued investigating his son, Bilal, for money laundering. “Italy should be attending to the mafia, not my son,” he said. Once again, Erdoğan revealed his true idea of democracy: Leaders give orders to judges who then obey. Prime Minister Matteo Renzi retorted that Italy has an independent legal system, and “judges answer to the Italian constitution and not the Turkish president.”[46] But curiously, a few weeks later, the Italian prosecutor dropped charges against Erdoğan’s son.[47]
 Another European country wary of Turkey is Austria. Chancellor Christian Kern said that he would start a discussion among European heads of government to end membership talks with Ankara. He called Turkey’s accession talks “diplomatic fiction” and added, “We know that the democratic standards are clearly not sufficient to justify [Turkey's] accession.”[48]
 Revealingly, even the Turks’ next of kin were not happy. According to the Associated Press, on August 3, thousands of Turkish Cypriots in their tiny statelet on the divided island took to the streets to protest against “Turkey’s attempt to mold their secular culture into one that’s more in tune with Islamic norms.”[49]
 A Society of “Passionate” Politics
 Turkish politics is an anomaly in a century-long war of religion between the pious and secular adherents of the same sect of the same religion. The thousands of people, urged by Erdoğan to take to the streets in the aftermath of the failed coup, passionately chanted “Allahu Akbar.” They were in the streets not to defend democracy but to defend the man whom they viewed as guardian of their religion. Ironically, the same “pro-democracy” crowds chanted the slogan, “We want the death penalty [back].”[50]
 Religion was why Erdoğan and Gülen had long been allied against the “infidel” Kemalists, leftists, and seculars. Religion was also why Erdoğan’s and Gülen’s Sunni Islamist followers are now at each other’s throat. Erdoğan and Gülen did not break up because one of them abandoned their common faith. They keep praying to the same God, reciting the same prayers, while their followers keep attending the same mosques.
 One lesson from the failed Turkish coup is that Islam the religion or Islamism the political ideology will never forge the alliances Islamists often seek. Political Islam is not the right glue for enduring political alliances.
 Ironically, for many years, Erdoğan feared a coup by Kemalist generals. Instead, the coup attempt came from fellow Islamists disguised within the military as secular officers. Moreover, on July 15, Kemalist officers helped Erdoğan by fighting their crypto-Islamist colleagues. In short, July 15 was an Islamist coup attempt targeting Islamists.
 For Erdoğan and his camp, the Gülenists were the useful dupes; for the Gülenists, Erdoğan and his AKP bigwigs were the useful dupes; and for both, the pro-government liberals were the useful dupes. Probably all of them were right. The alliance of the faithful was designed to crush the secular system, to Islamize Turkey, by stealth or otherwise, in order to advance political Islam.
 In the early years of Erdoğan’s government, the West offered him unconditional support, mistakenly thinking that this supposed Muslim reformist would build a strong democracy in Turkey by sending the Kemalist generals back to the barracks. They joined the Turkish comic opera as the Western useful fools. They naively believed that if the secular army no longer intervened in politics, Turkey would become a democracy in the Western sense. Instead, Turkey became even more authoritarian in the hands of its two Islamist groups.
 Turkey’s Islamists never wanted to make the country a democracy. They wanted to make it a hybrid, “ballot-box” democracy in which they could win election after election and Islamize. They merely wanted to replace military authoritarianism with an Islamist one.
 This is hardly surprising. Since the foundation of modern Turkey, the country has been an ideological battlefield. Most Turks–leftist, rightist, pious, or secular—will not be content to merely defend their ideologies democratically. They do not view other ideologies as rivals but as “the other” that must be converted or crushed.
 What Now?
 Just because a coup was averted on July 15 and the parliamentary system is ostensibly functioning does not make Turkey a democracy. After a pause in his efforts to Islamize and polarize the country, Erdoğan, once again feeling safe, will return to his divisive rhetoric and governance.
 The Turkish Röhm-Putsch will run at full speed with thousands of non-Gülenists punished on false charges. Meanwhile, crypto-Gülenists who successfully disguise themselves will plan the movement’s recovery, thus adding to Erdoğan’s deep paranoia. And millions of opportunists will keep informing on their rivals and enemies as Gülenists.
 Ankara’s relations with its Western allies will be further poisoned as Erdoğan’s paranoia that the coup was planned abroad deepens. Behind closed doors, countries chasing big Turkish government contracts will promise Ankara that they will suspend local Gülenist activities. But having seen on July 15 how dangerous his nemesis can be, Erdoğan, like most Middle Eastern autocrats, will continue to live in constant fear.
 Erdoğan’s popularity still runs high. His party won 49.5 percent of the national vote in the November 2015 parliamentary elections, and some pollsters put his ratings today as high as 67 percent.[51] The coup provided Erdoğan the opportunity to introduce the executive, presidential system he has long craved. His push is no longer controversial. Ankara averted a coup, and another potential blow to the Turkish democracy is a more pressing issue than how unconstitutionally the president may be running the country.
 **Burak Bekdil is an Ankara-based columnist for Hürriyet Daily News and a fellow of the Middle East Forum. He has written for the U.S. weekly Defense News since 1997.
 [9] William Armstrong, “Turkey’s 1960 coup, still resounding today,” Hürriyet, Sept. 11, 2014; “Turkey commemorates victims of 1960 coup,” TRT World (Istanbul), May 27, 2016.
 [10] USA Today (McLean, Va.), July 15, 2016.
 [11] Ibid.
 [12] The Guardian (London), Aug. 28, 2007.
 [13] The New York Times, July 29, 2011.
 [14] The Independent (London), Aug. 2, 2016; Press TV (Tehran), Aug. 18, 2016.
 [15] Der Spiegel (Hamburg), Mar. 19, 2014.
 [16] “Turkey’s Recent Elections: From March 2014 to November 2015,” Carnegie Europe, Brussels, Oct. 22, 2015.
 [17] TRT Haber TV (Istanbul), Aug. 3, 2016.
 [18] Associated Press, July 16, 2016.
 [19] The Guardian, Jan. 12, 2008.
 [20] Holocaust Encyclopedia, r.v. “Röhm Purge,” accessed Oct. 21, 2016.
 [21] Encyclopædia Britannica, s.v. “Purge trials: Soviet history,” accessed Oct. 21, 2016.
 [22] Reuters, Aug. 18, 2016.
 [23] Hürriyet, July 25, July 28, 2016; “Turkey’s Gulen purges,” The Economist, Sept. 10 2016.
 [24] Hürriyet, July 25, 2016; The Guardian, July 27, 2016.
 [25] Hürriyet, Oct. 31, 2016.
 [26] CNN News, July 27, 2016.
 [27] The Daily Mail (London), July 25, 2016.
 [28] Hürriyet, Sept. 10, 2016.
 [29] Ibid., Sept. 3, 2016; AA (Anadolu Ajansı, Ankara), Aug. 31, 2016.
 [30] CNN News, Sept. 8, 2016.
 [31] Hürriyet, Sept. 11, 2016.
 [32] EurActiv Media, London, Sept. 8, 2016.
 [33] Hürriyet, Aug. 22, 2016.
 [34] Efraim Karsh and Inari Karsh, Empires of the Sand: the Struggle for Mastery in the Middle East 1789-1923 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 71-2.
 [35] Hürriyet, July 28, 2016.
 [36] MemurlarNet Media, July 31, 2016; Strategic Culture Foundation Online Journal (Moscow), July 28, 2016.
 [37] Bob Unruh, “Obama Lives in Make-believe World with Muslim Dictator Erdogan,” World Net Daily (Washington, D.C.), Oct. 3, 2016.
 [38] Voice of America, July 29, 2016.
 [39] Hürriyet, Aug. 15, 2016.
 [40] Associated Press, Aug. 9, 2016.
 [41] Time Magazine, Aug. 11, 2016.
 [42] NBC News, Nov. 28, 2015.
 [43] Reuters, July 18, 2016.
 [44] Associated Press, July 18, 2016.
 [45] Reuters, Aug. 4, 2016.
 [46] Ibid., Aug. 2, 2016.
 [47] Ibid., Aug. 2, 2016; Sept. 21, 2016.
 [48] Ibid., Aug. 3, 2016.
 [49] The National Herald (New York), Oct. 24, 2016.
 [50] BBC News, July 19, 2016.
 [51] Bloomberg News (New York), Aug. 11, 2016.
 [1] Hürriyet (Istanbul), July 20, 2016.
 [2] Reuters, July 16, 2016.
 [3] The Wall Street Journal, July 17, 2016.
 [4] RT TV (Moscow), July 23, 2016.
 [5] Hürriyet, July 18, 2016.
 [6] Ibid., July 29,2016.
 [7] Ibid., July 17, 2016.
 [8] CNN News, July 18, 2016.