LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

December 18/16

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletin16/english.december18.16.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends
John 15/12-15/:"My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends. You are my friends if you do what I command. I no longer call you servants, because a servant does not know his master’s business. Instead, I have called you friends, for everything that I learned from my Father I have made known to you."
 

I am longing to strengthen you or rather so that we may be mutually encouraged by each other’s faith, both yours and mine.

Letter to the Romans 01/01-12/:"Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God, which he promised beforehand through his prophets in the holy scriptures, the gospel concerning his Son, who was descended from David according to the flesh. and was declared to be Son of God with power according to the spirit of holiness by resurrection from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord, through whom we have received grace and apostleship to bring about the obedience of faith among all the Gentiles for the sake of his name, including yourselves who are called to belong to Jesus Christ, To all God’s beloved in Rome, who are called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for all of you, because your faith is proclaimed throughout the world. For God, whom I serve with my spirit by announcing the gospel of his Son, is my witness that without ceasing I remember you always in my prayers, asking that by God’s will I may somehow at last succeed in coming to you. For I am longing to see you so that I may share with you some spiritual gift to strengthen you or rather so that we may be mutually encouraged by each other’s faith, both yours and mine.

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on December 17-18/16
Hezbollah are no geniuses. Our guys are helping a lot/Roger Bejjani/Face Book/December 17/16/
Elite Beduin trackers guarding Israel's border with Lebanon/Jerusalem Post/December 17/16
Egypt Church Bombing Raises Calls to Uproot Bigotry/Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 17/16/
Christian Worship Is ‘Worse than Murder and Bloodshed’/Raymond Ibrahim/Coptic Solidarity/December 17/16
Islamism in Europe/Khadija Khan/Gatestone Institute/December 17/16
After the Fall of Aleppo/Jonathan Spyer/Jerusalem Post/December 17/16
Does expelling religion from the public space lead to extremism/Samar Fatany/Asharq Al Awsat/December 17/16
Here’s How Trump could Succeed/Philip Churm/Washington Post/December 17/16

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on December 17-18/16
Hezbollah are no geniuses. Our guys are helping a lot.
Image shows Hezbollah, Iranian militia detain civilians in Aleppo
Berri: Don't Push Me to Tell Who is Obstructing Cabinet Line-Up
Bassil: FPM Makes Sacrifices to Serve Lebanon's Interest
Report: Gov. Formation Facing New Complexities, LF Won't Relinquish Portfolios
Ogassapian Says Proportionality 'Impossible' Under 'Logic of Arms'
LAF artillery shells militants in Arsal outskirts
Christmas Village" kicksoff with the muchawaited 100 Santa Claus Parade
Arslan via Twitter: We are in agreement with MP Joumblatt over all matters that promote the Druze community
Clash between public van owners blocks Aley international highway
Security forces reopen Aley international highway
Elite Beduin trackers guarding Israel's border with Lebanon

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on December 17-18/16
Aleppo’s civilians fleeing Assad attacks
Thousands in Desperate Wait for Evacuation from Aleppo
Egypt Church Bombing Raises Calls to Uproot Bigotry
Iran sermon: Muslims defeated ‘infidels’ in Aleppo
Iran threatens to restart nuclear activities
Iran summons British envoy in Syria tit for tat
Arab League Condemns the Brutal Killings in Aleppo
David Cameron: Britain is suffering from Iran regime’s terrorism
Iran: 11 Executions in Three Prisons
Iran Regime Is Explicitly Formulating the Sectarianism Plan in Syria
PLO warns peace prospects ‘dead’ if US embassy moves to Jerusalem
Hamas blames Israel for killing of drone expert in Tunisia
S. Korea Protests Switch Focus to Impeachment Court

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on
December 17-18/16
Tunisia: Rapist gets off by marrying 13-year-old girl he impregnated
Islamic State threatens Egypt with “volcano of jihad” for executing jihad murderer
Muslim Chaplain of the Canadian army: Beat your wife, but keep it private
Patient Diagnosed as “Islamophobic” on CBS’s “Pure Genius”
Minnesota: Muslim migrant rapes woman on bus
Noam Chomsky: Idea of “Islamic terror as seeking to destroy us” is “scapegoating
Obama: “Almost every country on Earth sees America as stronger” than eight years ago
De Blasio “really angry” with Muslim hate crime hoaxer because it’s really Trump’s fault
Germany: 12-year-old Muslim boy targets Christmas market with nail bomb
PA claims it got no US aid in 2016, when it really got $357 million
Bloomberg Businessweek: “Europe’s Migrant Flood Brings Germany a Much-Needed Baby Boom”
Jamie Glazov Christmas Moment: Crucified Again

Links From Christian Today Site for on on December 17-18/16
Pope Seeks Deal As He Chairs Talks Between Colombian President And Rival
Canadian diplomats visit pastor imprisoned in North Korea
Latest on Aleppo: Evacuation resumes as Trump promises 'safe zones', Obama says no easy fix
Thirteen Turkish Soldiers Killed, 48 Wounded In Car Bomb Attack
IS Shows No Sign Of Weakening As Mosul Battle Enters Third Month
How London Churches Are Battling The Housing Crisis
Anti-Discrimination Legislation Threatens Basic Freedoms Say US Religious Leaders
Thousands Demand Turkey Release US Pastor Jailed On Terrorism Charges
Pope Francis Uses Sign Language In Lively Christmas Video For Deaf People

Latest Lebanese Related News published on on December 17-18/16

Hezbollah are no geniuses. Our guys are helping a lot.
Roger Bejjani/Face Book/December 17/16/When you blackmail your own people and country and violate the constitution hence voiding Baabda Presidential palace from his resident for 2 years and half, you should not be surprised Mr. President to be fed with the same nature of crap. If is your turn to be blackmailed. As for Hariri and Geagea if they have not learned yet that their opponent considers every "rapprochement" as weakness and an opportunity to move forward, they should change careers.
If Aoun and Hariri had political vision and b----, they should have created 48 hours subsequent to the taklif a non-partisan apolitical cabinet of 14 which main mission must have been coordinating a new electoral law and organizing the forthcoming parliamentarian elections in May 2017. This cabinet would have been entrusted with a parliamentarian majority. Unfortunately, FPM, Aoun, Geagea and Hariri were dreaming of this piece of the pie for those unfortunate 6 months to come.
Hezbollah are no geniuses. Our guys are helping a lot.

Image shows Hezbollah, Iranian militia detain civilians in Aleppo
Saturday, 17 December 2016/Pro-regime media outlets have published an image allegedly showing Iranian and Lebanese militiamen detaining and killing civilians who were trying to leave besieged Aleppo. In the image, which has gone viral on social media, soldiers carrying weapons are seen standing over men lying face down on the ground. An eyewitness testimony from the head of White Helmets Aleppo center published a voice recording in Arabic saying Iranian militia arrested a pregnant woman on Friday after executing her husband in front of her at a checkpoint. Syrian media activist, Hadi Abdullah, confirmed to Al Arabiya English the incident involving Iranian and Hezbollah militias. According to him, they were met with Hezbollah and Iranian militia at checkpoint where they stopped them and began firing with 23 mm machine guns and expelled the Red Crescent and the Red Cross vehicles by threatening them. He then said the militias took out all the men from the buses, and took their belongings, making them take off most of their clothes and laying down on the floor. Abdullah backed what the White Helmet rescue worker said, that one of the men who went out with his pregnant wife had resisted the militias after a militant harassed his wife and was subsequently killed among others. After the incident, the wife started to bleed due to shock. Abdullah explained, and was taken to regime-held areas. The militiamen then sent the rest of the civilians back walking to the besieged areas, he added. Syrian rebels accused Iran and its Shiite-backed militias on Saturday of holding up a deal to evacuate civilians trapped in the remaining rebel bastion in Aleppo.

Berri: Don't Push Me to Tell Who is Obstructing Cabinet Line-Up
Naharnet/December 17/16/Speaker Nabih Berri said he knows the “secret” behind the delay in the cabinet formation but prefers not to be “provoked” into disclosing it to the public, al-Joumhouria daily reported Saturday. “I know where the problem is, and I know the secret behind the obstructions. Don't provoke us to make us announce it frankly and publicly,” sources close to Berri quoted him as saying. The sources pointed to some attempts aiming to hold the AMAL Movement responsible for the cabinet delay, “some want to blame us, but they can't hold us responsible. We are not the problem. Things are clear on our part. Let them search for the solution somewhere else, it is in their own hands.”Berri however said: “Everyone knows that President Michel Aoun, Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri and myself have agreed during our meeting at Babbada to form a cabinet of 30 minsters. We were not the ones who retracted, but they were.”Aoun and Hariri are still struggling to put together a new cabinet amid conflicting demands from the political forces that are seeking to join the unity government. The formation process made major progress on Monday and Tuesday after the political parties reached a settlement over the thorny issue of the public works portfolio. Under the settlement, the Marada Movement will be given the public works portfolio while the Lebanese Forces will get the health portfolio. But horsetrading resumed when it was agreed to form a 30-member cabinet instead of 24, where the disagreement lingers on the additional six state ministers and their distribution on the political parties.

Bassil: FPM Makes Sacrifices to Serve Lebanon's Interest
Naharnet/December 17/16/Foreign Minister and Free Patriotic Movement leader Jebran Bassil stated that the FPM makes sacrifices for the greater interest of Lebanon alone, as he assured that the delayed cabinet will eventually be formed, the National News Agency said Saturday. “I assure you today that the government will be formed. You must put any delay in a simple equation which states that we are people who know well when to make sacrifices in favor of others in order to make Lebanon benefit,” said Bassil at the annual dinner held by the FPM-Byblos branch a day earlier. The Minister reassured supporters that a delay in the formation of the cabinet was normal, since the country was not living through usual circumstances. “This cabinet's mission is to hold legislative elections on time...and ministries do not belong to any one person or political movement, they belong to all Lebanese,” he said.He concluded that the FPM made concessions for the greater good of the country and nothing else.

Report: Gov. Formation Facing New Complexities, LF Won't Relinquish Portfolios
Naharnet/December 17/16/The Lebanese Forces party said forming a new cabinet is facing complexities because shifting to form a cabinet of 30 ministers instead of 24 requires anew consultations, and stressed that they will not concede any ministerial portfolio in the new line-up agreement, al-Akhbar daily reported on Saturday. “The formation of the cabinet is getting complicated,” Maarab sources told the daily on condition of anonymity. “We are not against forming a cabinet of 30 ministers, but we technically oppose it for two reasons: first it will blow away the arrangement of 24 ministers, secondly it will bring the consultations back to square one which means that the efforts exerted by Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri have gone in vain,” added the sources. On the difficulties facing the formation, the sources expressed astonishment at the insistence of Speaker Nabih Berri to have all the March 8 alliance parties represented in the cabinet. They said it would push the March 14 alliance to take similar steps and demand the representation of independent Shiite and Sunni figures, similar to former Minsters Ashraf Rifi, and Ibrahim Shamseddine and ex MP Mohammed Baydoun. The sources concluded by saying that the LF will not make any concessions as for the ministerial portfolios to be allotted, “we won't let them withdraw any of the portfolios agreed upon.”
The formation process made major progress on Monday and Tuesday after the political parties reached a settlement over the thorny issue of the public works portfolio. Under the settlement, the Marada Movement will be given the public works portfolio while the Lebanese Forces will get the health portfolio. But horsetrading resumed when plans changed and a suggestion to form a 30-member cabinet instead of 24 emerged. The disagreement lingers on the additional six state ministers and their distribution on the political parties.

Ogassapian Says Proportionality 'Impossible' Under 'Logic of Arms'
Naharnet/December 17/16/Al-Mustaqbal MP Jean Ogassapian said on Saturday it is impossible to reach a complete proportional representation election law in light of the spread of Hizbullah's arms. “Everyone knows that proportional representation will not be passed in the parliament, and it is impossible to reach this representation under the logic of arms spread in specific areas,” said Ogassapian in an interview to Free Lebanon radio. “This law will drag the country into further paralysis. We will face a problem shall we approach June 20 next year when the tenure of the parliament ends, without having a new law to stage the elections or agreeing on the term extension or staging the elections based on the 1960,” he added. “We need political stability and we must benefit from the election of President Michel Aoun and the designation of PM Saad Hariri. We need an efficient government to restore life to the constitutional institutions,” he went on to say. Ogassapian urged the March 8 alliance to facilitate the mission of the President, and the political parties to help Lebanon confront the regional challenges instead of wrangling over the distribution of ministerial portfolios. Pointing to the recent speech of Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah whereby he said that he was not concerned about domestic matters but regional ones, Ogassapian described it as “very dangerous.” Hizbullah has repeatedly called for an electoral law based on proportional representation but other political parties, especially al-Mustaqbal Movement, have rejected the proposal and argued that the party's controversial arsenal of arms would prevent serious competition in regions where the Iran-backed party is influential. Mustaqbal, the Lebanese Forces and the Progressive Socialist Party have meanwhile proposed a hybrid electoral law that mixes the proportional representation and the winner-takes-all systems. Speaker Nabih Berri has also proposed a hybrid law. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017. 

LAF artillery shells militants in Arsal outskirts

Sat 17 Dec 2016/NNA - The Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) targeted the outposts of militants in the outskirts of Arsal on Saturday afternoon, NNA correspondent to Hermel reported.'

Christmas Village" kicksoff with the muchawaited 100 Santa Claus Parade
Sat 17 Dec 2016/NNA - "Christmas Village" was officially launched, on Saturday, at Beirut Souks with an opening ceremony headed by Deputy Atef Majdalani representing PM-designate Saad El Hariri, Mr. Mohamed Choukair, President of the Chamber of Commerce, Industry & Agriculture in Beirut and Mount Lebanon, and Mrs. Sandra Ghattas, General Manager of Gata Events & Promotions, and the organizer of the event in collaboration with Solidere.
The official ceremony kicked-off with the one-of-a-kind and much anticipated 100 Santa Claus Parade featuring 100 Santa Claus who marched around the Souks to spread the joyful Christmas spirit. The Christmas Village will be welcoming visitors, free-of-charge, starting today the 17th till Friday the 23rd of December 2016 from 3 PM till 10 PM, to discover the Food Village offering live cooking and all sorts of Christmas sweets; Souk el Tayyeb, famous for their local produce; and the Christmas Market with more than 50 participants showcasing their Christmas products, handcrafts, and trendy decoration and gift ideas including fashion, fashion accessories, jewelry, handbags, home accessories, candies and sweets, and toys for the little ones.The Village also features a fun-packed entertainment schedule every day with on-stage performances and mobile entertainers for all ages.

Arslan via Twitter: We are in agreement with MP Joumblatt over all matters that promote the Druze community
Sat 17 Dec 2016/NNA - Lebanese Democratic Party Head, MP Talal Arslan, stressed Saturday via Twitter on "the ongoing agreement with MP Walid Joumblatt over all matters pertaining to the development of the Druze community, including the government issue," while criticizing anyone who tries to insinuate otherwise.

Clash between public van owners blocks Aley international highway
Sat 17 Dec 2016/NNA - Owners of vans and public transport busses blocked Aley international highway to both sides of traffic following a dispute between a van owner from Aley and another one from Baalbek. This caused stifling traffic, which the security forces and army continued to work on dissolving.

Security forces reopen Aley international highway
Sat 17 Dec 2016/NNA - Following a personal dispute between van owners for public transportation, security forces successfully reopened Aley international highway to both sides of traffic.

Elite Beduin trackers guarding Israel's border with Lebanon
Jerusalem Post/December 17/16
It’s a sunny day, the first after a few days of rain. Looking at the dirt path running along the border with Lebanon, Maj. Fahed Gahder scans the ground. There are pebbles, puddles, and what appear to be footprints, at least to the layman.
Across the valley, Gahder points to a shack “that used to be a Hezbollah outpost.” He kneels, motioning for me to return to the footprint, explaining with a smile that it represented no danger. “It was a cow.”Ghader, a Beduin from northern Israel, is a natural detective of the ground. He knows that the devil is in the details, able to ascertain if a single footprint in the dirt can lead him to a terrorist infiltration or to a civilian.
Beduin men, who patrol Israel’s borders and act as the first line of defense, are not obliged to serve in the army, meaning that they volunteer to put their lives at risk for their country. Since 1948, more than 110 Beduin have been killed defending Israel. During Operation Protective Edge against Hamas in 2014, more than a dozen Beduin and an Israeli of Ethiopian descent in the tracking unit were killed.
In the IDF, Beduin are highly respected for their tracking and navigational skills, something they learn in their youth, Gahder told The Jerusalem Post, adding that in his unit there are career soldiers between the ages of 35 and 47, and soldiers as young as 20 years old.
But Gahder is worried that technological advancements will render them obsolete. Israel’s border installations are some of the most advanced in the world, with smart fences, concrete walls, cameras and thermal sensors.
“In the next five, 10 years, I am not sure if we will still be needed,” he said. “It’s my biggest fear.”
But technology is not always the answer and the trackers are always the first called to the scene of a possible infiltration. On one three-day incident Gahder recounted, it was the trackers who lasted the longest in the field, not the helicopter, not the trucks and not the dogs.
The difficulty of the tracker’s job varies with the location and the topography, Gahder told the Post. Near the Gaza Strip, the trackers are able to easily read the sand, and are able to quickly tell if there is an infiltration toward Israel. Up in the Northern Galilee, he said, it’s more difficult as the area is full of forested hills; water is also challenging, he said, but trackers identify the possible entry point and scan the banks in both directions for a possible exit point.
According to Kamal, a Beduin from the southern city of Rahat, Beduin “are given the toughest, hardest orders, but are rarely recognized for their work.” He cited the locating of the bodies of teenagers Gil-Ad Shaer, Naftali Fraenkel and Eyal Yifrah, who were kidnapped and murdered by Hamas in Judea in June 2014.
According to a May report by State Comptroller Joseph Shapira, a third of Israel’s 200,000 Beduin live in unrecognized villages. The inhabitants of these villages suffer from a lack of infrastructure, rely on solar panels for electricity, lack roads and sewerage, are not connected to Israel’s water supply network, and despite being citizens, are not provided any health and educational services.
And in addition, the government continues to demolish these unrecognized Beduin villages, mainly in the southern part of the country. Many NGOs have criticized Israel’s policy of demolishing unrecognized villages, but according to Gahder, it’s clear: Beduin who build unauthorized villages are breaking the law.
And demolition isn’t the only danger Beduin face living in unrecognized villages. During Operation Protective Edge two-and-a-half years ago, a rocket fired from the Gaza Strip struck the village of Qasr al-Sir near the southern city of Dimona. Because Beduin villages do not have air raid sirens, lack bomb shelters, and incoming rockets are not intercepted by the Iron Dome, 32-year-old Oudi Lafi al-Waj was killed. Three of his family members, including two children, were wounded.
All the men in his family had been in the army, but even after his death, the High Court of Justice ruled that there was no need for a shelter to be placed in unrecognized Beduin villages. According to the court, while these villages are vulnerable to rockets, “the level of risk did not justify the supply of portable shelters at the expense of areas at higher risk.”
“Will his sons now join the army? If their safety is such a low priority for the state? I don’t think so,” Kamal told the Post over coffee. “When the army says it’s the army of the people, what does that even mean? Are the Beduin not part of the people of Israel? From what I see, what I experience, the Beduin are only important for one or two specific duties for the army. Nothing more.”
There is also pressure from the Islamic Movement in Israel not to serve, Gahder told the Post. “They come and say, ‘Look, your son joined the army and the country destroyed your home. How does that make you feel?’”
These pressures have affected enlistment. According to a senior IDF officer, 357 Beduin joined the IDF in 2015, 254 from the North and 103 in the South.
Gahder, who after 12 years in the army still hopes to advance as far as he can, plans to build community centers when he is discharged, where more of his fellow Beduin can connect to Israel and be encouraged to volunteer to enlist in the army.
“I am very proud to serve in the IDF,” he told the Post. “We all have one goal: to protect Israel.”
http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Politics-And-Diplomacy/Elite-Bedouin-trackers-guarding-Israels-border-with-Lebanon-475681

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on on December 17-18/16
Aleppo’s civilians fleeing Assad attacks
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Saturday, 17 December 2016/Syrian activists shot a video of civilians in eastern Aleppo escaping after Assad forces and loyalists opened fire at the border crossings during the evacuation process, which the regime and its allies claimed was safe operations. In the video, the Syrian activist says as he’s running with a crowd of civilians: “these people are currently under threat by the Syrian regime, they are running away from the Regime’s checkpoint that Russia and the Syrian regime said was safe.”

Thousands in Desperate Wait for Evacuation from Aleppo
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 17/16/Thousands of trapped civilians and rebels waited desperately Saturday for evacuations to resume from the last opposition-held areas of Aleppo after the operation was suspended by the Syrian regime. A rebel representative told AFP that an agreement had been reached to allow more evacuations from the city, which has been ravaged by some of the worst violence of the nearly six-year war that has killed more than 310,000 people. But there was no confirmation from President Bashar al-Assad's regime or its staunch allies Russia and Iran, which are under mounting international pressure to end what US President Barack Obama denounced as the "horror" in Aleppo. Obama called Friday for impartial observers to monitor efforts to evacuate civilians from the devastated city and warned Assad that he would not be able to "slaughter his way to legitimacy". Families spent the night in freezing temperatures in bombed out apartment blocks in Al-Amiriyah district, which was the departure point for evacuations before they were halted on Friday, an AFP correspondent reported. Many had not had a proper meal in days and were surviving on just a few dates. A lot of people had burned all possessions they could not carry with them, determined not to allow them to be looted by government troops and militia who have recaptured almost the entire city. - Trading accusations -The government blamed rebels for the suspension of the evacuation operation which had begun on Thursday, saying they had tried to smuggle out heavy weapons and hostages. The opposition accused the government of halting the operation in a bid to secure the evacuation of residents from Fuaa and Kafraya, two villages under rebel siege in northwestern Syria. In return the rebels want the evacuation of the towns of Madaya and Zabadani in Damascus province which are besieged by the regime.
"We are working on a resumption of the operations today (Saturday)," said Al-Farook Abu Bakr, a representative of the hardline Islamist rebel group Ahrar al-Sham.
"There will be evacuations from Fuaa and Kafraya, as well as Madaya and Zabadani, and all the residents of Aleppo and the fighters will leave."The precise number of people still trapped in the last rebel-held pocket southwest of central Aleppo is unclear. UN envoy Staffan de Mistura estimated that as of Thursday there were around 40,000 civilians and perhaps as many as 5,000 opposition fighters in the rebel enclave but the world body has since acknowledged there is uncertainty about the figures. Before evacuations were suspended around 8,500 people, including some 3,000 fighters, left for rebel-held territory elsewhere in the north, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based monitoring group. "The evacuations are expected to resume on Saturday in Aleppo, in synchronisation with the evacuation from Fuaa and Kafraya of around 4,000 people -- the wounded and their families, as well as civilians and orphans," Observatory director Rami Abdel Rahman said.
- Women, children trapped -Tens of thousands of civilians had already fled opposition-controlled parts of Aleppo after the regime began its latest assault in mid-November.
The Russian defence ministry said after evacuations were suspended that only hardline rebel fighters remained. But World Health Organization country representative Elisabeth Hoff said: "There are still high numbers of women and infants -- children under five -- that need to get out."
The main regional supporters of the rival sides in Syria's devastating civil war engaged in a flurry of diplomacy on Friday to try to secure a resumption of evacuations.
Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu, whose government is a key backer of the opposition, said he had spoken more than a dozen times with his Iranian counterpart, Mohammad Javad Zarif, during the day. On Friday a convoy of evacuees that had already left east Aleppo when the operation was suspended was forced to turn back, an AFP correspondent said. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), supervising the evacuations, said it was looking into reports of shooting before the convoy was turned around.
In New York, the Security Council could vote as early as this weekend on a French-drafted proposal to allow international observers in Aleppo and ensure urgent aid deliveries.
Several thousand people protested on the Turkish border on Saturday against the siege of Aleppo, while a demonstration was planned in Berlin. More than half the Syrian population has been displaced, with millions becoming refugees, since the conflict began with anti-government protests in 2011. Diplomatic efforts -- including several rounds of peace talks in Geneva -- have failed to make progress in resolving the conflict, which reached a turning point last year when Russia launched an air war in support of Assad.

Egypt Church Bombing Raises Calls to Uproot Bigotry
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 17/16/
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/17/afp-egypt-church-bombing-raises-calls-to-uproot-bigotryap-egypt-church-attack-prompts-fears-of-militant-escalation/
Growing up in Egypt, Mina and other Copts remember all too well the anti-Christian slurs they used to hear at school and on the street. Once, while playing football, a Muslim youth snatched Mina's necklace and crucifix and stomped on it. "I won't forget that day," said Mina, now in his 30s. Egypt is now trying to come to terms with the kind of religious bigotry behind a December 11 suicide bombing in a Cairo church that killed 26 people during Sunday mass.
"School curricula, some (religious) platforms and the absence of an enlightened current are what have led to this," said Coptic Church spokesman Boulos Halim. Egyptian authorities have announced the arrest of four jihadist suspects. But the authorities must go much further and address the kind of prejudice running through Egyptian society that for decades has fuelled attacks on Coptic Christians, said Halim. "Police and military power have never been able to erase terrorism. It must be accompanied by the power of thought," he said.
The attack claimed by the Islamic State group was the second church bombing in Egypt since 2011 and only the latest sectarian incident in the Muslim-majority country where Christians have long complained of discrimination. Copts, who make up about 10 percent of Egypt's 90-million population, say they are sidelined both in the education system and state institutions.
Halim traces the roots of violence against his community to the 1970s, when then president Anwar Sadat empowered Islamists against his socialist opponents. Attacks by Muslims on Christians, especially in rural areas, carried on after Sadat himself was assassinated by jihadists in 1981 and succeeded by his vice president, Hosni Mubarak. In more recent times, Copts have also had to contend with Islamist extremists whose propaganda portrays them as outsiders and second-class citizens.
- Roots of discrimination -Some say the roots of discrimination can be found in schools.
Schools teach compulsory classes in religion, with Christians leaving classrooms during Islamic lessons to attend separate Christian religion tuition. In Arabic classes, Christians memorise Koranic verses -- a primary reference for teaching the language -- while Muslims are taught about Christianity from an Islamic perspective. "They don't learn anything about my religion," said Peter, a Copt in his 30s. Bigotry was one of the reasons that Peter, who asked not to be fully identified, left Egypt, saying it made him feel "like I'm not from this country". Halim said confronting discrimination should involve government ministries as well as institutions from both sides of the religious divide. They should "create a national project to start a current of enlightenment among Egyptians", Halim said. After Mubarak's overthrow in a 2011 uprising, Copts came under attack again, with dozens killed in sectarian clashes and in a confrontation with the military in October that year. Under Islamist president Mohamed Morsi, fundamentalists regularly incited violence against Christians. Following his overthrow by the military in 2013, Muslim mobs attacked dozens of churches and Christian properties accusing the Copts of having sided with the army.
With former military chief Abdel Fattah al-Sisi's election a year later, Copts hoped they had found an ally who understood the dangers of Islamist extremism. Sisi, who oversaw a bloody crackdown on Morsi's supporters and pledged to wipe out a jihadist insurgency, became Egypt's first president to attend a Christmas mass. His administration also finally regulated church construction under a law supported by the Coptic Church, though opposed by critics for retaining obstacles.
- Uptick in sectarian violence -"What happened is not enough to change ideologies," said Halim.
There has been an uptick of sectarian incidents in 2016. In May, Muslim villagers set ablaze Christian homes and paraded an elderly Coptic woman naked over rumours that her son was in a relationship with a Muslim woman. In February, authorities halted the hiring of a Christian woman as a school principal after student protests in Minya province, south of the capital.
Violent attacks have increased, with clashes often ignited by rumours that Christians were building a church. Activists say extremist Salafi preachers are spreading hatred in non-mainstream religious services, some of them available online. "It is very clear that hatred is present in speeches. I don't know what they (the authorities) are waiting for," Halim said.
This year, four Coptic teenagers were convicted of insulting Islam after they recorded a video mocking the Islamic State group. The government prefers to defuse communal tensions or clashes between Muslims and Copts by holding "conciliation meetings" rather than applying the law, critics say.

Egypt Church Attack Prompts Fears of Militant Escalation

Associated Press/December 17/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/17/afp-egypt-church-bombing-raises-calls-to-uproot-bigotryap-egypt-church-attack-prompts-fears-of-militant-escalation/
When a suicide bomber blew himself up in a Cairo church a week ago, it marked a bloody escalation by Egypt's jihadi militants, raising fears that an insurgency which for years largely focused on fighting in the Sinai and killing policemen may now turn to unleash attacks on civilians in the country's capital. A stepped up campaign by militants linked to the Islamic State group would be a heavy blow to a country trying to rebuild a wrecked economy and revive a vital tourism industry. The prospect is already spreading terror among Egypt's Christians, who could be a main target. In fact, the militants may use Christians in an attempt to enflame sectarian divisions in Muslim-majority Egypt, following the strategy of the Islamic State group in Syria and Iraq. By targeting the minority community, the group may be betting it can sow chaos and undermine the government of President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi while avoiding indiscriminate bombings that kill fellow Muslims and bring an even more furious public backlash.
"They are framing justification for sectarian violence in Egypt in the same way they do it in Syria and Iraq," said Mokhtar Awad, research fellow in the Program on Extremism at George Washington University.
A storm of attacks on civilians would be a frightening change for Egypt. Despite continued political unrest since 2011, Cairo and Egypt's other cities along the Nile Valley have largely been spared such mass mayhem, even as Iraq, Syria and neighboring Libya have collapsed into chaos.
Extremists linked to the Islamic State group have been waging an insurgency in the Sinai Peninsula in brutal fighting with soldiers and security forces. In Cairo, they have carried out small-scale attacks on policemen and soldiers, as well as assassinations of officials, but rarely mass bombings. In the past two years, security agencies succeeded in breaking up multiple militant cells outside of Sinai, aiming to keep the insurgency bottled up in the peninsula. Northern Sinai is a hotbed of militancy with plentiful weaponry. Last year, the militants are believed to have smuggled a bomb on to a Russian jet leaving the Sinai resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, downing it in an attack that has devastated tourism there.
But weapons and explosives are easily found across Egypt and can be smuggled in through the porous western border with Libya, a failed state where militias hold sway, said author and Sinai expert Mohannad Sabry.
"It's a sprawling hub for explosives like TNT, just take a look at all the improvised explosive devices going off in Sinai and that the government claims it has seized — we are talking tons," he said. El-Sissi has fashioned himself as the leader of the fight against Islamic militancy in the region, portraying his crackdown on Egypt's previously ruling Muslim Brotherhood as part of that wider battle. The new attack could be a move by militants to shake confidence in him at a sensitive time, after introducing painful economic reforms.
Last Sunday's suicide bomber hit a church linked to the main cathedral of Egypt's Coptic Christian Church, ripping through a crowd of mainly women worshippers, killing at least 26 and wounding dozens more. It was the deadliest such attack on Christians in years, recalling a 2011 suicide bombing at an Alexandria church that killed more than 20.
The government said Sunday's bomber was a former supporter of the Brotherhood who joined militants. Later, the Islamic State group claimed responsibility.
Egyptian officials, however, have kept their focus on the Brotherhood, the Islamist political movement whose leader, Mohamed Morsi, was ousted from the presidency by the military in 2013. On Monday, the Interior Ministry said exiled Brotherhood leaders provided "financial and logistical support" for the church bombing. Spokesmen for the Interior Ministry, responsible for police, as well as the Foreign Ministry, did not respond to requests for comment on whether they believed the bombing signaled the start of a wider campaign.
But a recent uptick in attacks has shown how violence has evolved the past two years. New groups such as one known as Hasm have emerged, launching high-level assassination attempts and attacks on security forces in mainland Egypt, including one that killed six policemen outside Cairo last week. The militants could unleash a wider, indiscriminate campaign of violence, including against tourist sites — though tourism already is low. But they run risks in broad mass attacks. Egypt is more homogenous than Iraq and Syria, with virtually no Shiites. An Islamic militant campaign in the 1990s against the population as a whole produced mass resentment rather than turning the people against their leaders, and IS has been cautious of repeating that.
More likely, they could be trying to push the security agencies into mass arrests or abuses that could stoke resentment and further radicalize some.
In the aftermath of the bombings and at the ensuing funerals, many Christians shouted angry anti-government slogans, echoing a long-standing charge that the government's security state is neglecting the most vulnerable segment of the population — theirs. El-Sissi himself has denied the church bombing was due to a lapse in security. "In the present context, any attack on Egypt's Christians is bound to both embarrass the government and its pretense to restoring law and order and erode popular support for the el-Sisi regime," wrote Michael Hanna, a senior fellow at the U.S.-based Century Foundation. "But more importantly, those effects can be achieved while not risking broad-based backlash, with Egypt's ingrained sectarianism insuring that outrage remains real but limited."
 
Iran sermon: Muslims defeated ‘infidels’ in Aleppo
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Saturday, 17 December 2016/Tehran Friday prayers cleric, Ayatollah Mohammad Emami Kashani, claimed a military victory in Aleppo, applauding what he commended as “Aleppo triumph” as a victory of the “Muslims over the Infidels”, according to various Iranian state run controlled media outlets. According to “al-Alam” news channel website, Kashani affirmed that Aleppo was “liberated” and not “fallen” and that the Muslims were victorious over the infidels, as an innuendo to the Syrian opposition, who rebelled against Bashar al Assad’s authoritarian regime and consequently being forcibly evacuated from their homes as culmination of the siege, starvation and shelling. In addition, Kashani was quoted by the Iranian “al Hawza news agency” Saturday, saying that Aleppo’s accomplishment is “a victory achieved as a consequence of resoluteness, tenacity and determination.”Furthermore, the “terrorist” Qassim Soleimani, was seen strolling in some Aleppo neighborhoods and around its citadel sectarian militias as a "triumph of Muslims infidels.” In the new photos published by Iranian publications, Friday, Soleimani appeared walking next to a Syrian army officer, in the city that is being entirely enclosed by Lebanese, Iranian, Iraqi sectarian militias.

Iran threatens to restart nuclear activities

Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Saturday, 17 December 2016/Iran’s Vice President and head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, Ali Akbar Salehi, threatened to restart to nuclear activities ‘if necessary.’In an interview on Friday night with an Iranian television channel, Channel Two, Salehi brought up the possibility of new negotiations on the nuclear agreement as the US administration stated. He said that the new negotiations will prove to be a lesson on how to negotiate nuclear terms, and the need to be more accurate. “Today, each will explain the terms of the nuclear deal as he wants, and will say the deal has not been violated,” he added.Iran’s Foreign Minister, Mohammad Javed Zarif, sent a letter to the nuclear deal’s Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action calling for a meeting to discuss the United States’ recent call to extend sanctions on Iran. Zarif pointed out Iran’s full commitment to the deal’s obligations, since the signing of the agreement.

Iran summons British envoy in Syria tit for tat

AFP, Tehran Saturday, 17 December 2016/Iran summoned the top British diplomat in Tehran for the second time this month to complain about criticism of its actions in Syria, state television reported on Saturday. The move came after British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson called in the Russian and Iranian ambassadors in London on Thursday to express his “profound concern” over their countries’ role in the “suffering” of the people of Aleppo. “Following the ill-considered statements and positions of British officials concerning the role of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Syrian crisis, the British charge d’affaires was summoned to the ministry of foreign affairs to receive the protest,” a statement published by state broadcaster IRIB said. A charge d’affaires was summoned as ambassador Nicholas Hopton is currently out of the country. Iran has provided substantial military and financial support to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and played a key role in overwhelming rebel forces in Aleppo over the past month. Tensions between Tehran and London have mounted just three months after the two countries restored full diplomatic relations. It was only a week ago that Iran summoned Hopton to complain after Prime Minister Theresa May told Gulf allies that Britain would help “push back against Iran’s aggressive regional actions”. The two countries severed diplomatic relations in 2011 when protesters stormed the embassy in Tehran, angry over Britain’s role in sanctions imposed over Iran’s nuclear programme.
They restored relations following a nuclear deal between Iran and major powers last year.

Arab League Condemns the Brutal Killings in Aleppo
Saturday, 17 December 2016/NCRI - The Council of Arab League in the final statement of its meeting in Cairo on Thursday December 15 strongly condemned the “brutal” military operation of Assad regime and its allies in Aleppo. This emergency meeting was held at the level of permanent representatives in Cairo, the Egyptian capital, to review the situation in Syria, especially in Aleppo, during which military operations and killing of civilians in Aleppo by Assad regime and its supporters were condemned. The Arab League statement urged the international community to exert pressure on the Assad regime to allow entry of humanitarian aid to the besieged areas in Aleppo. Another part of the statement states that the League will meet regularly to keep track of the developments in Syria, especially in Aleppo and for adopting necessary measures. The Arab League emergency meeting on Thursday was held at the request of Qatar.

David Cameron: Britain is suffering from Iran regime’s terrorism
Saturday, 17 December 2016/NCRI - Speaking at the ‘Arab Strategy Forum’ in Dubai, former British Prime Minister David Cameron and former CIA Director and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta looked at the world’s political status in 2017 while expressing concerns about terrorism. On the Iranian regime, former British PM David Cameron said that “I understand that the Iranian regime’s policies have been the source of concern in the region and Britain is suffering so much from terrorism, including the one sponsored by the Iranian regime. We are not naive, we take matters seriously and we know that the nuclear deal is a difficult issue and that the deal has not been an ideal one.”Leon Panetta said that “terrorism is at the top of our concerns and the world has been suffering from this phenomenon since September 11, 2001. The second threat is from Iran.”“In addition to the nuclear deal with Iran, which needs to be implemented to prevent Iran from attaining nuclear weapons, the Iranian regime should also be told that they cannot support terrorists in the region.” Said Panetta. He added that Iranian regime should stop supporting Hezbollah and intervention in Syria and maintained that Iran cannot support instability in the region.

Iran: 11 Executions in Three Prisons
Saturday, 17 December 2016/The Iranian regime’s authorities sent 11 inmates to the gallows in the span of three days (December 12 to 15) in the prisons of Maragheh, Karaj and Bandar Abbas, all across Iran. In the morning of December 15 at least five prisoners in Karaj Central Prison (west of Tehran) and one in Bandar Abbas Central Prison (southern Iran) were hanged. The day before three Iranian Baluchis were hanged in Bandar Abbas Central Prison and another inmate was hanged in Ghezel Hesar Prison of Karaj after enduring 23 years behind bars. On December 12 an Iranian Kurd was hanged in Maragheh Prison (northwest Iran). In the meantime, Mohammad Javad Larijani, secretary of the Iranian regime’s so-called “High Council for Human Rights” has been recently making a lot of noise over the necessity of decreasing the number of executions in Iran, all to deceive the international community. “The foundations of jurisprudence says those charged for drug crimes are considered corrupt individuals and their sentence is death… the Guardian Council has rejected the parliament’s recent bill to cancel executions for those convicted of drug crimes, and this ruling went to the Expediency Council, where this subject was further confirmed… more than 90% of our executions are related to drug offenses.” (State-run Mizan news agency – December 11, 2016)
These remarks are made at a time when regime officials have in the past few weeks alone launched a widespread propaganda campaign on decreasing death sentences, all aimed at influencing a United Nations General Assembly resolution on human rights violations in Iran. This includes Pour-Mohammadi, the justice minister of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani’s cabinet, and a member of the notorious ‘Death Commission’ during the summer 1988 massacre. “The number and the reason for executions must be reviewed,” he said. (State-run ILNA news agency – October 29, 2016)
“We have been witnessing a large number of executions related to drug charges under existing laws. We are involved in efforts to alter this law and 80% of the executions will be cancelled if we succeed in passing this law in parliament. This can be important news,” Javad Larijani had said prior to this.
Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/December 16, 2016

Iran Regime Is Explicitly Formulating the Sectarianism Plan in Syria
Saturday, 17 December 2016/NCRI - The member of the National Coalition for Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces: The Iranian regime intends to occupy Kaaba by its sectarianism plan. Al-Arabiya television had an interview with the member of the National Coalition for Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces, Osama Taljo.Al-Arabiya: what are your view and concern regarding the residents of East of Aleppo who are being relocated?
Osama:
I hope that the process of relocation will be carried out successfully. In fact, this process began with crime and we fear that the plan is associated with other crimes as well since the Iranian officials were forced to accept this agreement so they are unwilling to implement it. Consequently, they are likely to do anything.
First, international observers must be present during the relocation process, because we do not trust any party other than international partners.
Second, the number of those who are being relocated is scarce. This process would take a month to be completed. Due to this slow process, the residents will remain without enough food, medicine, and water. They do not have necessary resources to live in this one month.
Therefore, we initially call for airlifting the humanitarian aids to our people until the process of relocation takes place. Second, the international observers should be present during the relocation process in order to ensure the safety and security of citizens.
Third, according to the ceasefire agreement, the families who want to stay in the town shall be under the international protection so that they will be safe from the militants that are currently in Aleppo. If the United Nations had delivered humanitarian aids to Aleppo, we would not have been at this point. This applies to all besieged areas as well. If the United Nations had carried out its duty, we would not have witnessed the forced immigrations and displacements. That is why the United Nations is involved in these crimes.
Al-Arabiya: the issue is about the future of Aleppo. Mr. Staffan de Mistura warns against the repetition of scenario in Idlib? What is your opinion?
Osama: we are now talking about the people of Aleppo. If the international community does not react to the crisis in Syria, in fact, the current incidents and calamities are also terrible crimes. There are 250 thousand people in Aleppo and 3 million in Idlib. Where do all these people go? Is Europe capable of receiving 3 million people? Is Turkey able to provide security for this number of people? Therefore, it is difficult to understand how the international community deals with the crisis in Syria. The international community usually waits for an incident to occur and then it deals with it. They must consider taking actions against the crisis in Idlib and Ghouta as they are targeted by the enemies.
Nevertheless, the forced immigrations, changing the population texture and the sectarianism are the plans of the Iranian regime. The Iranian militants occupied a neighborhood known as Hanano a few days ago and they have established religious centers there.
Therefore, Iran is explicitly formulating the sectarianism plan. They plan to reach the Kaaba. They targeted Mecca with missiles a few weeks ago. I am wondering why the world does not stand against this barbaric regime? The Arabic world must know that they are threatened by the Iranian regime as long as these barbarians are in power.

PLO warns peace prospects ‘dead’ if US embassy moves to Jerusalem
Reuters, Jerusalem/Washington Saturday, 17 December 2016
A senior Palestinian official warned on Friday that implementation of Donald Trump’s pledge to relocate the US embassy to Jerusalem would destroy any prospects for peace with Israel, even as a spokesman for the US president-elect said he remained committed to the move.
Saeb Erekat, secretary-general of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, issued the grim prediction just a day after Trump announced his decision to nominate as ambassador to Israel David Friedman, a pro-Israel hardliner who supports continued building of Jewish settlements and shifting the embassy from Tel Aviv.
Speaking to foreign journalists, Erekat said Jerusalem was a final-status issue to be negotiated between Israel and the Palestinians, who also want it as the capital of a future independent state.
Successive US administrations have avoided formally recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. If Trump makes good on his campaign promise, it would up-end decades of US policy, enrage the Muslim world and draw international condemnation.
Jerusalem is home to sites sacred to Jews, Muslims and Christians.
“No one should take any decisions which may preempt or prejudge (negotiations) because this will be the destruction of the peace process as a whole,” Erekat said, according to a transcript provided by an aide. The last U.S.-backed talks on statehood collapsed in 2014.
He further warned of dire consequences if Israel annexes settlements built on occupied land. Friedman, a bankruptcy lawyer and close friend of Trump who has no diplomatic experience, has advocated the idea of Israel annexing the West Bank, as it did with Arab East Jerusalem following its capture in the 1967 Middle East war in a move not recognized internationally.
Erekat said he would like to look Trump and Friedman in the eye and tell them “if you were to take these steps of moving the embassy and annexing settlements in the West Bank, you are sending this region to more chaos, lawlessness and extremism.”
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has had a fractious relationship with President Barack Obama, was satisfied with Friedman’s appointment, according to the Israeli website Ynet, and several members of his right-wing government welcomed the choice.
Liberal Jewish-American groups have raised objections over positions he has stated in writings and press interviews, which they see as a rejection of a two-state solution, a longtime bedrock of U.S. Middle East policy, and alignment with Israel’s far right.
Trump spokesman Jason Miller said the president-elect “remains firmly committed” to relocating the embassy but that it was “premature” to present a timetable for such a move.
US-based analysts said that while Friedman’s appointment could signal a break with longstanding US policy as well as Obama’s sometimes tough approach to ally Israel, US ambassadors typically do not drive Middle East policy and it was still unclear how far Trump would be prepared to go.
Friedman, who must be confirmed by the US Senate, declined to answer questions when contracted by Reuters. “I’ll do that at some point, but I’m not providing any comments just yet,” he said.
In Thursday’s announcement, Friedman said he looked forward to doing the job “from the US embassy in Israel’s eternal capital, Jerusalem.”
“Appointing David Friedman ... is a positive declaration of intent,” Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked tweeted. “David is a true friend of Israel.”
Friedman has also called liberal Jewish Americans supporting a two-state solution “worse than kapos,” a reference to Jewish prisoners in World War Two concentration camps assigned by Nazi guards to supervise fellow inmates.
J Street, a liberal pro-Israel group, told supporters Friedman’s appointment was “unacceptable” and it would fight to persuade US senators not to confirm his nomination.

Hamas blames Israel for killing of drone expert in Tunisia

Reuters, Gaza Saturday, 17 December 2016/The Palestinian Hamas group in Gaza blamed Israel on Saturday for the killing in Tunisia this week of a Tunisian national it described as one of its drone experts, and threatened retaliation. Hamas's armed wing, the Qassam Brigades, said Mohammed Zawari, who was gunned down near the city of Sfax on Thursday, had been a member of the group for 10 years and had been supervising its drone program.
Hamas, which rules the Gaza Strip, did not offer any evidence to support its accusation. A spokesman for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. “Qassam Brigades mourns the martyr of Palestine, martyr of the Arab and Muslim nation, the Qassam leader, engineer and pilot Mohammad Zawari, who was assassinated by Zionist treacherous hands on Thursday in Sfax,” a statement posted on the group's website said.
“The enemy must know the blood of the leader Zawari will not go in vain,” the statement said.The Tunisian interior ministry said Zawari was killed in his car by multiple gunshots in front of his house in El Ain, near Sfax, on Thursday. Four rental cars were used in the killing and two handguns and silencers were seized, the ministry said. Television footage aired on local media showed a black Volkswagen with its windows apparently shot out. A judicial spokesman from Sfax, Mourad Tourki, told Tunisian radio Shems FM eight Tunisian nationals had been arrested in connection with the killing. One of the suspects is a Tunisian journalist based in Hungary, arrested along with a cameraman. Two other suspects, one of them a Belgian of Moroccan origin, are still at large, Tourki said. Authorities have not commented on who is suspected of being behind the killing.
Local media said Zawari had returned to Tunisia in 2011 after spending two decades abroad, including in Syria. They gave his age as 49 and said he was a technical director in a private engineering firm and a model aircraft expert.

S. Korea Protests Switch Focus to Impeachment Court
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/December 17/16/TTens of thousands of protestors turned out in Seoul for the eighth straight week Saturday, pushing for the swift and permanent removal of impeached South Korean President Park Geun-Hye. Unlike previous weeks, the demonstrators didn't have the streets of the capital all to themselves, with a sizeable rally by Park loyalists seeking to buttress support for the beleaguered president. The main anti-Park protest began with a gathering in central Seoul, with organisers putting the turnout at around 300,000.It then split into three columns, marching on the presidential Blue House, the office of the prime minister and on the Constitutional Court whose nine justices are considering the validity of the impeachment bill passed by the national assembly more than a week ago. The court has 180 days to make a ruling, but the protesters are pressing for a swift judgement. Although Park has been stripped of her substantial executive powers, she is allowed to retain the title of president and continue to live in the Blue House while the court deliberates. The protesters are adamant that she should resign immediately and face criminal prosecution.
Park still has her supporters, many of them elderly voters who remain steadfast admirers of her father, the late military dictator Park Chung-Hee -- credited as the architect of the South's economic transformation but vilified as an authoritarian rights abuser.
- Flags and roses -Police said around 30,000 Park loyalists attended their own rally near the court earlier in the day to demand the impeachment bill be thrown out. Waving national flags and clutching red roses they carried banners denouncing the anti-Park protests as a leftist conspiracy. On Friday, Park's legal team formally submitted a 24-page rebuttal of the impeachment charges to the court, arguing that they had no legal basis. "We can't accept that there was any violation of the constitution by the president... the impeachment motion should be rejected," one of her lawyers, Lee Joong-Hwan, told reporters. Park was impeached on numerous counts of constitutional and criminal violations ranging from a failure to protect people's lives to bribery and abuse of power. Most of the charges stemmed from an investigation into a scandal involving the president's long-time friend, Choi Soon-Sil, who is currently awaiting trial for fraud and embezzlement. Prosecutors named Park a suspect in the case -- a first for a sitting president -- saying she colluded in Choi's efforts to strong-arm donations from large companies worth tens of millions of dollars.
- Public outrage -The impeachment process was ignited and fuelled by public outrage at Park's behaviour, with the weekly mass demonstrations demanding that politicians take a proactive role in removing her from the presidential Blue House. The National Assembly has played its part, but the country now faces a lengthy period of uncertainty at a time of slowing economic growth and elevated military tensions with nuclear-armed North Korea. The man charged with steering the country through these dangerous waters is a former prosecutor who has never held elected office. As Park's prime minister, Hwang Kyo-Ahn became the temporary guardian of her sweeping executive powers the moment after she was impeached. The protesters have called on him to resign as well, arguing that he is too tainted by his association with the president to wield her authority. The mass rallies, some of which drew crowds of more than one million people, have been passionate but good-natured so far, with no clashes despite a heavy police presence.

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on on December 17-18/16
Christian Worship Is ‘Worse than Murder and Bloodshed’
Raymond Ibrahim/Coptic Solidarity/December 17/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/17/raymond-ibrahimcoptic-solidarity-christian-worship-is-worse-than-murder-and-bloodshed/
For an idea on why Egypt’s Coptic Christians and their churches are constantly under attack—most recently last Sunday, when a church was bombed, killing at least 25 Christians—one need merely listen to the words and teachings of some of the nation’s Muslim preachers.
Take Dr. Ahmed al-Naqib, for instance. He has studied at the best Islamic madrassas, including Al Azhar, authored numerous books on doctrine, received awards and decorations for his academic achievements, and regularly appears on television. In one video he appears discussing an earlier Muslim mob attack on a church in Egypt, which the media and government always denounce as fitna, an Arabic word that means temptation or discord and which Islam commands Muslims to oppose.
Citing revered Islamic texts including the Koran, Dr. Naqib explained that the open display of shirk—the greatest sin in Islam, associating someone else with God, which the Koran accuses Christians of doing via the Trinity—“is the worst form of fitna, worse than murder and bloodshed.”
 In other words, and as he went on to make perfectly clear in the remainder of the video, fitna (or discord) is not when Muslims attack Christian churches—far from it—but rather when Christians are allowed to flaunt their shirk (or blasphemies) in churches near Muslims. Fighting that—even to the point of “murder and bloodshed”—is preferable.
 Then there’s Dr. Yasser Burhami, the face of Egypt’s Salafi movement, who is as well credentialed and prolific as Naqib: he’s on record saying that, although a Muslim man is permitted to marry Christian or Jewish women, he must make sure he still hates them in his heart—and always shows them that he hates them—because they are infidels; otherwise he risks losing his Islam.
 As for churches, Burhami once issued a fatwa forbidding Muslim taxi and bus drivers from transporting Christian priests to their churches, which he depicted as “more forbidden than taking someone to a liquor bar.”
 But it’s not just “radical” or Salafi sheikhs who make such hateful pronouncements. Even so-called “moderate” Islamic institutions, such as Al Azhar’s Dar al-Ifta, issued a fatwa in August 2009 likening the building of a church to “a nightclub, a gambling casino, or building a barn for rearing pigs, cats or dogs.”
 The analogy is not original to the Salafis or Dar al-Ifta, but rather traces back to some of Islam’s most revered doctrinaires, including Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim. They taught that “building churches is worse than building bars and brothels, for those [churches] symbolize infidelity, whereas these [bars and brothels] represent immorality.”
 One can go on and on with examples of Muslim clerics and institutions inciting—with absolute impunity—against Christians and their churches in Egypt. Many secular and/or moderate Egyptians agree. Back in 2014, for instance, Muslim Brotherhood supporters mauled and murdered a woman named Mary after her cross identified her as a Christian. Soon thereafter, an Egyptian op-ed titled “Find the True Killer of Mary” argued that:
 Those who killed the young and vulnerable Mary Sameh George, for hanging a cross in her car, are not criminals, but rather wretches who follow those who legalized for them murder, lynching, dismemberment, and the stripping bare of young Christian girls—without ever saying [the word] “kill.” [Islamic cleric] Yassir Burhami and his colleagues who announce their hate for Christians throughout satellite channels and in mosques—claiming that hatred of Christians is synonymous with love for God—they are the true killers who need to be tried and prosecuted.
 One can say the same thing about the suicide-bombing of St. Peter’s cathedral.
 In short, until such time comes that the Egyptian government removes the “radical” sheikhs and their teachings from the mosques, schools, television stations and all other positions of influence, Muslims will continue to be radicalized, churches will continue to be bombed, and Christians will continue to be killed. 

Islamism in Europe
Khadija Khan/Gatestone Institute/December 17/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/17/khadija-khangatestone-institute-islamism-in-europe/
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9566/islamism-europe
Ironically, those who dare to speak out against extremists either face severe consequences, such as death threats, or are called anti-Muslim bigots. This kind of response often discourages progressive voices from speaking out, and understates the progress of counter-extremism even within the Muslim community. Opposition voices still might be there -- more than ever. They just go underground.
Since the unprecedented terror attacks in France, Belgium and Germany, citizens across the Europe have been living in constant fear. They seem to be sick and tired of the Muslim extremists; children might be in danger on their way to school, and shopping takes place under the protection of soldiers.
With Brexit, the election of Donald Trump, and Italy's referendum, there seems to be a snowball effect. The growing influence of Alternative for Germany (AfD), the National Front in France, the Party for Freedom in the Netherlands, the Freedom Party Austria and the Five Star Movement in Italy all appear to be byproducts of the same rhetoric.
The dull reaction of a vast number of European Muslims to the rising wave of terror and violence has also contributed to this shift. Increasing numbers of native-born Europeans seem angry and distrustful of their fellow Muslim citizens, especially when everyone else has come out loud and clear in denouncing terrorist crimes.
German authorities and those across Europe seem finally to be strengthening their campaign against the militant far-right, including Muslim extremists, during the past few weeks.
This awakening, however, seems to be coming after a major price that Europe had to pay in terms of death and chaos unleashed by terrorists in Germany, Belgium, France, Denmark, and so on.
Governments across the Europe seem to be switching into panic mode to prevent the rise of European radicalism through the rise of the far-right, racism and nationalism throughout the entire continent.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel sounds as if she is backing down a bit from championing the influx of migrants and her slogan of "We can do it!" in developing a multicultural society. She not only vowed to Germans in an address last week that the migrant crisis must never be repeated; she also called for an all-out ban on the full-face veil covering in Germany.
Following Merkel's lead, Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière also proposed a partial ban on veils, and pronounced them contrary to assimilation.
The dramatic shift in policy might be a consequence of the planned and perpetrated acts of terrorism by extremist Muslims, many of whom are the migrants on whom Merkel placed her hopes. It might also be the result of the resultant rise of European neo-Nazis. More likely, it would appear to come from an eye to re-election.
Merkel was declared by many the only defender of the free world after the election of Donald Trump as U.S. president. Perhaps, after the surprising victory of Donald Trump, she realized that it might be a good idea finally to address the grievances of her fellow countrymen.
The brutal rape and murder of a 19-year-old German woman, Maria Ladenburger, apparently by Afghan migrant who claims to be 17 years old, seems to have been the last nail in the coffin of Merkel's open-door migrant policy, which she had promised to not to let go even after extreme opposition from within her own party's leadership.
Ladenburger had been a medical student volunteering at a migrant housing facility. Her murderer had reportedly seen her in the shelter. The incident set off shockwaves not only in the Germany but also across Europe, especially after promises by Germany's interior ministry to deport as many Afghan citizens as possible after failing to confirm any credible claims for asylum.
In the meanwhile, authorities in Berlin last weekend announced the arrest of an Afghan citizen who was actively involved in terrorist attacks in Afghanistan, while living part-time in Germany.
German police a few weeks back also launched an operation against a Salafist group in the country, whose members were brainwashing Muslim youths, mostly in Germany, to get jihadist training and join the Islamic State's battle against the world in Syria and Iraq.
The Salafist organization had registered itself as a social work entity under the cover of distributing the Quran in markets and public places, and claiming to be bridging the gap between the West and Islam.
One suspect was arrested in Aschaffenburg and another was detained in Mannheim, on the allegation of plotting an Islamically motivated attack on a public place.
This recent shift in strategy is also a lesson that the West has learnt a bit too late, despite having experienced similar assaults not that long ago by the Nazis, Mussolini, Lenin, Stalin as well as terror organizations such as Baader Meinhof, al-Shebaab, ETA, the Red Brigades, Hamas, Al Qaeda, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah, to name just a few.
Since the unprecedented terror attacks in France, Belgium and Germany, citizens across the Europe have been living in constant fear. They seem to be sick and tired of the Muslim extremists; children might be in danger on their way to school, and shopping takes place under the protection of soldiers.
Since the unprecedented terror attacks in France, Belgium and Germany, citizens have been living in constant fear. In France, soldiers are deployed in the streets. Pictured: A soldier on guard at the Eiffel Tower in Paris. (Image source: Kirsteen/Flickr)
With Brexit, the election of Donald Trump, and Italy's referendum, there seems to be a snowball effect. The growing influence of Alternative for Germany (AfD), the National Front in France, the Party for Freedom in the Netherlands, the Freedom Party Austria and the Five Star Movement in Italy all appear to be byproducts of the same rhetoric.
The dull reaction of a vast number of European Muslims to the rising wave of terror and violence has also contributed to this shift. Increasing numbers of native-born Europeans seem angry and distrustful of their fellow Muslim citizens, especially when everyone else has come out loud and clear in denouncing terrorist crimes.
Ironically, those who dare to speak out against extremists either face severe consequences, such as death threats, or are called anti-Muslim bigots. This kind of response often discourages progressive voices from speaking out, and understates the progress of counter-extremism even within the Muslim community. Opposition voices still might be there -- more than ever. They just go underground.
The majority of Muslims in the West seem oblivious to the fact that they would be the greatest victims of empowered lunatic extremists such as ISIS or neo-Nazis, because both would try to punish progressive Muslims either for remaining silent about terrorist attacks or for not joining the bandwagon for ISIS.
Progressive Muslims should realize that their voices matter at this sensitive time if they do not want to end up being losers between those two extremes.
The failed political policies of the global powers have started to translate into a dreadful future for humanity where a clone of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Anders Breivik or a Neville Chamberlain clone might be calling the shots, and the civilized world would become a hell for those caught in the middle, the rest of us.
**Khadija Khan is a Pakistan-based journalist and commentator.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
 
After the Fall of Aleppo
Jonathan Spyer/Jerusalem Post/December 17/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/12/17/jonathan-spyerjerusalem-post-after-the-fall-of-aleppo/
The battle for Aleppo is over. The Assad regime and its Russian, Iranian and Shia paramilitary allies have achieved victory.
The process of evacuation of civilians and rebels is yet to be completed. Syrian oppositionists are alleging that pro-regime militias are committing atrocities in the conquered areas. The UN accused pro-regime forces of summarily executing 82 civilians. But while important, these details cannot obscure the main point. Rebel-controlled eastern Aleppo, which held for four years, has now ceased to exist.
What does this mean for Syria and the further direction of the Syrian war?
First and most obviously, there is no longer any prospect of the Assad regime being removed by force. In effect, any such possibility ended on September 30, 2015, with the entry of Russian airpower into the war. The rebellion had and has nothing in its arsenal capable of challenging the might of a world class air force. From the moment of the Russian entry, Assad’s survival was assured. With the destruction of rebel eastern Aleppo, the regime’s ascendancy is sealed.
Assad has now gained control over all of the major cities of Syria’s center. The regime still controls only around a third of the entire territory of the country. But this includes a majority of the population, the entirety of the coast, and the capital, Damascus.
Secondly, the fall of Aleppo does not mean the immediate end of the Syrian rebellion. With Aleppo city gone, the rebellion remains in control of Idleb province in the northwest, parts of Dera’a and Quneitra provinces in the south west, parts of rural Aleppo, and isolated pockets elsewhere.
The regime side is now likely to turn its attentions to Idleb. One of the original heartlands of the revolt, Idleb Province is today controlled by two powerful Salafi jihadi militias – Ahrar al-Sham and Jabhat Fateh al-Sham.
The regime is set to present its actions there as part of the war against al-Qaeda. These jihadi organizations also dominate the rebel controlled area in the area south of Aleppo city.
But while there will be few in the west who will leap to the defense of these organizations, Ahrar al Sham has a close relationship with Turkey. This support looks set to continue.
In the North Aleppo countryside, meanwhile, the rebels operate in direct cooperation with the Turkish army, and non-jihadi groups have a more significant presence.
Ongoing Turkish support for and cooperation with the rebels in these areas complicates the picture for the regime and the Russians, and is likely to prevent the complete eclipse of the rebellion in the immediate future.
In the south of the country, the rebellion is dominated by non-jihadi groups and supported by Jordan and the west. In that area, however, Amman has in recent months reduced support for the rebels, and begun coordination with Russia. The rebels are instructed to operate against Islamic State forces only.
From an Israeli point of view, the prospect of a regime return to the border is of deep concern. It may be assumed that Israel will be seeking to use its channels of communication with Russia to ensure that the Iranian/Hizballah hope of building a new confrontation line east of the Quneitra Crossing does not come to pass in the period of regime advancement now beginning.
It is worth noting that the regime’s advances in Aleppo were achieved largely with the help of non-Syrian fighters. A major question remark remains regarding the regime’s ability to re-conquer and permanently pacify the Sunni Arab-majority areas still held by the rebellion.
Thirdly, the separate war against Islamic State in eastern Syria is not immediately affected by the fall of Aleppo. IS’s shock reconquest of Palmyra from the regime, even as Assad’s forces pushed into eastern Aleppo, is testimony to the continued danger posed by the jihadis – as well as showcasing once again the regime’s shortages of available manpower.
Large swathes of eastern and northern Syria remain outside of regime control, held either by IS or by the US-supported, Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces.
The regime is likely now to propose itself as the right candidate for global support to defeat IS in Syria. At least for the immediate future, though, the war in the east is likely to remain largely outside of the regime’s purview.
Finally, much will depend on the stance taken by the new US Administration after January 20th. The current Administration’s Syria policy has been characterized mainly by flailing ineffectuality. Ambassador Samantha Power’s tones at the UN this week – asking Russian representatives if the suffering in Aleppo didn’t ‘creep them out’ – were a perfect coda to this.
The incoming Administration contains hawkish figures who are deeply suspicious in particular of the ambitions of Iran and its allies in the Middle East. Generals Mattis, Kelly and Flynn exemplify this trend. But President-elect Trump himself has spoken of the need to coordinate with Russia in the fight against IS (and Russia, of course, is allied with Iran and Assad in Syria). Incoming Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s close ties to Russia are a further notable factor in this regard.
If the Iran-sceptic element in the new Administration wins out, this may usher in a determined policy to contain the gains of the Iran-aligned Assad regime, and maintain support to anti-regime and anti-IS forces in Syria.
If, however, the desire to ‘co-ordinate’ with Russia against IS wins out, this raises the genuine possibility of pro-Iranian, pro-Russian forces taking the key role in the ongoing fight against IS and by so doing launching a real bid to reunite Syria under their own control.
If this latter scenario transpires, it isn’t immediately imminent, given the regime’s manpower problems and remaining priorities in its war against the rebels further west. But it will be a matter of concern for all regional elements, including Israel, who are watching closely the advances made by the Iranians and their allies in Iraq and in Syria in recent months.
So the fall of eastern Aleppo marks the end of any hopes of rebel victory in the Syrian civil war. But in regard to other processes under the way in the country – further regime advancement, the rebellion’s survival, the war against IS – the final word has not yet been said.

Does expelling religion from the public space lead to extremism?
Samar Fatany/Asharq Al Awsat/December 17/16
The Mediterranean Dialogue held in Rome between December 1-3 included a series of panel discussions and workshops which gathered experts, academics, government officials and businessmen to share their insights and provide solutions for a lasting peace for a region in turmoil.
One of the most interesting panels addressed the threat of religious intolerance in Europe. The panelists discussed counter-narratives to fight religious extremism. Olivier Roy, a French professor at the European University Institute in Florence, cautioned against rashly linking Islam with terrorism. He also argued that the current violence is simply politics and not a clash of civilizations.
Professor Roy refuted the prevalent perception that radicalization is the result of failed integration. He explained that many of the European extremists were well integrated and spoke French, English and German. They are very Western in their approach and hardly know anything about their Islamic tradition. He stated that they are more likely influenced by the violence in movies and video games. According to research studies these recruits do not belong to a Muslim community and most of them are not religious and many of them are petty criminals and drug addicts.
He goes on to say that Islamist radicalization can neither be attributed to current foreign policy nor to colonial crimes. These young radicals don’t know anything about the colonial wars in Algeria. They want a radical break from their parents’ generation and find in their version of Islam the best way to express, experience and live their rejection of society.
In Europe, the trend is to consider any religion as a potential problem. In France, the answer to radicalism is to marginalize religion more
The problem with Islam in Europe is the lack of a common narrative that connects all Muslims. There is a need for a European Muslim narrative. Muslims belong to different identities and European decision makers do not have any positive teachings on Islam. The identity search among young European Muslims has triggered the turmoil.
The French scholar believes that the way to counter the narrative of ISIS is by not depicting it as the biggest threat to Western civilization and not to allow radical Islam to have a monopoly on Islam. He argues that we should encourage the rise of normal Islam, not a moderate Islam. The concept of moderate Islam is totally misleading. We should let normal Islam emerge as a religion in the public sphere.
Marginalizing religion
In Europe, the trend is to consider any religion as a potential problem. In France, the answer to radicalism is to marginalize religion more and to expel it from the public space and that is a problem he says. He believes that if Europe expels religion from the public space, then it will give religion to the extremists and the radicals.
Professor Roy asserts that France does not have an Islamization of society. In polls, only 20 percent of Muslims in France are really practicing Islam. In fact, what is prevalent is the secularization of Muslims. But the more secularization you have, the more religion is visible because religion is not integrated into the dominant secular culture. Unfortunately, he says, religion in Europe now seems weird to people.
The French scholar concluded by highlighting the need to urgently take a multidisciplinary approach when tackling the phenomenon of Islamist radicalization. He believes that radicals are not reacting to a real situation or conflict. They are in a virtual war, he says, pointing out that ISIS almost never mentions real conflicts. Instead, it attracts radical youth who are not adjusted to any society. It is not the revenge of the Afghans or Iraqis against the Americans. It is not connected to real struggles. They live in an imaginary world.
Professor Roy believes that in Europe today the terrorism and refugee crises are linked, according to public opinion, with the young generation of Muslim youth who are making trouble. However, their problem is more related to disenfranchisement and petty delinquency than to Islam.
Appreciating European values
Mufti Nedžad Grabus of Slovenia talked about the situation of Muslims in his country and said that some people try to create problems for the Muslim community in Slovenia. However, he stressed the fact that the Muslim community in Slovenia are Europeans and appreciate their European values. They are moderate and do not have militants among them.
The Mufti argued that problems occur when people do not enjoy equal rights and when they are not allowed to satisfy their spiritual needs. He demonstrated how Muslims in Slovenia pushed for their right to construct their own mosques and to worship and live in harmony with the rest of the society.
The Slovenian Mufti believes that it is better for European governments to allow Muslim religious and cultural institutions to operate overtly and not be forced underground.
Both panelists presented the voices of wisdom and positive solutions to address the growing threat of terrorism and the radicalization of young Europeans. Their presentations provided a new perspective to the situation of Muslim immigrants in Europe. They refuted some of the misconceptions that linked Islam to extremist ideology and offered practical solutions that could effectively counter the terrorist propaganda that is creating the divide between the West and the Muslim world.
At a time when the region is going through a turbulent and violent cycle, the value of the Mediterranean Dialogue 2016 initiative organized by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Italian Institute for International Political Studies cannot be underestimated. The dialogue, which addressed regional challenges, led to the formation of new ideas and the rethinking of traditional approaches.

Here’s How Trump could Succeed
Philip Churm/Washington Post/December 17/16
On Fox News on Sunday, President-elect Donald Trump lamented that those seeking government permits sometimes “are waiting in line for 15 years,” sometimes only to get rejected in the end, and vowed to speed up the process. To succeed, he’ll need a new approach to governing. Every president since Jimmy Carter has vowed to cut unnecessary regulations, but the red-tape machine has defied all attempts at control.
Trump’s idea is to institute a “one-in, two-out” rule — that for every new regulation, two must be removed. Britain instituted a similar protocol in 2010 to cull unnecessary regulation and recently expanded it to “one in, three out.” This is part of a broader British effort to control regulatory creep, and it has achieved modest success. Imposing similar discipline on new U.S. regulations is long overdue. For the past 50 years, Washington’s approach has been like the Roach Motel — regulations check in, but they never check out. But incremental reform is not enough.
Red-tape reformers have failed because they assume the problem is a matter of degree — that there are just too many rules. Liberals stride into the red-tape jungle with pruning shears, and find themselves entangled in the internal logic of the rules. Conservatives get cheers for demanding deregulation, but when push comes to shove, voters don’t want to drink polluted water, eat spoiled food or entrust loved ones to the unsupervised care of strangers in day-care centers and nursing homes. That’s why the regulatory state grew, not shrank, in the 20 years of Reagan and two Bush presidencies.
What reformers have missed is that regulatory failure is not merely a matter of too much regulation but is caused by a flawed philosophy on how to regulate. Both sides assume that human responsibility should be replaced by what is called “clear law.” By striving to prescribe every possible good choice, and proscribe every possible evil, U.S. regulation became an obsessive exercise in micromanagement. That’s why rulebooks are often 1,000 pages, while the Constitution is 15. The evil to be exorcised by all these legal dictates is human authority. Only by lashing each other tightly with detailed law can liberal and conservative politicians be sure that the other side won’t do something bad.
But ordinary citizens in our free society are also lashed to these mindless dictates — complying with rules that often make no difference, filling out forms no one reads and stymied by bureaucrats whose response to every idiocy is always “The rule made me do it.” In the name of better freedom, detailed regulations have made everyone powerless.
The solution — the only solution — is to retool regulation to focus on results, not inputs. Find any good school, any good agency, and you will find people who take responsibility for getting the job done. Experts at the Federal Aviation Administration certify planes as “airworthy” based on their expert judgment, not compliance with detailed specs on, say, how many rivets per square foot. Teachers at good schools typically say that the principal encourages them to do what they think is best and not worry about complying with many forms and metrics.
The activating mechanism for every public choice must be human responsibility. What’s good is what works. Yes, it’s a good idea to review environmental impacts, but it’s idiotic to spend a decade creating 5,000-page tomes that double the cost of projects and cause environmental harm by prolonging polluting bottlenecks.
The opportunity here is to move from paralysis to practicality. Focusing on results, with clear lines of authority and accountability, is a win-win strategy: Regulation is more effective, and less costly, when regulators and citizens are not preoccupied with compliance. Australia replaced dense nursing home regulation with 31 general principles — for example, to provide “a home-like setting.” Within a short period, nursing homes across Australia markedly improved because, studies showed, the caregivers felt free to focus on what residents needed instead of trudging through the day with their noses in a rulebook.
Regulation by results would radically simplify law — in some areas, more like “one-in, 20-out.” Hundreds of federal safety specifications for factory equipment could be encompassed within one general principle: “Tools and equipment shall be reasonably suited for the use intended, in accordance with industry standards.” Is there room for disagreement? Yes, but only at the margins. Instead of wasting regulatory resources on foot faults that don’t matter, the safety agency could redeploy its resources to finding workplaces that are actually unsafe. Specificity would still be needed for, say, pollution discharge limits, but the litmus test should be whatever achieves the desired results.
Rebuilding the federal behemoth is an ambitious goal, fraught with perceived peril as well as opportunity. But do we have a choice? No one serious defends the inefficiencies in the current system. Americans are tired of being pushed around by headless bureaucracy. Half-measures by the past six presidents have all failed.
The upside here is transformational. Virtually every federal program is broken, with the only open question how much. Should Dodd-Frank compliance costs drive small banks into the arms of larger banks? Should safety laws prohibit children from normal play activities? All these stupidities can be cured, but only if people with responsibility are given the freedom to use common sense. Giving permits for infrastructure in two years, not 10, would add 1.5 million jobs and create a greener footprint.
The downside is low. Rigid bureaucracy prevents officials and citizens alike from adapting to rapid changes in global forces. Regulation by results doesn’t guarantee success, but it gives us the freedom to try.
**Philip Churm is a UK-based multi-media journalist and lecturer with knowledge of European, South Asian and Middle Eastern affairs. He specializes in news and analysis of British diversity issues.