LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

November 17/16

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletin16/english.november17.16.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
I do not have a demon; but I honour my Father, and you dishonour me. Yet I do not seek my own glory; there is one who seeks it and he is the judge
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 08/46-50/:"Which of you convicts me of sin? If I tell the truth, why do you not believe me? Whoever is from God hears the words of God. The reason you do not hear them is that you are not from God.’ The Jews answered him, ‘Are we not right in saying that you are a Samaritan and have a demon?’Jesus answered, ‘I do not have a demon; but I honour my Father, and you dishonour me. Yet I do not seek my own glory; there is one who seeks it and he is the judge.

Circumcision is a matter of the heart it is spiritual and not literal. Such a person receives praise not from others but from God
Letter to the Romans 02/17-29/:"But if you call yourself a Jew and rely on the law and boast of your relation to God and know his will and determine what is best because you are instructed in the law,and if you are sure that you are a guide to the blind, a light to those who are in darkness, having in the law the embodiment of knowledge and truth, you, then, that teach others, will you not teach yourself? While you preach against stealing, do you steal? You that forbid adultery, do you commit adultery? You that abhor idols, do you rob temples? You that boast in the law, do you dishonour God by breaking the law? For, as it is written, ‘The name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you.’ Circumcision indeed is of value if you obey the law; but if you break the law, your circumcision has become uncircumcision. So, if those who are uncircumcised keep the requirements of the law, will not their uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision? Then those who are physically uncircumcised but keep the law will condemn you that have the written code and circumcision but break the law. For a person is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is true circumcision something external and physical. Rather, a person is a Jew who is one inwardly, and real circumcision is a matter of the heart it is spiritual and not literal. Such a person receives praise not from others but from God.

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on November 16-17/16
Lebanon has significant role in region: Egypt FM/ The Daily Star/November 16, 2016
Hezbollah military parade in Qusayr raises eyebrows/ Joseph A. Kechichian/Gulf News/November 16, 2016
Can coalition of reformers snag Lebanese parliament seats/Author Scott Preston/Al Monitor/November 16/16
Former European lawmaker Struan Stevenson.The world cannot allow Iran's 1988 massacre to go unpunished/NCRI/Wednesday, 16 November
UN adopts 63rd resolution condemning human rights violations in Iran/ Wednesday, 16 November 2016
Trump: Europe’s wake-up call/Dr. Azeem Ibrahim/Al Arabiya/November 16/16
Israeli government trumps up the new US president/Yossi Mekelberg/Al Arabiya/November 16/16
A Sunni Karbala/Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/November 16/16
In our new Cold War, deterrence should come before detente/ David Ignatius/Washington Post/November 15/16
Turkey Targets Oldest Syriac Orthodox Monastery/by Robert Jones/Gatestone Institute/November 16/16
Senior Saudi Journalist Turki Al-Dakhil: Trump Will Be Good For Gulf States
MEMRI/November 16/16/
Palestinians: The Message Remains No and No/Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/November 16/16
Everyone Loves Israel -- Until They Don't/Robert Satloff/Mosaic/November 14, 2016
What's the Most Immediate National Security Issue Facing Trump/Mark Martin/CBN News/November 16/16

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on on November 16-17/16
Hariri Visits Aoun as 'Draft Cabinet Line-Up' Surfaces
Berri Optimistic as Parties Say Govt. May be Formed within '48 Hours'
Jumblat Rejects “Dwarfing” PSP Role in Next Government
Franco-Lebanese Mogul Says Gave Gadhafi Cash to Sarkozy Campaign in 2006-07
Geagea Mends Relations with Kataeb in Telephone Call with Gemayel
Report: Defense Ministry Allotted to President Share
Hizbullah Denies Qassem Said Party Has 'an Army'
Report: LF Acquires Deputy Prime Minister Post instead of Sovereign Portfolio
EU and Lebanon Adopt 'Partnership Priorities' for Next Four Years
Franjieh Requests Key Portfolio in Cabinet Line-Up
Egypt FM Meets Lebanon Leaders, Hands Aoun, Hariri Letters from al-Sisi
Aoun: My mission is to unite Lebanese from all confessions
Sami Gemayel tackles cabinet formation updates with Ghattas Khoury, Nader Hariri
Change and Reform bloc holds regular meeting tomorrow in Rabieh
Qadisha Valley Committee visits Rahi, Strida Geagea confirms LF's attachment to cabinet share
Shukri after meeting Geagea: For coalition government to preserve state institutions
Lebanon has significant role in region: Egypt FM
Hezbollah military parade in Qusayr raises eyebrows
Can coalition of reformers snag Lebanese parliament seats?

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on on November 16-17/16
Canada welcomes the adoption of the UN General Assembly resolution on the situation of human rights in Iran
US House OKs bills to renew Iran sanctions
Syrian, Russian jets pound rebel areas
Syria Regime Bombs Rebels as Aleppo Food Aid Runs Out
Iraqi Paramilitaries Say Entered IS-Held Airport West of Mosul
'Our Depots are Empty': Food Aid Runs Out in Syria's Aleppo
Foreign Medics Treat Wounded Children in Iraq's Mosul
Israel Gives Initial Backing to Bill to Legalize Settler Homes
Israeli Bid to Turn Down Mosque Prayer Calls Blocked
12 Haftar Soldiers Killed in Libya's Benghazi
Egypt Policeman Sentenced to Life for Killing Vendor
Russia Withdraws Signature from ICC Founding Statute
Egypt FM Meets Lebanon Leaders, Hands Aoun, Hariri Letters from al-Sisi
Iranian Regime's Former Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces: Missile Launch Impossible Without Khamenei's Approval
Maryam Rajavi meets Gérard Deprez MEP
Islamic Republic of Iran: Sharia court sentences Christians to 80 lashes for drinking communion wine

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on November 16-17/16
Canada Muslim teen wrote on Twitter: “Use a bomb, a knife, a gun or car hashtag ISIS”
Islamic Republic of Iran: Sharia court sentences Christians to 80 lashes for drinking communion wine
Minnesota: Self-described “servant of Allah” pleads guilty, says “Yes, I am a terrorist”
Germany: Arabic translator says Muslim migrants “want Germany to be Islamised. They despise our country and our values.”
UK police force promotes “Islamophobia Awareness Month” with Islamic State hand signal
Media claims “spike” in hate crimes against Muslims, FBI shows anti-Jewish attacks over twice more common
Saudi Arabia warns Trump on blocking oil imports
Huffington Post’s Christopher Mathias uses SPLC hit list of foes of jihad terror to smear Bannon
Fatah leader: Trump “revealed his true face, Zionist and racist”
What Trump Must Do on Islamic Threat — on The Glazov Gang
Germany bans Islamic organization, raids mosques, finds machetes, tasers, knives and knuckle dusters

Links From Christian Today Site for on November 16-17/16
Teen Girls Defend Christian Faith From Muslim Attack - End Up In Jail For 'Inciting Religious Violence'.
Christian Governor Of Jakarta To Face Trial After Allegedly Insulting Islam
Heil Trump' And 'Whites Only' Among Nazi-Style Slogans Appearing On US Churches
South Sudan Needs Your Prayers, Say Christian Leaders As Country Moves Closer To Civil War
Pope Francis Faces Unprecedented Challenge From Conservative Cardinals Over Divorce
Log In To Eternal Life: The Anglo-Saxon Christians Who Buried Their Dead In Tree Trunks
Gafcon Gay Clergy List Prompts Hundreds To Sign 'Proud List Of Violators'
Hundreds Of Mosques Raided As Germany Bans Hardline Islamist Group
Pope Francis' Call Is Answered: Cuba Pardons 787 Prisoners

Latest Lebanese Related News published on November 16-17/16
Hariri Visits Aoun as 'Draft Cabinet Line-Up' Surfaces
 Naharnet/November 16/16/Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri held talks Wednesday evening at the Baabda Palace with President Michel Aoun.
 "Some details are being mulled regarding the cabinet line-up and the atmosphere is positive," said Hariri after the meeting. Asked whether the cabinet line-up will be announced soon, the PM-designate said "God willing." Several political parties had announced earlier in the day that the government might be formed “within 48 or 72 hours” after resolving the remaining obstacles. MTV said Hariri submitted to Aoun a draft line-up that might be announced very soon.
 The following is the draft line-up as reported by MTV:
 - Shiites: Ali Hassan Khalil (Finance, AMAL Movement), Yassine Jaber (Public Works or Economy, AMAL), Ali Abdullah (Public Works or Economy, AMAL), Ali Fayyad (Industry or Agriculture, Hizbullah) and a fifth minister who would be loyal to the president.
 - Maronites: Jebran Bassil (Foreign Affairs, Free Patriotic Movement), Bassam Yammine (Energy, Marada Movement), Ghattas Khoury (Culture, Mustaqbal Movement), Salim al-Sayegh (Education, Kataeb Party) and Pierre Raffoul (Labor, FPM).
 - Sunnis: Saad Hariri (PM), Jamal al-Jarrah (Telecommunications, Mustaqbal), Nouhad al-Mashnouq (Interior, Mustaqbal), Mohammed Kabbara (Social Affairs or Environment, Mustaqbal), Moein al-Merehbi (Social Affairs or Environment, Mustaqbal).
 - Greek Orthodox: Elias Bou Saab (Defense, FPM), Ibrahim Najjar (Justice, Lebanese Forces) and Ghassan Hasbani (Deputy PM, LF).
 - Greek Catholic: Michel Pharaon (Tourism, LF) and Melhem Riachi (Information, LF).
 - Druze: Marwan Hamadeh (Health, Democratic Gathering) and Lebanese Democratic Party chief MP Talal Arslan for a portfolio that is yet to be allocated.
 - Armenians: Hagop Pakradounian (Tashnag Party) for a portfolio that is yet to be allocated and Jean Oghassabian (Administrative Development, Mustaqbal).
 The political forces are pushing for forming the new Cabinet before Independence Day, which Lebanon marks on November 22.
 According to media reports, a settlement has been reached under which the Lebanese Forces will be given the deputy premier post instead of a so-called sovereign portfolio.
 “The biggest obstacle in the wrangling over services-related portfolios is revolving around Marada Movement's insistence to get one of three key portfolios – public works or energy or telecommunications,” LBCI television said.
 Aoun's election and Hariri's appointment as premier-designate have raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees.
 In a sign that Hariri's mission as premier might not be easy, Hizbullah's MPs declined to endorse him during binding parliamentary consultations.
 Hariri is likely to struggle with his government's policy statement, which will have to make reference to Israel, as well as the war in Syria, both potential flashpoints with Hizbullah.
 
Berri Optimistic as Parties Say Govt. May be Formed within '48 Hours'
 Naharnet/November 16/16/Speaker Nabih Berri expressed optimism Wednesday that the line-up of the new Cabinet will be announced soon as some political parties declared that the government might be formed “within 48 or 72 hours.”“The cabinet formation process is moving forward positively and some obstacles are being resolved,” MPs quoted Berri as saying during his weekly meeting with lawmakers in Ain el-Tineh. The speaker also hoped the Cabinet will be formed before Independence Day, noting that “the government should be formed as soon as possible so that it can start addressing the pressing and vital issues and files.”“The government must also embark on studying and approving an electoral law, which must be a top priority,” Berri added. MP Qassem Hashem of Berri's Development and Liberation bloc meanwhile announced that “the government line-up can be announced within 48 or 72 hours if the last obstacles are resolved.”MP Ayyoub Hmayyed of the same bloc for his part stressed that the Marada Movement is a “key ally” of Berri's AMAL Movement and the rest of the March 8 forces. “We will not participate if Marada does not get an important ministerial portfolio,” Hmayyed added. Following talks with caretaker Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq, MP Simon Abi Ramia of the Change and Reform bloc also said that Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri will likely announce the line-up of his Cabinet “this week.”The political forces are reportedly pushing for forming the Cabinet before Independence Day, which Lebanon marks on November 22. Horsetrading is currently revolving around the distribution of the so-called sovereign ministerial portfolios – finance, defense, foreign affairs and interior – and other key portfolios like energy and public works.
 
Jumblat Rejects “Dwarfing” PSP Role in Next Government
 Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat said on Wednesday that he prefers to be allotted to the health ministry again instead of being weakened in the new government line-up and given the social affairs ministry which he believes has been “drained” of its resources. “After draining the social affairs ministry they suggest it be given to us, but I prefer not to be dwarfed in the new cabinet line-up,” said Jumblat on Twitter. “Let each party take by force what it wants, it is forbidden to even hint at any sovereign ministerial portfolio, it only belongs to high-level people,” said the PSP leader sarcastically referring to the dilutes among political parties to be given a so-called sovereign portfolio. “After draining the social affairs ministry they now suggest it be given to us. I know that my words might upset some on this beautiful day, but need justifies the deeds,” added the minister. “We prefer not to be weakened and to be kept in the health ministry,” added the MP. The political forces are reportedly pushing for forming the cabinet before Independence Day, which Lebanon marks on November 22. Horsetrading is currently revolving around the distribution of the sovereign ministerial portfolios – finance, defense, foreign affairs and interior – and other key portfolios like energy and public works.
 
Franco-Lebanese Mogul Says Gave Gadhafi Cash to Sarkozy Campaign in 2006-07
 Naharnet/November 16/16/Agence France Presse/Nicolas Sarkozy's links with the late Moammar Gadhafi came under fresh scrutiny Tuesday after a businessman admitted delivering three cash-stuffed suitcases from the Libyan leader toward the Frenchman's first presidential bid. In an interview with the Mediapart investigative news site, Franco-Lebanese businessman Ziad Takieddine said he had made three trips from Tripoli to Paris in late 2006 and early 2007 with cash for Sarkozy's campaign. Each time he carried a suitcase containing between 1.5 and 2.0 million euros in 200-euro and 500-euro notes, Takieddine told the site in a video interview, saying he was given the money by Gadhafi's military intelligence chief Abdallah Senussi. Sarkozy, who is bidding to recapture the presidency in next year's election, has for years been dogged by allegations that he accepted millions from Gadhafi during his successful 2007 run for the top office. During questioning in a separate case, Takieddine accused Sarkozy of having been in Gadhafi's pocket in 2006-07 but he had never previously claimed to be the bagman. The allegations against Sarkozy first emerged in March 2011, when the French leader was campaigning for the NATO-led military intervention that helped overthrow Gadhafi. "Sarkozy must first give back the money he took from Libya to finance his electoral campaign," Gadhafi's son Seif al-Islam, who is now in jail in Libya, demanded. A year later, as Sarkozy was campaigning for a second term, Mediapart published a document signed by former Libyan intelligence boss Musa Kusa referring to an agreement for 50 million euros ($54 million at current rates) in backing from Tripoli. Sarkozy, who lost his 2012 re-election bid, vigorously denied the allegations, claiming the document was a fake. Takieddine's video testimony comes five days before Sarkozy goes up against former prime minister Alain Juppe and other rivals in a primary to choose the candidate of the French right in next year's presidential vote. The first round of the two-stage primary takes place on Sunday. Takieddine said he delivered the cash directly to the interior ministry, which Sarkozy headed at the time.
 He said he was received on the first two occasions by Claude Gueant, Sarkozy's then cabinet chief whom he later made his interior minister.
 'Mafia state'
 The businessman, who said he wanted to tell all about "the mafia state in which we are living," said he set down the cases in Gueant's office but did not discuss the contents with him. On the third occasion, he was received by Sarkozy himself in an apartment on the first floor of the ministry, he claimed. After setting down the case, he said Sarkozy spoke to him briefly about a group of Bulgarian health workers imprisoned in Libya whose liberation Sarkozy negotiated later that year. But he studiously avoided the topic of the briefcase. In 2012, Senussi, who is also imprisoned in Libya, told investigators he "personally supervised" the handover of 5.0 million euros towards Sarkozy's campaign. But despite several other such former high-ranking members of Gadhafi's regime making similar claims, French investigators have yet to find any evidence of illegal campaign funding, according to AFP's sources. Sarkozy has brushed off the allegations as the claims of vindictive Libyan regime members, furious with him for leading the intervention that ended Gadhafi's 41-year rule. The 61-year-old right-winger, who is trailing presidential frontrunner Juppe in opinion polls, is embroiled in several scandals. He has been charged with influence peddling in a separate affair and with illegal financing of his 2012 campaign. Sarkozy has accused the judiciary of trying to stymie his comeback ambitions.
 
Geagea Mends Relations with Kataeb in Telephone Call with Gemayel
 Naharnet/November 16/16/Lebanese Forces chief Samir Geagea affirmed good relations with the Kataeb party in a telephone conversation with ex-President Amin Gemeyal after some recent tension in ties over a statement made by leader of the Kataeb Sami Gemayel. Geagea hailed Gemayel's rhetoric after his meeting with newly-elected President Michel Aoun at the Presidential Palace, the LF chief said: “Normal relations between the LF and Kataeb is a norm while conflict is an exception.” Geagea stressed that the national and intellectual perspectives of both parties are one and should be refletced in their political actions. Relations between the two soared recently after a statement made by (Sami) Gemayel where he criticized Geagea and said: “Geagea does not mind to be with Hizbullah in a single government, but he does not want the participation of Kataeb.”The LF tensely replied to Gemayel and the tension stretched to include supporters of both parties who took to social media outlets to express their positions. Bickering took a halt after leaders of both leaders urged their supporters to end the war of words on social media. Prime Minister-designate Saad Harir is in the process of forming up a new cabinet amid reports that the political forces are reportedly pushing for forming one before Independence Day, which Lebanon marks on November 22. Horsetrading is currently revolving around the distribution of the so-called sovereign ministerial portfolios – finance, defense, foreign affairs and interior – and other key portfolios like energy and public works.
 
Report: Defense Ministry Allotted to President Share
Naharnet/November 16/16/In light of horsetrading revolving around the distribution of the so-called sovereign and services-related ministerial portfolios, it has been decided to allot the defense ministry as part of the share of President Michel Aoun, al-Akhbar daily reported on Wednesday. The daily said that the current outgoing Education Minister Elias Bou Saab will be given the defense ministry in the new cabinet line-up, added the daily. Reports have said earlier that the defense ministry was to be given to former Deputy Prime Minister Issam Fares and that the suggestion has been dropped now. The new government will be composed of 24 ministers after negotiations to raise the number to 30 were disregarded. Horsetrading is currently revolving around the distribution of the sovereign ministerial portfolios – finance, defense, foreign affairs and interior – and other key portfolios like energy and public works.
 
Hizbullah Denies Qassem Said Party Has 'an Army'
 Naharnet/November 16/16/As Safir newspaper has quoted Hizbullah deputy chief Sheikh Naim Qassem as saying that the party now has a trained "army", in remarks that were denied later by Hizbullah's media department. In a statement issued Wednesday afternoon, the department said Qassem did not tell As Safir that Hizbullah “has an army now” or that the latest military parade was “a message to everyone.”"We now have a trained army and the Resistance (Hizbullah) does not need to rely on guerilla tactics," As Safir quoted Qassem as saying. Hizbullah's media department disputed that quote, insisting Qassem had actually said: "We have become more than a guerilla movement but less than an army." "We are heavily armed and well-trained and have acquired well-developed expertise in order to protect Lebanon and the interest of Lebanon,” As Safir quoted Qassem as saying. Referring to the unprecedented military parade that the party held in the Syrian border region of Qusayr, Qassem was quoted as saying that the move "does not need any explanation."Pictures distributed on social networking websites showed hundreds of Hizbullah fighters taking part in a military parade alongside dozens of tanks, armored vehicles, howitzers and heavy-caliber machineguns in Qusayr. Pro-Hizbullah media outlets said the parade was held on November 11 to mark “Hizbullah's Martyr Day”. On newly elected President Michel Aoun, Qassem stressed: “President Michel Aoun is a strategic ally and he protects our national and public choices. We trust him and agree with him on several positions.”On Hizbullah's presence in Syria, he said: “We are located in Syria, we do not need to explain or justify. We support the Syrian army and the Syrian state. Without our intervention in Syria the terrorists would have entered all Lebanese regions. The subject of our intervention in Syria is not currently the subject of debate among the Lebanese communities. “Our coordination is high with the Syrian leadership and the military parade is part of the field practices,” he went on to say. Qassem emphasized: “The Resistance does not want to invest its military power in the Lebanese internal conflict, and despite its power, we are engaged in the political and electoral work like the rest of the parties so we either win or lose.”“There is no contradiction between our role as a Resistance and in Syria with our work for Lebanon. We have contributed to prevent the obstruction of the current government and helped the parliament convene. What we want today is to stipulate a just election law based on proportional representation because it is the only way to reform the Lebanese system and combat corruption,” added Qassem. Commenting on the process of lining-up the new government, Qassem said: “We have announced that we authorized Speaker Nabih Berri to negotiate the formation and the details of participation. We are still in the discussion stage on the distribution of portfolios and hope that the negotiations end quickly and the government is formed soon.”“We are part of the composition of the Lebanese state and are interested in everything that is suitable for it, but we alone cannot change the equation. We adhere to the Taef Accord and its full implementation. Currently we don't ask to change or modify it.”
 
Report: LF Acquires Deputy Prime Minister Post instead of Sovereign Portfolio
 Naharnet/November 16/16/To make it up for the Lebanese Forces, Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri suggested to give the post of deputy prime minister to the LF if the party was not given one of the so-called sovereign portfolios in the new cabinet that Hariri is intent on forming before Independence Day on November 22, media reports said on Wednesday. Sources following up closely on the cabinet formation process said, the atmospheres of finalizing a line-up are positive after Hariri's suggestion to give LF chief Samir Geagea the post of deputy prime minister in case none of the sovereign portfolio were given to the party. However, information said that another obstacle still needs to be flattened in light of the LF insistence to leave the deputy prime minister without a ministerial portfolio. The party suggests to add his share to the remaining share of the LF in the cabinet, which is initially composed of two ministers, raising the number to three ministers in a 24-minister government.The political forces are reportedly pushing for forming the cabinet before Independence Day, which Lebanon marks on November 22. Horsetrading is currently revolving around the distribution of the so-called sovereign ministerial portfolios – finance, defense, foreign affairs and interior – and other key portfolios like energy and public works.
 
EU and Lebanon Adopt 'Partnership Priorities' for Next Four Years
 Naharnet/November 16/16/The European Union and Lebanon adopted Tuesday the partnership priorities for the coming four years, as well as a compact, during a visit by caretaker Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil to Brussels, the EU delegation to Lebanon said in a statement. “The partnership priorities set up a renewed framework for political engagement and enhanced cooperation. They were agreed in the context of the revised European Neighborhood Policy and the EU's global strategy for foreign and security policy,” it said. The compact includes the mutual commitments through which the EU and Lebanon will fulfill the pledges they made at the London conference on supporting Syria and the region in February 2016. The objective is to “improve the living conditions both of refugees temporarily staying in Lebanon and of vulnerable host communities,” the statement said. The announcement was made jointly by Bassil and Federica Mogherini, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. “Partnership priorities in EU-Lebanon relations for the coming years include: security and countering terrorism, governance and the rule of law, fostering growth and job opportunities, and migration and mobility,” the statement. The EU-Lebanon compact foresees “an EU allocation of a minimum of € 400 million in 2016-2017, in addition to the bilateral assistance of more than €80 million for those two years.” It outlines “specific mutual commitments to address the impact of the Syrian crisis and aims to turn the situation into an opportunity to improve the socio-economic prospects, security, stability and resilience of the whole Lebanon.”In turn Lebanon “commits to ease the temporary stay of Syrian refugees, in particular regarding their residency status.”Lebanon currently hosts at least 1.1 million Syrians. It is the country hosting the highest number of displaced persons and refugees both per capita and per square kilometer.
 
Franjieh Requests Key Portfolio in Cabinet Line-Up
 Naharnet/November 16/16/Marada Movement leader MP Suleiman Franjieh insists to be given a key services-related portfolio in the upcoming new government and demands to either be given the telecommunications or energy ministry, al-Akhbar daily reported on Wednesday. Reports added that Franjieh has rejected suggestions to allot him one of two ministries, the education or health. Meanwhile Speaker Nabih Berri and Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri are eager to keep Franjieh content with the shares that will be allotted for his party, while the Lebanese Forces and the Free Patriotic Movement refuse that Marada be given a key ministry, added the daily. The political forces are reportedly pushing for forming the cabinet before Independence Day, which Lebanon marks on November 22. Horsetrading is currently revolving around the distribution of the so-called sovereign ministerial portfolios – finance, defense, foreign affairs and interior – and other key portfolios like energy and public works.
 
Egypt FM Meets Lebanon Leaders, Hands Aoun, Hariri Letters from al-Sisi
 Naharnet/November 16/16/Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry held talks Wednesday with President Michel Aoun and other senior Lebanese leaders. “I handed President Aoun a letter from (Egyptian) President (Abdel Fattah) al-Sisi and it contains a message of support, solidarity and keenness on Lebanon's stability. I also handed him an official invitation to visit Egypt,” Shoukry said after meeting Aoun in Baabda. The visiting minister arrived later in Ain el-Tineh for talks with Speaker Nabih Berri. “I carried to him the salutations of His Excellency President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and his appreciation of his important and prominent role in achieving Lebanon's stability and filling the vacancies in its constitutional institutions,” Shoukry announced after the talks. Egypt's top diplomat later met with Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri and also handed him a letter from al-Sisi. The letter contains “congratulations on Lebanon's election of a new president and the looming formation of a new cabinet,” Shoukry said. “We expressed a common interest in strengthening the ties between the two countries, and Egypt will support stability in Lebanon,” the minister said. “We are looking forward to maintaining communication with all Lebanese parties in order to serve the interests of the two peoples,” Shoukry added. He also held talks with caretaker Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil, Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat and Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea. “My visit is aimed at extending congratulations and expressing Egypt's relief over the election of a president and the formation of a unity cabinet,” said Shoukry during a joint press conference with Bassil. Bassil for his part reminded of Aoun's oath of office, noting that it calls for “an independent foreign policy based on Lebanon's interest and commitment to the Arab League Charter and the principle of non-interference in the affairs of the Arab countries.”And speaking after talks with Shoukry in Clemenceau, Jumblat noted that “the delay in forming the cabinet is local,” adding that “some underprivileged components have the right to make some demands.” 

Aoun: My mission is to unite Lebanese from all confessions
Wed 16 Nov 2016 /NNA - President of the Lebanese Republic, General Michel Aoun, said, "My mission is to unite Lebanese from all confessions as there is no political discrimination in the social agreement between us."President Aoun's stance came Wednesday as he received at Baabda Presidential Palace a delegation of gatherings of heads of nunneries. General Aoun confirmed his determination to combat corruption and accomplishing essential projects like the administrative decentralization. Separately, Aoun received a Chinese military delegation composed of Deputy President of the Military Central Committee at the Communist Party that came to inspect the Chinese unit working within UNIFIL in the South.

Sami Gemayel tackles cabinet formation updates with Ghattas Khoury, Nader Hariri
Wed 16 Nov 2016/NNA - Kataeb Party leader, MP Sami Gemayel, met on Wednesday evening with former MP Ghattas Khoury, and head of Prime Minister designate Saad Hariri's bureau, Nader Hariri. Talks reportedly touched on cabinet formation updates.

Change and Reform bloc holds regular meeting tomorrow in Rabieh
Wed 16 Nov 2016/NNA - The Free Patriotic Movement's media bureau issued a statement on Wednesday confirming that the Change and Reform Parliamentary bloc will be holding its regular meeting on Thursday at 3:30 pm in Rabieh.

Qadisha Valley Committee visits Rahi, Strida Geagea confirms LF's attachment to cabinet share
Wed 16 Nov 2016/NNA - Maronite Patriarch, Mar Bechara, Boutros Rahi met on Wednesday afternoon with a delegation representing Qadisha Valley Committee. In the wake of the meeting, Committee member, MP Strida Geagea, said that she expected the new cabinet to see light before Independence Day. "Fruitful cooperation is underway with the Free Patriotic Movement. The historical reconciliation agreement which dates back to January 2016 has sparked a series of positive events, most importantly the election of President Michel Aoun," MP Geagea said. As for the Lebanese Forces' cabinet share, the lawmaker confirmed her party's keenness on receiving its rightful share. "The Lebanese Forces enjoys huge representation. If the cabinet is to comprise of 30 ministers, then we demand the appointment of five LF ministers. If the cabinet is to comprise of 24 ministers, then we request the appointment of 4 LF ministers," Geagae said, reiterating attachment to the LF's cabinet share. "Harmony among the new cabinet members is paramount because Ministers are expected to communicate and run the nation's affairs hand-in-hand," she added. "We are looking forward to have LF ministers assume sovereignty and service ministries," Geagea added.

Shukri after meeting Geagea: For coalition government to preserve state institutions
Wed 16 Nov 2016/NNA - Lebanese Forces leader, Samir Geagea, met on Wednesday at his Meerab residence with Egyptian Foreign Minister, Sameh Shukri, accompanied by Egyptian Ambassador to Lebanon, Nazih al-Najjari, Acting Minister Yasser Alawi, and Advisors Ahmed Abu Zeid, Kamel Jalal and Nader Zaki. The meeting was also attended by LF Foreign Relations head Pierre Bou Asi. Minister Shukri voiced Egypt's support to Lebanon's stability in the various fields, hoping that a national coalition government would be formed to preserve the Lebanese state institutions.
 
Lebanon has significant role in region: Egypt FM
 The Daily Star/November 16, 2016
 BEIRUT: Visiting Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry Wednesday expressed interest in strengthening ties with Lebanon, saying that it plays an important role in maintaining the joint interests of Arab countries.
 After holding talks with President Michel Aoun at Baabda Palace, Shoukry told reporters that Egypt "is seeking to open communication with Lebanon's institutions for a deep dialogue and to [build] a strong relationship to achieve their common goals."
 "Lebanon has an important role in Arabism and in maintaining the joint Arab interests," he said after handing Aoun a message of solidarity from President Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi and an invitation to visit Cairo.
 The FM arrived in Beirut Tuesday evening for a two-day official visit to convey Egypt’s support for the recent political breakthrough in Lebanon, which paved the way for the election of Aoun after a 2-1/2-year deadlock.
 The Egyptian FM also met with Speaker Nabih Berri at the latter’s residence in Ain al-Tineh, where he said he hoped Berri would exert efforts to restore the Arab solidarity and joint Arab action.
 Later, in a joint news conference with his Lebanese counterpart Gebran Bassil, he also reiterated hopes that Cairo and Beirut would unify efforts to strengthen the bilateral ties to fend off persisting challenges.
 "Egypt stands by Lebanon ... we are seeking to maintain stability and sovereignty [of the countries of the region] and block any interference in their local affairs," the FM said.
 Bassil said that Lebanon has managed to remain secure "despite the growing pressure, consisting the [Israeli] enemy along the border, the Syrian refugees crisis and the terrorism ... the dialogue language prevailed over violence."
 He added that hoped that the Arab League would restore its active and positive role, adding that "Lebanon's interest is to abide by the Arab League pact not to interfere in the affairs of surrounding countries."
 Shoukry later in the day met with Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri at his Beirut downtown residence and Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblatt at his residence in the Lebanese capital's Clemenceau area.
 He last visited Lebanon in August, when he held meetings with rival political leaders in an effort to end the presidential crisis. The visit follows a similar trip by Iranian FM Mohammad Javad Zarif to the country's capital last week.  
 
Hezbollah military parade in Qusayr raises eyebrows
Appearance of US weapons in parade raises questions as militia sends message to
 Joseph A. Kechichian/Gulf News/November 16, 2016
 Riyadh: Although the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) issued a formal denial on Tuesday that the vehicles that appeared in a Hezbollah military parade in Qusayr (Syria) were never part of the LAF’s arsenal, the United States announced that it had launched an investigation to determine how the party acquired US-made tanks and armoured vehicles.
 For its part, the Future Movement condemned the parade, describing it as a “threatening message” addressed to the Lebanese, in particular to the newly-elected head of state, asserting that Hezbollah placed “Iran’s interest before the national interest”.
 Several media outlets published photographs of thousands of militiamen in numerous military vehicles. Though the LAF insisted that the armed personnel carriers (APCs) “were not taken from the army’s arsenal”, any such transfers would be a violation of US law. Washington is the largest donor of military equipment to the LAF though one of the provisions of all such donations is that nothing can be handed over to third parties, especially a militia that the US Department of State has identified as “a foreign terrorist organisation”.
 The photographs showed M113 APCs, M198 howitzer guns, and heavy-calibre machine guns, all of which exist in the LAF inventories, though the origins of these specific items could also be the now defunct South Lebanon Army (the so-called Lahd Army that was established during the 1975-1990 civil war), which was equipped by Israel. In 2000, Hezbollah seized various SLA items as most of the units fled when the Israeli army withdrew from South Lebanon, leaving a trove of materials behind. It will be up to American investigators to determine whether these vehicles originated in Israel or whether thy may have originated in Iran, which counted numerous such items from the time of the Shah’s regime.
 In addition to this display of military might, it was unclear what the political message of the parade was, or could be.
 To be sure, November 11 marked Hezbollah’s “Martyr Day”, although this was the very first time when such a display occurred to commemorate the anniversary. That is what prompted many to wonder whether Hezbollah, which backed President Michel Aoun and reluctantly accepted Prime Minister Sa‘ad Hariri as the next head of the government, intended to telegraph specific views to Lebanese elites at the beginning of the new presidential tenure.
 President Aoun stressed in his oath of office his intention to “restore the State’s role, presence and prestige”, all of which were challenged by this parade as Hezbollah was reluctant to submit its will to that of Beirut. For their part, political parties were engaged in fierce competition regarding the formation of the next Cabinet that, presumably, would be empowered to address a host of security-related concerns, including Hezbollah’s involvement in the Syrian civil war.
 Aoun was anxious to persuade Saudi Arabia to reallocate the $3 billion grant to the LAF — which was suspended after Foreign Minister Jibran Bassil criticised Riyadh in the aftermath of Iranian attacks on Saudi diplomatic posts in Tehran and Mashhad — while the Italian Ambassador to Lebanon Massimo Marotti announced that his country would provide the LAF with equipment and ammunition worth €3.5 million.
 
Can coalition of reformers snag Lebanese parliament seats?
Author Scott Preston/Al Monitor/November 16/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/16/48750/
 BEIRUT — Michel Aoun’s election as president on Oct. 31 ended the longest presidential vacancy in Lebanon’s history, and with that and Saad Hariri’s appointment as prime minister, Lebanese are now turning their attention to next summer’s parliamentary elections. After parliament extended its term for a second consecutive time in 2014, new groups arose to challenge the powers that have traditionally dominated Lebanon’s government, making for a potentially historic election.
 An array of civil and Reformist groups are calling for a coalition to challenge the country’s traditional and dominant political parties in the 2017 parliamentary elections.
  A series of popular movements emerged out of the 2015 garbage protests, channeling protesters’ demands and presenting voters with political alternatives. Although Lebanese civil society groups have thus far fallen short of their objectives of winning elections and deciding government policy, they have inspired a new wave of Reformist parties that could for the first time realistically contest the current political elite at the parliamentary level.
  Sami Atallah, executive director of the Lebanese Center for Policy Studies, said an array of new parties is gearing up for the elections. “Definitely there is an excitement,” he told Al-Monitor. “There are so many groups. I know of at least 20, and there is probably another 10 or 15 that I don’t know of, maybe another 20. Some of them are new, some of them are old, some of them are doing other things — but they want to run, so there is sort of an intoxication with this.”
  “‘Beirut Madinati did it, we can do it,’” he said, explaining the new groups' hopes and referring to a new party that ran in the municipal elections last year. “But it’s hard, it’s not going to be a picnic. There are many groups, but I don’t know what the success rate is going to be.”
  The fate of Lebanon’s nascent popular movements will depend in part on their ability to learn from the shortcomings of their predecessors and establish a unified front. Like You Stink, one of the most prominent groups in the garbage protests, the Reformists will likely have to navigate a gauntlet of external threats. According to Carmen Geha, an assistant professor of public administration at the American University of Beirut, the garbage protest movements were unable to further mobilize supporters because of media attacks, government co-optation and the threat of physical force from the country's dominant parties.
  Nonetheless, the social momentum generated by You Stink’s campaign encouraged the formation of Beirut Madinati, a grassroots party that Atallah said represents the first time Lebanese civil society has seriously contested the traditional parties in elections. The party also faced opposition from Charbel Nahas’ Citizens Within a State list, which ran on a similar secular and reformist platform. Although Beirut Madinati surpassed expectations, attracting 40% of the vote in Beirut, Lebanon’s majoritarian electoral law prevented it from taking any seats in the municipal government.
  Tarek Ammar, who ran as Beirut Madinati’s vice mayor, told Al-Monitor that the group considered participating in the 2017 elections, but decided against the idea on Oct. 29. “As Beirut Madinati, for the time being, we decided not to go into parliament because of the many responsibilities we have, because of the structure we have,” he explained. “However, it doesn’t mean that Beirut Madinati’s members are not active or working on the parliamentary election.”
  In light of the challenges You Stink and Beirut Madinati faced in the past year, some civil society groups are now looking to form coalitions to bolster their competitiveness in the 2017 balloting. Among them is Sabaa, a new organization that made waves with a $60,000 marketing campaign before announcing its formation at a press conference Oct. 19.
  Sabaa spokesperson Assad Douiahy told Al-Monitor that one of the group’s primary objectives is to establish a model of participatory democracy that others can follow. The concept, he said, centers around ensuring democratic governance within the party — for example, choosing party leaders through an election process and engaging constituents in identifying community issues and drafting policy solutions. To that end, Douiahy said Sabaa will soon reveal a mobile polling app that will enable users to communicate directly with Sabaa members. Utilizing this participatory approach, Douiahy hopes his group can form partnerships with other parties and draft strategies in pursuit of their goals, such as adoption of an electoral law based on proportional representation.
  Douiahy noted that Sabaa might not run in the summer elections, depending on its readiness, but he encourages others to join forces. “They [parties] need to unite, whether under a fair electoral law or not. They need to unite. I mean, not like what happened with Beirut Madinati and [Charbel] Nahas. It was a very bad experience.”
  Nadine Moussa, president of the Citizens' Movement, told Al-Monitor that her party is interested in coalition forming even if her party's candidates don’t make it onto the ballot. “It is not about candidates or persons; it is about the right criteria for the selection of the candidates,” she said. “We are not going to run just to have a seat.”
  She added, “People are sick and tired of such opportunistic politicians. They want ... real public services. They want people who really represent them, who have really suffered their suffering.”
  The United Lebanese League is another anti-establishment party hoping to reduce corruption, increase transparency and pursue liberal priorities such as civil rights. Party founder Rabih Chafi said his group is also looking to build a coalition with organizations that share similar platforms.
  “There are a lot of potential candidates that are ready,” Chafi told Al-Monitor. “A lot of people who are independent of a political group want to run on their own, and the intention is to basically bring these people together to form a coalition in order to make a national proclaimed, national movement.”
  Despite the reformist parties having similar goals, it remains unclear whether they will be able to agree on common strategies and tactics if united under a coalition. According to Geha, if such a coalition emerges as a realistic challenge to the traditional parties, they should expect steep resistance from the current power holders.
  “You can imagine, at the national level, what the two coalitions [March 14 and March 8] will do if there is a serious opponent,” Geha said. “‘Okay, I have people, and I have money and mobilization; it’s serious, we can actually win.’ I think they might postpone the elections. I think they might co-opt it. I think they might rig the result.”
  Scott Preston is a journalist based in Beirut, writing about social and political issues in the Middle East. On Twitter: @scottapreston
 
Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on November 16-17/16
Canada welcomes the adoption of the UN General Assembly resolution on the situation of human rights in Iran

 November 15, 2016 - Ottawa, Ontario - Global Affairs Canada
 The Honourable Stéphane Dion, Minister of Foreign Affairs, today welcomed the adoption, by the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly, of the Resolution on the Situation of Human Rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran; 85 member states voted in favour of the resolution.
 Presented by Canada and 41 co-sponsors at the UN General Assembly, the Iran resolution reiterates the international community’s concerns about Iran’s poor human rights record and seeks to support its improvement. Canada collaborated with a cross-regional group of countries to ensure strong support of the resolution.
 The human rights situation in Iran remains serious. Persistent and widespread violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms continue to occur, with a high number of executions (including of minors) and restrictions on the rights of women and minorities (including faith communities) and on freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association, as well as disregard for the rule of law and due process.
 Through the adoption of this resolution, the international community calls on Iran to take concrete actions, both in law and in practice, to fully respect its human rights obligations.
 Quotes
 “The adoption of this resolution by 85 member states shows that Canada and the international community remain deeply concerned with the lack of respect of human rights for all people in Iran. Canada calls on the Government of Iran to implement its human rights obligations. Our bilateral re-engagement with Iran allows us to address issues of concern for Canada, which include human rights.”
 - Stéphane Dion, Minister of Foreign Affairs
 Associated links
 Report of the Secretary-General on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran
 Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran
 Contacts
 Chantal Gagnon
 Press Secretary
 Office of the Minister of Foreign Affairs
 343-203-1851
 chantal.gagnon@international.gc.ca
 Media Relations Office
 Global Affairs Canada
 343-203-7700
 media@international.gc.ca
 Follow us on Twitter: @CanadaFP
 Follow Minister Dion on Twitter: @MinCanadaFA
 Like us on Facebook: Canada’s foreign policy - Global Affairs Canada

 US House OKs bills to renew Iran sanctions
The Associated Press, Washington/Tehran Wednesday, 16 November 2016
The House on Tuesday overwhelmingly approved bipartisan bills to crack down on supporters of Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government and renew a decades-old Iran sanctions law. Swift passage underscored broad support on Capitol Hill for punishing financial backers of the Syrian government and maintaining economic pressure on Tehran. Both bills had the firm backing of Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, and Rep. Eliot Engel of New York, the panel’s top Democrat. The Senate must now act on the legislation before the bills can be sent to the president. Lawmakers have accused the Assad government of war crimes as the number of people killed during the violence in Syria continues to mount. The war, now in its sixth year, has killed as many as half a million people, contributed to Europe’s worst refugee crisis since World War II and given ISIS room to grow into a global terror threat. “What we have now is a grim lesson in human suffering,” Royce said. “We can see the ethnic cleansing going on. Even the United Nations calls this ‘crimes of historic proportions.’ Enough is enough.”The Syria legislation targets key backers of Assad such as Russia and Iran, according to Royce, by requiring the president to sanction countries or companies that do business with or provide financing to the Syrian government or the Central Bank of Syria. e that provides aircraft to Syria’s commercial airlines, does business with the transportation and telecom sectors controlled by the Syrian government, or supports the country’s energy industry also would be subject to sanctions, according to the legislation. “If you’re acting as a lifeline to the Assad regime, you risk getting caught up in the net of our sanctions,” Engel said. Sanctions could be suspended if internationally recognized negotiations to resolve the war in Syria are making progress and the violence against civilians has ended, according the legislation. The White House and State Department had previously argued to Congress that new sanctions legislation could undermine efforts with Russia to forge a cease-fire between Assad and rebel groups. While the Russia talks have collapsed, the administration maintained concerns that the sanctions might hurt Iran, another Assad supporter, giving Tehran an excuse to renege on the US-brokered nuclear deal. The House bill would authorize the State Department to assist in the collection and preservation of evidence for war crimes trials. Secretary of State John Kerry last month called for a war crimes investigation of Russia and Syria, a move that escalated already heated rhetoric against Moscow for its part in a deadly military offensive in Aleppo, Syria’s largest city, and its longstanding support of Assad.
Rouhani: Iran will remain loyal to nuclear deal
Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani says his country will remain committed to a landmark nuclear deal with world powers regardless of the US presidential election result. Speaking Wednesday in the city of Karaj in a speech broadcast live on state TV, Rouhani said, “If a president is changed here and there, it has no impact on the will of Iran.”Without mentioning any specific names, Rouhani said, “The world is not under the will of a single individual and party. The reality of the world will impose many things on extremists.” He added, “nobody should imagine it is possible to play with Iran.”In his campaign, US President-elect Donald Trump had criticized the deal that capped Iran's nuclear activities in return for lifting international economic sanctions.

Syrian, Russian jets pound rebel areas
Agencies Wednesday, 16 November 2016/Air strikes pounded neighbourhoods around a children's hospital and a blood bank in rebel-held eastern Aleppo on Wednesday in a second day of renewed bombing that has killed at least 32 people, a war monitor, medics and emergency workers said. “Russian military planes were seen all night until morning in several regions of Idlib” in northwestern Syria, said Rami Abdel Rahman, head of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. “The regime air force bombed eastern sectors of Aleppo,” Syria’s divided second city, Abdel Rahman told AFP. The air raids formed part of a wider military escalation by the Syrian government and allies including Russia, which fired coordinated volleys of missiles at rebels on Tuesday and for the first time used its only aircraft carrier. The Syrian Observatory said the air strikes on eastern Aleppo on Wednesday alone killed at least 21 people, including five children and an emergency worker. They were carried out by either Russian or Syrian warplanes, it said. The Observatory said districts struck included al-Shaar, al-Sukkari, al-Sakhour and Karam al-Beik. Air raids also continued in the countryside west of Aleppo from which rebels have launched assaults on government-held areas. An attack on the village of Batbo killed at least 19 people including three children, the Observatory said. Moscow has denied reports that its jets have hit Aleppo in the renewed wave of bombardment, and said it was sticking to a moratorium on air strikes in the city. Tuesday's bombing run on eastern Aleppo appeared to mark the end of a pause inside the city declared by Russia on Oct. 18 which Syria's military had also largely observed. The Observatory and residents said the city's east was hit by rocket fired from jets, barrel bombs dropped from helicopters and artillery from government forces. "The helicopters won't stop for a single moment," Bebars Mishal, a civil defence worker in rebel-held Aleppo, told Reuters. "Right now, the bombing won't let up."Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu spoke of a “major operation” which saw the first missions carried out by warplanes taking off from the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier that arrived off Syria last week.
The Kremlin said on Wednesday that a moratorium on Russian air strikes against targets in Aleppo remained in place for the time being. In this Oct. 11, 2016 file photo, provided by the Syrian Civil Defense group known as the White Helmets, residents sit amongst rubble in rebel-held eastern Aleppo, Syria. (AP) The offensive drew strong condemnation from the United States, which said it had received reports of hospitals and clinics being bombed. Once Syria’s economic powerhouse, Aleppo has been ravaged by the war that has killed more than 300,000 people across the country since it started in March 2011 with anti-government protests.
UN condemns Syrian attacks in Aleppo
Meanwhile, a UN committee has approved a resolution strongly condemning the recent escalation of attacks in Aleppo and continuing violence by the Syrian government against its own people. The General Assembly’s human rights committee voted 116-15 with 49 abstentions in favor of the draft resolution on Tuesday. It is virtually certain to be adopted when the assembly votes next month. An injured child waits after receiving treatment at the University hospital in a government-held neighbourhood on November 3, 2016 following reported rebel fire on government-held parts of the northern city of Aleppo. (AFP)
The draft resolution demands that Syrian authorities “immediately put an end to all indiscriminate attacks, including those involving the use of terror tactics, air strikes, barrel and vacuum bombs, incendiary weapons, chemical weapons and heavy artillery.”It “deplores and condemns in the strongest terms” widespread human rights violations by the Syrian government. The draft calls for a cease-fire by all parties, saying this “is essential to achieve a political solution.”
Food production in Syria ‘at all-time low’
Food production has dropped to an all-time low in Syria where civilians are struggling through their sixth winter in a war zone, UN agencies said on Tuesday.
Many farmers have had to abandon their land, unable to afford the soaring cost of seeds, fertilizers and tractor fuel, the Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Food Programme said. Wheat output - vital for making flat loaves of bread, a staple of the Syrian diet - dropped from an average 3.4 million metric tonnes harvested before the war began in 2011 to 1.5 million this year, they said in a joint statement. The area planted for cereals in the 2015-16 cropping season is the "smallest ever", they added, citing field visits and surveys that also showed record low production of barley. "Food production in Syria has hit a record low due to fighting and insecurity but also weather conditions," World Food Programme spokeswoman Bettina Luescher told a news briefing in Geneva.
Food shortages are particularly worrying in east Aleppo, the rebel-held part of the city besieged by government forces where the UN says 250,000-275,000 civilians still live. "The last food rations provided by the UN have been given out (in east Aleppo). It is very hard to say how people will be coping there. Of course it is a very different situation in the capital where food is available at the markets and people can buy things," Luescher said.
Before the war, Syria was an exporter of livestock. "Now herds and flocks have shrunk, there are 30 percent fewer cattle, 40 percent fewer sheep and goats and a staggering 60 percent less poultry which of course is the most affordable source of animal protein," Luescher said. More than 7 million people in Syria are classified as "food insecure", meaning they are not always sure where their next meal is coming from, she added. The World Food Programme is distributing rations to more than 4 million people in Syria each month. (With AP, Reuters and AFP)

Syria Regime Bombs Rebels as Aleppo Food Aid Runs Out
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/November 16/16/Syrian government and Russian warplanes pounded rebel-held parts of northern Syria Wednesday, including battered second city Aleppo, where food aid rations were near-depleted after months of regime siege. The renewed bombardment killed at least 35 people in Aleppo city in 24 hours, and sparked anger from Washington and the United Nations. It came as President Bashar Assad said in an interview that U.S. president-elect Donald Trump could be a "natural ally" if he fights "terrorists."Damascus considers all those who oppose Assad's government to be "terrorists" like the Islamic State jihadist group, which Trump has said should be the focus of U.S. involvement in Syria. The regime and its ally Russia launched a wide-ranging assault on rebels on Tuesday, shattering a month of relative calm in the rebel-held east of devastated Aleppo. But Moscow denied carrying out air strikes on east Aleppo. "Planes of the Russian air force have not been carrying out strikes on Aleppo for the past 29 days," said Igor Konashenkov, a spokesman for the defense ministry. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based monitor, said six children were among the 35 killed in government strikes and artillery fire on besieged opposition-held districts since Tuesday. The Independent Doctors Association, a medical group, said barrel bomb attacks had damaged two facilities it supports in eastern Aleppo -- the children's hospital and the only blood bank in the area. Medical facilities have regularly been hit, and sometimes completely destroyed, in the government's fight against rebels, though Damascus and Moscow deny they target hospitals.
Food aid runs out in Aleppo
The Observatory also reported 21 people were killed in Batabo, a village on the border between Aleppo and Idlib province, where Russia and Syria were carrying out strikes. The monitor said it was not immediately clear if the strikes on Batabo were carried out by Russian or Syrian planes. The bombardment ended a period of relative respite, particularly in eastern Aleppo, where Moscow halted air strikes on October 18 ahead of a series of brief ceasefires. The ceasefires were intended to encourage residents and surrendering rebels to leave the east, but few did so, fearing moving into government-held territory. Food aid stockpiled in the east is all-but-exhausted, with international organizations and their local partners saying they have distributed final rations in recent days. No aid has entered the eastern neighborhoods since government troops surrounded them in mid-July. Once Syria's economic powerhouse, Aleppo has been ravaged by the war that has killed more than 300,000 people nationwide since it started in March 2011 with anti-government protests. Russia intervened in September 2015 in a bid to bolster the government, and Tuesday said its forces were launching a "major operation" in Idlib and central Homs province, targeting IS and former al-Qaida affiliate Fateh al-Sham Front with air strikes from a carrier in the eastern Mediterranean. But the bombardment has been criticized by both the U.N. and Washington, with the General Assembly's human rights committee voting overwhelmingly Tuesday to condemn escalating attacks on civilians.
Assad open to Trump alliance
Washington said it had received reports that the latest bombing raids had damaged civilian infrastructure in rebel areas. "We strongly condemn the resumption of air strikes in Syria by the Russians as well as the Syrian regime," State Department spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau said. "The most recent reported attacks are on five hospitals and one mobile clinic in Syria. We believe it's a violation of international law."Washington was an early backer of the uprising against Assad, and has supported the rebels fighting his government. But that could change under the next administration, with Assad telling Portugal's RTP state television Tuesday he welcomed Trump's campaign comments suggesting Washington's involvement in Syria should be focused exclusively on fighting jihadists. "We cannot tell anything about what he's going to do, but if... he is going to fight the terrorists, of course we are going to be ally, natural ally in that regard with the Russian, with the Iranian, with many other countries," Assad said. Washington already leads an international coalition carrying out strikes against IS in Syria and Iraq, but it does not coordinate with Damascus and Assad's government has condemned it as ineffective. The coalition is supporting an operation by the Kurdish-Arab alliance known as the Syrian Democratic Forces to capture the IS bastion of Raqa. "We are advancing even though IS is mining the villages as they flee," SDF commander Rodi Derik said Wednesday in the village of Tuwaylaa, recently captured from IS.

Iraqi Paramilitaries Say Entered IS-Held Airport West of Mosul
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/November 16/16/Iraqi paramilitary forces announced Wednesday that they had entered the Tal Afar airport west of Mosul and were fighting to clear pockets of Islamic State group jihadists inside it. The airport is located some six kilometers (four miles) south of the town of Tal Afar, the ultimate target of an operation billed as an attempt to cut off jihadists in Mosul from territory they control farther west. Fighting towards Tal Afar has so far been the main task for the Hashed al-Shaabi, an umbrella organization for pro-government paramilitaries that is dominated by Iran-backed Shiite militias, in the massive operation aimed at recapturing Mosul that was launched on October 17. "An operation to pursue pockets of (IS) hiding inside the airport is happening now," Hashed al-Shaabi spokesman Ahmed al-Assadi said in a statement. The airport will be "a launch point for Hashed al-Shaabi forces to liberate the center of the Tal Afar district, and cut the last (IS) supply lines between Mosul and Tal Afar," Assadi said. Hashed forces have been pushing their way toward Tal Afar from starting points south of Mosul for more than two weeks, retaking a series of villages from IS along the way. There has been opposition both inside and outside Iraq to the idea of Shiite militia forces, which have been repeatedly accused of rights violations against Sunnis, being involved in the battle for predominantly Sunni Arab Mosul. The Hashed push for Tal Afar, which had a Shiite majority prior to being seized by IS in 2014, gives these forces a role in the battle but so far only federal forces have entered the city. IS seized Mosul along with swathes of other territory in June 2014, but Iraqi forces have since regained much of the areas they lost two years before, and the city is now the country's last major population center still in jihadist hands. The Hashed al-Shaabi, which was established in June 2014 but includes militias that were founded years earlier, played a major role in halting the initial IS offensive and later in pushing the jihadists back, and is widely admired among Iraq's Shiite majority.

'Our Depots are Empty': Food Aid Runs Out in Syria's Aleppo
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/November 16/16/In two districts of the besieged eastern side of Syria's battleground city of Aleppo, local volunteers distributed meager bags containing the last food aid left in their depots. "Our depots are empty, we have nothing else to distribute," said Ammar Qadah, director of Al-Sham Humanitarian Foundation, a Syrian charity in the rebel-held side of the battered city.No aid has entered eastern Aleppo since mid-July when government forces surrounded the rebel-held east, sealing off more than 250,000 residents from the outside world. "Today we finished distributing food aid to the roughly 2,000 families that we support," said Qadah, speaking Tuesday at a warehouse in the Maadi neighborhood. "This month, we've only been able to distribute rations a quarter of the usual size because of the dwindling supplies," he told AFP. Outside the warehouse, volunteers oversaw a truck full of boxes of food. Ordinarily, each family would receive two large boxes with enough aid to last for a month. But this time, each received only a single bag, containing two bottles of oil, two kilos (4.5 pounds) of rice, two kilos of lentils, two kilos of sugar and a box of mortadella. A family of five will struggle to stretch those supplies longer than a week.
Final aid distributions
In the Marjeh neighborhood, residents at a distribution point waited their turn for a bag, as children sat on the pavement nearby. Last week, the United Nations said the last of the food aid it had delivered to east Aleppo before the siege began was being distributed. "The last food rations are being distributed as we speak," the head of a U.N.-backed humanitarian taskforce for Syria, Jan Egeland, told journalists on November 10. He urged all sides to the conflict to grant humanitarian access to the besieged eastern neighborhoods. "I don't think anybody wants a quarter of a million people to be starving in east Aleppo." A World Food Program spokeswoman, Bettina Luescher, told AFP that the U.N. agency's partners had delivered the last of their aid over the weekend. "The last distributions of WFP food through our partners took place on Sunday, 13 November," she said. An AFP journalist in Aleppo said most NGOs distributing food aid were reliant on WFP rations that had now run out. But others, like al-Sham, have purchased food to distribute from the declining stocks available in local markets, where prices have spiraled as the siege goes on.
'Catastrophic consequences'
Even as the last food aid was being distributed, Syria's government and its ally Russia on Tuesday renewed their bombardment of rebel strongholds across the country, with heavy government fire on east Aleppo. Moscow said it had paused its air strikes in Syria in October, as it organized a series of brief "humanitarian pauses" in east Aleppo intended to encourage residents and surrendering rebels to leave. But few did, and the U.N. said it was unable to obtain sufficient security guarantees to allow the evacuation of wounded civilians or delivery of fresh aid. Moscow last week rejected a U.N. call for longer ceasefires, despite Egeland's warning that "the consequences of no help and no supplies will be so catastrophic I cannot even see that scenario." In Maadi district, a small crowd gathered Tuesday behind a truck half-full of boxes and cartons of aid. "They told us that this is the last distribution because there is no more aid," said Abu Ahmed, 32, his face tired as he waited for food. The Maadi resident confirmed that this month he was receiving just a quarter of the aid he would normally get to feed his wife and three children. "These rations won't last more than a week. We have nothing to rely on but them and God," he said.

Foreign Medics Treat Wounded Children in Iraq's Mosul
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/November 16/16/Foreign medics are helping Iraqi special forces personnel treat a growing number of children wounded by intense urban warfare inside the jihadist-held city of Mosul. Car bombs, sniper fire and booby traps have led to mounting casualties in the east of the city, where advancing Iraqi troops are battling Islamic State group fighters. Three foreign medics working with the Academy of Emergency Medicine, a Slovakian charity, have teamed up with more than a dozen Iraqi special forces medical personnel to treat wounded civilians and soldiers. Their sparsely equipped field clinic is set up in an open courtyard on the only route out for fleeing civilians. Fewer than a dozen green cots are organised into rows, flanked by two ambulances and several crates of gauze, intravenous drips, and other medical supplies purchased with donations to AEM. Slovakian medic Marek Adamik says most of the casualties he has treated have been from makeshift bombs or sniper fire -- some "directly targeted with head shots." The charity's country manager, Peter Reed, has just finished tending to the first civilian casualty of the day, a young girl in pink pyjamas with a shrapnel wound to her right leg. Sporting a thick, strawberry-blond beard, the former US Marine says he came to Iraq in 2015 to join the fight against IS. But after months without seeing combat, Reed began treating wounded Kurdish peshmerga fighters before "realising there's a need for civilian treatment on the front lines." - 'Kids are the worst' -In the space of just three days this week, AEM and Iraqi medics treated a 12-year-old whose right leg was nearly blown off by a mortar round, a scrawny boy hurt when he picked up a mine, and a girl wounded in a car bombing that killed her entire family. "Kids. Kids are the worst," Reed says, shaking his head. "Adults and small children stay inside. Kids -- especially boys -- like to go outside and be adventurous."Wounded civilians are brought to the field clinic in the back of pick-up trucks or on the hoods of armoured Humvees. It is still too dangerous for their few ambulances to make the one-kilometre (less than one mile) journey to the front line. AEM staff and Iraqi paramedics work together to stop bleeding or dress wounds, with Reed often barking orders in English that a stocky Iraqi man translates to his colleagues. Urgent cases -- like the young mortar fire victim -- are transported by ambulance to hospital in Arbil, the Kurdish regional capital, some 80 kilometres (50 miles) to the east. To relax after treating patients, Reed and fellow American medic Derek Coleman, 27, guzzle down energy drinks and munch on chocolate. "I ended up here as a foreign fighter, and then I saw there was a need for medical (work)," Coleman, from New Jersey, says. Lifting his grey baseball cap to pat down his messy chestnut hair, he tells AFP he is bracing himself for a wave of civilian casualties as Iraqi troops push deeper into Mosul. "Also, if there's no fighting to keep Daesh busy, they may have more opportunity to target civilians," he adds, using an Arabic acronym for IS that its members consider pejorative. Reed, Coleman, and Adamik spend all day with Iraqi first aiders, then bed down with them in a nearby abandoned home to the sound of intermittent gunfire or shelling. Even on slow days, they look worn out by the afternoon. "Less patients mean you remember certain ones much more vividly," says Reed.

Israel Gives Initial Backing to Bill to Legalize Settler Homes
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/November 16/16/The Israeli parliament gave initial approval Wednesday to a bill to legalize thousands of West Bank settler homes, a measure drawing international anger and posing the government's biggest test since 2015 polls. The bill, which would apply to an estimated 2,000 to 3,000 Jewish homes in the occupied West Bank, requires three more full parliamentary votes to become law. There have been reports that a behind-the-scenes compromise could see the bill now stall. The vote in the Knesset, or parliament, was 58-50. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu initially opposed the bill, fearing an international backlash and legal implications, but voted in favor on Wednesday. Netanyahu faces pressure to hold his right-wing coalition together and not be seen as moving against the powerful settler movement. There has been speculation that the bill could even cause the government to collapse -- though a number of analysts caution that a compromise seems more likely for now. The bill has been pushed by hardline members of Netanyahu's coalition who defied his pleas not to move forward, while the country's attorney general says it will never hold up in court. But those who support it say the move is urgently needed to protect a Jewish outpost in the occupied West Bank called Amona. The outpost, where some 40 families live, is under a high court order to be demolished by December 25 because it was built on private Palestinian land. The bill, however, goes far beyond legalising Amona and would allow an estimated 2,000 to 3,000 Jewish homes in the West Bank built on Palestinian land to be legalized. Palestinian landowners would be offered compensation in exchange, but attorney general Avichai Mandelblit says the move would undermine private property laws. US President Barack Obama's administration says it is "deeply concerned." "This would represent an unprecedented and troubling step that's inconsistent with prior Israeli legal opinion and also break longstanding Israeli policy of not building on private Palestinian land," State Department spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau said. The international community considers all Israeli settlements in Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem and the West Bank to be illegal, whether they are authorized by the government or not. The Israeli government differentiates between those it has approved and those it has not. The progress of the bill, approved earlier by a committee of ministers on behalf of the government, has demonstrated the power of the settler movement.
'Land grab'
Netanyahu's government is seen as the most right-wing in Israeli history, and key members of his coalition advocate annexing most of the West Bank while openly opposing the idea of a Palestinian state. Opposition leader Isaac Herzog, who heads the Labor party, said the bill contravened Israeli and international law while justifying "theft." Israeli rights group Yesh Din, which represents Palestinian landowners in Amona, said parliament had "made another step towards legalizing widespread land grab in the West Bank and annexing the occupied territory to Israel."It said it had done so "all because the so-called leaders are incapable of standing up to lawbreakers." Education Minister Naftali Bennett, who heads the hardline Jewish Home party and has been the driving force behind the bill, has made no secret of his position. Last week, after the election of Donald Trump as president in the United States, he called for an end to the idea of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the basis of years of negotiations. He said "the era of a Palestinian state is over." Netanyahu's government currently controls 66 of the 120 seats in parliament. Finance Minister Moshe Kahlon, whose center-right Kulanu party holds 10 seats, has been key and had initially threatened not to vote. In the end, he voted for Wednesday's initial backing but said he would withdraw support in the future if it "harms" the country's high court. The statement was a reference to Amona and the high court ruling against it -- signaling that the bill could stall in the future if the outpost is not removed from it. Some Israeli analysts have spoken of the outsized power Bennett has accumulated with the help of the settler movement, saying it could seem Netanyahu was serving in his cabinet rather than the other way around. Bennett's party has only eight seats in parliament. But both men have little interest in new elections for now, a number of analysts said. "Bennett knows that it will be difficult to have a government more right-wing than the current one," a government official told AFP on condition of anonymity.

Israeli Bid to Turn Down Mosque Prayer Calls Blocked
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/November 16/16/A government-backed Israeli bill to limit the volume of calls to prayer at mosques has been blocked by an unlikely source -- the country's ultra-Orthodox Jews. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had backed the controversial bill, which government watchdogs had called a threat to religious freedom. It had been due to get its first reading in parliament this week until Health Minister Yaakov Litzman, a member of the ultra-Orthodox United Torah Judaism party, stepped in.Litzman appealed the bill Tuesday night, saying it could affect similarly loud Jewish prayers, Israeli media reported. The bill, proposed by members of the far-right Jewish Home party, was adopted by a ministerial committee on Sunday and was due to go through three readings in parliament before becoming law. The bill will now be put on hold until a ministerial committee holds a second vote.The bill was drafted in response to noise from mosques, but would in theory apply to all religious institutions -- including synagogues. "For thousands of years, the Jewish tradition has used various tools, including shofars (a ram's horn) and trumpets" for Jewish holidays, the minister said in his appeal letter, cited by the media. "Since the technology developed, loudspeakers have been used to announce the onset of the Sabbath, at the permitted volume level, and in compliance with every law," he added, referring to the weekly Jewish day of rest.He added that the proposed law constitutes an interference with religious practice and the status quo between religious authorities and the state. In protest against the bill, Arab-Israeli lawmaker Talab Abu Arar chanted the Muslim call to prayer in parliament earlier this week, provoking furious protests from some Jewish members. According to media reports, Arab MPs opposed to the bill pressured Litzman to use his power as a minister to block it, arguing a common right to religious practice for Jews and Muslims. Around 17.5 percent of Israelis are Arab, the vast majority of them Muslim, but they complain of discrimination and are underrepresented in high-level jobs. Israeli Arabs are the descendants of Palestinians who remained on their lands during the war that led to the creation of Israel in 1948. The draft law would also apply to east Jerusalem, occupied and later annexed by Israel and where more than 300,000 Palestinians live. Israeli Jews living in settlements in the east of the city had protested against the volume of prayer calls, Israeli media reported. The Israel Democracy Institute, a non-partisan think tank, has spoken out against the proposal and called it an unnecessary provocation. 

12 Haftar Soldiers Killed in Libya's Benghazi
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/November 16/16/Twelve soldiers of armed forces led by Marshal Khalifa Haftar have been killed in two days of fighting with jihadists in Libya's second city of Benghazi, military sources said Wednesday. They said 10 were killed on Tuesday and another two on Wednesday in west Benghazi. "Our forces have made a clear advance," one military official told AFP. Benghazi, birthplace of the 2011 revolution which toppled Libya's longtime strongman Moammar Gadhafi, has been the scene of daily clashes for the past two years between Haftar's forces and jihadist militias holding onto pockets of the city. Five years after the revolution, the country is embroiled in violence and run by two rival administrations.

Egypt Policeman Sentenced to Life for Killing Vendor
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/November 16/16/A Cairo court sentenced a policeman to life in prison on Wednesday for shooting dead a vendor in a dispute over the price of a cup of tea, judicial officials said. The incident in a Cairo suburb last April inflamed anger over a string of police abuses which the government has promised to end. The court convicted low ranking officer Zeinhom Abdel Razzek of murdering the street vendor after they quarreled over the price of a cup of tea. The court also convicted him of the attempted murder of two passersby he wounded in the shooting. In the incident's aftermath, President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi called for police who make mistakes to "immediately" be held responsible. In February, another policeman shot dead a driver using his official firearm following an argument over the price of ferrying goods, setting off protests in a Cairo neighborhood.

Russia Withdraws Signature from ICC Founding Statute
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/November 16/16/Russia said Wednesday it is formally withdrawing its signature from the founding statute of the International Criminal Court, saying the tribunal has failed to live up to the hopes of the international community. Russia in 2000 signed the Rome Statute setting up the ICC, the world's first permanent war crimes court, but never ratified the treaty. "The court did not live up to the hopes associated with it and did not become truly independent," Russia's foreign ministry said, describing its work as "one-sided and inefficient". Moscow said it is unhappy with the ICC's treatment of the case on Russia's short war with neighbouring Georgia in 2008, saying the court ignored aggression by Tbilisi against civilians in South Ossetia -- a pro-Moscow separatist region of Georgia. "In these conditions one cannot speak of trust in the International Criminal Court," the ministry said, adding that the decision to "not be a participant in the ICC statute" was taken by President Vladimir Putin and entails "withdrawing the signature from this document".
 
Egypt FM Meets Lebanon Leaders, Hands Aoun, Hariri Letters from al-Sisi
Naharnet/November 16/16/Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry held talks Wednesday with President Michel Aoun and other senior Lebanese leaders. “I handed President Aoun a letter from (Egyptian) President (Abdel Fattah) al-Sisi and it contains a message of support, solidarity and keenness on Lebanon's stability. I also handed him an official invitation to visit Egypt,” Shoukry said after meeting Aoun in Baabda. The visiting minister arrived later in Ain el-Tineh for talks with Speaker Nabih Berri. “I carried to him the salutations of His Excellency President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and his appreciation of his important and prominent role in achieving Lebanon's stability and filling the vacancies in its constitutional institutions,” Shoukry announced after the talks. Egypt's top diplomat later met with Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri and also handed him a letter from al-Sisi. The letter contains “congratulations on Lebanon's election of a new president and the looming formation of a new cabinet,” Shoukry said. “We expressed a common interest in strengthening the ties between the two countries, and Egypt will support stability in Lebanon,” the minister said. “We are looking forward to maintaining communication with all Lebanese parties in order to serve the interests of the two peoples,” Shoukry added. He also held talks with caretaker Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil, Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat and Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea. “My visit is aimed at extending congratulations and expressing Egypt's relief over the election of a president and the formation of a unity cabinet,” said Shoukry during a joint press conference with Bassil. Bassil for his part reminded of Aoun's oath of office, noting that it calls for “an independent foreign policy based on Lebanon's interest and commitment to the Arab League Charter and the principle of non-interference in the affairs of the Arab countries.”And speaking after talks with Shoukry in Clemenceau, Jumblat noted that “the delay in forming the cabinet is local,” adding that “some underprivileged components have the right to make some demands.”
 
Iranian Regime's Former Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces: Missile Launch Impossible Without Khamenei's Approval
Wednesday, 16 November 2016/NCRI - In an interview with the terrorist Quds Force’s Tasnim news agency, the former Iranian regime’s Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces said that “no missile is launched in the country unless approved by the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.”In parts of his interview published on November 12, Hassan Firouzabadi said that “the launch of ‘Emaad’ missile was approved by his holiness ‘Agha’ (Khamenei, the Iranian regime’s supreme leader)… when a missile reaches its testing phase, it needs the approval of ‘Agha’ (Khamenei) in order to be tested. Missile launch needs Agha’s approval. Even launching missiles during the military exercises need to be approved by the leader of the revolution (Khamenei).”He said that “missile launch without Khamenei’s approval is impossible. But before that, the technical and policy-making commissions make all the necessary arrangements, checking to see whether the missile has technically been properly built, whether it works and also whether that’s politically a good time to test the missile.”Firouzabadi added: “these issues are discussed and voted in those commissions and the final decision will be presented to the leader by the General Staff and if ‘Agha’ approves, the launch will be carried out, otherwise, it won’t. Even the timing of the launch is determined by him. Missile launch is by no means easy. Unlike a Kalashnikov bullet which may hit a pigeon or a chimney if it goes wrong, the missile could destroy part of a city if gone wrong.”

Maryam Rajavi meets Gérard Deprez MEP
NCRI Iran News/Wednesday, 16 November 2016/Maryam Rajavi meets Gérard Deprez, President of the Friends of a Free Iran (FOFI) at the European Parliament
Dr Gérard Deprez, MEP, President of the Friends of a Free Iran (FOFI) inter parliamentary group at the European Parliament met and held talks with Maryam Rajavi on November 11, 2016, at her residence in Auvers-sur-Oise. Mr. Deprez was accompanied by his parliamentary and press assistants in Brussels. He congratulated Mrs. Rajavi on the great victory for the Iranian Resistance and the People's Mojahedin of Iran (PMOI/MEK) in the successful relocation of the residents of Camp Liberty to Europe. He stressed that the Friends of a Free Iran enjoys the support of over 300 members of the European Parliament across the political groups. FOFI constantly endeavored over the years to ensure safety and security of the Iranian people's freedom fighters. Mr. Deprez said he is glad that the selfless children of the people of Iran have been relocated to a safe place despite deaths, injuries and considerable deprivations. Mr. Deprez also expressed the solidarity of MEPs with the Iranian people's Justice Seeking Movement to prosecute and punish the perpetrators and masterminds of the 1988 massacre of political prisoners in Iran. He pointed out that there is significant support in the European Parliament for democratic change in Iran. Maryam Rajavi expressed her gratitude to the President of the Friends of a Free Iran and the group's members. She stressed that the European Parliament should heed the deteriorating situation of human rights in Iran as well as the expansion of protests across the country and condition every step to expand trade relations with Iran on end to executions. She pointed out that every investment on Iran's clerical regime is not going to be productive as the regime faces irremediable political and economic crises and the Iranian people's detestation and profound discontent.

Islamic Republic of Iran: Sharia court sentences Christians to 80 lashes for drinking communion wine
Robert Spencer/Jihad Watch/November 16, 2016
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/16/islamic-republic-of-iran-sharia-court-sentences-christians-to-80-lashes-for-drinking-communion-wine/
“It is not illegal for Christians to drink alcohol in Iran but under Islamic law, Muslims are forbidden from drinking and it is illegal for Muslims to convert. The trio’s conversion from Islam to Christianity is not recognised by Iranian authorities who subscribe to Sharia law.”
The death penalty for apostasy is part of Islamic law. It’s based on the Qur’an: “They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah. But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper.” (Qur’an 4:89)
A hadith depicts Muhammad saying: “Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him” (Bukhari 9.84.57). The death penalty for apostasy is part of Islamic law according to all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence.
This is still the position of all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence, both Sunni and Shi’ite. Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the most renowned and prominent Muslim cleric in the world, has stated: “The Muslim jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them. The majority of them, including the four main schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools of jurisprudence (the four Shiite schools of Az-Zaidiyyah, Al-Ithna-‘ashriyyah, Al-Ja’fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah) agree that apostates must be executed.”
Qaradawi also once famously said: “If they had gotten rid of the apostasy punishment, Islam wouldn’t exist today.”
But the Iranian authorities are just lashing these converts, not executing them. At last, moderate Islam!

“Christians sentenced to 80 lashes by Sharia court for drinking communion wine,”
Katie Mansfield, Express, November 16, 2016
A SHARIA court has sentenced three Christians to 80 lashes each after finding them guilty of blasphemy for drinking holy communion wine. Yaser Mosibzadeh, Saheb Fadayee and Mohammed Reza Omidi will be flogged in public after being arrested at a house church gathering in Rasht, Iran, earlier this year. The trio spent weeks in prison before finally being released on bail, but will now be subjected to the cruel and degrading punishment after being found guilty by Islamist judges. Security agents also raided the home of their pastor Yousef Nadarkhani and his wife Fatemeh Pasandideh and arrested them at the same time, but they were not detained. Iranian authorities later charged converts Mosibzadeh, Fadayee and Omidi for consuming alcohol during a communion service. It is not illegal for Christians to drink alcohol in Iran but under Islamic law, Muslims are forbidden from drinking and it is illegal for Muslims to convert. The trio’s conversion from Islam to Christianity is not recognised by Iranian authorities who subscribe to Sharia law. An Iranian court sentenced the trio to 80 lashes each as punishment for their actions. Many people faint after eight strokes due to the severe pain of the barbaric corporal punishment, which was commonplace in the Middle Ages. The group, alongside Nadarkhani, are also due to be sentenced for “action against national security” at a later date at the Revolutionary Court in Rasht….

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on November 16-17/16
Former European lawmaker Struan Stevenson.The world cannot allow Iran's 1988 massacre to go unpunished
NCRI/Wednesday, 16 November 2016
 http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/16/former-european-lawmaker-struan-stevenson-the-world-cannot-allow-irans-1988-massacre-to-go-unpunished/
The United Nations General Assembly will debate a report on human rights in Iran later this month, writes former European lawmaker Struan Stevenson. The UN special rapporteur on the human rights situation in Iran, the author of the report, has been denied access to the country but, based on hundreds of interviews and careful analysis, he has described the situation in Iran as dire, Mr. Stevenson wrote on Tuesday in The Herald. Under the so-called “moderate” leadership of the regime's President Hassan Rouhani, some 3,000 executions have taken place, Mr. Stevenson pointed out.
"Although the human rights report on Iran will lay bare the horrific record of arbitrary arrest, torture and execution routinely meted out by the theocratic regime, many UN member states are demanding a full, independent inquiry into the summary execution of more than 30,000 political prisoners in Iran during the summer of 1988 in an atrocity that must rank as one of the most horrific crimes against humanity of the late 20th century. The vast majority victims were activists of the opposition People’s Mojahedin of Iran PMOI (MEK). The mass executions, in jails across Iran, were carried out on the basis of a fatwa by the regime’s then supreme leader, the psychotic and murderous Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini," Mr. Stevenson wrote in The Herald.
"A 'death committee' approved all of the sentences. Mostafa Pour-Mohammadi, leader of that 'committee', is President Rouhani’s justice minister. Other members of the 'committee' hold prominent positions in the Iranian regime. When Khomenei was questioned about those who had already served their sentences and been released from prison, or those who had been sentenced to terms of imprisonment, he ordered that they should all be put to death. He decreed that there should be no mercy for anyone, including teenagers. He said even pregnant women should not be spared or have the chance to give birth to their babies."
"Kangaroo courts were set up in Tehran and in cities across Iran and PMOI/MEK political prisoners were hauled in front of a Sharia judge who demanded to know if they supported the Mojahedin. Those who defiantly said yes were sentenced to immediate execution. These sham trials took on average two minutes. It was estimated that 30,000 political prisoners were hanged from cranes in batches of 10 every 15 minutes from dawn to dusk between August and December that year."
"The truth about this horrific genocide was revealed on August 9 this year when the son of grand ayatollah Hossein-Ali Montazeri, former deputy supreme leader of the Islamic Republic and nominated successor to Ayatollah Khomeini, published a previously unknown audio-tape in which Montazeri acknowledged that the massacre had taken place and had been ordered at the highest levels. Montazeri can be heard telling a meeting of the 'committee' that it is responsible for a crime against humanity. He says: 'The greatest crime committed during the reign of the Islamic Republic, for which history will condemn us, has been committed by you. Your names will in the future be etched in the annals of history as criminals.' Because of his forthright protests, the Grand Ayatollah was dismissed as the heir to the Supreme Leader by Khomeini and placed under house arrest until his death in 2009. Meanwhile Montazeri’s son has been charged with bringing the Islamic Republic into disrepute and could face the death penalty."
Mr. Stevenson continued: "The world cannot allow this grisly crime to go unpunished when we know that the murderers are not only still alive but also in positions of power. The justice minister has admitted his guilt, boasting publicly that he was 'proud to carry out God’s will in ordering the executions' and even calling for remaining supporters of the PMOI to be executed. President Rouhani, was deputy commander-in-chief of the regime’s armed forces at the time. He was aware of the extermination of political prisoners and should also be held to account."
"If the UN is to retain any shred of legitimacy it must launch a full and independent investigation into this appalling crime and insist on the arrest and trial for crimes against humanity of Khamenei, Rouhani and the other murderers whose bloodstained hands the West continues to shake," the article added.
**Struan Stevenson, a former Conservative Member of the European Parliament (MEP) representing Scotland, is president of the European Iraqi Freedom Association (EIFA)

UN adopts 63rd resolution condemning human rights violations in Iran
 Wednesday, 16 November 2016
 http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/16/un-adopts-63rd-resolution-condemning-human-rights-violations-in-iran/
 Maryam Rajavi: The international community seriously needs to take action to end executions, probe 1988 massacre
 NCRI - The United Nations General Assembly's Third Committee adopted a resolution Tuesday, November 15, 2016, on the violations of human rights in Iran with 85 favorable votes.
 The resolution expresses "serious concern at the alarmingly high frequency of the imposition and carrying-out of the death penalty by the (Iranian regime)… including executions undertaken for crimes that do not qualify as the most serious crimes, on the basis of forced confessions or against minors and persons who at the time of their offence were under the age of 18…"
 It also called on the Iranian regime "to abolish, in law and in practice, public executions," and demanded the regime "to ensure, in law and in practice, that no one is subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, which may include sexual violence, and punishments that are grossly disproportionate to the nature of the offence…"
 The UN resolution urged Tehran "to cease enforced disappearances" and "address the poor conditions of prisons, to eliminate the denial of access to adequate medical treatment and the consequent risk of death faced by prisoners."
 It further urged the regime "to end widespread and serious restrictions, in law and in practice, on the right to freedom of expression, opinion, association and peaceful assembly, both online and offline, including by ending the harassment, intimidation and persecution of political opponents, human rights defenders, women’s and minority rights activists…"
 The Third Committee resolution called on the regime "to release persons arbitrarily detained for the legitimate exercise of these rights, to consider rescinding unduly harsh sentences, including the death penalty and long-term internal exile, for exercising such fundamental freedoms" and "to eliminate, in law and in practice, all forms of discrimination and other human rights violations against women and girls," as well as against "persons belonging to ethnic, linguistic or other minorities."
 The Iranian Resistance's President-elect Maryam Rajavi welcomed the UNGA Third Committee's adoption of the resolution on human rights in Iran. She said, "The time has come for the international community to end the barbaric and systematic violations of human rights in Iran, particularly the mass executions, and undertake practical and effective measures. Inaction vis-à-vis a regime that has 120,000 political executions on its record --including the massacre of 30,000 political prisoners in 1988-- is a flagrant violation of the values and principles the United Nations Organization has been founded on.
 This is the 63rd UN resolution censuring human rights abuses in Iran. Despite the clerical regime's extensive efforts and schemes to prevent its adoption, the resolution received higher favorable votes compared to the General Assembly's resolution last year, with nine more countries voting in favor of it.  Noting the Third Committee resolution's call on the Iranian regime "to launch a comprehensive accountability process in response to all cases of serious human rights violations, including those involving the Iranian judiciary and security agencies, and to end impunity for such violations," Mrs. Rajavi said, "Since the Iranian regime's leaders, high ranking officials and incumbent judiciary officials are the main masterminds and perpetrators of human rights violations in Iran, the United Nations needs to launch an independent investigation committee to probe the regime's anti-human crimes and bring justice to those who ordered and carried out such crimes, particularly in the case of the 1988 massacre which is a true example of crime against humanity."
 *The Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/November 15, 2016
 
Trump: Europe’s wake-up call?

Dr. Azeem Ibrahim/Al Arabiya/November 16/16
It should not be controversial to observe that the EU is in a bit of a mess. It has been one slow-motion disaster ever since the 2008 financial crisis. That was initially because one of the pillars of European unity is the Euro currency, yet the European Union does not have the effective political integration to make a currency union work. Though Europe’s economies, for example, are more similar between themselves than the richest and the poorest states of the US, the United States has an adequate level of political and financial integration to make their monetary union work. Europe is quite far from that. And the political pressures this has put on Europe’s rulers, both in Brussels and in their respective capitals, has been tearing the Union apart. As has the series of political failures over the handling of the Syrian refugee crisis. Between the two, there is an existential threat hovering over the European project. Brexit was the first spasm of a potentially fatal illness. But the EU can survive Brexit. Britain has always made a point of being peripheral in the Union, and the EU has never gotten morally or culturally invested in having Britain in. Nevertheless, as seems to always be the case, people only really react adequately strongly to immediate threats. Long-term threats typically fail to elicit the right amount of concern. The lack of urgency amongst the general peoples of the world regarding climate change is but the best example. The European project suffers from much the same malaise among its leaders. They can all see that unless they change their approach drastically, the disillusionment with the European project among the people of Europe can ultimately lead to the dissolution of their ambitious project. Yet, nothing nearly dramatic or organized enough has come out of Brussels, even after Brexit. And this, even as France looks increasingly likely to elect Front National’s Marine Le Pen as President next year, which could well lead to the exit of France from the Union – and that would be a fatal blow. The threat of American withdrawal from Europe and the resurgence of Russian aggression on European soil may end up doing what the economic situation and the refugee crisis have failed to do
Trump’s NATO rhetoric
The unlikely hero of this story, however, may end up being Donald Trump. Trump is the first elected leader of the United States to have expressed antagonism towards NATO. NATO has been the keystone of American global power since WW2, but Trump, and his supporters, prefer a more isolationist United States. If Trump’s rhetoric on NATO is to be taken at face value, the security arrangements for Europe change drastically. For seven decades, Western European countries have developed under the protective umbrella of American military might, while they themselves have maintained semi-independent foreign policies. The security of European NATO members has always been understood as equivalent to the security of the United States’ vital interests, and thus their safety was assured. But the new US administration does not seem to hold to this defensive doctrine any longer. And even if the Pentagon is still on board, the mere fact that this is up for discussion for the President-Elect, even as Russia continues to carry out military operations against neighboring countries in Europe (i.e. Ukraine), should smash some sense of urgency into the heads of Europe’s political leaders. Europe is less safe now than at any time since the end of WW2. And at this moment in history, division will mean death. The threat of American withdrawal from Europe and the resurgence of Russian aggression on European soil may end up doing what the economic situation and the refugee crisis have failed to do: persuade Europe’s peoples of the critical importance of coming together and making the European project succeed, both economically and politically, but ultimately, also militarily; and also, get Europe’s leaders on the case and start taking drastic measures to re-engage the integration progress now, while there is still time. The Front National time-bomb is still ticking. But at least now, thanks to Trump, nobody in Europe can continue to pretend that they cannot hear the ticking. Or that they do not understand the consequences if the bomb does go off.

Israeli government trumps up the new US president
Yossi Mekelberg/Al Arabiya/November 16/16
Not many leaders around the world received the shocking news of Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential election with jubilation. Netanyahu’s Israeli government was one of the rare exceptions. Does Netanyahu see something in this most flawed of future US president in living (and beyond) memory, the rest of us don’t see? Most probably not; he must see leadership created in his own image. Trump brought to the election campaign much of the reckless methods that Netanyahu has used for more than two decades to win elections. Lies, deception, racism, promises that would never materialize and the appalling treatment of people working for them is just a short litany of the commonalities between these two elderly wealthy white men, who pretend to represent the deprived and disenfranchised in their societies and the future of their countries. Both have a very negative view of the ‘other’ that leads them to believe that walls between people serve their countries’ security and wellbeing best, not exploring common interests through dialogue. Netanyahu’s 10 years of premiership, stretching over more than two decades, had the misfortune, from his perspective, of coinciding with Democratic presidents in the White House – first in the 1990s it was Bill Clinton and over the last seven years Barak Obama. Both saw him as an obstacle to peace between Israel and the Palestinians. For the first time during his time in office, his counterpart in Washington is a Republican of sorts, but on this occasion of the very unpredictable and impulsive kind. Electing a president with negligible knowledge on foreign affairs and no understanding of the complexities of the Middle East might be seen as an advantage in Jerusalem.
True to form Trump changes his views on the Israeli-Palestinian issue from declaring his “neutrality”, to expressing his unwavering support for Israel. Needless to say, he was advised that being neutral toward Israel during elections in the United States is not an option for a candidate with a will to win. Israeli decision makers favor the idea that the new occupant of Oval office prefers confrontation with Iran rather than continuing diplomatic engagement with troublesome, though mostly pragmatic, interlocutors in Tehran. An Israeli minister from Netanyahu’s inner political circles asserted that there is a considerable overlap between US president-elect Donald Trump and Israel on key issues of importance that was lacking with President Barack Obama. Another declared that this was the time to bury the notion of a Palestinian state.
Two major sources of disagreement between the Netanyahu government and the Obama administration were the expansion of the Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and the Iranian nuclear deal. For the settlement movement in the occupied West Bank and their supporters, President Obama was an enemy who put pressure on Israel not to expand the settlements further, especially around Jerusalem. It was convincingly argued that Netanyahu might not have enjoyed the American pressure, however, used it effectively to counter balance the relentless pressure from the settlement movement for unrestrained building in the settlements.
Peace and settlement
If Trump’s close advisor Jason Greenblatt suggestion is correct that the newly elected president believes that settlement activity should not be condemned and that it is not an obstacle to peace, no surprise then that the Right in Israel celebrates his election. Even the little that Obama managed in limiting settlements’ construction will now become redundant. Moreover, according to Greenblatt, Trump is wholly subscribed to the Israeli narrative that the withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 and the removal of the Jewish settlements brought Hamas to power instead of advancing the cause of peace. This oversmiplistic view of the conflict is most probably going to be the prevailing one in the new Trump administration. Consequently, one wonders what can stop or at least restrain Israel from entrenching its occupation of Palestinian land. Releasing the brakes on the number of Jewish settlers in the West Bank in conjunction with fulfilling the election promise of the highly symbolic move of the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, surely will be the last nail in the already scant possibility of a peace agreement between the Israelis and the Palestinians, based on a two state solution, brokered by the United States. Trump’s election campaign was void of substance and replete with load of waffle. He called the nuclear deal with Iran a “disaster” and “the worst deal ever negotiated.” He gave no reasoning for these claims, though if you are Donald Trump you do not need to provide any logical explanation.
This was music to Netanyahu’s ears who was leading a campaign against the agreement with Iran. The President-elect announced that he wants to renegotiate the terms of the agreement, a move that can only harm an agreement, which despite its imperfections seems to be adhered to by all sides. He might also find the US isolated from the other members of the P5+1 that were instrumental in reaching a deal which is not flawless, but so far serves its purpose rather well. It would also make a mockery of signing agreements with one US administration, knowing that the next one is going to challenge it or even just reject it. Israeli decision makers favor the idea that the new occupant of the Oval office prefers confrontation with Iran rather than continuing complex diplomatic engagement with troublesome, though mostly pragmatic, interlocutors in Tehran. The Israeli government may rejoice over the election of Donald Trump and wave a goodbye of relief in the New Year to eight years of Obama’s presidency, but they do so for all the wrong reasons. Trump, who specialized in making gains out of bankruptcies, will very quickly discover that in international affairs when your foreign policy is bankrupt, there might not be a second chance. US policy in the Middle East in general and more particularly toward the peace process already lacks credibility. If Trump follows his irresponsible promises on the election trail, US foreign policy will face complete bankruptcy, and those in Israel who welcome a Trump presidency with great enthusiasm will find that there are no advantages when your closest of allies goes into political insolvency.

A Sunni Karbala
Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/November 16/16
A Lebanese friend, who happens to be a university professor and a distinguished researcher, told me about this conversation he had with a Lebanese Shiite intellectual. He was a sympathizer but not a member of Hezbollah. The discussion hovered around the injustice Sunnis have encountered in Lebanon in recent years. This Lebanese Sunni told his Shiite friend that the Sunnis in Lebanon are suffering from injustice and terrorism, because of the arms, militias and intelligence of Hezbollah which is organically linked to the Khomeini revolution guards.
The Shiite friend responded by saying: “We are the ones suffering as a result of injustice.” He said that they belong to the weak category and are being subjected to revenge for being Imam Hussain’s killers. We are loyal to those who grieve over injustice and persecution in annual ritual during Ashura. Every land is Karbala and every day is Ashura. The Sunni friend said that what concerns is the current situation in Lebanon. “Who is the strongest? Who is the armed party? Which party controls the country on the military level or exports its power to Syria to its far north in Aleppo and far east in Palmyra and to Iraq, Yemen and Gulf countries?”“And what have we done?” he asked. Even ISIS and al-Qaeda – and you accuse us of belonging to them – actually murder us, accuse us of infidelity and distort our positions. The madmen of ISIS and al-Qaeda have wreaked havoc and have harmed the security of our major countries, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan and other Gulf countries, while there has peace inside Iran. Grieving, lamenting and instilling angry emotions and appealing to the desire to avenge for Imam Hussain have, throughout history, been an emotional path and a means for politically mobilizing the public
‘Monopolizing injustice’
He concluded this interesting conversation by telling his nice Shiite friend: “Oh dear brother, for God’s sake, just give us the right to lament over injustice, just this once! Don’t monopolize injustice”. Grieving, lamenting and instilling angry emotions and appealing to the desire to avenge for Imam Hussain have, throughout history, been an emotional path and a means for politically mobilizing the public under the guise of avenging the blood that was shed on the soil of Iraq. All this is done in the name of Imam Hussain. The killing of Hussain happened around 1,400 years ago and the incident was condemned by all Muslims. I remember how during my teenage years I felt very sad reading about the murder of Hussain in the book The Beginning and The End by Ibn Kathir, the Sunni Shafi’i historian. Some may say why bother with all this as the Shiites will remain Shiites while the Sunnis will remain Sunnis and no one will change his mind after all these centuries since the entire incident has turned into a matter of social identity. This is true. However, the aim here is not religious or scientific debate but to indicate an interesting note which is that ordinary Sunnis today are the ones being subjected to oppression of “Karbala” proportions. Or perhaps everyone should take notice of the call for unifying patriotism and abandon this talk of history.
**This article was first published in Asharq al-Awsat on Nov. 16, 2016.

In our new Cold War, deterrence should come before detente
 David Ignatius/Washington Post/November 15/16
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/in-our-new-cold-war-deterrence-should-come-before-detente/2016/11/15/051f4a84-ab79-11e6-8b45-f8e493f06fcd_story.html?utm_term=.de4d8905af66
 The White House sent a secret “hotline”-style message to Russia on Oct. 31 to warn against any further cyber-meddling in the U.S. election process. Russia didn’t escalate its tactics as Election Day approached, but U.S. officials aren’t ready to say deterrence worked.
  The previously undisclosed message was part of the high-stakes game of cyber-brinkmanship that has been going on this year between Moscow and Washington. How to stabilize this relationship without appearing to capitulate to Russian pressure tactics is among the biggest challenges facing President-elect Donald Trump.
  The message was sent on a special channel created in 2013 as part of the Nuclear Risk Reduction Center, using a template designed for crisis communication. “It was a very clear statement to the Russians and asked them to stop their activity,” a senior administration official said, adding: “The fact that we used this channel was part of the messaging.”
  According to several other high-level sources, President Obama also personally contacted Russian President Vladimir Putin last month to caution him about the disruptive cyberattacks. The senior administration official wouldn’t comment on these reports.
  The private warnings followed a public statement Oct. 7 by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson charging that “Russia’s senior-most officials” had authorized cyberattacks that were “intended to interfere with the U.S. election process.”
  The senior administration official said Russia gave a “noncommittal” response to the Oct. 31 message, neither acknowledging the U.S. charges nor denying them. But the official confirmed reports by other high-level sources that after the public and private warnings, Russia did not increase its cyber-activity and may have reduced it.
  “We did not see an escalation of Russian cyber-activity aimed at either trying to disrupt the election process or trying to influence the process, in the month leading up to the election,” said one senior official. A second senior official cautioned, however, that it was too early to say “whether the Russians were deterred” from additional activity.
  The White House feared a last-minute Russian cyber-onslaught right up to Nov. 8, but it apparently never came. “We saw no evidence of any systematic attempt to disrupt the election on Election Day,” the first official said.
  These disclosures about secret U.S.-Russia contacts are the latest chapter in the story of heightened confrontation between the two countries — a process that Putin and Trump say they are seeking to reverse. Putin phoned Trump on Monday to discuss ways to improve current “unsatisfactory” relations after Trump takes office and seek a “partner-like dialogue,” according to a Kremlin statement.
  The Obama administration has grappled with how to establish norms of deterrence in cyberspace that check destabilizing actions by an aggressive, risk-taking Russia. The White House thought it was making progress with a joint statement at the November 2015 G-20 summit in Antalya, Turkey, which affirmed that “international law applies to state behavior in cyberspace.” The United States argues that this commitment includes observing laws of armed conflict that require proportionality and limited collateral impact in whatever battlespace. But the Obama administration fears Russia is ignoring these limits.
  The Obama administration is ready to explore these issues further with Russia through a little-known “working group” created under a defunct “presidential bilateral commission.” The working group last met in April in Geneva. At that meeting, according to the White House, “both sides discussed the possibility of expanding the quantity and scope of information sharing about malicious activity occurring on the networks of both countries.”
  Those words ring hollow now, in light of alleged Russian activities this year.
  Opinions newsletter
 Thought-provoking opinions and commentary, in your inbox daily.

 Sign up
 Russia experts in the Obama administration caution their successors: “It will be very difficult for the next administration . . . to know what Russia’s intentions are and whether you can have confidence that they will live up to their commitments,” said the second official. Russia has shown “increasing willingness to take risky actions,” and “old assumptions about the careful, calculating, risk-averse nature of Russian leadership . . . seem to be shifting.”
 Republican Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), a longtime critic of Russia, issued a similar warning Tuesday about Putin’s professed desire for “partner-like” relations. “We should place as much faith in such statements as any other made by a former KGB agent who has plunged his country into tyranny, murdered his political opponents, invaded his neighbors, threatened America’s allies and attempted to undermine America’s elections,” he said.
  A new Cold War has begun in cyberspace. Trump seems to want detente. But first he should think carefully about how to establish clear norms of deterrence in this new domain.

Turkey Targets Oldest Syriac Orthodox Monastery
by Robert Jones/Gatestone Institute/November 16/16
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9326/turkey-syriac-monastery
"The Turkish state attacks this sacred site to abuse Assyrians and indirectly convey this message: 'You will either live as I want you to live or you will leave these lands." — Tuma Celik, the Turkey representative of the European Syriac Union (ESU) and the editor-in-chief of the Assyrian monthly newspaper, Sabro.
"Latin Catholic churches still have neither a legal personality nor foundation status, making it impossible for them to register property or seek restitution." — European Commission 2016 Turkey Progress Report.
Muslim extremists often try to blame the violent or repressive acts against non-Muslims on "Muslim grievances." They claim that because of the "pain" or alleged "injustices," they are exposed to, they kill or attack other people.
Why do many Muslim extremists often demand more privileges in the West -- such as Islamic sharia law courts -- but never give indigenous non-Muslims equal rights in their own countries?
If their violence is only for "self-defense," why are they attacking, enslaving and persecuting the communities that are on the verge of extinction?
And why is the Turkish government attempting to build mosques across five continents while it relentlessly persecutes Christians who have been there for centuries -- long before Turks even arrived in the region from the Central Asia?
The European Commission has recently issued its 2016 Turkey Progress Report, which contains serious criticism of the country's increasingly grave human rights record.
One of the issues that the report has brought to light is the problem that Assyrians (or Syriacs) in Turkey face as a religious minority, such as property rights for the oldest surviving Syriac Orthodox monastery in the world: Mor Gabriel (the monastery of St. Gabriel), located in Mardin province, in southeastern Turkey.
One would expect Turkey, a NATO member and a candidate for EU membership, to preserve both the monastery and the tiny Assyrian community in the country. Nonetheless, the Turkish government has been involved in a dispute with the historic monastery and has threatened its existence.
"The lawsuits against the monastery were filed in 2008," said Tuma Celik, the Turkey representative of the European Syriac Union (ESU) and the editor-in-chief of the Assyrian monthly newspaper, Sabro.
One lawsuit demands that the monastery tear down the wall built around it to protect it 30 years ago; the lawsuit is claiming that the wall was built without permission. It is also demanding the imprisonment of those responsible for its construction.
Other lawsuits filed by the Under-Secretariat of Turkey's Treasury, and the Ministry of Forestry, claim that some of the land on which the monastery was built belong to the Turkish state and demand its return. Another lawsuit filed by the residents of the neighboring villages claims that the monastery is inside the borders of their villages.
"When we take into account all of these demands we see that the Turkish state is trying to harass Assyrians," Celik said.
"The lands that are the subject of the lawsuits have no economic value. But Assyrians often visit there because the monastery is sacred to them. The Turkish state attacks this sacred site to abuse Assyrians and indirectly convey this message: 'You will either live as I want you to live or you will leave these lands.' The state does so because Assyrians have been taking steps to return to their ancestral lands in Turkey since the 2000s."
Celik added that 30 parcels of land were seized from the monastery based on court rulings.
"In 2013, President Erdogan, who was prime minister at the time, promised in televised comments that he would return the lands that were unjustly seized from the monastery. Ever since, 12 parcels of land have been given back to the monastery but 18 are still in the hands of those who have seized them."
David Vergili, a member of the European Syriac Union (ESU), said that the monastery won the local lawsuits, but the Turkish Supreme Court overturned the rulings: "Then, the monastery went to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)." The trial at the ECHR is still ongoing.
"For Syriacs, the trial is political," added Vergili. "The fact that the monastery has enormous importance for Syriacs and that it still educates students has always kept the Turkish state on alert."
The EC report echoed the problems addressed by Celik and Vergili.
"Court cases on property restitution continued, including on ownership of the land on which the Syriac Orthodox Mor Gabriel monastery is built. Syriacs and Yazidis still faced difficulties to register property," stated the report, which stressed that other religious minorities are also exposed to similar discrimination.
"Latin Catholic churches still have neither a legal personality nor foundation status, making it impossible for them to register property or seek restitution. Problems were reported for Greek nationals in inheriting and registering property... The second church in Istanbul has not been opened yet despite requests by the Syriac Orthodox community."
The current population of Turkey is 99.2 % Muslim, according to the country's official figures. However, Anatolia, the region in which most of Turkey is located, used to have a Christian majority, with sizable Jewish and Yazidi communities, before the Turkish-Islamic invasion in the 11th century.
The Assyrian people, or Syriacs, are an indigenous Christian people in the region and one of the world's oldest civilizations. Some of the Assyrians are known as Chaldeans and others as Arameans. Today, their native lands are within Iraq, Turkey, Syria, and Iran.
Assyrians speak Aramaic, whose massive historic and religious importance the author Ross Perlin explains as follows:
Nearly three millennia of continuous records exist for Aramaic; only Chinese, Hebrew, and Greek have an equally long written legacy. For many religions, Aramaic has had sacred or near-sacred status. It is the presumed mother tongue of Jesus, who is reported in the Gospel of Matthew to have said on the cross: "Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?" ("My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?") It came to be used in the Jewish Talmud, in the Eastern Christian churches (where it is known as Syriac), and as the ritual and everyday language of the Mandaeans, an ethno-religious minority in Iran and Iraq.
It is not only the Islamic State (ISIS) that is exterminating the Assyrians. Turkey has also been a historic persecutor of the community.
The persecutions -- including the 1915 Ottoman genocide of Assyrians -- as well as subsequent and widespread discrimination against Assyrians, have led the community's size to dwindle. The remaining Assyrians in the country are estimated to number around 25,000 today. And even this tiny minority and its remaining religious sites are still subjected to bigotry, threats and discrimination.
When the issue of Islamic violence or terrorism is discussed, Muslim extremists often try to blame the violent or repressive acts Muslims carry out against non-Muslims on "Muslim grievances." They claim that because of the "pain" or alleged "injustices" they are exposed to, they kill or attack other people -- apparently how they choose to exhibit their emotions or frustrations.
But if these claims are genuine, why are they and their governments targeting and persecuting religious minorities such as Assyrians, Yazidis, Alevis, Baha'is, Mandaeans, Shabaks, and Zoroastrians, among others, who are forced to live almost like hostages in majority-Islamic countries that are actually their ancestral lands?
Why do many Muslim extremists often demand more privileges in the West -- such as Islamic sharia law courts -- but never give indigenous non-Muslims equal rights in their own countries?
If their violence is only for "self-defense," why are they attacking, enslaving and persecuting the communities that are on the verge of extinction?
And why is the Turkish government attempting to build mosques across five continents while it relentlessly persecutes Christians who have been there for centuries -- long before Turks even arrived in the region from the Central Asia -- and tries to seize lands from a historic Christian monastery?
**Robert Jones, an expert on Turkey, is currently based in the UK.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
 
Senior Saudi Journalist Turki Al-Dakhil: Trump Will Be Good For Gulf States
 MEMRI/November 16/16/ While many writers in the Saudi and Gulf media reacted to the election of Donald Trump for U.S. president with mixed emotions, expressing hopes for cooperation with him but also concern because of his hostile statements regarding Muslims,[1] Turki Al-Dakhil, the general manager of Al-Arabiya's news channel, took a much less ambivalent position, stressing the possible benefit of Trump's election for Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states. In a November 13, 2016 article titled "On Trump-Phobia," he wrote that Trump's statements against African Americans, Latinos and Muslims had been mere propaganda aimed at achieving electoral gains, and that now that the elections were over, Trump would rule according to law. He also stressed that Trump's foreign policy advisor, Walid Phares, had confirmed Trump's desire to strengthen U.S. ties the Gulf in order to combat terrorism and confront the Iranian expansion, and this in contrast to Obama, who flirted with the Iranian axis and rewarded it.
 The following is the article as it appeared on Al-Arabiya's English-language website:[2]
 "Arab lamentation and some people's grief over Donald Trump's victory in the US presidential election is all due to the statements which Trump made during his election campaign. The president-elect had made statements against African Americans, Latinos, Mexicans and Muslims. However, now that he's been elected, he will be everyone's president and he will govern according to law.
 "It's necessary to differentiate between Trump during the election campaign and Trump after being elected president.
 "The road to the White House has a lot of turns which obligate one to adapt to successfully achieve goals.
 "When it comes to election campaigns, there are certain formulas; escalation against black people gains the support of white fanatics while accusations against Muslims attract Evangelical voters. The issue is not related to an electoral agenda but was rather a pattern of propaganda against Hillary Clinton who was guaranteed the votes of the minorities. It's all about calculations and each statement achieved a certain electoral gain. However, after victory is achieved, all this ends as they turn over a new leaf. This seems obvious from the speech which Trump delivered after he won and from the statements which he's made since then.
 "Trump's foreign policy advisor Walid Phares confirmed Trump's desire to strengthen historical ties with Saudi Arabia and to make every effort to implement the proposal for a Gulf-American partnership in the region to confront terrorism and Iranian expansion. Phares also confirmed Trump's desire to increase sanctions against Hezbollah and besiege it on all levels.
 "Excessive optimism or pessimism is not welcome in political realism.
 "Barack Obama's presidential terms brought our region nothing but hesitance toward the Iranian axis, while flirting with it and rewarding it, and strictness toward the Gulf axis, while evading agreements. So let him go as no one will weep about his White House departure!"
 Endnotes:
 [1] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No.6674, Arab World Reacts To Trump's Presidential Win With Cautious Optimism, Hope For Future Cooperation, November 11, 2016.
 Arab World Reacts To Trump's Presidential Win With Cautious Optimism, Hope For Future Cooperation
 [2] English.alarabiya.net, November 13, 2016.

Palestinians: The Message Remains No and No
Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/November 16/16
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9334/palestinians-rejectionism
The position of the two Palestinian leaders, Arafat and Abbas, is deeply rooted in the Palestinian tradition and culture, in which any compromise with Israel is considered an act of high treason. Abbas knows that concessions on his part would result in being spat upon by his people -- or killed.
Hence the PA president has in recent years avoided even the pretense of negotiations with Israel, and instead has poured his energies into strong-arming the international community to impose a solution on Israel.
The French would do well to abandon their plan for convening an international conference on peace in the Middle East.
Declaring a Palestinian state in the Security Council only makes them look as if their actual goal is to destroy Israel -- and they know it. They would be fooling no one.
Many in Europe, particularly France, seem be aching to do just that -- as a "present" to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to show how submissive they can be; to encourage more "business" with Muslim states, and, they might hope, to deter more terrorist attacks. Actually, if the members of the UN Security Council declare a Palestinian state unilaterally, they are encouraging more terrorist attacks: the terrorists will see that attacks "work" and embark on more of them to help the jihadi takeover of Europe go even faster.
Last week, Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas tipped his hand concerning his ultimatum on any revival of the peace process with Israel.
"I'm 81 years old and I'm not going to end my life drooping, making concessions or selling out."
Thus declared a defiant Abbas at a rally in Ramallah, marking the 12th anniversary of the death of his predecessor, Yasser Arafat.
Abbas in this way relayed to the hundreds of Palestinians who gathered in Ramallah to commemorate Arafat: "I have no intention of going down in history as a leader who compromised with Israel."
Like Arafat, Abbas would rather die intransigent than achieve a peaceful settlement with Israel.
Yet the position of the two Palestinian leaders is deeply rooted in the Palestinian tradition and culture, in which any concession to or compromise with Israel is considered an act of high treason.
Upon returning to Ramallah in the summer of 2000, after following the botched Camp David summit, Arafat explained his decision to reject the offer made by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak. According to Arafat, Barak wanted the Palestinians to make concessions concerning Jerusalem and its holy sites.
"He who relinquishes one grain of soil of the land of Jerusalem does not belong to our people," Arafat announced. "We want all of Jerusalem, all of it, all of it. Revolution until victory!"
At Camp David, Arafat and his negotiators demanded full sovereignty over the entire West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem, including its holy sites and the Jewish Quarter in the Old City. They also repeated their long-standing demand that the "right of return" for Palestinian refugees be fully implemented, allowing hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to flock into Israel.
Barak, for his part, is said to have offered the Palestinians a state that would be established on 91% of the West Bank, large parts of East Jerusalem and the entire Gaza Strip. What is certain is that Barak wanted the Palestinian leader to make some concessions on the explosive issues of Jerusalem and refugees.
The Camp David summit failed the moment Arafat realized that he was not going to get all of his demands met. Arafat later informed his confidants that he walked out of the summit because he did not want to go down into history as a leader who succumbed to Israeli and American pressure.
Fast-forward 16 years: Abbas stands near Arafat's grave in Ramallah and spouts similar sentiments. Vowing to continue in Arafat's path and honor his legacy, Abbas said that these days he was being "inspired" by his predecessor's "determination" and "resolve."
Abbas is at least up-front in his intentions. No one, he says unashamedly -- not the Israelis nor the Americans nor the Europeans -- ought to harbor any illusions. "Peace" with the Palestinians, says Abbas, means Israel fulfilling each and every demand he -- and Arafat -- has made. "Peace," in other words, with no Palestinian concessions.
Arafat continues to enjoy massive popularity among Palestinians because he died without "selling out" to Israel. His hero status hinges on his rejectionism at Camp David.
Had Arafat accepted Barak's offer at that summit, he would have been condemned as a "pawn" in the hands of the Israelis and Americans, a failed leader who betrayed his people.
Abbas's self-fashioning himself in the guise of Arafat is not new. For many years, he has been following in the footsteps of Arafat and honoring his legacy. Moreover, Abbas is well aware that, like Arafat, he is not authorized by his people to make any concessions to Israel. This is not merely because Abbas is now in his 12th year of a four-year-term in office.
Like his predecessor Yasser Arafat (left), Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas (right) would rather die intransigent than achieve a peaceful settlement with Israel.
Even if Abbas were a legitimate president, no concessions to Israel would be forthcoming. Arafat was quoted back then as saying that he rejected the Barak offer because he did not want to end up drinking tea with assassinated Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, the first Arab leader to sign a peace agreement with Israel.
Thus, Abbas is in no hurry to return to the negotiating table with Israel. Indeed, for Abbas, there is no negotiation -- only demands. He knows that concessions on his part would result in being spat upon by his people -- or killed.
Hence the PA president has in recent years avoided even the pretense of negotiations with Israel, and instead has poured his energies into strong-arming the international community to impose a solution on Israel -- one that would indeed supply the Palestinians with nearly all their demands.
Abbas and the Palestinian leadership in Ramallah want the international community to hand them what Israel will not give them at the negotiating table. Abbas is hoping to achieve his goal through international conferences on the Middle East, like the one being floated around by France, or through the United Nations and other international agencies and institutions.
In fact, this has been Abbas's sole strategy in recent years: a diplomatic war in the international arena that is aimed at isolating and delegitimizing Israel, in order to force it to comply with all Palestinian demands.
Of course, this strategy has its risks. Yet, if it fails, Abbas will at least depart the scene without being branded with the scarlet letter of "traitor." His successor, he hopes, will stand next to his grave and pledge to follow in his footsteps, as he himself has done for Arafat. And this is not an idle hope. Thanks to decades of indoctrination and anti-Israel rhetoric, for which both Arafat and Abbas are also responsible, Palestinians have been radicalized to the point where it is impossible to identify a single leader who would negotiate in good faith with Israel.
Under the current circumstances, any attempt by the Obama Administration -- in its remaining months in power -- to support a United Nations vote in favor of a Palestinian state will be seen as a reward to those Palestinians who are opposed to a resumption of peace negotiations with Israel.
Many in Europe, particularly France, seem be aching to do just that -- as a "present" to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) to show how submissive the French can be; to encourage more "business" with Arab and Muslim states, and, they might hope, to deter more terrorist attacks. Actually, if the members of the UN Security Council declare a Palestinian state unilaterally, they are encouraging more terrorist attacks: the terrorists will see that attacks "work" and embark on more of them to help the jihadi takeover of Europe go even faster.
The Obama Administration (and the next US Administration) need to make it clear to Abbas and the Palestinians that the only way to achieve a state is through direct negotiations with Israel, and not additional UN resolutions.
Similarly, the French would do well to abandon their plan for convening an international conference on peace in the Middle East. They need to understand that Abbas and the Palestinians are hoping to use the conference as an excuse to stay away from the negotiating table with Israel -- the only country that could really help the Palestinians achieve a state through direct talks. Declaring a Palestinian state in the Security Council only makes them look as if their actual goal is to destroy Israel by allying "two sides of the Mediterranean" against Israel -- and they know it. They would be fooling no one. The message that needs to be relayed to the Palestinians is that UN resolutions and international conferences will not bring them closer to achieving their aspirations. Another message that needs to be driven home to the Palestinian leadership is that without preparing their people for peace and compromise with Israel, the whole idea of a two-state solution is meaningless.
An entire Palestinian generation has been raised on the poisonous idea that even the consideration of compromise with Israel is traitorous. The next US Administration might do well to consider this unpleasant reality.
**Khaled Abu Toameh, an award-winning journalist, is based in Jerusalem.
Follow Khaled Abu Toameh on Twitter
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
 
Everyone Loves Israel -- Until They Don't
Robert Satloff/Mosaic/November 14, 2016
Yes, Israel is popular right now, but most of its new friendships are based on assessments of common interest, and such assessments can change overnight.
 In the lead article of Mosaic online magazine, "Everybody Loves Israel," the Hudson Institute's Arthur Herman celebrates Israel's stunning global popularity -- in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and across a wide section of America -- and suggests that Israel's diplomatic future looks brighter than ever. Invited by Mosaic to respond, Washington Institute Executive Director Robert Satloff struck this more cautionary note.
 Arthur Herman is right: Israel is hot -- diplomatically, not just meteorologically. Old adversaries are burying the hatchet; new friendships are blossoming; and suitors around the world are jockeying for the attention of Israeli leaders, diplomats, generals, scholars, investors, consultants, and hi-tech entrepreneurs.
 Little of this is known -- and less is appreciated -- in the Washington-to-Boston corridor that defines "conventional wisdom" for the large majority of Americans, who are told that Israel is increasingly isolated around the world. But that unfortunate circumstance does not alter the array of opportunities presented by Israel's exploding relations throughout Asia, Africa, Latin America, and even parts of Europe. Nor does it obscure the fact that Israel remains hugely popular across large swaths of America -- particularly, perhaps especially, where there are few Jews.
 Still, at the risk of raining on a parade of what is, without doubt, good news for the Jewish state, I believe a warning about "irrational exuberance" is in order. This is not to disparage the remarkable achievements Israel has scored on the global front over the past decade or so, as Herman ably and comprehensively chronicles. Nor is it to criticize the wise investments Israeli governments, corporations, and civil-society organizations have made in spreading the word of Israel's attractions and advantages to the four corners of the globe.
 Rather, it is to caution Israel and its friends against a series of what I believe are false hopes about the ultimate strategic significance of these welcome shifts -- namely, false hopes that Israel's current burst of global popularity will necessarily remain the "new normal" of international politics; that the world will forever agree to relegate the Palestinian issue to the diplomatic back burner; and, perhaps the falsest of all, that one or a collective of Israel's new friends could replace the often irksome, sometimes cranky alliance with the United States.
 Not that Herman himself makes these assumptions; indeed, he offers a series of caveats both at the outset and in the conclusion of his essay. Others, however, are less cautious in their determination to find long-term strategic significance in Israel's current global economic and diplomatic success. And even Herman's own caveats can strike one as pro-forma, much like the warning labels on cigarette packs or liquor bottles: perfunctory statements that smokers or drinkers don't even notice in their zest to partake.
 So let me spell out my warnings.
 First, given the speed of seismic strategic shifts in both the Middle East and broader global politics in recent years, it is foolhardy for any government -- especially Israel's -- to bank on the idea that "the way things are" are the way things are going to be. In its immediate neighborhood, Israel's good fortune rests on a strengthened partnership with an increasingly authoritarian Egypt; a convergence of interests with the Sunni states of the Gulf; and an energy-based condominium with Turkey.
 The long-term stability of any of these three realities is not a foregone conclusion. Egypt's volcanic domestic change has probably not seen its last tremor; the Gulf's under-the-table bromance with Israel will last only so long as Gulf leaders see it as a useful component of regional competition with revolutionary Iran, the common enemy of Sunnis and Zionists alike; and no one can seriously bank on any strategic continuity with a megalomaniacal leader like Turkey's Erdogan at the helm of a regional power.
 Specifically, when either change comes to Iran or Gulf leaders opt for a different strategy toward that country -- accommodation, for example -- ties with Israel, such as they are, will be easily jettisoned. My friendly advice to Israel would therefore be to take advantage of the moment to expand its web of relationships in Egypt, Turkey, and the Gulf so as to insulate bilateral ties as much as possible from the almost inevitable changes in the broader strategic environment. But Israelis should never forget that in all of these relationships, they are the dependent variable, whose fortunes will rise and fall based on events largely beyond their control.
 In this same connection, it bears stressing that Israel's strength and survival remain a core strategic interest for only two actors in the region: the Hashemite kingdom of Jordan and the Palestinian Authority. Despite the competition and mutual mistrust between these two entities, both rely on Israel for critical elements of their security. They may not say so publicly, but that is the strategic reality, and it is unlikely to change in the foreseeable future.
 Next, an important component of Israel's current global success is the fact that countries around the world seem to have lost interest in the Palestinian issue. Given the dysfunction of the Palestinian Authority, the years of apparently fruitless diplomacy, the now-structural division between the PA-governed West Bank and Hamas-ruled Gaza, and, most importantly, the far more pressing real-life urgency of the crisis in Syria and the twin challenges of Sunni jihadism and Iranian expansionism, it is no surprise that the Palestinian issue has been downgraded on both the regional and international fronts. Indeed, this changed prioritization is both right and just.
 But we have seen this movie before. Remember 1987? That was the year when a previous episode of intra-Muslim sectarian conflict -- the Iran-Iraq war -- dominated Arab politics, and Saddam Hussein commanded the stage at an Arab summit in Amman, Jordan. The Palestinians, including Yasir Arafat himself, were shunted aside, an afterthought on the Arab agenda. At the time, Yitzhak Shamir was Israel's prime minister, and many in his circle viewed this turn in Arab politics as signaling a new realism among regional capitals concerning Israel's approach toward the Palestinians. But that didn't last long. Just weeks after the gavel fell on the Arab summit, the Palestinian uprising broke out, the word intifada entered our lexicon, and the new "reality" was overturned. The rest, as they say, is history.
 This is not to imply that the current moment is as fleeting as the seeming respite of 1987. Nor do I wish to minimize the impact that decades of experience with Palestinian dysfunction and the failures of peace diplomacy have had on the global attention span. Rather, I recount this story to reaffirm a truism about the resonance of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict: namely, that, at its core, this is an inter-communal and not an inter-state issue. That's good news on the conventional military level, in the sense that no state is likely ever to fight Israel on behalf of the Palestinians. But it's also bad news in the sense that when the relationship between Israelis and Palestinians blows up, the reverberations can spread far and wide, with the potential to overwhelm other political realities.
 Admittedly, this doesn't always happen; a case in point is the survival of Jordan's and Egypt's peace treaties with Israel despite periodic turbulence in Israeli-Palestinian relations. But the potential is certainly there. In the current moment, calm reigns between Israel and, respectively, Ramallah and Gaza. With the potential for tumultuous days ahead -- when, for example, change comes in a post-Mahmoud Abbas environment -- few would wager that calm will reign forever. And that will have a powerful impact on how other states -- especially but not solely Arab states -- calibrate their relations with Israel.
 What, then, about Israel's non-Arab new friends, especially among the great powers of Russia, China, and India? It is, of course, no small achievement for Israel to have built such strong relationships over the past two decades with these powerful and influential countries, relationships from which Israel reaps enormous economic and, to a lesser but still significant degree, political and diplomatic benefit. Wise Israeli leaders will continue to do what they can to cultivate these connections.
 But giddiness over Israel's new "strategic partnerships" should be avoided. As Herman quite correctly notes in his concluding caveats, two of these countries -- Russia and China -- are, to say the least, not democratic; their relations with Israel are devoid of "shared values" and are based solely on assessments of current common interest. Such assessments can change over time, and overnight. One has only to recall that in 1947 the Soviets supported the UN partition resolution that authorized Israel's creation, only to shift course, arm Israel's sworn enemies, and eventually lead the fight for the UN's infamous "Zionism is Racism" resolution of 1975, a move designed to undermine the very legal and moral foundations of the Jewish state. If today's "correlation of forces" leads Moscow or Beijing to value relationships with powers other than Israel, there will be little nostalgia or sentimentality standing in the way of junking ties with Jerusalem.
 India, a robust democracy, is probably a surer friend over the long term than either China or Russia, inasmuch as it shares both values and interests with Israel; as a result, building deeper ties with New Delhi deserves even greater effort and urgency on the part of Israeli leaders. But even here, some humility is in order concerning the strategic significance of the Israeli-Indian partnership.
 The relevant historical analogue here is France, a democracy that was Israel's great-power patron in the 1950s. And the French-Israel relationship, it is important to note, had the additional advantageous component of the French-Jewish community -- one of the world's largest -- as a bridge between the two countries, an asset that the India-Israel relationship lacks. But when in the 1960s a popular political leader in Paris suddenly decided to end the strategic relationship and shift from an alliance with Israel to an alliance with Israel's enemies, the partnership was swiftly severed. Nothing decrees that India-Israel relations are fated to be a reprise of French-Israel relations of a half-century ago, but it is well to be reminded that even partnerships with democracies can swiftly and suddenly collapse.
 This leads finally to a discussion of the United States. In his essay (which was published before the recent election), Herman expresses the hope that, once Barack Obama leaves office, the next presidential administration will come to base its Middle East policy on an "unapologetic assertion of the congruity of U.S. and Israeli interests in promoting, peace, stability, and democratic values." Perhaps that will happen; one certainly hopes it will. But it would be foolish not to entertain at least the possibility that some of today's worrying signs about the U.S.-Israel relationship could worsen and even congeal politically. These signs include frustration with Israel's policy toward the Palestinians, which has eroded pro-Israel sentiment among substantial elements of the Democratic party, and frustration with Israel's deference to an Orthodox state rabbinate, which has eroded support for Israel among a substantial part of another key constituency, namely, the American Jewish community.
 To be sure, Israel remains a wildly popular ally for many Americans, and neither of these phenomena currently threatens the status of what is, in many respects, the most remarkable alliance between a great power and a small regional power in modern history. But alliances need tending; they don't thrive without care and attention. Should Israel take the American alliance for granted -- without devoting care and attention to weak spots in the relationship and without investing in the new areas of opportunity, such as the rising Latino influence in American politics -- it runs the risk of awaking one morning with an American alliance in profound disrepair. This doesn't mean that Israel needs to take measures that run counter to its core national interest for the sake of the U.S.-Israel relationship; but it also doesn't mean that indifference to the concerns of large and influential blocs of politically active Americans is a wise policy.
 The good news for Israel is that the ability to determine the health and vibrancy of its alliance with America lies largely in its own hands. This has long been a reality of the U.S.-Israel relationship, if one that not every Israeli leader has fully appreciated. Israeli leaders who are serious about the task of tending the relationship and who take the initiative to deepen and broaden it will find their efforts justly rewarded.
 Robert Satloff is executive director of The Washington Institute and author of several books on the Middle East, including Among the Righteous: Lost Stories from the Holocaust's Long Reach into Arab Lands.

What's the Most Immediate National Security Issue Facing Trump?
Mark Martin/CBN News/November 16/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/16/mark-martincbn-news-whats-the-most-immediate-national-security-issue-facing-trump/
 http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/2016/november/whats-the-most-immediate-national-security-issue-facing-trump
President-elect Donald Trump is building his administration and many are watching closely to see who he'll put on his national security team. Professor Ryan Mauro, the national security analyst for the Clarion Project, weighed in on some of the potential choices. The Clarion Project is a non-profit organization with the goal of shining the light on the dangers of Islamist extremism.
 "I like a lot of the names that are being thrown out there such as Jim Woolsey, John Bolton, Rudy Giuliani, Jeff Sessions," Mauro told CBN News.
  Woolsey served as the CIA director under President Bill Clinton. Bolton served as the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations under President George W. Bush. Giuliani is the former mayor of New York City and gained national acclaim for his handling of the 9-11 crisis. Sessions has served as a U.S. Senator from Alabama since 1997.
 Mauro believes the most immediate issue facing Trump is dealing with al Qaeda and ISIS.
  "The issue I really need to hear some articulation on is (how) ISIS's loss is al Qaeda's gain," Mauro said. "So if al Qaeda's picking up the remnants of ISIS and other groups are joining and aligning with al Qaeda in Syria as they are, then how do you gain ground against the ideology and the groups that act on behalf of that ideology?"Another national security issue facing the Trump administration is the Iran nuclear deal.
  "If Trump wants to scrap that deal the second that he takes that oath of office, he can do it," Mauro said. "It's an agreement between two countries, leaders, and one of the leaders -- ours -- is no longer in power at that point."
 "But what I would recommend is that the United States implement tough sanctions on Iran for terrorism and human rights and start backing Iranian opposition groups," he continued. "The Iranian regime has said they would respond by pulling out of the deal if they did it."
  "I would much prefer to force Iran to scrap the deal than us," he said.
 Another national security issue before the Trump administration involves the Muslim Brotherhood. Walid Phares, a foreign policy advisor for Trump, has said the president-elect will work to pass legislation designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group.
 "Walid Phares is another name that gives me a lot of confidence; there are few people that I would like to see in an administration more than Walid Phares," Mauro told CBN News.
 "There is a bill in Congress to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization," he continued. "The Trump administration makes it more likely than ever that that will happen. The reason that is important to designate the Brotherhood as a terrorist group is because it is the parent group of Hamas."
 "Hamas is just the Palestinian wing of the Brotherhood, so Hamas is banned in the U.S., but the rest of the Brotherhood is not," Mauro said. "And so they're allowed to influence our politics, our debate, our civil society, our policy, and that can go on no longer. That has to be stopped."
 *CBN neither supports nor opposes any candidate for public office.