LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

November 24/16

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletin16/english.november24.16.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew 12/46-50/:"While he was still speaking to the crowds, his mother and his brothers were standing outside, wanting to speak to him. Someone told him, ‘Look, your mother and your brothers are standing outside, wanting to speak to you.’But to the one who had told him this, Jesus replied, ‘Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?’And pointing to his disciples, he said, ‘Here are my mother and my brothers! For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.’
 
You are no longer a slave but a child, and if a child then also an heir, through God
Letter to the Galatians 04/01-07/:"My point is this: heirs, as long as they are minors, are no better than slaves, though they are the owners of all the property; but they remain under guardians and trustees until the date set by the father. So with us; while we were minors, we were enslaved to the elemental spirits of the world. But when the fullness of time had come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, in order to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive adoption as children. And because you are children, God has sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, crying, ‘Abba! Father!’So you are no longer a slave but a child, and if a child then also an heir, through God."

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on November 23-24/16
Prince Khalid al-Faisal in Lebanon/Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al-Awsat/November 23/16
Donald Trump's New Cabinet Will Hold Iran to Account/Struan Stevenson/ UPI/November 23/6
Dividing or Sharing Syria/Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al-Awsat/November 23/16
Stop Facebook, Social Media Fake News/Abdulrahman Al-Rashed/Asharq Al-Awsat/November 23/16
Iran, Hamas and the Dance of Death/Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/November 23/16
Status of the Syrian Rebellion: Numbers, Ideologies, and /Fabrice Balanche/The Washington Institute/November 22/16
Letting Catholic priests into Australia was a mistake/By Richard Cooke/Monthly/November 23/16
The Atrocious Scandal of the UNESCO Vote on Jerusalem/ Salim Mansur/Gatestone Institute/November 23/16
Trump's Iran policy can finally correct for Obama, Bush failures/ Heshmat Alavi/The Hill/November 23/16
A global library in Dubai/Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/November 23/16
Getting to know the company Trump would like to keep/Chris Doyle/Al Arabiya/November 23/16
Arab action for happiness is need of the hour/Samar Fatany/Al Arabiya/November 23/16


Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on on November 23-24/16

Butterball turkey supplier investigated for business ties to Hizballah
Your Thanksgiving Turkey May Come from a Company with Terrorist Ties
Salam receives Foreign Minister of Qatar
Qatari Foreign Minister meets Geagea
Qatari Foreign Minister visits Hariri: Confident that a strong government will be formed
Jumblatt meets German official in Clemenceau
Justice Council to look into Bachir Gemayel assassination lawsuit Friday
Rahi in Rome: Lebanon at threshold of new phase
Hakim inaugurates Art of Living exhibition at Forum Du Beirut
Man shot in cheek in Sidon
Bassil: All Parties Can be Represented in 24-Member Govt., Minor Details Delaying Line-Up
Qatar FM Invites Aoun to Visit Doha, Vows 'Continued Support' for Lebanon
Qatar’s FM says Doha stands with Lebanon
Sideline Meetings on Indepedence Day Tackled Cabinet Formation Hurdles
Berri: Minor Obstacles Impeding Cabinet Will be Eased
Baalbek-Hermel Vendettas Panel Begins Action after Meeting Nasrallah
Zahra: Lebanese Forces Share in Cabinet Rightful
Houri: Visits of Gulf Officials Reinstates Confidence in Lebanon
Ogassapian: Hurdles to Form Cabinet Result of Concerns over 'Christian Agreement'
Prince Khalid al-Faisal in Lebanon
Rouhani felicitates Lebanon on Independence Day
Lebanon: Ministerial Consultations Mark Independence Day Celebrations
Reports: Hezbollah chief’s guard seen in Syria’s Aleppo, Homs

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on on November 23-24/16
Aleppo Civilians Try to Flee as Syrian Army Advances
Family of six die in east Aleppo chlorine gas attack
Moral outrage’ over Aleppo child deaths, suffering
Israel bid to quiet Muslim call to prayer revived
A Top Egyptian Human Rights Activist Banned from Travel
Israel Minister Doesn't Expect Mideast Move by Obama
European Parliament Vote on Turkey Has 'No Value'
Libya unity forces closing on Sirte militants
Trial begins for suspects held in King Abdullah assassination bid
Trump keen to broker Palestine-Israel peace deal
Trump chooses immigrant background Haley for UN ambassador: Reports
Eight Arab countries follow Morocco, withdraw from Guinea summit
Eighteen members of Canadian military took their own lives in 2015, DND reports Soldiers generic
US-Iranian citizen convicted in US for trying to buy missiles for Iran
Iran: Arrest and beating of demonstrators
Iran – Tehran, Gathering in Front of the United Nations to Protest the Continued Detention of Mohammad Ali Taheri
Donald Trump's New Cabinet Will Hold Iran to Account
Iran: Call to save political prisoners on hunger strike
For Iran Regime, to Truly Reform Is to Lose Power and to Face the Wrath of the Population
New Developments in the Internal Conflict of the Iranian Regime
Iran Warns of Reaction to Renewal of Decades-Old Sanction
The Iranian Regime Fears for the Future Combination of the US Cabinet
 
Links From Jihad Watch Site for on November 23-24/16
Austin, TX “Support Our Muslim Neighbors” event tries to “ease anxiety of local Muslims following Trump’s election”
Islamic jihad terrorists not poor and illiterate, but rich and educated
DC imam: “We’re going to invite people to a little sweetie-pie Islam…We have to rescue the poor, dumb American people”
Providence, RI mayor establishes Muslim-American Advisory Board to protect Muslims
UK: Trojan Horse school governor’s son killed waging jihad with the Islamic State
Obama Justice Dept. sues NJ township for rejecting mosque
Butterball turkey supplier investigated for business ties to Hizballah
Pat Condell video: A word to the criminal migrant
New Zealand: Muslim cleric removed from Federation of Islamic Associations for anti-Semitic remarks
Iran’s Supremo warns of retaliation if U.S. breaches nuclear deal

Links From Christian Today Site for on November 23-24/16
Church Of England Issues Fierce Rebuke To Conservative Body GAFCON
Now Trump Rows Back On Climate Change: It Might Be Real After All
Colour Of Blood': London Turns Red For Millions Killed In Religious Persecution
Bones From Ancient Christian Settlement In Britain To Be Reinterred
The Poor Will Be 'Hit Harder And Faster': Churches Blast Autumn Statement
Education Secretary Praises 'Hugely Popular' Christian And Other Faith Schools
US Leaders Condemn Putin's Bid To Equate Christian Evangelism With Terrorism
Report Says: Pastors Kept Politics Out Of Pulpit During Election
Top Barrister To Examine Evidence Of Sex Abuse Case Against Bishop George Bell
Atheist Sues For Right To Say 'I'm God' On His Car Licence Plate
3 Countries To Pray For Where Christians Are Persecuted
Should I Try To Convert My Muslim Neighbour? Not Exactly

Latest Lebanese Related News published on November 23-24/16
Butterball turkey supplier investigated for business ties to Hizballah
Robert Jihad Watch/November 23, 2016
Maybe this is why all Butterball turkeys used to be all halal, whether labeled as such or not.
butterball-turkey
Your Thanksgiving Turkey May Come from a Company with Terrorist Ties
 Michal Addady, Fortune, November 22, 2016:
 The Justice Department is currently investigating the company that sells your Thanksgiving turkey for potential terrorist ties.
 Seaboard SEB -2.11% is an international company that, among other things, sells Butterball turkeys. The Wall Street Journal reports that in 2010 it bought a 50% stake in Butterball, the largest turkey producer in the U.S. Now, investigators are trying to determine if Seaboard has business ties to individuals who are on a U.S. government blacklist for allegedly supporting the Lebanon-based militant group, Hezbollah.
 The allegations are that a Seaboard milling subsidiary in Africa has done business with Kassim Tajideen, a man who was blacklisted by the U.S. government in 2009 and 2010 for allegedly financing Hezbollah to the tune of tens of millions of dollars and running cover companies for the organization in Africa.
 Tajideen says that he has no ties to Hezbollah and that he has never even heard of Seaboard, claiming that investigators often confuse him with two of his brothers who are also on the blacklist, Ali and Husayn Tajideen. Ali says he’s never heard of Seaboard and has no ties to the organization. While Husayn has heard of Seaboard, he claims to have no recent business dealings with the company.
 Seaboard claims that it didn’t enter into any contracts with firms connected to the Tajideen family after they’d been blacklisted by the U.S. government. Even if the company did so unintentionally, it could face civil penalties, according the the Journal.
 Federal investigators are particularly interested in an alleged meeting between Seaboard and a Hezbollah financier in 2012. The Journal writes that people with knowledge of the meeting say the two parties had discussed using a middleman to hide Seaboard’s ties to Tajideen firms….
 
Salam receives Foreign Minister of Qatar

Wed 23 Nov 2016/NNA - Prime Minister, Tammam Salam, met at the Grand Serail on Wednesday with visiting Foreign Minister of Qatar, Mohammad Abdul Rahman Al-Thani, delegated by Prince of Qatar, Tamim Bin Hamad Al-Thani.
The meeting took place in the presence of Qatari Ambassador to Lebanon, Ali Bin Hamad Al-Mari, along with an accompanying delegation.

Qatari Foreign Minister meets Geagea

Wed 23 Nov 2016/NNA - Visiting Qatari Foreign Minister, Mohammad Bin Abdul Rahman Al-Thani, met at his temporary residence at Phoenicia Hotel with Lebanese Forces Leader, Dr. Samir Geagea.

Qatari Foreign Minister visits Hariri: Confident that a strong government will be formed
Wed 23 Nov 2016/NNA - Prime Minister Saad Hariri received this evening at the Center House Qatari Foreign Minister, Sheikh Mohammed Bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, as an envoy of Qatari Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, at the head of a delegation, accompanied by Qatar's ambassador to Lebanon Ali bin Hamad Al Marri and in the presence of the Minister of Interior and Municipalities Nouhad Machnouk, advisers Bassem Sabeh and Ghattas Khoury and Hariri’s chief of staff Nader Hariri.
The meeting focused on the latest developments in Lebanon and the region as well as the bilateral relations between the two countries.
Hariri then hosted a dinner in honor of the Qatari Minister and the delegation during which they pursued the talks.
Upon leaving, the Qatari minister said: "First I would like to thank Prime Minister Hariri, to whom I conveyed the greetings of His Highness Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad, stressing the support of Qatar for the Lebanese people and their choices. We congratulate them on the election of President Michel Aoun and we hope that this courageous decision that ended the political vacancy crisis in Lebanon will be followed by the formation of a government headed by Prime Minister Saad Hariri, so that life can return to normal, and the institutions can work more efficiently.
We will pursue our support for our brothers in Lebanon and the Lebanese government, and we wish his Excellency all the best in his efforts, we are very confident that a strong government will be formed and would be supportive of the Lebanese people and all the Arab peoples."
Hariri
Prime Minister Hariri was asked about his opinion regarding the Gulf delegations visiting Lebanon. He replied: "This shows that the Gulf is open towards returning to Lebanon. In fact, it did not leave Lebanon, but there were crisis in Lebanon because of the presidential vacancy, and there was no political decision. Today we witness after the election of President Michel Aoun that there is hope in Lebanon and the Lebanese have faith in their country. The Gulf States hope that this country is able to stand on its feet. Question: What are the steps required from the government to correct the Lebanese-Gulf relations?Hariri: There is no doubt that we will turn the page. The cloud passed and the President is keen on the relations with all Arab countries, especially with the Gulf countries, and hopefully he will visit these countries and so will we.
Question: Will there be new high-level Gulf visits?
Hariri: We hope so.
Question: How do you assess the visits of Saudi Prince Khaled al-Faisal, and today of the Qatari foreign minister to Lebanon?
Hariri: The Lebanese lost hope at one stage because the country was mixed-up, and so did the non-Lebanese especially the Gulf. Today, hope is back with the election of President Michel Aoun therefore hope returned to the entire Gulf that Lebanon is recovering and will rise from its problem."

Jumblatt meets German official in Clemenceau
Wed 23 Nov 2016/NNA - Democratic Gathering Leader, MP Walid Joumblatt, received this evening in Clemenceau the regional director for the Middle East and Morocco at the German Foreign Ministry, Philippe Ackermann, accompanied by German ambassador to Lebanon, Martin Huth. Jumblatt discussed with his visitor the current situation in Lebanon and the region.

Justice Council to look into Bachir Gemayel assassination lawsuit Friday
Wed 23 Nov 2016/NNA - The Justice Council shall convene on forthcoming Friday to look, for the time, into the lawsuit on the 1982 assassination of former president Bachir Gemayel, National News Agency correspondent reported on Wednesday.

Rahi in Rome: Lebanon at threshold of new phase

Wed 23 Nov 2016/NNA - Maronite Patriarch Mar Bechara Boutros Rahi said that the official ceremony and the military parade that took place marking Lebanon's 73rd Independence Day, in the presence of the Lebanse President, Prime Minister, and House Speaker, were all indicators that Lebanon stood at the threshold of a new stage which was to witness a new spirit in terms of power rotation. Rahi's words came on Wednesday in an address he gave during a reception organized by the Lebanese Embassy in Rome. "We hope the new mandate serves the nation's public interest best," he added. He praised the Italian authorities, stressing the importance of Lebanese-Italian relations based on cooperation. The Patriarch finally called on the international community to find peaceful and political solutions to the wars of the Middle East and to establish a just and comprehensive peace by ensuring the return of refugees to their homeland.

Hakim inaugurates Art of Living exhibition at Forum Du Beirut
Wed 23 Nov 2016/NNA - Trade and Economy Minister, Alain Hakim, inaugurated this afternoon the Art of Living exhibition at Forum Du Beirut. Minister Hakim visited the various pavilions of the exhibition.

Man shot in cheek in Sidon
Wed 23 Nov 2016 /NNA - A young man, Omar. A. (born in 1995), was shot in the cheek in Al-Filat region of Sidon city, NNA field reporter said on Wednesday.The man was duly rushed to Sidon Governmental hospital for treatment. Security Forces have launched an investigation into the incident, NNA reporter added.

Bassil: All Parties Can be Represented in 24-Member Govt., Minor Details Delaying Line-Up
Naharnet/November 23/16/Free Patriotic Movement chief Jebran Bassil announced Wednesday that all parties can be represented in a 24-member cabinet, noting that only “minor details” are still delaying the line-up. “We have agreed on the important and essential parts and there is no real reason to delay announcing the cabinet line-up except for some minor details, which might be important for some parties and less important for others,” Bassil said after the weekly meeting of the Change and Reform bloc in Rabieh.“We want a national unity cabinet that includes everyone, at least the forces that are represented in parliament,” he added. “We are not rejecting any party and we want the Marada (Movement), the Kataeb (Party), the Syrian Social National Party, the non-Mustaqbal Sunni forces and MP Talal Arslan to be represented, even in a 24-member cabinet,” Bassil emphasized. He added that the parties have agreed that the new government “will not establish any new norms” and that “no portfolios will be permanently allocated to a certain sect or party.”“There will be no vetoes. We have not put a veto on anyone and in return we won't accept vetoes from anyone,” Bassil went on to say. He noted that Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri is not opposed to the nomination of a Sunni minister by President Michel Aoun and “in return we have accepted that al-Mustaqbal (Movement) be represented by a Christian minister.”Bassil also urged a new electoral law, emphasizing that “no one wants to keep the 1960 law and we must not allow anyone to keep the 1960 law.”
 
Qatar FM Invites Aoun to Visit Doha, Vows 'Continued Support' for Lebanon
Naharnet/November 23/16/Qarati Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdul Rahman al-Thani held talks Wednesday in Baabda with President Michel Aoun as part of an official visit to Lebanon. The minister handed Aoun a letter from Qatar's ruler Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, Lebanon's National News Agency said. “We hope this will be a beginning for restoring stability and we wish success for the efforts that are aimed at forming a government so that things can return to normal,” the Qatari minister said after the meeting. “We invited President Aoun to visit Qatar and we congratulate the Lebanese on overcoming the presidential void crisis and we hope they will also overcome the cabinet formation dilemma,” he added. Sheikh Mohammed also stressed that “the Qatari-Lebanese relations will continue and Qatar's support for Lebanon will not stop.”The meeting was attended by caretaker Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil. The Qatari visitor later headed to Ain el-Tineh where he held talks with Speaker Nabih Berri. “I was honored to meet Speaker Berri and I conveyed to him the greetings of Qatar's emir Sheikh Tamim and congratulated him on the election of President Michel Aoun,” Sheikh Mohammed said after the meeting. He is also scheduled to meet with Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri, caretaker PM Tammam Salam and caretaker FM Bassil. The visit comes a few days after a similar one by a senior Saudi delegation led by Mecca Governor Prince Khaled al-Faisal. Aoun's election as Lebanon's 13th president after two and a half years of presidential void has raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees. In addition to pledges of economic growth and security, Aoun said in his oath of office that Lebanon must work to ensure Syrian refugees "can return quickly" to their country. Aoun also pledged to endorse an "independent foreign policy" and to protect Lebanon from "the fires burning across the region."

Qatar’s FM says Doha stands with Lebanon
The Daily Star/November 23/16/BEIRUT: The Qatari Foreign Minister Wednesday invited President Michel Aoun to visit Doha, conveying a message of support from the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamid al-Thani to Lebanon. "Qatar adopts constant principals towards Lebanon... it stands by the Lebanese people and will not back down on its support," Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani told reporters after meeting with Aoun at the Baabda Palace. He expressed hope that the presidential elections would be followed by the formation of the Cabinet led by Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri. "It's a start to reactivate [Lebanon's] institutions... the Qatari-Lebanese ties will continue both diplomatically and politically," the visiting FM said. The FM arrived in Beirut at 3:00 p.m. The FM and the accompanying delegation met with Speaker Nabih Berri at the latter's residence in Beirut's Ain al-Tineh. The diplomat said that Lebanon's recent presidential vacuum "was similar to a previous one that was ended by the Doha Accord." The Doha Accord, reached by rival March 8 and March 14 leaders in the Qatari capital in May 2008, ended an 18-month political crisis, led to the election of then-Army chief Michel Sleiman as a consensus president, the formation of a national unity Cabinet and an agreement on a new electoral law. The accord also followed street fighting between pro- and anti-government groups in Beirut and other parts of the country.The FM will also meet with caretaker Prime Minister Tammam Salam before holding a joint conference with his Lebanese counterpart FM Gebran Bassil. He will conclude his visit to Beirut after joining a dinner banquet hosted by Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri. The Qatari FM’s visit follows separate trips by a Saudi delegation, Egyptian FM Sameh Shoukry and Iran's FM Mohammad Javad Zarif earlier this month. The flurry of diplomatic activity comes in light of Aoun's election in October that ended more than two years of a crippling presidential vacuum.
 
Sideline Meetings on Indepedence Day Tackled Cabinet Formation Hurdles
Naharnet/November 23/16/Closed meetings held between Lebanon's top officials at the sideline of the presidential reception at the Baabda Palace on Independence Day, generated positive signals that the diplomats have finally eased the difficulties that have been hampering the formation of a new cabinet. Before the reception to receive well-wishers began, a meeting was held between President Michel Aoun and Speaker Nabih Berri. Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri later joined the two men, to be followed shortly by Caretaker PM Tammam Salam. According to the media office at the presidential palace, discussions touched on the general situation in the country and the process of forming a new cabinet. They did not elaborate any further. Sources close to Hariri told pan-Arab al-Hayat daily that the discussions focused on the difficulties the formation process is facing, and that the issue was a subject of a lengthy phone call between Hariri and Berri a day earlier. The sources however have described the atmospheres as positive. They assured that there are no differences between Hariri and Berri. The issue at hand is that the PM-designate had promised to give the public works portfolio to the Lebanese Forces, which Berri insists that it be given to his party. For his part, Salam was optimistic when he described the short meetings and said “the atmospheres are positive.”Berri's TV station, the NBN, quoted the Speaker as saying: “The atmospheres are well and shining.”Hariri was optimistic as well, as he pointed out the “consultations will carry on,” without specifying a date for the completion of a cabinet formation. Hariri is still facing obstacles bringing together a line-up that balances Lebanon's delicate sectarian-based political system. At stake is the distribution of the most powerful portfolios, including the Defense Ministry.
 
Berri: Minor Obstacles Impeding Cabinet Will be Eased

 Naharnet/November 23/16/Speaker Nabih Berri said after the weekly Wednesday meeting with MPs that he is optimistic as for the efforts to line-up the cabinet, and emphasized that he insists to be given the public works ministerial portfolio. “We expect minor problems hindering the formation to be eased. Efforts are ongoing to solve them and form a government in order to stipulate a new electoral law,” Berri remarked. However, the Speaker emphasized that he still wants the ministerial portfolio of public works as part of his share in the cabinet. MPs quoted Berri as saying that a lot of work awaits the new government mainly the stipulation of a new electoral law. He added that the issue must top future discussions to pave way for the upcoming parliamentary elections.Following President Michel Aoun's election in October, Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri is still facing obstacles bringing together a line-up that balances Lebanon's delicate sectarian-based political system. A struggle between Hariri and Aoun on one side and Berri over the government line-up. At stake is the distribution of the most powerful portfolios, including the Defense Ministry. The political parties are also bickering over amending the current election law which divides seats among the different religious sects. The current parliament has failed to amend the law, and has extended its mandate twice amid criticism. New elections are scheduled for May 2017.
 
Baalbek-Hermel Vendettas Panel Begins Action after Meeting Nasrallah
Naharnet/November 23/16/After dignitaries from Baalbek and Hermel discussed the security situation and the issue of blood feuds with Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah on October 29, a reconciliation committee has started implementing the recommendations of the conference, a Hizbullah statement said on Wednesday. “The reconciliation committee formed during this conference has started implementing Sayyed Nasrallah's recommendations on the ground,” Wednesday's statement said. “The committee started its efforts in the town of Bednayel by holding a meeting there with dignitaries from the towns of Bednayel, Qsarnaba and Beit Shama,” the statement added. Committee chief Faisal Shukur spoke during the Bednayel meeting, noting that “some parties might be behind the proliferation of security incidents in the community of the resistance.”“The phenomenon of blood feuds has returned after a long pause and these incidents have started to pose an impending threat to everyone and only the enemies of this community will benefit from this,” Shukur warned. “We must work to implement the Sayyed's recommendations. He said that we must not protect, defend or cooperate with any wrongdoer... and that we must ask the State to play its role,” he added.
 
Zahra: Lebanese Forces Share in Cabinet Rightful
Naharnet/November 23/16/Lebanese Forces party MP Antoine Zahra stressed on Wednesday that the party's share in the government is a right of theirs as he stressed that they have no problem with Speaker Nabih Berri, the National News Agency reported. “Our share in the government is a total right for us,” emphasized Zahra. “The momentum that was created upon the arrival of President Aoun to office is being tampered with by hampering the government formation,” added the MP, assuring that all portfolios are sovereign when treated so.
 “Minister Jebran Bassil, who is the actual representative of the President, is highly keen on the LF-Aouni duality, and no promise has been broken yet,” he noted, stressing that the oath of office,the statement made before the crowd in Baabda and the Independence message were all proof of the President's ambitions and of his intention to put Lebanon outside the political polarizations and the regional conflicts. “The President abides by Lebanon's constitution and cares for its interests. He refuses the affiliation of Lebanon to any axis, be it Saudi or Iranian, and confirms that Israel is an enemy which we should fight through the State,” Zahra said. Denying any knowledge about the timing of the government formation, Zahra noted that “our issue is not with Speaker Nabih Berri. The PM-designate and the President of the Republic are fully aware of our rights, and I hope the government formula will be announced soon to guarantee healthy institutional work.”
 
Houri: Visits of Gulf Officials Reinstates Confidence in Lebanon

 Naharnet/November 23/16/Al-Mustaqbal MP Ammar Houri confirmed on Wednesday that the consecutive visits of the Saudi and Qatari officials to Lebanon would re-activate confidence in Lebanon and open once closed doors due to “improvised policies.”The lawmaker pointed out in an interview to VDL (100.5) that President Michel Aoun's oath of office had focused on the constants and reassembled the Lebanese approaches, stressing that “commitment to it falls in Lebanon's interest,” and helps it to “kind of dissociate itself from the burning region.”On the difficulties facing the formation of a new cabinet, Houri said: “the difficulties could be managed. We have come a long way to overcome the obstacles.”
 
Ogassapian: Hurdles to Form Cabinet Result of Concerns over 'Christian Agreement'
 Naharnet/November 23/16/MP Jean Ogassapian said Wednesday that not all political parties were content with the understanding reached between the two Christian parties, Lebanese Forces and the Free Patriotic Movement, which explains the reactions of some, including Speaker Nabih Berri's. The MP said the hurdles hampering the distribution of ministerial portfolios and the reactions of Speaker Nabih Berri could be the result of “susceptibility” generated after the Christian understanding. “It is not easy for political parties to accept it mainly because of concerns of the great influence planned to be given for the LF, and the fears to begin a presidential term under a strong president,” Ogassapian told VDL (93.3). In January, LF chief Samir Geagea and founder of the FPM Michel Aoun reached an understanding that ended over two decades of bitter ties between the war-time Ogassapian warned that differences over the distribution of portfolios would delay the formation of the cabinet until next year, and would gravely reflect on the new term of President Michel Aoun. He wondered if the goals from the fight over portfolios aim to keep Lebanon “on hold” until the regional developments clear out. On the other hand, the MP appeased the fears and said that Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri and President Michel Aoun have agreed to provide a space for convergence for all political parties and not to overstep the Taef accord. The lawmaker called on the political factions to speed up the government formation "if honest intentions exist". Michel Aoun's election as president and Hariri's appointment as premier-designate have raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees. In a sign that Hariri's mission as premier might not be easy, Hizbullah's MPs declined to endorse him during binding parliamentary consultations.Hariri is likely to struggle with his government's policy statement, which will have to make reference to Israel, as well as the war in Syria, both potential flashpoints with Hizbullah.
 
Prince Khalid al-Faisal in Lebanon
Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al-Awsat/November 23/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/23/tariq-alhomayedasharq-al-awsatprince-khalid-al-faisal-in-lebanon/
In a remarkable move, Governor of Makkah Prince Khalid bin Faisal bin Abdulaziz, advisor to the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques visited Lebanon and carried with him a congratulatory message from King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud to Lebanon’s new President Michel Aoun.
Al-Faisal said in Beirut that he was carrying two messages to Aoun. The first was congratulating him on being elected as president of Lebanon, and the second was an invitation to pay a visit to the Kingdom. Al-Faisal also said that President Aoun promised him that he will pay this visit directly after the formation of the Cabinet. The reader here might question the reasons behind describing this visit as remarkable and important while the answer is simply because it came following speculations that Saudi Arabia has disengaged from Lebanon.
This is what many Lebanese politicians have been convinced with and what those – who believe that Saudi Arabia has gone too far in the Lebanese file – have been promoting for. Therefore, this visit carries many important implications as it came at a high level since Prince Khalid al-Faisal is a prominent figure and is the advisor to the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, which means that Saudi Arabia did not disengage itself from Lebanon.
Saudi Arabia, as a country, would never retreat – and politics in general is an art where there is no place for rupture; even in crises and wars communication still takes place either directly among countries or through mediators. This does not reflect any weakness; instead, this communication remains in order to achieve desired goals. Notably, Saudi Arabia’s major targets, since its establishment, are to deepen stability and peace in the region.
The other important thing about al-Faisal’s visit was the fact that it was culminated by meeting leaders of the Lebanese institutions instead of meeting the different Lebanese parties. Saudi Arabia is a state and it deals with other countries according the concept of the state. This is what Prince Khalid did when he met with President Aoun, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, Prime Minister Tammam Salam and Prime Minister designate Saad al-Hariri.
Therefore, Prince al-Faisal’s visit to Lebanon is important and considered as a good indicator because neglecting Lebanon is wrong no matter how many crises it passes through.
We have to remember that by communicating with Lebanon, Saudi Arabia’s goal is not the conflict or the imposition of predominance; it is, instead, a victory for the concept of the state, especially in geographical borders witnessing crises in the region, and Lebanon is the center. This is what al-Faisal assured in Beirut as he clearly said that Saudi Arabia and Saudis do not want Lebanon to be “an arena for Arab conflict but a meeting place for Arab accord.” This could only be achieved by communication and political tireless hard work.  Construction is way harder than destruction; this is why the mission of wise countries in the region, headed by Saudi Arabia, is more difficult from that of the saboteurs, headed by Iran.

Rouhani felicitates Lebanon on Independence Day
TEHRAN, Nov. 23 (MNA) – Iranian President Hassan Rouhani sent a message of congratulations to his Lebanon counterpart Michel Aoun on the occasion of the country's Independence Day on Nov. 22. "I sincerely congratulate the Independence Day of Lebanon to your Excellency, the government and the noble people of that country,” President Rouhani said in his message on Wednesday. “I am confident that with your management and through empathy and cooperation among different political groups in your country, we will witness prosperity and continuous pride and stability in Lebanon,” he added. President Rouhani concluded the message by highlighting the Islamic Republic’s continued support to the government and the strong people of Lebanon, saying Iran is ready to develop bilateral ties in all areas.The election of Michel Aoun to the presidency of Lebanon ended the country's 29-month leadership stalemate on October 31.
 
Lebanon: Ministerial Consultations Mark Independence Day Celebrations
Asharq Al-Awsat/November 23/16/Salam, Aoun, Berri, Hariri at the Presidential Palace on Tuesday/NNA
Beirut – The ministerial consultations on Tuesday marked celebrations held in Lebanon on the 73rd commemoration of the country’s Independence Day embraced by the four leaders, President Michel Aoun, Speaker Nabih Berri, Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri and caretaker Prime Minister Tammam Salam. The four failed until now to reach an agreement on a new cabinet with some parties still attached to certain ministerial portfolios and shares – which their opponents say – are over their representational size. On Tuesday, while Hariri described things as “good” stating that “negotiations are ongoing as there is no time-limit for the government lineup,” Speaker Berri was content to reply to reports by saying: “Things are good, glittering and polished.”Head of the Lebanese Forces Samir Geagea said on Tuesday that those who reject the new term wish to return to the days of Syrian custodianship. “President Michel Aoun was a strong man that could not be subdued to the will of others,” Geagea said. In the past two years, Lebanon refrained from celebrating its Independence Day due to the presidential vacuum. This year, after the election of Aoun as president, a military parade was conducted at Shafiq Wazzan Boulevard in Beirut to mark the 73rd commemoration of the Independence Day in the presence of tight security measures. Following the parade, the four men moved to the Presidential Palace, east of Beirut where an official reception was held for the first time since the past two and a half years on this occasion. Aoun also received several congratulating cables on this national day. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif also sent a cable to his Lebanese counterpart Gebran Bassil wishing Lebanon would recuperate its constructive role in the region in light of the agreement between all the Lebanese parties.
 
Reports: Hezbollah chief’s guard seen in Syria’s Aleppo, Homs

Ahd Fadhel, Alarabiya.net Wednesday, 23 November 2016/Social media accounts since last week have circulated pictures of Lebanese Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah’s body guard, donning a military attire, in Syria. Lebanon’s Shiite movement Hezbollah is an Iranian proxy and has long supported Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad’s government following the regionalization of the Syrian conflict, which began in early 2011. On a Facebook account belonging to ‘Sham Zainab’ on Nov. 16, a picture of Nasrallah’s body guard, who is known by his alias ‘Abu Ali’, was published. The caption said: “Abu Ali, Sayed Hassan Nasrallah’s guard, in one of the battle fields in Syria.”On another Facebook account under the name of ‘Faris Al-Quds’, a picture of ‘Abu Ali’ was published, showing him wearing a military uniform. The caption said that the picture belonged to Nasrallah’s body guard. One Facebook account under the name ‘Mihwar Al-Mukawa” reported on Nov. 16 that Israel’s Channel 10 said that ‘Abu Ali’ is in Qusayr – a city in the western Syrian governorate of Homs – where a military parade was taking place. Meanwhile, other Twitter accounts under the names of ‘Ali Nazal’ and ‘Abu Al-Huda Al-Humsi’ on Nov. 18 said “Iranian websites close to Iran’s Republican Guards said Hezbollah has sent Hassan Nasrallah’s guard to Aleppo, and he is called Ali Abu Jawad in search for Jerusalem’s path.” ‘Jerusalem’s path’ is a term used by Hezbollah to justify its involvement in the Syrian conflict as it considers liberation of Jerusalem from Israel as its final battle that should be won for Muslims. Lebanese media has also reported about the pictures. The independent Lebanese newspaper Annahar published on Tuesday that social media users have circulated a new picture for ‘Abu Al’, said to be taken at the “frontier battles between the Syrian army and militants in Aleppo.”
(The article was first published in the Arabic language website for Al Arabiya News Channel) 

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on November 23-24/16
Aleppo Civilians Try to Flee as Syrian Army Advances
 Agence France Presse/Naharnet/November 23/16/Dozens of civilians tried to flee rebel-held east Aleppo overnight but were forced back by gunfire, as the Syrian army on Wednesday pressed an offensive to recapture the whole city. The government last week resumed its drive to retake the east of the city, where more than 250,000 civilians have been trapped under siege by the army for months, with dwindling food and fuel supplies. The regime has pounded the east with air strikes, barrel bombs and artillery fire for more than a week, killing more than 140 people as it advances.Recapturing the east would give President Bashar Assad's government perhaps its most important victory yet in the conflict, which has killed more than 300,000 people since it began in March 2011.The government accuses rebels in the east of using residents as "human shields" and preventing them from leaving. On Wednesday, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based monitor of the war, said dozens of civilians had tried to flee overnight but were forced back by gunfire."On Tuesday night, around 100 families gathered near a passage from the (rebel-held) Bustan al-Basha district to cross to Sheikh Maqsud," said Observatory director Rami Abdel Rahman."But when the civilians tried to cross to the other side, gunfire broke out," he told AFP without elaborating. Sheikh Maqsud is a northern neighborhood controlled by Kurdish forces, allied with neither the regime nor the rebels, between the government-held west and rebel-held east.
 'Regime rumors'
 On Tuesday, the army issued a statement accusing rebels of holding civilians as "hostages.""Permit those citizens who want to do so to leave, stop using them as hostages and human shields, clear the mines from the crossings identified by the state."Rebel groups deny they are preventing civilians from leaving and accused the regime of spreading "rumors.""This has nothing to do with reality," said Yasser al-Youssef, from the political office of rebel group Nureddin al-Zinki. "The regime is spreading rumors to try to undermine the resolve of the rebels and those who support them in Aleppo," he told AFP.The Syrian army, backed by allied forces from Iran, Russia and Lebanon's Hizbullah group, launched a renewed assault on east Aleppo on November 15.The offensive has killed at least 143 civilians in the east, among them 19 children, since then. Rebel fire has killed 16 civilians in the government-held west, including 10 children. After days of ferocious bombardment, regime troops now control half of the strategic Masaken Hanano district in the northeast of the city, the Observatory said.
 Capturing the district would give the army line-of-fire control over several other parts of the rebel-held east and divide it in two.
 - 'Moral outrage' -
 The renewed bloodshed has stoked international concern, though there has been little sign so far of a plan to halt it. French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault said on Wednesday that backers of Syria's moderate opposition would meet in Paris in early December to discuss the situation. He urged the international community to "stop averting its gaze" from the "terrible reality" of the conflict. Save the Children called for an internationally monitored ceasefire to allow aid into east Aleppo and the evacuation of sick and wounded civilians. "It is a moral outrage that the death toll of Aleppo's children continues to grow and seems only set to get worse, whilst so little action is being taken to end the bombing and hold warring parties accountable," the charity's Syria director, Sonia Khush, said. The latest government offensive has hit hospitals and rescue centers, and forced schools to close. Medical officials in the east said some of the barrel bombs dropped by the government appeared to contain chlorine gas. Both Damascus and its ally Moscow have strongly denied any illegal military use of the chemical. Over the weekend, U.N. envoy Staffan de Mistura floated a humanitarian plan for Aleppo as well as a proposal for a truce. The truce deal would have allowed the opposition administration in east Aleppo to remain in place, at least temporarily, in return for jihadist fighters leaving. But the government rejected it, insisting the state had to retake control as any alternative would "reward terrorists." 

Family of six die in east Aleppo chlorine gas attack
 Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Tuesday, 22 November 2016
 A photo apparently showing a family of six killed in a suspected chlorine gas attack in rebel-held eastern Aleppo, has gone viral on social media. If genuine it would not be the first picture from Aleppo showing civilians, including women and children being killed in the heavy bombardments carried out by Russian and Syrian airstrikes. On Sunday it is claimed a helicopter struck the Al Sakhour neighborhood with chlorine gas killing the four siblings and their father. Media activists from Aleppo told Al Arabiya English that the mother died shortly after from shock.
 
Moral outrage’ over Aleppo child deaths, suffering
AFP, Beirut Wednesday, 23 November 2016/Save the Children has hit out at the “moral outrage” of the mounting deaths and suffering of children in the battleground Syrian city of Aleppo, in a statement released Wednesday. The charity said medics across northwest Syria were looking to fortify hospitals after a wave of attacks in rebel-held east Aleppo left facilities struggling to care for injured children. Regime forces have been waging a ferocious assault on east Aleppo since November 15, with the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights saying more than 140 civilians have been killed, 19 of them children. The renewed fighting comes amid international concern for the fate of more than 250,000 civilians trapped in besieged rebel-held areas of the northern city. Save the Children also condemned a rebel attack on west Aleppo that killed at least eight children on Sunday. It said among those killed at the weekend was an education worker at a school it supports in east Aleppo who was found buried in rubble along with her baby son. Classes at 13 such schools in east Aleppo had been suspended as shelling intensified in recent days, said Save the Children. It said the deadly rebel attack on the school in the west of the city showed “there is no safe place for children in this conflict”. “Children and aid workers are being bombarded by missiles whilst they are sitting at their desks in schools and seeking treatment in hospitals which are also under attack,” said Sonia Khush, Syria director for Save the Children. “The very places they should feel safest have become deadly,” she said. “It is a moral outrage that the death toll of Aleppo’s children continues to grow and seems only set to get worse, whilst so little action is being taken to end the bombing and hold warring parties accountable for these attacks on civilians.”Save the Children called for an internationally monitored ceasefire to bring humanitarian relief into east Aleppo and evacuate the sick and wounded. It said the United Nations and opposition groups had already agreed on access for an aid convoy which could go ahead once all sides agree to a ceasefire.Parties to the conflict must come together to agree an immediate ceasefire, and to evacuate civilian casualties and get life-saving aid into the area.” UN Syria envoy Staffan de Mistura was rebuffed in Damascus on Sunday on a truce proposal that would allow the opposition to administer the city’s east. Aleppo was once the country’s economic powerhouse, but it has been ravaged by the brutal war across Syria that has killed 300,000 people since it began with anti-government protests in March 2011.
 
Israel bid to quiet Muslim call to prayer revived

AFP, Jerusalem Wednesday, 23 November 2016/A controversial Israeli bill to quiet the Muslim call to prayer is to go forward after it was amended so as not to affect the Jewish Shabbat siren, the speaker’s office said Wednesday. Health Minister Yaakov Litzman, an ultra-Orthodox Jew, had blocked the draft law in its original form for fear it would also force the toning down of the sirens that announce the start of the Jewish day of rest at sundown each Friday. But he lifted his objections after it was amended to apply only between 11 pm and 7 am, limiting its scope to the first of the five daily Muslim calls to prayer just before dawn.The bill will “probably” now be put to a preliminary vote in parliament “next week,” a spokesman for speaker Yuli Edelstein told AFP. It will then require three further parliamentary votes before it becomes law but it has already sparked outrage around the Arab and wider Muslim world. Even Israeli government watchdogs have baulked at the proposed legislation, describing it as a threat to religious freedom and an unnecessary provocation. Arab Israeli lawmaker Ahmed Tibi has vowed to appeal to the High Court of Justice if the Shabbat siren is excluded from the scope of the bill on the grounds that it discriminates between Jewish and Muslim citizens. The law would apply to mosques in annexed Arab east Jerusalem as well as Israel, although the supersensitive Al-Aqsa mosque compound – Islam’s third holiest site -- will be exempted. “No changes will be made on the Temple Mount,” an Israeli official told AFP, using the Jewish term for the mosque compound, which is also Judaism’s holiest site. The bill’s sponsor, Motti Yogev, of the far-right Jewish Home party, says the legislation is necessary to avoid daily disturbance to the lives of hundreds of thousands of non-Muslim Israelis. He also charges that some muezzins -- the lay officials charged with calling the faithful to prayer -- abuse their function to incite hatred of Israel. His party is key member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's governing coalition.

A Top Egyptian Human Rights Activist Banned from Travel
 Associated Press/Naharnet/November 23/16/An airport security official says Egyptian authorities have banned a prominent human rights activist, who heads a center investigating police abuses, from leaving the country. Aida Seif el-Dawla, a psychiatrist and co-founder of the Nadeem Center for Rehabilitation of Victims of Violence, was boarding a flight to Tunisia on Wednesday to attend a meeting of non-governmental organizations. Security authorities at Cairo international airport told her she couldn't leave the country because her name is on a travel-ban list, according to the security official. The official said judicial authorities banned her on the grounds that she is involved in an ongoing trial implicating the majority of the most active human rights groups in Egypt. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak to the media.
 
 Israel Minister Doesn't Expect Mideast Move by Obama
 Agence France Presse/Naharnet/November 23/16/Israel's hardline defense minister said Wednesday that he does not expect any new U.S. Middle East policy initiative from Barack Obama in the final weeks of his presidency. Avigdor Lieberman's comments came as the U.N. Security Council was set to debate proposals for a draft resolution calling for a halt to Israeli settlement expansion in the occupied Palestinian territories, which could be tabled before the end of the year. There has been speculation that Obama, whose administration has expressed mounting anger over Israeli settlement policy, could break with recent U.S. practice and support -- or at least not veto -- such a resolution before he leaves office on January 20. Lieberman made no direct reference to Wednesday's debate at the United Nations. But asked if he expected any new initiative from Obama before his term ends, Lieberman said: "I don't think so. "It is clear we are in a transition period, it is clear today -- not only in Israel but in the world -- we are waiting for new policies, a new administration." Obama has had frosty personal relations with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu throughout his two-term presidency. In September, he signed off on a 10-year military aid package for Israel worth $38 billion -- the largest in U.S. history. But the following month, the White House accused Israel of a betrayal of trust over its settlement policy and Washington called for action by the Security Council to salvage the possibility of a two-state solution. That prompted Netanyahu to call on Washington "not to change what has historically been its policy for decades: to prevent anti-Israel resolutions in the U.N. Security Council."Lieberman, who himself lives in a Jewish settlement in the occupied West Bank, was speaking at a conference organized by the Jerusalem Post newspaper. In a wide-ranging interview with one of the paper's staff, he launched a renewed assault on the peace credentials of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. "I don't believe in his intention to achieve a real peaceful solution," Lieberman said, pointing to previous failed peace efforts. "Everybody who speaks about final status agreements in the next two, three, four years I think it is... illusions."
 
European Parliament Vote on Turkey Has 'No Value'
 Associated Press/Naharnet/November 23/16/Turkey's president says an upcoming vote in the European Parliament on whether to freeze membership talks with Turkey is of no "value" to his country. European Union legislators are scheduled to hold a non-binding vote this week on whether Turkey's accession talks should be suspended over the Turkish government's unprecedented crackdown following the failed military coup in July. Addressing an Organization for Islamic Cooperation Islamic Conference meeting on Wednesday, Recep Tayyip Erdogan said: "Whatever the result is, in our eyes this vote has no value."EU nations have voiced concern over Turkey's post-coup clampdown, which has resulted in mass purges, the arrests of journalists and politicians and the closure of media outlets. Erdogan suggested joining the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which includes Russia and China, as an alternative to the EU.
  
Libya unity forces closing on Sirte militants
AFP, Libya Tuesday, 22 November 2016/Forces loyal to Libya’s Government of National Accord said on Monday that they are closing in on the last ISIS group fighters in the coastal city of Sirte. The pro-GNA forces said they managed to dislodge ISIS fighters from a fortified school in the al-Giza al-Bahriya district that the militants had fiercely defended. Artillery pounded ISIS positions as pro-GNA fighters mainly from the western town of Misrata advanced house by house, said an AFP correspondent who reported seeing wounded. A medical source said the fighting killed two pro-GNA fighters and wounded 17 others. Sirte, 450 kilometres (280 miles) east of the capital Tripoli, had a population of 120,000 before ISIS seized it in June 2015 and residents began to flee. The pro-government forces announced the launch of the battle for Sirte on May 12 and, within weeks, they recaptured large chunks of the coastal city. But the pro-GNA forces slowed down the offensive in an effort to avoid losses among their own ranks and to protect civilians trapped in the city. The fighting has left nearly 700 GNA fighters dead and 3,000 wounded. The death toll for the militants is not known.
 
Trial begins for suspects held in King Abdullah assassination bid
 Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Wednesday, 23 November 2016/Security sources in Saudi Arabia reported on Tuesday that 4 suspects affiliated to al-Qaeda have gone on trial, accused of plotting to assassinate the late Saudi King Abdullah. The retrial of the four defendants comes after the Supreme Court in Riyadh rejected the previous sentences. The court accused the first person with 41 charges, including adopting a takfiri approach violating the Sunnah and being associated to one of al-Qaeda terrorist leaders. The second has been charged with adopting a takfiri approach, offending the Saudi government and embracing al-Qaeda’s terrorist ideology by believing that it was right to support terrorist operations inside and outside the Kingdom. He was also accused of participating in the planning of the assassination of King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz during his visit to the Qassim region. The trial was attended by the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism at the United Nations. The Saudi Kingdom has been able to overcome the escalation of al-Qaeda’s attacks for ten years but has endured several bloody attacks on mosques and security forces undertaken by ISIS. King Abdullah died of natural causes in January 2015 and was succeeded by his brother Salman.
 
Trump keen to broker Palestine-Israel peace deal
 AFP, Washington Wednesday, 23 November 2016/President-elect Donald Trump said Tuesday he would “love” to clinch a deal to end the intractable conflict between Israel and the Palestinians despite the checkered history of US attempts to broker a Middle East peace. “I would love to be the one who made peace with Israel and the Palestinians, that would be such a great achievement,” Trump said in an interview with The New York Times. A New York Times reporter tweeted that Trump also suggested that his son-in-law Jared Kushner could help broker the deal. Kushner, who is married to Trump’s daughter Ivanka, is from an Orthodox Jewish family. The businessman and investor was a close adviser to Trump during the election campaign. After Trump’s November 8 win, Kushner reportedly asked for access to the daily White House security briefings given to his father-in-law. Kushner and his wife were present when Trump visited with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on November 17, the president-elect’s first meeting with a foreign leader. Trump has raised Palestinian ire by proposing that Jerusalem should be recognized as Israel’s capital, an idea contrary to traditional US policy. The Israeli right has expressed particular satisfaction with Trump’s election win, viewing it as a sign to resume or accelerate settlement building in the Israel-occupied Palestinian territories, and even the end of the idea of an independent Palestinian state. Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman last week said Trump’s aides were urging right-wing Israeli politicians to curb their public jubilation at his election, according to Israeli media. The US secretary of state, John Kerry, has been trying for months, unsuccessfully, to bring Israelis and Palestinians together for peace talks. Direct talks between the two sides ended two and a half years ago.
 
 Trump chooses immigrant background Haley for UN ambassador: Reports
 Reuters Wednesday, 23 November 2016/US President-elect Donald Trump has chosen South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, a daughter of immigrants from India who has little international experience, to be US ambassador to the United Nations, The Post and Courier newspaper and other media reported on Wednesday. The 44-year-old governor has accepted the offer, the Charleston, South Carolina, newspaper reported, citing unidentified sources. The choice of Haley, who embraces tolerance, may be aimed at offsetting Trump's divisive comments about immigrants and minorities, as well as accusations of sexism during his campaign for the Nov. 8 election in which he defeated Democrat Hillary Clinton. Haley, who last year signed a bill to remove the Confederate flag from the grounds of the South Carolina state capitol, condemned Trump during the Republican presidential primary campaign for not speaking out more forcefully against white supremacists. The Civil War flag, an emblem of the American South, is long associated with slavery. Haley supported Trump rivals in the primary before saying last month she would vote for Trump despite reservations about his character. Trump, a Republican, is due to succeed President Barack Obama, a Democrat, on Jan. 20.
 
Eight Arab countries follow Morocco, withdraw from Guinea summit
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Wednesday, 23 November 2016/As many as eight Arab countries have announced their withdrawal from the fourth Arab-African Summit being held in Malabo, Equatorial Guinea, because of the insistence of the African Union on the participation of the Desert Polisario separatist delegation. The countries that pulled out are Morocco, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Yemen, Oman, and Somalia. Morocco was the first to withdraw and was followed by other Arab countries. In a related development, it was revealed that a high-level African diplomat source has postponed the session to a later date that is not yet specified. He added that African countries will hold an emergency meeting to discuss the dispute and, in turn, heads of delegations of Arab countries will meet to find a solution to the conflict between the two sides. The Polisario Front and its supporters gained membership of the Organization of African Unity in 1983, which led to Morocco’s withdrawal from the organization officially in 1984. Morocco requested to join the African Union in September after 32 years. **This article is also available in Arabic at AlArabiya.net
 
Eighteen members of Canadian military took their own lives in 2015, DND reports Soldiers generic
The Canadian Press/Published Wednesday, November 23, 2016/OTTAWA -- The Canadian military says 18 service members died by suicide last year. The findings are contained in a report published today by the surgeon general of the Canadian Armed Forces.
The report says many of the 18 had sought some type of mental-health treatment shortly before taking their own lives. more likely to kill themselves than members of the general population, as well as fellow service members in the navy and air force.
The report finds that the likelihood of a Canadian Forces member taking his or her own life was even higher if the person had been deployed on a mission overseas. The military has been struggling with how to deal with mental-health injuries among its soldiers, with attempts to increase services and ease the transition to civilian life introduced in recent years.

US-Iranian citizen convicted in US for trying to buy missiles for Iran
 By Reuters, New York Wednesday, 23 November 2016/A dual citizen of Iran and the United States was found guilty on Tuesday on charges that he tried to help acquire surface-to-air missiles and aircraft components for the government of Iran in violation of US sanctions. Reza Olangian, 56, was convicted by a federal jury in Manhattan on all four counts he faced, including conspiring to acquire and transfer anti-aircraft missiles, prosecutors said. Olangian faces a mandatory minimum prison sentence of 25 years and a maximum of life. He is scheduled to be sentenced on March 13. Lee Ginsberg, Olangian’s lawyer, said the verdict “was very disappointing and we do plan to appeal.”Olangian, who became a US citizen in 1999, was arrested in Estonia in October 2012 and subsequently extradited to the United States following a sting operation orchestrated by the US Drug Enforcement Administration. Prosecutors said that in 2012, Olangian met in Ukraine with a DEA informant posing as a Russian weapons broker to arrange for the purchase of surface-to-air missiles and various military aircraft components. In recorded conversations and emails, Olangian described his plans to acquire the missiles and parts and smuggle them into Iran, for whose government he was purchasing them, from Afghanistan or from another neighboring country, prosecutors said. Prosecutors said Olangian negotiated a deal involving 10 missiles and dozens of aircraft parts, and during a video conference with the informant, stated that he ultimately wanted to acquire at least 200 missiles. The deal followed a failed effort by Olangian in 2007 to obtain about 100 missiles for Iran, prosecutors said. His goal throughout, they said, was to make a substantial profit selling the weapons. At trial, Ginsberg described Olangian as having been active in protests against the Iranian government during his US college studies and said he had moved back to Iran when it appeared the country might become more democratic. But after the election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as president in 2005, Olangian began engaging with people involved with selling weapons to get Iran to agree to buy them and expose the government “for what they were all about,” Ginsberg said.“It was his desire to get the Iranian government on the hook on a contract, on a piece of paper, that would definitely show what they were trying to do,” Ginsberg said in his opening statement.

Iran: Arrest and beating of demonstrators
NCRI Statements/Wednesday, 23 November 2016/Protesters demanded the release of Mohammad Ali Taheri, being in his second month of hunger strike. On Tuesday, November 22, the regime's oppressive forces brutally attacked a group of people who had gathered in front of the UN office in Tehran to protest against the continued detention of political prisoner Mr. Mohammad Ali Taheri and lack of news about him. The protesters presented the UN office some documents, including about the repressive forces' attack on the gathering outside the regime's parliament a day earlier. In the course of Monday attacks, the club-wielders of the IRGC so-called "Tharallah" headquarters and the special anti-riot guards severely beat the demonstrators with batons and sticks. Due to the attack, many demonstrators, including women and young people, were injured and sent to hospital. The IRGC forces arrested 20 protesters. The repressive forces were hunting well-known demonstrators in the surrounding streets and subway stations. During the last days, similar protests were held in various parts of Tehran and other cities, including Isfahan.
Mr. Taheri was sentenced to five years in prison on charges of "blasphemy, unauthorized use of academic titles, subversive books and works". He was due to be released on 7 February 2016. However, the regime's judiciary refuses to release him by fabricating fake new dossiers against him. He has been on hunger strike since September 28 in protest at his continued detention; however, this morning (November 22), he went unconscious on his fifty-sixth day of hunger strike due to a sharp drop in his blood pressure and blood sugar. The prison guards have conditioned meeting his family upon ending his hunger strike. The Iranian Resistance calls all human rights advocates and international authorities to take urgent action for the release of Mr. Taheri and those arrested in recent days, and to strongly condemn the regime's repressive measures against political prisoners' families.
Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/November 22, 2016

Iran – Tehran, Gathering in Front of the United Nations to Protest the Continued Detention of Mohammad Ali Taheri

Wednesday, 23 November 2016/NCRI - On Tuesday morning, November 2, dozens of sympathizer of political prisoner Mohammad Ali Taheri, staged a protest gathering in front of the United Nations’ office against his continued detention, while at the fifty-sixth day of hunger strike. Protesters delivered the documents of the brutal attack on demonstrators by security forces on Monday, November 21 in front of the Parliament, to the Office of United Nations, It is noteworthy that, on Monday, November 21, also calling for the unconditional release of all the political prisoners, especially Mr Taheri, supporters of this political prisoner, held protest rallies for the third day in front of Iran regime’s parliament and 7 other parts of Tehran, in which Plainclothes agents and security officers brutally attacked and bit the protesters.

Donald Trump's New Cabinet Will Hold Iran to Account
Struan Stevenson/ UPI/November 23/6
Trump and his team know the nuclear deal may have postponed Iran's ability to produce a nuclear bomb, but they also know that this has not made the world a safer place, wrote Struan Stevenson, in an article published by UPI on Nov.21. The Following is the full text of the article.
BRUSSELS, Nov. 21 (UPI) -- President-elect Donald Trump made some bellicose remarks about Iran during his campaign. At a rally held on the steps of the Capitol in Washington, D.C., in September 2015 he called the nuclear agreement between Iran and the world's six major powers the worst deal he'd ever seen in his lifetime. "I've been doing deals for a long time," he told the crowd. "I've been making lots of wonderful deals, great deals. That's what I do. Never, ever, ever in my life have I seen any transaction so incompetently negotiated as our deal with Iran. And I mean never." He later told Chuck Todd, host of NBC's Meet the Press that the deal could "lead to a nuclear holocaust."
Trump's selection of Congressman Mike Pompeo, R-Kan., to serve as the next CIA director has gained significant praise from senior congressional insiders and foreign policy experts, who say the lawmaker won plaudits for taking a tough line on Iranian intransigence and investigating the Obama administration's secret negotiations with Tehran. Pompeo exposed the way the U.S. government, despite its denials, paid over $2 billion to Iran in ransom money, in exchange for the release of American hostages.
Nominee for the post of attorney general is veteran Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., who called the Iran nuclear deal "a mistake" and "a wrong decision for the U.S." and voted against it in the Senate. He claimed the deal could be repudiated if the incoming president disagreed with it.
Rudy Giuliani, the ex-New York City mayor is one of Trump's highest-profile backers. He was a loyal supporter and protagonist during the campaign and has been hotly tipped as a possible secretary of state. Giuliani is a fierce critic of the Iranian regime and a longtime supporter of the Mujahidin-e Khalq, the main Iranian opposition movement.
Also potentially in the frame for a key post is ex-House Speaker Newt Gingrich who was a top adviser and television spokesman for Trump during the campaign. Like Giuliani, Gingrich is a fierce critic of the Iranian regime and a key backer of the Iranian democratic opposition.
Trump and his potential Cabinet appointees are sure to watch closely how Iran adheres to the nuclear pact and they will be ready to pounce at the first sign of any breach. Unlike U.S. President Barack Obama, Trump is not likely to be easily fooled by the so-called "moderate" Iranian President Hassan Rouhani. They know that Rouhani is far from moderate. More than 3,000 people have been executed during the three years he has been in office. Under his leadership Iran has the highest per capita rate of executions of any country in the world. The smiling Rouhani justifies such barbarity by saying that the death penalty is God's judgment on offenders. Nevertheless juveniles and women are regularly hanged, often in public and medieval punishments such as amputations, eye gouging, lashing and stoning to death are commonplace.
Obama chose to base his Middle East policy on reaching out to the Iranian regime. It was perceived that a policy founded on appeasement and concessions could transform a regime renowned for seeking nuclear weapons, a sponsor of terrorism, an exporter of fundamentalism and an outspoken enemy of the United States and western democracies into an ally that could help Obama resolve the many crises riddling the Middle East.
The past eight years have proven this policy to be an utter failure.
Far from curtailing Iran's expansionist agenda, the nuclear deal has significantly strengthened the mullahs' position in the Middle East. Iran's efforts to build a nuclear weapon have only been slowed down. The United States has lifted sanctions and released over $150 billion in frozen assets. This was a windfall for a regime whose biggest export is terror; a regime which funds Hezbollah in Lebanon, Bashar al-Assad in Syria, the Houthi rebels in Yemen and the brutal Shi'ite militias in Iraq. Even John Kerry has admitted that some of these newfound resources have gone toward funding Iran's proxy wars in the region.
Trump and his team know the nuclear deal may have postponed Iran's ability to produce a nuclear bomb, but they also know that this has not made the world a safer place. Iranian expansionism continues apace in the Middle East and the 80 million Iranian citizens who believed the ending of sanctions would offer a glimmer of hope for a better future have had their hopes sorely dashed. These 80 million oppressed Iranians will now look to Trump to hold the fascist theocratic regime in Tehran to account.
**Struan Stevenson, president of the European Iraqi Freedom Association, was a member of the European Parliament representing Scotland (1999-2014), president of the Parliament's Delegation for Relations with Iraq (2009- 2014) and chairman of Friends of a Free Iran Intergroup from 2005-2014.

Iran: Call to save political prisoners on hunger strike
NCRI Statements/ Wednesday, 23 November 2016/Iranian Resistance calls on international human rights bodies, especially the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in Iran, for immediate and effective measures to address the situation of political prisoners on hunger strike. Not only does the religious fascism ruling Iran not respond to the demands of legitimate political prisoners, but puts them doubly under persecution and torture by fabricating fake files and denying them necessary medical care.
- Morteza Moradpour, being in solitary confinement in the central prison of Karaj, is on his 29th day of hunger strike in protest at his continued detention. He suffers from heart problem, but his torturers beat him severely and exiled him from Tabirz prison to the solitary confinement of Karaj central prison.
- Arash Sadeghi in ward 8 of Evin prison and on the 30th day of hunger strike. He suffers from severe heart palpitation and shortness of breath and kidney pain. On November 21, he became unconscious due to a sharp drop in blood pressure, but the prison guards conditioned sending him to hospital on wearing prison uniform and putting handcuffs on his hands and feet. He was detained in 2014 and was sentenced to 19 years in prison on the charge of "holding assemblies, and collusion against the regime and insulting the sacred".
- Vahid Sayyadi Nassiri, in notorious quarantine ward of Evin prison, is suffering severe weight loss and low blood pressure. He has been on hunger strike in protest at 13 months of uncertainty and lack of attention to his case. In order to punish him, the prison guards have transferred him to the quarantine ward (ward 4) of Evin prison. In this ward the prisoners are under more pressure and torture and are denied their most basic rights, including visitation rights and access to medical needs. He was arrested in September 2015 and was sentenced to eight years of imprisonment on the charge of "insulting sanctities and propaganda against the regime".
- Mehdi and Hossein Rajabian are two artist prisoners in ward 7 of Evin prison. They are on their 25th day of hunger strike. Mehdi Rajabian was taken to hospital in recent days due to stomach bleeding, but was returned to prison without proper treatment. His brother, Hossein came down with left kidney infection. These two artists were arrested in their office in the city of Sari in September 2013 and were sentenced to three years in prison on the charge of "propaganda against the regime and insulting the sacred".
- Amir Amir-Gholi, in ward 8 of Evin prison, has been on hunger strike since November 16 in protest at lack of separation of prisoners' crimes and failing to address the situation of political prisoners. Mafia-like gangs in prison, provoked by the henchmen, attacked and wounded him with a knife. The torturers prevented his injury treatment. Mr. Amir-Gholi was arrested in January 2016 and was sentenced to five years of imprisonment on the charge of "holding assemblies and collusion, propaganda against the regime and…".
Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/November 23, 2016

For Iran Regime, to Truly Reform Is to Lose Power and to Face the Wrath of the Population
NCRI Iran News/Wednesday, 23 November 2016/It's time for a new policy on Iran, this is the topic of an article in thehill.com by Dr. Davina Mille senior lecturer and former Head of Peace Studies at the University Of Bradford (UK),
From Reagan to Obama, each U.S. president has approached the theocracy in Iran with a sense of defeatism. One can hope that President-elect Trump, who prides himself on being the arch negotiator, will have a better sense of the actual hand he has to play. In spite of Trump’s avowed distaste for the nuclear deal with Iran — the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — Obama’s ‘echo chamber’ is still reverberating with no shortage of ‘experts’ taking to the web to claim that the re-negotiation is impossible and tearing it up would have a range of consequences from a more rapidly nuclear-armed Iran to international distrust in the U.S.’ future deal-making. There are a number of assumptions underpinning these positions which need urgent unpicking.
In terms of a more rapidly nuclear-armed Iran, the JCPOA gave Iran an easing of sanctions and the release of $150 billion in frozen assets in exchange for limitations on its capacity to enrich uranium and other fissile material.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) told Iran just last week that it was risking the nuclear deal with the West by yet again exceeding the limit placed on a sensitive material, in that case, heavy water. This precise criticism comes after many general accusations that Iran has broken the spirit of the nuclear deal.
Thus, Trump’s critics would do well to remind themselves that Iran has a history of breaking agreements, and, moreover, a history of clandestine nuclear activity.
Most important in countering the defeatism with which Iran has been approached by Washington élites is to unpick the hidden assumptions which surround the JCPOA. The JCPOA was meant to address one aspect of Iran’s problematic behavior in hopes that the mere act of resolution could lead to moderation in other areas.
It cannot — and the evidence is clear a year on — with, in the UN’s words, “a new wave of oppression” at home and increasingly vicious adventurism abroad. The fundamental driver of the Iranian élite is regime survival. Once that is understood, all assumptions about moderation dissolve.
That the regime is driven only by its need to survive can be grasped if one understands its origins. The Tehran regime hijacked a popular revolution through force of arms. It is that fundamental illegitimacy which propels the regime to repression at home and expansion abroad.
These are the means of survival, and factional fighting is about how best to maintain the regime, not reform it. To truly reform is to lose power and to face the wrath of the population. The factions, and the personalities within them, are, in the words of a 1990 State Department cable, “interchangeable parts of a machine.”
To understand this dynamic is to understand that there is no prospect of moderation, and, thus, that the wider ambitions of the JCPOA were always a chimera.
As for the risk to the U.S.’ standing as a dealmaker, any glance at the history of the West’s foreign policy towards Iran reveals each Western capitol criticizing the others for concessions to Iran while each making their own unholy deals to avoid the pain of terrorism or to gain a corner of the Iranian marketplace. Leadership in policy towards Iran is long overdue.
The dirty little secret of Western political élites is that Iran has outplayed them for nearly 40 years, dangling the prospect of moderation as the carrot and the threat of terrorism as the stick for a torrent of concessions to the regime’s ambitions.
The long-term has always been sacrificed to the short-term, whether that was the retrieval of U.S. citizens from Lebanon or Evin Prison or a brake — for that is all the JCPOA is — on Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
The last faulty assumption is that Western governments must yield to the Iranian regime as no alternative presents itself. Ironically — and, again, we see the regime outplaying the West — by restricting and demonizing the main opposition, the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI or MEK) in exchange for concessions from Iran, Western governments have strengthened the security of what is an inherently weak regime.
Of course, the regime has worked hard both to demonize and to minimize the significance of its opposition. Those who buy into the regime’s propaganda about the MEK have clearly never interacted with it. Many of its supporters among U.S. decision-makers initially approached the opposition with sKepticism only to be won over by its political sophistication and the diversity of its Iranian supporters. All the MEK wants is a chance for democracy to take its course in Iran, whether or not it is a beneficiary of the result.
It should also be noted, when apologists for the Iranian government attempt to say it has no popular standing in Iran, that it was the MEK which exposed the regime’s nuclear programm. To penetrate the most secretive part of the state in the most comprehensive of ways demonstrates the depth and breadth of support the MEK has inside Iran.
In addition, the fact that the regime always puts the MEK on the negotiating table as a “diplomatic commodity,” in Ambassador Lincoln Bloomfield’s words, gives the lie to its insignificance.
The CIA once concluded that Iran had the U.S. “for breakfast, lunch and dinner.” If President Trump can unpick the long-held but faulty assumptions of U.S. policy towards Iran and appreciate the regime’s weaknesses and the MEK’s strengths, not least its anti-fundamentalist agenda, he can bring a lasting stability to the region — with all the attendant benefits for U.S. security.

New Developments in the Internal Conflict of the Iranian Regime
Wednesday, 23 November 2016/NCRI - As the speech of Ali Motahari, Vice-President of the Iranian regime’s Parliament was canceled in Mashhad – Northeastern Iran, a new development enhanced in the internal conflict of the regime, and the two rivals including Khamenei and Rafsanjani have seriously disputed. Ali Motahari's speech which was going to be held on Sunday November 20th was canceled by Mashhad's Prosecutor Office.
As regime's authorities stated, the speech delivery was coordinated 10 days ago. Simultaneously, an office affiliated with Rafsanjani and Rouhani was shut down.
Ali Motahari in a letter to President Rouhani described these actions as ISIS-deeds and wrote:"my speech delivery was canceled by the order of Mashhad's Prosecutor as he received a letter. I hope this letter would not be on behalf of the leader of the Friday Congregational Prayers of Mashhad. The relevance of this issue with the Prosecutor and the leader of Friday Prayers is not clear to me. Please clarify us that if the ruler of Razavi Khorasan Province is a governor-general or a prosecutor or a leader of Friday Prayers? And basically what is the role of a prosecutor in this matter?
At the same time, the Spokesman of the Ministry of Interior described the act of Mashhad's Prosecutor as interference in the duties of the Municipal Security Council.
The Interior Minister of Rouhani's government has ordered his political Deputy to investigate the cause of the cancellation of the speech.
Media report that the governor of Mashhad is going to be ousted. On the other hand, a press affiliated with the regime quoted from the Deputy of Razavi Khorasan's Governor-General that a decree was already been issued 10 days ago to assign a new governor and to oust the previous one in charge and it has nothing to do with the cancellation of Ali Motahari's speech.
The Mullah Lotfi affiliated with Khamenei supported the cancellation of Ali Motahari's speech and stated:"if nothing was done against it, the youths undoubtedly would have reacted more violently."
Following the current incident that happened in Mashhad on Sunday, the media affiliated with the Mullahs' regime described such happening as a political earthquake.
Fars News Agency, affiliated with IRGC also printed the handwritten apologies of Ali Motahari to the Leader of Karaj's Friday Congregational Prayers, Mullah Alamolhoda ; asking to be forgiven. The news is hesitantly written:"now we have to see how Ali Motahari reacts to the baseless accusations in which he made to the representative of the Supreme Leader in Mashhad."
On the other hand, a number of MPs affiliated with Rafsanjani and Rouhani, including Mohammad Reza Aref as the main member, called for the government's clarification on the reason for preventing Ali Motahari to deliver a speech.

Iran Warns of Reaction to Renewal of Decades-Old Sanction
Associated Press/Naharnet/November 23/16/Iran's top leader has warned that renewal of a decades-old sanction on his country will lead to reaction by Tehran. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's website quoted him as saying on Wednesday, "Definitely, the Islamic republic of Iran will show reaction" about the renewal. He didn't elaborate. Khamenei, who has final say on all state matters, said the renewal is a violation of a landmark nuclear deal with world powers that capped Iran's nuclear activities in return for lifting sanctions. Khamenei, who supported the deal, said the U.S. has violated the deal by "various violations" so far. Last week, the U.S. House renewed the Iran Sanctions Extensions, first passed by Congress in 1996 and which expired at the end of the year. There is widespread support in the Senate for approving it. 

The Iranian Regime Fears for the Future Combination of the US Cabinet
Wednesday, 23 November 2016 /NCRI - After introducing Gen. James Mattis as the leading candidate for defense secretary in Trump's cabinet, the Iranian regime’s terrorist Quds Force News Agency on November 20th 2016 in an article entitles "Pentagon is waiting for a General that considers Iran more threatening than al-Qaeda and ISIS." and writes: "Donald Trump introduced the retired Army General as a leading candidate for defense secretary." Gen. Mattis is against the Iranian regime and he believes that the regime is the main threat to the stability in the Middle East and it is even more dangerous than al-Qaeda and ISIS. The terrorist Qods Force News Agency added: "Mattis had earlier said that in his opinion ISIS is nothing more than a pretext for the Iranian regime to continue its misconduct. The Iranian regime is not the enemy of ISIS. They benefit from the serious unrest caused by ISIS in the region."
Quds Force News Agency affiliated with Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) wrote that Trump's option for defense secretary is an anti-regime General. Trump intends to appoint a person to this position whom Obama could not tolerate his extremist stances against the Iranian regime thus Gen. Mattis became sedentary.
The "Foreign Policy" Magazine wrote that Gen. Mattis was forced into early retirement by Barack Obama in 2013 since he had radical views on how to deal with the Iranian regime."Entekhab" News Agency wrote about Iran's concern over Trumps' possible cabinet:"if Lopez, Giuliani, Bolton or Gingrich takes office in Trump's government, MEK will be at the highest level of access in the United States of America. Giuliani is not the only possible member of the next government that has maintained his relation with MEK. John Bolton is another possible member of Trump's cabinet, as rumors spread. Clare Lopez is also on the candidate list of deputy national security advisor and Newt Gingrich rejected the position of the secretary of state but he is keen on taking the position of the political advisor in Trump's government. All these people are the supporters of MEK and they praise Maryam Rajavi.

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on November 23-24/16
Dividing or Sharing Syria?

Tariq Alhomayed//Asharq Al-Awsat/November 23/16
Bashar al-Assad’s regime rejected U.N. Convoy Stephan de Mistura’s proposal to save Aleppo through granting it self-ruling system. French Foreign Minister warned that an all-out war in Syria could lead to its division and empowering ISIS. So, are we really being faced by dividing Syria or by sharing it? Since the Russian military intervention in Aleppo in 2015, many have warned from the dangers of dividing Syria, especially with the mention of “useful Syria” which is the geographical areas useful for Iran, as well as ensuring the safety of reinforcements for “Hezbollah” from Iran through Iraq and Syria reaching Lebanon. Yet, after the convergence of the Turkish-Russian ties, we are witnessing hints of a political power division in Syria rather than a geographical distribution.
Visitors in Turkey could sense that Ankara is confident that Russian President Vladimir Putin is the one who “owns Syria.” Everybody is talking nowadays about Putin and the role of Russia after the election of Donald Trump – as well as possible cooperation between the two, especially in Syria. This was even mentioned in the Israeli media where Syria is portrayed as a follower of Putin.
So, what about Iran? Definitely, Iranian weapons are flowing into Syrian territories just as the Iranian Forces and Iran-backed Shiite militias. But it seems that Russians are the ones talking about the Syrian issues, not the Iranians. In-fact , anyone seeking an international solution in Syria is discussing it with Moscow. It is noticeable that “Hezbollah” no longer speaks about Syria, and when Hasan Nasrallah mentions the Syrian war, it is to mobilize followers of his party and convince them of the necessity to be involved in the Syrian blood shedding.
It doesn’t end here, surely. Assad didn’t ignore the political sharing process when he commented on Trump’s winning of U.S. elections. Assad said: “If he fights the terrorists, it is clear that we will be a natural ally, together with the Russians, Iranians and many other countries who want to defeat the terrorists.” This is an evidence that Assad himself is admitting Syria is being divided between Russia and Iran, add to them Turkey, especially in Aleppo and the areas on the border. Russia has better chances because its military presence in Syria is the largest in its intervention history. The question now is whether the political division of powers in Syria will divide it geographically, or lead to its disruption, especially that the anticipated battle whether in Iraq or Syria – after eliminating ISIS – will be a revolution or – the expected Sunni revolution – where it is difficult for the Sunni majority to be ruled by minorities supported by the Russian or Iranian occupation, who support a murderer like Assad?
 I think we are closer to a downfall similar to Afghanistan, and I hope I am just being pessimistic.
 
Stop Facebook, Social Media Fake News
Abdulrahman Al-Rashed/Asharq Al-Awsat/November 23/16
 Earlier, some journalists used to lie to their audience. Today, one audience can lie to another. This is the new situation with social media which became our source for information and where everybody has become a journalist. We used to underestimate the effect of social media and its fabricated stories and images. We didn’t think it was much worthy because we believed it’s not credible or we thought it won’t have that much of an effect. This is not true. It turned out to have the ability and the methodology to create or change the public opinion.
Studies criticized fabricated news saying it had affected the convictions of voters in U.S. like the news that said Pope Francis supports Donald Trump which affected the opinion of his Catholic voters.
I think it is worse in our area. Though there might not be elections that could be affected by social media, it is more dangerous. It provides the mass with faulty convictions at times prevailed with provocation and struggles like no other. It used to be little harmless lies of jinn and wonders of nature. Mark Zuckerberg, owner of Facebook; considered to be the most important platform in providing social communications around the world, promised that his company would provide a solution for this issue. He said that Facebook will soon have an additional feature to flag fake news and alert the provider. But what about Twitter? And what about WhatsApp which is widely spread?
Spreading fake news used to be part of entertainment and we used to believe it exists in countries of less credible media outlets. But it turned out to be an epidemic all over the world, inflicting the educated and the illiterate, the smart and the idiot, and societies full or poor with media outlets. I don’t trust what Zuckerberg said; fake news and hoaxes on Facebook are much more than just 1%. Although I don’t have statistics about this, but a big percentage of the news that reache people through social media from unknown sources are misinformation or forged. Despite repeated attempts to warn the public of fake news and all awareness campaigns asking them not to believe everything they receive and to refute every story, nothing can stop the tide. Many people believe what seems to them like real news. Fabricators are now skilled in formulating news and convincing the public with their credibility.
Governments, institutions, and individuals are now busy trying to correct or minimize damage done from conspiracy, tarnishing images of public figures, and the rise of faulty news created to form new opinions. I believed we still have a long way before the new media outlets and primarily social media, provide more truthful information and less invented ones. Credibility is one of the most important things that every newspaper or TV channel dream of, and there are media trademarks known for gaining the trust of the public, like BBC which created a spot for itself in people’s minds for over half a century. Today, we are in a chaotic world created by the collapse of the old international media system. That is why – and because lies are prevailing over truths – I think credibility will make a comeback and become a demand. It will be create a distinctive place for whoever wants to be special in this crowded medium because the truth, according to journalism ethics, deserves it no matter how harmful or costly it might be. Integrity means that people trust this media; it can create one and destroy another.

Iran, Hamas and the Dance of Death

Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/November 23/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/23/khaled-abu-toamehgatestone-institute-iran-hamas-and-the-dance-of-death/
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9395/iran-gaza-hamas

It now appears that the Obama Administration's failed policies in the Middle East have increased the Iranians' appetite, such that they are convinced that they can expand their influence to the Palestinians as well.
Iran has one goal only: to eliminate the "Zionist entity" and undermine moderate and progressive Arabs and Muslims.
"Relations between Iran and Hamas are currently undergoing revitalization, and are moving in the right direction," announced Osama Hamdan, a senior Hamas official. He went on to explain that "moving in the right direction" means that Iran would "continue to support the resistance" against Israel.
Hamas and Iran have no meaningful ideological or strategic differences. Both share a common desire to destroy Israel and replace it with an Islamic empire. Iran expects results: Hamas is to use the financial and military support to resume attacks on Israel and "liberate all of Palestine, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea."
As far as Iran is concerned, there is nothing better than having two proxy terror organizations on Israel's borders -- Hezbollah in the north and Hamas in the south.
The biggest losers, once again, will be President Mahmoud Abbas and his Palestinian Authority in the West Bank.
Israel's presence in the West Bank has thus far thwarted Iran's repeated attempts to establish bases of power there.
The Iranians and Hamas are exploiting the final days of the Obama Administration to restore their relations and pave the way for Tehran to step up its meddling in the internal affairs of the Palestinians in particular and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in general.
Emboldened by the nuclear deal framework with the world powers, Iran has already taken the liberty of interfering in the internal affairs of other Arabs, particularly the Iraqis, Lebanese, Syrians, Yemenites and some Gulf countries.
It now appears that the Obama Administration's failed policies in the Middle East have increased the Iranians' appetite, such that they are convinced that they can expand their influence to the Palestinians as well.
Thanks to the civil war in Syria, relations between Hamas and Iran have been strained over the past few years. Hamas's refusal to support the regime of Bashar Assad -- Iran's chief ally in the region -- has led the Iranians to suspend financial and military aid to the Islamist movement in the Gaza Strip. However, recent signs indicate that Iran and Hamas are en route to a kind of Danse Macabre -- a move that will undoubtedly allow Tehran to become a major player in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Iran used to funnel money to Hamas because the terrorist group shares Iran's desire to destroy Israel and replace it with an Islamic empire. Relations between Iran and Hamas foundered a few years back, when Hamas leaders refused to support the Iranian-backed Syrian dictator, Bashar Assad. Pictured above: Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal (left) confers with Iranian "Supreme Leader" Ali Khamenei, in 2010. (Image source: Office of the Supreme Leader)
This, of course, bodes badly for any future peace process between Israel and the Palestinians. Iran has one goal only: to eliminate the "Zionist entity" and undermine moderate and progressive Arabs and Muslims.
The new US administration would do well to take very seriously Iran's comeback to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, because of its implications not only concerning prospects for peace, but also because it means that this will lead to an upsurge in violence and terror attacks against Israel.
Proof of Iran's renewed effort to infiltrate the Palestinian arena was provided this week by statements made by a senior Hamas official, Osama Hamdan, who is in charge of the Islamist movement's "external affairs." Asked about Hamas's relations with Iran, Hamdan was quoted as saying that he had good reason to be optimistic.
"Relations between Iran and Hamas are currently undergoing revitalization, and are moving in the right direction," Hamdan announced. He went on to explain that "moving in the right direction" means that Iran would "continue to support the resistance" against Israel:
"Relations between Iran and Hamas extend over a period of 25 years. Undoubtedly, any flaw in this relationship has a negative impact. But this relationship is capable of renewing itself. This is a relationship that is based on supporting the resistance and the Palestinian cause."
In reality, Hamas and Iran have no meaningful ideological or strategic differences. Both share a common desire to destroy Israel and replace it with an Islamic empire. The two entities are also committed to an "armed struggle" against Israel, and are vehemently opposed to any compromise with it. The crisis between the two sides over the civil war in Syria is no more than a minor, tactical dispute. When it comes to the real agenda, such as destroying Israel and launching terror attacks, Iran and Hamas continue to be in total alignment.
Another sign of the apparent rapprochement between Iran and Hamas came in the form of reports that the Islamist movement has appointed a new leader in the Gaza Strip with close ties to Tehran. According to the reports, Emad El Alami, who previously served as Hamas's first emissary to Tehran, has been entrusted with temporarily replacing Ismail Haniyeh as the ruler of the Gaza Strip. Haniyeh has in recent months relocated from the Gaza Strip to Qatar. At this stage, it remains unclear when and if Haniyeh will return to the Gaza Strip. Some Palestinians have surmised that Haniyeh may replace the Doha-based Khaled Mashaal as head of the Hamas "Political Bureau." If this happens, then El Alami, who is regarded by many Palestinians as Iran's agent, will become the permanent de facto ruler of the Gaza Strip.
El Alami's rise to power will undoubtedly further facilitate Iran's ambition to become a significant player in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through the gates of the Gaza Strip. This means that Hamas can expect more cash and weapons to enter Gaza in the coming weeks and months. Such an influx would significantly increase the likelihood of another war between Hamas and Israel. Iran's millions will not be used by Hamas for building schools and hospitals, or providing desperately needed jobs for Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. Nor will the Iranian-supplied weapons be stored in Hamas warehouses and tunnels, or used in military parades.
Iran expects results: Hamas is to use the financial and military support to resume attacks on Israel and "liberate all of Palestine, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea." When Hamas leaders talk about Iranian support for the Palestinian "resistance," they mean suicide bombings, rocket attacks and other forms of terrorism. They are saying with unmistakable clarity that they seek a resumption of Iranian support for the "resistance" -- not for the tens of thousands of unemployed and impoverished Palestinians living under the Hamas regime in the Gaza Strip. The well-being of the Palestinians living under its rule is the last thing on Hamas's mind. The Iranians, for their part, appear to be extremely eager to resume their role as enablers and funders of any group that vows to eliminate Israel. As far as Iran is concerned, there is nothing better than having two proxy terror organizations on Israel's borders -- Hezbollah in the north and Hamas in the south.
Iran is already backing other terror groups in the Gaza Strip, such as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Al-Sabireen. But these are tiny groups compared to Hamas, which has tens of thousands of gunmen and a strong military group, Ezaddin Al Kassam. And there is nothing to prevent Iran from extending its control to the Gaza Strip through Hamas, especially in the wake of the Obama Administration's policy of appeasing not only the Iranians, but also the Muslim Brotherhood.
In the coming months, Hamas is scheduled to hold secret elections to elect a replacement for Khaled Mashaal. Mashaal's departure from the scene is also set to facilitate Iran's effort to infiltrate the Gaza Strip. The three candidates who are seen as potential successors to Mashaal -- Ismail Haniyeh, Musa Abu Marzouk and Yehya Al Sinwar -- have all pledged to improve their movement's ties with Iran. The biggest losers, once again, will be President Mahmoud Abbas and his Palestinian Authority (PA) in the West Bank.
PA officials continue to express deep concern over Iran's meddling in Palestinian affairs, especially its financial and military support for terror groups in the Gaza Strip and even some parts of the West Bank. Yet Israel's presence in the West Bank has thus far thwarted Iran's repeated attempts to establish bases of power there. Abbas has no choice but to work with Israel if he wishes to prevent Iran and its supporters from overthrowing his regime, and perhaps dragging him to the center of Ramallah and hanging him as a traitor.
Abbas and his senior aides are nonetheless plenty worried about Iran's increased efforts to infiltrate the Palestinian arena. At a lecture in Bahrain last week, PLO Secretary-General Saeb Erekat sounded an alarm bell when he said:
"Iran has no right to interfere in the internal affairs of the Palestinians. Iran must respect the particularity of our country. We hope that Iran will focus on placing Palestine back on the map and not intervene through this or that group."
But this warning is likely to fall on deaf ears in the waning Obama Administration, which obviously no longer shares the widespread concern among Arabs and Palestinians that Iran remains a major threat to stability and security in the region, including Israel. Perhaps the new US administration will see Iran and its machinations a bit more clearly. The alternative is allowing Iran and its proxy terror groups further to drench the region in blood.
*Khaled Abu Toameh, an award-winning journalist, is based in Jerusalem.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute. 

Status of the Syrian Rebellion: Numbers, Ideologies, and Prospects
Fabrice Balanche/The Washington Institute/November 22/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/23/fabrice-balanchethe-washington-institute-status-of-the-syrian-rebellion-numbers-ideologies-and-prospects/
An in-depth look at how many fighters are still arrayed against the Assad regime, which ideology they subscribe to, and whether more moderate actors can still seize the mantle from extremist factions.
After more than five years of war, most of the armed opposition to Bashar al-Assad is increasingly fragmented, aside from the Islamic State (IS) and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). It is becoming more and more difficult to predict the rebellion's dynamics, as the number of groups continues to grow and the coalitions that house them change in composition and name. The opposition's most universal trait is its Sunni identity -- apart from foreign jihadists, most of the rebels are Sunni Arabs, joined by a few thousand Sunni Turkmens, so it is fair to refer to them as a "Sunni rebellion." But this religious homogeneity is not enough to give the armed opposition the military cohesion and unified political identity it so sorely needs. A closer look at the geography of this fragmentation can help observers better understand the rebellion and assess whether it still has a chance to prevail.
BETWEEN 100,000 AND 150,000 FIGHTERS
A March report by the Institute for the Study of the War (ISW) categorized twenty-three of Syria's hundreds of rebel groups as the main "powerbrokers" and "potential powerbrokers" in the opposition. In total, these groups command an estimated 90,000 fighters.
The report described a third category of groups with a few hundred fighters each. While most of the twenty-six factions in this category do not profess any ideology, several of them are linked to al-Qaeda: namely, Jund al-Aqsa, Harakat al-Fajr al-Sham al-Islamiyah, Imarat al-Qawqaz fi al-Sham, and a brigade called "Ajnad Kavkaq."
The report also outlined a fourth category composed of hundreds of smaller groups with a few dozen fighters each. These factions correspond to local clans, and their main objective is to protect their given neighborhood or village; they are incapable of launching offensives.
Estimating the total number of fighters in the third and fourth categories is difficult. The best approximation is between 10,000 and 60,000. In total, then, the "Sunni rebellion" could have anywhere from 100,000 to 150,000 fighters.
In comparison, the Syrian regime has about 125,000 regular army troops and 150,000 pro-government militia members, including around 50,000 Shiite foreign fighters (i.e., Hezbollah personnel and Iranian-trained Iraqis, Pakistanis, and Afghan Hazaras). Yet most of the native forces are preoccupied with defending territory and communication lines; only about a fourth of them are able to launch offensives.
For their part, the SDF and its main component, the Syrian Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD), have about 30,000 fighters. As for IS, the CIA believes it has as many as 30,000 total fighters in Syria and Iraq. Yet Patrick Cockburn of the Independent has argued that this figure is a gross underestimation because IS recruited thousands of local fighters after seizing large tracts of territory in 2014. In his view, the group's forces could number as many as 200,000, with one-quarter of them in Syria (though the capabilities and loyalties of these additional fighters, whatever their numbers, would likely not be on par with those of the IS core).
POLITICO-RELIGIOUS CATEGORIES
The ISW usefully classified the various rebel groups into four ideological categories: transnational Salafi-jihadists (i.e., al-Qaeda-linked fighters), national Salafi-jihadists, political Islamists, and secularists. The difference between national jihadists and political Islamists is more or less akin to the difference between Salafists and the Muslim Brotherhood -- in simplified terms, the former seek strict application of Islamic law, while many of the latter tend to favor a state with an Islamic civil constitution but protections for religious freedom. As for the "secularists," the term is used very loosely because most of the fighters in this category are conservative Muslims who do not actually want a secular government.
Among the 90,000 "powerbroker" rebels, some 20 percent can be classified as transnational jihadists, 31 percent as national jihadists, 24 percent as political Islamists, and 25 percent as "secularists." When the thousands of rebels in the non-powerbroker categories are added, the "secularists" become the largest grouping, but they are also the most fragmented and therefore the least effective.
EXTERNAL INFLUENCES ACCENTUATE THE DIVISION
The opposition's external supporters have failed to establish a single, unified operations room from which rebel coalitions can coordinate large-scale offensives. Western governments, Saudi Arabia, and the Qatar-Turkey alliance each have their individual clients: the West mainly finances secularists, Riyadh tends to fund Syrian Salafi-jihadists, while Doha and Ankara fund political Islamists. The operations rooms established in Jordan and Turkey do bring these external partners together in support of secularist and political Islamist factions, but the assistance coming from these centers is less important than the direct aid from Gulf Arab countries, which has helped marginalize the secularists.
The division among donors has combined with internal ideological differences to cause multiple confrontations between rebel groups. Al-Qaeda affiliate Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, which until this summer called itself Jabhat al-Nusra (JN), has systematically eliminated groups that opposed its hegemony in the northwest, especially those linked to the Free Syrian Army. And in the Ghouta suburbs of Damascus, Jaish al-Islam and Failaq al-Rahman, assisted by JN, waged a bloody war against each other this spring, allowing the army to retake half of East Ghouta over a six-month period. Most recently, fighting between Jund al-Aqsa and Ahrar al-Sham, both members of the same coalition (Jaish al-Fatah, or the Army of Conquest), was largely responsible for the failure of the Hama offensive last month.
DIFFERENT FRONTS
In the absence of a single command, rebel factions meet in regional coalitions; once they accomplish a given military objective, they separate and renegotiate their participation in a new operation. The coherence of these coalitions depends mainly on the sustainability of external financing and/or the ability of the dominant group to maintain unity.
The most sustainable and effective coalition so far has been Jaish al-Fatah, which JN created in the northwest in February 2015. It continues to grow thanks to its military successes and its coercive power over other groups. JN is trying to reproduce this formula on other fronts. Currently, this al-Qaeda affiliate (along with Ahrar al-Sham, another powerful faction) is present in seven of the opposition's ten regional coalitions; the three exceptions are the Southern Front, Fatah Halab, and the Euphrates Shield.
The Southern Front. Established in February 2014 by the Amman Military Operations Center, this umbrella group comprises 23,000 fighters dominated by five "secularist" groups. Yet a report issued by researcher Aron Lund a month after the coalition's creation argued that it existed only on paper, and that its five main groups were merely a weak federation of village militias. Whatever the case, the front's efforts to take Damascus in 2014 and then Deraa in June 2015 both failed. Since September 2015, its military activity has been limited to the struggle against IS.
Damascus area. Around 20,000 rebel fighters are in the Damascus area. Half of them (hailing from Jaish al-Islam, Failaq al-Sham, and JN) are currently encircled by regime forces in East Ghouta. One by one they have lost towns in the western suburbs (e.g., Daraya, Moadamiya, Qudsaya). In the Anti-Lebanon Mountains, Assad's forces hold Zabadani and Madaya to ensure the security of the Shiite towns of al-Fua and Kefraya in Idlib province.
These encircled rebels had hoped to take Damascus, but all of their offensives since summer 2012 failed. They have now lost hope of reaching this goal or even being rescued from the south. Some factions in Daraya and Qudsaya have therefore made deals to be exfiltrated to the rebel-controlled province of Idlib -- an arrangement the regime was willing to countenance because it can easily retake this valuable area near the capital once local rebels are gone.
The northwest. The main focus of the rebellion is now in the northwest, where nearly 47,000 fighters are active. Jihadist and Islamist factions represent three-fourths of these personnel. JN and its allies have essentially built an Islamic emirate in the Idlib area by gradually eliminating or integrating secularist groups.
Since last year's Russian intervention, however, even rebels on this front have been forced to withdraw. Although their territorial losses have not been large, they have been strategic -- key regime areas in Latakia, Hama, and Aleppo are no longer threatened.
In Eastern Aleppo, JN and its allies now dominate the rebellion, and the Fatah Halab coalition seems marginalized. Led by JN forces, Jaish al-Fatah has been attacking toward the Hama and Latakia fronts to divert the army from Aleppo so that rebels might finally take that city. More broadly, by maintaining its radical line and refusing to negotiate with the Assad regime or other players, JN has sought to attract other rebels disappointed by the lack of support from outside allies.
Northeast Aleppo. The 5,000 rebel fighters in the Azaz-Marea pocket have been reinforced by thousands of pro-Turkish fighters from Idlib province, including the Turkmen brigade Firqat Sultan Murad. The main objective of their offensive is to create a safe zone between Azaz and Jarabulus and thus prevent the PYD from unifying the Kurdish cantons along the northern border.
The Houla-Rastan pocket. A few thousand rebels are essentially surrounded in this enclave between Homs and Hama. The leading group appears to be Harakat Tahrir Homs, a faction headquartered in Rastan and classified by ISW as political Islamist. It competes with both Jaish al-Sham in Talbisah and a local coalition in Houla for dominance.
Yet the situation is calmer in this region than in East Ghouta. The rebels have launched offensives to the north in order to assist with the battle for Hama and link up with the rebel province of Idlib. This is their only chance of avoiding the fate of their brethren in Ghouta, though the army may yet take direct action against this enclave.
HOW AVOID JIHADISTANS
Although the non-jihadist rebels technically outnumber the jihadists, they are very fragmented and marginalized on most fronts, which gives the jihadists the ascendancy. Only the West, particularly the United States, can help "secularist" rebels become major actors again. That would require the incoming administration to act quickly, and even then, the policy would not work if Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey continue supporting Islamist factions. Yet this may be the only means of preventing rebel zones from becoming ''jihadistans," as has already happened in Idlib province.
**Fabrice Balanche, an associate professor and research director at the University of Lyon 2, is a visiting fellow at The Washington Institute.
.
Letting Catholic priests into Australia was a mistake
By Richard Cooke/Monthly/November 23/16
Centuries of failed migration policy must not be repeated
Warning: you are now entering a politically incorrect zone. Australia is in the middle of an honest discussion, fuelled by Immigration Minister Peter Dutton. Previously, Australia’s immigration policy has been based on a complex, rather muddled process where immigrants from all over the world joined the so-called “most successful and harmonious multicultural nation in the world”.
But that’s a phrase our prime minister hasn’t used it for some time now. Things change. Our nation is not counting its immigration successes, but its immigration failures. Chief among those is the introduction of Lebanese Muslims. Mr Dutton says that allowing them to flee the Lebanese Civil War to our shores was a “mistake”. And what better way to quantify that mistake than crime statistics. In question time, Dutton pointed out that, of 33 recent terrorism charges, 22 were against people of Lebanese Muslim background.
How refreshing. No dithering about community cohesion, just the cold calculus of raw stats. And such vision – seeing all the way from 40-year-old policy decisions to the ethnic crime of now and the future. The belly-ache brigade is already making contrived comparisons to sci-fi action movie Minority Report, but it’s just common sense.
Obviously, this new migration “pre-crime” framework will take some time to codify. Weeding out groups that might turn anti-social is not work our nation can just rush into. But on evidence available already, one thing is clear: letting Catholic priests arrive and operate in Australia has been a calamity. No need to finish grading the report card. It’s a capital “F” for Fail.
Just look at the numbers. There are around 80,000 Lebanese Muslims in Australia. Of these, 22 have been charged with terrorism offences, or around one in 3600. There are around 3000 Catholic priests in Australia, plus a few hundred retirees. Of these, an astonishing one in 20 has been charged with child sexual abuse offences. And according to the best academic experts, the true number of offenders is around one in 15.
I know what you’re thinking, what we’re all thinking: that Catholic priests are about 250 times worse than Lebanese Muslims. But go deeper. Even if we include all categories of crimes committed by Lebanese Muslims, Catholic clergy are so committed to child molestation that are still dozens of times more likely to wind up in gaol. They offend at six times the rate of all other Christian denominations combined.
Some have argued celibacy is a factor in this pattern of offending. But, thanks to Peter Dutton, I’m beginning to think that church doctrine is a blessing in disguise. Just imagine the kind of multi-generational crime-wave we’d be looking at otherwise!
Now, some bleeding hearts might suggest that the Catholic Church is not all bad. That its priests and lay members tend to the sick and poor and otherwise make a valuable contribution to Australian society. But under the Dutton scheme, we must give crimes their due weight, and this huge quantity of good works is easily outweighed by a small number of outrages.
And it gets worse. After all, no-one has been harmed or killed by a Lebanese Muslim terrorist attack in Australia. Meanwhile, Catholic child abuse has thousands of victims. Contrast the way that the two groups co-operate with the police. While Australian Muslims have generally worked with authorities (and have even been complimented for that work), this is not true of the Catholic Church.
That’s not surprising: it represents a medieval pre-Enlightenment system of thought. Many Catholic priests came from rural areas of Southern Europe where police were not to be trusted. And now we have to ask if those beliefs are compatible with a modern society, or instead create some kind of “dual loyalty”. The answer should give us pause, and we shouldn’t pander to the apologists and appeasers, or be ashamed to discuss it openly.
In fact, if we’re honest, if we add these cultural issues to the number of victims, the evidence is undeniable: Catholic priests are literally thousands of times worse than Lebanese Muslims.
Shamefully, many sounded the alarm and were ignored. As early as the 18th century, commenters tried to bell the cat by pointing out that Irish Catholics in Australia had a criminality rate approaching 100%. But they were howled down by the bien pensant lynch mobs of their day. Pointing out this reality was given the ugly name “sectarianism”, as a way to silence sensible discussion.
Now that the blinkers are off, those so-called “sectarians” have been proven correct. Indeed, they are owed an apology. Evidence of the folly is everywhere, not just in our prisons. Under the rose-tinted policy of co-existence, Catholics were even allowed to play cricket for Australia. Look at how the team is doing now. Can anyone honestly say this has been a success?
To avoid the mistakes of the past, Peter Dutton must now prioritise vetting of Catholic priests as matter of urgency, and introduce an all-out ban if necessary. But in time his approach should be applied to other groups, and for other crimes. There are already some suggestions coming from the Liberal Party. Josh Manuatu, an advisor to Eric Abetz, appeared on The Drum where he defended Mr Dutton’s comments: “You just have to have a look at the people being recruited into bikie gangs, who end up in jail, it is a problem.”
He’s right. But while Mr Manuatu’s viewpoint is welcome, under the new system he will presumably be offering it from somewhere else. Unfortunately his heritage is Polynesian, which on his own metrics of gaol overrepresentation and biker gang recruitment means he fails the Dutton test by some margin.
This might seem harsh at first, even antithetical to liberty and the presumption of innocence. After all, Mr Manuatu appears to be a political staffer engaged in the business of doing government. But statistics don’t lie. There’s a real danger he might join an anti-social gang hostile to the values of Team Australia, and that’s the last thing we need right now.
About the author Richard Cooke
**Richard Cooke is a writer, broadcaster and contributing editor to the Monthly.

The Atrocious Scandal of the UNESCO Vote on Jerusalem
 Salim Mansur/Gatestone Institute/November 23/16
 https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9402/unesco-jerusalem-scandal
 It was over the ruins of these sacred Jewish sites, left behind by the Romans, that Arab conquerors of Jerusalem in the seventh century built two mosques, the Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa, to lay claim on the City of David for Islam.
 There can be no dispute about Jewish links with Jerusalem, and Jewish rights to their sacred sites that long pre-date the arrival of Arabs bearing Islam to the City of David. This latest effort by the UNESCO, however to deny the Jewish nature of Jerusalem is much more than a scandal; it is a Stalinist measure to airbrush history by an organization which, according to its own charter, is supposed to be devoted without prejudice to the preservation of historical records.
 There is precedent for such a resolution to nullify the recent UNESCO resolution on Jerusalem. In December 1991, the UN General Assembly voted to repeal the UN resolution passed in 1975 that declared, "Zionism is a form of racism."
 Muslim denial of the Jewish links to the City of David and their ancestral rights over Judea and Samaria, or Palestine, is ironically contrary to the Word of God in their own sacred scripture.
 Their claim on Jerusalem, or the holy land, on the basis of Islam is simply not found in the Quran. On the contrary, the Quran is explicit in addressing Jews as "children of Israel" and speaking of them, as in "Remember those blessings of Mine with which I graced you, and how I favoured you above all other people." (2:47)
 A resolution on "Occupied Palestine" this past October, at the 200th session of the Executive Board of the UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) in Paris, France, was orchestrated by Arab and Muslim member-states as another attempt to diminish Jewish links with Jerusalem. UNESCO's World Heritage Committee, despite Israel's opposition, adopted the resolution by a vote of ten countries in favour, two opposed, and eight abstentions.
 In 1975, UNESCO was already an official supporter of the UN declaration that "Zionism equals racism." So it should come as no surprise that in October 2016, a UNESCO resolution pointedly ignored the Biblical Jewish connection to two of the faith's holiest sites in Jerusalem: the Temple Mount and the Western Wall, which pre-date Islam by hundreds of years.
 Instead, the resolution refers to the Temple Mount compound solely in Arabic: The Al-Aqsa Mosque/Al-Haram Al-Sharif, as it is called by Muslims. The resolution also unfairly rebukes Israel's caring oversight of these sacred places.
 In effect, the passage of this resolution amounts to diplomatic jihad by Qatar and Arab-Muslim countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) against Israel. As usual, unaffected by historical fact, a corrupt UN agency, which should protect heritage sites and not debauch them, has provided support to the knife-wielding jihad of Palestinians -- the same who are encouraged to commit murder and who then are praised for it by Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestine Authority (PA).
 The Arab-Muslim countries together, as the 57-member OIC, including the "Palestine Authority" -- form the largest single bloc in the UN; their numbers alone are mostly responsible for the one-sided prejudicial treatment of Israel in the UN.
 Any fair-minded individual, however, will agree with Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, "To say that the Jewish people has no connection to Jerusalem is like saying that the sun creates darkness."
 A reasonable response at UNESCO, or in any other forum, to this deranged effort of OIC members to delegitimize Jewish and Israeli links to Jerusalem, would rest on evidence, and not on airbrushing historical records.
 One may note how often the stories of the Old and New Testament were enacted in the precinct of the Jewish Temple, as in the story of Jesus's confrontation with the moneychangers. Then one may take into account the eyewitness testimony of Josephus Flavius, a priest in the Jewish Temple during the Herodian era and a rebel against Rome who eventually surrendered to the Romans. Josephus witnessed the Romans destroy the Jewish Temple in AD 70 and wrote an account of what occurred in his book, The Jewish Wars, which we have at hand to give us evidence of events in Jerusalem two thousand years ago.
 In Rome, any present-day tourist can behold, on the ancient Arch of Titus, the engraved likeness of the Jewish candelabra (Menorah), which the Romans brought back from Jerusalem after ransacking the Jewish Temple.
 In Rome, any present-day tourist can behold, on the ancient Arch of Titus, the engraved likeness of the Jewish candelabra (Menorah), which the Romans brought back from Jerusalem after ransacking the Jewish Temple. Pictured: Photo of a panel copy from the Arch of Titus, displayed in the Beth Hatefutsoth museum in Israel. (Image source: Wikimedia Commons/Sodabottle)
 Then those who want to study the history of the sacred sites of Jews in their ancient city may read The Temple of Jerusalem by Professor Simon Goldhill of Oxford University. It was over the ruins of these sacred Jewish sites, left behind by the Romans, that Arab conquerors of Jerusalem in the seventh century built two mosques, the Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa, to lay claim on the City of David for Islam.
 There can be no dispute about Jewish links with Jerusalem, and Jewish rights to their sacred sites that long pre-date the arrival of Arabs bearing Islam to the City of David. This latest effort by the UNESCO, however, to deny the Jewish nature of Jerusalem is much more than a scandal; it is a Stalinist measure to airbrush history by an organization which, according to its own charter, is supposed to be devoted without prejudice to the preservation of historical records.
 In such circumstances, when the UN is abused by the numerical weight of Muslim countries, it might be asked on the basis of fairness: would UNESCO adopt a resolution that declares Muslim claims on Jerusalem as a sacred city for Islam untrue? It might not be far-fetched to imagine such a resolution submitted at some future session of the UNESCO, and adopted by a majority vote.
 The likelihood of reversing the UNESCO resolution on Jerusalem by another resolution that affirms Jewish rights to the Temple Mount and the Western Wall has increased with the forthcoming change of administration in Washington, led by Donald Trump elected as the 45th President of the United States. There is precedent for such a resolution to nullify the recent UNESCO resolution on Jerusalem. In December 1991, the UN General Assembly voted to repeal the UN resolution passed in 1975 that declared, "Zionism is a form of racism."
 It is undeniable that the Muslim claim on Jerusalem as one of Islam's sacred cities -- the other two, far more major ones, being Mecca and Medina -- rests on exceedingly shaky grounds.
 It is an article of Muslim faith that the Quran is the Word of God. And there is no explicit mention of Jerusalem in the Quran.
 At the beginning of Muhammad's prophetic mission, he prayed in the direction (qiblah) of Jerusalem. Then, according to a verse in the Quran, he was directed to pray by turning "toward a qiblah which is dear to thee" (2:144), that is the Ka'aba (the cube) in Mecca.
 Then follows the claim based on the story of Muhammad's heavenly "night journey" from "the Inviolable Place of Worship to the Far Distant Place of Worship the neighbourhood whereof We have blessed" (17:1). Again, there is no explicit mention of Jerusalem in this opening verse from the chapter in the Quran known as Bani Israil or "The Children of Israel."
 It was much later, and after Muhammad's demise, that the ulema (religious scholars) agreed the location of the "far distant place of worship" was the Temple Mount. It is a stretch, however, by Muslims to take the Quran's elliptical reference to the Temple Mount and deny any link the site has with the Jewish faith and history. It is simply dishonest to make such inference in delegitimizing Jewish rights to the site that is indisputable historically as the grounds on which the Jerusalem Temple once stood.[1]
 According to the earliest historians of Islam, the grounds of the Temple Mount was piled high with garbage, deposited there over the centuries by the Byzantine Christian inhabitants of the city. The same historians -- Tabari (d. AD 923) was the most notable -- report that when the Arab armies took Jerusalem in AD 638, the Byzantine Patriarch or ruler, Bishop Sophronius, indicated he wished to surrender the key of the city to the Muslim leader in person. Hence Umar, the second Caliph, or Successor of the Prophet (AD 634-44), came to Jerusalem, and Sophronius received him on the steps of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.
 When it was prayer time, as we find in the narratives of Syed Ameer Ali and F.E. Peters[2], based on the earliest Muslim sources, the Bishop invited the Caliph to pray inside the Church. Umar declined Sophronius's invitation by observing that if he did, then those Muslims who came after him in following his example might lay claim on the Church. Umar obviously knew well the mentality of his people. Instead, Umar prayed outside in an open area where now stands the Mosque of Umar adjacent to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.
 But when Umar wanted to learn about the sacred sites of Jerusalem, the same historians record that it was a Jew by the name of Ka'b al-Ahbar, who had embraced Islam and was accompanying the Caliph, who guided him around the sites. Umar ordered the removal of garbage from the Temple Mount area, and Jews were granted permission to pray on the site that had been denied them under Byzantine rule.
 When Arabs and Muslims deny Jewish links to Jerusalem, they are also then in denial of their own history. Their claim on Jerusalem, or the holy land, on the basis of Islam is simply not found in the Quran.
 On the contrary, the Quran is explicit in addressing Jews as "children of Israel" and speaking of them, as in "Remember those blessings of Mine with which I graced you, and how I favoured you above all other people" (2:47). Or, as the Quran recalls the words of Moses to his people, "O my people! Go into the holy land which God hath ordained for you. Turn not in flight, for surely ye turn back as losers" (5:20-21).
 An objective reading of the Quran -- setting aside the later exegesis of the ulema as more or less politically motivated -- and the accounts of the earliest Muslim historians does not give unequivocal support to claims of Muslim countries over Jerusalem. Indeed, Muslim denial of the Jewish links to the City of David and their ancestral rights over Judea and Samaria, or Palestine, is ironically contrary to the Word of God in their own sacred scripture.
 It is Muslims who are in the wrong over Jerusalem. And no amount of their fallacious efforts in UNESCO, or at the UN, can airbrush the historic links of Jews with the City of David and deny Jews their rights to the sites most sacred to them, in the words of the Quran, as the people of the Book.
 **Salim Mansur is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Gatestone Institute. He teaches in the department of political science at Western University in London, Ontario. He is the author of "Islam's Predicament: Perspectives of a Dissident Muslim" and "Delectable Lie: A Liberal Repudiation of Multiculturalism."
 [1] F.E. Peters, Jerusalem (Princeton University Press, 1985) and Syed Ameer Ali, A short history of the Saracens (Macmillan, 1961).
 [2] Ibid.
 © 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
 
 Trump's Iran policy can finally correct for Obama, Bush failures
 Heshmat Alavi/The Hill/November 23/16
 The U.S. presidential elections and the victory of Donald Trump alludes to the end to a long era. After all, Iran benefited significantly from the past 16 years of appeasement adopted by the past two U.S. administrations.
 MAJOR MISTAKES UNDER TWO PRESIDENTS
 George W. Bush launched a war with Iraq, shifting all attentions from Tehran to Baghdad, and opening the doors of Mesopotamia to Iran’s lethal meddling. Barack Obama extended a helping hand to the mullahs, providing a green light for the regime to severely crack down on the Iranian people.
 Obama’s foreign policy pillar of engagement with Iran resulted in the toughest period for the Iranian people ever since Eisenhower and the 1953 coup d'état against Iran’s sole democratically elected government. The mullahs received the ultimate life support as the Obama White House refused to implement many of the measures included in the already misguided nuclear agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), to full extent.
 Thus, it goes beyond doubt that an end to the Obama tenure will be considered a severe blow to Iran
 In the past 16 years, Tehran was able to take full advantage of Washington’s strategic mistakes to further plunge the entire region into chaos, as we see now in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Lebanon. The U.S. policy on Iran in the Bush and Obama administrations increased the suffering of the Iranian people.
 The election of Obama marked the beginning of the 2009 uprising in Iran following the highly disputed reelection (read re-selection) of firebrand Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. If Obama had supported the uprising, taken a position against Ahmadinejad or merely questioned the election’s credibility, his words would have fueled spirit into the popular movement.
 Unfortunately, positions taken by Obama and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry decreased the pressure on the mullahs.
 WHAT TO EXPECT
 Whether Trump remains loyal to all his election campaign pledges is a legitimate question. From Tehran’s point of view, however, this new White House will be completely different from a Hillary Clinton White House.
 The fact that Trump has taken very firm positions against Iran, including threatening to rip apart the nuclear deal, has already terrified Tehran, representing a major contrast to the “golden era” under Obama.
 While Trump may not eliminate the JCPOA, it is obvious he is not committed to any made pledges. Iran desperately needs the JCPOA to remain intact, as seen in the recent lobbying campaign.
 Any JCPOA tension can spark major change for Iran under the Obama-blueprinted nuclear deal, and transform the pact into an unwanted ordeal.
 More importantly, however, are appointees of Trump’s probable administration lineup. This team has been completely against Iran. Tehran is already terrified of the likes of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, former House speaker Newt Gingrich and Ambassador John Bolton.
 Many possible Trump cabinet candidates vehemently oppose the Iran nuclear deal and/or have supported the main Iranian opposition MEK in its call for regime change in Iran. The mullahs’ lobbies on both sides of the Atlantic have launched a smear campaign against these figures, and yet they have maintained their positions.
 HOW IRAN CHERISHED THE OBAMA YEARS
 Analysts in Iran’s state media are already thinking deeply about Trump’s cabinet lineup. Any decision by a new White House to turn the heat up on the Iran deal will fuel internal disputes already flaring inside the regime.
 Hossein Mousavian, a member of Iran’s nuclear negotiation team, shed more light on Obama’s huge incentives to Tehran. Mousavian emphasized no other president would have provided such key services to the mullahs, warning senior regime officials not to lash out at Trump.
 FINAL THOUGHTS
 A new American president with a firm stance will have a major impact on politics inside Iran. Does this mean the new American administration will completely put aside the entire appeasement policy and stand alongside the Iranian people?
 Time will tell.
 A new era in U.S.-Iran foreign policy began Nov. 8. With Trump’s election, a complete restructuring is in the making for Washington. The Trump administration adopting a firm Iran policy is in the Iranian people’s interests, and a pre-requisite of peace and stability in the region. The more this regime is terrified of a Trump presidency, the more it proves how Obama played completely into the mullahs’ hands.
 The election of Donald Trump marks a new beginning, and the mullahs themselves understand this best.
 **Alavi is an Iranian political and human rights activist. He tweets at @HeshmatAlavi
 
A global library in Dubai
Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/November 23/16
Some people’s idea about Dubai doesn’t go beyond skyscrapers and huge malls. Of course, this stereotype developed due to shallow visions and some people’s lack of perspectives when viewing the city.
Dubai is a global city which hosts hundreds of nationalities, races, colors, identities and religions, which co-exist and contribute to the rise of this unique city. Dubai did not imitate anyone and no one has been able to imitate it. It broke record numbers, shifted formulas and exceeded expectations. Dubai has, through its complex projects, led intellectual change in the United Arab Emirates and in the Arab world in general.
In my previous articles, I talked about cultural projects. In this article, I will discuss the law which Vice President and Prime Minister of the UAE His Highness Sheikh Mohammad bin Rashid Al-Maktoum issued last week. The law stipulates establishing a cultural library.
Sheikh Mohammad bin Rashid explained the purpose of this project and said the aim is “for the library to be a cultural forum that embraces knowledge and that acts as a civilized center in the region to contribute to enhancing reading and turning culture into a social product that complements the developmental path of the state.”
The library’s aim is bigger than making it a reference for researchers at universities or for those who look into manuscripts or who are addicted to reading and borrowing books
“The library - thanks to the knowledge it will provide - will activate writing and translating, bring intellectuals and thinkers closer and solidify the culture of dialogue, tolerance and acceptance of others. It will plant the passion for knowledge in children and future generations, and become a gathering place for authors, intellectuals, translators and researchers from all nationalities,” he said.
“It will contribute to preserving the Arabic language and enriching it and encourage writers, authors, promising amateurs and translators to enhance different intellectual works in the Arabic language. The library also aims to preserve and document cultural heritage,” Sheikh Mohammad bin Rashid added.
Beyond borrowing books
The library’s aim is bigger than making it a reference for researchers at universities or for those who look into manuscripts or who are addicted to reading and borrowing books. Its aim carries cultural messages such as solidifying the importance of reading regardless of one’s age, spread values of tolerance and positively behave with others.
The library is bigger than a hall that contains hundreds of books as it has responsibilities. When assigning the library’s members of board of directors, who include academics, intellectuals and people interested in publishing books, Sheikh Mohammad bin Rashid recommended these cultural messages to them and instructed them to include them in the strategy of launching the library.
The library will be established at a cost of more than $270 million and will be built on an area that exceeds one million square feet. It will include 1.5 million books and receive around 42 million people annually from the region and the wider world. In addition to the major library, there will be eight special libraries that include one for children, one for the youth and one for business.
According to the law the Mohammad bin Rashid Al Maktoum Foundation will be in charge of the general supervision of the library and will be tasked with carrying out the required duties to achieve the library’s aims. Some of these tasks include devising general policy, developing comprehensive strategic plans to implement the library’s cultural and educational vision, and achieving its aims and improving societies’ awareness in this vision locally, regionally and globally.
Through this library, Dubai will lead a cultural initiative that goes beyond isolated reading, which does not transfer what is read into influential material. The miracles and effects of books know no boundaries. In a young city like Dubai, one needs such a library. During a televised interview with a foreign journalist, Sheikh Mohammad bin Rashid said most urban projects one sees in Dubai did not exist in the city - which was a barren desert in 2000 - until very recently. We’re talking about a very recent renaissance. Establishing the library does not come late as some claim and it’s rather an extension to Dubai’s huge cultural efforts.
Dubai is not just about markets, builds, skyscrapers and stores which tempt people in to shop. It’s all that in addition to libraries, reading projects, dialogue and platforms for discussion – as well as cultural and intellectual activity. Those who’ve been to the book exhibitions in the UAE and who saw the activity of publishing houses in the country are witnesses to that.
Mohammad bin Rashid’s Library will be another precious jewel that decorates the beautiful city of Dubai.
**This article was first published in AlBayan on Nov. 23, 2016.

Getting to know the company Trump would like to keep
Chris Doyle/Al Arabiya/November 23/16
Imagine being in a newsroom and you have to label President-elect Donald Trump and his administration-in-waiting. Is it hard-line, controversial, right wing, far-right, Republican, anti-establishment, insurgent, or perhaps ultra-nationalist, isolationist, anti-immigrant, extremist, or even racist, sexist, fascist and neo-Nazi? Love or loathe the Donald, attaching a suitable moniker to him is not as easy as one might first think. The media adores simple reductive tags and labels for senior politicians – right wing, liberal, left wing. They need to be put in their appropriate boxes but can this be done in a way that is fair, accurate and not partisan but also widely understood? What should be used when one label does not neatly fit all? In traditional politics, this has not been an issue. Politicians are Democrat or Republican; Conservative or Labour. But traditional labels are eroding. Across Europe, far right parties (as they are almost uniformly described) are also anti-EU, anti-immigrant but also borderline neo-Nazi. Some even openly endorse the Nazis.
The challenge is that aside from some mainstream policies, Trump champions what many view as deeply extremist and racist positions chief of which are the registry of Muslim immigrants in the US and banning Muslims from even entering the country.
Trump is fingertips Republican and on certain issues such as free trade, is on the left even echoing Bernie Sanders. Many of those he has brought in to his transition team are similarly tough to label. How should the media treat Trump’s crowd from the so-called alt-right?
Sugar coating reality
The risk is that the media will sugar coat the new Trump order scared now that he is on the cusp of power to describe the overt reality. Just describing him as right-wing risks legitimising his racist, sexist and Islamophobic positions. This has happened with so many other leaders.
Ariel Sharon shifted from being decried as a war criminal to being billed a man of peace, based on no evidence at all. NPR reported on the “strongman of Iraq being executed,” that is the mass murdering genocidal war criminal Saddam Hussein. This sugar coating has of course already started. On the BBC, Lt. General Michael Flynn, Trump’s new national security adviser, was touted for his skill as being “tough on Islamic extremism.” Really.
Most American politicians will willingly describe themselves as against extremism but Flynn is clearly and openly anti-Islam and Muslims. He has described Islam as a “malignant cancer”
Most American politicians
will willingly describe themselves as against extremism but Flynn is clearly and openly anti-Islam and Muslims. He has described Islam as a “malignant cancer.” That is being soft on Islamic extremism as it starts depicting al-Qaeda and ISIS types as somehow mainstream which is what they crave. Lt. General James “Mad Dog” Mattis was just interviewed for Trump’s Secretary of State for Defense. Despite garnering lavish praise from the President-elect, he clearly got a black mark against his name for not endorsing waterboarding, better referred to as torture. Yet worryingly he may have scored high for his predilection for shooting people. “You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women around for five years because they didn’t wear a veil. You know, guys like that ain’t got no manhood left anyway. So it’s a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them.” Is he just hard-line or something much worse?
The chief strategist
Steve Bannon, Trump’s chief strategist, was described on the BBC as just a “right-wing media chief”. Yet he is seen by many to be a white nationalist (Nancy Pelosi); a white supremacist, a Nazi (Howard Dean) sexist and racist. Is hardliner adequate? Neo-Nazi movements claim him as their guy in the White House. Even Glenn Beck describes Bannon as a “terrifying” man. Some papers referred to him as “controversial”, hardly illuminating in an administration whose raison d’etre is to be exactly that. The anti-Muslim brigade is trying lamely to defend Bannon from the charge of being an anti-Semite, merely on the basis that he is pro-Israel. (History is replete with examples of anti-Semites backing the Zionist movement). Bannon was the head of Breitbart, a so-called news organisation that he described as the platform for the ‘alt-right’. Typically, Breitbart is just billed as right-wing. Yet the leader of this alt-right movement, Richard Spencer is clearly and undeniably a Nazi sympathiser as his “Hail Trump” speech on 19 November highlighted. If he appears on CNN and the BBC, will he be so described? If not why not? Lindy West in The Guardian has argued that calling the movement alt-right is misleading. “If you see a Nazi, say Nazi.” This Nazi group, the so-called alt-right, disputes any of these terms. For example, its sexism is merely an application of “masculinist principles” that “opposes feminism.” For years Trump and his retinue castigated President Obama for not talking about radical Islamic terrorism. So he can have no complaints if media outfits and commentators start using stronger terms even if negative. Maybe Nazi is a goosestep too far for the administration-in-waiting, but if Trump governs as he campaigned just what word would suffice? Perhaps one world could be deployed, Trumpery. It was first used in 1456 to denote “deceit, fraud, imposture, trickery” – or something that is showy but worthless.

Arab action for happiness is need of the hour
Samar Fatany/Al Arabiya/November 23/16
Many governments are now focused on putting the happiness of citizens at the forefront of their priorities. Researchers argue that true happiness depends on social capital and not only on financial resources. Research shows that “happiness is intertwined with all elements of sustainable development, and it is integrally linked to the promotion of human rights, especially gender equality.” The concept of happiness from a German and Arab perspective was the subject of discussion during the Euro- Mediterranean-Arab Association (EMA), third German-Arab Women’s Forum held in Berlin on November 10, 2016. The discussion among four prominent panelists focused on the meaning of happiness and whether the state can be responsible for bringing happiness into the lives of citizens.
UAE Ambassador Ali Alahmad spoke about the UAE’s experience in introducing a Ministry for Happiness and its role in society. He highlighted the role of the government in creating an environment where people can reach their potential and find happiness. He said the Ministry is keen on building the skills of the people and providing services. The UAE government has linked happiness to the principle of gender equality. Societies cannot be happy and cannot function if one-half of their members are not empowered, he said.
The UAE is ranked as the 28th happiest country in the world and the happiest country in the region. According to the 2015 UN World Happiness report, Denmark, Switzerland and Iceland occupied the top three slots. The US is high but behind several European countries and Canada.
During the panel discussion, Prof. Jutta Allmendinger, President of the WZB Berlin Social Science Center and professor of educational sociology and labor market research at the Humboldt University in Berlin, said that according to research, happiness is life satisfaction and a sense of belonging. She outlined a study conducted by WZB researchers on the quality of life. The data shows that richer people are happier than poorer people because wealth makes them feel successful. Happiness may be a crucial ingredient for success. Unemployment, doubts about career prospects, and job dissatisfaction affect happiness. Arab countries are in desperate need of promoting innovative approaches to the well-being of their citizens. Happiness can provide them a boost to overcome their challenges
Productivity and positivity
Science has shown that people are more productive when positive. When we feel positive our intelligence, creativity and energy levels rise. In order to have success and happiness in our lives, we must stop thinking that happiness is dependent on success, and realize the success is aided by happiness. Today, happiness research has become politically more relevant. Many economists and political analysts view happiness as a serious job for governments. Martina Nibbeling-Wriebnig, head of the government strategy, good living in Germany, Department of Culture and Communication of the Federal Foreign Office, emphasized the need for policies that provide a better life for people and the need for government to focus on the quality of life for citizens as well as economic growth.
According to research, the concept of wealth-creation is no longer the goal of government. Success and achievement bring happiness; therefore, policies should be directed at increasing economic mobility.
Economists advocate increasing educational opportunities and stimulating the spirit of entrepreneurship. Researchers emphasize that those who believe there is opportunity to advance through hard work are happier than those who do not. They also emphasize that people are happier when they are content and have stability in their lives.
There is a lot of evidence that trust is also relevant to happiness. Research suggests that the trusting live longer and are healthier, happier and more successful. Government policies should focus more on gaining the trust of citizens to build a more stable and prosperous society.
Researchers argue that it is important for citizens to learn how to make choices that will increase community happiness. They stress the value of increasing employment and education, and specifically suggest an emphasis on “moral education.” That is, education in the value of helping others, as well as the “control of one’s own emotions, parenting, mental illness” and citizenship. The discussion was very informative and brought to light a new perspective that could be of great benefit to our region. Such initiatives and innovative solutions could have a great impact on our troubled societies. We need to bring happiness to our communities and work toward implementing policies and practical rules that can promote a happier society and a more positive outlook toward life.
Arab countries are in desperate need of promoting innovative approaches to the well-being of their citizens. Happiness can provide them a boost to overcome their challenges and the determination to achieve a happier environment for their children.
During these times of turmoil, uncertainty and suspicions that prevail within our region, EMA’s role comes as a breath of fresh air. The genuine German-Arab women exchange is a positive initiative that can enable Arab women to serve and make a difference. Women in the region have the potential to play a bigger role to help their societies prosper. It also remains critical for Arab governments to empower women and support their contributions to protect the future of their children.
**This article was first published in the Saudi Gazette on November 19, 2016.