LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

November 25/16

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletin16/english.november25.16.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
All who see the Son and believe in him may have eternal life; and I will raise them up on the last day
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 06/40-44/:"This is indeed the will of my Father, that all who see the Son and believe in him may have eternal life; and I will raise them up on the last day.’Then the Jews began to complain about him because he said, ‘I am the bread that came down from heaven.’They were saying, ‘Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How can he now say, "I have come down from heaven"?’Jesus answered them, ‘Do not complain among yourselves. No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father who sent me; and I will raise that person up on the last day.".

Friends, I beg you, become as I am, for I also have become as you are. You have done me no wrong
Letter to the Galatians 04/08-12/:"Formerly, when you did not know God, you were enslaved to beings that by nature are not gods. Now, however, that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God, how can you turn back again to the weak and beggarly elemental spirits? How can you want to be enslaved to them again? You are observing special days, and months, and seasons, and years. I am afraid that my work for you may have been wasted. Friends, I beg you, become as I am, for I also have become as you are. You have done me no wrong." 

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on November 24-25/16
Hezbollah’s army in Syria is good news/Hussain Abdul-HussainNow Lebanon/November 24/16/
The Forced Conversion of Christians in Gaza/Raymond Ibrahim/Coptic Solidarity/November 24/16/
Stop 'Islamophilia' to End Islamophobia/Tawfik Hamid/Newsmax/Wednesday, 16 Nov 2016
Iran's Forces Outnumber Assad's in Syria/Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/November 24/16
Hassan Rouhani: Iran's Executioner/Heshmat Alavi/American Thinker/November 24/16
Dutch MP,Wilders's Trial: "Unnecessarily Offensive"/Robbie Travers/Gatestone Institute/November 24/16
Final Statement of Geert Wilders at his Trial/Geert Wilders/Gatestone Institute/November 24/16
France on the Verge of Total Collapse/Guy Millière/Gatestone Institute/November 24/16
Is Post-Truth the only truth left in public life/Yossi Mekelberg/Al Arabiya/November 24/16
Unravelling the Trump phenomenon/ Eyad Abu Shakra/Al Arabiya/November 24/16
Why this surge of US interest in Yemen/Khaled M. Batarfi/Al Arabiya/November 24/16’

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on on November 24-25/16
Assassination of Bachir Gemayel: Kataeb considers resumption of trials prelude to serving justice
Hezbollah and Russia in first direct military meeting: report
Airport chairman denies weapon transfer from Lebanon to Syria
Amr Moussa pays visit to President Aoun
Salam discusses developments with Abou Faour, Areiji
Hariri receives Amr Moussa and German Official
British Embassy: Lebanon within UK funded programme for Elimination of Violence Against Women
Report: Aoun, Hariri Warn Parties Have One Week to Form Cabinet
Aoun Vows to 'Protect State's Interests, Citizens' Rights'
RHIA Chief Denies Iran Transferring Arms to Syria via Beirut Airport
Kanaan Says 'Christian Agreement Established New Balance', Riachi Hails 'Christian Strength'
Lebanon within a UK Funded Program for Elimination of Violence Against Women
Salameh: Aoun's Election, Hariri's Designation Boost Confidence in Lebanon
EDL Workers Kick-off Protests in Beirut and South Lebanon
Major Wildfire Erupts in Southern Region
Lebanese Forces Media Officer Resigns
Houri: Obstacles Hindering Cabinet Formation Alleviated
Hezbollah’s army in Syria is good news
The Forced Conversion of Christians in Gaza

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on on November 24-25/16
Aleppo rebels agree UN aid plan; Russia, Syria yet to approve
Syrian forces aim to split east Aleppo in two
US service member killed in blast in Syria
UN dismisses rumors that Syria envoy has quit
Ankara will retaliate for death of Turkish soldiers in Syria
IS Truck Bomb Kills 70 in Iraq, Mostly Iranian Pilgrims
ISIS truck bomb targets Shiite pilgrims in Iraq
Turkey PM warns Europe: Cutting off ties would bring ‘flood’ of migrants
Car bomb attack kills 8 soldiers in Egypt’s Sinai
Gunmen kill at least 3 policemen in Egypt’s Sinai
UN, GCC concern over ‘missing’ Iranian N-device
Wild fires plague Israel for third day
GCC Shoura members condemn targeting of Makkah; reject JASTA
Iran: Execution of four young men in public in Qeshm
US-Iranian citizen convicted for trying to buy 200 missiles for Iran regime
Iran: 80 Percent of Wage Earners Are Below the Poverty Line
Iran: Call to save political prisoners on hunger strike
Hurricane, 7.0 Quake Hit Central America at Same Time

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on November 24-25/16
Germany: veteran Santa Claus fired for opposing child marriage
UK: Muslim who ‘who advocated dying while fighting jihad’ given platform at London university
Muslim contribution to Thanksgiving: 81 sand-filled trucks line Macy’s Parade route to prevent jihad attack
Australia: Immigration minister charged with “creating terrorists” by saying it was mistake to bring in so many Muslims
Muslims celebrate Israel fires: “Please Allah, let Israel burn entirely, Amen”
Ohio: Muslim plotted to murder military employee and cops for the Islamic State
Norwegian PM: “You cannot expect Norwegian society will pay you benefits if you refuse to work for religious reasons”
France: Imam explains the importance of deception in Islamic conquest of Europe
Nigeria: Muslims carry out coordinated attacks on Christians in 5 villages, murdering 45
Amsterdam mosque leaders suspected of jihad terror activity
9/11 mastermind: Al-Qaeda now favors immigration and “outbreeding non-Muslims” to destroy US
Austin, TX “Support Our Muslim Neighbors” event tries to “ease anxiety of local Muslims following Trump’s election”

Links From Christian Today Site for on November 24-25/16
Colour Of Blood': London Turns Red For Millions Killed In Religious Persecution
Iraqi Christians Revisit Historic Town Abandoned By ISIS
Five People Sentenced To Death By Hanging For 'Brick Kiln' Murders Of Pakistani Christian Couple
Biblical 'Thinker' Dug Up In Israel Dates From The Time Of Abraham And Isaac
Catholic Apology For Genocide In Rwanda Is Profoundly Inadequate, Says Government
Christian Students Plead For Prestigious College To Become 'Sanctuary' To Prevent Deportations
Former Labour Minister To Take On Religion At The BBC
Besty DeVos, Billionaire Christian Philanthropist, To Head Education For Donald Trump
Christian Convert From Islam Is Released After Nearly 7 Years in Jail
Hundreds Of Pentecostal Christians To Gather In London For Landmark Meeting

Latest Lebanese Related News published on November 24-25/16
Assassination of Bachir Gemayel: Kataeb considers resumption of trials prelude to serving justice
Thu 24 Nov 2016/ NNA - The Kataeb party applauded in a statement issued on Thursday the resuming of the trials in the assassination of martyred President, Bachir Gemayel and his companions, considering this step a prelude to the realization of justice, even after a delay of 34 years. The party called on the Lebanese judiciary to reveal the identity of the provocateurs and those involved in this crime, and punish them severely, so that they become examples to all those who try to harm Lebanon, its presidents, its symbols or its innocent people. The party finally asked the concerned security networks to mobilize, with a view to arresting the persons whose names have appeared in the indictment.

Hezbollah and Russia in first direct military meeting: report
Now Lebanon/November 24/16/Al-Akhbar reported that Moscow and the Lebanese militant party will now maintain ongoing contact on operational issues in Syria.
 BEIRUT - Hezbollah military officials have held their first ever direct meeting with their Russian counterparts in a landmark sitdown that tackled the Aleppo front, according to a daily close to the powerful Lebanese militant organization. “Less than a week ago, Aleppo witnessed the first direct meeting between Hezbollah field commanders and Russian army officers,” Al-Akhbar reported Thursday. The Lebanese daily said that the gathering “came at the request of the Russians” who were impressed by Hezbollah’s military performance during the “Battle of Martyr Abu Omar Saraqeb,” a failed rebel offensive launched in late October against regime positions in western Aleppo. After observing the results of the rebel campaign, which was turned back thanks in part to Hezbollah’s large military presence on the frontlines, Russia last week called for a meeting with the Lebanese organization, according to Al-Akhbar. “The meeting was attended by high-ranking Russian officers, who paid tribute to [Hezbollah’s] capabilities,” the report claimed, explaining that previous communication between Moscow and Hezbollah was handled by both sides’ representatives in the joint operations room in Baghdad and Damascus that include Syrian and Iraqi military officials. However, after the recent Aleppo meeting, Hezbollah and Russia will now maintain “constant communication across joint channels in Syria,” the newspaper said. While the open channel will include discussions on military plans, the talks will remain “purely operation” and not discuss broader issues, such as Hezbollah’s long-term conflict with Israel, the report added.
NOW's English news desk editor Albin Szakola (@AlbinSzakola) wrote this report.

Airport chairman denies weapon transfer from Lebanon to Syria
Thu 24 Nov 2016/NNA - Rafic Hariri International Airport chairman, Fady Hasan, on Thursday came out with a statement sternly denying the hostile Israeli news saying that one of the Iranian airline companies was transferring weapons from Lebanon to Syria via said airport. "The airport chairmanship strongly refutes the news in all terms and confirms that it's not true at all. The chairmanship also asks some local media resources not to convey any piece of news issued by the Israeli enemy and bears the aim of hurting Lebanon and its airport," said the statement.

Amr Moussa pays visit to President Aoun
Thu 24 Nov 2016/NNA - Lebanese President, Michel Aoun, received on Thursday former Secretary-General of the Arab League, Amr Moussa, who congratulated him on his election. "I expressed my optimism to President Aoun regarding the future of Lebanon, and wished him all success in his national responsibility," Moussa pointed out. The pair tackled the general situation in the region in light of latest developments. President Aoun received congratulatory cables on the occasion of Independence day from French President François Hollande, Emir of Qatar Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, and two other Qatari officials. "Your election and the designation of a new Prime Minister constitute a new phase for Lebanon. Lebanese politicians proved their capacity of assuming responsibilities and putting terms to the presidential vacancy," said Hollande in his letter. The latter also hoped that a government of national unity would be quickly formed, reiterating his support to Lebanon. Separately, General Aoun received Lebanese school students at Baabda Palace.

Salam discusses developments with Abou Faour, Areiji
Thu 24 Nov 2016/Later, Salam met with Caretaker Culture Minister, Rony Areiji, with talks featuring high on several issues. Salam met with the Japanese Ambassador to Lebanon, Seiichi Otsuka. Discussions touched on the developments in Lebanon and the region, in addition to bilateral ties between both countries.

Hariri receives Amr Moussa and German Official
Thu 24 Nov 2016/NNA - Prime Minister Saad Hariri received this evening at the "Center House" the Regional Director for the Near and Middle East and the Maghreb at the German Federal Foreign Office Philipp Ackermann, in the presence of the German Ambassador to Lebanon Martin Huth. They discussed the developments in Lebanon and the region. Hariri also met with former Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa.

British Embassy: Lebanon within UK funded programme for Elimination of Violence Against Women
Thu 24 Nov 2016/NNA - The British Embassy on Thursday issued a statement saying: "As we mark International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women on 25 November, Lebanon is one of ten countries participating in an initiative led by the Arab Coalition of Women MPs to build a future free from violence and the fear of violence. "On 1 December the Coalition in partnership with the Arab League and its Women and Family and Child Department, will present the first draft of an Arab Convention to combat violence against women, at a conference hosted by the Arab League in Cairo. The Coalition aspires for the Convention to send a strong political signal of the importance of improved domestic legislation to protect women and girls from violence, hold perpetrators to account, and effectively care for victims. The Convention will sit alongside other international and regional agreements including the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women, the Council of Europe Convention, the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the Sustainable Development Goals. "Attending the conference from Lebanon MP Michel Moussa, Chair of the Human Rights Parliamentary Committee and MP Gilbert Zouein, Chair of the Women and Child Committee. "Parliaments can play a crucial role in establishing a legal environment which protects women. With improved laws more rigorously enforced, perpetrators will be discouraged from committing violence and victims will have access to necessary treatment and social services. The two-year project is funded by the UK Government's Magna Carta Fund, and implemented by Westminster Foundation for Democracy, the UK's leading democracy-strengthening organisation which supports inclusive governance through strengthened policy-making, accountability, representation and citizen participation. "Preventing Violence Against Women and Girls is a key priority for the UK. In addition to support through the Magna Carta Fund for Human Rights and Democracy, the UK's Department for International Development (DFID) is proud to be a world leader in tackling violence against women and girls and will continue to put the rights and well-being of girls and women at the heart of its development programmes."

Report: Aoun, Hariri Warn Parties Have One Week to Form Cabinet
Naharnet/November 24/16/Political parties are obliged to agree on the controversial distribution of ministerial portfolios within a week time limit, otherwise they will be compelled to agree on a government line-up set by President Michel Aoun and Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri, media reports said on Thursday. Aoun and Hariri will not leave the disagreements on portfolios to hinder the formation process any longer and have decided to take action in that regard. The choices at hand include “imposing a line-up which they see appropriate,” Free Patriotic Movement sources told al-Akhbar daily. “Parties have one week to agree and announce a new cabinet,” the sources quoted Aoun. The sources told the daily on condition of anonymity that allotting the health ministry instead of the public works ministry to the Lebanese Forces did not solve all the hurdles hampering the formation which made Aoun and Hariri escalate rhetoric. Although reports said the two officials have set a week time limit for the differences to settle between parties, but sources close to Hariri assured that no time limits was set. Aoun's election as president after two and a half years of presidential void and Hariri's designation as PM have raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees. However, Hariri is still facing obstacles bringing together a line-up that balances Lebanon's delicate sectarian-based political system. A struggle between Hariri and Aoun on one side and Berri over the government line-up. At stake is the distribution of the most powerful portfolios, including the Defense Ministry. The political parties are also bickering over amending the current election law which divides seats among the different religious sects. The current parliament has failed to amend the law, and has extended its mandate twice amid criticism. New elections are scheduled for May 2017.

Aoun Vows to 'Protect State's Interests, Citizens' Rights'
Naharnet/November 24/16/President Michel Aoun on Thursday pledged to “protect the interests of the State” and to “preserve the rights of the citizens.”“Lebanon will rise again and there are signs of improvement. The State will be strong again and Lebanon will return to being the first economic, financial and ethical hub in the Levant,” Aoun told a delegation from the Higher Greek Orthodox Council. He also promised to cater to “the needs of citizens in Beirut and the rest of the Lebanese cities and towns,” noting that he will meet the invitations that he received from several Arab countries “on the basis of mutual respect, not subordination.” Aoun's election as Lebanon's 13th president after two and a half years of presidential void has raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees. In addition to pledges of economic growth and security, Aoun said in his oath of office that Lebanon must work to ensure Syrian refugees "can return quickly" to their country. Aoun also pledged to endorse an "independent foreign policy" and to protect Lebanon from "the fires burning across the region."

RHIA Chief Denies Iran Transferring Arms to Syria via Beirut Airport
Naharnet/November 24/16/Israeli claims that an Iranian airline is transferring arms from Lebanon to Syria via Beirut's Rafik Hariri International Airport are “baseless,” RHIA's president announced on Thursday. “The Israeli enemy has circulated news claiming that an Iranian airline is transferring arms and ammunition from Lebanon to Syria via Beirut's RHIA and some local media outlets have circulated this report, citing Israeli sources,” Fadi al-Hassan said in a statement. “The presidency of the Rafik Hariri International Airport strongly denies this report in its entirety and it stresses that it is totally baseless,” al-Hassan added. He also urged Lebanese media outlets not to “circulate any media report published by the Israeli enemy and aimed at harming the image of Lebanon and its international airport.”

Kanaan Says 'Christian Agreement Established New Balance', Riachi Hails 'Christian Strength'
Naharnet/November 24/16/MP Ibrahim Kanaan of the Free Patriotic Movement announced Thursday that the so-called “Christian agreement” between the FPM and the Lebanese Forces “has established a new balance and a new equation” in the country, as LF official Melhem Riachi noted that Christians “have regained their strength.”“Accept the fact that we have agreed and that there is no turning back, that Christians are an essential component of the system and that they have their role, presence and representation,” Kanaan said, addressing whom he called “the partners in the country.”“We want the Lebanon of pluralism, partnership and democracy... and in order to realize this everyone must accept the Christian agreement, which is not a bilateral sharing of power but rather an agreement on a national vision that represents a boost for everyone,” Kanaan added during a seminar at the Antonine International School in Ajaltoun. He noted that nowadays “all parties have started sensing, even if they don't admit it, that the president is a guarantee for all Christians and all Lebanese.”Riachi for his part pointed out that “whenever Christians become weak, others would split their shares.” “When they regained their strength, others started asking for shares from Christians, after Christians begged others for shares in the past,” Riachi added. “It is our responsibility to protect the agreement and confront anyone seeking to undermine it,” he went on to say. The LF-FPM rapprochement agreement and LF leader Samir Geagea's key support were behind boosting the presidential chances of FPM founder MP Michel Aoun, who was elected as Lebanon's 13th president on October 31.

Lebanon within a UK Funded Program for Elimination of Violence Against Women
Naharnet/November 24/16/As the world marks the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women on November 25, Lebanon is one of ten countries participating in an initiative led by the Arab Coalition of Women MPs to build a future free from violence and the fear of violence. On December 1 the Coalition in partnership with the Arab League and its Women and Family and Child Department, will present the first draft of an Arab Convention to combat violence against women, at a conference hosted by the Arab League in Cairo.
The Coalition aspires for the Convention to send a strong political signal of the importance of improved domestic legislation to protect women and girls from violence, hold perpetrators to account, and effectively care for victims. The Convention will sit alongside other international and regional agreements including the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women, the Council of Europe Convention, the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the Sustainable Development Goals. Lebanon will be represented at the conference by MP Michel Moussa, Chair of the Human Rights Parliamentary Committee, and MP Gilbert Zouein, Chair of the Women and Child Committee. “Parliaments can play a crucial role in establishing a legal environment which protects women. With improved laws more rigorously enforced, perpetrators will be discouraged from committing violence and victims will have access to necessary treatment and social services,” the British Embassy in Lebanon said in a statement. “The two-year project is funded by the UK Government’s Magna Carta Fund, and implemented by Westminster Foundation for Democracy, the UK’s leading democracy-strengthening organization which supports inclusive governance through strengthened policy-making, accountability, representation and citizen participation,” it added. Preventing Violence Against Women and Girls is “a key priority for the UK,” the statement said.

Salameh: Aoun's Election, Hariri's Designation Boost Confidence in Lebanon
Naharnet/November 24/16/Central Bank Governor Riad Salameh emphasized on Thursday that the latest political developments in Lebanon after the election of President Michel Aoun have improved the overall confidence in Lebanon. Speaking at the opening of the annual Union of Arab Banks conference in Beirut, Salameh said: “(President Michel) Aoun's election and the designation of (Prime Minister-designate Saad) Hariri have both boosted consumer and investor confidence.” “The private sector loans have increased by %5, and the plans of the central bank have a major role in maintaining the credit,” added Salameh.He stressed that the bank will “continue to support energy-saving projects in cooperation with European countries.”Aoun's election as Lebanon's 13th president after two and a half years of presidential void has raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees. In addition to pledges of economic growth and security, Aoun said in his oath of office that Lebanon must work to ensure Syrian refugees "can return quickly" to their country. Aoun also pledged to endorse an "independent foreign policy" and to protect Lebanon from "the fires burning across the region."

EDL Workers Kick-off Protests in Beirut and South Lebanon
Naharnet/November 24/16/Electricite Du Liban daily contract workers staged protests on Thursday and blocked the entrance to the company's headquarters in Beirut to pressure the government into a long-standing demand that makes them full-time employees, the state-run National News Agency reported. The employees first blocked the customer service gate and prevented the employees from accessing the building. Shortly afterward they only allowed the employee to enter, NNA added. In a parallel move in the south, the EDL contract workers in the city of Tyre also blocked the entrance to the facility in the city. “All the departments in the south have been blocked and this measure will apply all over Lebanon,” a spokesman in the name of the workers said. He warned: “We will escalate measures and the blockade will extend to the power plants.” The spokesman reminded of the workers' demands for full-employment “principally that they have taken the civil service exams.” In 2012, an agreement was reached between the workers and EDL that the government will hire workers who pass a civil service entrance exam. Several hundreds took the exam and 140 passed but none were hired.

Major Wildfire Erupts in Southern Region
Naharnet/November 24/16/A huge wildfire erupted Thursday in the Mimes area in the southern region of Hasbaya, state-run National News Agency reported. “The flames are gutting forestlands and olive trees,” NNA said. Civil Defense firefighters assisted by residents are trying to douse the blaze, the agency added. Raging bushfires have forced the evacuation of tens of thousands of people from parts of Israel's northern third city Haifa on Thursday as firefighters struggled to control blazes across Israel. Israeli officials have attributed the bushfires to an unusually dry autumn and strong winds.

Lebanese Forces Media Officer Resigns
Naharnet/November 24/16/Melhem Riachi stepped down on Thursday as Lebanese Forces media officer and was replaced by journalist and political activist Charles Jabbour. The LF accepted the resignation of Riachi as media officer effective today and appointed journalist Charles Jabbour, an LF statement said. LF leader Samir Geagea accepted Riachi's resignation and named Jabbour to replace him, added the statement. Riachi had a significant role, together with Change and Reform bloc MP Ibrahim Kanaan, to broker a political agreement between the LF and the Free Patriotic Movement. The agreement has eventually led founder of the FPM Michel Aoun to the post of president. The resignation comes amid reports that Riachi might become a minister in the new cabinet line-up to be formed by Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri. Jabbour is a journalist, political activist, and co-founder of human rights NGO Media Against Violence.

Houri: Obstacles Hindering Cabinet Formation Alleviated
Naharnet/November 24/16/Al-Mustaqbal bloc MP Ammar Houri confirmed on Thursday that impediments hindering the formation of the new Lebanese cabinet have been finally alleviated, the National News Agency reported. “We are closer than ever to the announcement of the cabinet line-up,” Houri said in an interview to the told Orient Radio station, citing the example of other countries worldwide who make similar efforts to ensure the best political representation of their respective political party. Touching on the stipulation of a new electoral law, the MP said: “A new electoral law will be formed in case of good intentions.”He expected the impending parliamentary election to take place based on a law draft that had been forwarded by the Mustaqbal bloc, the Lebanese Forces, and the Democratic Gathering. Moreover, the lawmaker warned that failure to swiftly form a cabinet shall only bog the nation down in a negative phase that held negative repercussions against the Lebanese. The parliament elected President Michel Aoun, a former general, as president last month, ending a two-and-half-year deadlock that left Lebanon without a president. But Premier-designate Hariri is still facing obstacles bringing together a line-up that balances Lebanon's delicate sectarian-based political system. At stake is the distribution of the most powerful portfolios, including the Defense Ministry. The political parties are also bickering over amending the current election law which divides seats among the different religious sects. The current parliament has failed to amend the law, and has extended its mandate twice amid criticism. New elections are scheduled for May 2017.

Hezbollah’s army in Syria is good news
Hussain Abdul-HussainNow Lebanon/November 24/16/
The Party of God's transformation into a conventional fighting force may keep it focused on extending influence inside Syria, rather than in Lebanon, and hinder guerrilla tactics in any future conflict with Israel, Hussain Abdul-Hussain argues
Lebanese complaints against Hezbollah’s parade of its newfound army, in the Syrian town of Qusayr, were misplaced. In fact, the Lebanese should rejoice on two accounts: That the Hezbollah militia has now become a regular army, and that the parade happened on Syrian soil.
The significance of a militia turning into an army is substantial. If Hezbollah sticks to such a format, it means that the party will lose its ability to fight asymmetric wars, and will be forced to engage in regular army-to-army battles. This means that Hezbollah will lose its ability to blend in with non-combatants, or launch its offensive from civilian neighborhoods. After all, tanks and artillery do not really fit in small streets and cannot be hidden behind bushes.
 If Hezbollah’s militia sticks to its new setup as a conventional army, then the party will have to calculate its wars more carefully. Hezbollah already avoids battle with Israel after Tel Aviv announced its Dahiyeh (Suburb) Doctrine and razed large areas of Beirut’s southern suburbs, as well as Shiite villages in the south in the 2006 War. Israel’s indiscriminate bombing of neighborhoods containing Hezbollah and its supporters exacted a heavy toll on the party, and have forced it to avoid further wars with the Israelis, despite all the bravado from Hezbollah’s leaders.
 With an army instead of a militia, Hezbollah will have to fight its future wars with Israel out in the open, which should be good news for Shiite non-combatants and the Lebanese at large, who lost a considerable chunk of their infrastructure, such as bridges, that Israel destroyed to hinder the movement of the party’s invisible fighters in 2006. Now that Hezbollah’s fighters are visible, Israel will have less reason to hit Lebanon, and will instead engage Hezbollah in head-to-head combat, which Hezbollah says they are not shying from this time, arguing that in any future war with Israel, the party’s fighters will not sit back and defend, but might pressure the Israeli north, attempting to win and hold territory.
 The second upside from Hezbollah’s military parade in Qusayr is the fact that, with this parade, the party did not undermine Lebanese sovereignty, for a change. For the first time in decades, Hezbollah has chosen instead to undermine the sovereignty of other states, this time Syria. This means that if anyone should feel threatened, and complain, it should be Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Even if Hezbollah is Assad’s ally, the Qusayr parade speaks volumes about who has the upper hand, and where.
 If Hezbollah’s military parade in Qusayr was to show solidarity with Assad, then the parade would have been a joint exercise between the party and regular Syrian forces. Yet the fact that it was Hezbollah’s Politburo Chief Hashem Safieddine delivering a speech at the event suggests who is really the boss in Syria’s Mid-West.   Clashes between Hezbollah and Assad are inevitable, sooner or later. News reports suggest there have been skirmishes between the two in some areas across Syria. Assad should understand that Hezbollah did not offer so much blood and treasure, only to quit Syria the minute Assad might say “thank you and good bye.” Lebanon has been in Hezbollah’s pocket for some time. Judging by how the Lebanese oligarchy is now back to its regular political shenanigans, electing Michel Aoun president and selecting Saad Hariri as prime minister, one cannot but conclude that Lebanon is “back to normal.” Syria, however, is not. If fighting ever stops in Syria, it will be interesting to see how things will play out between Assad and Hezbollah’s new army parading in Qusayr, which could end up exerting complete control over other territories inside Syria

The Forced Conversion of Christians in Gaza
Raymond Ibrahim/Coptic Solidarity/2016/11/01
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/24/raymond-ibrahimcoptic-solidarity-the-forced-conversion-of-christians-in-gaza/
The plight of Christian living in Gaza under the Palestinian authority continues to worsen. According to a new Arabic language report, recent years have “witnessed a critical upsurge against the Christians,” who only amount to approximately 2,500 people—surrounded by approximately 1.5 million Muslims. Local authorities have abandoned the tiny minority to Islamist elements who have “placed great and continuous pressure” on the Christians.
“At times we hear of the bombing of a Christian bookshop and assaults on churches and other Christian institutions; other times we hear of the kidnapping of Christians and the coercion of them to embrace the religion of Muhammad,” says the report.
In mid October, Christians in Gaza led a protest, calling for the return of their kidnapped children and loved ones. They held up signs saying “I am a Christian and boast of my cross.” Bishop Alexios of the region “confirmed that the Christians who converted to Islam did so under threats, coercion, compulsion, and force.” His church also submitted a formal petition to the governor of the region, Ismail Haniyeh, calling on him to investigate matters, but received no response.
Palestinian Muslim leaders say that such Christians convert of their own free will and without pressure; however, these same Muslim leaders refuse to let their Christian families meet with or even learn the whereabouts of these recent converts, so they can confirm if their conversions were committed freely or under duress.
The report adds that Gaza’s Christians are calling on the Christian world to intervene. The bishop said that he is trying to communicate all of this to the Vatican, the United Nations, and the United States.
http://raymondibrahim.com/2016/11/01/forced-conversion-christians-gaza/
***Christian family hold picture of abducted son whom officials said willingly converted to Islam.

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on November 24-25/16
Aleppo rebels agree UN aid plan; Russia, Syria yet to approve
 Reuters, Geneva Thursday, 24 November 2016/Syrian rebels in besieged east Aleppo have agreed to a UN plan for aid delivery and medical evacuations, but the United Nations awaits a green light from Russia and the Syrian government, humanitarian adviser Jan Egeland said on Thursday. With freezing winter conditions setting in, some 275,000 people are trapped in east Aleppo, where the last UN food rations were distributed on Nov. 13. Hundreds of trucks are ready in Turkey and government-controlled west Aleppo to bring aid to the eastern sector, but the United Nations needs 72 hours once it has all approvals to prepare a “big, complex and dangerous operation”, Egeland said. “We do now have written approval in principle by the armed opposition groups of east Aleppo,” he told reporters, specifying that he was referring to rebels with whom the UN is in contact - which do not include former Nusra Front militants. “We have verbal support also from the Russian Federation on our four-point plan. We need written support and we need unconditional support also from Russia and we are waiting still for the answer from the government of Syria.”Hundreds of wounded are awaiting evacuation for treatment under the plan, Egeland said. Asked about any ‘Plan B’, he replied: “In many ways Plan B is that people starve. And can we allow that to happen? No, we cannot allow that to happen.”
 
Syrian forces aim to split east Aleppo in two
Reuters, Beirut Thursday, 24 November 2016/Syrian government forces are trying to split opposition-held eastern Aleppo in two in a fierce ground and air assault that is taking a heavy toll on besieged civilians and rebel fighters who are battling hard to stop them, a rebel commander said. Abu Abdelrahman Nour, Aleppo commander of the Jabha Shamiya, one of the biggest groups fighting against President Bashar al-Assad in northern Syria, called for more help from countries such as France and Turkey, saying it would be a “catastrophe” if the government forces managed to bisect eastern Aleppo. Aleppo, Syria’s biggest city before the start of a civil war that has killed hundreds of thousands of people, is already divided into the government-held west and rebel-held east, where UN officials say at least 250,000 people are under siege. Dividing eastern Aleppo would expose rebel fighters to attack on new fronts and could hasten what would be a major victory for Assad in the rebels’ most important urban stronghold after five years of fighting. In the latest fighting, the pro-government forces, identified by the rebels mainly as Shiite militias, have sought to advance into an area of northeastern Aleppo, Nour said. Heavy bombardment of civilian areas has also resumed. “The regime is using heavy, systematic bombardment in the areas where it is trying to advance. This is causing many injuries in the ranks of the revolutionaries,” he said late on Wednesday via Skype from Aleppo. “For roughly five days the intensity of the attack and clashes in the northeast area has increased, and this threatens the entire eastern region.”The aim is “to besiege Aleppo twice, and split it into two areas, and this will be a catastrophe if it happens”, Nour said, explaining that the pro-government forces would then able to open new fronts in the battle for Aleppo. This would further stretch the outgunned rebel fighters after what Nour called “one of the hardest periods” Aleppo had faced. Parts of the city have been largely reduced to rubble and residents are short of food, medicine and fuel. Nour said flour was being mixed with other foods such as rice and cracked wheat to eke out remaining supplies. Despite this, Nour said rebel morale was high. “God willing it will not be easy for the regime. We have excellent capabilities and are defending well,” he said.
 “Total war”
 The government, backed by Russian air power and Shi’ite militias from Iran, Iraq and Lebanon, has tightened its grip on eastern Aleppo this year, gradually encircling it before launching the new assault in September. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based organization that reports on the war, says pro-Assad forces are making “clear advances” in eastern Aleppo, including the belt of territory that could split the rebel-held east in two. Asked about the government’s strategy, a Syrian military source said “the army had a number of plans for the eastern districts”. The source said “the matter will be settled sooner or later, and it won’t be later”. Western states have condemned the Russian-backed campaign that has killed hundreds of people since September. Hospitals and other civilian infrastructure have been hit, and all of east Aleppo’s hospitals were declared out of action last week. France accused the Syrian government and its allies on Wednesday of using political uncertainty in the United States to launch “total war” against rebel-held areas. Syrian rebels in besieged east Aleppo have agreed to a UN plan for aid delivery and medical evacuations, but the United Nations is awaiting a green light from Russia and the Syrian government, humanitarian adviser Jan Egeland said. US President-elect Donald Trump has suggested he may overhaul U.S. policy in Syria, questioning the policy of supporting moderate rebels fighting Assad and suggesting he may cooperate with Russia in the fight against ISIS. The Jabha Shamiya, which is known in English as the Levant Front, has received support from states that oppose Assad, such as Turkey. But the backing has fallen short of what the rebels say they need to fight the better armed government side. “We were frankly counting on the friendly states -- Turkey, France, others -- to offer us assistance much greater than this, on the military or humanitarian level,” Nour said. Nour said assaults on the southern periphery of the rebel-held areas of Aleppo had died down, but “on the northeastern front, the regime attempts are of increasing ferocity”.
 
US service member killed in blast in Syria
 AFP, Washington Friday, 25 November 2016/A member of the US military died from his wounds Thursday after a blast caused by an improvised explosive device in northern Syria, the US military’s central command said. The man was wounded by the explosion in the vicinity of Ayn Issa, Lieutenant General Stephen Townsend, commander of the US-led coalition fighting the ISIS group, was quoted as saying in a CENTCOM statement. The victim’s identity was not released.
 
UN dismisses rumors that Syria envoy has quit
AFP, Geneva Thursday, 24 November 2016/The United Nations on Thursday dismissed rumors that its special envoy for the Syrian conflict, Staffan de Mistura, had resigned. “Media reports that Special Envoy de Mistura is resigning his post are not accurate. The Special Envoy remains fully engaged on his mission,” the UN said in a statement. Arabic media had reported earlier Thursday that de Mistura had handed in his resignation for personal reasons. The 69-year-old was named to the post in July 2014, charged with the daunting task of trying to find a peaceful resolution to the conflict that has torn Syria apart since 2011, killing 300,000 people. Two other special envoys had previously held the post before resigning: former UN secretary-general Kofi Annan, and former Algerian foreign minister Lakhdar Brahimi. De Mistura, a Swedish-Italian career diplomat, told Swiss public TV network RTS last month that he had no plans to quit the job, despite the difficulty of the task. “If I did it, it would only be if I thought there was no use for our work and if my family asked it of me,” he said.
 “My conscience tells me I must support the Syrians, but no one is indispensable,” he added.
 
Ankara will retaliate for death of Turkish soldiers in Syria
 Reuters, Ankara Thursday, 24 November 2016/Turkey will retaliate against an attack in Syria which killed three Turkish soldiers, Prime Minister Binali Yildirim told reporters on Thursday in Ankara. “Three soldiers lost their lives in the attack yesterday. It is clear that some people are not happy with this battle Turkey has been fighting against Daesh (ISIS). This attack will surely have a retaliation,” he said. The Turkish military said earlier that a suspected Syrian air strike had killed the three soldiers, in what appeared to be the first Turkish casualties at the hands of Syrian government forces since Turkey launched an incursion into Syria three months ago.

IS Truck Bomb Kills 70 in Iraq, Mostly Iranian Pilgrims
 A suicide bombing claimed by the Islamic State group killed at least 70 people, mainly Shiite pilgrims, south of Baghdad Thursday, as Iraqi forces battle to retake Mosul from the jihadists.The huge truck bomb blast ripped through a petrol station where buses packed with faithful returning from the Arbaeen commemoration in Karbala were parked, officials said. Most of the victims were Iranians, the largest contingent of foreigners in the pilgrimage, which is one of the world's largest religious events and culminated on Monday. The attack took place near a village called Shomali, about 120 kilometers (75 miles) southeast of Baghdad. IS, which is fighting to defend its Mosul stronghold in northern Iraq, claimed responsibility for the attack. Falah al-Radhi, head of the provincial security committee for Babylon, the province where the bombing happened, said several buses were targeted. "A large truck exploded among them. It was a suicide attack," he told AFP. "There are at least 70 dead, fewer than 10 are Iraqis, the rest are Iranians."Videos circulating on social media showed debris scattered over a large area along the main highway linking Baghdad to the main southern port city of Basra. "There are completely charred corpses at the scene," said Radhi, who added that at least 20 wounded were transferred to nearby hospitals. The Joint Operations Command in Baghdad issued a statement saying the truck was packed with 500 liters of ammonium nitrate, a chemical compound used in many explosive devices.
 Diversionary attacks
 Up to 20 million people visited Karbala, home to the mausoleum of Imam Hussein, for Arbaeen this year. According to the Iraqi authorities, around three million of them were Iranians. Iran's foreign ministry spokesman Bahram Ghasemi condemned the "brutal and inhumane" attack, the IRNA news agency said. Iraq had deployed around 25,000 members of the security forces in and around the shrine city, which lies southwest of Baghdad, to protect the pilgrims from a feared IS attack. The jihadist group, which is losing ground in Mosul, has carried out a series of high-profile diversionary attacks since Iraqi forces launched a huge offensive against their northern stronghold last month. Elite forces battled IS jihadists in eastern Mosul Thursday, looking for fresh momentum in their five-week-old offensive to retake Iraq's second city. Maan al-Saadi, a commander with the Counter-Terrorism Service (CTS), told AFP on the front line in Mosul that his forces were fighting IS in the neighborhood of al-Khadraa. "They cannot flee. They have two choices -- give up or die," he said. Over the past few days, Iraqi forces have cut off the main supply line running from Mosul to the western border with Syria, where IS still controls the city of Raqa. The U.S.-led coalition also bombed bridges over the Tigris river that splits Mosul in two, reducing the jihadists' ability to resupply the eastern front. "The Iraqi advance on the south and southeast of the city has started to pick up some steam," coalition spokesman Colonel John Dorrian said.
 'Brutal' fighting
 "It is extraordinarily tough fighting, just brutal, but there is an inevitability to it. The Iraqis are going to beat them," he told AFP. IS fighters moving in an intricate network of tunnels have used snipers, booby traps and a seemingly endless supply of suicide car bombers to stop Iraqi forces. The authorities have not released casualty figures since the start of the offensive but fighters have admitted being surprised by how fierce IS resistance has been. Iraqi forces launched a major offensive on October 17 to retake Mosul, where jihadist supremo Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi proclaimed a caliphate in 2014. They are also edging towards the city from a northern front as well as from the south, where they are within striking distance of Mosul airport. Among the forces deployed south and west of the city are the Hashed al-Shaabi (Popular Mobilization), an umbrella for paramilitaries dominated by Tehran-backed militias. They have focused their operations on Tal Afar, a large town still held by IS west of Mosul and on Wednesday announced they had cut the main road between it and Syria. That will make it very long and dangerous for IS if it attempts to move fighters and equipment between Mosul and Raqa, the last two bastions of their crumbling "state."The International Organization for Migration said Thursday that around 76,000 people had been displaced since October 17. A few of them have returned to their homes in retaken areas already but Iraqi forces on Thursday slapped a curfew on neighborhoods of eastern Mosul under their control.
 
ISIS truck bomb targets Shiite pilgrims in Iraq
AFP, Hilla, Iraq Thursday, 24 November 2016/A truck bomb Thursday ripped through a petrol station where buses packed with Shiite pilgrims returning from the Arbaeen commemoration in the Iraqi city of Karbala were parked and killed close to a 100 people, security officials said. Several Iranian nationals -- the largest contingent of foreigners at the Arbaeen pilgrimage that ended on Monday -- were among the victims, the Joint Operations Command (JOC) said. “At least seven buses with pilgrims were inside the petrol station at the time,” a police lieutenant colonel told AFP. The blast struck in the village of Shomali, 120 kilometers (75 miles) southeast of the capital Baghdad and around 80 kilometers (50 miles) from Karbala. There was no immediate casualty toll but the JOC said “several civilians were killed and wounded, including Iranians”. “Those buses were loaded with Iranians, Bahrainis and Iraqis. Ambulances and civil defense are on their way to the site,” a police intelligence source told AFP. A Shomali resident said the petrol station was on the main motorway between Baghdad and the southern port city of Basra. “There were Iranians but also lots of people from Basra and Nasiriyah,” Mousa Omran told AFP, referring to another southern city. Between 17 and 20 million people visited Karbala, home to the mausoleum of Imam Hussein, for Arbaeen, which is one of the world’s largest religious events. The days-long final phase of the pilgrimage sees huge numbers of pilgrims walk long distances to reach Karbala. According to the Iraqi authorities, around three million Iranians were among this year’s visitors. Many of them stay a few days longer to visit the shrine city. Iraq’s security forces were on high alert for the duration of the pilgrimage, seen as a major potential target for the ISIS group. The jihadist organization, which is currently trying to defend its last major Iraqi bastion of Mosul against a massive offensive, has claimed countless such bombings. Observers had feared the group, whose cross-border caliphate is crumbling under the pressure of multiple military operations backed by Iran and the West, would seek to attack Karbala. Around 25,000 members of the security forces were deployed in and around the city last week to protect the pilgrims and the shrine but some have since returned to the front lines. Thursday’s attack marred an Arbaeen commemoration that had passed with fewer attacks than in previous years.
 
Turkey PM warns Europe: Cutting off ties would bring ‘flood’ of migrants
Reuters, Ankara Thursday, 24 November 2016/Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim on Thursday warned Europe that without Ankara’s help it could be “flooded” by waves of migrants and said cutting off talks with the bloc would be far more damaging to Europe than Turkey. “We are one of the factors protecting Europe. If refugees go through, they will flood into Europe and take it over, and Turkey prevents this,” Yildirim said in comments broadcast live on television. “I accept that cutting off ties with Europe would harm Turkey, but it would damage Europe 5-to-6 times more.”
 
Car bomb attack kills 8 soldiers in Egypt’s Sinai
AFP, Cairo Friday, 25 November 2016/Eight Egyptian soldiers were killed in a car bomb attack targeting a checkpoint in Sinai, where the local affiliate of the ISIS group is leading an insurrection, the army said Thursday. “A group of armed terrorists attacked one of the security checkpoints in north Sinai,” the army spokesman said. “A car bomb attack, the clashes that ensued and a blast targeting one of the vehicles left eight members of the armed forced dead.”
 
Gunmen kill at least 3 policemen in Egypt’s Sinai
Reuters, Cairo Friday, 25 November 2016/Gunmen killed at least three policemen and injured seven in an attack on a checkpoint in the restive northern Sinai on Thursday, Egyptian security sources said. There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the attack. An Islamist insurgency in the rugged, thinly populated Sinai Peninsula has gained pace since the military toppled President Mohamed Mursi of the Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt’s oldest Islamist movement, in mid-2013 following mass protests against his rule.In Thursday’s incident, assailants fired two rocket propelled grenades at the checkpoint south of the city of al-Arish, and three pick-up trucks carrying masked men then drove by and opened fire, security sources said. The militant group staging the insurgency in Sinai pledged allegiance to ISIS in 2014 and adopted the name Sinai Province. It is blamed for the killing of hundreds of Egyptian soldiers and policemen since then. In its weekly online magazine Al-Nabaa released on Thursday, ISIS urged members to join other branches of the group active in areas like the Sinai, Libya, Yemen and West Africa if unable to reach its self-declared “caliphate” in Iraq and Syria. ISIS had previously called on members to carry out attacks in their home countries if unable to enter Iraq or Syria because of tougher security measures in the region aimed at cutting off militant supply lines.
 
UN, GCC concern over ‘missing’ Iranian N-device
Staff writer, Al Arabiya Thursday, 24 November 2016/Gulf countries are following up with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on the potential negative effects of a missing nuclear device at the Iranian nuclear reactor in Bushehr. They are specially keen to know what impact it could have on water pollution in the region, a Gulf official has confirmed. Dr Adnan Al-Tamimi, Chairman of the GCC Emergency Management Center, expressed his concern over the loss of the radioactive device that was used for industrial purposes. According to reports, the car that was carrying it was stolen and then it was found without it. Tamimi told al-Sharq al-Awsat newspaper that the estimates indicate that the radioactive device loses half of its strength 74 days after its activity is suspended. However, this requires caution if the intent behind the incident is to smuggle the device. Tamimi added that what “raises their concerns is the low safety and security levels in the Iranian Bushehr reactor and the absence of the overall transparency in Iran’s nuclear program.”He pointed out that there will be cases of early warning in all Gulf countries if the radiation leaks into air and water. He also said that a special training on radiological injuries will be conducted next year in cooperation with the IAEA.
 
Wild fires plague Israel for third day
By Steven Scheer Reuters, Haifa, Israel Thursday, 24 November 2016/Tens of thousands of residents were ordered to leave Israel’s third largest city on Thursday as wildfires tore across central and northern Israel, and the country’s chief of police said politically motivated arson may be behind some of the blazes. Television pictures showed a wall of flames raging through central neighborhoods of Haifa, a city of around 300,000 in the north of the country, engulfing a petrol station that firefighters were rapidly dousing with water. The fires have been burning in multiple locations for the past three days but intensified on Thursday, fueled by unseasonably dry weather and strong easterly winds.Education Minister Naftali Bennett, the leader of a far-right party, said whoever set the fires could not have been Jewish, hinting Arabs or Palestinians were behind them. Police gave no indication of who was to blame but did say they had reason to believe arson was responsible in some cases. “There was arson and a lot of non-arson,” Police Chief Roni Alsheich told reporters. “It’s likely that where it was arson, it goes in the direction of nationalistic,” he said, suggesting a political motive, before adding: “I don’t want to disturb the investigation.” He said there had been some arrests but gave no details. On social media, some Arabs and Palestinians celebrated the fires and the hashtag #Israelisburning was trending. On Wednesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attributed the fires to “natural and unnatural” causes and some Israeli officials referred to an “arson intifada”, a reference to previous Palestinian uprisings against Israel.
 "Every fire that was caused by arson, or incitement to arson, is terrorism by all accounts. And we will treat it as such," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told reporters gathered in Haifa. "Whoever tries to burn parts of Israel will be punished for it severely."With fires burning in the forests west of Jerusalem, around Haifa, on central and northern hilltops and in parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank, the government sought assistance from neighboring countries to tackle the conflagration.Greece, Cyprus, Croatia, Turkey and Russia offered help, with several aircraft already joining efforts to quell the blaze, dropping fire-retardant material to try to douse the heaviest fires and stem their spread. A thick haze of smoke hung over Haifa, which rises up from the Mediterranean Sea overlooking a large port. Schools and universities were evacuated, and two nearby prisons transferred inmates to other jails, a prisons service spokesman said. Patients were moved out of a geriatric hospital.
 Worrying forecast
 A lack of rain combined with very dry air and strong easterly winds have spread the fires this week across the center and north of the country, as well as parts of the West Bank. Hundreds of homes have been damaged or destroyed but no deaths or serious injuries have been reported. Bennett, the leader of the Jewish Home party which supports settlements in the West Bank where Palestinians seek statehood, said on Twitter that arsonists were disloyal to Israel, hinting that those who set the fires could not be Jewish. “Only those to whom the country does not belong are capable of burning it,” he said in a tweet in Hebrew. Haifa’s mayor said he feared for the city and called on residents with water sprinklers to turn them on to help keep the flames at bay. Those leaving their homes were urged to go to sports stadiums and other safer locations. “Each neighborhood is situated among forests and while we are proud of this, at the moment it is a problem,” Yona Yahav told Israel’s Channel 2. “There are some four major fire locations at the moment.”Highway 443, which links Jerusalem and Tel Aviv as it cuts through a southern flank of the West Bank, was temporarily closed to morning rush-hour traffic as flames reached the city of Modi’in, about half way between the two conurbations. Local weather forecasters have said the tinder-dry conditions - it has not rained in parts of Israel for months - and strong winds are set to continue for several days and they see little prospect of normal seasonal precipitation arriving. “Meteorology is not responsible but it is conducive to the spread of these fires,” said Noah Wolfson, the chief executive of weather forecasting company Meteo-Tech. “The atmosphere will remain very dry, at least until Monday or Tuesday.”
 
GCC Shoura members condemn targeting of Makkah; reject JASTA
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Thursday, 24 November 2016/Speakers, presidents and chairmen of the GCC Shoura, representatives and national councils and assemblies expressed profound condemnation and denunciation of the terrorist act carried out by the Houthi militias against Makkah recently. In a statement at the conclusion of their 10th session held in Manama on Wednesday, the parliamentary leaders said that tampering the security of Saudi Arabia and the feelings of Muslims is tampering the security and feelings of the GCC countries and their people, the Saudi Press Agency said. They urged all countries, organizations, and commissions of the international community to take serious and effective steps to prevent a repetition of such terrorist acts in future on one hand and exert continuous effort to help the Arab Coalition efforts to bring about an end to the crisis in Yemen. Also read: US treasury chief warns on 9/11 JASTA law during Saudi visit. In a separate statement, the meeting rejected the US Congress-drafted Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA) as a flagrant violation of the bases and principles of international relations, particularly the principle of equality of sovereign immunity which is to be enjoyed by all sovereign states of the world. The statement said any breach of this rule would constitute a threat to the world security and peace. It called on the US Congress to re-consider this decision and not to give the final okay for implementing it. 

Iran: Execution of four young men in public in Qeshm
Thursday, 24 November 2016 /Iranian Regime’s Member of Parliament: 5,000 young people of 20 to 30 years old in Iran’s prisons are on death row
The religious fascism ruling Iran, in order to intensify the atmosphere of intimidation and to prevent popular uprising, has resorted to public hangings, and everyday shows horrendous scenes of hanging bodies from the cranes in public. On Wednesday November 23, the mullahs' henchmen publicly hanged four young people collectively in the Qeshm Island in Hormozgan province. Hassan Norouzi, a member of the regime’s Parliament in a shocking confession said: “5,000 people aged 20 to 30 years old are on death row. Most of them are first-time drug offenders" (Mehr state run news agency – November 23). Youssefian, another member of parliament said: “We have executed so many, we execute every day. ... Rajaeeshahr 30, another place 20, another place 10, what was the result? In 1990 when I was the prosecutor in Mazandaran province, a report came from the office of education that when you execute one person, 20 to 30 other students don’t come to school… a lady said in the court … in Iran a whole family is executed, it is not the individual who gets executed.” (Farhag state-run radio November 23). Any relationship with this medieval regime, which maintains power only through torture and execution, must be contingent upon a halt to executions. Ignoring the appalling record of human rights violations by the clerical regime under any pretext further emboldens Iran's ruling criminals.
Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/November 23, 2016

US-Iranian citizen convicted for trying to buy 200 missiles for Iran regime
Thursday, 24 November 2016 /A dual citizen of Iran and the United States was found guilty on Tuesday on charges that he tried to help acquire surface-to-air missiles and aircraft components for the Iranian regime in violation of U.S. sanctions. Reza Olangian, 56, was convicted by a federal jury in Manhattan on all four counts he faced, including conspiring to acquire and transfer anti-aircraft missiles, prosecutors said. Olangian faces a mandatory minimum prison sentence of 25 years and a maximum of life. He is scheduled to be sentenced on March 13, Reuters reported. Olangian, who became a U.S. citizen in 1999, was arrested in Estonia in October 2012 and subsequently extradited to the United States following a sting operation orchestrated by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. Prosecutors said that in 2012, Olangian met in Ukraine with a DEA informant posing as a Russian weapons broker to arrange for the purchase of surface-to-air missiles and various military aircraft components. In recorded conversations and emails, Olangian described his plans to acquire the missiles and parts and smuggle them into Iran, for whose government he was purchasing them, from Afghanistan or from another neighboring country, prosecutors said. Prosecutors said Olangian negotiated a deal involving 10 missiles and dozens of aircraft parts, and during a video conference with the informant, stated that he ultimately wanted to acquire at least 200 missiles. The deal followed a failed effort by Olangian in 2007 to obtain about 100 missiles for Iran's regime, prosecutors said. His goal throughout, they said, was to make a substantial profit selling the weapons.

Iran: 80 Percent of Wage Earners Are Below the Poverty Line
Thursday, 24 November 2016 /NCRI - An economic expert of the Mullahs' regime expressed his concern about the fury and protests of people regarding the current economic situation in the country and said:"following the current economic situation in the country, there is a concern that 12 million people are unemployed and 30 millions of indigents are pessimist towards the future of their country. The situation might cause people to protest in the future and the president would be responsible for that." As Resalat Newspaper reported on 23rd November 2016, Ebrahim Razaghi admitted that the number of unemployment and indigence is increasing and the people are getting disappointed over the regime. He stated:"the economic orientation of the government towards the wealthy strata of the society is in favor of a particular class. The government does not pay attention to the main issues. Today 80 percent of the wage earners are below the poverty line and 7 million households are unable to pay house rents. The more the poverty develops the more the people lose their hopes."
Ebrahim Razaghi referred to the inability of the current government as well as the previous one to resolve the issue in this regard and added:"in recent years, it is proved that following the liberal economic policies is not helpful for us and it has faced our country with various challenges including poverty and unemployment. The governments at different periods have diverted people's attention to other issues in order to conceal the inefficient policies. It seems that the government's economic policies and approaches are being developed in favor of the wealthy people. In the current situation, the serious and main issues of the society are not actively in practice in order to be resolved." He also discussed the inefficiency of authorities to exert measures in order to solve the economic problems and confessed that a revolution is required in the field of management since some current managers are not able to cure the basic problems of people. Ebrahim Razaghi at the end added:"recently it has been announced that 72 senior managers have dual citizenship, i.e. they do not have an Iranian nationality but they rule the country. Such a form of management is not acceptable in any part of the world. On the other hand, we must say, some managers are looking for receiving a green card instead of rectifying people's problem."

Iran: Call to save political prisoners on hunger strike
NCRI Statements/Wednesday, 23 November 2016
Iranian Resistance calls on international human rights bodies, especially the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in Iran, for immediate and effective measures to address the situation of political prisoners on hunger strike. Not only does the religious fascism ruling Iran not respond to the demands of legitimate political prisoners, but puts them doubly under persecution and torture by fabricating fake files and denying them necessary medical care.
- Morteza Moradpour, being in solitary confinement in the central prison of Karaj, is on his 29th day of hunger strike in protest at his continued detention. He suffers from heart problem, but his torturers beat him severely and exiled him from Tabirz prison to the solitary confinement of Karaj central prison. - Arash Sadeghi in ward 8 of Evin prison and on the 30th day of hunger strike. He suffers from severe heart palpitation and shortness of breath and kidney pain. On November 21, he became unconscious due to a sharp drop in blood pressure, but the prison guards conditioned sending him to hospital on wearing prison uniform and putting handcuffs on his hands and feet. He was detained in 2014 and was sentenced to 19 years in prison on the charge of "holding assemblies, and collusion against the regime and insulting the sacred".
- Vahid Sayyadi Nassiri, in notorious quarantine ward of Evin prison, is suffering severe weight loss and low blood pressure. He has been on hunger strike in protest at 13 months of uncertainty and lack of attention to his case. In order to punish him, the prison guards have transferred him to the quarantine ward (ward 4) of Evin prison. In this ward the prisoners are under more pressure and torture and are denied their most basic rights, including visitation rights and access to medical needs. He was arrested in September 2015 and was sentenced to eight years of imprisonment on the charge of "insulting sanctities and propaganda against the regime".
- Mehdi and Hossein Rajabian are two artist prisoners in ward 7 of Evin prison. They are on their 25th day of hunger strike. Mehdi Rajabian was taken to hospital in recent days due to stomach bleeding, but was returned to prison without proper treatment. His brother, Hossein came down with left kidney infection. These two artists were arrested in their office in the city of Sari in September 2013 and were sentenced to three years in prison on the charge of "propaganda against the regime and insulting the sacred".
- Amir Amir-Gholi, in ward 8 of Evin prison, has been on hunger strike since November 16 in protest at lack of separation of prisoners' crimes and failing to address the situation of political prisoners. Mafia-like gangs in prison, provoked by the henchmen, attacked and wounded him with a knife. The torturers prevented his injury treatment. Mr. Amir-Gholi was arrested in January 2016 and was sentenced to five years of imprisonment on the charge of "holding assemblies and collusion, propaganda against the regime and…".
Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/November 23, 2016

Hurricane, 7.0 Quake Hit Central America at Same Time
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/November 24/16/A fierce hurricane and a powerful offshore earthquake struck Central America at the same time Thursday, triggering emergency responses in Nicaragua, El Salvador and Costa Rica, and prayers among fearful populations. Hurricane Otto, a storm packing winds of 175 kilometers (110 miles) per hour hit first, plowing into Nicaragua's southern Caribbean coast. Communities in that zone and in northern neighboring Costa Rica were evacuated ahead of it. There were no immediate reports of any deaths. Just an hour later came the earthquake, with a magnitude of 7.0 and located 120 kilometers off El Salvador in the Pacific Ocean, on the other side of the Central American isthmus. It was felt also in Nicaragua's capital Managua and in Costa Rica. While there were no immediate reports of damage or casualties from the temblor, El Salvador and Nicaragua issued a tsunami alert for their Pacific coasts, and El Salvador ordered all people in the zone to evacuate.The double whammy was a dire test for a largely poor region generally lacking resources and preparedness for major disasters.
 Hurricane
 Faced with a hurricane and possible tsunami, Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega on Thursday declared a national emergency -- a step Costa Rica had already taken ahead of Hurricane Otto. The storm was expected to chew its way along a broad swath of territory on both sides of the Nicaragua-Costa Rica border into Friday, losing strength as it went. But the U.S. National Hurricane Center warned Otto's trailing rains "will likely result in life-threatening flash floods and mudslides." Earlier this week, the outer bands of the storm caused the deaths of four people in Panama. The hurricane came ashore Thursday near San Juan de Nicaragua, also known as Greytown, south of the city of Bluefields and close to the Costa Rican border. "The wind is very strong and it's raining a lot," a local resident, Aldrick Beckford, told AFP by telephone. "We just saw neighbors' roofs collapse."A reporter for Nicaraguan state television in San Juan de Nicaragua described a "difficult" situation with brutal gusts. "There are cables fallen, trees brought down," he told Channel 4 television. The wind lifted off the roof of the town hall, which had been operating as an emergency coordination center. In Bluefields, a city of 45,000 people, and elsewhere, panic-buying cleared shops of bottled water, battery-powered lamps and plastic bags. On Wednesday, hundreds crammed onto boats to flee, while others who remained hammered metal sheeting over windows. "This is the first time a hurricane has hit here," said Faucia Pena, an inhabitant of Bluefields. "We are asking God to end it or send it elsewhere. Everybody is afraid." Both Nicaragua and Costa Rica closed schools, mobilized emergency crews and issued red alerts for areas across much of their territories for the hurricane. They also carried out evacuations, though some residents in northern Costa Rica decided to stay put to guard against looters. One woman who did evacuate her home near the village of Barra del Colorado, Teresa Romero, 52, told AFP that around 10 male locals had refused to leave. She was taking shelter in a church near the capital San Jose."Otto is the southernmost landfalling hurricane in Central America on record," the US hurricane center said. A previous, far-stronger hurricane, Matthew, devastated parts of southern Haiti early last month, killing 546 people and leaving nearly 175,000 homeless.
 Offshore quake
 The strong earthquake on the other side of the region came as the hurricane was making its way west. It occurred at a depth of 10.3 kilometers (6.4 miles), according to the US Geological Survey -- sufficiently shallow to spark fears in the Salvadoran government of a possible tsunami. "All protection mechanisms have been activated under which we have started evacuations," the minister in charge of the emergency response, Aristides Valencia, said on state radio. Officials were scrambling to evaluate the impact of the quake. The task was made more difficult because some telephone lines in the capital San Salvador were cut. People ran out of dozens of buildings in the city in panic, fearing aftershocks.  

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on November 24-25/16
Stop 'Islamophilia' to End Islamophobia

By Tawfik Hamid/Newsmax/Wednesday, 16 Nov 2016
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/24/tawfik-hamidnewsmax-stop-islamophilia-to-end-islamophobia/
 http://www.newsmax.com/TawfikHamid/islam-muslim-muslims/2016/11/16/id/759151/
 When you encounter a religious ideology in the 21st century that promotes killing apostates, stoning women to death for sexual indiscretions, and brutally slaughtering gays; an ideology that instigates wars to impose its inhumane value system upon others; an ideology that not only condones but encourages its soldiers to take female war prisoners as sex slaves — and when you contemplate the number of terrorist acts conducted in its name — then you begin to realize that feeling some trepidation in the face of that religious ideology is not only rational, but probably advisable from a purely survival instinct standpoint.
It is definitively not an irrational response, and therefore by definition not a phobia. In fact, to not recoil in horror from such an ideology must be seen as a disease that needs to be treated.
The current mainstream Islamic ideology not only promotes these atrocities, but the leading Islamic scholars are teaching it as an integral part of the Islamic religion.
There is neither a single major approved Islamic theological institute nor a leading Islamic scholar who stands unambiguously against these barbaric 7th century values and teachings. And yet some people wonder why reasonable people respond with alarm, and decry such a response as “Islamophobia.”
If these teachings and these atrocities were to decline and disappear, this so-called “Islamophobia” would soon afterwards also begin to decline and disappear.
A deeper analysis of this situation reveals that the real problem is actually “Islamophilia” not “Islamophobia.”
Islamophilia” has taken a variety of forms, such as insisting that Islam is a religion of peace, pronouncing Jihad a peaceful endeavor, and claiming that Shariah laws are compatible with the U.S. Constitution — despite overwhelming evidence against such unfounded assertions, which contradict both historical facts and current mainstream Islamic teaching.
Such “Islamophilia” — which is based on hallucinations and pathological lying — has impeded our ability to recognize the true cause of Radical Islam since Sept. 11 2001, and has thus allowed this ideological cancer to spread, resulting in increased hatred of the religion and aggravating the problem of “Islamophobia.”
Liberal left (and Muslim) champions of a blind disregard for the role of the religious teaching in creating the phenomenon of terrorism, have actually aggravated the problem of “Islamophobia” by adopting a pathological “Islamophilia.”
And this bizarre “Islamophilia” has impeded the efforts of many Muslim reformers by preaching that there is no problem at all in the ideology, and accordingly, there is no need for reformation.
This is like a physician insisting that there is no cancer and thus preventing other doctors from treating it — allowing the cancer to spread inexorably.
The complete irrationality of many Islamic and liberal left groups in addressing the phenomenon of radical Islam, and their utter lack of objectivity in evaluating the problem has created anger among many of those who have evaluated the problem in an honest and unbiased manner.
The latter have realized that “Islamophilia” is based on lies and is an insult to everyone’s intelligence.
The anger this has aroused has resulted in more hatred toward Muslims and has made things considerably worse. Had these groups addressed the problem of Islamic radicalism in an honest and realistic manner, and had they admitted the obvious fact that the Islamic ideology plays a major role in the phenomenon of radical Islam, the level of anger and thus “Islamophobia” would be far less widespread than it is today.
  Imagine that the aforementioned physician had instead recognized — and admitted — that the patient had a disease. Then therapeutic measures would have been taken and the patient would be much healthier today.
  The blind defenders of an Islam that exists only in their imaginations have by denying the existence of the disease seriously impeded the treatment process, which has resulted in the more and worse complications that we see today.
  In brief, “Islamophilia” is the real threat that must be defeated first if we are to have any hope of halting and reversing the spread of so-called “Islamophobia.”
  **Dr. Tawfik Hamid is the author of "Inside Jihad: How Radical Islam Works, Why It Should Terrify Us, How to Defeat It." Read more reports from Tawfik Hamid
 http://www.newsmax.com/TawfikHamid/islam-muslim-muslims/2016/11/16/id/759151/
 
Iran's Forces Outnumber Assad's in Syria
Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/November 24/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/24/majid-rafizadehgatestone-institute-irans-forces-outnumber-assads-in-syria/
Pursuing a sectarian agenda, Iranian leaders have also fueled the conflict by sending religious leaders to Syria to depict the conflict as a religious war.
Iran's military forces and operations in Syria are significantly more than what has been generally reported so far.
The Syrian war has led to the rise and export of terrorism abroad as well as to one of the worst humanitarian tragedies, in which more than 470,000 people have been killed.
Iran has played a crucial role in maintaining in power President Assad, who has repeatedly used chemical weapons on civilians. Iran has promoted continuing the conflict.
While, according to reports by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the Syrian military has fewer than 50,000 men, Iran has deployed more than 70,000 Iranian and non-Iranian forces in Syria, and pays monthly salaries to over 250,000 militiamen and agents. According to a report entitled, "How Iran Fuels Syria War," published by the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), non-Iranian mercenaries number around 55,000 men; Iraqi militias are around 20,000 men (from 10 groups), Afghan militias are approximately 15,000 to 20,000 men, Lebanese Hezbollah are around 7,000 to 10,000 men, and Pakistani, Palestinian and other militiamen number approximately 5,000 to 7,000.
In addition, the composition of Iranian IRGC forces are around 8,000 to 10,000 men, and 5,000 to 6,000 from the regular Iranian Army.
The major Iranian decision-makers in the Syrian conflict are Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the senior cadre of the Revolutionary Guards. Iran's so-called moderate leaders -- including President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Javad Zarif -- are also in favor of Iran's military, advisory, financial, and intelligence involvement in Syria. Rouhani repeatedly announced his support for Assad and pledged to "stand by [Syria]."
Khamenei insists on using more military power in Syria:
"[I]n December 2015, Khamenei ordered the IRGC to stand fast in the Aleppo region. He reiterated that if they retreated, their fate would be similar to the Iran-Iraq war and the regime would ultimately be defeated in Syria. Thus, in January 2016, the IRGC doubled the number of its forces in Syria to about 60,000 and launched extensive attacks in the region. However, despite tactical advances in some areas, these forces have been unable to even take control of southern Aleppo. IRGC faced a deadlock. In March 2016, Khamenei ordered the regular Army's 65th Division (special operations) to be deployed around Aleppo, and increased the number of other forces as well. Plans for a major offensive to capture Aleppo were set in motion. During attacks by the IRGC and the Iranian army in April 2016, dozens of the regime's forces, including IRGC commanders and staff, Iranian army personnel and foreign mercenaries from Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan, were killed. Although the IRGC and the Iranian regime's regular army forces have failed to change the balance of military power in Syria, Khamenei insists on sending more IRGC and army forces into the Syrian quagmire. Seeing no way forward, and no way back."
Iran has also played critical role in pushing Russia to intensify its military involvement in Syria by providing air support, so that the IRGC and its allies could help Iran's military make quick territorial gains.
Iran has spent approximately USD $100 billion on the Syrian war. The sanctions relief given to Iran as a result of the "nuclear agreement" has significantly assisted the Iranian leaders' ability to continue the war.
Iran also pays salaries to non-Iranian militias to participate in the war: "The Tehran regime spends one billion dollars annually in Syria solely on the salaries of the forces affiliated with the IRGC, including military forces, militias, and Shiite networks."
Iran, for example, pays nearly USD $1,550 a month to the IRGC's Iraqi mercenaries who are dispatched to Syria for a month-and-a-half, and approximately USD $100-200 a month to the Syrian militia fighters from the Syrian National Defense.
Pursuing a sectarian agenda, Iranian leaders have also fueled the conflict by sending religious leaders to Syria to depict the conflict as a religious war.
"Iran's ruling regime has deployed a vast network of its mullahs to Syria, where their warmongering stirs up the fighters. And much like during the Iran/Iraq War, religious zealots are also sent to Syria to fuel the flames of religious fervor among the IRGC's Basiij fighters and Afghan and Iraqi mercenaries."
Iran has divided Syria into five divisions and haד over 13 military bases including the "Glass Building" (Maghar Shishe'i), which is the IRGC's main command center in Syria, located close to the Damascus Airport. The IRGC placed its command center near the airport because,
"the airport would be the last location to fall. IRGC forces airlifted to Syria are dispatched to other areas from this location. One of the commanders stationed at the Glass Building is IRGC Brig. Gen. Seyyed Razi Mousavi, commander of IRGC Quds Force logistics in Syria. Between 500 and 1,000 Revolutionary Guards are stationed there."
Other Iranian bases are scattered across Syria including in Allepo, Hama, and Latakia.
Since Brig. General Hossein Hamedani was killed in Syria, the current command of Iran's forces in Syria lies with the Command Council, whose members include: IRGC Brig. Gen. Esmail Qaani (deputy of Qassem Soleimani who is the commander of the Quds Force) and IRGC Brig. Gen. Mohammad Jafaar Assadi (aka Seyyed Ahmad Madani).
The Syrian conflict has become the "root cause" of terrorism, which does not recognize borders and has spread to Europe and America. Since the Syrian war is the epicenter of terrorism, fighting terrorist groups such as ISIS without resolving the Syrian conflict is fruitless.
Terrorist groups such as ISIS are the symptoms, and the Syrian war is the disease. We need to address the disease and the symptoms simultaneously.
The best strategic and tactical approach is to cut off the role of a major player in the conflict: i.e. Iran. Without Iran, Assad would most likely not have survived the beginning phase of the uprising.
Iran kept Assad in power and gave birth to terrorist groups such as ISIS. In other words, Iran and Assad are the fathers of ISIS. Iran and Assad also played the West by claiming that they are fighting terrorism.
Considering the military forces and money invested in Syria, Iran is the single most important player in the Syrian war, and has tremendously increased radicalization of individuals, militarization and terrorism. Iran benefits from the rise of terrorism because it expands its military stranglehold across the region. Iran is top sponsor of terrorism, according to the latest report from U.S. State Department.
Iran will not agree to abandon Assad diplomatically.
In order to resolve this ripe environment of conflict for terrorism in Syria, Iran's financial and military support to Assad should be strongly countered and cut off.
**Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, political scientists and Harvard University scholar is president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He can be reached at Dr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute. https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9406/iran-soldiers-syria

Hassan Rouhani: Iran's Executioner
By Heshmat Alavi/American Thinker/November 24/16
As we begin to wind down to the end of Hassan Rouhani’s term as president of the regime in Iran, it is time to take a look back at the past four years. We all remember how the West joyfully welcomed his election -- read selection -- as a change of gear in Iran aimed at moderation. However, what the world witnessed ever since has been anything but. An atrocious rise in executions, continued public punishments and an escalating trend of oppression has been Rouhani’s report card during his tenure. With a new administration coming into town, Washington must make it crystal clear to Tehran that human rights violations will no longer be tolerated.
Unprecedented executions
Despite pledging to hold the “key” to Iran’s problems, Rouhani has failed to provide even an iota of the freedoms the Iranian people crave and deserve. His record has revealed an unrelenting loyalty to the regime establishment in regards to social oppression and continued crackdowns. Iran sent 18 to the gallows last week alone, according to official reports.
As the international community continued its policy of appeasement, Rouhani and the entire regime used this opportunity to launch an execution rampage. Over 2,500 people have been sent to the gallows ever since Rouhani came to power, shattering all records held by this regime itself in over two decades. In 2015 alone, Iran was executing an individual every eight hours, as reported by Dr. Ahmed Shaheed, former United Nations special rapporteur on human rights in Iran.
Vast social crackdown
Rouhani’s commitment to regime supreme leader Ali Khamenei and the ruling elite has rendered a wide-ranging, escalating crackdown. In addition to the executions mentioned above, state-sponsored social oppression has resulted in horrific scenes of public hangings, floggings, and even limb amputations. The prisons are overwhelmed with inmates, leading to intolerable and inhumane conditions. Political prisoners, specifically, are subject to horrendous treatment by the authorities. Renowned human rights organization Amnesty International has recently issued an Urgent Action call expressing major concerns over the case of Maryam Akbari Monfared, a Green Movement organizer still in prison two years after her family put up her bail. And this is merely a single example of the dreadful results of Rouhani’s domestic policies. The regime, with the West unfortunately falling in line, had claimed that the Iranian nation welcomed Rouhani’s presidency with open arms. While such assertions were politically motivated from the very beginning, the ordinary Iranian has been the first to pay the price of such a failed engagement policy.
A call for justice
The Iranian population is extremely fond of the Internet and millions are actively using social media. Despite its vast censorship efforts, the regime has failed to completely firewall the entire globe from the clever and highly motivated Iranian netizen. Various clips, images, and stories from inside Iran are leaking to the outside world as we speak, revealing ever more the regime’s atrocities. One significant case involves the exposure of a controversial sound file shedding light on a private meeting between the late Ayatollah Hossein-Ali Montazeri and the main officials involved in the horrendous 1988 summer massacre of over 30,000 political prisoners across Iran. Montazeri was the successor to Iranian regime founder, mullah Ruhollah Khomeini, set aside by Khomeini himself considering his opposing perspectives. This disclosure sent shockwaves amongst the Iranian people from all walks of life, and throughout the globe. As a result a global movement is demanding accountability from those responsible for the horrific massacre of thousands of innocent political prisoners. The victims of this carnage included members and supporters of the main Iranian opposition entity, People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran, and other dissident groups and minorities. The PMOI, more commonly known as the MEK in the West, has also been the focus of a lobbying campaign launched by Iran. Tehran’s mullahs are terrified of MEK supporters such as former New York City mayor and ambassador John Bolton being considered for senior cabinet posts in a Donald Trump White House.
Conclusion
The entire regime in Iran, including the so-called “hardliners” and “moderates,” are shifting gear for the upcoming presidential elections in June 2017. Members of the Rouhani faction have described U.S. President Barack Obama’s tenure as a “golden era.” This signals how Tehran took full advantage of Obama’s rapprochement as a green light to escalate executions and further implement social crackdown. With a new administration set to take the reins in Washington, the opportunity has arrived for America to raise the issue of Iran’s human rights violations. Such outrageous crimes have no place in the 21st century, and all eyes are on U.S. president-elect Donald Trump. Supporting the call to hold all senior Iranian regime officials involved in the 1988 massacre accountable for their crimes is a good start.
Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/11/hassan_rouhani_irans_executioner.html

Dutch MP,Wilders's Trial: "Unnecessarily Offensive"
Robbie Travers/Gatestone Institute/November 24/16
Geert Wilders is now on trial for having national security views that the prosecution have deemed unacceptable to air in public.
To suggest that Dutch citizens, whose safety Wilders was elected to protect -- it is his job; it is why he was elected -- should not publicly given his best advice, would to countermanding his official duty.
Is it racist to note these problems? Statistical data are usually not racist; they simply express the factual reality of a situation.
The freedom to speak and to question without fear of retribution is fundamentally what separates democratic governments from totalitarian ones. Sunshiny, politically correct views do not need protecting. The reason for free speech is to protect the less-than-enchanting views.
It is fundamental for the health of our society that Wilders and others be able to speak and be heard freely. To protect us and to protect the humanist values of freedom brought to us by Erasmus and the Enlightenment, it is crucial that the Dutch court grant Wilders a full acquittal.
As his trial continues in the Netherlands, Geert Wilders, if found culpable, faces a fine for his comments, purportedly "racist", on Moroccans.
The prosecution alleges that his comments unfairly "targeted a specific race, which is considered a crime."
Never mind that Moroccans are not a race or even a religion; they are citizens of a country -- apparently, making comments on trends that are prominent within minorities, or advice on how to keep a country secure, is now criminal. Statements might sometimes be unpleasant to hear, but to express these views should not be "criminal."
Look at the comments of the lead prosecutor, Wouter Bos, who said, "Freedom of expression is not absolute, it is paired with obligations and responsibilities." This is worrying. To suggest that an individual should have the obligation not to "uncessarily offend," is to make every individual responsible for the thoughts of every other, theoretical individual who might be offended by one's words -- or even, as we see now all too often, just claim to be offended for malicious purposes.
Bos added that Wilders has "the responsibility not to set groups of people against each other." Is this really what Wilders was trying to do? The opposite would seem to be true: Wilders was not calling for racial tension; in his view, he is seeking to alleviate it, his solution being less immigration from Morocco. So far, objectively, immigrants from Morocco seem to have had a significant effect on the increase in crime syndicates, drugs- and human-trafficking, and a notably lopsided change in the composition of the prison population in the Netherlands.
Is it racist to note these problems? Statistical data are usually not racist; they simply express the factual reality of a situation.
With this in mind, perhaps then the struggle Wilders faces could be better described as: Geert Wilders is now on trial for having national security views that the prosecution have deemed unacceptable to air in public.
Dutch MP Geert Wilders is now on trial for having national security views that the prosecution have deemed unacceptable to air in public. (Source of Wilders photo: Flickr/Metropolico)
The latest development in this process is that the prosecution have demanded that Wilders be punished with a €5,000 fine, in order for him to atone for his alleged transgression against Moroccans.
To suggest that Dutch citizens, whose safety Wilders was elected to protect -- it is his job; it is why he was elected -- should not publicly be given his best advice, would to countermand his official duty. If, heaven forbid, there were to be adverse circumstances in the Netherlands, as seen all too often in France, Denmark, Germany and Belgium, and Wilders had failed to warn his countrymen, why could he not, conversely, risk being charged with reckless endangerment?
Saying that the Netherlands should have fewer Moroccans is apparently considered "unnecessarily offensive."
Perhaps the problem for the long-term survival of Europe is that in modern politics, too many individuals are seeking to base legislation on protecting people from being offended, instead of basing legislation on what is best for the national and cultural security of a country. While no-one might wish others to be offended, sometimes offending others is necessary, even a duty.
When Wilders criticises Islam and its associated practices and legal codes, no doubt he offends many conservative Muslims. Does this mean his criticism should not have been expressed? (No.)
When Wilders criticises the European Union, he no doubt offends Eurocrats in Brussels. Does this mean his criticism should not have been expressed? (No.)
So when Wilders criticises immigration from Moroccan and suggests there should be less of it, he may well have offended Moroccans. Does this mean his criticism shouldn't have been expressed? (No.)
Sometimes, causing offence and allowing individuals critically to engage with a viewpoint with which they disagree is a crucial part of our dialogue as a society. Individuals sometimes need to be presented with uncomfortable truths.
Whether one agrees with Wilders's view or not, it should be comforting that an individual is allowed to question fundamental building blocks for the future health of our Western values and communal well-being.
The freedom to speak and to question without fear of retribution is, in fact, fundamentally what separates democratic governments from totalitarian ones.
If one wants individuals to be able to counter views they perceive to be "racist" or in some other way prejudiced, they first need to be able to hear them to counter them.
In condemning Wilders, we are not only robbing Wilders of his right to free expression, we are also robbing individuals of a right to listen to him.
In a democratic society, individuals should have the right to hear Wilders, and then, based on his arguments, to draw their own conclusions. Too many countries, based on originally well-intended laws that repress free speech, have already fallen into the trap of "the truth is no defense."
Is the implication, then, that half-truths, distortions and lies are an acceptable defense? In closing the door to "truth" in Europe and Canada, our fragile Western democracies are opening the door to authoritarian governance. Farewell, democracy.
There are other reasons why all Dutch citizens or other individuals should be terrified of this.
For Wilders, as a Member of Parliament, the demand of the prosecutors in this case for a fine of €5,000 may not -- on the surface -- destroy his life. But this fine would not include the crushing court costs Wilders has had to incur, even if he is acquitted. What happens when ordinary members of the Dutch public are summoned before a court -- possibly for even greater penalties and with greater court costs -- for expressing views that prosecutors claim are "unnecessarily offensive"?
Wilders, as a private citizen with possibly a moderate income, has had to go up against the virtually unlimited exchequer of the entire Dutch government. People's resources are not inexhaustible. This is the nightmare that great protectors of freedom such as Franz Kafka or George Orwell have written about.
What happens if Geert Wilders, who is a politician, is only among the first of those who might be prosecuted for speaking out? Other individuals who might also want "fewer Moroccans" may not be able to afford endless court costs and a fine of €5,000 -- or whatever the judgement might be on December 9. Are we really asking the citizens of the Netherlands, and much the free world, as we have already seen too often -- to go through life weighing whether expressing a view will come with a crippling economic cost?
Surely if there is a conviction this will be only the beginning. Will anyone ever feel free again to express opinions that might be found -- by someone, anyone, who knows -- "unnecessarily offensive"? Probably not.
What, by the way, does "necessarily offensive" consist of? Will lawyers become rich as person after person is hauled into court to decide, case by case, how necessary is "necessary"?
Is this really what the free world wants: societies that claim to protect the rights of the individual but then instead prosecute them? Sunshiny, politically correct views do not need protecting. The reason for freedom of speech is to protect the less-than-enchanting views. Without any contrarians, how would society have developed?
If this court rules against Wilders, will every politician thereafter who makes a statement that someone deems "unnecessarily offensive" be summoned before a court? At the other end of the political spectrum, three Dutch Labour Party politicians were noted to have insulted Moroccans far more corrosively than Wilders ever did -- even likening them to dirt and excrement. Those Labour politicians were never prosecuted. Gee, could this be a double standard we are seeing? Wilders's judges refused to dismiss his trial on the grounds that it was, as Wilders maintained, politically motivated; but what looks suspiciously like a selective prosecution seems to bear him out. Will the Dutch prosecutors, in fairness, proceed to try these even-more-insulting politicians from the political left?
Repeated trials and appeals only lead, as in a totalitarian government, to no-one being able to afford maintaining his freedom by due process.
That thought leads to the major politically incorrect elephant in this room:
Is it possible that there are people who are exploiting the West's open but expensive legal process precisely to shut down freedom of speech and political views they find inconvenient for themselves? Is that the whole secret point behind the prosecution: to smother speech and smother thought?
European nations seem to be rapidly approaching a path of political censorship, to prevent views being expressed that their leaders deem unacceptable. The result? These views only grow in prominence. Across Europe, as Brexit, Wilders, Le Pen, and other "politically incorrect" tributaries that leaders are trying to restrict, are surging in popularity.
Ideas cannot be killed by stopping individuals from hearing them; people only seem to want to hear more about what they sense is being hidden from them.
You do not have to like Geert Wilders or even agree with him; it is, however, fundamental for the health of our civilization that he and others be able to speak and be heard freely.
To protect us and to protect the humanist values of freedom brought to us by Erasmus and the Enlightenment, it is crucial that the Dutch court grant Wilders a full acquittal.
*Robbie Travers, a political commentator and consultant, is Executive Director of Agora, former media manager at the Human Security Centre, and a law student at the University of Edinburgh.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute .https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9407/wilders-trial-unnecessarily-offensive

Final Statement of Geert Wilders at his Trial
Geert Wilders/Gatestone Institute/November 24/16
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9404/wilders-trial-closing-statement
Translation of the original text: Laatste woord Geert Wilders - Rechtbank
Mr. President, Members of the Court,
When I decided to address you here today, by making a final statement in this trial against freedom of speech, many people reacted by telling me it is useless. That you, the court, have already written the sentencing verdict a while ago. That everything indicates that you have already convicted me. And perhaps that is true. Nevertheless, here I am. Because I never give up. And I have a message for you and the Netherlands.
For centuries, the Netherlands are a symbol of freedom.
When one says Netherlands, one says freedom. And that is also true, perhaps especially, for those who have a different opinion than the establishment, the opposition. And our most important freedom is freedom of speech.
We, Dutch, say whatever is close to our hearts. And that is precisely what makes our country great. Freedom of speech is our pride.
And that, precisely that, is at stake here, today.
I refuse to believe that we are simply giving this freedom up. Because we are Dutch. That is why we never mince our words. And I, too, will never do that. And I am proud of that. No-one will be able to silence me.
Moreover, members of the court, for me personally, freedom of speech is the only freedom I still have. Every day, I am reminded of that. This morning, for example. I woke up in a safe-house. I got into an armored car and was driven in a convoy to this high security courtroom at Schiphol. The bodyguards, the blue flashing lights, the sirens. Every day again. It is hell. But I am also intensely grateful for it.
Because they protect me, they literally keep me alive, they guarantee the last bit of freedom left to me: my freedom of speech. The freedom to go somewhere and speak about my ideals, my ideas to make the Netherlands -- our country -- stronger and safer. After twelve years without freedom, after having lived for safety reasons, together with my wife, in barracks, prisons and safe-houses, I know what lack of freedom means.
I sincerely hope that this will never happen to you, members of the court. That, unlike me, you will never have to be protected because Islamic terror organizations, such as Al-Qaeda, the Taliban and ISIS, and who knows how many individual Muslims, want to murder you. That you will no longer be allowed to empty your own mailbox, need to carry a bulletproof vest at meetings, and that there are police officers guarding the door whenever you use the bathroom. I hope you will be spared this.
However, if you would have experienced it -- no matter how much you disagree with my views -- you might perhaps understand that I cannot remain silent. That I should not remain silent. That I must speak. Not just for myself, but for the Netherlands, our country. That I need to use the only freedom that I still have to protect our country. Against Islam and against terrorism. Against immigration from Islamic countries. Against the huge problem with Moroccans in the Netherlands. I cannot remain silent about it; I have to speak out. That is my duty, I have to address it, I must warn for it, I have to propose solutions for it.
I had to give up my freedom to do this and I will continue. Always. People who want to stop me will have to murder me first.
And so, I stand here before you. Alone. But I am not alone. My voice is the voice of many. In 2012, nearly 1 million Dutch have voted for me. And there will be many more on March 15th.
According to the latest poll, soon, we are going to have two million voters. Members of the court, you know these people. You meet them every day. As many as one in five Dutch citizens would vote the Party for Freedom, today. Perhaps your own driver, your gardener, your doctor or your domestic aid, the girlfriend of a registrar, your physiotherapist, the nurse at the nursing home of your parents, or the baker in your neighborhood. They are ordinary people, ordinary Dutch. The people I am so proud of.
They have elected me to speak on their behalf. I am their spokesman. I am their representative. I say what they think. I speak on their behalf. And I do so determinedly and passionately. Every day again, including here, today.
So, do not forget that, when you judge me, you are not just passing judgment on a single man, but on millions of men and women in the Netherlands. You are judging millions of people. People who agree with me. People who will not understand a conviction. People who want their country back, who are sick and tired of not being listened to, who cherish freedom of expression.
Members of the court, you are passing judgment on the future of the Netherlands. And I tell you: if you convict me, you will convict half of the Netherlands. And many Dutch will lose their last bit of trust in the rule of law.
Of course, I should not have been subjected to this absurd trial. Because this is a political trial. It is a political trial because political issues have to be debated in Parliament and not here. It is a political trial because other politicians -- from mostly government parties -- who spoke about Moroccans have not been prosecuted. It is a political trial because the court is being abused to settle a political score with an opposition leader whom one cannot defeat in Parliament.
This trial here, Mr. President, it stinks. It would be appropriate in Turkey or Iran, where they also drag the opposition to court. It is a charade, an embarrassment for the Netherlands, a mockery of our rule of law.
And it is also an unfair trial because, earlier, one of you -- Mrs. van Rens -- commented negatively on the policy of my party and the successful challenge in the previous Wilders trial. Now, she is going to judge me.
What have I actually done to deserve this travesty? I have spoken about fewer Moroccans at a market, and I have asked questions of PVV members during a campaign event. And I did so, members of the court, because we have a huge problem with Moroccans in this country. And almost no-one dares to speak about it or take tough measures. My party alone has been speaking about this problem for years.
Just look at these past weeks: Moroccan fortune-seekers stealing and robbing in Groningen, abusing our asylum system, and Moroccan youths terrorizing entire neighborhoods in Maassluis, Ede and Almere. I can give tens of thousands of other examples -- almost everyone in the Netherlands knows them or has personally experienced nuisance from criminal Moroccans. If you do not know them, you are living in an ivory tower.
I tell you: If we can no longer honestly address problems in the Netherlands, if we are no longer allowed to use the word "alien," if we, Dutch, are suddenly racists because we want Black Pete to remain black, if we only go unpunished if we want more Moroccans or else are dragged before a criminal court, if we sell out our hard-won freedom of expression, if we use the courts to silence an opposition politician, who threatens to become Prime Minister, then this beautiful country will be doomed. That is unacceptable, because we are Dutch and this is our country.
And again, what on earth have I done wrong? How can the fact be justified that I have to stand here as a suspect, as if I robbed a bank or committed murder?
I only spoke about Moroccans at a market and asked a question at an election-night meeting. And anyone who has the slightest understanding of politics, knows that the election-night meetings of every party consist of political speeches full of slogans, one-liners and making maximum use of the rules of rhetoric. That is our job. That is the way it works in politics.
Election nights are election nights, with rhetoric and political speeches; not university lectures, in which every paragraph is scrutinized for 15 minutes from six points of view. It is simply crazy that the Public Prosecutor now uses this against me, as if one would blame a football player for scoring a hattrick.
Indeed, I said at the market, in the beautiful Hague district of Loosduinen: "if possible fewer Moroccans." Mark that I did so a few minutes after a Moroccan lady came to me and told me she was going to vote PVV because she was sick and tired of the nuisance caused by Moroccan youths.
And on election night, I began by asking the PVV audience "Do you want more or less EU," and I also did not explain in detail why the answer might be less. Namely, because we need to regain our sovereignty and reassert control over our own money, our own laws and our own borders. I did not do that.
Then, I asked the public "Do you want more or less Labour Party." And, again, I did not explain in detail why the answer might be less. Namely, because they are the biggest cultural relativists, willfully blind and Islam-hugging cowards in Parliament. I did not say that.
And then I asked, "Do you want more or fewer Moroccans," and again, I did not explain in detail why the answer might be fewer. Namely, because people with Moroccan nationality are overrepresented in the Netherlands in crime, benefit dependency and terror. And that we want to achieve this by expelling criminals with Moroccan nationality after denaturalizing them of their Dutch nationality, by a stricter immigration policy and an active voluntary repatriation policy. Proposals that we have made in our election manifesto from the day I founded the Party for Freedom.
I explained this in several interviews on national television, both between the statement at the market and election night, as well as on election night a few moments after I had asked the said questions. It is extremely malicious and false of the Public Prosecutor to want to disregard that context.
Disgusting -- I have no other words for it -- are the actions of other politicians, including the man who for a few months may still call himself Prime Minister. Their, and especially his, actions after the said election night constituted real persecution, a witch hunt. The government created an atmosphere in which it had to come to trial.
Prime Minister Rutte even told small children during the youth news that I wanted to expel them, and then reassured them that this would not happen. As if I had said anything of that kind. It is almost impossible to behave viler and falser.
But, also, the then Minister of Security and Justice -- who, it should be noted, is the political boss of the Public Prosecutor -- called my words disgusting and even demanded that I take them back. A demand of the Minister of Justice -- you do not have to be named Einstein to predict what will happen next, what the Public Prosecutor will do, if you do not comply to the demand of the Minister of Justice.
The Interior Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister, too, both from the Labour Party, expressed themselves similarly. In short, the government left the Public Prosecutor no option than to prosecute me. Hence, in this trial, the Officers of Justice are not representatives of an independent Public Prosecutor, but accomplices of this government.
Mr. President, the elite also facilitated the complaints against me. With pre-printed declaration forms, which were brought to the mosque by the police. In which, it has to be noted, the police sometimes said that they, too, were of the opinion that my statements were inadmissible.
And a sample taken by us showed that some complaints were the result of pure deception, intimidation and influence. People thought they were going to vote; they not even know my name, did not realize what they were signing or declared that they did not feel to be discriminated against by me at all.
Someone said that, at the As Soenah mosque, after Friday prayers alone, 1,200 complaints were lodged because it was thought to be an election. There were parades, led by mayors and aldermen, like in Nijmegen, where CDA mayor Bruls was finally able to show off his deep-seated hatred of the PVV. The police had extra opening hours, offered coffee and tea, there were dancing and singing Moroccans accompanied by a real oompah band in front of a police station. They turned it into a big party.
But meanwhile, two representative polls, one commissioned by the PVV, the other commissioned by De Volkskrant, showed that, apart from the government and media elite, 43% of the Dutch people, around 7 million people, agree with me. Want fewer Moroccans. You will be very busy if the Public Prosecutor is going to prosecute all these 7 million people.
People will never understand that other politicians -- especially from government parties -- and civil servants who have spoken about Moroccans, Turks and even PVV members, are being left alone and not prosecuted by the Public Prosecutor.
Like Labour leader Samsom, who said that Moroccan youths have a monopoly on ethnic nuisance.
Or Labour chairman Spekman, who said Moroccans should be humiliated.
Or Labour alderman Oudkerk, who spoke about f*cking Moroccans.
Or Prime Minister Rutte, who said that Turks should get lost.
And what about police chief Joop van Riessen, who said about me on television -- I quote literally: "Basically one would feel inclined to say: let's kill him, just get rid of him now and he will never surface again"?
And in reference to PVV voters, van Riessen declared: "Those people must be deported, they no longer belong here." End of quote. The police chief said that killing Wilders was a normal reaction. That is hatred, Mr. President, pure hatred -- and not by us, but against us. And the Public Prosecutor did not prosecute Mr. Van Riessen.
But the Public Prosecutor does prosecute me. And demands a conviction based on nonsensical arguments about race and concepts that are not even in the law. It accuses and suspects me of insulting a group and inciting hatred and discrimination on grounds of race. How much crazier can it become? Race. What race?
I spoke and asked a question about Moroccans. Moroccans are not a race. Who makes this up? No-one at home understands that Moroccans have suddenly become a race. This is utter nonsense. Not a single nationality is a race. Belgians are no race, Americans are no race. Stop this nonsense, I say to the Public Prosecutor. I am not a racist and neither are my voters. How do you dare suggest that? Wrongly slandering millions of people as racists.
43% of the Dutch want fewer Moroccans, as I already said. They are no racists. Stop insulting these people. Every day, they experience the huge problem with Moroccans in our country. They have a right to a politician who is not afraid to mention the problem with Moroccans. But neither they nor I care whether someone is black, yellow, red, green or violet.
I tell you: If you convict someone for racism while he has nothing against races, then you undermine the rule of law, then it is bankrupt. No-one in this country will understand that.
And now the Public Prosecutor also uses the vague concept of "intolerance." Yet another stupidity. The subjective word intolerance, however, is not even mentioned in the law. And what for heaven's sake is intolerance? Are you going to decide that, members of the court?
It is not up to you to decide. Nor up to the Supreme Court or even the European Court. The law itself must determine what is punishable. We, representatives, are elected by the people to determine clearly and visibly in the law for everyone what is punishable and what is not.
That is not up to the court. You should not do that, and certainly not on the basis of such subjective concepts, which are understood differently by everyone and can easily be abused by the elite to ban unwelcome opinions of the opposition. Do not start this, I tell you.
Mr. President, Members of the Court,
Our ancestors fought for freedom and democracy. They suffered, many gave their lives. We owe our freedoms and the rule of law to these heroes. But the most important freedom, the cornerstone of our democracy, is freedom of speech. The freedom to think what you want and to say what you think.
If we lose that freedom, we lose everything. Then, the Netherlands cease to exist; then the efforts of all those who suffered and fought for us are useless. From the freedom fighters for our independence in the Golden Age to the resistance heroes in World War II. I ask you: Stand in their tradition. Stand for freedom of expression.
By asking for a conviction, the Public Prosecutor, as an accomplice of the established order, as a puppet of the government, asks to silence an opposition politician. And, hence, silence millions of Dutch. I tell you: The problems with Moroccans will not be solved this way, but will only increase.
For people will sooner be silent and say less because they are afraid of being called racist, because they are afraid of being sentenced. If I am convicted, then everyone who says anything about Moroccans will fear to be called a racist.
Mr. President, Members of the Court, I conclude.
A worldwide movement is emerging that puts an end to the politically correct doctrines of the elites and the media that are subordinate to them.
That has been proven by Brexit.
That has been proven by the US elections.
That is about to be proven in Austria and Italy.
That will be proven next year in France, Germany, and The Netherlands.
The course of things is about to take a different turn. Citizens no longer tolerate it.
And I tell you, the battle of the elite against the people will be won by the people. Here, too, you will not be able to stop this, but rather accelerate it. We will win, the Dutch people will win, and it will be remembered well who was on the right side of history.
Common sense will prevail over politically correct arrogance. Because everywhere in the West, we are witnessing the same phenomenon.
The voice of freedom cannot be imprisoned; it rings like a bell. Everywhere, ever more people are saying what they think. They do not want to lose their land, they do not want to lose their freedom.
They demand politicians who take them seriously, who listen to them, who speak on their behalf. It is a genuine democratic revolt. The wind of change and renewal blows everywhere. Including here, in the Netherlands.
As I said:
I am standing here on behalf of millions of Dutch citizens.
I do not speak just on behalf of myself.
My voice is the voice of many.
And, so, I ask you, not only on behalf of myself, but in the name of all those Dutch citizens:
Acquit me! Acquit us!
Geert Wilders is a member of the Dutch Parliament and leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV).
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

 

France on the Verge of Total Collapse
Guy Millière/Gatestone Institute/November 24/16
France did not perceive it at the time, but it placed itself in a trap, and the trap is now closing.
In the 1970s, the Palestinians began to use international terrorism, and France chose to accept this terrorism so long as France was not affected. At the same time, France welcomed mass-immigration from the Arab-Muslim world, evidently as part of a Muslim wish to expand Islam. France's Muslim population has since grown in numbers while failing to assimilate.
Polls show that one-third of French Muslims want the full application of Islamic sharia law. They also show that the overwhelming majority of French Muslims support jihad, and especially jihad against Israel, a country they would like to see erased from the face of earth.
"It is better to leave than flee." -- Sammy Ghozlan, President of the National Bureau of Vigilance against Anti-Semitism. He was later mugged, and his car was torched. He left.
Villiers also mentions the presence in "no-go zones" of thousands of weapons of war. He adds that weapons will probably not even have to be used; the Islamists have already won.
Originally, France's dreams might have been of displacing America as a world power, accessing inexpensive oil, business deals with oil-rich Islamic states, and the prayer of no domestic terrorism.
France is in turmoil. "Migrants" arriving from Africa and the Middle East sow disorder and insecurity in many cities. The huge slum commonly known as the "jungle of Calais" has just been dismantled, but other slums are being created each day. In eastern Paris, streets have been covered with corrugated sheets, oilcloth and disjointed boards. Violence is commonplace. The 572 France's "no-go zones," officially defined as "sensitive urban areas", continue to grow, and police officers who approach them often suffer the consequences. Recently, a police car drove into an ambush and was torched while the police were prevented from getting out. If attacked, police officers are told by their superiors to flee rather than retaliate. Many police officers, angry at having to behave like cowards, have organized demonstrations. No terrorist attacks have taken place since the slaughter of a priest in Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray on July 26, 2016, but intelligence services see that jihadists have returned from the Middle East and are ready to act, and that riots may break out anywhere, any time, on any pretext.
Although overwhelmed by a domestic situation it barely controls, the French government still intervene in the world affairs: a "Palestinian state" is still its favorite cause, Israel its favorite scapegoat.
Last Spring, even though both France and the Palestinian territories were in terrible shape, French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault anyway declared that it was "urgent" to relaunch the "peace process" and create a Palestinian state. France therefore convened an international conference, held in Paris on June 3. Neither Israel nor the Palestinians were invited to it. The conference was a flop. It concluded with a vapid statement about the "imperative necessity" to go "forward".
France did not stop there. The government then decided to organize a new conference in December. This time, with Israel and the Palestinians. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, noting that Israel does not need intermediaries, refused the invitation. Palestinian leaders accepted. Saeb Erekat, the Palestinian Authority spokesman congratulated France, adding, not surprisingly, that the Palestinian Authority had "suggested" the idea to the French.
Now Donald Trump is the U.S. president-elect, and Newt Gingrich is likely to play a key role in the Trump Administration. Gingrich said a few years ago that there is no such a thing as a Palestinian people, and added last week that settlements are in no way an obstacle to peace. As such, the December conference looks as if it might be another failure.
French diplomats nevertheless are working with Palestinian officials on a UN resolution to recognize a Palestinian State inside the "1967 borders" (the 1949 armistice lines), but without any treaty of peace. They are apparently hoping that outgoing U.S. President Barack Obama will not use the American veto at the Security Council, allowing the passage of the resolution. It is not certain at all that Barack Obama will want to end his presidency on a gesture so openly subversive. It is almost certain that France will fail there too. Again.
For many years, France seems to have built its entire foreign policy on aligning itself with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC): 56 Islamic countries plus the Palestinians. Originally, France's dreams might have been of displacing America as a world power, accessing inexpensive oil, business deals with oil-rich Islamic states, and the prayer of no domestic terrorism. All four have been washouts. It is also obvious that France has more urgent problems to solve.
France persists because it is desperately trying to limit problems that probably cannot be solved.
In the 1950s, France was different from what it is now. It was a friend of Israel. The "Palestinian cause" did not exist. The war in Algeria was raging, and a large majority of French politicians would not even have shaken hands with unrepentant terrorists.
Everything changed with the end of the Algerian war. Charles de Gaulle handed Algeria over to a terrorist movement called the National Liberation Front. He then proceeded to create a strategic reorientation of the France's foreign policy, unveiling what he called the "Arab policy of France."
France signed trade and military agreements with various Arab dictatorships. To seduce its new friends, it eagerly adopted an anti-Israeli policy. When in the 1970s, terrorism in the form of airplane hijackings was invented by the Palestinians, and with the murder of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics, "the Palestinians" all at once became a "sacred cause" and a useful tool for leverage in the Arab world. France, adopting the "cause," became rigidly pro-Palestinian. The Palestinians began to use international terrorism, and France chose to accept this terrorism so long as France was not affected. At the same time, France welcomed mass-immigration from the Arab-Muslim world, evidently as part of a Muslim wish to expand Islam. The Muslim population has since grown in numbers, while failing to assimilate.
France did not perceive it at the time, but it placed itself in a trap, and the trap is now closing.
France's Muslim population seems anti-French in terms of Judeo-Christian, Enlightenment values, and pro-French only to the extent that France submits to the demands of Islam. As France's Muslims are also pro-Palestinian, theoretically there should have been no problem. But France underestimated the effects of the rise of extremist Islam in the Muslim world and beyond.
More and more, French Muslims consider themselves Muslim first. Many claim that the West is at war with Islam; they see France and Israel as part of the West, so they are at war with them both. They see that France is anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian, but they also see that several French politicians maintain ties with Israel, so they likely think that France is not anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian enough.
They see that France tolerates Palestinian terrorism, and seem not to understand why France would fight Islamic terrorism in other places.
To please its Muslims, the French government may believe it has no choice other than to be as pro-Palestinian and as anti-Israeli as possible -- even though it looks as if this policy is failing badly in the polls.
The French government undoubtedly sees that it cannot prevent what increasingly looks like a looming disaster. This disaster is already taking place.
Perhaps France's current government is hoping that it might delay the disaster a bit and avoid a civil war. Perhaps, they might hope, the "no go zones" will not explode -- at least on their watch.
France today has six million Muslims, 10% of its population, and the percentage is growing. Polls show that one-third of French Muslims want the full application of Islamic sharia law. They also show that the overwhelming majority of French Muslims support jihad, and especially jihad against Israel, a country they would like to see erased from the face of earth.
The leading French Muslim organization, the Union of Islamic Organizations of France, is the French branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, a movement that should be listed as a terrorist organization for its open wishes to overthrow Western governments.
The Muslim Brotherhood is primarily financed by Qatar, a country that invests heavily in France -- and that has the comfort of its very own U.S. airbase.
Jews are leaving France in record numbers, and these departures do not stop. Sammy Ghozlan, President of the National Bureau of Vigilance against Anti-Semitism, repeated for many years that, "It is better to leave than flee." He was mugged. His car was torched. He left, and now lives in Israel.
The rest of the French population clearly sees the extreme seriousness of what is happening. Some of them are angry and in a state of revolt; others seem resigned to the worst: an Islamist takeover of Europe.
The next French elections will take place in May 2017. French President François Hollande has lost all credibility and has no chance of being reelected. Whoever comes to power will have a difficult task.
The French seem to have lost confidence in Nicolas Sarkozy, so they will probably choose between Marine Le Pen, Alain Juppé or François Fillon.
Marine Le Pen is the candidate of the far-right National Front.
Alain Juppé is the mayor of Bordeaux, and often campaigns in the company of Tareq Oubrou, imam of the city. Until recently, Tareq Oubrou was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Alain Juppé seems to believe that the present disorder will calm down if France fully submits.
François Fillon will probably be the moderate-right candidate. He recently said that "Islamic sectarianism" creates "problems in France." He also said that if a Palestinian State is not created very soon, Israel will be "the main threat to world peace."
Three years ago, the French philosopher Alain Finkielkraut published a book, The Unhappy Identity (L'identité malheureuse), describing the dangers inherent in the Islamization of France and the major disorders that stem from it. Juppé chose a campaign slogan intended to contradict Finkielkraut: "The Happy Identity".
Since the publication of Alain Finkielkraut's book, other pessimistic books were published that became best sellers in France. In October 2014, columnist Eric Zemmour published The French Suicide (Le suicide français). A few weeks ago, he published another book, A Five-Year Term for Nothing (Un quinquennat pour rien). He describes what he sees happening to France: "invasion, colonization, explosion."
Zemmour defines the arrival of millions of Muslims in France during the last five decades as an invasion, and the recent arrival of hordes of migrants as the continuation of that invasion. He depicts the creation of "no-go zones" as the creation of Islamic territories on French soil and an integral part of a colonization process.
He writes that the eruptions of violence that spread are signs of an imminent explosion; that sooner or later, revolt will gain ground.
Another book, Will the Church Bells Ring Tomorrow? (Les cloches sonneront-elles encore demain?), was recently published by a former member of the French government, Philippe de Villiers.
Villiers notes the disappearance of churches in France, and their replacement by mosques. He also mentions the presence in "no-go zones" of thousands of weapons of war (AK-47 assault rifles, Tokarev pistols, M80 Zolja anti-tank weapons, etc). He adds that weapons will probably not even have to be used -- the Islamists have already won.
In his new book, Will the Church Bells Ring Tomorrow?, Philippe de Villiers notes the disappearance of churches in France, and their replacement by mosques. Pictured above: On August 3, French riot police dragged a priest and his congregation from the church of St Rita in Paris, prior to its scheduled demolition. Front National leader Marine Le Pen said in fury: "And what if they built parking lots in the place of Salafist mosques, and not of our churches?" (Image source: RT video screenshot)
On November 13, 2016, France marked the first anniversary of the Paris attacks. Plaques were unveiled every place where people were killed. The plaques read: "In memory of the injured and murdered victims of the attacks." No mention was made of jihadist barbarity. In the evening, the Bataclan Theater reopened with a concert by Sting. The last song of the concert was "Insh' Allah": "if Allah wills." The Bataclan management prevented two members of the US band Eagles of Death Metal -- who were on stage when the attack started -- from entering the concert. A few weeks after the attack, Jesse Hughes, lead singer of the group, had dared to criticize the Muslims involved. The Bataclan's director said about Hughes, "There are things you cannot forgive."
*Dr. Guy Millière, a professor at the University of Paris, is the author of 27 books on France and Europe.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9363/france-collapse

 Is Post-Truth the only truth left in public life?
Yossi Mekelberg/Al Arabiya/November 24/16
 News that Oxford Dictionaries has declared “Post-Truth” to be its international word of the year should worry all of us, but not surprise anyone in the slightest. Enduring an overdose of Brexit and the US election campaigns leaves one wondering if truth matters anymore.
 This new adjective is defined by the dictionary as “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.”
 The likes of Trump and Farage have not invented the politics of make-believe and half-truths, but they and their campaign strategists brought it to a completely new level. Recognizing that we live in a post-truth world also coincided with both Facebook and Twitter announcing that they would fight fake news, and will counter extremist and harassing language.
 The Mock Turtle in Alice in Wonderland best exemplifies the feelings of many in response to contemporary public debate, when it says, “Well, I never heard it before, but it sounds uncommon nonsense.” History is replete with despicable examples of leaders in search of power who dispose with the truth, or at least exercise it economically. They exploit raw emotions such as fear, misplaced hope and even vanity.
 However, it is not only the political world that is tainted with a made-up world to serve vested interests, the commercial world and part of the media sector are not far behind. Social media is a world of its own in the spreading of information, which varies from the thoughtful and well substantiated to complete falsehoods.
 From the Renaissance period through the Scientific Revolution and up until today a worldview evolved that perceives fact-based reasoning and argumentation as sacrosanct. This approach has now been turned on its head into selling people what they either would like hear or to lead them to behave in a certain way. As in any type of communication those who choose to believe the message need to take at least some of responsibility too.
 The frequency and the intensity of the discourse which appeals to emotions rather rational thinking sheds a new light on the issue of freedom of speech, which is a cornerstone of liberal democracies. Limiting it is interfering with the free market of ideas and information which in return undermines the essence of these societies, their values, and their ability to progress and improve through introspection.
 The frequency and the intensity of the discourse which appeals to emotions rather rational thinking sheds a new light on the issue of freedom of speech, which is a cornerstone of liberal democracies
 Freedom of speech
 Nevertheless, when unmitigated freedom of speech achieves the opposite, society is required to defend itself from spreading hatred and extremism without harming open and honest debate. In the age of immediate communication through platforms such as Twitter and Facebook, which enable the dissemination of untrustworthy information in a matter of a few nanoseconds to around the world, containment of such uncorroborated “knowledge”, partial truths or even sheer lies is a major challenge.
 On the other hand, the very same technology at our fingertips provides us with an instant and easy way to verify the truthfulness of any piece of information as much as to spread it. Many are failing to do so, not necessarily out of gullibility, or laziness, but as a choice not to confront inconvenient truths.
 When the Leave campaign in the UK falsely claimed that the British membership in the European Union costs the country £350 million a week that otherwise could be channelled to the ailing National Health Service, many opted to believe it. Those who failed to look for hard-core evidence did so probably because they wanted Brexit anyway. They were enjoying the short term satisfaction of false hope, like buying a lottery ticket, knowing full well how slim the chances to win are.
 Trump’s special relations with reality did not start or stop with The Apprentice. PolitiFact, a Florida based fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others who speak up in American politics, found out that 85 percent of Trump’s claims during the election campaign ranged from half-truths to pure ‘pants on fire’ categories.
 Regrettably, this did not change once the campaign turned into unexpected victory. A Donald Trump tweet in the category of “pants on fire” asserted that “Of course there is large scale voter fraud happening on and before election day. Why do Republican leaders deny what is going on? So naive!”
 Another in this category alleged that Hillary Clinton, “… wants to let people just pour in. You could have 650 million people pour in, and we do nothing about it. Think of it. That’s what could happen. You triple the size of our country in one week.” It beggars belief that anyone could take these kind of arguments seriously, let alone that this post-truth surreal reality is about to enter the White House jargon.
 Opportunistic worldview
 It is not, however, only the Trumps, the Farages and La-Pens of this world that infect the public debate with their baseless opportunistic view of the world. Nothing is more misleading than calling a genre of TV programmes Reality Shows, in which nothing in them is real and consequently gives an entire generation a distorted view about various aspects of life. Post-truth is far from stopping there.
 What about the language which protects failed business people and bankers from paying the price for their colossal mistakes, or enables them in avoiding paying tax like the rest of us? With no shred of evidence, we are expected to believe that for the good of the world the very rich should retain their precious little tax havens, or that making bankers accountable for their incompetence will bring about the collapse of the global economy.
 In a post-truth world, it is hard not to welcome Twitter’s decision to introduce improved tools for its users to counter abuse, and in addition to temporarily ban accounts associated with ultra-right individuals and groups. Mark Zuckerberg’s announcement that Facebook is working on the problem of fake news, that some argued affected the outcome of US elections, is also a step in the right direction.
 Nevertheless, this must come with a caveat that any interference with freedom of speech has its perils as well. Honouring freedom of speech, one of the fundamental tenets of democratic societies, and the need to conduct debate which is truthful and free of hate and incitement, seem presently to clash. Getting the balance wrong between the two harbours great dangers.
 
 Unravelling the Trump phenomenon
 Eyad Abu Shakra/Al Arabiya/November 24/16
 I have to admit that my forecast regarding the outcome of US presidential election was wrong, even though I have observed American affairs for decades, having lived under the “Western democracy” since 1978.
 I deluded myself into believing that human nature is capable of transcending selfishness, greed and hatred for “the other” if it gets the opportunity to freely express itself. Perhaps I should have paid more attention to recent developments, in the UK in particular, when citizens voted to leave the European Union in a move known as Brexit.
 I should have considered two facts: That the American voter is not necessarily more tolerant or mature than the British; and that a high percentage of Brexit supporters were immigrants. Some of them were even, until a few years ago, refugees who took advantage of the British tolerance to live on the UK territory. But they proved selfish, voting for those who promised to deny access to other immigrants who are suffering today perhaps more than they did when they decided to leave their countries.
 I should have also been more realistic with regard to the notion of coexistence in the US where, for eight years, the identity and faith of the first African-American president was always doubted by far-right “birthers” and nativists. With polls telling us that President Barack Obama was enjoying a 53-55 percent public approval rating toward the end of his second term, I failed, like many serious American analysts, to probe the depth of racism of the white population in rural America and the antipathy the semi-cultured segments had for the black president.
 I also failed to gauge the strong hatred harbored by the right-wing Catholics, Protestant-Anglican and conservative politicians for the Democratic Party liberals. The American presidential election served as an opportunity for them to get revenge on multiple enemies in a single swing.
 They hit back at the political “establishment” in Washington by consistently voting for Trump, who is not a politician but won the Republican Party’s nomination against prominent political figures, and by supporting Bernie Sanders, who although not a member of the Democratic Party, got 40 percent of the Democrats’ votes in the initial race for the party’s nomination. Racist white people sought to address a political situation they perceived as threatening the demographics in the US and having the potential to become “permanent”.
 The Founding Fathers established the United States of America as a haven for immigrants. Now, the same country voted for building border walls and denying entry to emigrants based on their religious identities
 For example, statistics show that the white population of European origin under 25 years of age will become a minority in the US (compared to those of Hispanic, African or Asian ancestry) by 2020, that is, by the end of Trump’s first term. This, in addition to the reality that the three most populous US states — California, Texas and Florida — are dominated by “minority” majorities. Trump and other far right demagogues focused on “the necessity to save America before it’s too late” propaganda.
 Indeed, this strategy paid off greatly, and it is now feared that it could negatively affect not only the coexistence of ethnic groups in the US, but also the principle of separation of powers, which represents the key guarantee of any democratic system, the US included, because the Republican Party, which increasingly drifts toward the extreme right, has won not only the presidency (the executive power), but also kept control of the two Houses of Congress (the legislative power), which gives Trump the opportunity to appoint partisan judges who back Republican policies on the Supreme Court (the judiciary).
 The angry white voters
 The third target of the angry white voters was globalization. This was used by a number of Republican candidates before the Republican nomination went to Trump, the most outspoken candidate in favor of racism and isolation. Trump had earlier pledged to ban Muslims from entering the US and to build a wall along the US-Mexico border. Even the speech of Ben Carson, former Republican presidential candidate of African-American descent, was racist and fanatic, particularly against Muslims.
 This means that those candidates understood the nature of the voters and tried to incite their hatred and stir up their feelings of fear and despair in order to gain their votes. The fourth backlash was against technological and scientific progress, which is interrelated with globalization.
 There were remarkable similarities between the speeches of leftist Sanders and right-wing Trump, as well as of some Republicans, talking about the suffering of the working class in the US due to the fall of barriers to market movement, jobs and goods. Trump gained a significant proportion of the votes of blue-collar workers in Northeastern states, the so-called Rust Belt, whose once-powerful industrial sector had shrank.
 In fact, Trump won the presidential election after securing the votes of three northern states (Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, along with Ohio), which were supposed to vote for his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton. The ongoing protests in some US cities are in response to the shocking Trump win. Protesters fear that tolerance will no more exist in their country where voters decided to do away with time-honored principles and human decency.
 The Founding Fathers established the United States of America as a haven for immigrants. The country developed, guaranteeing openness, pluralism and acceptance of the other — regardless of color, race or religion. Now, the same country voted for building border walls and denying entry to emigrants based on their religious identities.
 The US, which was founded on the principles of individual initiatives, free economy and open market, eliminated all kinds of restrictions and enacted legislations against monopoly, is now working against the interests of its industrial companies, which were forced by the competitiveness of the capitalist system, to reduce production costs by building factories abroad.
 America, which boomed thanks to the scientific progress, encouraging creativity and embracing scientists from around the world, is now bidding for the votes of anti-progressive parties. It may even suspend scientific research under pressure from the radical Christian right, whether in the field of the stem cells, artificial intelligence, nanotechnology or information technology.
 This is Trump’s America in the 21st century. And the world will have to pay the price even though it did not vote for him.
 **This article was first published in Asharq al-Awsat on November 19, 2016.
 
Why this surge of US interest in Yemen?
 By Dr. Khaled M. Batarfi/Al Arabiya/November 24/16
 The sudden surge of American interest in the Yemen conflict raises serious questions. I have taken part in many discussions last week about Kerry’s surprise visit to Oman to meet with a Houthi delegation. Here are some of these questions and my answers:
 Why all the secrecy? Why in Oman?
 Whenever America needs to speak to Iran and its Arab proxies, US officials meet in Oman, with total radio silence! They negotiated the nuclear deal with Iran for years in a similar fashion. Who knows what else?
 If it was only the Houthis were engaged in last week’s meeting, why all the secrecy? My bet is Iran was there. This is explainable, since it is the troublemaker in Yemen, as well as in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. To resolve the Yemeni problem, you need to talk to them, not to the Houthis and Saleh.
 If the Iranian masters are not in agreement, the Arab agents will keep breaking their promises and failing their commitments. The Houthis are allied with ex-President Ali Abdullah Saleh. How come Kerry has met only with them?
 It was a crude recognition of reality. The Houthis are the ones in the driver’s seat. Saleh was going out of his scripted line calling on Saudi Arabia to talk directly to him. Kerry could have saved his breath by meeting with the Iranians alone. Or maybe that was exactly what he did. The Houthis may have been there just for the photo-op, and to get directions from their masters.
 The Yemeni government was not invited, notified or consulted. Why Kerry chose to ignore them?
 Since the Yemeni government has resisted the US-UN proposal, Kerry may have decided to enforce it on them. This is the American way. It backfired on him, because President Abdrabbu Mansour Hadi refused to sign on, and the Arab Alliance supported him.
 It was rude and humiliating, to say the least, to ignore a legitimate president and travel across the world for a meeting with a low-level delegation of a rebellious militia that kidnapped Americans and fired missiles on the US fleet. American pride and prestige, not just Yemeni, were compromised. Later on, he had to apologize in person to President Hadi for a move that was hasty and badly conceived.
 Not a partner in alliance
 America is an ally and partner in the Decisive Storm. Why the change of heart?
 The Obama Administration has never been a partner in any alliance against Iran — Not in Iraq, not in Syria, not in Lebanon and not in Yemen. They were initially against the Storm, but had to play catch-up after its start. Most of their help consists of expensive services, paid in cash. Like any war merchants, they made a fortune of sold equipment, spare parts and other logistics.
 US heart has always been with the Houthis. Under their watch (and their agent in the UN, Jamal bin Omar) the rebels swept the country with ruthless force, from their base in Sa’da, north of Yemen, to Sanaa, and down to Ta’az and Aden. They had overthrown a legitimate, elected government, imprisoned its Cabinet, and chased its president with “wanted dead or alive” bounty on his head.
 The UN-US legitimized all the above by dealing with the rebels as de-facto rulers. And if it wasn’t for the Arab Alliance’s support of Hadi, Yemen would have been delivered to Iran, the same way Iraq had been. And Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states would have been surrounded with the Farsi Empire north, south and east. The nuclear deal with Iran, then, would have been completed.
 Kerry peace plan
 What is so wrong with the UN and Kerry’s peace plan that the Yemeni government so adamantly refused?
 What was leaked is disturbing. The president would have to transfer his authority to a new government divided between three groups. One third would go to the Houthis, another to Saleh, and a third to the current government. So the rebels, who controlled 20 percent of the country would be rewarded with two thirds of the new government — an overwhelming control.
 The Houthis would turn over their heavy guns to unspecified third party. They should get their forces out of major cities. That is too vague. They could easily say that most of their arms were destroyed and turn only what cannot be hidden. Their militants could pretend to be civilians and stay in Sanaa. Later, they may incorporate them in the national army.
 Since they would be ruling the government and parliament they could pass any changes and roles they may wish. We are back to worse than square one. Iran wins, Yemen and Arabs lose.
 This means either everyone accepts, or another war erupts. Either way, US, Britain, Israel and Iran rule our world. And they get richer selling arms to all sides. Forget about it!
 **This article was first published in the Saudi Gazette on Nov. 22, 2016.