LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

November 30/16

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletin16/english.november30.16.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
Follow me, and I will make you fish for people
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew 04/18-23/:"As he walked by the Sea of Galilee, he saw two brothers, Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the lake for they were fishermen. And he said to them, ‘Follow me, and I will make you fish for people.’ Immediately they left their nets and followed him. As he went from there, he saw two other brothers, James son of Zebedee and his brother John, in the boat with their father Zebedee, mending their nets, and he called them. Immediately they left the boat and their father, and followed him. Jesus went throughout
Galilee, teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the good news of the kingdom and curing every disease and every sickness among the people."

Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord
First Letter to the Corinthians 01/26-31/:"Consider your own call, not many of you were wise by human standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth. But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong; God chose what is low and despised in the world, things that are not, to reduce to nothing things that are, so that no one might boast in the presence of God. He is the source of your life in Christ Jesus, who became for us wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification and redemption, in order that, as it is written, ‘Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.’"

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on November 29-30/16
Lebanese Cabinet debate grows as Lebanon speaker decries 'unjust' treatment/The Daily Star/ November 29/16
Does Lebanon want to build a wall to separate refugees/Yara al-Wazir/Al Arabiya/November 29/16
Iraq’s People’s Mobilization Units (PMU), Hezbollah and the Iranian design/Diana Moukalled/Arab News/November 29/16
In praise of Professor Walid Phares/Yair Ravid/Jerusalem Post/November 29/16
Hezbollah to play lead role in new Syria regime force: report/Now Lebanon/November 29/16
What would the fall of Aleppo mean/ Alex Rowell/Now Lebanon/November 29/16
Iran’s Project – Becoming a Big Naval Police Force/Abdulrahman Al-Rashed/Asharq Al Awsat/November 29/16
The ‘New World Dis-Order/Eyad Abu Shakra/Asharq Al Awsat/November 29/16
What About the Cultural Imbalance/Nonie Darwish/Gatestone Institute/November 29/16
France's Politician Dhimmis/Yves Mamou/Gatestone Institute/November 29/16
The Middle East and Donald Trump/Hussein Shobokshi/Al Arabiya/November 29/16
Legalizing Iraq’s Shiite mobilization forces/Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/November 29/16
Will Fatah seal its transfer to non-violent resistance/Daoud Kuttab/Al Arabiya/November 29/16
Advent: A Time To Reflect On Judgement And Hope/David Robertson/Today Christian/28 November 2016
The Houris: Islam’s ‘Sexual Superwomen/Raymond Ibrahim/FrontPage Magazine/November 29/16

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on on November 29-30/16
Lebanese Cabinet debate grows as Lebanon speaker decries 'unjust' treatment
Berri: Forming a Cabinet Before the Holidays an 'Accomplishment'
Rahi visits French Holy Family School in Jounieh
Hariri Says Government Must Improve Employment Opportunities for the Youth
Hizbullah, Mustaqbal Call for 'Benefiting from Positive Atmosphere' to Form Govt.
Report: Aspirations of Some to Get Veto Power Impeding Cabinet Formation
Mustaqbal Warns against Wasting Momentum of New Presidential Tenure
Hizbullah Minister Says 'Not Impossible' to Form 'Inclusive Govt.'
Geagea Says New Govt. Bickering a 'Veiled Attempt to Target LF-FPM Alliance'
Police Arrest Gang Tied to Car Thefts in Southern Beirut Suburb
Lebanon: Fears from Long Government Vacuum
Does Lebanon want to build a wall to separate refugees?
Iraq’s People’s Mobilization Units (PMU), Hezbollah and the Iranian design
In praise of Professor Walid Phares
Hezbollah to play lead role in new Syria regime force: report

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on on November 29-30/16
Brazil in Mourning as Plane Carrying Football Players Crashes in Colombia
Plane carrying Brazil soccer team crashes in Colombia, 76 dead
Iranian vessel points weapon at U.S. helicopter: officials
U.N. Security Council to Hold Meeting on Aleppo Crisis
Syrian rebels battle Assad forces in Aleppo
Rebels’ hold on eastern Aleppo collapses as troops move in
Woman loses unborn baby in Aleppo bombing
Errors led to coalition strike on Syria forces: Pentagon
Iraqi forces liberate ISIS-held Nineveh Plain
Ali Khamenei criticizes Rowhani: We rushed in the nuclear deal
Dutch parliament votes to ban burqas, niqabs in some public places
A prominent Egyptian rights leader banned from travel
Trump: ‘Very impressed’ with Petraeus as he weighs top diplomat job
Gulf states denounce Houthis forming cabinet
1,400 saved in med as Italy sees record migrant arrivals
Safa Al Hashem: Kuwait’s lone women’s voice in parliament
Abbas Re-Elected Party Leader as Fatah Opens Rare Congress 

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on November 29-30/16
Islamic State claims responsibility for Ohio State University jihad attack.
Catholic Charities helped Ohio State University jihadi resettle in U.S.
German left planning to disarm “right-wing extremists,” “Brexiteers,” Trump supporters.
OSU jihadi one of 98,799 Somali Muslim refugees admitted to US since 9/11.
FBI can’t confirm that hate letters sent to mosques actually came from outside Muslim community.
Columbus Somali Muslim leader on OSU jihad attack: “The timing is not good”.
Ohio Muslim leaders: No “radicalization” in Columbus, worried about girls in hijabs getting stared at.
NPR: “Muslim Community Fears Backlash After Ohio State Attack”.
Fox News: Ohio State University jihad attacker’s “motive remains unclear”.
CNN’s Alisyn Camerota: Americans should wear headscarves in solidarity with Muslims.
Robert Spencer in FrontPage: Muslim Refugee Brings Jihad Terror to Ohio State.
UK: Islamic State woman receives $163,868 in legal aid.
Germany: Court determines “Sharia Patrol” is legal.
Why Mitt Romney’s “establishment” position on Islam/Mideast should disqualify him from Trump’s team.

Links From Christian Today Site for on November 29-30/16
Signs Of Hope: Ancient Relics Found In Monastery Destroyed By ISIS.
 Fear And Exhaustion In Aleppo As Brutal Siege Continues.
 Does Your Church Need To Think Differently About Mission?
 Government Ministers See Religion As 'Essentially A Problem' - Labour Faith Envoy.
 By God, we will break your cross': ISIS' Harrowing Vow To Christians In Iraq.
 Billy Graham: Don't Celebrate Christmas Like A Secular Holiday.
 This Megachurch Is Offering To Pay Your Rent If You Turn Up On New Year's Day.
 Scotland Could Offer Free Abortions To Northern Irish Women.
 'God Be With Our Athletes': 76 Dead In Colombia Plane Crash.

Latest Lebanese Related News published on November 29-30/16
Lebanese Cabinet debate grows as Lebanon speaker decries 'unjust' treatment
 The Daily Star/ November 29, 2016
 BEIRUT: The deadlock over Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri's Cabinet lineup continued Tuesday with Speaker Nabih Berri saying he refuses to be treated unjustly.
 Berri's visitors quoted him as saying that he hoped he wasn’t “doing anyone wrong,” adding that his Amal Movement “will not allow anyone to be partial with us,” in remarks published by Al-Joumhouria newspaper Tuesday.
 The speaker's statement comes one day after Hariri said that he "stands by Speaker Berri whether he is right or wrong."
 The Prime-Minister designate’s attempts to form a new Cabinet, which he hoped to finish before Lebanon's Independence Day last Tuesday, have been hampered by overlapping demands by rival politicians.
 "We are only asking [rivals] to facilitate the Cabinet formation ... talks are focusing on the formation of a national unity government, which requires the representation of everyone without any exclusion," Berri reportedly told his visitors.
 He reiterated that the current gridlock over Cabinet formation reduces the possibility of adopting a new electoral law.
 Tensions emerged between Berri and Hariri last week over the delay in the government formation. However, the two leaders appeared to have settled their differences when they met together with Aoun for Independence Day celebrations.
 Since Hariri’s appointment as prime minister, Berri has insisted that his party retains control of both the Public Works and Finance ministries, and demanded that the Marada Movement be given a key portfolio. The Lebanese Forces are also demanding the Public Works Ministry as well as other portfolios.
 Meanwhile, Hariri insists that the Telecommunications Ministry is allocated to his Future bloc and the Free Patriotic Movement wants to retain control of the Energy Ministry.
 However, the Marada Movement, led by MP Sleiman Frangieh, who ran against Aoun in the presidential race, is demanding one of the three key portfolios – Telecommunications, Energy or Public Works – as a condition for its participation in the government.
 Hariri met with President Michel Aoun Monday and said that he was addressing the issues holding up the completion of a new government.
 Later on Tuesday, Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblatt commented on the stalemate by tweeting "Enough already!" 
 
Berri: Forming a Cabinet Before the Holidays an 'Accomplishment'
Naharnet/November 29/16/In a sign that efforts to line up a new government may not succeed before the end of the year, Speaker Nabih Berri said that it would be an “accomplishment” for Lebanon to form one before the holidays, media reports said Tuesday.
“If the formation of the government before Independence Day would have been a miracle, forming it before the holidays would be an accomplishment,” said Berri. Sources close to Berri said the Speaker insists on being given the public works ministerial portfolio and on giving Marada leader MP Suleiman Franjieh a key portfolio in the new cabinet.After the designation of Hariri on October 3, he exerted efforts to form a new cabinet before Independence Day on November 22. But the efforts have failed and aspirations now turn towards forming it before the new year. Hariri is still facing obstacles bringing together a line-up that balances Lebanon's delicate sectarian-based political system. At stake is the distribution of the most powerful portfolios, including the defense ministry and other key portfolios including the public works. In that regard, Hariri held a meeting with President Michel Aoun on Monday where discussions focused on ways to end the stalemate before the holidays, according to media reports.

Rahi visits French Holy Family School in Jounieh
Tue 29 Nov 2016/NNA - Maronite Patriarch Bechara Rahi on Tuesday visited French Holy Family School in Jounieh accompanied by a number of religious dignitaries. Patriarch Rahi gave a speech whereupon he urged students to go for employments in public institutions and work for fighting corruption.

Hariri Says Government Must Improve Employment Opportunities for the Youth

Naharnet/November 29/16/Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri said on Tuesday that the Lebanese government must look into improving the employment opportunities for the youth to build human capabilities, and to maintain Lebanon's “special” position in the region and world. “I believe that one of the most important responsibilities of the state now is to improve employment opportunities for young men and women in Lebanon, and to create a climate of confidence and hope for the younger generation, which is the future of our country,” said Hariri at the opening of the Outreach and Leadership Academy (OLA) in Beirut downtown. “Not just because Rafik Hariri loved them the most and believed that our human capital is our greatest asset, but also because I am convinced that learning and acquiring knowledge are the only ways to build human capabilities, to achieve a significant leap in the great potential of our economy and to maintain our preferential advantages in the region and the world,” added Hariri. He went on to say: “This project gives the youth, at their schools, universities, and professions the skills and abilities that increase their chances in getting a job after graduation, or the chances to succeed in the individual initiative in their profession, and at the same time, it renews their hope to achieve their dreams and ambitions.” “I feel even more proud today that the OLA Center is being launched in Beirut specifically, because our goal is to restore the role of our capital as an incubator of the ambition and creativity of its sons and daughters and all the Lebanese,” concluded Hariri.

Hizbullah, Mustaqbal Call for 'Benefiting from Positive Atmosphere' to Form Govt.
Naharnet/November 29/16/Hizbullah and al-Mustaqbal Movement on Tuesday called for “benefiting from the positive atmosphere in the country” in order to “form the government as soon as possible.” In a statement issued after their 37th dialogue session in Ain el-Tineh, the two parties also called for devising a new electoral law and for holding the parliamentary elections on time. Michel Aoun's election as president and al-Mustaqbal leader Saad Hariri's appointment as premier-designate have raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees. In a sign that Hariri's mission as premier might not be easy, Hizbullah's MPs declined to endorse him during binding parliamentary consultations. Aoun and Hariri are still struggling to put together a new cabinet amid conflicting demands from the political forces that are seeking to join the unity government.Horsetrading is still revolving around the so-called services-related ministerial portfolios, mainly public works and telecommunications. Speaker Nabih Berri, who is negotiating on behalf of the Hizbullah-led March 8 camp, is clinging to the finance and public works portfolios while also insisting that the Marada Movement must get a key portfolio

Report: Aspirations of Some to Get Veto Power Impeding Cabinet Formation
Naharnet/November 29/16/The wrangling among political parties over the distribution of ministerial portfolios turns out to be over the so-called “blocking third” or veto power, which sources following up closely on the cabinet formation process said is the core of the differences among the conflicting sides, al-Joumhouria daily reported Tuesday. Even though no one has openly mentioned that the core of the difference lies in the aspiration of some parties to obtain the majority of the cabinet seats which gives them veto power to pass or obstruct future government decisions, but the problem actually lies there, the sources said on condition of anonymity. Aspirations to have veto power in the new cabinet can be detected in the share of the Lebanese Forces and the Free Patriotic Movement. The share of the President (3 ministers) and the share of the FPM (3 ministers) in addition to the share of the LF (3 ministers plus a portfolio for minister Michel Pharaon) will pave way for the LF-Aouni alliance to get 10 seats in a 24-minister cabinet, senior sources remarked. Despite these reports, the LF and the FPM consider the “hypothesis” unrealistic, and slammed any intentions to have an obstruction power in the future cabinet. Last month, the parliament elected Michel Aoun, a former general, as president ending a two-and-half-year deadlock that left Lebanon without a president. But Premier-designate Saad Hariri is still facing obstacles bringing together a line-up that balances Lebanon's delicate sectarian-based political system. At stake is the distribution of the most powerful portfolios like the defense ministry and other key portfolios including the public works. The political parties are also bickering over amending the current majoritarian or winner-takes-all election law which divides seats among the different religious sects. The current parliament has failed to amend the law, and has extended its mandate twice amid criticism. New elections are scheduled for May 2017.

Mustaqbal Warns against Wasting Momentum of New Presidential Tenure
Naharnet/November 29/16/Al-Mustaqbal parliamentary bloc on Tuesday urged the political parties not to “weaken or waste” the momentum that was created by the election of a new president, noting that the Lebanese people are pinning hopes on the new presidential tenure. “Al-Mustaqbal bloc sees that there is an available chance to achieve a correct beginning of the new presidential tenure and this chance must not be weakened or wasted,” the bloc said in a statement issued after its weekly meeting. “The Lebanese people are pinning hopes on the possibility of achieving a breakthrough... during this pivotal and critical period that Lebanon and the region are going through,” it added. Accordingly, Mustaqbal hoped that “the ongoing contacts and efforts that Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri is conducting will result in the formation of a new government as soon as possible.” “Essential and necessary tasks are awaiting the new government, topped by preparing and approving the 2017 state budget and contributing to the passing of a new electoral law,” the bloc said. Michel Aoun's election as president after two and a half years of presidential void and Hariri's re-designation as premier have raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees. In a sign that Hariri's mission as premier might not be easy, Hizbullah's MPs declined to endorse him during binding parliamentary consultations. Hariri and Aoun are still struggling to put together a new cabinet amid conflicting demands from the political forces that are seeking to join the unity government. Horsetrading is still revolving around the so-called services-related ministerial portfolios, mainly public works and telecommunications. Speaker Nabih Berri, who is negotiating on behalf of the Hizbullah-led March 8 camp, is clinging to the finance and public works portfolios while also insisting that the Marada Movement must get a key portfolio.

Hizbullah Minister Says 'Not Impossible' to Form 'Inclusive Govt.'
Naharnet/November 29/16/Caretaker Industry Minister Hussein al-Hajj Hassan of Hizbullah noted Tuesday that it is “not impossible” to form “a broad and inclusive national government.”“Security and safety have been achieved through the sacrifices of the Lebanese army and the resistance,” Hajj Hassan said during the inauguration of a health center in the Bekaa town of Brital. “Thanks to this security and safety, the presidential vote was held and General Michel Aoun was elected president of the Lebanese republic,” he added. “There are obstacles hindering the formation of the cabinet and we hope they will be resolved, and it is not impossible to reach a broad and inclusive national government,” Hajj Hassan went on to say. Aoun and Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri are still struggling to put together a new cabinet amid conflicting demands from the political forces that are seeking to join the unity government. Horsetrading is still revolving around the so-called services-related ministerial portfolios, mainly public works and telecommunications. Speaker Nabih Berri, who is negotiating on behalf of the Hizbullah-led March 8 camp, is clinging to the finance and public works portfolios while also insisting that the Marada Movement must get a key portfolio.

Geagea Says New Govt. Bickering a 'Veiled Attempt to Target LF-FPM Alliance'

Naharnet/November 29/16/Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea announced Tuesday that “the wrangling over shares and ministerial portfolios is a veiled attempt to target the LF-Free Patriotic Movement alliance.”“Some parties do not want a new presidential tenure, but rather a continuation of the previous presidential tenures, especially those we witnessed during the (Syrian) tutelage era,” Geagea said in an interview with the al-Markazia news agency. “We will spare no effort to back this tenure so that it truly becomes a new tenure,” Geagea added. “We realized from the very first moment that the issue goes beyond the distribution of portfolios... but the State will only rise according to the Constitution, which is very clear in this regard,” the LF leader went on to say, noting that some parties “are confronting the new presidential tenure's policies through obstruction.”And hoping to “expand the Baabda-Maarab-Center House axis to include Ain el-Tineh, Dahieh and the Progressive Socialist Party,” Geagea noted that “it is no longer acceptable or possible to maintain the rules that governed the political game between 1990 and 2005.”He also denied that there is an intention to “eliminate or exclude any political group.”“Anyone is welcome to join the era of the constitution-governed State,” Geagea said. The LF leader also said that the new cabinet will likely be formed soon, noting that “wasting time is not in the dictionary of” President Michel Aoun and Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri. “Should no solutions loom on the horizon, the constitutional solution exists, and there is an inclination to form a constitutional government,” Geagea added, hinting that Aoun and Hariri might impose a cabinet line-up on the political parties. Aoun's election and Hariri's appointment as premier-designate have raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees. In a sign that Hariri's mission as premier might not be easy, Hizbullah's MPs declined to endorse him during binding parliamentary consultations. Hariri and Aoun are still struggling to put together a new cabinet amid conflicting demands from the political forces that are seeking to join the unity government. Horsetrading is still revolving around the so-called services-related ministerial portfolios, mainly public works and telecommunications. Speaker Nabih Berri, who is negotiating on behalf of the Hizbullah-led March 8 camp, is clinging to the finance and public works portfolios while also insisting that the Marada Movement must get a key portfolio.

Police Arrest Gang Tied to Car Thefts in Southern Beirut Suburb
Naharnet/November 29/16/A gang comprised of three Lebanese nationals tied to a rash of car thefts was arrested by law enforcement police in the southern suburbs of Beirut, the Internal Security Forces said in a statement on Tuesday. Police units carried out a raid in the southern suburb of Hay el-Sellom over the weekend where the suspects were meeting. The assailants opened fire at the police officers which compelled them to respond, added NNA. The gang's leader was hit and taken to the hospital for treatment. Police confiscated amounts of hashsih in their possession. Investigations continue with the related authorities.

Lebanon: Fears from Long Government Vacuum
Paula Astih/Asharq Al Awsat/November 29/16/Beirut- Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri’s busy schedule at his Future Movement’s general convention last week and the trip of Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil to Brazil have dissipated the momentum that accompanied the election of President Michel Aoun and the nomination of Hariri to form the new cabinet.  There is no sign that there will be a breakthrough soon on the government lineup, which appears to be hindered by a dispute on the Public Works Ministry, but in fact, is more linked to an attempt by the leading political parties to enforce a new way in dealing with the decision-making strategies that would last until after the spring parliamentary elections and the government that would follow.  A leading official at the Future Movement told Asharq Al-Awsat that the delay in the cabinet formation “was not linked to a portfolio, but is rather an attempt from the Speaker and (Hezbollah) to revive the troika formula (a policy that was implemented during the 1990’s to divide power between the president, the speaker and the prime minister).”  The official, who wished to remain anonymous, said that Speaker Nabih Berri was trying to say that the government should be formed based on a tripartite formula and on a decision taken by Hariri and Aoun alone.  It seems that none of the parties directly concerned by the Public Works Ministry are ready to offer any concessions in this regard.  Officials at the Marada Movement told Asharq Al-Awsat that the party was not ready to give up on its right to get one of the three ministries: Energy, Telecommunications or Public Works. But, sources at the Lebanese Forces said: “Some parties are trying to halt the cabinet lineup formation and to exert pressure on President Aoun by delaying the start of his term using the Public Works portfolio.”  The sources added: “If each party insists on keeping the ministerial share it had in the previous cabinet, then why MP Suleiman Franjieh is not satisfied with keeping the Ministry of Culture?”The sources said some parties are hiding behind the Marada Movement to justify halting the formation of the cabinet. The so-called Hezbollah insists on supporting Franjieh’s right to get an influential portfolio.” Meanwhile, a meeting held on Monday between Aoun and Hariri at the Presidential Palace did not signal any near announcement of a new cabinet.  Following the talks, Hariri confirmed his understanding with Aoun in all matters, indicating the presence of some knots “which we are trying to untie” in the cabinet formation process.

Does Lebanon want to build a wall to separate refugees?
Yara al-Wazir/Al Arabiya/November 29/16
While the world celebrated International Day for Solidarity with Palestinians on Friday November 25, thousands of Palestinian refugees in Lebanon’s Ain al-Hilweh camp grew anxious about their future. Earlier in the week, the Lebanese authorities began to build a wall on the western part of the camp, which is home to 70,000 refugees in what seems to be part of a “security measure.”
One must pay particular attention to the possible implications to how the refugee community within Lebanon, and worldwide, is viewed. The Palestinian community within Lebanon is largely made up of refugees who fled during the first diaspora in 1948, and now their decedents. In total, there are 450,000 Palestinian refugees registered in Lebanon, making up a total of 10 per cent of the population of the country, according to the United Nations. What seems to be a collective definition of a community of 70,000 people as a “security threat” sends a dangerous message to the public. This wall is sure to make the refugee community feel alienated even further, and for the general public to justify any negative feelings they may have.
More importantly, what is the exact reasoning behind building the wall – are Palestinians really seen as such a serious security threat that they must be sidelined and collectively imprisoned with a concrete structure? How is this wall being financed, and what benefit will it actually bring to either the Palestinians in the camp, or those who live outside of the camp? The answers to these questions are unclear, as very limited statements have been made about the wall. However, what is known is that collective punishment of 70,000 people will almost certainly provoke anger and frustration, and may well be the reason why within days, the building of the wall was “paused.”
If the recent refugee crisis has taught the world anything it is that as human beings, we are all vulnerable to changes in politics, the environment and culture, and our lives can change within days
It is understandable that the Lebanese army is trying to maintain security within the camp; after all it is their job. It is time that the authorities stop using the word “security” as a scapegoat excuse for an active effort to sideline the refugee community – building walls will not make the problems go away, only building bridges can do that. Without an official statement to explain the purpose of this wall, and without an official statement to explain why the building was paused, whether or not it will resume, and if it will resume, when, the Palestinians within Ain al-Hilweh camp and the other 11 refugee camps in the country cannot be blamed for feeling anxious, angry, and alienated.
 Putting politics aside– what will the world look like fore refugees in 2030? As the world transcends into the “sharing” economy, it seems that people want to share services but not responsibilities.
Looking back just ten years, who would have guessed or estimated that there would be more than 10 million Syrian refugees scattered around the world? If the recent refugee crisis has taught the world anything it is that as human beings, we are all vulnerable to changes in politics, the environment and culture, and our lives can change within days. Be it refugees of war or refugees of climate change, the struggle is real. Increasingly, it feels that the host countries are treating individuals are threats, rather than questioning the system that dehumanized them and made them refugees.
For the past week, I too have been anxious about the future of the Ain al-Hilweh camp. When the very state acknowledges that it sees an entire population of a camp as a potential security threat, one must wonder why it hasn’t done anything to contain this threat before, what has made this part of the population a security threat (70,000 people is an incredibly large number), and that surely there must be more effective ways to deal with a security threat rather than to build a wall. Perhaps getting to the root cause of security threats, understanding motivations and driers, and providing education and opportunities to distract from these drivers and offer a method to positively contribute to the economy would go miles further in combatting potential security threats than a concrete wall. Without getting to the root cause of why people are angry and building walls of alienation, it will only provoke people further and instigate further negative sentiments that will impede development. 
 
Iraq’s People’s Mobilization Units (PMU), Hezbollah and the Iranian design
Diana Moukalled/Arab News/November 29/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/29/diana-moukalledarab-news-iraqs-peoples-mobilization-units-pmu-hezbollah-and-the-iranian-design/
http://www.arabnews.com/node/1017031/columns
It is no coincidence that there are strong parallels between Iraq’s People’s Mobilization Units (PMU) and Lebanon’s Hezbollah militia. Hezbollah’s ability to weaken the central state and implement a policy that does not recognize borders is a model that Iran seeks to replicate in several places in light of the Hezbollah model allowing an extremely dangerous Iranian penetration in Lebanon.
Iraq is heading toward greater political tension following the endorsement of a law that legitimizes the PMU as an official militia. This is quite similar to legitimizing Hezbollah as an armed “resistance” party following the end of the Lebanese war.
The PMU has already committed war crimes and human rights violations, according to reports issued by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. Such violations are documented in reports, photos and videos. This reminds us of the beginnings of Hezbollah, which was formed by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard in Lebanon in the 1980s.
At that time, Hezbollah aka Islamic Jihad and Islamic Resistance, got involved in a series of kidnappings and killings of foreign hostages as well as assassinations. In addition, it also fought a fierce war against the Amal Movement before gaining Syria’s support and being declared a legitimate resistance organization following the post-war settlement. It is noteworthy that this particular armed legitimacy has grown parallel to, and even bigger than, the state itself.
The beginning of PMU’s existence in Iraq is very similar to Hezbollah’s existence in Lebanon; both have a legacy of violations and crimes. However, this existence is not all inclusive; it is the predominance of one party over the other in the sectarian-political equation in the two countries.
The undeniable truth is that both the PMU and Hezbollah are sectarian militias. The PMU is funded and officially sponsored by the Iraqi government, but it is actually controlled by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. The Hezbollah is, at the same time, recognized by the Lebanese government but it is also under the control of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.
Iran aspires to achieve its expansionist ambitions through sectarian wars, militias and by doing away with the identities of nations — as seen in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. To achieve this, Tehran seeks to boost sectarian ties and strengthen relations between Shiite groups so that they become disconnected from their identities and national history. As a result, they would be separated into narrower identities instead of guaranteeing equal citizenship.
Tehran sees the countries it has militarily, politically and socially penetrated, such as Lebanon and Iraq, as hybrid fields lacking a specific authority — with its main aim being to turn Shiite groups outside Iran into a base of great influence.
Is Iran seeking to revive its dream of imperial expansion through its several bases of influence? Maybe. But will it succeed in doing so?
In fact, Iran has so far achieved some serious successes in that regard. However, these successes are tinged with feelings of tension, hatred and conflict that will not bring about national unity and stability. The so-called fighting against Daesh and terrorism in Mosul and northern Syria is merely a pretext for making demographic changes and forming a sectarian group that will make us pay dearly for years to come.
• Diana Moukalled is a veteran journalist with extensive experience in both traditional and new media. She is also a columnist and freelance documentary producer. She can be reached on Twitter @dianamoukalled.

In praise of Professor Walid Phares
Yair Ravid/Jerusalem Post/November 29/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/29/yair-ravidjerusalem-post-in-praise-of-professor-walid-phares-2/
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/In-praise-of-Professor-Walid-Phares-473912
Ben Lynfield, writing on November 16 in The Jerusalem Post (“Who is Walid Phares, Trump’s Mideast adviser?”), sets out a series of absurd accusations against Dr. Walid Phares, who served as foreign policy adviser to presidential candidate Donald Trump and as national security adviser for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney in 2011-2012.
Phares is a well-respected scholar and analyst in the US whose expertise in Middle East affairs is widely recognized and well received in US defense, intelligence and national security circles as well as in Congress, where he has testified and advised for two decades, as public archives show. A forme chair of the subcommittee on intelligence in the US House of Representatives considers Phares one of the best strategic minds in the world on US national security. As one who actually had the Lebanon file in his hands for many years, particularly in the 1970s and ‘80s, I do not remember anyone among those who have recently attacked Phares walking beside me on the paths of Southern Lebanon and in Beirut alleys in 1976, when I started working on relations with the Christians in South Lebanon and with the Phalangists in Beirut.
We know who did what for 15 years. Unfortunately, none of his recent critics have bothered to search the archives of the Lebanese press or interview those who, like me, were actually there at the time.
Naturally attacks have poured in against Phares from the various foes of the United States and the West, particularly from pro-Iranian and Muslim Brotherhood operatives, and at times far-leftist bloggers. Since 2011, the campaign against Phares has aimed consistently at keeping his advice as far as possible from influencing US policy in a way that could affect the interests of these parties, those who abhor Israel and the moderate Arabs in the region. Most use the same talking points and smear charges used by the pro-Hezbollah and Islamist propagandists in 2011 and 2016.
In general the attacks against Phares originate from a widely discredited hit piece published by far-left blogger and Iran deal supporter Adam Serwer in Mother Jones. The piece’s fabrications about the scholar’s life in Lebanon before he emigrated to the US 26 years ago have been fully discredited by several investigative articles already, but these charges keep circulating, especially the charge that Phares was an “ideologue of Lebanese militiamen during the civil war in the 1980s.”
The sources of this charge are either Hezbollah- friendly or misquoted. One of the quoted persons, Toni Nissi, has himself slammed the far-left media for lying about him: “Regrettably Mother Jones selected three sentences from an almost four-hour... conversation with Serwer about the Lebanese resistance against Syrian occupation. Serwer maliciously distorted the form and core of what was discussed in a cheap and repulsive attempt to attack Professor Walid Phares and create an absurd and ludicrous connection between Professor Phares’ academic, political and intellectual roles [as a] contribution to educate the high cadres of the Lebanese Christian resistance [is] deplorable and unacceptable.”
A second unsubstantiated claim is that “Phares advocated that Lebanon’s Christians work toward creating a separate, independent Christian enclave.” This of a man who has published books since 1979 while he was at law school, and hundreds of articles, all focusing on a federal solution to the crisis in Lebanon.
Lynfield quoted far-left Mother Jones stating “that he was a close adviser of Samir Geagea, a Lebanese- Christian warlord.” Toufic Hindi, a Lebanese politician today, has already crippled this charge in an interview where he wondered why Phares’ critics insist on this falsehood since Hindi himself was the adviser to Geagea, not Phares. The source for this allegation is a young woman who had a beef with Samir Geagea personally. A reminder of how the Communists attacked Vaclav Havel, not by citing his work, but by referring to an agent accusation against him.
The Post piece goes on to claim that in the 1990s, Phares tried “to lobby the Israeli government to carve out a state for Christians in the security zone Israel maintained in southern Lebanon, despite the fact that Israel had been burned badly when it allied with Lebanese Christians in 1982, that most of zone’s inhabitants were Shi’ite Muslims and that Israel already had its hands full dealing with an insurgency by Hezbollah.”
This is utterly false.
At the time Phares, along with his NGO colleagues, lodged a demand at the United Nations Security Council in New York to issue a resolution to establish international protection for a “free zone” in south Lebanon, to replace the Israeli military. The plan was that Christians, Muslims and Druse together would control their own destinies under a federal system. They wanted to see local police stations and municipalities act as a functioning local government until Syria had withdrawn and Hezbollah had been disarmed.
Phares’ views were prescient as another UN resolution, one he worked on later in 2004 (UNSCR 1559), forced Assad to pull his troops out of Lebanon in 2005.
Lynfield also cites a 1997 article authored by Phares to intimate that he was trying to drag the Israelis into Lebanon again. He quotes conversations where the scholar said: “Despite the 1982 episode, the Christians of Lebanon are the only potential ally against the advance of the northern Arabo-Islamic threat against Israel.”
In fact, many on both sides of the border were watching Hezbollah and the jihadists advancing and taking over in Lebanon. This advance, which was completed in 2000, had in fact, according to his own account, encouraged Osama bin Laden to strike New York and Washington in 2001. By this time, Phares was examining the global terrorist threat, not only an ethnic conflict within his motherland.
Nevertheless, former Mossad director Efraim Halevy opines on Phares’ mischaracterized position: “To think in 1997 of creating a Christian enclave in the South, an area of preponderant Shi’ite presence, is esoteric bordering on the ridiculous.”
Yossi Alpher, former director of the Jaffe Center for Strategic Studies (now the Institute for National Security Studies), wrote: “Even in Israeli terms, he represents an attempt to subvert our good intentions and exploit us militarily so that we spill our blood for the Maronites. This ended very badly and he is a reminder of this.”
None of that was found in Phares’ arguments at the time. Precisely the opposite: the Lebanese-American scholar argued that Israeli forces should withdraw but surrender the area not to Hezbollah and Assad, but to local municipalities’ forces protected by the UN. In fact his plans then are the same as what is being discussed today for areas in Iraq and Syria.
Alpher continues: “His association with the Lebanese Forces is very problematic... He was a prominent ideologue indoctrinating people who went out and murdered people and he has never accounted for that.”
Alpher’s ignorance is abysmal. Walid Phares was never a combatant and never headed a Lebanese Forces military command.
He wrote books and articles and offered lectures. Sadly, Hezbollah propaganda has now been able to manipulate Israeli expertise.
Neither the young Phares nor any other Lebanese person at the time was responsible for Israel’s entanglement in Lebanon. Rather, the megalomania of some in the Israeli defense establishment, who thought they could establish a new order in Lebanon, were responsible for that imbroglio – members of the political wing of the Mossad, who did not recognize the Lebanese arena and acted unprofessionally.
The critical article also quotes anti-Israel Abed Ayoub, the national legal and policy director for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, libeling Phares: “If you look at his history, he was a warmonger and he shouldn’t be near the White House.
He was part of a militia that committed war crimes and, if anything, he should be tried for war crimes.”
Ayoub and his group are the ones who should answer for backing the murdering jihadists who really do commit war crimes, not an author of 14 books on pluralism and democracy.
There is an assertion that “Phares appeared to flirt with the idea that Israel could use nuclear weapons to deal with its threat from the North, but then ruled this out as a possibility.”
It quotes Phares as saying, “The only military strategic option remaining to the Jewish state in the medium and long term, if it is to maintain its balance of power with the northern threat, is obviously the nuclear deterrent. But Lebanese and Israelis alike know all too well the consequences of a blast anywhere in Lebanon....”
These were parts of conversations that anyone in the field of defense and military studies has had, but to use a discussion about Iran’s military advance in the region, select half a sentence and paint Phares as developing a nuclear doctrine is not just silly, but low.
No one knows the Arab world and Lebanon better than Phares. When he and others were part of conversations about establishing a so-called mini-entity alongside Israel, like the Kurds actually did in northern Iraq and in Syria, they wanted to express their belief at the time that minorities in the region could count on each other.
After he ended his patriotic efforts for his motherland and emigrated, these were ideas he advanced to resolve the conflict, not to create more tensions. He was proven right in every single prediction he made for America in his book Future Jihad and for the free world in his other books. His peak prescience came with his book The Coming Revolution where he predicted, in 2010, the forthcoming Arab Spring of 2011. Walid Phares, as American Jewish leader Sarah Stern wrote, has become a US “national treasure” and has been working hard for more than a quarter of a century to defend his adoptive homeland, the United States.
He was faithful to his ancestral home Lebanon, and he has been a loyal citizen to his adoptive land since he emigrated.
What concerns me in The Jerusalem Post piece is historical veracity. We cannot as Israelis rewrite the history of our northern neighbor to please the terrorist network that dominates it at this point in time. Phares is a public figure in the US with most of his adult life dedicated to public service. His work during his 20s in his ancestral homeland is to be praised, not condemned, and above all described accurately. For demonizing is a prelude to ostracizing and we in this country know exactly what that means.
It is unfortunate that a segment of our own academic and media elite has fallen for the games of Iranian and Islamist propagandists.
Most of those who were associated with smearing Phares have no real understanding of Lebanon’s history and politics, certainly not of the complexity of the issues. In my book Window to the Backyard, which was published in English in May 2016, I describe the establishment of relations between the State of Israel and the Christians in Southern Lebanon and the Phalangists and other groups in Beirut, and later the partnership between Israel and the South Lebanon Army.
I do so as the person that was in charge of the ties between our country and these communities.
What we know and what we saw are very different from the vapid and erroneous writing of critics and the comments they quoted. When it comes to history let’s be serious and not reproduce chimeric tales concocted by Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood in order to meddle in US politics.
**The author is a veteran Israeli intelligence officer and served as head of the Mossad’s operational branch in Beirut. He is the author of Window to the Backyard: The History of Israel-Lebanon Relations – Facts & Illusions.
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/In-praise-of-Professor-Walid-Phares-473912

Hezbollah to play lead role in new Syria regime force: report
Now Lebanon/November 29/16
As-Safir reported that top Hezbollah commanders will embed in the Fifth Corps, which is expected to include elite fighters form the Lebanese militant group.
Hezbollah and Syria flags. (image via SANA)
BEIRUT - Hezbollah will play a leading role overseeing a recently-formed corps set to serve as an auxiliary fighting force for the Syrian regime, according to a Lebanese daily supportive of Damascus.
As-Safir reported Monday that top Hezbollah commanders known for their “high leadership quality” will embed with the Fifth Corps, which was formed last week by the Syrian regime.
“It is expected that some Hezbollah military leaders will have a major role in leading some of the fighting groups that will join the Fifth Corps,” the pro-Assad Lebanese daily claimed.
It went on to say that “a new force of elite troops within Hezbollah” will either operate under the banner of the Fifth Corps or directly coordinate with the new unit, without going into further details on the matter.Officially dubbed a “storming force” by Syria’s army command, the Fifth Corps publicly stated mission is to “work alongside the Syrian army and allied troops” to “eradicate terrorism.”Syrian state media has broadcast calls for volunteers to join the new unit, prompting reports in some opposition outlets that the Fifth Corps is another regime attempt to bolster its fighting manpower. However, As-Safir’s report indicates that Damascus has far more ambitious plans for the Fifth Corps. “The Fifth Corps is not just a new force being added to the system of Syrian army forces and allied units, it is an important turning point for the ties between allied forces within the same axis,” the newspaper said, in reference to the wide array of militia units, including Hezbollah and other Iranian-backed Shiite units, that fight on behalf of the Bashar al-Assad regime. “The formation of the Fifth Corps… will [usher in] peak cooperation and coordination between the quarter of Syria, Iran, Russia and Hezbollah,” the report boasted. As-Safir added that the Fifth Corps could be the “nucleus” for a “Syrian National Mobilization,” a reference to the Iraqi Popular Mobilization Front umbrella front of militias given official sanction by the government.According to the newspaper, the Desert Falcons and Liwa al-Quds militias, two of the larger pro-regime forces in northwestern Syria, will spearhead the Fifth Corps, however the report did not specify where it will operate, saying only that it could “attract volunteers in particular from the east.”The formation of the Fifth Corps comes over a year after Russia helped create the Fourth Assault Corps, another auxiliary unit that As-Safir said offered valuable lessons for its successor force.
“Field trials and battles… revealed some errors and insufficient levels of coordination,” As-Safir said of the Fourth Assault Corps, which brought together fighters from the Syrian Social Nationalist Party and Baath Party’s militias in the Latakia province.
“All of these errors are subject to examination… which will be reflected in the entry of the Fifth Corps.”
NOW's English news desk editor Albin Szakola (@AlbinSzakola) wrote this report. Amin Nasr translated Arabic-language source material.
As-Safir published a report Monday on the role Hezbollah will play in the Syrian army's new Fifth Corps. (image via SANA). It is expected that some Hezbollah military leaders will have a major role in leading some of the fighting groups that will join the Fifth Corps.

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on on November 29-30/16
Brazil in Mourning as Plane Carrying Football Players Crashes in Colombia
Asharq Al Awsat/November 29/16/Brazil declared a mourning period after a charter plane carrying members of Brazilian soccer team Chapecoense and several journalists crashed in the mountains in Colombia late Monday, killing 76 people, officials said. According to the officials, five survived the disaster. The LAMIA airlines charter declared an emergency at around 10 pm local time” 0300 GMT Tuesday, reporting it had suffered “electrical failures,” and crashed a short time later near the city of Medellin, officials said. In all, there were 72 passengers and nine crew on board. “We were able to rescue six people alive but one of them died on the way to the hospital,” Jose Gerardo Acevedo, a police commander, told reporters. One of the survivors was Alan Ruschel, a 27-year-old defender for the Brazilian team, the head of Colombia’s civil aeronautics agency, Alfredo Bocanegra, told reporters. Chapecoense Real is a football club which was to have played in the Copa Sudamericana finals on Wednesday against Atletico Nacional of Colombia. Radio Caracol said two other players — Marcos Danilo Padilla and Jackson Follmann — also survived and were taken to area hospitals, along with a flight attendant and a journalist. The LAMIA airlines flight originated in Sao Paulo, Brazil and had made a stop in Santa Cruz, Bolivia before continuing on to Rionegro, a city near Medellin. The airport statement said the plane reported an emergency at 10 pm local time (0300 GMT). “It declared it had electrical failures.” It went down about 50 kilometers from Medellin, Colombia’s second largest city, in an area called Cerro Gordo. Elkin Ospina, the mayor of the town of La Ceja near the crash site, said the mountainous terrain was some 3,300 meters above sea level and very difficult to access. Rescuers carrying stretchers had to hike for more than half an hour to reach the site. Conmebol, the South American football confederation, meanwhile officially called off the Copa Sudamericana final. Brazil’s President Michel Temer expressed his grief for the victims of the crash and ordered a three-day mourning period. “I express my solidarity in this sad hour during which tragedy has beset dozens of Brazilian families,” Temer said in a statement, adding that Brazil’s Foreign Ministry and Air Force were working to assist the relatives. “The government will do all it can to alleviate the pain of the friends and family of sport and national journalism.”

Plane carrying Brazil soccer team crashes in Colombia, 76 dead
Reuters, Bogota Tuesday, 29 November 2016/Brazilian soccer team Chapecoense, heading for the biggest game in their history, were on board a plane carrying 81 people that crashed in Colombia killing 76 people, police said on Tuesday. Chapecoense, from Brazil’s top league, had been flying to face Atletico Nacional of Medellin in the first leg of Wednesday’s Sudamericana final, South America’s equivalent of the Europa League. It was the first time the small club from Chapeco had reached the final of a major South American club competition. Three players were among the survivors, Colombian disaster authorities said. “Six people were rescued alive, but unfortunately one died. The rest of the occupants unfortunately died. The tragic toll is 76 victims,” Jose Gerardo Acevedo, regional police commander, told journalists. The plane crashed in a mountainous rural area outside of the city of Medellin and heavy rains at one point halted rescue operations. News showed photos of twisted wreckage and hospital staff awaiting patients. The club said in a statement that it would not be making any official comments until it had more information from Colombian authorities about Monday night’s crash. Flight tracking service Flightradar24 said on Twitter the last tracking signal from flight 2933 had been received when it was at 15,500 feet, about 30 km from its destination, which sits at an altitude of 7,000 feet. The Avro RJ85 was produced by a company that is now part of UK’s BAE Systems . The charter flight was carrying 72 passengers and nine crew, when it crashed around 10:15 p.m. on Monday. Heavy rain first hampered and then halted rescue operations. Officials told local media that bodies would be removed at first light.Brazilian news organizations reported 21 journalists had been on board to cover the match.
Tributes
The crash evoked memories of Munich air disaster in 1958, which killed 23 people including eight Manchester United players, journalists and travelling officials. Players Alan Luciano Ruschel, Marcos Danilo Padilha and Jacson Ragnar Follmann were listed as survivors in a statement from the disaster management agency. Chapecoense qualified for the biggest game in their history after overcoming Argentine club San Lorenzo in the semi-final on away goals following a 1-1 draw in Buenos Aires and a 0-0 draw at home. They were very much the underdogs for the match against a club going for a rare double after winning the Copa Libertadores in July. Chapecoense were the 21st biggest club in Brazil in terms of revenue, bringing in 46 million reais ($13.5 million) in 2015, according to an annual rich list compiled by Brazilian bank Itau BBA.
The club has built its success on a frugal spending policy that eschewed big money signings and instead concentrated on blending young talent and experienced journeymen. Their best-known player was Cleber Santana, a midfielder who best years were spent in Spain with Athletico Madrid and Mallorca. Coach Caio Junior was also experienced, having managed at some of Brazil’s biggest clubs, Botafogo, Flamengo and Palmeiras among them . The crash prompted an outpouring of solidarity and grief on social media from the footballing community, with Brazilian top flight teams Flamengo and Santo tweeting messages of support.Porto goalkeeper Iker Casillas tweeted: “My condolences for the plane accident that carried @ChapecoenseReal. Tough moment for football.

Iranian vessel points weapon at U.S. helicopter: officials
Reuters/Nov 29, 2016 /A small Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard vessel pointed its weapon at a U.S. military helicopter in the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday, two U.S. defense officials told Reuters on Monday, an action they described as "unsafe and unprofessional." The incident is the latest in a series of similar actions by Iranian vessels this year, but the first reported since Republican Donald Trump won the U.S. presidential election on Nov. 8. During his campaign, Trump vowed that any Iranian vessel that harassed the U.S. Navy in the Gulf would be "shot out of the water," if he was elected. Trump is due to take office on Jan. 20. There was no immediate Iranian comment on the incident. Trump's transition team did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the incident took place when a Navy MH-60 helicopter flew within half a mile (0.8 km) of two Iranian vessels in international waters. One of the vessels pointed a weapon at the helicopter, the U.S. officials said. "The behavior by our standards is provocative and could be seen as an escalation," the officials said. At no point did the crew of the helicopter feel threatened, they added. It was not immediately clear what type of weapon was pointed at the U.S. aircraft. Years of mutual animosity eased when Washington lifted sanctions on Tehran in January after a deal to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions. But serious differences still remain over Iran’s ballistic missile program, and over conflicts in Syria and Iraq. In September, a U.S. Navy coastal patrol ship changed course after an Iranian fast-attack craft came within 100 yards (91 meters) of it. "When they circle our beautiful destroyers with their little boats and they make gestures at our people that they shouldn't be allowed to make, they will be shot out of the water," Trump said at the time. (Reporting by Idrees Ali; Additional reporting by Steve Holland; Editing by Bill Rigby and Jonathan Oatis)

U.N. Security Council to Hold Meeting on Aleppo Crisis
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/November 29/16/The U.N. Security Council will hold an emergency meeting Tuesday or Wednesday on the dire humanitarian crisis unfolding in Aleppo, diplomats said. France's U.N. ambassador Francois Delattre said Tuesday that Paris is working with the government of Senegal, which currently holds the rotating presidency of the council, to convene the meeting on providing relief to the besieged Syrian city. "We hope we'll be able to schedule it by tomorrow," Delattre told reporters. "France and its partners cannot remain silent in the face of what could be the biggest massacre of civilian population since World War II," the French diplomat added. "We need to find a way to get the humanitarian aid to the population."France called for an immediate U.N. Security Council session amid fighting that has seen the Syrian army capture a third of opposition-controlled east Aleppo in recent days. Britain's ambassador to the United Nations, Matthew Rycroft, voiced support for the emergency meeting. He said the council would discuss plans for the U.N. to deliver much-needed food and medicine into Aleppo and evacuate the sick and wounded. "Russia complained that the opposition had not agreed to this plan. Now they have, so I call on Russia to make sure the Syrian regime agrees," Rycroft said. "The future of Aleppo is in the hands of the regime and Russia, and we urge the regime and Russia to stop the bombing and let the aid go through." Diplomats hope to finally address the need for desperately needed assistance to the city, which is besieged by a government offensive trying to recapture parts of it held by rebels. Fighting has prompted an exodus of terrified civilians, many fleeing empty-handed into remaining rebel-held territory, or crossing into government-controlled western Aleppo or Kurdish districts. The U.N. has said nearly 16,000 people have fled the assault and more could follow.

Syrian rebels battle Assad forces in Aleppo

Reuters, Beirut Tuesday, 29 November 2016/Syrian rebels were fighting pro-government militias on the southeastern edge of east Aleppo’s opposition-held enclave on Tuesday, a rebel official said, as Damascus and its allies try to build on major gains in the city in recent days. Russia said on Tuesday that the Syrian army's breakthrough in Aleppo had dramatically altered the situation on the ground, allowing more than 80,000 civilians to access humanitarian aid after years of being used by militants as human shields. A major assault by government forces backed by allied militia has driven rebels from the northern part of their eastern Aleppo enclave and they now hold only two thirds of the area they had held for years in the city. “There are no new advances (by government forces) but the bombardment and battles are still fierce, particularly in Aziza,” an official in the Jabha Shamiya rebel group told Reuters. The official said there was a large mobilization of pro-government militias in the area on Monday night.
Jabha Shamiya is one of the main rebel groups in Aleppo.
Up to 16,000 displaced
Up to 16,000 people have been displaced in Syria’s Aleppo by intense attacks on the rebel-held eastern part of the city, the United Nations humanitarian chief and relief coordinator Stephen O’Brien said on Tuesday, citing initial reports.
The area had no functioning hospitals left, food stocks were nearly exhausted and it was likely that thousands more people would flee their homes if fighting persisted in the coming days, he said in an emailed statement. “The situation is very bad. There’s intense fear of collective annihilation,” said a medic who lives in the area and gave his name as Abu al-Abbas. “This week I’ve changed locations three times,” he added, speaking on Monday using a social networking site. “In the shelter, we had dead people who we couldn’t take out because the bombardment was so intense.”The Syrian army and its allies made a sweeping advance across the northern part of besieged eastern Aleppo on Sunday night and Monday as rebels pulled back to a more defensible front line after losing control of a key district.
Aleppo has become the most pressing battle in Syria’s war, pitting President Bashar al-Assad, backed by Russia, Iran and Shi’ite militias, against mostly Sunni rebel groups including some supported by the United States, Turkey and Gulf monarchies. Conditions in its rebel-held eastern districts were already difficult after the army and its allies managed to impose a siege over the summer, followed by heavy bombardments using artillery, warplanes and helicopters dropping barrel bombs. However, the fighting has escalated after the army began a new offensive last week, bringing more eastern Aleppo districts close to the front line as rescue and ambulance workers say their vehicles and equipment are running out of fuel. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based war monitor, said warplanes pounded eastern Aleppo districts overnight, killing at least 18 people, including 12 in al-Shaar district near the new front line. Syrian state news agency SANA said on Monday that rebel shelling had killed seven people in government-held districts of the city.

Rebels’ hold on eastern Aleppo collapses as troops move in
The Associated Press Beirut Tuesday, 29 November 2016/Syrian government forces captured more than a third of opposition-held eastern Aleppo on Monday, touching off a wave of panic and flight from the besieged enclave as rebel defenses in the country’s largest city rapidly collapsed. The dramatic gains marked an inflection point in Syria’s nearly 6-year-old conflict, threatening to dislodge armed opponents of President Bashar Assad from their last major urban stronghold. Reclaiming all of Aleppo, Syria’s former commercial capital, would be the biggest prize of the war for Assad. It would put his forces in control of the country’s four largest cities as well as the coastal region, and cap a year of steady government advances. It also would bolster his position and momentum just as a new US administration is taking hold, freeing thousands of his troops and allied militiamen to move on to other battles around the country. Charles Lister, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Middle East Institute, said the opposition’s losses in Aleppo are the biggest since 2012.
“Aleppo city itself has also been a consistent base of moderate opposition activity, so its collapse spells what could be an existential blow to the moderate opposition from which it’ll likely struggle to recover,” he said. Ever since it joined the uprising four years ago, eastern Aleppo tried to make itself a model for a Syria without Assad. It elected local leaders, ran its own education system and built an economy trading with the rebel-held countryside and neighboring Turkey. Its residents kept life going amid ferocious fighting with the pro-government western districts, but four years of battles and airstrikes have reduced entire blocks in the territory to rubble. Helped by massive Russian air power and thousands of Iranian-backed Shiite militia fighters from Lebanon, Iraq and Iran, Assad renewed his push for Aleppo this month. The besieged eastern districts came under intense airstrikes that killed hundreds in the past two weeks. More than 250,000 people are believed trapped there with limited access to food, water and medical supplies. They include more than 100,000 children, the UN says. “It is stinging cold, food is scarce and people are shaken in the streets,” Mohammad Zein Khandaqani, a member of the Medical Council in Aleppo, told The Associated Press in a text message from eastern Aleppo. Some are taking refuge in mosques while others moved to homes of displaced people in safer areas, he added.

Woman loses unborn baby in Aleppo bombing
Monday, 28 November 2016/A pregnant mother in eastern Aleppo was rushed to the hospital after an airstrike struck the building she lived in, killing her unborn baby. The woman who was several weeks into her pregnancy was taken to the hospital with injuries as a result of the attack. Dr Farida, a doctor who performed an operation on the mother told Al Arabiya English: “The woman came to the hospital with a wound from her thigh to her abdomen penetrating her uterus. She said that in addition to the heavy bleeding, the woman was also in severe shock. Doctors removed the mutilated remains of the fetus from the woman’s womb. The woman remains in hospital. The head of the hospital told Al Arabiya English the woman is now in a stable condition. He said the operation took about 90 minutes.

Errors led to coalition strike on Syria forces: Pentagon
AFP, Washington Tuesday, 29 November 2016/The Pentagon said Tuesday that intelligence errors resulted in a US-led coalition air strike in Syria in September that reportedly killed around 90 Syrian government forces. There were "errors in the development of intelligence, as well as missed opportunities for coalition members on duty to recognize and voice contrary evidence to decision-makers," the US military's Central Command said in a statement following a six-week probe into the September 17 attack near Deir Azzor.
The US-led coalition is focused on attacking the ISIS group in Syria and Iraq and does not want to get involved in Syria's brutal civil war. Australian, Danish, British and American planes all took part in the air strike, which the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group has said killed at least 90 regime troops. The Pentagon said it had only been able to conclusively count 15 deaths, but acknowledged the toll was possibly much higher. "In this incident, we made an unintentional, regrettable error primarily based on human factors in several areas in the targeting process," Brigadier General Richard Coe, who investigated the case, told reporters. Key among these mistakes was an early misidentification of a Syrian vehicle as belonging to ISIS militants, which colored subsequent intel assessments.
Further complicating matters, the troops were not wearing recognizable military uniforms or carrying identifying flags, the Pentagon said. Perhaps most significantly, a critical miscommunication occurred when Russian forces called the coalition to tell them the strike was hitting Syrian regime troops. That call, which came in on a special hotline between the coalition and Russians, was subject to a 27-minute delay because the officer with whom the Russians normally spoke was not immediately available. During that window, almost half of the 32 separate strikes making up the larger assault occurred. As soon as the Russians were able to speak to their regular point of contact, the strike was called off. No coalition forces are being charged in the incident. "In my opinion, these were a number of people all doing their best to do a good job," Coe said. "The decision to strike these targets was made in accordance with the law of armed conflict and the applicable rules of engagement."
The strike was conducted by F-16 and FA-18 fighters, A-10 ground-attack craft and drones.

Iraqi forces liberate ISIS-held Nineveh Plain
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Tuesday, 29 November 2016/The “We Are Coming, Nineveh” Operation said on Monday that it liberated the Nineveh Plain area from ISIS. Lt. Gen. Abdul-Amir Yar Allah, commander of the operations of the Mosul battle which was launched on October 17, said security forces will resume their operations until they purge all of Mosul from ISIS.In the east front, commanders in the counter-terrorism force said the countdown to restore the left coast from ISIS has begun. This comes after the counter-terrorism force liberated 20 neighborhoods from the east coast. Lt. Gen. Abdul-Ghani al-Assadi, commander of the counter-terrorism force in east Mosul, said the people’s cooperation helped them restore most of these neighborhoods. Meanwhile, the Iraq army announced killing 54 ISIS members in shelling that targeted the organization’s posts in south of Mosul. The US-led coalition also destroyed four booby-trapped cars for ISIS in east Mosul.
Mosul’s poor struggling to get food
Meanwhile, the United Nations said on Tuesday there were indications that poorer families in Mosul are struggling to feed themselves as food prices increase.
“Key informants are telling us that poor families are struggling to put sufficient food on their tables,” UN Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq, Lise Grande, told Reuters. “This is very worrying.”Iraqi government and Kurdish forces surround the city from the north, east and south, while Popular Mobilization forces - a coalition of Iranian-backed Shiite groups - are trying to close in from the west. Last week the Popular Mobilization forces cut off the supply route to Mosul from ISIS-held territory in Syria. “In a worst case, we envision that families who are already in trouble in Mosul will find themselves in even more acute need.” Grande said. “The longer it takes to liberate Mosul, the harder conditions become for families.” ISIS kills civilians who don’t cooperate. ISIS militants in the Iraqi city of Mosul have killed civilians who refuse to allow rockets and snipers to be sited in their houses or whom they suspect of leaking information or trying to flee, a UN human rights spokeswoman said on Tuesday. “On Nov. 11, ISIL reportedly shot and killed 12 civilians in Bakir neighborhood of eastern Mosul city for allegedly refusing to let it install rockets on the rooftops of their houses,” Ravina Shamdasani told a regular UN briefing. Information received by the UN also showed that militants publicly shot to death 27 civilians in Muhandiseen Park in northern Mosul on Nov. 25, and on Nov. 22 an ISIS sniper killed a seven-year-old running towards the Iraqi Security Forces in Adan neighborhood in eastern Mosul. (With Reuters)

Ali Khamenei criticizes Rowhani: We rushed in the nuclear deal
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Tuesday, 29 November 2016/Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei criticized the opening-up policy pursued by the president, Hassan Rowhani, about the nuclear file stating that: “The west side is not committed to this agreement, while some Iranian officials rushed to sign it.”According to Tasnim news agency; during a meeting with the Iranian Army Navy leaders on Sunday, Khamenei commented on the decision of the US House of Representatives to extend the sanctions for ten other years on Iran, saying that “despite the negotiations on the lifting of sanctions, the US Congress has chosen to extend it, under the pretext that is only a continuation of the previous ban and not a new one.” He added: “There is no difference between imposing a new ban or resuming one that has lapsed, the second is an explicit negation of what has been agreed upon previously by the Americans.”In the light of the recent decision of the United States to extend the sanctions against Iran, the Iranian leader has threatened to retaliate, saying that their decision is a violation of the nuclear deal. The House of Representatives approved on the 15th of November, with a majority of 419 votes all in favor of extending the sanctions on Iran for ten other years, because of its continuous support of terrorism and violation of UN resolutions by developing and testing ballistic missiles. The Republicans who now dominate both houses of the Congress confirm that the President-elect Donald Trump and his upcoming office will be firm and sturdy towards the Iranian regime. Republicans assert that the president-elect Donald Trump plans to amend the nuclear deal with Iran, in line with the spirit of the agreement which prevents Tehran from producing nuclear weapons, and deter its intervention in regional policy which will hinder its support for terrorism. *This article can be viewed in Arabic on AlArabiya.net

Dutch parliament votes to ban burqas, niqabs in some public places
Reuters, Amsterdam Tuesday, 29 November 2016/The Dutch Parliament’s lower house voted on Tuesday to ban the wearing of face-covering clothes - such as burqas and niqabs - in some public places, making the Netherlands the latest European country to restrict garments worn by some Muslim women. The legislation, which still needs to be passed by the senate, bans the veils in settings where identifying the wearer is considered essential, such as in government buildings, on public transport, at schools and in hospitals. Few women in the Netherlands wear such clothes, but the issue has been high on the agenda for years, with an outright ban one of the main demands of the anti-Islam opposition Freedom Party, which is leading in polls ahead of elections in March.

A prominent Egyptian rights leader banned from travel
The Associated Press, Cairo Tuesday, 29 November 2016/A prominent rights advocate has been banned from leaving Egypt, the latest in a series of travel bans imposed on rights leaders. Abdel-Hafez Tayel, the head of the Egyptian Center for the Right to Education, said on Tuesday that he was heading to Kuwait to attend an international conference on education late Monday when airport authorities held him for several hours before ordering him to head home. He was banned based on an ongoing investigation into allegations he illegally received foreign funds, a case that involved Egypt’s top rights groups. Authorities ordered a freeze to his assets pending an investigation. The investigation comes at a time the Egyptian parliament is expected to pass a new law that puts heavy restrictions on non-governmental organizations.

Trump: ‘Very impressed’ with Petraeus as he weighs top diplomat job
Reuters, New York Tuesday, 29 November 2016/President-elect Donald Trump stepped up his search on Monday for a new US secretary of state, with the focus on David Petraeus, a former US military commander in Iraq whose mishandling of classified information led to his resignation as CIA chief in 2012. “Just met with General Petraeus--was very impressed!” Trump said on Twitter shortly after Petraeus, a retired general, left an hour-long meeting with the Republican winner of the Nov. 8 election at Trump Tower in Manhattan. Trump’s consideration of Petraeus, who has also been mentioned as a contender for the top job at the Pentagon - adds a new layer of drama to his unusually public deliberations over the top diplomatic job for his administration. Petraeus, who led international forces in both Iraq and Afghanistan, was sentenced to two years’ probation and fined $100,000 last year for the unauthorized removal and retention of classified information. He admitted sharing classified information with his biographer, with whom he was having an affair. The scandal forced Petraeus to resign from the CIA in 2012. Petraeus said after meeting Trump that the New York businessman “basically walked us around the world” in their discussion. “He showed a great grasp of the variety of challenges that are out there and some of the opportunities as well,” Petraeus told reporters. Trump, who takes office on Jan. 20, plans to hold talks with Mitt Romney on Tuesday in his second recent meeting with the 2012 Republican presidential nominee. A Republican source close to the transition team said it had appeared late last week that Trump was leaning toward choosing Romney as his secretary of state but that the appearance of Petraeus at Trump Tower suggested the president-elect was still undecided and casting a wider net for the position. US Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani are also in the mix for the job of America’s top diplomat, Trump aides say. Frances Townsend, a national security aide during the administration of Republican President George W. Bush, also met Trump on Monday.
Petraeus troubles
Petraeus’ past mishandling of classified documents is unlikely to be an obstacle to Trump offering him a top government post, said a source who has advised the transition team on national security. That is despite Trump harshly criticizing Democratic rival Hillary Clinton during the election campaign for using a private email server while she was secretary of state. Trump often compared the prosecution of Petraeus with the lack of legal action against Clinton, who was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation but never charged with any offense. “Just based on his public statements, I think (Trump) sees Petraeus as a good man who made a mistake, who did a fraction of what other people have done and received a lot more punishment,” said a source who has advised the transition team on national security.

Gulf states denounce Houthis forming cabinet
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Tuesday, 29 November 2016/The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) on Tuesday has denounced Iran-backed Houthi militias forming a government in Yemen led by Abdulaziz bin Habtour in what’s been viewed as a provocative move. GCC’s Secretary General Abdulatif Al-Zayani said the Gulf states completely reject this step. Zayani said this shows that the Houthis are not serious to enter any political talks, and are complicating UN’s envoy attempt to end conflict in Yemen. The cabinet consists of 42 ministerial portfolios that were equally distributed between the Houthis and supporters of deposed president Ali Abdullah Saleh. The ministries of defense, interior and foreign affairs were assigned to supporters of Saleh while the finance, civil service, planning, international cooperation, education, information, justice and legal affairs were assigned to Houthi militias. This comes as United Nations Special Envoy for Yemen Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed resumes his efforts to find a solution for the crisis and after Kuwait welcomed receiving the legitimate government’s and rebels’ delegations to sign a peace deal.

1,400 saved in med as Italy sees record migrant arrivals
AFP, Rome, Italy Tuesday, 29 November 2016/Rescuers saved some 1,400 migrants off the coast of Libya on Monday as Italy announced a record number of people arriving this year after crossing the Mediterranean, authorities said. “It was a very difficult day but thanks to the work of the units that helped out, all of the migrants were rescued,” a spokesman for the Italian coast guard, which coordinates the operations, told AFP. The unseaworthy condition of the migrant boats and the sheer number of people packed onto them make the journey dangerous even in summer, but colder months add increased risk of hypothermia and rough seas. Italian, Irish and charity group ships, along with commercial vessels, helped rescue the migrants from 11 inflatable dinghies and two small boats. Authorities in Italy said Monday they had recorded a record number of arrivals by sea this year, with one month still to go in 2016. Over 171,000 migrants have arrived, which beats the previous annual record of 170,100 from 2014. The tally does not include Monday’s rescues. The vast majority of the migrants landing in Italy come from Africa and begin their sea crossings from Libya, typically paying traffickers several hundred dollars for the journey. With Italy’s neighbors having tightened their borders, the numbers being housed in reception facilities across the country have risen to an unprecedented total of over 176,000, prompting howls of protest from some local authorities. Many migrants arrive in Italy with the intention of travelling north, often to try and rejoin relatives, with Germany and Sweden among the popular destinations.
At least 4,690 migrants are confirmed to have died or disappeared in the Mediterranean so far this year, according to counts by the International Organization for Migration and the UN refugee agency.

Safa Al Hashem: Kuwait’s lone women’s voice in parliament
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Tuesday, 29 November 2016/Fourteen women put their names forth and campaigned for Kuwaitis to elect them into the upcoming parliament, but only woman – Safa Al Hashem – prevailed. She came fifth in the third electoral district with 3,273 votes. By winning her seat, Al Hashem became the ninth woman to be elected to Kuwait’s National Assembly since women gained the right to vote and run in national elections in 2005. Al Hashem, a former Member of Parliament herself, made history in this election by becoming the first woman to win in three parliamentary elections, two of them consecutively. Born in 1964, the lone female MP holds degrees in English literature and in business administration. She is also a successful businesswoman, founding and managing of Advantage Consulting Company (ACC), a Kuwait-based company that provides management and business advisory services.She received the Female CEO of the Year award at the CEO Middle East Awards 2007 in Dubai. Al Hashem has one of the strongest following for a Kuwaiti politician on social media, amassing more than 300,000 followers on Twitter alone.
 
Abbas Re-Elected Party Leader as Fatah Opens Rare Congress
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/November 29/16/Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah re-elected him party head Tuesday as the movement opened its first congress since 2009 with talk mounting of who will eventually succeed the 81-year-old. Abbas was re-elected by consensus, party spokesman Mahmoud Abu al-Hija said, and was due to address the congress at 6:00 pm (1600 GMT). Some 1,400 delegates were attending. The election of members of Fatah's parliament and its central committee over the five-day conference will signal the direction the oldest Palestinian party will take at a time when Abbas is weakened by his own unpopularity and internal dissent. While the aging leader has said he has no intention of stepping aside anytime soon, talk of who will eventually succeed him as Palestinian president has intensified. He has not publicly designated a successor. Some analysts see the congress as an attempt by Abbas to marginalize political opponents, including longtime rival Mohammed Dahlan, currently in exile in the United Arab Emirates. Observers have seen the reduced number of officials to vote -- down from more than 2,000 in 2009 -- as part of a move to exclude Dahlan supporters. Dimitri Diliani, elected to Fatah's revolutionary council, or parliament, in 2009, said he was not invited to the congress like dozens of others because "we bring a different voice."He said a press conference set for a refugee camp near Ramallah on Tuesday with those recently dismissed from the party had been called off after threats "from the security services," including death threats. Jibril Rajoub, a former intelligence chief, current head of the Palestinian Football Association and Fatah central committee member, acknowledged "opponents and dissidents" had not been invited, but said "the priority is to hold the congress." Rajoub also said the gathering will provide an opportunity to update the party's structures. "The system from the 1960s no longer works in 2016," he told AFP. "We have to take into account the current circumstances. The current system was created when we were in the diaspora and we are now on national soil. It was put in place at a revolutionary stage. Now we have a state."Saeb Erekat, Palestine Liberation Organization secretary general and Fatah central committee member, said the congress will allow the party to "choose leaders for the next stage."
Stalled peace efforts
But the congress also comes at a difficult time for the push to create a Palestinian state, with the cause overshadowed by other crises in the region. The incoming Donald Trump administration in the United States has signaled its policies will be far more favorable to Israel. Peace efforts have been at a standstill since a U.S.-led initiative collapsed in April 2014. Israel is concerned that U.S. President Barack Obama may take action related to the conflict before he leaves office in January, but his intentions remain unclear.
In an op-ed published in the New York Times on Tuesday, former U.S. president Jimmy Carter called on Obama to recognize a Palestinian state before his term is up. The congress also comes with Fatah and its Islamist rival Hamas, in power in the Gaza Strip, still deeply divided. Fatah dominates the Palestinian Authority, which runs the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Israel has prevented dozens of Fatah members in Gaza, which is under an Israeli blockade, from attending the conference, said party spokesman Mahmud Abu al-Hija.
Israeli authorities did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Israel controls all borders of the Palestinian territories apart from the Gaza-Egypt frontier. Abu al-Hija, the Fatah spokesman, said an objective of the congress is to determine how to act in the face of stalled peace negotiations. Peace initiatives being promoted by France and Arab nations will be discussed, as will the possibility of a U.N. Security Council resolution against Israeli settlement building in the West Bank. Fatah is the main component of the PLO, created in 1964 in Jerusalem, which brought together the main Palestinian nationalist movements of that time.

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on November 29-30/16
What would the fall of Aleppo mean?
 Alex Rowell/Now Lebanon/November 29/16
 While undoubtedly a symbolic blow, the fall of rebel-held Aleppo may not change much militarily at the nationwide level
 Syrian pro-regime forces stand on top of a building overlooking Aleppo in the city
 The stunning loss by rebels of 40% of the territory they held in Syria’s largest city in a matter of mere hours over the weekend has understandably dropped jaws around the world, and raised the inevitable question as to whether the armed rebellion is now on its last legs, not only in Aleppo, but nationwide.
 That Aleppo’s remaining rebel-held neighborhoods will also fall soon is widely seen as a foregone conclusion, given the torrential bombardment showered upon them by the combined air forces of the regime and Russia, in conjunction with the suffocating ‘starve-or-surrender’ siege imposed at ground level by the regime and Iranian-backed allies like Hezbollah.
 In fact, the rebel districts south of the Airport Road, which marks the new frontline, may be trickier to take, both because rebel defenses are stronger, and because they include the historic Old Town, whose priceless heritage even a regime as cold-blooded as Assad’s may be reluctant to obliterate. Nonetheless, with the rebels’ foreign backers evidently willing to tolerate the city’s loss – Turkey, most conspicuously, is pressing ahead with its Al-Bab campaign as though nothing of note is happening anywhere else in the area – a deal sooner or later to evacuate the city’s fighters to Idlib seems overwhelmingly probable.
 Morale-crushing as that moment would undoubtedly be for the rebels, it’s unclear how much it would change militarily at the countrywide level. To see why, first recall that Syria’s rebels number around 150,000, according to the analyst Charles Lister’s book, The Syrian Jihad. To put that in context, the total number of fighters in eastern Aleppo was estimated by the UN last month at 8,000, or about 5% of the total. A quick glance at a map shows that the other 142,000 fighters are geographically spread throughout the country, holding almost all of Idlib Province as well as sizeable chunks of the provinces of Aleppo, Quneitra, and Daraa, with smaller enclaves in the environs of Damascus, Homs, Hama, and Latakia. Indeed, as Lister documented in a recent 40-page report on Syria’s rebels, as of September 2016 there were more than 80 CIA-vetted rebel brigades still actively fighting the regime, in coordination with Turkey- and Jordan-based command centers, across Aleppo, Damascus, Deraa, Hama, Homs, Idlib, Latakia, Qalamoun, and Quneitra Provinces. Of the 80, only 13 (or 16%) operated exclusively in Aleppo Province.
 The fight, in other words, will carry on. And while the rebels’ regional allies may have conceded Aleppo City, that’s by no means the same as them conceding the war overall. “[Our] support is going to continue, we are not going to stop it. It doesn’t mean that if Aleppo falls we will give up on the demands of the Syrian people,” said Qatar’s Foreign Minister Sheikh Muhammad bin Abdulrahman al-Thani in an interview with Reuters Saturday. Turkey, more pointedly, resumed airstrikes around the Islamic State-held town of Al-Bab last week, in the latest phase of its ‘Euphrates Shield’ intervention in northern Syria that’s now in its fourth month. Turkey’s President Erdoğan has said several times the eventual goal of ‘Euphrates Shield’ is to remove both ISIS and Kurdish militants from a 5,000 sq. km. buffer zone extending west from the Euphrates along the Turkish border to the outskirts of the Kurdish district of Afrin – a plan that has seen Turkey enlist the help of thousands of local rebels, who presumably are intended to govern the area once the Turkish jets and tanks return home. Similarly, if and when ISIS’ Syrian capital of Raqqa gets liberated from the jihadists, one can be certain Ankara and Doha, among many other capitals, will be insisting that Syria’s non-jihadist rebels take the reins in their stead.
Which is not, of course, to say the situation is rosy for the opposition. With Aleppo wrapped up, the regime and its friends would be able to start squeezing the rebels’ Idlib stronghold from Aleppo in the east, Latakia in the west, and Hama in the south; a move that could eventually escalate into a full-blown siege. Even if it doesn’t, the total terrain held by the opposition would suffice to keep the rebellion alive, but surely not to topple the regime.
But then, that’s already where things stood before the loss of the first eastern Aleppo neighborhood on Saturday. The rebels’ misfortunes have been steadily compounding for years – from the Russian intervention in 2015, to Obama’s abandonment of the chemical weapons ‘red line’ in 2013, to Washington’s refusal to provide the opposition arms when it would have made the most difference, in 2012. Symbolic as the fall of Aleppo – if it happens – would be, for most Syrians on all sides of the conflict the next day would still very much be business as usual.

Iran’s Project – Becoming a Big Naval Police Force
Abdulrahman Al-Rashed/Asharq Al Awsat/November 29/16
After having fought multiple wars in Iraq and Syria directly, and ones in Yemen and Lebanon indirectly, it seems that the Iranian leadership has discovered the magic of military influence and its importance in imposing its foreign policy, both regionally and internationally. This is what has been indicated by recent statements made by Iranian officials. The most recent of these statements was made by the Chief of Staff for the Armed Forces of Iran Mohammad Bagheri.
He said: “We have relinquished our nuclear power and we are making up for this by building a naval power that will give us greater value. We will have a military fleet in the Sea of Oman and another in the Indian Ocean, and we will build naval bases on coasts or islands in Yemen and Syria. We will also develop our military intelligence capabilities through drones in our naval extensions”.
Although I do not believe that Iran possesses the military power for such a costly expansion, it is clear that Iran has taken two strategic decisions; to increase its foreign military capability and revive the Shah’s old dream to be the police force of the Gulf. Currently, Iran wants to become the police force of the area from the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean Sea. This orientation will create more tension in our already troubled region and lead to parties resorting to using military power as a political tool.
The Iranian Chief of Staff’s statement does not correlate with his justification that the objective of the military naval project is to combat piracy in these seas because Iran’s maritime trade is very limited compared to other countries such as India, the Gulf, Egypt and other countries that use these naval corridors outside Gulf waters.
In addition to this, piracy does not exist in the Sea of Oman and in the Mediterranean. Whether this statement is intended to intimidate or reflect the new strategy that Iran is pursuing as an alternative to the nuclear project after it bowed to western pressure and abandoned it in exchange for the lifting of sanctions, the new Iranian way of thinking which followed the signing of the nuclear deal revolves around military superiority and not the opening up of the economy like the American administration thought. This is what the administration marketed when it listed the benefits of the nuclear deal.
Talk of an Iranian military base in the Mediterranean is an exaggeration and I rule out that European powers will allow such a presence in their waters, particularly the presence of a state whose activities they are suspicious of. I would also imagine that Israel would not allow this, and it recently sent back an Iranian ship loaded with Iranian weapons that tried to pass through Bab Al-Mandab. The Israeli navy has also pursued Iranian ships heading to Sudan in the past and bombed one of them.
In the case that Iran succeeded in re-establishing Bashar Al-Assad’s regime in Syria, it will no longer need to build military naval bases there because it would then be in control of the regime in Damascus as part of an alliance which will not be easy for Assad to get rid of.
Although Iran gave two reasons for its involvement in the war in Syria; to protect Shiite shrines and repay the Assad regime for standing by it in the war against Iraq in the eighties, these two reasons are not convincing in the calculations of political relations. Tehran considers controlling Syria a necessity to control Iraq so that it can secure its presence, influence and interests in this strategic Arab country.
Iran’s wide – ranging military operations in Iraq and Syria confirm that fighting wars has become Iran’s new policy and that strengthening its military capabilities is a key pillar of its foreign policy. Since breaking free from the western siege, becoming capable of taking part in international trade and using the dollar, Iran has been trying to become a dominating power by expanding geographically, on land and by sea. This may mean that we are facing a decade of a regional arms race and more military adventures in the region.

The ‘New World Dis-Order’
Eyad Abu Shakra/Asharq Al Awsat/November 29/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/29/eyad-abu-shakraasharq-al-awsat-the-new-world-dis-order/

Rumors were rife during the past few days about Moscow’s attempts to influence the outcome of the forthcoming German elections.
Marine LePen, the leader of France’s extremist anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant ‘National Front’ was ecstatic in commenting that now, following the UK’s exit from the European Union and Donald Trump’s victory in America, her ‘alt-Right’ lot are on their way up.
True to form, Bernard-Henri Levy, widely regarded in the Arab world as the ‘Arab Spring philosopher’ expressed his belief that given recent developments in Europe and globally, there was now a good chance that Ms LePen would win the French presidential race!
Contrary to many self-proclaimed ‘Leftists’ and ‘Revolutionaries’, Russia’s Vladimir Putin is a right-wing nationalist who has nothing to do with Soviet legacy except his links with the KGB (the salient symbol of the USSR’s police state) and Moscow’s everlasting ‘Superpower’ ambitions. The latter simply metamorphosed in tactics but not in substance from ‘Tzarist Imperialism’ to the Bolsheviks’ ‘International Scientific Socialism’ and ‘Anti-Colonial Emancipation’.
Technically, Putin is a 2016 model ‘Tzar’! He is a KGB-trained and German-fluent ‘Tzar’ who completed his apprenticeship in the German theatre of intelligence operations; and like many of his generation, is a firm believer that Germany is the source of existential threat to Russia from the west. He also knows that Germany is the pulsating ‘heart’ of Europe, its most populous nation, and the cradle of its notion of ‘unity’. Thus, disrupting Germany from within, after achieving a similar goal in the USA through his unreserved support of Trump’s campaign, will go a long way in strengthening his ‘escape forward’ strategy, which includes exporting Russia’s severe domestic economic, demographic and social problems.
However, what is noteworthy today too is that Putin’s disruptive – indeed, destructive – attempts are not limited to the USA and Germany, but extend to various parts of Europe, including France, where the countdown of its own presidential elections has started.
As for the Muslim world, there isn’t much to say actually, in the light of Russia’s direct involvement, with American acquiescence. Moscow is currently a ‘partner’ with Barack Obama’s administration, and is expected to be even closer to the future Trump administration, in the global fight against Sunni political Islam.
Therefore, Putin’s attempts to weaken and blackmail Western democracies through supporting its most extreme and racist political forces, and joining Moscow and western capitals with ‘security pacts’ against ‘political Sunni Islam’ as a common enemy, would achieve several goals in one go.
The first goal is weakening liberal, democratic and progressive groups in the West against the onslaught of the extreme Right, which would exacerbate internal instability, frighten immigrant communities, alienate minorities, and encourage secessionist movements as we see today in Scotland and Catalonia.
The second is eliminating the issue of ‘human rights’ as a political tool often used by the West against the excesses of the Kremlin, whether inside Russia or in the former satellites of the defunct USSR; since the ‘new’ Western extremist political elites are as intolerant and as abusive. In other words, those who persecute minorities and immigrants, bar asylum seekers, build walls, and discriminate against people based on color, religion and language, are not entitled to lecture others about tolerance.
The third, in connection with two above, leave Moscow to do as it pleases in regions where it claims to have ‘inherited’ or legitimate rights, or strategic core interests. This is exactly what we witness today in the Arab east, the Black Sea region including the Caucasus and the Balkans where two pro-Moscow presidential candidates won in Bulgaria and Moldova.
The fourth and last, is making Russia a full political and security partner in drawing the future Euro-American strategy in a world going through rapid political and demographic changes, to the extent that the White, Christian, European powers (be they Germanic, Latin or Slavic) are not guaranteed future world supremacy. This is the case given the economic, population and educational growth in many parts of the world, especially, in Asia. Another thing, worth mentioning in this context is that the world is returning unannounced to the idea of ‘Clash of Civilizations’ against ‘Islam’; as the major non-Christian religion in Europe’s neighboring regions, without forgetting the presence of Muslim communities in Western Europe, the USA, and Russia.
The four aforementioned goals, and there may be many others, tell us that that all that was said about since the fall of the ‘Berlin Wall’ in 1989, and the emergence of the ‘New World Order’ under America’s unipolar dominance, may have either been premature or incomplete.
Those who have hailed the great victory of Western Liberalism over Socialism – although, some softened their stances – it looks now that there was indeed some kind of a ‘New World Order’ born after the collapse of the USSR, in 1991, but has not been solid and well-defined. Within less than two decades the ‘victorious’ Liberal capitalist West was shaken and devastated by the financial crisis of 2008, which was a proof that if Soviet-style Socialism had failed, capitalism was not doing well either. In fact it has been suffering from debilitating structural problems no denial or political obstinacy can hide.
Furthermore, in addition to denial and obstinacy, and in vain attempts to defend their own ‘legitimacy’, American and European capitalisms, began to look for scapegoats which were soon found to be the following:
1.Globalization, i.e. the freedom of movement of people, goods and services, and the resulting racist and xenophobic hostility towards migrant workers willing to accept lower wages, and less secure working conditions.
2. Technology, whereby technological advances in the fields of computer science, communications and robotics have made several manual jobs redundant and old techniques obsolete.
As a result, it may time we talked about the ‘New World Dis-Order’.

What About the Cultural Imbalance?
Nonie Darwish/Gatestone Institute/November 29/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/29/nonie-darwishgatestone-institute-what-about-the-cultural-imbalance/
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9379/cultural-imbalance
If we do not demand equal cultural access, such a cultural imbalance will result in one side absorbing the values of the other, while keeping the Islamic nation "pure" and free of any outside influence. This one-sided cultural tyranny is forcing us, the American citizen, into tolerating intolerance while never expecting anything more aligned to Western values from the Muslim world.
As soon as Muslims form a small community inside a Western nation, they immediately deny access to any kind of Biblical preaching or education inside their community, but at the same time apparently feel entitled to demand access to preach the Koran in American prisons and spread Islamic culture and values in American schools.
If Muslims finance Islamic Studies departments on American campuses and teach Islam in our public schools, the same rights must be awarded to Americans. It is true there are a few American schools in the Middle East, such as the American University in Cairo, but these schools are forbidden from having departments of Biblical Studies.
If Muslim governments and citizens have full access to build mosques in America, America must insist on having the same access in their countries. That is not the fault of Muslim countries, so much as it is the fault of Western "multiculturalism," which expects nothing and is adhered to only by Western nations.
If such one-sided access of Islam into the West continues, while other religions in Muslim communities and countries are considered by them illegal "hate crimes," Western culture and the values of free will and religious freedom will atrophy and die. Islamists are counting on Western inertia to win.
Similar to the often-mentioned trade imbalance, there is a large imbalance Western nations and Muslim nations that is hardly ever mentioned: the cultural imbalance.
Muslims have access to build mosques in the West, yet give no access to the West to build churches or synagogues in Muslim countries. Muslim governments finance "Islamic Studies" and "Middle East Studies" departments in almost all major American universities, but will not allow Christian Studies or Judaic Studies departments at any university in the Muslim world. They freely preach Islam everywhere and consider it their right. But not one Muslim country legally permits Christian missionary work, and those few missionaries who dare to try are harshly punished, imprisoned or killed.
As soon as Muslims form a small community inside a Western nation, they immediately deny access to any kind of Biblical preaching or education inside their community, but at the same time apparently feel entitled to demand access to preach the Koran in American prisons and spread Islamic culture and values in American schools.
Evangelical ministers have often been expelled from Arab and Islamic communities. This happened at an Arab festival in Dearborn, Michigan. The city of Dearborn had to apologize for arresting several Christian missionaries who were peacefully preaching to Muslims at the Dearborn Arab International Festival in 2010.
Dearborn police arrest a Christian for the "crime" of peacefully preaching to Muslims at the Dearborn Arab International Festival, in 2010.
It was also reported by the Telegraph that two Christian ministers in the UK were ordered by a "community support officer" to "stop handing out gospel leaflets in a predominantly Muslim area of Birmingham." The local Muslims threatened to beat the pastors, and accused them of committing a "hate crime" against Muslims by preaching the gospel -- while Muslim preachers are preaching Islam and building mosques all over the world.
If such one-sided access of Islam into the West continues, while access to other religions in Muslim communities and countries is considered by them an illegal "hate crime," Western culture and the values of free will and religious freedom will atrophy and die. Western values will be the loser in this equation. Islamists are counting on Western inertia to win.
If Muslim governments and citizens have full access to build mosques in America, America must insist that it has the same access in Muslim countries. The fault is not with the Muslim countries so much as it is the fault of Western "multiculturalism," which expects nothing and is adhered to only by Western nations.
If Muslim countries have the right to proselytize in America, then Americans must insist on having the right to do the same in Muslim countries. If Muslims finance Islamic Studies departments on American campuses and teach Islam in our public schools, then the same rights must be awarded to Americans. It is true there are a few American schools in the Middle East, such as the American University in Cairo, but these schools are forbidden from having departments of Biblical Studies.
The Coptic Christians of Egypt have no access to any services from the Egyptian government to study the Bible. While every school in Egypt teaches Islam and the Koran, Egyptian Christians are left to play instead of being provided with equivalent religious studies.
If we do not demand equal cultural access, American Christians and Jews who live in majority Muslim neighborhoods could one day be forbidden from studying the Bible. Such a cultural imbalance will result in one side absorbing the values of the other while keeping the Islamic nation "pure" and free of any outside influence. This one-sided cultural tyranny is forcing us, the American citizen, into tolerating intolerance while never expecting anything more aligned to Western values from the Muslim world.
For many decades, America has set itself as the light of freedom to the world, an example for the world to emulate. Our politicians and media allowed the signing of agreements to lift up other nations at the expense of the American worker in the hope that the world would eventually reciprocate.
But reciprocation in kind, as planned by the do-gooders in the West, was not given. As Donald Trump said, we give them the money and the jobs and they give us the drugs and unemployment.
Trump's statement struck a nerve among the suffering and hard-working American middle class. No other American politician in recent history has said such a long-awaited comforting statement to the American people, even after 9/11.
It is also time to treat US citizens, culture and values as number one again. Culture matters, and it is time to acknowledge the importance of values, sovereign law, and Western freedoms. The multiculturalists have for too long trampled over American pride, traditional values and Judeo-Christian ethics. The damage done to American national pride and dignity has been profound.
The American and European public has been suffering in silence for too long and getting the short end of the stick from those who were elected to look after their own citizens first. It is time for Western politicians and leaders, from the left and right, to treat their citizens as number one again inside their own countries.
*Nonie Darwish, a Middle East Expert born and raised in Egypt, is the author of the upcoming book: "Wholly Different: Why I Chose Biblical Values over Islamic Values."
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

France's Politician Dhimmis
Yves Mamou/Gatestone Institute/November 29/16
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9443/france-politician-dhimmis
"Moreover, it is puzzling and disturbing that France adopts a double standard in relation to Israel, while ignoring 200 territorial conflicts currently taking place around the world, including those taking place right on its doorstep." — Response of Israel's Foreign Ministry to France's new labeling regulations.
In the Ukraine, a few sanctions were imposed by France and EU, but there was never any labeling of food or cosmetic products.
Ironically, and sadly, the people most negatively affected by the French and EU regulations will be the 25,000 Palestinians employed by Israelis in the West Bank.
In just one year, 2016, France and its socialist president have made multiple hostile gestures towards Israel, which reveal more about raw anti-Semitism posing as anti-Israelism in France than about its unjustly solitary target.
The Muslim vote is now an important factor in French politicians' decisions. In 2012, socialist President François Hollande was elected with 93% of the Muslim vote. That is how diplomacy is made conducted in France, and in Europe generally. It is a diplomacy solidly rooted in domestic policy. It is a domestic policy made by dhimmi politicians.
In France, retail chains and importers now have the legal obligation to label products originating in Judea, Samaria, eastern Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.
On November 24, the Official Gazette of the French Republic (JORF) published Regulation No 1169/2011, ordering "economic operators" to inform consumers about "the origin of goods from the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967."
This French regulation is an application of the interpretive notice issued by the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ), on November 12, 2015. The notice states that the EU "does not recognise Israel's sovereignty over the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967, namely the Golan Heights, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and does not consider them to be part of Israel's territory" and claims it is responding to "a demand for clarity from consumers, economic operators and national authorities".
The European Commission allowed member states to arrange their own national implementation of this European regulation, with financial penalties.
The French adoption of this EU policy insists on labeling Israeli products with the greatest precision possible.
A limited reference to "originating from the Golan Heights" or "product originating in the West Bank" is not acceptable... The omission of the additional geographical information that the product is derived from Israeli settlements is likely to mislead the consumer into error as to the true origin of the product. In such cases, it is necessary to add, parenthetically, the term "Israeli settlement" or similar terms. Thus, expressions such as "product originating in the Golan Heights (Israeli settlement)" or "product originating in the West Bank (Israeli settlement)" can be used.
Apparently, "precision" in the French regulation is not associated with financial penalties. It is a kind of "moral recommendation."
The Israeli Foreign Ministry issued a tough response to the French decision, stating:
"The Israeli government condemns the French government's decision...
"We regret that France, at a time when there are anti-boycott laws, promotes such measures, which can be interpreted as a boost to radical elements and to the boycott movement against Israel. Moreover, it is puzzling and disturbing that France adopts a double standard in relation to Israel, while ignoring 200 territorial conflicts currently taking place around the world, including those taking place right on its doorstep."
Israel's Foreign Ministry may have been thinking of the island of Alboran in the Mediterranean Sea, controlled by Spain but claimed by Morocco; the Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla, claimed by Morocco; northern Cyprus, occupied by Turkey; Crimea belonging to Ukraine but annexed by Russia. In the Ukraine, a few sanctions were imposed by France and EU, but there was never any labeling of food or cosmetic products.
Labeling food and cosmetic products is a compromised position. Like dhimmi nations, moved by a strong desire to comply to the wishes of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (a bloc of 56 Islamic countries and "Palestine"), many countries in the European Union, with France as usual foremost among them, were advocating even tougher measures against (only) Israel -- a move that reveals more about raw anti-Semitism posing as anti-Israelism in France than about its unjustly solitary target.
Economic impact: If all EU member states adopt this labeling regulation, Israel's Ministry of the Economic estimates that the negative impact would be about $50 million a year, and affect fresh produce such as grapes, dates, wine, poultry, honey, olive oil and cosmetics (Dead Sea products). But this $50 million would represent only one-fifth of the $200-$300 million worth of goods produced in settlements each year -- and a drop in the ocean compared to the $13 billion in goods and $4 billion in services Israel exports to the EU annually.
Ironically, and sadly, the people most negatively affected by the French and EU regulations will be the 25,000 Palestinians employed by Israelis in the West Bank, and earning as much as two to three times the wages paid by Palestinian factories.
Political and diplomatic impact. EU officials have insisted that the labeling is not a boycott of Israeli products in general, but the singling out of Israel, and in such pettiness, unmasks their denial as just another French fraud.
In just one year, 2016, France and its socialist president have made multiple hostile gestures towards Israel.
On January 27, 2016, International Holocaust Remembrance Day, Hassan Rouhani, President of the Islamic Republic of Iran -- a regime that denies the fact that the Holocaust took place and does not hide its intention to commit still another one -- was received in Paris for an official visit. Iran was presented on every side as a "reliable ally" of the West in the fight against the Islamic State.
The day after Rouhani's visit in Paris, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius (who has since resigned) announced that France wanted to organize a major international conference to relaunch the Israeli-Palestinian "peace process," based on an old Saudi peace plan, which includes, of course -- as a poison pill -- the "right of return." Fabius added that if the French initiative failed, France would nevertheless recognize a Palestinian state.
On April 15, 2016, France supported, voted on and passed another fraudulent resolution at the Executive Board of UNESCO, the Paris-based UN organization dealing with education, culture and heritage. The resolution was drafted by the Palestinians, but officially submitted by Sudan's genocidal regime together with Algeria, Egypt, Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, and Qatar -- all members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. The text of the UNESCO resolution tries to "delete" any Jewish link to Jerusalem's Temple Mount, and erase any historical record of a first Jewish Temple and a second Jewish Temple in Jerusalem. From now on, according to UNESCO, the area is supposedly just the Al-Aqsa Mosque/Al-Haram Al Sharif.
On October 13, France was among 26 countries that abstained from adopting the same resolution denying any Jewish link with Temple Mount at UNESCO.
France has the first largest Muslim community in the European Union. More than six million Muslims live in France, and make up approximately 10% of the population. The Muslim vote is now an important factor in French politicians' decisions. In 2012, socialist President François Hollande was elected with 93% of the Muslim vote. In 2017, the same president will probably pursue reelection and is already looking for the votes of French Muslims, on the basis of hatred towards Israel. That is how diplomacy is made conducted in France, and in Europe generally. It is a diplomacy solidly rooted in domestic policy. It is a domestic policy made by dhimmi politicians.
**Yves Mamou is a journalist and author based in France. He worked for two decades for the daily, Le Monde, before his retirement.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

The Middle East and Donald Trump
Hussein Shobokshi/Al Arabiya/November 29/16
Now that the dust has settled, the world is coming to terms with the shocking outcome of the US presidential elections. There is readiness to accept the victory of Donald Trump and the willingness to coexist with his statements and attitudes that will undoubtedly be reflected in his specific and controversial policies.
How will the Arab world be affected by the arrival of Donald Trump to the White House? Of course this is the big question, which comes naturally to people’s mind in the Middle East today. The arrival of Donald Trump came as a great shock to the leaders of political Islam (both Sunni and Shiite, represented by the Muslim Brotherhood and the ruling regime in Iran). The two groups have invested heavily in a political relationship with Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration and it was obvious that both the groups would continue to open up and develop this relationship if Clinton came to power. However, this did not happen and a victorious Trump arrived on the scene instead.
Trump, known for his hostility and distrust toward the political Islamic groups, has a clear anti-Iran stance regarding the building of any positive relationship with the Islamic Republic as he seems to regard it as the major sponsor of terrorism in the region.
Trump will launch a very harsh and cruel military policy against all extremist groups that raise religious slogans and he wants to eliminate them immediately
Trump will launch a very harsh and cruel military policy against all extremist groups that raise religious slogans and he wants to eliminate them immediately. His position will be clearer on Iran after he takes office and confronts the alarming situation in the Middle East.
Iran will not be a friend or an ally in Trump’s era but he will want to coordinate with the Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose close relationship with him will help him deal with the Syrian crisis. Trump believes that his priority is to eliminate ISIS and remove them from the Syrian territories and grant Bashar al-Assad a chance to extend his influence on the ground but without favoring his stay in power. He has stated that my times before. It remains a mystery how he will balance his relationship with Russia and Iran in a very turbulent Middle East though. He has made it clear that he favors a strong relationship with America’s allies in the Middle East, which include Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
Trump’s energy policy will be to rely mainly on US oil, which means granting immense benefits to shale oil and gas companies in the United States to explore and produce and then export it in order to strengthen America’s position and be competitive and influential in the global oil market.
The man’s policy regarding Palestine would be to create “attempts” in order to revive the peace process but he would not be interested in a historic achievement as that would require huge political cost which his circle believes it is not “worth it.”
He will maintain a respectful relationship with Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Morocco and Kuwait as these states have had a successful relationship with America in the past as far as the economic, security and political areas are concerned. These states believe wholeheartedly that they were “abandoned” by the Obama administration, the Saudis especially, feel even stronger; they feel they were sold out to Iran and betrayed after a very long and important relationship.
Of course it is too early to judge about his proposed policies against immigrants and minorities, especially Muslims and relations with the Islamic world as these policies have to be first implemented officially. But needless to say that the Muslim world is holding its breath in anticipation. Donald Trump’s reign will be a complete change from the era of Barack Obama. People who were not happy with Barack Obama’s policies will heave a sigh of relief with the new administration, while those who benefited from his policies will be very disappointed. America chose a shock therapy to deal with its crises by electing a man with no previous experience in any governmental position; a man who did not serve in the military, a man with controversial positions against traditional American political principles.
The world has to deal with this choice!
**This article was first published in the Saudi Gazette on November 28. 2016.

Legalizing Iraq’s Shiite mobilization forces
Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/November 29/16
The Iraqi parliament has recently legalized the Popular Mobilization Units. With that, Iraq, as a state, will have slipped down a dark path.
The Popular Mobilization - and without any exaggerations or intimidation - is a structure that's deeply into Khomeini ideals, sectarianism and financial corruption. It wants to follow the example of its counterpart, the Revolutionary Guard, or the guards of Khomeini revolution in Iran. Iran's revolutionary guards are in control of the state as they're in control of arms, money, media outlets, hawza programs, ayatollahs, banks, ports, oil, gas, foreign policy and everything else.
Iraq is not like Iran despite attempts by former Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and his comrades among the leaders of Iraqi Shiite parties to transform it. There is the independent Kurdish bloc, the Peshmerga, with its government, region and army. There are also Arab Sunni powers and although they're dispersed now, this will not last forever as it's only due to current circumstances and this will end once the circumstances change. Finally, there is a big percentage of Iraqi civil nationalists who reject the governance of fundamental groups, whether Sunnis or Shiites, and they are the spirit of the awaited Iraq.
Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi would have gained glory and won the Iraqis' support and love if he had rejected this law legalizing the Popular Mobilization Units.
Unfortunately, he did not reject it but only minded it a little bit requesting them to be patient before approving it and transfering the law to the cabinet. However Shiite parties did not listen to him and the law was passed amid Sunni MPs and other MPs' boycotted the session. The law passed support from the MPs of Maliki's, Ammar al-Hakim's, Muqtada al-Sadr's and other Shiite leaders' blocs, and Abadi therefore giving their blessing for the move.
Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi would have gained glory and won the Iraqis' support and love if he had rejected this law legalizing the Popular Mobilization Units
All proposals to postpone passing the law were rejected and all suggestions to amend it were prohibited. Some Sunni MPs' suggestions proposed allotting 40 percent of the units' fighters to Sunni tribes.
Relentless attempts
Saleh al-Mutlaq, former deputy prime minister and leader of Al-Arabiya Coalition, said passing the law "ends the dream of the civil state which the Iraqis dream of." The law is dangerous and it seriously tampers with the structure of the Iraqi state and paves way for continuous strife that may conclude with dividing Iraq or sustaining tensions and civil war as it creates a perfect atmosphere for sectarianism and transform Iraq into a Shiite state where others, mainly Sunni Arabs live under mercy and tutelage of others - that is if they live at all.
There are relentless attempts to fortify the criminal sectarian mobilization forces from being legally pursued after its involvement in bloodshed and violent practices which resemble ISIS' has been proven. The approved law's fourth article allows the Popular Mobilization to militarily act to confront any armed practices and to protect the government and the regime.
Shiite Al-Fadila bloc MP Hassan al-Shammari had requested providing legal immunity to the Popular Mobilization forces if they fight against ISIS and liberate areas occupied by the latter.
This law "destroys national partnership" like Sunni powers and other powers in Iraq said. By the way, I do not know how "brother" Salim al-Jabouri, the Brotherhood Islamist figure who is the speaker of parliament, explains passing this poisonous law.
Peace be upon Iraq.
**This article was first published in Asharq al-Awsat on November 28, 2016.

Will Fatah seal its transfer to non-violent resistance?
Daoud Kuttab/Al Arabiya/November 29/16
When the Palestinian National Liberation movement known by the name FATAH was established in Kuwait in 1959, it chose to make its public announce its launch following an anti-Israel military operation.
As 1,500 delegates set on November 29, 2016 to start the Fatah’s seventh congress in occupied Ramallah, the movement has changed a whole lot since those days. The change will be obvious both in its political rhetoric, it approved liberation tactics, base of operations and its leadership profile.
The January 1, 1960 attack that was launched from South Lebanon against northern Israel signaled that Fatah would employ the armed struggle as its means of liberation of Palestine.
Led by a charismatic leader, Yasser Arafat, the movement would continue its attacks and move even into higher gear after the Israeli occupation in 1967 as it quickly became the leading Palestinian guerrilla movement.
‘The gun has long disappeared’
Over the years Fatah (which took over the PLO in the late 1960s) would become a national movement that would energize and unite Palestinians as it moved into the political realm that was climaxed 42 years ago with Arafat’s olive branch and gun speech at the UN speech in November 1974.
The gun has long disappeared from the Palestinian movement’s rhetoric and actions as the PLO moved into the political and negotiations mode. During the last decade Fatah has basically been trying to be involved in state building (even under occupation) and has dabbled part time with negotiations. Fatah’s current leader and Arafat’s successor, Mahmoud Abbas has defended security coordination with Israel and has totally denounced any attempts (especially by Hamas) to militarize resistance to Israel.
The newly elected leaders of Fatah will be entrusted with the role of keeping the liberation struggle alive and leading the Palestinian people and will provide Abbas an honorable way to exit the political scene.
Since the Israeli occupation has not ended, settlements activities have not stopped and the siege of Gaza is not even newsworthy any more, no Fatah congress can take place without at least lip service to resistance.
When Abbas led the sixth congress in 2009 in Bethlehem after a 20-year hiatus, the delegates approved the need to use “popular struggle” as the means of continuing the resistance to the occupation. With the exception of Ziad Abu Ein a Palestinian cabinet minister who died in 2014 while trying to protest Israeli settlement activity, few Palestinian leaders have gotten their hands dirty trying to initiate or participate in a serious nonviolent campaign.
A changing Fatah?
On the eve of the seventh congress, Fatah activists have introduced a new concept namely “smart popular resistance.” According to Fatah central committee leader Mohammad Shtieh who has been assigned to present a paper on the issue, the smart popular struggle will attempt to use some of the successes of the first intifada and try to apply them to the current struggle.
The seventh congress of Fatah which will be held on the International Day for Solidarity with the Palestinian people, will have the fewest Palestinians living internationally.
The majority (73 percent) of the delegates (1,100) have been born and raised under occupation a far cry from previous Fatah congresses in which the majority represented Palestinians who had left Palestine during the 1948 and 1967 wars and were based in the diaspora.
Another feature of the upcoming congress that will be the profile diversity and age of the delegates attending the congress in President Abbas’s muqata’a headquarters in Ramallah. 167 (11%) delegates are women and 33 delegates (2%) are Christians. One delegate, Uri Davis an Israel Jew was elected to the Revolutionary Council in the sixth congress in 2009. The list of delegates includes 151 military cadres (50 of them retired) 44 members of Palestinian diplomatic missions and 66 are prisoners (among them 50 prisoners come from the West Bank). The prisoners will vote by proxy. Leading Palestinian prisoner Marwan Barghouti’s wife Fadwa and son Qassam are delegates to the congress and will be able to vote on behalf of one of the most popular figures in the movement.
But the most important category of delegates will be the youth. Nearly 312 (21 percent) delegates (200 West Bank and 112 from Gaza) were elected by their communities over the past two years in a primary-style internal elections. And unlike the sixth congress in which Palestinian delegates from Gaza were not allowed to leave, this congress has already seen a change in that Hamas has already allowed the nearly 400 delegates from Gaza to leave most of who have already arrived in Ramallah.
Fatah has come a long way since it launched its first attack against Israel in 1960. By holding the congress without, Mohammad Dahlan and his supporters, Mahmoud Abbas would have succeeded again in keeping the organization relatively united and independent. Abbas has resisted pressure from Dahlan’s supporters in some Arab countries. In so doing Abbas will lead a smaller but more united Fatah and most importantly he is going to keep the movement independent of regional and international interference.
The seventh congress will most probably be the last major Fatah event that Abbas will preside over. The newly elected leaders of the movement will be entrusted with the role of keeping the liberation struggle alive and leading the Palestinian people and will provide Abbas an honorable way to exit the political scene. Many are looking to this congress to see what kind of post Abbas direction in policy and personnel it will yield.

Advent: A Time To Reflect On Judgement And Hope
David Robertson/Today Christian/28 November 2016
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/29/david-robertsontoday-christian-advent-a-time-to-reflect-on-judgement-and-hope/
http://www.christiantoday.com/article/advent.a.time.to.reflect.on.judgement.and.hope/102308.htm
It's Advent. As a Scots Highland Presbyterian I was vaguely aware of the word but didn't really know what it meant – and it certainly meant nothing in my church. In fact it may come as a shock to those who regard Christmas as the heart of Christianity, but my parents grew up in an era when many people did not really celebrate Christmas – it was just another ordinary day. For them Advent was meaningless.
Even those who follow what is called the 'church year' seem to have lost much of the meaning of Advent. And that is why this week's passage from Revelation (chapter 6) is so amazingly appropriate for us to grasp the truth that Advent celebrates – a truth that the church needs to recover.
The term Advent comes from the Latin Adventus, meaning 'coming'. From about the 5th Century it was used in the Church to refer not to the coming of Christ as the baby in the manger, but his coming in judgement at the end of time. In the Middle Ages it was again linked to the first coming of Christ. Today it refers to the four Sundays before Christmas – so we are now in Advent.
Dr John Hall, the dean of Westminster, told The Spectator this week that the themes of Advent are death, judgement, heaven and hell. "A lot of people in the church have abandoned the idea of hell, but I can't do that. There's a popular belief that it will be all right. What we're missing, perhaps, is the sense of humanity under judgement." Hall is right. And ironically it seems to me that many evangelical churches are guilty of the very thing he critiques. We have contributed to the mushiness of Christianity. The tinsel Jesus, the cute child in the warm stable is as much the staple diet of our Christmas as Marks & Spencer adverts are for most people. The irony is that it is the more liturgical churches who through their music and readings remind us of the harsher aspects of judgement – even if some of these are hidden in Latin terms!
Revelation 6 is probably not going to be one of your Christmas Day readings in church. It seems far better suited to the Clint Eastwood classic film Pale Rider, where death, justice and revenge are the themes, than the cute cozy Merry Christmas Yuletide services we offer.
The rider on the horse is thought by some people to be Christ. Others say it is the gospel. But Eastwood's exegesis is better – each of the four riders is a judgement.
The white horse represents a strong army. The fiery red one, civil strife, perhaps civil wars where 'men slay each other'. "When you hear of wars and rumors of wars, do not be alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come. Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be earthquakes in various places, and famines. These are the beginning of birth pains." (Mark 13:7)
The black horse is famine. A quart of wheat is a man's daily ration but that leaves nothing for his family. What does 'do not damage the oil and wine' mean? Just before Revelation was written, in the year AD 92, there was a grain shortage in the Roman Empire. The emperor Domitian ordered the restriction of wine cultivation and an increase of corn growing. An order that had to be abandoned. Perhaps this is what is being referred to. This is a world where the poor starve and the rich feast.
The pale horse is death. More especially Pestilence. All of these 'riders' are curses from the Old Testament. There are numerous texts especially in the prophets which refer to these. For example Ezekiel 4:16: "He then said to me: 'Son of man, I am about to cut off the food supply in Jerusalem. The people will eat rationed food in anxiety and drink rationed water in despair, for food and water will be scarce. They will be appalled at the sight of each other and will waste away because of their sin.'"
Hades following afterwards reminds us that death is not the end.
The fifth seal moves from the judgements of the horses, to the subject of sacrifice. The Jews thought that to be buried in Israel was to be buried under the altar. It was something to be desired. Paul refers to this in Philippians 2:17: "But even if I am being poured out like a drink offering on the sacrifice and service coming from your faith, I am glad and rejoice with all of you."
The sixth seal takes a series of images from Isaiah, Hosea, Ezekiel, and Joel to talk about the great judgement coming on the earth. The sun turning black, the rolling up of the sky like a scroll and the great earthquake "In my zeal and fiery wrath I declare that at that time there shall be a great earthquake in the land of Israel. The fish in the sea, the birds in the sky, the beasts of the field, every creature that moves along the ground, and all the people on the face of the earth will tremble at my presence. The mountains will be overturned, the cliffs will crumble and every wall will fall to the ground." (Ezekiel 38:19-20).
Sponsored Watch Your Favorite Christian Films, 24/7. Click Here To Start Your Free Trial Today
It's a great judgement coming. In the words of the late great Johnny Cash, "God's gonna cut you down". The Pale Rider is coming, whoever you are. Verses 15-17 describe different classes of human beings. This is coming to all.
What is the solution? If Christ is coming in judgement, to deal with all the injustices, sins and evil in the world, where do we fit into the picture? If you go back to the fifth seal you see a great hint for our hope. The Lord's people are dressed in white robes. What does that represent? It is what the theologians call their justification. In a world of injustice, the just one comes. But before he comes in judgement, he has come as the baby in the manger. He has come as the perfect teacher who lived a perfect life and demonstrated the power of God through his miracles. He has come as the One who was to die, not for his own sins, but for the sins of his people. The message of Christmas is the message of the one who was born to die. A few years ago I edited a church magazine and our Christmas edition cover caused a bit of controversy. I still think it symbolizes the clash between the glitter of Christmas and the purpose of Christmas:
He has taken our filthy rags and given us his white robes. He gives us beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, the Spirit of praise for the garment of heaviness.
That's why it's good for us today, in our 21st Century confused and confusing world, to remember Advent. To think of the coming judgement and then remember the one who came in weakness and mercy. It is why for me the hymn of Advent is also the greatest Christmas carol:
O come, O come, Emmanuel,
And ransom captive Israel,
That mourns in lonely exile here
Until the Son of God appears.
Rejoice! Rejoice!
Emmanuel shall come to thee, O Israel.
**David Robertson is minister of St Peter's Free Church, Dundee and associate director of Solas CPC. Follow him on Twitter @theweeflea

 

The Houris: Islam’s ‘Sexual Superwomen’
Raymond Ibrahim/FrontPage Magazine/November 29/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/29/raymond-ibrahimfrontpage-magazine-the-houris-islams-sexual-superwomen/
Last month, when the battle for Mosul began, Islamic State “caliph” Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi reportedly promised four extra Houris (supernatural, celestial women designed for sexual purposes)—atop the other 72 promised by prophet Muhammad—to all jihadis who die (are “martyred”) fighting the infidel forces, according to Arabic media accounts.
Al-Baghdadi did this during an extra “fiery sermon” wherein he recounted 15 hadiths and three stories dealing with the Houris in the context of the original Muslim conquest of Mosul, circa. 637, at the hands of Muhammad’s companions (the sahahba). After promising his followers that “blood will run like rivers in the [forthcoming] battle,” al-Baghdadi declared: “All, without exception, will enter paradise as martyrs. Moreover, you will enter paradise with four more Houris than other martyrs. For just as you stand by me now, so will they stand by you, or under you, or above you, so that you might forget what will happen to you by way of violence, death, and degradation in this war.”
While it is easy to dismiss this report as a hoax (among other things, it doesn’t explain why al-Baghdadi thinks they will get four more heavenly concubines), the problem is that Islam—from its history and doctrines, to the exhortation of its leaders, from Muhammad to al-Baghdadi—is full of stories and enticements concerning the Houris.
Here, for instance, is an authentic hadith—a statement attributed to Muhammad that mainstream Islam acknowledges as true—which all jihadi organizations (including ISIS) regularly invoke:
The martyr is special to Allah. He is forgiven from the first drop of blood [that he sheds]. He sees his throne in paradise…. He will wed the Houris [[a.k.a. “voluptuous women”] and will not know the torments of the grave and safeguards against the greater horror [hell]. Fixed atop his head will be a crown of honor, a ruby that is greater than the world and all it contains. And he will copulate with seventy-two Houris. (Source: The Al Qaeda Reader, p.143).
The histories of the conquest of Mesopotamia and Syria are in fact full of anecdotes of Muslims throwing themselves into the fray and rushing to death’s embrace because they believed doing so would rush them to the warm embraces of the heavenly sex slaves. Here are some anecdotes from al-Waqidi’s account of the battle of Yarmuk in Syria (636), which took place right around the same time as the conquest for Mosul, and which also pitted smaller Muslim forces against much greater infidel forces (in this case, Christian Byzantine):
As one Muslim captain searched for his nephew, Suwayed, in a field of Muslim corpses, he found him dying on the ground. When the man came into the vision of the fallen youth, Suwayed began to cry. He explained that, after being speared by a Byzantine, “something amazing began to happen to me: the Houris are standing beside me, awaiting my soul’s departure.”
A jihadi reported that he came upon a fallen comrade in a strange posture: “I saw him smitten on the ground, and I watched as he lifted his fingers to the sky. I understood he was rejoicing, for he saw the Houris.”
While waving his standard, another Muslim battalion leader told his men that a furious rush against the “Christian dogs” is synonymous with a “rush to the embraces of the Houris.”
Obsession over the Houris is not limited to arcane Islamic texts or ISIS (“which has nothing to do with Islam”). Over the years I have watched numerous videos of Muslim men discussing their excitement at the prospect of dying in the jihad and being rushed to the embraces of the supernatural celestial women. For an idea of how pervasive the Houri is in Islam, consider its impact on Muslim women, as demonstrated in a video of a Muslim cleric taking and answering questions via phone calls. A woman called in expressing outrage at the Houris, saying that she would be driven “mad with jealousy” seeing her husband copulating with these supernaturally beautiful women all day in heaven. The cleric responded telling her that “when you enter paradise, Allah will remove the jealousy from your heart. And have no fear, for you will lord over the Houris and be their queen.” Still apprehensive, the Muslim wife pleaded: “But must he have the Houris?” Laughing, the cleric reassured her: “Look, when you enter paradise, you will be more beautiful than the Houris—you will be their mistress. Okay? And, when you enter paradise Allah will remove any jealousy or concerns from your heart.”
All this is a reminder that the Muslim mindset and the motivations behind the jihad are many and multifaceted—and even include those that disbelieve in Allah and the afterlife altogether. As such, Western secular minds would do well to stop projecting their own materialistic paradigms onto jihadis—such as when the Obama administration said that people join ISIS for “a lack of opportunity for jobs”—and start understanding Islam’s paradigms and motivations on their own terms.