LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

February 02/17

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins17/english.february02.17.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
This child is destined for the falling and the rising of many in Israel, and to be a sign that will be opposed so that the inner thoughts of many will be revealed and a sword will pierce your own soul too.’
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 02/22-35/:"When the time came for their purification according to the law of Moses, they brought him up to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord (as it is written in the law of the Lord, ‘Every firstborn male shall be designated as holy to the Lord’), and they offered a sacrifice according to what is stated in the law of the Lord, ‘a pair of turtle-doves or two young pigeons.’Now there was a man in Jerusalem whose name was Simeon; this man was righteous and devout, looking forward to the consolation of Israel, and the Holy Spirit rested on him. It had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he would not see death before he had seen the Lord’s Messiah. Guided by the Spirit, Simeon came into the temple; and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him what was customary under the law, Simeon took him in his arms and praised God, saying, ‘Master, now you are dismissing your servant in peace, according to your word; for my eyes have seen your salvation, which you have prepared in the presence of all peoples, a light for revelation to the Gentiles and for glory to your people Israel.’ And the child’s father and mother were amazed at what was being said about him. Then Simeon blessed them and said to his mother Mary, ‘This child is destined for the falling and the rising of many in Israel, and to be a sign that will be opposed so that the inner thoughts of many will be revealed and a sword will pierce your own soul too.’"

For Christ is the end of the law so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes
Letter to the Romans 09/30-33//10/01-04/:"What then are we to say? Gentiles, who did not strive for righteousness, have attained it, that is, righteousness through faith; but Israel, who did strive for the righteousness that is based on the law, did not succeed in fulfilling that law. Why not? Because they did not strive for it on the basis of faith, but as if it were based on works. They have stumbled over the stumbling-stone, as it is written, ‘See, I am laying in Zion a stone that will make people stumble, a rock that will make them fall, and whoever believes in him will not be put to shame.’ Brothers and sisters, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for them is that they may be saved. I can testify that they have a zeal for God, but it is not enlightened. For, being ignorant of the righteousness that comes from God, and seeking to establish their own, they have not submitted to God’s righteousness. For Christ is the end of the law so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes."

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 01-02/17
Phares quoted on MTV Lebanon: "President Trump's measures are not sectarian but security driven"
Berri Won't Endorse Electoral Law that 'Doesn't Enjoy Consensus'
Geagea Assures, No Intentions to Manipulate Taef Accord
Hariri Says Ties Unmarred with Aoun
Kataeb, Geagea Discuss Possible 'Improvements' to Proposed Hybrid Law
Jumblat: Stop Breaching the Constitution, Implement Taef Accord
PSP Flatly Rejects Proposed Electoral Law as Talks Return to Square One
Cabinet Convenes at Grand Serail, Electoral Law not on Agenda
Report: Nasrallah to Deliver Speech on Election Law
Hariri welcomes Apostolic Nuncio
Hamadeh listens to demands of private school teachers
Lebanese, Palestinian meeting broaches situation in Ain el Helwe
French MP Bapt visits President Aoun upcoming Friday
Riachy opens Information Ministry doors before citizens
Sarraf, Estonian Defense House Committee tackle current developments
Lebanon basketball team scores victory over Jordan team in West Asian Basketball Championship
UCIP congratulates NNA for winning award for Best Arab News Agency concerned in tourism

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 01-02/17
Phares quoted on MTV Lebanon: "President Trump's measures are not sectarian but security driven"
Berri Won't Endorse Electoral Law that 'Doesn't Enjoy Consensus'
Geagea Assures, No Intentions to Manipulate Taef Accord
Hariri Says Ties Unmarred with Aoun
Kataeb, Geagea Discuss Possible 'Improvements' to Proposed Hybrid Law
Jumblat: Stop Breaching the Constitution, Implement Taef Accord
PSP Flatly Rejects Proposed Electoral Law as Talks Return to Square One
Cabinet Convenes at Grand Serail, Electoral Law not on Agenda
Report: Nasrallah to Deliver Speech on Election Law
Hariri welcomes Apostolic Nuncio
Hamadeh listens to demands of private school teachers
Lebanese, Palestinian meeting broaches situation in Ain el Helwe
French MP Bapt visits President Aoun upcoming Friday
Riachy opens Information Ministry doors before citizens
Sarraf, Estonian Defense House Committee tackle current developments
Lebanon basketball team scores victory over Jordan team in West Asian Basketball Championship
UCIP congratulates NNA for winning award for Best Arab News Agency concerned in tourism

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 01-02/17
National security adviser puts Iran 'on notice'
US, Western allies launch war games near Iran waters
UAE Foreign Minister says Trump travel ban an internal US affair
Rex Tillerson confirmed as US secretary of state
U.N. Chief Backs Plan to Pick Syria Delegates to Geneva Talks
UN chief says Trump travel ban should be 'removed sooner rather than later'
Lavrov Calls for Syria's Return to Arab League
Iran: We will not negotiate our missiles
Violence erupts during eviction of Israeli settlers from illegal outpost
US envoy to UN slams Iran missile test
Israel authorizes 3,000 West Bank settler homes
Middle East peace relies on firm action vis-à-vis Iran violating UNSC resolution
Regretful Decease of Thierry Levy, the Prominent Lawyer, Humanist and Distinguished French Writer
A Letter From the Iranian- British Citizen Who Is Jailed by the IRGC
EU Warns Iran Against Missile Tests
IRAN: IRGC kills young destitute porters
Tens of Thousands of Yemenis Trapped in Red Sea Fighting
EU Warns New Israeli Settlements Risk Making 2-State Solution 'Impossible'

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on February 01-02/17
Trump’s National Security Advisor Michael Flynn: “As of today, we are officially putting Iran on notice”
Fake news: Iraqi-American lied when he claimed that his mother died due to Trump ban
DNC boots candidate from chairmanship race for criticizing Islamic law’s discrimination against gays
World Hijab Day: Non-Muslim women asked to wear hijab today in solidarity with Muslim women
Hugh Fitzgerald: On Dogs and Pictures in Islam
Muslim Killers Versus Muslim Victims
Montreal: Man arrested for “online hate speech targeting Muslims”
Real Madrid soccer team removes cross from logo to avoid offending Muslims
Germany: Major Islamic State jihad terror plot thwarted, police raid 54 mosques, homes and businesses
University of San Francisco in uproar, persecutes former student for Snapchat “Allah akbaremoji
German and EU taxpayers will pay nearly $46,000,000,000 to deal with problems caused by Muslim migrants
Democrat Congressman compares Trump immigration order to Japanese internment camps

Links From Christian Today Site for on February 0102/17
Trump Picks Conservative Judge Neil Gorsuch For Supreme Court
Leaders Of Anglican Mission Agencies Call On Trump To Reverse Refugee Ban
Exclusive: Lord Carey Praises Potentially 'Outstanding' President Trump And Condemns 'Reprehensible' Protests
Exclusive: Lion Hudson Christian Publisher Files For Administration
Divisions Deepen In Catholic Church Over Communion For Remarried Couples
Trump Under Pressure From Israel Supporters To Move Embassy To Jerusalem
Norway's Lutheran Church Approves Service For Gay Marriage
Boy Scouts To Allow Transgender Boys, Frustrating Conservatives
Reformation 500: Evangelical Alliance Warns Against Compromise With Catholicism
Priest Defends As 'Funny' His 'Jump For Trump' Suicide Post On Social Media
Murdered Priest Appeals From Beyond The Grave For Killer To Be Let Off Death Penalty
What Is Luke's Story Of The Miraculous Catch Of Fishes Really Telling Us?

Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 0102/17
Phares quoted on MTV Lebanon: "President Trump's measures are not sectarian but security driven"

Face Book/February 01/17/
Dr Walid Phares explains to the Arab world the reality of the executive order issued by President Trump regarding the seven countries in the region, in response to a hostile campaign of criticism mounted by the opposition. "US citizens are always free, residents are not blocked from travel, and citizens from these countries where Jihadists operate will be vetted normally. There is no mention of religion and these measures aren't sectarian. The system glitches will be addressed and everything will be normal again, except for the terrorists

Berri Won't Endorse Electoral Law that 'Doesn't Enjoy Consensus'
Naharnet/February 01/17/Speaker Nabih Berri announced Wednesday that he will not endorse any electoral law that “does not enjoy consensus.”“Contacts and discussions are still ongoing in a bid to agree on a new electoral law and new ideas are being discussed,” MPs quoted Berri as saying during his weekly meeting with lawmakers in Ain el-Tineh. “We are still in the phase of mulling proposals and we have not yet reached a dead end,” Berri added. “We reiterate the need to apply unified standards (in the electoral law format) and I will not endorse any law that does not enjoy consensus,” the speaker went on to say. Berri's AMAL Movement, Hizbullah, al-Mustaqbal Movement and the Free Patriotic Movement are holding meetings aimed at agreeing on a new electoral law. The Progressive Socialist Party has meanwhile raised the alarm over the representation of the minority Druze community, warning that any electoral law containing the proportional representation system would “marginalize” Druze in the political system.

Geagea Assures, No Intentions to Manipulate Taef Accord
Naharnet/February 01/17/Lebanese Forces chief Samir Geagea stressed on Wednesday that no one is trying to manipulate the Taef accord, assuring that efforts exerted are merely focusing on finding a new election law, the National News Agency reported on Wednesday. Geagea expressed astonishment at the “latest talk about the Taef Accord. We like to remind that we were the first to pay the price, and will not accept any tampering with Taef. “But it is worth noting that no one has such an intention. There are strenuous efforts to reach a new electoral law which in turn would reinstate the Taef Accord further,” said Geagea during a celebration in Maarab. He called upon all political parties to focus on approving a new electoral law to regulate political work in Lebanon, considering that the “hybrid law is the only one that would bring all parties together midway.”He pointed out that the majority neither agreed on the full proportionality nor on full majority, adding accordingly, the hybrid law has been the least rejected among all suggested drafts. Geagea underscored that they are open to any suggestion that improves representation, just as the hybrid law does, and acquires the agreement of all parties provided that this suggestion be on the table within few days as it is due time to agree on a new electoral law.

Hariri Says Ties Unmarred with Aoun
Naharnet/February 01/17/In light of the political debate surrounding the controversial electoral law which brought differences between Lebanon’s political parties, Prime Minister Saad Hariri assured that his relations with President Michel Aoun are firm and unwavering. “The President and I are on the same terms. I want to appease those betting on sabotaging relations between the ruling sides, that an understanding to protect political stability is firm and strong,” Hariri said in comments he made at the beginning of a cabinet meeting he chaired at the Grand Serail on Wednesday.“When the government affirmed in its ministerial statement on the priority to stage the elections, it did not separate between this end and the efforts to prepare for a new law, because they go in parallel,” he said. “Differences in points of view between political parties does not necessarily mean we reached a dead end. On the contrary, it indicates wellness.” “I emphasize here that political efforts must continue, and standing at the view points of all political parties is the responsibility of all, mainly the responsibility of parties participating in the government.”He added: “We must not despair from reaching a new law, we must have the ability to sacrifice in order to reach a new law that does not raise the fears of political parties and sects.”

Kataeb, Geagea Discuss Possible 'Improvements' to Proposed Hybrid Law
Naharnet/February 01/17/A Kataeb Party delegation held talks Wednesday in Maarab with Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea. The delegation comprised ex-minister Alain Hakim, politburo member Albert Kostanian and former secretary-general Michel Khoury. “We discussed the proposed (electoral) law and the possibility of introducing amendments to it in order to improve parliamentary representation,” Hakim said after the meeting, referring to a hybrid electoral law that mixes the proportional representation and winner-takes-all systems.The proposed law was recently discussed in four-party meetings between the Free Patriotic Movement, al-Mustaqbal Movement, Hizbullah and AMAL Movement. It was reportedly proposed by FPM chief Jebran Bassil. Asked whether Kataeb would endorse the draft law should the demanded improvements be incorporated, Hakim said: “Today we have a vision and a lot of remarks that we have put at the disposal of the LF's leader and the president, and we support amending and improving this law.” “There are a lot of points of contention regarding the hybrid law but we're open to reaching a law that allows better representation and pluralism,” Hakim added. The main political parties are discussing several formats of the so-called hybrid law but the Progressive Socialist Party has raised the alarm over the representation of the minority Druze community, warning that any law containing proportional representation would “marginalize” Druze in the political system.

Jumblat: Stop Breaching the Constitution, Implement Taef Accord
Naharnet/February 01/17/In light of the political flurry over agreeing on an election law that meets approval of all parties, Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat voiced calls for the implementation of the Taef Agreement and slammed threats about vacuum at the parliament as “unconstitutional.”“Enough putting election draft laws that only divide instead of unite, and violate the constitution,” said Jumblat in a tweet on Tuesday. “Implement the Taef,” he said, voicing calls upon political parties to endorse a law for the upcoming parliamentary polls in conformity with the 1989 Taef Accord. The PSP categorically rejects a hybrid electoral law proposed by Free Patriotic Movement chief Jebran Bassil and all other proposals that contain proportional representation. The Democratic Gathering bloc of Jumblat, has been touring officials lately to make their position clear, the most recent was a meeting with Prime Minister Saad Hariri on Tuesday. After the meeting the conferees agreed that all discussions regarding the electoral law must conform with the 1989 Taef Accord. Jumblat added in his tweet: “Threats about vacuum at the parliament,” shall officials fail to agree on a new law are “unconstitutional.”He was referring to a statement made by President Michel Aoun, who said that if had to choose between extending the parliament’s term or vacuum, he would choose vacuum. The political parties have intensified their efforts in recent days in a bid to agree on a new electoral law before the expiry of the deadlines. They are discussing several formats of a so-called “hybrid” electoral law that combines the proportional representation and winner-takes-all systems. But according to media reports, the consultations regarding the law have returned to square one. One of the main obstacles is the Progressive Socialist Party's rejection of proportional representation. The party has warned that any law containing proportional representation would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah has repeatedly called for an electoral law fully based on proportional representation but other political parties, especially Mustaqbal and the PSP, have rejected the proposal, arguing that Hizbullah's weapons would prevent serious competition in the Iran-backed party's strongholds. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.

PSP Flatly Rejects Proposed Electoral Law as Talks Return to Square One
Naharnet/February 01/17/The Progressive Socialist Party on Tuesday said it categorically rejects a hybrid electoral law proposed by Free Patriotic Movement chief Jebran Bassil and all other proposals that contain proportional representation, as media reports said consultations regarding the electoral law “have returned to square one.”“We're here to inform Prime Minister (Saad) Hariri of our categorical rejection of all the formats that are being proposed for the electoral law,” MP and ex-minister Wael Abu Faour said after arriving at the Grand Serail with a Democratic Gathering delegation. After the meeting, delegation member and Education Minister Marwan Hamadeh described the talks with Hariri as “excellent,” noting that the conferees agreed that all discussions regarding the electoral law must conform with the 1989 Taef Accord. “That's why we didn't focus on technicalities but rather on the general political framework of the draft laws, which must ensure the rights of all parties,” Hamadeh added. “We openly declare that we support the full rights of Christians, but we are not insignificant and no one can infringe on our rights,” the minister stressed. He reminded that the Taef Accord stipulates “the formation of a national commission for the abolition of political sectarianism, the creation of a senate and the re-demarcation of governorates prior to the organization of the first (post-war) parliamentary elections, without mentioning proportional representation.”“We are showing openness and we'll continue our visits in search of a law that relieves everyone,” Hamadeh added, stressing that the PSP “will not accept to be eliminated.” “This will not happen,” he underlined. Asked about the Free Patriotic Movement's remarks that “keeping the 1960 law is a coup against the Taef Accord,” Hamadeh said the PSP does not want to start an exchange of tirades with any party or with President Michel Aoun. He however noted that the FPM was behind “the tense remarks about taking to the streets and imposing certain electoral laws.”“We want them to be relieved and to take their full rights, but we won't allow anyone to usurp our rights,” Hamadeh emphasized. The Democratic Gathering delegation had earlier on Tuesday held talks with ex-PM Najib Miqati. Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Abu Faour said: “There is a constitutional contract, which is the Taef Agreement, and it is binding for all the Lebanese. It had cost a lot of sacrifices, losses, bloodshed, and wounds that we have all shared as Lebanese. If anyone wishes to overthrow the Taef (accord), let them say it frankly.”“We want to follow the path of Taef; the election law is all about Taef and its mechanism is clear," he added. For his part, Miqati underlined keenness on reaching an election law that complies with Taef Agreement. He also called for the establishment of a senate.

Cabinet Convenes at Grand Serail, Electoral Law not on Agenda
Naharnet/February 01/17/Prime Minister Saad Hariri chaired a cabinet meeting on Wednesday at the Grand Serail where discussions tackled several items on the agenda, amid reports saying the controversial electoral law was not the focus of discussions.“The cabinet approved all the items on the agenda,” said Information Minister Melhem Riachi after the meeting. “Hariri stressed the necessity to put into implementation a waste management plan that has been set earlier to address the trash management crisis,” he added. “The ministerial committee tasked with handling the file will meet. We won't permit that Lebanon drowns in trash again,” he stressed. Hariri commenced the session, he said: “When the government pledged in its ministerial statement on the priority to stage the elections, it did not separate between this end and the efforts to find a new election law.”“Differences in points of view do not necessarily mean that we have reached a dead end, but is evidence of wellness and workshops must continue,” said Hariri, assuring that efforts seek to reach an electoral law that raises no fears for any political party or sect. Before the meeting began, Information Minister Melhem Riachi said the “cabinet will tackle items that have to do with the ministries.” Health Minister Marwan Hamadeh commented on the controversial talks as for an election law, he said: “The electoral format that has been circulating is over now. The search will continue until a new format is found.”Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq assured that the cabinet discussions today will not tackle the election law, saying it is likely to be discussed next week at the Baabda Palace. For his part, State Minister for Parliament Affairs, Ali Qansou also commented on the debate over an election law, saying he “supports considering Lebanon as one electoral district on the basis of proportionality.” Assuring the deliberations will continue until a new law is found, Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil said: “Discussions have not returned back to square one,” as claimed by media reports, “discussions are continuing.”Separately, in parallel with the cabinet meeting, women demonstrators rallied in Riad al-Solh square demanding that the cabinet look into increasing the participation of women in political life.The campaigners demanded that women be given 30 per cent quota in politics. “No parliamentary elections without a 30% quota for women. We must be involved in the ongoing consultations over an election law too,” a campaigner said. She said the lawmakers are requested to preserve the right of women and help them reach senior positions.

Report: Nasrallah to Deliver Speech on Election Law
Naharnet/February 01/17/Hizbullah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah is expected to make a “pivotal” statement in the next few days as for the controversial election law for the upcoming parliamentary elections, al-Joumhouria daily reported on Wednesday. Everybody is anxious to hear the stance of Nasrallah, which he might declare in the next few days, said the daily. They are counting that he takes a pivotal position about the future of the electoral law, based on an earlier stance he made a few weeks ago when he said a law fully based on proportional representation is a compulsory passage towards building the State.According to the daily, many speculations arise as for Nasrallah’s position. He might either reaffirm commitment to proportional representation based on large constituencies, or voice calls to return back to a law project of ex-PM Najib Miqati or even reject staging the elections in the first place.

Hariri welcomes Apostolic Nuncio
Wed 01 Feb 2017/NNA - Prime Minister Saad Hariri received this evening at the Grand Serail, in the presence of his advisor Daoud al-Sayegh, the Apostolic Nuncio to Lebanon Gabriele Caccia. Hariri also chaired a meeting of the ministerial committee in charge of tax provisions related to petroleum activities. It was attended by Minister of Finance Ali Hassan Khalil, Minister of Energy and Water Resources Cezar Abi Khalil, Chairman of the Lebanese Petroleum Administration Wissam Chbat and two of its members, Wissam Dahabi and Gaby Daaboul, and Secretary General of the Council of Ministers Fouad Fleifel.

Hamadeh listens to demands of private school teachers
Wed 01 Feb 2017/NNA - Higher Learning and National Education Minister, Marwan Hamadeh, welcomed on Wednesday a delegation representing the Private School Teachers' Syndicate, headed by Nehme Mahfouz. Mahfouz requested of Minister Hamadeh to refer the salary scale project to the House of Parliament before the end of February to be included in the new public budget. "In case of failure to refer the project on time, then they should opt for the salary scale project that's already present at the House of Parliament," Mahfouz suggested. Moreover, the syndical delegation also wished of Hamadeh to allow private school teachers to benefit from the Social Security Fund after retirement. In turn, Hamadeh said that he was following up on all the aforementioned projects. He also requested the establishment of a "Teacher's House" with an administrative council.

Lebanese, Palestinian meeting broaches situation in Ain el Helwe
Wed 01 Feb 2017/NNA - A Lebanese-Palestinian security meeting was held at noon on Wednesday between the head of the Army Intelligence branch in South Lebanon, General Khodr Hammoud, and the Palestinian High Security Committee chaired by Palestinian National Security Commander, General Sobhi Abu Arab. The meeting touched on the situation in Ain el Helwe, especially in light of the recent security incidents. Both sides also broached and the items of the security document which had been submitted to the Army Intelligence. "A meeting is taking place on weekly basis in order to monitor the situation in camps, mainly that of Ain el Helwe and the means to strengthening the role of the security forces," General Abou Arab said. He also said that investigations were underway in coordination with the Lebanese security forces to unveil the identity of the murderers of Palestinian official, Ismail Charouf Abu Ihab, who was assassinated last Sunday in Sidon.

French MP Bapt visits President Aoun upcoming Friday
Wed 01 Feb 2017/NNA - French Socialist MP Gerard Bapt announced that he will visit President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, upcoming Friday at Baabda Palace, to congratulate him on his assumption of presidency and to inquire about the latest internal developments, notably the issue of the existence of more than one million Syrian refugees in Lebanon. Bapt is a physician and a member of the Parliamentary French Lebanese Friendship Committee, and the Chairman of the French Syrian friendship Committee in the National Assembly. Bapt said in a statement that he "will participate in a medical mission to evaluate the tragic medical and health needs endured in specific by the residents of Aleppo."
The French Lawmaker will meet along with his accompanying the delegation local authorities, officials of the health sector, the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, in addition to representatives of various groups and communities.

Riachy opens Information Ministry doors before citizens
Wed 01 Feb 2017/NNA - Information Minister, Melhem Riachy, on Wednesday opened his ministerial office doors before Lebanese citizens, without prior appointments, and listened to their demands and concerns. "The prime goal behind this meeting is to listen to the demands and concerns of the citizens in an attempt to meet their needs as much as possible," Riachy said before his visitors. "These visits could be repeated once per month. Some people are not here for requests but to make proposals or suggest ideas," the Minister added. Responding to a question, Riachy said that he had sensed huge support by the people concerning the changes that were being introduced at the level of audio-visual media."Some people voiced need for some services because they had no one to turn to. Of course, I will try my best to meet their demands with the support of other ministers and ministries," he added.

Sarraf, Estonian Defense House Committee tackle current developments
Wed 01 Feb 2017/NNA - National Defense Minister, Yacoub Riad Sarraf, received on Wednesday at his ministerial office Chairman of the defense committee in the Estonian Parliament, Hannes Hanso, on top of a high-level parliamentary delegation. Estonian Embassy Charge d'Affaire was also present. Talks reportedly touched on an array of matters pertaining to the Middle East region, in general, and Lebanon, in particular. Both sides also discussed means of bolstering civil military cooperation between Lebanon and Estonia.

Lebanon basketball team scores victory over Jordan team in West Asian Basketball Championship

Wed 01 Feb 2017/NNA - The Lebanese national basketball team scored victory 72-61 over its Jordanian counterpart in West Asian Basketball Championship taking place in the Jordanian capital, Amman, qualified for Asia Championship which shall be held upcoming August in Lebanon. It is to note that the Lebanese national basketball team has reaped four consecutive times in its history the West Asian Basketball championship, and will be competing with the Syrian national team during tomorrow's last match at the conclusion of the Championship at 3.00 p.m. Beirut local time.

UCIP congratulates NNA for winning award for Best Arab News Agency concerned in tourism
Wed 01 Feb 2017/NNA - The International Catholic Union of the Press in Lebanon (UCIP- Lebanon) congratulated the National News Agency (NNA) in a letter addressed to NNA Director, Laure Sleiman Saab, for winning award for best Arab News Agency concerned in local and Arab tourism. This comes in the framework of a celebration of the Arab Center for Media, which was held in Casablanca late January 2017. The Union expressed pride that the new award has been added to another previous achievement, notably Lebanon's joining of the Organization of Asia-Pacific News Agencies (OANA) represented by the NNA Director as member of the Organization's executive council, during its recent 16th round of meetings which took place recently in Azerbaijan's capital of Baku. The Union highly commended NNA and its administration for its pioneering role in demonstrating utmost professionalism and competence at the forefront of Arab and international media arena.

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 01-02/17
National security adviser puts Iran 'on notice'
 Associated Press/WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's national security adviser says the administration is putting Iran "on notice" after it tested a ballistic missile. Michael Flynn told reporters Wednesday that the Trump administration "condemns such actions by Iran that undermine security, prosperity and stability throughout and beyond the Middle East that puts American lives at risk."He says "Iran is now feeling emboldened," criticizing the Obama administration for failing "to respond adequately."Flynn says that "we are officially putting Iran on notice," although it's not clear what he meant. A defense official said this week that the missile test ended with a "failed" re-entry into the earth's atmosphere. The official had no other details, including the type of missile. The official was not authorized to discuss the matter and spoke on condition of anonymity.

US, Western allies launch war games near Iran waters
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Wednesday, 1 February 2017/The US and four other allied navies have begun a three-day maritime exercise in international waters next to the Iranian shoreline. The exercise includes navy participants from the UK (which is leading the exercise), France and Australia. "The exercise is intended to enhance mutual capabilities, improve tactical proficiency and strengthen partnerships in ensuring the free flow of commerce and freedom of navigation," a US Navy press release said.
According to Sputnik News, it is expected that the HMS Daring, the HMS Ocean, and US and French warships will simulate destroying Iranian combat jets, ships and coastal missile launching facilities during the exercise. The exercise comes after a series of brief encounters between US warships in the Gulf and Iranian ships. There were 35 incidents in the first half of 2016, according to the Pentagon, and earlier in January the USS Mahan fired flares and a warning shots on four Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps attack boats as they approached the US Navy ship. The head of the Iranian navy, Rear Adm. Habibollah Sayyari, has warned against any incursion of the participating ships into Iranian territorial waters. But US officials have said there is no plan to enter Iranian territorial waters, according to the military.com news site.
 
UAE Foreign Minister says Trump travel ban an internal US affair
AFP/Reuters, Abu Dhabi Wednesday, 1 February 2017/President Donald Trump’s travel ban imposed on citizens of seven mainly Muslim countries was a sovereign decision for the United States and not directed at any religion, United Arab Emirates Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdallah bin Zayed said on Wednesday. Also read: Trump defends travel ban, says US needs ‘strong borders’Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed said most Muslims and Muslim countries were not included in the ban and the named states faced “challenges” that they needed to address. “The United States has taken a decision that is within the American sovereign decision,” Sheikh Abdullah said. “There are attempts to give the impression that this decision is directed against a particular religion, but what proves this talk to be incorrect first is what the US administration itself says ... that this decision is not directed at a certain religion.” The UAE, a major oil exporter, is a close ally of the United States and a member of the US-led coalition fighting Islamist militants in Syria. Speaking at a joint news conference with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov in Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Abdallah also said the idea of safe zones in Syria would be welcome if they were to be temporary and for humanitarian purposes under international auspices. But he said Abu Dhabi wanted to hear more details from Washington before subscribing to the idea. “If the aim behind these areas is humanitarian and temporary and under an international umbrella, I think this is a basis we can work on,” he said. “But I think that it is still early to decide what our final stance toward these zones is before we hear from the new US administration the ideas and develop that further,” he added. “The United States has made... a sovereign decision,” he said, pointing out that it was “provisional” and did not apply to “the large majority” of the world’s Muslims. But the 90-day ban, which could still extend to other states, has exempted Muslim-majority nations associated with major attacks in the West.
 
Rex Tillerson confirmed as US secretary of state

REUTERS/01 February 2017/The tally was largely along party lines, with every Republican favoring Tillerson. WASHINGTON - The US Senate confirmed Rex Tillerson as President Donald Trump's secretary of state on Wednesday, filling a key spot on the Republican's national security team despite concerns about the former Exxon Mobil Corp chief executive officer's ties to Russia. In the vote, 56 senators backed Tillerson, and 43 voted no. The tally was largely along party lines, with every Republican favoring Tillerson, along with four members of the Democratic caucus, Senators Heidi Heitkamp, Joe Manchin and Mark Warner as well as Angus King, an independent. Democratic Senator Chris Coons did not vote. Senate Democrats had tried, but failed, to delay the vote because of Trump's executive order banning immigration from seven mostly Muslim countries and temporarily halting the entry of refugees.They said they wanted to ask Tillerson more questions about the issue after Trump signed the order on Friday. Senators had also expressed concerns over Tillerson's ties to Russia after the executive spent years there working for the oil company. Some faulted him for failing to promise to recuse himself from matters related to Exxon Mobil businesses for his entire term as secretary of state rather than only the one year required by law. Republicans said they thought Tillerson would be a strong leader as the country's top diplomat. They also said it was important to fill key slots on Trump's national security team quickly.

U.N. Chief Backs Plan to Pick Syria Delegates to Geneva Talks
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/February 01/17/U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres on Wednesday backed his peace envoy's plan to pick representatives from the Syria opposition to the Geneva talks if the groups fail to agree on their delegates. U.N. envoy Staffan de Mistura came under sharp criticism from the Syria opposition after giving opposition groups until February 8 to agree on their delegation to the talks, scheduled to open on February 20. "It is clear this is a possibility that might be used," Guterres told reporters about the ultimatum. "What we want is the success of the Geneva conference, and the success of the Geneva conference implies that there is a meaningful representation of the Syrian opposition in Geneva," he said. "We will do everything to make sure that that happens." De Mistura told the Security Council on Tuesday that he was delaying the peace talks, initially scheduled to begin on February 8, to allow both sides to better prepare. He warned that if the opposition fails to agree, he would "select the delegation in order to make sure that it can be as inclusive as possible."Guterres noted that U.N. resolutions on Syria give De Mistura the prerogative to pick the delegation to the peace talks. "What is important is to have, this time, substantive discussions on the central issues, and I hope that this will be possible," he said. Previous UN-led talks have broken down over disagreements on ensuring a transition in Damascus that would lead to President Bashar Assad's exit from power. The opposition rejected the envoy's comments as "unacceptable." "Selecting the Syrian opposition delegation is not the business... of de Mistura," Riad Hijab, head of the opposition High Negotiations Committee, wrote on his Twitter account.  More than 310,000 people have been killed in Syria since the conflict erupted with anti-government protests in March 2011.

UN chief says Trump travel ban should be 'removed sooner rather than later'
 Wed 01 Feb 2017/NNA - The United Nations' Secretary General Antonio Guterres said on Wednesday that U.S. President Donald Trump's travel restrictions on seven countries and freeze on refugee resettlement should be lifted sooner than later."This is not the way to best protect the U.S. or any other country in relation to the serious concerns that exist about possible terrorist infiltration," Guterres said to reporters. "I don't think this is the effective way to do so. I think that these measures should be removed sooner rather than later."--REUTERS
 
Lavrov Calls for Syria's Return to Arab League
Naharnet/Agence France Presse/February 01/17/Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov called Wednesday for Syria's return to the Arab League, saying its membership would allow the organization to help find a political solution to the country's conflict. "The League could play a more important, more effective role if the Syrian government was part of the organization," Lavrov, whose country is a key ally of the Damascus regime and also a broker in peace efforts, told a press conference in the Emirati capital. He said Syria was a "legitimate" member of the United Nations and yet "cannot take part in discussions inside the Arab League.""This does not help our joint (peace) efforts," said Lavrov. But Arab League chief Ahmed Aboul Gheit, speaking at the same press conference, ruled out an early return of Syria to the Cairo-based organization. Any decision was up to the League's 21 other members, he said, adding that the issue was not on the current agenda and would only be raised when "a political settlement" was in sight for Syria's almost six-year-old civil war.The Arab League suspended Syria's membership at the end of 2011 following months of brutal repression of anti-regime demonstrations and an opposition movement supported by Gulf monarchies. Turning to new U.S. President Donald Trump's proposal of establishing safe zones for refugees in Syria and Yemen, another war-torn Arab nation, Lavrov expressed skepticism. "The Trump administration still has to work out a concrete approach. The idea of safe zones was studied at the onset of the Syrian crisis, something that would reproduce the sad experience of Libya," he said. "Everyone understood this when Libya was destroyed," the Russian foreign minister said. But Lavrov said he remained convinced that Russia could "re-establish a complete and regular dialogue with the United States to lead to pragmatic results towards settling the situation in Syria, Libya and Yemen." He said such cooperation would "not be dictated by the ideology of democratization for example," referring to the role of past U.S. administrations in the overthrow of dictators such as Iraq's Saddam Hussein and Moammar Gadhafi in Libya

Iran: We will not negotiate our missiles
Staff writer, Al Arabiya.net Wednesday, 1 February 2017/Iran announced on Wednesday that it will not negotiate over its controversial missiles program. Iran’s announcement came in light of International positions refusing its recent ballistic tests and demands within the US administration of President Donald Trump, to review the nuclear agreement between Tehran and the P5+1 group of powers to urge the Iranian regime to comply with the terms of the agreement, prohibiting experiments on missiles carrying nuclear warheads. Iranian Fars agency quoted Iranian Shura Council's national security and foreign policy committee spokesman Hussein Husseini saying that the Commission confirmed during its meeting on Wednesday that the defense and missiles programs are not negotiable, and that he will not allow anyone’s intervention in this matter. Husseini said that the Committee held an urgent meeting on Wednesday, in the presence of the Commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps Aerospace Force Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, deputy foreign minister for European and American Affairs Majid Takht Ravanchi, and officials from the Intelligence Ministry. The meeting was to discuss the American positions. He stressed that the participants agreed that “the defense and missiles issue is not negotiable and should witness outstanding progress. He added that the Shura Council should show its support in this matter.
 
US envoy to UN slams Iran missile test
By AFP, United Nations, United States Wednesday, 1 February 2017/Iran’s test-firing of a medium-range ballistic missile is “absolutely unacceptable,” US Ambassador Nikki Haley said Tuesday following a closed-door meeting of the UN Security Council. The United States requested the urgent talks following the weekend missile launch, the first action taken at the council by President Donald Trump’s envoy. “We have confirmed that Iran did have a medium-size missile launch testing on January 29, on Sunday. This is absolutely unacceptable,” Haley told reporters. She challenged Iran’s assertion that its missiles are not in violation of UN resolutions because they are for defense purposes and not designed to carry nuclear warheads. “They know that they are not supposed to be doing ballistic missile testing” of anything that can carry warheads, said Haley. The missile launched Sunday was capable of carrying a 500-kilogram payload and had a range of 300 kilometers, she said. “That is more than enough to be able to deliver a nuclear weapon.” The ambassador said Iran was trying to convince the world that “they are being nice” before adding: “I will tell the people across the world that is something we should be alarmed about.” “The United States is not naive. We are not going to stand by. You will see us call them out,” warned Haley. “We are committed to making them understand that this is not anything that we will ever accept.”Haley said the United States wanted to shut down supplies of missile technology to Tehran. “No country should be supplying Iran with any of the technology allowing them to do that,” she said. The council requested a report on the missile launch from UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and from a committee set up after the council endorsed the Iran nuclear deal, British Ambassador Matthew Rycroft said.
 Britain maintains that the test is “inconsistent” with UN resolutions, but has not declared the launch to be a violation.
 
Violence erupts during eviction of Israeli settlers from illegal outpost
Reuters, West Bank Wednesday, 1 February 2017/Rightist protesters scuffled with Israeli police carrying out a court order to evict settlers from an illegal outpost in the occupied West Bank on Wednesday, hours after the government announced more construction in larger settlements. Around 330 Israeli settlers live in Amona, the largest of scores of outposts built in the West Bank without official authorisation. The Supreme Court ruled in November, after a lengthy legal battle, that settlers had to leave Amona because their homes were built on privately-owned Palestinian land. With no weapons visible, but wearing backpacks, hundreds of police walked past burning tyres and pushed back against dozens of nationalist Israeli youths who flocked to Amona in support of the settlers. Several protesters were detained by police during the scuffles and there were a few instances of stone-throwing. A police spokesmen said at least 10 officers were injured slightly by rocks and caustic liquid thrown at them. “A Jew doesn’t evict a Jew!” the youngsters chanted. The Amona settlers themselves stayed largely put inside their homes after erecting makeshift barriers in front of their doors and vowing passive resistance to eviction. “We won’t leave our homes on our own. Pull us out, and we’ll go,” one settler told reporters. “It is a black day for Zionism.”On a nearby hilltop, Issa Zayed, a Palestinian who said he was one of the owners of the land on which Amona was built, watched the scene through binoculars. “With God’s help, it will be evacuated and our land will return to us,” he said.
 New settler homes
 Earlier, Israel announced plans for 3,000 more settlement homes in the West Bank, the third such declaration in 11 days since U.S. President Donald Trump took office. Trump, a Republican, has signalled he could be more accommodating toward such projects than his Democratic predecessor Barack Obama. An announcement a week ago by Israel that it would build some 2,500 more dwellings in the West Bank, territory captured in a 1967 Middle East war and where Palestinians now seek statehood, drew rebukes from the Palestinians and the European Union. It followed approval a few days before of over 560 new homes in East Jerusalem, also taken by Israel in 1967. “The decision ... will place obstacles in the path of any effort to start a peace process that will lead to security and peace,” said Nabil Abu Rdainah, a spokesman for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Palestinians want the West Bank and Gaza Strip for an independent state, with its capital in East Jerusalem. Israeli troops and settlers withdrew from Gaza in 2005.
 In 2006 Amona saw a violent partial eviction, with nine shacks torn down by authorities. Police were confronted by thousands of settlers and more than 200 people were injured. Most countries consider all Israeli settlements to be illegal. Israel disagrees, citing historical and political links to the land - which the Palestinians also assert - as well as security interests. The Amona issue had caused tensions within Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition government. But they eased after he got behind a law proposed by the Jewish Home party, a far-right political ally, to retroactively legalise dozens of outposts. This would not apply to Amona because of the existing court decision. “We have lost the battle over Amona but we are winning the campaign for the Land of Israel,” cabinet minister and Jewish Home leader Naftali Bennett tweeted after the evacuation began. The legislation is expected to be passed in parliament next week. It is opposed, however, by Israel’s attorney-general and legal experts predict it eventually would be overturned in court.
 
Israel authorizes 3,000 West Bank settler homes

By AFP, Jerusalem Wednesday, 1 February 2017/Israel announced Tuesday night the construction of 3,000 settlement homes in the occupied West Bank, the fourth such announcement in the less than two weeks since the inauguration of US President Donald Trump. “Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have decided to authorize the construction of 3,000 new housing units in Judea-Samaria,” the defense ministry said in a statement, using a term Israel uses for the West Bank, a Palestinian territory it has occupied since 1967. Since the January 20 inauguration of Trump, Israel has approved the construction of 566 housing units in three settlement areas of east Jerusalem and announced the building of 2,502 more in the West Bank. On Thursday last week, Israeli officials gave final approval for 153 settler homes in east Jerusalem. They had been frozen under pressure from the previous US administration of president Barack Obama, which had warned that settlements could derail hopes of a negotiated two-state solution.
 Trump however has pledged strong support for Israel, and Netanyahu’s government has moved quickly to take advantage. “We are building and we will continue building,” Netanyahu said last week, referring to settlement approvals. The prime minister has said he sees the Trump presidency as offering “significant opportunities” after facing “huge pressures” from Obama on Iran and settlements. The announcements have deeply concerned those seeking to salvage a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. All Israeli settlements are illegal under international law, with much of the international community seeing them as a major obstacle to peace as they are built on land the Palestinians see as part of their future state. In a telling break with the Obama administration, Trump’s White House has not condemned Israel’s settlement expansion.
 
Middle East peace relies on firm action vis-à-vis Iran violating UNSC resolution
NCRI Statements/Wednesday, 01 February 2017/
Missiles launched under Khamenei authorization & Rouhani's orders
The Iranian Resistance emphasizes the need for a firm reaction vis-à-vis Iran’s mullahs for violating United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231, and continuing to build and test-launch ballistic missiles able to deliver nuclear payloads. Such action is needed to establish peace and tranquility, and stand against continued regional warmongering by Iran. In the past the international community’s silence in the face of constant UNSC violations by Tehran provided significant assistance to the mullahs in pursuing their nuclear program and efforts to obtain an atomic bomb.Iranian Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan admitted Wednesday to the test launch after the UN Security Council confirmed last night Iran conducted a ballistic missile launch. “What has been raised as a missile test was according to our schedules and we will continue our programmed measures, based on orders issued by the President late last year, with the utmost pace and precision,” he said. Following the adoption of UNSC Resolution 2231 back in July 2015 this is not Iran’s first violation by conducting such test fires. Iran has carried out at least four other missile launches through the course of 2015 and 2016. Hassan Firuzabadi, senior advisor to Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and former chief of staff of the mullahs’ armed forces, also made remarks in this regard. “No missiles are launched in this country without authorization from the commander-in-chief. [Khamenei] must also authorize any missile launches in military drills… even the exact timing of the launch,” he said. (IRGC Quds Force-affiliated Tasnim news agency – November 12, 2016) UNSC Resolution 2231 calls on Iran “not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology.”
 Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/February 1, 2017
 
Regretful Decease of Thierry Levy, the Prominent Lawyer, Humanist and Distinguished French Writer
NCRI/Wednesday, 01 February 2017
Mr. Thierry Levy, the prominent lawyer, authoritative author and steadfast defender of the People’s Mojahedin of Iran, died Monday in Paris. Thierry Levy’s works are among the best-selling books in France.Thierry Levy was an unwavering defender of the Iranian Resistance and its members, after the violent attack to the offices of the Iranian Resistance on June 17, 2003, and case fabrications of Iranian regime against them, he courageously defended them counter to this injustice and together with other prominent lawyers succeeded to impose a humiliating defeat to the Iranian regime, and as such once again proved the legitimacy of the Iranian resistance.
Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, the President-elect of the Iranian Resistance, expressed her profound grief and condolences over the sorrowing decease of Thierry Levy to the community of Lawyers and the French intellectuals and her most sincere empathies to the families and survivors and wished them forbearance.
Levy was a kind person who always stood against injustice and represented the genuine values ​​of France.
The people and the Resistance of Iran will never forget, justice- seeking and great men like him, who in the darkest of days, played an important role in the victory of them against the clerical regime’s conspiratorial jurisdictive dossiers.
French President expressed his condolences and the Elyse presidential palace on January 30, 2017 on the occasion of his death wrote: "Thierry Levy the tireless defender of human rights for which, he not only as a lawyer but also as the head of ‘International prisoner Watch’ between 2000 and 2004 was fighting. In his absence, a capacity for resentment and an unforgettable voice in the judicial world has left us. "
Over the decease of this noble French lawyer, Le Monde, 30 January 2017 wrote: “Thierry Levy along with his colleagues Robert Badinter, Henri Leclerc and Philippe Lemaire participated in all the battles for the abolition of death penalty. He was also a tireless campaigner for improving the conditions of detainees, his intransigence, and his refraining from any appeasement, made him a master of law, who lent influence over a generation of lawyers."
 In the judicial cases, which Iran regime’s ministry of intelligence (MOIS), had litigated against Iranian resistance, through its Iranian or foreign lackeys. Levy’s masterful defense always turned the courts against Iranian regime and its agents instead. In such trials, Levy was always stepping forward and exposing regime’s agents and lawyers with his winning logic and his robust defense.
 On February 21, 2008, Levy said in Paris court branch 17 regarding Anne Singleton’s hired agents who had attended the court to testify against NCRI, “we have listened to the testimonies of a lot of English parliamentarians. They describe Mrs. Singleton as an Iranian regime’s agent. Also her husband Masoud Khodabandeh is working for the Iranian regime. They have described her this way, and it has particularly been stated by a Member of Parliament. Actually, the most critical information has been provided by Win Griffiths.
 Win Griffiths has visited Evin Prison and has spotted Mrs. Singleton in the corridors there. The worst crimes are taking place in this same prison. This prison is the most secret and most brutal of its kind. Anne Singleton was spotted (in Evin Prison) in 2004. Mr. Griffith had with his own eyes seen Mrs. Singleton accompanied by some officials there. He had seen how she walked freely in prison’s corridors. This woman had been joking with the prison officials. This is unimaginable. This is unexplainable.
 Lord Corbett prevented a press conference from being held in a building belonging to British Parliament in November 2005. The conference was organized by Anne Singleton and participated by Alain Chevalérias. We have Lord Corbett’s testimony. You can’t be more English than Lord Corbett. A testimony with Corbett’s own signature according to which Mrs. Singleton has been identified as an agent. Also Sobhani has been among the organizers of the press conference. He is the same person who was arrested in Paris by French police with a knife in hand after he had attacked and wounded a person who had opposed a rally set up against NCRI. Sobhani is one of Chevalérias main sources of information.”
 Thierry Levy was also the lawyer of Yves Bonnet, former head of France’s anti-terrorist Organization, in a court held on December 17, 2009. In the case, Iranian regime’s intelligence had, through one of its notorious agents Named ‘Ehsan Naraghi’ as well as two of its other hirelings, complained against Yves Bonnet for his published book titled ‘VAVAK: At The Service of Ayatollahs’. The book had revealed the criminal, spying nature of the Iranian regime, provoking anger among Mullahs and their hirelings.
 As part of his defense, Thierry Levy described Naraghi’s records in supporting and justifying torture and killing by the Mullahs’ regime, saying that “Naraghi writes a letter to Ahmadinejad, describing how he’s been fighting against PMOI in the past forty years, due to which he has been favored by Khomeini and former Presidents, and that he’s been praised by Khomeini for his services. He then suggests Ahmadinejad to launch a costly trial and hire a prominent lawyer. He later requested Ahmadinejad in another letter for financial assistance.”
 “Naraghi has even sent the invoices and fees for Ahmadinejad! “, Levy continues, “There’s also a recorded tape from Naraghi in which he once again asks for money. Despite that, he says he’s been defamed, whereas he is the one who introduces VAVAK agents to French Judiciary to testify against NCRI”
 He added that “behind his cultured, intellectual and delicate mask, there is a character that provokes disgust in the court. He has written in his book as well as said in the court that torture is justifiable …”
 Finally as the French Major daily newspaper ‘Le Monde’ described him: “Of all his contemporaries, he is undoubtedly the one who has most thought the job of defending.”
 
A Letter From the Iranian- British Citizen Who Is Jailed by the IRGC
NCRI/ Wednesday, 01 February 2017/The Iranian-British citizen Nazanin Zaghari, who has been arrested by Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) and sentenced to five years in jail, has in a letter to her daughter complained about being subjected to such a ‘horrifying and painful fate’ in her own birthplace. Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, arrested on 3 April 2016 in Tehran’s airport when returning from her two-week trip to Iran, is now in Evin Prison. She has asked her daughter in a letter to forgive her mom for being forced to leave her little daughter alone. The letter reads: “Believe me, I had no idea such a horrifying and painful fate was awaiting you in the country where your mother was born and raised, otherwise, I would’ve never rushed a single moment to pack for or a two-week trip to Tehran in March 2016.”Written on Tuesday January 24, the letter has been published on Iran’s Human Rights Defenders Association website on Saturday January 28.
 Following her arrest by the Revolutionary Guard’s intelligence agents, Zaghari was taken to a prison in Kerman. She was later transferred to Tehran’s Evin Prison in May 2016 to stand trial in Tehran’s revolutionary court. Zaghari was sentenced to five years in jail by primary court, following which the Judiciary spokesman Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei told reporters that the court order for the Iranian-British citizen was final.
 Nazanin’s daughter Gabriella, 22-months old at the time of her mother’s arrest, has been held by Nazanin’s parents ever since. “The day when they, in all injustice an unfairness, took you away from my arms, my breast from which you were feeding until a few days before, while giving me the hope of a freedom morning, I didn’t know and didn’t understand, either, by which religious, moral or humanitarian standards is such cruelty to a mother and her child valid?”, writes Zaghari in her letter to her daughter.
 “Didn’t they hear a mother wailing overnight, those who for their own purposes brought me to trial, reprimanded, charged and kept me in solitary confinements and eventually issued a sentence?”, she asks. Prior to her arrest, the Iranian-British citizen was the director of a number of projects belonging to Thomson-Reuters Charity Foundation (linked to Thomson-Reuters news agency). She has also been involved in some humanitarian activities in Bam following the earthquake there.
 
EU Warns Iran Against Missile Tests
NCRI Iran News/ Wednesday, 01 February 2017/The EU on Tuesday warned Iran against stoking mistrust by continuing ballistic missile tests, after Tehran told the new US administration not to use the issue as a pretext to create fresh tensions. “The EU reiterates its concern about Iran’s missile program and calls upon Iran to refrain from activities which deepen mistrust, such as ballistic missile tests,” said Nabila Massrali, an EU foreign affairs spokeswoman. The UN Security Council is due to hold emergency talks at Washington’s request later Tuesday on Iran’s recent test-firing of a medium-range missile — which Tehran has not confirmed. The European Union helped broker a landmark accord between the West and Iran under which Tehran agreed to rein in its nuclear program in return for the lifting of western economic sanctions. US President Donald Trump has repeatedly attacked the nuclear accord, threatening to reverse it or find other ways of sanctioning Iran. Separate UN, US and EU sanctions imposed against Iran over its ballistic missile program remain in force. The EU spokeswoman noted that since Iran’s ballistic missile effort was not included in the nuclear accord, “the tests are not a violation.”Additionally, it was up to the Security Council to determine if the latest test was a violation of UN resolutions on Iran’s missile program, she said. The missile test, which Fox News reported took place on Sunday, was unsuccessful; the Khorramshahr medium-range ballistic missile flew 600 miles and then exploded, it said, citing US officials.
 
IRAN: IRGC kills young destitute porters
NCRI Statements/ Wednesday, 01 February 2017
An annual $25 billion of contraband deals are struck in Iran by Khamenei and IRGC affiliates
Four Kurdish porters were arrested last week in the border area of Banneh (western Iran) and subsequently pushed down into the valley by agents of the clerical regime. One of the porters by the name of Azad Ghassemi, father of a small child, got killed and the three other porters were badly injured. Two other porters who had witnessed this murder were also arrested and taken to an unknown location. The regime officials have threatened the families of the six porters to refrain from all forms of dissemination of the news and information about this crime. Five young porters, 18-27, lost their lives on January 28 and 30 in the villages of Piranshahr and Sardasht (Iranian Kurdistan) when they got trapped in the freezing storm and avalanche. A number of other porters were injured and at least two of them are in critical conditions. The shocking death of these youths is but a small part of the Iranian regime's record of corruption and crimes. The clerical regime has plundered the Iranian people's wealth and squandered the country's assets on nuclear projects, and export of terrorism, fundamentalism and war to the region. It has destroyed the country's economy and brought about poverty, unemployment and inflation for the people of Iran. An increasing number of people have had to become porters as a consequence of the destruction of the Iranian economy and rampant unemployment. Ten-year-old children, elderly men and women, as well as students and university graduates are among these porters. They are in constant danger of being directly targeted by the State Security Force. Avalanches, drowning in the rivers, freezing in the cold, and falling into deep valleys, are among other dangers of this job.
 In the 8-month period between March and November 2016, at least 70 Kurdish porters lost their lives in the border areas as a result of the SSF shootings. Dozens of others have become wounded.
 Mr. Ahmad Shahid, the former UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in Iran, noted the systematic killing of porters in one of his reports and underlined the fact that the regime's laws criminalize the activities of these porters and consider them punishable by several months of imprisonment or cash fines which are equal to the price of the items that are confiscated from them. The UNSR received reports that border guards shoot the porters and in this way, dozens of porters and their horses are killed or wounded every year.
 These young destitute porters are gunned down or killed while the clerical regime, namely Khamenei, the IRGC, as well as the security and intelligence agencies, manipulate, facilitate and organize contraband deals such as smuggling of narcotic drugs, contraband goods, trafficking of young women and girls, etc. Habibollah Haghighi, head of the Central Staff of Combatting Smuggling Goods and Foreign Exchange, said that every porter receives between 30 to 50 thousand toumans for every round of carrying loads.
 Hossein Ali Haji Deligani, Majlis deputy, pointed out that the volume of contraband deals in the country is $25 billion which is three times the country's construction budget. According to Haji Deligani, the smuggling of goods and foreign exchange has led to the unemployment of 800,000 people. (The state-run media, June 19, 2016) The state-run Tabnak website also revealed two years ago that the smuggling of goods and etc. eliminates 1.750.000 job opportunities every year. (The state-run Tabnak website – March 7, 2015)
So long as the anti-human and anti-Iranian clerical regime rules the country, the people of Iran will experience only oppression. The only way to do away with so much pain and suffering, is the unity of all strata of the Iranian people to topple this medieval and criminal regime.
The Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/February 1, 2017

Tens of Thousands of Yemenis Trapped in Red Sea Fighting
Fighting between Yemeni government forces and rebels has trapped tens of thousands of civilians in and around the port town of Mokha, where over 30 fighters were killed Wednesday, residents and the U.N. said. "We fear the (Shiite) Huthi (rebel) snipers who have taken up positions on rooftops but also the firing from the other (government) side," said Majed Mukaibar, a 32-year-old fisherman and father in the Red Sea town of southwest Yemen. Ibrahim Saleh, a tradesman who works in southern Yemen's main city of Aden, told AFP that he has been trying since last week to evacuate his family from Mokha but has been thwarted by incessant gunfire. The U.N. humanitarian coordinator in Yemen, Jamie McGoldrick, said in a statement released Tuesday that he was "extremely concerned about the safety and well-being of civilians" in Mokha and nearby Dhubab. "Information from the field indicates that military operations in the coastal region have forced most residents of Dhubab to flee the area," he said. McGoldrick said "an estimated 20,000-30,000 people, almost one third of the population, are trapped in the town (of Mokha) and require immediate protection and relief assistance."Constant air strikes, shelling and sniper fire around the town had "killed and injured scores of civilians and have ground most services to a halt," including water supplies. The U.N. official appealed for a halt to fighting "to facilitate the delivery of assistance to Mokha and enable the free movement of civilians." Military and medical sources said 25 rebels and six soldiers on the government side, which is being supported by a Saudi-led Arab coalition, were killed in the latest clashes on Wednesday for control of Mokha. Forces loyal to President Abedrabbo Mansour Hadi have been battling on three fronts but so far failed to penetrate the center of Mokha, according to residents and military sources. Before government forces launched a major offensive on January 7, Huthi rebels controlled virtually all of Yemen's 450-kilometer (280-mile) Red Sea coastline. Soldiers have since thrust north from the Bab al-Mandab strait where the Red Sea joins the Indian Ocean, overrunning Dhubab district and entering the historic port of Mokha in their biggest advance in months. Conflict in Yemen escalated in March 2015 when the Saudi-led coalition launched air raids against the Huthi rebels, who had taken over the capital and seized swathes of the country's center and north. The war has cost more than 7,400 lives in the past two years, according to the U.N.'s World Health Organization.
 
EU Warns New Israeli Settlements Risk Making 2-State Solution 'Impossible'
Israel's latest announcement of new settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories risks making a two-state solution impossible, EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini said Wednesday. Israel unveiled plans for 3,000 new homes for Jewish settlers in the occupied West Bank, the fourth such announcement in the less than two weeks since U.S. President Donald Trump took office. The announcement "marks a very worrying trend, posing a direct challenge to the prospects of a viable two-state solution, which is increasingly difficult and risks becoming impossible," Mogherini warned in a statement. The European Union "deeply regrets that Israel is proceeding with this, despite the continuous serious international concern and objections, which have been constantly raised at all levels," Mogherini said. Settlements in both the West Bank and east Jerusalem are viewed as illegal under international law and major stumbling blocks to peace as they are built on land the Palestinians want for their own state. Mogherini said continued settlement expansion "goes directly against" EU policy and the recommendations of the Quartet, which is made up of the EU, the United States, the United Nations and Russia. "A negotiated two-state solution is the only way to fulfill the legitimate aspirations of both parties and to achieve enduring peace," she said. Since Trump took office with top aides sympathetic to the settlement enterprise, the Israeli government has announced a string of new projects that will add more than 6,000 homes for Jewish settlers. 

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 01-02
Attacking Trump and the immigration law
Mamdouh AlMuhaini/Al Arabiya/February 01/17
The Trump administration’s decision to temporarily ban citizens belonging to seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States has stirred a lot of controversy. The new American administration said the ban is not permanent and it is not directed toward Muslims in general. If this was the case, hundreds of millions of Muslims would have been banned and of course it is impossible for this to happen. Yet, some of those who objected to the decision voiced doubt over its fairness, adding that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are not included in the list of banned countries. As if what’s needed here – according to their point of view – is to increase the number of Muslims banned and not decrease it. The list includes countries whose citizens applying to travel to the US were strictly monitored for six or more months during the Obama administration.
The new administration said it selected these countries because of the chaos prevailing there as it has become difficult to get reliable security information about citizens wanting to immigrate to the US or visit it.
This is not the first time the citizens of a certain country are banned from entering the US. However due to Trump’s image, and the manner in which the ban order was signed, a lot of controversy has erupted. This debate has diminished the significance of much more important matters to our region such as agreeing on safe zones in Syria and confronting the Iranian threat. These issues have even been discussed during Trump’s phone call with Saudi King Salman.
To fairly understand the motives behind all this, we must understand the motives of those involved and understand their real positions. I am not talking about the moral and humanitarian position taken by those who defend weak people and who are threatened and seek refuge to escape horrible tragedies. Such people adopt similar positions on all major causes and play important roles in helping those persecuted.
However, they often also quickly become a tool at the hands of deceitful politicians, partisan media figures and biased artists. These are the ones who have fueled recent protests in an attempt to serve their own aims.
Political gimmicks
In a democratic system, it is understandable for politicians to fight to remain in power. We, who are far away from these malicious activities, sometimes forget that politicians’ rhetoric and actions are not for our sake but for the sake of fulfilling their partisan aims and ambitions. Would there have been the same fuss if former President Barack Obama had issued this ban. He is said to have secretly worked on such a thing and no one objected? Trump opposes the traditional political institution in Washington and his stunning victory against Hillary Clinton was unexpected. Countries which have been at the forefront fighting terrorism, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, are being continuously criticized at a time when Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif lectures about brotherhood and peace
This is why he came under heavy criticism and all means have been used in this attack against him. It is humiliating when a competent competitor defeats you but what’s more humiliating is to be defeated by a competitor who is a joke, as the Democrats and even the Republicans allied with the Democrats see Trump as.
For them this as an opportunity to attack Trump during his first days in power. However, they don’t care about morals and values here, and this is understandable in politics. Former Secretary of State John Kerry participated in a protest on the first day when Trump became president. Former president Obama did not express sympathy for the horrific massacres in Aleppo. Yet, he violated the traditional practice of former presidents refraining from criticizing a new president with a view to preserving presidential legitimacy.
Few days later, Obama criticized Trump to serve partisan and personal interests. Although there are hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugees, only few were allowed into the US. In 2011, they accepted 29 refugees, in 2012, they accepted 31, in 2013, they accepted 36 and in 2014 it was a little more than 100. These are small numbers considering the barbaric war in which dangerous weapons have been used and have led to scenes like that of child Aylan Kurdi who drowned in the Mediterranean Sea. We have not heard any political or moral criticism on those the way we do today.
Twitter battle
Susan Rice, who was Obama’s foreign policy adviser, wrote on Twitter that the ban order was mad. Rice strongly opposed American intervention in Syria when at the same time Iranian militias are publicly committing crimes there. This is a misleading tweet of course but it’s unfortunately accepted during these political struggles. Her tweet also has nothing to do with the pain of the people she claims to defend. Trump’s war with the media has been open and public ever since he announced he will run for the presidency and it has increased after he emerged victorious. Trump’s insistence to use his Twitter account is a frank confrontation in which well-known journalists announced that he was not their president and that they have not recognized his legitimacy until now. Although he selected respectable figures in his administration, the latter has not yet received a single positive praise. Instead, they have unfairly focused on the administration’s flaws and mistakes and they’ve done so in an exaggerated manner. Following the ban order, the professional media, which unfortunately abandoned its neutrality, found a chance to fiercely attack Trump. This is a clear and intentional attempt to finish off the new administration and tarnish its image by describing it as racist, fascist and anti-Muslim. If these journalists care about weak Muslims, then why haven’t they said anything regarding the terrorist crimes and massacres which the Iranian regime has committed? They’ve actually done the complete opposite of that. They did not voice any doubts about Iran and they did not question Obama’s lenient stance with the Iranian regime which planted the seeds of evil and threatened moderate countries.
Terror battlefronts
In fact, the opposite seems to have happened. Countries which have been at the forefront fighting terrorism, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, are being continuously criticized at a time when Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif lectures about brotherhood and peace. The same applies to the group of artists who are angered by laws that may change but do not care about the pain of people outside those stuck at American airports. Those who oppose the ban said they are against it because it will contribute to angering Muslims and will increase recruitment among terrorist groups. It’s an obvious fallacy and a public insult. It’s a fallacy because due to the current culture of hate, extremist groups do not need any reasons to recruit more terrorists. Obama resorted to the approach of remaining silent and not being provocative. Despite that, ISIS and the Popular Mobilization were formed during the phase when he was president. The excuse for opposing the ban order is an insult because it pictures all Muslims as monsters who are willing to easily get involved in terrorism and who lack logic and do not recognize dialogue or civil means of voicing opposition. What’s unfortunate is that those spreading this idea are religious leaders in the West. These figures threaten governments that each step the latter takes and which they consider as anti-Muslim will create anger in Muslim societies and thus trigger the latter to go on a rampage and take to the street to kill whoever comes into their face. These are insulting statements that are being made within the context of defending Muslims.
The truth remains that they associate Muslims with inferiority and view them as immature. We don’t hear them making similar statements about other people and followers of different religions. Some want to picture the ban order as a war against Muslims. This is what Muslim extremists want to do to deepen the culture of hate. In the west, they use Muslims to serve their political and partisan aims in order to overthrow Trump. However, isn’t it in our interest to pause for a while and stop repeating what is being said in western media in terms of accusations of racism, fascism and even Nazism and frankly tell ourselves: Let’s forget Trump for a while. Why did we become a toy in the hands of extremists, who want to serve their terrorist aims, and of western politicians who want to serve their partisan goals? Why don’t we begin reforming our situation and fighting fanatics instead of continuing to insult others? This is the only way to resolve matters. Even if Trump goes, we will find another Trump to blame for all of our problems.
*This article is also available in Arabic.

Trump, Iran and mixing up the issues
Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/February 01/17
We have wasted many years without differentiating between Iran’s interests and our own interests and without differentiating between honest causes and fake ones. The Iranian regime has succeeded in exploiting our causes, such as the Palestinian cause, and other Arabs’ and Muslim causes, and has used them to achieve its aims. Many could only comprehend this truth when it was too late and realized it after they saw Iran’s crimes in Iraq, Syria, Yemen and Bahrain. We will see how Iran, and parties which are in its camp, repeat their acts and launch campaigns to confront the new administration in the United States and other governments which oppose them. Therefore, we must not mix up facts and interests. Let Iran and its friends fight on their own.
So what’s the aim of all these loud confrontations which the US President Donald Trump is involved in? I think his aim is to establish presidential popularity to confront his rivals – and there are many – in the media, the Democratic Party, the Congress and others.
For instance, due to citizens’ complaints that foreigners are taking their jobs, he decided to build a wall with the country’s neighbor Mexico to prevent illegal immigration of more than 700,000 people a year. Since there are worries of terrorism, he banned the citizens of seven Islamic countries, where there is chaos and terror, from entering the US for three months. Since labor unions oppose American companies which open their factories outside the US, he pledged he will impose fines on their imported goods.
In order to convince those who criticize government contracts that he is against corruption, he returned two major contracts for review. One of these contracts is for building his presidential airplane. Since there are conservative people who are against abortion, he ordered to suspend government spending on abortions, and so on. We cannot say Trump is against Muslims. Proof to that is he is building a wall to prevent the illegal immigration of Mexicans who are mostly Christians. He promised he will deport illegal residents in the US and they are more than 11 million, most of whom are not Muslims
Not against Muslims
We cannot say Trump is against Muslims. Proof to that is he is building a wall to prevent the illegal immigration of Mexicans who are mostly Christians. He promised he will deport illegal residents in the US and they are more than 11 million, most of whom are not Muslims. From among 57 Muslim countries, Trump only imposed a travel ban on seven of them because there are wars, unrest and a weak central authority there. Most countries stall granting visas to these countries’ residents because there is no central authority they can coordinate with on the security level. Terrorism is not limited to these countries as there is terrorism in countries in central Asia. There is terrorism in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and other Muslim countries. There is even terrorism in western countries like Belgium, France, Italy and others. The reason Trump banned these seven countries from traveling to the US is because there are no central governments and security apparatuses which they can coordinate with and thus decrease threats. Trump’s battle is not with Muslims or Mexicans but it’s with the American street. Trump feels that he made promises to his voters and he will try and keep up most of these promises which people elected him for. Despite his insistence, he may not win his battles as a result of popular protests and due to legal obstructions. In all cases, this is an internal American affair.
The US is the country which benefitted from migrants, refugees and naturalized citizens the most. It even benefitted from illegal residents in managing its economy, which is a major force in the world. The American experience of containing others has become inspiring for many countries which seek economic competition. These countries have altered their standards which are now relevant to the gains and benefits which laborers bring to the state and the market. It is normal for those who are unemployed or who are less fortunate in the society to reject these foreigners. This happens in all societies due to competition for job opportunities and tussle among political parties which use these issues in their electoral campaigns, like Trump did. The new enthusiastic president with all the power he has will not be able to prevent terrorism or to deport all illegal residents or to prevent people from illegally entering the US through Mexico. However, he will try to achieve whatever he can inside the US. The same goes to his work on the foreign level as he will not win all his battles. Perhaps the most important of his decisions is not cooperating with Iran. This will anger Tehran which will direct its puppets in Gaza, Iraq, Syria and Yemen and extremist groups which falsely operate under the name of Islam against him.
**This article was first published in Asharq Al-Awsat on February 01 2017.

India is yours if you have lost most of your possessions
Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/February 01/17
“India is yours if you have lost most of your possessions.” This is a proverb our grandparents and parents often said in the Arabian Peninsula. They traveled East and West, from Egypt to India. The Gulf region’s relation with India has multiple aspects that are related to geography, history, cultural influences and travels on both sides. Above all that, economy on both sides have governed a relationship which no other country could replicate. India, with its population of billions, dozens of religions and languages, has managed to have its people co-exist with one another. The incidents of violence, particularly between Hindus and Muslims, were not a regular phenomenon and only last a short time. Such events do not affect India’s magnificent co-existence.
An Emirati daily recently published a report about India’s “miracle” economy entitled “India transforms from a country that lives off grants to the world’s sixth largest economy.” The report provided essential information that helps understand the country.
“More than 150 years after British colonization, India managed to become the world’s sixth largest economy, thus replacing Britain which was the world’s sixth largest economy for years. Last October, the International Monetary Fund expected India’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to increase by 7.6 percent during 2017.
However, the estimates of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) were more optimistic as it expected the average GDP to increase by 8.2 percent. This is the highest estimate by an international institution.
Engaging with India is bound to be fruitful at the economic level at a time when major countries are going through economic decline, such as what has happened in Britain
Burgeoning economy
India’s cash reserves did not exceed $1 billion in the beginning of the 1990s. According to the Central Bank, India’s foreign reserves reached $355.95 billion by March 2016. The value of the bank’s gold reserves settled at $19.33 billion during the same phase,” the report said. These are bits of information regarding Indian economy, which were highlighted during Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed’s historic visit to this country. These developments in India show that the Indian society does not rest on its laurels. The calm in that country, which has achieved miracles, is due to the fact that they are working without creating a fuss. This is the nature of the Indian society, unlike other societies neighboring it like Bangladesh and Pakistan. This is why Professor Abdullah al-Madani who is an expert in Asian affairs wrote a book entitled “Flashes from Asia…What Kumar did that Abdulfadeel did not do.”
If economic development is how we currently look at India, it is important to look at investments in all its fields. India’s industrial sector is developed, particularly in terms of medical industry. Gulf countries can form higher consultation councils between them and India in order to establish standards and supervise relations. India has massive economic, historical and human resources and is somewhat detached from the global crisis. Engaging with the country is bound to be fruitful on the economic level at a time when major countries are going through economic decline, such as what has happened in Britain.
Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed’s visit enhanced trade ties between the two countries. Abdullah al-Saleh, the undersecretary for foreign trade and industry at the ministry of economy, said: “There is an ambitious vision between the UAE and India to achieve a 60 percent growth in commercial trade between the two countries so this growth exceeds $100 billion during the next five years and by 2020. The two countries have the necessary components to achieve this ambitious aim.”This orientation towards Kumar’s creations is important. India’s miraculous society has, despite its massive number of people, lacked resources even though complicated demographics have helped it survive global crises. Our grandparents were right when they said: “India is yours if you have lost most of your possessions.” India is a country of partnership through drought and riches and the pleasant and the unpleasant. This is the ancient civilization called India.
**This article was first published in Al-Bayan on Feb. 01, 2016.

Is Iran testing Donald Trump?
Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/February 01/17
Was the Khomeini republic testing the will power of the new US President Donald Trump when it launched a ballistic missile that traveled more than 900 kilometers and then exploded before reaching its target in a “failed experiment” as a Pentagon official described it? The experiment is a clear violation of the UN Resolution 2231, which prevents Iran from carrying out such acts for eight years. Russia, through its Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, tried to underestimate the magnitude of what happened and to interpret the international resolution in a way that serves Iran. What Europeans, Russians and the Khomeini camp apprehend is what Trump, and the new “hawks” in his administration, are thinking about. If this missile test was carried out during Obama’s waning phase, it would have peacefully passed by. John Kerry would have just issued statements voicing worry and offered cold academic advice. But things are now different considering the new American administration. The US immediately called for an urgent UN Security Council meeting in response to this violation.
Senator Bob Corker, Chairman of the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, said he will work with other legislators and Trump’s government to hold Tehran accountable after this missile show it performed. The European Union which is fearful of the new American president’s intentions criticized Iran’s act and called on Tehran to “refrain from activities which deepen mistrust.”If this missile test was carried out during Obama’s waning phase, it would have peacefully passed by. John Kerry would have just issued statements voicing worry and offered cold academic advice
Angering Trump?
Everyone wants to avoid angering Trump rather than looking into the essence of the problem in the entire region’s context – something that the weak Obama administration and the EU also failed to do. We face a new culture and different standards and everyone is trying to test them today. Perhaps the expectations which the Jordanian King voiced during his recent meeting with members of parliament and officials about the dangerous situation in the Middle East will turn out right. He said the region in 2017 is going through its most difficult phase, adding that he expects there will be major changes during this year. We must recall Jordanian King Abdullah II’s great experience in predicting international and regional developments. In December 2004, it was him who warned of the formation of the Shiite crescent in the region. He coined that term during his famous interview with the Washington Post. At the time, it was an early and shocking warning. How will Trump deal with this new Iranian challenge just two weeks after he was appointed president? It is said – and we know – that Trump shares Saudi Arabia’s and the UAE’s vision of the nature of the Iranian threat. We have witnessed that during his recent phone call with Saudi King Salman and Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed.
Everyone is in a state of alert and everyone wants to test the new American determination and its limits.
*This article was first published in Asharq al-Awsat on February 01, 2016.

Russia freezes Syrian, Iranian military movements
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report January 31, 2017
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/02/01/debkafile-russia-freezes-syrian-iranian-military-movements/
An order to remain stationary was issued Thursday night, Jan. 26, by the Russian Commander in Syria Lt. Gen. Alexander Zhuravlev to the high commands of the Syrian army and of the Iranian and Shiite forces positioned in Aleppo, as well as Hizballah units in all parts of Syria. Gen. Zhuravlev, acting on instructions from Moscow, prohibited any movement by those forces out of their current positions as of noon local time.
debkafile’s military and intelligence sources report that the order banned the opening of new battlefronts anywhere in Syria and the movement of Syrian air force units between bases.
This order has been obeyed to date.
The ban came from Moscow to prevent military reprisals against the Putin-Trump deal for Syria. There was no mention of penalties for disobedience, but the tone was peremptory. The three army commanders did not need reminding that the Russians are capable of using their electronic warfare systems to disrupt unauthorized military movements, jam their communications, and withhold fuel, ammo and spare parts to create havoc in their armies.
Moscow has never resorted to extreme action of this kind in previous Russian military interventions in Middle East lands.
The decision was taken shortly after the Kremlin was notified that US President Donald Trump had agreed to join forces with President Vladimir Putin in Syria.
Since then, the Trump administration has kept all dealings with Moscow over Syria under a cloak of secrecy, including the outcome of President Trump’s first phone conversation with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin. All other concerned parties, such as Israel, have been left groping in the dark about what happens next.
The Russian standstill order in Syria came shortly before the US presidential decree that barred Iranians from entering the United States (along with the nationals of six other terror-prone Muslim countries)
Iran can no longer doubt that the two powers, America and Russia, have ganged up to push the Islamic Republic out of their way. Trepidation in Tehran was articulated on Monday, Jan. 30, at a convention staged in the Iranian capital to celebrate 515 years of Iranian-Russian relations, an anniversary that would not normally be marked by a special event.
In his opening remarks, Foreign Minster Mohammed Zarif Javad said: that Iran and Russia “need to have far more extensive relations,” and “few countries in the world have relations as deep and historical as Iran and Russia.” This sounded like an appeal to Moscow for protection against the new US president. It most likely fell on deaf ears. Putin is fully engaged in promoting his new relations with Donald Trump.

Welcome to the "Social Justice" University
Philip Carl Salzman/Gatestone Institute/February 01/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9604/social-justice
Diversity becomes a moral end in itself. If all variations of human beings are not present at an event or in an organization, it is seen as prejudiced and discriminating. But this does not apply to members of the majority, who are increasingly not welcome.
The University of Pennsylvania removed a portrait of Shakespeare, on the grounds that Shakespeare is not sufficiently diverse, and replaced it with a portrait of the black lesbian poet, Audre Lorde.
As capitalism is recognized as a cause of inequality, and thus oppression, it must be replaced. These days, progressives do not usually specify what capitalism is to be replaced by, but presumably they are impressed with [irony alert] the great benefits socialism brought to the people of the USSR, Mao's China, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, North Korea, and Cuba.
Hurt feelings are the "social justice" criteria for what is and what is not allowed. You may not say anything that would hurt someone's feelings; if you do, you must be punished.
Finally, diversity of opinion in the social justice university is forbidden: opposition to social justice is never reasonable opinion, but evil. Disagreement with the principles of social justice identifies such critics as sexist, racist, homo-lesbo-transphobes, xenophobes, and fascists.
Universities used to be fonts of knowledge, charged with disseminating the known and seeking new knowledge. But progressives have brought great progress to the university: progressives know all the answers, and that the problem is not to understand the world, but to change it.
Welcome to the "social justice" university. Its orientation is expressed by the School of Social Work, at Ryerson University in Toronto:
School of Social Work is a leader in critical education, research and practice with culturally and socially diverse students and communities in the advancement of anti-oppression/anti-racism, anti-Black racism, anti- colonialism/ decolonization, Aboriginal reconciliation, feminism, anti-capitalism, queer and trans liberation struggles, issues in disability and Madness, among other social justice struggles.
Many universities are not as candid as Ryerson, but often their positions are much the same. Many have established "equity and inclusiveness" committees to oversee "just practice," to disseminate "correct" views through literature, posters, and re-education workshops, in some cases mandatory. They also sanction faculty members who express unacceptable views. Schools of education ensure that their graduates will be inculcating their school pupils in the principles of "social justice," and in identifying the deplorable "multiphobes" in their families and communities. American schoolchildren have been taught by teachers determined to discredit America, that slavery was an American invention and existed exclusively in America -- a staggeringly counter-factual account.
What do progressives intend under the label of "social justice"? What theories and policies have they made the central task of the university to advance?
The first goal to be advanced is equality, by which they mean equality of result, as opposed to equality of opportunity -- which is often inadequate and needs to be addressed. Thus, to advance economic equality, progressives advocate redistribution of wealth, taking money from those who have it and giving it to preferred others. ("The problem with socialism," as the late British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher pointed out, "is that sooner or later you run out of other people's money.")
Progressives also recognize that equality of result contradicts individual freedom, and that individual freedom will have to be suppressed supposedly for the collective good. Coercion is necessary to enforce social justice goals. A social justice friend recently argued that cars should be replaced by public transport, and that people should live in central cities rather than suburbs. When it was pointed out that housing and transport choices indicated North Americans seem to have a strong preference for suburbs, and that they prefer driving cars to taking public transport, he replied that they will have to be forced to live in cities and use public transport. This is an actual the plan of the United Nations, known as Agenda 21.
Given the necessity of coercion to get people to do the "right" thing, progressives favour a strong central government to direct citizens' -- or subjects' -- lives.
Second, equality among individuals is "insufficient," and must be complemented by collective rights based on "category membership". Each category -- of gender, sexual preference, national origin, culture, race, religion, and so on must be considered equal and receive equal benefits. All societal roles should therefore have an equal number of each category, either at the same time or in rotation. Equality of result also mandates that members of each category must have the same position and same benefits as all others: an equal number of men and women in government offices and in business administration. So too with members of different races, religions, sexual preferences, and so on. To balance ethnic representation in professions, Jews who want to become dentists must be forced to become police officers, while Irish men and women who wish to become police officers, must be forced to become dentists. Diversity becomes a moral end in itself.
If all variations of human beings are not present at an event or in an organization, it is seen as prejudiced and discriminating. But this does not apply to members of the majority, who are increasingly not welcome; only "diverse" members of minorities are now welcome. This applies even to history. The University of Pennsylvania English Department removed a portrait of Shakespeare, on the grounds that Shakespeare is not sufficiently diverse, and replaced it with a portrait of the black lesbian poet, Audre Lorde.
Third, all victims of inequality must unite under the principle of "intersectionality," to oppose their oppressors. Since capitalism is recognized as a cause of inequality, and thus oppression, it must be opposed and replaced. These days, progressives do not usually specify what capitalism is to be replaced by, but presumably they are impressed with [irony alert] the great benefits socialism brought to the people of the USSR, Mao's China, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, North Korea, and Cuba. Not only are these outstanding examples of "social justice" actually versions of "state-capitalism" where the leaders were "more equal than others," but for the "others", they succeeded in avoiding the corrupting prosperity of capitalism, the selfish freedom for individuals, and the anti-social inequality of differences. And [irony alert] abolishing capitalism would be pain-free; supposedly no one was "hurt" in the socialist states of the 20th century. Or at the very least, everyone, except for the dear leaders, were hurt equally, which presumably made being hurt all right.
So, too, must imperialism and colonialism be abolished, which are recognized by progressives as unique to the West -- never, of course, to the conquests by Islamic empires, for example, of Turkey, Greece, North Africa, Eastern Europe, as well as parts of Portugal and Spain. Under the label of "postcolonialism," Western imperialism is blamed for all of the ills in the world, a world which, prior to Western intrusion, was ostensibly characterized by peace, prosperity and brotherhood. Thus, the imperialist West is evil, and the victimized rest, the South, the People of Colour, are "Good".
No notice is also taken by progressives of empires of the past -- Phoenician, Greek, Roman, Arab, Mongol, Turkish, Russian, to name a few -- or of the present, among them, the Chinese, Iranian and Turkish empires, all of which have shaped our world beyond the relatively short-lived British, French, Dutch, Belgian, German, and Italian empires. No, social justice warriors can imagine only an uninformed, simplistic good and evil. Evidently, no one teaches history anymore, so everyone, such as UNESCO, can now make it up to suit his view.
Fourth, each culture must be viewed through the lens of cultural, ethical, and total relativism between opinion and fact. Each culture must therefore be considered as valuable as any other, ostensibly including ISIS and Boko Haram, and therefore have equal representation in every society. This "just" multiculturalism accepts all customs and practices, and installs all languages as official languages. Although Canada has been lauded as an exemplar of multiculturalism, which has been adopted as an official policy of the Federal Government, Canada in fact falls seriously short of ideal "cultural justice." One reason is that Canadian multiculturalism exists within a bilingual state, with only French and English having official status. The other reason is that Canadian French and English culture make up the cultural mainstream, and a large majority of Canadians want immigrants and citizens with other cultural backgrounds to adapt to the Canadian mainstream.
Canadian cultural relativism would have to be seen by cultural justice warriors as weak and flawed.
Multiculturalism, further, requires respect for other cultures, shown, for example, by not imitating another culture in any way, and by not borrowing from it. Unauthorized imitation, such as wearing a Halloween costume representing another culture, such as an American wearing a sombrero, or participating in activities, such as Indian yoga or Asian martial arts, is called "cultural appropriation," and is banned by social justice warriors. This piece of social engineering apparently exists because the feelings of people of other cultures might be hurt, or they might feel ridiculed or demeaned.
Hurt feelings are the social justice criteria for what is and what is not allowed. You may not say anything that would hurt someone's feelings, and, if you do, you must be punished. Here is an illustration, reported by Margaret Wente in the Globe and Mail, from Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario:
At Queen's, a good-natured off-campus costume party blew up into a crisis over racism. Queen's principal Daniel Woolf denounced the event on his blog as "the unacceptable misappropriation and stereotyping of numerous cultures," and solemnly vowed yet again to improve diversity and inclusion on campus. In other news from Queen's, the head of a student theatre group was forced to grovel after announcing a plan to cast a white female as the lead in Othello. "There is absolutely no excuse for making a casting decision that was oppressive and caused people of colour to feel as though they were invalid," she apologized. The production was cancelled.
A further corollary of multiculturalism is that borders, blocking the inflow of worthy immigrants, should be abolished, and a full open-borders policy should be established. All immigrants are seen as benign, and the possibility that some might be threats to the receiving population and its society is dismissed out of hand. Opposition to such humanitarian uprightness could only exist if its critics were supposedly xenophobes and racists.
Finally, diversity of opinion in the social justice university is forbidden: opposition to social justice is never a reasonable opinion, but evil. Disagreement with the principles of social justice identifies such critics as sexist, racist, homo-lesbo-transphobes, xenophobes, and fascists.
In our universities, social justice is reproduced through a variety of techniques. One is special oversight committees, usually called "Equity and Inclusiveness Committees", which police the socialization and speech of new students, and the speech and actions of academic and other staff.
A second technique is that university administrators, no less than the cutting-edge justice-warrior professors of the social sciences and humanities, aim to improve, implement and defend social justice policies. Dissidents will find no refuge or sanctuary in university administrations; quite the contrary.
A third techniques is in classes, where students are indoctrinated with "Social Justice Truth," and those who resist are penalized by low grades. Social justice professors must punish students who refuse to learn the Social Justice Truth. On the other hand, students of "victim categories" must be "encouraged" with good grades. I have had the unpleasant experience of being pressured by colleagues to give a good grade to a weak minority student.
A fourth technique is the well-known preference for admitting weaker students of victim categories and turning away more capable students of other categories. Thus, in the University of California system, applicants of Hispanic background with weak records are admitted, and applicants of Asian ethnicity with strong academic records are rejected -- "category equality" and preferential treatment with a vengeance.
The fifth technique is "Social Justice Reproduction": hiring academic staff under close scrutiny to guarantee that they have the correct social justice orientation. Heavens, would you want to put students and thus the future into the hands of "multiphobes" and fascists?! Selection for social justice is the only just path.
The illiberal social justice movement strikes at several important liberal values: First, it undermines individual autonomy and freedom by reducing individuals to being a member of one or another ethnic, racial, gender, sexual, national, or religious "category." Second, it strives to undermine individual autonomy and freedom by restricting outcomes of activity through imposing arbitrary criteria of equality of result. Third, it undermines basic human rights, such as freedom of speech, by forbidding any speech that "offends" anyone. Fourth, it undermines the right to assemble peaceably, because social justice warriors try to shut down any assembly where incorrect views might be expressed. Fifth, it undermines understanding by reducing all people to victims and oppressors, good versus bad, a gross oversimplification of the complexities of history and human life.
For progressives, the social justice movement is progress on the move; to others, it seems increasingly a movement of intolerant authoritarianism. Its main victim, so far, is the idea of the open-minded, inquiring, liberal university.
**Philip Carl Salzman is Professor of Anthropology at McGill University, Canada.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Germany: Angela Merkel Faces Challenge for Chancellorship
Germany Heading for Four More Years of Pro-EU, Open-Door Migration Policies

Soeren Kern/Gatestone Institute/February 01/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9870/martin-schulz-angela-merkel
The policy positions of Schulz and Merkel on key issues are virtually identical: Both candidates are committed to strengthening the EU, maintaining open-door immigration policies, pursuing multiculturalism and quashing dissent from the so-called far right.
Regardless of who wins, Germany is unlikely to undergo many course corrections during the next four years.
Schulz has already called for tax increases on the wealthy and for fighting the AfD party. He has also threatened financial consequences for European countries that refuse to take in more migrants.
"The chancellor's office is worried." – Der Spiegel.
Martin Schulz, the former president of the European Parliament, has been chosen to challenge Chancellor Angela Merkel in Germany's general election on September 24.
The policy positions of Schulz and Merkel on key issues are virtually identical: Both candidates are committed to strengthening the European Union, maintaining open-door immigration policies, pursuing multiculturalism and quashing dissent from the so-called far right.
Time for a changing of the guard? Pictured: Then European Parliament President Martin Schulz meets with German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Brussels, January 30, 2012. (Image source: European Parliament)
Polls show Merkel, who heads the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), slightly ahead of Schulz, the new leader of the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD). Regardless of who wins, Germany is unlikely to undergo many course corrections during the next four years.
Schulz, who became a Member of the European Parliament in 1994, and has spent most of his political career in Brussels, unofficially took over the reins of the SPD on January 29, 2017, after the unpopular Sigmar Gabriel said he was stepping down. The move will become official at a party congress on March 19. SPD leaders said that as an "outsider," Schulz has a better chance of unseating Merkel, who has been in office since November 2005, and is running for a fourth term.
The SPD has been the junior partner in a Merkel-run "grand coalition" (Große Koalition) government since December 2013. SPD leaders say that if the party wins at least 30% of the national vote, Schulz will become the next chancellor.
In an interview with Der Spiegel, Schulz, 61, said he was the best candidate to replace Merkel, who is 62. "I have worked with Angela Merkel longer than almost anyone outside her party," he said. "I have studied her, gotten to know her." Schulz has eight months to persuade Germans to vote for him.
The latest INSA poll shows the CDU (together with its Bavarian sister party, the CSU) with 32.5% of the vote, the SPD with 26%, and the anti-establishment party Alternative for Germany (AfD) in third place with 13%.
If the CDU/CSU or the SPD fail to win a majority, they may join forces to form another grand coalition. Either party may also seek to form a coalition government with other smaller parties, particularly the Greens, but all have ruled out entering into a coalition with the eurosceptic AfD.
The AfD, which is set to enter the Parliament (Bundestag) for the first time, is uniquely placed to attract voters who are angry about Merkel's decision to allow into Germany more than one million mostly Muslim migrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East. The party, which polled as high as 15.5% in December 2016, has struggled to gain more traction due to internal power struggles and accusations of anti-Semitism.
Schulz — a high school dropout whom The Economist magazine described as "pugnacious" and "impulsive" — is campaigning on a platform to unite an increasingly divided German polity. "Germany needs a new start and that cannot happen with the CDU," he said. "We have come to the end of what we can achieve with divided conservatives."
The SPD will not unveil its election platform until a party congress in May. But Schulz has already called for tax increases on the wealthy and for fighting the AfD. He has also threatened financial consequences for European countries that refuse to take in more migrants.
When a television presenter confronted Schulz about his lack of governing experience, he compared himself to Barack Obama: "I share the fate with Barack Obama. He also had no government experience when he became President of the United States."
If elected, Schulz, an ardent Europhile who is committed to European federalism, is sure to work to strengthen the European Union. "I know what's going on in Europe," he said. "I know the strengths and also weaknesses of the European Union." He added:
"European politics is German domestic politics and German domestic politics has a powerful effect in Europe. Whoever wants to play those against each other is committing a sin against the future of our children and generations to come."
Schulz has argued that the EU must be preserved at any cost:
"We are at a historical juncture: A growing number of people are declaring what has been achieved over the past decades in Europe to be wrong. They want to return to the nation-state. Sometimes there is even a blood and soil rhetoric that for me is starkly reminiscent of the interwar years of the past century, whose demons we are still all too familiar with. We brought these demons under control through European structures, but if we destroy those structures, the demons will return. We cannot allow this to happen."
He has opposed the idea of holding national referendums on quitting the EU:
"Referendums have always posed a threat when it comes to EU policy, because EU policy is complicated. They're an opportunity for those from all political camps who like to oversimplify things."
Schulz has also said that the British decision to leave the European Union would facilitate the creation of a European Army:
"In the fields of security and defense policy, although the EU loses a key member state, paradoxically such a separation could give the necessary impulse for a closer integration of the remaining member states."
Playing the anti-Americanism card, Schulz has expressed his disdain for U.S. President Donald J. Trump, calling him "an obviously irresponsible man sitting in a position that requires the utmost sense of responsibility." He added: "Trump is not just a problem for the EU, but for the whole world."
Schulz described Trump's order to build a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico as "a taboo breach that is intolerable." He also criticized Trump's temporary travel ban for citizens of seven countries deemed to be terrorist safe havens:
"I'm sure when European politicians travel to Washington they will explain to the U.S. government that international law and human rights also apply for Donald Trump."
Schulz has reserved his worst vitriol for the anti-immigration AfD, whose leaders he has described as "rat catchers" (Rattenfänger) who are "trying to profit from the plight of refugees." He has also called them "shameful and repulsive."
Merkel, who up until recently vowed to continue her open-door migration policy, has now promised to consider an annual cap on the number of migrants allowed into Germany. In a rare moment of contrition, she said: "If I could, I would turn back the time by many, many years. If I knew what change in policy people wanted, I would be ready to consider it and to talk about it."
In an interview with Welt am Sonntag, Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble admitted that the Merkel government made mistakes with its open-door migration policy. "We have tried to improve what got away from us in 2015," he said. "We politicians are human; we also make mistakes. But one can at least learn from them."
Some in the German media are skeptical about Schulz. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung wrote:
"As a chancellor candidate, Schulz has announced an election campaign for social justice and the EU. He will not allow 'bashing' of the EU. Can Schulz score points? Like any other German politician, he stands for 'Brussels' as a cipher for a detached and bureaucratic European elite. The alienation between elites and large parts of the population is not only in America. In Germany as well, voters increasingly are turning away from established politics."
By contrast, Der Spiegel published a sensational cover story entitled, "Saint Martin" which portrayed Schulz as a supernatural figure — similar to its adulation of Barack Obama eight years ago. The magazine added: "The chancellor's office is worried."
*Soeren Kern is a Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute. Follow him on Facebook and on Twitter.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Turkish Jails: Packed with Kurds, Only Seven Members of ISIS
Uzay Bulut/Gatestone Institute/February 01/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/02/01/uzay-bulutgatestone-institute-turkish-jails-packed-with-kurds-only-seven-members-of-isis/
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9871/turkish-jails-kurds
According to a recent public statement by the HDP party, 1,478 Kurdish politicians -- including 78 democratically-elected mayors -- have been arrested since July 2016.
The co-heads of the HDP, Selahattin Demirtas and Figen Yuksektas, are also in jail. Prosecutors seek up to 142 years in jail for Demirtas and up to 83 years in jail for Yuksekdag. One of the charges directed to Demirtas is "managing a terrorist organization."
According to a recent report by Turkey's Platform for Independent Journalism (P24), 151 individuals are in prison for being journalists or for being employed in the news media. Dozens of TV stations, news agencies, newspapers, magazines, and radio stations have been closed down by the Turkish government.
In Turkey, it seems, ISIS members are freer than journalists and peaceful, democratically-elected Kurdish politicians.
According to the Turkish ministry of justice, only seven members of the Islamic State (ISIS) have been convicted of crimes and jailed in Turkey in the last year and a half.
The data was made public when Bekir Bozdag, the Turkish justice minister, was asked in Turkey's parliament the number of ISIS convicts in Turkish jails.
One of the many ISIS members in Turkey that has been released by Turkish courts is Abdulsamet C., arrested on September 2 of last year on charges of being a member of a terrorist organization.
Abdulsamet C. confessed that he had travelled to Syria to join ISIS in 2014. He added that an Azeri man with the code-name "Ammar", who spread ISIS propaganda in an Istanbul mosque, provided him with contact information that enabled him to go to the Turkish city of Gaziantep, through which he entered Syria, where he joined ISIS.
Abdulsamet C. said that he went to the Syrian town of Jarabulus with a group of people, received religious education in the town of Manbij for a month, and then traveled around to Iraq and Syria before returning to Turkey in July 2015.
Seeking to benefit from the "Active Repentance Law," he was released by a Turkish court on probation. Yet he continued to be in contact with ISIS even after returning to the Umraniye neighborhood in Istanbul, where his family resides.
An indictment drafted for Abdulsamet C. by the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office includes evidence showing his connections with ISIS, such as banners, photographs, videos and songs. During a raid on Abdulsamet C.'s house, police also found a book entitled, "44 Ways of Supporting Jihad," which is banned in Turkey.
Despite all the evidence at hand, Abdulsamet C. was released by an Istanbul court on probation on the grounds that he has a permanent residence in Istanbul. The newspaper Hurriyet contacted the lawyer of the ISIS member, who said he was surprised at the release of his client.
Meanwhile, Turkish courts have arrested several deputies and politicians of the pro-Kurdish Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP), as well as Kurdish mayors from the Democratic Regions' Party (DBP). The total number of HDP deputies under arrest is 12. Trustees have been appointed by the government to replace the arrested mayors in the country's predominantly Kurdish southeast.
According to a recent public statement by the HDP, 1,478 Kurdish politicians -- including 78 democratically-elected mayors -- have been arrested since July 2016.
The co-heads of the HDP party, Selahattin Demirtas and Figen Yuksektas, are also in jail. Prosecutors seek up to 142 years in jail for Demirtas and up to 83 years in jail for Yuksekdag. One of the charges directed to Demirtas is "managing a terrorist organization."
The co-heads of the Peoples' Democratic Party of Turkey, Selahattin Demirtas and Figen Yuksektas, have been jailed in Turkey on trumped-up charges. Pictured: EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini meets Demirtas, August 31, 2015. (Image source: European Union)
Journalists critical of the government are also under various pressures in Turkey. According to a recent report by Turkey's Platform for Independent Journalism (P24), 151 individuals are in prison for being journalists or for being employed in the news media. Dozens of TV stations, news agencies, newspapers, magazines and radio stations have also been closed down by the Turkish government. The Kurdish media in particularl is under attack. Many of the arrested journalists work for the pro-Kurdish media.
In the meantime, an Islamic State (ISIS) member who appeared in an ISIS propaganda video threatening Turkey has previously been detained twice in Turkey and released.
According to Hurriyet, the recently identified militant, Hasan Aydin, was detained in 2012 in an operation targeting al-Qaeda in the southern province of Adana but later released. He was again detained in 2015, while attempting to cross into Syria.
Military equipment and a drone were found in the minibus Aydin was using, and he was summoned to court. He was later released on condition of judicial control.
According to Kurdish politician Ayhan Bilgen. the movement of Islamist terrorists from Syria to Turkey has been escalating recently,
During the opening speech of the party assembly at the HDP headquarters in Ankara on January 22, Bilgen, an HDP MP and spokesman, said that members of ISIS, the al-Nusra Front, Ahrar al-Sham, and the Free Syrian Army, which have roots in al-Qaeda, have been moving in large numbers from Syria to Turkey.
"This is loud and clear. A market has been formed in Ankara. There are regular trips between Raqqa [an ISIS stronghold in Syria] and ASTI [Ankara's main bus terminal] for $1,250 per passenger. Everybody knows the traffic [of militants] is intense. What are the security and intelligence units in Turkey doing in the face of that? Who took these people there and are they being brought back? And what is expected from bringing back groups such as ISIS and al-Nusra?"
Following these remarks, Bilgen was arrested on "terror charges," on January 31.
In Turkey, it seems, ISIS members are freer than journalists and peaceful, democratically-elected Kurdish politicians.
**Uzay Bulut, a journalist born and raised a Muslim in Turkey, is currently based in Washington D.C.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

The KRG’s Relationship with the Yazidi Minority and the Future of the Yazidis in Shingal (Sinjar)
Matthew Barber/Syria Comment/February 01/17
http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/krgs-relationship-yazidi-minority-future-yazidis-shingal-sinjar/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Syriacomment+%28Syria+Comment%29
Following the closure of Yazda, a Yazidi humanitarian and human rights organization, by the KDP asa’ish (security police affiliated with Kurdistan’s largest political party, the Kurdistan Democratic Party) on January 2, 2017 in Dohuk, people have been asking many questions about why this took place. Fortunately, the government has now reversed its position on the closure and Yazda has reopened. Nevertheless, this episode points to some serious political issues that impact the status of the Yazidi minority in Kurdistan. I will explore these issues in this article.
Having left the country last August after a year of leading Yazda’s Iraq and Kurdistan-based operations, I will not speak for Yazda now. But I will present my opinions on the Yazidi situation and discuss the feelings of the Yazidi people, which may shed light on why Yazda was persecuted by the authorities.
A Broken Relationship
Understanding the tension between KDP government and the Yazidis requires investigating why the KDP generally has an adverse relationship with the majority of the Yazidis. In fact, those Yazidis who become close to the KDP political establishment usually lose favor and respect among much of their community. This is because the agendas of the KDP often conflict with the welfare of the Yazidi people, and a number of crucial issues jeopardizing the future of the Yazidis have come to a head this past year.
What do I mean by a clash of interests between the Yazidis and the KDP? Ever since the fall of Saddam, Kurdistan has worked hard to expand the boundaries of what is hoped will be a future independent Kurdistan. These aspirations and efforts are noble considering the many ways that Kurds have been victimized by the various regimes in Iraq through history. But many Kurds today do not realize that despite this history of victimization, their newfound power also creates the possibility and risk of victimizing others—especially the minorities who often inhabit the disputed territories that Kurdistan would like to appropriate.
The Sheikhan district in the Nineveh Plain used to be a Yazidi-majority area, but just since the fall of Saddam, it has been targeted with a program of demographic change that has involved settling Sunni Kurds in the area in order to strengthen the claim that it should be included within the Kurdistan Region. This program is similar to the Arabization schemes to which Saddam subjected the Kurds, and Yazidis call it “Kurdification.” Sheikhan, a historic Yazidi homeland, is now a Muslim-majority area, a change that occurred entirely post-Saddam. Even the Mir, the highest Yazidi religious authority, spoke to US officials about this problem.
In Shingal (“Sinjar” in Arabic) after 2003, the KDP quickly became a powerful presence. Many Yazidis were open to pursuing a future for Shingal as part of Kurdistan, hoping that life under Kurdish government would offer greater rights for minorities than had been the case under Ba’thist rule. But from those early days, KDP asa’ish began systematically arresting and intimidating Yazidi civilians who joined competing political parties, especially those who favored keeping Shingal’s administration under the authority of the central government. Though services in Shingal are almost entirely paid for by Baghdad, the KDP bullied non-KDP Nineveh officials out of Shingal so that it could maintain administrative control. Shingal’s “mayors” (qaymaqam), including the current one, are never elected by the local people, but are appointed by the party and are, of course, always party loyalists. Despite the fact that the KDP completely dominated Shingal, it remained one of Iraq’s least developed and most marginalized districts.
Because of this legacy, by 2014 the majority of the Yazidis of Shingal already resented KDP control; the Peshmerga withdrawal the morning of the genocide was simply the final straw, severing trust with the KDP forever. But because of KDP policy, the Yazidi situation has become even worse following the genocide, which is the main issue that this article will explore.
Today there is a bitter political standoff in Shingal that is exacerbating the already poor relations between the Shingali Yazidis and the KDP. In order to understand the development of this conflict, we must first clarify some key aspects of how the genocide unfolded, and also debunk several myths propagated by government officials regarding the day of the genocide.
Setting the Record Straight on Shingal
Though everyone is familiar with the Peshmerga withdrawal on August 3, 2014, the day the Yazidi Genocide began, many citizens of Kurdistan and Iraq have been led to accept three key excuses advanced by KDP officials trying to justify the withdrawal: 1) that the IS (Islamic State) invasion of Shingal was a surprise attack; 2) that the Peshmerga lacked adequate weaponry to defend local Yazidis from IS; and 3) that the Peshmerga defended but IS was just too powerful and the front line collapsed.
The first claim is obviously false since everyone knows that Mosul was conquered in early June, almost two months prior to the attack on Shingal. During the period between the conquest of Mosul and the Yazidi Genocide, IS gradually solidified control over the Arab areas south and east of Shingal. Tel Afar was conquered during that period, and IS forces grew increasingly close to Shingal. In fact, several small attacks occurred on outlying Yazidi villages southeast—and even north—of Shingal, prior to August 3. Tel Banat was attacked several times. In other words: The IS threat was well-known and there was plenty of time to prepare for any potential conflict, and to put an evacuation plan in place for civilians.
The second claim is an attempt to side-step responsibility for the failure to defend the Yazidis. It ignores the fact that after the Iraqi military dissolved in the areas near Mosul, Kurdish forces seized control of Iraqi weapons depots and snatched up all of the weaponry and ammunition. This included Kesek, which housed the “regional ammunitions center” that provided weapons and ammunitions to the 2nd and 3rd Iraqi army divisions and to military academies in Zakho and Suleimani. Moreover, when Iraqi army forces were retreating from Tel Afar and leaving the Shingal area, they were unable to retreat to Baghdad without passing through Kurdish-controlled territory. KDP-affiliated forces, therefore, forced these sections of the Iraqi army to hand over all of their weapons, ammunition, equipment, and military vehicles—at the KDP headquarters in Shingal, no less. This included the 10th brigade of the 3rd division and the 11th brigade of the 3rd division of the Iraqi army. Despite holding out and defending Tel Afar for some time, once these troops were pushed out by IS, they were effectively looted by KDP forces and sent back to Baghdad wearing civilian clothing. But beyond this evidence contravening the claim that the Peshmerga lacked adequate weaponry, the question should be asked as to how the Syrian YPG forces, who have smaller weapons, inferior vehicles, and are generally less equipped than the Peshmerga, were able to enter an unfamiliar area that they had never controlled, without the high-ground advantage, and fight through IS lines after IS had already established itself in the area and surrounded the mountain. The point is that the alleged superiority of IS weaponry had nothing to do with the withdrawal. Keep in mind that there are numerous locations in the foothills of Shingal Mountain where just a handful of Yazidi farmers with old rifles were able to prevent the jihadists from ascending into these enclaves—such is the advantage of the higher ground. The idea that the Peshmerga had to flee to Dohuk, rather than move to the protection of the mountain while providing cover to the evacuating civilians, is patently absurd.
But most important is the third claim, that the Peshmerga’s lines were overwhelmed by the might of the IS jihadists. This claim is demonstrably false in light of the way that the withdrawal was conducted. The withdrawal was not a chaotic, haphazard fleeing after engaging the enemy; Shingal Mountain is 72 kilometers long, and with the security presence in many of the towns all around, it would be nearly impossible that every single “front line” would collapse simultaneously. If troops had been overwhelmed in one location, many other troops would have been able to hold their ground in other locations. But the withdrawal was collective (involving almost all security and militia personnel in the entire district), and was conducted in an organized fashion, with all weapons and military vehicles being transported out of Shingal and back to Kurdistan. When local Yazidi civilians saw that the Peshmerga were abandoning them, they begged them to at least leave behind the weapons so that they could defend their own families. But the Peshmerga refused. According to hundreds of survivor accounts, this planned withdrawal occurred before the jihadists reached Shingal. These countless testimonies of civilian eyewitnesses were corroborated by a Peshmerga leader named Sime Mulla Muhammad, responsible for troops in Shingal, who disclosed to the Xendan newspaper in an interview published August 3, 2016 that he withdrew his men without engaging the enemy, prior to the arrival of the jihadists, after it was known that IS was moving on the area. Beyond all of this, not only did Qasim Shesho (the current leader of the KDP Peshmerga in Shingal) state for the record that the Peshmerga fled before the civilians could evacuate, but President Barzani’s reaction to the withdrawal also dispelled any notion of the front line breaking, as in early August 2014 he referred to the “negligence” of those in command and formed a committee to investigate possible desertions.
The facts presented above become even more painful when considering that the day before the genocide, August 2, 2014, local people in Shingal knew that IS was mobilizing. They could sense that an attack might be imminent. Yazidis asked those responsible for security if the people should evacuate. Peshmerga leaders gave assurances to the people that they would be protected, and told them to stay in their villages. In some cases, asa’ish even prevented families from evacuating; some families had loaded up their cars and were attempting to drive to Kurdistan but were turned back at the checkpoints guarding village entrances.
I have presented this background to make it perfectly clear why the trust of the Shingali Yazidis in the KDP was irreparably shattered on August 3. This should also explain why the YPG and PKK forces that entered Shingal to defend the Yazidis won so many hearts and minds. Not only did those forces save the lives of tens of thousands of Yazidis that had been left to die, but they enabled the local Yazidis to hold the front line against IS for the next 15 months, killing more jihadists than any other militia.
Preventing Yazidis from Returning and Rebuilding: The Economic Blockade
This brings us to the present political conflict that is victimizing the Yazidis. As is common knowledge, after the PKK-affiliated forces rescued the Yazidis in the absence of the Peshmerga, they helped the Yazidis form a local militia known as the YBŞ. This force is affiliated with the PKK but is primarily comprised of local Shingali Yazidis who came together to defend their own families and homes.
The KDP wants the YBŞ to disappear. They want all non-KDP militias to dissolve so that the KDP Peshmerga can again enjoy full control of Shingal and return to business as usual. But the KDP knows that if the displaced Yazidis now living in the camps in Dohuk return to Shingal, they will be more likely to support a rival militia, like the YBŞ, because they have no loyalty for the KDP.
And that brings us to the most discouraging of facts, the economic blockade of Shingal, which is the KDP’s disgraceful strategy to keep Yazidi families, who survived a genocide, trapped in camps that they have lived in for over two and a half years, rather than allowing them to return to Shingal. The north side of Shingal Mountain has been free of the IS presence since December 2014, without any IS-related security incident. The north side has eight major towns and over 25 smaller locations inhabited by Yazidis. It is viable for return and reconstruction, and several thousand Yazidi families have already taken up residence there, trying to rebuild their destroyed homes and farms. However, for over a year now, the KDP asa’ish have been effectively starving these families—and preventing the return of thousands more who would like to begin rebuilding a normal life—through an economic blockade. At the primary checkpoint controlling access to Shingal from Dohuk (Fishkhabour, near Suheila village), asa’ish do not allow Yazidis to bring goods to Shingal upon which a basic economy depends, such as livestock or most products for retail shops. Even beyond the commercial level, Yazidi families are not allowed to bring into Shingal basic household goods and foodstuffs upon which any family depends for their livelihood. There are countless examples of what is not allowed though. Here are a few examples that I gathered personally through my own conversations with affected families, farmers, and shop owners:
Auto mechanics are not allowed to bring in spare parts for vehicles, including parts for pickup trucks and tractors, both depended upon by farmers.
Small amounts of bulk food items for the use of a single family (such as a single bag of sugar, flour, or rice) are generally not allowed through.
Farmers report not being allowed to bring motor oil through which is needed for their harvester machines (Shingal depends on wheat and barley farming). Fuel (for gas stations) is also occasionally restricted.
Cement and cinderblocks needed for the rebuilding of homes destroyed by IS are often not allowed through.
Many families have been prevented from bringing a single sheep or lamb through the checkpoint.
Fertilizer is not allowed through. The asa’ish claim that it is to prevent terrorists from making bombs; this is not a risk among poor Yazidi farmers. Without fertilizer, farmers lose 50% to 70% of their yield.
Farmers are not being allowed to being ordinary farming equipment, such as irrigation supplies, to Shingal.
The headmasters of schools in Shingal have not been allowed to bring basic school supplies (such as paper, a single printer, or a single laptop) through the checkpoint, and have also been prevented from bringing fixtures for the schools, such as well pumps for the schools’ water systems.
Displaced families trying to return have been turned back to the camps when attempting to transport their own furniture or tents in which they need to live while rebuilding their destroyed homes.
Veterinary medicine has not been allowed through. Shingal’s families live off of herds but shop owners who sell veterinary medicine are not able to reopen their shops in Snune or the other collective villages because of the restrictions.
As an unannounced and therefore “unofficial” blockade, it is selectively enforced. Those with close ties to the government, asa’ish, or Peshmerga are sometimes allowed to bring some goods through. A few basic retail items are allowed through for the shops in Snune. This allows government officials to deny the existence of the blockade when challenged about it. But even when certain goods are allowed through, drivers are often treated roughly and humiliated by the asa’ish, being forced to unload their entire delivery (crates of vegetables, for example) in the sun. Many drivers for hire have simply given up trying to transport goods to Shingal. When some farmers complained about the restrictions on moving ordinary goods, government officials told them that they must apply for certain permits in order to bring goods to Shingal (permits that never existed before and that no one had heard of). Farmers that have tried to navigate this process are given a runaround, being sent from office to office, and the process—just to get official authorization to take farming supplies to one’s small farm—can take months. This can mean missing a planting or harvesting season. Most people simply give up trying. One farmer who finally succeeded in securing a permission document from the Dohuk governorate was still blocked from transporting the goods to Shingal by the asa’ish at the checkpoint: there’s no guarantee that the asa’ish will respect government documents.
Human Rights Watch investigated this blockade and recently issued a report, condemning the government for actively preventing reconstruction. I have personally always been in favor of reconstruction so that Yazidis can have a future in their homeland instead of being forced to emigrate. Emigration destroys the traditional diversity of the local society and puts the heritage of small minorities at risk. However, current policies actively prevent Yazidi families from returning and rebuilding, which produces hopelessness and prompts greater emigration from the country.
Political Violence toward Yazidis
This situation becomes even worse. Not only are families who were targeted with genocide and are now in their third year of living in camps prevented from returning home to resume normal lives, they are also punished severely if they complain about this situation. The asa’ish maintain strict control of Yazidi activities in the camps. Yazidis in the camps are generally not allowed to organize a public meeting unless it is for an activity related to an official political party. This included memorial gatherings to commemorate the anniversary of the genocide, last August, which asa’ish feared could turn into opportunities where dissent would be expressed. Yazidis in the camps holding peaceful demonstrations or speaking out on social media to protest the political policies that harm them have often been arrested, beaten, or threatened. In general, the asa’ish have succeeding in suppressing the voices of Yazidis who are broken and frustrated about their situation.
Worst of all is the political violence targeting Yazidis who join rival militias. These young people—and their families—can be persecuted through arrests, jailing, interrogations, and beatings. Young Yazidi men and women who join the YBŞ cannot visit their displaced relatives in the IDP camps in Dohuk, or else they will be arrested. In fact, KDP asa’ish have arrested poor taxi drivers accused of carrying YBŞ-affiliated passengers as customers in their taxis. Some taxi drivers have no knowledge of the identities of their paying customers, but have been arrested and jailed all the same. Some young men and women have not seen their families in the camps—only a three-hour drive away—for over two years for fear of being arrested.
One of my employees when I was leading Yazda in Iraq and Kurdistan was an uneducated, destitute man who worked as a cleaner in Yazda’s health care center. He had no interest in politics, but several of his grown children decided that they would join the YBŞ to defend their homeland. One day, he was taken by the asa’ish to an office where he was interrogated and told that he would be made to disappear (i.e., imprisoned without charges or trial) if he did not convince his children to disaffiliate from the YBŞ. He could not convince them to leave their cause of defending Shingal, so he had to leave the Kurdistan Region. He moved back to Shingal where he has no work and no resources, out of fear for his safety. Such stories are commonplace.
The political persecution of Yazidis who voice criticism of the government is so severe that it has prompted many families to immigrate to Europe. A number of Yazidi activists and journalists, not affiliated with any party, received threats against their families from the asa’ish because they spoke out. They chose to leave the country rather than live in fear. Individuals and families are not the only ones targeted; organizations are also victims of the crackdown on free speech.
Yazda Iraq is not the first local Yazidi organization to be shut down by the KDP since the genocide. Rainbow, a Yazidi-created project doing activities with children in Mamilian camp, was shut down in late 2015 after some of its volunteers joined peaceful demonstrations against the treatment of the Yazidis. Hezar Dinar, or the “Thousand Dinar” campaign, was an influential project with a huge impact. Yazidi volunteers collected small donations from large numbers of local people to redistribute to the needy in the camps. The project was apolitical but was shut down just before summer 2016 by KDP asa’ish after some of its members were seen in a photograph holding a non-KDP flag. Yazda was simply the latest casualty in an ongoing campaign to silence the free expression of any critical sentiments among the Yazidis.
While working in the KRI, I was frequently attacked by Kurdish officials if I voiced even the smallest concern about the situation and how it was affecting the survivors of the genocide. If I mentioned in a UN cluster meeting that the asa’ish were preventing certain goods from being transported to Shingal, I was ridiculed publicly by the government representative and accused of being a “troublemaker.” Of course, it was the government that was making trouble for the victims of the genocide.
Individuals or organizations expressing any criticism of KDP policy in Shingal were often accused of “supporting the PKK.” This is a strange allegation; critiquing harmful KDP policy does not constitute support for the PKK.
Aside from the competition in Shingal, the political dynamics inside the Kurdistan Region were also unhealthy. In the spring of 2016, I was visited by a PUK Peshmerga captain who commanded the small contingent of PUK Peshmerga in Shingal. He described to me how he had a large shipment of medicine that he was trying to bring to Shingal but was being prevented from doing so by the KDP asa’ish, despite being a Peshmerga leader. During my period of work in the country, the primary health centers in the Shingal region suffered from a lack of medicine. I am not speaking of the health centers created by the PKK to serve displaced Yazidis on top of the mountain; I am referring to the established, government-run health centers serving the collective villages on the north side of the mountain. These health centers are part of Nineveh administration and are responsible for the health care of several thousand local Yazidi families that had returned to Shingal. However, the managers of those health centers frequently disclosed to me that they were not being allowed to bring any shipment of medicine originating with the Nineveh government to their centers. I visited such centers personally and saw that their stores of medicine were empty. In the spring, I also spoke with a member of the Kurdish parliament who visited camps in Dohuk to inquire about the needs of genocide survivors and learn how she could help support them. She asked a camp manager what the needs were of the people in the camp. Knowing that she belonged to the PUK, he replied, “Nothing—they have everything they need.”
The Risk of Demographic Change
Like the program to change the demographics in Sheikhan, Shingal is at risk of being targeted with a similar project. Yazidis are very afraid that the KRG may inhibit them from returning home and instead try to settle them within the Kurdistan Region where they will be easier to rule, leaving Shingal open for settlement by KDP loyalists, making the district easier for the KDP to control. As a disputed territory that still officially belongs to the central government, it would be far easier for Kurdistan to gain permanent control of Shingal if it could be populated with Kurdish party loyalists, rather than by an “unruly” minority. As soon as the mass displacement of Shingal occurred in 2014, Yazidis began voicing fears of a possible long-term strategy to prevent them from returning home. Yazidi suspicions of a plan among high-level Kurdish officials to resettle Shingal’s Yazidis inside the Kurdistan Region were corroborated when I and some other Yazda volunteers met with Dr. Fuad Hussein, Chief of Staff to the Presidency of the Kurdistan Regional Government, on November 3, 2015. In our meeting, I pressed Dr. Fuad about the need to rebuild Shingal so that Yazidis could return home. Dr. Fuad told me that it would be too expensive and said that “those people need to be resettled elsewhere.” I responded that it would be less expensive to rebuild their existing homeland than it would be to construct an entirely new home for the Yazidi people.
Of course, if the Kurdish government continues to prevent the Yazidis from returning to Shingal, the real tragedy will be for the Yazidis to lose their historic homeland, with all of its sacred religious and cultural sites.
The Future That the Yazidis Need
Recently, Kurdish officials have intensified calls for the PKK to “leave” Shingal. The PKK itself has only a minimal presence in Shingal. What they mean is that they want PKK support for the Yazidi YBŞ forces to be eliminated so that the YBŞ will dissolve. Kurdish Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani is presenting this as a prerequisite for the ending of the blockade.
By saying that the PKK presence prevents peace from returning to Shingal, Nechirvan Barzani is pretending that the KDP has no choice in its implementation of the blockade. He is effectively saying, “We are helpless in victimizing the Yazidis unless we get the political outcome we want.” But of course the KDP has control over its actions and could lift the blockade today, whether or not it gets its way.
Nechirvan Barzani’s remarks do not acknowledge that the YBŞ’s forces are primarily local, consisting of Yazidis from Shingal—not a foreign force that has invaded the country. (The largest foreign force in the area is actually the Peshmerga Rojava, a KDP-affiliated militia created by the KDP by recruiting from the Syrian refugee camps inside the Kurdistan Region.) Though I do not support the YBŞ or any other partisan militia, or any of the parties with which these militias are affiliated, I nevertheless firmly believe in the Yazidis’ freedom to choose their political affiliation—this is democracy. But this issue is about much more than the right to choose a party. What most Yazidis want now is not to choose a party, but to build their own administrative infrastructure, independently of any major party.
Most Yazidis from Shingal are worried about the PKK becoming the next KDP in Shingal. They do not want to see the PKK replace the KDP as a new hegemon in Shingal—the next chapter in single-party authoritarianism maintaining complete control over a population. But Yazidis are even more fearful about an end to PKK support for Yazidi militias, because this will result in the return of KDP hegemony, which is viewed as the worst-case scenario. Yazidis therefore recognize that PKK influence is creating balance for the moment; neither the KDP nor the PKK are strong enough to gain full control of Shingal. This deferment of an outside force again taking complete control of Shingal is allowing the Yazidis time to plan their own form of local administration, security, and governance, but they need better support and guidance from the U.S. and European countries to accomplish this. This is what the vast majority of Yazidis want. Rather than leaving their security to party-affiliated forces originating outside of Shingal—forces that failed to protect them in the past—Yazidis want to oversee their own affairs, by building local, nonpartisan institutions of administration and security that will be officially recognized under the Iraqi legal framework. Yazidis want to maintain a relationship between the Shingal district and the Kurdistan Region, but they prefer to be in charge of their own security and infrastructure, while promoting the development of an environment of political pluralism. This is very reasonable.
Therefore, the desire of most of the Yazidis who join the YBŞ is not to support the pan-Kurdish ideology of the PKK, but rather to protect their own homeland and strengthen their capacity for local governance. They simply do not see an alternative sponsor qualified to defend Yazidi interests at the moment. For the Yazidis, the issue is not a choice of loyalty between Erbil versus Baghdad, but is about creating a framework for self-administration—something that Erbil will never tolerate. By rejecting Erbil’s claims to Shingal (something the vast majority of Shingali Yazidis are united in), Yazidis are not expressing some kind of preference for a special relationship with Baghdad. Rather, they simply want to work within the framework of the government that will best provide the opportunity for self-administration.
The KDP had a decade to convince the Yazidis to join with them instead of seeking their own administration under Baghdad. They failed in this endeavor because they used excessive intimidation rather than extending goodwill and respecting the right of the Yazidis to choose. When I was in Shingal in the summer of 2015, I spoke to wheat and barley farmers who had left the camps in Dohuk to temporarily return to their farms on the north side of the mountain, in order to harvest their fields that had been left standing after the genocide. They hoped to sell their grain and return to the camps. But instead of facilitating this effort on the part of the poor families, Peshmerga leaders in charge of the area after the liberation of the mountain’s north side were not allowing Yazidis to bring their grain to Dohuk. (This was prior to the economic blockade discussed in this article.) The Peshmerga leaders were forcing the Yazidi farmers to sell their grain within Shingal, below the current price, to the Peshmerga leaders themselves, who were then transporting it to the Kurdistan Region to sell for a large profit. This is only one example of the kind of corruption that Shingal suffers under single-party rule and it was heartbreaking to see a broken people continue to be subjected to such exploitation even after the genocide.
Today should mark the end of these abuses. The desire of the Yazidis for self-administration within Iraq’s legal framework should now be respected by all sides. The wishes of the Yazidis are not unreasonable or unrealistic. They are not asking to secede from Iraq and create their own country. They simply want to work within the parameters of the Iraqi constitution to effectively manage and protect their historic region. Such goals are sensible—if this minority is to survive in its homeland—and achievable with local and international support.
A New Message from Kurdistan to the Yazidis
At this stage, the KDP has lost the contest for Yazidi loyalty. The best thing for the KRG to do now is to approach the Yazidi community with a new message. Here is the message that President Barzani, the KDP, and all of Kurdistan should give to the Yazidis of Shingal:
First, we would like to take responsibility for abandoning you in your hour of need, and for allowing the genocide of the Yazidis to take place. We want to apologize in humility for the terrible negligence that left your people defenseless. We should have apologized to you directly, long ago, and we are sorry for the long delay in giving you this honest message. Apologies are painful, but the pain of humility is worth the chance to rebuild trust and good faith with you.
Second, we recognize that it was not a genocide targeting all Kurds for their ethnicity, but rather targeting Yazidis specifically, for their religious identity. As your brothers and sisters, we stand with you, and we recognize that you alone were targeted with a special project of extermination and enslavement.
Third, we recognize that no one has the right to choose your leaders for you, except you. Shingal has always been your historic homeland, and you have the right to shape its future. Even after the way that we have broken trust with you, we hope that you will still want seek a future with Kurdistan, but we recognize that the choice is yours, and we will respect whatever decision you make, and will always seek to maintain friendship with you.
Fourth, we will immediately lift the economic blockade that we have levied against your homeland, Shingal, for the entire past year. We recognize that our actions have further victimized you and inhibited your recovery, even after the terrible trauma of the genocide that you have endured. We do not have the right to tell you not to return to your homeland, or to keep your population in camps for years at a time, while your children grow up hopeless about their lack of a future.
Fifth, regardless of what political loyalties you democratically choose within your homeland, we pledge to not only allow you free passage with your personal goods from the Kurdistan Region to Shingal, but we also pledge to assist your reconstruction in whatever way we are able, recognizing that after our own negligence, we are now responsible to do what we can to help you rebuild, regardless of whether you place your political loyalties with our parties or not. Kurdistan is contending with economic crisis now, which limits our ability to perform significant reconstruction, but we will do our best to assist you.
These positions represent the goodwill of the Kurdish people who believe in democracy and justice and this statement represents the Kurdish values of fairness, equality, and integrity.
The purpose of this article has not been to attack Kurdistan, but to address some problems that are weakening social cohesion among communities in Kurdistan and northern Iraq. Kurdistan is a wonderful place with wonderful people who have fought very hard for their own rights and freedoms. On my first visit to Kurdistan years ago, I visited a prison that Saddam had built in which he would imprison Kurds who expressed dissent about their situation. The prison was turned into a museum and I was moved by the depictions of human suffering that the Kurds had endured at the hands of Saddam, and by the bravery of the Peshmerga that had labored so tirelessly to liberate their people. Being honest in our confrontation of new political realities of this generation, and the failure of the Peshmerga in Shingal, does not constitute a denial of the heroism of the Peshmerga over the many years that they have defended Kurdistan. Nevertheless, it is essential that we confront the Ba’thist-like behavior of the asa’ish toward the minority populations, and the political system that looks the other way when abuses occur. Sadly, I have lost some valued friendships with Kurds who are very dear to me, because of the position that I have taken on these issues. It is sad to lose those friendships, but in this context of genocide, I cannot compromise on the truth. In America we say “friends don’t let friends drive drunk.” We can critique government action in Kurdistan because we love Kurdistan and want to see it thrive, just as it is our duty to critique the treatment of minorities in the U.S. whenever our government abuses freedoms. Because of campaigns for the rights of minorities, many people in America today have rights that they did not have a few short years ago. Those rights are always placed in jeopardy when we stop speaking out. My involvement in the Yazidi situation is not that of someone with any stake in political factions. I have never had an affiliation with or affinity for any political group in Iraq, Syria, or Turkey. Rather, I am approaching this situation as a historian who understands how fragile the existence of a minority group like the Yazidis is, and how real the possibility is that the Yazidi people could disappear from the region. We have witnessed the recent decline of many minority communities in the Middle East, not only because of the threat of extremist violence, but also because of the harmful politics of nationalism. It is vital that citizens of Iraq and Kurdistan work to ensure that the Yazidis are not another casualty of politics. You—the people of Kurdistan—must speak out and let your government know that their treatment of the Yazidis is unacceptable and contrary to your values.
**Matthew Barber is a PhD student studying Islamic thought and history in the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations at the University of Chicago. He was working in Kurdistan when the Yazidi Genocide began and later served as the Iraq Executive Director of Yazda for one year in 2015-2016. He has conducted research on the Yazidi minority and can be followed on Twitter: @Matthew__Barber 

One Muslim Country Seems Well Positioned To 'Graduate' Off The Visa Ban
Alberto M. Fernandez/MEMRI/February 01/17
https://www.memri.org/reports/one-muslim-country-seems-well-positioned-graduate-visa-ban
I recently saw a small but noisy demonstration in a Spanish city. The young demonstrators, pierced, tattooed, and well dressed, were Communists with hammer and sickle flags, and they called for "an end to borders and to walls." But they were not demonstrating against Donald Trump – rather, against the seemingly sieve-like borders and barriers of the European Union. Spain's unemployment rate is 20% and its youth unemployment rate is 44%.
Today it seems that there are those that want only walls and those that want to tear them all down, and uneasy populations in between. The January 27, 2017 White House Executive Order "Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States" has generated tremendous controversy and comment, most of it negative, with heartbreaking accounts of cases of real individual hardship and also partisan spin. Polling suggests more Americans approve of the E.O. than disapprove.[1]
One of the more specious lines of argument has been that the new Executive Order is a "boon for ISIS recruitment" – the idea being that somehow Muslims will now be more easily swayed by the ISIS narrative. As if Muslims were children or ticking time bombs so ready to become terrorists if the world is mean to them or Trump excludes them. The overwhelming majority of Muslims oppose ISIS for their own reasons, not because of us or our policies or because of who is U.S. president. Yes, we can do all sorts of things to hurt our own efforts in the anti-ISIS fight, but denying Muslims their own complexity and agency, and their own motivation, would seem to be not just bigotry but shallow.
And it is hard to see how much a (seemingly mostly temporary) visa ban would help an ISIS narrative that makes much of ancient events like the Crusades and the Reconquista and threatens to "conquer Rome, break your crosses, and enslave your women." The ISIS narrative uses and will use everything, but it has been mostly driven in past years by the idealized creation of a supposedly perfect Islamic Caliphate based on "the Prophetic Methodology" and on the sectarian carnage in the Middle East, especially in Syria.
One ISIS supporter demonstrated such a broad-brush approach when he commented on January 29: "People are all pissed off Trump slammed the doors on migrants from Muslim lands, and I too am angry, but do you realize that Obama has deported more people than all the 20th century presidents before him COMBINED? This just goes to show it's not just Trump or Obama, it's everyone in this poisoned, corrupt, redneck kuffar [infidel] country. The problem is not just the elected official, it's the kuffar who put them there too. They are all evil all of them, especially the Jews!"[2]
And while much ink has been spilled on the emotions of the moment and on criticizing the new American administration, less has been said on how will the seven governments on the temporary visa ban list seek to come to terms with it.
It is entirely possible that the administration will decide, after a comprehensive review, that safeguards are mostly in place and that most visa operations can resume. But in my view, five of the listed countries – Libya, Somalia, Yemen, Syria, and Iran – could be hard-pressed to meet any advanced visa threshold. These are all countries in chaos, often lacking resident U.S. Embassies or with a very anti-American regime in power (Iran).
It is quite probable that plausible and logical reasons will be found for Iraq, given its centrality in the fight against the Islamic State, to be removed from this blacklist.[3] The one country most likely to be able to take steps on its own to satisfy the Americans, and that is quite motivated to do so is, ironically, the Islamist government of Sudan.
A serial human rights violator and long-time international pariah, the NCP-ruled Sudan is, in terms of its own survival, the most successful Sudanese state in history, in power now for almost 28 years (1989-2017). The independent Mahdiyya state in Sudan only last 14 years before it was destroyed by the British. Despite continued domestic unrest, demonstrations, vibrant civil society activism, and a range of sometimes bloody, low-grade brush wars on its periphery – Darfur, Abyei, South Kordofan, Blue Nile – the regime of Omar Al-Bashir has endured, if not flourished.
Conflict in all of those places has not disappeared, of course, especially in South Kordofan and Blue Nile where the SPLM-N has forces. But the level of violence has been intermittent and low-key enough to avoid the negative international headlines Sudan garnered at the height of the Save Darfur Movement more than a decade ago. Or it may be that the sort of violence seen in Sudan now seems rather distant and old-fashioned compared to the crushing of cities seen in Syria today.
Author with US Special Envoy Scott Gration in SLA rebel-held Jebel Marra in 2009
The Sudanese regime has constantly reinvented itself through the years, from a promoter of regional Islamic terrorism and safe-haven for Bin Laden to peacemaker with the SPLM and valuable cooperator on counterterrorism with the U.S. More recently, it shifted from a cozy relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran to a cementing of improved relations with Saudi Arabia. Sudan even supplied troops for the Saudi-led effort in Yemen.[4]
A recent, much publicized State Department Dissent Channel message warned that the new travel ban "can only be lifted under conditions which will be difficult or impossible for countries to meet."[5] Sudan, with its well-organized if fearsome national security apparatus, the NISS, and with a full functioning U.S. Embassy, and with the added incentive of the lifting of sanctions and removal from the State Sponsors of Terrorism list, seems the best bet to meet these "difficult or impossible conditions."
The Obama administration's January 13, 2017 announcement of the removal of a trade embargo and sanctions was supposedly done with the approval of the incoming Trump administration but kicks in 180 days after that announcement. Unlike Iran, Sudan is not a major regional menace, and an improvement of relations with the United States could be an early diplomatic win for the Trump Administration and possibly could improve life for ordinary Sudanese.[6] Certainly many fierce Sudanese critics of the current regime are in favor of an early improvement of relations with the United States.[7]
Sudan is also benefiting from an improvement of relations with a European Union concerned about rampant unmanaged migration flows from Africa to Europe, and is indirectly receiving money to help stem that flow and to improve life in the country's marginalized peripheries.[8]
The situation in Sudan is not that stable. There is considerable unrest and growing unhappiness about economic conditions and continued repression. The succession to an aging President Al-Bashir is murky. But Sudan has been a "turbulent state" for decades now, and almost seems a model of some sort of workable governance compared to the anarchy of Libya or Yemen.[9] This is a regime that loves to negotiate and revels in the minutiae of political and security agreements. Certainly the parts of the Sudanese leadership needed to reach a deal with the Americans – the ruling political elite and the security forces – are capable enough to see it through.
Endnotes:
[1]Thehill.com, January 31, 2017.
[2] See MEMRI JTTM report ISIS Supporters React To President Trump's Immigration Policy On Facebook, Instagram, January 30, 2017.
[3] Foreignpolicy.com, January 30, 2017.
[4] Theguardian.com, January 12, 2016.
[5] Huffingtonpost.com, January 30, 2017.
[6] Forbes.com, January 23, 2017.
[7] Africanarguments.org, October 17, 2007.
[8] Irinnews.org, May 26, 2016.
[9] Africanarguments.org, October 17, 2007.