LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

February 03/17

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins17/english.february03.17.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
Prophetess, Anna, the daughter of Phanuel, Spoke about the Child & Thanked God for this Holy Grace
Luke 02/36-41/:"There was also a prophetess, Anna, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher. She was advanced in years, having lived seven years with her husband after her marriage, and then as a widow until she was eighty-four. She never left the temple, but worshiped night and day with fasting and prayer. And coming forward at that very time, she gave thanks to God and spoke about the child to all who were awaiting the redemption of Jerusalem. When they had fulfilled all the prescriptions of the law of the Lord, they returned to Galilee, to their own town of Nazareth. The child grew and became strong, filled with wisdom; and the favor of God was upon him.12 Each year his parents went to Jerusalem for the feast of Passover,"

Our boast is this, the testimony of our conscience that we have conducted ourselves in the world, and especially toward you, with the simplicity and sincerity of God, (and) not by human wisdom but by the grace of God.
Saint Paul's letter (2 Corinthians) 01/08-14/:"We do not want you to be unaware, brothers, of the affliction that came to us in the province of Asia; we were utterly weighed down beyond our strength, so that we despaired even of life. Indeed, we had accepted within ourselves the sentence of death, that we might trust not in ourselves but in God who raises the dead. He rescued us from such great danger of death, and he will continue to rescue us; in him we have put our hope (that) he will also rescue us again, as you help us with prayer, so that thanks may be given by many on our behalf for the gift granted us through the prayers of many. For our boast is this, the testimony of our conscience that we have conducted ourselves in the world, and especially toward you, with the simplicity and sincerity of God, (and) not by human wisdom but by the grace of God. For we write you nothing but what you can read and understand, and I hope that you will understand completely, as you have come to understand us partially, that we are your boast as you also are ours, on the day of (our) Lord Jesus.

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 02-03/17
Is it possible to create safe zones in SyriaظDiana Moukalled/The Arab News/February 02/17
Beirut's last public beach: residents fear privatisation of Ramlet al-Baida/Alex Dziadosz in Beirut/The Guardian/February 02/17
Will Saudi Arabia Negotiate with Iran/ Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al Awsat/February 02/17
The Christian God ‘Loves’ Sex and Booze/ Raymond Ibrahim/February 02/17
Syrian opposition figure to deploy all-Arab force in Raqqa offensive/Mahmoud Mourad/Reuters/February 02/17
Canadian Press/CPC leadership candidate, "Shark Tank" star Kevin O'Leary tells us how he'd govern Canada/ Canadian Press/February 02/17
Rashid Khalidi Worries that Jews Will ‘Infest’ the Trump Administration/Dore Feith/National Review/ February 02/17
Arabs Should Look In The Mirror Before Criticizing Trump’s Travel Ban/A separate State Of Mind/February 02/17
Debate in Dutch Parliament about President Trump/Geert Wilders/Gatestone Institute/February 02/17
Trump ban is a firm and correct decision/Mohammed Al Shaikh/Al Arabiya/January 02/17
Iran Tests Trump/Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/February 02/17
Bring Russia to the Table and Promote America's Security/Stephen Blank and Peter Huessy/Gatestone Institute/February 02/17
What suits the West does not necessarily ennoble the rest/Mohammed Nosseir/Al Arabiya/January 02/17
A new strategy to raise standard of education/Samar Fatany/Al Arabiya/January 02/17

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 02-03/17
Democratic Gathering Delegation Meets Franjieh
oun: Constitution Won't Be Violated During my Term
our-Party Panel Steps Up Election Law Efforts before Deadline
Jreissati Sends Memo to Syria Demanding Extradition of al-Hashem's Killer
Justice Minister Orders Probe into Suspected Corruption at Casino du Liban
Mustaqbal Urges Unified Standards in Electoral Law, Respect for Coexistence
Hizbullah Bloc Says 'Possible' to Agree on New Electoral Law, Calls Anew for Proportional Representation
Arslan Defends Four-Party Panel: Taken on too Much Responsibility
Khoury Calls for Leaving 1960 out of Discussions: We Will Find a New Law
Machnouk receives Bishop Darwish
Ambassador of Germany makes donation on behalf of German Cooperation Agency to Orphan Care Association
Nadim Gemayel: The single constituency ensures a healthy representation of communities
Jumblatt wins uncontested PSP president
Body of drowned Syrian child arrives at Halba hospital
Merehbi, Bavarian Minister tackle refugee affairs
Egyptian Minister of Administrative Reform arrives in Beirut
Round table on improving protection of children from involvement in armed conflicts
Hasbani in front of Bishop Darwich: Eliminating phenomenon of kidnappings and security zones stringent matter
Lebanon officially rule WABA Championship 2017 while Iran and Syria make it to FIBA Asia Cup
Lebanese Women Call for 30 percent Quota in Parliamentary Seats
CIA Releases: Franjieh Enlisted Assad’s Help after Failing to Contain Lebanon Civil War
Is it possible to create safe zones in Syria?
Beirut's last public beach: residents fear privatisation of Ramlet al-Baida

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 02-03/17
Statement by the National Security Advisor General Mike Flynn
John Bolton on Iran Sanctions Bill: We Won't Let Them Get Nukes
Dumb deal' drags Australia-U.S. ties to new low after tense Trump call
Rrump white house signals tough line on Iran
US expected to impose fresh sanctions on Iran
Top Khamenei ally: Useless for US to threaten Iran over missile test
Imam in US disputes man’s claim that mom died due to travel ban
Top Khamenei ally: Useless for US to threaten Iran over missile test
Trump honors US navy seal killed during Yemen raid
UN chief backs Syria delegates plan for Geneva
Syria: Ceasefire meeting to convene Monday
Turkish warplanes kill 51 ISIS militants in Syria
Iraq faces massive challenge in Mosul offensive
UN rights experts urge Iran to halt execution of juvenile
Qaida Stands to Gain from Trump Strikes on Yemen
Qaida Kills Yemen Police, Targeted in U.S. Raid
Netanyahu to Visit London for Talks with May
Palestinian NGO Worker Pleads Not Guilty to Helping Hamas
Hardliners Hold Out in West Bank Settlement Outpost

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on February 02-03/17
Trump to recast Obama’s “Countering Violent Extremism” program to focus on the jihad threat
Nancy Pelosi: Trump’s immigration ban “has not made us more safe”
Afghanistan: Former child bride’s ears hacked off by husband for speaking to other men
Muslim leader defends Trump immigration order after mosque burns down
Islamophobia: Kuwait imposes visa ban on five Muslim-majority nations, including Pakistan
Steve Bannon in 2010: “Islam is not a religion of peace. Islam is a religion of submission.”
UC-Berkeley: Left-fascists riot, prevent Milo speech, Trump threatens federal funds
Denver: Muslim carrying “Islamic writings” shoots and kills transit security officer, investigators baffled
Fake news: Iraqi-American lied when he claimed that his mother died due to Trump ban
DNC boots candidate from chairmanship race for criticizing Islamic law’s discrimination against gays

Links From Christian Today Site for on February 02-03/17
Christians In Turkey: Attacked, Deported And Seen As A 'Threat Against National Security'
Trump At National Prayer Breakfast: 'As Long As We Have God, We Are Never, Ever Alone'
Archbishop Of Canterbury Apologises For Sex Abuse At Church Camps
Bishop Of London's Farewell Service: Church Must Stand United In The Face Of 'Great Promise And Great Peril'
Archbishop Of Canterbury 'Glad' To Meet Trump: 'I Would Try To Change His Mind'
In A World Of Fake News, Is Fake Theology Next?
Why It Is Wrong To Pretend That Catholics And Protestants Agree #Reformation500
Why It's Wrong To Say You Have To Be A Christian To Be An American
7 Things You (Probably) Didn't Know About The Longest Psalm In The Bible
Leaked Trump Executive Order On Religious Freedom Threatens To Sweep Away Anti-Discrimination Protections For Minorities

Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 02-03/17
Democratic Gathering Delegation Meets Franjieh
Naharnet/January 02/17/A Democratic Gathering bloc delegation held talks on Thursday with Marada Movement chief MP Suleiman Franjieh where talks focused on an electoral law for the upcoming parliamentary polls.After the meeting, Franjieh lashed out at President Michel Aoun without naming him, he said: “A political party came into power under the banner of empowering itself at the expense of others.”He said he supports electoral laws that provide just representation for all political parties without excluding any. “We simply support any just law, not complicated laws similar to the one suggested recently,” Franjieh told reporters, referring to a hybrid law proposed lately by the main political parties. “Coordination between Marada and the PSP has been ongoing for over a year now. Today we support them because they are facing a war of elimination under the banner of 'Christians rights'.”The MP pointed out that he does not reject the 1960 law but “supports laws that serve justice for all. I don't back complicated laws," he said. For his part, former minister Akram Shehayyeb said: “We are open to all suggestions outside the framework of settlements. “What we have seen lately is very dangerous,” he said. The main political parties are discussing several formats of the so-called hybrid law but the Progressive Socialist Party has raised the alarm over the representation of the minority Druze community, warning that any law containing proportional representation would “marginalize” Druze in the political system.

Aoun: Constitution Won't Be Violated During my Term
Naharnet/January 02/17/President Michel Aoun emphasized on Thursday that he will not accept any violations against the constitution during his term, and assured that he is keen on the Lebanese' rights. “During my term, I will not allow violations against the constitution or ignorance against the Lebanese' will for change,” said Aoun in a meeting with Lebanon's Ambassadors. “I will use my constitutional powers to preserve the rights of the Lebanese people, their aspirations and hopes,” he added. Aoun was criticized lately for a stance he made over the debate on an election law for the parliamentary elections. He said that if had to choose between extending the parliament’s term or vacuum, he would choose vacuum. Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat slammed threats about vacuum, without naming Aoun, at the parliament as “unconstitutional.”

Four-Party Panel Steps Up Election Law Efforts before Deadline
Naharnet/January 02/17/After the four-party panel failed to garner consensus over a hybrid-law that combines proportional representation system with the winner-takes-all system, the committee will intensify its meetings to find a new format before February 21, when electoral bodies are requested to begin preparations, An Nahar daily reported on Thursday. Sources from the panel, told the daily: “The committee is in front of 10 decisive days during which meetings and discussions will be intensified at all levels in order to agree on a new format before February 21.”The four-party panel included representatives from the AMAL Movement, Hizbullah, al-Mustaqbal and the Free Patriotic Movement. The main political parties are discussing several formats of the so-called hybrid law but the Progressive Socialist Party has raised the alarm over the representation of the minority Druze community, warning that any law containing proportional representation would “marginalize” Druze in the political system. They discussed a law which was reportedly proposed by FPM chief Jebran Bassil. The committee will discuss new formats with amendments to the hybrid-law, reports said. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.

Jreissati Sends Memo to Syria Demanding Extradition of al-Hashem's Killer
Naharnet/January 02/17/Justice Minister Salim Jreissati on Thursday sent a memo to his Syrian counterpart, demanding the extradition of a Syrian national accused of killing Lebanese citizen Majid al-Hashem. Lebanon's National News Agency said Jreissati had telephoned Syrian Justice Minister Najm Ahmed on Wednesday regarding “the extradition of Syrian national Khaled Radwan Slim, who is accused of committing abductions and robberies and of murdering Lebanese citizen Majid Jerjes Raji, who is known as Majid al-Hashem.”Jreissati demanded that Slim be “handed over through the administrative procedures, knowing that an extradition file had been submitted by the competent Lebanese authorities in line with the agreement signed between Lebanon and Syria,” NNA said. “Jreissati sent a memo to his Syrian counterpart on Thursday as requested by the Syrian justice minister during the phone call,” the agency added. Slim had been arrested by Syrian authorities last Thursday after fleeing Lebanon to the neighboring country. After two days of search operations, the dead body of al-Hashem, 61, had been found buried in sand at a stone factory in the Jbeil town of Akoura. Several of the stone factory's Syrian workers have been detained on charges of involvement in al-Hashem's kidnap and murder.

Justice Minister Orders Probe into Suspected Corruption at Casino du Liban

Naharnet/January 02/17/ Justice Minister Salim Jreissati, who is close to President Michel Aoun, on Thursday ordered a probe into suspected corruption at Casino du Liban. In a memo to State Prosecutor Samir Hammoud, Jreissati demanded “conducting the necessary investigations into the Casino du Liban file, especially regarding the allowances of the chairman and the board members, the diesel issue, the number of employees and contract workers, the Casino's failure to honor its obligations towards the Lebanese state, the car parking, and anything else unveiled by the probe.” President Aoun has pledged that “corruption will be eradicated” during his presidential tenure.

Mustaqbal Urges Unified Standards in Electoral Law, Respect for Coexistence
Naharnet/January 02/17/ Al-Mustaqbal Movement stressed Thursday that any electoral law should be based on unified standards in the distribution of seats and electoral to districts. “Al-Mustaqbal Movement will be fully ready to take part in the parliamentary elections on any dates set by the Lebanese government and according to any law that receives consensus and the parliament's approval,” Mustaqbal's political bureau said in a statement issued after a periodic meeting. It called on the political forces to avoid “selective standards” and to endorse “political mechanisms and electoral districts that conform with the requirements of coexistence among the Lebanese.” While Mustaqbal has rejected that the electoral law be fully based on proportional representation, arguing that Hizbullah's weapons would prevents serious competition in the party's strongholds, the Democratic Gathering led by MP Walid Jumblat has totally rejected proportional representation, even within a hybrid law, warning that it would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah, Mustaqbal, the Free Patriotic Movement, AMAL Movement and the Lebanese Forces are meanwhile discussing several formats of a so-called hybrid electoral law that mixes proportional representation with the winner-takes-all system.

Hizbullah Bloc Says 'Possible' to Agree on New Electoral Law, Calls Anew for Proportional Representation
Naharnet/January 02/17/ Hizbullah's Loyalty to Resistance parliamentary bloc noted Thursday that it is still “possible” to reach a “positive agreement” over the electoral law, as it reiterated its call for an electoral law fully based on the proportional representation system. “Any agreement on a new electoral law must conform with the stipulations of the Document of National Accord (Taef Accord) and the constitution in terms of ensuring equal power-sharing (between Christians and Muslims), enhancing coexistence, and securing correct, comprehensive and effective representation,” said the bloc in a statement issued after its weekly meeting. “After the bloc was briefed on the deliberations of the interlocutors and on the points of agreement and contention, it stressed its keenness on the continuation of consultations and pointed out that it is possible to reach a positive agreement,” Loyalty to Resistance added. It also emphasized that “the debate must always be based on constitution and the Document of National Accord” and that it must “avoid selectivity.” And while reiterating its rejection of a new extension of the parliament's term, the bloc renewed its call for an electoral law “fully based on proportional representation and a single electoral district or several large electorates.”“This is the format that is compatible with the constitution and free of selectivity,” Loyalty to Resistance noted. While al-Mustaqbal Movement has rejected a law fully based on proportional representation, arguing that Hizbullah's weapons would prevents serious competition in the party's strongholds, the Democratic Gathering led by MP Walid Jumblat has totally rejected proportional representation, even within a hybrid law, warning that it would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah, Mustaqbal, the Free Patriotic Movement, AMAL Movement and the Lebanese Forces are meanwhile discussing several formats of a so-called hybrid electoral law that mixes proportional representation with the winner-takes-all system.

Arslan Defends Four-Party Panel: Taken on too Much Responsibility
Naharnet/January 02/17/Minister of the Displaced Talal Arslan defended the four-party committee studying drafts for a new electoral law and said it “was given more than it can handle,” as he assured that its main task is to study drafts that will be submitted to the cabinet or parliament, al-Joumhouria daily reported on Thursday. “The four-party committee has carried more than it can handle. It is not qualified to take a final decision because its mission is limited to drafting laws in consultation with everyone. The draft laws will eventually be submitted to the cabinet or parliament (for approval),” he told the daily in an interview. Hizbullah, al-Mustaqbal, Free Patriotic Movement and AMAL Movement are holding meetings aimed at agreeing on a new electoral law before the expiry of the deadlines. The parties are discussing several formats of the so-called hybrid law but the Progressive Socialist Party has raised the alarm over the representation of the minority Druze community, warning that any law containing proportional representation would “marginalize” Druze in the political system. Referring to President Michel Aoun, PM Saad Hariri and Speaker Nabih Berri, Arslan added: “The three presidents insist on the need to reach a new law and not to return back to the 1960 law. This is an accomplishment in itself,” he added.

Khoury Calls for Leaving 1960 out of Discussions: We Will Find a New Law
Naharnet/January 02/17/Culture Minister Ghattas Khoury voiced calls on Thursday to leave out the 1960 election law from deliberations since everyone else wants a new law for the parliamentary elections. “Everybody wants a new law and we will find one. The ongoing discussions indicate that a de facto law will not be endorsed, only a consensual law will be passed,” Khoury told the daily in an interview. Referring to the deadlines for endorsing a new law, the Minister said: “The deadlines are not pressing to the point being pictured. If we were able to find a law after calling the electoral supervisory commission, then we can amend the deadline.”In order for the elections to be held on May 21, the Interior Minister must call for elections and complete all preparations before February 21.The majority of Lebanon's political parties, mainly the Lebanese Forces, al-Mustaqbal Movement and the President, refuse the 1960 law. Hizbullah has repeatedly called for an electoral law based on proportional representation but other political parties, especially Mustaqbal, have rejected the proposal and argued that the party's controversial arsenal of arms would prevent serious competition in regions where the Iran-backed party is influential. The parties are discussing several formats of the so-called hybrid law but the Progressive Socialist Party has raised the alarm over the representation of the minority Druze community, warning that any law containing proportional representation would “marginalize” Druze in the political system. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.

Machnouk receives Bishop Darwish
Thu 02 Feb 2017/NNA - Interior minister, Nouhad Machnouk, received on Thursday, the bishop of Zahle and Bekaa for Catholic Greeks, Isaam Darwich. Discussions focused on the situation in Zahle and the Bekaa, as well as on matters related to the development of the region.

Ambassador of Germany makes donation on behalf of German Cooperation Agency to Orphan Care Association
Thu 02 Feb 2017 /NNA - The German ambassador to Lebanon, Martin Huth, visited on Thursday the Orphan Care Association in Sidon whereby he presented a donation from the German Agency for International Cooperation to the "Center of Ahmed Al-Bizri" dedicated for people with special needs, and to the "Generations of Sidon" School, which are both affiliated with the Association. The event was attended by former Prime Minister Fouad Siniora , MP Bahia Hariri, and mayor of Beirut Mohammad Al-Saudi. Huth toured the centers and departments of the Association, and he was briefed on the social, medical, educational and psychological services it provides, especially for people with special needs.

Nadim Gemayel: The single constituency ensures a healthy representation of communities
Thu 02 Feb 2017/NNA - Member of the parliamentary bloc "Kataeb", Deputy Nadim Gemayel, said on Thursday that the single constituency proposed by the party would allow closer relations between citizens and MPs, which could therefore facilitate the process of accountability at the parliament. "The single constituency could also ensure a healthy representation of the communities," Gemayel said in an interview with the Tele Liban channel.The MP then presented an explanation of this bill and the means of dividing constituencies into 112, pointing out finally that the criticisms addressed by some to this project were unjustifiable.

Jumblatt wins uncontested PSP president
Thu 02 Feb 2017/NNA - Progressive Socialist Party (PSP) Command Elections' Nominations Committee announced in a statement the names of candidates running for the 15-seat membership of the Party's Command Council in elections set for next Sunday, February 5, 2017. The Committee announced that Walid Kamal Jumbalt won uncontested the presidency of PSP, and Doureid Mohammed Yaghi as Vice President. Winning uncontested was also Kamal Farid Mouawad as Vice President and Zafer Kamel Nasser the General Secretary. Elections will take place after the adoption of the political document at the Party's General Conference next Sunday at the Phoenicia Hotel.

Body of drowned Syrian child arrives at Halba hospital
Thu 02 Feb 2017/NNA - The body of four-year-old girl (Syrian), Sanaa Hammoud, has been transported to Al-Yussuf medical Center in Halba - Akkar, the NNA correspondent said. Her parents say he drowned in a small lake near their home in Bebnin. Investigations are underway.

Merehbi, Bavarian Minister tackle refugee affairs
Thu 02 Feb 2017/NNA - State Minister for Refugee Affairs, Mouin Merehbi, met on Thursday at his ministerial office with Bavaria's Minister for International Affairs, Betty Merck, in the presence of German Ambassador to Lebanon, Martin Hoth, and her accompanying delegation. Talks reportedly dwelt on an array of affairs related to the displaced people in Lebanon and their present conditions, in addition to the crisis impact on the Lebanese society. Minister Merehbi stressed the "need for continuous coordination between the two countries and to increase support in relation to infrastructure and humanitarian and social challenges. The Minister also underlined the need to intensify efforts to end the war in Syria.
Merehbi hailed German efforts in support of Lebanon in addressing the refugee crisis.

Egyptian Minister of Administrative Reform arrives in Beirut
Thu 02 Feb 2017/NNA - The Egyptian Planning and Administrative Reform Minister, Ashraf El-Araby, just arrived in Beirut to attend a meeting of the Arab Economic Forum to be held in Lebanon. The minister was received at the Beirut airport by ambassador of Egypt, Nazih Al-Najjari.

Round table on improving protection of children from involvement in armed conflicts
Thu 02 Feb 2017/NNA - Geneva Call organization held at "Lancaster Tamar" Hotel in Hazmieh a round table on improving the protection of children from involvement in armed conflicts, in partnership with Permanent Peace Movement and with the support of UNICEF, to focus on the importance of ratifying and implementing the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of children in Armed Conflicts (OPAC). The meeting was attended by the member of the Committee on Women and Children, MP Shant Janjanian, Director of Permanent Peace Movement, Fadi Abi Allam, Armin Kohli representing Geneva Call, Violet Warnery UNICEF Representative, former Secretary General of the Supreme Council for Childhood Dr. Elie Mikhael, Representative of Minister of Social Affairs, Zahi El Haibi, Director of the International Humanitarian Law and Human rights, Brigadier General Elias Abu Jaoude, and Lieutenant Colonel Iyad Abu Dargham from the Lebanese Army Command. Members of Kataeb Party, Progressive Socialist Party, Marada Movement, Free Patriotic Movement, Future Movement, Lebanese Forces and Al Azem Movement also partook in the round table. In the opening speech, Abi Allam said that it was hard to count the number of children who were recruited and used in hostilities, but studies and researches done by the end of the 1990s estimated the number of child soldiers by 300 thousand. "Undoubtedly, this feature increasingly outspread with the rise in the number of armed conflicts, as children were exploited in around 40 armed conflicts all over the world," he added. He said that according to a report issued by UNICEF in 2014, it was the worst year for two successive generations of children in the world, with around 230 million children living in countries and regions affected by armed conflicts, including 15 million suffering directly from this phenomenon in Central African Republic, Iraq, southern Sudan, Palestine, Syria and Ukraine. He said that Lebanon was affected by this issue, with some Lebanese children recruited and taken to fight outside Lebanon. He pointed out that the problem was that we lack knowledge concerning the definition of child. According to the Convention on the Rights of Children 1989, "the child is who is under the age of 18," while militias focus on ages from 15 to 18. "The debate today intends to reactivate this issue to struggle for the ratification of the Protocol in Lebanon," he concluded.
MP Janjanian said that the Lebanese government signed on 17/02/2002 decree no. 7887 regarding this issue, but the parliament did not ratify it. He pointed out that "we should spread awareness in the Lebanese community and raise such awareness on Human Rights."
"We should ensure a safe environment for children for physical and intellectual growth on one hand, and we should convince all parties before submitting this protocol to the General Committee, on the second hand." He added that we gathered altogether today because we believe in this cause. Al Haibi said that the Higher Council for Children was also interested in the issues of protection of children at the ministry, stressing "the need to intensify communication amongst the parties in order to protect our children."

Hasbani in front of Bishop Darwich: Eliminating phenomenon of kidnappings and security zones stringent matter
Thu 02 Feb 2017/NNA - Deputy Prime Minister, Public Health Minister, Ghassan Hasbani, congratulated military and security forces for the arrest the mastermind of the kidnapping of citizen, Saad Richa, saying such a move enhances the state's authority and citizens' confidence with the launch of the new tenure. "Eliminating the phenomenon of kidnappings and terminating security zones is a stringent matter in order to consecrate the state of law," Minister Hasbani said during his meeting with Melkite Greek Catholic Archbishop of Ferzol, Zahle and Beka, Bishop Issam Darwish, who visited him at his Ministerial office on Thursday along with Zahle bloc head Tony Abu Khater and MPs Joseph Maalouf and Chanet Jenjian. On the other hand, Hasbani met with British Ambassador to Lebanon, Hugo Shorter.

Lebanon officially rule WABA Championship 2017 while Iran and Syria make it to FIBA Asia Cup

Thu 02 Feb 2017/NNA - Lebanon have locked up the title in the West Asia Basketball Association (WABA) Championship 2017 in Amman, Jordan after beating hosts Jordan on Day Four of competition. Iran and Syria also notched huge victories to book seats in the FIBA Asia Cup 2017. Iran bounced back from yesterday's loss to Lebanon by unloading their fury on Iraq, 92-80. Right off the bat, Iran led comfortably and even put up a 19-point bubble in the second half. Iraq mounted a rally of sorts in the third and fourth periods, but Team Melli just proved to be too composed and too deep. Mohammad Jamshidi had 27 points to lead the Iranians in their victory, while wingman Behnam Yakhchali also did pretty well with 18 points on the strength of 3 triples. On the other end, naturalized player Kevin Galloway spearheaded Iraq's offense with 29 points and 2 three-pointers. Ali Hamas started in this contest, and he turned out to score 15 points on 5-of-8 field goal shooting for the losing side. In the second game, Lebanon defeated Jordan, 72-61, to move up to 4-0 and officially win the WABA Championship 2017 crown. The Cedars did not waste any time in this one, building up a commanding 27-9 lead at the end of the first period. Coach Joe Moujaes and his wards would not relinquish the advantage the rest of the way despite Jordan staying within striking distance. Lebanon were successful on defense, holding down erstwhile leading Jordanian scorer Mahmoud Abdeen to just 2-of-12 field goal shooting en route to only 8 points. The Cedars also out-rebounded Al Nashama, 41-35, and forced 20 turnovers from the home team. Timeless scorer Fadi El Khatib led Lebanon with 33 points, 6 rebounds, 2 assists and 4 steals, while frontliner Ali Haidar tallied 18 points and 8 boards. Naturalized player Ater Majok also made his presence felt on the defensive end, grabbing 9 rebounds and blocking 1 shot. Mohammad Shaher Hussein was Jordan's most impressive player in this one, recording 11 points, 8 rebounds and 3 rejections, while Mousa Al-Awadi also did well with 16 points. To end the day, Syria played their finest game so far to pull the rug from under Palestine, 86-70. After trailing by nine to end the first quarter, the Syrians rallied in the second period to lead at the half, 43-34. They would hold on to that lead for the entire second half and preserve the win thanks to good rebounding, playmaking and defense. Syria had 49 rebounds to just 39 for Palestine while also being +4 in assists and +7 in steals. Syria's second unit also stepped up here, outscoring Palestine's bench, 20-11. Journeyman Micheal Madanly paced Syria, which saw five players score in double-digits, with 21 points, while Omar Cheikh Ali had a superb 17-point, 19-rebound effort. Magd Harbasha and Wael Jlilaty also did well for the victors with 16 and 14 points respectively. On the other end, Jamal Abu-Shamala led Palestine with 21 points and 10 boards. Mainstays Salim Sakakini and Tamer Habash struggled, though, combining for just 8-of-29 field goal shooting for the Palestinians. Syria's win ensured their qualification, and they are tied with Iraq at 1-3. Palestine, meanwhile, are winless after four outings. For Palestine to make it to the FIBA Asia Cup 2017 tourney, they need to beat Iraq tomorrow by 20 or more points. - FIBA.com

Lebanese Women Call for 30 percent Quota in Parliamentary Seats
Caroline Akoum/Asharq Al Awsat/February 02/17/Beirut– Lebanese women rallied on Wednesday to call for an increased female representation in any parliamentary electoral law approved by the different political parties. While women constitute 51 percent of the Lebanese population and 54 percent of university graduates, they are merely represented in Parliament, as they currently occupy 3.1 percent of parliamentary seats. Lebanese President Michel Aoun and Prime Minister Saad Hariri have stressed on several occasions their commitment to allocate a certain quota to women to support their active participation in political life. On Wednesday, dozens of women and activists gathered in downtown Beirut to voice their demands for a women’s quota. State Minister for Women’s Affairs Jean Oghassabian joined the march to express his solidarity with the demonstrators. In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper, Free Patriotic Movement MP Alain Aoun said that the parliamentary administrative and justice committee was currently studying “women’s quota”, in addition to other necessary reforms that should be implemented in the new electoral law. Aoun added that while the majority of parliamentary blocs support the introduction of a women’s quota in the new law, some other blocs have expressed reservations on the matter. “Reservations are not on women’s participation but rather on the quota,” the FPM deputy said. For his part, Oghassabian expressed full support for women’s demands. “It’s a righteous cause; we will work on it until we reach the aspired goals.” “We believe that women have strong capabilities; we need such energy inside Parliament and the government,” he said. The minister hoped that Wednesday’s rally would spread across different Lebanese areas to guarantee a women’s quota in the upcoming parliamentary elections. Oghassabian also expressed the prime minister’s support to this endeavor.“Prime Minister Hariri joins you in these demands and believes in your cause,” the minister said, addressing the demonstrators.
 
CIA Releases: Franjieh Enlisted Assad’s Help after Failing to Contain Lebanon Civil War

Asharq Al-Awsat/Asharq Al Awsat/February 02/17
Washington- United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) declassified documents exposed details which led and in part contributed to the 1976 occupation of Lebanon by Syria– carried out by Hafez al-Assad’s administration to end the then conflict pitting the Lebanese National Movement (LNM, also known by Al-Harakat al-Wataniyya al-Lubnaniyya) and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) on one side and Christian parties on the other. Considered a critical time for Lebanon -during the President Suleiman Franjieh administration- both the LNM and the PLO held the upper hand. With the bearings for instating balance fading, the region was threatened by the conflict breaking out of its local constraints– warring parties stringed along powerful regional players pushing the conflict beyond Lebanese borders. CIA documents reveal that Franjieh phoned his Syrian counterpart, Assad, relaying outrage and threatening escalatory measures should the latter roll back a direct military intervention dedicated to end the fighting in Lebanon.  The declassified documents drew a link between the impending direct Israeli intervention seeking to keep PLO, leftist allies and nationalists (natural Israel enemies) from securing a militarized advantage, and Franjieh resorting to Assad to step in and end the conflict.  Perhaps the most significant document of all declassified excerpts was a telegram involving British foreign minister, James Callaghan, (who later became British Prime Minister) reviewing the Lebanon situation with Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko, and communicating and consulting with United States Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. In hindsight, the then Lebanon civil war truly was a quagmire involving not only regional players, but also international superpowers.The Lebanese Civil War was a multifaceted civil war in Lebanon, lasting from 1975 to 1990 and resulting in an approximated 250,000 fatalities.

Is it possible to create safe zones in Syria?
Diana Moukalled/The Arab News/Tuesday 31 January 2017
US President Donald Trump’s administration has issued an order temporarily banning citizens from several nations, and indefinitely banning Syrian refugees, from entering the US. However, the order mentioned the intention to set up safe zones in Syria.
Safe zones, seen as a compromise between the options of a military solution and absolute retreat, was suggested by Turkey nearly a year ago, but was opposed by Russia. Now, following Russian-Turkish rapprochement, Moscow says it does not oppose the idea, but it would require approval by the Syrian regime, which said any attempt to create safe zones without coordinating with it would be unsafe.
Can safe areas, based on previous experiences, really provide safety, or they are just an easy alternative to the ultimate military solution? In modern history, there are many examples of safe zones that failed. During the Bosnian war, the UN declared the town of Srebrenica a safe zone, but Serb forces massacred and raped thousands of people there.
However, the US set up a safe zone in northern Iraq in 1991, and introduced a no-fly zone and military presence that protected Kurds for more than 12 years, though it required a large military presence and financial costs.
What we can learn from both examples is that areas that are intended as safe havens for civilians require a political decision, a large military presence and huge resources. This would be complicated in Syria, whose people have fled the brutal bombings of a regime bolstered by Iran and Russia. Who will enforce the safe zones? What about the Turkish and European positions, not to mention that of the US, which is now allied with Moscow?
Is it possible to create safe areas for Syrian refugees that would be enforced by the regime, Moscow and Tehran, which are the main cause of Syrian deaths and displacement? President Bashar Assad recently reiterated that “Syria’s social fabric” is “much better than before the civil war began.” His statement indicates that the regime believes the return of refugees to their country would tear apart that social fabric.
 Syrian refugees have become a major source of confusion for the world. Neighboring Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon want to be relieved of this heavy burden, so they may turn a blind eye to the dangerous move of transferring refugees to areas that would not be safe if they remained under regime control. Meanwhile, the international community is exerting enormous pressure to prevent refugees from seeking asylum in Western countries.
 Talk of safe zones is an evasion of major international responsibilities toward the ongoing tragedy in Syria. More dangerously, the move would forcibly transfer and put Syrian refugees under the mercy of the very parties that have caused their misery.
 • Diana Moukalled is a veteran journalist with extensive experience in both traditional and new media. She is also a columnist and freelance documentary producer. She can be reached on Twitter @dianamoukalled
 
Beirut's last public beach: residents fear privatisation of Ramlet al-Baida
Alex Dziadosz in Beirut/The Guardian/February 02/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/02/02/alex-dziadoszthe-guardian-beiruts-last-public-beach-residents-fear-privatisation-of-ramlet-al-baida/
Take a stroll down the golden sands of Ramlet al-Baida, Beirut’s last public beach, and you’ll see families fishing and smoking shisha in ramshackle palm frond cabanas, boys kicking footballs under battered lamp-posts, and children building sandcastles in the waves. It is a rare outlet in a city where public spaces are few and far between. But at the beach’s southern end, the scene abruptly gives way to looming cranes and men in hard hats driving rebars into a rising edifice of concrete.
The development, known as the Eden Bay resort – a more than 5,000 sq metre project billed by its website as “a sanctuary of luxury and refinement” – began construction last year, sparking outrage among beachgoers, civil society activists and public space advocates. The company behind the project says they have complied with the law and are set to inject vital investment and hundreds of jobs into Lebanon’s bruised economy. But many of the poor and middle class Beirutis who have been going to the beach for generations see it as an encroachment on one of the few public spaces they have left.
“Poor people are trash here,” says Hisham Hamdan, 59, glancing at the development as he lounges with a lunch of fish, hummus and vegetables alongside half a dozen friends. “It’s Ali Baba and his 40 thieves,” he adds, listing a few prominent politicians and businessmen. “They’re mafiosos, all of them.”
He plucks a cane topped with a bust of Nefertiti from the sand and gestures toward a row of apartment buildings. “Look,” he says. “You know how much that is? Four million dollars. And everyone here has nothing.” (Some nearby properties do indeed sell for that much.)
A little way up the beach, Abu Rami, a 43-year-old department store worker who asked to be identified by his nickname so he could speak freely, kicks a football with his son. “When I was a bachelor I used to come out to Ramlet al-Baida every day,” he says. “I’d run down here with my friends around six or seven and we’d play football. We’d even come out and play football at night – we’d swim and play and stay out late. Everyone has memories like that.”
Now, he says, people are afraid private companies will overwhelm the beach, leaving nothing for the city’s poorer people and middle classes. “The way I see it, the people here need to come out and protest against these companies – this is repression against the poor.”
The roots of anger and suspicion go much deeper than one resort. For a city its size, Beirut has a shocking lack of public space. There is just one major central park – Horsh Beirut, which was recently reopened to the public after years of closure – while miles of Mediterranean coast are covered with luxury apartments, clubs, restaurants, hotels and resorts that charge hefty entrance fees. For the many Beirutis living on just a few hundred dollars a month, the price to bring a family into one of these clubs could amount to a major chunk of a month’s salary. If you’re poor, you don’t always have the right to enjoy the outdoors.
Mohammad Ayoub, executive director of Nahnoo, a civil society group that advocated to reopen Horsh Beirut and is now working to revitalise Ramlet al-Baida, compares the city’s situation to a house without a living room – the space where a family comes together.
“The salon is where you have to learn how to deal with your differences, because everybody owns it. You can’t watch TV alone, so you need to discuss what to do. It teaches you dialogue, it teaches you democracy, it makes you feel a sense of belonging. This is why it’s Ramlet al-Baida is Beirut’s last public beach. Photograph: Jamal Saidi/Reuters
Such spaces are especially vital given the legacy of sectarian division left by the country’s 1975-90 civil war, he says. But a lack of sufficient public regulation has allowed developers to chip away at such spaces over the years, leaving only a handful open to the public. “What do we own in the city?” Ayoub says. “We own nothing. Why are we here in the city; what can we do in the city? You have to pay for everything.”
As one of the few exceptions, Ramlet al-Baida (“white sands” in Arabic) has long been a magnet for suspicions about developers’ intentions. Activists point to a 1925 decree declaring everything up to the highest point the waves reach to be public property. However, since the 1960s, a string of exemptions, loopholes, violations and favouritism bestowed upon developers has gradually eaten away at the coastline and left the beach one of the last bastions of free access, they say. The nearby Dalieh outcrop is also under threat, although construction hasn’t started.
In a cluttered and dimly lit office in central Beirut, Ali Darwish, head of Green Line, a Lebanese environmentalist group, runs his finger over a satellite image of Ramlet al-Baida, ticking off the plots where he says private developers are bent on building. “Ask any older Beiruti above 50 or 60 and they won’t even know that this is [privately] owned,” he says. “It’s enshrined, it’s anchored in our brains that this is public land.”
Back in the late 90s, Darwish says his group discovered a plan which showed that former prime minister Rafik Hariri – famous for his extensive postwar real estate dealings – wanted to turn the area into a marina, an effort quashed by public lobbying. Controversy flared up again in 2015 when a judge permitted two companies owning plots on the beach to close them to the public. The judge reversed her decision, but activists were on high alert.
Security forces stand guard during a protest outside the gates of the Eden Rock Resort development, on the south end of Ramlet al Bayda beach, Beirut, Lebanon, 26 November
Amid the atmosphere of distrust, civil society leaders have trouble seeing the Eden Bay development as anything less than a precursor to a full-scale takeover. Green Line has filed a suit to stop the project but pending a decision, construction has continued. If Eden Bay succeeds, activists believe other developers will undoubtedly follow. Darwish says one plot owner has already filed for a building permit a little further up the beach: “This is the door-opener.”
Achour Development expresses a very different view of the situation. In an office overlooking downtown Beirut – nicknamed “Solidere” after the company Hariri founded before his 2005 assassination – its lawyer Bahij Abou Mjahed, flips through a thick folder of documents which, he says, definitively prove the company’s right to build on the land.
An assistant brings copies of the plot’s ownership records, the project’s building permit, clearance from the order of engineers, and a map showing that the development is hundreds of metres from the part of the beach considered public.
To Beirut with hope: how the city shaped by refugees makes room for new arrivals
Given regional turmoil, the new resort represents a “courageous and ambitious project” that will add hundreds of jobs to an economy badly in need of them, Abou Mjahed says. “Lebanese departments are travelling all over the world to encourage investors to invest in Lebanon. If we create a war against this project, which has all the legal documents and all the legal permissions and permits and decisions, what’s the message we’re sending to the investor? ‘Come to Lebanon and invest, and in a moment somebody will decide that it’s a public area and stop you?’”
He says objections to the project are rooted in misunderstandings and, in some cases, conspiracy theories that assume the entire Lebanese government is arrayed against the public. “It’s against the laws of nature.”
Back at Ramlet al-Baida, the nuances of the legal debate are of little interest to most beachgoers; many take it as a given that the system is rigged against them. “There are politicians who are monopolising everything. They come down and take money and, so long, it’s over. They can do what they want,” says Abu Rami, the department store worker. “The Lebanese people need to stand together. You’ll find people coming out and demonstrating against this repression, this theft – three quarters of people are with them but they stay in their homes.”
Why? “Maybe people are distracted,” he says. “They’re busy just getting by.”

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 02-03/17
Statement by the National Security Advisor General Mike Flynn
Agencies/February 01/17/“Recent Iranian actions, including a provocative ballistic missile launch and an attack against a Saudi naval vessel conducted by Iran-supported Houthi militants, underscore what should have been clear to the international community all along about Iran’s destabilizing behavior across the Middle East. The recent ballistic missile launch is also in defiance of UN Security Council Resolution 2231, which calls upon Iran “not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology.” These are just the latest of a series of incidents in the past six months in which Houthi forces that Iran has trained and armed have struck Emirati and Saudi vessels, and threatened U.S. and allied vessels transiting the Red Sea. In these and other similar activities, Iran continues to threaten U.S. friends and allies in the region. The Obama Administration failed to respond adequately to Tehran’s malign actions—including weapons transfers, support for terrorism, and other violations of international norms. The Trump Administration condemns such actions by Iran that undermine security, prosperity, and stability throughout and beyond the Middle East and place American lives at risk. President Trump has severely criticized the various agreements reached between Iran and the Obama Administration, as well as the United Nations – as being weak and ineffective. Instead of being thankful to the United States for these agreements, Iran is now feeling emboldened. As of today, we are officially putting Iran on notice.” 

John Bolton on Iran Sanctions Bill: We Won't Let Them Get Nukes /جون بولتون: لن نسمح لإيران ان تمتلك القدرة النووية
Newsmax/February 02/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/02/02/john-bolton-on-iran-sanctions-bill-we-wont-let-them-get-nukes/
House Republicans introduced a bill Wednesday for new sanctions against Iran after President Donald Trump's national security adviser Michael Flynn put the nation "on notice" for a reported ballistic missile test – a bill that, former ambassador John Bolton said, vows: "Won't let Iran get to nuclear weapons.""Iran has made a mockery of the international community with its missile program, support for terrorism, and human rights abuses," Rep. Peter J. Roskam, R-Ill., wrote in a statement.
"Just this past weekend, the Islamic Republic conducted a ballistic missile test in violation of the U.N. Security Council. The United States will no longer stand idly by and allow the Mullahs to flout international law and threaten the peaceful coexistence of nations with its reckless, belligerent behavior."Flynn told reporters Wednesday "Iran is now feeling emboldened," and the Trump administration "condemns such actions by Iran that undermine security, prosperity and stability throughout and beyond the Middle East that puts American lives at risk... we are officially putting Iran on notice."
Iran's missile test "failed" on re-entry, something former U.N. ambassador Bolton told Fox News' "Your World" with Neil Cavuto signals a nuclear warhead test. "This failed missile test that provoked the legislation, Pentagon sources are saying that the failure of the test came at the reentry stage," Bolton told Fox News. "Well, you know, missiles that launch communications and weather satellites don't have reentry to worry about. What you have reentry is for a nuclear weapon under a nose cone.
"So, the fact they were testing at the reentry level shows exactly what the Iranian missile program is for: to deliver nuclear weapons." Bolton has long spoken out against President Barack Obama's controversial dealings with Iran, which reportedly included paying that nation more than $10 billion in gold, cash, and assets since 2013. "This deal is a sham, a danger to the United States, Israel and the Arab friends in the Middle East," Bolton said. "The sooner we get rid of it the better."
Flynn's statement Wednesday and the ensuing legislation proposal signal a movement in policy with the new administration, which is tougher on Iran in the Middle East, Bolton said. "Michael Flynn's statement is extremely significant," Bolton told Cavuto. "It says for the first time in an official statement in about eight years that the United States is on to Iran's game. And it does put them on notice that this administration is not the last administration, in case they hadn't noticed it.
" ...The legislation that's been introduced in the House of Representatives couldn't come at a better moment, and if the Iranians don't like it, let them pull out of the deal." Cavuto noted Iran pulling out of the deal would not impact all the billions the U.S. has paid to Iran under President Obama. "Well, that's one of the reasons this was such a poorly negotiated deal: The Iranians got the benefits up front and their compliance is due at the back end," Bolton responded. "But the fact is, I don't believe they have ever given up their desire to have a deliverable nuclear weapon, and I think they're violating this deal right now."So, there's a lot of different ways you can to approach it. But the political significance is ending the deal, sending the message unequivocally to the rest of the world, 'We won't let Iran get to nuclear weapons.'"

Dumb deal' drags Australia-U.S. ties to new low after tense Trump call
By Jane Wardell and Colin Packham/February 02/17/SYDNEY (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump labeled a refugee swap deal with Australia "dumb" on Thursday after a Washington Post report of an acrimonious telephone call with Australia's prime minister threatened a rare rift in ties between the two staunch allies. The Post reported that Trump described the resettlement plan as "the worst deal ever" and accused Australia of trying to export the "next Boston bombers". It said the call had been scheduled to last an hour but Trump cut it short after 25 minutes when Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull tried to turn to subjects such as Syria. Turnbull told reporters the call with Trump at the weekend had been frank and candid but refused to give further details. "I do stand up for Australia. My job is to defend Australian interests," Turnbull said in Melbourne. Turnbull refused to confirm the Post report that Trump, who had earlier spoken to world leaders including Russian President Vladimir Putin and Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto, had angrily told him that the call was "the worst so far".Political analysts said such acrimony was unprecedented, surpassing even the difficult relations between former U.S. President Richard Nixon and then Australian Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, who pulled Australian troops out of the Vietnam War. "Even that was always done in the language of foreign policy niceties," said Harry Phillips, a political analyst of 40 years experience at Edith Cowan and Curtin universities in Perth. As reports of the conversation hit headlines on both sides of the world, Trump tweeted shortly before midnight in Washington: "Do you believe it? The Obama Administration agreed to take thousands of illegal immigrants from Australia. Why? I will study this dumb deal." That threw more confusion over the status of the controversial deal Australia agreed with former President Barack Obama late last year for the United States to resettle up to 1,250 asylum seekers held in offshore processing camps on Pacific islands in Papua New Guinea and Nauru.

Trump white house signals tough line on Iran
AFP, Washington Thursday, 2 February 2017/President Donald Trump’s national security advisor signaled a toughening US stance on Iran Wednesday, condemning a recent missile test and declaring America was “officially putting Iran on notice.”In his first public remarks since taking office, National Security Advisor Michael Flynn accused former president Barack Obama’s administration of having “failed to respond adequately to Tehran’s malign actions.”Citing a recent missile test and the actions of Iranian-backed rebels in Yemen, Flynn said “Iran is now feeling emboldened.”“As of today, we are officially putting Iran on notice,” he said without elaborating. Both Trump and Flynn have been vocal opponents of an international deal that saw Iran curb its nuclear program in return for sanctions relief.
 
US expected to impose fresh sanctions on Iran
Agencies, Washington Thursday, 2 February 2017
The United States is expected to impose sanctions on multiple Iranian entities as early as Friday following Tehran’s recent ballistic missile test, but in a way that will not violate the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, sources familiar with the matter said on Thursday.
One source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said about eight Iranian entities were to be sanctioned, or “designated” in US legal jargon, for terrorism-related activities and about 17 for ballistic missile-related activities under separate existing US executive orders. The source declined to name the entities.
Trump puts Iran ‘on notice’ after missile test
Earlier, President Donald Trump said his administration has put Iran “on notice,” echoing comments from his top national security adviser that the US will act against Iran unless it stops testing ballistic missiles and supporting Houthi militia in Yemen.
Trump and his national security adviser, Michael Flynn, didn’t elaborate on what retaliatory actions the US could pursue. Trump tweeted, “Iran has been formally PUT ON NOTICE for firing a ballistic missile. Should have been thankful for the terrible deal the US made with them!”He added in another tweet: “Iran was on its last legs and ready to collapse until the US came along and gave it a life-line in the form of the Iran Deal: $150 billion.”As part of the nuclear deal struck during the Obama administration, Iran received access to an estimated $100 billion of its own money that had been frozen in foreign bank accounts. The US did not give Iran $150 billion. Flynn on Wednesday forcefully denounced Iran’s behavior in his first public remarks since Trump took office. He accused Iran of threatening US allies and spreading instability throughout the Middle East while faulting the Obama administration for doing too little to stop the Islamic Republic.
“As of today, we are officially putting Iran on notice,” Flynn said from the White House podium. On notice for what, Flynn didn’t say. Senior Trump administration officials said they were actively considering a “range of options” including economic measures and increased support for Iran’s regional adversaries. The officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity, declined repeatedly to say whether military action is being considered. Iran’s acting commander of the elite Revolutionary Guard, Gen. Hossein Salami, responded in comments to the semi-official Tasnim news agency Thursday, saying Iran will “never change direction by a world power’s demand, and our missile and nonmissile power will be updated every day.” Salami added, “If our missile power was not such a power to put fear into the hearts of Americans, there is no reason for these controversies.”The warning was an early manifestation of Trump’s promise of a tougher American approach to Iran. Yet administration officials emphasized that their allegations were unrelated to Iran’s obligations under the Iran nuclear deal that President Barack Obama and world leaders negotiated. Though Flynn noted Trump has criticized that deal, officials declined to say whether Trump planned to follow through on his campaign pledge to renegotiate it.
 “The Obama administration failed to respond adequately to Tehran’s malign actions - including weapons transfers, support for terrorism and other violations of international norms,” Flynn said.
 
Top Khamenei ally: Useless for US to threaten Iran over missile test
Reuters, Ankara Thursday, 2 February 2017/A top adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday Iran will not yield to “useless” US threats from “an inexperienced person” over its ballistic missile program. US President Donald Trump’s national security adviser, Michael Flynn, said on Wednesday the United States was putting Iran on notice over its “destabilizing activity” after it test-fired a ballistic missile. Trump echoed that language on Thursday, saying in a tweet “Iran has been put formally put on notice” after his administration said it was reviewing how to respond to the launch that Iran said was solely for defensive purposes. Iran said on Wednesday it had tested the new ballistic missile but said it did not breach a nuclear deal reached with six major powers in 2015 or a UN Security Council resolution that endorsed the accord. “This is not the first time that an inexperienced person has threatened Iran ... the American government will understand that threatening Iran is useless,” Ali Akbar Velayati said, without identifying any US official specifically in his comments. “Iran does not need permission from any country to defend itself,” he was quoted as saying by the semi-official Fars news agency. Khamenei is the country’s most powerful figure. A US official said Iran had test-launched the medium-range ballistic missile on Sunday and it exploded after traveling 630 miles (1,010 km). Iran said it had been a successful launch. A series of tests conducted by Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) in 2016 caused international concern, with some powers saying any launch of nuclear-capable ballistic missiles would violate UN Security Council resolution 2231.
 
Imam in US disputes man’s claim that mom died due to travel ban
The Associated Press, Dearborn, Michigan Thursday, 2 February 2017/A Detroit-area woman whose son told television stations that she died because President Donald Trump’s travel ban prevented her from returning to the US for medical care actually died several days before the order was signed, the leader of a mosque said. Imam Husham Al-Hussainy spoke to The Associated Press on Wednesday about comments Mike Hager made to TV stations in Boston and Detroit. Hager said he tried to bring his ill mother back from Iraq on Friday, but that she was not allowed to enter the country because of Trump’s order temporarily barring citizens from seven Muslim-majority countries. Al-Hussainy told the AP that the woman actually died on Jan. 21 or 22 and that prayers were said for her at the Karbalaa Islamic Educational Center in Dearborn. Al-Hussainy said he learned she died then by members of his mosque and from posts on the family’s Facebook page. A funeral was held for the woman at a nearby mosque last weekend, Al-Hussainy said. The Associated Press was unable to reach Hager on Wednesday at his Dearborn home. He told television stations that he and his family had traveled to Iraq to visit relatives when his mother fell ill. He said he is a US citizen, but that his mother and others in his family who traveled to Iraq were not. The others were not allowed to return, he said. Al-Hussainy said Hager spoke to him by phone around Jan. 19 that he and other members of his family were traveling to Iraq to visit relatives. Hager also said his mother suffered from kidney disease, the imam said. Al-Hussainy has not spoken to Hager since that phone call. He said the woman’s body remained in Iraq.
 
Top Khamenei ally: Useless for US to threaten Iran over missile test
Reuters, Ankara Thursday, 2 February 2017/A top adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday Iran will not yield to “useless” US threats from “an inexperienced person” over its ballistic missile program. US President Donald Trump’s national security adviser, Michael Flynn, said on Wednesday the United States was putting Iran on notice over its “destabilizing activity” after it test-fired a ballistic missile. Trump echoed that language on Thursday, saying in a tweet “Iran has been put formally put on notice” after his administration said it was reviewing how to respond to the launch that Iran said was solely for defensive purposes. Iran said on Wednesday it had tested the new ballistic missile but said it did not breach a nuclear deal reached with six major powers in 2015 or a UN Security Council resolution that endorsed the accord. “This is not the first time that an inexperienced person has threatened Iran ... the American government will understand that threatening Iran is useless,” Ali Akbar Velayati said, without identifying any US official specifically in his comments. “Iran does not need permission from any country to defend itself,” he was quoted as saying by the semi-official Fars news agency. Khamenei is the country’s most powerful figure. A US official said Iran had test-launched the medium-range ballistic missile on Sunday and it exploded after traveling 630 miles (1,010 km). Iran said it had been a successful launch. A series of tests conducted by Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) in 2016 caused international concern, with some powers saying any launch of nuclear-capable ballistic missiles would violate UN Security Council resolution 2231.
 
Trump honors US navy seal killed during Yemen raid
AFP, Washington Thursday, 2 February 2017
President Donald Trump on Wednesday made an unannounced visit by helicopter to Delaware to honor the Navy SEAL killed in a daring raid in Yemen, the first American combat death since he became commander-in-chief. Chief Special Warfare Operator William “Ryan” Owens of Illinois, who reportedly was a member of the famed SEAL Team 6, was killed Sunday in a rare ground assault in conflict-torn Yemen. Trump flew from the White House aboard the Marine One presidential helicopter to Dover Air Force Base in Delaware for the repatriation of Owens’s remains. Trump was accompanied by his daughter Ivanka and was due to meet with the Owens family. Owens, 36, was killed during a firefight. Three commandos were wounded in the raid and three more were injured when a V-22 Osprey military aircraft made a hard landing, according to Pentagon spokesman Chris Sherwood. US special operations forces had mounted the raid in the Yakla region of Baida province against al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), which Washington views as the global terror network’s most dangerous branch. On the AQAP side, 14 fighters, including women, were killed, according to the Pentagon. Officials said the commando raid was aimed at gathering intelligence and seizing computers and other electronic equipment being used by AQAP. The raid snagged “an unbelievable amount of intelligence that will prevent the potential deaths or attacks on American soil,” White House spokesman Sean Spicer said.
But “you never want to call something a success 100 percent when someone’s hurt or killed,” he told reporters.
Civilians ‘likely’ killed in US raid
Civilians were “likely” killed in a US commando raid in Yemen over the weekend and children may have been among the dead, the US military’s Central Command said Wednesday. The January 29 raid against Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula has garnered wide attention because a Navy SEAL was also killed and several more wounded in what marked the first operation of its kind authorized by President Donald Trump. A Yemeni provincial official had previously said 16 civilians were killed in the raid – eight women and eight children – but CENTCOM did not provide any numbers. “A team designated by the operational task force commander has concluded regrettably that civilian non-combatants were likely killed in the midst of a firefight during a raid in Yemen January 29. Casualties may include children,” CENTCOM said in a statement.
 
UN chief backs Syria delegates plan for Geneva
AFP, United Nations Thursday, 2 February 2017/United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres on Wednesday backed his peace envoy’s plan to pick representatives from the Syria opposition to the Geneva talks if the groups fail to agree on their delegates.
UN envoy Staffan de Mistura came under sharp criticism from the Syria opposition after giving opposition groups until February 8 to agree on their delegation to the talks, scheduled to open on February 20. “It is clear this is a possibility that might be used,” Guterres told reporters about the ultimatum. “What we want is the success of the Geneva conference, and the success of the Geneva conference implies that there is a meaningful representation of the Syrian opposition in Geneva,” he said. “We will do everything to make sure that that happens.” De Mistura told the Security Council on Tuesday that he was delaying the peace talks, initially scheduled to begin on February 8, to allow both sides to better prepare. He warned that if the opposition fails to agree, he would “select the delegation in order to make sure that it can be as inclusive as possible.” Guterres noted that UN resolutions on Syria give De Mistura the prerogative to pick the delegation to the peace talks. “What is important is to have, this time, substantive discussions on the central issues, and I hope that this will be possible,” he said. Previous UN-led talks have broken down over disagreements on ensuring a transition in Damascus that would lead to President Bashar al-Assad’s exit from power. The opposition rejected the envoy’s comments as “unacceptable.”“Selecting the Syrian opposition delegation is not the business... of de Mistura,” Riad Hijab, head of the opposition High Negotiations Committee, wrote on his Twitter account.
 
Syria: Ceasefire meeting to convene Monday
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Friday, 3 February 2017/Kazakhstan’s Foreign Ministry announced Thursday the second round of Syria peace talk to be held in Astana on February 6. Iran, Russia, and Turkey will discuss in the upcoming meeting how a cease-fire in Syria is being implemented, the ministry said in a statement. The trio issued a communiqué at the end of the first round of peace talk last month calling for direct dialogue between Syrian oppositions and al-Assad regime, in addition to Iran, Russia and Turkey agreement to create a joint mechanism to monitor the cease-fire in Syria, which came into effect on December 30. The Syrian opposition expressed many reservations on the communiqué, underscored entire rejection for any role for Iran in the future of Syria. However, the trio sponsors bolstered the Syria opposition participation in the UN-sponsored talks to be held in Geneva on February 8.The statement stressed that “there is no military solution to the conflict in Syria, and it is only achievable through a political process.”
 
Turkish warplanes kill 51 ISIS militants in Syria
Reuters, Ankara Thursday, 2 February 2017/Turkish warplanes killed 51 ISIS militants in operations over the last 24 hours, the military said in a statement on Thursday. Warplanes destroyed 85 ISIS targets in the areas of al-Bab, Tadif, Kabbasin and Bzagah, including buildings and vehicles. Turkey launched an operation, dubbed “Euphrates Shield”, to drive jihadists away from the Syrian border more than five months ago and has been besieging the Islamic State controlled town of al-Bab for weeks.
 
Iraq faces massive challenge in Mosul offensive
AFP, United Nations, United States Thursday, 2 February 2017/Iraqi forces face a massive challenge as they press on to retake western Mosul, but the days of the ISIS are counted, a UN envoy said Thursday. Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi declared on January 24 that his forces had retaken east Mosul and the battle was now moving to the other side of the Tigris River. “This steady progress should not conceal that fighting has been and will be a massive challenge, in particular inside the old city in western Mosul,” UN envoy Jan Kubis told the Security Council. “Yet in the rather short foreseeable future, the liberation operations in Iraq are coming to an end - the days of the so-called ISIS are counted.”Iraq launched an offensive in October to drive out ISIS fighters who seized Mosul in 2014.
 Kubis voiced concern over the “extremely high percentage” of civilian casualties, adding there was “clear evidence” from gunshot wounds that civilians were being targeted by ISIS combatants. The envoy added that civilians will be at “extreme risk” when the fighting starts in the western sections of Mosul.
 
UN rights experts urge Iran to halt execution of juvenile
 Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Thursday, 2 February 2017/A group of United Nations human rights experts are appealing to Iran to immediately halt the execution of juvenile offender is scheduled to be executed by hanging on Saturday. Hamid Ahmadi was 17 years old when he was sentenced to death in 2009 for the fatal stabbing in 2008 of a young man during a fight between five boys. Since then, Ahmadi’s execution was scheduled to take place and halted three times at the last minute. The court relied on confessions reportedly obtained under torture and ill-treatment at a police station, where Admadi was denied access to a lawyer and his family. “To our knowledge, in the case of Hamid Ahmadi, the most stringent guarantees of fair trial and due process contained in international human rights instruments have been disrespected and, the allegations of torture and confessions extracted under duress were not taken into consideration nor did the lead to any investigation,” the human rights experts said. “Any death sentence undertaken in contravention of a Government’s international obligations, and particularly when a conviction is based on confessions extracted under torture, is unlawful and tantamount to an arbitrary execution,” they stressed.

Qaida Stands to Gain from Trump Strikes on Yemen
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 02/17/Al-Qaida is gaining ground in Yemen and could benefit from military actions like the deadly raid by elite US forces ordered by President Donald Trump, the International Crisis Group warned Thursday. "The Yemeni branch of al-Qaida is stronger than it has ever been," ICG said in a report documenting the spread of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). "The first military actions by the Trump administration in Yemen bode poorly for the prospect of smartly and effectively countering AQAP," read the report, released after Sunday's US air raid in central Yemen. While Washington has said at least 14 suspected jihadists and one US Navy SEAL were killed in the strike, ICG said the death toll included "many civilians, including at least 10 women and children".The think-tank warned that strikes like the January 29 raid on Baida province could increase fear of or even hostility towards the United States among civilians, providing fertile ground for recruitment by AQAP.  "The use of US soldiers, high civilian casualties and disregard for local tribal and political dynamics... plays into AQAP's narrative of defending Muslims against the West and could increase anti-US sentiment and with it AQAP's pool of recruits," said the Brussels-based ICG. With its key role in regional politics, Trump's White House also stands to impact efforts to find a political solution to Yemen's conflict which has killed more than 7,400 people since March 2015, according to the World Health Organization. "These efforts will be imperilled if states interested in fighting AQAP and Yemen's nascent Islamic State (IS) branch, such as the US, take military actions that ignore the local context... or fail to restrain partners who tolerate or even encourage AQAP/IS activities," added the 35-page report.  Saudi Arabia, which intervened militarily two years ago in Yemen to support the government, is a key regional ally of the United States, which regards AQAP as al-Qaida's most dangerous branch. The oil-rich Gulf monarchy has been spared Trump's travel ban imposed last Friday targeting nationals of seven Muslim-majority countries, including Yemen.  'Women, children' among dead -Washington is also facing questions on whether an eight-year-old American girl was killed in the raid. Local sources say the girl was the daughter of senior al-Qaida cleric and US citizen Anwar al-Awlaqi, killed in a 2011 US drone strike.
Under Trump's predecessor Barack Obama, the US dramatically increased its use of drone strikes against suspected jihadists in Yemen. The Pentagon said Monday that "a lot of female combatants" were caught up in Sunday's battle. Women were among the fatalities, it said, declining to specify whether children were also killed. The death toll was still being evaluated, it said. On the ground, a Yemeni provincial official gave a toll of 41 suspected militants and 16 civilians killed, eight of them women and eight children.
The US raid was said to have targeted the houses of three tribal chiefs linked to al-Qaida. The provincial official said Apache helicopters also hit a school, a mosque and a medical facility which were all used by al-Qaida militants. AQAP said in a statement that 30 people died in the raid -- "only women and children... with some tribal leaders who have no connections" to the group. The conflict in Yemen escalated two years ago when a Saudi-led Arab coalition launched air raids against Iran-backed Shiite Huthi rebels, who had taken over the capital and seized swathes of the country's centre and north. The war has allowed both AQAP and IS jihadists to gain ground in the impoverished nation. The United Nations estimates over three million people have been displaced since fighting between the Huthis and pro-government forces broke out in 2014. The Arab world's poorest country now faces a major humanitarian crisis, with one and a half million children suffering severe malnutrition.

Qaida Kills Yemen Police, Targeted in U.S. Raid
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 02/17/Suspected al-Qaida militants in southern Yemen killed six policemen Thursday and their jihadist group was targeted in a raid likely carried out by the U.S. Navy, security and tribal sources said. In the first incident, a vehicle exploded as a group of about 30 members of the Yemeni security forces traveled from the town of Loder to the southern city of Aden, the security source said. "An exchange of fire with al-Qaida fighters" followed the blast, the source said, adding that "six of our men were killed and others were wounded" in the ambush. Separately, about 30 kilometers (18 miles) away, a known al-Qaida haunt in the mountains of Khabar al-Maraqsha was targeted by naval forces operating in the Gulf of Aden, tribal sources said. The sources were unable to say if the targets had been hit or there had been any casualties, but added that the attack was "probably the work of the U.S. Navy."There was no immediate confirmation of the report. The incidents come after an American raid in southern Yemen at the weekend that U.S. military says was "likely" to have killed civilians, in the first such operation authorized by President Donald Trump. The U.S. military said it lost a Navy SEAL during the land and air strike in the Yakla region of Baida province that had killed 14 members of Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula. The United States views AQAP as the global network's most dangerous branch. A Yemeni provincial official had previously said 16 civilians were also killed in Sunday's raid -- eight women and eight children -- but the U.S. military's Central Command did not provide any numbers. In a report issued on Thursday, the International Crisis Group warned that al-Qaida could benefit from military actions like the deadly U.S. raid. "The Yemeni branch of al-Qaida is stronger than it has ever been," ICG said. "The first military actions by the Trump administration in Yemen bode poorly for the prospect of smartly and effectively countering AQAP," read the report.

Netanyahu to Visit London for Talks with May
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 02/17/ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is to visit London next week for talks with British counterpart Theresa May, the two governments said on Thursday. Netanyahu's office said he would travel to London on Sunday and meet May on Monday morning before flying home later in the day. A spokeswoman for May said the two leaders would "talk about a range of security and international issues, including the Middle East peace process."She said the prime minister would raise Britain's concern about how the "continued increase of settlements activity undermines trust."There has been a sharp acceleration in Israeli settlement expansion plans since U.S. President Donald Trump took office last month, with more than 6,000 new homes announced in less than a fortnight. British Minister for the Middle East Tobias Ellwood warned on Wednesday that the plans made the two-state solution "much harder to achieve."Britain voted in favor of a U.N. Security Council resolution passed in December demanding a halt to settlement construction. The vote prompted Israel to temporarily scale back relations.But Britain refused to sign the final statement of a Middle East peace conference held in Paris last month that was strongly opposed by Israel. It said it had "particular reservations" about the meeting taking place without Israeli or Palestinian representatives.

Palestinian NGO Worker Pleads Not Guilty to Helping Hamas
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 02/17/ The Gaza head of a major U.S.-based NGO pleaded not guilty in an Israeli court Thursday to aiding Palestinian militant group Hamas, his employers said. Israel accuses Mohammed al-Halabi, head of Gaza operations for the global Christian charity World Vision, of siphoning millions of dollars to the Islamist movement which runs the territory. At the district court in Beersheba in southern Israel, Halabi pleaded not guilty to all charges against him, World Vision said. "World Vision has not seen any credible evidence supporting the charges," it said in a statement. The group said its humanitarian work in Gaza has been suspended following Halabi's arrest "as we conduct a thorough and wide-ranging review of our operations." Halabi's lawyers have complained they have been prevented from seeing much of the evidence against him and objected to two additional charges being tacked on seven months after his initial arrest. The trial will continue on February 23. Israel has fought three wars with Palestinian militants in Gaza since 2008. Israel has long alleged Hamas has sought to infiltrate humanitarian organizations and divert aid, accusations the Islamists strongly deny. Aid workers privately admit to pressure from Hamas but say the restrictions by Israel on goods taken into Gaza are already some of the strictest in the world. In a similar case, on January 4 a United Nations worker from Gaza was sentenced in an Israeli court to seven months in jail for aiding Hamas "without intention."

Hardliners Hold Out in West Bank Settlement Outpost
Associated PressNaharnet/January 02/17/Police moved into a synagogue of a wildcat outpost in the occupied West Bank Thursday to remove dozens of hardline Jewish settlers barricaded inside on the second day of an operation to evict residents.The eviction of settlers and their supporters came just hours after the government unveiled plans for 3,000 new homes in other West Bank settlements, viewed by the global community as illegal and barriers to peace with the Palestinians. Police on Wednesday managed to remove all but one of the 42 families living in the Amona outpost near Ramallah in line with a High Court order that found that it was built illegally on private Palestinian land. On Thursday, large numbers of police moved in to evict the last remaining family, carrying them and supporters out of a house one by one with the mother screaming loudly as she was dragged away, an AFP correspondent reported. Police had tried to negotiate the voluntary departure of dozens of "anarchists" who had barricaded themselves inside a nearby synagogue, but entered after talks broke down. Hundreds of far-right activists slipped past army roadblocks early on Wednesday in a show of support for the Amona residents.Police said they removed 800 people, making 13 arrests. They said 24 officers sustained minor injuries in scuffles with protesters, some from rocks and glass bottles thrown at them, others with chemical burns from cleaning fluid launched by the activists.Around 100 police were positioned Thursday outside the synagogue wearing protective glasses with the first line of officers carrying shields. Eliana Passentin, a spokeswoman for the Benjamin Regional Council which covers settlements, told AFP that police were being "very violent" on Thursday, "very different from yesterday.""We condemn violence on both sides but people here have a right for peaceful civil disobedience," she said. Police said they intend to finish the eviction on Thursday, after which the defense ministry would begin to remove residents' possessions before bulldozing the structures.
'A new era' -
When announcing the latest round of new settlements on Tuesday, Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman said Israel was entering a "new era" in which settlement building would return to normal. All Israeli governments since 1967 have built settlements but none has formally created a new outpost since 1992, before the Oslo peace accords signed with the Palestinians, settlement expert Hagit Ofran of the Peace Now NGO told AFP. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu broke with that tradition late Wednesday when he said a new settlement would be built for the evicted Amona families, with a task force including representatives of the settlers asked to choose a location. Ofran called the announcement "very dramatic," noting that settlements had continued to grow since 1992 either by construction within existing settlements or by legalizing wildcat outposts such as Amona, formed without initial Israeli approval. Hardliners within the governing coalition -- viewed as Israel's most right-wing ever -- had bitterly opposed the eviction and spent months trying to pass legislation to overturn the court order. The international community considers all Jewish settlements on occupied Palestinian land illegal and regards their construction as the biggest obstacle to a peaceful settlement of the conflict. Israel has now approved more than 6,000 new homes for settlers since U.S. President Donald Trump took office less than two weeks ago having signaled a softer stance on settlement construction than predecessor Barack Obama. EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini warned Wednesday that the quickening expansion of Jewish settlements risked making a two-state solution to the Middle East conflict impossible.

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 02-03/17
Will Saudi Arabia Negotiate with Iran?
 Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al Awsat/February 02/17
 The reply to the question in the title above is: maybe, but! To explain the answer, one must understand the Iranian motives to want to engage in dialogue with Saudi Arabia now. It is evident from latest statements of Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif, the importance of Saudi-Iranian cooperation in Syria and Yemen, like that in Lebanon.
 Zarif’s statement doesn’t necessarily equal Iran’s credibility or maturity. It is an indication that Iran is concerned with a new era of U.S. Presidency occupied by Donald Trump.
 Some might wonder what Saudi Arabia has to do with this. Well, the answer is simple. We have a historic event which we should recall now.
 During the presidency of former U.S. President Bill Clinton, Washington was lobbying for a Saudi cooperation that could condemn Iran in the Khobar bombings. Back then, Iran resorted to its old repetitive game: Reform.
 Tehran sought reconciliation with Riyadh which led to the “NayefRouhani” agreement, that is the agreement between the late Crown Prince Nayef bin Abdul Aziz, may his soul rest in peace, and current President Hasan Rouhani, who was head of intelligence back then.
 The agreement stipulates that Iran would commit to good-neighborliness, refrain from interfering in Saudi internal affairs and hand over the suspects involved in the bombings.
 As soon as the U.S. storm subsided, Iran went back to its old game and became further involved in the internal affairs of Arab states.
 Iran’s effort to create chaos is no strange to any of us.
 Therefore, the statements of Iranian FM are no more than extensions of Tehran’s old tricks on the hope that a dialogue with Riyadh would eliminate any chance of a Saudi, and consequently Gulf, American coalition against Iran, and grant Tehran the chance to deal with Trump without a Saudi role.
 The issue is as simple as that, and there are evidences to support that.
 Hence, there is no rupture of relations in politics and there is nothing wrong with initiating dialogue and negotiations even if done through back channels. But, there is no room for goodwill in politics either, especially with Iran who has to show its seriousness and goodwill for dialogue.
 If Tehran is indeed direct and serious it should stop its involvement in the internal affairs of Yemen, Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia.
 Iran should stop the killing machine in Syria and withdraw its Shi’ite armed militias from there, including Hezbollah and Iraqi terrorist parties.
 Tehran’s involvement in Syria doesn’t need any proof, particularly that Bashar al-Assad’s personal guards are Iranians!
 Consequently, if Iran wants negotiations, the ball is in its court and it should take serious measures. Other than that, believing Iran’s statements is just a waste of time.
 We have witnessed Iran’s aggressive behavior over the past ten years and observed its extreme vanity during the presidency of former U.S. President Barack Obama.
 History taught us a lot about the Iranian tricks, and the reformists-hardliners game.
 So, Tehran should retreat to its geographical area and stop sabotage and incitement in the region, or it will be left to face its own destiny. 
 
The Christian God ‘Loves’ Sex and Booze?
 Raymond Ibrahim/February 02/17
 http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/02/02/raymond-ibrahim-the-christian-god-loves-sex-and-booze/
 Muslim cleric arguing that the Christian God “loves” immorality.

 In keeping with ongoing revelations of just how immoral some Muslims view Christianity—to one cleric, Christian church worship is worse than murder and bloodshed—here is another Muslim cleric that appeared on an Arabic language television program claiming that the Christian God “loves”—and thus demands that his followers love—immoral behavior. This is precisely why, argued the sheikh, that Europe is so sexually liberal.
 After the more sane-looking host pointed out that in Christianity, fornication and adultery are sins, and that secular Europe’s profligate attitude toward sex is not reflective of Christian teachings, the sheikh loudly protested:
 No, fornication and adultery are not forbidden in Christianity. You see, God is love for them. This is one of their false teachings. The foundation for Christianity is that God is love. So what does “God is love” mean? It means that God loves everything. And why does God love everything? Because God is the source of everything. This means God is the creator of fornication and adultery. So who makes you commit fornication and adultery? God. Thus “God is love” means that God loves everything he created, and therefore we are obligated to love it too…. God is the one who created fornication and adultery; he is the one who created alcohol—so who are we to hate things that God created? God is love and so we are to love everything he created.
 This sort of thinking—connecting Christian beliefs with immoral behavior—is not new for Muslims. It goes all the way back to Islam’s first encounter with Christianity, in the guise of the Byzantine empire, which withstood Islam’s onslaughts for centuries, till its demise in 1453.According to Nadia Maria El Cheikh, author of Byzantium Viewed by the Arabs, “Byzantine women are strongly associated with sexual immorality.” In Islam’s oldest writings, European Orthodox Christian women are portrayed as the “most shameless women in the whole world,” always “prone to adultery,” which “is commonplace in the cities and markets of Byzantium.” Apparently the greatest hussies were “the nuns from the convents [who] went out to the fortresses to offer themselves to monks.” But as Cheikh concludes:
 [T]he image that they [Muslims] create in describing these women is anything but beautiful. Their depictions are, occasionally, excessive, virtually caricatures, overwhelmingly negative…. In fact, in Byzantium, women were expected to be retiring, shy, modest, and devoted to their families and religious observances…. [T]he behavior of most women in Byzantium was a far cry from the depictions that appear in Arabic sources.
 Several centuries later, in a written excerpt that goes to great (if not pornographic) lengths, Persian court scholar ‘Imad ad-Din (d.1201) portrayed Frankish Catholic women as “all licentious harlots, foul-fleshed and sinful.” “They dedicated as a holy offering what they kept between their thighs” and “maintained that they could make themselves acceptable to God by no better sacrifice than this.” He had particular contempt for one young woman who “walked proudly with the cross on her breast,” since this proved for the learned Muslim that she “longed to lose her robe and her honor.”
 And, just as the earliest Muslims (falsely) portrayed sexual profligacy as a hallmark of Christian piety in Byzantium, so the Persian wrote, “Now among the Franks a woman who gives herself to a celibate man [monk] commits no sin, and her justification is even greater in the case of a priest, if chaste men in dire need find relief in enjoying her.”
 Such is Islam’s centuries-old calumny against Christianity, because the latter teaches that “God is Love” (1 John 4:8). Of course, none of this should be surprising; for the Bible also teaches that there will always be those who “call evil good and good evil” (Isaiah 5:20).
 http://raymondibrahim.com/2017/02/02/christian-god-loves-sex-booze/
 
Syrian opposition figure to deploy all-Arab force in Raqqa offensive
 By Mahmoud Mourad/Reuters/February 02/17
 CAIRO (Reuters) - A Syrian opposition figure who says he controls 3,000 Arab fighters has told Reuters they are training with U.S.-led coalition forces in preparation to help drive Islamic State from its de facto capital in the city of Raqqa.
 Ahmad Jarba commands the Syrian Elite Forces, described by the U.S. military as a significant component of the coalition assembled against Islamic State.
 Its involvement in the battle for Raqqa, alongside the Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), is welcomed by Washington, which is keen to broaden the political base of the opposition forces in the area.
 "Now we are preparing for the battle of Raqqa," Jarba said in an interview in Cairo. "There is a training programme with the coalition forces. We will be ready to enter this battle in force and we are in the process of preparing for it to liberate our lands."
 The SDF launched an operation in Raqqa province in November aimed ultimately at seizing the northern city from Islamic State. The first two phases captured territory to the north and west of Raqqa and the third will seek to take remaining areas.
 One decision awaiting U.S. President Donald Trump is whether to directly provide weapons to Kurdish fighters as they push toward Raqqa. Trump has made defeating Islamic State a key aim and ordered his joint chiefs of staff to devise a plan in 30 days to defeat the group.
 ARAB CONTINGENT
 The United States considers the Kurds allies in Syria but has said the Raqqa operation should be predominantly Arab, the ethnicity of most of its residents. The SDF already includes an Arab contingent, the Syrian Arab Coalition, but recruiting Arab allies has been a priority to ease ethnic concerns locally and in neighbouring Turkey.
 Jarba said he had struck a deal with the U.S.-led coalition in December to deploy his all-Arab force in the fight for Raqqa.
 "In the last two months there have been meetings with senior officials of the American army and the international coalition forces against terrorism," he said.
 Colonel John Dorrian, spokesman for the U.S.-led Operation Inherent Resolve, described Jarba's men in December as a "notable" force, and said the Syrian was an influential player in the region.
 The SDF also confirmed in December that Jarba's forces would be joining it from the second phase of the attack on Raqqa.
 'FEUD WITH TERRORISTS'
 Jarba enjoys strong ties with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and commands what he says is a force of 3,000, currently deployed between Deir al-Zor to the east, Raqqa to the north and Hasaka in the northeastern corner of Syria.
 He aims to attract new recruits among locals who helped expel President Bashar al-Assad's army from northeastern Syria in 2011-12 before losing ground to Islamic State, which swept through the area in 2014.
 "There is a feud between us and this terrorist organisation," said Jarba, who hails from northeastern Syria.
 He welcomed Trump's move to heal differences with Russia, a key Assad ally whose military support has swung the six-year civil war in favour of the government.
 "What we are hoping for is that there will be a American-Russian agreement, because the differences between America and Russia are what have harmed us as Syrians," he said.
 Jarba said he would likely visit the United States in the coming months and may also travel to Russia.
 (Writing by Lin Noueihed; Editing by Mark Trevelyan) 
 
Canadian Press/CPC leadership candidate, "Shark Tank" star Kevin O'Leary tells us how he'd govern Canada/ Americans trust me more than Trudeau: O'Leary

Canadian Press/February 02/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/02/01/canadian-presscpc-leadership-candidate-shark-tank-star-kevin-oleary-tells-us-how-hed-govern-canada-americans-trust-me-more-than-trudeau-oleary/
OTTAWA - He's a household name in Canada and the U.S., and Kevin O'Leary intends to use audiences in both to convince Canadians he's the right man to lead this country.
Millions of Americans watch his reality TV show "Shark Tank" each week, making him a household name in a country that's overhauling all of its international relationships, O'Leary said in a wide-ranging interview with The Canadian Press.
Case in point: on Tuesday, O'Leary met Conservative MPs, and later glad-handed with party members whose support he needs to become leader; this morning, he was planning to be on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange for the opening bell.
He said he would be talking up the Canadian economy and trade in a way the current Liberal government under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has failed to do in the weeks since U.S. President Donald Trump was elected.
"This is an opportunity for me to do something I don't believe any Canadians had an opportunity to do," O'Leary said.
"I've built a trust over a decade with them on television, and to be able to explain our relationship in a unique way, in a way that they will trust. Trudeau? I'm better known in the U.S. than he is."
Those conversations are part of a long game O'Leary said he's playing when it comes to carving out his path to victory in the Conservative leadership race, a campaign that comes to a close May 27 when members choose a permanent new leader.
The moment O'Leary called his now-campaign chair to confirm he would run came just before Christmas, when the federal Finance Department issued a report predicting budget shortfalls until at least 2051, with debt levels exceeding $1.55 trillion.
The thought of his two adult children buried by that kind of debt was unthinkable, O'Leary said.
It's his kids — 20-year-old Trevor and 23-year-old Savannah — that seem to be serving as the touchpoints for O'Leary's nascent political campaign.
He said he intends to win by targeting voters in the 18-to-35 demographic and convincing them to first join the party, and then to back him in 2019 for prime minister.
His secret weapon? They've seen him on TV.
© Provided by thecanadianpress.com
"There's no other candidate that connects with the young with the way I can," he said. "They grew up with me; I've been on television forever."
While he's running on an economic platform first, on social issues he said he intends to be where his kids are on the political spectrum. And in 2015, neither of them voted Conservative.
So when his daughter tells him that protecting and championing the rights of lesbian, gay, transgender and intersex Canadians is important, he listens, he said.
And to social conservatives within the party who don't agree, or who don't want to legalize marijuana or permit doctor-assisted dying, he has a simple question: "Do you want to win a majority government?"
He's already providing hints of what life might look like under an O'Leary majority government.
A series of angry letters he's been trading with Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne, who he blames for destroying the Ontario economy, is partially about setting a tone, he suggested.
Any province that gets in the way of his plan to get the country to 3 per cent growth in GDP will feel the heat, he said.
"Call me when you fix it or suffer the consequences of a prime minister with a big stick," O'Leary said. "There's many many tools you have as a prime minister — you start at transfer payments all the way down."
Since announcing he was joining the race in late January, O'Leary said his campaign has signed up 9,000 members and raised $300,000, an effort he said that dwarfs that of any of the 13 other candidates in the race.
Fundraising numbers released Tuesday show Maxime Bernier raised $586,000 during the final three months of 2016, with Kellie Leitch, the next closest candidate, came in at more than $355,000.

Rashid Khalidi Worries that Jews Will ‘Infest’ the Trump Administration
Dore Feith/National Review/ February 02/17
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/444457/rashid-khalidi-nazi-slur-jews-rats-infestation
The famous Columbia professor repeatedly used a Nazi-era metaphor to depict Jews as vermin. Rashid Khalidi is unapologetic. The longtime Columbia University professor last month said repeatedly that supporters of Israel would “infest” the Trump administration — language that evokes the imagery and metaphors of the Nazis. But for all the on-campus sensitivity seminars and trigger warnings that dominate our age, don’t expect an apology in this case. Apparently, no language, even if it is dehumanizing and deeply rooted in historic anti-Semitism, is out of line in condemning Israel.
 Professor Khalidi is well known as Columbia University’s professor of modern Arab studies. January 17, in a lengthy radio interview on WBEZ Chicago’s “Worldview,” Khalidi warned that this infestation would begin under the new president. Describing Israel supporters in terms that evoke vermin was not a momentary lapse or slip of the tongue. He used “infest” three times, saying “these people infest” the Trump transition team and will soon “infest” the government.
 Who are “these people?” In his view, they’re a bit crazy but also scheming. Khalidi explains:
 There are a group of people, a lot of them in Israel and some of them in the United States, who live in a world of their own. That is to say, they think that whatever they want, and whatever cockamamie schemes they can cook up, can be substituted for reality.
 Free speech is a blessed thing, and hypersensitivity to offensive language is a curse on college campuses. I have no desire to stifle discussion, but it’s fair to ask: What’s become of “reasonable people can differ”? What’s become of civil discourse? What’s become of the golden rule? One has to suppose that Khalidi would take offense if someone analogized Palestinians, rather than Jews, to rats or cockroaches.
 His remarks may not be the ugliest comment along these lines that ever emerged from the Middle East–studies faculty at Columbia. Professor Hamid Dabashi once described the soul of an Israeli Jew as containing a “vulgarity of character that is bone-deep and structural to the skeletal vertebrae of its culture.” But the “infestation” theme is nasty enough to warrant special notice.
 What makes it especially nasty is its historical resonance. To be sure, not all criticism of Israel is anti-Semitism and not all anti-Semitism is Nazism. But there’s no getting around the fact that in his memoir, Mein Kampf, Hitler over and over again described the Jews as an infestation of vermin. That was one of the book’s main metaphors. And that’s why Nazi officials made a point of saying their Jewish policy aimed not to “kill” but to “exterminate” (vernichten), a word more appropriate for bugs or lice than human beings.
 While characterizing his opponents as nonhuman, Khalidi complains that “these people . . . have a vision whereby there’s no such thing as the Palestinians.” But that’s not an essential trait of Israel’s supporters, many of whom not only recognize the existence of the Palestinians but also sympathize with their suffering. Many believe, contrary to Professor Khalidi’s views, that it’s corrupt and undemocratic Palestinian officials who are mainly responsible for Palestinians’ suffering. But it’s flatly wrong to say that Khalidi’s opponents think “there’s no such thing as the Palestinians.”
 Further describing Israel supporters, Khalidi says, “They have a vision whereby international law doesn’t exist.” That’s not true, either. Over many decades, Zionists have published voluminous works on international law, explaining how it supports Israel’s existence and policies. Khalidi can challenge their views, but he shouldn’t grossly mischaracterize them.
 I know Rashid Khalidi personally. I was a student in his Modern Middle East course last semester and had several private discussions with him. So after his radio interview, I wrote to him and suggested he publicly clarify that he didn’t mean to characterize his political opponents so harshly. He replied by pointing me to the statement he gave to the Forward.
 In that statement, he acknowledged “infelicitous phrasing,” but that’s even less of an apology than the classic non-apology “I’m sorry if anyone took offense.” In an e-mail to me, he then renewed his attack on “these people” as having “a racialist disregard for Palestinians” and using “anti-Muslim, anti-Palestinian and anti–international law rhetoric.” In other words, Khalidi doubled down on his insult when he should have simply said “Sorry.” Rather than grant that both sides of the Palestinian–Israeli conflict have points worth hearing, Khalidi painted Israel’s supporters as crazy extremists who lack rational arguments and who don’t deserve serious consideration.
 Many good people are puzzled about how the Arab-Israeli conflict can fester and rage for more than a hundred years. A key reason is that Israel’s enemies are so passionate in their hatred that they pass it down through the generations.
 Rashid Khalidi’s uncivil words demonstrate the problem. They damage the very people he favors. After all, the Palestinian people would benefit from mutual accommodation and peace with Israel. And his words also harm the interests of Columbia students who hope to have mutually respectful exchanges of ideas about controversial subjects.
 — Dore Feith is a junior at Columbia and the president of Aryeh: Columbia Students Association for Israel.

Arabs Should Look In The Mirror Before Criticizing Trump’s Travel Ban
A separate State Of Mind/February 02/17
 Over the past few days, I watched Americans old and young protest against their president’s travel ban. It was a sight to behold – those people who were taught all their lives to fear Arabs, Muslims and to have all kinds of negative connotations with them were standing up for human decency.
 The protests haven’t been exclusive to the United States. London and other European cities have had their own share, culminating in an fiery discussion between British PMs about Trump and his policies.
 Meanwhile in the Arab world, crickets.
 Not a single Arab country had anything to say about the ban. They couldn’t even muster the guts to stand up with their own. I guess that whole “Arabism” theme is only nice when used from Arab Idol and The Voice podiums.
 What some countries did was the exact opposite: Kuwait fortified travel bans against 5 Muslim countries, including Syria. The top Emirati diplomat came out in support of the travel ban. And these moves are not without context.
 The two Arab countries that have taken the most refugees are Jordan and Lebanon with 1 million and 1.5 million officially registered refugees, respectively. Gulf counties, all of which are not affected by Trump’s ban despite them being the biggest exporters of Islamic terrorism, have taken in a total of zero.
 As a side note, that is also the exact same number of Americans that have been killed by terrorist attacks from the countries Trump has banned, while the number is 2500+ from the Gulf countries that he has not banned and who haven’t taken in any refugees.
 In fact, Gulf countries have made their visa requirements for other Arabs so disgusting that no one dares speak up against it. I personally have no intention to ever work or live there, so I suppose I can speak up.
 KSA has increased its visa price to $1200 for Lebanese nationals in an attempt to curb the number of Lebanese coming in for work, and as a political retaliation at the country not giving it the blowjobs it always needs.
 The UAE has made it near impossible to obtain work visas for it as well, and depending on the Emirate you’re applying to work in, you could be rejected entirely despite having proper paperwork. Moreover, the UAE has made it near impossible for Syrians whose families are in the country to get visas to visit; case in point: a Syrian friend of mine who was born and raised there couldn’t go see her family since moving to Lebanon for university studies, but was able to get a 2 year US visa (prior to the ban).
 The UAE’s situation doesn’t stop there. They’ve been systematically targeting people for deportation based on their religious affiliation. If the Lebanese state had any decency, they’d publish the list of Shiite nationals who were deported just for being Shiites.
 As mentioned above, Kuwait has enforced a visa ban on 5 Muslim countries, including Syria. But this isn’t new for Kuwait. In fact, the country is known for its derision of foreigners coming in, however they are, except if they are Westerners of course.
 As a Lebanese, I need a visa to enter every single Arab country even if for a visit except Jordan and Syria. The rest of those countries don’t have a straightforward process either and for some of them, I have to provide the same papers demanded by the US or Schengen visas. And my country isn’t better either. Yes, we have 1.5 million to 2 million refugees, which is probably more than what the country can handle granted, but few are those who are happy with having the refugees here and see them as anything more than a burden in the best of cases or treat them with all the xenophobia they could muster on average.
 In fact, it might be hard to believe but Lebanon has strict visa requirements toward certain countries as well. For starters, the criteria we’ve enforced towards accepting Syrians in are hell. Many are turned away at our borders because they can’t tick off the checklist from hell we’ve started to enforce a few years ago. We also enforce inhumane visa requirements on countries we deem as “lesser.” Refer to how Deepa Dermasiri, Malek Maktabi’s New Year Eve gut-wrenching story, couldn’t get a visa to come see her daughter in Lebanon and passed away before she was able to.
 What’s worse, the story doesn’t just stop with visas. While Americans protested against a ban that doesn’t even affect most of them, has there been any protests in the places we come from? In the grander scheme of things, has there been protests against the horrendous visa requirements we have for each other to begin with?
 Do Lebanese dare to speak up against the rules the Emirati government humiliated them with? Or Saudi visas? Or any Arab visa?
 Do we even stand up for minorities in our countries? When was the last time we had protests for some parts of our societies that were oppressed? When did Muslims have mass protests for the persecuted Christians in some Arab countries? When did we have mass protests for women rights? LGBT rights? KSA has Muslim only roads. Just saying.
 Yes, those of us who stand up are courageous because it’s so difficult to do so in the first place, but the rest are complacent and satisfied. With what? Religion, money, lack of education… you name it.
 Yes, Trump’s ban is all kinds of messed up. But then again, aren’t we all kinds of messed up too? Let’s take a hard look in the mirror at how we treat each other before panicking about how others are treating us, because the fact of the matter is: we treat other Arabs worse than Trump could ever do.
 So thanks to the Americans protesting for us. You’re greater than even I thought you were.
 https://stateofmind13.com/2017/02/01/arabs-should-look-in-the-mirror-before-criticizing-trumps-travel-ban/

Debate in Dutch Parliament about President Trump
Geert Wilders/Gatestone Institute/February 02/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9878/trump-debate-wilders
Geert Wilders: President Donald Trump, what a relief! What a relief in comparison with the leftist dictatorship of the fearful cowardly and willfully blind leaders that we have in the rest of Europe and also here in this Chamber. It makes one cry. I tell you, finally America has a President, finally a Western country has a President who not only fulfills his promises, but also states that the security of his own citizens is his primary concern.
I tell you, Foreign Minister, that, in two weeks' time, President Trump has passed an immigration policy that is more effective than that of your entire cabinet as long as it has existed. As long as it has existed. They did it. And I tell you something else. If we in the Netherlands, in Europe, had done what Mr Trump does – namely close the borders to people from places such as Syria – then these people, including terrorists, would not have come our way and then a lot of innocent people, innocent victims of terrorism in Europe, would still be alive today.
Speaker of the House: And your question is?
Wilders: So stop shedding crocodile tears. My question is: Learn from Trump and stop chickening out like cowards.
Foreign Minister Bert Koenders:
I would like to say to Mr Wilders that what he proposes is exactly what is ineffective in the fight against terrorism, namely the famous divide and rule. Ensure that the people in your own society no longer have any rights. Ensure that you look away when it comes to human rights. Ensure that the Iraqis, with whom our soldiers at the moment are fighting against ISIS, have no rights anymore and that the countries, from which terrorists obviously do not come, are the ones on this list.
The chaos we now see in the international world when it comes to air travel, does nothing to do increase the security of our people. On the contrary, it tears people apart. I will tell you one thing from my experience as foreign minister who frequently visits the Middle East: If you want to fight terrorism the worst thing you can do is to trample human rights, conduct a divide-and-rule policy and so-called screen people, whether they be Christians, Jews or Muslims, and not look at what can really protect us. I address you, because we are at the moment at a central point in the Netherlands and the world. We need to fight against terrorism together. If we fail to do it together, but exclude, then I guarantee you that the fight against terrorism will not be effective and that your position is one of insecurity.
Wilders: A lot of words, but absolutely no content. What this minister, Mrs Merkel and Prime Minister Rutte have done – what is written large on their foreheads – is open borders. Come on in everyone, do come in. Even when you have a fake passport or no identity card, come on in everyone. And we've seen what happens then. We have seen that with the asylum influx, the tsunami of asylum seekers, which was already disruptive in itself, terrorists have come along from countries such as Syria – because you agreed with it, because you refused to check them – who, all over Europe, from Paris to Berlin, have murdered innocent people. You'd better stop talking about security! Just stop it. Because of the open borders and bringing people from Islamic countries here, attacks were committed in Europe. Stop the lies!
Koenders:
Balderdash, Mr Wilders, balderdash! Really, how are you even able to concoct such an amalgam. As if the Dutch government is responsible for the terror attacks. First, the people who commit these attacks are responsible. Second, you know damn well that, when it comes to refugee policy and counter-terrorism, you toss it all together, as if there is no screening, as if the threat of terror comes only from the outside – often people from one's own society are involved – and as if trampling human rights and large groups of people does not lead exactly to what we want to avoid, namely radicalization and terror. You prescribe the wrong medicine. It will not work and you will make the country unsafe with it.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Trump ban is a firm and correct decision
Mohammed Al Shaikh/Al Arabiya/January 02/17
We can’t conclusively claim that President Donald Trump’s decision, to prevent citizens of Iran and six other Arab countries from entering the US, was a verdict directed at Muslims. Had the US president aimed his decision to prevent all Muslims, the first thing would be to prevent Saudis from entering the United States. It is an Islamic state with all its population as Muslims and has the two Holy Mosques.
Moreover, President Trump telephoned the Custodian of the two Holy Mosques and a friendly conversation took place between the two in which they agreed to fight terrorism, and strengthen the historical ties. This clearly indicated definitely that the decision has nothing to do with Islam and Muslims.
His decision is aimed at protecting the United States from countries that are full of terrorists. Five of the six countries in the list suffer from security disruptions and devastating civil wars, which makes them a fertile breeding ground for terrorists. As a precautionary measure, it is natural for the US to shut its doors to prevent citizens of those countries from coming till such time procedural controls are introduced and firm measures are taken to cut down the infiltration of terrorists.
Needless to add, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen and Somalia are all unstable and it is natural to ban citizens from these countries in order to prevent entry of potential terrorists. As for Sudan, there are other reasons such as security turmoil and unstable environment in the west of the country.
All the countries listed in Trump’s executive order are banned temporarily for objective reasons and it has nothing to do with racial and religious discrimination as Iranians and the Muslim Brotherhood claim
Objective reasons
All the countries listed in Trump’s executive order are banned temporarily for objective reasons and it has nothing to do with racial and religious discrimination as Iranians and the Muslim Brotherhood claim. When analyzing a situation, it is important to be fair and objective to all the dimensions of the matter. So we can honestly say that the motives and justifications behind the decision was a matter of national security.
There is indeed precedence of some countries banning citizens from conflict zones from entering their territory as a precautionary measure. Let us not fall for the bidding of human rights organizations, which deal with humanitarian issues from an ideological point of view, not based on reality and their manifestations on the ground. A prudent politician, who cares about security of his country, doesn’t pay attention to what should happen but to what is actually happening.
As for the decision to ban Iranian citizens, it is a brave and good one that was awaited since the time of President Barack Obama. However, Obama was too indulgent with Iran and let the country intervene in Iraq, Syria and Yemen. Even some masters of al-Qaeda continue to live in Iran.
The question is how do one trust a state that is sponsoring al-Qaeda leadership and issues them travel documents in order to carry out terrorist acts in the US homeland? I would like to make one more point to my colleague, Anwar Achki, who took part in a dialogue on the subject in the Free Hour program of American Al-Hurra channel – God have mercy on those who know when to speak and when to keep silent.
**This article is also available in Arabic.
_______________________
Mohammed Al Shaikh is a Saudi writer with al-Jazirah newspaper.

Iran Tests Trump
Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/February 02/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/02/02/majid-rafizadehgatestone-institute-iran-tests-trump/
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9880/iran-tests-trump
"Regarding the issue of production of ballistic missiles for hitting moving targets, I should say that we are among a handful of countries that have gained the knowhow (in this field)". — Iranian Brigadier General Hossein Salami, January 29, 2017.
Iran has the largest ballistic missile arsenal in the Middle East.
"Iran has received Soviet-designed Scud-B missiles and it has adapted the design into two independently-built versions; the Shahab 1 and Shahab 2." — Center for Strategic and International Studies, November 2014
Helpfully, National Security Advisor Michael Flynn has put Iran "on notice."
Right after the executive order from the White House to put a hold on issuing visas to seven countries including Iran, Tehran has test-fired a ballistic missile. The U.S. intelligence community was able to detect Iran's launch. Iran conducted the launch at a well-known location near the capital, Tehran.
Iran has confirmed firing a ballistic missile. This ballistic missile's launch would constitute Iran's ninth test-firing of ballistic missiles since the nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), reached between P5+1 and Iran.
Intriguingly, on the same day that Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) test-fired a ballistic missile, Iran's state media outlet Tasnim News Agency quoted IRGC Brigadier General Hossein Salami who bragged about Iran's ballistic capabilities and achievements. General Salami boasted that Iran is among few countries that can produce ballistic missiles and strike moving targets. Speaking to reporters in Tehran on Sunday, Brigadier General Salami pointed out:
"Our enemies have stood against us with complex and special tactics and techniques...In order to confront them, we need to take the initiative and employ special methods, techniques and tactics...Regarding the issue of production of ballistic missiles for hitting moving targets, I should say that we are among a handful of countries that have gained the knowhow (in this field)".
Iran is breaching the UN Security Council Resolution 2231. Security Council resolution 2231 (section 3 of Annex B) "calls upon Iran not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology." In addition, the United Nations Security Council resolution 1929, states:
"Iran shall not undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using ballistic missile technology, and that States shall take all necessary measures to prevent the transfer of technology or technical assistance to Iran related to such activities."
Russia, which enjoys close ties with Tehran, is siding with Iranian leaders arguing that Tehran has not violated the UN resolution because Tehran's ballistic missile is not "capable of delivering nuclear weapons". Moscow is playing with words.
Iran has the largest ballistic missile arsenal in the Middle East.
Technically speaking, for Iran's ballistic missile to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, it has to have a 500 kg payload. It is well-known that Iran's ballistic missiles have much higher payload capabilities. According to Center for Strategic and International Studies, "Iran has received Soviet-designed Scud-B missiles and it has adapted the design into two independently-built versions; the Shahab 1 and Shahab 2. Both of which have the same diameter of 88 cm and their ranges, for a 750 kg warhead, are 340 and 440 km respectively. For a 1000 kg warhead, the ranges become 285 and 370 km. Even though the Shahab-1 could fit a 1000 kg warhead but it cannot reach deep into GCC territory. Whereas the Shahab 2 nuclear capability is marginal to deliver nuclear warhead in excess of 350 km."
In addition, due to their range, Iran's ballistic missiles are capable of delivering nuclear weapons to many Middle Eastern countries. Center for Strategic and International Studies adds:
Iran's Shahab 3 & 3M missiles which have a diameter of 125 cm and a range in excess of 900 km with a payload of 1,000 kg would be able to deliver a nuclear warhead to many of the Middle East capitals and high-value targets.
Germany and the UK appear to be on the side of the US when it comes to whether Iran has violated the UN resolution or not. Germany's Foreign Ministry pointed out the missile test "give reason for serious concern" and that Germany believes the test was incompatible with the UN resolution.
Iran is also dangerously provoking other regional states and destabilizing the region.
According to a previous report obtained by the Associated Press, the launches are "destabilizing and provocative" and the Shahab-3 medium-range ballistic missile and Qiam-1 short-range ballistic missile fired by Iran are "inherently capable of delivering nuclear weapons."
Iran is publicly challenging President Trump and his administration. Iranian leaders are sending a signal that Trump's presidency is not going to alter Tehran's core pillars of foreign and revolutionary policies towards Israel and the US. Iranian authorities are also testing the water to examine what Washington's reaction would be and whether the White House would react the same way that it did under Obama administration.
Iran became emboldened to an unprecedented level during the Obama administration. As President Trump's national security adviser, Michael Flynn, pointed out the Obama administration's nuclear deal is "weak and ineffective."
"Instead of being thankful to the United States for these agreements, Iran is now feeling emboldened.... the Obama administration failed to respond adequately to Tehran's malign actions - including weapons transfers, support for terrorism and other violations of international norms".
Trump administration has officially put Iran on notice. Flynn stated "Recent Iranian actions, including a provocative ballistic missile launch and an attack against a Saudi naval vessel conducted by Iran-supported Houthi militants [from Yemen], underscore what should have been clear to the international community all along about Iran's destabilizing behavior across the Middle East," Flynn said.
Nevertheless, Iran is not backing down. Iranian Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan signaled that Iran will continue with its current behavior " The recent test was in line with our plan...Nobody can influence our decision. We will not allow foreigners to interfere in our defence affairs."
US allies are on the side of Washington when it comes to opposing Iran's military adventurism. Trump administration can use the power of these alliances. President Trump ought to continue with robust responses to Iran's violations. Because If Iran's aggressions and violation are disregarded, Tehran will interpret it as weakness and as a green light to continue with its anti-American, anti-Semitic, revolutionary and militaristic policies. If Iranian leaders' military adventurism and destabilizing behavior are ignored or downplayed, as it happened under Obama administration, Tehran will be significantly emboldened and empowered; hence Iran will more powerfully pursue policies that damage US national security interests.
Continuing to take the lead in adequately addressing Iran's destabilizing behavior and violations will be extremely critical at this point because it will define Iran's behavior, whether Tehran will be taking Trump administration seriously afterwards, ensure US allies' security, and it will restore US global image and leadership.
Helpfully, National Security Advisor Michael Flynn has put Iran "on notice."
*Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, political scientists and Harvard University scholar is president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He can be reached at Dr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Bring Russia to the Table and Promote America's Security
Stephen Blank and Peter Huessy/Gatestone Institute/February 02/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9877/american-security-russia
Putin's Russia is determined to demilitarize NATO in Eastern Europe, end Western economic sanctions, allow the permanent amputation of Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity including the Crimea, secure Bashar Assad's rule over all of Syria, and in general establish Moscow in world affairs on a plane of "equal status with Washington".
This last goal is not going to be acceptable to any US president. It would give Russia a veto on U.S. activity abroad and a free hand in its self-proclaimed sphere of influence. Moreover, it would divide NATO, demoralize the EU, and almost certainly encourage further Russian aggression.
Energy policy is the key. A smart, aggressive, and self-interested energy policy makes America stronger and the world safer.
The US and Europe should agree to hold a major NATO summit in advance of a Trump-Putin sit-down. This move would demonstrate renewed NATO strength and resolve.
The proposed American conventional modernization must embrace the entire zone from the Baltic to the Black Sea. It must be coordinated by the U.S. with its allies. It is thus hoped that by doing so, the conventional modernization will help check Russia's nuclear threats.
Realistically, the US-Russia rivalry will remain in place -- but a "strong and nationalist United States," writes Victor Davis Hanson, can be a diplomatic, military and economic "hinge" upon which U.S. efforts to "discourage" Putin from doing things unwise can succeed.
The rivalry between the United States and Russia is entering a new era with the election of Donald Trump. While Trump has made no secret of his desire for better relations between the two nations, he has also called for a more muscular and efficient US military.
The new President seeks to modernize the US nuclear deterrent, expand effective missile defenses, and significantly increase conventional military capability, while reforming and revitalizing NATO.
These plans will no doubt rub up against Mr. Putin's objectives. Putin's Russia is determined to demilitarize NATO in Eastern Europe, end Western economic sanctions, allow the permanent amputation of Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity including the Crimea, secure Bashar Assad's rule over all of Syria, and in general establish Moscow in world affairs on a plane of "equal status with Washington".
This last goal is not going to be acceptable to any US president. It would give Russia a veto on U.S. activity abroad and a free hand in its self-proclaimed sphere of influence. Moreover, it would divide NATO, demoralize the EU, and almost certainly encourage further Russian aggression.
Nevertheless, since both sides wish to negotiate, the two urgent tasks for the new administration are: 1. formulation of strategic objectives, and 2. adoption of a strategy that gets the United States and its allies where the US would like to go. That means bringing Russia to the table from a position of US strength, rather than the calculated weakness of the last eight years.
For his part, Putin has redoubled his efforts to intimidate the U.S. and its allies. The examples are many and worrying: the destruction and capture of Aleppo, the exclusion of the U.S. from the diplomacy over Syria, the attempted Russian coup in Montenegro, the re-intensification of fighting in Ukraine, the continuing information warfare against the U.S. and its allies in Europe, and of course the public trumpeting of supposed of nuclear and military superiority.
Strategic Choices and Realities
How can a President Trump strategy negate Russian efforts at intimidation?
The two critical strategies lie with US military and economic power. The military side is already well known. President Trump has not only aggressively embraced the nuclear modernization but his defense team has also publicly advocated rebuilding the conventional deterrent and creating a successful cyber-strategy. The modernization of conventional and nuclear capability and its deployment at the earliest possible time to Europe will have two immediate advantages: it will demonstrate the resolve to uphold US commitments to her NATO allies; and it will force Europe into commitment to raise is defense spending in order to field effective and capable military forces in Central and Eastern Europe -- as the new defense secretary highlighted in his Senate testimony.
This enhanced ground, sea, air, cyber, and electronic set of capabilities will reassure Europe and continue to deter Moscow. It will begin to counter balance Putin's continued threats to use nuclear weapons early in any number of regional scenarios as a means of intimidating the US and its allies to "stand down" before a crises has become a conflict.
Meanwhile, Russia's defense budget is under severe pressure as the drop in oil and gas prices in the past few years has dramatically cut into Russian government revenues. Economic sanctions, too, are hurting Russia's overall economy and that as well is curtailing government revenue.
It is true that sanctions alone—which will probably continue to at least July unless rescinded—are not a strategy. But when applied together with a real buildup of NATO forces and U.S. comprehensive defense modernization, they constrain Russia's options as it will have severe difficulty in matching a rebuilt US conventional capability.
In fact, the EU's decision to continue the sanctions actually reflects the success of Trump's pressure on Europe in forcing US allies to assume more responsibility for their own self-defense. And this example suggests how economics and defense policies can work together to create strategic outcomes that add to U.S. and allied leverage.
The proposed American conventional modernization must embrace the entire zone from the Baltic to the Black Sea. It must be coordinated by the U.S. with its allies. It is thus hoped that by doing so, the conventional modernization will help check Russia's nuclear threats.
The US and Europe should agree to hold a major NATO summit in advance of a Trump-Putin sit-down. This move would demonstrate renewed NATO strength and resolve. Simultaneously, a joint U.S. and NATO economic strategy to squeeze Putin's war machine—both through sanctions and through smart, nationalistic economic policy.
Energy Policy is the Key
Here is where history can be a useful guide. A key pillar of then-President Ronald Reagan's successful strategy to end the Soviet empire was to dramatically lower energy prices through the decontrol of domestic oil prices in January 1981. Subsequently in 1985 Reagan successfully got both Great Britain and the Saudi Kingdom to cooperate to dramatically increase OPEC oil production. As a result, the price of crude fell from $30 to $6 a barrel and with it $20 billion in lost oil sales revenue annually flowed out of the Soviet exchequer.
Both 1981 and 1985 Reagan administration efforts had the effect of dramatically curtailing Soviet oil export earnings. This meant a serious loss of revenue to the Soviet government which hindered their ability to invest in the military technology modernization effort needed to meet the challenges of the 1970's revolution in military technology. Soviet industry simply could not meet new defense needs without securing major technology transfers and investments from the West.
Fast forward to 2017. The new President, incoming Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross, and Secretary of Energy Rick Perry, have long supported increasing US energy production and exports to both Europe and Asia. In a rare moment of energy unity during the previous administration, Congress passed legislation in December 2015 lifting the three-decade old ban on U.S. crude oil exports.
Now we also know Russia is seeking to get OPEC to curtail production to raise oil prices. We also know it is highly unlikely that Russia will actually reduce oil exports given its heavy reliance on oil and gas export earnings to supply the government revenue. Russian energy costs are denominated in rubles, but earnings are in dollars -- so there are compelling motives for selling as much oil (and gas) as possible. Russia's economic capacity to sustain its defense program and its overall state budget rests disproportionately upon its ability to sell oil and gas abroad.
Both sanctions and the low energy prices have affected this capability and preserving them is very much in U.S. interests. Millions of acres of United States government regulated land have just recently been put beyond oil and gas production by executive action by previous administration. This is in addition to the millions of acres owned by the US government already previously put out of bounds for any energy exploration or production.
Increasing US oil and gas production, coupled with Canada and Mexico's potential could easily make North America the energy giant on the globe, break the back of OPEC, and give the United States significant leverage in world fossil fuel policy and prices. The Keystone pipeline, as well as other pipelines, refineries, and terminals can be greenlit to enhance the production, distribution, and export of American oil and gas.
At a Capitol Hill event two years ago, the Ambassadors from the three Baltic nations told us that getting American natural gas to Eastern Europe would be an extraordinary achievement, as it would—in their words—"turn Russia from an energy bully into an energy supplicant".
Gas converted into liquefied natural gas (LNG) can be exported from the United States. Once our prices become truly competitive, the European gas terminals already in Lithuania and Poland that began initial operations recently can receive our exports as well.
Beyond that process the EU is constructing interconnectors across all of Central and Eastern Europe that will gradually unify the continent. Those interconnectors and terminals are already adding to Russian difficulties in selling Europe gas--the resource Moscow most uses for political gain because of its historical monopoly position.
The new administration can also accelerate the process which grants terminal construction licenses, as well as approval for oil and gas exports. Alternatives such as the Southern Gas Corridor from Azerbaijan through Turkey to the Balkans, and the exploitation of recently discovered huge deposits of gas found in the Eastern Mediterranean off Israeli, Egyptian, and Cypriot shores for export to Europe can further bolster US energy policy.
Europe, however, is not the only market for American gas and oil. China currently is heavily dependent on high-sulfur coal for its electrical production. Its old coal power plants do not use environmental safeguards and thus air pollution is leading to a significant rise in the incidence of cancers and other serious health problems among China's population. Combined with India, the two nations have 2.5 billion people while all of Asia taken together now has 4.5 billion people, or nearly 60% of the world's population. The energy demand of such a population can be a major opportunity for the US energy production sector.
US gas resources as well as new technology that allows for the economically viable and useful capture of coal based carbon green-house gases could help spring an energy revolution in the western Pacific, further enhancing US energy policy as a geostrategic tool. There are East Asian firms in South Korea that are already exploring constructing terminals to store US sourced energy.
These initiatives deserve Federal government, support as they advance American and NATO economic and strategic interests vis a vis Russia and China. As President Ronald Reagan demonstrated, military strength alone while critical does not guarantee global peace and security: a smart, aggressive, and self-interested energy policy makes America stronger and the world safer.
The failed 2009 reset with Russia and Putin's belligerence does not mean we are doomed to war. As Victor Davis Hanson observes, given our new-found fossil-fuel wealth and our continued technological superiority, we are in an unusually strong position if we would simply seize "realist avenues" where cooperation can benefit both countries.
Realistically, the US-Russia rivalry will remain in place -- but a "strong and nationalist United States," writes Hanson can be a diplomatic, military and economic "hinge" upon which United States efforts to "discourage" Putin from doing things unwise can succeed. That, however, requires an America willing to, in Hanson's words, "carry huge sticks".
Unfortunately, America has not done so for nearly the past decade. But changing such a strategy now to one of "peace through strength" is exactly the path we encourage the new administration to take. It worked to end the Cold War. And can be the foundation to secure once again a safer America and an allied Europe. That, indeed, would reflect a new "art of the deal".
*Stephen Blank is a Senior Fellow at American Foreign Policy Council. Peter Huessy is President of Geostrategic Analysis.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute. 

What suits the West does not necessarily ennoble the rest
Mohammed Nosseir/Al Arabiya/January 02/17
“I strongly believe that this is the ultimate solution” is a phrase that politicians often use to frame and mobilize their followers. But when this phrase is stated by a politician attempting to impose a solution on another country, we must challenge his proposition! Western politicians, unfortunately, have become quite conceited about their ideas and policies. Convinced that if it suits them it must be good enough for others, they often attempt to enforce these ideas on the rest of the world. Their superiority has given them a universal political advantage that is undeniable – but unjustifiable. Technological advancements and abidance by proper democratic mechanisms certainly constitute a blessing that lends western nations a degree of political and economic authority. However, this superiority does not mean that their respective politicians’ international outlooks are always correct, entitling them to force their ideas on others.
Western political elites whose ideas shape the world are often unaware of the political dynamics of other countries and do not truly care to enhance their knowledge in this regard. This obviously includes newcomers to the political scene, such as US President Trump who, in fact, has no political background. Applying the western world’s thinking mechanism and tools to other parts of the world has proved to be an abject failure! The political and economic dynamics in each part of the world is often unique; inherited cultures, citizens’ perceptions, and their readiness to digest and adapt new mechanisms vary from one country to another.
Debating ideas
Western politicians and thinkers often debate ideas that have major implications for other countries. While some of them have had more international exposure than others, it remains true that the entire western society operates within its closed circles and abides by its own thinking tools that are not always suited to the rest of the world. Decision-making in the western world is quite clearly structured; politicians’ ideologies and goals are patently clear and their political circles of influence are known well in advance. By contrast, in regions such as the Middle East for instance, countless hidden factors often implicitly affect many of the region’s national policies. Ruling a nation entails clear principles of political accountability, whereas interfering in formulating solutions without being accountable as a ruler is often perceived as a violation of the sovereignty of other countries that is aimed at promoting western political interests. Western leaders achieve their political status empowered by their citizens’ votes. The fact that they don’t have followers in other countries and, obviously, are unable to micromanage other nations’ challenges is, by default, a shortcoming that should devalue their ideas forthright. Ironically, western politicians tend to magnify their successful interventions and to attribute the blame for all failures to domestic issues – completely ignoring the part played by their initial and continuing intervention
Internal political mechanism
At home, within the framework of their democratic process, Western politicians tend to act softly, offering their fellows many promises; with regard to external issues that are often isolated from their internal political mechanism however, their behavior is ignorant and arrogant. Most of the challenges that we are facing in the Middle East are the direct results of our shortcomings. Nevertheless, westerners’ interferences have complicated many recent regional crises that have led to the current catastrophic conditions in each of Iraq, Libya and Syria; western intervention has contributed substantially to the political and economic deterioration of these countries. Ironically, western politicians tend to magnify their successful interventions and to attribute the blame for all failures to domestic issues – completely ignoring the part played by their initial and continuing intervention. Apart from the moral question of whether any given nation is entitled to interfere in the political development of another country; if Western nations insist that they are entitled to engage in other countries’ political development, they should at least openly assume the responsibility for their failures. I am not anticipating that western politicians will read this piece and refrain from international interference, but I do hope that they will consider broadening their vision to better understand how other cultures operate.

A new strategy to raise standard of education
Samar Fatany/Al Arabiya/January 02/17
Francis Ricciardone, the President of the American University in Cairo (AUC), held talks with senior officials in the Ministry of Culture and Information in a bid to develop a new strategy to increase academic cooperation with partners in the region.
His visit was significant because it comes at a time when there is uncertainty about the new American administration. Ricciardone, who is also a former diplomat, told reporters that under the new Trump administration, “American globalized audiences are concerned about America’s place in the world, and want to study and learn the true story about Islam and Muslims.” He urged the need for American Arab cooperation and said, “There are bigots in the West and the East who want to build walls and paint each other as fanatics and murderers. Sadly, they’re having some success and they’re causing fear.” He emphasized the importance of education saying: “Education is the way, and the AUC is the vehicle that brings together Arabs and Americans.”
The AUC President’s offer is an indication that all is not lost between the US and the Arab world. An American collaboration to upgrade our educational system could be of great benefit for our students and teachers. Academic experts urge the need to adopt best practices from reputable academic institutions, like the (AUC), to raise the level of our schools and universities. One of the most positive initiatives to address the problem so far is the Irtiqa’a program that measures the effectiveness of Saudi parents’ engagement in their children’s education
Standard of education
In line with the new vision and the alarming threat of terrorism, seeking academic cooperation with reputable academic institutions is critical to promoting a high standard of education that can counter the intolerance that has led to extremism, violence and conflict.
In order to develop society economically and culturally, educationists are required to change the rigid mindset that rejects anything that is foreign and refuses to adopt a modern approach to a progressive life. One of the most positive initiatives to address the problem so far is the Irtiqa’a program that measures the effectiveness of Saudi parents’ engagement in their children’s education. The objective of the program is to engage 80 percent of Saudi parents in school activities by 2020. The idea is to encourage the participation of parents in the learning process of their children. The implementation of this program is very much needed to produce better educational standards among students and engage parents in their children’s upbringing. This will allow parents to discipline their children and build character in our youth with proper guidance and support.
Meanwhile, academic experts assert the importance of developing our school curriculum and introducing the English language and updated knowledge. Students graduate with little or no language skills. They struggle to write any official document and lack eloquence, which makes them inefficient at any job they take. Saudi educators urge the need to teach English at an early age. English was introduced in Grade 4 in primary schools for boys and girls in the 2011-2012 academic year. The Ministry of Education also announced that it is planning to teach the language below Grade 4. Meanwhile, many parents are enrolling their children in international schools because they want them to be fluent in English, the global language of science, business and technology.
Qualified teachers
Education is fundamental to the development of every nation. If we are to provide quality education for our students we need qualified teachers who can enhance creative and critical thinking. We need to invest in boosting the teaching profession and empowering educationists with updated knowledge and modern technology to increase their respect among students in our schools. The Arab nation cannot catch up with advanced countries without developing education and abandoning old ineffective teaching techniques.
Reforming our educational system remains a critical challenge. Our nation will not prosper if we continue to lag behind the fast developing countries of the 21st century. We need a new strategy to raise educational standards. Supporting international academic institutions in the Arab world could be of great benefit to our students, some of whom may no longer feel safe to travel beyond the Middle East.
**This article was first published in the Saudi Gazette on January 28, 2016.