LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

February 04/17

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins17/english.february04.17.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
These things occurred so that the scripture might be fulfilled, ‘None of his bones shall be broken.
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 19/28-37/:"After this, when Jesus knew that all was now finished, he said (in order to fulfil the scripture), ‘I am thirsty.’A jar full of sour wine was standing there. So they put a sponge full of the wine on a branch of hyssop and held it to his mouth. When Jesus had received the wine, he said, ‘It is finished.’ Then he bowed his head and gave up his spirit. Since it was the day of Preparation, the Jews did not want the bodies left on the cross during the sabbath, especially because that sabbath was a day of great solemnity. So they asked Pilate to have the legs of the crucified men broken and the bodies removed. Then the soldiers came and broke the legs of the first and of the other who had been crucified with him. But when they came to Jesus and saw that he was already dead, they did not break his legs. Instead, one of the soldiers pierced his side with a spear, and at once blood and water came out. (He who saw this has testified so that you also may believe. His testimony is true, and he knows that he tells the truth.) These things occurred so that the scripture might be fulfilled, ‘None of his bones shall be broken.’And again another passage of scripture says, ‘They will look on the one whom they have pierced.’ 
 
We act with great boldness, not like Moses, who put a veil over his face to keep the people of Israel from gazing at the end of the glory that was being set aside.
Second Letter to the Corinthians 03/07-14/:"If the ministry of death, chiselled in letters on stone tablets, came in glory so that the people of Israel could not gaze at Moses’ face because of the glory of his face, a glory now set aside, how much more will the ministry of the Spirit come in glory? For if there was glory in the ministry of condemnation, much more does the ministry of justification abound in glory! Indeed, what once had glory has lost its glory because of the greater glory; for if what was set aside came through glory, much more has the permanent come in glory! Since, then, we have such a hope, we act with great boldness, not like Moses, who put a veil over his face to keep the people of Israel from gazing at the end of the glory that was being set aside. But their minds were hardened. Indeed, to this very day, when they hear the reading of the old covenant, that same veil is still there, since only in Christ is it set aside. 

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 03-04/17
Christian Lives in Syria Matter/Carlo Jose Vicente Caro/Huffington Post’s Contributor platfor/February 03/17
Christians In Turkey: Attacked, Deported And Seen As A 'Threat Against National Security'
James Macintyre/Christian Today/February 02/17
How Trump Can Help Persecuted Christians and Protect Americans with One Move/
Raymond Ibrahim/February 03/17
Ways to change the Iran government peacefully/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya/February 03/17
Putting a Spoke in the Wheel of Saudi-U.S. Relations/Salman Al-dossary/Asharq Al Awsat/February 03/17
Obama, Trump and the Muslim Ban /Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/February 03/17
Russia, Turkey, Assad and a New Stage/Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al Awsat/February 03/17
U.S.-Australia Rift Is Possible after Trump Ends Call with Prime Minister/Glenn Thrush and Michelle Innis/The New York Times/February 03/17
International Armed Conflict Back to Iraq/Abdulrahman Al-Rashed/Asharq Al Awsat/February 03/17
Quebec: The Crisis of the West/Giulio Meotti/Gatestone Institute/February 03/2017
Who are Those Refugees Australia Doesn't Want/Shoshana Bryen/Gatestone Institute/February 03/2017
Return of an international armed conflict over Iraq/Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/February 03/17
On neutralizing Syria’s ‘Arabism’/Ghassan Imam/Al Arabiya/February 03/17
Mothers can come together to make Saudi roads safer/Khaled Almaeena/Al Arabiya/February 03/17
 


Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 03-04/17
Lebanese president calls for safe zones in Syria for refugees
Aoun pushes for new electoral law that represents all Lebanese
US announces fresh Iran-related sanctions, including on Lebanese entities
Aoun: International Community Must Help Syrian Refugees Return Home
Army Soldiers Killed in Car Collision on Highway
Bassil meets South Africa FM, says U.S. travel ban not concerning Lebanon
Mashnouq Says Security Plan Kept Concealed
Aoun Says to Propose 'Referendum' if Parties Fail to Agree on Electoral Law
Bassil Replies to Franjieh's Remarks on Electoral Law
Report: Opposition Front Growing to Confront 'Marginalization Practices'
4 Workers Hurt in Blast at Metal Workshop in Taanayel
Tashnag Delegation Meets Geagea, Calls for 'Forgetting' 1960 Electoral Law
U.N. Refugee Chief Meets Hariri, Vows 'Full Support' for Lebanon
Report: Kataeb, Mustaqbal Discuss Ties, New Electoral Law Format
Army apprehends 5 Syrians in Ain el Remmaneh
Lebanese Diaspora Energy South Africa's Conference winds up

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 03-04/17
Louvre attack: Egyptian man, 29, believed to be assailant
First Trump-Trudeau meeting expected 'very soon'

U.S. Announces New Sanctions on Iran Over Ballistic Missile Test/United States lists 13 individuals and 12 entities.
Gulf Police, Interpol Cooperation Bolstered by Signing MoU
US sends Navy destroyer to Yemen
More than 100,000 visas revoked amid Trump travel ban
Jubeir demands international reaction to address Iran’s interference in region
UN sees western Mosul assault driving out 250,000 civilians
Yemen: al-Qaeda spreads again in three towns of Abyan province
Iran Announces 'Reciprocal Action' to U.S. Sanctions
UNHCR chief says safe zones would not work in Syria
Suspected Coalition Raids Cut Water to IS Syria Bastion
U.N. Peacekeepers Say Attacked by Mobs in the South
Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs speaks with United States Secretary of State
9 Syrian Officials Are Accused of Torture in Spanish Court
Watch! Erdogan tells Merkel not to use term “Islamist terror” and praises Turkish democracy
Former EU-president Van Rompuy: ‘Trump is danger to the world and I saved the EU’
U.S. warns North Korea of 'overwhelming' response if nuclear arms used
Trump rattles world leaders as Cabinet tries to soften tone
The Latest on President Donald Trump
Donald Trump Says 'Iran Is Playing With Fire' After Ballistic Missile Test
US New Sanctions on Iran Regime Targets 13 Individuals 12 Entities
Iran: Smuggling Contrabands by IRGC and Custom Office
IRAN: Police Officer Arrested for Revealing Tehran Plasco Fire Casualty

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on February 03-04/17
Erdogan tells off Merkel for using phrase “Islamist terrorism”
Do YOU have all of Robert Spencer’s books?
Trump says Iran “playing with fire,” imposes new sanctions in wake of missile tests
UK: Muslim sex abusers in Rotherham scream “Allahu akbar” as they’re jailed for “vile” abuse of girls
Islamic Republic of Iran: “We are the strongest power… America should be careful!”
Trump warns that Islamic State jihadis specifically targeting Jews, Christians and “peaceful Muslims”
Paris: Machete-wielding Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar” attacks French soldiers at the Louvre
Hugh Fitzgerald: “I’m a Muslim — Ask Me Anything,” Answers 7-10
Raymond Ibrahim: The Christian God ‘Loves’ Sex and Booze?
Trump going wobbly? White House suggests Israeli “settlements” may “not be helpful” for peace
Trump to recast Obama’s “Countering Violent Extremism” program to focus on the jihad threat
Nancy Pelosi: Trump’s immigration ban “has not made us more safe

Links From Christian Today Site for on February 03-04/17
Ukraine, Separatists Say More Civilians Killed In Eastern Flare-up
Delightful' Friend Of Archbishop Of Canterbury Faced Charge Of Killing Zimbabwe Teen
Bishop Of London's Farewell Service: Church Must Stand United In The Face Of 'Great Promise And Great Peril'
Largest Ever #VisitMyMosque Day Expected To Attract Thousands
Australian Catholic Leaders Warn Congregations Ahead Of 'Horrific' Abuse Hearing
Don't Be Too Quick To Clean Up Islamic State Damage – It Erases Evidence, Says Aid Worker
Refugee Groups Speak Out On Impact Of Trump's Policies
The 10 Lessons Pastors Of Expanding Churches Have Learned
Siberian Man Builds Orthodox Church Out Of Snow
China Crackdown: Human Rights Lawyers And Christians Arrested And Tortured
Why Donald Trump Is Right – And Brave – To Get Rid Of The Johnson Amendment
Trump Wants To Let Your Pastor Do Party Politics. Here's Why It's A Bad Idea

Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 03-04/17
Lebanese president calls for safe zones in Syria for refugees

Reuters/February 03/17/Lebanese President Michel Aoun said on Friday world powers must work with Damascus to create safe zones in Syria so refugees can return to their country. It was the first time the Beirut government had lent its support to such a plan. At least a million people have fled the Syrian civil war since 2011 into Lebanon, which has an estimated total population of less than six million. Lebanon would not force unsafe return on any refugees, but the international community must make their return possible, Aoun's office quoted him as saying in a meeting on Friday with U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi. He said it was "important to achieve a political solution" to the conflict. Aoun is an ally of Lebanon's Hezbollah group which is fighting in Syria in support of President Bashar al-Assad. U.S. President Trump said last week he would "absolutely do safe zones in Syria" for refugees fleeing violence and that Europe had made a mistake by admitting millions of refugees.. According to a document seen by Reuters, Trump is expected to order the Pentagon and the State Department to craft such a plan, a move that could ratchet up U.S. military involvement in Syria.The Syrian government said on Monday that any attempt to create so-called safe zones for refugees without coordinating with Damascus would be "unsafe" and violate Syria's sovereignty. Rebel backers including Qatar have welcomed Trump's support for safe zones, and Turkey says it is waiting to see the outcome of the U.S. president's pledge. Almost six years of war has divided Syria into a patchwork of areas controlled by Assad's government, various rebel groups, Kurdish militia and Islamic State militants. Also In World News French soldier shoots, wounds machete-wielding attacker at Paris Louvre U.S. to issue new Iran sanctions, opening shot in get-tough strategy. The conflict has killed hundreds of thousands of people, made more than half of Syrians homeless and created the world's worst refugee crisis. (Reporting by Ellen Francis; editing by Andrew Roche)

Aoun pushes for new electoral law that represents all Lebanese
Fri 03 Feb 2017/NNA - President of the Republic, Michel Aoun, met on Friday at Baabda Presidential Palace with Elias Aoun, head of Lebanese Press Editor heading a delegation. "In case of failure to achieve a new electoral law that represents all the Lebanese segments there won't be justice and we won't enjoy political stability in the country," Aoun told his visitors. The President called on the Lebanese politicians to adopt the unified standard in any law, pointing out that he might resort to referendum in case of failure to achieve a new electoral law. On the other hand, Aoun said "the written press crisis is a world crisis," confirming continuous efforts to resolve this crisis. The President described his relation with Prime Minister, Saad Hariri as "excellent", stressing "I will be a father to all the Lebanese and I will take into consideration the interests of all the sects without exception." Separately, Aoun met the French Deputy Gerard Bapt, in the presence of Deputy Simon Abi Ramya with talks featuring high on the situation in Lebanon and the region. Later, Aoun met with a delegation of Majed Al Futtaim Company.
 
US announces fresh Iran-related sanctions, including on Lebanese entities
The Arab News/February 03/17/The United States on Friday announced that 13 Iranian individuals and 12 entities will come under US sanctions. This move follows the White House putting Tehran "on notice" just days earlier over a ballistic missile test and other acts. The US Treasury announced the new sanctions in a statement on its website, where it also listed individuals and entities based in the United Arab Emirates, Lebanon and China. Among those named were Lebanese nationals Mohammed Abdul Amir Farhat and and Yehia Issa Mohamad, along with four Lebanon-based firms. Before taking office as US president, Donald Trump had promised to take a tough line on Iran, vowing to go as far as revoking the nuclear accord agreed under the Obama administration. Iran is currently one of seven Muslim-majority countries listed on Trump's immigration ban.
 
Aoun: International Community Must Help Syrian Refugees Return Home
Naharnet/February 03/17/In light of the aggravating crisis of refugees that has been burdening Lebanon and its economy since the war erupted in Syria, President Michel Aoun urged the international community to facilitate the return of refugees to safe zones in their homeland. “The International community must facilitate the return of displaced Syrians back to their homeland,” Aoun told UN High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi in a meeting at Baabda Palace. “Establishing safe zones in Syria in collaboration with the Syrian government helps the return of the displaced,” he emphasized.Nevertheless, Aoun assured that Lebanon does not intend to obligate any of the displaced to return under unstable security conditions. He concluded: “Displaced Syrians could not stay in Lebanon forever.”Lebanon hosts more than one million Syrians who have sought refuge in Lebanon from the devastating conflict in their homeland that has killed more than 310,000 people. Another half a million undocumented Syrians also live in Lebanon.
 
Army Soldiers Killed in Car Collision on Highway

 Naharnet/February 03/17/Lebanese army soldiers were killed on Friday in a vehicle collision on the Zahle-Baalbek highway, the National News Agency reported.Two soldiers, H.M. who hails from Ali al-Nahri town and A.S.Q. from Temnin al-Tahta, were killed early Friday in an accident near Dar al-Amal State Hospital on the Zahle-Baalbek highway, NNA said.
 
Bassil meets South Africa FM, says U.S. travel ban not concerning Lebanon
Fri 03 Feb 2017/NNA - Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil on Friday met with his South African counterpart Maite Nkoana-Mashabane in Johannesburg, with talks reportedly dwelling on the bilateral ties, in addition to latest security developments in the Middle East region.
Bassil, currently in South Africa for the Lebanese Diaspora Energy Conference, indicated that his visit aims to bolster the bilateral relations between the two countries. "We agreed to develop the bilateral ties. We also agreed to ink agreements on economy, trade, and visa cancellation," Bassil told a joint news conference following talks with his counterpart. "We discussed all the issues which we are facing the [Middle East] region, especially the wave of Syrian displacement, the spread of terrorism, and the hostilities Israel is committing against Lebanon," he said. "The Lebanese model that is founded on tolerance and coexistence is what the world needs in the face of terrorism and Daesh," he added. In response to reporters, Bassil underlined that there couldn't be tolerance among terrorists, but only among people "who are ready to live together in peace." "Regarding the Palestinian state issue, the idea of peace does not exist with the current Israeli administration. Peace cannot be built unless the rights of others are recognized. Until then, the international community is responsible for the atrocities committed by Israel against the neighboring countries, especially that it is against the establishment of a Palestinian state," he said. Bassil also considered that there must be reforms inside the United Nations "since a state like Israel is entitled to trespass international laws." Moreover, Bassil indicated that Lebanon was not concerned with the U.S. travel ban. "Lebanon would have adopted similar policies to protect its territory and security, but we do carry a different message, that is to accept others in dangerous times."For her part, the South African Minister highlighted the importance of boosting relations with Lebanon on all political, economic, cultural, and tourist levels. "The Lebanese Diaspora here is very active; descendants of Lebanese origins are contributing massively to South Africa's prosperity," she indicated. "During the meeting, we discussed latest developments in Lebanon and the region, especially the political and economic challenges your country is facing. We also dwelt on the questions of peace and security. We do share your vision on the peace process and the two-state solution, and we firmly object to settlements' building in Israel," she said.
 
Mashnouq Says Security Plan Kept Concealed
Naharnet/February 03/17/Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq emphasized that intentions to carry out a security plan in the eastern Beqaa valley will not be declared beforehand to the public, An Nahar daily reported on Friday. “Specific dates for the new security plan will not be declared beforehand. No details will be given to the media this time,” said Mashnouq in an interview with the daily. He said that President Michel Aoun has requested that no feedback or details be given about the plan before it is executed on the ground. “This time, President Michel Aoun wants us not to mention anything about the plan before it actually happens on the ground, and we support him,” he said. For his part, the governor of Baalbek-Hermel district, Bashir Khodr stressed that the “plan will not have a specific date for execution, nor will the security forces display presence in the said region. It will be different focusing more on intelligence efforts instead of (security members) deployment on the ground.” Earlier in January, Mashnouq revealed that the Higher Defense Council will soon convene to mull and discuss a plan aimed at combating kidnap rings, which are especially active in the Bekaa region. The developments come in the wake of a four-day abduction of a 74-year-old Bekaa man, Saad Risha, who was kidnapped in Qab Elias and taken to the town of Brital. Risha was released after massive road-blocking protests and intensive political contacts led by Speaker Nabih Berri and his envoy Bassam Tlais. The man was eventually freed without a ransom but any of the five kidnappers has not been arrested until the moment. Occasionally, the state carries out security procedures, mainly in the Bekaa region, to clamp down on criminals, gangs, drug dealers and networks that kidnap for ransom.
 
Aoun Says to Propose 'Referendum' if Parties Fail to Agree on Electoral Law
Naharnet/February 03/17/President Michel Aoun warned Friday that he would propose a popular “referendum” should the political forces fail to agree on a new electoral law. “Any electoral law must be based on unified standards and I will propose a referendum should we reach a dead end,” Aoun told a delegation from the Syndicate of Press Editors. He lamented that “there is no will approve an electoral law.”“How can we build a stable society in the absence of such a will?” the president wondered. And stressing his insistence on “an electoral law that achieves correct representation,” Aoun noted that “the crisis lies in the fact that each political leader wants to crush the minority that is present in his community and to steal a number of seats from the other communities.” While al-Mustaqbal Movement has rejected that the electoral law be fully based on the proportional representation system, arguing that Hizbullah's weapons would prevents serious competition in the party's strongholds, the Democratic Gathering led by MP Walid Jumblat has totally rejected proportional representation, even within a hybrid law, warning that it would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah, Mustaqbal, the Free Patriotic Movement, AMAL Movement and the Lebanese Forces are meanwhile discussing several formats of a so-called hybrid electoral law that mixes proportional representation with the winner-takes-all system. The country has not organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature has instead twice extended its own mandate.
 The last polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next vote is scheduled for May.
 
Bassil Replies to Franjieh's Remarks on Electoral Law
Naharnet/February 03/17/Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil replied on Friday to comments made by Marada Movement chief MP Suleiman Franjieh, over an electoral law debated among the main political parties, and said “they must find someone among them who understands numbers.”“I realize that some cannot understand figures. Let them find someone among them who does, so he would explain the suggestions we made,” said head of the Free Patriotic Movement Bassil. On Thursday, Franjieh described as “complicated” a hybrid law that was discussed by a four-party panel comprised of the Free Patriotic Movement, al-Mustaqbal Movement, Hizbullah and AMAL parties. “The law is as complicated as the ones who endorsed it,” said Franjieh after meeting a delegation from the Democratic Gathering bloc of MP Walid Jumblat. Franjieh had assured that he backs laws that garner the approval of all political parties, and rejects “complicated laws tailored to the interests of specific sides.”The main political parties are discussing several formats of the so-called hybrid law but the Progressive Socialist Party has raised the alarm over the representation of the minority Druze community, warning that any law containing proportional representation would “marginalize” Druze in the political system.
 
Report: Opposition Front Growing to Confront 'Marginalization Practices'
Naharnet/February 03/17/Efforts to form an opposition front comprised of political parties and independent figures is about to be formed to confront and reject the “marginalization and policy of exclusions” practiced by some parties, al-Joumhouria daily reported on Friday.
The so-called opposition parties, plan to object against what they described as the “divisive formats of districts and random classification of parliamentary seats,” they told the daily on condition of anonymity. They were referring to the latest discussions of a four-party panel studying a hybrid electoral law for the upcoming parliamentary polls that raised objection among various political parties.
They raised concerns that some (unnamed) sides have hidden intentions of marginalizing others and of planning to do so through an electoral parliamentary law that meets their own interests. Lashing out at the hybrid electoral law, they said concerns were raised when some “dual parties” showed willingness to impose a “lame, sectarian, territorial law that only represents specific political forces.” “The matter pushed us to raise our voices and stand against it because no one can eliminate another in Lebanon. This is not only a slogan but a right of ours. What some are suggesting, harms the country's future, stability and the safety and rights of Lebanese citizens,” they added. The sources pointed out that PSP leader Walid Jumblat was not the only one to reject the approach, saying “all parties who were threatened by marginalization are included. A Positive point in our favor is that the two Shiite parties also categorically reject annulment formats,” in addition to Christian partisans outside the said “duality.”“Everybody knows that what is happening is not only an exclusion attempt but it is a real coup intended to seize control through the parliamentary elections and control the government as well,” they concluded. A four-party panel comprised of Hizbullah, al-Mustaqbal Movement, AMAL and the Free Patriotic Movements are discussing several formats of the so-called hybrid law but the Progressive Socialist Party has raised the alarm over the representation of the minority Druze community, warning that any law containing proportional representation would “marginalize” Druze in the political system. Other political parties including the Kataeb and Marada have voiced rejection of the law.
 
4 Workers Hurt in Blast at Metal Workshop in Taanayel
 Naharnet/February 03/17/Four workers were injured Friday in a blast inside a metal workshop in the Bekaa town of Taanayel, state-run National News Agency reported. The explosion, in the workshop owned by a man from the al-Oraibi family, wounded three Syrian workers and a Bangladeshi employee, NNA said. “They were all rushed in civilian cars to hospitals in the region before the arrival of ambulances,” the agency added.Civil Defense firefighters have since managed to douse the blaze that was sparked by the blast.
 
Tashnag Delegation Meets Geagea, Calls for 'Forgetting' 1960 Electoral Law
Naharnet/February 03/17/A Tashnag Party delegation held talks Friday in Maarab with Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea, after which it stressed the need to pass a “fair and modern electoral law.”“We emphasized the need to hold the elections within the constitutional timeframe while ensuring correct representation for all political forces, confessions and sects,” Tashnag MP Hagop Pakradounian said after the meeting. “Accordingly, we and the LF share the viewpoint that efforts should be intensified ahead of the February 21 deadline in order to reach a fair and modern electoral law,” he added. “We must forget the 1960 law... so that we leave a modern law for the coming generations and so that, as Christians, we feel represented in this State, not according to our numbers but rather according to our existential and real strength as founders of this entity and country,” Pakradounian added. He also said that that “there are some reservations regarding the hybrid electoral law.”Asked whether Tashnag will ally with the LF in the elections, Pakradounian said his party supports the rising LF-Free Patriotic Movement alliance and “feels to be in the heart of this new equation that led to the election of General Michel Aoun as president.”“We have stressed the need for Christian unity throughout our political history and today we're witnessing the completion of an essential part of this unity and we want all other Christian and national forces to take part in this endeavor,” Pakradounian added. The LF, the FPM, Hizbullah, al-Mustaqbal Movement and AMAL Movement are discussing several formats of a so-called hybrid electoral law that mixes proportional representation with the winner-takes-all system. The country has not organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature has instead twice extended its own mandate.The last polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next vote is scheduled for May.
 
U.N. Refugee Chief Meets Hariri, Vows 'Full Support' for Lebanon
Naharnet/February 03/17/Prime Minister Saad Hariri held talks Friday at the Center House U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi, in the presence of State Minister for Refugee Affairs Mouein al-Merehbi, UNHCR representative in Lebanon Ninette Kelly and Hariri’s adviser for refugee affairs Nadim Mounla. We reviewed the situation of the Syrian refugees in the country that, in percentage terms, hosts the highest concentration of refugees in the world. I expressed to the Prime Minister once again our full support for the role that Lebanon played and continues to play in hosting hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugees,” Grandi said after the talks. “I agreed with the Prime Minister that it is important to continue to call on the international community for more resources to be given to Lebanon, to its institutions that provide services like education and health and to the economy of Lebanon, so that both the Lebanese and the refugees can benefit from more opportunities,” he added. Grandi noted the upcoming conference in Brussels, called for by the European Union and attended by many others, will be “a very good opportunity to reiterate the importance of supporting host countries and in particular Lebanon.” “My message here is one of extreme gratitude for a country that, alone, at a time when refugees are under pressure all over the world, has been so generous of its resources, space and energy to host millions of people for so many years,” Grandi added.
 
Report: Kataeb, Mustaqbal Discuss Ties, New Electoral Law Format
Naharnet/February 03/17/A meeting between a Kataeb Party delegation and al-Mustaqbal Movement official at the Grand Serail on Thursday, came as part of a series of meetings held by Kataeb with officials to tackle the controversial electoral law. The meeting comes in light of talks that a new electoral law format has surfaced and will be put for discussion, after the failure of a hybrid law proposal that was reportedly suggested by Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil. The delegation comprised of Kataeb chief adviser Michel Khoury and politburo member Albert Kostanian held talks PM Saad Hariri's aide, Nader Hariri, said al-Joumhouria daily on Friday. A closed meeting was first held between Khoury and Hariri where discussions focused on the ties between the two parties, added the daily. Talks have later focused on the election law that will govern the upcoming polls. Hariri informed the delegation that a new format for the electoral law has been put for discussion. He said the format is based on a hybrid electoral law where 75 MPs would be elected under the winner-takes-all system in districts, while 53 MPs would be elected under a proportional representation system. Reports have said the law was suggested by Hizbullah party. The Kataeb Party had earlier (Wednesday) held talks with the Lebanese Forces chief Samir Gegaea. Talks have focused on the bilateral relations between the two parties and the electoral law. The main political parties are discussing several formats of the so-called hybrid law but the Progressive Socialist Party has raised the alarm over the representation of the minority Druze community, warning that any law containing proportional representation would “marginalize” Druze in the political system.
 
Army apprehends 5 Syrians in Ain el Remmaneh
Fri 03 Feb 2017/NNA - Five Syrians who work in a coffee shop were arrested tonight in Ain-el-Remmeneh, following raid operations carried out by the army, National News Agency correspondent reported on Friday.
 
Lebanese Diaspora Energy South Africa's Conference winds up
Fri 03 Feb 2017/NNA - Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil on Friday wrapped up the Lebanese Diaspora Energy Conference in Johannesburg, South Africa, whereby he reiterated the necessity to bolster bilateral ties with this African nation. "We are at your service, whether through contacts with the officials of the countries you are living in or through our diplomatic, political, and material efforts. It is our duty to pave the way for you and to facilitate your affairs," Bassil told the Lebanese expats. "We agreed with the South African Foreign Minister to sign a number of agreements during her coming visit to Lebanon," he revealed. He also indicated that his next meeting with the Lebanese Diaspora would take place in Africa, in February next year. 

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 03-04/17
Louvre attack: Egyptian man, 29, believed to be assailant
BBC/February 03/17
French authorities say they believe the man who tried to attack the Louvre museum in the capital Paris on Friday was a 29-year-old Egyptian man.
Prosecutor Francois Molins said he is thought to have travelled to Paris from Dubai on a tourist visa last month.
Police are trying to establish if the man acted alone or under instructions, he added.
The machete-wielding attacker was critically injured after he was shot by French soldiers in a bid to stop him.
One of the soldiers received minor injuries when the man tried to enter the museum.
At the time of the incident, hundreds of visitors were inside the Louvre, which is home to numerous celebrated art works, including the Mona Lisa.
President Francois Hollande praised the soldiers' actions, saying "this operation prevented an attack whose terrorist nature leaves little doubt".
He told reporters at an EU summit in Malta on Friday that he expected the suspect to be questioned "when it is possible to do so".Prosecutor Molins said the Egyptian man had no identity papers but mobile phone data showed he had arrived in Paris on 26 January after acquiring a one-month tourist visa in Dubai.
However, he cautioned, the authorities have not yet formally established the suspect's identity.
Egyptian security sources though say they have identified him, Reuters news agency reports.
He was believed to have been staying in the capital's 8th district (arrondissement) which was searched in a police raid earlier on Friday.
There, he bought two machetes from a shop selling guns.According to the prosecutor, the attacker, armed with the machetes, approached four soldiers guarding the entrance to crowded shops beneath the Louvre just before 10:00 local time (09:00 GMT).
When the soldiers challenged him, he attacked two of them while shouting in Arabic "Allahu Akbar" ("God is greatest"). One of them shot him at least three times, hitting him in the stomach.
"The attacker fell to the ground, seriously wounded. He has been taken to hospital and is fighting for his life," the prosecutor said.
He was carrying a rucksack which contained paint spray cans - but no explosives.
The guards on patrol outside the museum were just some of the thousands of troops lining the streets as part of the stepped-up response to a series of attacks in France since 2015.
Though still hugely popular, the Louvre has suffered a drop in visitor numbers amid fears of a militant attack. A series of assaults by gunmen and suicide bombers claimed by so-called Islamic State killed 130 people in November 2015.
In January of the same year, 17 people were killed in an attack on the Charlie Hebdo magazine and linked shootings.
Last July, 86 people were killed when a lorry ploughed through crowds celebrating Bastille Day in Nice.
Security has become a theme of the French presidential election in April, which sees far-right leader Marine Le Pen and centrist independent Emmanuel Macron leading the polls.

First Trump-Trudeau meeting expected 'very soon'
Robert Fife/The Globe and Mail/Friday, February 03/2017
A first face-to-face meeting between President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is expected to take place “very soon,” White House press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters Friday.
There were tentative plans for the two leaders to meet on Wednesday, but the shooting at the Quebec City mosque delayed the White House sit-down for at least another week.
“He has spoken to Prime Minister Trudeau, and I know they are looking at setting up a time to come down. We have been in constant contact with Canadian officials, and I think that there will be a meeting that will be set up very shortly,” Mr. Spicer told reporters during his daily press briefing.
Mr. Spicer was also asked about potential border irritants that Mr. Trump could be expected to raise with the Prime Minister but he declined to comment.
The Prime Minister’s Office said a date for the get-together has not been firmed up. Normally, a new President follows the tradition of visiting Canada on his first foreign trip, but both countries prefer the meeting to take place in Washington. A trip by the President to Ottawa would likely result in large protests against Mr. Trump’s immigration policies.
In recent days, Trudeau cabinet ministers have moved quickly to reach out to Mr. Trump’s cabinet secretaries to seek areas of agreement on continental and global issues and to demonstrate Canada’s desire to develop a positive relationship with the new Republican administration.
Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan, who commanded troops in Afghanistan, will drop by the Pentagon on Monday to meet his U.S. counterpart, retired four-star Marine Corps general James Mattis. The two former military commanders are expected to discuss the fight against the Islamic State and what additional responsibilities the Americans might expect of Canada within NATO and the North American Aerospace Defence Command [NORAD].
Mr. Sajjan can be expected to seek guidance on whether the U.S. will continue to stand with Ukraine, given Mr. Trump’s comments about mending relations with Russia. Since Mr. Trump moved into the White House, there has been a surge in violence in Ukraine that is threatening to overturn a ceasefire in the three-year-old conflict.
Canada first deployed about 200 troops to Ukraine in the summer of 2015 to help train government forces after Russia annexed Crimea and began aiding separatist forces in Ukraine’s Donbass region. The mission is set to expire at the end of March, and Ottawa has been non-committal on an extension despite public appeals from the Ukrainian government.
Mr. Saijan will also ask Mr. Mattis what the U.S. thinks of Canada sending up to 600 Canadian peacekeepers to Mali, a deployment now on hold until Ottawa has secured American support. Command of the 13,500-troop UN mission in Mali is now vacant, and the UN has been waiting since December for confirmation that Canada will nominate a general for the post.
On Thursday, Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland spoke by telephone with newly confirmed Secretary of State Rex Tillerson about coming negotiations on the North American free-trade agreement and the importance of keeping the Canada-U.S. border open to trade and travel.
“The two underlined the importance of the Canada-U.S. bilateral relationship, including mutually beneficial trade and economic ties. Both highlighted the progress of recent preclearance measures, as well as the need for a safe and secure border that does not impede the smooth flow of goods and people,” the Department of Foreign Affairs said in an statement. “The Minister and Secretary noted the importance of open channels of communication between Canada and the United States, and the two agreed to meet as soon as possible.”
Ms. Freeland and Mr. Trudeau’s senior advisers have held meetings and phone conversations with key players in the Trump administration, including Commerce Secretary-designate Wilbur Ross, who has been put in charge of U.S. trade policy, as well as Jared Kushner, the President’s son-in-law, and Mr. Trump’s chief adviser Stephen Bannon.
Mr. Ross, a billionaire turnaround specialist, has said every aspect of the North American free-trade agreement will be on the negotiating table, and any final agreement should contain an automatic measure to reopen the deal later to address further issues.
The Americans want to discuss country-of-origin rules and the independent dispute-settlement mechanism that are key features of the 1994 NAFTA pact, officials say. Country-of-origin rules, which govern how much content from outside NAFTA a product can contain and still qualify to be shipped duty-free, are specific to each product and spelled out in writing. They cover every kind of good and service, from suits to cars. The Trump administration is expected to take a harder line on exactly what can cross the border duty-free.
Mr. Trump announced Thursday that he wants to “speed up” renegotiation of NAFTA, promising either a “renovation of NAFTA or a brand-new NAFTA.” The White House must give Congress 90-days notice before formally starting talks with Canada and Mexico.
The Liberal government has yet to receive a formal letter from the White House that would notify Canada of the U.S. plan to renegotiate NAFTA and the key areas up for discussion. Canadian officials have received assurances that Mr. Trump’s focus is largely on the trade imbalance the U.S. has with Mexico.
Aside from NAFTA, Mr. Trudeau is likely to raise the problems that have arisen from Mr. Trump’s sweeping immigration ban on citizens from seven majority Muslim nations, as well as all refugees – including an indefinite halt to the settlement of Syrian refugees in the United States.
 
U.S. Announces New Sanctions on Iran Over Ballistic Missile Test/United States lists 13 individuals and 12 entities.
Amir Tibon/Haaretz/ Reuters Feb 03/17 /The United States on Friday sanctioned 13 individuals and 12 entities under U.S. Iran sanctions authority, days after the White House had put Iran "on notice" over a ballistic missile test and other activities. In a statement on its website, the U.S. Treasury listed the sanctioned individuals and entities, some of which are based in the United Arab Emirates, Lebanon and China. The U.S. Treasury said in a statement that the sanctions are part of the Treasury's "ongoing efforts to counter Iranian malign activity abroad" that is outside scope of nuclear deal. Iran carried out a test launch of a medium-range ballistic missile on Sunday which exploded after 630 miles, a U.S. official said on Monday. U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters on Thursday that "nothing is off the table" in terms of a response to Iran's ballistic missile test. Trump made the comment in response to a question about whether he would consider military options to respond to Iran. A bipartisan group of senators sent a letter to Trump on Thursday expressing support for his administration's plans to place new sanctions on Iran in light of its ballistic missile experiment conducted over the weekend. In the letter, the senators wrote they were "concerned by reports that Iran conducted a ballistic missile test," adding that "[i]f it is confirmed, Iran will have again violated both the letter and the spirit of its obligations under UN Security Council Resolution 2231 not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology."The accusation that Iran violated the nuclear accord was also made by Trump's National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. At a White House press briefing earlier this week, Flynn said Iran was "officially on notice," and that the Trump administration was going to tackle Iran's destabilizing behavior throughout the Middle East. The Russian government, however, put out a statement saying it did not consider Iran's test a violation of the resolution.
 
Gulf Police, Interpol Cooperation Bolstered by Signing MoU
Asharq Al-Awsat/February 03/2017 /Lyon- The Gulf Police and Interpol have reinforced collaboration by officially signing a memorandum of understanding that stipulates developing cooperation and coordination in the field of police work, the fight against terrorism, organized crime and cyber security. The signing took place based on the decision of interior ministers of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). GCC General Secretariat Dr. Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani and Secretary-General Jurgen Stock co-signed the memorandum in France’s city Lyon. Many officials attended the signing, such as first chairman of the proposed GCC police force Mubarak Al-Khaili. The memorandum promotes mutual cooperation with respect to organization, holding seminars and joint conferences, and the development of training drills. Further establishing of supportive skill sets in addition to holding fruitful consultations and enhancing the effectiveness of joint cooperation have been incorporated to the agreement. Zayani expressed deep appreciation for great efforts invested by the Interpol internationally, combating all forms of crime and facilitating cooperation between police forces worldwide, enabling them to face the security challenges on both national and international levels. He also considered the signing of the memorandum a crucial step for joint cooperation that would allow for Gulf Police forces to benefit from Interpol experience. For his part, Interpol’s Secretary General highlighted the importance of such a memorandum, particularly on encouraging cooperation and coordination between the GCC and the international police organization in the fight against crime. He pointed to the willingness of the organization to save no effort in sharing experience and knowledge with the Gulf Police.

US sends Navy destroyer to Yemen
Reuters, Washington Friday, 3 February 2017/The United States has placed a Navy destroyer off the coast of Yemen to protect waterways from Houthi militia aligned with Iran, two US officials said on Friday, amid heightened tension between Washington and Tehran. The USS Cole arrived in the vicinity of the Bab al-Mandab Strait off southwestern Yemen where it will carry out patrols including escorting vessels, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Earlier this week the armed Houthi movement attacked a Saudi warship off the western coast of Yemen, causing an explosion that killed two crew members.

More than 100,000 visas revoked amid Trump travel ban
Reuters, Washington Friday, 3 February 2017/More than 100,000 visas have been revoked in the wake of the Trump administrations recent travel ban on citizens of seven mainly Muslim countries, according to media reports on Friday. The Washington Post reported the figure, citing a government attorney at a federal court hearing in Virginia. NBC News' Washington affiliate also reported the number from the hearing.

Jubeir demands international reaction to address Iran’s interference in region

Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Friday, 3 February 2017/Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir appealed on Thursday during a meeting in New York with António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations, for the international community to address Iran’s interference in the affairs of other countries in the region, especially in Yemen. Jubeir said that Tehran is providing weapons for the militias which is a clear violation of UN Security Council resolutions. Ahead of his visit to New York, Jubeir met in Washington with a number of senior officials in the new US administration to discuss ways of cooperation on how to address the challenges in the region. On Thursday, the UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs had summoned the Chargé d’affaires at the Iranian embassy in Abu Dhabi and handed him a protest note regarding Tehran’s assistance to the Houthi militias in Yemen, which is a violation of Security Council resolutions prohibiting it.

UN sees western Mosul assault driving out 250,000 civilians
Reuters, Geneva Friday, 3 February 2017/A renewed assault on ISIS militants in the Iraqi city of Mosul could force 250,000 civilians to flee, if they can find a way out, the UN refugee agency UNHCR said on Friday. Such an exodus would be on top of roughly 162,000 people already displaced by Iraqi government efforts to retake the city since October. Such numbers, although high, remain well below UNHCR's initial contingency plans, which anticipated a million people or more fleeing from the city. “As many as 250,000 Iraqis could be displaced from their homes with the anticipated escalation of conflict in densely-populated western Mosul,” UNHCR spokesman Matthew Saltmarsh said. An expected intensification of fighting around Hawija, 130 km southeast of Mosul, could displace another 114,000, adding to the 82,000 who have fled since August, risking ambushes and death. In Iraq's biggest military operation since the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003, government forces have seized most of east Mosul. But they have yet to cross the Tigris river, leaving the western half in the hands of the jihadists, who declared a caliphate there two-and-a-half years ago. UN Special Representative for Iraq Jan Kubis told the UN Security Council on Thursday that retaking western Mosul would be a massive challenge, with complex urban operations.
“There is no question that civilians will be at extreme risk when the fighting starts in the western sections of Mosul,” he said. “Humanitarian partners are bracing for a variety of possible scenarios in the western sections, including a possible mass exodus, prolonged siege-like conditions, or a sequenced and managed evacuation by the Iraqi Security Forces.”He praised Iraqi forces, including the Popular Mobilization Forces, for prioritizing the protection of civilians after learning from mistakes in previous battles to wrest control of cities from ISIS.
“I however express my concern over disturbing reports of looting and destruction of civilian property, and looting of humanitarian aid by armed groups operating in support of the Iraqi Security Forces, in particular by some local resistance groups.”Hundreds of civilians allegedly disappeared in a previous battle, for the city of Fallujah, and the Iraqi authorities have still not published heir findings into what happened there, he said.

Yemen: al-Qaeda spreads again in three towns of Abyan province
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Friday, 3 February 2017/A Yemeni official and tribal sources said that fighters of al-Qaeda fighters have taken control again in three towns in the Abyan province south of the country. The security official said that the withdrawal of the security forces from these areas was a protest following the delayed payment of salaries, which facilitated the entry of fighters into Lauder, Shukrah and Aked areas in Abyan. The official added that the security forces are suffering from a shortage of resources, especially weapons, to confront the enemies. Sources said that al-Qaeda fighters set up checkpoints on the streets in Lauder and blew up two security buildings using explosives. This comes as warships, believed to be American, bombed strongholds of al-Qaeda in the mountainous area south of the country. The source confirmed that the ships fired several missiles towards al-Marakichah mountain where al-Qaeda elements are stationed. The strikes come less than a week after a secret raid carried out by the US Navy special operations in southern Yemen in the framework of a fierce campaign against one of the most active branches of al-Qaeda.

Iran Announces 'Reciprocal Action' to U.S. Sanctions
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 03/17/Iran announced it will take "reciprocal action" against U.S. individuals and companies after President Donald Trump's administration on Friday imposed new sanctions on Tehran over its weapons procurement network."In response to the new move by the United States of America and as a reciprocal action, (Iran) will impose legal limitations for some American individuals and companies that have had a role in the creation and support of extreme terrorist groups in the region," the foreign ministry said in a statement. The fresh U.S. measures were in response to Iran's latest ballistic missile test and its support for Shiite Huthi rebels in Yemen who in the past week targeted a Saudi warship, U.S. officials said. Iran last Sunday test-fired a medium range missile, which the White House contends violated a U.N. Security Council resolution proscribing missiles that could carry a nuclear device. The Islamic republic has confirmed it tested a ballistic missile but denied it was a breach of a 2015 nuclear deal with world powers or U.N. resolutions. "The action was in line with boosting Iran's defense power and is not in contradiction with the JCPOA (the nuclear deal) or (Security Council) Resolution 2231," said Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan. Tehran says its missiles do not breach U.N. resolutions because they are for defence purposes only and are not designed to carry nuclear warheads. Iran, which accuses Washington and Arab allies in the Gulf of supporting radical Sunni Islamists in the Syrian conflict, has missiles with a range of up to 2,000 kilometers (1,250 miles), enough to reach Israel and U.S. bases in the region.
 
UNHCR chief says safe zones would not work in Syria
Fri 03 Feb 2017 /NNA - The head of the United Nations refugee agency said on Friday that safe zones would not work inside Syria for people fleeing the country's nearly six-year-old war. U.S. President Donald Trump said last week he would "absolutely do safe zones in Syria" for refugees escaping violence and that Europe had made a mistake by admitting millions of refugees. "Frankly, I don't see in Syria the conditions" to create successful safe zones, U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi said at a news conference in Beirut. "With the fragmentation, the number of actors, the presence of terrorist groups, it's not the right place to think of that solution," he added. In a meeting with Grandi on Friday, Lebanese President Michel Aoun said earlier that world powers must work with the Damascus government to create safe zones in Syria so refugees can return to their country. At least a million Syrians have fled since 2011 into Lebanon, which has an estimated total population of less than six million. The war has divided Syria into a patchwork of areas controlled by President Bashar al-Assad, various rebel groups fighting to unseat him, Kurdish militia and Islamic State militants. According to a document seen by Reuters, Trump is expected to order the Pentagon and the State Department to craft a plan for the safe zones, a move that could ratchet up U.S. military involvement in Syria. Trump has not provided details about the proposed zones, except to say he would have the Gulf states pay for them. Policing them could prove difficult in a war zone dotted with armed groups. The U.N. refugee chief, who had just completed a visit to Syria, said his agency had not been approached about the plans and there were no details on what would constitute a safe zone or how it would be enforced.
 "Let's not waste time planning safe zones that will not be set up because they will not be safe enough for people to go back," Grandi said. "Let's concentrate on making peace so that everything becomes safe. That should be the investment." The Syrian government said on Monday that any attempt to create so-called safe zones for refugees without coordinating with Damascus would be "unsafe" and violate Syria's sovereignty. Rebel backers including Qatar have welcomed Trump's support for safe zones, and Turkey says it is waiting to see the outcome of the U.S. president's pledge. The conflict has killed hundreds of thousands of people, made more than half of Syrians homeless and created the world's worst refugee crisis.Trump also signed an executive order last week that halted refugee arrivals for four months, barred Syrian refugees indefinitely and temporarily banned citizens from seven mainly Muslim countries, including Syria. The UNHCR estimates that around 20,000 refugees worldwide would be affected by the hold on the U.S. resettlement program, Grandi said. "We are taking exception to discrimination," he said. "All people that are vulnerable, irrespective of their ethnic or religious affiliations, should be given a chance to benefit from this program." ---Reuters
 
Suspected Coalition Raids Cut Water to IS Syria Bastion

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 03/17/Water to the Islamic State group's Syrian bastion of Raqa has been cut after suspected coalition raids on the city's main pipeline, a monitor and activists told AFP on Friday. "After coalition air strikes, the main water line was ruptured and water was cut to all of Raqa city," said Hamoud al-Mousa of the Raqa is Being Slaughtered Silently activist collective. His group said the overnight strikes hit several bridges in the north of Raqa, including one known as the Old Bridge. Mousa said a pipeline running along the Old Bridge into Raqa -- the only way residents could get water -- had been destroyed. "People were heading to the river at dawn today to get water," Mousa told AFP. Raqa, 90 kilometres (less than 60 miles) south of the Turkish border, is IS's de facto capital in Syria and remains home to more than 300,000 people. The city and surrounding province have been battered by air strikes carried out by the US-led coalition fighting IS and by Russia, a key ally of Syria's government. The coalition raids are backing an alliance of Arab and Kurdish fighters who launched a major offensive against Raqa in November. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights confirmed water to Raqa had been cut after "probable" coalition raids. "Air strikes on the city destroyed a huge water pipe. It's almost certain they were coalition raids," said Observatory head Rami Abdel Rahman. The Observatory, which relies on a wide network of sources inside Syria for its information, says it determines whose planes carry out raids according to type, location, flight patterns and munitions used.
 
U.N. Peacekeepers Say Attacked by Mobs in the South
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 03/17/Groups of civilians attacked United Nations peacekeepers on patrol in two incidents in southern Lebanon on Friday, damaging their vehicles but causing no injuries, the mission said in a statement. The U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) said two patrols in the al-Mansouri and Majdal Zoun areas in south Lebanon were obstructed on Friday morning "by groups of aggressive men." "Civilians attempted to block the way of UNIFIL patrols and attacked the peacekeepers," the statement said. "UNIFIL patrol vehicles had to push aside some civilian vehicles used as roadblocks in order to safely pull out from the locations."The statement said no peacekeepers were injured in the incidents, which caused "severe damages" to UNIFIL vehicles. It gave no indication of the reason for the incidents, or any prior tension in the area, and said the mission was in touch with the Lebanese army to determine the cause of the attacks. The 10,000-strong UNIFIL mission monitors the ceasefire line between Lebanon and Israel, which remain technically in a state of war.
  
Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs speaks with United States Secretary of State
February 3, 2017 - Ottawa, Ontario - Global Affairs Canada
 The
Honourable Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Foreign Affairs, spoke yesterday with Rex Tillerson, Secretary of State of the United States of America. The Minister congratulated the Secretary on his appointment. He shared his condolences in light of the recent terrorist attack in the city of Québec.
 The two underlined the importance of the Canada-U.S. bilateral relationship, including mutually beneficial trade and economic ties. Both highlighted the progress of recent pre-clearance measures, as well as the need for a safe and secure border that does not impede the smooth flow of goods and people.
 The Minister and Secretary noted the importance of open channels of communication between Canada and the United States, and the two agreed to meet as soon as possible.
 Quick facts
 Canadians and Americans benefit from a trade and investment relationship valued at more than $1.4 trillion.
 Nearly nine million U.S. jobs depend on trade and investment from Canada.
 Canada is the number one customer for 35 U.S. states. No other country buys more goods made in the U.S. than Canada.
 The U.S. is Canada’s most important security and defence partner. For over 50 years, Canada and the U.S. have worked side by side in NORAD.
 Canada and the U.S. share the longest secure border in the world. Some 400,000 people and over $2 billion in goods and services cross the border every day.
 Canada is currently the leading and most secure supplier of energy products to the U.S., including crude oil, refined petroleum, natural gas, electricity and uranium.
 
 9 Syrian Officials Are Accused of Torture in Spanish Court
By MARLISE SIMONSFEB/TheNew York Times/ 02/ 2017
The case relies in part on post-mortem photographs smuggled out of Syria and displayed at the United Nations headquarters in New York in 2015. Credit Lucas Jackson/Reuters
 International lawyers have filed a criminal complaint against nine Syrian security and intelligence officials in a Spanish court, accusing them of torture and other human rights violations. It is the first case specifically citing members of Syria’s government to be heard in a Western court. The names of the officials have not been made public, because prosecutors hope this will improve their chances of apprehending the officials outside Syria if arrest warrants are issued. The lawyers who filed the complaint on Wednesday said the defendants included senior officers who ran a torture center in Damascus, Syria’s capital, in 2013 and leaders of the Syrian intelligence and security services, who are part of President Bashar al-Assad’s inner circle.
 The court, Spain’s National Court, has previously taken up international human rights cases in Latin America, most notably when it ordered the arrest of the former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet in 1998, while he was visiting London. Mr. Pinochet was kept under house arrest in Britain for 18 months until he was released because of poor health.
 In the Syrian case, the court has received 3,600 pages of evidence, including signed orders, detailing acts of brutality that the lawyers say will link senior Syrian officials to atrocities, torture and executions in government prisons and military-run hospitals.
 But the case will be focused narrowly on the misfortunes of one Syrian man whose sister moved to Spain and became a Spanish citizen. The lawyers argue that her citizenship allows the Madrid court to take the case because she can also be considered a victim.
 Her brother, a van driver who earned a living supplying grocery stores, was 43 when he disappeared in Syria in 2013. He was last seen alive in a military-run prison. Images of his emaciated body, with burn marks, were found among more than 50,000 post-mortem photographs taken by the police and smuggled out of Syria.
Almudena Bernabeu, an international human rights lawyer who is leading the legal team, asked journalists to withhold the names of the victim and his sister to protect his widow, children and other family members who are still in Syria.
The lawyers said they had drawn on many sources, including archives compiled by the Commission for International Justice and Accountability, an independent documentation center based in Europe and funded by several governments.
Criminal cases related to the Syrian conflict are being prepared in several other European countries, including France and Germany. National courts are currently the only legal avenues for such cases. The International Criminal Court has no jurisdiction over Syria because the country is not a member. Russia has blocked efforts by the United Nations Security Council to give the court jurisdiction.
 
Watch! Erdogan tells Merkel not to use term “Islamist terror” and praises Turkish democracy

Vincent van den Born/Gatestone Europe/February 03/2017/On her first visit to Turkey since the failed coup in July, German Chancellor Angela Merkel has voiced her concern about Erdogan’s reaction to the coup, which consisted of mass-arrests and a strengthening of his institutional position. She also said to be worried about the freedom of expression in Turkey: “In such a time of profound political upheaval, everything must be done to continue to protect the separation of powers and, above all, freedom of opinion and the diversity of society. (…) Opposition is part of democracy. We see that with one another every day in democratic states.”In a response, Turkish president Recep Erdogan said that: “First of all, there’s not an ounce of truth to this. There’s a legislative organ; an executive one as well; and a judicial. (…) It is out of the question for the separation of powers to be abolished.“Erdogan then went on to reproach Merkel for mentioning ‘Islamist terror’. Seemingly oblivious, or ignoring the semantic difference, he said that “personally, as a Muslim, as a Muslim president, I can never accept this [term].”Merkel responded by claiming she “would like people in Turkey to know, in any case, that we do not just respect and value Muslims, but we want to work well together and fight this terrible terrorism together.” While she was hesitant in answering Turkey’s call to refuse asylum to suspected Gulen perpetrators of the July coup, she did stress a willingness to fight the PKK: ” “We talked in particular about how the P.K.K., and everything associated with it in Germany, is being observed and how we’re also taking action against it, because as I said, the P.K.K. is, as a terrorist organization, banned in Germany, too.”
 
Former EU-president Van Rompuy: ‘Trump is danger to the world and I saved the EU’

Vincent van den Born/Gatestone Europe/February 03/2017
The former EU-president Herman van Rompuy, being interviewed by Dutch newspaper NRC Handelsblad, said: “Trump is a danger to the world. To the West in general. We are in a storm. We do not agree with the US on China, not on Russia, not on NATO, not on free trade. What áre we in agreement about?“In an interview that reads like a set-up to allow Van Rompuy to voice his opinions, he isn’t challenged once. Asked what his biggest fear is, he answers: “Trump is the Commander-in-Chief of the most powerful army in the world. Obama was a president who allowed himself to be convinced by experts. But if we see a crisis of war shortly, then in Trump we have someone that demonstrably lacks the capacity of listening and taking well-balanced decisions. The risk of accidents is huge.”
This fact-free opinion is followed by the question on how to deal with a leader like Trump, and the answer is revealing: “the anxiety [about Trump] is well founded, but that doesn’t mean you have to isolate [him]. You have to gain traction in his government, where not everyone thinks the same, and in the American Congress. That way there is a chance for ‘damage control‘. Be diplomatic, even if Trump doesn’t make things easy for Europeans.”
There is no explanation of how this would work with a president Van Rompuy just, very diplomatically, described as “[lacking] the capacity of listening and taking well-balanced decisions.”
Instead of pushing him on this point, the NRC changes the topic, allowing Van Rompuy to prove just how far removed from reality he is. Asked if he understands the dissatisfaction with unelected EU bureaucrats by ‘European populists’ with whom Trump is popular, Von Rompuy answers by a scathing attack on national politicians and a defence of his own policies:
“My mission as EU-president was: solve the Greek Crisis, save the Eurozone. I managed to do that. After that, the world changed quickly. Is that the fault of ‘the unelected eurocrats’? The EU member-states themsélves have enough problems with politicians that áre elected. Look at the Netherlands: the distrust for your [political elite] is impressive. And that’s putting it mildly. Look at France, what’s happening there with the rise of Marine Le Pen. The crisis of confidence is spreading in áll Western democracies.”
But what is most frightening about the interview is Van Rompuy’s closing remark:
“I am an optimist and convinced of one thing: even though Trump wants it, the EU will not implode. We have no other choice than the Union.”
There is always another choice. But Van Rompuy represents an elite so closed-minded, that for them no alternative exists. They cannot argue about why the European Union is better than the alternative, because they deny that there is one. There is a danger in closed minds impervious to the fact that the world is dynamic, or that engaging other ideas make your own ones better. And Van Rompuy is that danger’s poster child.

U.S. warns North Korea of 'overwhelming' response if nuclear arms used
SEOUL (Reuters)[February 03/17/ - U.S. President Donald Trump's defense secretary warned North Korea on Friday of an "effective and overwhelming" response if it chose to use nuclear weapons, as he reassured South Korea of steadfast U.S. support.
"Any attack on the United States, or our allies, will be defeated, and any use of nuclear weapons would be met with a response that would be effective and overwhelming," Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said at South Korea's defense ministry, at the end of a two-day visit.
Mattis' remarks come amid concern that North Korea could be readying to test a new ballistic missile, in what could be an early challenge for Trump's administration.
North Korea, which regularly threatens to destroy South Korea and its main ally, the United States, conducted more than 20 missile tests last year, as well as two nuclear tests, in defiance of U.N. resolutions and sanctions.
The North also appears to have also restarted operation of a reactor at its main Yongbyon nuclear facility that produces plutonium that can be used for its nuclear weapons program, according to the U.S. think-tank 38 North.
"North Korea continues to launch missiles, develop its nuclear weapons program and engage in threatening rhetoric and behavior," Mattis said.
North Korea's actions have prompted the United States and South Korea to respond by bolstering defenses, including the expected deployment of a U.S. missile defense system, known as Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), in South Korea later this year.
The two sides reconfirmed that commitment on Friday.
China, however, has objected to THAAD, saying it is a direct threat to China's own security and will do nothing to bring North Korea back to the negotiating table, leading to calls from some South Korean opposition leaders to delay or cancel it.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang reiterated China's opposition, which he said would never change.
"We do not believe this move will be conducive to resolving the Korean peninsula nuclear issue or to maintaining peace and stability on the peninsula," Lu told a daily news briefing in Beijing. South Korean Defense Minister Han Min-koo said Mattis' visit to Seoul - his first trip abroad as defense secretary - sent a clear message of strong U.S. support.
"Faced with a current severe security situation, Secretary Mattis' visit to Korea ... also communicates the strongest warning to North Korea," Han said.
Once fully developed, a North Korean intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) could threaten the continental United States, which is about 9,000 km (5,500 miles) from North Korea. ICBMs have a minimum range of about 5,500 km (3,400 miles), but some are designed to travel 10,000 km (6,200 miles) or more.
Former U.S. officials and other experts have said the United States essentially has two options when it comes to trying to curb North Korea's fast-expanding nuclear and missile programs - negotiate or take military action. Neither path offers certain success and the military option is fraught with huge dangers, especially for Japan and South Korea, U.S. allies in close proximity to North Korea. Mattis is due in Japan later on Friday.
(Additional reporting by Ben Blanchard in Beijing; Editing by Nick Macfie, Robert Birsel)

Trump rattles world leaders as Cabinet tries to soften tone
JOSH LEDERMAN and VIVIAN SALAMA/February 03/17WASHINGTON (AP) — Donald Trump's spats with U.S. allies as close as Mexico and as unlikely as Australia are leaving his new secretary of state and others in his Cabinet to clean up a lot of potential damage. It's a good-cop, bad-cop dynamic that could define America's foreign policy for the next four years.
President Trump's first two weeks on the job have rattled foreign friends and foes alike — and even members of his own party — starting with his order to temporarily halt all refugee admissions as well as immigration from seven mainly-Muslim countries. Concern only escalated the past few days with his personal dust-ups with foreign leaders and declaration that Iran is now "on notice" for possible American action.
"It's time we're going to be a little tough, folks," Trump said at a National Prayer Breakfast on Thursday, as unseemly details circulated about his private phone calls with the Mexican and Australian leaders. "We're taken advantage of by every nation in the world virtually. It's not going to happen anymore."
Trump's blunt comments came a day after word emerged of a tense discussion with Australian Prime Minister Malcom Turnbull, in which the new U.S. president lambasted an Obama-era deal to resettle some 1,600 asylum-seekers.
Diplomatic dysfunction was clear. Minutes after the U.S. Embassy in Canberra said the deal was still on, Trump seemed to contradict that message, tweeting: "I will study this dumb deal!"
On the other side of the globe, new details emerged about strained ties between the U.S. and its southern neighbor. There was already irritation on both sides following Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto's cancellation of a trip to Washington after Trump made the visit contingent on Mexico agreeing to pay for a U.S. border wall.
In a follow-up phone call, Trump warned Pena Nieto that he was ready to send U.S. troops to stop "bad hombres down there" if Mexico's military can't control them, The Associated Press learned. The White House said the comments were made in a "lighthearted" manner. But administration officials described the calls with both leaders as contentious.
Some top aides are underscoring Trump's emphasis on toughness and brawnier U.S. negotiations, dominant themes of his "America First" foreign policy.
At the United Nations, Trump's U.N. ambassador, Nikki Haley, said the U.S. would be "taking names" of countries that "don't have our back." His national security adviser, Michael Flynn, made a surprising appearance at the White House daily briefing to "officially" put Iran "on notice" after its ballistic missile test. Trump topped Flynn Thursday by saying "nothing is off the table" when it comes to a potential American response.
But Trump's top diplomats are striking noticeably softer tones.
Rex Tillerson, in his first day as secretary of state, implicitly acknowledged in an address to staff that many U.S. diplomats oppose some of Trump's positions. Without criticizing that, he called for unity.
"Honesty will undergird our foreign policy, and we'll start by making it the basis of how we interact with each other," Tillerson said. "We are human beings first."
The former Exxon Mobil CEO offered an olive branch to hundreds of diplomats who signed a "dissent cable" challenging Trump's order on immigration and refugees, affirming that "each of us is entitled to the expression of our political beliefs." While noting the nation's "hotly contested" election campaign, Tillerson stressed that "we cannot let out personal convictions overwhelm our ability to work as one team."
Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to project the same sentiment internationally in South Korea on Thursday, in his first official trip abroad. He said the president's message was "about the priority that we place on this alliance between our two nations," seeking to reassure an ally that was unnerved by Trump the candidate when he said it should take on greater self-defense responsibility.
While Trump drives foreign policy from the White House, he appears to be tasking his top Cabinet officials with the responsibility of follow-up reassurance. They're also fielding questions from allies about his taboo-shattering language and trying to clarify the true U.S. positions behind the rhetoric.
Though Tillerson himself lacks experience as a diplomat, he portrayed himself in his Senate confirmation hearing as a levelheaded tactician with foreign policy views within the Republican mainstream. He spent his first day at work meeting with Jordan's King Abdullah II and German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel.
For many of Trump's supporters, each new antagonistic tweet, statement or executive order has been a fresh measure of proof that he intends to shake up a foreign policy establishment they reject and fulfill his promise to put "America first." They argue he is reasserting American strength after the weakness of the Obama administration.
After winning the presidency, Trump quickly ruffled China, a chief American economic and political rival, with a call to the president of Taiwan, breaking longstanding U.S. policy.
Trump's first meeting with a foreign leader, last week with British Prime Minister Theresa May, had been a bright spot in his diplomatic debut. But his immigration order brought thousands of protesters to London's streets labeling her "Theresa the Appeaser." Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson then called Trump's order "divisive, discriminatory and wrong."
Trump's warnings to Iran prompted a more hostile response from Tehran on Thursday.
"It is not for the first time that a naive person from the U.S. poses threats to Iran," said Ali-Akbar Velayati, foreign adviser to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader. According to Iran's state-run IRNA news agency, Velayati said: "The U.S. will be the final loser."
Meanwhile, it fell to Sen. John McCain, a hawkish Republican, to smooth relations with Australia. McCain said he phoned Australia's ambassador to affirm "unwavering support for the U.S.-Australia alliance."

The Latest on President Donald Trump
The Associated Press/February 03/17/Sen. Bernie Sanders says President Donald Trump may be right in claiming he won the general election votes of some former Sanders supporters.
A participant in a White House meeting Thursday says Trump said he got those votes because he and the Vermont independent think some trade treaties have hurt Americans. The participant spoke on condition of anonymity to describe a private meeting.
Sanders was not present. He said in an interview later that many working-class Democrats who backed him in the presidential primaries are "disgusted" with U.S. trade policy and probably voted for Trump. An early November ABC News-Washington Post poll showed 8 percent of Sanders supporters planned to back Trump. 
  
Donald Trump Says 'Iran Is Playing With Fire' After Ballistic Missile Test

NCRI/Friday, 03 February 2017/President Donald Trump has accused Iran of "playing with fire" as part of a diplomatic spat over Iran's latest ballistic missile test.’INDIPENDENT’, reported on February 3, the following is a part of this report:
 Referring to the previous administration of Barack Obama, Mr Trump added that the Iranian government didn't appreciate how "kind" that the US had been to them - a potential reference to the nuclear deal struck with the US and other world powers in 2015 where Iran's nuclear capability was reduced in return for a loosening of sanctions. Mr Trump said that he would not follow a similar path.Tweet: Iran is playing with fire - they don't appreciate how "kind" President Obama was to them. Not me!
 Shortly after My Trump's tweet Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said via the same platform that his country is unmoved by US threats following its missile test launch and Tehran will never initiate war.
 The episode follows a tweet from President Trump a day previously that he had put Iran “on notice” over a the missile test that could be in contravention of a UN resolution. He added that Tehran in that should have been “thankful” for the nuclear deal as the country was on “its last legs”.The warnings appear as an early manifestation of Mr Trump's promise of a tougher American approach to Iran, but the Thursday tweet received an angry response in Tehran - which may have prompted the latest outburst.
 The missile test occurred at a well-known site outside Semnan, about 140 miles east of Tehran. The Khorramshahr medium-range ballistic missile flew 600 miles before exploding, in a failed test of a reentry vehicle, US officials said.
 The warning from the US could foreshadow more aggressive economic and diplomatic measures against Iran.
 Three senior US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters a range of options, including economic sanctions, were being considered and that a broad review was being conducted of the US posture toward Iran.
 “We are in the process of evaluating the strategic options and the framework for how we want to approach these issues,” the official said. “We do not want to be premature or rash or take any action that would foreclose options or unnecessarily contribute to a negative response.“Our sincere hope is that the Iranians will heed this notice today and will change their behavior.”Iran has test-fired several ballistic missiles since the nuclear deal in 2015, but the latest test was the first since Mr Trump became President.
 
US New Sanctions on Iran Regime Targets 13 Individuals 12 Entities
NCRI/Friday, 03 February 2017 /The US has imposed new sanctions against Iran Regime as President Donald Trump has sought to punish Tehran for testing its ballistic missile program. The Treasury Department said in a statement that they have published a list of 13 people and 12 entities facing new sanctions. The sanctions will freeze any property or funds they may have under U.S. jurisdiction. The Treasury Department also said that "U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions" with those on the sanctions list. According to a statement published on Friday on the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) website. Five of the entities are based in Iran, four are based in Lebanon, one is based in the United Arab Emirates and two are based in China. The sanction list includes engineering, logistics and chemical equipment companies. Acting OFAC Director John Smith said the United States will continue to roll out sanctions if Iran keeps pursuing its ballistic missile program. "This action reflects the United States’ commitment to enforcing sanctions on Iran with respect to its ballistic missile program and destabilizing activities in the region and is fully consistent with the United States’ commitments under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action," the statement said. Trump signaled the sanctions with an early morning tweet: "Iran is playing with fire - they don't appreciate how "kind" President Obama was to them. Not me!" Speaker Paul D. Ryan said the “swift and decisive response proves that our new administration is serious about holding the Iranian regime accountable for its illicit behavior.”“Iran’s latest ballistic missile test was a flagrant violation of U.N. Security Council resolutions,” the Wisconsin Republican said. “I applaud President Trump for imposing new sanctions to crack down on Tehran’s dangerous ballistic missile program and support for terrorism across the globe.”House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce, California Republican, said Iran’s action poses “a direct threat to the United States and our allies.” “I’m glad the administration is taking long-overdue steps to hold the regime accountable,” Mr. Royce said. “I look forward to working with the administration to build on these designations, push back against Iran’s destructive policies, and promote stability in the Middle East.”
 
Iran: Smuggling Contrabands by IRGC and Custom Office
NCRI/Friday, 03 February 2017/On February 1st 2017, the state-run Resalat Newspaper has a headline about the confessions of the Minister of Economic Affairs and Finance in the Parliament of Iran. The news reads: “the reports of the Iran's Central Task Force to Combat the Smuggling of Commodities and Currency shows that the majority of contrabands i.e. 70 percent of those are imported into the country from the official ports under customs supervision."
The newspaper writes: “the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance attended the Parliament and stipulated that trafficking, as well as excessive imports, could be a serious threat to the production and employment condition of the country."
According to the state-run news agency IRNA, the President of the Iranian regime, Hassan Rouhani on 13th of February 2016 had a conflict with the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) and implicitly accused this organ of corruption and smuggling in Iran without naming it. He stated: “when the production is going to increase, a factor of corruption and smuggling does not allow the process in Iran. It actually impedes the improvement and prosperity in the country." Rouhani in an implicit remark to IRGC slammed this organization for corruption in the country. In such circumstances, the commodities are smuggled into the country to an amount of 25 billion dollars annually. It is surprising that some authorities of the Iranian regime have announced that this figure even reaches to 30 billion dollars in a year. More than 90 percent of cell phones are smuggled into the country i.e. 1 million and 300 thousand mobiles. Nearly all clothes are imported and 500 million square meters of fabrics are smuggled into the country as well. In Health and Beauty section, more than 2 billion and 600 million dollars products are smuggled into the country in which most of them are fake.The sheer volume of trafficking shows that smuggling has been fully established in government organs and it is controlled by the organs affiliated with IRGC.
 
IRAN: Police Officer Arrested for Revealing Tehran Plasco Fire Casualty
NCRI/Friday, 03 February 2017/ The authorities in Iran have arrested a police officer for revealing the number of missing persons in the collapse of Tehran’s 17 story Plasco Building after a fire on 19 January 2017. The police officer at Bahrestan Police Station in Tehran had been arrested for revealing the number of casualties of the disastrous fire in Tehran, according to the reports received from Tehran. Quoting a police officer at Bahrestan Police Station, state-run news outlets in Iran had reported on 24 January 2017 that some 200 have been reported on missing persons in Plasco fire. The reports quoted the officer as saying: “We have been very busy since morning. To be honest with you some 200 person have come to us up to know and declared someone missing in the fire. What a disaster has become. It is unbelievable that that many people have been trapped in the rubles… and no one knows about it.”The authorities of the Iranian regime are not providing true figures on the number of those missing or killed during the fire that shocked Tehran residents.
The ruling regime and specifically the mullahs' supreme leader Ali Khamenei are responsible for the harrowing deaths of all the people who got stuck under the rubbles. Khamenei and his criminal regime have given absolute priority to the repressive apparatus at home and allocated exorbitant sums to export of terrorism and war to the Middle East, particularly to Syria, while Iranian cities are deeply vulnerable to such incidents and the urban aid services are powerless and held in primitive state.

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 03-04/17
Christian Lives in Syria Matter /  الأخطار الوجودية التي تواجه المسيحيين في سوريا
Carlo Jose Vicente Caro/Huffington Post’s Contributor platfor/February 03/17
 http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/02/03/carlo-jose-vicente-carohuffington-christian-lives-in-syria-matter%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%AE%D8%B7%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%88%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%8A-%D8%AA%D9%88/
 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/christian-lives-in-syria-matter_us_58941bc3e4b061551b3dfd4a
 I was raised a Roman Catholic and yet I decided to write this not because of my faith but rather because it seemed logical for me to do so.
 I have lived in three different continents, and as a result I have been immersed in different cultures and with people from all kinds of national origins. This has taught me to tolerate other religions or traditions, that might seem strange to others, while appreciating the diversity and richness of humanity and human nature.
 And yet I feel a duty to focus on Christians in Syria, not because they are Christians like I am, but because the context of their situation makes me want to raise my voice for them.
 Despite my personal views on President Trump, I do not agree with the temporary ban on citizens from 7 Islamic nations nor do I believe it is a productive counter-terrorism strategy. It was also poorly planned and executed.
 However, I disagree with criticism against President Trump for prioritizing Christian refugees. I disagree with the argument that refugees should be treated the same, and it was wrong to give priority to this religious group. In fact and in a way, the spirit of “Black Lives Matter” actually applies to the “Lives of Christians” in Syria.
 As someone who has been studying security problems in the Middle East since 2014 in academia, it is clear that it is necessary to prioritise Christians and other oppressed minorities like Yazidis for example. My argument stems from the fact that they lack protection, recognition, and even further funding.
 The war in Syria is highly sectarian, and so a few years ago the Vice Minister of Justice of Kuwait openly called on people in his country to support Jihad in Syria. But by doing so he was calling on Sunnis to support and fight for Sunnis there. Iran has supported the Alawite regime of Assad which is Shia, and Shiite militias like Hezbollah support and claim to protect Shia populations in that country (and in Iraq).
 Now the vast majority of militant groups in the opposition are Sunni and while they coerce the Sunni population, which makes up the majority of the country, and they enforce their own literalist interpretation of religion on them (especially the Islamists) they do not look upon the population as infidels, and they claim that they are there to defend them.
 As a result one cannot ignore the religious dimensions of the conflict and why a foreigner would travel hundreds of miles, claiming he is there to prevent another Battle of Karbala; or to defend the tomb of a Shia saint; or to fight for a village of Sunnis facing extermination from Shiite regime forces.
 And so Iran funds the Shiite militias, the Gulf monarchies fund Sunni groups (from the Free Syrian Army to al-Nusra to Ahrar al Sham), the U.S funds a variety of different groups, but who helps the Christians outside Syria?
 The disappointing but real answer is that no external force actually provides them adequate help. Even the Kurds who are said to have no friends but the mountains, are helped by the U.S. The Christians in Syria, unlike those in Lebanon, have failed to form sophisticated militias, and those outside regime control have had no one to depend on.
 This is made all the worse when their only alternative is then to join regime forces, and they are accused of being part of the “Shabiha”; thugs of Assad. While Assad’s Syria was always secular and in it he respected their rights, it is not true that Christians are blind followers of the regime. The problem is that in such conditions, when they have no allies, and when mountains do not even offer them shelter, then they have no other alternative.
 After the start of the “Syrian Revolution”, Christians quickly began to see their place in society disappear. With the rise of ISIS, and the influx of other Islamist groups that had unlimited budgets from oil-rich nations and were therefore able to dominate both battlefield alliances and the governance of population centers, then Christians living outside regime control saw their rights, properties, and possessions taken away.
 American Herald Tribune
 Free Syrian Army militant mocking sacked Christian symbols.

 While Christians are part of People of the Book, you cannot expect armed groups full of thugs with AK-47s to be religious scholars. Other Christians who happened to be more fortunate were forced to pay protection taxes by many of the armed groups or forced to renounce their religion and convert. Those who did not renounce their religion were executed. Women were raped or sold into slavery.
 This is not to say that atrocities are not committed against Sunnis or Shiites but one can argue there has been more leniency towards them and they have had many more power structures to depend upon for their defense.
 The U.S accepted 12,587 refugees from Syria in 2016 and only 0.5 percent were Christians. Of course in a country that is overwhelmingly Sunni then there will be more Muslims displaced and seeking refuge than Christians which represent around 5.2 to 10 percent of the population, depending on estimates.
 But this is beside the point: the importance here is that Christians in Syria who fell prey to chaos and anarchy since 2011 have not had thousands of strong armed men traveling from abroad claiming to defend them or nations prepared to risk their own national security or a geopolitical confrontation for their sake.
 Alas, it’s not 1827 or 1860 anymore when the European powers intervened to protect Greek Christians and then Maronite Christians in the Ottoman Empire. And neither do I call for such actions.
 All I ask is for people to take the situation of Christians in Syria objectively, and despite your criticism of the current government in Washington D.C, to understand that President Trump was not wrong when he advocated that we give more attention to the plight of Christians in Syria.

 المسيحيون في تركيا يعتدى عليهم ويرحلون ويعتبرون خطراً على الأمن القومي
Christians In Turkey: Attacked, Deported And Seen As A 'Threat Against National Security'

James Macintyre/Christian Today/February 02/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/02/02/christians-in-turkey-attacked-deported-and-seen-as-a-threat-against-national-security%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%AD%D9%8A%D9%88%D9%86-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%AA%D8%B1%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%A7-%D9%8A%D8%B9/
Churches face serious terror threats in Turkey, where hate speech against Christians in social and conventional media has increased and Church figures are being deported, according to the country's Association of Protestant Churches.
The findings come in a Human Rights Violations report for 2016, which especially highlighted hate speech incidents around Christmas and New Year's Eve, conveyed through billboard advertisements, posters, leaflets, and online.
According to the report, Protestant religious officials have been handled by the government as a "threat against national security" and some have been deported.
Anteb church leader Patric Jansen was not allowed to enter Turkey on August 26, 2016 because he was regarded by officials as a "threat against national security".
Andrew Craig Brunson, the leader of İzmir Resurrection Church, was detained to be deported and kept in a repatriation centre for 64 days. His request to leave the country voluntarily was denied and was again arrested on December 9.
Ryan Keating, who is affiliated with the Ankara Salvation Church, was leaving Turkey on October 8, 2016 to attend a conference abroad when he was informed at the airport that his residence permit was cancelled and that he posed a "threat against national security". He was told he would not be able to return to Turkey.
The report also charts a number of other persecution incidents, including an amateur theatrical act on a street in the Nazilli district of the western province of Aydın, in which a group of traditionally costumed men were recorded holding another man dressed as Santa Claus at gunpoint on December 28, 2016.
It further covers multiple protests and attacks against Protestants in Turkey, including on February 25 when a group broke the surveillance camera of Samsun Protestant church and tried to enter; on March 31 when police tightened security around all churches and Protestant institutions in Turkey, especially the Protestant church in Ankara and Radio Shema because of potential terrorist threats; and on November 22 when the pastor of the Protestant church in Çanakkale was threatened over the phone.
Around 98 per cent of Turkey's population is Muslim.

بامكان ترامب حماية الأميركيين ومساعدة المسيحيين المضطهدين في نفس الوقت
How Trump Can Help Persecuted Christians and Protect Americans with One Move/
Raymond Ibrahim/February 03/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/02/03/raymond-ibrahim-how-trump-can-help-persecuted-christians-and-protect-americans-with-one-move%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%83%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A8-%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7/
During a recent interview on CBN, President Trump was asked if he thinks America should prioritize persecuted Christians as refugees. He responded:
Yes. Yes, they’ve been horribly treated. If you were a Christian in Syria it was impossible, or at least very, very tough, to get into the United States. If you were a Muslim you could come in, but if you were a Christian, it was almost impossible and the reason that was so unfair — everybody was persecuted, in all fairness — but they were chopping off the heads of everybody but more so the Christians. And I thought it was very, very unfair. So we are going to help them.
Trumps response is far different from that given by Barrack Hussein Obama back in November 2015. Then, as president, he described the idea of giving preference to Christian refugees as “shameful”: “That’s not American. That’s not who we are. We don’t have religious tests to our compassion,” he had added.
While Obama was making such lofty admonishments, his administration was quietly discriminating against Mideast Christians in a myriad of ways—including, as Trump pointed out above, by very obviously favoring Muslim refugees over Christian ones. Indeed, despite the U.S. government’s own acknowledgement that ISIS was committing genocide against Syrian Christians—and not against fellow Sunni Muslims—the Obama administration took in 5,435 Muslims, almost all of whom were Sunni, but only 28 Christians. Considering that Christians are 10 percent of Syria’s population, to be merely on an equal ratio with Muslims entering America, at least 500 Christians should’ve been granted asylum, not 28.
But questions of equal numbers aside, the idea of prioritizing Christian refugees over Muslims (which I argued for back in 2015) is not only more humane; it brings benefits to America as well.
Consider:
Unlike Muslims, Christian minorities are being singled out and persecuted simply because of their despised religious identity. From a humanitarian point of view—and humanitarianism is the reason being cited for accepting millions of refugees—Christians should receive top priority simply because they are the most persecuted group in the Middle East. Even before the Islamic State was formed, Christians were, and continue to be, targeted by Muslims in general—Muslim individuals, Muslim mobs, and Muslim regimes, from Muslim countries of all races (Arab, African, Asian)—and for the same reason: Christians are infidel number one. (See Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians for hundreds of anecdotes before the rise of ISIS as well as the Muslim doctrines that create such hate for Christians.)
Conversely, Muslim refugees—as opposed to the many ISIS and other jihadi sympathizers posing as “refugees”—are not fleeing religious persecution (as mentioned, 99% of Muslim refugees accepted into the U.S. are, like ISIS, Sunnis), but chaos created by the violent and supremacist teachings of their own religion. Hence why when large numbers of Muslims enter Western nations—in Germany, Sweden, France, the UK—tension, crimes, rapes, and terrorism soar.
Indeed, what more proof is needed than the fact that so-called Muslim “refugees” are throwing Christians overboard during their boat voyages across the Mediterranean to Europe? Or that Muslim majority refugee centers in Europe are essentially microcosms of Muslim majority nations: there, Christian minorities continue to be persecuted. One report found that 88% of the 231 Christian refugees interviewed in Germany have suffered religiously motivated persecution in the form of insults, death threats, and sexual assaults. Some were pressured to convert to Islam. “I really didn’t know that after coming to Germany I would be harassed because of my faith in the very same way as back in Iran,” one Christian refugee said.
Is persecuting religious minorities the behavior of people who are in need of refugee status in America? Or is this behavior yet another reminder that it is non-Muslims from the Middle East who are truly in need of sanctuary?
The U.S. should further prioritize Christian refugees because U.S. foreign policies are directly responsible for exacerbating their persecution. Christians did not flee from Bashar Assad’s Syria, or Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, or Muamar Gaddafi’s Libya. Their systematic persecution—to the point of genocide—began only after the U.S. interfered in those nations under the pretext of “democracy.” All that these policies did is unleash the jihadi forces that the dictators had long kept suppressed. Now the Islamic State is deeply embedded in precisely all three nations, enslaving, raping, and slaughtering Christians and other minorities.
Surely if U.S. policies were responsible for unleashing the full-blown jihad on Christians, the least humanitarian America can do is prioritize Christians as refugees? In fact, and as Trump pointed out during his CBN interview, it’s the opposite: According to one report, from May 1 to May 23 alone, 499 Syrian refugees were received into the U.S, 99% of them Sunnis. Zero Christians were admitted.
Questions of fairness and humanitarianism aside, there are also benefits in absorbing Mideast Christians refugees instead of Muslims. Christians are easily assimilated in Western societies, due to the shared Christian heritage and outlook, and regularly become productive members of society. Muslims follow a completely different blueprint, Islamic law, or Sharia—which calls for constant hostility (jihad) against all non-Muslims, and advocates any number of distinctly anti-Western practices (misogyny, sex slavery, death for “blasphemers” and “apostates,” etc.). Hence it’s no surprise that many Muslim asylum seekers are anti-Western at heart—or, as a German police union chief once said, Muslim migrants “despise our country and laugh at our justice.”
Mideast Christians also bring trustworthy language and cultural skills. They understand the Middle Eastern—including Islamic—mindset and can help the U.S. understand it. And unlike Muslims, Christians have no “conflicting loyalty” issues: Islamic law forbids Muslims from befriending or aiding “infidels” against fellow Muslims (click here to see some of the treachery this leads to in the U.S. and here to see the treachery Christians have suffered from their longtime Muslim neighbors and “friends”). No such threat exists among Mideast Christians. They too render unto God what is God’s and unto Caesar what is Caesar’s—not to mention they have no loyalty to the Islamic ideologies that made their lives a living hell in the Middle East, the Islamic ideologies that are also responsible for jihadi terror in America. Thus a win-win: the U.S. and Mideast Christians complement each other, if only in that they share the same foe.
All the above reasons—from those that offer humanitarian relief to the true victims of persecution and genocide, to those that offer stability and benefits to the United States—are unassailable in their logic.
President Trump understands this—even if most liberals and lying media don’t.

Ways to change the Iran government peacefully
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya/February 03/17
 http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/02/03/dr-majid-rafizadehal-arabiya-ways-to-change-the-iran-government-peacefully/
 Hoping that the Iranian government would suddenly become a constructive, responsible, and rational member of the international community on its own is unrealistic.  Fundamental changes from within the Iranian government, that would alter the revolutionary principles, are inconceivable. This is because the ruling clerics’ theocratic constitution has confined Iran with such unbending legal and social restrictions that change is made impossible, and the political establishment of the ruling clerics is becoming more and more incompatible with the standards, rules and international laws of the international community.  In addition, according to the Islamic Republic’s constitution, people do not have the right to change the fundamentals of the constitution; only the Supreme Leader has such a right.  Many politicians, policy analysts, and scholars have been arguing for a long time, since 1979, that the Islamic Republic of Iran will change for the better honoring its own citizens and the rules of the international community. However, history has forcefully shown that their arguments have repeatedly failed. There exist ample reasons why moderating the Iranian government and a change in the Iranian government from a Shiite theocracy toward a democratic system of governance would be conducive and beneficial not only to the Iranian people, but also for the regional and global stability, peace and security.
 Instead of delving into these reasons, which are evident and explicit, the major question to address would be: what are some effective and non-violent approaches to channel such democratic reform in Iran?
 Standing with the Iranian youth
 Iran has a large young population, who are disaffected and dissatisfied with the current political establishment. Approximately more than 60 percent of the Iranian population is under 30 years old.  The overwhelming majority of the population strive for a democratic system of governance where freedom of speech, press, and assembly are not suppressed. However, they feel that they are left alone, more than ever before, in their attempts to achieve their aspiration for self-determination.  Foreign governments or non-state actors need to send a clear message to them that they do stand with the Iranian people, and that they support their aspirations.
 Words are very crucial for this objective. Words from people such as Nelson Mandela and John F. Kennedy led to people make fundamental changes. In this case, words from top-level politicians, institutions, or nations can be a robust tool to empower the Iranian people to achieve their goal.
 The Iranian people and opposition groups in and outside Iran, with assistance and support from the international community, can bring about freedom and democratic change
 Pressure from international community
 Siding with the majority of the Iranian population also means parting from having close political or diplomatic ties with the Iranian government.
 A foreign government cannot send a contradictory message to the Iranian people by stating that it supports their cause, but at the same time its politicians sit at the same table with Iranian politicians shaking hands and smiling. The Iranian people would view such act as a double standard.
 There is an opposite correlation; when foreign nations show their friendship and support (politically, diplomatically, economically, geopolitically, strategically or in terms of trade) to the Iranian government, they are directly weakening the majority of the Iranian people.
 Genuine support for the democratic cause favored by the overwhelming majority of the Iranian people inevitably means excluding the Iranian government.
 Social media and technology
 Iran’s major social media outlets are owned by the government and they disseminate the ruling clerics and politicians’ propaganda.
 Standing with Iran’s young population means supporting and facilitating access to technological and social media platforms. The Iranian government has become skilled in censoring social media. Nevertheless, more advanced countries can chart ways to bypass the Iranian government’s censorship.
 Iran has a highly educated and technologically savvy society. Cooperation between Iranian youth and other tech companies can be effective as well. In addition, those Persian media outlets, which are not owned by the Iranian government and conduct real and professional journalism, should be strengthened.  Influential foreign media outlets need also to focus on giving voice to the Iranian people and groups that express themselves on platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc.
 Human rights, international laws and domestic groups
 Foreign governments should focus on Iran’s human rights violations of its own citizens, oppression of religious and ethnic minorities (Arab, Turks, Kurds, Christians, Jews, Sunnis, etc), military interference in other countries, sectarian agenda, as well as Iran’s breaching of international laws and UN resolutions.  For example, Iran ranks top in the world when it comes to executions per capita. The Iranian government is continuously being listed as the world's leading sponsor of terrorism. Covert human rights and democratic groups inside Iran should be supported politically and financially.  Focusing on Iran’s egregious records of human rights violations and total disregard for international laws can indeed empower the Iranian people and put significant pressure on the Iranian government.
 Supporting opposition groups
 Finally, there exists a large number of Iranian dissident groups inside and outside Iran, which are connected and strive to bring about democratic reforms in Iran.
 Unfortunately, without the political, diplomatic and financial support of other state or non-state actors, these groups would appear powerless in the face of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Iran’s paramilitary group the Basij.
 One example was Iran’s 2009 uprising whereas the Iranian police brutally cracked down on the people, while many foreign governments left the Iranian people standing alone. It is crucial to officially recognize and support the opposition groups as democratic alternatives to the Iranian government, and to bring them under one recognized umbrella.  In closing, the Islamic Republic’s political establishment does not allow fundamental change in the constitution, and democratic reforms. The Iranian people and opposition groups in and outside Iran, with assistance and support from the international community, can bring

Putting a Spoke in the Wheel of Saudi-U.S. Relations
Salman Al-dossary/Asharq Al Awsat/February 03/17
Marking the first visit made by a United States President to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, former U.S. President Richard M. Nixon, in 1974, addressed the late King Faisal bin Abdulaziz with a great deal of respect saying that people from all over the world have sought the Kingdom, however, Nixon distinguished his landmark stopover as one primarily driven by a quest for wisdom. Good morals can be drawn from such a dramatic encounter found in the former royal protocol department undersecretary Abdurrahman al Hamoudi’s narrative “Al Dublomasiyya wal Marasem Suoodiya” (Arabic for Saudi Diplomacy and Customs). It speaks of the special relations shared by Riyadh and Washington that endured unbroken for 80 years after being anchored in shared strategic interests.
Saudi-U.S. relations have proven to be steady and strong even during harsh times, such as the 70’s oil crises, the September 11 attacks, and even during the turbulent Obama administration—ties with Saudi Arabia throughout 2009-2017 have been labeled as cold and not tense. Even though cold, former President Barack Obama visited Riyadh a total of three times, while Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz visited Washington twice during the Obama administration.
King Salman made his first visit upon his appointment as Defense Minister in 2011. His second trip to Washington was after officially taking reign in 2015. On significant Saudi Royals visiting the U.S. during the Obama presidency, the crown prince visited once and the deputy crown prince twice.
For a ‘cold’ status quo, Saudi-U.S. relations did good enough to strike envy among other countries—hoping their U.S. ties in dark hours would crystalize in the same manner. On Jan 29, 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump phoned Saudi King Salman in what evolved to be more than a mere protocol call, but an hour-long fruitful meeting on bilateral relations. In that long-distance call, the two heads of state outlined the character of future bilateral relations. What is more is that most of Trump’s regional stances were identical to those of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Popularly disputed topics with the Obama administration seem to have leveled out to an accord as soon as Mr. Trump stepped into the White House. Matters such as the Iran nuclear deal and counterterrorism efforts no longer reflect different U.S. and Saudi viewpoints.
Although the nuclear deal with Iran was meant to curb the country’s arms manufacture, it proved counterproductive as it has managed to build ballistic missiles that destabilize and threaten regional security. More so, under the Obama administration, fighting terrorism was selective and carried out in a one step forward, two steps back fashion.
Saudi Arabia fathoms the truth in the U.S. being a political, economic, military and technology superpower, and has established that its shared ties are core to Riyadh’s foreign policy. But one must keep in mind that the U.S. in turn also understands the central role played by the Kingdom in terms of sustaining regional stability across the scopes of politics, military, economy and security. The U.S. realizes that the two countries’ relations are not centered on oil. Truth be told, the U.S. no longer needs Saudi oil for national consumption, but when speaking in terms of global economy a stabilizing 10 million bpd produced by the kingdom become indispensable. Today’s reality is that the international political, economic and security solidity are unsustainable without the Saudi played role.
Trump’s recent executive order banning travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering U.S. grounds is controversial and has flooded U.S. media—but an attempt to pull Saudi Arabia into the heat of dispute, by viewing the ban as directed against the Kingdom, is just another try at sparking conflict between Washington and Riyadh.
Saudi citizens still go unaffected by the ban, given that the kingdom is not one of the listed Muslim-majority countries. Hence the ban has no direct effect against Saudi interests. Today’s case is similar to that of (Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act) JASTA—Saudi Arabia did not jeopardize its relations with the U.S. administration based on fleeting reactions then, why would it now?! The ban was largely condemned by Baghdad and Tehran, and those in line with their policy. Other Muslim-majority countries provided reasonable criticisms and not blunt disapproval. It seems that those affected by the ban are the one’s rallying against the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia day in and day out, so it is only expected for them to try and drag the kingdom into a battle it is not remotely concerned with.
Even though Saudi-U.S. relations have naturally undergone tensions throughout the past eight decades, they never strayed from being the partnership clear in strategy.
More so, those tensions are what helped sustain relations with such great momentum.
These days Washington’s viewpoint on the Iran and counterterrorism files is consistent with Riyadh’s, which only reasserts the clarity and accuracy of Saudi stances. This strongly motivates restoring the alliance to its natural course, bolstering confidence and strengthening the partnership, after it had long stumbled due to the Obama administration’s indecision.
**Salman Aldosary is the former editor-in-chief of Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper.

Obama, Trump and the Muslim Ban أوباما وترامب والخظر على دخول المسلمين إلى أميركا

Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/February 03/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/02/03/amir-taheri-obama-trump-and-the-muslim-ban%D8%A3%D9%88%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A7-%D9%88%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A8-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%B8%D8%B1%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%AF%D8%AE%D9%88%D9%84/
As expected, the decision by the new American President Donald Trump to impose a 90-day ban on visitors from seven Muslim-majority countries has provoked violent reactions in many parts of the world, including the United States. The fact that the majority of citizens of the countries concerned are Muslims has led some commentators to claim that the ban is anti-Islamic and violates the United States’ Constitution which guarantees respect for all religions. A few politicians, mostly in Western Europe, have gone further by comparing Trump to Hitler and Mussolini. (Incidentally, though Hitler and Mussolini were similar they were also different!) Deconstructing Trump’s move might show that the hysteria is misplaced if not counter-productive. It may also offer an insight into Trump’s modus operandi as president.
The first thing to settle is whether or not the move is anti-Islam.There is nothing in Trump’s Executive Order (EO) to indicate that this is the case. Although a majority of the citizens of the nations concerned are Muslims, the EO applies to non-Muslim citizens as well. The measure is not aimed against citizens of those countries as such; it is aimed at passports issued by governments of those countries. If a citizen of those countries has another passport, as is the case with an estimated 4.5 million dual-nationals who have European or even American passports, he would not be covered by the ban.
Muslims form a majority of populations in 57 out of the world’s 198 countries. Muslims are also found in almost all other countries. The United Sates itself is home to an estimated 6.5 million Muslims while a further 4.5 million Muslims hold American permanent residency known as the Green Card. In the case of Iran, one of the seven countries, no fewer than 1,500 senior officials of the Islamic Republic are holders of American Green Cards, according to the Islamic Majlis in Tehran. The children of many top Khomeinist officials are among the 16,000 Iranians attending American universities.
The countries concerned – Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya and Yemen -account for just under 10 per cent of the world’s total population of Muslims. None of the five countries with the largest number of Muslims, India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Egypt, are included in the list of seven unwanted ones. Only two of the seven, Iran and Sudan, describe themselves as Islamic Republic. Three other Islamic Republics, Mauritania, Afghanistan and Pakistan, are not included. The malicious seven have been singled out because of the threat they are supposed to pose to American security. Whether or not that threat is real could be debated; but it seems plausible on several grounds.
Take Iran, for example, it has been in a state of war against the United States since 1979 when it raided the U.S. Embassy and held its diplomats hostage, a casus belli under international law. Since then, hardly a day has passed without the Islamic Republic holding some U.S. citizens hostage in Tehran or Beirut. Every year, Tehran hosts an international conference known as “End of America” and attended by individuals and groups that, for a variety of reasons, seek the destruction of the United States. Iraq, also on the list, is included despite the close relationship it has with the U.S. The reason is that ISIS (or Da’esh in Arabic) still controls three of Iraq’s provinces plus its third most populous city Mosul.
In 2015, Baghdad authorities announced that ISIS had seized thousands of Iraqi passports and might use them to send infiltrators abroad. In an even more precarious situation than Iraq, Syria suffers from similar problems. There, too, ISIS, is in control of vast chunks of territory and in possession of an unknown number of stolen passports.
In Libya, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and their affiliates are established in areas larger than Switzerland, a metaphorical marshland where mosquitoes of terror breed. A similar situation exists in Somalia with al-Shabab and the remnants of gangs that lynched 18 U.S. Marines in Mogadishu in December 1992 are still active.
Sudan, home to the leaders of Al-Qaeda and other terror groups for decades, hosted the Popular Islamic Congress which selected a nine-man leadership council with the mission to launch their version of Jihad across the globe. Since then, Sudan has changed and is trying to distance itself from terrorist groups. However, groups that have struck roots there for decades cannot be weeded out in a few years.
In Yemen, al-Qaeda is in control of a chunk of territory while the Houthi militia, backed by Iran, launched at least two attacks on U.S. naval vessels in 2016.
The list of the malicious seven is not a brainchild of Trump. It was established by President Barack Obama in 2016 as a new version of the list of “States Sponsors of International Terrorism” promulgated by the Bush administration in 2002. In the same year, the Bush administration pushed through an amendment to the section 306 of The Immigration and Naturalization Act to impose a total ban on travel by citizens of the seven countries listed as “State Sponsors of international terrorism.” The amendment gave the president the right to waive the ban when and if he desired, something that both Bush and Obama used extensively. What Trump has done is to insist on the full implementation for 90 days of an act passed under George W Bush in 2002. The original list of “sponsors of terrorism” included Cuba and North Korea instead of Syria and Yemen.
At that time, Syria was regarded as an ally. Between 1992 and 2002 three successive U.S. secretaries of states paid a total of 29 visits to Damascus. At the time, Yemen, under President Ali Abdullah Saleh, was also regarded as an ally. In other words, changes in political and security circumstances could alter Washington’s perception of friend and foe. Last year, Obama paid his photo-op visit to Havana and had to remove Cuba from the “terrorist list”. Obama also removed North Korea from his list of “Countries of Concern”, presumably because he realized that no one from there might want to visit the U.S. as a tourist or on a business trip.
During his campaign, Trump promised to impose a temporary ban on all Muslims wishing to travel to the U.S. What he has come up with, however, is a temporary ban on citizens of a small number of Muslim countries. In a sense, he has acted in Obama’s style of faking action, doing something that like candy-floss, looks big at first but melts into nothingness in a consumer’s mouth. Obama’s authenticity was fake. Will Trump’s fakery turn out to be authentic?

Russia, Turkey, Assad and a New Stage!
Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al Awsat/February 03/17
News of a Russian-Turkish agreement on Syria with both Iranian accord and disagreement, and a euphoric joy that Bashar al-Assad couldn’t mask, have been flooding the media for the past month. “Delusional festivities” peaked throughout the Astana talks that were convened in the absence of senior U.S. or Saudi officials. United States President Donald Trump is now at the White House and taking some controversial measures, meaning he is different than his predecessor, president Barack Obama. Obama was weak and hesitant—we now face an energetic president who is ready to open channels with all parties and at the same time!Despite reports on the nature of relations between Trump and Putin, the former initiated a step that is a remarkable game changer, especially in Syria.
Two days ago, an important phone conversation was held between the Saudi King and the U.S. President who initiated the call. The two agreed on several important ideas including enforcing the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran and facing Iran’s destabilizing regional activities. They also agreed on safe zones in Yemen and Syria.
Meanwhile their arrangement on Yemen is translated in terms of U.S.-Saudi multilateral coordination based on geography and politics, discussing Syria safe zones hints that the U.S. President views Saudi Arabia as an important partner with respect to materializing a solution for the Syrian crisis. It also indicates that brokering a Syria peace settlement is not limited to Russia, or Turkey and surely not Iran. Accordingly, this shows that the region will return to its political norm unlike the Obama logic which saw no harm in allowing Iran to take over four Arab capitals: Sana’a, Damascus, Baghdad, and Beirut. Even if many believe that the Moscow-Ankara role in our region is harmless – given that Iran is out of the picture- the U.S. administration, for the first time, supplied Syrian Democratic Forces (an Arab-Kurdish coalition) with armored vehicles. Russia believes that imposing safe zones contradicts their previous statements of the gravity of such a move, and it is clear the Russians were surprised by it. They tried to restrain their reactions and find a way out.
While Assad’s regime conditioned safe zones with prior coordination, Russia’s FM Sergei Lavrov stated that the regime’s approval is a must to establish safe zones and launch an agreement with Damascus or Moscow for any future US-Russian coalition against terrorism.
This shows that Russia doesn’t want to escalate matters with Trump. They would rather buy some time to identify Trump’s actual plan, which is proven by Lavrov’s statement in Abu Dhabi on Wednesday when he said that President Trump should be more accurate concerning his suggestion for safe zones in Syria. Lavrov added that he hopes Russia would be able to discuss the proposal with the U.S. Foreign Ministry as soon as detailed plans are set out.
This simply means that the month of “delusional festivities” in Syria is over, and a new stage began.

U.S.-Australia Rift Is Possible after Trump Ends Call with Prime Minister
Glenn Thrush and Michelle Innis/The New York Times/February 03/17
WASHINGTON — A phone call between President Trump and the Australian prime minister is threatening to develop into a diplomatic rift between two stalwart allies after the two men exchanged harsh words over refugee policy, and Mr. Trump abruptly ended the call.
The phone call last Saturday between Mr. Trump and Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull turned contentious after the Australian leader pressed the president to honor an agreement to accept 1,250 refugees from an Australian detention center.
Late Wednesday night, Mr. Trump reiterated his anger over the agreement on Twitter. He called the agreement a “dumb deal” and blamed the Obama administration for accepting it but then said that he would “study” it. The tweet was posted after The Washington Post reported details of the phone call.The leaders of the two allies did not seem to agree on the outcome of the conversation. Mr. Trump’s tweet suggested the agreement could be at risk while Mr. Turnbull said that, despite the bluntness of the discussion, the United States had committed to upholding the arrangement.The flare-up — and conflicting characterizations of the call from Mr. Trump and Mr. Turnbull — threatened to do lasting damage to relations between the two countries and could drive Canberra closer to China, which has a robust trading relationship with Australia and is competing with Washington to become the dominant force in the Asia-Pacific region.
A senior Trump administration official said the president told Mr. Turnbull on Saturday that the refugees could include the “next Boston bombers.” He also said he was “going to get killed” politically by the deal, given that the day before he signed an executive order to stem the refugee flow into the United States and refuse visas for all citizens from seven Muslim countries.
The Trump administration official said the call was shorter than planned, and ended abruptly after Mr. Turnbull told the president it was necessary for the refugees to be accepted.
The details of the call were confirmed by a senior administration official with direct knowledge of the exchange who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to publicly discuss the diplomatic talks.
Mr. Turnbull, speaking Thursday at a press briefing in Australia’s southern state of Victoria, refused to comment at length on the telephone call, or say whether it had ended sooner than expected. But he did acknowledge that it had been candid.
“I’ve seen that report,” Mr. Turnbull said of the Washington Post account, “and I’m not going to comment on the conversation, other than to say that in the course of the conversation, as you know and as was confirmed by the president’s official spokesman in the White House, the president assured me that he would continue with, honor the agreement we entered into with the Obama administration with respect to refugee resettlement.”
Pressed about Mr. Trump’s tone, and whether the president ended the call by hanging up, Mr. Turnbull refused to comment. “It’s better that these things, these conversations are conducted candidly, frankly, privately,” he said.
Mr. Turnbull again stated that Australia’s relationship with the United States remained robust, but if the deal to resettle the refugees falls through, Canberra will be left with a seemingly intractable political problem at home.
The Australian government has a policy that bars any refugees who attempted to arrive by boat from ever setting foot in the country. The majority of the refugees being held on the Pacific islands of Nauru and Manus are from Iran and Iraq. Both are Muslim-majority nations that are among the seven countries — including Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen — whose citizens are barred from entering the United States for at least 90 days under an executive order signed by Mr. Trump last week.
“I can assure you the relationship is very strong,” Mr. Turnbull said. “The fact that we received the assurance that we did, the fact that it was confirmed, the very extensive engagement we have with the new administration underlines the closeness of the alliance.”
“But as Australians know me very well — I stand up for Australia in every forum — public or private.”
Bill Shorten, the leader of Australia’s opposition Labor Party, said there were two versions of the conversation between Mr. Turnbull and Mr. Trump over the refugee deal, and Mr. Turnbull should be “straight with the Australian people.”
Mr. Turnbull “made it clear he had a constructive discussion” over the refugee deal, Mr. Shorten said. “But now it appears another, different version of the same conversation has emerged.”
Kim Beazley, a former Australian ambassador to the United States who served in Washington during much of the Obama administration, said the impact of the flare-up would be “minimal” if the refugee deal remained in force. But he added, “If the tonality is true you wouldn’t want to have too many conversations like that.”It was not the only awkward call last week between Mr. Trump and a world leader. Earlier, on Friday, Mr. Trump joked to President Enrique Peña Nieto of Mexico that he would deploy troops to Mexico if the Mexican government failed to control “bad hombres down there.”On Wednesday night, the senior Trump administration official said the president’s comments to Mr. Peña Nieto were made in jest and the comments reflected Mr. Trump’s standing offer to help Mexico battle drug gangs and control border crossings. The official said the conversation between the two presidents was friendly, and Mr. Peña Nieto did not appear to be offended.
The Mexican government issued a statement denying the A.P. report and said it did not “correspond to reality.”

International Armed Conflict Back to Iraq
Abdulrahman Al-Rashed/Asharq Al Awsat/February 03/17
U.S. President Donald Trump criticized his predecessor Barack Obama several times for squandering three trillion dollars to build an allied Iraq and leaving the country an easy target for the Iranians.
Instead of assuring Trump, Iranian authorities indirectly sent Trump indirect threatening messages through giving orders to one of its militias in Iraq “Harakat al-Nujaba” to launch missiles in order to show off its’ power. Al-Nujaba is one of the militias that can target neighboring countries and is similar to the Yemeni Houthis that are also used by Iran to bomb Saudi Arabia with Iranian-funded missiles.The ultimate danger of Iran laying its hands over Iraq affects Iraqis themselves first more than the Gulf and the region.
Iran’s main objective is to take over Iraq, the second richest country in the region, in order to fund its military and economic needs. During the past six years, Iran has transformed Iraq into an Iranian military base from where it wages its wars in Syria and threatens Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Jordan.
Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) brags that foreign military actions in Syria and Iraq haven’t impinge on the Iranian treasury any additional cost because it depends on the Iraqi treasury, which has become IRGC financial portfolio and ruled by pro-Iran groups, especially after marginalizing the powers of Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi.A number of officials from Trump’s administration have served in Iraq previously and are familiar with the role of the Iranian regime there.
What to expect from Trump’s administration in the battle regarding the Iranians in Baghdad?
It is very unlikely for this administration to send military forces to Iraq, but some measures will be taken to limit Iran’s role. Most probably the U.S. administration will hold the Iraqi government responsible and will be given tough choices. It might also reactivate the role of U.S.-pro forces such as Kurds to achieve a balance of power with Iran. Plus, it will push opposing Sunni and Shi’ite national forces to reconsider the Civil State project that was neglected by Obama. The question is not about what Trump can do to end the Iranian takeover of Iraq, but what the region can do to support national forces there. Terrible failures occurred after the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. Countries of the region refused the U.S. call to build an Iraqi national regime.When some of these countries, including the Gulf, left Iraq, Iran seized the opportunity to be the sole regional force to offer cooperation with Americans to manage the new Iraq.
At the same time, Iran and Assad regime in Syria were supporting operations of the so-called Iraqi resistance and al-Qaeda to kick out the U.S. military forces from there. Tehran succeeded in its dual project: cooperation and conspiracy, specially after the arrival of Obama who found that Iran has influence in Iraq and hence chose to communicate with the Iranians rather than confront them.
The current US leadership in the White House, along with Defense and intelligence authorities, that have worked previously in Iraq are aware that Iran was behind the war on its troops in Iraq, including al-Qaeda.They are also familiar with Iran’s way of managing battles through using local forces such as the so-called Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas and Islamic Jihad Movement in Palestine in Gaza, Fatah al-Islam in Lebanon and a number of al-Qaeda organizations in Syria and Iraq as well as Houthis in Yemen.
Therefore, I believe that confrontations are now more likely than ever in Iraq and elsewhere. These confrontations are a natural result for Obama’s policy that allowed the Iranian regime to expand in the region until it became a threat to the moderate countries including Egypt, Turkey, Jordan and the Gulf; not to mention the American interests and international peace.

Quebec: The Crisis of the West
Giulio Meotti/Gatestone Institute/February 03/2017
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9881/quebec-crisis
Quebec, like the entire West, is facing an existential demographic and religious crisis.
Quebec's death spiral is explicitly linked with the calls for increased immigration. Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who put an end to the military campaign against the Islamic State, just called on Muslim migrants to come to his country.
Resistance to Quebec's dramatic collapse of Christianity does not necessarily require a new embrace of an old Catholicism, but it certainly does need a sane rediscovery of what a Western democracy should be. That includes an appreciation of Western identity and Judeo-Christian values -- everything Trudeau's government and much of Europe apparently refuse to accept.
Welcome to Quebec, with its flavor of an old French province, with its beautiful landscapes, where streets are named after Catholic saints, and where a gunman just murdered six people in a local mosque.
Violence can be the consequence of societal convulsions, as in the 2011 massacre on Norway's island of Utoya, in a country that prided itself of being ultra-secularized, and part of the global "good society". Quebec, also, like the entire West, is facing an existential demographic and religious crisis.
George Weigel, writing in the American publication, First Things recently called Quebec "Catholicism's Empty Quarter". "There is no more religiously arid place," he wrote, "between the North Pole and Tierra del Fuego; there may be no more religiously arid place on the planet".
Sandro Magister, one of Italy's most prominent journalists on Catholic affairs, wrote, "while Rome talks, Quebec has already been lost".
Quebec's Catholic buildings are empty; the clergy is aging. Today, inside the Church of Saint-Jude in Montreal, personal fitness trainers take the place of Catholic priests. The Théatre Paradoxe in Montreal now sits where the church of Notre-Dame-du-Perpétuel-Secours was before it shut. The former Christian nave is now used for concerts and conferences, while Christian hymns on Sundays are replaced by disco shows.
The Church of Saint-Jude in Montreal is today the "Saint-Jude spa" for "wellness worshippers," complete with personal trainers, trendy cocktail parties and custom-built crucifix-shaped benches in the changing rooms. (Image source: Montreal.TV video screenshot)
The Catholic Diocese of Montreal sold 50 churches and other religious buildings in the last 15 years. On May 24, 2015, the last Mass was celebrated in the famous Church of St. John the Baptist, dedicated to the patron of French Canadians. The Auxiliary Bishop of Quebec, Gaetan Proulx, said that "half of the churches in Quebec" will close in the next ten years.
In Denys Arcand's film "The Barbarian Invasions," there is a moment when a Catholic priest surveys the worthless religious art kitsch with which his diocese is burdened, to point to the irrelevance. The old priest says:
"Quebec used to be as Catholic as Spain or Ireland; everyone believed. At a precise moment, during the year 1966 in fact, the churches suddenly emptied in a matter of months. A strange phenomenon that no one has ever been able to explain".
"
Man without history, without culture, without country, without family and without civilization is not free: he is naked and condemned to despair", writes Quebec's philosopher, Mathieu Bock-Côté.
The state of Catholicism in Quebec today is indeed desperate. In 1966, there were 8,800 priests; today there are 2,600, most of whom are elderly; many live in nursing homes. In 1945, weekly mass was attended by 90% of the Catholic population; today it is 4%. Hundreds of Christian communities have simply disappeared.
The Quebec Council of the Religious Heritage has reported that in 2014 alone, a record 72 churches closed. The situation is even worse in the Archdiocese of Montreal. From 257 parishes in 1966, there were 250 in 2000, and in 2013 only 169 parishes. Christianity seemed at the risk of extinction; the Archbishop of Montreal, Christian Lépine, launched a moratorium on the sale of the churches.
While Quebec's authorities used an aggressive secularism as a tool to advance multiculturalism, Quebec witnessed a dramatic rise in the number of young Muslim men who joined the Islamic State. Terror attacks were committed by converts to Islam -- people who rejected Canadian relativism to embrace Islamist fanaticism. "Quebec's secularist fundamentalism has gone so far as to impose on all state and private schools -- the first instance of its kind in the world -- an obligatory course on 'ethics and religious culture'", Sandro Magister wrote.
An academic report concluded: "Canadian census data shows that Islam is the fastest growing religion in the country, and that although most of the Muslim population growth is related to Muslim birth rates and migration, since 2001 the Muslim population has also increased as a result of religious conversions by non-Muslim Canadians".
Quebec's demographic decline is also telling. The birth rate has fallen from an average of four children per couple to just 1.6 -- well below what demographers call the "replacement rate". Quebec was unique compared to developed nations in the intensity and speed with which total fertility rates dropped.
Quebec's death spiral is explicitly linked with the calls for increased immigration. Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who put an end to the military campaign against the Islamic State, just called on Muslim migrants to come to his country.
According to demographers, the province of Quebec alone needs between 70,000 and 80,000 immigrants a year to compensate for its low birth rate. But to compensate for a demographic fall, what happens when one of the most famous Catholic territories in the world undergoes such a cultural and religious revolution?
Resistance to Quebec's dramatic collapse does not necessarily require a new embrace of an old Catholicism, but it certainly does need a sane rediscovery of what a Western democracy should be. That includes also the appreciation of the Western identity and Judeo-Christian values -- everything that Trudeau's government and much of Europe apparently refuse to accept. Half of Trudeau's ministers were not sworn in with a religious oath. They refused even to say "so help me God".
Quebec's motto is: "Je me souviens": I remember. But what, exactly? In "Catholicism's empty quarter", will the winner be Islam?
*Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute

Who are Those Refugees Australia Doesn't Want?

Shoshana Bryen/Gatestone Institute/February 03/2017
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9883/australia-refugees
The refugees are the collateral damage in Australia's widely criticized "Stop the Boats" policy, the rule that asylum seekers who try to reach Australian shores by sea will never "make Australia home," even if they are genuine refugees, are children or have skills. — Los Angeles Times.
"[T]he arrivals by sea seem to prompt anger. One reason for this could be that migrants and refugees who try to reach Australia by sea are, in fact, coming illegally. Those that are being resettled through its Humanitarian Programme, meanwhile, are registered refugees being accepted under Australia's international obligations." — J. Weston Phippen, in The Atlantic.
Then-Secretary of State John Kerry worked out the deal with Australia to "fast track" the immigrants, but did not tell Congress. It would be illegal if the deal was considered a treaty negotiated by Kerry. According to the Constitution, it would have to have been sent to Congress for ratification.
It is hard to complain about Australia -- democratic, sunny, cheerful, and oh, those koalas and kangaroos. On a more serious note, Australia is a welcome ally, participating in military operations around the world with American forces and sharing our concerns about aggressive Chinese behavior in the South- and East China Seas. Australia is spending billions to modernize its military forces.
But a few things about Australia should be made clear as President Trump scuttles an Obama-administration deal to take 1,250+ refugees currently in Australian-run internment camps in Papua New Guinea and Nauru. Internment camps? Papua New Guinea and Nauru?
The Wall Street Journal explains: Under laws first put in place in 2001, successive Australian governments have required asylum seekers coming by boat to be intercepted. The conservatives, on winning power in 2013, set up a maritime blockade that Mr. Turnbull has offered as a model for Europe. But the system began to unravel after Papua New Guinea's highest court last year ordered the closure of the Australian-operated immigration center on Manus Island, ruling asylum seekers were being held illegally.
So chipper Australia has been intercepting ships at sea and dropping the passengers off on less well-developed islands. They are mostly men from Myanmar (Rohingya Muslims), Malaysia, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Somalia, although there some women and children. The Los Angeles Times further explains:
The refugees are the collateral damage in Australia's widely criticized "Stop the Boats" policy, the rule that asylum seekers who try to reach Australian shores by sea will never "make Australia home," even if they are genuine refugees, are children or have skills. "If you come to Australia illegally by boat, there is no way you will ever make Australia home," an Australian army chief warned in a 2014 video aired online and on television in countries such as Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.
Australia does take thousands of refugees each year under official programs. J. Weston Phippen wrote in The Atlantic:
To be sure, it's not that Australia has an issue with refugees–in fact, it has agreed to resettle 12,000 Syrians, atop the refugees it typically takes through its Humanitarian Programme. It granted 13,800 refugee visas between 2013 and 2014, and 20,000 between 2012 and 2013.
But the arrivals by sea seem to prompt anger. One reason for this could be that migrants and refugees who try to reach Australia by sea are, in fact, coming illegally. Those that are being resettled through its Humanitarian Programme, meanwhile, are registered refugees being accepted under Australia's international obligations. The two main parties also contend that its policies deter human-smuggling.
So off they go to Nauru and Manus.
Out of sight, perhaps out of mind until the UN documented serious problems in the camps, including physical, emotional and sexual abuse. The Guardian (Australia) published a series last summer on abuses at the Manus camp, following the leak of more than 2,000 "incident reports" detailing "assaults, sexual abuse, self-harm attempts, child abuse and living conditions endured by asylum seekers held by the Australian government, painting a picture of routine dysfunction and cruelty." Although children make up only 18% of those in detention, more than 51% of the incident reports involve children.
The Manus Island regional processing facility, where Australia sends illegal immigrants. (Image source: Australia Department of Immigration and Citizenship)
Cases of depression and self-harm are high; two people set themselves on fire last year, one of whom died, and one girl swallowed bleach. Many have reported that the biggest problem is the sense of paralysis at being trapped in limbo indefinitely, according to Tracey Donehue, a former teacher at one of the facilities interviewed by the Los Angeles Times.
Following the very unpleasant exposure, the government of Malcolm Turnbull announced in August 2016 that it would close one center on Manus Island, but would bring none of its internees – 854 adults, all men – to the Australian mainland, raising the question of what to do with them. Australia's Immigration Minister, Peter Dutton, said Canberra's "position is very clear, and that is we are not going to accept people who have sought to come to our country illegally by boat, they will not settle permanently in our country."
Enter President Obama.
In September, Turnbull agreed to resettle Central American refugees who were in a processing center in Costa Rica. At the time, Australian officials said firmly there would be no quid pro quo. "There will not be a people swap," announced Scott Ryan, a special minister of state. The American agreement to take Australian internees came two months later, providing a convenient way for Mr. Turnbull to keep his promise to his people and get rid of people who had become a public relations disaster.
Then-Secretary of State John Kerry worked out the deal with Australia to "fast track" the immigrants, but did not tell Congress. In November, responding to information it received, WND reported that the chairmen of the House and Senate judiciary committees demanded details:
"Congress only learned of the deal through media reports two weeks ago [November, 2016] and – according to a letter sent to administration officials by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), and Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) – the deal is not only a matter of grave national security concern, but it could be illegal."
It would be illegal if the deal was considered a treaty negotiated by then-Secretary Kerry. According to the Constitution, it would have to have been sent to Congress for ratification.
Asked if he had discussed the deal with then-candidate Donald Trump, Turnbull said, "We deal with one administration at a time and there is only one president of the United States at a time." But Donald Trump is now president and his decision appears to have left the Australian government with few choices.
Asked if there was a "Plan B" for Australia, Turnbull said he was examining several options, but that Australia would not back down on its decision not to let those refugees stopped at sea enter the country:
"Our expectation naturally, given the commitments that have been made, is that it will go ahead. The only option that isn't available to [the refugees] is bringing them to Australia for the obvious reasons that that would provide a signal to the people smugglers to get back into business."
Whether there is an agreement to be had between the United States and Australia for the resettlement of Australia's interned population or not, it is clear that this deal had more to it than the Obama Administration -- or the Turnbull government -- wanted to admit. The United States and Australia both had reasons not to admit the migrants closest to their borders, but trading Central Americans who wanted to come to the U.S. for Muslims who wanted to reach Australian shores would allow Turnbull to keep a campaign promise and Obama to divert attention from the massive breach of America's southern border.
*Shoshana Bryen is Senior Director of the Jewish Policy Center.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Return of an international armed conflict over Iraq
Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/February 03/17
The new US President Donald Trump criticized his predecessor Barack Obama several times. He said that Obama has left Iraq an easy target for the Iranians, squandering $3 trillion efforts deployed by the US to build an allied Iraq.
The Iranian authorities sent Trump indirect threatening messages instead of reassuring ones. They ordered one of their many militias in Iraq, al-Nujaba movement, to fire missiles in order to show its strength. Al-Nujaba is one of the militias that can target neighboring countries and is similar to the Yemeni Houthis that are also used by Iran to bomb Saudi Arabia with missiles financed by them.
Iran’s threat in Iraq is not just for the neighboring Gulf countries but rather a threat against Iraqis first and then against the surrounding countries. Iran’s main objective is to seize Iraq, which is the second-richest country in the region, to finance its economic and military needs. During the past six years, Iran has converted Iraq into an Iranian military base, from which it wages its wars in Syria, and threatens Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Jordan.The leadership of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards brags about not costing the Iranian treasury any money on foreign military activities in Syria and Iraq, because it depends on the Iraqi treasury that has become its financial portfolio and under the control of pro-Iranian groups after marginalizing the authorities of current Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi. Since a number of the Trump administration figures had previously served in Iraq, they know the real role of the Iranian regime there. They have expressed in the past their anger at Obama’s policy because he has left Iraq an easy prey for Iran. What can we expect from Trump’ administration regarding the Iranians in Baghdad?
The question is not about what Trump can do to stop Iran’s takeover of Iraq but what the countries of the region can offer to support the national forces there
Limiting Iran’s control
It is quite unlikely for this administration to send forces to Iraq but it will take steps to limiting Iran’s control. It will most likely consider that the Iraqi government is responsible and in control and will give it tough choices.
It will most likely boost the role of the allied forces, like the Kurds for example, to set a balance facing the pro-Iranian forces. It will also support the national Shiite and Sunni opposition forces to demand the return of the Civil State project that was neglected by the Obama administration.
The question is not about what Trump can do to stop Iran’s takeover of Iraq, but what the countries of the region can offer to support the national forces there. Terrible failures took place after the US invasion of Iraq in 2003; the countries of the region rejected the US call to cooperate in order to build an Iraqi national regime.
When the countries of the region, including the Gulf, left Iraq, Iran seized the favorable opportunity to be the only regional power that has offered to cooperate with the Americans in the management of the new Iraq. At the same time, in cooperation with the Assad regime in Syria, Iran was supporting what was called the Iraqi resistance and al-Qaeda to attack the US military presence and get it out of Iran.
Collaboration and conspiracy
Tehran succeeded in its dual collaboration and conspiracy project, especially after the arrival of Obama who found that Iran has influence in Iraq and hence chose to communicate with the Iranians rather than confront them.
The current US leadership in the White House along with the defense and intelligence authorities, which have already been in Iraq, know that Iran was behind the war on its troops in Iraq, including al-Qaeda.
These authorities are aware of Iran’s approach in managing its battles using local forces as proxies, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza, Fath al-Islam in Lebanon, a number of al-Qaeda sub-branches in Syria and Iraq, as well as the Houthis in Yemen.
Thus, I guess that the confrontation is now more likely than ever in Iraq and elsewhere. It is the expected result after Obama’s policy that allowed the Iranian regime to expand in the region and threaten the existence of the moderate countries including Egypt, Turkey, Jordan and the Gulf. It is now threatening American interests as well as international peace.
**This article was first published in Asharq Al-Awsat on February 03 2017.

On neutralizing Syria’s ‘Arabism’
Ghassan Imam/Al Arabiya/February 03/17
The constitution is the society’s mirror, the nation’s identity and the title of sovereignty. It is not a gift that’s given by a nation to another and is not imposed by one country over another unless the state receiving this “gift” has lost sovereignty and the state offering it is an invader, aggressor and occupier.
In the current Syrian case, Russia announced it submitted an amended Syrian draft constitution to suspicious Syrian opposition groups so they “can study it and voice their opinion about it.” These opposition groups include Kurdish and Syrian members who are affiliated with countries in the region or who are close to Bashar al-Assad’s regime and they have not left the areas and zones which the Assad regime controls.
Russia has not officially announced the content of the amendments. However, there are contradicting rumors and information about the content and Russia has not denied these reports.
It is said the amendments include a proposal to implement “democracy and secularism” and another proposal to neutralize Arabism from the current Syrian constitution which was drafted under the supervision of the regime many years ago. It is based on the current constitution that Bashar al-Assad himself was elected president for the third time after he spent 14 years in power across two seven-year presidential terms.
Official and non-official Iranian sources were quick to reject and criticize democracy and secularism. This is self-evident. A religious country like Iran will not accept democracy and secularism in a country where it has gotten its settlement claws deep into its soft skin and wounded body.
The Iranian government has so far not declared its opinion regarding the Russian proposal to cancel Syria’s Arabism. However, its silence implies it supports cancelling the identity of a country it occupies, and it wants to do this in Shiite sectarian settlements to allow itself to intervene in them, tear their national identity and separate them from their Arab brothers.
It’s also self-evident that Russia will propose neutralizing national identity when it knows that some Syrian opposition groups are willing to give up this identity. The political Syrian opposition, which was formed at the beginning of the revolution, abstained from announcing their national affiliations either because they wanted to humor European parties which embraced them and even bribed them or to anger the Syrian regime which still hides behind commitment to fake and suppressive Arabism.
Despite the regime’s attempt to hide behind this Arabism, its alliance with regional countries that oppose Arabism and that oppose the Sunni Arab majority is no secret. A member of the political opposition coalition proposed a draft constitution without Arabism as he naively though it may work as a democratic constitution if it cancelled the national identity of the majority of Syrians.
The roof of the skyscraper which President Trump owns is not enough for Syrian refugees. So where else will he house these miserable people?
Tutelage of opposition groups
Armed religious opposition groups which reject the tutelage of political opposition groups considered their Islam to be abandoning their Arabism. Instead of forming one free and unified Syrian army, they acted upon opportunism and became linked with fanatical organizations, like ISIS, al-Qaeda, al-Nusra and Fateh al-Sham.
These organizations were bitterly defeated when fighting Shiite militias which Iran brought into Syria. They then accepted the Russian advice to separate from the aforementioned fanatical groups so they were defeated again when they fought ISIS and al-Nusra in Aleppo’s northern countryside and Edleb.
The Kurdistan Workers’ Party militia realized that Syrian political opposition groups and armed groups were abandoning their national identity so they exploited that and dared announce their separatist identity after the Assad regime had granted them Syrian nationalities.
It established an autonomy near the Turkish-Syrian border and this zone extends from east of the Euphrates River to the borders of Iraq’s Kurdistan. It humors the US and Russia by announcing its willingness to participate in the liberation of ar-Raqqah and Deir az-Zour from ISIS.
The Russian circus in Astana ended with a Russian-Iranian dispute regarding the final statement and they disagreed over the necessity of withdrawing foreign militias from Syria. What’s interesting here is that Iran accepts the withdrawal of Chechen and Tunisian militias and ISIS mercenaries who came from the Balkans and western Europe but it rejects withdrawing Shiite militias, including Hezbollah’s mercenaries.
Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov announced postponing the Geneva talks on Syria without asking the permission of the UN’s new secretary general. Lavrov’s aim is to hold the entire cards in his hand to be ready to confront and thwart the project of Russia’s new “friend” Donald Trump who wants to establish safe zones for Syrians displaced inside and outside Syria so there’s no influx of refugees again towards Europe and America.
The Syrian refugees
The roof of the skyscraper which President Trump owns is not enough for Syrian refugees. So where else will he house these miserable people? Most probably, in the area which Turkey occupies and which extends from the border area of Jarabulus, west of the Euphrates River, to Azaz and Afreen and which is 50 kilometers inside Syria. This area neighbors the Kurdish autonomous zone, east of the Euphrates River.
Amid all these intertwined details, there is no coordination among Arabs’ high-ranking figures’ activity. After his visit to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Jordan’s King Abdullah II announced he will visit US President Donald Trump. This visit will be before the visit of Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi. It was said that Sisi will be the first Arab president to meet with the new American president.
Perhaps King Abdullah is in a hurry to be reassured about American financial aid to his country and needs to make sure this aid will not be canceled in a tweet by Trump as perhaps the latter may want to anger his predecessor, Barack Obama, who said there is a plan to increase it from $600 million to $1 billion. But what will King Abdullah II say to Trump about the possibility of moving the US embassy to Jerusalem as recognition of the latter as a capital of Israel? What will he tell him about the Brotherhood in Jordan after Trump announced the possibility of blacklisting the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization because he suspects it is linked to violent acts against Sisi’s regime? And finally what about the Kuwaiti initiative between Saudi Arabia and Iran? Will the famous diplomacy of Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, which once nominated Kuwait to become a pivotal state, resume its activity due to its feeling of its national duty now that the Arabs’ situation reminds of the old poet’s verse: “He who inattentively grazes sheep in the land of lions, will wake up to the lions grazing the sheep.”
*This article is also available in Arabic.

Mothers can come together to make Saudi roads safer
Khaled Almaeena/Al Arabiya/February 03/17
Every day glaring headlines of traffic accidents are splashed across local papers. Over the weekend there were quite a few. Everyone speaks about the abnormal high ratio of deaths in the Kingdom compared to the population. Newspapers highlight deaths on the highways but many tragic accidents go unnoticed. For the past couple of decades, there have been many road safety programs organized by the traffic department. Fines have also been increased. Jail terms are given to errant drivers. However, the dangerous devil-may-care attitude of drivers continues unabated.
Moreover, there has not been any significant improvement in traffic services. And to top it all, many drivers know that they can get away with irresponsible behavior behind the wheel. A phone call from a father, cousin or friend can solve any problem.
What then is to be done? I believe that the first cause of accidents is the condition of our roads and the haphazardly improvised detours that can be found in our cities. Secondly, the blame must be placed on unsystematic traffic instructions and closure of exits. Finally, of course, there is the absence of police cars on the roads and the failure to enforce traffic regulations. As a society, we have no safety culture and this is also reflected in our driving. All of these factors put together are responsible for the tragic carnage on our roads. What is needed is a sustained safety program, which is easily implemented and which holds the errant driver totally accountable for his actions. Apart from this, we need a traffic department with mature personnel, who are well trained and educated in the enforcement of traffic regulations.
Mothers Against Drunk Driving
In America, there is an organization called MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) started in 1980 by a woman in California whose 13-year-old daughter was hit and killed by a drunk driver. This non-profit organization has been effective to a great extent and it claims that its involvement in aspects of traffic rules, regulations and safety awareness has helped to reduce by half the number of traffic accidents related to drunk driving. In Saudi Arabia, we too can have an organization like MADD. And call it MADD, as well. However, it should stand for Mothers Against Dangerous Driving. Women are a powerful force in Saudi society and many of them have lost their sons, fathers, brothers and husbands as a result of traffic accidents.
If moms across the Kingdom join together to help make our roads safer, many lives will be saved!
**This article was first published in the Saudi Gazette on January 29, 2016.