LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

February 05/17

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins17/english.february05.17.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
From everyone to whom much has been given, much will be required; and from one to whom much has been entrusted, even more will be demanded
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 12/42-48/:"The Lord said, ‘Who then is the faithful and prudent manager whom his master will put in charge of his slaves, to give them their allowance of food at the proper time? Blessed is that slave whom his master will find at work when he arrives. Truly I tell you, he will put that one in charge of all his possessions. But if that slave says to himself, "My master is delayed in coming", and if he begins to beat the other slaves, men and women, and to eat and drink and get drunk, the master of that slave will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour that he does not know, and will cut him in pieces, and put him with the unfaithful. That slave who knew what his master wanted, but did not prepare himself or do what was wanted, will receive a severe beating. But one who did not know and did what deserved a beating will receive a light beating. From everyone to whom much has been given, much will be required; and from one to whom much has been entrusted, even more will be demanded."

While physical training is of some value, godliness is valuable in every way, holding promise for both the present life and the life to come
First Letter to Timothy 04/06-16/:"If you put these instructions before the brothers and sisters, you will be a good servant of Christ Jesus, nourished on the words of the faith and of the sound teaching that you have followed. Have nothing to do with profane myths and old wives’ tales. Train yourself in godliness, for, while physical training is of some value, godliness is valuable in every way, holding promise for both the present life and the life to come. The saying is sure and worthy of full acceptance. For to this end we toil and struggle, because we have our hope set on the living God, who is the Saviour of all people, especially of those who believe. These are the things you must insist on and teach. Let no one despise your youth, but set the believers an example in speech and conduct, in love, in faith, in purity. Until I arrive, give attention to the public reading of scripture, to exhorting, to teaching.Do not neglect the gift that is in you, which was given to you through prophecy with the laying on of hands by the council of elders. Put these things into practice, devote yourself to them, so that all may see your progress. Pay close attention to yourself and to your teaching; continue in these things, for in doing this you will save both yourself and your hearers."

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 04-05/17
F
urther investment in education Hezbollah, electoral reform and Pandora’s box/Makram Rabah/Middle East Eye/February 04/17
Aoun to Grandi: Help Syrians go home/The Daily Star/February 04/17
Under Trump: New Directions for American Foreign Policy/Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/February 04/17
I am Muslim and I am not angry/Mamdouh AlMuhaini/Al Arabiya/February 04/17
Question: "Is it important for a Christian to have daily devotions?"/GotQuestions.org/February 04/17
Muhammad and Forced Conversions to Islam/Raymond Ibrahim/February 04/17
Why do so many Americans believe that Islam is a political ideology, not a religion/Michael Schulson/The Washington Post/February 04/17
Trump lashes out at travel ban ruling by 'so-called judge'/SEATTLE (AP) February 04/17
The French Inquisition/France's New Dreyfus Trial, a Jihad against the Truth/Yves Mamou/Gatestone Institute/February 04/2017
Iran's Latest Missile Test: Scenarios and Implications for the New Administration/Farzin Nadimi/The Washington Institute/February 04/2017
Donald Trump and the road to presidential humility/Pierre Ghanem/Al Arabiya/February 04/17
On the preservation and revitalization of Islamic traditions/Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/February 04/17

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 04-05/17
U.S. Denies Lebanon, Other Nations to be Added to New Travel Ban
Report: Parliamentary Polls Likely Postponed until September
Aoun to British Minister: Looking forward to having UK's support to solve Displaced Syrians' problem
Aoun to British Minister: Looking forward to having UK's support to solve Displaced Syrians' problem
British Embassy: Patel congratulates President and Prime Minister, demonstrates increasing commitment through further investment in education
Harb Says a Referendum is a Way to Evade the Elections
U.N. Peacekeepers Say Attacked by Mobs in the South
Kataeb delegation from Bnechii : Discussions tackle methods to bring down 60's law, draft to improve fair representation
Palestinian Detained over Ties to Costa Would-Be Bomber
British Minister visits Hariri: Lebanon should make the most of its partnership with the international community
Demilitarized grenade found in Mount Beddawi
Army arrests wanted suspect following pursuit and shooting along Baalbek Highway
British Embassy: Patel congratulates President and Prime Minister
Aoun to Grandi: Help Syrians go home

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 04-05/17
U.S. Denies Lebanon, Other Nations to be Added to New Travel Ban
Report: Parliamentary Polls Likely Postponed until September
Aoun to British Minister: Looking forward to having UK's support to solve Displaced Syrians' problem
Aoun to British Minister: Looking forward to having UK's support to solve Displaced Syrians' problem
British Embassy: Patel congratulates President and Prime Minister, demonstrates increasing commitment through further investment in education
Harb Says a Referendum is a Way to Evade the Elections
U.N. Peacekeepers Say Attacked by Mobs in the South
Kataeb delegation from Bnechii : Discussions tackle methods to bring down 60's law, draft to improve fair representation
Palestinian Detained over Ties to Costa Would-Be Bomber
British Minister visits Hariri: Lebanon should make the most of its partnership with the international community
Demilitarized grenade found in Mount Beddawi
Army arrests wanted suspect following pursuit and shooting along Baalbek Highway
British Embassy: Patel congratulates President and Prime Minister
Aoun to Grandi: Help Syrians go home

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on February 04-05/17
Dems: Trump shouldn’t fight “Islamic extremism” only, that will offend Muslims
Establishment propaganda media in uproar over unproduced Bannon film on jihad threat
Vox: Islam isn’t a race, but “Islamophobia” is racism
Pakistan’s ambassador in Kuwait says Kuwait hasn’t banned Pakistanis
DOJ to defend Trump’s executive order on immigration
Austria: Muslim MP calls for Christian symbols ban after burka outlawed
Denver police, DHS were warned about jihadi who killed guard, chose to keep it quiet
Smuggling migrants into Europe now a major funding source for the Islamic State
Tapson and Greenfield on “Blindness About Islamic Misogyny at the Women’s March”
Establishment propaganda media crows that Kellyanne Conway “made up” terror attack to justify Trump’s ban
Muslim with dark view of Islam attacks in Louvre 2 days after NY Times warns of Trump’s “dark view of Islam”
Hugh Fitzgerald: “I’m a Muslim — Ask Me Anything,” Answers 16-23

Links From Christian Today Site for on February 04-05/17
US Judge Overturns Donald Trump's Controversial Travel Ban
Delightful' Friend Of Archbishop Of Canterbury Faced Charge Of Killing Zimbabwe Teen
Philippine Catholic Church to slam 'reign of terror' behind war on drugs
Bishop Blames Violent And Punitive Theology For Alleged Abuse At Christian Summer Camps
Catholic Theologian Slams Trump's Border Wall, Says 'Significant Spiritual Issues Are At Stake
ISIS Chops Off Hands Of 2 Kids In Front Of Their Families For Refusing Order To Kill Captives
Millions At Risk As Famine Looms In Somalia – Unless We Act Now
German Magazine Sparks Furor With Image Of Trump Beheading Statue Of Liberty
What Are The 5 Words That Never Fail To Touch Donald Trump's Heart?
 

Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 04-05/17
U.S. Denies Lebanon, Other Nations to be Added to New Travel Ban

Agence France Presse/Associated Press/Naharnet/February 04/17/The United States has denied reports claiming that seven countries including Lebanon will soon be added to a new travel ban list. An Executive Order recently signed by U.S. President Donald Trump had imposed a 90-day pause on the entry into the United States of nationals from Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Iran, Somalia, Libya, and Yemen. A statement issued by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has emphasized that "these seven countries are the only countries to which the pause on entry applies." "No other countries face such treatment. Nor have any other countries been identified as warranting future inclusion at this time, contrary to false reports," the statement said. A pro-Trump website had claimed that seven new countries, including Lebanon, could be added to a list of countries where travelers are banned from traveling to the United States. The alleged list mentioned Egypt, Afghanistan, Colombia, Pakistan, Venezuela, the Philippines and Lebanon. The sources had clarified that the reports still need to be officially confirmed. Trump's order last week sparked protests nationwide and confusion at airports as some travelers were detained. The White House has argued that it will make the country safer. A U.S. judge on Friday imposed a nationwide hold on Trump's ban on travelers and immigrants, siding with two states that had challenged the executive order that has launched legal battles across the country.
 
Report: Parliamentary Polls Likely Postponed until September
Naharnet/February 04/17/Political parties have realized that the parliamentary elections slated for May could be postponed until September to be staged based on a new electoral law, al-Joumhouria daily reported on Saturday. “The political parties are fully informed that the polls will be staged on the last Sunday of September and will be held based on a new law,” Lebanese Forces sources told the daily.  “Attempts to escape forward will not work because the polls will be staged based on a new law simply because it is no one's benefit to trigger enmity with the new term (of the President) in the first few months of its inception,” the sources declared.  “Additionally, it is in no major political force's benefit to expose Lebanon during a stage of external transformations that require consensus domestically, especially that everyone is certain that President Michel Aoun does not intend to show leniency in the issues of extension (of parliament term) and the 1960 law,” they continued to say.  The political parties have intensified their efforts in recent days in a bid to agree on a new electoral law before the expiry of the deadlines. They are discussing several formats of a so-called “hybrid” electoral law that combines the proportional representation and winner-takes-all systems. One of the main obstacles is the Progressive Socialist Party's rejection of proportional representation. The party has warned that any law containing proportional representation would “marginalize” the minority Druze community.  The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.
 
Aoun to British Minister: Looking forward to having UK's support to solve Displaced Syrians' problem
Sat 04 Feb 2017 at 17:13/NNA - President of the Republic General Michel Aoun welcomed on Saturday UK's State Minister of International Development Affairs Priti Patel in the presence of Britain's Ambassador to Lebanon Hugo Shorter, noting that Lebanon is looking forward to enjoying the UK's support to solve the displaced Syrians' problem. Patel congratulated Aoun on his election as President of the Republic, underscoring the United Kingdom support to Lebanon in all fields as well as its willingness to strengthen friendship relations between the two countries.
"Our relations are strong and we would work to strengthen them, especially in the economic field. We will also provide aid in shouldering the burden of the displaced Syrians," Patel told the President of the Republic, pointing out that her country would urge the International community to double their aid to Lebanon. In turn, the President thanked Patel and praised the Kingdom's efforts to support Lebanon in facing challenges, especially those related to terrorism and the displaced Syrians' crisis. The President pointed out that Lebanon would like to enjoy Britain's support to" find a solution to the displaced Syrians' crisis by facilitating their safe return to their country as Lebanon cannot bear anymore the burdens of this unprecedented displacement," reiterating the need to find a political solution to the Syrian crisis. Aoun also thanked Britain for hosting the Donor Countries' conference which was held in February 2016, hoping Britain will continue providing Lebanon with the needed support in this context, especially that a follow- up conference is to be held in Belgium in April 2017.
 
Aoun to British Minister: Looking forward to having UK's support to solve Displaced Syrians' problem
Sat 04 Feb 2017/NNA - President of the Republic General Michel Aoun welcomed on Saturday UK's State Minister of International Development Affairs Priti Patel in the presence of Britain's Ambassador to Lebanon Hugo Shorter, noting that Lebanon is looking forward to enjoying the UK's support to solve the displaced Syrians' problem. Patel congratulated Aoun on his election as President of the Republic, underscoring the United Kingdom support to Lebanon in all fields as well as its willingness to strengthen friendship relations between the two countries. "Our relations are strong and we would work to strengthen them, especially in the economic field. We will also provide aid in shouldering the burden of the displaced Syrians," Patel told the President of the Republic, pointing out that her country would urge the International community to double their aid to Lebanon. In turn, the President thanked Patel and praised the Kingdom's efforts to support Lebanon in facing challenges, especially those related to terrorism and the displaced Syrians' crisis. The President pointed out that Lebanon would like to enjoy Britain's support to" find a solution to the displaced Syrians' crisis by facilitating their safe return to their country as Lebanon cannot bear anymore the burdens of this unprecedented displacement," reiterating the need to find a political solution to the Syrian crisis. Aoun also thanked Britain for hosting the Donor Countries' conference which was held in February 2016, hoping Britain will continue providing Lebanon with the needed support in this context, especially that a follow- up conference is to be held in Belgium in April 2017.

British Embassy: Patel congratulates President and Prime Minister, demonstrates increasing commitment through further investment in education
Sat 04 Feb 2017/NNA - The British Embassy in Beirut issued the following press release on Saturday: "Today, UK Secretary of State for International Development Priti Patel announced that the UK is delivering on its commitment to invest £160m over 4 years in quality education in Lebanon. Compared to last year's enrolment figures, the funding will contribute to getting 147,000 more children into public schools, while maintaining free enrolment for all. The funding will support the London Conference goal of reaching all children with education by 2016/17, provide over three million textbooks, rehabilitate at least 10 schools, and raise standards. The UK Secretary of State made the announcement during a visit to Lebanon to mark the one-year anniversary of the London Conference, which saw donors agree to support Lebanon's medium and long term development through the Lebanese Government's Statement of Intent.   On 4 February 2016, the international community pledged over $12bn to support Syria and its neighbours - more than has ever been pledged for a humanitarian crisis in a single day. The UK's commitment to Lebanon this year alone was £114m, but we have pledged to continue supporting Lebanon not just in education but in its wider development for at least the next four years. Secretary of State for International Development Priti Patel is the first British Cabinet Minister to visit Lebanon since the new Lebanese government took office.  On behalf of the British Government, the Secretary of State for International Development congratulated the President and Prime Minister, and called on the Speaker of Parliament. And in a sign of the close partnership between the British Government and the Government of Lebanon, she also hosted a dinner for the ministers working on Lebanon's Crisis Response Plan. In all her meetings she underlined the UK's steadfast commitment to Lebanon's stability."
 Following her meeting with Prime Minister Hariri, Patel said:  "I am very pleased to have visited Lebanon at this time. Yes, this country faces great adversity, but it is also a country of great generosity, great resilience and great symbolism. Speaking to the Prime Minister, the President today. I sensed a new mood in the country, with the end of the political vacuum, reactivation of Cabinet and the prospect of a renewed parliament on the horizon. I think there is a real opportunity for Lebanon to make the most of its partnership with the international community, both for its own people and for the many refugees it is hosting. The UK has delivered on the promises we made last year, reaching hundreds of thousands of Lebanese and refugees - now it is essential that the international community and host governments alike step up with the funding and reforms needed to complete the ambitious agenda agreed in London."In the morning, she had witnessed the challenging conditions of Syrian refugees coping with a harsh winter. She learned how the UK is lessening the burden by providing improved shelter for refugees and improved water and sanitation for tens of thousands of Lebanese and refugees.SoS Patel had also visited a school where the next generation of Lebanese and refugee children were benefitting from international support for renovated school buildings and improved teaching standards.  Patel said: "It's not enough for children just to get into school, we are working to ensure that they are learning well and thriving in their academic career for a brighter future."
 Notes for editors
 - Priti Patel is
the Senior Secretary of State responsible for the Department of International Development. The UK is also the only G7 country to meet its UN Millennium Project commitment of spending 0.7% of its GNP to Overseas Development Assistance.
 
Harb Says a Referendum is a Way to Evade the Elections
Naharnet/February 04/17/MP Boutros Harb stated that a suggestion made by President Michel Aoun to introduce a referendum shall political parties fail to agree on a new electoral law, is a “method of circumventing the polls.”“Nothing prevents the parliament from approving a draft referendum for the polls as suggested by President Aoun, but the idea of a referendum is a way of circumventing the elections,” Harb said in an interview with VDL (93.3). The MP lamented that political parties have failed so far to meet on common ground “we were not able to agree on an electoral draft law, how would we be able to agree on a referendum?”Harb ruled out the possibility that a new electoral law approved by all parties would be found before the constitutional deadline.He warned that shall parties fail to find a consensual format, it “would lead to the demolition of the entire political system.” Endeavors have failed so far because none of the political parties succeeded at finding a 'magic format' that meets approval of all,” added the MP. President Michel Aoun warned Friday that he would propose a popular “referendum” should the political forces fail to agree on a new electoral law. “Any electoral law must be based on unified standards and I will propose a referendum should we reach a dead end,” Aoun told a delegation from the Syndicate of Press Editors.
 
U.N. Peacekeepers Say Attacked by Mobs in the South
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 04/17/Groups of civilians attacked United Nations peacekeepers on patrol in two incidents in southern Lebanon on Friday, damaging their vehicles but causing no injuries, the mission said in a statement. The U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) said two patrols in the al-Mansouri and Majdal Zoun areas in south Lebanon were obstructed on Friday morning "by groups of aggressive men.""Civilians attempted to block the way of UNIFIL patrols and attacked the peacekeepers," the statement said. "UNIFIL patrol vehicles had to push aside some civilian vehicles used as roadblocks in order to safely pull out from the locations." The statement said no peacekeepers were injured in the incidents, which caused "severe damages" to UNIFIL vehicles. It gave no indication of the reason for the incidents, or any prior tension in the area, and said the mission was in touch with the Lebanese army to determine the cause of the attacks. The 10,000-strong UNIFIL mission monitors the ceasefire line between Lebanon and Israel, which remain technically in a state of war.

Kataeb delegation from Bnechii : Discussions tackle methods to bring down 60's law, draft to improve fair representation
Sat 04 Feb 2017/NNA - "Marada" leader Sleiman Franjieh welcomed on Saturday at his residence in Bnechii a delegation from Kataeb Party which included Former Minister Alain Hakim, advisors of Kataeb leader Michel Khoury and Albert Costanian. Following the meeting, Khoury said that the visit came within their tour to various Lebanese leaders and references, stressing that it aimed at discussing with MP Sleiman Franjieh all the suggestions and formulas regarding the new electoral law. Khoury added that they discussed with Franjieh in specific, as with most of the leaders that they visited, the " methods to bring down the 60's electoral law and suggesting a new law that better secures fair representation for all sects, opens the opportunity to new persons to be in the parliament, preserves diversity in Lebanon and creates efficient opposition." Khoury added that they are against any draft based on a sectarian, partisan or annulment back ground. Khoury described discussions with MP Franjieh as "friendly, honest and serious," hoping that they would be able to face the constitutional crisis that looms in the horizon. Khoury wished all political parties would agree on an electoral law that satisfies all the Lebanese. 
 
Palestinian Detained over Ties to Costa Would-Be Bomber
Naharnet/February 04/17/The Lebanese army intelligence units arrested in south Lebanon , a Palestinian man over suspicion of having ties to a would-be suicide attacker who attempted to carry out a terror operation in Beirut's upscale Hamra neighborhood earlier this year, the National News Agency reported on Saturday. The detainee identified as Hassan Majdi Obeid was arrested in al-Zahrani's Sarafand area, NNA added. He is a friend and a co-worker of failed suicide-bomber Omar al-Assi. Both have worked at the Hammoud Hospital University Medical Center in Sidon. Security forces arrested al-Assi, inside the Costa cafe in one of the busiest neighborhoods in the capital Beirut. Wearing an explosive bomb belt, the man had been detained by authorities after entering the coffee shop in Hamra in west Beirut.
 
British Minister visits Hariri: Lebanon should make the most of its partnership with the international community
Sat 04 Feb 2017/NNA - Prime Minister Saad Hariri received today at the "House of Center" the British Secretary of State for International Development, Priti Patel, in the presence of the British Ambassador to Lebanon Hugo Shorter, the Minister of State for Refugees Affairs Moein Merehbi and Hariri's advisor for refugees affairs Nadim Mounla.  After the meeting, Patel said: "I am very pleased to have visited Lebanon at this time. Lebanon faces great adversity, but it is also a country of great generosity, great resilience and great symbolism. Speaking to the Prime Minister and the President today, I sensed a new mood in the country, with the end of the vacuum and the reactivation of Cabinet that brought up opportunity in the horizon. I think there is a real opportunity for Lebanon to make the most of its partnership with the international community, both for its own people and for the many refugees it is hosting. The UK delivered on the promises we made last year, reaching hundreds of thousands of Lebanese and refugees. Now it is essential that the international community and host governments alike step up with the funding and the reforms needed to complete the ambitious agenda agreed in London last year."

Demilitarized grenade found in Mount Beddawi
Sat 04 Feb 2017/NNA - A demilitarized-detonator bomb was detected in a building under construction in Jebel Beddawi on Saturday, whereby security forces enforced a blockade around the vicinity while a military expert worked on transferring the bomb, NNA correspondent in Dinniye reported.

Army arrests wanted suspect following pursuit and shooting along Baalbek Highway

Sat 04 Feb 2017/NNA - Army units arrested, on Saturday, a wanted suspect after long pursuit and open gunfire at the entrance to the town of Majdaloun along Baalbek's international highway, whereby he was taken to Army barracks for investigation, NNA correspondent in Baalbek reported.
 
British Embassy: Patel congratulates President and Prime Minister, demonstrates increasing commitment through further investment in education Hezbollah, electoral reform and Pandora’s box
Makram Rabah/Middle East Eye/February 04/17
 http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/hezbollah-electoral-reform-and-pandora-s-box-783825264
Hezbollah has done everything to distract, delay and impede democracy. Its endorsement of a new PR system is more of the same
The Lebanese public last went to the polls to elect representatives to parliament in 2009. Those elections followed a deal reached by the Lebanese factions in Qatar, which put an end to the quasi-coup Hezbollah and their allies launched against the government of prime minister Fouad Siniora.
The Doha Accord, as it came to be known, rewarded Hezbollah and their allies for using their weapons against government forces who conceded defeat. Ultimately, Doha gave Hezbollah and its main Christian ally Michael Aoun, Lebanon’s current president, an electoral law which suited them.
The abysmal failure of the ruling class to elect a president for over two years, forced the current parliament to extend its own term in office, which it did unconstitutionally. This will expire in June this year.
Consequently with only a few more months remaining, the different political factions are once more jostling to influence, or more precisely gerrymander, a new election law which will give them victory.
The fistfight has been over the formula to adopt in the voting process rather the division of the districts which will remain almost identical.
As it stands, the majority of the Christian politicians, led by president Aoun’s bloc are endorsing an ostensibly modern law which introduces proportional voting (PR) which naturally gives their side a clear disadvantage by preventing non-christian factions from winning christian seats as they have customary done in the past.
 In contrast, other factions, chiefly amongst them Walid Joumblatt the chief of the Druze, have been vocal against such PR which ultimately disenfranchises and prevents them from catering to their constituency within the larger clientelist Lebanese system.
 The most interesting part of this game however is the part played by Hezbollah. Closer examination reveals a more elaborate plot in the making.
 Hezbollah’s staunch endorsement of Aoun’s electoral reform is to be expected, given that their alliance is now into its eleventh year.
 Strangely however, Hezbollah’s rejection of majoritarian law and its zealous support of Aoun’s proportional law appears to be against their interests, given that any form of PR would reduce Hezbollah’s parliamentary bloc as well as that of its main Shiia ally, the Amal Movement.
 Has Hezbollah suddenly become altruistic? Their calculations are better understood as a piece of a bigger and wider long-term strategy as a Lebanese subsidiary of Iran.
 Until 2005, when Syrian exodus from Lebanon took place, Hezbollah’s direct involvement in the structure of Lebanese governance remained minimal and revolved around a small, inconsequential, parliamentary bloc.
 Having never recognised the Taif Accord, which ended the civil war, Hezbollah’s accommodation with the Lebanese state was largely the result of a regional settlement which gave the late Hafez al Assad custody over Lebanon including Hezbollah.
 This changed after the assassination of the then prime minister, Rafik Hariri, as Hezbollah had to step up to the plate, take part in the executive branch of government and become fully immersed in the trivialities of Lebanese politics.
 Despite this tremendous shift, Hezbollah never endorsed, nor aspired to empower, the Lebanese state but rather remained focused on preserving its own parallel state structure which was primarily geared towards protecting the interests of the Iranian revolution.
 Consequently, its endorsement of PR, which weakens the grasp of the traditional political parties and their leaders, is actually an attempt to make the Lebanese state implode and to finally renounce the formula agreed at Taif. This aim is shared by Aoun.
 Having blocked the presidential elections over the past two years by boycotting the parliament sessions, Hezbollah have once and gain used the banner of empowering Christians as a pretext for further deepening the sectarian structure of government set by Taif.
 In the bigger picture, Hezbollah’s involvement in the Syrian civil war has exposed them domestically, further implicating them in the Iranian-Russian attempt to salvage what remains of Bashar al-Assad and his regime.
 The growing and now visible rift between Russia and Iran over Syria and its future has placed Hezbollah at a disadvantage, seeing as growing Russian influence in the region might erode their standing over time both locally and regionally.
 While Russia has never shied away from using its muscle to settle its disputes, its military involvement in Syria will sooner or later come to an end.
 When the time comes, Russia will reach out to Sunni political actors in the area to seek a partner to settle the Syrian crisis.
 This scenario will certainly push Iran and Hezbollah against the ropes and will necessitate a preemptive plan on their part that involves them using Lebanon and its people as leverage to stay afloat in the international game of nations.
 Hezbollah’s investment in a harmless election law, which seemingly empowers progressive elements, might appear tempting to some - but one has to be aware of the Pandora’s Box this simple move might open.
 Next time you hear any of Hezbollah’s representatives’ praise or endorse any legislation or initiative to reform the Lebanese system, bear this in mind: ultimately, if all this electoral maneuvering and using democracy as a façade fails, Hezbollah can always fall back on what it does best - using its arms to gets what it wants. This is the reality no ballot box can mask.
 - Makram Rabah is a lecturer at the American University of Beirut, Department of History. He is the author of A Campus at War: Student Politics at the American University of Beirut, 1967-1975.
 The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
 
Aoun to Grandi: Help Syrians go home
The Daily Star/February 04/17
BEIRUT: Syrian refugees should return to Syrian safe zones, President Michel Aoun said Friday during a meeting with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi.
The UNHCR head, who arrived on an official visit to Lebanon Thursday, met with Aoun at Baabda Palace and discussed the situation for refugees in the country. Aoun told the U.N. official that the Lebanese people appreciated the efforts UNHCR has been exerting to assist Syrian refugees and Lebanese communities.
The president told Grandi that the international community should work to facilitate refugees’ return by forming safe zones for them in Syria, which should happen in coordination with the Syrian government.
Lebanon has begun the stage of advancement despite the difficult economic circumstances that the country is passing through and the negative implications on its economy resulting from the Syrian refugees,” Aoun told the U.N. official.
Lebanon is not looking at forcing any of the refugees to return to Syria amid unstable security conditions, but there must be a unified international effort to find the suitable atmosphere to facilitate the return,” he added.
The U.N. official said he had assured Aoun that UNHCR would help those wanting to return. When pressed on the matter of returning refugees, numerous U.N. officials in Lebanon have reiterated the need for them to be able to do so voluntarily and with safety and dignity.
Speaking after the meeting, Grandi said that when Aoun asked him what could be done to hasten the return of refugees, the U.N. official told him a stable security atmosphere should be secured. He added that a reconstruction plan for Syria should also begin in certain cities.
As part of the official tour, Grandi also visited Speaker Nabih Berri and Prime Minister Saad Hariri.
“We reviewed the situation of the Syrian refugees in the country that, in percentage terms, hosts the highest concentration of refugees in the world,” Grandi said, after the meeting with Hariri which was attended by Minister of State for Refugee Affairs Mouin Merehbi, Hariri’s adviser for refugee affairs Nadim Mounla and other officials.
He said he expressed his gratitude to Hariri for the work the Lebanese government has been doing to host Syrian refugees. Grandi also told the prime minister that a European Union-hosted humanitarian conference in Brussels would act as an opportunity to restate support for countries hosting refugees. He said that during his recent visit to Syria, he observed the dramatic situation in some of the country’s largest cities. “I just came back from a trip to Syria. I found the northern cities Homs and Aleppo very devastated and I think that once the political process reaches positive conclusions, it will be important to invest resources there to reconstruct the country,” Grandi said.But until the situation is suitable for the refugees to go back home, cooperation will continue between the U.N. and Lebanon: “We are very happy that the prime minister has appointed a state minister for refugee affairs ... and we will be working with him very closely, and with the rest of the government, on this important [role].”In a further meeting with Interior Minister Nouhad Machnouk, the minister told Grandi of the importance of maintaining strong constitutional institutions in order to be able to protect the country from threats surrounding it.

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 04-05/17
The Pope Just Threw Shade At Trump In The Classiest Way Possible
Carol Kuruvilla Associate Religion Editor/The Huffington Post/February 04/17
Pope Francis hasn’t yet directly addressed President Donald Trump’s executive order on refugees and immigrants ― but the pontiff is clearly thinking about the large swath of humanity Trump is shoving to the margins.
Days after Trump signed a sweeping order dramatically restricting the number of refugees and foreign nationals allowed to enter the United States, Francis called on his flock to pray that the “poor, refugees, and marginalized” would find “welcome and comfort in our communities.”
Curiously, he mentions “skyscrapers” and “real estate deals” ― two things the president is intimately acquainted with.
“We live in cities that throw up skyscrapers and shopping centers and strike big real estate deals but they abandon a part of themselves to marginal settlements on the periphery,” he said in the video published on February 2. “The result of this situation is that great sections of the population are excluded and marginalized: without a job, without options, without a way out. Don’t abandon them.”
Pope Francis shows drawings made by children on his flight back to Rome following a visit at the Moria refugee camp in the Greek island of Lesbos, April 16, 2016.
The YouTube video announced Francis’ prayer intentions for the month of February. Every month, the pope encourages Catholics to join his worldwide prayer network in praying for a specific theme. February’s theme asks Catholics to “welcome the needy.”
The pope has often spoken out about the plight of migrants and refugees, emphasizing that welcoming them is a Christian duty. Mirroring Jesus’ actions in the Bible, the pope traditionally washes the feet of a few followers during the Christian holy day known as Maundy Thursday. Last year, he chose to wash and kiss the feet of 12 refugees. A few weeks later, after a trip to Greece, he took 12 Syrian Muslim refugees back to Rome with him on the papal plane.
On Wednesday, the Vatican’s deputy secretary of state, Archbishop Angelo Becciu, told an Italian Catholic television station that the Holy See is concerned about Trump’s order.
“Certainly there is worry because we are messengers of another culture, that of openness,” a top-ranking Vatican official, told TV2000. “Pope Francis, in fact, insists on the ability to integrate those who arrive in our societies and cultures.”
Pope Francis welcomes a group of Syrian refugees after landing at Ciampino airport in Rome following a visit at the Moria refugee camp in the Greek island of Lesbos, April 16, 2016.
In the United States, some Catholic bishops and lay leaders offered strong condemnations of the ban. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, an assembly composed of American bishops, is involved with helping refugees resettle and build new lives in the country. “We strongly disagree with the Executive Order’s halting refugee admissions,” Bishop Joe S. Vásquez said in a statement on behalf of the USCCB. “We believe that now more than ever, welcoming newcomers and refugees is an act of love and hope. ”
After the inauguration, Francis sent the new president a telegram that both congratulated Trump and reminded him of his responsibility to take care of the poor and marginalized. While the pontiff hasn’t spoken about the executive order itself, his views on refugees can probably be summed up in an exchange he had with pilgrims in Germany last October. “It’s hypocrisy to call yourself a Christian and chase away a refugee or someone seeking help, someone who is hungry or thirsty, toss out someone who is in need of my help,” he said. “If I say I am Christian, but do these things, I’m a hypocrite.”

Iran is world's biggest state sponsor of terrorism, US says
BBC/February 04/17/ US Defence Secretary James Mattis has called Iran the world's "biggest state sponsor of terrorism", amid rising tensions between the two nations. His comments come a day after the Trump administration imposed new sanctions against Iran in response to a ballistic missile test. But Mr Mattis said he did not see any need to boost US troop numbers in the Middle East to deal with Iran. Iran has been carrying out military exercises in a show of defiance. Tense but unclear Trump-Iran relations
The Revolutionary Guards, set up to defend Iran's Islamic government, said the drills would "showcase the power of Iran's revolution and to dismiss the sanctions". Iranian-built missile systems, radars, command and control centres, and cyber warfare systems are being tested during Saturday's exercises, state media reported. A senior commander said the armed forces were ready to "rain down missiles" on the country's enemies if attacked. "We are working day and night for the security of the Iranian nation," said Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of the Revolutionary Guards' air force.
'Playing with fire'
US officials said the sanctions, targeting 13 people and 12 companies, were in response to last Sunday's missile test and what they called Iran's "continued support for terrorism". They are the first Iran sanctions of Donald Trump's new presidency, who has signalled a tougher stance on Iran than the Obama administration. Mr Mattis had more strong words for Iran while visiting Japan. "As far as Iran goes, this is the single biggest state sponsor of terrorism in the world," he told reporters. "We have seen their [Iran's] misconduct, their misbehaviour, from Lebanon and Syria to Bahrain and to Yemen and it's got to be addressed at some point," he added. But he went on to say that despite the recent tensions he saw no need to boost troop numbers in the Middle East. "We always have the capability to do so, but at this time I don't think it's necessary," he said. 'We will never initiate war' Iran has denied that its missile test violates a UN Security Council resolution or the nuclear deal it struck with international powers, including the UN. In response to the US sanctions, Iran announced restrictions against US companies and individuals "involved in creating and supporting extremist terrorist groups or are helping in the killing and oppression of defenceless people". Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif has also said the Islamic Republic was unmoved by US threats. "We'll never initiate war, but we can only rely on our own means of defence," Mr Zarif wrote. US officials have suggested more action could follow. Mr Trump has been a vocal critic of the nuclear accord, which saw Iran agreeing to curb its sensitive nuclear activities in return for the lifting of economic sanctions. Iran is also among the seven Muslim-majority countries included in a controversial US travel ban.

State Department reverses visa ban, allows travelers with visas into U.S.: official
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. State Department will allow people with valid visas into the United States, a department official said on Saturday, in order to comply with an opinion from a federal judge in Seattle barring President Donald Trump's executive action.
"We have reversed the provisional revocation of visas," the State Department official said in a statement. "Those individuals with visas that were not physically canceled may now travel if the visa is otherwise valid."
(Reporting by Yeganeh Torbati and Julia Edwards Ainsley; Editing by Bill Trott)

Father of Louvre attack suspect: My son is innocent
Ashraf Abdel-Hamid, Al Arabiya Saturday, 4 February 2017/Gen. Ridha Rifai’i al- Hamahmy, the father of the Egyptian accused of being involved in the Louvre attack in which a knife wielding man attempted to enter gallery the, has revealed new information about his son.
In an interview with Al Arabiya, Gen. Hamahmy said his 29-year-old son, is completely innocent and has evidence to support it. He said Abdullah is currently employed in a legal consulting firm in Sharjah, in the UAE. He told Al Arabiya he called him a few days ago to tell him that he was traveling with his colleagues on a business trip to Paris and would be returning to Sharjah on Saturday. Abdullah was shot four times after slightly injuring a soldier patrolling the underground mall in Paris, but his injuries are no longer life-threatening, according to the Paris prosecutor's office. He informed him that he would take the Friday off to explore Paris and buy some gifts. He added that Abdullah had contacted him on Thursday evening, one day before the Louvre incident to assure him that “the business trip was a success”.
His father said he was ‘shocked’ to hear about his son’s involvement in the Louvre attack, saying Abdullah was completely innocent of all charges for several reasons. He said Abdullah was being charged with assaulting a police officer with a knife, while in fact the police officer was more than 190 cm tall, while Abdullah’s height is only 157 cm. Abdullah was shot four times after slightly injuring a soldier patrolling the underground mall in Paris. (Supplied) “So logically speaking, it couldn’t have been him. Furthermore, the Louvre has three electric gates which make it impossible to smuggle weapons or metals objects in,” Gen. Ridha said. “It is unreasonable for a young man to execute a terrorist attack carrying gifts he purchased and his ID card on him,” he added. Gen. Ridha, a former leader of the Egyptian police, said that his son always listens to music and has no political or extremist affiliation to any group stressing that Abdullah resents extremist ideals in general. And on the issue of what was written by Abdullah on his Twitter account, Al- Hamahmy speculated that the account might have been hacked adding that "what is written there are not the words of Abdullah. My son loves life and hates extremist groups that kill innocent people". He explained that his son is now lying in a hospital bed in France. The French security forces rushed to shoot him without checking his identity. Consequently, he suffered serious injuries and had to undergo surgery on his stomach. He said members of his family were not allowed to talk with their son and that Egyptian security services had all the necessary information on the case of Abdullah. Al-Hamahmy mentioned that his other son works as a police officer and all the members of his family enjoy certain social privilege and status. He said his family had no affiliation with extremist groups, emphasizing that the investigation would prove Abdullah’s innocence. He added that Abdullah was married and has a son named Youssef. “Abdullah is an example of discipline and dedication to his work which earned him the confidence of his superiors in the company he works for. He was always carrying out the company’s mission abroad, and if he had any extremist or militant ideas they wouldn’t have trusted him to implement the company’s missions outside the UAE,” the father said.

Iran: If Enemies Do Wrong, Missiles Will Come Down on Them
Naharnet/Associated Press/February 04/17/Iran's missiles will come down on the country's enemies if they do wrong, a senior commander in Iran's elite Revolutionary Guard was quoted as saying in a Saturday report from semi-official Tasnim news agency. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, chief of the Guard's airspace division, said: "If the enemy does not walk the line, our missiles come down on them." Hajizadeh's comments came during a Revolutionary Guard military exercise aimed at testing its missile and radar systems. The exercise was taking place in a 35,000-square-kilometer (13,515-square-mile) area in Semnan province in northern Iran. The exercise comes a day after U.S. President Donald Trump's administration imposed sanctions on Iran in response to a recent missile test. The sanctions target more than two dozen people and companies from the Persian Gulf to China. Tasnim said all the equipment used in the war game, including all defensive systems, radars, command centers and ground-to-air missile equipment, are designed and manufactured by Iranian scientists. Iranian English language Press TV reported that Iran Senior Vice President Ishaq Jahangiri dismissed what he called recent anti-Iran posturing by the U.S. He said "threadbare" accusations are aimed by Washington at scaring away investors. "The Iranian nation and authorities do not attach the least value to these remarks," he said. Iran insists its missile test was only for defensive purposes and not a violation of the U.N. Security Council 2231 resolution or the nuclear deal with Western powers. Foreign Minister Javad Zarif tweeted Friday that his country was "unmoved by threats as we derive security for our people. We'll never initiate war, but we can only rely on our own means of defense."

Anti-IS Syria Force Launches New Phase in Raqa Campaign
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 04/17/US-backed Kurdish and Arab fighters announced on Saturday a new phase in their campaign for the Islamic State group's Syrian stronghold of Raqa, but said they needed more weapons to win. The Syrian Democratic Forces launched their campaign to capture the city last November and have taken some ground further up the Euphrates Valley but are still some distance away. The SDF "announce the beginning of the third phase to liberate Raqa and its surroundings, which will target the eastern part of the province," spokeswoman Jihan Sheikh Ahmed said. Speaking in the village of Aaliyah, north of the city, Ahmed said 750 more Arab fighters had joined the SDF after being trained by the US-led coalition. The coalition has carried out air strikes against IS in Syria and Iraq since 2014. Washington has dispatched about 500 troops -- including bomb disposal experts, trainers and special operations troops -- to support the SDF's campaign.
In a first, Washington has also provided the SDF with armoured sports utility vehicles since President Donald Trump took office, Pentagon and alliance officials said last week.
"Coalition forces provided our Arab contingent with vehicles, but the numbers are very small and we hope they will increase in the coming days," SDF spokesman Talal Sello said on Saturday. Local SDF commander Rojda Felat said additional equipment that had been requested was not arriving quickly enough. "The weapons that we need to liberate Raqa are tanks, Dushkas (heavy machine guns) and armoured vehicles," Felat, 38, told AFP.
"There has been a delay in the arrival of weapons we need, but the support will be increased in the next phases," she said. Felat could give no timeline for when the SDF would reach the outskirts of Raqa, but said: "In this phase, we will get closer."Of the roughly 30,000 fighters within the alliance, around two-thirds belong to the Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG), which Turkey considers a "terrorist" group.Washington insists it only delivers military aid to the Arab component of the SDF, but the assistance has still angered Ankara. The SDF offensive is one of three rival operations targeting IS in Syria.Further west, the jihadists are under attack in the city of Al-Bab, with Turkish-backed rebels on its northern outskirts and Syrian government forces now six kilometres (four miles) to the south.

Shot Louvre attacker's condition improving: French prosecutor
Sat 04 Feb 2017/NNA - The condition of the man shot and seriously wounded outside the Louvre museum when he set upon French soldiers with a pair of machetes is improving and he is out of danger, the Paris prosecutor's office said on Saturday. The 29-year-old Egyptian, identified by security sources as Abdullah Reda al-Hamamy, was shot several times in the abdomen on Friday after what French President Francois Hollande described as a terrorist attack. The man's condition has "markedly improved", an official at the prosecutor's office said. "His life is no longer in danger."One soldier was slightly injured in the incident near the entrance to the museum, which reopened on Saturday. The attacker was also carrying a backpack that contained paint spray cans but no explosives, police said. ---REUTERS

Defiant Iran in missile exercise after sanctions
Agencies Saturday, 4 February 2017/Iran is to deploy missiles for a Revolutionary Guards exercise Saturday in a show of defiance a day after the United States imposed sanctions over a ballistic missile test launch last weekend. The Guards' Sepahnews website said the manoeuvres were aimed at demonstrating their "complete preparedness to deal with the threats" and "humiliating sanctions" from Washington. "Different types of domestically produced radar and missile systems, command and control centers, and cyber warfare systems will be used in this exercise," it said. The US Treasury Department on Friday issued sanctions against organizations and individuals aiding Iran’s ballistic missile program, as well as for acting for or on behalf of, or providing support to, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force (IRGC-QF). The statement by the US Treasury’s Department of the Treasury’s Office said: “This action reflects the United States’ commitment to enforcing sanctions on Iran with respect to its ballistic missile program and destabilizing activities in the region and is fully consistent with the United States’ commitments under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).” According to Reuters, 13 individuals and 12 entities based in the Gulf, Lebanon and China come under the new US sanctions. The OFAC has designated several networks and supporters of Iran’s ballistic missile procurement, including a critical Iranian procurement agent and eight individuals and entities in his Iran- and China-based network, an Iranian procurement company and its Gulf-based network, and five individuals and entities that are part of an Iran-based procurement network, which was designated on January 17, 2016. Individual providing procurement and other services on behalf of the IRGC-QF were also in the sanctions list. This action was taken pursuant to an Executive Order, which targets proliferators of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery and supporters of such activity. (AFP and Reuters)

Syrian Democratic Forces launch new phase in Raqqa
Reuters, Raqqa Province Saturday, 4 February 2017/An alliance of US-backed militias said it had started a new phase of its campaign against the ISIS-held city of Raqqa on Saturday, aiming to complete its encirclement and sever the road to militant strongholds in Deir al-Zor province. The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) said in a statement the action was being undertaken with "increasing support from the (US-led) international coalition forces through guaranteeing air cover for our forces’ advances, or via the help provided by their special teams to our forces on the battle ground". The SDF, which includes the powerful Kurdish YPG militia, launched its multi-phased campaign aimed at encircling and ultimately capturing Raqqa in November. A SDF commander told Reuters the forces had so far advanced a few kilometres (miles) in the latest phase, which aims to capture areas to the east of the city, including the highway linking it to Deir al-Zor province. Deir al-Zor, which is almost entirely in ISIS hands, stretches all the way to the Iraqi border. A Kurdish military source told Reuters on Tuesday that the goals of this phase included capturing the main highway. Several hundred US special forces soldiers have been supporting SDF operations against ISIS in northern Syria. France said in June that its special forces were advising rebels in the same area.

Anti-Nusra Front demo in Idlib ‘start of new revolution’
By Leila Alwan/Al ARabiaya/Saturday, 4 February 2017/In spite of the military battles, every Friday residents in Idlib come together to protest peacefully against the Syrian regime to reignite the spirit of the 2011 revolution.But this Friday was quite different. Activists and local residents of the rebel-held city chanted the same hymns they usually do, but instead of Assad, substituted “Goddamn you, Jolani” referring to Mohamad al-Jolani, head of Jabhat Fateh al-Sham formerly known as the al-Nusra Front. Al-Dana, Maeret Noaman and other towns filled with hundreds of people who defied the al-Nusra Front. Since 2011, every Friday protest across Syria was organized under a united theme, but yesterday’s title was, ‘No room for al-Qaeda in Syria’.Activist and aid worker Khaled Salame told Al Arabiya English that this the beginning of a new revolution in Syria. “The people are ready to revolt against anything that stands in the face of their freedom.”He said these past days brought him back to 2011.
“The banners of al-Qaeda have fallen, and the Syrian revolution flag has risen once again,” he said.
‘Liberating Damascus
“I said this two years ago, the way to liberating Damascus is through defeating the extremists,” Salame added. The activist said they have not only fought Assad militias, but also Hezbollah, Iraqi militias, Iran, Russia, ISIS, and al-Qaeda; referring to them all as one. “They are all one entity, fighting in different ways.”Recent heavy clashes between al-Qaeda’s former Syria branch and Syrian rebels took place last Friday. The clashes took place in west of Idlib near Aleppo and the Turkish border, and the south. According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, both groups used “heavy weaponry,” and many casualties were reported. Militant group Ahrar al-Sham sided with Free Syrian Army groups, and Jabhat Fateh al-Sham refused to reconcile after they had targeted a rebel faction.

U.S.-backed Syrian force in new phase of Raqqa assault
Reuters/ By Rodi Said and Tom Perry
RAQQA PROVINCE, Syria/BEIRUT, Feb 4 (Reuters) - An alliance of U.S.-backed militias started a new phase of its campaign against the Islamic State-held city of Raqqa on Saturday (Shenzhen: 002291.SZ - news) , aiming to complete its encirclement and sever the road to militant strongholds in Deir al-Zor province.
The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) said in a statement the action was being undertaken with "increasing support from the (U.S.-led) international coalition forces" through both air strikes and backing from coalition special forces on the ground.
The SDF, which includes the powerful Kurdish YPG militia, launched its multi-phased campaign aimed at encircling and ultimately capturing Raqqa in November. It is the main U.S. partner in the fight against Islamic State in Syria.
Fighting also raged between Islamic State and Syrian government forces northeast of Aleppo, where the Syrian army is nearing the IS-held city of al-Bab, risking a confrontation with Turkish forces that are fighting the group in the same area.
Islamic State is being fought in separate campaigns in Syria by the U.S.-backed SDF, the Turkish army and the Syrian rebel groups it backs, and the Syrian army with help from the Russian air force and Iranian-backed militia.
A SDF commander told Reuters the forces had so far advanced a few kilometres (miles) in the latest phase, which aims to capture areas to the east of the city, including the highway linking it to Deir al-Zor province.
Deir al-Zor, which is almost entirely in Islamic State hands, stretches all the way to the Iraqi border. A Kurdish military source told Reuters on Tuesday that the goals of this phase included capturing the main highway.
Several hundred U.S. special forces soldiers have been supporting SDF operations against Islamic State in northern Syria. France said in June that its special forces were advising rebels in the same area.
Representatives of the U.S.-led coalition looked on as the statement declaring the start of the new phase was read out in a village in northern Raqqa province.
PHASE THREE
This is the third phase of the Raqqa operation. The first phase targeted areas north of Raqqa city. The second, targeting areas to the west of the city, is ongoing, with SDF forces yet to capture the Islamic State-held Euphrates dam.
Air strikes on Friday in Raqqa hit two bridges over the Euphrates river, hindering movement from the city southwards and killing six IS militants, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported.
U.S. support for the SDF has been a point of tension with NATO ally Turkey, which views the YPG as an extension of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), a group that has fought a three-decade insurgency in Turkey.
The United States says it is providing training and material support only to Arab elements of the SDF. It supplied them last month with armoured vehicles for the first time to help in the Raqqa campaign.
U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order last week requesting the Pentagon, joint chiefs of staff and other agencies to submit a preliminary plan in 30 days for defeating Islamic State.
One key decision awaiting the Trump administration is whether to directly provide weapons to the YPG.
The U.S.-backed campaign against Islamic State in Syria has focused mostly on northern parts of the country. Turkey launched its own offensive against the group along the border in August, deploying its army in support of Free Syrian Army rebel groups.
The Turkish campaign, which also aims to prevent further expansion of YPG control, has been encountering fierce Islamic State resistance in al-Bab since December.
Syrian government forces have staged a rapid advance of their own towards al-Bab in the last two weeks. (Writing by Tom Perry in Beirut; Editing by Alexander Smith)

Israel Hits Back at Trump Over Settlement Intervention
 Kobi Gideon/The Daily Beast/February 04/17/ Israel hit back at President Trump on Friday after the White House warned that new settlement construction might threaten the chances of peace in the region. An unexpected statement released by the Trump administration on Thursday said that expanding Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank might be unhelpful. “While we don’t believe the existence of settlements is an impediment to peace,” White House press secretary Sean Spicer said in the statement, “the construction of new settlements or the expansion of existing settlements beyond their current borders may not be helpful in achieving that goal.” Israel Deputy Foreign Minister Tzipi Hotovely claimed that the statement contradicted itself. “The White House itself holds that the settlements are not an obstacle to peace and they never have been. It must be concluded therefore that expansion of construction is not the problem.”
 
Iran Regime's Inhumane Punishment of Death by Stoning Continues
NCRI/Saturday, 04 February 2017 19:20 /Criminal Court of the Western Lorestan province in Iran, condemned a man and a woman accused of so called ‘unethical relation’ to medieval capital punishment of death by stoning. According to the verdict of the Criminal Court Branch 1, in Lorestan Province, the sentence of ‘death by stoning’ has been issued, for Mr. KH. A and Mrs. S-M.Th. The state run website called Kashkan reported on February 2, 2017. The source said: "At the moment the sentence is issued by the lower court and the track is communicated to the attorneys of the defendants and added, in this case the role of the city administration chief, the Public Prosecutor Bureau, feta police intelligence and police has been outstanding in gathering evidence, arresting suspects and transferring the case to legal authorities. The source also stated that the two accused are already in custody, awaiting final approval of the sentence by the court. It is noteworthy that Amnesty International earlier this year in Jaunary, has called out the mullahs’ dictatorship and asked other international human rights charities and governments to condemn these atrocities. In a statement, Amnesty International wrote: “Iran’s persistent use of cruel and inhuman punishments, including floggings, amputations and forced blinding over the past year, exposes the authorities’ utterly brutal sense of justice.”
 
Day After Warnings, Iran Regime's IRGC Starts Missile Tests
NCRI/Saturday, 04 February 2017 19:20 /IRGC Commander: “We will not stop enhancement of our capability specially the missile industry” Only a day after a senior official of the United States of America warned about Iran's missile tests, Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) announced the start of a new Missile Drill in Semnan east of Tehran. Iran regime’s military drill is being conducted in Semnan while, earlier Iran's controversial missile tests also were held around the same city. State run Fars news agency reported on February 4, that: Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force kicked off massive military drills dubbed 'Modafe'an Harim-e Aseman Velayat' (Defenders of the Velayat Skies) in Semnan province in Northern Iran on Saturday. The massive drills are being held in an area of 35,000 square kilometers, and are aimed at demonstrating Iran’s power, intelligence command, and defense readiness to counter any threats. Different types of missile and radar systems, which are designed and manufactured by Iranian experts and engineers with diverse ranges, were used during the exercises.
The radar systems also used in the massive drills included long-range Qadir radar system with a tracking range of up to 1,100 kilometers, Matla al-Fajr radar system with a range of 500 kilometers and capable of tracking different kinds of aircraft and drones and Kavosh radar system with a range of 150 kilometers and capable of tracking air threats at low altitudes, including cruise missiles and different aircraft.
In late January, Commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps Aerospace Force Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh announced that his forces will take part in a massive military drill in the near future.
"The main aim of the upcoming war game is to display IRGC's capabilities in producing the him-made military equipment," General Hajizadeh said, addressing a ceremony in the Northeastern city of Sabzevar.
No matter what the enemies do and even if they try to impose restrictions on Iran, "we will not stop enhancement of our capability, knowledge and production in defense fields, specially the missile industry", Hajizadeh said, addressing Iranian university officials and professors in Tehran. Hajizadeh had also announced earlier this month that the country has increased the number of its ballistic missiles, while increasing their precision-striking capability.
"In addition to enhancing the precision-striking power and quality of ballistic missiles, the Iranian authorities and experts have used innovative and shortcut methods to produce inexpensive missiles and today, we are witnessing an increase in production (of ballistic missiles)," General Hajizadeh said in Tehran.
His remarks came after Iranian Defense Minister Brigadier General Hossein Dehqan underlined that his country sees no limit for the range of the ballistic missiles that it is developing.
"We don’t have any limit for the range of liquid or solid-fueled ballistic missiles," Dehqan said in a meeting in the Central city of Isfahan in August.
He underlined the indigenous nature of most Iranian weapons and military equipment, and said, "90 percent of the country's defense systems have reached an acceptable standard and enjoy competitive quality compared with the weapons of advanced countries; production of the national individual weapons and efforts to improve the quality and precision-striking power of ballistic missiles are among the defense ministry's achievements in the defense field."
General Dehqan added that Iranian experts have also taken long strides in building satellites, satellite carriers, missile launch pads and research work in defense areas.
His remarks came as the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) fired 2 home-made 'Qadr H' ballistic missiles from the Eastern Alborz Mountains at a target in Iran's Southeastern Makran seashore some 1400km away in March.
The missiles were fired on the sidelines of the main stage of the IRGC drills in Central Iran and various parts of the country.
One missile had a message written on it that said in Hebrew: "Israel should be wiped off the Earth". Qadr is a 2000km-range, liquid-fuel and ballistic missile which can reach territories as far as Israel. The missile can carry different types of ‘Blast’ and ‘MRV’ (Multiple Reentry Vehicle) payloads to destroy a range of targets. The new version of Qadr H can be launched from mobile platforms or silos in different positions and can escape missile defense shields due to their radar-evading capability.
 
Iran: Call to Stop Execution of a Juvenile
NCRI Statements/Saturday, 04 February 2017 /The Iranian Resistance calls on all international human rights organizations, especially the United Nations High Commissioner on Human Rights and Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Iran, to take urgent and effective action to stop the execution of a juvenile.Hamid Ahmadi, currently in prison, is set to be executed for a crime he allegedly carried out at the age of 17. After enduring 9 years behind bars, Ahmadi was transferred to solitary confinement of Lakan Prison in Rasht, northern Iran, in preparation for his execution. Reports indicate he is scheduled to be executed on Saturday, February 4. Authorities had placed this young man under extreme torture and threats to obtain a coerced confession. “As of March 2016, at least 160 juvenile offenders were reportedly on death row,” according to a report issued by former U.N. secretary-general Ban Ki-moon. A large number of the 88 individuals executed in Iran in January were under the age of 18 when arrested. On January 29 alone four young men between the ages of 22 and 26 were executed in public in the cities of Mashhad and Bandar Abbas, northeast and southern Iran, respectively.
 Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/February 3, 2017
 
Iranian Resistance Welcomes New Sanctions on Iran Regime
NCRI/Saturday, 04 February 2017/Position of Mr. Mohammad Mohaddessin, the Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), on new sanctions imposed on the Iranian regime: Welcoming the new sanctions and Stressing the need to impose total sanctions on the Revolutionary Guards and other entities involved in suppression, terrorism and fundamentalism. “Imposing sanctions against numerous individuals and companies affiliated to the clerical regime for their role in missile proliferation and terrorism is a positive step in confronting the illegitimate and terrorist dictatorship whose record includes 120,000 political executions. But in order to deal with the threats emanating from the Godfather of state-sponsored terrorism and the biggest source of war and instability in the region that has played the most significant role in ISIS’s ascension to power and survival, it is imperative to impose comprehensive sanctions on the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC), its affiliated entities, the Ministry of Intelligence, and other entities involved in suppression and export of terrorism. The IRGC and its affiliated militias and their commanders including Qassem Soleimani and Iraj Masjedi (the Iranian regime’s ambassador to Iraq) should be expelled from the countries of the region, in particular from Iraq, Syria, and Yemen. Otherwise, the region will not witness peace and tranquility.” It is noteworthy that yesterday the president of the United States imposed new sanctions on 25 individuals and entities, affiliated to the clerical regime for their role in missile proliferation and terrorism.
On Wednesday February 1, U.S. National Security Advisor Michael Flynn put the Iranian regime “on notice” over the regime's recent ballistic missile test launch, calling it a "provocative" breach of a UN Security Council resolution. On Friday, Flynn announced in a statement that the U.S. was sanctioning 25 individuals and entities that provide support to the regime’s ballistic missile program and to the IRGC Quds Force:
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
February 03, 2017
Statement by National Security Advisor Michael T. Flynn on Iran
Today, the United States sanctioned twenty-five individuals and entities that provide support to Iran’s ballistic missile program and to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Force.
The Islamic Republic of Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism and engages in and supports violent activities that destabilize the Middle East. This behavior seems continuous despite the very favorable deal given to Iran by the Obama Administration. These sanctions target these behaviors.
Iran’s senior leadership continues to threaten the United States and our allies. Since the Obama Administration agreed to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran in 2015, Iran’s belligerent and lawless behavior has only increased. Examples include the abduction of ten of our sailors and two patrol boats in January 2016, unwarranted harassment of vessel traffic and repeated weapons tests. Just this week, Iran tested a ballistic missile, and one of its proxy terrorist groups attacked a Saudi vessel in the Red Sea.
The international community has been too tolerant of Iran’s bad behavior. The ritual of convening a United Nations Security Council in an emergency meeting and issuing a strong statement is not enough. The Trump Administration will no longer tolerate Iran’s provocations that threaten our interests.
The days of turning a blind eye to Iran’s hostile and belligerent actions toward the United States and the world community are over.
 
Iran: 110 Military Commanders Convicted of Election Fraud in 2005
NCRI /Saturday, 04 February 2017/Ali Motahari, a Deputy Speaker of the Iranian regime’s parliament has said that the former chairman of the regime’s expediency council Ali-Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani believed in 2005 that the elections had been engineered.
“Rafsanjani complained in this regard, as a result of which 110 military commanders were convicted of ‘election manipulation’”, Motahari said in an interview with the state-run Jamaran website on February 2. Motahari added that “Rafsanjani told me that he was worried it would be too bad for the system if the court ruling was going to be implemented, so he decided not to pursue it any further.”As Motahari claims, the reason for Rafsanjani’s candidacy in the 2005 Presidential election was not that he was seeking power, but he entered the race due to his alarm at the presence of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. “Ahmadinejad was smart and found out soon that part of the system wanted Rafsanjani to be sidelined”, maintained Motahari. Regarding Rafsanjani’s disagreements with the regime’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei, Motahari said that “Hashemi Rafsanjani believed that the election had not been healthy. As a matter of fact, the disagreement between Hashemi and the leader began right at that time, namely from the time Ahmadinejad entered, since the leader totally believed in Ahmadinejad and strongly supported him whereas Hashemi regarded Ahmadinejad as a threat for the revolution (regime), and this naturally led to a disagreement.” On February 24, 2016, Rafsanjani pointed to Khamenei’s support for Ahmadinejad, saying that “all the achievements of the revolution was put on sale in the 2005 presidential election. I warned the authorities as well as public broadcasting officials while talking to reporters at the time, not to act on a whim, setting Caesarea on fire for a worthless piece of cloth.”
Iranian Resistance President-elect Maryam Rajavi said that Rafsanjani’s death on January 8, 2017 would lead to the regime losing its “internal and external equilibrium.”

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 04-05/17
Under Trump: New Directions for American Foreign Policy

Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/February 04/17
With the U.S. Senate endorsing the nomination of Rex Tillerson as the new Secretary of State, President Donald J Trump’s national security team is now complete, ready for action.
The Trump team differs from those of previous presidents in a number of ways.
 To start with, Trump has decided to seek a tighter grip for himself by granting Steve Bannon, his chief strategist, or even Svengali as critics claim, a seat at the National Security Council (NSC).
 Next, he has decided that his National Security Advisor, Lt. General Michael Flynn, would fix the NSC’s agenda in consultation with Bannon.
 This would give the inner-circle of presidential advisers a tighter grip on the choice of issues that the administration wishes to focus on.
 Another important decision is to deprive the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the top echelon of the U.S. armed forces, of a permanent presence in the NSC. Under Trump, the chiefs would be invited only to sessions that discuss matters directly related to their area of competence and authority.
 Lowering the profile of the Top Brass need not be regarded as a major event if only because the top echelon of the Trump administration includes two retired four-star generals, Defence Secretary James Mattis and Homeland Secretary John F. Kelly, plus Flynn who has three stars.
 The new Trump configuration also diminishes the role of the State Department, the vehicle for American diplomacy. Trump believes that the department has morphed into an exclusive club for cosmopolitan liberals more concerned about the sensibilities of foreign foes than the interests of the U.S. and its allies. Thus, the department will lose the seat traditionally reserved for the Deputy Secretary of State, even though the post may now go to a loyal Trumpist.
 Tillerson’s choice as Secretary of States indicates Trump’s determination to shake the State Department. A businessman, Tillerson would be able to cast a fresh glance at all aspects of U.S. foreign policy, disregarding the receive wisdom dished out by the State Department’s “tired” diplomats.
 It would be interesting to see how long would Tillerson resist “going native” and adopting the discourse and style of the State Department professionals.
 The “inner circle” also includes Kt McFarland, a veteran of all Republican administrations since President Richard Nixon, who has been named Deputy National Security Adviser. Legal “know-how” for the inner circle would be provided by Don McGahan, named as White House Counsel.
 Also expected to be part of the inner circle is Nikki Haley, named as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations with a seat on the Cabinet.
 Two more members of the administration are likely to acquire some influence, at least on aspects of Trumps policy related to international trade and the changing patterns of the global energy market.
 They are Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Energy Secretary Rick Perry.
 The Trump ream differs from previous administrations in a number of ways.
 To start with it consists mostly of people who have been successful in their respective fields of activity and do not owe their place and prestige to political patronage. This means that we could expect real debate at least within the inner circle.
 Under Obama, the standard response of senior administration members was “yes, sir”. Under Trump one may get a better deal, at least with “yes, but.”
 The average American public servant is often excessively concerned about “what-is-in-it-for me”, with an eye on the next rung of the ladder he might climb. Trumps team may be different if only because of the age of its members, six years older than the average for members of the last three administrations and the fact that most members do not envisage further political careers. Another factor is the personal wealth of the members of the new team that includes several billionaires. (Obama’s administration had no billionaires; most of its members were only millionaires.)
 But what will the new team do?
 Though no definite answer could be suggested as yet, there are indicators pointing to the direction that U.S. foreign policy might take at least in certain domains.
 Some analysts, especially in Europe, have seen the Trump slogan of “America First” as an indication that the new administration tilts towards isolationism.
 The “America First” slogan of Trump isn’t new however; it was launched in the late 1930s by people like the politician Huey Pierce, Father Charles Coughlin and the aviator Charles Lindbergh with a view to keep the United States out of the looming Second World War. At that time, the slogan meant a policy of disengagement or even benign neglect wherever possible.
 With Trump, however, it means active engagement with the aim of securing better “deals” for the United States.
 In the 1930s the slogan was really meant to convey an “America Alone” sentiment. Trump reads it differently to imply that America must come first in relation to, and competition with, other nations.
 That sentiment is shared by the vast majority of Trump’s new team, men and women who have extensive experience of the outside world plus command of foreign languages.
 Trump’s “America First” slogan is laced with a feeling of resentment prompted by the belief that the U.S. has been “made a sucker of” by friend and foe alike.
 The average American could be world champion of friendship and generosity even to the point of fighting and dying on distant battlefields to save friends and allies. But he simply goes mad if he gets the feeling that the friends and allies he has saved simply took advantage of him, and pour scorn on him in secret.
 Trumps promise, not to say threat, to tear up trade agreements is largely motivated by that anger. However, once it becomes clear that even the worst trade agreements have served U.S. interests, the “America First slogan might be given a different tonality.
 What remains to be seen is the ability of the new team to translate what is a simple, not to say simplistic, slogan into the backbone of a coherent world-view and practical foreign policy.
 Unlike Obama who believed, or pretended to believe, that his own ersatz charm and persiflage could move the biggest hurdles, Trump feels that what matters when the chips are down is the relative power of any two sides involved in a relationship. That point is amply made clear in Trump’s book “The Art of the Deal” in which he recommends bullying, bluster and bluffing as legitimate tools of negotiations.
 In Trump’s vision of the world, no nation is assigned a permanent label, and even the United States’ oldest friends cannot expect automatic indulgence when they act in an unfriendly manner.
 A nation could be an ally or even a friend but act as an adversary or even an enemy in particular instances and on specific issues. Trump has two cases most in mind. The first concerns the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) which he has described as “obsolete.”
 This does not mean he wants to abolish NATO; in fact last month he indicated he wants to strengthen it. But he certainly would insist on the allies meeting their commitments both in terms of financial contribution and allocation of resources.
 Next, Trump has served notice on allies, including Japan South Korea, Taiwan and friendly Arab states, not to expect the U.S. to continue providing police service for their protection on a no-tomorrow basis. But here, too, the outcome may well be a strengthening of U.S. commitment to the defence of its allies.
 The conventional wisdom is that Trump will be “soft” on Russian President Vladimir Putin and his projection of power in the area of influence of the deceased Soviet Empire. However, Putin’s strategy is primarily aimed at promoting his own image as a strong nationalist leader standing up against Western bullies.
 Obama fell into Putin’s trap by talking tough and doing nothing to increase the cost of Russian expansionism. Trump is likely to do the opposite: turning the volume down on Putin but making sure he pays the maximum price for his cheat-and-retreat shenanigans. This is why Trump’s 30-minute long telephone conversation with Putin did not include any reference to the easing of sanctions on Russia.
 Trump may adopt a similar tactic against the Islamic Republic in Tehran. There, too, the mullahs have made maximum propaganda mileage by claiming that are standing against “the only Superpower” and winning. They have set aside the fact that the same “only Superpower” went out of its way to smuggle cash to them to pay the salaries of Iranian security services.
 In fact, Islamic Republic President Hassan Rouhani has publicly stated that without Obama’s help in the context of the “nuclear deal” Iran would be in the same state of economic meltdown as Venezuela is today.
 There is much speculation regarding Trump’s intention to scrap the Iran “nuclear deal”, a point hinted at by Tillerson in his Senate confirmation hearings.
 However, no such dramatic action may be necessary. Instead, the new administration may do two things. First, it could stop operating as a lobby for the mullahs, as Obama and his Secretary of State John Kerry did. That would send a strong signal to the rest of the world that the mullah’s regime remains a pariah and has a long way before qualifying for “business as usual.”
 Secondly, Trump may administer some of the mullahs’ own medicine in the form of low-intensity operations and proximity pressure. In fact, Gen. Flynn, followed by Trump himself, this week put Tehran on notice that the Islamic Republic is now under close observation and that its’ every move would receive the response it merits.
 That is in contrast with Obama’s policy of boasting about “all options are on the table” while violating international law to help the mullahs under the table.
 The Middle East, with special attention paid to Iraq, Syria and Yemen, in addition to Iran, is likely to feature prominently in Trump’s global strategy.
 The Trump administration has better and more direct knowledge of the region than did that of Obama. General Mattis was in command in Iraq and has a vast network of contacts among politicians, the military, tribal chiefs and religious figure there. He also has a smattering of Arabic and those who know him closely claim he genuinely wants Iraq to succeed in building itself as an independent and democratic nation.
 Both generals Kelly and Flynn to could be regarded as old Middle East hands having visited the region and served therein various capacities since the 1990s.
 The fact that Trump has cited the “total destruction” of ISIS (Da’esh in Arabic) as a top priority adds to the importance of reviewing Washington’s policy on Iraq.
 Eliminating ISIS also requires a Syrian policy different from Obama’s confused musings.
 Here, too, the conventional wisdom claiming that Trump would allow Russia to take sole charge of the Syrian dossier may be misguided. In a Machiavellian sense that wouldn’t be a bad policy, keeping Russia bogged down in the Syrian quagmire and wasting rare resources on keeping Bashar al-Assad nominally in power in a tiny corner of Damascus.
 However, the new administration’s aims, as put by Tillerson during the Senate hearings, include two objectives that do not tally with such a Machiavellian scheme. Tillerson fixed two goals: The departure from power of Assad and the destruction of ISIS.
 More importantly, perhaps, Tillerson insisted that the two objectives should be attained together.
 This means that Washington is unlikely to pursue Obama’s policy under which U.S. military capabilities would be used in Syria only to strengthen Assad by attacking his non-ISIS opponents.
 Obama’s policy failed because the U.S. military chiefs, and Pentagon as a whole, opposed working with Russia to achieve their military objectives.
 Trump may offer a new “deal” under which Washington and Moscow can pull resources to destroy ISIS with the assurance that Assad, too, is flushed out. Such a joint venture would also prevent Russia from inheriting a totally ruined Syria which it won’t be able to rebuild on its own.
 According to Washington sources, the new administration is already preparing contingency plans to help “domestic democratic force” in Lebanon where the new President, Michel Aoun, though beholden to Tehran, is known for his ability to change course when and if necessary.
 Only thanks to Gen. Flynn, a specialist in Turkish affairs, relations with Ankara are also in line for a major review. There, evolving a balance between Washington’s traditional support for Kurdish rights and its interest in consolidating Turkey’s position as key member of NATO may prove difficult to achieve but not impossible.
 The fact that Iran is singled out as America’s chief adversary in the region also means a higher U.S. profile in Yemen where rebel forces backed by Iran appear to be in some disarray.
 An infusion of massive Iranian support could still prevent the total defeat of the Houthis and their allies, at least for the time being. The Trump administration’s aim is to make Tehran understand the true cost of such an adventure in Yemen. That understanding may persuade Tehran strategists to review a policy that is visibly leading nowhere.
 In his style as a deal-maker, Trump may also enlist Russia as second-fiddle in reining in China’s growing ambitions in the Far East and Siberia.
 The new Trump team has the great advantage of being bound together with a set of clear ideas which, though debatable, could provide the U.S. with a clear direction, ending eight years of rudderless zigzag under Obama.
 This new team believes that America’s enemies have little power but use all of it against the U.S. while the U.S. has a lot of power but has been afraid of using even a tiny it of it against its foes.
 The new team claims its aim is to make sure that fear changes camp and that cowardice finds a home with America’s adversaries.
 How well, or how badly, the new team may pursue that aim remains to be seen.
 **Amir Taheri was the executive editor-in-chief of the daily Kayhan in Iran from 1972 to 1979. He has worked at or written for innumerable publications, published eleven books, and has been a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat since 1987. Mr. Taheri has won several prizes for his journalism, and in 2012 was named International Journalist of the Year by the British Society of Editors and the Foreign Press Association in the annual British Media Awards. 
 
I am Muslim and I am not angry
Mamdouh AlMuhaini/Al Arabiya/February 04/17
In 2011, a mosque that was going to be built in the Ground Zero area near the World Trade Center that witnessed the 9/11 attack, caused a huge controversy. Those who were against constructing it said that the location is inappropriate, while Muslims and their supporters conveyed a correct point of view, stating that they are not responsible for the actions of terrorists, even if the perpetrators were Muslims.
This is a logical argument but the other side of the argument that will always be repeated and echoed was stated by the mosque’s imam, Sheikh Faysal Abdul Raouf, saying that the prevention of the construction will anger Muslims and mobilize them against the West. However, the reality is that a small number of Muslims was interested in this topic or has even heard of it. At the end, the center was built few miles from the controversial location and we have not heard Muslims objecting in the streets.
The same story was recently repeated on a larger scale. The US administration issued a ban on travelers from seven Muslim countries for security reasons. The decision triggered a wave of anger because it was perceived as being against Muslims despite the repeated denials of the administration. Days after the decision was issued, the infuriated voices calmed down and the administration helped when stating that some of the refugees can enter the US territories. Some objectors reiterated the same excuse warning from “angry Muslims” and the fear of provoking them.
After the last decision and its repercussions, the argument of “angry Muslims” is more than ever humiliating because it puts all the Muslims in one category as if they were just a rigid group of people angered and entertained by the same thing, even if it is a trivial issue. It is even more humiliating because it assumes that it is easy to manipulate the feelings of Muslims and treat them like children who are not incapable of independent thinking and they react about the same thing differently. What hurts me and angers me is different from what angers and hurts my friend or my brother; assuming the opposite would make us some puppets without opinion or core values.
I remember that once a professor said something during his lecture, and then apologized for all Muslim students in the room. That was the most humiliating apology I have ever heard in my life because he put us all in the same basket, as if we were a flock of identical sheep.
What is even more humiliating is that they do not react in the same way about all other religions and cultures; they know that what angers one person will not anger the others, so the same professor did not have to apologize to everybody, formulating an apology that would work for fools.
There is an exploitative mean side. The mosque’s Imam, Abdel Raouf has used “angry Muslims” as an excuse to terrorize and intimidate the opponents from these unrestrained beasts in order to be victorious in his own battle, without thinking for one second that he is hurting our image and reputation. The same applies to those who are against the ban, like famous religious figures who use us at every opportunity as a boogeyman that scares frightened foreigners from our savage anger that can explode at any moment. This is why we have become a valuable tool in the negotiations and conflicts; this tool can end the debate swiftly.
They terrorize Muslims who see things from another angle, or even have a different opinion; they label them as racists and fascists
Such argument is repeated in Western press that perceives us with the same amount of inferiority. This argument is used by politicians and journalists who claim to defend Muslims in order to achieve their interests and damage the reputation of other currents under the pretext of distorting the image of Islam and Muslims.
Strangely enough, the rational Muslim figures in the West are under attack from the same press, under the pretext of their alliance with the right-wing radical currents. The situation is weird. They terrorize Muslims who see things from another angle, or even have a different opinion; they label them as racists and fascists.
This issue has a deeper and more dangerous side used by radicals who promote and boost such concerns for obvious reasons.
They want to portray Muslims as if they were a huge bloc so that they would be able to control them and achieve 3 goals. They use them in negotiations with the West, under the pretext that they can control this vicious monster and at the same time isolate this monster and deepen its hostility and isolation from other civilizations, and thirdly they benefit personally on the financial and social level, through detaining the keys to money and power.
Maybe it's time to stop this erroneous and humiliating argument. I am a Muslim and I am not angry and you cannot manipulate my mind and emotions easily. There are millions of Muslims like me.

Question: "Is it important for a Christian to have daily devotions?"
GotQuestions.org
Answer: Daily devotions is a phrase used to denote the discipline of Bible reading and prayer with which Christians start or end their day. Bible reading in daily devotions can take the form of a structured study using a devotional book or a simple reading of certain passages. Some people like to read through the Bible in a year. Prayer in daily devotions can include any or all of the different types of prayer—praise, confession, thanksgiving, petition, and intercession. Some people use prayer lists for their daily devotions. Others prefer to pray as they read the Word in an interactive manner, listening for God speaking to them through the Bible passages and responding in prayer. Whatever the format of daily devotions, the important thing is that our daily devotions, as the name implies, be truly devoted to God and occur daily.
It is important to spend time with God in daily devotions. Why? Paul explains: “For God, who said, ‘Let light shine out of darkness,’ made his light shine in our hearts to give us the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ” (2 Corinthians 4:6). The experience of having God’s light shine in our hearts comes in our times spent in the presence of God. Of course, this light comes only from knowing God through Christ. The marvelous treasure of the Holy Spirit is given to each Christian, and we need faith to believe and act upon that truth. In all reality, if we truly yearn to experience the light of our Lord, we will need to be with God every day.
Someone once said, “The gospel brings man to God; devotions keep him close to God.” The apostle James wrote, “Come near to God and he will come near to you. Wash your hands, you sinners, and purify your hearts, you double-minded” (James 4:8). As the children of God seek a closer relationship with God, they will find God is closer than ever. In their daily devotions, Christians seek to draw close to God’s heart, understand more about Him, obey His commands, and hold on to His promises. The impure and double-minded will have no such yearning in their hearts. In fact, they will seek to separate themselves from God as much as possible.
In daily devotions, we want to draw near to God. The expression “draw near” was originally associated with the priesthood in Israel. Under the regulations of the Old Covenant, the priests represented the people before God. However, prior to approaching God’s presence, the priest had to be washed physically and be ceremonially clean. This meant he had to bathe, wear the proper garments, and offer the proper sacrifices. His own heart had to be right with God. Then he could “draw near” to God on the people’s behalf. In time, the concept of “drawing near” was applied to anyone who approached God’s presence in worship and prayer.
The sincere believer knows that God wants His people to draw near to Him with true and pure hearts, and that’s what daily devotions are all about. “Let us draw near to God with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled to cleanse us from a guilty conscience and having our bodies washed with pure water” (Hebrews 10:22). This verse applies the language of the Old Testament ceremonial system to us today. Just as those ancient priests prepared themselves to be near God, we also should prepare ourselves spiritually to worship Him, whether in formal worship or in our personal devotional times.
After salvation, the spiritual growth begins. The believer will, like Enoch, naturally want to walk with God (Genesis 5:22). He will, like Asaph, desire to be near God (Psalm 73:28). He will, like the disciples, yearn to pray effectively (Luke 11:1). In short, the child of God will want to find time for daily devotions.

Muhammad and Forced Conversions to Islam
Raymond Ibrahim/February 04/17
What are we to make of the glaring contradiction between the Koran’s claim that “there is no compulsion in religion” (2:256) and the many other verses that call for war, slavery, and death to those who refuse to submit to Islam (9:5, et al)—to say nothing of the militant behavior of the prophet of Allah, Muhammad? This is the question Stephen M. Kirby examines in his new book, Islam’s Militant Prophet: Muhammad and Forced Conversion to Islam.
Rather than offer speculations or cite nearly 1,400 years of Islamic history that is heavy laden with forced conversions, Kirby answers the question in an objective and meticulous fashion—in a fashion that any Muslim will be hard pressed to counter: he focuses exclusively on the career of Muhammad, from its beginnings in 610 till his death in 632, as recorded in Islam’s primary sources, the Koran and Hadith, and as understood or interpreted by Islam’s most authoritative scholars, such as Ibn al-Kathir. Along the way, readers are provided useful explanations—again, directly from Islam’s learned scholars themselves—of arcane or misunderstood doctrines, such as abrogation, which is essential for any exegesis.
The long and short of it all?
The command of “no compulsion in Islam” was a unique command that had doctrinal authority for only a little over two years. It was abrogated both by the Sunnah and the Koran. Its short lifetime was preceded and followed by commands that non-Muslims were to be given the option of converting to Islam, fighting to the death, or, at times, paying the Jizyah. Muhammad was indeed the militant prophet of a militant religion that supported forced conversions to Islam.
Before reaching this conclusion, Kirby offers example after example of Muhammad giving non-Muslims—pagan Quraysh, Jews, and Christians, almost always people who had no quarrel with him aside from rejecting his prophetic authority—two choices: convert or suffer the consequences, the latter of which often manifested as wholesale massacres.
It’s also noteworthy that, according to Islam’s earliest histories, sincere belief in Muhammad’s prophet claims is lacking. The overwhelming majority of those who converted to Islam did so either under duress—literally to save their heads—or else to be part of Muhammad’s “winning team.” Conversion was the price for one man, Malik bin Auf, to get his kidnapped family back from Muhammad.
Insincere, coerced conversion is especially evident in Muhammad’s conquest of Mecca. When Islam’s prophet, at the head of a vast army—which had already put several tribes to the sword for refusing to convert—was approaching the polytheists of Mecca, the latter were warned: “Embrace Islam and you shall be safe. You have been surrounded on all sides. You are confronted by a hard case that is beyond your power.” When the leader of Mecca, Abu Sufyan—who had long mocked Muhammad as a false prophet—approached the Muslim camp to parley, he too was warned: “‘Embrace Islam before you lose your head.’ Abu Sufyan then recited the confession of faith and thus he entered Islam.” The Meccans soon followed suit.
Rather tellingly, the Muslim historians who recorded these non-Muslim conversions to Islam saw no contradiction between the coerced and insincere nature of the conversions and the Koran’s claim that “there is no compulsion in religion.” For instance, in Muslim historian Taqi al-Din al-Maqrizi’s (d. 1442) multivolume history of Egypt, anecdote after anecdote is recorded of Muslims burning churches, slaughtering Christians, and enslaving their women and children. After each incident, the pious Muslim historian concludes with, “Under these circumstances a great many Christians became Muslims.” (One can almost detect in inaudible “Allahu Akbar.”)
Aside from sporadic bouts of persecution, the entrenched dhimmi system (see Koran 9:29)—itself a form of coercion—saw the increasingly impoverished Christians slowly convert to Islam over the centuries, so that today they remain a steadily dwindling minority. In The Arab Conquest of Egypt, Alfred Butler, a 19th century historian writing before the age of political correctness, highlights this “vicious system of bribing the Christians into conversion”:
[A]lthough religious freedom was in theory secured for the Copts under the capitulation, it soon proved in fact to be shadowy and illusory. For a religious freedom which became identified with social bondage and with financial bondage could have neither substance nor vitality. As Islam spread, the social pressure upon the Copts became enormous, while the financial pressure at least seemed harder to resist, as the number of Christians or Jews who were liable for the poll-tax [jizya] diminished year by year, and their isolation became more conspicuous. . . . [T]he burdens of the Christians grew heavier in proportion as their numbers lessened [that is, the more Christians converted to Islam, the more the burdens on the remaining few grew]. The wonder, therefore, is not that so many Copts yielded to the current which bore them with sweeping force over to Islam, but that so great a multitude of Christians stood firmly against the stream, nor have all the storms of thirteen centuries moved their faith from the rock of its foundation.
In short, the Koran’s claim that “there is no compulsion in religion” seems more of an assertion, a statement of fact, than a command for Muslims to uphold. After all, it is true: no Muslim can make a non-Muslim say the words “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.” But that doesn’t mean they can’t enslave, extort, plunder, torture, and slaughter those who refuse.
http://raymondibrahim.com/2017/02/03/muhammad-forced-conversions-islam/  
 
Why do so many Americans believe that Islam is a political ideology, not a religion?

By Michael Schulson/The Washington Post/February 03/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/02/04/michael-schulson-why-do-so-many-americans-believe-that-islam-is-a-political-ideology-not-a-religion/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2017/02/03/why-do-so-many-americans-believe-that-islam-is-a-political-ideology-not-a-religion/?utm_term=.0659b9bf6a56
For many Americans, last week’s executive order on immigration was a clear case of religious discrimination since it singles out Muslim-majority countries and gives preferential treatment to non-Muslim refugees from those countries.
The implication seems to be that, in keeping with President Trump’s campaign promises, the United States will sort people at the border based on faith.
For other Americans, the executive order might not seem like a case of religious discrimination — not because the policy doesn’t differentiate between Muslims and non-Muslims, but because they are skeptical that Islam is actually a religion at all.
Google Islam, religion and politics, and it’s easy to find websites like PoliticalIslam.com, which claims to use “statistical methods” to prove that “Islam is far more of a political system than a religion.”
The argument travels outside the Internet fringe of conspiracy theories. “When we discuss ‘Islam,’ it should be assumed that we are talking about both a religion and a political-social ideology,” former assistant U.S. attorney Andrew C. McCarthy wrote in the National Review in 2015.
“Islam is not even a religion; it is a political system that uses a deity to advance its agenda of global conquest,” said John Bennett, a Republican lawmaker in the Oklahoma state legislature, in 2014.
A thoughtful, educated evangelical pastor recently told me that he thinks “religious liberty just needs to be protected for all belief systems, but there also needs to be clarity as to if Islam is fully a religion, or if it’s really a political movement disguised as a religion.”
The idea has adherents at the highest levels of power. “Islam is a political ideology” that “hides behind the notion of it being a religion,” national security adviser Michael Flynn told an ACT for America conference in Dallas last summer.
The growing popularity of this idea speaks to a profound disconnect in American conversations about faith — and it offers a way that many self-proclaimed advocates of religious liberty might defend discriminatory policies against Muslims.
It is difficult to think of a definition of religion that does not include Islam — an ancient tradition with practitioners who believe in one God, pray and try to live their lives in accordance with a scripture.
So why has this particular canard taken off?
Wajahat Ali, a writer, attorney, and the lead author of “Fear, Inc.,” a report on American Islamophobia, traces the idea’s recent surge to anti-Islam activists David Yerushalmi and Frank Gaffney. In 2010, Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy published a report, “Shariah: The Threat to America,” arguing that Muslim religious law, or sharia, was actually a dangerous political ideology that a cabal of Muslims hoped to impose on the United States.
“Though it certainly has spiritual elements, it would be a mistake to think of shariah as a ‘religious’ code in the Western sense,” the report argued. It also suggested banning “immigration of those who adhere to shariah … as was previously done with adherents to the seditious ideology of communism.”
“They misdefine sharia in a way which is not recognizable to any practicing Muslim,” Ali said. But the idea was influential. By the summer of 2011, more than two dozen states were considering anti-sharia legislation. More recently, Gaffney reportedly advised Trump’s transition team.
For many Americans, confusion about religious law, political ideology and sharia may reflect a distinctly Christian, and especially Protestant, way of thinking about the nature of religion.
“It’s hard to talk about this sometimes because there is no equivalent of sharia in the Christian tradition,” said Shadi Hamid, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and the author of “Islamic Exceptionalism: How the Struggle Over Islam Is Reshaping the World.” “Even when you’re talking to well-intentioned, well-meaning people who really want to understand, explaining sharia is very challenging because there’s nothing in Christianity that’s quite like it.”
This kind of wide-ranging religious legal code may be unfamiliar to many Christians, but it’s not unique to Islam. There are strong similarities between sharia and Jewish law, or halakhah, which itself descends from legalistic sections of the Bible that both Jews and Christians consider scripture. Both words derive from roots meaning “path” or “way.”
Judaism has also been accused of being as much a political program as a religion. The “Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” an influential anti-Semitic forgery, falsely depicts Jews describing Judaism as “the one and only religious and political truth.”
Both sharia and halakhah include laws for communal as well as personal life. These traditions do not necessarily draw sharp legal distinctions between religious and other kinds of spaces.
Certainly, some Muslims may believe that faith touches all parts of their lives, including their political involvement. But the same could be said for devout members of almost any other religious tradition.
The entanglement of faith and politics is not unique to Islam. Consider the televangelist Pat Robertson, who ran for president in 1988 because, he believed, God wanted him to do so. After he lost, Robertson wrote about his hope for “one of America’s major political parties taking on a profoundly Christian outlook in its platforms and party structure.”
Nevertheless, Robertson told viewers in 2007 that “Islam is not a religion” but instead “a worldwide political movement.”
The idea of Islam as a political ideology fits well with our particular political moment. Since the fall of communism, some Western intellectuals, most notably the late Harvard political scientist Samuel Huntington, have argued that the next great global struggle will be between Western civilization and Islamic civilization.
The ideology that is against the U.S. or the American values used to be communism, and now it’s Islam. And it cannot be Islam as a religion. It has to be Islam as a political ideology,” said Jocelyne Cesari, a professor at the University of Birmingham in Britain and author of “Why the West Fears Islam,” paraphrasing those arguments.
Increasingly, there seems to be a disconnect between those who understand the national conversation about Islam in terms of religious rights and the protection of religious minorities, and those who see it as a conversation about large-scale ideological battle.
As Cesari points out, thinking about Islam in these terms allows people to reconcile a commitment to First Amendment rights with a sense of Islam as an existential political enemy. The stakes could be high. “Once you look at Islam as a political ideology, especially one that is threatening, you can ignore or neglect all kinds of civil procedures or protection of religious freedoms that go with the status of being religious in this country.”
**Michael Schulson is a freelance journalist in Durham, N.C.

Trump lashes out at travel ban ruling by 'so-called judge'
SEATTLE (AP) February 04/17— A federal judge's ruling temporarily lifting a ban on travel to the U.S. from certain countries triggered confusion in airports around the world as airlines began boarding flights bound for America and federal lawyers took steps to reinstate the ban. As the impact of the ruling took hold, President Donald Trump lashed out on Twitter early Saturday morning, referring to U.S. District Judge James Robart as "this so-called judge" and calling his decree "ridiculous."
"The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned," Trump tweeted. "When a country is no longer able to say who can and who cannot come in & out, especially for reasons of safety & security - big trouble!"The White House said it would try to get a court to reinstate the ban that prompted the State Department to cancel visas for 60,000 or more people from the affected countries, causing widespread confusion at airports when some travelers were detained and others sent back. An internal email circulated among Homeland Security officials Friday night told employees to immediately comply with the judge's ruling. However, the U.S. embassy in Baghdad said Saturday that they're still awaiting guidance on what to tell Iraqis eager to see if their visa restrictions had changed.
"We don't know what the effect will be, but we're working to get more information," the embassy told The Associated Press in a statement. A pair of prominent Middle Eastern air carriers announced they would begin allowing passengers from the seven affected countries. Both Qatar Airways and Etihad Airways, national carrier of the United Arab Emirates, said U.S.-bound passengers from those countries with valid visas would be allowed to travel. In Egypt, Cairo airport and airline officials said they have received instructions from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend President Trump's executive order. Government-backed Qatar Airways is one of a handful of Mideast airlines operating direct daily flights to multiple American cities. Its U.S. destinations from its Doha hub include New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Miami and Washington.
The judge's decision was a victory for Washington and Minnesota, which had challenged Trump's directive. Robart in Seattle issued a temporary restraining order, ruling the states had standing. He said they showed their case was likely to succeed.
"The state has met its burden in demonstrating immediate and irreparable injury," Robart said. The White House has argued that it will make the country safer. Spokesman Sean Spicer released a statement late Friday saying the government "will file an emergency stay of this outrageous order and defend the executive order of the President, which we believe is lawful and appropriate."
Soon after, a revised statement was sent out that removed the word "outrageous."
"The president's order is intended to protect the homeland and he has the constitutional authority and responsibility to protect the American people," the statement said. A State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity because the matter is under litigation, said Friday: "We are working closely with the Department of Homeland Security and our legal teams to determine how this affects our operations. We will announce any changes affecting travelers to the United States as soon as that information is available."
In their arguments to the court, Washington state and Minnesota said the temporary ban on entry for people from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya and Yemen and the global suspension of the U.S. refugee program significantly harms residents and effectively mandates discrimination.
After the ruling, Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson said people from the affected countries can now apply for entry to the U.S. "Judge Robart's decision, effective immediately ... puts a halt to President Trump's unconstitutional and unlawful executive order," Ferguson said. "The law is a powerful thing — it has the ability to hold everybody accountable to it, and that includes the president of the United States."
The judge's ruling could be appealed the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Federal attorneys had argued that Congress gave the president authority to make decisions on national security and immigrant entry. But in his written order released late Friday, Robart said it's not the court's job to "create policy or judge the wisdom of any particular policy promoted by the other two branches," but rather, to make sure that actions taken by the executive or legislative branches "comports with our country's laws." Court challenges of the ban have been filed nationwide from states and advocacy groups. Washington Solicitor General Noah Purcell said his state's focus is the way the president's order targets Islam. Trump has called for a ban on Muslims entering the country, and the travel ban was an effort to make good on that campaign promise, Purcell told the judge. "Do you see a distinction between campaign statements and the executive order?" Robart asked. "I think it's a bit of a reach to say the president is anti-Muslim based on what he said in New Hampshire in June."
 Purcell said there is an "overwhelming amount of evidence" to show the order is unconstitutionally directed at the Muslim religion.
 The judge then questioned the federal government's lawyer, Michelle Bennett, about Trump's rationale.
 Robart, an appointee of President George W. Bush, asked if there had been any terrorist attacks since 9/11 by people from the seven counties listed in Trump's order. Bennett said she didn't know. "The answer is none," Robart said. "You're here arguing we have to protect from these individuals from these countries, and there's no support for that." Bennett argued that the states can't sue on behalf of citizens, and the states have failed to show the order is causing irreparable harm. Robart disagreed, and rejected a request from Bennett for an immediate stay of his order.
The State Department said Friday that Trump's order canceled visas for up to 60,000 foreigners from the seven majority-Muslim countries, contradicting a Justice Department lawyer who said Friday that about 100,000 visas had been revoked.
The State Department clarified that the higher figure includes diplomatic and other visas that were actually exempted from the travel ban, as well as expired visas. Ferguson, a Democrat, said the order is harming residents, businesses and the state's education system. Washington-based businesses Amazon, Expedia and Microsoft support the challenge, saying the ban is hurting their operations as well. 
 
The French Inquisition/France's New Dreyfus Trial, a Jihad against the Truth
Yves Mamou/Gatestone Institute/February 04/2017
 https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9885/france-bensoussan-trial
"It is a shame to deny this taboo, namely that in the Arab families in France, and everyone knows it but nobody wants to say it, anti-Semitism is sucked with mother's milk." — George Bensoussan, historian of Moroccan heritage, on trial for saying that.
"When parents shout at their children, when they want to reprimand them, they call them Jews. Yes. All Arab families know this. It is monumental hypocrisy not to see that this anti-Semitism begins as a domestic one. " — Smaïn Laacher, French-Algerian professor of sociology.
This witch-hunt against Bensoussan is symptomatic of the state of free speech today in France. Intellectual intimidation is the rule. Complaints are filed against everyone not saying that Muslims are the main victim of racism in France.
In December 2016, Pascal Bruckner, a writer and philosopher, was also brought to court for saying: "We need to make the record of collaborators of Charlie Hebdo's murderers." He named the people in France who had instilled a climate of hatred against Charlie.
Muslims, especially young Muslims, as the new revolutionary labor class. It did not matter that most of them were not working: they were "victims".
"Anti-racist vigilance became a gag rule... Anti-racist organizations are in the denial of 'Muslim racism.'" — Alain Finkielkraut, philosopher and academic.
An important red line in France has just been crossed. In true dhimmi fashion, in a move reminiscent of both the Inquisition and the Dreyfus Trial, all of France's so-called "anti-racist" organizations have joined a jihad against free speech and against truth.
On January 25, 2017, France's "anti-racist" organizations -- all of them, even the Jewish LICRA (International League against Racism and anti-Semitism) -- joined the Islamist CCIF (Collective against Islamophobia) in court against Georges Bensoussan, a highly regarded Jewish historian of Moroccan extraction, and an expert on the history of Jews in Arab countries.
Georges Bensoussan, a highly regarded Jewish historian of Moroccan extraction, and an expert on the history of Jews in Arab countries. (Image source: Jusqu'au dernier video screenshot)
Not only did the Islamist CCIF and the Jewish LICRA unite against him, but also the French Human Rights League, SOS Racism and MRAP (Movement against Racism and for Friendship with People).
Bensoussan is being prosecuted for remarks he made during a "France Culture" radio debate, about antisemitism among French Arabs:
"An Algerian sociologist, Smaïn Laacher, with great courage, just said in a documentary aired on Channel 3: It is a shame to deny this taboo, namely that in the Arab families in France, and everyone knows it but nobody wants to say it, anti-Semitism is sucked with mother's milk."
The documentary that Bensoussan was referring to was called "Teachers in the Lost Territories of the Republic," and was aired in October 2015, on Channel 3. In this documentary, Laacher, who is a French professor of Algerian origin, said:
"Antisemitism is already awash in the domestic space... It... rolls almost naturally off the tongue, awash in the language... It is an insult. When parents shout at their children, when they want to reprimand them, they call them Jews. Yes. All Arab families know this. It is monumental hypocrisy not to see that this anti-Semitism begins as a domestic one."
No complaint was filed against Laacher. But as soon as Bensoussan, in the heat of a radio debate, referred to Arab anti-Smitism as "sucked in with mother's milk", CCIF, followed by all anti-racist associations, brought Bensoussan to supposed justice. Their accusation was simple: "mother's milk" is not a metaphor for cultural anti-Semitism transmitted through education, but a genetic and "essentialist" accusation. It means: "all Arabs are anti-Semitic" -- in other words, Bensoussan is a racist.
Professor Smaïn Laacher, of the University of Strasbourg, denied the quote and told the website Mediapart. "I have never said nor written that kind of ignominy". He filed a complaint against Bensoussan, but later withdrew it.
Judgment will be rendered March 7.
This witch-hunt against Bensoussan is symptomatic of the state of free speech today in France. With the leading Islamist CCIF stalking "Islamophobia", intellectual intimidation is the rule. Complaints are filed against everyone not saying that Muslims are the main victim of racism in France.
In December 2016, Pascal Bruckner, a writer and philosopher, was also brought to court for saying in 2015, on Arte TV, "We need to make the record of collaborators of Charlie Hebdo's murderers". He named people in France who had instilled a climate of hatred against Charlie: the entertainer Guy Bedos, the rap singer Nekfeu, anti-racist organizations like The Indivisibles, or the journalist Rokhaya Diallo and the supremacist movement for "people of color" known as Les Indigènes de la République ("The Indigenous of the Republic").
It was not the first time that Islamists filed complaints against people they dislike. Charlie Hebdo was twice brought to court by Islamist organizations. Twice, the accusations of Charlie's Islamist accusers were dismissed.
But with the Bensoussan trial, we are entering in a new era. The most venerable, the most authentic anti-racist organizations -- some of them are older than a century -- are, shamefully, lining up with Islamist organizations.
This tipping point was initiated in the 1980s by with SOS Racism. This organization, founded to organize young Muslims and help them to assimilate into French society rapidly, became a political movement, manipulated by the Socialist Party. SOS Racism and its slogan, "Don't hurt my buddy", rapidly became a new direction to the working class. With the working class attracted by the far-right party Front National, the Socialist party needed a new "clientele". They chose Muslims, especially young Muslims, as the new revolutionary labor class. It did not matter that most of them were unemployed: they were "victims".
Thirty years later, it is easy for Islamist organizations to take the reins of this ideology of victimization, and to transform "anti-racism" into a fight against "Islamophobia".
In 2016, at a symposium in Paris dedicated to "False Friends and Useful Idiots of Secularism", Alain Jakubowicz, president of the Jewish anti-racist group LICRA, described the anti-racist field war:
"Today, CCIF (Collective against Islamophobia) is the leading anti-racist organization. This is terrifying. Today, CCIF and Indigenous of the Republic are the leading fighters against racism... not against anti-Semitism, because they do not care. This is not the question for them. And they are very clever to recruit "useful idiots" like rap singers. And Muslim youths, who have good reason to protest being those "left behind" in French society, see their idols promoting CCIF and its accusations of "state racism". In 2016, how is it possible to talk about a racism practiced by the state in the French Republic ? This is unbelievable!"
 In 2017, what is unbelievable is to see the same Alain Jakubowicz and the Jewish LICRA sitting side by side in court with CCIF to file a complaint against a prominent historian who simply speaks what he sees about the cultural transmission of anti-Semitism within the French Arab and French Muslim community.
 Richard Abitbol, president of the Confederation of French Jews and Friends of Israel, accused Jakubowicz and LICRA of obeying the "necessity for them to find a Jewish scapegoat to build a virginity in order to comply with those who fight Islamophobia".
 To evaluate the treason of this Jewish anti-racist movement colluding with its worst enemy, it is important to remember that LICRA has been created to defend Samuel Schwartzbard. In 1920, in Paris, Schwartzbard had killed Simon Petlioura, a Cossack leader responsible for killing thousands of Jews in Ukraine. Schwartzbard was acquitted. LICRA militants were also famous in the 1930s for their street-fights against far-right anti-Semitic "Camelots du roi".
 But the LICRA disarray can be generalized to all the "anti-racist" movements. SOS Racism -- which in 2008 supported the firing of a veiled Muslim employee by her employer -- is today a follower of CCIF.
 The venerable French League of the Human Rights (LDH), in 2006, had two prominent members -- Antoine Spire and Cedric Porin -- resign from the CCIF and publish an op-ed in Le Monde accusing the CCIF "of responding to the racism experienced by young people of immigrant background by showing complacency towards the Islamist organizations that claim to represent them".
 When the French philosopher Robert Redeker received death threats from Islamists terrorists because he criticized Islam, "the LDH stated that it did not share the "noxious ideas" of Mr Redeker, but conceded that, "whatever one thinks of the writings of Mr Redeker, there is no reason for him to undergo such treatment".
 Regarding the MRAP (Movement against Racism and for Friendship with People), it is enough to say that its leader, Mouloud Aounit , publicly joins Muslim Brother Tariq Ramadan to fight "Islamophobia'.
 In September 2009, Sihem Habchi, president of the feminist association Ni Putes, Ni Soumises (Neither Whores nor Submitteds), wrote in France Soir: "When I see MRAP, LDH, and Ligue de l'Enseignement accept excision as a cultural practice, I realize that these people are not ready to help me to be free".
 In court, in defense of Bensoussan, Alain Finkielkraut, philosopher and academician, explained to the judge: "A rogue antiracism makes you to criminalize a concern instead of fighting the cause of this concern. If the court obeys to this injunction, it will be a moral and an intellectual catastrophe". Finkielkraut should have added : a political and civilisationnal catastrophe.
 Later, at the radio Finkielkraut added: "Anti-racist vigilance became a gag rule. (...) For a long time, racism in France had only a white face and his victims were Arabs, Blacks and Romas". In other words, it is impossible today in France to say that antisemitism is coming essentially from the (not all, but a big part of) Muslim population. "Anti-racist organizations are in the denial of 'Muslim racism'. And the Licra is joining today the denial of an anti-racist party". Finkielkraut, a senior member of LICRA, sent a resignation to the Board.
 *Yves Mamou is a journalist and author based in France. He worked for two decades for the daily, Le Monde, before his retirement.
 © 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Iran's Latest Missile Test: Scenarios and Implications for the New Administration
Farzin Nadimi/The Washington Institute/February 04/2017
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/02/04/farzin-nadimithe-washington-institute-irans-latest-missile-test-scenarios-and-implications-for-the-new-administration/
Regardless of how the details surrounding Sunday's launch shake out, it was an unhelpful move at a time when the Trump administration is determining its policy toward Iran's missile program and broader regional behavior.
According to recent media reports, Iran conducted a weapons test on January 29 that involved either a nuclear-capable ballistic missile, a land-attack cruise missile, or perhaps even both. Alternatively, in light of prior Iranian statements and preparations, it might have been an attempted satellite launch gone awry. Whatever the case, the Trump administration has described the incident as a destabilizing move, put Tehran "on notice" for the launch, and announced new sanctions targeting "multiple entities and individuals involved in procuring technology and/or materials to support Iran's ballistic missile program."
Analyzing the systems that may have been tested is important because it could give valuable insights into Iran's capabilities and intentions, both present and future. In particular, it could help the international community assess Tehran's claim that its ballistic missile program is purely defensive in nature.
BALLISTIC AND CRUISE SCENARIOS
Quoting unnamed U.S. officials, Reuters noted on January 30 that Iran had quietly tested a ballistic missile out of its Semnan test range the previous day. Satellite tracking purportedly showed the missile traveling 1,013 km (630 miles) before its journey ended, apparently in failure. While the nature of the launch is still under investigation by U.S. intelligence, some reports have suggested it was the Khoramshahr missile that Iranian officials first spoke of publicly several months ago.
In September, Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan declared that Iran would start production of Khorramshahr and Sejjil "long-range" missiles within six months. While the Sejjil was first tested more than eight years ago, in November 2008, the newly proclaimed Khoramshahr is yet to be displayed in public. It could be a completely new design, but more likely it is a slightly modified version of an existing model such as the Imad, itself a modification of the Shahab-3. All of these missiles are said to have ranges between 1,300 and 2,200 km, with explosive payloads in excess of 700 kg. On January 30, a U.S. National Security Council official indicated that the system launched Sunday was a Shahab-type ballistic missile.
Yet according to unnamed German intelligence sources quoted by Die Welt newspaper, a Soumar land-attack cruise missile was tested up to a range of 600 km (373 miles) -- whether instead of or in addition to a Shahab-type ballistic missile is unclear. Iran first announced that it was beginning production of the Soumar on March 8, 2015, for use with ground, air, and sea launch platforms. As part of that announcement, several completed missiles were shown (but only one equipped with a launch booster), along with video of a test launch from a truck-mounted platform. No Western intelligence sources had reported an Iranian cruise missile test at the time. The displayed weapons closely resembled the Russian Kh-55 cruise missile design, which Iran reportedly obtained from Ukraine in 2001 in secret; it may also have been trying to reverse-engineer the missile together with North Korea.
Whatever the case, the original Kh-55 design can achieve ranges of up to 2,500 km (1,550 miles) at a speed of Mach 0.7, carrying either a 410 kg conventional warhead or a 250 kiloton nuclear warhead. Although it is an outdated design, it could still pose an elevated threat to shipping in the Persian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, and northern Arabian Sea if launched from Iran's coastal areas. It could also threaten land targets within its range, and perhaps even be deployed on modified or future Iranian submarines. Although the latter capability seems only theoretical at this point, it could allow Iran to deter similarly capable regional nations such as Israel.
During the 1990s, Russia also fielded the Kh-65SE, a variant with a shorter range of around 600 km. Compliant with the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, this system was a tactical air-launched, radar-guided, sea-skimming antiship missile that lacked a booster. To be sure, the Soumar models that Iran has displayed in the past did not seem to be based on this variant, and some reports indicated that Sunday's launch exceeded its range. Yet even if 600 km were the maximum range the Iranians had attained during cruise missile development, that is still double the reach of their other antiship missiles. Moreover, they could theoretically pair the 1,200-kg Soumar with their Sukhoi Su-24MK long-range strike aircraft, giving them the capability to hit maritime or land targets anywhere in the Middle East or Arabian Sea (the Su-24 has a low-altitude unrefueled combat radius of 615 km with a 3,000 kg payload). While any terrain-following capability the Iranian design may have would be useless over water, it could still assist with route navigation over urban or feature-rich environments along the southern Persian Gulf coast.
As for the international legal implications of Sunday's launch, they may depend on the type of missile tested. UN Security Council Resolution 2231 called on Iran to avoid any activity related to nuclear-capable ballistic missiles, albeit without expressly prohibiting such efforts. Yet the Trump administration may decide that this language applies to any missile design capable of delivering nuclear weapons -- a category that includes cruise missiles based on Russia's Kh-55 family.
A FAILED SATELLITE LAUNCH?
An outside possibility is that Sunday's incident was an attempted satellite launch to mark the Islamic Republic's so-called "Fajr" festivities. During a televised interview on January 26, Vice President for Science and Technology Sorena Sattari stated Iran's intention to conduct one or two satellite launches before the end date of the current Persian year (March 21). Iran has a history of such launches during these state festivities -- in fact, three out of its four successful orbital launches have occurred around the same dates: February 3 (in 2009 and 2012) and February 2 (in 2015).
According to Iranian media, the regime was also expected to launch its heaviest-ever satellite before the Persian New Year -- the 100 kg remote-sensing Tolou-1. The satellite was supposed to be lifted to a 500 km low earth orbit using a new Simorgh space launch vehicle, and separate reports have indicated that a Simorgh launch was imminent. In addition, Tehran claims that it has received Russian help to further develop its space program, and that it is negotiating with Moscow to buy a telecommunications satellite after several failed attempts with France.
Iran also recently expanded the Imam Khomeini Space Center near Semnan, apparently with North Korea's help, intending to launch larger rockets such as the Simorgh. Yet repeated delays have made international experts suspect that it is having technical difficulties with that two-stage design. According to various analysts, Iran may have launched its first Simorgh in April 2016, though it is not clear if the flight was a success. If this Sunday's launch was a failed test of a Simorgh carrying a satellite, it could be a significant blow to the Islamic Republic on the eve of its revolutionary anniversary, and therefore a reason for secrecy surrounding the launch.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Whatever the January 29 missile incident turns out to be, it is undoubtedly an unhelpful move at a time when the new U.S. administration is trying to shape its policy toward Iran's missile program and wider regional activities. Since the nuclear agreement was implemented, the Rouhani government has sought to limit international backlash against Tehran by restricting high-profile military maneuvers and missile tests. Yet the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and other hardliners have harshly criticized this approach and engaged in various provocations. Following Sunday's incident, Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif reiterated Tehran's previous stance that its ballistic missile tests involve conventionally armed delivery systems that are purely defensive in nature, and therefore legitimate under its existing international obligations; he did not discuss details about the launch, however.
Going forward, Iran still has an opportunity to prove to the new administration and the rest of the world that it wants to be an integral part of a calm and deescalated Middle East. Yet this means refraining from controversial moves conducted in public or in secret -- an approach that may be impossible due to hardliner pressure. And the lack of enforcement mechanisms in the missile-related portions of Security Council Resolution 2231 may complicate Washington's efforts to respond to such actions, whether in terms of implementing the latest U.S. missile sanctions or applying other measures.
The international community is also concerned that Iran could use the know-how it gains from a space-launch program to develop longer-range and more-accurate ballistic missiles capable of reaching targets beyond the Middle East. For now, Tehran's apparent reliance on Russian, Chinese, or North Korean manufacturing and older designs suggests that such capabilities will be slow to come. Even so, its military-controlled space program is walking on a political and technological minefield at home and abroad. To alleviate these concerns, Iran would need to establish a more transparent -- not more secret -- space program under full civilian control.
*Farzin Nadimi is a Washington-based analyst specializing in the security and defense affairs of Iran and the Persian Gulf region.

Donald Trump and the road to presidential humility
Pierre Ghanem/Al Arabiya/February 04/17
In recent days, Trump supporters have had reason to cheer his early executive actions that have been in line with his campaign promises. He announced his Supreme Court pick, he announced a new military strategy to defeat ISIS, he suspended immigration to the US from six Arab countries and Iran for a limited period, he pressed on boosting the jobs market in the US and gave the go ahead for the construction of a wall along the Mexican border.  The president’s opponents slammed every single action he took, with the Democrats denouncing his suspension of the immigration program and the travel ban. They also were quick to express alarm at his Supreme Court pick Neil Gorsuch.
 Gorsuch is, no doubt, a conservative but he not a far-right figure.
 Previously Trump claimed he knows more about ISIS than US generals do, and now he is asking the generals to draw a strategy to crush the terrorist group.
 The US president right now stands at the beginning of a journey towards presidential humility
 He has stopped Syrian refugees from entering the US indefinitely and temporarily suspended the country’s refugee program for a limited period of time. Earlier in his campaign, Trump vowed a complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States and when he signed the executive order his administration, he blamed his predecessor for the ban, saying it is similar to measures by former President Barack Obama – despite this later being proven untrue.
 Also, he is threatening American companies with the tax cudgel, but nothing has been implemented yet, and as for the wall, it will be funded through the congressional appropriations process.
 In fact, the US president stands right now at the beginning of a journey towards presidential humility. A few days ago, during an interview, he was asked about the effectiveness of torture and tactics such as waterboarding, Trump said: “absolutely, I feel it works." He added: “But I would tell you that he [US Secretary of Defense James Mattis] will override because I’m giving him that power. He’s an expert.”
 Trump expressed his disinterest in the daily intelligence briefing, saying he “gets it when he needs it,” but the Tuesday and Wednesday schedules confirm him receiving a daily briefing even more comprehensive than the ones previously received by Obama, according to the White House.
 On Wednesday, National Security Advisor Michael Flynn said from the White House briefing room that Iran was “officially put on notice,” in a warning that appeared to show the US administration as beating the war drums. Shortly afterward, Trump made an unannounced visit to Dover Air Force base for the return of the remains of a US service member killed in a raid in Yemen, the first military mission to be ordered by the new president.
 On Friday, Trump imposed sanctions on Iran similar to the ones imposed during Obama’s tenure.
 Presidential modesty is an outcome of a mishap; the 9/11 attacks left George W. Bush dazed, Barack Obama realized the limit of his popularity after the Gulf of Mexico oil spills, soon afterwards, his party lost the mid-term elections.
 Today, the world may see the new US president as an uncontrollable train or an impetuous flood. That’s probably true, but by standing in front of a coffin of the soldier that was sent by him to a conflict zone, could mean that Trump has already started his trip down the road of humility,
 **Pierre Ghanem is an Al Arabiya correspondent based in Washington, D.C.
 
On the preservation and revitalization of Islamic traditions
Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/February 04/17
Dr. Radwan al-Sayyed, is a professor and Sheikh in the field of political ideology in Islam, or ‘Islamic politics’ as it is known.
He studied at the Religious Institute in Lebanon and then at the Religious Academy of al-Azhar in Egypt. He then pursued his Philosophy studies about Islam and Christianity at Tubingen University in Germany. He later on became a professor of Islamic studies at Lebanese University. He expounded many ideas and insights about the awareness of political jurisprudence and its theories through the ages. In this regard, I can remember for example, a precious lecture ‘From the Caliphate and the Sultanate to a national country’, that he delivered in Abu Dhabi. It took me on an exciting journey between the changes in nomenclature and the awareness about political structures through Islamic history.
 Dr. Sayyed was recently granted the King Faisal International Prize for Islamic Studies. He deserves it and much more for his research and modernizing approach, and for fusing the old methods of scholarship with modern curricula. He used this brilliantly in his studies and in counselling, from which I personally benefited a lot.
I am strongly convinced that the reason for the overall climate around Muslims today is because of the lack in reading religious and heritage-related material, and not vice versa!
What is important now is that our ‘Mawlana’ Sheikh Radwan, is interested in the rehabilitation of Hanbalism and Salafism. He wants to free them from secular defections and political media scrutiny that are very far from noble sciences. He also wants to defend them from ‘ignorant defenders’.In his interview with Al Arabiya by Fahd Shoqiran, Dr. Sayyed spoke about this sensitive matter and said: “I do not know why they hate Sunni Islam in particular (some secular Arab intellectuals), despite the fact that those who have succeeded in establishing a religious state in modern times are Iranian Shiites.”
 He then talked about the important studies of an American professor of Lebanese origin, Dr. Georges Makdissi, who was interested in the 60s in Hanbali studies and restored its importance in academia, unlike what was prevailing in Orientalist studies.
 “Makdissi’s main idea of the Hanbali people was that they were preachers and responsible for the Sunni doctrine, and he disapproved Goldziher who believed that Ash’arism was the doctrine of the Sunnis, not the Hanbali school,” he said.
 Finally, Dr. Sayyed is not a fan of Hanbalism or Salafism. On the contrary, he calls for the preservation and revitalization of Islamic traditions. He speaks from the point of view of a scientific scholar, who studies political tendencies and sectarian implications in Islamic Studies.
 In the interview, Radwan stressed that Salafists should be modernized and not pushed towards extremism. In fact, the eradication of Salafism is impossible as it is a broad current supported by Muslims, but who would understand it, he queries.
 I am strongly convinced that the reason for the overall climate around Muslims today is because of the lack in reading religious and heritage-related material, and not vice versa!
 **This article was first published in Asharq al-Awsat.