LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

February 08/17

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins17/english.february08.17.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
The Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life a ransom for many
You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones are tyrants over them

Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew 20/20-28/:"Then the mother of the sons of Zebedee came to him with her sons, and kneeling before him, she asked a favour of him. And he said to her, ‘What do you want?’ She said to him, ‘Declare that these two sons of mine will sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your kingdom.’ But Jesus answered, ‘You do not know what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I am about to drink?’ They said to him, ‘We are able.’He said to them, ‘You will indeed drink my cup, but to sit at my right hand and at my left, this is not mine to grant, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared by my Father.’When the ten heard it, they were angry with the two brothers. But Jesus called them to him and said, ‘You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones are tyrants over them. It will not be so among you; but whoever wishes to be great among you must be your servant, and whoever wishes to be first among you must be your slave; just as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life a ransom for many.’"

Have nothing to do with stupid and senseless controversies; you know that they breed quarrels.
The Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but kindly to everyone, an apt teacher, patient, correcting opponents with gentleness

Second Letter to Timothy 02/14-26/:"Remind them of this, and warn them before God that they are to avoid wrangling over words, which does no good but only ruins those who are listening. Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved by him, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly explaining the word of truth. Avoid profane chatter, for it will lead people into more and more impiety, and their talk will spread like gangrene. Among them are Hymenaeus and Philetus, who have swerved from the truth by claiming that the resurrection has already taken place. They are upsetting the faith of some. But God’s firm foundation stands, bearing this inscription: ‘The Lord knows those who are his’, and, ‘Let everyone who calls on the name of the Lord turn away from wickedness.’In a large house there are utensils not only of gold and silver but also of wood and clay, some for special use, some for ordinary. All who cleanse themselves of the things I have mentioned will become special utensils, dedicated and useful to the owner of the house, ready for every good work.Shun youthful passions and pursue righteousness, faith, love, and peace, along with those who call on the Lord from a pure heart. Have nothing to do with stupid and senseless controversies; you know that they breed quarrels. And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but kindly to everyone, an apt teacher, patient, correcting opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant that they will repent and come to know the truth, and that they may escape from the snare of the devil, having been held captive by him to do his will.

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 07-08/17
Amnesty: As many as 13,000 hanged in Syria prison since 2011/AP/February 07/17
Walid Phares, Trump Campaign Foreign Policy Advisor, Rehired as Fox National Security Expert/Rebecca Bynuml/Family Security Matters/February 07/17
The Trump-Trudeau Tryst/Thomas Quiggin/Gatestone Institute/February 07/017
Trump’s decisions, operation Decisive Storm to end mullahs’ dream/Jerry Maher/Al Arabiya/February 07/17
The game of safe zone in Syria/Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/February 07/17
Will Le Pen be the new French President/Randa Takieddine/Al Arabiya/February 07/17
Post truth phenomenon and separating news from facts/Essayid Weld Ebah/Al Arabiya/February 07/17
The pros and cons of expat remittance taxes in Saudi Arabia/Dr. Mohamed A. Ramady/Al Arabiya/February 07/17
France's New Islamist Guillotine/The Trial of Georges Bensoussan/Denis MacEoin/Gatestone Institute/February 07/017
Israel's So-Called Poverty Problem/OECD Poverty Lines Do Not Define Poverty/Malcolm Lowe/Gatestone Institute/February 07/017
For Iranian Americans, Trump has complicated an already tricky trip to motherland
Sarah Parvini/Los Angeles Times/February 06/17

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 07-08/17

Saudi-Lebanon ties become better with new ambassador
Active Saudi Comeback to Lebanon
Bassil Dubs 'Shameful' the Failure to Endorse New Vote Law
Bassil signs with his Gabonese counterpart agreement over systematic diplomatic deliberation
Ter Sarkisian Urges Aoun, Hariri to Maintain 'Consensual' Ties
Report: Pre-Emptive Security Operations Foil Beirut Attack Plot
Twinning Declared between ISF and Police Service of Northern Ireland
Lebanese Man Arrested in U.S.-Based Gun Smuggling Scheme
World Bank Gives Lebanon $200 Million to Upgrade Roads
Mustaqbal Urges Timely Polls under 'New, Consensual Law'
Aoun Hits Back at Jumblat over Call for Abolishing Sectarianism
Aoun: Problem lies in transgression of laws
Makari adjourns cabinet questioning session
1 Dead, 3 Hurt in Zgharta Town Family Clash
Adwan: Cabinet Must Dedicate Meetings to Discuss Election Law
Islamic State 'Emir' Killed in Arsal
Mikati, Sabhan hold talks
Italian Deputy FM meets Lebanese ministers
Jumblatt, Egyptian Ambassador hold talks
Bassil, tackles ties with President of Equatorial Guinea
Riachy: We are preparing workshop of laws at ministry
Fenianos, Iraqi counterpart take up cooperation prospects
Israeli enemy gunboat violates regional waters
Geagea receive condolences on his late Mother Mary
Bukhari visits Red Cross headquarters in Beirut
Ajib revokes request to free Bahij Abu Hamze

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 07-08/17
President Trump Not Welcome in UK Parliament, Speaker of the House Says
At least 20 dead in bomb blast outside Afghan Supreme Court
Settler homes on private Palestinian land legalized
Air strikes hit Syria’s rebel-held Idlib city, 15 dead
Syria Opposition Demands International Observers in Regime Jails
Louvre attack suspect speaks to investigators
Khamenei tells Trump 'no enemy can paralyze' Iran
Florida man jailed for 30 years for mosque fire
Canadian woman found guilty of hiding six baby burials
Settler homes on private Palestinian land legalized
Rona Ambrose’s yacht vacation keeps Conservatives mum on Liberal ethics
Sarkozy to Face Trial over 2012 Campaign Financing
Abbas Calls Israeli Settler Law an 'Attack against Our People'
Egypt Says It Backs Trump's Media Criticism
 

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on February 07-08/17
Trump says media doesn’t report terror attacks, media responds with outrage and fury
House Committee members compromised by rogue IT staff: Abid, Imran and Jamal Awan
Robert Spencer: Democrat Leaders Protest Trump’s Determination to Fight Jihad
Canada’s Trudeau sets up “war room” to monitor not jihad terrorists, but Donald Trump
Ohio State University course highlights how Muslims helped build America
Toronto: BLM protestors claim Quebec Muslims were murdered “because Islam challenges white supremacy violence”
What motivates female jihad-martyrdom suicide bombers?
Germany: Muslim disrupts church funeral, “I come in name of Prophet, to proclaim message of Allah to infidels”
Mohajer vs. Greenfield on Trump’s Travel Restrictions — on The Glazov Gang
Hugh Fitzgerald: “I’m a Muslim — Ask Me Anything,” Answers 30-38
Toronto Muslim speaker: “We must celebrate our way of life…until their way of life dissipates under our feet”

Links From Christian Today Site for on February 07-08/17
Exclusive: Prime Minister To Meet Pope Francis 'Sooner Rather Than Later'
Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby: 'The Most Important Thing I've Ever Done Is Become A Follower Of Jesus.'
LGBT Campaigners Plot Shock Defeat Of Church's Gay Marriage Stance
Museum Of The Bible Makes Forbes' Top 100 List Of Nonprofits In The US
In Egypt, Christians Can Now Take Leave From Work To Go On Pilgrimage
Woman In Vatileaks Trial Claims She Got Messages Via Confession Box
Morocco Religious Authorities Rule Leaving Islam Is No Longer Punishable By Death
Violence, John Smyth And The Gospel
Why We Need To Support Our Queen In Her Meeting With Donald Trump
Is Evangelical Theology Really To Blame For Sadistic Abuse?

Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 07-08/17
Saudi-Lebanon ties become better with new ambassador

Reuters/February 6, 2017/Aoun sought to mend relations with Saudi Arabia's monarch
Saudi Arabia will appoint a new ambassador to Lebanon, encourage the return of Saudi tourists and increase flights there by Saudi airlines, the Lebanese president's office said, in a sign of improved bilateral ties. Saudi Arabia's Gulf Affairs Minister Thamer Al Sabhan informed President Michel Aoun of the changes when they met at the Presidential Palace on Monday, Aoun's office said in a statement. Saudi Arabia's former ambassador left Beirut last summer, and the post has been vacant since.Aoun was elected in October in a deal that also saw Lebanon's leading politician, Saad Al Hariri, appointed prime minister.  Aoun sought to mend relations with Saudi Arabia's monarchy, which has traditionally backed Hezbollah's opponents in Lebanon, when he visited Riyadh earlier this month.  Aoun said his visit had helped improve ties, after tensions linked to the regional rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran led Riyadh to cancel $3 billion of military aid to Beirut last year. Lebanon's president had also hoped his trip would result in a lifting of travel advisories imposed by some Gulf states last year on nationals visiting Lebanon, which severely damaged its tourism sector. Last year, Riyadh also advised big-spending Saudis not to visit Lebanon.  The tensions had also created uncertainty for an estimated 750,000 Lebanese nationals living and working in Saudi Arabia and in other Gulf Arab states, who transfer between $7 and $8 billion each year to support extensive families.
 
Active Saudi Comeback to Lebanon
Asharq Al-Awsat/ February 7, 2017/Beirut – The visit of Saudi State Minister for Arab Gulf Affairs, Thamer al-Sabhan to Beirut this week has pushed the Lebanese-Saudi relations towards a positive stage particularly with a decision taken from Riyadh to appoint a new ambassador to Lebanon. Informed sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that during his meeting with President Michel Aoun at the presidential palace in Baabda on Monday, Sabhan informed the president that the Saudi King had ordered the appointment of a new Saudi ambassador to Lebanon, and that the Lebanese government would be informed about the Saudi decision through the diplomatic channels.  Other Arab sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Aoun informed the Saudi minister about his desire that Lebanon’s defense minister visits the Kingdom to discuss military joint cooperation between both countries.  The sources also said Sabhan thanked the Lebanese cabinet for the tight security measures taken to protect Gulf tourists in general, and Saudis in particular.  The Saudi Minister had arrived in Beirut Sunday for talks with senior Lebanese officials on bilateral relations.
 After meeting with Aoun, Sabhan confirmed on Monday that his visit to Beirut “comes within the framework of the follow-up on topics that have been agreed upon between President Aoun and the Saudi King.”  For his part, Aoun said that he has given instructions to the ministers to complete discussing all the arrangements related to the common points between both countries.  Following his visit to Baabda’s presidential palace, Sabhan and the accompanying Saudi delegation met with Prime Minister Saad Hariri in Beirut. The two men discussed the latest domestic and regional developments, in addition to bilateral ties between both countries. Sabhan also met separately with head of the Democratic Gathering parliamentary bloc MP Walid Jumblatt and former Prime Minister Tammam Salam.  The comeback of the warm Saudi-Lebanese relations had started to show through the increase of hotel reservations during the upcoming spring and summer seasons.  Sources from the Hotels Association in Lebanon told Asharq Al-Awsat they expected a very promising summer this year. The sources said Sabhan’s announcement that his country had also decided to increase the Saudi Airlines flights to Lebanon would surely push thousands of Saudis and Gulf nationals to visit Lebanon.

Bassil Dubs 'Shameful' the Failure to Endorse New Vote Law
Naharnet/February 07/17/Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil criticized as “shameful” the political parties failure to agree on a new election law for the upcoming parliamentary polls, stressing that the sought vote system must reinforce unity among the Lebanese, the National News Agency reported on Tuesday. “It is such a shame that we, the Lebanese, have defeated the Israeli enemy and terrorism, while we fail to agree on an electoral law,” Bassil told the Lebanese Diaspora in Gabon during a dinner banquet Monday. “It is such a shame that we are still governed by a law that goes back to the 1960, and that we are unable to develop our political life,” he said. “We must not expect to defeat the enemy while we are unable to build a state,” added the minister.
 
Bassil signs with his Gabonese counterpart agreement over systematic diplomatic deliberation
Tue 07 Feb 2017/NNA - Foreign Affairs Minister Gibran Bassil on Tuesday signed with his Gabonese counterpart Pacome Moubelet-Boubeya an agreement relevant to systematic diplomatic deliberation that includes consultations over improving bilateral ties.
Minister Bassil hoped heightening the level of commercial and economic exchange between both countries, thanking the Gabonese authorities for their support to Lebanon podiums, notably their stance towards the conflict in Palestine. Bassil invited his counterpart to visit Lebanon in the context of the arranged visit of the Gabonese president to Lebanon.
 
Ter Sarkisian Urges Aoun, Hariri to Maintain 'Consensual' Ties
Naharnet/February 07/17/MP Serge Ter Sarkisian voiced calls on Tuesday upon President Michel Aoun and Prime Minister Saad Hariri to “safeguard their joint visions” for Lebanon and to “preserve their consensual views” in light of the debate between political parties over an electoral law for the upcoming parliamentary polls. “I call upon the President and PM to complete their common vision and to maintain consensual positions,” said the MP in an interview with VDL (93.3). The MP ruled out any political setback in light of the “prevailing atmosphere of democracy.”Reports have claimed recently that disputes over the new electoral law could harm the political harmony between Aoun and Hariri. The political parties have intensified their efforts recently in a bid to agree on a new electoral law before the expiry of the deadlines. The country has not organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature has instead twice extended its own mandate. The last polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next vote is scheduled for May. On the other hand, Ter Sarkisian stressed the need that Lebanon approves its state budget, he said: “The state budget is one the most important files in question in light of the economic recession.”However, he warned against a tax hike at the expense of the Lebanese, he said: “We will stand against any increase in taxes if the corruption file is not handled first.”He stressed “the need to organize and regulate income revenues and put an end to squandering.”Due to conflicts between the rival political parties, Lebanon has not approved a state budget since 2005 and its public debt has amounted to around $70 billion.
 
Report: Pre-Emptive Security Operations Foil Beirut Attack Plot
Naharnet/February 07/17/The General Security Directorate was able to thwart an Islamic State group terror scheme, that had plans to target Beirut's Central District, al-Akhbar daily reported on Tuesday. The daily added that the Islamic State's plans were “exceptional” this time, after it managed to infiltrate the real estate company of Solidere and recruit one of the employees. The breached employee was not an ordinary worker, it said. He was the man responsible for follow-up on the surveillance cameras belonging to Solidere in Downtown. He was tasked by the IS to set a list of targets. The employee is a Lebanese and hails from Sidon, added the daily. His task was to collect information about political figures, economic and tourist sites in the said area. He was also tasked to gather information about the entrances that lead to the residence of Prime Minster Saad Hariri which lies in the area. The General Security arrested the suspect on the 10th of January after he was “technically exposed,” judicial sources told the daily. He confessed during interrogations that he was recruited by a Palestinian man residing in the southern refugee camp of Ain el-Hilweh. He tasked him with collecting data about all potential targets in Downtown Beirut. In that regard, General Security chief Maj. Gen. Abbas Ibrahim held talks with Hariri and briefed him on the pre-emptive operation, added al-Akhbar. In a telephone call with the daily, Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq said: “The General Security carried out a pre-emptive operation and was able to foil a terror attack. The detainees were referred to the military justice more than ten days ago.”
 
Twinning Declared between ISF and Police Service of Northern Ireland
Naharnet/February 07/17/Within the framework of the £13million Memorandum of Understanding signed in June 2016 between the British embassy in Beirut and Lebanon's Ministry of Interior, a twinning ceremony was held Tuesday at the Internal Security Forces’ headquarters between the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) and the Lebanese Internal Security Forces.The strategic twinning between the two police forces aims at strengthening areas of public order, human rights, and coordination and tasking, scenario based training and strategic planning, a British embassy statement said. British Ambassador to Lebanon Hugo Shorter was accompanied by PSNI Deputy Chief Constable Drew Harris and they were welcomed by the ISF chief Maj. Gen. Ibrahim Basbous and the Head of Aramoun Academy Gen. Ahmed Hajjar. They were joined at the ceremony by Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq, Head of ISF Mobile Forces Gen. Fadi Hashem, Head of Police of Beirut Gen. Mohammed Ayoubi, ISF Inspector General Joseph Kallas, and Chief of Staff Gen. Naim Chammas. The Police Service of Northern Ireland is a force recognized internationally for “excellent work in the fields of community policing, counter terrorism and public order policing,” the embassy said in its statement. “The visit by DCC Harris will build on the relationships between PSNI and senior officers in the ISF and allow DCC Harris to tour a number of ISF facilities,” it added. After the twinning, Ambassador Shorter said “today marks yet another major step in our strong strategic relationship with the Internal Security Forces.”“The Police Service of Northern Ireland have bravely undergone deep reform to become a world leading police force that regularly provides advice to partners around the world on subjects such as public order, community policing and human rights. I am very proud that we are able to introduce a strong friend and mentor to the ISF as it embarks on its own journey of reform, in turn the PSNI will benefit from the lessons learnt by the ISF in policing in such a complex social and security environment,” added Shorter. The PSNI was formed on November 4, 2001 after decades of sectarian troubles between Republican Catholics seeking independence and Protestant Loyalists seeking to remain part of the United Kingdom.The predecessor to the PSNI was the Royal Ulster Constabulary, a predominantly Protestant organization. As part of the peace building process it was agreed that a new police force, representing both Catholics and Protestants in equal numbers, was required.
 
Lebanese Man Arrested in U.S.-Based Gun Smuggling Scheme
 Associated Press/Naharnet/February 07/17/A Lebanese man has been arrested in the United States in connection with a scheme to smuggle guns purchased in the state of Iowa to Lebanon. Federal authorities arrested 42-year-old Fadi Yassine this week as he got off a flight in New York City. He made a court appearance Monday in Brooklyn, New York and will be transferred to Cedar Rapids, Iowa to face charges of conspiring to violate the Arms Export Control act. Four Cedar Rapids residents with ties to Lebanon were sentenced to prison for their role in the conspiracy last year. Investigators say that Yassine purchased guns in Lebanon that the Iowa residents had shipped there, and told one of the conspirators which guns to purchase. Yassine is also accused of giving one of the conspirators $30,000 cash to buy more guns.
 
World Bank Gives Lebanon $200 Million to Upgrade Roads
Associated Press/Naharnet/February 07/17/The World Bank said Tuesday it has earmarked $200 million for repairing Lebanon's unsafe roads, signaling a resumption of international aid months after the election of a president following two and a half years of political vacuum in the country. The international lender said in a statement that the funds will be used to repair around 500 kilometers of roads in the first phase of a broader government plan "to revamp the country's crumbling road sector."It said the Roads and Employment Project was approved Monday by its board of directors. Ferid Belhaj, the World Bank's Middle East director, said the project would "help Lebanon continue to offer basic services both to its citizens and to Syrian refugees in the country." Lebanon is home to some 1.2 million Syrian refugees, the equivalent of a quarter of its own population. Hundreds of millions of dollars in assistance money from the World Bank was held up as Lebanon's long-feuding parties failed to agree on a president for more than two years. In October, the parliament was finally able to elect Free Patriotic Movement founder Michel Aoun as president.
 
Mustaqbal Urges Timely Polls under 'New, Consensual Law'
Naharnet/February 07/17/Al-Mustaqbal parliamentary bloc on Tuesday stressed “the importance of holding the parliamentary elections on time and without any delay, according to a new law that allows consensus among the various parties in line with the constitution and the Taef Accord.” In a statement issued after its weekly meeting, the bloc also noted that “the developments and changes in the region and the world at several political, security and economic levels require all the main political leaders to be aware of the possible dangerous repercussions on the situations in Lebanon.”“Everyone must be vigilant and keen on holding onto wisdom, equanimity, sobriety and flexibility, in order to reach solutions to the ongoing and impending problems,” Mustaqbal urged. It also called for “strengthening national unity, enhancing stability and supporting the success of the new phase that Lebanon entered with the election of a president and the formation of a new government.” While Mustaqbal has rejected that the electoral law be fully based on the proportional representation system, arguing that Hizbullah's arms would prevent serious competition in the party's strongholds, Druze leader MP Walid Jumblat has totally rejected proportional representation, even within a hybrid law, warning that it would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah, Mustaqbal, the Free Patriotic Movement, AMAL Movement and the Lebanese Forces are meanwhile discussing several formats of a so-called hybrid electoral law that mixes proportional representation with the winner-takes-all system. The country has not organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature has instead twice extended its own mandate.The last polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next vote is scheduled for May.
 
Aoun Hits Back at Jumblat over Call for Abolishing Sectarianism
Naharnet/February 07/17/President Michel Aoun on Tuesday announced that he will press for “alleviating sectarianism and its repercussions without affecting Lebanon's rich diversity and pluralism.”“Some parties' overbidding in their remarks about the abolition of sectarianism does not practically lead to its abolition,” Aoun said, in an apparent response to Jumblat's latest stance. The president also called for “respecting competent individuals in every religious community,” noting that “political affiliation should not be the exclusive criterion for choosing the representatives of each sect in state institutions.”Jumblat had on Sunday noted that all the proposed electoral law formats that contain proportional representation are not compatible with the 1989 Taef Accord, calling for elections “under a revised version of the 1960 law.”“We can find an amended format of the 1960 law, or else let us immediately seek the implementation of the Taef Accord, which we can implement fully or gradually while taking into consideration the country's circumstances,” the PSP leader urged. “Taef Accord stipulated new electoral districts and administrative governorates and the creation of a senate in which all sects and confessions would be represented after the abolition of political sectarianism in the parliament's structure,” Jumblat reminded. “Political sectarianism can be abolished while keeping some norms, specifically the election of a Christian president for the republic. When we abolish political sectarianism we can mull the implementation of proportional representation, which was not mentioned in the Taef Accord,” the PSP leader explained.
 
Aoun: Problem lies in transgression of laws

 Tue 07 Feb 2017/NNA - President of the Republic, Michel Aoun, said on Tuesday that the problem was not the absence of legal documents but the transgression of laws and their non-implementation. President Aoun called for work in order to consecrate the cultural piers that would contribute in the exit from tight sectarian frameworks towards citizenship.Aoun confirmed that he would push for the alleviation of sectarian brunt and its repercussions without minimizing the wealth of Lebanon, which constitutes its diversity and plurality and makes it a model country. He stressed the necessity to shed light on humanitarian values and principles of co-existence, saying that "the resort of some to exagerate in calls for abolishing sectarianism does not practically lead to the intended abolition."The Head of State informed a delegation of civil society representatives that he attached great importance to bills related to family protection. "The Law on the Protection of Persons with Special Needs was promulgated and its implementation must be ensured," he pointed out.General Aoun also received National Defense Minister, Yacoub Sarraf, who informed the President of the military institution situation and needs as well as his inspection tour on Lebanese-Syrian borders. Aoun met with former Minister Marwan Charbel over most recent developments. He also received Paraguay's Ambassador Hassan Khalil Dia on the occasion of the end of his diplomatic mission and awarded him the National Order of the Cedar, wishing him all the best in his new diplomatic mission.
 
Makari adjourns cabinet questioning session
Tue 07 Feb 2017/NNA - Parliament Speaker Deputy Farid Makari ended the cabinet questioning session which was held today (Tuesday) at about 1:30 p.m. without announcing any new date for the upcoming session. Makari pointed out that "parliament speaker Nabih Berri and the Parliament Bureau committee will decide the date of the next session.
 
1 Dead, 3 Hurt in Zgharta Town Family Clash
Naharnet/February 07/17/One person was killed and three others were wounded in a clash between members of the al-Arnaout family in the Zgharta district town of Alma on Tuesday, state-run National News Agency reported. It identified the slain family member as Doumit al-Arnaout and the wounded as “Doumit's mother and Bassam and Saad al-Arnaout.” “Security forces have launched a probe into the incident while two people have been arrested for interrogation following authorization from the relevant judicial authorities,” the agency added. A statement issued by Doumit Arnaout's family said “the property dispute had started among family members a year ago, prior to the intervention of the mayor Ahmed al-Halwan and groups loyal to him and to Bassam al-Arnaout, who waged several attacks on Doumit and on members of our family.” “All the attacks were documented through complaints filed with the public prosecution of the North and with the army's Intelligence Directorate,” the statement added.
 
Adwan: Cabinet Must Dedicate Meetings to Discuss Election Law
Naharnet/February 07/17/Lebanese Forces MP George Adwan said on Tuesday that the cabinet must schedule sessions strictly dedicated to discussing a new electoral law for the looming parliamentary polls. “The cabinet must hold successive meetings where discussions strictly focus on finding a new electoral law,” said Adwan after an adjourned parliament session that was scheduled for questioning the cabinet. “We insist on having the elections held on time and that a new law is endorsed,” he added. “We have to cooperate to pass a vote law that supports and consolidates the mountain reconciliation,” he said. The political parties have intensified their efforts in recent days in a bid to agree on a new electoral law before the expiry of the deadlines. While al-Mustaqbal Movemnet has rejected that the electoral law be fully based on proportional representation, arguing that Hizbullah's arms would prevent serious competition in the party's strongholds, Druze leader MP Walid Jumblat has totally rejected proportional representation, even within a hybrid law, warning that it would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah, Mustaqbal, the Free Patriotic Movement, AMAL Movement and the Lebanese Forces are meanwhile discussing several formats of a so-called hybrid electoral law that mixes proportional representation with the winner-takes-all system. The country has not organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature has instead twice extended its own mandate. The last polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next vote is scheduled for May.
 
Islamic State 'Emir' Killed in Arsal
Naharnet/February 07/17/Islamic State 'emir', Ahmed Wahid al-Abed, was killed in a bomb explosion in the southeastern town of Arsal, LBCI reported on Tuesday. Al-Abed, a Syrian hailing from al-Jarajir town in al-Qalamoun, was killed in a bomb explosion in the outskirts of Arsal, it added. Militants from IS and Fateh al-Sham Front -- formerly al-Qaida's Syria affiliate al-Nusra Front -- are entrenched in rugged areas along the undemarcated Lebanese-Syrian border and the army regularly shells their posts while Hizbullah and the Syrian army have engaged in clashes with them on the Syrian side of the border. The two groups briefly overran the town of Arsal in August 2014 before being ousted by the army after days of deadly battles. The retreating militants abducted more than 30 troops and policemen of whom four have been executed and nine remain in the captivity of the IS group.
 
Mikati, Sabhan hold talks

Tue 07 Feb 2017/NNA - Former Prime Minister, Najib Mikati, met on Tuesday night at his residence with Thamer Al-Sabhan, Minister of State for Arab Gulf Affairs. Both sides discussed bilateral ties between Lebanon and Saudi Kingdom as well as the situation in Lebanon and the region.
 
Italian Deputy FM meets Lebanese ministers
Tue 07 Feb 2017/NNA - "Italian Deputy Foreign Minister, Vincenzo Amendola, started on Monday series of official meetings with Lebanese officials, the Italian embassy said in a statement on Tuesday. Amendola met with Social Affairs Minister, Pierre Abou Assi. He reiterated his support for the international cooperation in the Italian Foreign Ministry to face refugees' crisis. Amendola visited this morning (Tuesday) the Minister of Energy and Water, Cesar Abi Khalil, showing Italy's willingness to work on the establishment of cooperation in the energy sector. Also he met with Finance Minister, Ali Hassan Khalil. In the afternoon, the Italian Deputy Foreign Minister met with Refugees Affairs Minister, Mouhin Merehbi, then Minister of Education and Higher Education, Marwan Hamadeh and Interior Minister, Nuhad Mashnouk. During the meetings, Amendola confirmed Italy's support for Lebanon's stability, which suffers from the Syrian refugee crisis and the importance of Lebanon's role in the regional balances. The Italian Deputy FM will meet at night with the Defense Minister, Yacoub Sarraf and a number of businessmen and journalists before concluding his visit tomorrow morning with Minister of State for Presidential Affairs, Pierre Raffoul."
 
Jumblatt, Egyptian Ambassador hold talks
 Tue 07 Feb 2017/NNA - PSP leader, Deputy Walid Jumblatt met on Tuesday night at his residence in Clemenceau with the Egyptian Ambassador to Lebanon, Nazih al Najjari, in the presence of MPs Ghazi Aridi and Akram Shehayeb.
 
Bassil, tackles ties with President of Equatorial Guinea
Tue 07 Feb 2017/NNA - Foreign and Expatriates Minister, Gebran Bassil, met on Tuesday with the President of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Edgar Lungu. Discussions focused on ties between both countries, particularly the economic and trade ties. "Work is underway to sign soon the bilateral agreements that have been discussed with the president to be completed by the charge d'Affaires at the Lebanese embassy in the capital of Guinea," Bassil said following the meeting. For his part, Lungu praised the Lebanese for "their commitment to the law in Guinea and their contribution to the construction of the country."Bassil concluded his visit by meeting with the Lebanese Community in Guinea.
 
Riachy: We are preparing workshop of laws at ministry
Tue 07 Feb 2017/NNA - Information Minister, Melhem Riachy, said on Tuesday night "the Ministry of Information is organizing workshop of laws and there is serious discussion in the preparation of draft laws for the exemption of customs to provide some of the funds and the costs to the written press." The minister added that his ministry is also setting a draft law to transform "the Information Ministry to the Ministry of dialogue and communication." Riachy's remarks came during a dinner at Mhanna restaurant held by the Media Graduates Association to honor the minister and in the presence of the Information Ministry's General Director, Hassan Falha and others. Riachy indicated "There is a project to develop the syndicate editors to include editors in all media outlets and to ensure the assets of contracting, provide synergy fund and retirement."
 
Fenianos, Iraqi counterpart take up cooperation prospects
 Tue 07 Feb 2017/NNA - Public Works and Transportation Minister, Youssef Fenianos, met on Tuesday evening with his Iraqi counterpart, Kazem Al-Hamami, on top of a delegation, whereby they discussed cooperation prospects at the air and sea transportation levels.
 Iraqi Ambassador to Lebanon, Ali Al Ameri, and MP Yassine Jaber were present during the meeting. Talks majorly touched on cooperation relations at the level of aircraft maintenance, ground services, pilots' training center, cooperation amongst seaports in the two countries, and benefitting from Lebanese pilots' experise.
 
Israeli enemy gunboat violates regional waters
 Tue 07 Feb 2017/NNA - Army Command - Guidance Directorate issued the following communiqué: "On Tuesday, a hostile Israeli gunboat violated the Lebanese regional waters off Ras Al-Nakoura between 11;33 for a distance of 555 m. for 42 minutes. The violation has been followed up in coordination with the UNIFIL."
 
Geagea receive condolences on his late Mother Mary
 Tue 07 Feb 2017/NNA - Lebanese Forces (LF) leader Samir Geagea received scores of phone calls offering condolences on the passing away of his Mother Mary Habib Geagea, notably from President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, Prime Minister, Saad Hariri, and Maronite Patriarch Cardinal Boutros Rahi. Diplomatic, religious, media, and army dignitaries also contacted for the same purpose LF leader Geagea. Similar cables of condolences also poured at Meerab notably from National Defense Minister Yaacoub Sarraf, former Iraqi PM Iyad Allawi, and Mrs. Nazek Hariri. On the other hand, Geagea received at Meerab State Minister for Planning Affairs Michel Pharoun, Land Movement Head Talal Dweihi, and Mr Michel Mkattaf.
 
Bukhari visits Red Cross headquarters in Beirut
 Tue 07 Feb 2017/NNA - Saudi Embassy Acting Charge d'Affaire Walid bin Abdullah Bukhari visited on Tuesday the headquarters of the Lebanese Red Cross in Beirut, whereby he toured its various departments and sections to have a closer look at the ongoing of work at the Center. Bukhari was greeted by Association chairman Dr. Antoine Zoghbi, who delivered a speech in which he thanked the Saudi kingdom for its humanitarian work carried out in various parts of the globe."The Saudi envoy also conferred upon Zoghby an honorary shield in recognition of the Association's humanitarian work.
 
Ajib revokes request to free Bahij Abu Hamze

 Tue 07 Feb 2017/NNA - Beirut Investigative Judge, Farid Ajib, revoked on Tuesday a request to free Bahij Abu Hamze due to the fact that investigative procedures concerning MP Walid Jumblatt's charges against Hamze have not been finalized, NNA field reporter said.
 
Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 07-08/17
Amnesty: As many as 13,000 hanged in Syria prison since 2011

SARAH EL DEEB/BEIRUT (AP) February 07/17/— Syrian authorities have killed as many as 13,000 people — possibly more — since the start of the 2011 uprising in mass hangings at a prison north of Damascus known to detainees as "the slaughterhouse," Amnesty International said on Tuesday. In a new report covering the period from 2011 to 2015, Amnesty said 20-50 people were hanged each week at Saydnaya Prison in killings authorized by senior Syrian officials, including deputies of President Bashar Assad, and carried out by military police.
The report referred to the killings as a "calculated campaign of extrajudicial execution."Amnesty has recorded at least 35 different methods of torture in Syria since the late 1980s, practices that only increased since 2011, said Lynn Maalouf, deputy director for research at Amnesty's regional office in Beirut. Other rights groups have found evidence of massive torture leading to death in Syrian detention facilities. In a report last year, Amnesty found that more than 17,000 people have died of torture and ill-treatment in custody across Syria since 2011, an average rate of more than 300 deaths a month. Those figures are comparable to battlefield deaths in Aleppo, one of the fiercest war zones in Syria, where 21,000 were killed across the province since 2011.
"The horrors depicted in this report reveal a hidden, monstrous campaign, authorized at the highest levels of the Syrian government, aimed at crushing any form of dissent within the Syrian population," Maalouf said. While the most recent data is from 2015, Maalouf said there is no reason to believe the practice has stopped since then, with thousands more probably killed. "These executions take place after a sham trial that lasts over a minute or two minutes, but they are authorized by the highest levels of authority," including the Grand Mufti, a top religious authority in Syria, and the defense minister, she said. Syrian government officials rarely comment on allegations of torture and mass killings. In the past, they have denied reports of massacres documented by international human rights groups, describing them as propaganda.
The chilling accounts in Tuesday's report came from interviews with 31 former detainees and over 50 other officials and experts, including former guards and judges.
According to the findings, detainees were told they would be transferred to civilian detention centers but were taken instead to another building in the facility and hanged. "They walked in the 'train,' so they had their heads down and were trying to catch the shirt of the person in front of them. The first time I saw them, I was horrified. They were being taken to the slaughterhouse," Hamid, a former detainee, told Amnesty. Another former detainee, Omar Alshogre, told The Associated Press the guards would come to his cell, sometimes three times a week, and call out detainees by name. Alshogre said a torture session would begin before midnight in nearby chambers that he could hear. "Then the sound would stop, and we would hear a big vehicle come and take them away," said Alshogre, who spent nine months in Saydnaya. Now 21, he lives in Sweden.
Speaking in an interview from Stockholm via Skype, Alshogre described how he was forced to keep his eyes closed and his back to the guards while they abused or suffocated a cellmate.
The body often would be left behind, or there would be a pool of blood in the cell for other prisoners to clean up.
"We can tell from the sound of the prisoner as he dies behind us. He dies a meter away. I don't see anything, but I see with my ears," said Alshogre, who at age 17 moved among nearly 10 detention facilities in Syria for two years before he was taken to Saydnaya.
Alshogre survived nine months in the prison, paying his way out in 2015 — a common practice. He suffered from tuberculosis and his weight fell to 35 kilograms (77 pounds).
Two cousins detained with him in western Syria didn't survive, dying a year apart in a military intelligence detention facility. The younger one died in Alshogre's arms, deprived of food and so weak he was unable to walk to the bathroom on his own.
Still, Alshogre said nothing could have prepared him for Saydnaya. At one point, Alshogre was called out by his guards "for execution," he said. He was brought before a military trial and told not to raise his gaze at the judge, who asked him how many soldiers he had killed.
When he said none, the judge spared him. Death in Saydnaya was always present, "like the air," Alshogre said. Once when he was deprived of food for two days, a cellmate handed him his food ration — and died days later. "This is someone who gave me his life," he said. Another cellmate died of diarrhea, also common in the prison. "Death is the simplest thing. It was the most hoped for because it would have spared us a lot: hunger, thirst, fear, pain, cold, thinking," he added. "Thinking was so hard. It could also kill," said Alshogre, who keeps a photo of one of his tormentors on the wall of his home.
 
President Trump Not Welcome in UK Parliament, Speaker of the House Says
LORA MOFTAH,Good Morning America /February 07/17
The speaker of the British House of Commons was greeted with cheers today after he announced his opposition to President Trump addressing Parliament during his state visit to the U.K. Speaker John Bercow pointed to Trump’s recent executive order barring citizens from seven Muslim-majority nation from travelling to the U.S. as part of the reason he could not support a Trump address.
"I would not wish to issue an invitation to President Trump to speak in the Royal Gallery," Bercow said during a session of Parliament, citing the body’s "opposition to racism and to sexism and our support for equality before the law and an independent judiciary."
Prime Minister Theresa May invited Trump to make a state visit during her meeting with the leader in Washington last month. The invitation has attracted significant controversy back in the U.K., one of the U.S.’s most important global allies.
A petition calling for the invitation to be rescinded garnered 1.8 million signatures and is now set to be debated in Parliament later this month. Thousands of demonstrators flooded the streets of London and other cities across the U.K. last week to protest Trump’s executive order. An estimated 10,000 protesters demonstrated in front of 10 Downing St., the prime minister's residence, chanting "shame on May" and other slogans opposing the invitation.
 Speaking before Parliament is considered a great honor for foreign leaders visiting Britain. Only a few U.S. presidents have addressed the body over the past decades: President Ronald Reagan in 1982, President Bill Clinton in 1995 and President Barack Obama in 2011.
Bercow underscored the significance of such an address during his comments to Parliament, saying, "an address by a foreign leader to both houses of Parliament is not an automatic right, it’s an earned honor."
He acknowledged that he, as speaker of the House of Commons, was not the only politician to have a say in whether Trump would be invited but that the imposition of the migrant ban meant that he is now "strongly opposed to an address by President Trump in Westminster Hall."In Parliament, his remarks were followed by a round of applause and cheers from many of the members present in the chamber, including Dennis Skinner, who rose to respond, "Further to that point of order, two words: Well done."
But some have criticized the speaker for the statements, most notably Nigel Farage, the former leader of the right-wing U.K. Independence Party and a prominent British Trump ally.
"For Speaker Bercow to uphold our finest parliamentary traditions, he should be neutral," Farage tweeted today.

At least 20 dead in bomb blast outside Afghan Supreme Court
Reuters Tuesday, 7 February 2017/At least 20 people were killed on Tuesday in a bomb blast outside the Supreme Court in the center of Afghanistan’s capital, Kabul, government officials said, in what appeared to be the latest in a series of attacks on the judiciary.
The Ministry of Public Health said at least 20 people were killed and 38 injured people were taken to city hospitals. There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the attack, in which police said an apparent suicide bomber targeted Supreme Court employees leaving their offices at the end of the working day. “When I heard a bang I rushed toward the Supreme Court’s parking lot to find my brother who works there,” said a witness, Dad Khuda, adding he had found his brother alive. “Unfortunately, several people were killed and wounded.”
Reuters witnesses at the scene reported blood stains on the street and numerous ambulances leaving the area. Last month, Taliban bombers killed more than 30 people and wounded about 70 in twin blasts in a crowded area of the city during the afternoon rush hour.
The Taliban, fighting to oust foreign forces and bring down the US-backed government, claimed responsibility for the Jan. 10 attack. Afghan government forces control no more than two-thirds of national territory, and have struggled to contain the Taliban insurgency since the bulk of NATO soldiers withdrew at the end of 2014.
 
Settler homes on private Palestinian land legalized
Reuters, Jerusalem Tuesday, 7 February 2017/Israel passed a law on Monday retroactively legalizing about 4,000 settler homes built on privately owned Palestinian land in the occupied West Bank, a measure that has drawn international concern.
The legislation has been condemned by Palestinians as a blow to their hopes of statehood. But its passage may only be largely symbolic as it contravenes Israeli Supreme Court rulings on property rights. Israel’s attorney-general has said it is unconstitutional and that he will not defend it at the Supreme Court. Though the legislation, passed by a vote of 60 to 52, was backed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right-wing coalition, it has raised tensions in the government. A White House official said that, given the new law is expected to face challenges in Israeli courts, the Trump administration “will withhold comment on the legislation until the relevant court ruling.”
The Hague
Political sources have said Netanyahu privately opposes the bill over concerns it could provide grounds for prosecution by the International Criminal Court in The Hague. The White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Washington would oppose any such international legal action. But the far-right Jewish Home party, a member of the coalition looking to draw voters from the traditional base of Netanyahu’s Likud, pushed for the legislation after the forced evacuation of 330 settlers last week from an outpost built on private Palestinian land.With Netanyahu under police investigation on suspicion of abuse of office, an allegation he denies, Likud has been slipping in opinion polls. Opposing the law would have risked alienating his supporters and ceding ground to Jewish Home. Last-minute appeals this week by Netanyahu to postpone the vote until after he meets US President Donald Trump in Washington on Feb 15, were refused by Jewish Home, political sources said.  In London, where he met Prime Minister Theresa May on Monday, Netanyahu told Israeli reporters he did not want to delay the vote and that he sought only to update Washington ahead of time - which he said he did. Israeli officials did contact their US counterparts at the “staff level,” the White House official said. Netanyahu himself did not attend the vote because he was on a plane back from London when it was held.
 “Black flag”
 Hanan Ashrawi, a senior member of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the main Palestinian political umbrella body, said in a statement that the law gave settlers a green light to “embark on a land grab”. “Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his extremist, racist coalition government are deliberately breaking the law and destroying the very foundations of the two-state solution and the chances for peace and stability,” Ashrawi said.  The UN Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process Nickolay Mladenov said in a statement that the law “will have far reaching legal consequences for Israel and greatly diminish the prospects for Arab-Israeli peace”.  “We are voting tonight on the connection between the Jewish people to its land. This entire land is ours,” Likud minister Ofir Akunis told parliament. Opposition leader Isaac Herzog of the Zionist Union said a black flag hung over the “insane law that threatens to destroy Israeli democracy. 

Air strikes hit Syria’s rebel-held Idlib city, 15 dead
Reuters, Amman Tuesday, 7 February 2017/At least 15 people died in air strikes on the rebel-held Syrian city of Idlib on Tuesday, in some of the heaviest raids there in months, residents and a rescue worker said. Around eight attacks by what were believed to be Russian jets wounded scores of people and leveled several multi-storey buildings in residential areas of the northwestern city, they added. “We are still pulling bodies from the rubble,” Issam al Idlibi, a volunteer civil defense worker, said. Most of the casualties were civilians and the death toll would probably rise, he added. The extent of the damage and the debris bore the hallmarks of a Russian attack, said two witnesses. There was no immediate comment from Moscow. Russian planes have targeted a number of towns and villages in the area since entering the Syrian conflict in September 2015 to back ally President Bashar al-Assad. But activists and residents said there had been a reduction of Russian strikes in Idlib province since a Turkish-Russian brokered cessation of hostilities late December. Planes from the US-led coalition have also launched a number of attacks in the rural province, a major stronghold of militants, many of them formerly affiliated to al Qaeda. Idlib’s population has been swollen by thousands of Syrian fighters and their families who were evacuated from villages and towns around Damascus and Aleppo city retaken by the government in recent months.

Syria Opposition Demands International Observers in Regime Jails
 Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 07/17/Syria's opposition on Tuesday demanded international observers be allowed access to regime-run detention centers, after an Amnesty International investigation into mass hangings at a notorious government prison.
 The damning report details the gruesome weekly ritual of group executions at Saydnaya prison that have left up to 13,000 people dead over five years. In a statement on Tuesday, the opposition National Coalition called for "immediately allowing international observers unobstructed access to detention centers and the immediate, unconditional release of all detainees. "The report must be transferred to the International Criminal Court, which will guarantee that those responsible for these war crimes and crimes against humanity will be held accountable," the Istanbul-based group said.Amnesty accused Syria's government of a "policy of extermination" by repeatedly torturing detainees, withholding food, water and medical care, and carrying out extrajudicial killings. The report comes just two weeks before a new round of talks is due to take place in Switzerland aimed at putting an end to nearly six years of civil war. The High Negotiations Committee, which is set to represent Syria's opposition at these talks, said the investigation "leaves no doubts that the regime has carried out war crimes and crimes against humanity.""Amnesty's new reports demonstrate... the scale of terrorism that the regime in Syria is practicing against the Syrian people," the HNC said in an emailed statement. It called for a halt to bombing, an end to government sieges, and the release of thousands of detainees as "the starting point for any serious talks" to end the war. More than 310,000 people have been killed since Syria's conflict erupted in March 2011 with protests against President Bashar Assad.

Louvre attack suspect speaks to investigators
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Tuesday, 7 February 2017/The Egyptian suspect in the attack on soldiers outside the Louvre museum in Paris has begun speaking to investigators and confirmed his identity, a source in the inquiry said Tuesday. The man, who was shot after wielding two machetes and lunging at a group of soldiers while shouting “Allahu Akbar” (God is Greatest) on Friday, has recovered sufficiently to confirm he is Abdallah el-Hamahmy, 29. He “gave his version of the facts”, the source said, without giving more details. It is believed the suspect lives in the United Arab Emirates and entered France on January 26 on a flight from Dubai. He was staying in a rented apartment near the Champs-Elysees avenue that was booked online in June, four months before he made a visa application. Speaking to Al Arabiya in Cairo on Saturday, retired senior police officer Reda el-Hamahmy said he believed the suspect was his son and that he had been in Paris on a business trip. He informed him that he would take the Friday off to explore Paris and buy some gifts. He added that Abdullah had contacted him on Thursday evening, one day before the Louvre incident to assure him that “the business trip was a success”. He said Abdallah’s pregnant wife was currently staying in Saudi Arabia with their seven-month-old son. French authorities are also examining Hamahmy’s Twitter account after around a dozen messages were posted in Arabic minutes before the attack. “In the name of Allah... for our brothers in Syria and fighters across the world,” he wrote, before referring to the ISIS militant group in another tweet a minute later. The attack near the Louvre, one of the world’s most visited museums, has revived fears that France remains a target for militants after a string of bloody attacks that have killed more than 230 people since 2015. The threat is one of the major issues in the campaign for this year’s presidential and parliamentary elections.(With AFP)

Khamenei tells Trump 'no enemy can paralyze' Iran
By Agencies Tuesday, 7 February 2017/Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei dismissed US President Donald Trump's warning to Tehran to stop its missile tests, and called on Iranians to respond to Trump's "threats" on Friday's anniversary of the 1979 revolution. "No enemy can paralyze the Iranian nation," Khamenei was quoted as saying by his website in a meeting with military commanders in Tehran. Khamenei says 'you should be afraid of me'. No! The Iranian people will respond to his words on Feb 10, (the anniversary of revolution) and will show their stance against such threats." Iranian President Hassan Rouhani gives a press conference in Tehran on Jaunary 17, 2017, to mark the first anniversary of the implementation of a historic nuclear deal. (AFP). Earlier, Iran's president Hassan Rowhani said Tehran’s landmark 2015 nuclear deal with world powers could serve as a blueprint for resolving other Mideast disputes. Rowhani said "dozens" of such high-profile negotiations could "lead to security and stability of the region" - even though President Donald Trump has called the agreement on curbing Iran's nuclear program "terrible."

Florida man jailed for 30 years for mosque fire

By Reuters, Miami Tuesday, 7 February 2017
A Florida man pleaded no contest and was sentenced on Monday to 30 years in prison for setting fire last year to the mosque where Orlando nightclub shooter Omar Mateen once worshipped, court officials said. Joseph Schreiber, 32, caused more than $100,000 in damage to the Islamic Center of Fort Pierce, which he set ablaze on Sept. 11, 2016, the 15th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, authorities said. The crime also coincided with the Muslim holy day of Eid al-Adha, or the Feast of Sacrifice. No one was hurt, but the fire forced the congregation to relocate prayer services as it seeks a new home. Schreiber told police after his arrest in September that his attack on the mosque had nothing to do with Mateen, Assistant State Attorney Steve Gosnell said in an interview on Monday. A lawyer for Schreiber could not be immediately reached after Monday’s court hearing in St. Lucie County. The mosque was close to the apartment Mateen shared with his wife before he killed 49 people and wounded dozens more at a gay nightclub in Orlando last June, the deadliest mass shooting in modern US history. Mateen pledged allegiance to the head of the ISIS militant group during a 911 emergency call before being killed in a shootout with police after a three-hour standoff at the Pulse nightclub. Investigators do not believe he had assistance from outside organizations. Schreiber told investigators he viewed the teachings of Islam as a national security threat, Gosnell said. Police previously said Schreiber’s Facebook page included anti-Muslim rhetoric. “He said he wasn’t angry, he didn’t do it with hatred,” the prosecutor said. Schreiber faced up to life in prison given his prior criminal record and the charge against him, arson evidencing prejudice, essentially a hate crime in Florida, Gosnell said. “It’s horrible when anyone attacks a house of worship for whatever purpose,” the prosecutor said.

Canadian woman found guilty of hiding six baby burials

AFP, Montreal Tuesday, 7 February 2017/A Canadian woman was found guilty Monday of intentionally hiding in a storage locker the remains of six babies to whom she gave birth. The 42-year-old Winnipeg woman refused to submit to a DNA test, but investigating police performed one with a warrant, using a sanitary napkin from her home. She was shown to have given birth to all the infants. “All of these children were likely born alive. There is no evidence of complications in these pregnancies,” Judge Murray Thompson said in finding Andrea Giesbrecht guilty of six counts of concealing the body of a dead child. Each count carries up to two years in prison. Giesbrecht was not charged with murder. Because the bones of the children were in bad condition, authorities were unable to determine their causes of death. One of the remains was found in cement, and another covered in a white powder. The discovery of the remains came after Giesbrecht failed to pay rent on her storage area. Staff readying to auction off the contents made the tragic discovery. She pleaded not guilty at trial in April.

Settler homes on private Palestinian land legalized

Reuters, Jerusalem Tuesday, 7 February 2017/Israel passed a law on Monday retroactively legalizing about 4,000 settler homes built on privately owned Palestinian land in the occupied West Bank, a measure that has drawn international concern.
The legislation has been condemned by Palestinians as a blow to their hopes of statehood. But its passage may only be largely symbolic as it contravenes Israeli Supreme Court rulings on property rights. Israel’s attorney-general has said it is unconstitutional and that he will not defend it at the Supreme Court. Though the legislation, passed by a vote of 60 to 52, was backed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right-wing coalition, it has raised tensions in the government. A White House official said that, given the new law is expected to face challenges in Israeli courts, the Trump administration “will withhold comment on the legislation until the relevant court ruling.”
The Hague
Political sources have said Netanyahu privately opposes the bill over concerns it could provide grounds for prosecution by the International Criminal Court in The Hague. The White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Washington would oppose any such international legal action. But the far-right Jewish Home party, a member of the coalition looking to draw voters from the traditional base of Netanyahu’s Likud, pushed for the legislation after the forced evacuation of 330 settlers last week from an outpost built on private Palestinian land. With Netanyahu under police investigation on suspicion of abuse of office, an allegation he denies, Likud has been slipping in opinion polls. Opposing the law would have risked alienating his supporters and ceding ground to Jewish Home. Last-minute appeals this week by Netanyahu to postpone the vote until after he meets US President Donald Trump in Washington on Feb 15, were refused by Jewish Home, political sources said. In London, where he met Prime Minister Theresa May on Monday, Netanyahu told Israeli reporters he did not want to delay the vote and that he sought only to update Washington ahead of time - which he said he did. Israeli officials did contact their US counterparts at the “staff level,” the White House official said. Netanyahu himself did not attend the vote because he was on a plane back from London when it was held.
“Black flag”
Hanan Ashrawi, a senior member of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the main Palestinian political umbrella body, said in a statement that the law gave settlers a green light to “embark on a land grab”. “Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his extremist, racist coalition government are deliberately breaking the law and destroying the very foundations of the two-state solution and the chances for peace and stability,” Ashrawi said. The UN Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process Nickolay Mladenov said in a statement that the law “will have far reaching legal consequences for Israel and greatly diminish the prospects for Arab-Israeli peace”. “We are voting tonight on the connection between the Jewish people to its land. This entire land is ours,” Likud minister Ofir Akunis told parliament. Opposition leader Isaac Herzog of the Zionist Union said a black flag hung over the “insane law that threatens to destroy Israeli democracy.

Rona Ambrose’s yacht vacation keeps Conservatives mum on Liberal ethics
Laura Stone/OTTAWA — The Globe and Mail/Published Monday, Feb. 06, 2017
The Conservatives on Monday abruptly put an end to questions about the Liberal government’s ethical woes after it was revealed interim leader Rona Ambrose vacationed in the Caribbean on a billionaire’s yacht at the same time she was blasting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for his own lavish holiday.
Ms. Ambrose and her caucus have been harsh critics of Mr. Trudeau for vacationing with his family and Liberal friends over the holidays on a private island in the Bahamas owned by the billionaire Ismaili leader, the Aga Khan. Mr. Trudeau is currently under investigation by the Ethics Commissioner, who will determine whether he broke the federal Conflict Of Interest Act, possibly for taking a private helicopter, although Mr. Trudeau denies wrongdoing.
 “Justin Trudeau knew what he did was against the law. All he had to do was say no, but he couldn’t resist the billionaire lifestyle,” Ms. Ambrose tweeted on Jan. 12.
 Read more: Rona Ambrose vacationed on billionaire’s yacht amid Trudeau trip scandal
 Margaret Wente: Justin Trudeau's out of touch with the 99 per cent
 Opinion: Ethics and the Aga Khan: The PMO needs a rear-view mirror
 But it turns out Ms. Ambrose was embracing that same billionaire lifestyle – possibly in that very moment.
 Ms. Ambrose’s spokesman, Mike Storeshaw, confirmed a report first published by news website iPolitics last week that the acting leader and her partner, J.P. Veitch, vacationed on energy mogul Murray Edwards’s yacht around the islands of St. Barths and Saint Martin.
 Mr. Storeshaw said Ms. Ambrose travelled between Jan. 3 and 14, but only checked in with the Office of the Ethics Commissioner on Jan. 12 – six days after Mr. Trudeau’s trip was first revealed by the National Post, and on the same day she sent her “billionaire lifestyle” tweet. Ms. Ambrose also tweeted a copy of Conservative MP Blaine Calkins’s letter to the Ethics Commissioner on Jan. 11.
 “Ms. Ambrose has followed all rules that apply to her with respect to her holiday, and was open and transparent with the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, unlike the Prime Minister,” Mr. Storeshaw said.
 “Ms. Ambrose paid for a flight on a charter to the holiday destination along with a number of friends, none of whom are public office holders.”
 The Ethics Commissioner’s office confirmed no inquiry into Ms. Ambrose’s trip has been launched.
 NDP MP Nathan Cullen said Monday that working Canadians are going to have a hard time identifying with either party.
 “So the sanctimonious and angry tweets of the Conservative leader … to the Liberal leader was from one billionaire’s yacht to another billionaire’s island. Must be tough being Liberal and Conservative leaders, because maybe it was billionaire envy,” he said.
 “If you’re going to throw stones, make sure you’re not standing in a perfect glass house.”
 As recently as Friday, Conservative House Leader Candice Bergen was criticizing the Liberals for having “a lot of money for vacations on private islands.”
 Conservative MPs on Monday defended Ms. Ambrose, even as none seemed aware she was on a billionaire’s yacht as she was criticizing Mr. Trudeau.
 “Nope,” Conservative MP Tony Clement said when asked if he knew of Ms. Ambrose’s vacation. “I didn’t have that conversation with her, as to where she decided to take her holiday,” Conservative MP Michael Cooper said.
 Mr. Edwards, who is also co-owner of the Calgary Flames, is ranked as the 30th richest person in Canada by Canadian Business magazine, with a net worth estimated at $2.96-billion. He is also chairman of the board of Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., which lobbies the federal government. But a spokeswoman for Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson said that since Ms. Ambrose is an MP and not a minister, she only has to adhere by the conflict of interest code, not the act. The code allows MPs to accept gifts that could not be seen to influence them in their positions, such as those from family and friends, and do not have to disclose such gifts. Ms. Ambrose told the Ethics Commissioner Mr. Veitch has been friends with Mr. Edwards for 33 years. Through a company spokeswoman, Mr. Edwards declined to comment.
 With a report from The Canadian Press

Sarkozy to Face Trial over 2012 Campaign Financing
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 07/17/Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy is to face trial on charges of illegally financing his failed 2012 re-election bid, causing more trouble for the country's rightwing Republicans party. The prosecution claims Sarkozy spent nearly double the legal limit of 22.5 million euros ($24 million) on his lavish campaign, using false billing from a public relations firm called Bygmalion.A legal source said Tuesday that one of two investigating magistrates in charge of the case, Serge Tournaire, had decided on February 3 that the case should go to trial. Sarkozy's lawyer announced plans to appeal the decision. Bygmalion charged 15.2 million euros in campaign events to Sarkozy's rightwing party -- which at the time was called the UMP, but has since been renamed the Republicans -- instead of billing the president's campaign. The affair came to light in 2014 but investigators have yet to determine who ordered the fraud. Sarkozy, who failed in a presidential comeback bid last year, told investigators last year he knew nothing about the billing and put the responsibility squarely on Bygmalion and the UMP. Only one other president -- Jacques Chirac -- has been tried in France's Fifth Republic, which was founded in 1958. He was give a two-year suspended jail term in 2011 over a fake job scandal. News of the trial comes as the Republicans' candidate for this year's presidential election, Francois Fillon, faces his own scandal over parliamentary jobs for his family. Fillon apologised on Monday for employing his wife over 15 years as an aide -- which is legal -- but continued to deny the more serious allegations that she barely worked for her average monthly salary of around 3,700 euros.
Failed comeback
The son of a Hungarian immigrant father, Sarkozy was nicknamed the "bling-bling" president for his flashy displays of wealth. His trial will focus on whether he himself caused the over-spending in 2012 by demanding that additional rallies be organised towards the end of his campaign, even though they were bound to blow the budget. The judicial source said he was accused of having ignored two warnings from advisors in March and April 2012 about his spending, which came to "at least 42.8 million euros".The divisive 62-year-old rightwinger faces up to a year in a prison and a fine of 3,750 euros if convicted. He could yet be spared trial, however, given that the second investigating magistrate in the case disagreed that Sarkozy be put in the dock. Thirteen other people will be tried alongside him on charges ranging from fraud to illegal campaign financing, including Bygmalion's management and Jerome Lavrilleux, deputy manager of Sarkozy's lavish 2012 campaign. Lavrilleux and Bygmalion executives have acknowledged the existence of fraud and false accounting.
Mass rallies
While the so-called Bygmalion case is the most pressing, Sarkozy has been fighting legal problems on several fronts. He is charged with corruption and influence peddling for allegedly offering to help a judge swing a plum retirement job in return from secret information about another case. He has also been accused by former members of Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi's regime of accepting millions in cash towards his first presidential campaign in 2007 from Kadhafi -- claims he has vehemently denied. After retiring from politics following his 2012 defeat by the Socialist Party's Francois Hollande, he returned to take the helm of the Republicans and sought the party's presidential nod in this year's election. In a surprise result, he was eliminated in November in the first round of a primary contest, trailing the eventual winner, Fillon, and another ex-premier Alain Juppe. 
 
Abbas Calls Israeli Settler Law an 'Attack against Our People'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 07/17/Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Tuesday called a new Israeli law legalizing dozens of Jewish outposts built on private Palestinian land an "attack against our people."Israel has faced broad international criticism over the law its parliament passed on Monday, including from Britain, France, the United Nations and neighboring Jordan. The United States has not commented. Abbas said the law was illegal and was "obviously against the wishes of the international community." Speaking alongside Abbas at a press conference in Paris, French President Francois Hollande said: "I want to believe that Israel and its government will reconsider this law." The legislation would legalize dozens of wildcat Jewish outposts and thousands of settler homes in the occupied West Bank and prompted a call by the Palestinians for the international community to punish Israel. Pro-Palestinian Israeli NGOs said they would ask the Supreme Court to strike down the law. Israeli opposition leader Isaac Herzog warned the legislation could result in officials being hauled before the International Criminal Court.
 
Egypt Says It Backs Trump's Media Criticism
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 07/17/Egypt on Tuesday applauded U.S. President Donald Trump's claims that Western media outlets have deliberately not reported on "terrorist" attacks. Trump accused the media on Monday of disregarding attacks by radical jihadists, in a provocative statement for which he provided no evidence. In Cairo, a statement by foreign ministry spokesman Ahmed Abu Zeid "hailed the U.S. administration stance" criticizing "the Western media's coverage of some terrorist attacks around the world."He said his statement addressed "the White House release of a list of 78 terror attacks (9 of which were in Egypt) which Western media ignored in a clear bias."Trump accused the media of downplaying the threat that his administration cites to justify its ban on travelers from seven Muslim majority states. Speaking during a visit to U.S. Central Command in Tampa, Florida, Trump listed a string of attacks in the United States, including 9/11, the Boston Marathon bombings, the Orlando gay nightclub massacre and the San Bernardino shootings. "You have seen what happened in Paris and Nice. All over Europe it's happening. It's gotten to a point where it's not even being reported," he said. "And in many cases the very, very dishonest press doesn't want to report it."Although he failed to provide evidence of this, the White House later distributed a list of 78 attacks it said were "executed or inspired by" the Islamic State group, saying most failed to receive adequate coverage but without specifying which. On Monday, the Egyptian foreign ministry statement said: "Accusations and the finger of blame were pointed at others (like Egypt) after terrorist attacks... which some Western media portrayed as a security failure on the part of the government." It cited Western media coverage of the downing of a Russian passenger plane in the Sinai on October 31 2015, killing all 224 people on board. IS said it had smuggled a bomb onto the aircraft, and Russia said an investigation found it was brought down by a bomb. The ministry also cited coverage of a suicide bombing that killed 29 Christian Copts at a Cairo church on December 11, sparking Coptic protests. Jihadists in Egypt have killed hundreds of soldiers and policemen since the military overthrew Islamist president Mohamed Morsi in 2013, unleashing a bloody crackdown on his supporters. The jihadist IS group's Egyptian affiliate operates mostly in the northern Sinai, although attacks have also taken place elsewhere, including in Cairo. Abu Zeid on Monday expressed the hope that "the next phase will witness an essential shift in the way the international community deals with the phenomenon of terrorism." Egypt-U.S. relations were fraught under former president Barack Obama amid disagreements over a rights crackdown, but Trump is expected to seek better ties. Washington's annual $1.3 billion in military aid was briefly suspended under Obama in 2013 after Morsi's ouster, but was fully reinstated in 2015. White House spokesman Sean Spicer said on January 23 that Trump is committed to providing military aid to Egypt.

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 07-08/17
Walid Phares, Trump Campaign Foreign Policy Advisor, Rehired as Fox National Security Expert
Rebecca Bynuml/Family Security Matters/February 07/17
Fox News has re-hired Dr. Walid Phares for his tenth year with the network as its "National Security and Foreign Policy Expert" after having served as a foreign policy advisor to President Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign.
In March 2016, Fox News Terrorism and Middle East Analyst and Congressional advisor, Dr. Phares was named by Presidential candidate Donald Trump as one of his foreign policy advisors along with another five distinguished experts. Since then, Phares assumed two missions:
One task performed by Dr. Phares over the previous year was to meet with diplomats, ambassadors, ministers and foreign dignitaries from many countries around the world to explain the Trump foreign policy agenda, in particular on salient issues such as Russian relations, the Iran Deal, North Korea, NATO, and the evolution of the wars in the Middle East. Dr. Phares engaged diplomats and foreign officials and responded to their many questions regarding the conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Libya and Yemen as well as the alternative plans to defeat ISIS. During his tenure as a foreign policy advisor, Phares also met with politicians and leaders in Europe and the Middle East, including with government officials and spiritual leaders in Egypt and the UAE.
In Europe, Dr. Phares met with leaders from countries from Eastern, Central and Western Europe as well as the leaders of the European Parliament. Before the meeting between candidate Trump and Egyptian President Sisi, Phares met with Egypt's top Islamic leaders, and later on, with 21 Egyptian lawmakers to exchange views on the future of US-Egyptian and Arab relations. He met with the head of state for the United Arab Emirates and his foreign minister as well as with the foreign ministers of Argentina, Tunisia and other countries. After the election, Phares met with a very large number of foreign officials and ambassadors from around the world, at their request, to explain the agenda of the incoming Administration.
Among the most important issues discussed by Dr. Phares were the strategies to defeat ISIS, the policies towards mass migrants, the crises in North Africa, solutions to the wars in Syria, Yemen and Iraq, and here at home, the terrorist attacks in San Bernardino and Orlando. During the campaign, Phares elaborated on three important policy issues:
1. Safe zones in Syria
2. Regional coalitions
3.
Vetting immigrants and refugees
A second task performed by Dr. Phares over the past year, was to meet and be interviewed by the foreign press, including European, Russian, Asian, Latin American, African and Arab media outlets. Knowing that a majority of the media worldwide had an unfavorable attitude toward candidate Trump, Phares engaged a large multitude of correspondents, journalists and television crews from around the world in order to clarify Trump's platform and policy speeches. Phares' interviews were published and aired from Brazil to Tokyo and from Egypt to Germany. His media interventions in the Arab world helped to diffuse many negative notions such as the so-called "Muslim ban" and "Islamophobia."
Dr. Phares also assisted in a third task, that of guiding the largest coalition of Americans from Middle East, East African and North African backgrounds in support of Presidential candidate Donald Trump. Phares and members of the American Mideast Coalition for Trump met with numerous community leaders from across the country and discussed the foundations of US policy toward the Greater Middle East.
As a foreign policy advisor, Dr. Phares also participated in briefings with senior campaign officials and provided insights and advice regarding President Trump's speeches on national security and foreign policy during the campaign.
After the Inauguration, Dr. Phares signed a new contract to begin his tenth year with Fox News which includes a wider scope for covering the assessment of conflicts worldwide. It should be noted that the former Foreign Policy Advisor was said to have been considered for a position in the Administration, but only by media accounts. As a citizen, Phares is always ready to serve the President if called upon, but as one of the leading experts in the nation, his knowledge and analytical ability are also badly needed by the public, as debates on national security are raging.
Every day is an important day in the public conversation and Walid Phares is a vital player in the national security debate. His role at Fox News is needed now more than ever.
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/walid-phares-trump-campaign-foreign-policy-advisor-rehired-as-fox-national-security-expert?f=must_reads


The Trump-Trudeau Tryst
Thomas Quiggin/Gatestone Institute/February 07/017
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9905/trump-trudeau-islamists
It had been reported prior to 2015 that the Muslim Brotherhood and Jamaat-e-Islami front groups would use the Liberal Party of Canada as a vehicle for political entryism.
The article also noted the roles of ISNA Canada and ICNA Canada in these efforts. A number of Canadian Members of Parliament have Islamist connections, advocate for sharia law or, in the case of Cabinet Minister Maryam Monsef, states that "Sharia fascinates me :)"
President Trump may be meeting with Prime Minister Trudeau of Canada shortly. The two leaders worked across from each other on the world's longest undefended border.
The January 29, 2017 shooting at a Quebec City mosque in which six people were killed may prove to be "interesting" as it plays on USA/Canada relations. There is emerging information to show that the mosque may have been targeted as a "Muslim Brotherhood mosque." This includes a July 2016 article (i.e. seven months before the attack) by the Journal de Quebec which stated that a pamphlet had been circulated in the neighbourhood claiming it was a Muslim Brotherhood mosque. Three weeks prior to the pamphlet being distributed, a pig's head had been left at the doorway of the mosque. Three incidents around one mosque suggests a pattern of activity and escalation by an individual or group that has grievances with the Muslim Brotherhood. It is not yet clear if terrorism charges will be laid in addition to charges of first degree murder.
South of here, a series of reports suggest that President Trump may use executive authority to list the Muslim Brotherhood and some of its front groups in the USA as terrorist entities. Senator Cruz (R-TX) has a bill in the US Congress that would have the effect of listing the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist entity along its front groups CAIR USA, ISNA and the North American Islamic Trust.
Trudeau and the Islamist Front Groups
Prior to the Canadian election of November 2015, it had been reported that the Muslim Brotherhood and Jamaat-e-Islami front groups would use the Liberal Party of Canada as a vehicle for political Entryism. The article also noted the roles of ISNA Canada and ICNA Canada in these efforts. A number of Canadian Members of Parliament have Islamist connections, advocate for sharia law or, in the case of Cabinet Minister Maryam Monsef states that "Sharia fascinates me :)"
In December of 2015, Prime Minister Trudeau sent a video message to the "Reviving the Islamic Spirit" conference in which he stressed "our shared beliefs." This, despite the fact the conference is sponsored by and has been attended by a virtual who-is-who list of Muslim Brotherhood front group members over several years. The same conference also featured Linda Sarsour who is currently leading a number of US demonstrations against President Trump and has ties to a variety of Islamist groups. Many members of her family have a long history with HAMAS – another Muslim Brotherhood spin-off organization. Prime Minister Trudeau had also appeared as a member of Parliament at the Reviving the Islamic Spirit Conference in 2012.
Member of Parliament Justin Trudeau also gave a speech at the ISNA mosque in Mississauga, albeit in 2013 before the ISNA had the charity status for its "Development Fund" revoked for funding terrorism. The ultimate destination of the funding was the south Asian based Jamaat-e-Islami , the same group noted above as being involved in the Liberal Party. The ISNA in turn has welcomed the election of Prime Minister Trudeau.
In 2016 Prime Minister Trudeau chose not to observe any official 9/11 memorial ceremony to honour the Canadians who died that day. However, the very next day, he attended the Ottawa Main Mosque which has multiple links to extremism. (Image source: Rebel.media screenshot)
Prime Minister Trudeau and his Public Safety minister also appeared to have stumbled into making claims about "hate crimes against mosques" when there is no evidence to suggest a hate crime actually occurred.
Canada and the USA – Terrorism and the Border
Cross border terrorism has a long and complex history between Canada and the USA. Terrorists from the USA (Jamaat al Fuqra) entered Canada in 1991 with the intent of killing some 5,000 people in an attack on a Hindu Temple and a theatre.
Hezbollah has used Canada as a base of operations, including shipping dual-use technologies from Canada into the USA for transhipment to Lebanon, as well as smuggling, fund raising and immigration fraud.
Then there was Ahmed Ressam in 1999. His intent was to depart Canada, enter the USA through Washington State and set off his car-bomb at LAX.
Senators
Senator Clinton and Senator McCain have made repeated statements that some of the 911 terrorists entered he USA though Canada, even after this story had been debunked numerous times.
Canada and the Cycle of Violence
The shooting at the Quebec mosque was the final one of three incidents which appears to show a pattern of escalation and a clear grievance against the Muslim Brotherhood. If this is the case, and the shooter did target the mosque for its Muslim Brotherhood connections, then this signals that a "cycle of violence" (attacks, revenge attacks, claims of victimization followed by more attacks) around Islamist extremism is indeed in Canada. This attack, of course, follows four previous Islamist violent incidents in Canada:
The terrorist murder of Warrant Office Vincent in 2014.
The attack on the National War Memorial and the Parliament with the killing of Corporal Cirillo, also in 2014.
The attack on the Canadian Forces Recruiting Centre in Toronto in 2016 and the attempted suicide bombing by Arron Driver, in which the bomb's detonator and the RCMP killed him in a taxi near London Ontario in 2016.
Additionally, many Canadians, including a number of Muslim Student Association alumni have died overseas as suicide bombers, ISIS fighters or propagandists.
US Canada Relations
US/Canada relations may hit a bumpy patch, especially given that Canada continues to act as host for a variety of Muslim Brotherhood front groups while taking no visible political action against them.
Canada may hit a bumpy patch too.
* Tom Quiggin, a court qualified expert on terrorism and practical intelligence, is based in Canada.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Trump’s decisions, operation Decisive Storm to end mullahs’ dream
Jerry Maher/Al Arabiya/February 07/17
Those who fiercely oppose US President Donald Trump’s statements these days are the Iranian lobby, which has influenced the former Obama administration, and its allies affiliated to the lobby and terrorist projects across the world. Trump’s recent tweets about Iran confused the latter as it is unaware what these stances will lead do and whether these tweets are nothing but mere statements or will they lead to military decisions and operations to confront Iran’s intervention in Syria, Yemen and Iraq and its provocation of countries in the region, particularly the Arab Gulf which the Trump administration views as a strategic ally. The Trump administration is also obliged to support the Gulf in confronting Iran’s expansion and terrorist militias. Barack Hussein Obama’s presidential term has ended. During this time, half a million Syrians fell martyrs. The Assad regime and its allies killed the Syrian people to protect them from being imprisoned twice. They justified their murder via the excuse of protecting worn out shrines that house nothing but bones – shrines that in the best case scenario are for being visited. After Iran and its allies have caused the death of tens of thousands of Syrians, Yemenis and Iraqis, there is now an American administration that is strict in its decisions to confront the expansion of the regime and its sectarian militias in Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen
Terror designs
The aim of these shrines, however, are to strengthen sectarian affiliations and collect money to fund terrorist plans for the vali-e-faqih who aims to fulfill the dream of his predecessor Khomeini and raise the flag of Iran in Arab capitals, mainly Damascus, Sanaa, Baghdad and others. Now that Obama’s term has ended, we look forward to a better future with the new American administration, which according to information I have attained from figures who are close to it, is working hard to limit Iran’s capabilities and expansion and its acts of going too far against other countries and American allies. Trump recently lambasted Iran in a Twitter post and said: “Iran is playing with fire. They don’t appreciate how ‘kind’ President Obama was to them. Not me!”
Sectarian militias
After Iran and its allies have caused the death of tens of thousands of Syrians, Yemenis and Iraqis, there is now an American administration that is strict in its decisions to confront the expansion of the regime and its sectarian militias in Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen and to protect the stability of Bahrain and Gulf countries which suffer from Iran’s attempts to support terrorism and nurture plans that contribute to igniting sectarian struggle in the region. All these ambitions are being confronted by the Decisive Storm Operation, which King Salman bin Abdulaziz launched to confront Iran’s expansion and its designs in Yemen and the Gulf in general. Don’t let anyone delude you into thinking that Trump’s era is the second face of Obama’s policy. Be certain that Trump’s term will mark a new phase in besieging Iran, limiting its expansion and eliminating its sectarian project that aims to destabilize the region.
This article is also available in Arabic.
**Jerry Maher is a journalist based in Europe and founder of Radio Sawt Beirut International. His twitter handle is @jerrymahers.

The game of safe zone in Syria
Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/February 07/17
It seems the Syrian people no longer have a say in what happens to them despite the several conferences held to discuss their situation and the solutions proposed. UN Special Envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura has all by himself decided who represents opposition organizations. The Russians wrote Syria’s future constitution and brought its printed copy to the Astana conference. Meanwhile, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi spoke on behalf of Syrian refugees and said no to safe zones. This is the current situation in Syria, and it’s more difficult and weirder than any other phase in the past few years. Millions of Syrian refugees have become a topic which governments throw in each other’s court, especially after US President Donald Trump surprised everyone by adopting the idea of establishing safe zones for refugees inside Syria. Former President Barack Obama promised to establish zones like those in 2012 but then abandoned the idea. The current situation is not only bad but it’s also very scary. There are more than 12 million Syrian refugees, and this is the biggest number of refugees in the history of civil wars since World War II. These refugees pose a threat to the security of countries like Turkey and Lebanon and threaten the continuity of the European Union entity. They have also become part of the internal dispute in the US.
Varying positions
There are different positions with regard to the safe zones, just as the case is with any other affair related to Syria. Russians are opposed to the plan. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov criticized it and then tactically amended his position in what seems like an attempt to avoid embarrassing Trump. Iranians and the Syrian regime reiterated that they officially oppose the idea because they think it violates sovereignty and because Assad, after launching a geographic cleansing operation, wants to get rid of the millions of the Syrians who oppose him. Turkey insists to keep displaced Syrians inside Syria and refuses to host more refugees after it became a target for terrorist groups which exploit the Syrians. Europe too thinks this refugees’ influx is a major security issue and it wants to stop it by building safe zones either in Syria or outside. Lebanon wants to stop more refugees from coming in and to send the million refugees it currently houses back to Syria.
Millions of Syrian refugees have become a topic which governments throw in each others’ court, especially after US President Donald Trump surprised everyone by adopting the idea of establishing safe zones for refugees inside Syria
Lebanon has, for the first time, adopted a stance that opposes Damascus as President Michel Aoun said he supports Trump’s call to establish safe zones inside Syria and called for returning the refugees in Lebanon to Syria. Aoun also called for placing these safe zones under the Syrian regime’s supervision.
Grandi, who is supposed to be the most concerned about housing the millions of refugees in exile, returned from Damascus and said he’s against establishing safe zones for refugees inside Syria! His stance is strange because he does not even have an alternative solution. Can he convince other countries to welcome the current millions of refugees and the millions who will follow them? Of course not. Can he convince hosting countries, like Lebanon, to continue to bear the burden of housing this massive number of people? He tried and failed.
His point of view is not completely wrong as protecting these safe zones and sponsoring them is almost impossible but at the same time he is forgetful of the fact that millions of refugees do not only suffer from the absence of security but they also suffer from hunger and cold and absence of refuge.
No perfect solution
There is no perfect solution. Despite that, the proposed safe zones are good enough to halt the influx of refugees and to stop the sectarian cleansing operation which has been the adopted policy through exporting the Syrian problem to the world instead of limiting it to be only the regime’s problem. Millions of the displaced Syrians were a gain to terrorist organizations as they recruited angry men who were willing to fight under any slogan. Terrorist groups used these people in terrorist operations against friendly and neutral countries, and it also used them against their enemies and against Syrian organizations while fighting mad and absurd wars. This is the outcome of the policy of displacement which the Syrian people have being subjected to during the past seven years. Refugees have now become a major cause and they may lead the path to a peace project, which has become urgent. Syrian refugees have become the most important cause in the world and they may be the key to stop massacres and displacement.
This article was first published in Asharq Al-Awsat on February 07 2017.

Will Le Pen be the new French President?
Randa Takieddine/Al Arabiya/February 07/17
The possibility of Marine Le Pen being elected as President of France is no longer ruled out. Although she is the first woman to run for presidency, the popularity decline of the Republican right-wing party’s candidate, Francois Fillon, can pave the way for her.
Fillon is now dealing with the allegations against his wife Penelope, or what is now being referred to as the Penelope Gate. The press slammed hard after learning that his wife who worked as his assistant in the Parliament got a high wage that amounted to 800,000 euros for her eight years of service. The possibility of Le Pen becoming the new French President is no longer out of question for several reasons. Donald Trump’s travel ban from seven Muslims-majority countries may appeal to the voters of the far-right in France. Extremist anti-Islamic sentiment is growing and so is the frequency of terrorist attacks. Last such attacks took place at the Louvre where a young Egyptian allegedly tried to attack the guard with a knife shouting “Allah Akbar”. The sentiment against Islam and Muslims has been growing in France since the Charlie Hebdo attack, the Bataclan attack and most recently the Nice attack. Islamophobia is no longer confined to a handful but can be witnessed among people and officials.
Francois Fillon has focused his campaign on the so-called challenge posed by Islam in France while flaunting his Christian values that would prevent him from executing reforms that would affect the poor. Now, the issue of his wife has sparked a backlash among low-income people.
Alain Juppé, who lost the candidacy of the Republican Party to Francois Fillon, is characterized by moderation, and a good knowledge of the Arab and Muslim world and the diversity of the French communities. His rivals gave him the nickname Ali Juppé to keep the voters away, as if moderation toward Islam is a sin.
The question remains whether it is possible for history to repeat itself as the world has changed and a large section has gone hostile against Islam and immigration
Demonstration effect
This phenomenon will probably enable Marine Le Pen to win the presidency just as it happened in the case of Trump in the United States. If Fillon continues his candidacy, there is speculation that he would be the third candidate after Le Pen and Emanuel Macron, who is running as the En Marche candidate for President in May 2017.
Macron says he doesn’t belong to the left or the right wing, and that he is a liberal. He represents the youth and comes from the Rothschild & Cie Bank background. He served as minister of economy, industry and digital affairs in the second Valls government in August 2014. He later resigned following deep irreconcilable difference with Valls and nobody truly knows Macron’s position on Islam. Nevertheless, it is safe to say that he is not an extremist.
Speculating the winner of the French Presidential election is still very difficult. Le Pen is expected to visit Beirut in the next few days and meet with President Michel Aoun, officials, and some supporters of her party in the French community in Lebanon. Many candidates have visited Lebanon recently including Macaron. Fillon was also expected to visit but had to cancel because of the Penelope Gate.
Le Pen launched a campaign this weekend, promising her voters that under her leadership France will control its borders and its own currency. She aspires to break free from the Eurozone. Opinion polls have been speculating on Le Pen’s victory in the first round on April 23, but say that she will lose in the second round on the 29th against Macron, if Fillon withdrew from the race.
However, if polls are proven wrong again, Le Pen can reach the Elysee. Everything is possible after Trump’s election and people have begun to rise in their own way. The question remains whether it is possible for history to repeat itself as the world has changed and a large section has gone hostile against Islam and immigration.
**This article is also available in Arabic.

Post truth phenomenon and separating news from facts
Essayid Weld Ebah/Al Arabiya/February 07/17
The German parliament is debating proposed new legislation to counter the proliferation of misinformation - or fake news - in social media. Simultaneously - and for the same aim - the French authority is considering introducing a watchdog mechanism for controlling these websites, while the British House of Commons is discussing a similar initiative. These collective initiatives came as fingers point to social media facilitating rigging elections by spreading fake news which, in one way or another, influence the public opinion who became indifferent toward serious media. Recently a new glossary of media terminologies has emerged and widely circulated such as “fake news”, “alternative facts”, and “post truth”. The first idiom became widely used after US President Trump denounced the mass media, in his first press conference after his election - singling out CNN and Buzzfeed in particular. In fact, the phenomenon is the focal point of media and social studies chiefly to analyze the political rhetoric and its influence on election campaigns. Some surveys claim to have proved that candidates for the last US presidential election (Trump and Clinton) resorted to “fake news” in their campaigns - mainly unreliable websites. As for the “alternative facts”, the phrase emerged after Trump’s senior advisor, Kellyanne Conway, made a statement justifying the White House press secretary’s false claims about the size of the crowd at president Trump’s inauguration saying “we feel compelled to go out and clear the air and put alternative facts out there”. Furthermore, the definition of “post truth” according to the Oxford Dictionary is: “relation to or denoting circumstances in which objects facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.” We need to underscore the “split of news from facts” phenomenon, which is the formation of these interrelated factors: “the rift between the elite and ordinary people and proliferation of social/digital media, versus the wane of traditional media.
The disintegration of parties has paved the way for the unleashed populist leaders, they are the emerging figures now in most of the democratic nations
Frame of reference
However, fake news or post-truth are not new political trends considering that Plat, during the democratic Greek era - believed that the Justice criteria based on truth and reason cannot be created in a political system that makes the public debate a framework of reference and resolutions, considering that such a society would be dominated by the “sophist”, the eloquent and the rhetoric, which is the commons persuasive tools. It is the critiques directed by radical assessment theories to the current democratic parliamentarians being founded on “complicity industry” through the media, which may seem free, while it creates awareness and guides it. However, what seems new is the collapse of public communication methods constituted by modern democracies. There are three major modules: the political party being the tactical and organizational structure for a political action the newspaper, which is the media source for debate and guarding beliefs and programs, the elected institution which represents the party and source of decisions. The disintegration of parties has paved the way for the unleashed populist leaders, they are the emerging figures now in most of the democratic nations. The ebbing of traditional media opened the doors for the uncensored and unverified social media that reflects passions and emotions rather than the established views and opinions. Moreover, the erosion of the systems undermined the voters’ ability to influence crucial decisions that determine their future. In a distinct article entitled “truth and politics”, which dates back to the beginning of the sixties of the last century, German-American philosopher Hannah Arendt said the chances of factual truth surviving the onslaught of power were very slim. What prevents photos, stories, and hypothetical events from becoming a viable substitute for reality and events, he added.
This article is also available in Arabic.

The pros and cons of expat remittance taxes in Saudi Arabia
Dr. Mohamed A. Ramady/Al Arabiya/February 07/17
A collective sigh of relief was felt by Saudi-based expatriates following yet another announcement that there were no plans to impose a new tax on foreign workers’ remittances. The Saudi Ministry of Finance statement was clear: Saudi Arabia is not planning to impose a new tax on expatriate remittances.
This denial stems from the deliberations of some members of the Saudi Shoura or Consultative Council last month. The Council said it was considering imposing a tax of up to six percent on expatriate remittances in the first year and gradually decrease to 2 percent from the fifth year onward. Following the Ministry of Finance denial, the Shoura Council withdrew its own proposal, with 86 members opposing the tax and 33 in favor.
Once again the seeming root was cause was to try and stem some of the outward remittance capital flow from the Kingdom, despite some evidence that these have begun to fall back. According to Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority (SAMA) official data, remittance outflows from expatriates in Saudi Arabia fell 4 percent year-on-year (YoY) to SAR 138.4 billion in the first 11 months of 2016 and dropped SAR 12.11 billion in November, down by 8 percent YoY.
In order to assuage the fears of foreign companies who are being encouraged to invest in the Kingdom’s ambitious Vision 2030 program through FDI inflows, the Ministry of Finance said on its Twitter account that the country supports the free movement of capital to and from the kingdom in line with international standards.
The fluctuating fortunes of oil revenues are a fact of life that the Gulf countries have now to live with, whether there is an OPEC and non- OPEC agreement in place or not to maintain some firmer level of prices
Value-added tax
The feeling of joy will be short-lived, however, as Saudi Arabia and other GCC countries mull a range of new value added taxes on so called “sin products” like tobacco and fizzy drinks and possibly extend these to other categories on both nationals and expatriates, as well as reducing subsidies and raising prices on utility charges in an effort to balance their budgets.
Other measures include imposing fees for government related services, especially on expatriates and the 2017 Saudi budget unveiled a host of such measures whereby starting from July 2017 a fee of SAR 100 will be paid on a monthly basis, for every dependent or sponsored person rising to SR200 in 2018, SR300 and SR400 per month in 2019 and 2020.
The kingdom expects to generate nearly SR44 billion in revenue from this tax. The move, along with imposition of an increased annual scale of fees on the number of foreign workers employed by Saudi companies, is ostensibly aimed at incentivizing Saudi companies to hire locally.
The fluctuating fortunes of oil revenues are a fact of life that the Gulf countries have now to live with, whether there is an OPEC and non- OPEC agreement in place or not to maintain some firmer level of prices.
Bastion of tax-free work
As such, the time when the Gulf remains a bastion of tax-free work and low fees and charges will be gone and the introduction of taxes will become the norm rather than the exception, despite yet another denial from the Saudi Ministry of Finance that the Kingdom was considering imposing an expatriate income tax.
Governments across the world have the sovereign right and do impose a raft of taxes on their citizens, and it is also the right of the Gulf countries to do the same. The Benjamin Franklin saying that death and taxes are the only certainty in life is an apt one, but how equitable it is and the method of application, whether progressive rate of taxes as income goes higher or a flat rate are key questions for taxation to be widely accepted by society and make them willing tax paying citizens.
In the Gulf, with its unique representation system and Consultative Councils, there is now a more definite move toward societal inclusiveness and transparency and these are now enshrined in all the various Vision and Mission statements. Knowing where and how taxes are being spent will assure citizens that these are indeed going into areas of most concern such as health, education, welfare and local infrastructure.
As for expatriates, assuring them that part of their remittance taxes and fee charges are going towards their health and dependents schooling will go a long way in reducing the current level of uncertainties, as many are considering sending their dependents back home, thus reducing local consumption of goods and services, or seeking alternative methods of remittance transfers, all unintended consequences of the introduction of such taxes, fees and charges.
This brings us back to yet another famous saying attributed to Colbert, that “the art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose as to obtain the largest amount of feathers with the least amount of hissing.” 

France's New Islamist Guillotine/The Trial of Georges Bensoussan
Denis MacEoin/Gatestone Institute/February 07/017
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9895/france-islamist-guillotine
It is not racist to accuse Muslims of wrongdoing; Islam is a religio-political system, not a race. This conflation of two very different things already causes endless confusion and miscarriages of justice. Such scattershot accusations fail to make a distinction between genuine hatred for Muslims and fair and balanced criticism of some of their behavior and their religion.
"Anti-racism... an instrument of intellectual terrorism has become today the greatest channel of the new anti-Semitism". — Georges Bensoussan.
The CCIF's charge of "Islamophobia" is almost certainly built, not so much about Arabs but about perceptions of a refusal by Muslim immigrants from North Africa to integrate into French society,
"To say that one drinks in anti-Semitism from one's mother's milk means that it is transmitted culturally. I have not spoken of a transmission through blood, which implies a genetic transmission. And I maintain that in some Arab families in France, anti-Semitism is taught. ... I have not invented the Kouachi brothers, who, after the attack on Charlie Hebdo, asked the printer with whom they took refuge if he was Jewish." — Georges Bensoussan.
"This visceral anti-Semitism proven by the Fondapol survey by Dominique Reynié last year cannot remain under a cover of silence. Conducted in 2014 among 1,580 French respondents, of whom one third were Muslim, the survey found that they were two times and even three times more anti-Jewish than French people as a whole". — Georges Bensoussan.
Why should this be surprising? Anti-Jewish feelings in Muslim countries and elsewhere are deeply embedded, with roots in the Qur'an, the Hadith, Islamic law-books, and general social attitudes from the 7th century onwards.
If Bensoussan is convicted, the CCIF and other organisations like it will start further prosecutions of other innocent people and succeed in shutting down debate about what is the greatest single threat to the stability not only of France and Europe, but the West.
The French historian and philosopher Georges Bensoussan is best known for his studies of matters relating to the Jewish world, on topics such as the Holocaust, anti-Semitism, Zionism, and the fate of the hundreds of thousands of Jews expelled from Arab countries after the declaration of Israel's independence in 1948 and the signal defeat of Arab armies which invaded the new state between then and 1949. He himself was born in Morocco in 1952, but moved with his family to France in his early years.
After a doctorate in history from the University of Paris I in 1981, Bensoussan became director of a journal for Holocaust history (Revue d'histoire de la Shoah) and went on to develop a training service for Holocaust education. Over the years, he has published several well-researched books on the Holocaust, Zionism, and related topics. Juifs en pays arabes: Le grand déracinement 1850-1975 (2012) covers the too-little known history of the way in which nearly a million Jews in Arab countries were reduced in fewer than thirty years to about 5,000. His intellectual and political history of Zionism, Une histoire intellectuelle et politique du sionisme 1860-1940 (2002), counters the modern use of the term Zionist as a pejorative.
Given these credentials as a leading opponent of Europe's oldest form of racism, one might very well expect that Georges Bensoussan would be one of the last people fit to be labelled a racist. And you would be correct. But on January 25, Bensoussan was obliged to present himself at the 17th chamber of the Tribunal Correctionel of Paris to face a charge of "provocation of racial hatred" ("provocation à la haine raciale"). A more honest description of the charge would have read "provocation of 'Islamophobia'". It is not racist to accuse Muslims of wrongdoing; Islam is a religio-political system, not a race. This conflation of two very different things already causes endless confusion and miscarriages of justice.
The charge against Bensoussan was brought by the Collectif contre l'Islamophobie en France (CCIF)[1] an Islamic activist organization that seeks to defend Muslims from perceived attacks ("Islamophobia") in the secular system of the country. Such scattershot accusations fail to make a distinction between genuine hatred for Muslims and fair and balanced criticism of some of their behavior and their religion. Leading the accusation in court was a hijab-wearing woman, Lila Cherif, in charge of the CCIF's legal team. On the public gallery sat an assemblage of anti-racist organizations: SOS-Racisme, a much criticized French and international group, the prestigious Ligue Internationale Contre le Racisme et l'Antisémitisme (LICRA), the anti-Israel and anti-Semitic Mouvement contre racisme et pour l'amitié entre les peoples (MRAP) – which is part of the Platform of French NGOs for Palestine that supports trying to destroy Israel economically – and the anti-Israel League of Human Rights (Ligue des droits de l'homme).
Nowadays, there are several principal international definitions of anti-Semitism – the US State Department's "Working Definition" of Anti-Semitism, the original EU Monitoring Centre's "Working Definition", and the most widely recognized International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's Definition. All three definitions include anti-Israel speech, writing and actions as fully anti-Semitic, and it is on this basis that some of these self-styled anti-racist groups may be described as anti-Semitic. In that context, their presence in the public gallery may have much to do with antagonism to Bensoussan's work in claiming anti-Semitism in his writings.
According to Raphaëlle Bacqué, in Le Monde on January 26, the specific charge against Bensoussan is based on a couple of statements he made in 2015 during a radio broadcast in an episode of Répliques, a much-respected program that discusses current affairs, often linked to new publications by those interviewed. The first statement was as follows (author's translation):
"Today, we find ourselves at the heart of the French nation in the presence of another people, who take a backwards view of a certain number of the democratic values which we have carried. There will be no integration so long as we cannot rid ourselves of the atavistic anti-Semitism which is hidden like a secret."
He then went on to say:
"An Algerian sociologist, Smaïn Laacher, with great courage, has just said in a film broadcast on France 3: 'It is a shame that, in order to maintain this taboo, to know that in Arab families in France – and everyone knows this but nobody wants to say it – anti-Semitism is sucked in with a mother's milk.'"
Days later, Laacher, a lecturer at the University of Strasbourg, denied that he had said this. Writing in the investigative journal Mediapart, he sternly declared "I have never said nor written anything of this ignominious nature". He condemned Bensoussan for suggesting that Algerian anti-Semitism was created naturally, meaning racially. "How could anyone believe for half a second that in these [Arab] families that anti-Semitism is transmitted in the end through blood".
But that is not what Bensoussan had said. He had not mentioned blood, just transmission through a mother's milk.
Underneath Laacher's response, however, a commenter named Aimelle turned Laacher's remarks upside down, writing as follows:
Fallacious? Really?
Here is a record (including the "ums" and the repetitions of what M. Laacher said in the documentary (at the 56th minute):
"It is a monumental hypocrisy not to see that this anti-Semitism is in the beginning domestic, and quite evidently, is without doubt reinforced, hardened, legitimated, almost naturalized with various distinctions um... externally. He will find it at home and will sense no radical lack of continuity between home and the external environment. Because the external environment, is, in reality, the most often [experienced]. It is to be found in what are termed the ghettos, it feels as though it is in the air one breathes, it is not at all strange. And it is difficult to escape from it in those places, particularly when you find it in yourself."
Certainly, he does not say "sucked in with a mother's milk" – an expression which, in French, is a metaphor employed to define something one acquires "in the atmosphere", "in the language", "on the tongue". But the idea is much the same.
Bensoussan argued that "sucked from a mother's milk" and "transmitted through blood" are not the same. His argument was based on Laacher's own statements in that television documentary. Why Laacher reacted so fiercely to Bensoussan's use of his own argument that Arab culture fosters anti-Semitism, so far as to deny he had ever said anything like that, is not easy to determine. Was it simply because he did not want to be associated with views that might so easily have been interpreted (as they were in Bensoussan's case) as racist in nature? In an interview with Alexandre Devecchio for Le Figaro, published on the day his trial opened, Bensoussan argued that anti-racism has been turned into an instrument that may be used to silence "the majority of the French people". He speaks of "delinquent anti-racism" ("l'antiracisme dévoyé"), and goes on to cite Elizabeth Badinter, an academic and, according to Jane Kramer writing in The New Yorker, France's "most influential intellectual", who has spoken of "collaboration through anti-racism", using "collaboration" in the French 1940s sense of collaboration with the enemy.
He himself says this illuminates that
"anti-racism, this legitimate struggle, has been progressively made a delinquent as the religion of anti-racism, indeed an instrument of intellectual terrorism has become today the greatest channel of the new anti-Semitism".
To make things more difficult for Bensoussan, the charge of "racism" was tangled up by the CCIF, who added to it a charge of being an "Islamophobe". This, ironically, is quite unrelated to the Laaser complaint, which is based on Arabs, not necessarily Muslims. But for Muslim activists, it is possible to attack on both fronts, conflating race and religion.
Because, as Bensoussan states, anti-racism is a form of religiosity in France (and indeed in other Western countries), using that charge serves effectively to intensify public outrage against any questioning of Islam within important sectors in a country with growing sensitivities about race-crime on the one hand and fear of Islamic terrorism exemplified by the attacks in Paris and Nice.
The CCIF's charge of "Islamophobia" is almost certainly not so much about Arabs but about perceptions of a refusal by Muslim immigrants from North Africa to integrate into French society, with its core Enlightenment values of liberté, égalité, fraternité, the country's motto.
Bensoussan has written two books on this subject: Les Territoires perdus de la République (2002) and Une France soumise: Les voix du refus (2017) ("Lost Territories of the Republic" and "A Submissive France: The Voices of Refusal")
In a long analytical interview with Caroline Valentin concerning Bensoussan's most recent book, Mathieu Bock-Côté (writing in Le journal de Montréal) summed up the issue:
"France is the principal theatre of the Islamist offensive in Europe. In saying that, we are not only thinking of the attacks which have marked the last two years, but of the creation on French territory of a veritable counter-society which does not speak its name and dissociates itself more and more from the nation. The desertion of the elites, criticism of French identity, cultural and physical insecurity, the increase of unreasonable compromises in schools and hospitals: it is in order to analyze and denounce this sloppiness that this book has appeared just now."
It is no secret that those who create this "counter-society" and disaffiliation from the French nation state are disproportionately Muslims – in this case mostly Muslims from North Africa – who refuse to integrate or are deterred by their communities from doing so. Many studies place the blame for this lack of integration on the French state and racial discrimination, and no doubt there is much truth in that. However, many modern surveys in countries like the UK indicate that Muslims are the hardest of all immigrant and minority groups to integrate, and that increasing numbers choose not to. A recent example is the December 2016 report by Dame Louise Casey for the British government which, among much else, concluded:
Polling in 2015... showed that more than 55% of the general public agreed that there was a fundamental clash between Islam and the values of British society, while 46% of British Muslims felt that being a Muslim in Britain was difficult due to prejudice against Islam. We found a growing sense of grievance among sections of the Muslim population, and a stronger sense of identification with the plight of the 'Ummah', or global Muslim community. (pp. 12-13)
Bensoussan's argument that Muslim communities contribute to the development of a society within society clearly attracted the attention of the CCIF, which introduced the notion that he is both a racist and an "Islamophobe". This opinion was reinforced when the lawyer for the CCIF instrumentalized anti-Semitism as a further means of defaming Bensoussan, saying that "What seems to us inadmissible is to attribute anti-Semitism to all the members of a group. That is essentialism." Essentialism here means defining an entire community with a single "essential" characteristic. To this, Bensoussan makes his strongest defence against that charge:
"To say that one drinks in anti-Semitism from one's mother's milk means that it is transmitted culturally. I have not spoken of a transmission through blood, which implies a genetic transmission. And I maintain that in some Arab families in France, anti-Semitism is taught. I have not invented Mohamed Merah [who murdered seven people in 2012, including three children at a Jewish school, admitting to anti-Semitic motives]. I have not invented the Kouachi brothers, who, after the attack on Charlie Hebdo, asked the printer with whom they took refuge if he was Jewish."
French historian Georges Bensoussan has defended remarks he made about anti-Semitism among French Muslims, saying: "To say that one drinks in anti-Semitism from one's mother's milk means that it is transmitted culturally. I have not spoken of a transmission through blood, which implies a genetic transmission. And I maintain that in some Arab families in France, anti-Semitism is taught. I have not invented Mohamed Merah". Merah murdered seven people in 2012, including children at a Jewish school, admitting to anti-Semitic motives.
Bensoussan's claim of culturally-transmitted anti-Semitism in Muslim and Arab communities is strongly backed by two important polls. The Anti-Defamation League's (ADL) Global 100 report on anti-Semitism worldwide gave figures for anti-Semitic attitudes in 16 Arab states, plus Turkey and Iran. The results are disturbing, ranging from 93% for the West Bank and Gaza, and 92% in Iraq, through ten countries scoring in the 80% to 90% range, four scoring in the 70%s, and Turkey and Iran at the bottom, with 69% and 56% respectively. The highest in Eastern Europe was 45% (Poland) down to 13% (Czech Republic); in Western Europe, there was only one high percentage, 69% for Greece, with figures from 37% for France down to 4% for Sweden.
These figures are bolstered by a 2011 Pew Global survey, which shows low figures for positive attitudes to Jews in Arab and Muslim countries: Turkey 4%, Egypt and Jordan with 2% and so on in two other Muslim states: Indonesia (the world's largest Muslim population) at 9% and Pakistan at 2%. That shows three Muslim countries – i.e. non-Arab states – with high levels of anti-Semitism. That in itself shows that this has nothing to do with genetics, but relates to culture, specifically Islamic culture.
Bensoussan himself has also drawn attention to a 2014 survey carried out in France:
"This visceral anti-Semitism proven by the Fondapol survey by Dominique Reynié last year cannot remain under a cover of silence. Conducted in 2014 among 1,580 French respondents, of whom one third were Muslim, the survey found that they were two times and even three times more anti-Jewish than French people as a whole."
Why should this be surprising? Anti-Jewish feelings in Muslim countries and elsewhere are deeply embedded, with roots in the Qur'an, the hadith, Islamic law-books, and general social attitudes from the 7th century onwards.[2]
Bensoussan has summed the matter up as follows:
"I am speaking about a cultural notion, not genetic. To confuse milk and blood is bad faith or stupidity. Yes, in some Arab families in France, anti-Semitism is passed on. To speak of a biological anti-Semitism would take me back to deny thirty years of my work. What culture can do, culture can undo; we can leave anti-Semitism behind. But I have not invented Mohamed Merah nor the friends of his family who expressed regret that he had not killed more Jewish children."
The verdict in the Bensoussan case will not be delivered until early March. But whether he is found guilty or innocent, he has already joined a long and growing list of Western thinkers and politicians who have been put on trial and sometimes convicted for outspoken criticism of Islam or criticism of some Muslim behavior, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, "Gregorius Nekschot", Lars Hedegaard, Michael Smith, Geert Wilders and others.
If Bensoussan is convicted, the CCIF and other organisations like it will start further prosecutions of other innocent people and possibly succeed in shutting down debate about what is the greatest single threat to the stability not only of France and Europe, but the West.
It could scarcely be more grotesque to find that a man who stands up to the rampant anti-Semitism within the Muslim community is twisted into the shape of a racist and purportedly an "Islamophobe".
** Denis MacEoin (PhD, University of Cambridge, 1979, is a commentator on matters related to Islam and is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at Gatestone Institute.
[1] For a well-documented and highly critical evaluation of the Collectif in French, see here.
[2] For a broad survey, see Andrew Bostom, The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism: From Sacred Texts to Solemn History, USA, reprint ed. 2008.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Israel's So-Called Poverty Problem/OECD Poverty Lines Do Not Define Poverty
Malcolm Lowe/Gatestone Institute/February 07/017
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9894/israel-poverty
According to the OECD definition of the "poverty line," you can make everyone fabulously rich while keeping them all as poor as before. But you can eliminate poverty by reducing them all to starvation levels.
Assume that large differences between OECD countries in alleged "child poverty" may, nevertheless, have some significance. The consequence of this assumption, however, is that Israel is doing better than numerous other OECD countries when the uniquely high fertility rate in Israel is taken into account.
It was a real achievement to raise the employment rate of single mothers from 66% to 81%. To insist that nothing has changed because the same proportion of such families remains below the so-called poverty line is both wrongheaded and could discourage attempts to improve the situation further.
It is sometimes thought to be paradoxical that Israel features so highly in the "World Happiness Reports" – at 11th place out of 157 countries in the latest report. There is no paradox if such factors as joy over having children and pride at being in work outweigh artificially defined poverty.
Israel joined the "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development" (OECD) on September 7, 2010. Since then, Israel has featured in the OECD's annual reports. Every year we are told that "Israel's poverty rates are highest among OECD nations," as again in 2016. Especially bewailed are figures about "the proportion of children living in families below the poverty line."
There are, of course, poor families in Israel. Any social worker dealing with families can name some. The question is whether the OECD reports provide information that can serve to deal with such poverty as exists. The answer is negative because OECD "poverty lines" are falsely construed as measures of poverty. They define, instead, something quite distinct from poverty: income disparity.
This absurd discrepancy is revealed in a little Wikipedia article on "Measuring Poverty," where we are told: "The main poverty line used in the OECD and the European Union is a relative poverty measure based on 'economic distance,' a level of income usually set at 60% of the median household income."
To be exact, the OECD sets the level at 50%. In one place, its website states:
"The poverty rate is the ratio of the number of people (in a given age group) whose income falls below the poverty line; taken as half the median household income of the total population."
By the "median household income" is meant the level of income such that half of households are above that level, and the other half below it. (In another place, as we shall see, the OECD website offers two distinct definitions of the poverty rate, of which this is the second.)
The OECD website does, however, immediately go on to note that "two countries with the same poverty rates may differ in terms of the relative income-level of the poor." Now, if one cannot give two countries the same rating on the income-level of the poor even when they have the same OECD poverty rate, how can any comparison of poverty rates between countries tell us anything about which countries suffer more or less from poverty? Yet the OECD does make such comparisons, year by year, as if it were telling us something important about actual poverty.
Approaches to "Eliminating Poverty"
In an online PDF file updated to August 2016, the OECD offers two distinct versions of child poverty. One is the "child income poverty rate," defined as "the proportion of children (0-to-17 year olds) with an equivalised post-tax-and-transfer income of less than 50% of the national annual median equivalised post-tax-and-transfer income." The other is the "poverty rates in households with children and a working-age head by type of household and household employment status." The definition of the latter is long and intricate, but basically it boils down to 50% of a median reached by a comparison of families-having-children, instead of the direct comparison between individual children upon which the "child income poverty rate" is based. (The intricacies come from the need to group families by type according to the number of adults and the number in jobs.) Indignation over "the proportion of children living in families below the poverty line" refers to the second definition. The document in question goes on to note that in any specific country the one or the other definition may yield a higher figure for "child poverty." Those differences, however, will not affect what we shall point out next.
Given either OECD definition of the "poverty line," let us consider two theoretically possible approaches to eliminating poverty in Israel -- or in any other OECD country. One approach is to raise everyone's income in real terms by one hundred times. You would think that this enormous effort would lift even families on the lowest incomes out of poverty. But no, because the OECD's officially defined poverty line, too, would have automatically and simultaneously risen one hundred times. Everyone is allegedly just as poor as before.
The second theoretically possible approach is to lower everyone's income to the point that one half of Israeli children (first definition) or Israeli households by type (second definition) have an income of 1.01 shekels a year and the other half have 0.99 shekels a year. You would think that this would plunge everyone into utter poverty. But no: according to the OECD definition there is now no poverty at all because the median child/household income is one shekel a year and no child/household falls below 50% of that.
According to either OECD definition of the "poverty line," therefore, you can make everyone fabulously rich while keeping them all as poor as before. But you can eliminate poverty by reducing them all to starvation levels.
What particularly agitates readers of OECD poverty reports, as we noted, are statements about "the proportion of children living in families below the poverty line." That is, reports based on the OECD's second measure of child poverty. Also in this regard, various alternative approaches can be envisaged.
The usual approach is to tax the rich in order to provide children's allowances that benefit children in poor families. This may be the moral thing to do and it may bring greater happiness to many poor children. Only it may also do nothing to reduce the number of children under the thus-defined poverty line. What if it encourages the poor to have more children while discouraging the rich from doing that? Then, in both regards, the number of children under the poverty line will increase. If the aim is to reduce that number, it may possibly be achieved by doing the opposite: taxing the poor to the point that they are scared of having children in the first place, and giving the money raised to the rich, enabling them to afford more children.
Indeed, given the second OECD measure of poverty, the one that compares families-with-children, there is even a sure and foolproof way of totally eliminating poverty in OECD terms. It is to confiscate all the children of the poor and oblige the rich to adopt them all. Once all children have been placed by an authoritarian government in households above the median household income by type of family, not a single child will live in a household falling under the poverty line. Even so, there may still be many children in actual poverty. This is because parents that were comfortably off while they had just one or two children may be financially challenged when they are saddled with more. The OECD will report that the phenomenon of children living in poverty has vanished, but in reality it is still there and has merely been made officially invisible.
That paradox arises with the OECD's second definition. Whether a similar paradox infects the first definition, we leave as an exercise for the inquisitive reader.
Interestingly, Israel's child benefits policy was changed in 2003 such as to mildly disincentivize ever-increasing families. For children who were born up to May 31, 2003: 150 shekels are granted monthly for the first child, 188 each for the second and third, 336 for the fourth and 354 each for any further child. For children who were born on June 1, 2003 or later: 150 for the first child and for the fourth and any subsequent child, but 188 each for the second and third. In the meantime, the proportion of children living under the OECD-type poverty line has decreased somewhat, such as in 2012 and in 2015. This gives Israel a somewhat improved grade from the OECD. In real terms, on the other hand, there is less government money available for all children and especially for large families, so actual poverty has presumably risen. Whether it has truly risen, however, can only be guessed; reliable figures for real poverty can hardly be found, as precisely that is not being measured.
This brings us back to the Wikipedia article mentioned earlier, which goes on to state:
"The United States, in contrast, uses an absolute poverty measure. The U.S. poverty line was created in 1963–64 and was based on the dollar costs of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's 'economy food plan' multiplied by a factor of three. The multiplier was based on research showing that food costs then accounted for about one-third of money income."
This definition is obviously free of the paradoxes that afflict the OECD definitions. So why has the OECD not adapted the U.S. definition to its own case? The answer is that, given some basic national statistics from the population registry and the income tax authorities, the relevant OECD officials can very quickly calculate the figures that result from its definitions of the poverty line. Never mind that the figures may tell us nothing useful about poverty! The U.S. definition, which does yield useful information, requires much harder work to implement.
Even the U.S. definition may be inadequate in the meantime. The Wikipedia article adds that the "one-time calculation" of 1963-64 "has since been annually updated for inflation." So has it not been updated to reflect the possibility that today food costs may no longer "account for about one-third of money income"? That is, even a realistic definition of poverty may require constant fresh hard work on its revision. That hard work, too, is evaded by the OECD definitions.
Inter-Country Comparisons
The OECD website offers another PDF file entitled "Five Family Facts," which gives five statistics for all OECD countries in 2009, including Israel. Thus the file seems to have been compiled immediately after Israel joined in 2010. That is a few years ago, but the file remains useful as an example of the OECD approach. A link to the file on an OECD webpage lists it under "Press material and country notes." This makes it the kind of OECD document that promotes alarming headlines in the press about alleged child poverty.
One of those five facts is variously called the "child poverty rate" (presumably the "child income poverty rate" mentioned above) or the "percentage of children living in poverty." As we have seen, to paraphrase the former phrase as the latter phrase is slipshod and misleading. The "child income poverty rate" is a relative measure used by the OECD, whereas the "percentage of children living in poverty" is an absolute measure that the U.S. approach attempts to calculate. The second phrase, therefore, is out of place in an OECD document.
Under "Israel," we are told: "In Israel, 26.6% of children live in poverty, which is the highest rate of the OECD and more than twice the average of 12.7%." Several other countries, however, are rated not much lower, such as Chile (20.5%), Mexico (25.8%), Poland (21.5%) and Turkey (24.6%),
But Israel is absolutely in a class on its own in another respect: "The fertility rate in Israel is the highest in the OECD with 2.96 children per women, compared to an OECD average of 1.74." The next highest, far behind, is Iceland (2.2). As for the other four countries just mentioned, the rates are Chile (2.0), Mexico (2.08), Poland (1.4) and Turkey (2.12). That is, Israeli women are having some 50% more children than women in three of those countries and over 100% more than women in Poland, yet Israel's so-called child poverty rate is by no means so much greater. This puts the alleged child poverty in Israel in a very different light: Israel seems to be performing better than those four countries
Add to this the fact that the OECD document repeatedly notes that a fertility rate of 2.1 is required to maintain a constant population. Apart from Israel and Turkey, only Iceland (2.2) and New Zealand (2.14) achieve this. Another eight countries have a rate of 1.9 or more: Australia (1.9), Chile (2.0), Ireland (2.07), Mexico (2.08), Norway (1.98), Sweden (1.94), the UK (1.94) and the USA ("just over 2"). Since the three Nordic countries all have child poverty rates under 10%, they would seem to outperform all the others. On the other hand, Israel might be seen as also doing better than countries like Spain, which has a child poverty rate of 17.3% despite a fertility rate of only 1.4.
In the previous section, we pointed out that OECD figures about "child poverty" may have little to do with actual poverty. The approach in this section was: Assume that large differences between OECD countries in alleged "child poverty" may, nevertheless, have some significance. The consequence of this assumption, however, is that Israel is doing better than numerous other OECD countries when the uniquely high fertility rate in Israel is taken into account.
OECD figures about "child poverty" may have little to do with actual poverty. But even assuming that large differences between OECD countries in alleged "child poverty" may, nevertheless, have some significance, it means that Israel is doing better than numerous other OECD countries when the uniquely high fertility rate in Israel is taken into account.
Annual Ritual
Every December, Israel's National Insurance Institute issues its own "poverty report" for the previous year (thus in December 2016 for the year 2015), based on OECD-type definitions. The immediate response is a great hoo-ha for a day or two. Even if poverty is said to have fallen slightly, the remaining allegedly high levels of poverty are noisily deplored. Opposition politicians castigate the government, which responds by alleging that the opposition did even worse when it was in power. General consensus: we must do better. After that day or two, however, the matter is forgotten and the media revert to other current controversies.
Realizing that its annual poverty reports have no lasting impact, the National Insurance Institute resorted to issuing reports twice a year instead. The result is merely that the phenomenon of instant uproar followed by instant apathy now occurs twice as often. We do not know whether the economic wise men in government ministries understand what we wrote above, but treat it as esoteric knowledge to be kept secret, or whether they are simply frustrated by years of vain attempts to produce a major change in the official figures.
In fact, the National Insurance Institute does much excellent work on researching actual poverty and on devising means to help poor families. Israel has also developed effective programs for bringing people back into work. When Binyamin Netanyahu -- then as Finance Minister -- changed child benefits in 2003, for instance, he also made changes aimed at encouraging single mothers to enter the labor market. The result up to mid-2016, we are told, was that "the proportion of single mothers who work has risen by about 15 percentage points – but the proportion of single-parent families below the poverty line has remained unchanged." That is: "In 2015, 81 percent of single mothers worked. But just as in 2002, a quarter of them were poor." Here again, we see that "below the poverty line" is misleadingly equated with "poor."
It was a real achievement to raise the employment rate of single mothers from 66% to 81% between 2002 and 2015. To insist that nothing has changed because the same proportion of such families remains below the so-called poverty line is both wrongheaded and could discourage attempts to improve the situation further.
According to OECD figures for late 2016, Israel's unemployment rate at 4.7% was comfortably below the OECD average of 6.3% and well below the European Union average of 8.5% and the Euro area's average of 10.0%. Only six OECD countries had lower rates. In the meantime, Israel's rate fell to 4.3% at year-end 2016.
For people in general, just to be in work instead of out of work is beneficial even on the same household income level. On the one hand, they are contributing to their society instead of living off it. On the other, being in work encourages self-esteem, multiplies social contacts, and makes the individual concerned more attractive to a future employer offering higher wages than members of the longtime unemployed.
It is sometimes thought to be paradoxical that Israel features so highly in the "World Happiness Reports" -- at 11th place out of 157 countries, in the latest report. (Preceded only by the five Nordic countries, the three Commonwealth Dominions, Switzerland and the Netherlands.) There is no paradox if such factors as joy over having children and pride at being in work outweigh artificially defined poverty.
*Malcolm Lowe is a Welsh scholar specialized in Greek Philosophy, the New Testament and Christian-Jewish Relations. He has been familiar with Israeli reality since 1970.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

For Iranian Americans, Trump has complicated an already tricky trip to motherland
By Sarah ParviniContact Reporter/Los Angeles Times/February 06/17
Traveling back to Iran was never uncomplicated for Arian Edalat.
Each visit after immigrating to the United States six years ago was a gantlet of frustrations — a reminder that the country he used to explore as a boy in the backseat of his father’s white 1976 Buick, with its turquoise blue interior, was in the grips of theocratic and severe rulers.
But trips to Iran, like the one he took in December, were the only way he could see his mother, now widowed, and help her secure a visa to the U.S.
“I’ll see what I missed in the face of my mother and my grandmother. How old they’ve gotten, and how I missed those creases and the layers of skin over skin on their faces,” Edalat, 42, said. “It bombards you on a daily basis when you’re there.”
For many Iranian immigrants and their families, the 7,500-mile journey between Tehran and California is an emotionally fraught necessity. Most Iranians in the U.S. oppose the hard-line regime in Tehran. Many fled for political freedoms or opportunities for professional growth. Others moved here for a Western education and planned to go back, but found themselves tethered to America after the Islamic Revolution in 1979.
The Casablanca that is "Tehrangeles" has long been a hotbed of political intrigue, turning heavily Iranian neighborhoods such as Westwood and Beverly Hills into key locations for gathering intelligence on Tehran. Both the CIA and the FBI have spent decades recruiting informants and sources among Iranian expatriates and businessmen who travel to Iran.
Still, the community’s roots, culture and family are in Iran, and the tug of the motherland, steeped in memories, pulls hard. Although it has never been easy or inexpensive to make the journey, until last week, it was manageable.
Now, on the heels of President Trump’s executive order, many Iranian immigrants are wondering how feasible it will be to continue the tradition. Trump’s action blocks citizens from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from coming to the U.S. for at least 90 days. It also imposes a ban for 120 days on refugees from any country entering the U.S. and bars refugees from Syria indefinitely, in a move the president has said will better protect the country against terrorist attacks.
A federal judge is­sued a tem­por­ary re­strain­ing or­der against Trump’s im­mig­ra­tion re­stric­tions on Fri­day, and signaled that the or­der ap­plies to cases across the coun­try. The Department of Homeland Security suspended "any and all actions" related to the ban in response, but the White House has said it will ask for an emergency stay of the judge's order.
Also Friday, Trump imposed sanctions on Iran, delivering on his promise to take a harder line with the volatile U.S. foe.
The sanctions, on 13 people and 12 companies, came a day after he put Iran “on notice” for testing a medium-range ballistic missile and for attacks by Iran-funded Houthi militants on a Saudi frigate.
Iran has instituted a tit-for-tat policy in response to Trump’s ban, barring Americans from receiving visas. Although dual nationals can still fly to Tehran, they wonder whether they will be caught in a political tug-of-war, harassed because they came from the U.S.
Edalat worries he won’t see his family for months. His mother had planned to visit the family in West Hills this month. The chemical engineer doesn’t know whether he should tell her to stay in Iran, or ask her to try her luck and fly out next weekend.
“She is devastated,” he said. “The damage is already done...you’re accusing a 65-year-old woman who hasn’t hurt an insect in her life of being a threat to the national security of this country.”
The ban is particularly dispiriting because it comes just one year after the implementation of the Iran nuclear deal, said Saman Djabbari, a first-generation American whose parents moved to Los Angeles from Iran.
“There was such hope with that. It seems like there was one giant step forward and two giant steps backward,” Djabbari, 30, said. “There was all this progress made. That thaw, who knows what happens with it now? Is it just frozen over again?”
His uncle still lives in Iran, he said, and the only chance the family has of seeing him now is flying there. Even that has its difficulties, Djabbari said.
“Last time I went there I was 15 years old and the Iranian government for some reason had this idea that I never left the country,” he said. “So that entire trip, my mom and her brother had to produce all this evidence that I was living in the States the whole time. I could have gotten stuck over there.”
Experts note that existing vetting policies were already rigorous.
“Could we do more? Yeah, we could send out FBI agents,” said Niels Frenzen, an expert in immigration and refugee law at USC. “When money isn’t an issue, one can always do more.”
Still, the ban is “illogical” and “confusing,” Frenzen added.
“It is stopping people who have been vetted,” he said. “The country selection process is a political decision and has nothing to do as far as I can tell with national security.”
Mahsa Pashaei left Iran about five years ago after her family won the green-card lottery. She admits the immigration process was easier for them because of that, but the ban ruined her family’s future plans.
Pashaei, a student at UCLA, said her mother planned to travel to Iran for Nowruz, the Persian New Year, in March.
“All these decisions are on hold,” Pashaei said in Farsi. “My family is worried we will never see each other again.”
The 25-year-old said she feels caught between two countries.
“Neither accepts you,” she said. “Each moment, you wonder ‘If something happens, which country would want to help me? Which way do I reach out?’ That’s its own horror.”
It took 14 months for Edalat’s mother to get through the vetting process, which included criminal background checks, flights to the U.S. Embassy in Armenia, presenting original copies of Iranian birth certificates and showing proof of income, among other steps.
His wife Samah’s aunt received a visa and planned to visit in March. The aunt, 70, traveled twice to the embassy in Austria for her visa.
“I’ve been on the phone with my mother, and she says my aunt has been crying over this,” Samah Edalat said as she fed their daughter, Nava, in the kitchen.
“You want to revoke this privilege -- and I agree it is a privilege for noncitizens -- at least be accountable,” her husband added. “People spent money, they invested their emotions and their time.”
Edalat’s mother paid for the family’s plane tickets during their December visit. With two children, he and his wife couldn’t spare $5,000 to fly to Tehran. It was money they could use for preschool.
With the ban in place, he doesn’t know when he will see his loved ones, or visit a country where a song or bite of food can cause a flood of memories.
“I met my nephew for the first time this trip. I’m not going to be there when he’s 10, or 5, or 6,” Edalat said. “Year after year, my mother’s birthday, my brother’s birthday, my nephew’s birthday. All of these things are missing.”
“They come back haunting you, all of these sacrifices you’re making.”
sarah.parvini@latimes.com
For more California news follow me on Twitter: @sarahparvini