LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

January 07/17

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins17/english.january07.17.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
Here is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world! This is he of whom I said, "After me comes a man who ranks ahead of me because he was before me.
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to
Saint John 01/29-34/:"The next day he saw Jesus coming towards him and declared, ‘Here is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world! This is he of whom I said, "After me comes a man who ranks ahead of me because he was before me." I myself did not know him; but I came baptizing with water for this reason, that he might be revealed to Israel.’And John testified, ‘I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it remained on him. I myself did not know him, but the one who sent me to baptize with water said to me, "He on whom you see the Spirit descend and remain is the one who baptizes with the Holy Spirit." And I myself have seen and have testified that this is the Son of God.’"
 
Indeed, we live as human beings, but we do not wage war according to human standards; for the weapons of our warfare are not merely human, but they have divine power to destroy strongholds
Second Letter to the Corinthians 10/01-11/:"I myself, Paul, appeal to you by the meekness and gentleness of Christ I who am humble when face to face with you, but bold towards you when I am away! I ask that when I am present I need not show boldness by daring to oppose those who think we are acting according to human standards. Indeed, we live as human beings, but we do not wage war according to human standards; for the weapons of our warfare are not merely human, but they have divine power to destroy strongholds. We destroy arguments and every proud obstacle raised up against the knowledge of God, and we take every thought captive to obey Christ. We are ready to punish every disobedience when your obedience is complete. Look at what is before your eyes. If you are confident that you belong to Christ, remind yourself of this, that just as you belong to Christ, so also do we. Now, even if I boast a little too much of our authority, which the Lord gave for building you up and not for tearing you down, I will not be ashamed of it. I do not want to seem as though I am trying to frighten you with my letters. For they say, ‘His letters are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible.’ Let such people understand that what we say by letter when absent, we will also do when present."
 
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 06-07/17
Lebanese President to Discuss kidnapped Soldiers During His Arab Tour/Paula Astih/Asharq Al Awsat/January 06/17
The Latest Ceasefire Will Not Change Hezbollah's Role in Syria/Hanin Ghaddar/The Washington Institute/January 06/17
Question: "What is the conscience/January 06/17
Iran sees hailing Assad as top priority/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya/January 06/17
Why Arabs hate Obama/Mamdouh AlMuhaini/Al Arabiya/January 06/17
Dialogue With Iran is an Unrealistic Idea/Salman Al-dossary/Asharq Al Awsat/January 06/17
Obama and the Palestinian Fig Leaf/Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/January 06/17
Egyptian Writers Argue Over Mosques' Calls To Prayer Using Loudspeakers/MEMRI/January 06/17
UN Security Council Res. 2334: A Victory of Jihadism/Bat Ye'or/Gatestone Institute/January 06/17
2017 will be another bad year for the Arab world/Smadar Perry|/Ynetnews/January 06/17

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on January 06-07/17
Lebanese President to Discuss kidnapped Soldiers During His Arab Tour
Boroujerdi: Iran Willing to Arm Lebanese Military Shall Government Approve
Report: Hizbullah Has Not Demured Aoun's Trip to Saudi Arabia
Report: FPM and AMAL in Reconciliation Bid
Saudi Envoy Says Aoun's Visit to SA Reflects Positively on Relations with Lebanon
Mustaqbal MP Badr Wannous Passes Away
Ibrahim: Two Mediators Negotiating File of Servicemen Abducted by IS
Kanaan: No return to 60's law, mixedjoint vision within 3 weeks
Chinese Foreign Minister at the House of Center: I explained to PM Hariri our President's initiative and our welcoming of Lebanon's participation in its execution
Rahi: Values are lost in our society
UNIFIL informed by Israeli army of shepherd's arrest, efforts underway for his release
Badr Wannous laid to rest in his hometown, Dhour alHawa
Armed gang kidnaps Lebanese expatriate in Mozambique
Shepherd disappears near borders with Palestine, Army contacts UNIFIL
Dabbour confers with Egyptian Ambassador over Palestinian situation
The Latest Ceasefire Will Not Change Hezbollah's Role in Syria
MEF's Legal Project Funds a Major Victory in Canada

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on January 06-07/17
Gunman opens fire at Florida airport, killing 5
Al-Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahiri calls ISIS ‘liars’
US house votes to condemn UN’s Israel resolution
Russia announces reductions in its forces in Syria
Coalition strike kills senior ISIS leader in Syria: US
ISIS militants kill 4 soldiers near Iraq’s Tikrit
Turkey to naturalize Syrian, Iraqi migrants: Erdogan
Syria Truce Enters Critical Phase, Opposition Urges Security Council Intervention
At Least 150 Pakistanis Arrested after Attempting to March in Support of Blasphemy Law
Bahraini Authorities Accuse Isa Qassim of Transferring $14 Million to Iranian Bank
Member of Syrian National Coalition: Iran Regime Is the One to Suffer Syria Ceasefire
Ankara Threatened That Those Who Violate the Ceasefire in Syria Will Face Sanctions
Iran: The Conflict Between Government's Branches; Plunders & Loots
Iran: How Trump can help the conflict in Syria
MEF's Legal Project Funds a Major Victory in Canada
Investigators return to question Netanyahu over alleged receipt of gifts
Vice-President Biden tells Trump to ‘grow up’
Four Yemeni nationals from Guantanamo arrive in Riyadh
Egypt Arrests Suspected Cairo Checkpoint Attackers
Arab coalition airstrikes pound Houthis
Vice-President Biden tells Trump to ‘grow up’
Bangladesh police kill prime suspect in July cafe attack

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on January 06-07/17
PA cartoon: Israel murders Santa Claus
Egypt: Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar” cuts Christian shopkeeper’s throat
France: Peugeot car plant closed as Muslim workers took “too many prayer breaks”
Video: Robert Spencer on the War on the First Amendment
Reza Aslan: A Muslim “Will & Grace” will cure “Islamophobia
Germany: Muslim migrants who witness “right-wing hate crimes” to be immune from deportation
Berlin jihad murderer was on terror watchlist, used 14 different aliases
Muslim migrant who beheaded Dutch woman admitted to UK, attacks cops with hammer
Uganda: Muslim relatives force woman to take poison for converting to Christianity
Ingrid Carlqvist Moment: How Sweden Became Absurdistan
Austria: Muslims commit wave of sex assaults on New Year’s Eve
Robert Spencer in PJ Media: Why Do Western Leaders Bother to Condemn Terror Attacks?
UK: Hundreds of “child migrants” lied about their ages, are as old as 29
Italy: Muslim sets fire to church Nativity scene

Links From Christian Today Site for on January 06-07/17
Multiple Shooting Deaths Reported At Fort Lauderdale Airport
Evangelical Pastor Sentenced To Over Two Years In Prison In China
Why It's OK To Laugh At 'The Real Housewives Of ISIS'
Jill Saward – A Saint For Our Times
Poirot Star David Suchet Will Read The Entire Gospel Of Mark In St Paul's Cathedral
How A Christian Ministry Is Reaching Out To Trafficked North Korean Women
Too Many Tearful Testimonies, Says Charleston Killer Dylann Roof
Nashville Megachurch Pastor Who Resigned Now Facing Divorce
Transgender Man Sues Catholic Hospital Over 'Refusal To Perform Surgery'
Jill Saward: Tireless Campaigner For Victims Of Sexual Assault Has Died

Latest Lebanese Related News published on January 06-07/17
Lebanese President to Discuss kidnapped Soldiers During His Arab Tour
Paula Astih/Asharq Al Awsat/January 06/17
Beirut – President Michel Aoun will discuss the “mysterious file” of the nine kidnapped Lebanese soldiers during his Arab tour which is expected to begin next week.
The president’s tour will include: Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Egypt where he will request assistance to reveal the fate of the soldiers kidnapped by ISIS since August 2014.
Aoun seems to have given this case his attention now that a new Lebanese mediator has been assigned to communicate with the kidnappers, prior to the negotiations that would end up with their release similar to the case of the 16 soldiers who were taken by al-Nusra Front.
On Thursday, families of the nine army soldiers held hostage met with President Aoun at the presidential palace where they received assurances from President Michel Aoun and General Security head Maj. Gen. Abbas Ibrahim that authorities were pushing for a resolution.
National News Agency (NNA) reported that the session was open and President Aoun expressed his determination to follow the case and ensure the safe return of the soldiers. Aoun said he would prefer to handle the case away from the media.
The president assured the families that he has been following up on the issue from the beginning and that he would continue with their case while he makes international visits.
“Trust that the state will not be relieved before this matter is closed,” Aoun told the families, according to his media office.
Maj. Gen. Ibrahim assured the families that President Aoun is following the case on a daily basis, saying that “we should hope for the best.” He gave a comprehensive presentation on the negotiations process so far and the new mediator who will be number 13.
Sources close to the matter told Asharq Al-Awsat that Aoun is intending to seek the help of the countries that could be of assistance on the case.
The sources also indicated that the President will do his best to bring the soldiers back home safe.
“For more than a month, I’ve been trying to follow up on holding a meeting and this is what prompted me to take a position and talk about the issue on the media,” Hussein Youssef, the families’ spokesperson.
“The meeting meant a lot for us and it boosted our spirits because the president showed his understanding in this case,” Youssef said. Youssef is the father of the kidnapped soldier Mohammad Youssef.
Youssef told Asharq al-Awsat that they won’t be relieved until they have seen their children live or on tape.
Later Thursday, Maj-Gen Ibrahim visited the families at their camp in Beirut’s Riad al-Solh.
“The efforts that are being exerted in this case are serious,” he told the families. “We hope that we witness a development soon that will bring this case to happy closure.”
Youssef said that Ibrahim was trying to send a message of assurance to the families by giving them a new hope … and he’s very optimistic. He said that he sensed the seriousness of the work of the new mediators.
Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Nizam Mogheit, brother of kidnapped soldier Ibrahim, was also optimistic of the recent updates especially now that the president had assured them that he would handle the case.
Security forces have no definite information regarding the soldiers or their whereabouts. Last time their families heard of them was in 2014 when three of the soldiers appeared on their knees in video being threatened by a militant who spoke in French.
Recent confessions of ISIS militants who were captured in Ersal revealed important information. One of the ISIS militants pointed out that he personally killed Abbas Medlij and informed the authorities about the soldiers being tortured and forced into hard labor.
President Michel Aoun presided on Thursday the first meeting of the Higher Defense Council at the Baabda Palace in the presence of Prime Minister Saad Hariri, director-general of the State Security apparatus, Maj. Gen. George Qaraa and other security officials.
Aoun stressed the “importance of pre-emptive confrontation against terrorist groups and the need for coordination between the security agencies.”
President Aoun added that the country will continue to “face the Israeli enemy and all forms of terrorism,” saying it is a top priority of the government.

Boroujerdi: Iran Willing to Arm Lebanese Military Shall Government Approve
Naharnet/January 06/17/Chairman of Iranian Parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Committee Alaeddin Boroujerdi, said on Friday that the Islamic Republic of Iran is ready to send military aid to the Lebanese army shall the Lebanese government authorize it.
Iran's permanent and firm stance is to stand by the brotherly Lebanese Republic of Lebanon, government and people. We therefore reiterate our firm will in the field of arming the Lebanese army,” said Boroujerdi after placing a wreath on the grave of slain Hizbullah official Imad Moghnieh and his son. He added that the issue “has been seriously discussed with (former) Defense Minister Samir Moqbel during the latter's visit to Iran.”“The matter is at the Lebanese government's disposal,” he concluded. During his visit to Iran in March 2016, Moqbel, told Iran that when the sanctions are lifted on Iran, then the Lebanese government would study Iran's will to support the Lebanese army. Saudi Arabia has halted a 3 billion dollar in military program for military supplies to Lebanon in protest against Hizbullah's policies.

Report: Hizbullah Has Not Demured Aoun's Trip to Saudi Arabia
Naharnet/January 06/17/Hizbullah assured on Friday that its relations with President Michel Aoun and the Free Patriotic Movement are “firm”, and assured that the party does not demur Aoun's travel to Saudi Arabia as the first trip the president is scheduled to take abroad, al-Joumhouria daily reported on Friday. Following the latest reports alleging that Aoun's scheduled visit to Saudi Arabia has “angered” Iran and “bemused” Hizbullah, party sources recalled the announcement of Hizbullah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah where he said “he has no problem with that,” the sources told the daily on condition of anonymity. They pointed out to the announcement made by Nasrallah in a public speech, where he assured that “President of the Republic has the right to travel anywhere,” and to choose the country to where his first trip would be. According to the daily, the sources said they were not entitled to veto “the first, second or third trip of Aoun to Saudi Arabia,” and in return “no one should veto his travel to Syria or Iran.” “We are in front of a new term. The Lebanese expect it to weave ties in Lebanon's interest and in the interest of the Lebanese people and in favor of Lebanon's future with other countries,” the sources continued. They reaffirmed that relations between the two are firm, saying: “Relations between Hizbullah and President Aoun are steady and full of confidence. A mutual trust between the party and the FPM, and a mutual trust between the President and Nasrallah.”

Report: FPM and AMAL in Reconciliation Bid

Naharnet/January 06/17/A meeting between a key member of the AMAL Movement, Ali Hassan Khalil and head of the Free Patriotic Movement Jebran Bassil took place on Thursday, marking an improvement in ties between the two parties after some conflict emerged against the backdrop the presidential elections, media reports said Friday. Khalil, who is also Finance Minister, and Bassil, a Foreign Minister, met at a luncheon banquet held in the foreign ministry and in the presence of General Security chief Maj. Gen. Abbas Ibrahim, who has been working on mending ties and ending the conflict between AMAL Movement and the FPM. Al-Joumhouria daily reported the atmospheres during the meeting as very positive and eager for a reconciliation. It has also been agreed to hold more future contacts in order to reach an agreement on various issues. Relations between the two parties were shaken after AMAL leader Speaker Nabih Berri nominated Marada Movement MP Suleiman Franjieh for the presidential post, while the FPM was backing its founder Michel Aoun --who won the elections in October 31, 2016.Fight over the distribution of ministerial portfolios aggravated the conflict further. Each party holds the other responsible for the strained ties, and for transforming a previously political, governmental coalition into a rift that made Speaker and AMAL leader Berri announce that he will join the ranks of the opposition in the new term of newly elected president Michel Aoun. Although Hizbullah party had tried to improve the relations between its two allies and was successful in getting their pledge to reduce tense media rhetoric, but a number of controversial issues similar to the electricity file, continue to shake the ties.

Saudi Envoy Says Aoun's Visit to SA Reflects Positively on Relations with Lebanon

Naharnet/January 06/17/Saudi chargé d'affaires in Lebanon Walid al-Bukhari stressed on Friday that Lebanon's president visit to Saudi Arabia will have positive results on the Saudi-Lebanese ties, al-Joumhouria daily reported on Friday. “The visit will have positive outcome on the relations between Saudi Arabia and Lebanon,” said Bukhari. He assured that the kingdom will never abandon Lebanon, saying: “We have not and will not abandon Lebanon.”President Michel Aoun will visit Saudi Arabia and Qatar next week in his first foreign trip abroad to discuss bilateral relations between the countries, in addition to the situation in the region. He is scheduled to visit Saudi Arabia on Monday and Tuesday, Qatar on Wednesday and Thursday. Improving relations between Lebanon and the Arab Gulf countries, which saw strained ties last year, are considered one of the major challenges facing Aoun.

Mustaqbal MP Badr Wannous Passes Away
Naharnet/January 06/17/Al-Mustaqbal MP Badr Wannous has passed away on Friday at the age of 80. Born in Tripoli in the neighborhood of al-Tebbaneh in 1941, he was married with two children, Bassam and Rana. His body will be laid to rest on Friday in the town of Dhour el-Hawa in the northern district of al-Koura. Prime Minister Saad Hariri and al-Mustaqbal Movement chief, mourned the MP and said: “We have lost a brother, honest friend and faithful companion. Badr Wannous was a gentleman whom Tripoli has lost."

Ibrahim: Two Mediators Negotiating File of Servicemen Abducted by IS
Naharnet/January 06/17/The file of servicemen abducted by the Islamic State extremist group is back in the spotlight, following Thursday's meeting between their relatives and President Michel Aoun, and the declaration of General Security chief Maj. Gen. Abbas Ibrahim that new mediators are negotiating to reveal their fate. Ibrahim, who attended the meeting between the relatives and Aoun, told al-Joumhouria on Friday: “We have been communicating with two mediators for the past two months. The first mediator is in the outskirts of Arsal, and the second is in Syria's Reqqa. They were tasked by the General Security to communicate and negotiate with the kidnappers and investigate the fate of the abductees.” “We can say that the path of the process is still serious, and negotiations with the abductors through the mediators continue regardless if the abductees are dead or alive. We insist to know their fate in order to reach a closure for this file and appease their families who deserve after a long-wait to know the fate of their sons,” added Ibrahim. On the DNA tests that were run on relatives of the servicemen and on dead bodies found by the General Security on the Lebanese-Syrian border, Ibrahim said: “the tests did not match.”The dead bodies found on the border, belong to missing non-Lebanese and the General Security is working on finding their identities, the daily added. The IS group and al-Nusra Front, which re-branded itself as Jabhat Fateh al-Sham in July when it split from the al-Qaida movement, abducted over 30 servicemen in clashes with the Lebanese army in the northeastern border town of Arsal in August 2014. Sixteen held by the Jabhat Fateh al-Islam were freed in December 2015 through a Qatari-mediated deal that also included a prisoner swap to release a number of inmates from Lebanese jails. The two groups had previously executed four of the hostages. Nine hostages are still being held by the IS and their families do not know much about their fate.

Kanaan: No return to 60's law, mixedjoint vision within 3 weeks
 Fri 06 Jan 2017/NNA - "Change and Reform" Parliamentary Bloc Secretary, MP Ibrahim Kanaan, ruled out, on Friday, any discussion of returning to or amending the 1960 electoral law, adding that "in the next 3 weeks, we should reach a common perception among the various parliamentary blocs regarding the electoral law, before the pressing deadlines."Speaking in an interview to "MTV" Channel, Kanaan indicated that, "discussions are underway regarding the mixed visions proposed with amendments to the terms of partition and seats." He pointed out that "amongst the dossiers subject to cooperation with House Speaker, Nabih Berri, is the electoral law, with the aim of reaching an intersection at this level."Kanaan concluded by saying that, "The page of presidential elections has been turned, and the approach today is between President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, representing the Constitution, and House Speaker Berri as Head of Parliament."
 
Chinese Foreign Minister at the House of Center: I explained to PM Hariri our President's initiative and our welcoming of Lebanon's participation in its execution
Fri 06 Jan 2017/NNA - Prime Minister, Saad al-Hariri, met on Friday evening at the "House of Center" with Chinese Foreign Minister, Zhang Ming, on head of an official delegation, in the presence of Chinese Ambassador to Lebanon Wang Kiqian. Following the meeting, Ming said: "I met with Prime Minister Hariri and we exchanged views on how to strengthen the friendly cooperation between China and Lebanon, in addition to regional and international issues of common interest.""Chinese President Jane Ping has launched a 'one belt, one road' initiative, which I explained to PM Hariri, whereby we welcome the participation of Lebanon in its execution," added Ming. "I also expressed China's satisfaction to see a strong trend towards compatibility and reconciliation between various sects in Lebanon, which symbolizes, God willing, further economic and social development and social stability in this friendly country," Ming underscored.
 
Rahi: Values are lost in our society
 Fri 06 Jan 2017/NNA - "Values in our society are being lost and the Lebanese society needs to be developed," Maronite Patriarch Cardinal Bechara Boutros Rahi said during a mass service in Bkirki on Friday upon the Epiphany Day. In his sermon, Rahi hoped that peace would prevail in the region especially in the countries that were witnessing fierce violence, terrorism and infringement on innocent lives. After the mass service, the Patriarch welcomed well-wishers upon Epiphany Day
 
UNIFIL informed by Israeli army of shepherd's arrest, efforts underway for his release
 Fri 06 Jan 2017/NNA - In an issued statement by the UNIFIL, it indicated that "around eight o'clock this evening, the UNIFIL was notified by the Israeli army that it has captured a shepherd who had crossed over the Blue Line in the vicinity of Aita al-Shaab in the South," adding that the UNIFIL immediately informed the Lebanese army, NNA correspondent in Tyre reported. The statement also indicated that "the head of the UNIFIL mission and its General Commander, Major General Michael Perry, as well as the UNIFIL correlation team are in touch with the parties concerned in this regard, focusing their efforts on securing the shepherd's release." In the meantime, UNIFIL is working to verify the circumstances of the incident, including the identification of the place where the shepherd was detained.
 
Badr Wannous laid to rest in his hometown, Dhour alHawa
Fri 06 Jan 2017/NNA - The town of Dhour al-Hawa in the region of Koura bid farewell, on Friday, the late Deputy Badr Wannous, member of the "Future" Parliamentary Bloc who passed away on Thursday night after his illness. In his eulogizing word, "Future Movement" General Coordinator, Ahmad Hariri, said: "It is a painful day with the loss of Deputy Badr Wannous, for he was a person who believed in the march of Rafic Hariri. He was with us throughout the bad times before the good moments, and was able to defy the political status quo around him, trusting in the notion of Lebanon's sovereignty and independence." "Through his absence, we have lost a cornerstone of the Future Movement and Bloc," Hariri added, expressing his sincerest condolences to the family of Wannous while praying for solace and for his soul to rest in peace. Representing the President of the Republic, Michel Aoun, at the funeral service was Economy Minister Raed Khouri, while Labor Minister Mohammad Kabbara represented Prime Minister Saad Hariri. Also present were: former PM Fouad Siniora, MP Khodr Habib, State Minister Mouïn Merehbi, and Deputies Farid Mkari, Samir Jisr and Kassem Abdel Aziz.
 
Armed gang kidnaps Lebanese expatriate in Mozambique
Fri 06 Jan 2017/NNA - The family members of Lebanese Expatriate, Communications Engineer Hassan Ali Karim, who hails from the Southern town of Yater, have received news of his kidnapping overnight by an armed robbery gang in Maputo, capital of Mozambique in West Africa, while on his way back from work as manager of a supermarket, NNA correspondent reported on Friday. His relatives have indicated that contacts are underway with the kidnappers to release him in exchange for a ransom.
 
Shepherd disappears near borders with Palestine, Army contacts UNIFIL

 Fri 06 Jan 2017/NNA - The citizen, Abdullah Hassan Rahma, disappeared on Friday, as he was grazing a herd of cattle in his hometown of Aita al-Shaab in the South, near the border region with occupied Palestine, NNA correspondent in Tebnin reported.
 
Dabbour confers with Egyptian Ambassador over Palestinian situation
 Fri 06 Jan 2017/NNA - Ambassador of the State of Palestine, Ashraf Dabbour, met on Friday with Egyptian Ambassador Nazih el-Najari, at the Embassy headquarters, with talks cantering on conditions inside the Palestinian occupied territories. According to a statement by Dabbour's Media Bureau, it indicated that "discussions touched on the Palestinian situation and the Israeli government's measures to impose a certain reality on the ground, as well as its attempts to undermine the Palestinian national project to establish an independent state with Jerusalem as its capital, and ensure the return of refugees." Dabbour stressed on "the importance of Egypt's role in support of the Palestinian cause at all levels."

The Latest Ceasefire Will Not Change Hezbollah's Role in Syria
Hanin Ghaddar/The Washington Institute/January 06/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/01/06/hanin-ghaddarthe-washington-institute-the-latest-ceasefire-will-not-change-hezbollahs-role-in-syria/
Iran and Russia may find a way to push past their strategic differences and make the ceasefire work, but it will be much more difficult to forge agreements on Syria's other intractable issues at the upcoming peace conference.
In mid-December, after a final military assault on Aleppo alongside Syrian regime forces, Russia announced that the city was free of rebels. A week later, Moscow and Turkey signed a ceasefire agreement. The Kremlin seems eager to ring in Donald Trump's presidency with a renewed effort to find a political solution and end the war, beginning with peace talks scheduled to be held in Astana, Kazakhstan, at the end of January.
Yet the ceasefire is under threat only days after it began, with Hezbollah and Assad regime forces fighting rebels in the Damascus suburbs of Wadi Barada and East Ghouta. Ten rebel factions have already threatened to boycott the Astana talks unless the ceasefire is fully implemented.
Wadi Barada has been under siege since July, when Syrian and Hezbollah troops cut access routes to a spring that provides much of the capital's water. Under the direction of its Iranian patron, Hezbollah has been working diligently to strengthen its control over the suburbs, in line with a wider plan to establish a Sunni-free corridor linking Iran to Lebanon via Iraq and Syria. This entails securing Damascus as the Alawite capital, with Bashar al-Assad staying on as president. The group aims to finalize this corridor before negotiating any division of power in Syria, so it is sidestepping the ceasefire as much as possible.
For its part, Russia genuinely seems to want the ceasefire to work, at least until the Astana meeting. Yet Iran is not trying so hard, indicating that Moscow and Tehran have different priorities in Syria. Iran's involvement in the lead-up to the agreement was limited -- while it sent a delegation to the final meeting in Moscow, the ceasefire itself was brokered by Russia and Turkey.
This does not mean that Iran and its Shiite militias will be pushed out of Syria anytime soon, however. The stakes are too high for that to happen, and all of the pro-Assad players still need each other. Yet even if the regime and the rebels push past the limited ceasefire violations -- which seems likely given the generally strong appetite for a political solution -- Hezbollah's actions signal potential disagreements between Russia and Iran regarding the future of Syria. Moscow prefers a political solution that guarantees Russia's sway over Syria's state institutions, in which it has invested for years. Yet Iran and its proxies prefer a military solution that yields faster demographic changes, with the aim of consolidating the "Shiite crescent" they have been working on for decades.
DISPARATE INTERESTS
Iran and Russia's alliance in Syria has always seemed like a temporary one -- while they agree on war, they differ on peace. Tehran often treats Assad's army as just another one of its militias in Syria, and a weaker one at that. It does not trust the army to secure its "Shiite corridor," instead relying on Hezbollah and other Shiite militias to help change the demography of towns within regime-held areas. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which oversees much of the pro-Assad camp's military activity, believes that any future solution in Syria will be based on sectarian grounds. Accordingly, Tehran prefers a partition plan that guarantees a Shiite statelet under its control. It also wants to make Damascus a full client government with weak institutions that are incapable of making independent decisions, similar to what it has in Lebanon. Among other things, this would give Iran access to Israel's northern borders via the Golan Heights, expanding its current access through Hezbollah-controlled southern Lebanon.
In contrast, Russia has no interest in demographic changes or sectarian division in Syria. Vladimir Putin does not want Assad's authority to be usurped behind the scenes by IRGC-Qods Force commander Qasem Soleimani. Instead, he prefers a political solution that leads to a gradual transition of power. Syria's state institutions are more significant to Russia than Assad and his family are. Brokering a solution would give Putin a chance to secure his influence over these institutions, and perhaps even strengthen his negotiating position with Europe on a variety of other interests.
These differences between Russia and Iran are hardly irreconcilable. Putin does not mind an Iranian corridor in Syria as long as Tehran does not try to overpower Russia in Damascus. And Iran knows that it needs Moscow given that the incoming Trump administration has signaled a tougher U.S. stance on the nuclear deal and other Iranian interests. So if Russia wants to call the shots while Iran secures its position in eastern Syria, Tehran will not make too much noise -- at least for now.
STUMBLING BLOCKS
Iran's main worry about the ceasefire is Turkey's preeminent role. Moscow needs Ankara to help win over the Sunni opposition and Sunni street in Syria, while Turkey needs Russia to help protect its borders against Kurdish forces. Yet Turkey and Iran are still not in agreement. Although Ankara seems to have given up its past insistence on ousting Assad, it still has issues with Iran's proxies.
Shortly after the ceasefire was announced, Turkish foreign minister Mevlut Cavusoglu declared to reporters back home, "All foreign fighters need to leave Syria. Hezbollah needs to return to Lebanon." He also stated that Turkey would guarantee rebel compliance with the ceasefire, Russia would guarantee Assad's adherence, and Iran would help monitor regime forces and allied Shiite militias.
Hezbollah responded the next day with a series of statements. Political Bureau chief Ibrahim Amin Assayed declared that the group will not leave Syria with or without an agreement. Similarly, a militia commander told Lebanese media that Hezbollah is in Syria to fight terrorism, and that the war on terrorism is not over. He added that the group entered Syria after reaching an agreement with the Syrian government, and only a similar agreement will get them out. As for the ceasefire violations in Wadi Barada, he blamed the opposition.
Likewise, Ali Akbar Velayati, a close advisor to Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, issued a statement on January 3 insisting that Hezbollah will remain in Syria even after the ceasefire. Two days later, the Russian ambassador in Beirut told Lebanese media outlet al-Modon that Moscow will not ask the group to leave Syria because they are partners in fighting terrorism.
In short, Turkey is the only party calling on Hezbollah to withdraw -- a fact that will not sit well with Iran. Although Ankara understands the current military need for Shiite militias in Syria, it still wants some sign or guarantee that they will eventually leave. Russia must also find a way to bring Saudi Arabia and Qatar along. These longstanding Sunni supporters of the rebellion will not be easily swayed as long as Assad is still acknowledged as Syria's president, and they are even more concerned about Iran's attempts to cement a Shiite crescent in the region.
Another stumbling block is Russia's unilateral deals with opposition fighters in certain areas, especially around Damascus. These deals guarantee that fighters can remain in their towns if they respect the ceasefire, but Iran wants all Sunnis out of such areas for demographic reasons, and it will have even more capacity to realize that goal now that Shiite forces have been freed up by the victory in Aleppo. So why did Russia make these deals knowing that Iran will try to break them? Moscow probably hoped to save face with the Syrian opposition and the Sunni majority population. As mentioned previously, Turkey might be able to help with that depending on the reaction from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, which is still vague.
BEYOND THE CEASEFIRE
Although Iran and Russia might find a way around their differences for the time being, a host of longer-term challenges looms on the horizon. Assad's fate has not been determined, and any political solution will require all of the parties at Astana to forge understandings on that and many other problematic issues, including the presence of Shiite militias and the question of who will reconstruct Syria so that refugees can return. Moreover, the relevant Gulf powers have not been invited to the conference, so it is unclear how they will respond to any decisions reached there. Barring their inclusion in the process or some other form of guarantee on Assad's fate and Shiite militias, the Astana initiative will have little chance of success, and all other problems will stay on hold.
For its part, the United States has been absent from the entire ceasefire process and did not have any significant feedback when the agreement was announced. Yet the Trump administration will take office before the Astana meeting, and while the timing is very tight, there might still be a place at the negotiating table for U.S. officials if they want it.
**Hanin Ghaddar, a veteran Lebanese journalist and researcher, is the Friedmann Visiting Fellow at The Washington Institute.

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on January 06-07/17
Gunman opens fire at Florida airport, killing 5
By Reuters, Fort Lauderdale, Fla. Friday, 6 January 2017
A gunman wearing a “Star Wars” T-shirt opened fire at a baggage carousel at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport on Friday, killing at least five people before being taken into custody, officials and witnesses said. Five people died and eight were wounded in the incident, the local sheriff’s office said. Police shot the shooter as he attempted to reload, MSNBC reported, citing witnesses. It said the man, who said nothing, appeared to be in his 20s and was wearing a “Star Wars” T-shirt. He carried a US military identification, US Senator Bill Nelson of Florida told MSNBC. The Florida attack was the latest in a series of mass shootings that have plagued the United States in recent years, some inspired by militants with an extreme view of Islam, others carried out by loners or the mentally disturbed who have easy access to weapons under US gun laws. About 90 minutes after the attack, panic broke out anew with passengers and police running frantically about the airport. Dozens of police sprinted back and forth with automatic weapons drawn, directing a large group of travelers. A police officer screamed “Get down, get down!” from a parking garage across the street from the airport terminal, a Reuters reporter witnessed. John Schlicher, who told MSNBC he saw the attack, described the shooter as a “slender man” who was “directly firing at us” while passengers waited for their bags to come off the carousel. “I put my head down and prayed,” Schlicher said, adding that his wife gave first aid to someone who had been shot in the head. His mother-in-law used her sweater to tend to another victim but it turned out that person was already dead, he said. The shooter reloaded for a second burst of shooting, Schlicher said, but could not say how many bullets were fired.
Mark Lea, another eyewitness, told MSNBC “there was no rhyme or reason to it.”“He didn’t say anything, he was quiet the whole time, he didn’t yell anything,” Lea said. Security officials corralled passengers underneath jetways and on the runway apron, according to images on television. A woman tended to a bleeding, seated man outside an airport building, according to a photo posted on Twitter by a Michigan information technology company. Air traffic was temporarily suspended. Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport is the second largest in South Florida, serving as an intercontinental gateway, with Miami International Airport known as the primary airport for international flights in the area.
History of shootings
Friday’s attack comes nearly two months after a former Southwest Airlines worker killed an employee of the company at Oklahoma City’s airport in what police called a premeditated act. The deadliest mass shooting in modern US history took place in June, when a gunman apparently inspired by Islamic State killed 53 people and wounded 49 others at a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida. One of the most shocking took place in 2012, when a man entered an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, and shot dead 20 first-graders and six adults.Attackers from Fort Lauderdale to Brussels have exploited security officials’ focus on preventing attacks on airplanes rather than inside airports. In Western Europe and the United States, terminals are easily accessible public spaces. But at Israel’s Ben Gurion Airport, widely seen as a model for security, private companies trained by the national security agency use bomb-detectors, profile passengers and question travelers under the watch of police at the airport’s entrance. That approach has its limitations and may just shift the target to another location at the airport, experts have said. Florida Governor Rick Scott was traveling to Fort Lauderdale to be briefed by law enforcement, his office said in a statement. The FBI’s Miami office was “aware of the situation” and in contact with local authorities, a spokesman said in an email. No further information was immediately available. Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport is the second largest in South Florida, serving as an intercontinental gateway, with Miami International Airport known as the primary airport for international flights in the area. Some 20 miles (30 km) north of Miami, the Fort Lauderdale airport is near cruise line terminals at Port Everglades.

Al-Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahiri calls ISIS ‘liars’
AFP, Washington Friday, 6 January 2017/Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri has denounced what he said was a dishonest propaganda campaign by rival group ISIS against his organization, in an audio message released Thursday. In the message found and translated by US-based watchdog the SITE Intelligence Group, the Egyptian extremist accuses ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi of slandering his group. In his message, the 65-year-old Zawahiri complained that Al-Baghdadi had alleged that Al-Qaeda opposes sectarian attacks on Shiites and was prepared to work with Christian leaders. “The liars insist upon their falsehood, to the extent that they claimed we do not denounce Shiites,” Zawahiri said, according to the translation of the message, which was released by Al-Qaeda’s media arm. Zawahiri denied he had said that Christians could be partners in the governance of a future Islamic caliphate, having only said that they could go about their affairs within it. “What I have said is that they are partners in the land, such as agriculture, trade, and money, and we keep their privacy in it, in accordance with the laws of our Sharia,” he said. And he insisted he had not called for Shiite Muslims to be spared, but had suggested focusing attacks on Shiite-led Iraqi forces and not on random atrocities against civilians. Also read: ISIS executes Iraqi man by drowning him in detergent liquid. “I had told them several times to stop explosions in markets, husseiniyats and mosques, and to concentrate on military, security and police forces and Shiite militiamen,” he said. A husseiniyat is a Shiite place of worship and the Iraqi security forces, in their battle against ISIS, are backed by Shiite religious militias. Zawahiri also denied Al-Baghdadi’s charge that Al-Qaeda had supported ousted former Egyptian president Mohammed Morsi, an Islamist who attempted to rule through the ballot box. Thursday’s message did not include any footage of Zawahiri speaking.

US house votes to condemn UN’s Israel resolution
AFP, Washington Friday, 6 January 2017/The US House of Representatives voted Thursday to condemn a UN resolution reprimanding Israel over its settlement activity, blasting last month’s move by the international body as “an obstacle to Israeli-Palestinian peace.” The congressional measure passed 342 to 80, with broad bipartisan support. It noted in particular that the US administration’s refusal to veto the controversial Security Council measure “undermined” Washington’s decades-long position of opposing anti-Israel action at the United Nations. Incensed US lawmakers – and President-elect Donald Trump – have assailed Barack Obama’s outgoing administration for abstaining in the December 23 vote instead of vetoing the UN resolution, essentially clearing the way for its passage. “I am stunned at what happened last month. This government – our government – abandoned our ally Israel when she needed us the most,” House Speaker Paul Ryan told the chamber shortly before the House vote. “It is time to repair the damage done by this misguided hit job at the UN,” he added. “It’s time to rebuild our partnership” with the Jewish state. White House aides have said that while Obama is a firm supporter of Israel, he felt that after eight years he had simply run out of ways to convince Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Israel building on Palestinian land is sabotaging hopes for peace. The House measure, which is non-binding, calls for the UN resolution “to be repealed or fundamentally altered so that... it is no longer one-sided and anti-Israel” and allows all final status issues toward a two-state solution to be resolved through direct bilateral negotiation. It also demands that the United States ensures that no action be taken at the Paris Conference on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict scheduled for January 15, that would impose an agreement on the two sides. The French-organized talks, to be attended by around 70 countries – but not by Israeli or Palestinian representatives – are being held to reiterate international support for a two-state solution to the conflict. “It’s subterfuge. This is about kicking a president on the way out, one more time,” fumed House Democrat Gerry Connolly, who voted no on the resolution.

Russia announces reductions in its forces in Syria
Agencies Friday, 6 January 2017/Russia says it is withdrawing its aircraft carrier and some other warships from the waters off Syria as the first step in drawing down forces in Syria.
Russian General Staff chief Gen. Valery Gerasimov said on Friday that the Admiral Kuznetsov carrier and accompanying ships are to be the first to leave. He was quoted as saying by the state news agency Tass that "in accordance with the decision by the supreme commander-in-chief (President) Vladimir Putin, the Defense Ministry is starting to downsize the grouping of armed forces in Syria." Moscow has been a key supporter of Syrian President Bashar Assad's government and forces in the Mideast country's devastating civil war.
Clashes in al-Bab
Additionally, Turkish-backed Syrian rebels are fighting street battles with ISIS militants in the city of al-Bab, and progress in taking it from the militants has been slowed by efforts to avoid civilian casualties, Turkey's defense minister said on Friday. The rebels, backed by Turkish special forces, tanks and war planes, have been besieging the ISIS-held city of al-Bab for weeks as part of an operation to drive the militants out of a strip of Syrian territory along the Turkish border.
‘Paying the price’
Meanwhile, Turkish Defence Minister Fikri Isik said on Friday that Turkey and the region are paying the price for the United States choosing the Syrian Kurdish YPG militia as a partner in the fight against ISIS. Speaking to broadcaster Haberturk, Isik said Washington was giving weapons to YPG militia, which Ankara sees as a hostile force, but added that it would be too much to say that it is doing it on purpose and to trigger terrorism in Turkey. Ankara views the YPG as an extension of the Kurdish PKK militant group, which has claimed or been blamed for a series of deadly attacks in Turkey, the most recent a car bombing in the western city of Izmir which killed two people on Thursday.

Coalition strike kills senior ISIS leader in Syria: US
AFP, Washington Friday, 6 January 2017/The US-based coalition has killed a senior ISIS group facilitator in an air strike in the extremists' self-proclaimed capital of Raqa, the US military command in the region said Friday. CENTCOM identified the target as Mahmud al-Isawi, an ISIS operative who managed instructions and finances for ISIS leaders and provided propaganda and intelligence support. He was killed on December 31, making him the 16th significant member of the network's external operations killed last year. The longtime ISIS member provided to the group's media and intelligence in Fallujah prior to his move to Raqa. He also facilitated transregional travel with other ISIS operators and had what CENTCOM dubbed a "close working and personal relationship" with Abd al-Basit al-Iraqi, emir of the group's Middle East attack network who was slain in a coalition air strike on November 2. "His death, combined with the recent successive deaths of other ISIL leaders plotting terrorist attacks, has degraded ISIL's trans-regional attack and facilitation network, and is forcing ISIL to increase their focus on internal security," CENTCOM said. "The coalition will continue to track and eliminate ISIL terrorists who plot and conduct attacks against coalition nations and our allies, wherever they are hiding."Syria has been wracked by a devastating civil war for nearly six years that has killed more than 312,000 people and forced millions to flee their homes.

ISIS militants kill 4 soldiers near Iraq’s Tikrit
Reuters, Baghdad Friday, 6 January 2017/ISIS militants attacked an Iraqi army outpost and a police station near the city of Tikrit on Friday, killing at least four soldiers and wounding 12 others, military and police sources said. The militants used a car bomb and two suicide attackers in their assault shortly after midnight on the army outpost in the town of al-Dour on Tikrit’s outskirts, killing two officers and two soldiers, the sources said. Gunmen separately attacked the police station a short distance away and set fire to the building before fleeing the area. There were no casualties from that attack, the sources said.

Turkey to naturalize Syrian, Iraqi migrants: Erdogan
AFP, Istanbul Friday, 6 January 2017/President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Friday announced that some of the millions of Syrian and Iraqis who have fled to Turkey would be given Turkish nationality. “Our interior ministry is carrying out work, and under this work, some of them will be granted our nationality after all the necessary checks” have been carried out, Erdogan said in a speech broadcast on television. “There are highly qualified people among them, there are engineers, lawyers, doctors. Let’s make use” of that talent, he argued. “Instead of letting them work illegally here and there, let’s give them the chance to work as citizens, like the children of this nation,” he said. Erdogan said the interior ministry “is ready to implement the measure at any time.” But he gave no further details, notably about how many would gain Turkish nationality. According to Turkish government figures, the country is hosting more than three million Syrians and Iraqis who have fled war. Erdogan outlined a naturalization plan last summer but the idea met with angry protests and xenophobic comments on social media. The country’s political opposition saw the plan as a scheme to widen Erdogan’s electoral basis at a time when he is pushing for constitutional reform that will strengthen his powers.

Syria Truce Enters Critical Phase, Opposition Urges Security Council Intervention
Paula Astih/Asharq Al Awsat/January 06/17
Beirut- Syria’s week-old ceasefire has officially entered a shaky phase after violations expanded their target range beyond the northern Rif Dimashq Governorate reaching east of rural Aleppo. Syrian opposition forces have urged the United Nations’ Security Council and truce monitoring international forces for an immediate intervention.
French President Francois Hollande demanded that pro-regime forces abide completely by the ceasefire and save no effort in giving the Geneva a chance.
U.N. Special Envoy Staffan de Mistura told international correspondents that preparations for Syria negotiations are on the right path, reiterating the international community’s trust in Russian and Turkish efforts to bring the ceasefire to success.
Preparations are currently underway for the multilateral meeting, led by Turkey and Russia, in Astana, Kazakhstan on January 23 to discuss the Syrian crisis, de Mistura affirmed Thursday.
The talks aim at implementing the comprehensive ceasefire in Aleppo, ending the Syrian crisis, and resuming peace negotiations between warring Syrian sides, Mistura said in a press conference.
De Mistura has set Feb. 8 for the next round of U.N.-mediated talks on Syria in Geneva.
He considered the case on Russian and Turkish influence reaching out to conflicting sides in Syria a hopeful one. It would help to ensure the full implementation of the ceasefire and the success of the Syria peace talks in Astana.
The U.N. plans on sending a representative to attend the Astana talks, in addition to employing any positive outcomes in order to ensure the steady progress of Syrian reconciliation during the February Geneva talks, de Mistura noted.
De Mistura’s humanitarian advisor Jan Egeland told reporters that Russia and Turkey brokered the ceasefire agreement on December 30, 2016, and have pledged to work to provide more access for aid and relief agencies to deliver humanitarian supplies across Syria.
Despite the ceasefire agreement, U.N. aid convoys are currently still struggling to gain access to a number of Syrian cities to deliver humanitarian aid and assistance to stranded civilians, Egeland noted, adding that U.N. relief teams were prevented from accessing areas in Rural Damascus, Homs, and Hama.

At Least 150 Pakistanis Arrested after Attempting to March in Support of Blasphemy Law
Asharq Al Awsat/January 06/17/Police arrest supporters of a Pakistani hardline group trying to rally in support of blasphemy laws, on the anniversary of the death of Salman Taseer, Pakistani governor of Pakistan's Punjab province, who was killed by his bodyguard in 2011 for opposing the country's harsh blasphemy laws, in Lahore, Pakistan, Wednesday, Jan. 4, 2017. Police arrest supporters of a Pakistani hardline group trying to rally in support of blasphemy laws, on the anniversary of the death of Salman Taseer, Pakistani governor of Pakistan's Punjab province, who was killed by his bodyguard in 2011 for opposing the country's harsh blasphemy laws, in Lahore, Pakistan, Wednesday, Jan. 4, 2017. Police authorities in Pakistan announced arresting 150 hardline activists on Wednesday. They were taken trying to gather for a protest in support of a country’s strict blasphemy law on the anniversary of a provincial governor’s assassination over his call to reform the statute.  Punjab Governor Salman Taseer was gunned down by his bodyguard Mumtaz Qadri six years ago for championing the case of a Christian woman who was sentenced to death under the blasphemy law, which he said needed to be reformed. Lahore Deputy Inspector General of Police Haider Ashraf said the arrested activists belonged to Tehreek-i-Labaik Ya Rasool Allah, a coalition of extremist groups who were planning to attack people staging a commemoration the anniversary of the governor’s killing. Tehreek-i-Labaik Ya Rasool Allah could not be reached for comment. Security was tight in the eastern city of Lahore throughout the day. Police locked down many parts of Lahore to prevent demonstrators from gathering, causing massive traffic jams.
Last February, Pakistan executed Taseer’s killer, but tens of thousands of supporters turned up at his funeral and hailed him as a hero of Islam. Those arrested were booked for disrupting law and order and assaulting police. The head of the Labaik group, Maulana Khadim Hussain Rizvi, was also among those

Bahraini Authorities Accuse Isa Qassim of Transferring $14 Million to Iranian Bank

Obaid Al-Suhaymi/Asharq Al Awsat/January 06/17/
Manama – A high court in Bahrain adjourned the trial of Isa Qassim and two of his deputies which was closed on June 14, 2016 in the case of illegal fundraising and money laundering by the Islamic Awareness Society. The case was postponed to January 30. Bahraini authorities that investigated several local societies accused of money laundering and illegal fund-raising acts had frozen Qassim’s bank account. He has been charged along with two other suspects of “illegal fundraising, money laundering and financial transactions to conceal their source and add legitimacy to them.”Earlier, the court requested the Central Bank of Bahrain a report on Qassim’s financial activities, which revealed he had four bank accounts in Future Bank, formerly known as Bank Melli Iran. The amount of money deposited summed up to around $14 million in four different accounts in Iranian banks, while the withdrawal from those accounts reached $6.6 million, according to the report of the Central Bank. The Central Bank also proved that the remained amounts were about $8.857 million. Hussein al-Qassam, another felon in the same case, was accused of withdrawing money of the amount $1.5 million from Isa Qassim’s four accounts. In July 2016, Bahraini authorities revoked Qassim’s citizenship, while the Public Prosecution investigated into the methods of raising money, determining its sources, and how it was spent.
“The religious figure succeeded in sending a large amount from the funds raised to Iran and Iraq in breach of the rules for financial remittance and disclosure. These amounts were received by foreign entities and organizations hostile to Bahrain,” said the prosecution at the time.

Member of Syrian National Coalition: Iran Regime Is the One to Suffer Syria Ceasefire
NCRI/Jaqnuary 06/17/ Following the adoption of the UN Security Council resolution on Syria, Orient TV has conducted an interview with Yasser Farhan, member of the Syrian National Coalition’s political committee. He believes that the one who is suffering the ceasefire in Syria is the Iranian regime.
Orient TV: how does the Syrian National Coalition see the UN Security Council resolution?
Yasser Farhan, Syrian National Coalition member:
Naturally, ceasefire is an absolute necessity for Syrian people. It’s a real interest and the main demand of the revolutionary forces and the Syrian opposition. The ones who open fire on the citizens and use different kinds of banned weapons are Assad and Iranian regimes. The Free Syrian Army is most committed to the ceasefire. The Free Syrian Army has made the ceasefire happen. The other side has recognized the revolutionary forces and the armed opposition as the main negotiator. Actually, the Free Syrian Army has succeeded to force the other side into granting this right. The Free Syrian Army is honestly committed to this agreement. The problem is the deceptive, hypocritical practices Assad and Iranian regime keep resorting to. One of these hypocritical measures is changing the ceasefire deal which the Free Syrian Army has signed and reached an agreement with Russia on its terms. The resolution adopted in UN Security Council is reasonable, the problem is in its enforcement mechanisms. We count on Turkey’s role, honestly trying to implement the deal. We need to make sure, however, that the Russians are neutral. The problem is continued ceasefire violations by Assad and Iranian regimes, which has been going on until now. The two regimes know pretty well that once they abandon the military solution and a ceasefire is achieved, they definitely will not have the possibility to continue their rule or occupation in Syria. It’s impossible that the interests of Syrian people coincide with those of the Iranian regime.

Ankara Threatened That Those Who Violate the Ceasefire in Syria Will Face Sanctions
NCRI/Jaqnuary 06/17/ The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey, Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu stated that Turkey will cooperate with Russia to punish those who violate the ceasefire in Syria.
On 5th of January 2017, Al-Jazeera TV reported that the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey has accused Assad regime, Hezbollah and the backed-up militants of the Iranian regime of violating the ceasefire in Syria. He urged Iran to put pressure on Hezbollah in order to stop violating the ceasefire.
On 5th of January 2017, Al-Arabiya TV also reported that Turkey imposes sanction on those circles that violate the ceasefire in Syria. There is not still any sign of cooperation between Russia and Turkey as well.
Ankara and Moscow threatened to boycott those parties who disrupt ceasefire provisions. Meanwhile, Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu urged Iran to put pressure on Assad regime and its backed-up militants to stop military operations in Wadi Barada, Syria. The threats made by Ankara are concurrent with the upcoming peace negotiation which is going to be held in Astana, Kazakhstan at the end of this month.
The area of Wadi Barada is being bombed and shelled for several consecutive days by the Assad forces and militants affiliated with the regime. The Human Rights Organization of Syria announced that Assad forces have advanced to this area and they have reached near the city of Ail Al-Fije which has the main water resources that supply Damascus. Nevertheless, some opposition groups believe that the advancement of militants into the areas is completely wrong.
Despite the ongoing protests that threaten the ceasefire agreement signed by Russia and Turkey, the Assad regime intends to continue the practice.
In order to protest against the wars and violation of ceasefire, the militants of the Syrian Opposition have recently announced that they have suspended the peace negotiation with the Assad regime which is going to be held in the capital of Kazakhstan, Astana.
The militants of the Syrian Opposition call for stopping the military attacks of the Assad regime and its militia, redeployment of the international observers to monitor the ceasefire and also fixing the main water power station of Al-Fije which has been damaged due to bombings.
According to the news, the Assad regime fired Wadi Barada area on Wednesday 4th of January 2017. However, the local authorities reached an agreement with the Russian officers.
According to the agreement, the Russian officers would be deployed to the area in order to monitor the ceasefire. Nevertheless, the Hezbollah forces prevented these officers from entering to Wadi Barada area. As a result, the Russian officers returned to Damascus.

Iran: The Conflict Between Government's Branches; Plunders & Loots
NCRI/Jaqnuary 06/17/ Hassan Rouhani's government has conflicted with the Judiciary of Iran on a case of robbery to an amount of 3 billion dollars. The conflict has arisen at the peak of public hatred regarding social disasters. The plunders and loots done by the Iranian regime are disclosed more than ever.
The first Deputy of the Judiciary accused the government of cheating. He requested that the financial resources of Rouhani's campaign in the last presidential election have to be announced.
On Wednesday of December 4th 2016, the first Deputy and the Spokesman of the Judiciary, Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje'I in a meeting stressed that the bank accounts of the Judiciary are completely transparent. As Hassan Rouhani has twitted yesterday that the government is ready to set up a system to reveal all income and expenditures, Eje'I responded:"Well, why not? Nobody has stopped you."
Gholam-Hossein Mohseni Eje'I also addressed Akbar Torkan who was the Deputy Campaign Manager of Hassan Rouhani in 2013, saying that he should unconditionally release the sources of the campaign.
Akbar Torkan had earlier stated that Rouhani's campaign will release the accounts information provided that all candidates also announce that whom they have received money from in the presidential election of 2013.
The spokesman of the Judiciary said:"I ask you how much does a person require for a presidential campaign? Certainly more than 20 billion Tomans. Well, you tell, where did this money come from?"
The conflict between two branches of the regime started when Hassan Rouhani announced in the last week that the Judiciary has prevented to deliver Babak Zanjani to the Ministry of Intelligence and it has not yet been ascertained who his accomplices were and why they are in such positions now.
The head of the Judiciary of the Regime, Sadegh Larijani on 3rd of January 2017 retorted to Rouhani that Babak Zanjani has donated to Rouhani's campaign in the presidential election of 2013, as he claims.
Sadegh Larijani reiterated that:"we do not have anything to say now. We can summon those who are alleged by Babak Zanjani and if needed we will apprehend them to figure out the case."
One day after that, Hassan Rouhani twitted that he is ready to establish a system to provide clarification about the government's accounts. Meanwhile, he asked the Judiciary to release its accounts information as well.
The two MPs have asked Sadegh Larijani to clarify about the amount of deposit which has been transferred from the Judiciary to his personal bank account.
The Senior Advisor of Hassan Rouhani, Akbar Torkan (who was also his Deputy Campaign at the time of presidential election) in an interview with Jamaran Website claimed that Babak Zanjani has never donated to Rouhani's campaign and this is a blatant lie.
In the midst of this conflict, the Spokesman of the Guardian Council implicitly threatened Rouhani that he will be disqualified for the next presidential election.
Abbas Ali Kadkhodaei contended that the Guardian Council has always assessed the eligibility of presidents closely and there is no guarantee that a president would be qualified for the second pres

Iran: How Trump can help the conflict in Syria
NCRI/Jaqnuary 06/17/ On 12th December last year, President-elect Donald Trump told Gerald Seib of The Wall Street Journal that during his presidency the U.S. will “stop looking to topple regimes and overthrow governments”. However, it is possible that Trump can help the situation in Syria, or at least stop it from getting worse, without trying to topple a regime or overthrow a government.
Trump could urge countries with foreign fighters in Syria to leave. With Aleppo in the hands of the regime, Russia could easily abandon its support for Assad and aid a peaceful transition in Syria.
Iran is trying to keep Assad at the centre of its regional strategy and has done since 2011 when the Syrian civil war started. Commander of Iran’s Quds Special Force Qassem Suleimani has the task of ensuring that Russia remains in Syria, which it has.
Why is the Iranian regime so desperate to stay in Syria? Well, mainly because the Iranian regime has next to no legitimacy in its own country. The people of Iran have been repressed to the extreme and has very little popularity at home. Therefore, the regime has to keep its hard image in another way and abroad.
In Iran, people are reaching the end of their tether and opposition is stronger than ever. In 2009 there was an enormous crackdown on protesters and supporters of the opposition. Many of those killed were members of the PMOI / MEK (People’s Mojahedin Organisation of Iran). PMOI members are growing and the regime is realising it is fruitless to undermine its power and support from all over the world.
In 1988, the Islamic Republic ordered the execution of over 30,000 political prisoners with the hope of destroying the MEK. Yet it is still around and has more support than ever. In fact, it is a major part of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) and is a friend of the Syrian opposition.
On 3rd December last year, President Obama shunned Israel and reached out to Iran at the United Nations vote. Trump is expected to take a different approach. He will “destroy” terrorists rather than attacking the leaders with drones.
If Trump were to keep the same policies in place as Obama, the Syrian opposition would never be able to survive. If however Trump manages to pull all foreign influences out of Syria and away from Assad, the opposition has a chance to survive. It needs to be a fair war in which Assad doesn’t have the support of tens of thousands of militias from Iran.
 
 MEF's Legal Project Funds a Major Victory in Canada
 News from the Middle East Forum/ January 5, 2017
 http://www.meforum.org/6471/mef-legal-project-funds-major-victory-in-canada
 Djemila Benhabib was sued for criticizing the "indoctrination" of students at a Muslim private school.
 PHILADELPHIA – Jan. 5, 2017 – A Quebec Superior Court has found feminist author Djemila Benhabib not guilty of defamation for telling a radio host that the Muslim School of Montreal gives its students "an indoctrination worthy of military camps in Afghanistan and Pakistan."
 "From now on freedom of expression will be better off in our democratic society," said Ms. Benhabib. "In helping me, the Middle East Forum's Legal Project has played such an important part in that matter."
 In 2012 radio interviews, Ms. Benhabib criticized the school for teaching "extremely violent" and "misogynistic" Koranic verses to students, and for "spreading a message of hatred." She said the school "is creating fundamentalist activists who in a few years will be demanding accommodations and all sorts of bizarre things."
 Ms. Benhabib also blasted the school for creating an alternate society "where women walk behind men with their heads down ... and men are probably going to commit honor crimes against their sisters."
 The school sued Ms. Benhabib for CAD 95,000. The Legal Project helped fund her legal defense.
 According to Marc-André Nadon, Ms. Benhabib's attorney, "The Superior Court's decision will undeniably have a substantial impact ... on the right to comment on and to criticize religious beliefs and education."
 The Legal Project protects the public discussion of Islam and related topics in the West, by assisting victims of predatory lawsuits and malign legislation.
 The Middle East Forum promotes American interests through activist, intellectual, and philanthropic efforts.
 For immediate release
 For more information, contact: Gregg Roman, Director
 Roman@MEForum.org

Investigators return to question Netanyahu over alleged receipt of gifts
Reuters, Jerusalem Friday, 6 January 2017/Israeli police officers on Thursday questioned Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu under caution for a second time this week on suspicion of taking gifts from businessmen in breach of his role as a public servant. Police said the session, which lasted some five hours, was held at Netanyahu’s official residence in Jerusalem. A first interrogation that took place on Monday lasted three hours. In questioning a suspect under caution, police believe that the person they are interviewing has a case to answer. “The investigation under caution of (Netanyahu’s) alleged receipt of benefits continued today and involved questioning about another affair ... due to a fear of disrupting the investigation, no further details can be revealed at the moment,” a police statement said. It added that during the past two days, an additional suspect, who was not named, was also questioned. Netanyahu has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and has told his political rivals not to expect his imminent downfall. “Wait with the celebrations, don’t rush,” Netanyahu told lawmakers in parliament earlier this week before questioning began. “I’ve said it before and I’ll say it once again: there will be nothing because there is nothing.”The move to interview the Israeli leader was authorized by Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit, who decided after a preliminary inquiry that there was enough evidence to open a criminal investigation. He has not detailed the suspicions. “The nature of the investigation precludes us at this stage from giving details of the ongoing investigation but we will consider releasing more information from time to time according to developments,” Mandelblit said in a statement on Monday. The left-wing Haaretz newspaper and other news outlets have said the probe relates to gifts worth “hundreds of thousands of shekels” given to Netanyahu by an Israeli and foreign businessmen. Channel 2, a commercial network, said the investigation was one of two cases now open against the prime minister, although it said details of the second remained unclear. Netanyahu is not the first prime minister to be questioned in a criminal case and Israeli commentators have pointed out that although he is being questioned, as has happened many times before, prime ministers have continued to stay in their post, sometimes for years.

Vice-President Biden tells Trump to ‘grow up’
AFP Friday, 6 January 2017/US Vice-President Joe Biden has a blunt suggestion for President-elect Donald Trump: It is time to “grow up.”Asked about a few of Trump’s controversial remarks and tweets since winning the November election, Biden had some intemperate comments of his own. “Grow up Donald, grow up, time to be an adult, you’re president,” he told television station PBS in an interview broadcast Thursday. “Time to do something. Show us what you have.” Trump earlier on Thursday described America’s leading congressional Democrat as the “head clown.”Biden has indicated he will not step away from the political fray entirely when he leaves office with President Barack Obama on January 20. The vice president has already been chiming in on how Democrats should respond to their shock election defeat, suggesting a renewed focus on the working and middle class. “It’s going to be much clearer what he’s for and against and what we’re for and against,” Biden told PBS.

Four Yemeni nationals from Guantanamo arrive in Riyadh
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Thursday, 5 January 2017/Four Yemenis from Guantanamo Bay military prison arrived in Riyadh on Thursday evening , in President Barack Obama’s final push to shrink the inmate population there despite pressure from the president-elect to halt such releases.Last April, Saudi Arabia - one of the top US allies in the region - accepted nine Yemenis under a long-negotiated deal between Washington and Riyadh. It will be the first in Obama’s final flurry of transfers aimed at sending as many as 19 prisoners to at least four countries, including Italy, Oman and the United Arab Emirates, before Donald Trump is sworn in on Jan. 20. If the final transfers go according to plan, only about 40 prisoners will remain at Guantanamo, despite Obama’s pledge to close the controversial facility at the US naval base in Cuba. (With Reuters)

Egypt Arrests Suspected Cairo Checkpoint Attackers

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 06/17/Egyptian authorities have detained three people suspected of planning and carrying out a Cairo police checkpoint bombing that killed six policemen last month, the interior ministry said Thursday. In footage published by the interior ministry, one of the suspects, Mahmoud Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed, confessed he planted an explosive device at the checkpoint on December 9 in Cairo's Al-Haram street. Investigations showed the perpetrators belonged to the newly-emerged Hassam Movement, the ministry said. Hassam had claimed responsibility for the attack. The two others arrested are members of the group operating its hideouts and handling its logistics, the ministry said. Authorities located hideouts for the group in Cairo's October 6 district, the ministry added. During raids by security forces on these hideouts, another suspect was killed in a gunfight, while police found items including footage recorded while the attackers were monitoring the checkpoint ahead of the bombing, according to the ministry. In the video confession, the suspect Ahmed said he joined the Muslim Brotherhood in 2015, and in mid-2016 he was told his subgroup had joined Hassam. After monitoring policemen's homes and security convoys, the group scoped out the Al-Haram street checkpoint before planning their attack.
 On the day of the explosion, the attackers moved close to the checkpoint and pretended their car had broken down. Ahmed placed an explosive device shaped like a rock near the checkpoint before another attacker set it off as they left in their car, he said in the video confession. Attacks on security forces have escalated since the military's July 2013 ouster of former Islamist president Mohamed Morsi, who hails from the Muslim Brotherhood group, and a crackdown on Islamists. Analysts had warned that Islamists affiliated with the Brotherhood, though not necessarily under their control, could step up violence in the face of the crackdown. Militants in North Sinai province, at the heart of an insurgency against security forces, pledged allegiance to the Islamic State jihadist group in November 2014. Most attacks in Cairo have been claimed by Hassam and another little-known group, Lawaa al-Thawra. IS claimed responsibility for a December 11 bomb attack inside a Cairo church that killed 27 people.

Arab coalition airstrikes pound Houthis
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Friday, 6 January 2017/Arab coalition airstrikes pounded scores of positions of Houthi militias and their ally, former Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh, while the Yemeni government army and Popular Resistance forces steadily score remarkable advances by pushing forward on all fronts. During the 24 hours, the coalition carried out 20 airstrikes on various militia targets in Saada, Lahaj and Taiz, which also destroyed a ballistic missile launch pad in the Directorate of Zibab. The aerial bombardments followed a missile attack launched by the militias group against Yemeni government forces positioned in Bab al-Mandab.
Pushed out
On the ground, Yemeni government forces progress incessantly, recovering a strategic mountainous area in Bihan valley exposing the supply lines of the militias to al-Safra area. Meanwhile, the militias have been pushed out of several tactical highlands and spots in Taiz, amid fierce clashes between the warring sides in Shabwa governorate.

Vice-President Biden tells Trump to ‘grow up’

AFP Friday, 6 January 2017/US Vice-President Joe Biden has a blunt suggestion for President-elect Donald Trump: It is time to “grow up.”Asked about a few of Trump’s controversial remarks and tweets since winning the November election, Biden had some intemperate comments of his own. “Grow up Donald, grow up, time to be an adult, you’re president,” he told television station PBS in an interview broadcast Thursday. “Time to do something. Show us what you have.” Trump earlier on Thursday described America’s leading congressional Democrat as the “head clown.”Biden has indicated he will not step away from the political fray entirely when he leaves office with President Barack Obama on January 20. The vice president has already been chiming in on how Democrats should respond to their shock election defeat, suggesting a renewed focus on the working and middle class. “It’s going to be much clearer what he’s for and against and what we’re for and against,” Biden told PBS.

Bangladesh police kill prime suspect in July cafe attack
Reuters, Dhaka Friday, 6 January 2017/Bangladesh counter-terrorism police shot dead two militants on Friday in a gunfight in Dhaka, including a prime suspect in the slaughter of 20 hostages, mostly foreigners, in an attack on a cafe in the capital last year. Nurul Islam Marjan, a commander of a splinter group of the Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) group, was killed along with another militant, Monirul Islam, chief of Dhaka’s counter-terrorism police said. Marjan was on a police wanted list for his role in the attack on the cafe last July. So far police have hunted down and killed at least 40 militants linked to the cafe attack, including mastermind Tamim Chowdhury. Police have attributed several attacks over the past two years to JMB, which says it is affiliated to ISIS although the government insists ISIS has no presence in Bangladesh. Also read: Militant suspected in Bangladesh cafe attack killed himself, police say. In September, police arrested Marjan’s wife, Shaila Afrin Prioyti, along with other two female militants in Dhaka. Marjan, who studied Arabic at Chittagong University, had disappeared a year ago from his family’s village in Pabna district, 160 km north of the capital, police said. While the government has dismissed ISIS’s claim of responsibility for the attack on the cafe, security experts say the scale and sophistication of the assault suggested links to trans-national networks. Investigators are still seeking Syed Mohammad Ziaul Haque, a militant who was an army major before his dismissal from the forces. 

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 06-07/17
Question: "What is the conscience?"ما هو الضمير بالمفهوم الإنجيلي
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/01/06/what-is-the-conscience/

GotQuestions.org

Answer: The conscience is defined as that part of the human psyche that induces mental anguish and feelings of guilt when we violate it and feelings of pleasure and well-being when our actions, thoughts and words are in conformity to our value systems. The Greek word translated “conscience” in all New Testament references is suneidēsis, meaning “moral awareness” or “moral consciousness.” The conscience reacts when one’s actions, thoughts, and words conform to, or are contrary to, a standard of right and wrong.
There is no Hebrew term in the Old Testament equivalent to suneidēsis in the New Testament. The lack of a Hebrew word for “conscience” may be due to the Jewish worldview, which was communal rather than individual. The Hebrew considered himself as a member of a covenant community that related corporately to God and His laws, rather than as an individual. In other words, the Hebrew was confident in his own position before God if the Hebrew nation as a whole was in good fellowship with Him.
The New Testament concept of conscience is more individual in nature and involves three major truths. First, conscience is a God-given capacity for human beings to exercise self-evaluation. Paul refers several times to his own conscience being “good” or “clear” (Acts 23:1; 24:16; 1 Corinthians 4:4). Paul examined his own words and deeds and found them to be in accordance with his morals and value system, which were, of course, based on God’s standards. His conscience verified the integrity of his heart.
Second, the New Testament portrays the conscience as a witness to something. Paul says the Gentiles have consciences that bear witness to the presence of the law of God written on their hearts, even though they did not have the Mosaic Law (Romans 2:14-15). He also appeals to his own conscience as a witness that he speaks the truth (Romans 9:1) and that he has conducted himself in holiness and sincerity in his dealings with men (2 Corinthians 1:12). He also says that his conscience tells him his actions are apparent to both God and the witness of other men’s consciences (2 Corinthians 5:11). Third, the conscience is a servant of the individual’s value system. An immature or weak value system produces a weak conscience, while a fully informed value system produces a strong sense of right and wrong. In the Christian life, one’s conscience can be driven by an inadequate understanding of scriptural truths and can produce feelings of guilt and shame disproportionate to the issues at hand. Maturing in the faith strengthens the conscience.
This last function of the conscience is what Paul addresses in his instructions regarding eating food sacrificed to idols. He makes the case that, since idols are not real gods, it makes no difference if food has been sacrificed to them or not. But some in the Corinthian church were weak in their understanding and believed that such gods really existed. These immature believers were horrified at the thought of eating food sacrificed to the gods, because their consciences were informed by erroneous prejudices and superstitious views. Therefore, Paul encourages those more mature in their understanding not to exercise their freedom to eat if it would cause the consciences of their weaker brothers to condemn their actions. The lesson here is that, if our consciences are clear because of mature faith and understanding, we are not to cause those with weaker consciences to stumble by exercising the freedom that comes with a stronger conscience. Another reference to conscience in the New Testament is to a conscience that is “seared” or rendered insensitive as though it had been cauterized with a hot iron (1 Timothy 4:1-2). Such a conscience is hardened and calloused, no longer feeling anything. A person with a seared conscience no longer listens to its promptings, and he can sin with abandon, delude himself into thinking all is well with his soul, and treat others insensitively and without compassion.
As Christians, we are to keep our consciences clear by obeying God and keeping our relationship with Him in good standing. We do this by the application of His Word, renewing and softening our hearts continually. We consider those whose consciences are weak, treating them with Christian love and compassion.
Recommended Resource: Conscience: What It Is, How to Train It, and Loving Those Who Differ by Naselli & Crowley

Iran sees hailing Assad as top priority
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya/January 06/17
While images of Iran homeless living in graves sock the nation, Iran’s state outlets and Persian-language newspapers decided instead to focus on the economic and strategic cooperation between Damascus and Tehran, and the meetings between the Syria’s Foreign Minister Walid Muallem and senior Iranian officials in Tehran including Iran’s President Hassan Rowhani, Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council Ali Shamkhani.
Oscar-winning film director Asghar Farhadi wrote an open letter to Rowhani. Farhardi suggested Iranian politicians to go into the streets to see how people are living. “Today, I read a shocking report about men, women and children who are living in graves of a cemetery near Tehran in these cold nights and now I am full of shame and have tears in my eyes,” Farhadi wrote. Although the lifting of sanctions and the release of billions of dollars to the Iranian governments have provided significant economic boost to Iran’s officials, the living standards of Iran’s ordinary people are becoming harder and harder. Unemployment and inflation have reached record high. One crucial factor behind the increasing poverty in Iran is Tehran’s spending of national wealth on supporting Assad and its proxies rather than assisting its own people. Financial corruptions and economic mismanagements are other reasons as well.
Assistance to Assad
The high-level meetings between Iranian and Syrian leaders were to reassert Iran’s financial, military, strategic, and geopolitical support to Assad’s forces. The meetings were also to send a message to the world that Iran and Syrian are on the winning side when it comes to the Syrian war.
Muallem also met with Ali Akbar Velayati, close advisor of the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and director of the Strategic Studies Center of Iran’s Expediency Council. To boast about Iran and Syria military capabilities, Velayati praised the recent military operations of Assad’s forces in Aleppo and he called the battle as “the victory of victories”. Velayati added: “The Islamic Republic of Iran has had long term and strategic relations with Syria since (the presidency of) Mr. Hafez al-Assad and it will continue…. The Islamic Republic of Iran has always stand beside the Syrian nation in various political arenas and will continue its supports and the Syrian nation will be the winner,”
One crucial factor behind rising poverty in Iran is its spending of national wealth on supporting Assad and its proxies rather than assisting its own people. Iran is now utilizing the ceasefire card as it desires to serve its geopolitical and ideological interests. After Russia, Iran and Assad’s forces heavily shelled the city of Aleppo and caused the oppositional groups to retreat, Tehran, Moscow and Damascus are advocating for ceasefire to maintain hold of the gained territories. In addition, by utilizing the ceasefire card, Iranian, Russian and Syrian leaders attempt to divert the international outcry regarding the humanitarian tragedy that occurred in Aleppo. The truce does not mean that Iran, Syria and Russia are seeking a permanent political resolution, but searching for regaining the whole territories under their control. In a telephone conversation on December 31, Rowhani spoke with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin emphasizing that the war will continue.
“Moderates” and “hardliners” support Assad equally
Iran’s publicized reception of Muallem and his delegation is aimed at sending a message to anti-Assad forces that the Islamic Republic’s support for Assad and his forces will remain robust as it has been in the nearly six-year Syrian war.
Iranian leaders, across the political spectrum, agree on Iran’s strategies and tactics in Syria. During his visit with Muallem, Rowhani pointed out: “The Islamic Republic of Iran has always stood by the Syrian nation in their resistance and at different political scenes, and will continue its support in the future,” and he added “We are confident that the Syrian people will achieve a final victory and success.”
Iran still views the destiny of the Syrian conflict as a grave matter of national security. Any change in the Syrian political establishment would significantly impact Iran’s regional influence and it will tip the regional balance of power against Tehran.
Iran is committed to view Assad, Tehran’s proxies, and its regional hegemonic ambitions as the priorities, rather than focusing on improving the living standards of its own citizens. Iran is committed to continue its financial, military, advisory intelligence, and political support to Assad. Tehran has provided Assad with billions of dollars in line credits, forces from Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps, recruiting Shiite militias from other countries including Afghanistan to fight in Syria, employing Iran’s proxies such as Hezbollah to help Assad forces.
As long as there exist no powerful collation to counter Iran’s influence in Syria, Khamenei and IRGC will not alter their geopolitical and strategic calculation in supporting Assad’s forces.

Why Arabs hate Obama?
Mamdouh AlMuhaini/Al Arabiya/January 06/17
President Obama’s relations with Arabs and Muslims started on a good note, then witnessed betrayal and ended up with hatred. The most powerful president of the world ignored the massacres that took the lives of Arab and Muslim children. He continued to remain silent despite terrorist Sunni and Shiite militias targeting towns and villages. He even entered into a deal with their biggest enemy.
But who is guilty – us or him? May be both. In fact, we did not understand his approach and policies properly. We had high expectations and insisted on seeing him as an exceptional president who will change the face of the world, even before he entered the White House.
In just two weeks, Obama will leave office and it is not difficult to analyze his legacy. He has been neither great nor miserable. He is neither extraordinary – as we expected – nor bad. He seemed to be a technocrat steeped in local issues without a global vision as president of the most powerful nation in the world should have.
The first mistake we made was in reading and understanding his Cairo University speech, which he delivered in 2009. We were moved by the emotional fervor that accompanied the victory of an African-American whose father’s name was Hussein and who was of Muslim origin. His father was in fact an atheist. We ignored the message that he had sent, which clearly stated that he wanted to withdraw from the Middle East as soon as possible.
His speech was entitled “The New Beginning” but those who carefully listened to it knew that its real title should have been more like “goodbye.” He used Arabic words in his speech and talked about his memories in Indonesia as a child. He touched the Arabs and Muslims by mentioning the glories of their ancient civilization.
All this psychological manipulation was to calm them down following the wave of anger toward America especially after the era of President George W. Bush. He then distanced himself from our region and this is what literally happened after that.
Understanding foreign policy
The second mistake was in understanding his foreign policy. On an intellectual level, Obama did not believe that diluting the monopoly over global affairs, which was constantly echoed by his predecessors, would devalue the “greatness of America”. Those who were close to him had the same vision. During his tenure, he changed three defense ministers: Bob Gates, Leon Panetta, and Chuck Hagel, because they did not have the same approach like him.
The only moment that Obama expressed a strong desire to intervene in foreign affairs was a mere emotional outburst that ended right after stepping into the White House. That was the famous threat of taking Assad down; which is now infamously known as the “red line”.
Obama’s critics were asking things from him that he did not have. Those who begged, out of humanitarian and moral duties, for the US use of force that is capable of blowing up the planet to save the children from explosive barrels, forgot that he decided from the beginning to be a spectator. He demonstrated more interest in US internal issues, such as health reforms and raising wages.
On an intellectual level, Obama did not believe that diluting the monopoly over global affairs, which was constantly echoed by his predecessors, would devalue the “greatness of America”
He appeared stubborn and lacked compassion toward the terrible events that shook the world, like for instance the images of Aylan Kurdi, the Syrian child who was found drowned and Omran Daqneesh. His disdain for what happens outside his country’s borders was clear as he used to receive terrible news of tragedies in Syria committed by the Assad regime. Yet he reacted; he was always busy on his BlackBerry.
The only argument that he used to resort to repeatedly was that the United States intervened in Iraq and the results were negative. One of the journalists once responded by saying: “But the world does not end in Iraq!”
He did not even take into consideration the American intellectual and politicians’ criticism. It was not a matter of morality, but rather a matter of maintaining international order, interests and influence toward a “world that the US had created” as stated in the title of a book written by one of his critics.
Approach to terrorism
Moreover, we did not understand Obama’s approach toward terrorism. It was perplexing to see ISIS, one of the most evil organizations, expanding during his tenure and committing dreadful massacres that no one had imagined in the 21st century. The US President believes that terrorism is the Muslim problem and should be dealt with away from the American shores. He thinks that he defeated terrorism when the US took down Osama bin Laden and confirmed that the intensity of terrorism has decreased. He insisted on his position, although everybody believed that it was not true; he also limited himself to unmanned drones. Obama expressed his interest in global warming issues and, in The Atlantic magazine interview, considered it more important than all of our issues today. The main reason behind all this was Obama’s orientation toward politics. He probably considered himself smarter and more educated than those in his government. Hence he used to think, decide and dictate without taking into consideration the advice of others, such as Hillary Clinton, whom he marginalized when she was secretary of state. The same happened to Richard Holbrook who died without getting the chance to convince him to change his tactic in Afghanistan. Obama was not able to become friends with other leaders. He distanced himself and remained secluded. He only became friends with Dmitry Medvedev and that was due to both being lawyers. It is said that he preferred to have dinner with his wife and two daughters rather than going to cocktail parties and meeting members of the Congress to strengthen his friendship and get their approval on his projects.
The social media generation
He currently does not have Republican friends or allies; therefore, his Obamacare program might be under threat of revocation by Trump. Obama believes that he belongs to the Facebook and Twitter generation yet he does not need to shoot short clips to communicate with his supporters and admirers. He does not either believe that he should be sitting with political figures who are opposed to his vision. Obama is not a president who failed domestically. He has contributed to economic reforms and saving the automobile industry. He also endorsed an important health project even though it had several weaknesses. He is a good orator and his book “Dreams from My Father” is one of the best biographies. However, the US president is the head of the world and “an indispensable nation,” as Bill Clinton rightly said. The US has eradicated evil regimes such as Nazism and fascism, weakened barbaric groups like al-Qaeda and maintained a liberal order, in which we are living today after the decline of the European powers.
Obama is the first US president to be hated by so many Arabs, whether they were conservatives, liberals, intellectuals, artists, traders, taxi drivers or carpenters. Strangely this time, they are right!
**This article is available in Arabic at Al-Arabiya.net
 
Dialogue With Iran is an Unrealistic Idea
Salman Al-dossary/Asharq Al Awsat/January 06/17
http://english.aawsat.com/2017/01/article55365044/opinion-dialogue-iran-unrealistic-idea
The story is not about the terrorist attack on a prison in Bahrain using pistols and automatic rifles in the style of films that resulted in a police officer being killed and 10 dangerous prisoners to escape. Nor was it about the planning that accompanied the operation which seems more likely to be carried out by intelligence services than members of a gang.
The real story is about Iran’s support for this operation which was exposed to the world when it conveyed an honest message via the satellite channel “Ahl Al-Bayt” encouraging the operation and describing it as “successful”. Although this Iranian admission is not new to the people of the region who are well aware of Iranian strategy, it defeated calls for Gulf- Iranian dialogue that the west and some well-intentioned Arabs make from time to time.
Since the conclusion of the Iranian nuclear deal, there is an idea circulating in western circles that government officials and western ministers are speaking frankly about and promoting. This idea is that the agreement provides an opportunity to take the first step in establishing a new security system in the Arabian Gulf in order to improve relations between Iran and Arab Gulf states. The launch of such a dialogue will provide a platform to address many security challenges and contribute to easing tension, crisis management and conflict prevention.
This is great, the terms are impeccable and the ideas on paper are wonderful and extremely ideal. Unfortunately, however, this is not applicable, and is closer to impossible. It is highly unlikely that Iran will openly declare hostility and carry out terrorism in word and deed. However, this has been overlooked only to ensure the success of the miserable nuclear deal. Perhaps it is time to restructure the deal as the President-elect Donald Trump has repeatedly stated.
The dialogue between any two parties in diplomatic relations is never an objective, rather it is a means. Repeated terms such as resolving political differences through negotiation and dialogue are correct in principle but impossible to implement when one of the parties refuses to give up its aggressive policy which has become a structural part of the nature of its political system, and when it wants to begin the dialogue from the point where its militias, which are scattered in the region, left off. Every time that the Gulf states tried to practice the principles of good neighbourliness and mutual respect with its neighbour Iran, they were shocked by its policies that oppose all of these principles.
Dialogue and negotiation to make viewpoints converge have never been a Gulf demand whilst Iran has never respected the rules of this dialogue. The most important difference between the Iranian and Gulf sides is Tehran’s insistence on continuing with its policy of intervening in the affairs of the region, destabilising its security and stability and even announcing this openly more than once.
This week last year, Saudi Arabia cut diplomatic relations with Iran after Iranians set fire to the Saudi Embassy in Tehran and its consulate in the city of Mashhad. This followed Saudi Arabia’s announcement that Nimr Al-Nimr had been executed. A year has passed since relations between the two countries were cut, and Riyadh was not affected by this freeze in diplomatic relations as much as Iran was. The Gulf states are not in need of such relations as long as Iran does not stop its aggressive policy and exporting the Iranian revolution. Perhaps what is interesting here is what the last Iranian Ambassador to Riyadh Hussein Sadiqi said to the Iranian Sharq newspaper: “Saudi Arabia’s decision to cut ties has caused us great damage” and “I say frankly that Saudi Arabia was not looking for an excuse to cut ties with Iran”.
In light of the dangerous escalation of Iran’s expansionist policy involving its militias and agents in six Arab countries, the idea of dialogue with Iran seems illogical and cannot even be hinted at. However, the west’s opening up to Iran requires it to push for dialogue in order to achieve its goals. The west can open up to Iran as it likes but it must stop portraying the Gulf countries as the ones who refuse to participate in dialogue that is not beneficial and only beautifies the ugliness of the Iranian regime.

Obama and the Palestinian Fig Leaf
Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/January 06/17
http://english.aawsat.com/2017/01/article55365068/opinion-obama-palestinian-fig-leaf
In the days that Fleet Street was the home of the British press many clichés circulated in the public bars as gospel truth of journalism. One such was the claim that the safest issues to write an editorial about were Palestine and Afghanistan. Six hundred words on why Palestine needed a better deal or why Afghanistan had to be helped to develop its economy would make the writer feel good about himself while the paper could pose as a fount of wisdom- all that without committing anyone to anything let alone upsetting any applecart.
It seems that the administration of President Barack Obama has adopted at least part of the cliché by suddenly feeling an upsurge of sympathy for the Palestinian cause. For more than a week the White House has been spreading the news that the US decided not to veto a resolution critical of settlement buildings in Israel on Obama’s “firm instructions.”
The resolution, numbered 2334, is marketed as an attempt at reviving the mythical peace process by fomenting confusion regarding other key resolutions of the Security Council, on the subject, notably the famous 242. It makes a set of recommendations to Israel without even hinting at what might be done if they are ignored. More immediately, it gives Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu additional arguments in favor of its “stand firm and fast, no compromise” stance that he tries to justify with reference to an uncertain international situation compounded by Obama’s apparent wish to fire parting shots at his Israeli bête-noire.
You need not be an expert in diplomacy to know that the resolution reduces any chance there might have been for a two-state solution, a chimera put in circulation by the then juvenile United Nations and later given a second life by President George W Bush. Because Obama is intelligent enough to know this, the only reason for his 11th hour activism on this issue must be his desire to hide the total favor of his lackluster presidency, especially in international affairs. One could already imagine him claiming in his memoirs that he had “worked hard” for a two-state solution until the last moments of his presence in the White House. (I wish Senator George Mitchell would write about his experience as Obama’s Middle East peace appointee and how the 11th hour self-styled peacemaker effectively sabotaged every practical step in that direction.)
Those who might ask why Obama didn’t do a thing eight years, or even two years ago, must remember that he was more concerned with his petty electoral calculations than any desire for justice for the Palestinians. In 2008 he needed the support of Jewish Americans in such crucial states as Florida and Ohio; and they did help by giving him 85 per cent of their votes. Last year he had the same calculation, this time in favor of Mrs. Hillary Clinton, his Democrat Party’s presidential candidate. No longer in need of electoral calculations, he can rediscover a conscience that reminds him of his attachment in his youth to the Palestinian cause.
Obama’s foreign policy factotum John Kerry has also been searching for a fig leaf to hide the nakedness of his failure as Secretary of State. His entourage tells me that he wanted to make a big speech on the subject in 2014, presumably to divert attention from his and Obama’s abject failures on Georgia, the Baltic States, Turkey, Egypt, Poland, Ukraine and Syria among other places. According to the yarn spun by his entourage, Kerry did not trigger his logorrhea because Obama ordered him to remain silent after the 2016 presidential election.
With that order no longer in force, Kerry, too, could build a bit of a legacy with a 60-minute diatribe that is bound to be studied as a model of confusion and dishonesty in diplomacy. According to French officials, Kerry has also asked to be allowed to make another lengthy speech in Paris later this month on the same subject as another failed president, Francois Hollande, launches an international peace conference on Palestine in Paris. Well, there is no reason why Hollande should be denied the fig-leaf that Obama and Kerry try to procure for themselves in the name of Palestine.
Obama, Kerry and Hollande are not the first to try to look heroic at the expense of the Palestinians, and the Israelis who suffer and die in a 70-year old zugzwang carted by the so-called international community which has told Arabs, and more specifically Palestinians, that they need do nothing themselves to achieve a peace settlement with Israel: the UN is there to do the work by passing endless resolutions with no mechanism for implementation.
For people far from the conflict and with no real interest in it, adopting a heroic posture at the expense of the Palestinians, or the Israelis for that matter, is no big deal.
The problem is that such heroism bought at the expense of others who pay with their lives could only prolong a conflict that might have been resolved decades ago hadn’t others, starting with the British, the UN, the Arab League, the US, Soviets etc. not intervened, often with empty promises or self-centered schemes, on one side or another.
The Obama-Kerry tandem may yet engage in other shenanigans before they ride into the sunset. Their political careers over in disaster across the board, they have nothing to lose by posing as peacemakers while settling personals scores on the side.
The Palestinians and Israelis should learn that no outsider, even with the best of intentions, which is not the case with Obama and Kerry, could solve their problems for them. It is up to the Palestinians and Israelis to decide whether they could live together and on what terms. Big speeches and meaningless resolutions might camouflage that fact for a while but won’t deprive it of its urgency.

Egyptian Writers Argue Over Mosques' Calls To Prayer Using Loudspeakers
MEMRI/January 06/17
For several years, Egypt's Ministry of Religious Endowments has been attempting to get mosques to limit their use of loudspeakers for the five-times-daily call to prayer and even for broadcasting the prayers themselves, which is a source of disturbance for local residents. In April 2015, the ministry issued a directive permitting electronic amplification only for Friday services and for the five calls to prayer on other days, and specifying the precise time the calls must be broadcast. The directive also stipulated that violation would be punishable by docking the salaries of the relevant authorities.[1]
Additionally, in late November 2016, it was reported that the ministry was testing a system for broadcasting a single series of calls to prayer and a single Friday prayer service across the country, to be rolled out first in Cairo and its environs, in order to prevent the cacophony of multiple simultaneous calls and prayers.[2]
A debate recently developed on this issue among journalists writing for the Egyptian daily Al-Masri Al-Yawm. The debate followed the November 14, 2016 publication of an article by the paper's owner and founder Salah Diab, a businessman who also writes under the pen name Newton, criticizing mosques' use of amplification, and arguing that the public calls themselves had been necessary in the early Islamic period when people did not have watches and everyone needed reminding that it was time to come pray. Today, he wrote, the amplified calls constitute "noise pollution" that damages the environment, and particularly disturbs children and the sick and elderly. Diab added that some Islamic countries currently ban amplified calls to prayer, and that it detracts from the importance of the religion and the respect due it.
Nihad 'Asqalani, a former aide to Egypt's foreign minister and former ambassador to Lebanon, wrote an article supporting Diab's view, as did senior Al-Masri Al-Yawm writer Osama Al-Ghazali Harb, who stated that amplification is an environmental and public nuisance and that it should be banned entirely for smaller mosques. Both argued that, unlike the imams themselves, there is nothing in the religion that promotes amplification and it does not indicate piety.
On the other hand, Al-Masri Al-Yawm columnist 'Abd Al-Nasser Salama, who is a former editor of the official daily Al-Ahram, criticized Diab and the others, saying that the calls to prayer disturb no one, and they should not provoke the public in this way. If they don't like the noise, he wrote, they should keep their distance from mosques.
In a rebuttal article, Diab stressed that he was not complaining about the calls to prayer, only about their volume when amplified, and reiterated that they do indeed harm the environment and disgrace the religion.
It should be mentioned that this debate took place as Israel was debating a law banning similar amplification by mosques; however, only Salama referred to this.
The following report will highlight excerpts from the debate in the Egyptian press on this issue:
Salah Diab (image: Al-Masri Al-Yawm, Egypt, June 21, 2014)
Owner Of Egyptian Daily: Amplification Of Call To Prayer Constitutes Noise Pollution
In a November 14, 2016 article titled "The Minaret Wars," Salah Diab, writing under the pen name Newton, criticized the use of mosque loudspeakers due to the excessive noise it creates. He wrote: "My grandson came to visit me; I live in an area that is packed with mosques, both large and small. We strolled together in my garden, conversing quietly and innocently, as is natural for a grandfather and his grandson. The time for afternoon prayer came, and suddenly we heard a sound like an explosion, bursting forth from dozens of loudspeakers in the area all at once. I was startled to see my grandson start to cry, and that he was fearful and terrified.
"I drew him close to me in an attempt to reassure him. I was at a loss – what should I say? Should I apologize for what scared him? Should I tell him, 'Don't be afraid, my little one – these are merely innovations in our praiseworthy religion?' How could I explain to him that ignorance prevails in the country?
"The mosques have been taken over by those who are boastful and who compete with each other to have the loudest voice, by means of microphones! Perhaps the loudspeakers will increase the value of the religion!
"Since then, I have been confused and ashamed. Every time voices burst forth from the loudspeakers all around me, I remember that day, and that little one's terror, and it deeply saddens me.
"The same thing happens with Friday sermons – dozens of sermons mix together, blaring from mosque loudspeakers in every neighborhood, and it is impossible to tell them apart, or to focus on a single one; they infiltrate, uninvited, into homes.
"I neither support nor oppose a [countrywide] uniform sermon [in all the mosques],[3] but I condemn this noise pollution that recurs five times every day, without an explanation – it is just pointless clamor. What would be the harm if every preacher focused solely on his own worshippers – that is, on those who answered the call to come hear his sermon without the noise pollution that he produces outside his mosque?
"[Islam's first muezzin] Bilal bin Rabah[4] would call people to prayer without using a microphone. His voice was extremely pleasant. At that time, there was no such thing as a clock, [so] there was a reason for announcing the prayers so that everyone would know it was time [to come pray].
"Unfortunately, we use every new Western invention for harming the beautiful manifestations of our religion. The fundamental [things] that we were used to 1,400 years ago no longer give us pleasure. Moreover, we have made them into a source of noise and of torment for the sick, children, and the elderly.
"Turkey bans the use of microphones [for these purposes] and so does Morocco; [both are] Muslim countries proud of their religion, but [they do not allow] it to be used to torment others.[5]
"The Prophet, peace be upon him, said in a respected hadith: 'Allah is beautiful and loves beauty.' By Allah, is this racket, these clashing voices, this harassment, and this harm done to Allah's words related to beauty [in any way]?"[6]
Excerpt from Diab's first article on this issue
Former Egyptian Diplomat: Small Mosques' Amplification Is Pointless – And Is Rooted In Rivalry And The Wish To Promote Their Own Imams
As noted, Diab's article launched a debate among Al-Masri Al-Yawm writers. Thus, on November 17, three days after his original article was published, he published in his column a response by Nihad Asqalani, a former aide to Egypt's foreign minister and former ambassador to Lebanon, seconding Diab's criticism of mosques' use of amplification and expressing the hope that the government would ban it for small mosques: "My dear Newton, I agree with the premise of your article 'The Minaret Wars' dealing with the amplification used by large and small mosques. [In the past,] I yearned for legislation that criminalizes the use of outside loudspeakers other than for the call to prayer and the prayers themselves. But now I hope for a total ban on use of outside speakers, except perhaps for calls to prayer for large mosques, but not small ones. Then we can implement Allah's command: 'Do not pray [too] loudly or softly – find the middle way.' Meaning that [Allah commanded that we seek] moderation and the middle path...
"As for small mosques – this is a big problem. I live near Qasr Al-Eyni Street [in Cairo], and there are three small mosques around us, less than 100 meters apart, each no larger than a small apartment. They have no need for inside amplification. Nevertheless, each has an amplification system and outside speakers that broadcast calls to prayer and each of [the five] prayers every day, as well as Friday sermons. Sadly, there is no coordination among them, and the calls [to prayer] come minutes apart, as though each has its own separate [prayer] times.
"I hope you agree with me that unlike large mosques, small ones require no amplification, because all the worshippers can hear the muezzin or preacher just fine. But [the amplification] is for the rivalry among the small mosques, and for promoting their imams.
"Therefore, I hope that the government decides to ban amplification in small mosques and restrict it to large mosques only. I also hope that they only will use them for the calls to prayer, and not for broadcasting the prayer itself. These are only hopes, since [state] officials would never dare make such decisions..."[7]
Egyptian Writer: We Cannot Actualize Islam's Supremacy By Loudly Broadcasting Calls To Prayer And Friday Sermons
Egyptian journalist Osama Al-Ghazali Harb also wrote in support of Diab's position, adding that today there are many technological solutions allowing people to keep abreast of the correct times for prayers. He also, like Diab, argued that Islam's supremacy can only be actualized through good deeds, not through loudly broadcasting the muezzin's call to prayer and the prayers themselves: "Newton's November 15 [sic] article 'The Minaret Wars' in Al-Masri Al-Yawm, and Nihad Asqalani's November 18 [sic] follow-up piece, are worthy of debate, because the chaos surrounding the use of amplification in mosques, large and small, persists. Indeed, there might be no solution, even with [intervention by] religious endowments ministers, many of whom have tried to fight this, such as former minister Dr. Hamdi Zaqzouq and current Minister Dr. Mohamed Mokhtar Gomaa...
"I completely agree with Newton and Ambassador Asqalani, and I too argue that we must restrict the use of these loudspeakers to large mosques only, not small ones, and only for calls to prayer, not for the prayers themselves. The over[use of amplification] and the chaos [that it creates] have nothing to do with the religion or religious adherence. I remember that when this issue was raised one individual in favor of the use of loudspeakers said that in the early days of Islam [loudspeakers were not used because] they did not exist, [and] in any event the Muslims were few in number and concentrated in small areas. But I reject [this argument]. Within a few decades [after the advent of Islam], the Muslims swiftly established a large empire [stretching from] the Maghreb to India, and for many centuries, this vast land had neither electricity nor amplification. On the other hand, today we have an unprecedented number of technological solutions on every cellphone allowing us to be up to date on prayer times. So why do we need these disruptive broadcasts in mosques across [Egypt]? No other Islamic country, from Morocco to Indonesia to all the Arab countries and Turkey, can compare [in terms of mosques broadcasting calls to prayer and prayers?].
"Why does this exalted religious act [meaning prayer] become something that harms people, many of whom are too scared to complain? The supremacy of Islam and Muslims will never be realized by amplifying calls to prayer and Friday sermons, but only by good deeds that save the Islamic world from its sordid reputation of least developed and advanced relative to other world cultures. Do you remember Samuel Huntington's famous book Clash of Civilizations?[8] Take another look at it, because, unfortunately, its prophecies were accurate and are now coming true..."[9]
Egyptian Journalist Criticizes Call To Ban Amplification: If The Noise Bothers You, Stay Away From The Mosques, And Leave The Rest Of Us Alone
On November 24, 'Abd Al-Nasser Salama, a columnist for Al-Masri Al-Yawm and former editor of the Egyptian state daily Al-Ahram, rebutted the other writers' positions. Nowadays, he maintained, children are used to loud music, so it is pointless to complain about amplified calls to prayer which are, after all, a source of blessing for the Muslims and the secret of Allah's protection of them. He also criticized Israel's moves to ban amplified calls to prayer by mosques: "Some believe that the call to prayer harms children, but children today are, with unprecedented intensity, attending parties [at which the partygoers are] deafened by the DJs' amplified [music]... These same children cannot be separated from their headphones and Walkmans in the streets, clubs, and nearly everywhere. These same children cannot be separated from loud music in their daily lives, even at home – and perhaps the call to prayer, which isn't as loud, will spur [them] to pray...
"I believe that all those who live in closed compounds and areas far away from [densely] populated areas can choose not to use amplifications in their mosques as long as they are happy with that. But we, in the populated, unplanned, or rural areas, are happy with the calls to prayer by all the mosques, large and small. We are blessed by them and they do not bother us at all – on the contrary. So leave us alone, and don't annoy us – at least not on the grounds of freedom of worship. You can stay away from these areas so you are not exposed to the hazard of the mosque loudspeakers...
"Incidentally, for those who do not know, [the need for] the call to prayer was explicitly set out by Allah; it was revealed in the dreams of some of the Companions of the Prophet Muhammad, and the Prophet said that these visions are real and not a human invention that can be permitted or banned. One may ask for guidance [on this], or ask that [the call to prayer] be pleasant, or ask that all [calls to prayer] be the same, or anything else – all these are fundamentally legitimate demands. But [demanding] that they be banned on the pretext that they [cause] disease, [impact] sleep and study, [make] noise, or anything else of this nature is unacceptable, since there are even worse noises in society that no one seeks to prevent...
"What I find sadder – without condemning those who imitate European practices – is Israel's moves to prevent calls to prayer in occupied Palestine, specifically at Al-Aqsa Mosque... This move by the occupation authorities is based on measures taken in Egypt and on [statements by] some who consider themselves clerics in [this country], and also on some of our TV shows and articles [in the newspapers]. But it was the churches there [in Israel] that rose up against this move, and immediately started using amplification, including in many homes, in order to send a clear message: Only the texts of Allah or the call to prayer – that is all we hear in most European capitals, with no harassment and no measures of this kind...[10]
"There are some among us who call to prayer, some who read the Koran, and some who wake at night when everyone else sleeps, and some who turn to Allah all the time in prayer and supplication. They are the secret of [Allah's ] protection [of us]. Leave them alone. Maybe we will remain alive [by virtue] of their prayers..."[11]
Diab Responds: My Request To Ban Amplified Broadcasts From Mosques Is Rooted In Protecting The Sanctity Of The Religion
In an article responding to Salama, Diab explained that his statements had been misinterpreted, that he had no problem with the call to prayer, just with its overloud amplification which disturbs people: "I am one of the many who read 'Abd Al-Nasser Salama's writings. But I am surprised that he always [insists on arguing] with any opinion, idea, or position [that is expressed]. He chooses the opposite position, even when the argument is sound.
"That is what he did in his article of two days ago on calls to prayer. There is a big difference between Israel's [and our] position on this – [Israel] want to silence the calls [altogether], while we want to turn down [the volume]... so that it is pleasant [to the ear]...
"On November 14, in my article 'The Minaret Wars,' I criticized the chaos of the calls to prayer and the loudspeakers. I was not criticizing the call to prayer [itself] – this would be unthinkable for any Muslim or Coptic Egyptian. But [the wish] to purify the call to prayer of the [damage] done by broadcasting it loudly actually reflects adherence to the religion and to its commandments... According to [Salama], Islam is based on six principles, not five, with the sixth being jihad of the loudspeakers – and there are so many kinds of jihad that have been brought down on us recently.
"[Salama] is defending the dozens of voices emanating from the loudspeakers of the mosques, large and small, in every neighborhood, that clash with each other and that are indistinguishable from each other, when it is impossible to focus on any one of them – they infiltrate homes without permission... Abd Al-Nasser [Salama] misunderstood this message, deciding that I wanted to stop the calls to prayer [altogether], while my statements concerned only their amplification. There are many who are negatively impacted by the chaos – some sick people are disturbed by it, children are startled by it, the elderly suffer from it. What harm would it do for this voice to come from a single source? Undoubtedly, it would make a better impression on all of us, and would be better received by the non-Muslims even before the Muslims...
"Such cacophony exists only in Egypt. Do you know of any other country where it happens? I think not. I have already noted that Turkey bans loudspeakers, and that Morocco does as well. This is not suppressing Islam, or a blow to the status of the religion. On the contrary – it preserves its sanctity and keeps it from being presented in an unseemly fashion.
"Will our religion be harmed if we control the use of amplification? If we choose a pleasant sound that people like? Begging your pardon, my friend 'Abd Al-Nasser."[12]
Endnotes:
[1] Al-Yawm Al-Sabi' (Egypt), April 17, 2015. In February 2016, Minister of Religious Endowments Mohamed Mokhtar Gomaa reiterated that mosques may only use amplification for calls to prayer and Friday prayers. Al-Misriyyoun, February 26, 2016; Following that, in May 2016, Undersecretary of Religious Endowments Sheikh Gaber Tayee said that the ministry's decision to allow amplification only for calls to prayer and Friday prayers is not new and had been the practice in mosques for a long time. Al-Watan (Egypt), May 27, 2016.
[2] Al-Yawm Al-Sabi' (Egypt), November 30, 2016.
[3] On the initiative to introduce uniform Friday sermons in ministry-funded mosques across the country, see MEMRI
Inquiry and Analysis No. 1263, Egypt's Al-Azhar Opposes Ministry Of Religious Endowments Plan For Uniform Friday Sermon, August 4, 2016 .
[4] 580-640 CE. The first muezzin in Islam, appointed by the Prophet Muhammad.
[5] This is inaccurate; to wit, Turkey recently allowed the call for prayer to be broadcast from the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, even though it has not been an active mosque for 81 years. See Huffpostarabi.com, October 21, 2016; islammemo.cc, October 20, 2016.
[6] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), November 14, 2016.
[7] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), November 17, 2016.
[8] Samuel Huntington (1927-2008) was a professor of political science at Harvard. His book Clash of Civilizations predicted that culture and religion will be the main sources of global strife in the post cold war era.
[9] Al-Marri Al-Yawm (Egypt), November 22, 2016.
[10] In response to the Israeli government’s plan to prohibit the call to prayer, churches in Nazareth showed solidarity with Muslims by broadcasting the call to the night prayer. See e.g., Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), November 18, 2016.
[11] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), November 24, 2016.
[12] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), November 26, 2016.

UN Security Council Res. 2334: A Victory of Jihadism
Bat Ye'or/Gatestone Institute/January 06/17
 https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9725/security-council-resolution-israel
 Led astray from their primary mission, these international organizations have become tools of corruption or terrorism, reinforcing global Islamic power. Those who vote are heads of state, motivated by interests and ideologies that are often criminal, and not all of which represent the opinions of their people whom they tyrannize, including those from European "democracies".
 In 1948-49, Egypt seized Gaza, Syria stood their ground on the Golan, and Transjordan colonized Judea, Samaria and the Old City of Jerusalem. Their Jewish inhabitants were killed or driven out by the Arab colonists, who seized their homes and destroyed their synagogues and cemeteries. Fighting ceased on armistice and cease-fire lines, there was no peace and no international borders were recognized.
 Europe rushed to adopt the French position in 1973 and, along with the OIC, planned political measures designed to destroy the Jewish State by denying its sovereign rights and its cantonment on an indefensible territory. Resolution 2334 is now the icing on the cake of this policy, which forms the basis for a Euro-Islamic policy to merge in all EU political and social sectors, as well as in promoting globalism and the enforcement of the UN's supranational decision-making powers.
 In 1967, once again, the combined armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan invaded Israel to destroy it, but this time Israel took back all the land that had been lost in 1949, that had become Judenrein [free of Jews], Arabized and Islamized. These were areas from which the Palestinian Jews had been driven out, and that Europe referred to as Jewish colonies. They are called Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria.
 No European nation protested against the Islamic colonization of Jewish-Palestinian areas, the expulsion of their Jewish inhabitants and the seizure of their belongings, or against the persecution of Jews in Arab countries.
 An artificial Palestinian Arab "people" was created in order to replace the people of Israel. A European army of forger-historians and Arab Christian dhimmis transferred the historic characteristics of the Jews onto them. Names of towns and regions were Islamized: Jerusalem was called Al-Quds and "the West Bank" replaced Judea and Samaria.
 Israelis, guilty of existing, were expected to apologize for that, humbly to maintain their enemies and suffer their terrorism without protesting or defending themselves. Their crime? They refused to mingle with and disappear into dhimmitude by giving up their rights and their history to the people created by the Euro-Arab alliance to replace them.
 It is the turn of Europeans to see a replacement population be created in their countries, with all the rights that are being taken away from them. It is their turn to be forced to renounce their national, historic, cultural and religious identity, to apologize and take the blame for existing. It is their turn to be forced to monitor their borders and guard their airports, their schools, their trains, their streets and their cities with soldiers. European governments that contemplated the destruction of Israel worked together with the enemies of Israel to destroy their own people, their sovereignty, their security and their freedoms.
 The recognition of the legitimacy of Israel's return to its homeland is the essential condition of Islamic peace with the world, because it will abolish the jihadist ideology.
 UN Security Council Resolution 2334, adopted on December 23, 2016, politically reinforces UNESCO's resolution that erased the history of Israel in its historical homeland in order to replace it with the Koranic version of the Bible.
 A vote at the UN Security Council (illustrative). [Image source: U.S. State Department]
 This UN resolution once again proves that there is Islamic control over the politics and culture of international institutions. Led astray from their primary mission, these international organizations have become tools of corruption or terrorism, reinforcing global Islamic power. But let us not forget that those who vote are Heads of State, fully conscious and responsible individuals, motivated by interests and ideologies that are often criminal, and not all of which represent the opinions of their people whom they tyrannize, including those from European "democracies". Their latest resolutions not only confirm the victory of jihadism and illiteracy: they also express the success of the years of effort made by this post-war Europe that continues to destroy, defame and delegitimize the Hebrew State in the name of Islamic justice. The beginning of this long journey dates back to 1967, in France.
 So what are these Israeli "settlements" that obsess nations so much? Are they vast territories thousands of kilometers from Israel, across seas and oceans? How did this so few people "conquer" them? Let us remind ourselves of the facts: in 1948, the Arab League declared jihad to destroy the Jewish State. The armies of five Arab States crossed the borders of Palestine, where the San Remo Resolution (1920) had recognized the legitimacy of a Jewish National Home. Egypt seized Gaza, Syria stood their ground on the Golan, and Transjordan colonized the Judea and Samaria Area and the old city of Jerusalem. Their Jewish inhabitants were killed or driven out by the Arab colonists, who seized their belongings and homes and destroyed their synagogues and cemeteries. Fighting ceased on armistice and cease-fire lines (1949), there was no peace and no international borders were recognized. But, to the great disappointment of millions of Nazi Europeans and their collaborators, Israel was not wiped out. It also welcomed most of the million Jews who had been robbed and driven out of Arab countries. No European nation protested against the Islamic colonization of Jewish-Palestinian areas, the expulsion of their Jewish inhabitants and the seizure of their belongings, or against the persecution of Jews in Arab countries. Between 1949 and 1967, the Israelis who had been brought together in a confined area without any international borders endured endless jihadist attacks from their neighbors.
 In 1967, once again, the combined armies of Egypt, Syria and Transjordan invaded Israel to destroy it, but this time Israel took back all the land that had been seized in 1949, and that had become cleansed of Jews [Judenrein], Arabized and Islamized. These were areas from which the Palestinian Jews had been driven out, and to which Europe referred as Jewish "settlements" when in reality they became Arab colonies. They are called Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria.
 The 1967 war ended with an Arab defeat. Once again, the Arab camp refused peace, and armistice lines separated the fighters. UN Security Council Resolution 242 (November 22, 1967) recommended the solution of two waves of refugees – both Arab and Jewish - and the conditions of a peace, to be negotiated between Israel and the Arab States that had occupied and colonized Palestinian territories, expelling or killing all its Palestinian Jewish inhabitants in 1949. It did not mention the Palestinians Arabs as a distinct people: they did not exist at that time. The Arabs, determined to destroy Israel, rejected this resolution.
 Israel's lightning victory in 1967 humiliated France, which, after its deadly decolonization wars and the loss of countless Muslim colonies, was keen to move closer to the Arabs by playing the anti-Semitic card. Resolution 242 had been written in English, and France translated it into French, falsifying it in the process, by inserting the word "the" before "territories", a word that had been bitterly fought against during the negotiations to make explicit that not all of the disputed land was to be included. It is this French mistranslation that has now been imposed.
 France had close links with the Palestinian leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Amin al-Husseini, Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and an ally of Hitler and the Vichy government. This alliance created the "Palestinian people", invented by Palestinian Chairman Yasser Arafat, the nephew of the Mufti and the representative of the PLO. France, which had saved the Mufti from the Nuremberg trials by hiding him, was the first to recognize Arafat in 1969 and impose him on the still-reticent European Community. To secure recognition on an international stage, the "Palestinian people" used terror - by innovating airplane hijacking, by taking civilians hostage and by terrorist attacks in Europe.
 In October 1973, Egypt and Syria attacked Israel once again and sustained another defeat. But this time the OIC declared an oil boycott on all countries that did not recognize Arafat and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), and that would not support Arab causes (Declaration of the Arab Summit Conference at Algiers November 28,1973). Europe rushed to adopt the French position in December 1973 and, along with the OIC, planned an agenda of political measures designed to destroy the Jewish State by denying its sovereign rights and its cantonment on an indefensible territory. Resolution 2334 is now the icing on the cake of this policy, which has developed in several stages and forms the basis for a Euro-Islamic policy to merge in all European Union political and social sectors, as well as in promoting globalism and the enforcement of the UN's supranational decision-making powers.
 To begin with, an artificial Palestinian Arab "people" was created in order to replace the people of Israel. A European army of forger historians and Arab Christian dhimmis [non-Muslims who have surrendered to living under Islam] transferred the historic characteristics of the Jews onto them. Made the symbol of salvation from the purported Occupation and the Colonization symbolized by Israel, the Palestinians were compared to Jesus, crucified on the cross of a supposedly "Zionist Nazism." The French Islamophiles and anti-Zionists, Louis Massignon and Jacques Berque, were the promoters of this role-reversal between the Jewish victims of Nazism and the Nazi persecutors, assisted by their Muslim allies on the battlefields and in the extermination camps, under the guidance of the Mufti.
 Names of towns and regions were Islamized: Jerusalem was called Al-Quds and the West Bank replaced Judea and Samaria. Jihad and dhimmitude became taboo words. The OIC and its satellites, including Europe, had ordered the planned elimination of Israel. No argument could hinder its condemnation and the hateful campaign, by subverting words and language, that justified it. There was no point in pleading. Neither truth nor morality would change this verdict: Israel was the cause of the war, the terrorist attacks, injustice, all the evils suffered by the Islamic world and Europe, victims of jihadist terrorism - which it attributed to the existence of Israel. The fight to eliminate Israel was referred to as a just cause, a fight for peace.
 The Euro-Arab alliance did its best to criminalize the Israelis for having restored their State to their historic homeland. The Israelis' national sovereignty, their cultural and historic roots, their survival, their successes and spectacular military victories earned them reproaches and denigration. Reinvigorated by Palestinian hatred, the post–war Nazi-Islamic alliance did its best to neutralize the success of the Jewish State on a political level, to make sure it remained unstable and insecure. Endlessly harassed by European governments and their armies of dhimmis, the Israelis, guilty of existing, were shamed for it, forced to apologize for it, and expected humbly to maintain their enemies and suffer their terrorism without protesting or defending themselves. Their crime? They refused to mingle with and disappear into dhimmitude by giving up their rights and their history to the people created by the Euro-Arab alliance (Eurabia) to replace them.
 The PLO was the jihadist arm of the Ummah [the Islamic community], the embodiment of its theological ideology which justified Islamic expansion and its appropriation of all spaces, while wiping out the previous cultures and people, imposing its law, its customs and its beliefs everywhere.
 Heads of state, European ministers, the clergy, dhimmi Christians who had become its courtiers, offered it their help, more than happy to collect its gold, while sweeping away the debris of people and history before its feet, obstacles to its progress as they finally managed to rid it of Israel. And – so they believed – they would rid them of nothing but Israel, and thereby achieve a Holocaust that began in Europe so that at last a world, a humanity, would emerge, without Israel. The dream of Hitler and the Mufti would be realized.
 The European governments, allies of the Palestinian anti-Israeli terrorists, whom they called a "just cause" - thus feeding them spiritually and funding them - believed that they were safe. But guess what? This Ummah policy against Israel, actively supported by its European and dhimmi courtiers, was unleashed against the people of Europe. Did terrorists attack Israelis during their festivities? Now it is the Europeans who have to celebrate their festivities protected by an army of soldiers. It is the Europeans' turn to see a replacement population being created in their own countries, with all the rights that are now being taken away from them. It is the Europeans' turn to be forced to renounce their national, historic, cultural and religious identity, to apologize and take the blame for existing as they are. It is the Europeans' turn to be forced to monitor their borders and guard their airports, their schools, their trains, their streets and their cities with soldiers. Ironically, the European governments that contemplated the destruction of Israel worked together with the enemies of Israel to destroy their own people, their own sovereignty, their own security and their own freedoms. The OIC pandered to their unconfessed hatred of Israel, blinding them with its gold and unwaveringly led the cowards and the fainthearted, under the whip of terrorism, towards dishonor and oblivion.
 Resolution 2334 is the culmination of this policy, but it is not the last chapter of the story. Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Libya no longer exist, Egypt is scarcely hanging on. In its cauldron, jihad is burning Muslims who once dreamed of carrying it out against Jews and Christians. Arab dhimmi clergy and intellectuals, who inspired the Euro-Arab alliance against Israel and the Palestinian falsification, are seeing their communities decimated by their own lies. In a ruined Europe, butchered by hostile "sectarians," the people are rising up to send the zealous servants of the OIC to the scrap heap of history. Worried about popular anger, ministers no longer dare to lie and are forced to recognize jihadism and blame the terrorism on it instead of on Israel.
 The future may well include the reconciliation of populations based on the recognition of the legitimacy of Israel's return to its homeland. Because this recognition will bring with it the quashing of the jihad against Christians and all non-Muslims. The recognition of the legitimacy of Israel's return to its homeland is the essential condition of Islamic peace with the world because it will abolish the jihadist ideology. Peace with Israel guarantees Islam's peace with the world's diversity. Maybe this is the mission of Israel's return to its birthplace as it battles alone at the bloody crossroads of nations.
 *Bat Ye'or, author of Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis, and of Europe, Globalization and the Coming Universal Caliphate (winner of a price in London, 2012) received a prize in Israel (1986) for her study on Oriental Jewry, and a price for the Courage of Free Speech in Paris (2015) and in Bologna (2015) for her book Comprendere Eurabia (2015). Her forthcoming book, Understanding Eurabia, will be published by Gatestone Institute and RVP Publishers in 2017.
 © 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

2017 will be another bad year for the Arab world
Smadar Perry|/Ynetnews/January 06/17
Analysis: All Mideast experts are predicting that least one leader in our neighborhood will be murdered this coming year. Who will it be? Each expert has his own guess, each commentator has his own scenarios.
The New Year catches the Arab world between the sixth anniversaries of the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia and the Tahrir Revolution in Egypt. While the street did kick out its leaders, there is no cause for celebration. After all, these two dramatic events have yet to end.
True, they did get rid of dictators - Zine El Abidine Ben Ali and Hosni Mubarak. One disappeared to a spacious palace in the Saudi deserts, and the other spends his days at the guarded wing of the Maadi Military Hospital in Cairo. But the young people who filled the streets have been rejected and are being ignored by the new government.
Tunisia is considered the only success among the shaken countries, but it also the No. 1 exporter of recruits and volunteers to ISIS. And the dictators’ heavy shadow still hovers above the squares where assembly is still forbidden. The most striking conclusion from the Arab Spring events is that the countries which expelled their dictators are now being swept away by waves of nostalgia. In Iraq, people miss Saddam Hussein, who knew how to hold the country together, before the murderous terror militias took over it. A movement called “Oh Rais, We Apologize” has been founded in Egypt as a sort of popular homage yearning for Mubarak. And in Libya there are those who believe that if Muammar Gaddafi were alive today, ISIS would not have succeeded in dictating an agenda of violence in the country.
Only few of the experts who pretend to know everything about the Arab world’s countries are willing to provide a prediction map for the coming year. If 2016 goes down in as the year that produced heartrending images, 2017 won't be much better. No matter how deep we dig into the list of the 22 Muslim countries, it’s hard to pull out any good news. Even the body we have been referring to as “the Arab world” is collapsing and falling apart. In the eyes of the onlooker, the region is holding onto a division between the “moderate” Sunni camp and the Shiite “axis of evil.” Above them, the voice of the Arab League umbrella, which is supposed to unite, sounds weak and frail – if it can even be heard. If last year’s Man of the Year was Russian President Vladimir Putin, this year’s Man of the Year is expected to be US President-elect Donald Trump. What do we know about his world view on issues related to the situation in the Middle East? Only what he writes on Twitter. Commentators are willing to predict that Trump will focus his efforts on creating a new order in his home field. Only if he is left with no other choice, he will get the people he appoints to intervene in the neighborhood’s urgent affairs.
There are optimists in the neighborhood too. They are clinging to the fact that Trump comes from the business world and believe that he will shape his foreign policy according to a profit and loss key. It won’t be simple. The new year is dragging along the threats and conflicts of 2016. The discreet pursuit of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who the world lost trace of three weeks ago, will continue. As ISIS grows weaker, the al-Qaeda terror organization and its branches are expected to rear their head.
Despite the ceasefire agreement, Syria will keep bleeding. Putin and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan are preparing to divide the Syrian loot between them behind Syrian President Bashar Assad’s back. Why should Assad care? As long as he controls Damascus and its suburbs and continues called "rais" (president), Bashar will obey Putin. The intelligence writers predict that Trump is preparing to team up with Putin. It won’t be an equal division of tasks. Putin is already here and Trump is reluctant to get involved, but the coordination will be tighter.
 It’s interesting to see another evaluation, which all experts are fixated on: At least one leader in our region will be murdered in 2017. Who will it be? Each expert has theirown guess, each commentator has their own scenarios. No one will take the risk of putting the name of the designated assassination victim in writing.