LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

January 11/17

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins17/english.january11.17.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
No one can receive anything except what has been given from heaven
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 03/22-30/:'After this Jesus and his disciples went into the Judean countryside, and he spent some time there with them and baptized. John also was baptizing at
Aenon near Salim because water was abundant there; and people kept coming and were being baptized John, of course, had not yet been thrown into prison. Now a discussion about purification arose between John’s disciples and a Jew. They came to John and said to him, ‘Rabbi, the one who was with you across the Jordan, to whom you testified, here he is baptizing, and all are going to him.’ John answered, ‘No one can receive anything except what has been given from heaven. You yourselves are my witnesses that I said, "I am not the Messiah, but I have been sent ahead of him." He who has the bride is the bridegroom. The friend of the bridegroom, who stands and hears him, rejoices greatly at the bridegroom’s voice. For this reason my joy has been fulfilled. He must increase, but I must decrease.’"
 
No wonder! Even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. So it is not strange if his ministers also disguise themselves as ministers of righteousness. Their end will match their deeds
Second Letter to the Corinthians 11/07-15/:"Did I commit a sin by humbling myself so that you might be exalted, because I proclaimed God’s good news to you free of charge?I robbed other churches by accepting support from them in order to serve you. And when I was with you and was in need, I did not burden anyone, for my needs were supplied by the friends who came from Macedonia. So I refrained and will continue to refrain from burdening you in any way. As the truth of Christ is in me, this boast of mine will not be silenced in the regions of Achaia. And why? Because I do not love you? God knows I do! And what I do I will also continue to do, in order to deny an opportunity to those who want an opportunity to be recognized as our equals in what they boast about. For such boasters are false apostles, deceitful workers, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. And no wonder! Even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. So it is not strange if his ministers also disguise themselves as ministers of righteousness. Their end will match their deeds."
 
 
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 10-11/17
Is Lebanon really secure/Diana Moukalled/Arab News//January 09/17
Understanding Hezbollah’s history as a ‘proxy of Iran/Tony Duheaume/Al Arabiya/January 09/17
The Real Face of Rafsanjani/NCRI/Tuesday, 10 January 2017/
Iran: Rafsanjani's Complicity in the Massacre of Political Prisoners/NCRI/January 10/17
The Age of Fake Policy/Paul Krugman/The New York Times/January 10/17
Arabs amid Uprisings/Ghassan Charbel/Al Arabiya/January 10/17
Trump Seems to Keep Siding with Russia, but What Does That Get Him/David Ignatius/The Washington Post/January 10/17
Exclusive: US Jerusalem embassy – only foundations/DEBKAfile Exclusive Report January 10/ 17
The difference journalists can make in conflict zones/Raed Omari/Al Arabiya/January 10/17
Emboldened by Syria, is Putin trying to make Libya a Russian satellite/Dr. Azeem Ibrahim/Al Arabiya/January 10/17
Four more years for Assad in power/Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/January 10/17
How Putin Unmasked Erdogan's Tough Guy Show/Burak Bekdil/Gatestone Institute/January 10/17
Palestinians: Glorifying Mass Murderers/Bassam Tawil/Gatestone Institute/January 10/17
Extremism Under Sisi/Khalil al-Anani/Foreign Affairs/January 10/17
Analysis: Syria shatters Obama’s Middle East legacy/Joyce Karam/Arab News/January 10/17

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on January 10-11/17
Lebanon’s Aoun meets with Saudi King Salman
U.S. Adds Two Hizbullah Members to 'Terrorism' Sanctions List
Report: Saudi Arabia Unblocks Military Aid to Lebanon
Saudi King During Talks with Aoun: Keen on Improving Ties with Lebanon
Lebanese, Saudi Summit winds up
Riachy meets Saudi counterpart, pins great hope on expanding media industry
Hajj Hasan: Positive signals in rapprochement of economic and industrial files
Jumblat: Druze Community Refuses Marginalization
Man Found Killed in Arsal's Wadi Hmeid
UNIFIL Head Meets Hariri, Hails 'Unprecedented Calm' in South
Hariri Says Parties Seeking 'Consensus' on Electoral Law, Jumblat 'Open to Dialogue'
Syria Refugees Test Palestinian Solidarity in Lebanon
Geagea Says New Election Law Must Meet PSP Approval
Report: Providing Lebanon with Weapons from Iran Violates U.N. Arms Embargo
Man shot dead in Hermel
Fenianos: I prefer approval of electoral law rather than remaining at ministry
Hajjar: Aoun tries to restore ties with Saudi Arabia
UNIFIL: Beary visits Prime Minister Saad Hariri
Army refers Hassan Hussein Hujairi to judiciary for links to Daash
Is Lebanon really secure?
Understanding Hezbollah’s history as a ‘proxy of Iran’

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on January 10-11/17
New U.N. Chief Seeks 'Whole New Approach' to Prevent War
UAE Ambassador, Diplomats Wounded in Kandahar Blast
Moscow Slams U.S.-Led Action in Syria as Ineffective
2 Missing Turkish Soldiers Reported Killed in Syria
Syrian Kurds Say Not Invited to Astana Talks
Saudi Detains Two Human Rights Activists
Iran’s Violations of Arms Embargo to Be Discussed by Security Council
Washington Describes Russian Contribution to Face Terrorism as ‘Zero’
Iran ‘disregarded invitation calls’ for Hajj arrangements talks
Free Syrian Army Commander: Iranian Regime's Agents Are Main Violators of Syria Ceasefire
The Role of Iranian Regime's Militias in Iraq
Iranian Political Prisoners Demand the World's Attention
Israeli Troops Kill Palestinian Knife Attacker in W.Bank
Tunisia Democratic Transition 'Blocked', Says Electoral Chief
Morocco Bans Production and Sale of Burqas

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on January 10-11/17
Meryl Streep avoids saying Jerusalem is in Israel while naming stars’ home nations during anti-Trump rant
Victory: Texas judge dismisses Clock Boy’s defamation lawsuit against critics of his “hate crime” hoax
South Dakota: Muslim migrant attempts to molest handicapped woman, local paper omits fact that he is “refugee”
Hugh Fitzgerald: Introducing François Fillon (Part II)
Obama administration has given Iran $700 million each month since nuke deal signed, totaling over $10 billion
Turkey’s Erdogan: Fighting “Islamophobia and xenophobia will be high on the agenda of our state”
BBC accused of “Islamophobia” for satirizing the Islamic State in “The Real Housewives of ISIS”
Utah: Teen Muslima gets on wrong school bus, asked to get off, claims discrimination, demands apology
Islamic State throws man off roof for crime of homosexuality
Georgetown University panel applauds Erdogan’s coup and the Islamization of Turkey
Switzerland: Court rules Muslim girls must swim with boys, government says integrate or leave
Germany: Muslim migrants lure nurse to park with “fake cries for help,” then beat and sexually abuse her
Anni Cyrus Moment: How I Was Screened as a Refugee

Links From Christian Today Site for on January 10-11/17
Thousands Of Muslims Coming To Faith In Christ Across The Middle East, Says Charity
Being Open To God': Incredible First Person Account Of Woman Caught Up In Florida Airport Shooting
Ten Killed In Fulani Herdsman Attack On Christian Village
Egyptian President Vows To Build Largest Church In Egypt
Muslim Children Forced To Attend Mixed-Sex Swimming Lessons
Letter To Meryl Streep: 'Trump Is Not The Answer. Nor Are You.'
How To Get Over The Embarrassment Factor In Evangelism
Democrat's Religious Liberty Bill Blocks Trump's Muslim Register Plans
Kidnapped Priest Fr Tom Uzhunalil 'Ignored Government Orders' Not To Go To Yemen
Why Christians Will Never Return To Mosul - Even After Islamic State Is Gone
Lesbian Couple To Lead Historic US Baptist Church

Latest Lebanese Related News published on January 10-11/17  
Lebanon’s Aoun meets with Saudi King Salman
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Monday, 9 January 2017
King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud held at Al-Yamamah palace in Riyadh official talks with General Michel Aoun, President of the Republic of Lebanon.
During the talks, they reviewed bilateral relations between the two countries and ways of enhancing them in various fields, and the latest developments in the Arab and international levels. Previously King Salman has received President Michel Aoun of the Republic of Upon arrival at the venue, he was also received by Prince Faisal bin Bandar bin Abdulaziz, Governor of Riyadh region. The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques held a luncheon in honor of the President of the Republic of Lebanon and his accompanying delegation.
Lebanese President Michel Aoun said on Monday that his visit to Saudi Arabia aims to dispel ambiguities. “I came to the kingdom to dispel ambiguities. I carry (nothing but) friendliness and honesty towards the Saudi people,” Aoun told Al-Ekhbariya television channel on Monday evening. The Lebanese president arrived in Saudi Arabia on Monday for a two-day official visit. Aoun also said that internal wars only end through political solutions and voiced the importance of cooperation to combat terrorism.
“We all need to cooperate to fight terrorism. We need to cooperate with Saudi Arabia and with all countries because terrorism is no longer limited to Middle Eastern countries but it's now across the entire world,” he told Al-Ekhbariya.
Addressing the Lebanese situation, Aoun said balances in Lebanon will strengthen each day, noting however that Lebanon bears the burden of the influx of Syrian refugees led to increasing the population during a short period of time thus resulting in huge financial burdens.
Aoun voiced hope that the crisis in Syria will be resolved peacefully and politically because refugees will thus be allowed to return to Syria and rebuild it. A statement issued by Aoun’s press office Monday said that his Riyadh trip was at the invitation of Saudi Arabia’s King Salman.
Among the topics sources say we will be discussed is the normalization of political and economic relations between the two countries, including the lifting of a travel ban on Saudi citizens visiting the country. Another issue to be discussed will be the restoration of Saudi assistance to Lebanese military, which was halted in February last year. Aoun’s tour will then continue on his Gulf tour when he is scheduled to visit Qatar on Wednesday.
Ministerial meetings
Aoun also met with Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister Adel Al-Jubeir at a reception attended by Saudi Minister of State Dr. Ibrahim bin Abdulaziz Al-Assaf. Jubeir also held a separate bilateral meeting with Lebanese minister of expatriates and foreign affairs Jobran Basil.
 My meeting with the Lebanese minister of expatriates and foreign affairs is come the following fruitful meeting between the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud and the Lebanese President Michel Aoun. We will seek to enhance bilateral relations,” Jubeir said. Minister of Culture and Information Adel Altoraifi met Lebanese Minister of Information Melhem Riashy. During the meeting, they discussed bilateral relations between the two countries and topics of common interest.  Also, Minister of Commerce and Investment Dr. Majed bin Abdullah Al-Qasabi received at King Saud palace the visiting Lebanese Minister of Economy and Trade Raed Khoury where they discussed investment opportunities between the two countries, especially in the field of agriculture and the development of food industry.

U.S. Adds Two Hizbullah Members to 'Terrorism' Sanctions List
Associated Press/Naharnet/January 10/17/The Obama administration said overnight Monday that it has added two senior members of Hizbullah to its “terrorism” sanctions list. The State Department said that Ali Damush and Mustafa Mughniyeh have been named “Specially Designated Global Terrorists.”Mughniyeh is a Hizbullah commander with extensive family links to the group. He's the nephew of Hizbullah's previous military commander, Mustafa Badreddine, who was killed near the Syrian capital last year, and the son of military commander Imad Mughniyeh, who was killed in a 2008 car bombing in Damascus that Hizbullah blamed on Israel. Damush is an aide to the group's leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. He heads the group's foreign relations department, which the State Department says "engages in covert terrorist operations around the world."

Report: Saudi Arabia Unblocks Military Aid to Lebanon
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 10/17/Saudi Arabia and Lebanon have agreed to hold talks on restoring a $3-billion military aid package that Riyadh froze last year, a Lebanese source told AFP on Tuesday. "The blockage is lifted," said an official in the delegation of President Michel Aoun, who held talks in the Saudi capital with King Salman earlier in the day. "It's finished. There is truly a change. But when and how, we have to wait to see," the official said, adding "a new page" had been turned and the aid was "going to move."
The king's son, the powerful Defense Minister and Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, will discuss with his Lebanese counterpart how to move forward with the package, said the official, who asked for anonymity. However, other sources from the Lebanese delegation downplayed the official's remarks. “The issue of the Saudi grant was discussed but no decision has yet been taken to unblock the aid,” LBCI television quoted the sources as saying. Earlier in the day, Lebanon's National News Agency said Aoun asked King Salman for “continued support for the army in the face of terrorism and the other security challenges, including the issue of the grant.”“The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman bin Abdul Aziz, said he will follow up on the issue with the competent ministers,” NNA added. In February, the kingdom halted the military aid program to protest what it said was "the stranglehold of Hizbullah on the (Lebanese) state."The program, funded by Riyadh, would provide vehicles, helicopters, drones, cannons and other military equipment from France. After Aoun's election, France's foreign ministry said it was in "close dialogue" with Lebanon and Saudi Arabia in hope of a deal.

Saudi King During Talks with Aoun: Keen on Improving Ties with Lebanon
Naharnet/January 10/17/President Michel Aoun held on Tuesday the long anticipated meeting with Saudi King Salman bin Aziz in Riyadh, where talks focused on improving ties between the two countries. An official welcoming ceremony was organized at al-Yamama Palace, greeting the President and the accompanying delegation. Discussions between the two men touched on the bilateral relations between the two countries highlighting ways to support and improve them at various levels, the Saudi News Agency said. The Saudi King stressed during talks with Aoun and the accompanying delegation “keenness to improve and strengthen ties with Lebanon and ensure stability in the Arab countries including Lebanon.”LBCI reported that Salman has also emphasized Saudi nationals will resume visits to Lebanon.
Later on Tuesday, Lebanon's National News Agency said Aoun asked the king for “continued support for the army in the face of terrorism and the other security challenges, including the issue of the grant.”“The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman bin Abdul Aziz, said he will follow up on the issue with the competent ministers,” NNA added. “Aoun also invited King Salman to visit Lebanon and the issue of Saudi flights will be addressed in a positive manner,” the agency said. The president “considers that a new chapter of Lebanese-Saudi ties has been launched and that the relations have returned to normal,” NNA added, noting that Aoun “heard from King Salman what confirms this.”
Earlier during the day, Aoun met at his place of residence in Riyadh, Saudi Minister of Commerce and Investment Majid bin Abdullah bin Othman el-Qasabi who assured that Saudi nationals will resume trips to Lebanon shortly, the state-run National News Agency reported.
After his meeting with the Lebanese President, el-Qasabi said: “Saudi nationals are likely to resume trips to Lebanon, and I will be at the forefront,” NNA said. Earlier, Aoun met with Saudi Culture Minister Adel Bin Zaid al-Tarifi.
Aoun arrived in Saudi Arabia on Monday on his first foreign trip since taking office, starting an Arab tour that will also take him to Qatar and Egypt. But, Tuesday reports said his trip to Cairo will be postponed.
He is accompanied by a large ministerial delegation comprising the ministers Jebran Bassil (foreign affairs), Marwan Hamadeh (education), Ali Hassan Khalil (finance), Yaaqoub al-Sarraf (defense), Nouhad al-Mashnouq (interior), Pierre Raffoul (presidency affairs), Melhem Riachi (information) and Raed Khoury (economy). In an interview with Saudi state news channel Al-Ekhbaria on Monday, Aoun said his ministers of foreign affairs, education, finance and information would meet their counterparts "to find some fields of cooperation."
Aoun had received an official invitation to visit the kingdom from Saudi King Salman bin Abdul Aziz. The trip plans to improve Lebanon's role at the Arab and regional levels, and to mend the Lebanese-Gulf ties which saw a twist in 2016. In 2016, Saudi Arabia, and other Arab countries, urged their citizens to leave Lebanon or avoid traveling there citing “safety” concerns. The move came after Saudi Arabia halted a $3 billion grant for the Lebanese security forces in response to "hostile" stances of Hizbullah and diplomatic positions.

Lebanese, Saudi Summit winds up
Tue 10 Jan 2017/NNA - The Lebanese-Saudi Summit has winded up with both sides voicing eagerness to bolster bilateral ties in an attempt to "bring back relations to their normal course," NNA field reporter said on Tuesday. The Saudi King confirmed his country's refusal to meddle in internal Lebanese affairs, and reiterated his country's keenness on having the Lebanese decide their own fate and affairs. The King also tasked his aides to follow up on issues proposed by Lebanese President, Michel Aoun, at the financial, military, security, and tourism levels.

Riachy meets Saudi counterpart, pins great hope on expanding media industry
Tue 10 Jan 2017/NNA - Information Minister, Melhem Riachy, currently on an official visit to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with Lebanese President, Michel Aoun, met on Tuesday with his Saudi counterpart, Dr. Adel Al-Tarifi. Talks between the pair reportedly focused on the media sector in both countries, and on the best means to bolster this sector at different levels. "We had a very special meeting by all means. It was a great opportunity to discuss standing issues between Lebanon and the KSA, which are now headed towards a radical solution," Riachy said on emerging in response to a question on Tarifi's views concerning Lebanon and its media sector. "We also discussed the existing relations between the Lebanese and Saudi Ministries of Information and broached the best means to boost these relations based protocols that are expected to see the light real soon," he added. In turn, the Saudi Minister hailed the Lebanese President's KSA visit as an attempt to boost the historically existing relations between Lebanon and the KSA. "There's an existing will by both sides to augment relations at the economic, developmental, and other levels. Both sides are also keen on beefing up agreement over regional issues that concern both countries," Al-Tarifi added. "The visits that President Aoun is currently paying to different Gulf and Arab countries are of significant importance, not to mention an important message for all sides. I think we will touch tangible progress by the end of this day," the Saudi Minister said, hoping that the year 2017 will witness good bilateral ties between both countries.

Hajj Hasan: Positive signals in rapprochement of economic and industrial files
Tue 10 Jan 2017/NNA - Industry Minister, Hussein Hajj Hasan, announced the emergeance of numerous positive indicators relevant to pending economic and social affairs, explaining that such positive signals came as Lebanese President Michel Aoun and PM Saad Hariri put the economic and social files on the list of top concerns. Minister Hajj Hasan's stance came Tuesday in the context of an interview on LBCI TV. Hajj Hasan saw another positivity in the approval on decrees relevant to oil and gas file.

Jumblat: Druze Community Refuses Marginalization

Naharnet/January 10/17/Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat was up in arms recently protesting the cabinet's performance and what he believes is “marginalization” of the Druze community, al-Joumhouria daily reported on Tuesday.
The Druze leader's stance stance was evident in a series of tweets in which he protested, what sources close to him described as, “tendency to marginalize,” them. “In light of this disposition to marginalize us, Jumblat has no choice but to engage in a fierce challenge to deter these attempts,” sources close to Jumblat were quoted as saying. They were referring to the debate over a new electoral law and suggestions to adopt the proportional representation law which Jumblat strongly disagrees with, according to the daily.
It is clear that Jumblat is ready for the challenge, said the daily, and has expressed resentment in a series of tweets with the stances of some ministers, without naming them, and government decisions the most recent were the oil and gas decrees. On his position as for the latest developments on stipulating a new election law for the parliamentary elections, Jumblat told the daily: “Let everyone know that I refuse to consider a major faction in Lebanon secondary...I will not abandon this faction and I am always ready for consultations.”
The Druze leader, concluded: “Enough outbidding and side talks. Each party is doing what suits it best, as if it is the only community being. They act as if the Druze community does not exist. We will not accept that.”In light of efforts to agree on a new election law for the parliamentary elections scheduled for May, some politicians have been encouraging for the adoption of proportional representation, which the PSP leader strongly rejects. Hizbullah has repeatedly called for an electoral law based on proportional representation but other political parties, especially al-Mustaqbal Movement, have rejected the proposal and argued that the party's controversial arsenal of arms would prevent serious competition in regions where the Iran-backed party is influential. Mustaqbal, the Lebanese Forces and the Progressive Socialist Party have meanwhile proposed a hybrid electoral law that mixes the proportional representation and the winner-takes-all systems. Speaker Nabih Berri has also proposed a hybrid law. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.

Man Found Killed in Arsal's Wadi Hmeid
Naharnet/January 10/17/Lebanese citizen Ismail H., 37, was on Tuesday found dead from a gunshot wound to the head in the Wadi Hmeid region east of the Bekaa border town of Arsal, State-run National News agency reported. “The corpse was transferred to the al-Rahma field hospital in the town,” the agency said. “A forensic doctor is expected to examine the body to unveil the circumstances of the incident,” NNA added. Militants from the Islamic State and the rival jihadist group Fateh al-Sham Front are entrenched in mountainous areas along the undemarcated Lebanese-Syrian border and the army regularly shells their posts while Hizbullah and the Syrian forces have engaged in clashes with them on the Syrian side of the border. The two groups overran the eastern border town of Arsal in 2014 before being ousted by the army after days of deadly battles. The retreating militants abducted more than 30 Lebanese soldiers and policemen of whom four have been executed and nine remain in IS' captivity.

UNIFIL Head Meets Hariri, Hails 'Unprecedented Calm' in South
Naharnet/January 10/17/UNIFIL Head of Mission and Force Commander Major General Michael Beary held talks Tuesday with Prime Minister Saad Hariri in Beirut, the U.N. force said in a statement. “I was extremely encouraged by this first meeting with Prime Minister Hariri. I was pleased to have this opportunity just weeks after he assumed office to brief him on UNIFIL’s mission and related developments in south Lebanon,” Beary said after the meeting. “I informed the Prime Minister that the situation along the Blue Line and in the UNIFIL area of operations remains calm, and that the parties have reiterated their commitment to resolution 1701 and to upholding the cessation of hostilities,” he added. The major general also briefed Hariri on the upcoming visit of a U.N. delegation that will conduct a “Strategic Review” of UNIFIL aimed at improving the mission’s “effectiveness and efficiency,” and to ensure that the Mission is “best configured and resourced to deliver on its mandate.” “In the tense regional situation, it is all the more important for both parties (Lebanon and Israel) to continue working with UNIFIL to address developing issues and prevent any escalation along the Blue Line,” Beary added. Hariri for his part voiced support for UNIFIL and “acknowledged the importance of the work we are doing together with the Lebanese Armed Forces to maintain a safe and secure environment in the South,” the general said. He also noted that UNIFIL will not allow “any miscalculation or misunderstanding” to lead to an “outbreak of tension or conflict in the area.”“It is important for the Government of Lebanon to continue to take advantage of this unprecedented calm that south Lebanon has enjoyed for more than 10 years,” Beary went on to say.

Hariri Says Parties Seeking 'Consensus' on Electoral Law, Jumblat 'Open to Dialogue'
Naharnet/January 10/17/Prime Minister Saad Hariri announced Tuesday that the political forces in the country are seeking “consensus” over the electoral law, while noting that the concerns of minorities will be taken into consideration. “There are several proposals, but we are seeking consensus on a single draft law in order to send it to parliament. We are committed to holding the parliamentary polls on time, but our bigger commitment is reaching a new electoral law,” Hariri told a delegation from the Press Syndicate. “The introduction of proportional representation is enjoying the support of a lot of political forces and I personally will add to it my commitment to a women's quota,” Hariri added. Asked about the stances of Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat over the electoral law, Hariri said “Walid Beik is the representative of Druze, part of the country's components and he has essential concerns.”“Our aim from consensus is relieving all sects, not stirring their concerns. Walid Beik has his viewpoints and he is open to dialogue and I support him in this,” the premier added. Hizbullah has repeatedly called for an electoral law fully based on proportional representation but other political parties, especially the PSP and al-Mustaqbal Movement, have rejected the proposal, arguing that the party's controversial arsenal of arms would prevent serious competition in regions where the Iran-backed party has clout. Mustaqbal, the Lebanese Forces and the PSP have meanwhile proposed a hybrid electoral law that mixes the proportional representation and the winner-takes-all systems. Speaker Nabih Berri has also proposed a hybrid law. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.

Syria Refugees Test Palestinian Solidarity in Lebanon
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 10/17/When Palestinian Fouad Abu Khaled fled Syria's war in 2013, he sought refuge among his own, looking for solidarity among Palestinian refugees based in Lebanon's Shatila camp. But instead he found a community already struggling to get by and sometimes resentful of new arrivals who are testing the limited resources of the U.N. agency dedicated to helping Palestinian refugees. "Despite the fact he's Palestinian and I'm Palestinian, I'm Syrian and he's from Lebanon," said Abu Khaled, who fled the Yarmuk camp in Damascus with his family after fighting began there. "He sees you as coming to take his place, exploit him, take his daily rations," he told AFP at the camp in southern Beirut notorious for violence in the past. Abu Khaled is one of at least 31,000 Palestinians who have taken refuge in Lebanon since Syria's conflict began in March 2011, part of a larger influx of some one million refugees from Syria. And Lebanon was already home to about 450,000 Palestinian refugees, mostly the descendants of those who fled their homes when the state of Israel was created in 1948, or during subsequent conflicts. Seated on a thin mattress in the one-bedroomed flat he shares with his wife and eight children, Abu Khaled said he simply couldn't make ends meet. Fighting in Syria destroyed the 52-year-old's grocery shop, and the aid he receives from the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees UNRWA and other charity groups has proved insufficient. "I think if the situation continues like this the people could explode," he said.
- 'Not welcome any more'
In another part of the camp, Najah Awad sits in a modest room where she has lived with her three children since fleeing Yarmuk in 2013. In the beginning "they welcomed us. But not any more," she said. "Now they see us as taking their jobs, taking their livelihoods." UNRWA Syria's director Matthias Schmale acknowledged the struggles faced by Palestinian refugees from Syria, as well as those in Lebanon hosting them. "The longer this displacement from Syria lasts and the more pressures grow on UNRWA and indeed the host population of Palestine refugees from Lebanon, I think we cannot rule out tensions," he said in English. But he stressed Palestinian refugees in Lebanon had displayed impressive generosity under difficult circumstances, sharing resources and in some cases even hosting Syrian Palestinians. "It takes a lot of solidarity if you yourself live below the poverty line," he told AFP. Some five million Palestinian refugees in Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, the West Bank and Gaza are registered to receive help from UNRWA, which was created after Israel's creation. The organization is frequently underfunded, but has come under new pressure with the conflict in Syria, where some 410,000 Palestinians now depend entirely on UNRWA handouts. In response, the agency launched a $410 million (390 million euro) emergency funding appeal on Monday. For Palestinians in Lebanon, including those coming from Syria, the hardships are exacerbated by tight restrictions on their ability to work.
Surviving on half needs
Abu Khaled is breeding canaries, hoping to sell the noisy chicks squeaking in a cage in his living room for up to $30 (28 euros) each. His wife is still recovering from a hernia operation. While UNRWA paid half the hospital bill, he struggled to raise the rest of the money. Some 90 percent of Palestinian refugees from Syria in Lebanon live under the poverty line, a 2016 study by UNRWA and the American University in Beirut found. Nine percent cannot meet even their basic food requirements. Najwa Hazeneh, a Palestinian from Yarmuk who works with charities in the camp, said some families have only 50 percent of their needs. "They might cover that by going into debt, and usually they go without lots of things. Some people go without medical treatment. The mother becomes the doctor of the family. Sometimes they go without certain foods." Abu Khaled said he knew people struggling to meet their most basic needs. "It's a catastrophe for those forced to flee. A family in a good situation gets two meals a day. An average one gets one. I know some that get none," he said. Despite the hardships, Mohammed Abu Ali of Fatah al-Intifada, one of several Palestinian armed factions that control Shatila camp, said Lebanese Palestinians were committed to helping their brethren. "We share everything. We can't have them being in the dark while we have electricity, or them not having water while we do," he said, sitting in military fatigues under a Palestinian flag at his office. "We hope UNRWA sees that they need to help us both."

Geagea Says New Election Law Must Meet PSP Approval
Naharnet/January 10/17/Lebanese Forces chief Samir Geagea emphasized on Tuesday that a parliamentary electoral law that does not meet the approval of the Progressive Socialist Party will not be accepted. “We will not accept an electoral law that does not meet the approval of the PSP,” said Geagea in a tweet. Geagea's comments came after PSP chief MP Walid Jumblat took to twitter and criticized, without naming, in a series of comments attempts to agree on proportional representation law. Lebanon's political parties are bickering over amending the current election law which divides seats among the different religious sects. Hizbullah has repeatedly called for an electoral law based on proportional representation but other political parties, especially al-Mustaqbal Movement, have rejected the proposal and argued that the party's controversial arsenal of arms would prevent serious competition in regions where the Iran-backed party is influential. Mustaqbal, the Lebanese Forces and the Progressive Socialist Party have meanwhile proposed a hybrid electoral law that mixes the proportional representation and the winner-takes-all systems. Speaker Nabih Berri has also proposed a hybrid law. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.

Report: Providing Lebanon with Weapons from Iran Violates U.N. Arms Embargo
Naharnet/January 10/17/A Western diplomat at the United Nations in New York stated that reports circulating in Lebanon recently on the possibility of extending the Lebanese army with weapons from Iran, are “inconsistent” with the decisions of the Security Council, the pan-Arab al-Hayat daily reported Tuesday. The diplomat stressed that Iran cannot extend arms to any side unless the U.N. Security Council decides otherwise, added the daily. “The Security Council's resolutions are very clear in terms of preventing Iran from sending weapons to states or non-state actors, and this applies to all countries without exception, unless the Security Council decided otherwise,” said the source who spoke on condition of anonymity. Iranian officials who visited Beirut recently have expressed Tehran's willingness to provide the Lebanese army with weapons, the most recent was Chairman of Iranian Parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Committee Alaeddin Boroujerdi. “Iran's permanent and firm stance is to stand by the brotherly Lebanese Republic of Lebanon, government and people. We therefore reiterate our firm will in the field of arming the Lebanese army,” said Boroujerdi while in Beirut last week. Iran is still subject to am arms embargo despite the fact that some sanctions were lifted a year ago under a deal Iran made with the United States, the European Union, Russia, China, Germany, Britain and France to limit its nuclear program.

Man shot dead in Hermel
Tue 10 Jan 2017/NNA - A Lebanese man was found shot dead on Tuesday night in Hermel and was admitted to the hospital, NNA field reporter said. The reporter added that a coroner inspected the body while ISF opened investigations into said incident.

Fenianos: I prefer approval of electoral law rather than remaining at ministry
Tue 10 Jan 2017/NNA - Minister of Public Works and Transport, Yousef Fenianos preferred "the approval of a new electoral law instead of staying at the ministry". His remarks came during a meeting at the airport and in the presence of Director General of Civil Aviation, Mohammed Shahabuddin, the commander of airport security, Brigadier George Doumit, president of the airport engineer Fadi Hassan and others. The attendees stressed the need to coordinate among all departments at the airport to ensure the proper functioning in this vital facility. On the other hand, the minister touched on the birds issue that pose a threat to aviation, he said: "Environment Minister Tarek Khatib held this week several meetings for this purpose. He met with the landfill company that covers Costa Brava. He also met with others. I will meet with him next Thursday".

Hajjar: Aoun tries to restore ties with Saudi Arabia
Tue 10 Jan 2017/NNA - Deputy Mohammad Hajjar said on Tuesday "President of the Republic, Michel Aoun, is trying to restore ties between Lebanon and Saudi Arabia."
Hajjar reported that Saudi financial support to the Lebanese army has been interrupted due to Hezbollah's stance and attacks on Saudi Arabia. On another note, the MP said that Future bloc stressed the need to hold the parliamentary polls on time based on a law that would ensure a fair representation.

UNIFIL: Beary visits Prime Minister Saad Hariri
Tue 10 Jan 2017/NNA - In a press release by UNIFIL, it said: "Head of Mission and Force Commander Major General Michael Beary today called on the newly appointed Prime Minister Saad Hariri in his office in Beirut.'Following the meeting, Major General Beary said: "I was extremely encouraged by this first meeting with Prime Minister Hariri. I was pleased to have this opportunity just weeks after he assumed office to brief him on UNIFIL's mission and related developments in south Lebanon.""I informed the Prime Minister that the situation along the Blue Line and in the UNIFIL area of operations remains calm, and that the parties have reiterated their commitment to resolution 1701 and to upholding the cessation of hostilities."Beary added: "I have also briefed the Prime Minister on the upcoming visit of a UN delegation who will conduct a Strategic Review of UNIFIL aimed at improving the mission's effectiveness and efficiency, and to ensure that the Mission is best configured and resourced to deliver on its mandate."UNIFIL Force Commander emphasized the importance of UNIFIL's liaison and coordination arrangements stressing on the crucial role played by the Tripartite forum: "This confidence building-mechanism has proven to be vital in preventing tension and incidents, and in de-conflicting the situation at critical moments. In the tense regional situation, it is all the more important for both parties to continue working with UNIFIL to address developing issues and prevent any escalation along the Blue Line." "The Prime Minister had strong words of support for UNIFIL and he acknowledged the importance of the work we are doing together with the Lebanese Armed Forces to maintain a safe and secure environment in the south. One of our main objectives is to continue working with LAF on furthering the Strategic Dialogue process to strengthen their capabilities in order to tackle the multiple challenges that face them"
Major General Beary said: "We will seek again to keep the calm with the LAF and not allow any miscalculation or misunderstanding to lead to an outbreak of tension or conflict in the area."During the meeting UNIFIL Head of Mission highlighted the greater involvement of the Lebanese Government in the south: "UNIFIL will continue to work with ministries as well as local leaders in extending their full authority in UNIFIL area of operations. It is important for the Government of Lebanon to continue to take advantage of this unprecedented calm that south Lebanon has enjoyed for more than 10 years."

Army refers Hassan Hussein Hujairi to judiciary for links to Daash

Tue 10 Jan 2017/NNA - Army Intelligence Directorate referred to the concerned judiciary the so called Hassan Hussein Hujairi, for his affiliation to the terrorist Daash organization and involvement in attacks on army posts in Arsal, army command said in a communiqué on Tuesday. Houjairi was also involved in firing at army patrols, monitoring military and civilian for assassination purposes and planting explosive devices targeting army patrols in Arsal town.

Is Lebanon really secure?
Diana Moukalled/Arab News/January 10/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/01/10/diana-moukalledarab-news-is-lebanon-really-secure/
http://www.arabnews.com/node/1036651/columns#.WHR8SFG_fNc.twitter
Lebanese newspapers have, over the past two weeks, extensively published reports of local security services thwarting terrorist plots targeting the country. These reports have presented scenarios for risks that could have aggravated the security situation in Lebanon, suggesting that tightened security measures have thwarted such threats. The country seemed as if it was about to explode due to all those reports about a series of busted plots, including a suicide bombing targeting Christmas Day and New Year’s Eve celebrations, double bombing attacks, and the arrest of people planning to launch attacks on places of worship and public places. Such reports indicated that suicide attacks and bombings that took place in recent years could be repeated on a larger scale. The news, leaked by security agencies, suggested that Lebanon has been saved from dangerous plots and that several terrorist networks have been dismantled. Such news may be true, or it may be somewhat exaggerated. In Lebanon we are not used to separating security and politics, so it is difficult to estimate how serious the Lebanese media were in dealing with those alleged terrorist plots.
Regardless of whether this information is true, it will not change the basic reality that Lebanon is of little importance compared with what is going on in Syria, Iraq, Palestine and Turkey. What is happening in these and other countries has an indirect impact on Lebanon, but local political changes are of little consequence. Internal developments — such as government decisions, settlements, political conflicts, and the Lebanese leadership’s preoccupation with oil and gas deals and promises of a wealthier future for the country — are marginal details. They cannot cancel the fact that Lebanon is partly involved in what is going on around us via Hezbollah’s role in Syria, Iraq, and even probably Yemen. Lebanon is still far away from the major explosions taking place nearby. It has not been triggered into armed confrontation between local and regional communities. But do some victories over Daesh-linked marginal cells in Lebanon actually protect the country from the repercussions of Lebanon’s involvement in Syria via Hezbollah? Politically speaking, Lebanon is living a big lie of the “self-distancing” policy that the country officially adopted years ago. There are experts affiliated to Hezbollah fighting alongside the Popular Mobilization Units in Iraq, and Lebanon’s role in Aleppo cannot be denied. In Lebanon, we try to distract ourselves from what is going around us by engaging in talk of a new president and government, oil and gas deals, and campaigns to improve the Internet. But all this, and all talk of preventing security risks, do not mean we are safe. Any talk of Lebanon’s alleged safety is nothing but a distraction from Lebanese involvement in conflicting zones nearby. This cannot be controlled by just dismantling a few terrorist cells.• Diana Moukalled is a veteran journalist with extensive experience in both traditional and new media. She is also a columnist and freelance documentary producer. She can be reached on Twitter @dianamoukalled.

Understanding Hezbollah’s history as a ‘proxy of Iran’
By Tony Duheaume/ Special to Al Arabiya English Saturday, 7 January 2017
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/01/10/tony-duheaume-al-arabiya-understanding-hezbollahs-history-as-a-proxy-of-iran/
During the early days of the Iranian regime, one man who had spent his entire career in the IRGC, who was devoutly committed to his military role as senior commander, had stood out more than most amongst his peers as a resolute leader, and this man was Hossein Dehghan. After Israel had invaded Lebanon in 1982, Dehghan, who was dedicated to the Iranian Revolution, and would later become Hassan Rouhani’s defence minister, left Tehran for active service there. After arriving in Lebanon, Dehghan worked alongside other military commanders to establish a fighting force that would be powerful enough to hit back at the Israeli invader, which eventually named itself Hezbollah (Party of God).
It was during his stint in Lebanon, Dehghan received orders from Tehran to carry out an attack against the multinational peacekeeping forces stationed in Beirut. On October 23, 1983, under the watchful eye of Dehghan, an Iranian suicide bomber named Ismalal Ascari drove a 19 ton Mercedes explosively-laden truck, containing an equivalent of six tons of TNT, through a barbed wire fence, and travelling past two guard posts, he trundled across a courtyard, driving the truck into the lobby of the 1st Battalion, 8th Marine Regimental Battalion Landing Team barracks in Beirut, situated at Beirut International Airport.
The barracks housed US Marines that were part of a multi-national peacekeeping force, who were sleeping at the time, and as a result of the devastating blast, the four-story building housing them had collapsed into a heap of rubble, killing 220 marines, 18 sailors and three soldiers.
Then minutes later, before the dust had even settled, a second truck bomb was driven into the underground car park of a separate building, in the Ramlet al-Baida area of West Beirut, which housed French paratroopers, and the resulting blast killed 58 soldiers of the 1st Parachute Chasseur Regiment. From the amount of damage the bombs had caused, it was estimated that the explosives were equivalent to 9,525 kg (21,000) of TNT. At the time of the attacks, a relatively unknown group calling itself “Islamic Jihad” had claimed responsibility for the bombings, but right from the start the Americans suspected the fledgling terror group Hezbollah had committed the atrocities, carried out at the behest of Iran and Syria.
Pulling strings
Hezbollah didn’t even admit to its existence until 1985, in its early years it was suspected of using the alias of Islamic Jihad, and was run by Imad Mughniyeh, who became notorious for the amount of attacks he eventually carried out in both the Middle East and the West, during his term as commander of Hezbollah. While leading the terror group, Mughniyeh was often spotted in both Iran and Syria, and was bankrolled by the mullahs, until his assassination by a car bomb in Syria on February 12, 2008.
During the 1980s, with the Quds Force still pulling its strings, Hezbollah continued to be a subservient proxy of Iran, and the regime often used it to carry out terrorist attacks, which allowed the mullah leadership the opportunity to claim plausible deniability to. As time went on, Hezbollah became a crucial wing of Iran’s overseas terror capabilities, with it having become obvious to the regime at an early stage, that by using its proxies to carry out the operational side of its attacks on foreign soil, it would leave its own military forces clear of any blame through lack of evidence, and the more the mullahs were getting away with mass murder, the bolder they became.
As acts of terror continued across the globe throughout the 1980s, a series of atrocities were placed at the door of Hezbollah, which included the 1983 hijacking of a TWA airliner, a series of fatal bombings in Paris killing 12 people, a series of kidnapping, tortures and murders of US, citizens in Lebanon throughout the 1980s; on a list that was forever growing during that era.
As far as Hezbollah’s terrorist activities were concerned, not even the likes of Hassan Rouhani, Iran’s current “moderate” president, could claim that he was exempt from blame. Rouhani himself was tainted by the deaths of dozens of people, as during the 1990s, when he was national security advisor to the then President of Iran, Hashemi Rafsanjani, two very devastating terrorist attacks took place, instigated by the Qods Force, both of which he was certain to have been linked to.
The first of these attacks took place March 17, 1992, when Rafsanjani was alleged to have ordered the truck bombing of the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires, when a 1985 Ford pickup truck containing approximately 225-340kg of TNT exploded near the front entrance of the embassy, destroying much of the building’s facade, killing twenty-nine people. Then two years later, on July 18, 1994, in the same city, the bombing of the Argentine-Israeli Mutual Association (AMIA) took place, in which 85 people lost their lives, and Hezbollah claimed full responsibility for both terror attacks. In the Jewish Community centre attack, a Renault Trafic van driven by Ibrahim Hussein Berro, a 21-year-old Lebanese citizen, and a known operative of Hezbollah, entered a heavily built up commercial area of Buenos Aires, and driving close to the entrance of the Jewish Community Centre, at calle Pasteurr 633, Berro detonated explosives that were packed inside the van.  The bomb was said to have been the equivalent of 300 to 400 kg of TNT, it was composed of ammonium nitrate, combined with aluminium, a heavy hydrocarbon, TNT and nitro-glycerine, and the resulting explosion brought down the front of the building, devastating the inside structure, wrecking buildings within a radius of around 200 metres, killing 85 people, and injuring over 150, many seriously maimed.
Then at a later date, during a press conference on October 25, 2006, Argentine prosecutors Alberto Nisman and Marcello Marquez accused high level Iranian ministers of being behind the 1994 terror attack against the AMIA. But it was claimed that only after the U.S. had applied diplomatic pressure on Argentina, arrest warrants were issued for Hashemi Rafsanjani, Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati, Intelligence Minister Ali Fallahijan and National Security Secretary Hassan Rouhani, for their involvement in the planning of the attack.
Too much on its hands
From a report published on May 29, 2013, the Argentine prosecutor Alberto Nisman issued a 500-page indictment, which also accused Shiite cleric Mohsen Rabbani of supplying logistical support for the AMIA attack, and at the time, although claiming to be a representative of the Ministry of Agriculture of Iran, he was in fact a leading member of Ayatollah Khomeini’s Intelligence Bureau.
Having originally arrived in Argentina as a tourist in 1983, within a year Rabbani had attained permanent residency, and through the use of three Shiite mosques, all of which were under his control, he was able to brainwash young students, recruiting them to take part in terrorist acts; a process which the Iranian regime is well accustomed to.
The report went on to explain how young recruits from poorer communities in Argentina, were offered payments to help them with their studies, which Rabbani was ordered by the Iranian regime to pay them. Then with his young recruits becoming financially indebted to the Shiite cleric, he was able to persuade them to fly to Iran for training at so-called religious centres, which were in fact IRGC military training facilities.
Then two years later, in 1996, Hezbollah’s role in the Khobar Towers apartment complex bombing in Saudi Arabia was highlighted, in which nineteen US servicemen and one Saudi were killed, and 372 people of various nationalities were wounded. Then following this came the October 2000 attack on USS Cole by al-Qaeda, of which Iran was said to have been involved in, and more recently the October 2011 plot to murder the Saudi ambassador in a New York restaurant. Then during the following year, on January 24, 2012, a three-man terror cell run by Iran was exposed for planning to attack the Israeli ambassador to Azerbaijan.
 With much more terrorist activity having taken place that year, 2012 was a busy period for Hezbollah, but now that much of its force is tied up in Syria, aiding its Iranian masters to prop up the Assad regime, it presently has too much on its hands to be a threat elsewhere. But as soon as that war is over, Iran will be once more back in the business of exporting terror, and Hezbollah will be back to its old tricks of dishing it out, a sentiment that has already been echoed by IRGC commanders, threatening future attacks on Bahrain once the Syrian conflict has been settled.
 
Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on January 10-11/17
New U.N. Chief Seeks 'Whole New Approach' to Prevent War
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 10/17/U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Tuesday called for a "whole new approach" to prevent war, vowing to boost the world body's mediation capacity to tackle global conflicts. Making his first address to the Security Council since taking office, Guterres said too much time and too many resources were being spent on responding to crises rather than preventing them. "People are paying too high a price," he said. "We need a whole new approach."The ex-prime minister of Portugal and former head of the U.N. refugee agency took over from Ban Ki-moon on January 1 with a promise to shake up the world body. But Guterres is confronted with a deeply divided Security Council that has notably been unable to take decisive action to end the nearly six-year war in Syria, where more than 310,000 people have been killed. The rules-based international order "is under grave threat," he said, describing the U.N. response to global crises as "fragmented."Guterres announced plans to launch an initiative to enhance mediation as part of his commitment to a "surge in diplomacy for peace," but he did not offer details.
Peace first
The 67-year-old diplomat-in-chief is expected to have a more hands-on approach than his predecessor Ban who left most of the mediation efforts to his special envoys. He encouraged the Security Council to invoke article six of the U.N. charter, which allows it to investigate disputes and lay out procedures for a settlement. "Too many prevention opportunities have been lost because member states mistrusted each other's motives, and because of concerns over national sovereignty," said Guterres. "Today, we need to demonstrate leadership, and strengthen the credibility and authority of the United Nations, by putting peace first," he said, renewing his pledge to make 2017 "a year for peace." Complicating Guterres' plan to revitalize U.N. diplomacy is the question mark hanging over the foreign policy of the incoming U.S. administration under President-elect Donald Trump. Trump has dismissed the world body as "just a club for people to get together and have a good time." Guterres spoke with the incoming U.S. leader by phone last week and the conversation was described by a U.N. spokesman as "very positive."Later this week, Guterres will make his first foray abroad as U.N. chief, heading to Geneva to shore up Cyprus peace talks. He returns to Geneva next week to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping, whose support for the United Nations has been steadily growing.
Russia-U.S. clash
In one of her final addresses to the council, U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power listed many of the conflicts raging worldwide -- in Syria, South Sudan, Yemen, Libya, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Burundi, Nigeria and Mali. "It is obvious that we as a council can do better," said Power, who will end her term as U.S. envoy when the new Trump administration takes over on January 20. She hit out at Russia, accusing Moscow of "trampling" over Ukraine's sovereignty in clear violation of the U.N. charter, and criticizing the military campaign in support of President Bashar Assad in Syria. Russia has resorted to its veto power six times to block action by the council on Syria. Russia's envoy shot back, accusing the United States of bringing chaos to the Middle East with the invasion of Iraq, the campaign against the Islamic State group in Syria and by "destroying" the state in Libya. "The outgoing administration of President (Barack) Obama is desperately looking for those that it can blame for their failure," said Ambassador Vitaly Churkin. French junior minister Matthias Fekl recalled France's proposal to restrict the use of the veto by council powers in conflicts that pose a risk of mass atrocities.
"This council must be able to act when it is necessary," said Fekl.

UAE Ambassador, Diplomats Wounded in Kandahar Blast
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 10/17/At least 11 people were killed in an explosion in the governor's compound in Afghanistan's southern Kandahar province Tuesday during a visit by the UAE ambassador, local media reported. The UAE foreign ministry said envoy Juma Mohammed Abdullah Al Kaabi and other UAE diplomats were wounded in the "terrorist attack." Kandahar's governor and the UAE envoy were wounded by flames from the explosion, but many others were burned beyond recognition, provincial police chief Abdul Raziq told AFP. He said around a dozen people were killed and an equal number were wounded, but the governor's spokesman Samim Khpolwak gave local media a death toll of 11. The explosives were hidden in a sofa, AFP said. No militant group has so far claimed responsibility.

Moscow Slams U.S.-Led Action in Syria as Ineffective
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 10/17/Russian military officials on Tuesday slammed U.S.-led coalition action against Islamic State jihadists in Syria as having had "less than zero" impact, and claimed that a U.S. air strike killed 20 Syrian civilians this month.
Russia's involvement in the war-torn country since September 2015 had "changed the course of fighting terrorism in Syria," said chief of general staff Valery Gerasimov. He listed the successes of Russia's operation to shore up the forces of long-time ally Bashar Assad, saying Moscow had carried out 71,000 strikes. But "our colleagues from the U.S.-led anti-terrorist coalition have conducted considerably fewer strikes, only about 6,500, over the past two and a half years of the operation against IS in Syria," he said. Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, speaking during a televised meeting, said the U.S.-led coalition had made no impact. "As much as we needed the support of the international coalition -- the effect of which has been less than zero -- I regret to say that we did not see this support, and this required us to exert all of our energy" on Syria, he said. Gerasimov said the coalition strikes never had "any significant results" and said they had caused a "considerable number of deaths among civilians and government troops." Besides a misguided strike on Syrian troops near Deir Ezzor last September, which the Pentagon admitted was a "regrettable error," Gerasimov said a U.S. plane had bombed Syrian civilians on January 3. "An American B-52 bomber struck Sarmada in the Idlib province without warning the Russian side. This is in an area where the ceasefire applies," he said, referring to the truce brokered by Russia and Turkey that went into effect on December 30. "As a result of the strike, over 20 civilians were killed," Gerasimov said.
Washington said last week it had killed about 20 al-Qaida militants in air strikes in northwestern Syria.

2 Missing Turkish Soldiers Reported Killed in Syria
Associated Press/Naharnet/January 10/17/Turkish media reports say two Turkish soldiers reported missing during a battle with Islamic State militants in northern Syria have died. The state-run Anadolu Agency says funerals for the two soldiers will be held Tuesday in their hometowns. The two soldiers were reported missing on Nov. 29 and were believed to be held captive by the IS. There was no information on the circumstances of their deaths or on the return of their remains. Turkey sent troops and tanks into northern Syria in August to support Turkish-backed Syrian opposition forces pushing the IS group away from a border area and curtail the territorial advances of Syrian Kurdish groups. Since then, 49 Turkish soldiers have been killed in battles.

Syrian Kurds Say Not Invited to Astana Talks
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 10/17/Syrian Kurds have not been invited to the talks on the political future of Syria due to take place this month in Kazakhstan, their representative in France said Tuesday. "We are not invited to Astana. There appears to be a veto on our presence," Khaled Issa told AFP in Paris. The Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD) and its armed wing, the Kurdish Peoples' Protection Units (YPG), have been Western allies in the Syrian war but are hated by Turkey, which will co-host the Astana talks with Russia. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan calls the PYD a "terror group" for its links to Kurdish separatist militants in Turkey and has blasted the United States for working with the group on the ground in Syria. Negotiations on Syria's future are scheduled to take place in the Kazakh capital in late January following the ceasefire negotiated by Russia on December 30, even though fighting has since flared up. "It seems that only representatives of armed groups, and not political representatives (of the opposition) will be invited to negotiate with the Syrian regime in Astana," Issa said. The political opposition will meet on Friday in the Saudi city of Riyadh to discuss the Astana process, diplomatic sources said. "If there is no peaceful solution in Syria, the Kurds cannot be ignored," Issa said. "I hope we will not be left out of an international solution." In March, Syrian Kurds unilaterally proclaimed the creation of a federal region grouping the territories they control in northern Syria. However a ground offensive by Turkey along the border in Syria in August put an end to Kurdish hopes of unifying the territories they control. "We have a political project -- the democratic federalism for the whole of Syria. We are prepared to negotiate with the (Syrian) regime, providing we have international guarantees," Issa said.

Saudi Detains Two Human Rights Activists
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 10/17/Saudi Arabia has arrested two human rights activists, one of whom tweeted a depiction of the birth of Christ on Christmas Day, a monitoring group said on Tuesday. The arrests of Essam Koshak and Ahmed al-Mshikhs are "part of the ongoing attacks on human rights defenders in the country," the Gulf Center for Human Rights said on its website. "No charges have been directed against either defender but it is believed that their online activities are the reason behind their arrest," said the center, which has offices in Copenhagen and Beirut. It called for their immediate and unconditional release. Koshak has been detained in Mecca since Sunday, the Gulf Center said. On Twitter, he is pictured against a map of the Middle East and wearing Western dress including a flat cap of the kind popularized by the cartoon character Andy Capp. Koshak describes himself as a "rights defender", and has tweeted Western media reports about Saudi Arabia. Koshak has also retweeted comments from other activists, including the banned Civil and Political Rights Association (ACPRA). The Gulf Center said Mshikhs, co-founder of the Al-Adalah Center for Human Rights in Saudi Arabia, has been detained since Thursday in Qatif, an eastern district dominated by minority Shiites. Mshikhs, whose Twitter account shows him against a backdrop of Nelson Mandela, Ernesto "Che" Guevara and Mahatma Gandhi, tweeted a Nativity scene showing the birth of Christ on Christmas Day. The practice of religions other than Islam is banned in Saudi Arabia. In December, London-based Amnesty International accused Saudi Arabia of a "continued ruthless and relentless crackdown on human rights defenders."Late last year, the kingdom was elected to a new three-year term on the United Nations Human Rights Council.
 
Iran’s Violations of Arms Embargo to Be Discussed by Security Council
Jordan Dakamseh/Al Arabiya/January 10/17/New York- Few days after former Secretary-general of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon expressed his concern regarding the fact that Tehran might have violated an arms embargo by supplying weapons and missiles to Lebanese Shi’ite group so-called Hezbollah, the topic is set to be discussed by the council on January 18. The second bi-annual report, due to be discussed by the 15-member council, also cited an accusation by France that an arms shipment seized in the northern Indian Ocean in March was from Iran and likely bound for Somalia or Yemen.
 Regardless that the session was aimed at following the implementation of U.N. resolution 2231, which endorsed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, Reuters confirmed on Monday that the report submitted every six months by U.N. chief included U.N. concern from Iran violating an arms embargo. According to Reuters, the report was submitted to the Security Council on Dec. 30 by Ban Ki-moon before he was succeeded by Antonio Guterres on Jan. 1. It came just weeks before U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, who has threatened to either scrap the nuclear agreement or seek a better deal, takes office. “In a televised speech broadcast by Al Manar TV on 24 June 2016, Hassan Nasrallah, the Secretary-General of Hezbollah, stated that the budget of Hezbollah, its salaries, expenses, weapons and missiles all came from the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Ban wrote in the “I am very concerned by this statement, which suggests that transfers of arms and related materiel from the Islamic Republic of Iran to Hezbollah may have been undertaken contrary to a Security Council resolution,” Ban said.
 Most U.N. sanctions were lifted a year ago under a deal Iran made with Britain, France, Germany, China, Russia, the United States and the European Union to curb its nuclear program. However, Iran is still subject to an arms embargo and other restrictions, which are not technically part of the nuclear agreement. Meanwhile, U.N. Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in Iran Asma Jahangir expressed deep concerns over the continuous detention of human rights defenders in the country, who, she said “have been tried on the basis of vaguely defined offences and heavily sentenced following trials marred with due process violations.”Raising alarm over the health of several prisoners of conscience in Iran, who have been on a prolonged hunger strike contesting the legality of their detention, the U.N. expert on the human rights situation there urged the authorities to “immediately and unconditionally” release all those who have been arbitrarily arrested, detained and prosecuted for exercising their rights. Two of at least eight protesting prisoners of conscience have been on hunger strike since October last year. One of the two ended his strike last week after his wife, Golrokh Ebrahimi Iraee, a human rights defender, was granted bail. Another protester – Mohammed Ali Taheri – started his strike on 28 September. However, his whereabouts have been unknown since his reported transfer to Baghiatollah Military Hospital in October.
 Furthermore, at least one of the protesters – Arash Sadeghi, another human rights defender – is being denied transfer to specialized medical facilities despite his critical health condition and is reportedly kept in his cell. “I call on the Iranian authorities to ensure that Sadeghi has access, as a matter of utmost priority, to specialized health care in a hospital outside prison, in compliance with international human rights standards and medical ethics in particular the principles of informed consent,” said Jahangir.
 
Washington Describes Russian Contribution to Face Terrorism as ‘Zero’
Al Arabiya/January 10/17/Moscow- Member of the Duma’s International Affairs Committee Sergey Zelezniak called for disregarding statements by U.S. Secretary of Defense who said that Russia has done “virtually zero” in the fight against ISIS terrorists in Syria.
 Ash Carter contended that the U.S. and its coalition partners are carrying this burden “by themselves.”“They haven’t done anything,” Carter stated in an interview with NBC’s Meet the Press.“They came in, they said they were going to fight ISIS, and they said they were going to help in the civil war in Syria.”Criticizing Russian involvement in Syria, Carter said that it “almost certainly” made the ending of Syrian civil war “harder,” because Moscow failed to align with Washington’s intention to oust the Syrian president and failed to “help Assad move aside gently” and “bring the moderate opposition into the Syrian government.”Russian Deputy Speaker of the State Duma Irina Yarovaya called the statement by Carter “unprofessional and hysterical.” Yarovaya was confident that Russia’s efforts against terrorism were the most efficient. “’Hysteria at sunset’ this is how the statements by the Pentagon could be described. They mean only one thing – a complete failure. It’s when you lose your nerve, and the only way out is to blame someone who proved efficient in the fight against terrorism – in this case Russia,” Yarovaya said. According to the lawmaker, the national and global security is not a game and a subject for speculation for Russia, especially when it comes to life of its citizens. 
 
Iran ‘disregarded invitation calls’ for Hajj arrangements talks
Staff writer, Al Arabiya.net Tuesday, 10 January 2017/Saudi Ministry of Hajj and Umrah confirmed that it has sent its counterparts to all the Muslim countries, including Iran, to arrange the pilgrimage of their missions this year. According to Asharq al-Awsat newspaper, the Saudi Ministry pointed out that the invitations were sent through pilgrimage-related authorities and not through the countries’ foreign ministries. Dr. Talal Kotb, director of the institution of pilgrims’ missions from Iran, explained that the Iranian regime ignored the call of the Saudi Ministry of Hajj and Umrah who sent an invitation to the Iranian delegation of the pilgrimage affairs, to discuss the arrangements related to the arrival of the pilgrims, their lodging and transportations. Kotb said: “The invitations were sent to all Muslim countries in order to set the date of the meeting; it is possible to change the date of the meeting according to the circumstances of the invited country. The ministry is dealing with this matter with high flexibility.”He was surprised by the statements released by the Iranian Foreign Ministry, which said that Iran had not received this invitation, while 79 countries confirmed its receipt and their delegations were received the beginning of this month. The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman bin AbdulAziz, had agreed on raising the numbers of pilgrims during the Hajj season this year from Saudi Arabia and abroad, in compliance with the regulations of the arrangements.
 
Iran ‘disregarded invitation calls’ for Hajj arrangements talks
Staff writer, Al Arabiya.net Tuesday, 10 January 2017/Saudi Ministry of Hajj and Umrah confirmed that it has sent its counterparts to all the Muslim countries, including Iran, to arrange the pilgrimage of their missions this year. According to Asharq al-Awsat newspaper, the Saudi Ministry pointed out that the invitations were sent through pilgrimage-related authorities and not through the countries’ foreign ministries. Dr. Talal Kotb, director of the institution of pilgrims’ missions from Iran, explained that the Iranian regime ignored the call of the Saudi Ministry of Hajj and Umrah who sent an invitation to the Iranian delegation of the pilgrimage affairs, to discuss the arrangements related to the arrival of the pilgrims, their lodging and transportations.  Kotb said: “The invitations were sent to all Muslim countries in order to set the date of the meeting; it is possible to change the date of the meeting according to the circumstances of the invited country. The ministry is dealing with this matter with high flexibility.”  He was surprised by the statements released by the Iranian Foreign Ministry, which said that Iran had not received this invitation, while 79 countries confirmed its receipt and their delegations were received the beginning of this month. The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman bin AbdulAziz, had agreed on raising the numbers of pilgrims during the Hajj season this year from Saudi Arabia and abroad, in compliance with the regulations of the arrangements.

Free Syrian Army Commander: Iranian Regime's Agents Are Main Violators of Syria Ceasefire
NCRI/Tuesday, 10 January 2017/On Sunday, January 8, in an interview with Simay-e Azadi TV, Mustafa Baru, a commander of Free Syrian Army who is a signatory to the nationwide Syria ceasefire as the representative of Syrian fighters stressed that the Iranian regime’s agents are the main culprit for violation of cease-fire. Baru said “Naturally, there’s an ongoing truce violation and the reason is the presence of different kinds of militias in Syria. Currently, Assad’s regime is by no means ruling over Syria. Assad is not even ruling over the regions that are under his control. Rather, these regions are being dominated by the militias and bands that have divided these areas among themselves.” When asked about the continuation of the Syrian revolution despite all the crimes perpetrated against the Syrian people by Assad regime and its backers, in particular the Iranian regime, he maintained “the revolution will not stop until the day the Syrian people are able to choose by themselves who will be going to rule on them and live a free and dignified life.” “We have not sacrificed millions of martyrs, wounded, disabled and refugees only to go back to Assad’s era,” he underscored. On the solidarity of Iranian people and resistance with the Syrian revolution, Mustafa Baru said “we are in solidarity with you and we know how hard it is for you when you hear we suffer losses here and there. Thank you and thank everyone who prays for our victory. Thanks to everyone who is standing by the revolution of Syrian oppressed people. Thanks to the Iranian resistance and People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) that have risen up against the rule of the Mullahs’ in Iran.”

The Role of Iranian Regime's Militias in Iraq
NCRI/Tuesday, 10 January 2017/In an interview with Aljazeera TV, Iraqi lawyer and director of London based National Center for Justice ‘Dr. Sheikhly’ discusses an Amnesty International report on the Iranian regime’s militia group ‘Al-Hasad Al-Shaabi’ being equipped with Western weapons. Aljazeera TV: what do you think about the ‘Al-Hashd Al-Shaabi’ militias being armed with Western weapons? Dr. Sheikhly from London: first of all, the Amnesty International report is an undeniable document which shows the crimes and infringements committed by ‘Al-Hashd Al-Shaabi’ are state-sponsored. They possess government weapons. They have American and Russian weapons, or obtain their weapons from EU countries or the Iranian regime.
These militias are means of a sectarian war, the kind of war Iraq has sponsored since 2004, 2005. Everyone knows that these militias have a black record regarding the Iraqi innocent people. The militias were made and prepared by the Iraqi government during Nouri Maleki’s first and second term in office. Garrisons were set up to train these militias while weapons belonging to the Iraqi army and held at their ammunition depots were delivered to the militia leaders. As a result, any crime committed by these militias is actually backed by American tax-payers and financially supported by EU countries. I believe that the Amnesty International’s report is a stigma on forehead of the United States and EU countries who are chanting fight against terror meanwhile are aware of the fact that the weapons they deliver the Iraqi government end up in militias’ hands.

Iranian Political Prisoners Demand the World's Attention
NCRI/Tuesday, 10 January 2017/On Jan. 4, the reports came from within Gohardasht Prison, near the Iranian capital Tehran, that activist and political prisoner Ali Moezzi, still behind bars despite completing his term, had disappeared. Wrote Dr Ali Safavi a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Council of Resistance of Iran and president of the Near East Policy Research, in ‘The Hill’ on January 9, 2017, the article continues as follows.
Moezzi has faced repression from the Islamic Republic since its earliest days. He spent years in prison in the 1980's for his affiliation with the Iranian opposition group, the Mujahedin-e Khalq (PMOI/MEK). He served two more years, beginning in 2008, for having visited his two daughters residing in Camp Ashraf, Iraq. He was arrested again in 2011, seven months after his latest release, because he had attended the funeral of a fellow political prisoner, another MEK activist who had died because authorities denied him access to life-saving medical treatment.
Over the course of Moezzi’s long history as a prisoner of conscience, he has faced many different forms of pressure, including the arbitrary and unlawful extension of his most recent prison term beyond its specified four years.
The extension signals the Iranian regime’s aversion to letting its political prisoners go free. In Moezzi’s case, as in many others, that aversion was underscored by numerous explicit death threats. Moezzi’s life was already in danger before this latest development. He was reportedly subjected to routine beatings and torture and, as with many ill or elderly prisoners, the absence of medical care and dire prison conditions had aggravated pre-existing health problems.
Moezzi’s most recent arrest came shortly after he had been released from a hospital after undergoing surgery following a cancer diagnosis. Over the years, the regime has repeatedly demonstrated its callous and deliberate disregard for the health and well-being of prisoners, especially those detained for political or religious “offenses.” One prominent, recent example is the case of Arash Sadeghi, who is serving a 15-year prison sentence for his peaceful human rights activism.Sadeghi began a hunger strike shortly after his wife was arrested over the contents of an unpublished short story found in her home.
Sadeghi finally ended his hunger strike after judicial authorities made the tiny concession of granting his wife temporary release from her pre-trial detention. It took more than 70 days for the regime to agree to even that, and, in the end, it was apparently not the likelihood of Sadeghi’s imminent death that prompted them to act, but the massive outpouring of support that his protest had garnered within Iran and abroad.
Hundreds of Iranians gathered outside of Evin Prison, protesting his treatment. Several thousands promoted his cause on the internet and via banned social media networks.
It may not be a coincidence that Moezzi disappeared from Gohardasht Prison just one day after it was announced that Sadeghi had been hospitalized and brought back from the brink of death.
Both incidents demonstrated that the Iranian regime has no qualms about endangering the lives of its political adversaries, but the ruling mullahs can only take such a situation to its drastic conclusion if relatively free from public scrutiny. It is much easier for the regime to kill political prisoners, or simply allow them to die, if those deaths occur in secret locations, beneath the haze of “plausible” deniability. Thus, Moezzi’s disappearance does not preclude Iran’s domestic activists or the international community from saving him in much the same way they saved Sadeghi. For the time being, it is impossible to know Moezzi’s current condition, much less to follow its deterioration in real time.
This presents a challenge because it is more difficult to rally people around a cause that they cannot see with their own eyes. These atrocities must not be allowed to continue in the shadows. This is the challenge that must be overcome; it simply requires serious commitment, and a broad-based campaign that encompasses much more of the international community and media. World powers must take an interest in this case, and in the overall plight of Iranian prisoners of conscience. This imperative is actually underscored by the recent successes of Iran’s domestic activists, particularly in the Sadeghi case.
If the global community remains silent, it is sending the clear message to the Iranian regime that it can get away with such crimes with impunity. That is a message we must not condone with our silence. Safavi is a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Council of Resistance of Iran and president of the Near East Policy Research. You can follow him on Twitter @amsafavi.

Israeli Troops Kill Palestinian Knife Attacker in W.Bank
 
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 10/17/Israeli troops in the occupied West Bank shot dead a Palestinian who attacked them with a knife during an overnight operation to arrest suspected militants, the army said on Tuesday. A Palestinian official in the refugee camp where the incident occurred said the man tried to prevent the soldiers from entering his home when he was shot. A military statement said that no soldiers were injured in the incident at Al-Fara refugee camp, northeast of the city of Nablus."Overnight, an assailant, armed with a knife, attempted to stab soldiers on operational activity to arrest suspects," the statement said. "Forces called the attacker to halt and, upon his continued advance, fired toward him, resulting in his death."It added that others in the camp hurled explosives and shot at the soldiers. Khaled Mansour, an official in the camp, identified the dead man as Mohammed al-Salhi, 32. Mansour told AFP Salhi had tried to prevent the soldiers entering his house before being shot six times. Since October 2015, 248 Palestinians, 40 Israelis, two Americans, a Jordanian, an Eritrean and a Sudanese have been killed, according to an AFP count. Most of the Palestinians killed were carrying out knife, gun or car-ramming attacks, according to Israeli authorities.  Others were shot dead during protests or clashes, while some died in Israeli air strikes on the Gaza Strip. Many analysts say Palestinian frustration with the Israeli occupation and settlement building in the West Bank, comatose peace efforts and their own fractured leadership have helped feed the unrest. Israel says incitement by Palestinian leaders and media is a leading cause. The Al-Fara incident occurred less than 48 hours after a Palestinian rammed a truck into troops visiting a Jerusalem tourist site, killing four soldiers in a stark reminder of tensions despite a recent lull in violence. The attacker was shot dead at the scene.
 
Tunisia Democratic Transition 'Blocked', Says Electoral Chief
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 10/17/Tunisia's transition to democracy after its 2011 revolution has hit a roadblock, the electoral commission chief said Tuesday, criticizing a delay in holding the first local elections since the uprising. "Tunisia stood out... through its partially successful transition and it is unacceptable that this march towards democracy be cut short," Chafik Sarsar told La Presse newspaper. "Everything is blocked... We have missed a date with history," he said. Tunisia, whose 2011 uprising inspired similar revolts across other Arab countries, has been touted as a regional example of a successful transition to democracy after a revolution. Sarsar criticized parliament's delay in adopting an electoral law necessary to hold the country's first municipal and regional polls since the revolt that toppled longtime dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali. He said the commission needed "eight months from the publication of the law" to organize the polls. If the elections were held in 2018, they would be immediately followed by the 2019 presidential elections, he said, warning holding these so close together risked "tiring out" the electorate. On Tuesday, a parliament vote on a third of the members of the electoral commission was postponed after the necessary quorum of 160 lawmakers was not met, NGO al-Bawsala reported. Tunisia passed a new constitution in 2014 and held free parliamentary and presidential elections the same year. But authorities have struggled to redress Tunisia's economy and solve youth unemployment -- particularly among new graduates -- since the 2011 revolt.
 On Tuesday morning, some 40 unemployed graduates broke in to local government offices in the town of Sidi Bouzid in central Tunisia, which was the cradle of the 2011 uprising, an AFP correspondent said. They had traveled from the town of Meknassi some 50 kilometers (30 miles) away to demand authorities provide them with jobs. Security forces arrested about 10 protesters. Calm returned to Sidi Bouzid by midday, but a call was issued for a general strike in Meknassi on Thursday. In January last year, authorities imposed a nationwide nighttime curfew after Tunisia witnessed some of its worst social unrest since the 2011 uprising. Anger erupted after the death of a 28-year-old unemployed man who was electrocuted when he climbed a power pole while protesting in the central town of Kasserine. That unrest had echoes of the public anger after the death of a young fruit seller who set himself on fire in Sidi Bouzid in December 2010 in protest at unemployment and police harassment.
 
Morocco Bans Production and Sale of Burqas
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 10/17/Morocco has banned the production and sale of burqa full-face Muslim veils, apparently for security reasons, media reports said Tuesday. While there was no official announcement by authorities in the North African nation, the reports said the interior ministry order would take effect this week. "We have taken the step of completely banning the import, manufacture and marketing of this garment in all the cities and towns of the kingdom," the Le360 news site quoted a high-ranking interior ministry official as saying. It said the measure appeared to be motivated by security concerns, "since bandits have repeatedly used this garment to perpetrate their crimes." Most women in Morocco, whose King Mohammed VI favors a moderate version of Islam, prefer the hijab headscarf that does not cover the face. The niqab, which leaves the area around the eyes uncovered, is also worn in Salafist circles and in more conservative regions in the north, from where thousands of jihadists have gone to fight in Syria and Iraq.
 In some commercial districts of Casablanca, the country's economic capital, interior ministry officials on Monday conducted "awareness-raising campaigns with traders to inform them of this new decision," the Media 24 website said.
 In Taroudant in southern Morocco, authorities ordered traders to stop making and selling burqas and to liquidate their stock within 48 hours, the reports said. Retailers in the northern town of Ouislane were said to have received similar instructions.
 It was unclear if Morocco plans to follow in the footsteps of some European countries such as France and Belgium where it is illegal to wear full veils in public. The reports were met with a muted response in the absence of official confirmation, though Salafists expressed concern that the measure could be expanded to include the niqab. "Is Morocco moving towards banning the niqab that Muslim women have worn for five centuries?" Salafist sheikh Hassan Kettani wrote on Facebook. "If true it would be a disaster," he added. Hammad Kabbaj, a preacher who was barred from standing in parliamentary elections in October over his alleged ties to "extremism," denounced the ban as "unacceptable." In comments on Facebook, he mocked the "Morocco of freedom and human rights" which "considers the wearing of the Western swimsuit on the beaches an untouchable right."But lawmaker Nouzha Skalli, a former family and social development minister, welcomed the ban as "an important step in the fight against religious extremism."
 The High Council of Oulemas, the country's top religious authority, has yet to comment on the issue of banning full-face veils. 

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 10-11/17
The Real Face of Rafsanjani
NCRI/Tuesday, 10 January 2017/
Iran after Rafsanjani
Dying at the age of 82 from a heart attack on Sunday, former Iranian president Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani had a long record of guiding the regime’s lethal measures domestically and abroad, including suicide bombings and eliminating exiled dissidents. Such an image is far from the “moderate” that Western media found in him. Wrote Amir Basiri in the ‘American Thinker’ on January 10, 2017, the article continues as follows.
Rafsanjani was known for his central role in Iranian politics. From the 1979 revolution forward, he placed himself amongst the inner circle of regime founder and first supreme leader Ruhollah Khomeini. He served as the regime’s parliamentary speaker in the 1980s, while in parallel acted as Khomeini’s envoy to supervise operations in the Iran-Iraq War.
As Khomeini died and the war wound down, Rafsanjani assumed the mantle of presidency in 1989 and played a significant part in Ali Khamenei’s rise as Khomeini’s successor. Rafsanjani continued his political life by chairing the Assembly of Experts -- in charge of appointing the supreme leader and acting as an oversight body over his role -- and move on to the Expediency Council before his death, both advising Khamenei and finalizing conflicts between the ultra-conservative Guardian Council and the parliament.
Following eight years of Mohammad Khatami’s presidency, in 2005 Rafsanjani made an effort to reclaim this position. This campaign ended in humiliation as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad assumed the presidency. For the next eight years Rafsanjani publicly criticized and denounced Ahmadinejad's policies and actions, distancing himself from the hardliners and further attempting to portray himself as a “reformist” favoring warm relations with the West.
Despite serious differences and rivalry over power and influence, Khamenei fully comprehended his need for Rafsanjani as a stabilizing factor and could never fully eliminate him. Rafsanjani’s death is now evaluated as the loss of a significant pillar for the entire regime, as explained by Iranian opposition leader Maryam Rajavi, president of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI).
Rajavi declared in a statement on Sunday defining Rafsanjani’s death as the downfall of “one of the two pillars and key to the equilibrium of the religious fascism ruling Iran.”
“Rafsanjani, who had always been the regime’s number two, acted as its balancing factor and played a decisive role in its preservation. Now, the regime will lose its internal and external equilibrium,” she added, also predicting the “approaching overthrow” of the mullahs’ regime.
For 38 years Rafsanjani “played a critical role in suppression at home and export of terrorism abroad, as well as in the quest to acquire nuclear weapons,” Rajavi underscored.
In 2006 Argentine federal prosecutor Alberto Nisman filed suit against Rafsanjani for his role in one of the deadliest Iran-supported terrorist attacks abroad -- the 1994 suicide truck bombing targeting the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires. The massive blast leveled entire buildings and resulted in the death of 85 people with hundreds more wounded. The investigators specifically issued arrest warrants for Rafsanjani and seven other senior Iranian regime figures.
Rafsanjani also ordered numerous assassinations of dissidents in exile, including former Iranian ambassador the United Nations and prominent human rights activist Dr. Kazem Rajavi. Iranian assassins murdered him in 1990 near his Geneva home. Swiss investigators raised charges against Tehran and authorities issued an arrest warrant for Rafsanjani’s spy chief Ali Fallahian.
The March 1993 assassination of 42-year-old NCRI Rome envoy Mohammad Hossein Naghdi in the Italian capital and the February 1996 murder of the NCRI’s refugee envoy Zahra Rajabi in Istanbul were also ordered by Rafsanjani.
He also had a particular enmity against the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK), the central entity in the NCRI umbrella group.
“Four rulings are a must for [MEK members]: 1-- Be killed. 2 -- Be hanged. 3 -- Arms and legs be amputated. 4 -- Be separated from society,” Rafsanjani is quoted in saying back in 1981. As Khomeini’s right hand, he also presided over the summer 1988 massacre, sending over 30,000 political prisoners to the gallows throughout Iran.
Rafsanjani has been a balancing factor through the course of the past four decades. The regime in its entirety has suffered a major defeat and will significantly decline down the road.
Khamenei’s focus will be to prevent this development from sparking into an uncontrollable turn of events for the entire establishment.
Considering this regime’s past approach, there is a high probably of Tehran’s mullahs resorting to enhancing their effort to spread violence, exporting extremism and terrorism, and promoting Islamic fundamentalism across the region and beyond.
http://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/iran-world/21912-the-real-face-of-rafsanjani

Iran: Rafsanjani's Complicity in the Massacre of Political Prisoners
NCRI/January 10/17
Following the United Nations fourth resolution condemning Iran regime for the 1988 massacre of 30,000 political prisoners in Iran, Hashemi Rafsanjani said: “These claimed executions are just rumors for propaganda purposes.”
At the time, despite ample evidence and after the UN General Assembly adopted the resolution in 1988, Rafsanjani came to the scene on December 2, 1988 to conceal the crime and deny it ever happened to evade accountability. He told state-run news agencies: “The claimed executions are just rumors for propaganda purpose in order to cover up internal crisis within the People’s Mojahedin Organization (PMOI/MEK) and to take the organization out of impasse.”
In addition, Rafsanjani on December 3, 1988, following wave of international condemnations of the 1988 massacre and crimes committed by the regime, once again tried to cover-up the crime and said: “This false and bizarre propaganda that Mojahedin have launched in Europe and Western countries claiming that several thousand of their forces have been executed in Iran, their aim is to bring them out of the impasse,” (State-run Resalat newspaper, December 3, 1988).
Backgroun
Former Iranian President Ali-Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, who died on January 8, 2017, aged 82, was one of the two pillars and ‘key to the equilibrium’ of the Iranian regime.
Over the past 38 years, both under Khomeini and in later years, Rafsanjani played a critical role in suppression at home and export of terrorism abroad as well as in the quest to acquire nuclear weapons. Though portrayed by some Western media outlets as a “pragmatist” or “moderate,” during his long career he was associated with some of the regime’s most egregious actions, including mass-casualty terror attacks and the assassinations of exiled dissidents.
Rafsanjani was a stalwart of the Iranian regime and is considered as one of its founding fathers. He played an outsized political role in the life of the Islamic republic, serving as President from 1989-1997 (after serving as Speaker of Parliament and Deputy Commander of the Armed Forces), but also heading two of the regime’s most important institutions – the Assembly of Experts, an 88-member body of top clerics which nominates the Supreme Leader; and the Expediency Council, a body that advises the Supreme Leader.
“Rafsanjani, who had always been the regime's number two, acted as its balancing factor and played a decisive role in its preservation. Now, the regime will lose its internal and external equilibrium,” opposition leader Maryam Rajavi said in a statement that also referred to the “approaching overthrow” of the clerical regime.
Suppression at home
• Rafsanjani viciously called for the extermination of members of Iran’s main opposition group, the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI or MEK). On October 3, 1981, the state-run Ettela’at daily wrote:
“Referring to the grouplets’ operations, Hashemi Rafsanjani, Speaker of the Islamic Parliament and Tehran’s acting Friday prayer leader, said in his sermon:
‘Divine law defines four sentences for them which must be carried out: 1 – kill them, 2 – hang them, 3 – cut off their arms and legs, 4 – banish them…
‘Had we caught and executed 200 of them right after the Revolution, they would not have multiplied so much. If we don’t deal decisively with [Mojahedin] armed grouplet and agents of America and the Soviet Union today, in three years we will have to execute thousands of them instead of one thousand now…”
• According to Khomeini's former heir Hossein-Ali Montazeri, Khomeini sought counsel on his dangerous decisions from these just two individuals: Rafsanjani and current Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. This included his decision to issue a fatwa ordering the massacre of some 30,000 political prisoners at the end of the Iran-Iraq war in the summer of 1988.
Terrorism abroad:
The assassination of Iranian dissidents abroad and the regime’s terror attacks skyrocketed during Rafsanjani’s tenure as President and as head of the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC), a body that oversees and authorizes the regime’s terrorist operations. The mullahs’ terror targets were not only Iranians.
• The Associated Press reported Rafsanjani’s remarks on May 5, 1989 as carried by Iran’s official state news agency IRNA: “If in retaliation for every Palestinian martyred in Palestine, they will kill and execute, not inside Palestine, five Americans or Britons or Frenchmen, the Israelis could not continue to do these wrongs… It is not hard to kill Americans or Frenchmen. It is a bit difficult to Kill [Israelis]. But there are so many [Americans and Frenchmen] everywhere in the world.”
• In 2006, Rafsanjani was implicated by Argentinian investigators in one of the deadliest instances of Iranian terrorism abroad – a 1994 suicide truck bombing of the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires, in which 85 people were killed.
The investigators accused Iran of instructing its Lebanese proxy, Hezbollah, to carry out the bombing. They issued arrest warrants for Rafsanjani, seven other senior Iranians, and a Lebanese national, Hezbollah terrorist chief Imad Mughniyah.
At Argentina’s request, Interpol then issued red notices – the organization’s equivalent of arrest warrants – for five of the Iranians and Mughniyah.
• The FBI established undeniable evidence that Tehran had masterminded the bombing of Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia on June 25, 1996, resulting in the deaths of 19 American servicemen.
Here are some of the most significant killings of prominent dissidents abroad during Rafsanjani’s tenure:
• The assassination in 1992 of four Iranian Kurdish dissidents in a Berlin restaurant called Mykonos. A German court in 1996 ruled that the Iranian regime under Rafsanjani was directly responsible for the Mykonos killings, a finding which the U.S. State Department said at the time provided further proof that Iran was a terrorist state.
Kazem Rajavi of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) – Iran’s most renowned human rights advocate and a former Iranian ambassador to the U.N. and Maryam Rajavi’s brother-in-law –was shot dead near Geneva in 1990. Swiss investigators accused the Iranian regime of responsibility and authorities issued an arrest warrant for Ali Fallahian, Rafsanjani’s intelligence minister.
• The NCRI representative in Rome, Mohammad Hossein Naghdi, shot dead on a street in the Italian capital in March 1993.
• Zahra Rajabi, the NCRI’s representative on refugee issues, shot dead with an NCRI colleague in an Istanbul apartment in February 1996.
Advancing the Iranian nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles program:
The Iranian clandestine nuclear weapons program had a jump start under Rafsanjani and he was the one who really pushed this program forward as a guarantor of the regime’s survival. He intensified cooperation with countries like North Korea to achieve these objectives.
In an interview published by the regime's official state news agency IRNA on October 27, 2015, Rafsanjani acknowledged that during his time as parliamentary speaker and President, both he and Khamenei sought ways to obtain a nuclear bomb.
"Our basic doctrine was always a peaceful nuclear application, but it never left our mind that if one day we should be threatened and it was imperative, we should be able to go down the other path," Rafsanjani said.
Rafsanjani added he had travelled to Pakistan to try to meet Abdul Qadeer Khan, the father of Pakistan's nuclear weapons program, who later helped North Korea to develop a bomb, but did not meet with him.

The Age of Fake Policy

Paul Krugman/The New York Times/January 10/17
On Thursday, at a rough estimate, 75,000 Americans were laid off or fired by their employers. Some of those workers will find good new jobs, but many will end up earning less, and some will remain unemployed for months or years.
If that sounds terrible to you, and you’re asking what economic catastrophe just happened, the answer is, none. In fact, I’m just assuming that Thursday was a normal day in the job market.
The U.S. economy is, after all, huge, employing 145 million people. It’s also ever-changing: Industries and companies rise and fall, and there are always losers as well as winners. The result is constant “churn,” with many jobs disappearing even as still more new jobs are created. In an average month, there are 1.5 million “involuntary” job separations (as opposed to voluntary quits), or 75,000 per working day. Hence my number.
But why am I telling you this? To highlight the difference between real economic policy and the fake policy that has lately been taking up far too much attention in the news media.
Real policy, in a nation as big and rich as America, involves large sums of money and affects broad swaths of the economy. Repealing the Affordable Care Act, which would snatch away hundreds of billions in insurance subsidies to low- and middle-income families and cause around 30 million people to lose coverage, would certainly qualify.
Consider, by contrast, the story that dominated several news cycles a few weeks ago: Donald Trump’s intervention to stop Carrier from moving jobs to Mexico. Some reports say that 800 U.S. jobs were saved; others suggest that the company will simply replace workers with machines. But even accepting the most positive spin, for every worker whose job was saved in that deal, around a hundred others lost their jobs the same day.
In other words, it may have sounded as if Mr. Trump was doing something substantive by intervening with Carrier, but he wasn’t. This was fake policy — a show intended to impress the rubes, not to achieve real results.
The same goes for the hyping of Ford’s decision to add 700 jobs in Michigan — or for that matter, Mr. Trump’s fact-challenged denunciation of General Motors for manufacturing the Chevy Cruze in Mexico (that factory mainly serves foreign markets, not the U.S.).
Did the incoming administration have anything to do with Ford’s decision? Can political pressure change G.M.’s strategy? It hardly matters: Case-by-case intervention from the top is never going to have a significant impact on a $19 trillion economy.
So why are such stories occupying so much of the media’s attention?
The incoming administration’s incentive to engage in fake policy is obvious: It’s the natural counterpart to fake populism. Mr. Trump won overwhelming support from white working-class voters, who believed that he was on their side. Yet his real policy agenda, aside from the looming trade war, is standard-issue modern Republicanism: huge tax cuts for billionaires and savage cuts to public programs, including those essential to many Trump voters.
So what can Mr. Trump do to keep the scam going? The answer is, showy but trivial interventions that can be spun as saving a few jobs here or there. Substantively, this will never amount to more than a rounding error in a giant nation. But it may well work as a P.R. strategy, at least for a while.
Bear in mind that corporations have every incentive to go along with the spin. Suppose that you’re a C.E.O. who wants to curry favor with the new administration. One thing you can do, of course, is steer business to Trump hotels and other businesses. But another thing you can do is help generate Trump-friendly headlines.Keeping a few hundred jobs in America for a couple of years is a pretty cheap form of campaign contribution; pretending that the administration persuaded you to add some jobs you actually would have added anyway is even cheaper. Still, none of this would work without the complicity of the news media. And I’m not talking about “fake news,” as big a problem as that is becoming; I’m talking about respectable, mainstream news coverage.
Sorry, folks, but headlines that repeat Trump claims about jobs saved, without conveying the essential fakeness of those claims, are a betrayal of journalism. This is true even if, as often happens, the articles eventually, quite a few paragraphs in, get around to debunking the hype: many if not most readers will take the headline as validation of the claim. And it’s even worse if headlines inspired by fake policy crowd out coverage of real policy.
It is, I suppose, possible that fake policy will eventually produce a media backlash — that news organizations will begin treating stunts like the Carrier episode with the ridicule they deserve. But nothing we’ve seen so far inspires optimism.

Arabs amid Uprisings
Ghassan Charbel/Al Arabiya/January 10/17
For years now, Arabs have been going through consequent uprisings, on which they can’t cast a blind eye since it is on their land or near it, and affects the security and stability of their states and people. Matter of the fact is that the Middle East has touched on uncharted territory, bringing the former regional system to an irreversible collapse. It is evident that the current costly state is transitional. Yet, it is early to predict the features of the new regional system as they depend on the result of the wars and confrontations in the region. The ongoing Syria conflict helped with unveiling new revolutionary agendas and paved the way for grand changes in policies and strategies. If anything, Syria’s civil war revealed the role of regional uprisings in Iran’s foreign policies aiming to turn it into a powerful country in a region the world remains concerned with its resources despite the talk of its waning importance. Iran’s program was clear when it refused to change anything in the Syrian episode of this series. At the outset of the armed combat in Syria, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei informed an Arab visitor what means: Syria will remain the way it has always been, or it just won’t be for anyone. Tehran tried to push its program into a wider and a more comprehensive stage by adding the Yemeni episode to what Iran considers its great conquests in the region, especially after it became impossible to create a loophole in Bahrain as part of its agenda to contain Saudi Arabia. Iran considered the war in Syria a matter of life or death for its program which seeks a safe passage through Iraq and Syria, all the way to stationing on the Mediterranean Sea through Lebanon.
Indeed, the Iranian project instills fears of disrupting historical balances among the main components of the regions, especially after the Iranian winds managed to infiltrate into the national fabric of more than a state. Tehran found its golden opportunity when the powerful countries didn’t restrict the nuclear agreement with Iran to continuing the regional revolution, which it resumed after the toppling of Saddam Hussein’s regime. The Syrian tragedy provided the Russian Caesar with an opportunity to reshuffle international balance that was formed following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Vladimir Putin used till the end Barack Obama’s withdrawal tendencies and fear of being involved in the Syrian horror. Russia intervened militarily in Syria and altered the trajectory of the war. It raised the slogan of “anti-terrorism”, but technically destroyed the dreams of the moderate Syrian opposition. From Crimea to Ukraine and Syria, Russia sent a message saying that the era of autocracy is over, and so did the time of colored revolutions.
The U.S. seemed distant. Europe was struggling under the burden of immigrants and the increased number of those wanting to leave the European train. The Iranian and Russian revolutions met on Arab and Syrian soil. We can’t say that the goals are the same, but at the same time it is too soon to assume that the disagreement on a political solution for Syria and the future of its regime will cause a rift or collision.
Turkey found itself on a demarcation with the Russian and Iranian rebellions in Syria.
Obama’s policy towards the Kurd, and lack of the Atlantic’s motivation, helped in convincing Recep Tayyip Erdogan to turn the page on the past of friction between him and Putin, and go on to a stage of agreements and dancing over the Syrian arena. The bitterness of the post-Turkish coup times increased the Turkish president’s inclination to go further than normalizing relations with Russia, Iran, and Iraq. The question raised today is whether Ankara will proceed with its gradual departure from U.S. and Europe, to come closer to Russia and the “new truths” in the region. Or will it wait the options of the new Trump administration in dealing with the Russian and Iranian uprisings? There is no doubt that hopelessness in an actual U.S. return to the region will make the Turkish changes something similar to a third coup in the region. Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim’s visit to Baghdad two days ago was a reminder of something Dr. Ahmad al-Jalbi said a few years ago. Back then, Jalbi said that the Middle East is heading towards major changes that old accounts are not fit for.
Put Iran and Iraq. Add to them Syria and Lebanon. Population, oil, gas and a strategic location. If you manage to convince Turkey of joining this group, even if just economically, Russia will understand that it is within its best interest to build stronger relations with such a giant group. It is clear that the U.S. wants a way out,” said Dr. Jalbi. Arab citizens observe those changes and wonder about the Arab status in the region. There is no doubt that those in charge of the ‘revolutions’ are waiting for Trump to see if Washington would adjust its strategy. Certainly, any U.S. acceptance of the results of the revolutions will double the Arabs’ responsibility in preparing themselves to protect their status, security and stability.

Trump Seems to Keep Siding with Russia, but What Does That Get Him?

David Ignatius/The Washington Post/January 10/17
Watching National Intelligence Director James R. Clapper Jr., a gruff, 50-year veteran of the spy world, answer congressional questions Thursday, you couldn’t help wondering whether perhaps this time President-elect Donald Trump has met his match.
To recall a quip made years ago by a prominent Washington lawyer, Clapper is not a “potted plant.” He has served Republicans and Democrats alike with the same grumpy dislike of political criticism.
The showdown between Clapper and Trump over allegations of Russian hacking will shape public perceptions of the next president in the two weeks before his inauguration. We’ll learn more about what Russian hackers did during the 2016 campaign. We’ll also learn more about Trump and whether he will bring his Russophilia into the White House.
After this week’s briefings of Trump and President Obama, the real circus will come next week, when members of Congress receive their own classified reports. Democrats would be wise if they kept their mouths shut and let GOP Sens. John McCain (Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (S.C.) do the talking.
Trump’s post-election line on Russian hacking has been to blame U.S. intelligence agencies and the news media. Bashing the “elitist” media has been a standard GOP tactic since Richard Nixon’s day. But Trump at times has actually seemed to be siding with Russia and other anti-American critics and against U.S. intelligence agencies.
The standard response of a president-elect to any allegation of foreign meddling in the U.S. election, you’d think, would be to call for an investigation. Instead, Trump called the allegations of Russian hacking “ridiculous,” said it was the Democratic National Committee’s own fault if its cybersecurity was poor, needled the CIA for its Iraq WMD mistakes, and otherwise sought to belittle the intelligence agencies.
Weirdest of all was Trump’s embrace this week of Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder and a person many U.S. officials, Republican and Democratic, see as having damaged U.S. national security by leaking classified documents about nearly every area of foreign policy.
When Assange sought to pooh-pooh Moscow’s role with a careful denial that his source hadn’t been “the Russian government” or a “state party,” he got three “Pinocchios” from The Post’s Fact Checker. But Trump treated him like a new friend. He approvingly tweeted Assange’s claim that U.S. media coverage was “very dishonest” and added: “More dishonest than anyone knows.”
Then, in one of those “who, me?” reversals that are a Trump specialty, he tweeted Thursday: “The dishonest media likes saying that I am in Agreement with Julian Assange — wrong. I simply state what he states . . . The media lies to make it look like I am against ‘Intelligence’ when in fact I am a big fan!”
We’ll soon see how supportive of U.S. intelligence Trump really is. But in recent months, his approach to the hacking story has been worryingly similar to Russia’s own response: It’s all lies, circulated by a dishonest media. Nobody can believe anything.
This sort of information fog is precisely what Moscow seeks to spawn in its own propaganda campaigns. The Russian goal is “to corrode democratic norms and institutions by discrediting the electoral process and to tarnish the reputations of democratic governments in order to establish a kind of moral equivalence between Russia and the West,” Thorsten Benner and Mirko Hohmann wrote last month in Foreign Affairs.
Anyone who thinks that the Russian hacking charges are simply an attempt to belittle or discredit Trump should study Russia’s current covert-action campaign in Europe. Benner and Hohmann quote Bruno Kahl, the chief of Germany’s intelligence service, who told a newspaper there that “cyberattacks are taking place that have no purpose other than to elicit uncertainty.” The head of French information security similarly warned last month that Western countries face “the development of a digital threat for political ends and for destabilization.”

Exclusive: US Jerusalem embassy – only foundations
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report January 10, 2017
Exclusive to debkafile: The appointment of Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, 35, as senior adviser in the future White House on Middle East affairs is part of a broader plan taking shape in the president-elect’s transition team for bringing forward a resolution of the Israel-Palestinian dispute. This plan has not yet jelled into concrete policy, but is still a set of ideas under consideration by the team’s insiders, in the light of Trump’s comments past and present.
On Nov 22, the president elect said that Kushner “could be very helpful” in reconciling the longstanding dispute between the Israelis and Palestinians. “He would be very good at it” and “He knows the region.”
He also said: Many people said “you can’t do it. I disagree. I think I have reason to believe I can do it.”
The incoming US president’s appointment of David Friedman as ambassador to Israel also mentioned the drive for peace and reiterated his campaign pledge to move the US embassy to Jerusalem.
This week, Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas warned that transferring the embassy would be tantamount to a US declaration of war on the Palestinians. King Abdullah of Jordan said it would be “a red line” for his government and “inflame the Islamic and Arab streets,” while Secretary of State John Kerry said, days before he leaves the post, “You’d have an explosion, an absolute explosion in the region – not just in the West Bank - and perhaps, even in Israel itself - but throughout the region.”
Those dire warnings went without response from the president elect and his designated secretary of state. However, they appear to have had some effect. debkafile’s exclusive sources report that the transition team is examining a number of proposals, one of which is to make a start on clearing the ground at the future site of the US embassy in Jerusalem and then wait.
The US government purchased the site some years ago for this purpose.The plot, known as the Allenby Camp, which served as a British military compound after 1917, is large and stands empty in the southern Jerusalem neighborhood of Talpiot, adjacent to the Palestinian district of Jabal Muqabar and the mixed neighborhood of Abu Tor.
Another idea is to conduct a cornerstone-laying ceremony at the site – and then suspend construction. The Palestinians would have to reciprocate by calling off their international campaign for vilifying and delegitimizing the State of Israel at the UN as well as in world capitals. Construction of the US embassy would then remain on hold. But if the Palestinians continued their anti-Israel campaign, construction of the Jerusalem embassy would go forward.
Our sources report that the embassy transfer is just one item on a broad program President-elect Trump is putting together on the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, including its territorial aspects.
Important details of this plan - and more - will be revealed exclusively in the coming issue of DEBKA Weekly (for subscribers) out next Friday, Jan. 13.

The difference journalists can make in conflict zones

Raed Omari/Al Arabiya/January 10/17
Media rights group Reporters Without Borders’ latest report says that 58 journalists were killed across the world in 2016 in the line of duty. In its annual report, the France-based press freedom group says that 19 and 10 journalists were killed in war-torn Syria and Afghanistan respectively, followed by nine in Mexico and five in Iraq. That the number of journalists killed in 2016 is fewer than the 67 in 2015 is attributed to the fact that many of them avoided conflict-ridden countries, mainly Syria, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Afghanistan and Burundi. That is why almost all of those killed in 2016 were local journalists. “The violence against journalists is more and more deliberate,” RSF Secretary General Christophe Deloire said, adding, “they are clearly being targeted and murdered because they are journalists.” RSF also urged the new UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres to appoint a special representative for the protection of journalists.
The RSF 2016 report, and several such reports, suggest an alarming prospect for journalists that even full-fledged democracies are failing to observe and address. The first is the disinclination to report from war-torn countries because of the lack of protection. This means that the truth is not being reported from places where truth needs to emerge. With little being done to protect journalists, one can conclude that deliberate attempts are being made to silence them as happened frequently during the 1960s, 70s and the 80s.
The fear or inability of journalists to report from dangerous territories has given rise to what we call “citizen journalists” in conflict-torn countries, like Syria. They have become the sources of information that even well-established news outlets immensely rely on for their coverage. However, even citizen journalists are not safe and many of them have been deliberately targeted.
In countries like Syria and Iraq, where the conflict has become extremely complicated, journalists need to be on the side of the powerful to keep themselves safe. This is why reporters belonging to some media outlets, needless to mention them, haven’t been hurt even as they continue to report from these countries.But what such well-protected news channels do in Syria and Iraq aren’t within the tenets of journalism and even those with limited knowledge of what good journalism is can point that out. In other words, they simply broadcast one-sided stories.
International law
We have reached this stage because of the international community’s failure to protect journalists by drafting strict laws that hold any party hurting or harassing them accountable. Journalists need a UN body to protect them and ensure their safety in war zones. This lies at the heart of international human rights that guarantee peoples’ right to knowledge. While it is true that the international humanitarian law provides journalists with protection as “citizens” but there are only two explicit references to media personnel in Article A (4) of the Third Geneva Convention and Article 79 of Additional Protocol I, which stipulate that that journalists are entitled to all rights and protections granted to civilians in international armed conflicts. According to legal experts, the same remains true in non-international armed conflicts by virtue of customary international law.
Syria
Absence of professional journalists in Syria which – according to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), has been the most dangerous place in the world for journalists – has one way or the other added complications to the ongoing war. In Syria, it is unclear who is fighting whom and who is winning. It is also true that the suffering of the Syrian people is less in regions which have been accessed by journalists. Several countries opposed to the Assad regime have been threatening to sue for war crimes. However, the lack of well-documented data due to the absence of professional media outlets and human rights organizations makes it a difficult proposition. According to the New York-based CPJ, a total of 107 reporters and media personnel have been killed in Syria since 2011. In a report it released some months ago, the Syrian Network for Human Rights said that that 463 media activists had been killed either by regime forces or armed groups. The monitoring group also said that 1,027 media workers were arrested or abducted between March 2011 and April 2015.
Iraq
Since June 2014, when Mosul fell to ISIS, Iraq’s second largest city was literally closed to the world. This was also the case with Syria’s Raqqa. Now because journalists covering the military operations in Mosul are enjoying protection, the world has started to know about the city, suffering of its people, developments on the ground and also about the unbearable atrocities being committed by ISIS. The world’s reaction to Mosul operation and the international community’s response to the suffering of the tens of thousands of citizens fleeing the battlefields is a lot more convincing than in Syria thanks to the sleepless journalists covering the war and its consequences there. Such is the noble cause of journalism that the modern world is still unable to appreciate.

Emboldened by Syria, is Putin trying to make Libya a Russian satellite?
Dr. Azeem Ibrahim/Al Arabiya/January 10/17
The Syrian civil war is all but concluded. And the result must be described as a complete success for Vladimir Putin. No other party in the conflict can claim to have gained as much from the conflict as Putin has. Not even President Assad himself. And President Putin has every intention to capitalize on this success. By all accounts, it seems he now intends to use the momentum gained in Syria to win the civil war in Libya as well. In many ways, Libya is a similar conflict to the one in Syria: there is an ongoing conflict between a faction feebly supported by the West, one intransigent faction that can rely on steadfast Russian backing, and ISIS in the middle, trying to expand into yet another failed state. But there are also significant differences to Syria. While the Western-backed, West of the country is governed by the de jure government, the Russian backed East holds most of the advantages: a better organized “government” under Marshal Khalifa Haftar, a better equipped and better trained army, control over most of the country’s oil fields, and consequently, a much healthier fiscal position, in no small part due to Russian help in capitalizing the oil assets and assistance in organising a rival monetary system.
In Syria, Russia had to do all the heavy lifting to bring the Assad government back from the brink of collapse. They did that, and Assad is now all but unassailable. In Libya, however, a much smaller Russian contribution should be enough to resolve the conflict swiftly, as the Russian-backed side is already holding the upper hand. Putin has benefited immensely from the way in which the wave of refugees from Syria into Europe has destabilized the political edifice of the European Union, and the internal politics of many EU member states
Redeployment?
What is more, this will likely happen now because two other circumstances have aligned in Haftar’s favor. First, Putin now has leeway to redeploy forces from Syria as the conflict there winds down. And indeed, troops can be very conveniently deployed from Russia’s greatest prize in Syria, the port of Tartus. And secondly, the main pillar of support for the government in the West, the support of our countries, has all but evaporated. In the United States, an extremely Russia-friendly Donald Trump is about to take over the Oval Office later this month.
In the UK, Prime Minister David Cameron who was one of the leaders of the intervention which brought down Qaddafi, has since lost his office in the wake of the Brexit Referendum, while his successor, Theresa May, has little scope for any interventions in foreign affairs beyond the Brexit negotiations. And in France, the other leader of the intervention, Francois Hollande, is due to leave the Presidency by May, as he is not standing in the presidential election this spring, while whoever succeeds him will also likely be too busy with Europe to have time to worry about Libya. All in all, it seems there is little in the way of Libya becoming a Russian satellite for the foreseeable future.
The oil fields
Indeed, the only ways in which the conflict in Libya might endure longer than this year is either if the Pentagon manages to wrest some operational independence from President Trump and decides that it is worth preventing Russia from claiming the prize of Libyan oil fields – a scenario that is really quite remote; or, if Putin decides that maintaining a state of instability in that region is more beneficial to Russian interests than a swift resolution of the conflict. And this last scenario is the one to watch. Putin has benefited immensely from the way in which the wave of refugees from Syria into Europe has destabilized the political edifice of the European Union, and the internal politics of many European member states. That flow of refugees has been, to a large degree, already stemmed. But the other major route of refugee flows into Europe has been through Libya, and if the conflict there is finally resolved, the new authorities will likely want to stop the movement through their country of so many migrants from countries farther to the south. The security of their own country will depend on it. But Russia would likely not be too keen to see this refugee route also close down. Putin may calculate that the benefits of continued refugee pressures on Europe outweigh the benefits of a stable and reliable ally in the Maghreb.

Four more years for Assad in power
Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/January 10/17
During discussions over a political solution to end the war in Syria, the Russians and the Iranians insisted that Bashar al-Assad remains president of Syria. They pledge that Assad will only remain president for the rest of his presidential term out of “respect for the constitution” while forming a cabinet where opposition powers are represented. This is in addition to promises of independent provinces and regions. When hearing this tempting proposal, one will welcome it if this is the condition for peace. Indeed Assad remaining in power does not seem like a problem if there is someone who guarantees implementing these vows. However, there are two problems here. First of all, Assad won the elections and no one knows how he did it especially that elections were carried out amid the raging war in mid-2014. So how will they make Assad exit power after he’s in full control and the opposition is disarmed? The second problem is that it’s still a long time until Assad’s term ends - 2021. This means it will be four long years that are more than enough to eliminate all opposition and semi-opposition powers.
The Syrians know well that aggreeing to let the regime stay for four more years means that the opposition has sold them, that all the promises which were made to them have been forgotten and that more than 500,000 Syrians have been sacrificed and millions have been displaced and will not return home
The Russian proposal for Assad to temporarily stay in power is in fact a life sentence. The opposition must realize that if it accepts it, it will have to completely give up everything and accept to go back to how it was before the 2011 revolution. It must not dream to achieve any of the demands it had made and must understand that all the promises of a hybrid government, constitutional guarantees and independent laws of provinces will be worthless later.
Respecting the constitution
If promises of international guarantees that the upcoming years will be a phase of reconciliation, rectification and transition of power are honest - though they’re impossible to believe - then I expect moderate opposition forces to accept them because their aim was not to destroy the country and the state but to achieve peaceful change. When the revolution erupted, it was peaceful and it was as such for several months as people only voiced their opposition of the regime through protesting, holding banners and singing. Their calls for a peaceful transition were different than the revolutions in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt. Talk of respecting the constitution, which has not even been respected by those who drafted it, and the call to allow Assad to complete his presidential term are just a negotiation ploy that aims to facilitate the opposition’s retreat, save face and later allege that it received major concessions. The Syrians know well that aggreeing to let the regime stay for four more years means that the opposition has sold them, that all the promises which were made to them have been forgotten and that more than 500,000 Syrians have been sacrificed and millions have been displaced and will not return home.
This will mean ending the moderate opposition and empowering the extremist opposition - that is actually as bad as the regime - which rejects negotiations. The opposition bears a huge responsibility on the level of bearing the results of what it’s currently negotiating and what it will sign later. No one will believe it was deceived because the solution of holding elections was once proposed. The elections were held in the midst of destruction and Assad won 89% of the votes. Most of the murder and destruction occurred after these elections which the regime claimed that more than 10 million people participated in them. We know that at the time, it would’ve been impossible for even two million to participate. This deception will happen again. Given the condition to keep the regime in power in order to end the war, it will be easier for the Syrians to accept dividing the country and granting the president a state where he guarantees the majority of votes from his sect without needing to forge them. Each party can happily live in its state without war and without any regime imposed on it. However even this bad divisions’ project is rejected by Turkey, Iran and Iraq as they fear its repercussions on them. Today, they are negotiating over Syria which is like a broken jar that they want to restore to its past shape after all this horrific destruction and murder.
**This article was first published in Asharq Al-Awsat on Jan 10, 2017.

How Putin Unmasked Erdogan's Tough Guy Show
Burak Bekdil/Gatestone Institute/January 10/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9693/putin-erdogan-unmasked
There was only leader who knew in which language to talk to Erdogan: Vladimir Putin. In November 2015, two Turkish F-16 jets shot down a Russian Su-24. Ankara said that as part of the new rules of engagement, any foreign plane violating Turkish airspace would be shot down. Putin immediately downgraded diplomatic relations, announced scores of punishing economic sanctions but, more importantly, he promised that the price Turkey would have to pay would not be limited to the economy and trade.
Erdogan panicked. He sent envoy after envoy to normalize ties with Russia. Moscow demanded an apology, which in mid-2016 Erdogan offered to Putin. Since then, Erdogan has been behaving like a member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, led by Russia and China.
Erdogan's balancing act has been successful because his Western counterparts were too naïve in deciphering him and his real political motives. He keeps fighting until the end, so long as he does not perceive or face any imminent major political or economic threat to his rule.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, until a few years ago, could astonish. Now the pattern of his primary political strategy boringly repeats itself.
The pattern started in 2009 with Erdogan's shocking tirade against then Israeli President Shimon Peres. "When it comes to killing," Erdogan told Peres at the Davos meeting, "You know very well how to kill." In the following years, that romantic neighbourhood-bully behaviour against major powers added to his popularity at home -- in addition to the anti-Zionist rhetoric and Jew-bashing that boosted his popularity both at home and on the Arab Street.
The target "tyrant" did not have to be non-Muslim. "Dictator Sisi" -- his reference to Egypt's President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, and the "Tyrant, murderer of Damascus" -- his reference to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad are still common currency.
Crowds vowed to march to war after him if he decided the mighty Turkish army should reach the gates of Damascus, Cairo or Jerusalem.
They cheered and cheered. In the personality of Erdogan, they were going to find the lost soul of their great imperial past. Erdogan, a smart politician, knew very well that even the talk of reverting back to "our glorious days" would suffice to mobilize "victory-hungry" masses behind him. You did not have to start the Third War to satisfy their thirst and convert it into votes.
This explains why Erdogan in later years diverted his empty, inflammatory rhetoric to the ailing European Union (EU). His -- and his cabinet ministers' -- rhetoric regarding the EU looked (and still looks) quite "Duterte-ish" -- ready to push people out of helicopters. That can be hardly surprising. This is what the "average Turk" wants to hear: The tough, brave guy challenging the world's major Western powers.
The same holds true for the United States. The past few years have featured the same story between Ankara and Washington:
Sir, the Turks are accusing the U.S.A. of...
Turkey is our ally. We can always talk to them to prevent any misunderstanding.
So boring, with all possible turns of speech, writing and press releases of spokespersons' cliché replies that never make it into big headlines. On December 28, for instance, Erdogan said he has evidence that U.S.-led coalition forces gave support to terrorist groups, including the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and Syrian Kurdish forces. A U.S. embassy statement said:
"The United States government has not provided weapons or explosives to the YPG or the PKK [Kurdish groups] -- period. We repeatedly have condemned PKK terrorist attacks and the group's reprehensible violence in Turkey.... The U.S. is cooperating with Turkey in the operations against ISIL."
So dry. So insufficient.
In Turkey's multiple and extremely serious challenges against various countries in recent years, there was only one leader who knew in which language to talk to Erdogan: Vladimir Putin. On Nov. 24, 2015, two Turkish F-16 jets shot down a Russian Su-24. Ankara said that as part of the new rules of engagement, any foreign plane violating Turkish airspace would be shot down. Putin immediately downgraded diplomatic relations, announced scores of punishing economic sanctions but, more importantly, he promised that the price Turkey would have to pay would not be limited to the economy and trade.
Turkey's economy started to suffer by losing billions of dollars in tourism and export revenue in half a year. Erdogan panicked. He sent envoy after envoy to normalize ties with Russia. Moscow demanded an apology, which in mid-2016 Erdogan offered to Putin. Since then, Erdogan has been behaving like a member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), led by Russia and China. More than once Erdogan offered to abandon the EU and join the SCO.
In July 2016, Erdogan apologized for downing a Russian plane, and in August he went to Russia to shake hands for normalization. Pictured: Russian President Vladimir Putin with Turkey's then Prime Minister Erdogan, meeting in Istanbul on December 3, 2012. (Image source: kremlin.ru)
Erdogan's balancing act has been successful not because the Russians are fools. It has been successful because his Western counterparts were too naïve in deciphering him and his real political motives. There is something brave and cunning about Erdogan. He keeps fighting until the end, so long as he does not perceive or face any imminent major political or economic threat to his rule. He would, however, immediately change sides if the path he is on is potentially a costly one -- as in how Putin "reshaped" Erdogan.
**Burak Bekdil, one of Turkey's leading journalists, was just fired from Turkey's leading newspaper after 29 years, for writing what was taking place in Turkey for Gatestone.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Palestinians: Glorifying Mass Murderers
Bassam Tawil/Gatestone Institute/January 10/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9743/palestinians-glorifying-murderers
The murderous legacy and personality of Yahya Ayyash, a Hamas mass murderer who masterminded a wave of suicide bombings, are being glorified not only by his Hamas supporters, but also by the "moderate" Western-funded Palestinian Authority (PA), headed by Mahmoud Abbas.
Ayyash won his reputation on the murdering and maiming of hundreds of Israelis, most of them innocent civilians. Had he fought for peace and coexistence, Ayyash would have been condemned as a "traitor" and gone down in history as a "defeatist" and "surrenderist."
"The mosque that produced the mujahed [warrior] Ayyash is continuing to produce heroes." – Sheikh Yusef al-Qaradawi, spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood.
It is in these mosques that Ayyash was taught that Islam permits people like him to build bombs and dispatch suicide bombers to blow up buses. It is also in these mosques where he was taught that devout Muslims are best engaged in spilling Jewish blood.
Children and youths who attend prayers at these mosques are being fed the same hate-speech rhetoric that their hero Ayyash was exposed to in his childhood. Hence it is no surprise that the mosques in the West Bank and Gaza Strip continue to this day to churn out new terrorists, many of whom aspire to become like Ayyash – mass murderers.
Thus, despite Fatah's double-talk about a two-state solution and "peace" with Israel, mass murderers still take top billing in its hall of fame. Fatah is also making it known that its former leader, Yasser Arafat, approved of such terrorism against Israel.
The voices of the Palestinians who reject this education for wholesale slaughter are being marginalized by the European leaders doing business with the still-wealthy members of the Arab elite who fund these imams and these mosques.
These European leaders wrongly image that if they get rid of Israel, it will be only Israel. They fail see that Israel is just the first course. They imagine that if they accede to Muslims' wishes, they will be safe. What they fail to see, as in France, Germany, Sweden, Belgium and Britain, is that they will be next.
Palestinian youths are being urged to follow in the footsteps of Yahya Ayyash, a Hamas mass murderer who masterminded a wave of suicide bombings that killed and wounded hundreds of Israelis. Ayyash's expertise in manufacturing explosive devices earned him the nickname "The Engineer" and turned him into a hero in the eyes of many Palestinians. The bomb-maker was killed by Israeli security forces on January 5, 1996, thereby ending one of the bloodiest chapters of Palestinian terrorism against Israel.
Two decades later, this arch-terrorist is still being revered as a hero and martyr. His murderous legacy and personality are being glorified not only by his Hamas supporters, but also by the "moderate" Western-funded Palestinian Authority (PA), headed by Mahmoud Abbas.
A few years ago, the PA decided to honor Ayyash by naming a street in Ramallah after him. The street sign was posted in Ramallah, the headquarters of the PA where Abbas lives and works, and reads:
"Yahya Ayyash, 1966-1996, born in Nablus, studied electrical engineering in Bir Zeit University. Was a member of the (Hamas military wing) Iz ad-Din al-Qassam, and was linked by Israel to a number of bombings. He was assassinated by Israel in his Beit Lahia (Gaza Strip) home on January 5, 1996."
This week, Palestinians took to social media to glorify the arch-terrorist further, depicting him as a role model and urging youths to follow in his footsteps.
On Twitter, for instance, they launched a hashtag entitled, "Be Like Ayyash." The campaign encourages Palestinian youths to admire the bomb-maker and endorse his "jihad" (holy war) against Israel. Activists posted video clips, songs, poems and portraits praising and lionizing Ayyash and his terrorism. The campaign, according to the sponsors, is also designed to acquaint Palestinians with the "humane and leadership qualities" of Ayyash and remind them of his "heroic actions."
Unsurprisingly, the social media campaign has attracted the attention of thousands of Palestinians and Arabs, who heaped praise on the Hamas bomb-maker-turned-icon. Ayyash won his reputation on the murdering and maiming of hundreds of Israelis, most of them innocent civilians. Had he fought for peace and coexistence, Ayyash would have been condemned as a "traitor" and gone down in history as a "defeatist" and "surrenderist."
This Palestinian "engineer" is not being glorified because he used his expertise to help improve the lives of Palestinians. He is being lauded because he used the education he received to build bombs and dispatch suicide bombers to kill Israelis.
One activist hailed Ayyash as "The Master of Men and the Moon of Palestine." He added: "We are proud of you, Hawk of Iz ad-Din al-Qassam!"
Another activist posted: "Oh history take note – the engineer of Palestine used to divert the path of Zionist buses towards hell!" (a reference to the suicide bombings that targeted Israeli buses).
Here is what another Palestinian had to say about the mass-murderer: "Yahya Ayyash is an idea, and ideas do not die. Although the resistance in the Gaza Strip has developed its weapons, the bombing of a bus has a special flavor!"
An image recently posted to Twitter glorifying Yahya Ayyash, a Hamas mass murderer who masterminded a wave of suicide bombings that killed and wounded hundreds of Israelis. The image shows Ayyash's face superimposed over an Israeli bus that was blown up by a Palestinian suicide bomber in the 1990's.
Sheikh Yusef al-Qaradawi, Chairman of the International Union of Muslim Scholars, joined the chorus of terror glorifiers by offering his own post commemorating the anniversary of the death of Ayyash. "Yahya Ayyash did not die," wrote the leading Islamic scholar, considered the spiritual father of Muslim Brotherhood. "He is alive in the conscience of all Palestine. The mosque that produced the mujahed (warrior) Ayyash is continuing to produce heroes."
Sheikh al-Qaradawi is right in two important ways. The first of these is that Ayyash was indeed "produced" by a mosque. Those close to Ayyash describe him as a devout Muslim who used to spend much of his time in mosques, where he was undoubtedly exposed to anti-Semitic hate-speech and indoctrination at the hands of preachers and imams.
It is in these mosques that Ayyash was taught that Islam permits people like him to build bombs and dispatch suicide bombers to blow up buses. It is also in these mosques where he was taught that devout Muslims are best engaged in spilling Jewish blood.
Al-Qaradawi is also right when he says that the mosques are continuing to produce "heroes." This is true because incitement and anti-Semitism remains a main theme of the Friday prayer sermons. Children and youths who attend prayers at these mosques are being fed the same hate-speech rhetoric that their hero Ayyash was exposed to in his childhood. Hence it is no surprise that the mosques in the West Bank and Gaza Strip continue to this day to churn out new terrorists, many of whom aspire to become like Ayyash – mass murderers.
"Ayyash was only 29 years old, but he became a legend that instilled fear in the hearts of the Zionists," remarked another social media activist. "He was transformed into an exemplary engineer inspiring new generations."
Hamas leaders, for their part, chose to celebrate the anniversary of the death of their terrorist by voicing hope that Palestinian youths would look at him as their role model and follow in his footsteps. "The students of Yahya Ayyash are the hope of the Palestinians," said Hamas spokesman Hussam Badran. He said that Ayyash continues to serve as an inspiration for youths who wish to join the jihad against Israel.
That Ayyash was a Hamas member has not prevented the rival Fatah faction headed by Mahmoud Abbas from joining the campaign of glorification.
True, Hamas and Fatah are rivals and they despise each other. But when it comes to murdering Israelis, they wholeheartedly agree. In truth, Fatah would have preferred if Ayyash had been one of its own. Had that been so Fatah would have been able to boast (instead of Hamas) of the "heroic" attacks engineered by the beloved terrorist.
Still, in the eyes of Fatah, this Hamas arch-terrorist is a hero because he killed and wounded hundreds of Israelis. On one of its Facebook pages, Fatah had these words to say about Ayyash: "The revolutionaries never die; Fatah pledges to remain committed to the martyrs and the path of Yasser Arafat."
Thus, despite Fatah's double-talk about a two-state solution and "peace" with Israel, mass murderers still take top billing in its hall of fame. Fatah is also making it known that its former leader, Yasser Arafat, approved of such terrorism against Israel. This Fatah stance should not come as a surprise to those who have been following its leaders' and activists' statements and actions. The glorification of terrorists has always been an integral part of Fatah ideology. Most recently, Fatah celebrated its 52nd anniversary in a series of Facebook posts glorifying Palestinian terrorists.
Some would argue that the absence of education for peace with Israel on the Palestinian side is largely responsible for the failure of the peace process. However, this assessment falls short of the full truth. That truth is that the same Palestinian children who are not educated toward peace with Israel are educated toward killing Israeli civilians, as many as possible. The continued glorification of terrorists and the encouragement of youths to join the jihad against Israel and Jews, as well as the celebrations marking the death of Ayyash, demonstrate this truth. Where, the international community might ask, are the voices of the Palestinians who reject this education for wholesale slaughter?
Their voices are being marginalized by many European leaders comfortably doing business with the still-wealthy members of the Arab and Muslim elite who fund those imams and mosques. These European leaders wrongly image that if they get rid of Israel, it will be only Israel. They fail see that Israel is just the first course. They imagine that if they accede to Muslims' wishes, they will be safe. What they fail to see, as in France, Germany, Sweden, Belgium and Britain, is that they will be next, and that what they have been seeing is just the start. That is how the Muslims in a few hundred years took over Persia, Turkey, southern Spain, all of North Africa, and most of Eastern Europe.
For anyone who treasures freedom – including many Arabs and Muslims who do not want to live under terrorist Islamic dictatorships but are strong-armed from speaking out - the United Nations is now poisonous place. It has been taken over by the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) -- 56 Islamic countries plus Palestine. It is now the seat of the universal caliphate. In this, it is assisted by dictators, despots and the many dhimmi-European leaders who together command a permanent voting majority and have been lately been busy rewriting historical facts. Nothing good can come from it. Freedom-loving countries should run.
*Bassam Tawil is a scholar based in the Middle East.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
 
Extremism Under Sisi
By Khalil al-Anani/Foreign Affairs/January 08/17
His Repressive Policies Have Worsened the Problem
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/01/10/khalil-al-ananiforeign-affairs-extremism-under-sisi/
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/middle-east/2017-01-08/extremism-under-sisi
Anyone seeking evidence of creeping Islamist radicalization in Egypt under President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi’s repressive regime need look no further than the bombing of the Coptic Orthodox church in Cairo on December 10. The attack, for which the Islamic State (also known as ISIS) claimed responsibility, killed 25 and wounded around 50. The suspected suicide bomber, 22-year-old Mahmoud Shafiq Mohamed Moustafa, had been arrested in 2014 by Egypt’s security forces when he and one of his classmates were passing by a protest for the opposition. He was tortured and spent a year in prison without being charged with any real crimes, according to one of his lawyers. Moustafa’s path to radicalization reveals the ease with which extremists capitalize on Sisi’s repressive policies to draw support from young Egyptians.
Although political and social scientists have extensively debated the causality between state repression and radicalization, there is ample evidence that the two are correlated in the cases of Algeria, Chechnya, Egypt, and Libya. In some cases, such as China, Kazakhstan, and Iraq under Saddam Hussein, scholars have found that severe repression can reduce dissension and rebellion. In others, such as Egypt, it provokes radical and violent behavior.
Egypt has a long history of terrorism and political violence, which began in the early 1970s and continued until the end of the 1990s. However, it has now reached a level unseen in over two decades. Since Sisi assumed the presidency in 2014, terrorists have bombed security buildings, assassinated senior officials and military personnel, destroyed military vehicles, and kidnapped and executed both soldiers and civilians. According to different documented reports, the number of casualties and attacks has soared in the past two years. As the Global Terrorism Index notes, terrorism in Egypt is at its highest level since 2000. “In 2015 there were 662 deaths, an increase of 260 percent, from 2014. In contrast, from 2000 to 2012, the most deaths recorded in one year was 92, which was in 2005.”
Sisi’s unprecedented repression of peaceful and nonviolent opposition has created a fertile environment for extremists and radical ideologies. Most of the attacks since Sisi took power have been carried out by Wilayat Sinai, ISIS’ Egyptian offshoot. Before the July 2013 coup, the group (originally called Ansar Beit al-Maqdis) had focused its operations in Sinai and was mainly targeting Israel. However, after the coup, it extended its operations to Egypt’s mainland, where it consistently targeted regime officials and security forces. Its attacks have drained the Sisi administration’s resources and hurt its public image as a powerful and stable regime.
Sisi’s unprecedented repression of peaceful and nonviolent opposition has created a fertile environment for extremists and radical ideologies. Other disenchanted Islamists have formed their own insurgency groups and networks that target government officials, institutions, and supporters. Over the past three years, a dozen radical and violent groups and networks have risen and grown, among them Ajnad Misr (Soldiers of Egypt), the Molotov Movement, and Liwaa al-Thawra (Revolution’s Brigade Movement). These groups use different tactics such as regrouping and changing their names to avoid regime repression and fight back against the crackdown, and they have proved significantly savvy and costly to the Sisi regime.
Unlike Wilayat Sinai, whose extremist ideology many Islamists in Egypt reject and condemn, these new, low-scale insurgency networks are driven primarily by political grievances. Their supporters within Islamist circles view them as vanguards against the regime, and many young Islamists cheer their operations against government security forces. These groups tend to draw support and recruit new members from those who are repressed by Sisi’s regime and those who might have lost some of their relatives and family members in the aftermath of the coup, particularly following the massacre of Rabaa, where as many as 800 people were killed on August 14, 2013. Some of them raise the Rabaa sign (four fingers) in their statements to legitimize their attacks.
Although there are no official numbers of how many people have been radicalized or have joined these new movements, the steady pace of sophisticated attacks—which reached 100 per month according to some reports—suggests that the problem will continue to haunt the regime. Furthermore, unlike the classical radical groups of the 1970s and 1980s, such as Jamaat al-Islamiyya and Egyptian Islamic Jihad, which had hierarchal organizations, disciplined structures, and strict chains of command and leadership, most of these new bodies are opaque and nimble, which is necessary to outmaneuver the regime.
A STRATEGY THAT BREEDS TERROR
Sisi’s counterextremism strategy has proved not only useless but counterproductive. Several accounts refer to the increase in radicalization among young Islamists thanks to his tactics. Two former Islamists interviewed by the author underscored the gloomy reality. One of them, who spent 11 months in a local prison without standing trial, describes the conditions as “ideal for recruiting and indoctrinating young Islamists by extremists.” The other recalls an 18-year-old man who was recruited by extremists while he was in prison for illegally protesting against the regime and eventually stopped meeting his parents during prison visits, calling them “infidels.” Similar anecdotes and conclusions have been presented by both Egyptian and foreign media.
According to a report published last April by the privately owned Al-Shorouk newspaper, the notorious Egyptian prison of Tora has become “a governmental center for recruiting Islamists into Daesh [ISIS].” Security forces and the prison’s administration not only are aware of the problem but also facilitate it by allowing mingling and interaction between extremists and newcomers. According to one of the interviewees, this tactic helps the regime to portray all prisoners as “terrorists” and justify their imprisonment.
Sisi’s fight against terrorism thus fuels more terrorism while also playing into his extremist opponents’ narrative that the regime encourages radicalism in order to justify its repressive policies. With thousands of Islamists now imprisoned, extremists will surely be able to attract and recruit hundreds more.
To be sure, Egypt does have a major security problem, and the Sisi government must do something to fight it. But Sisi could have better balanced his war on terrorism against hardened ideological groups such as ISIS with political, economic, and institutional reforms that could co-opt the more politically minded groups such as the April 6 Movement, peaceful Islamists, and leftists. For example, instead of wasting billions of dollars on dubious megaprojects, Sisi could have improved the socioeconomic conditions of millions of Egyptians who struggle to fulfill their own basic needs. And instead of spending millions of dollars on building new prisons, he could have created thousands of jobs for young Egyptians who feel increasingly alienated and neglected. Furthermore, instead of enhancing the economic empire of the military, he could have encouraged Egyptian investors, young businessmen, and entrepreneurs to emerge and flourish.
The majority of young Egyptians who toppled President Hosni Mubarak in 2011 want free speech and jobs. They want better lives. Most of them have become bitter and marginalized under Sisi’s rule, which plays into the hands of radicals and extremists.
The impact of Sisi’s authoritarian policies goes beyond Egypt’s borders and entails regional and global risks. In the fall of 2016, Wilayat Sinai brought down a Russian plane over Egypt’s Sinai Desert, killing all 224 people on board. It also claimed responsibility for bombing the Italian consulate in Egypt in July 2011, killing at least one person. Most recently, the Egyptian authorities pointed out that traces of explosives were found on the bodies of passengers of EgyptAir Flight 804, which crashed into the Mediterranean Sea on May 19, 2015, killing all 66 people on board. No terrorist group has claimed responsibility for the crash, but it isn’t unlikely that terrorists were involved. It is impossible to deny that radicalization has become a bigger problem in Egypt since the coup of 2013, and it would be naive to expect the problem to go away without addressing the Sisi regime’s role in it. Put bluntly, the longer Egypt’s government maintains its repressive policies, the more radicalized and violent its Islamists will become.

Analysis: Syria shatters Obama’s Middle East legacy
Joyce Karam/Arab News/January 10/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/01/10/joyce-karamarab-news-analysis-syria-shatters-obamas-middle-east-legacy/
 WASHINGTON, DC: As he takes the stage to deliver his farewell speech from Chicago in a few hours, do not expect US President Barack Obama to delve into his Middle East accomplishments, partly because in the view of experts they are either non-existent, drowned by chaos or greatly diminished. US experts who closely watched Obama’s rhetoric fall apart in the region, or served in his administration and saw first-hand how indecision and half-measures created an unprecedented void and chaos, tell Arab News that Syria is the epicenter of his administration’s train wreck in the Middle East.
 The “leading from behind” doctrine
 Even before the Arab Spring started in 2011, Obama’s larger doctrine for the Middle East and North Africa was defined by the “US stepping back so others can step in,” and doing so “regional actors can rise to the occasion and take responsibility,” said Shadi Hamid, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington. The “leading from behind” approach shaped the early thinking of the Obama administration by prioritizing the withdrawal from Iraq, cutting civil society aid programs to Egypt, allowing the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) to take a lead role in Yemen, and later leading to Russia’s intervention in Syria.
 There was a small caveat that the Obama team missed: This approach “doesn’t work in the Middle East,” said Hamid, because “the US has the misfortune of having bad actors in the region, so while it’s true that others stepped in, they were countries that didn’t share our interests or values.”Frederick Hof, director of the Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East at the Atlantic Council, says Obama’s main pitfall was the Syrian war. Hof, who served as a special adviser on Syria and coordinator for regional affairs at the State Department in Obama’s first term, tells Arab News that Obama’s failure over Syria “transcends the Middle East.”The former US official said: “By combining florid rhetoric with dogged inaction in the face of civilian slaughter in Syria, Obama facilitated a humanitarian catastrophe that spilled into Europe, undermining the continent’s political unity and compromising its trans-Atlantic relationship with the US.”
 Hof blames Obama’s “enormous gap between talk and action” in Syria, by calling on Syrian President Bashar Assad to step down in 2011 without a Plan B. It was also by drawing a red line for the Syrian regime over the use of chemical weapons, which Obama altered in 2013. These levers “emboldened a Russian president to alter European boundaries and to intervene militarily in Syria... and are behind the loss of confidence in Washington by long-time regional partners of the US,” said Hof.
 From Syria to Brexit and Trump
 Hamid, the author of “Islamic Exceptionalism: How the Struggle Over Islam is Reshaping the World,” links the crisis in Syria to an “undermined liberal order” across Europe, and a wave of instability that has shaken not just the country’s neighbors but also the UK, Germany and France. “Syria was never just about Syria, and while Obama assumed it can be contained, not only has it not been contained, the spill-over effects of Syria have threatened the stability of the entire Middle East and the very European project,” says Hamid.
 According to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, more than half of Syria’s population of 22 million has been displaced, with more than 5 million having fled the country, creating a massive refugee influx into Turkey, Jordan, Lebanon and Europe.
 The influx into Europe, coupled with the rise of Daesh during Obama’s second term, has translated into fear and a rapid spike in identity politics across the Continent and the United States. “The Brexit outcome could not have happened had it not been for fears of Muslim immigration, and (US President-elect Donald) Trump might not have won if it were not for Syria,” said Hamid. “What happens in the Middle East has reshaped and undermined the entire liberal order as we know it.”
 Prioritizing the Iran nuclear deal
 Hof and Hamid agree that Obama’s political capital was entirely spent in the Middle East on negotiating and later promoting the Iran nuclear deal, designed to curb the country’s nuclear program and possibly breaking the decades of animosity between Tehran and Washington.

 Hof said between 2012 and 2015, “what seemed to motivate the administration’s inaction in Syria more than anything else was fear of alienating the regime’s closest ally Iran.” The deal with Iran in July 2015 “was, and is seen by Obama, as the jewel in his legacy crown.”
 However, the nuclear deal did little to nothing to slow Tehran’s expansionist policies, says Hamid, while cutting the number of centrifuges did not relate to citizens of the region witnessing bloodshed across Syria, Yemen, Libya and Iraq. The Syria death toll reached 470,000 last February, according to the Syrian Center for Policy Research, more than double the Algerian and Lebanese civil wars, which lasted 11 and 15 years, respectively.
 But beyond the humanitarian suffering, it is also the geopolitical implications of the Syria conflict that have sunk Obama’s Middle East legacy, said Hof. History will recognize “a president and senior aides who spoke movingly, eloquently, and often about human suffering and its political consequences, but who did next to nothing about it.”