LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

January 21/17

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins17/english.january21.17.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
Then Jesus summoned his twelve disciples and gave them authority over unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to cure every disease and every sickness
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew 10/01-06/:"Then Jesus summoned his twelve disciples and gave them authority over unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to cure every disease and every sickness. These are the names of the twelve apostles: first, Simon, also known as Peter, and his brother Andrew; James son of Zebedee, and his brother John; Philip and Bartholomew; Thomas and Matthew the tax-collector; James son of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus; Simon the Cananaean, and Judas Iscariot, the one who betrayed him. These twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions: ‘Go nowhere among the Gentiles, and enter no town of the Samaritans, but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."
 
Put things in order, listen to my appeal, agree with one another, live in peace; and the God of love and peace will be with you. Greet one another with a holy kiss. All the saints greet you
Second Letter to the Corinthians 13/05-13/:"Examine yourselves to see whether you are living in the faith. Test yourselves. Do you not realize that Jesus Christ is in you? unless, indeed, you fail to pass the test! I hope you will find out that we have not failed. But we pray to God that you may not do anything wrong not that we may appear to have passed the test, but that you may do what is right, though we may seem to have failed. For we cannot do anything against the truth, but only for the truth. For we rejoice when we are weak and you are strong. This is what we pray for, that you may become perfect. So I write these things while I am away from you, so that when I come, I may not have to be severe in using the authority that the Lord has given me for building up and not for tearing down. Finally, brothers and sisters, farewell. Put things in order, listen to my appeal, agree with one another, live in peace; and the God of love and peace will be with you. Greet one another with a holy kiss. All the saints greet you. The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with all of you."  

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 20-21/17
Question: "What does it mean that Jesus fulfilled the law, but did not abolish it?"
GotQuestions.org/January 20/17
Zarif: We cooperated with Saudi Arabia in Lebanon/Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/January 20/17
Lebanon gets a new government, now it needs a new economy/Reuters/January 20/17/
The Full Transcript of President Trump's Inauguration Speech/January 20/2017
Lessons Trump Can Learn From Obama/Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/January 20/17
Do We Have a Place in the Future/Abdulrahman Al-Rashed/Asharq Al Awsat/January 20/17
UAE’s kindness will not be deterred by Kandahar’s crime/Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/January 20/17
Of Opera, taste for music and social hierarchy/Fahad Suleiman Shoqiranl/Al Arabiya/January 20/17
Trump could smash the old world order — and replace it with what?/David Ignatius/The Washington Post/January 19/17
First Trump era war? Serbia versus Muslim Kosovo/DEBKAfile Exclusive Report January 20, 2017
Europe's Jihad against Israel/Salim Mansur/Gatestone Institute/January 20/17

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on January 20-21/17  
Bekaa Roads Blocked over Risha Kidnap as Aoun Says 'All Security Forces Mobilized'
Arab League Head Holds Talks with Top Lebanese Officials
Cabinet to Tackle Electoral Commission, Interior Ministry Begins Logistic Preparations
2 Rockets Hit al-Nabi Othman, Army Bombs Militant Posts
Franjieh Holds Talks with Nasrallah on Latest Developments
Jumblat Renews Rejection of 'Proportional Representation under Sectarian System'
Arab Officials to Visit Beirut, Aoun to Receive Letter from Kuwait's Emir
U.S. Congress delegation visits Patriarch Rahi, says Mideast policy to change with Trump
Army: Rocket fired by gunmen fell in Nabi Othman
Kataeb chief follows up on Bekaa citizen abduction
Zarif: We cooperated with Saudi Arabia in Lebanon
Aoun vows to pump new blood into state institutions
Lebanon Launches New Plan to Respond to Refugee Crisis
Lebanon gets a new government, now it needs a new economy


Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on January 20-21/17
The Full Transcript of President Trump's Inauguration Speech
Donald Trump sworn in as US president
Trump keeps Obama's envoy for countering Islamic State
Islamic State increases oil and gas sales to Assad, officials say
US air strike in Syria kills more than 100 al Qaeda members
Russia sees positive signs in Syria peace process
Russia, Syria sign deal on expanding Tartus naval base
Over 40 Fateh al-Sham Jihadists Killed in North Syria Air Strikes
ISIS destroys part of ancient Roman theater in Palmyra
Khamenei’s uncle asks him to change his policies before it is too late
ISIS car bomb kills 5 Turkish soldiers near Syria's al-Bab
Rocket fired near Istanbul police headquarters
US air strike in Syria kills more than 100 al Qaeda members
Arab coalition intercepts two ballistic missiles over Marib
Iran summons Danish envoy over embassy attack
Iran Regime's President: JCPOA Is Also Beneficial for America
John Kerry: I Am Very Proud of the Effort We Made to Get MEK out of Camp Liberty to Places They Are Safe...
Iran: Four Patients Die in Hospital Due to Contaminated Drinking Water
The Message of a Prominent Political Prisoner in Iran
Iran: Rafsanjani and Me


Links From Jihad Watch Site for on January 20-21/17
Trump vows to “eradicate completely” “radical Islamic terrorism”
Hamas-linked CAIR tells mosque leaders to ignore pledge to support safety of ex-Muslims
Migrants attempted to race through US Southern border before Trump took over
UK jogger viciously attacked by Muslims escaped by speaking Arabic
Istanbul nightclub attacker tells how he was directed by the Islamic State
Australia: Melbourne car attacker identifies himself as Muslim
100 al-Qaeda jihadis killed in U.S. airstrikes in Syria
Why Barack Obama is the worst President in the history of the United States
Video of Australia car attacker: People run for their lives as he screams “Allahu akbar
Australia: Police ask reporter to take down video of witness saying car attacker was screaming “Allahu akbar
Australia: Muslim screaming “Allahu akbarplows car into pedestrians, cops say not terror-related

Links From Christian Today Site for on January 20-21/17  
Is The CofE Letting Clergy Down? Report Calls For Military-Style Covenant Pledg
The Gambia Explainer: What Will Happen Next?
Is The CofE Letting Clergy Down? Report Calls For
ISIS Jihadis Destroy Ancient Monument In Palmyra
Syrian Rebels Offered Chance To Quit Aleppo, Jihadists Retake Palmyra
Assad 'colluded with ISIS to retake Palmyra', leaked documents reveal
Most Importantly, We Are Protected By God.' Donald Trump Inauguration
Thrilling Things to Do in Vegas During the Day
145,000 Indian Children Without Support As Compassion's Funds Cut Off By Government
Why Are Abortion Numbers Falling In The United States?
Clergy V Laity 'Power Struggle' Is Blocking Church Growth, Synod Told

Latest Lebanese Related News published on January 20-21/17
Bekaa Roads Blocked over Risha Kidnap as Aoun Says 'All Security Forces Mobilized'
Naharnet/January 20/17/Several key roads in central Bekaa were blocked for a second consecutive day on Friday in protest at the abduction of 74-year-old merchant Saad Risha. “The Furzol-Zahle road was blocked with bulldozers near the town's intersection, in the presence of Furzol municipal chief Melhem al-Ghaddan, Saad Risha's son Jimmy, the businessman Michel Daher, and residents and dignitaries from the region,” state-run National News Agency reported. The Riyaq-Terbol road and the al-Fayda-Zahle road were also blocked by protesters. Members of Brital's municipality and a number of dignitaries meanwhile staged a sit-in on their town's public road in solidarity with the family of the abductee and to protest the recurrent abductions in the region. The captors have been identified as five residents of Brital and the army has been carrying intensive security measures in and around the town in search for the kidnappers and the elderly abductee. Speaker Nabih Berri has also dispatched an envoy to the town to help in the case. “The kidnappers only represent themselves because Brital is the land of martyrs and will always stand in the face of takfiris,” Brital municipal chief Ahmed Ismail said, demanding the release of Risha. President Michel Aoun meanwhile reassured a northern Bekaa delegation that the presidency is following up in the case. “All security forces have been mobilized to return him safe to his family,” Aoun added. MTV meanwhile reported that rumors were spreading in Zahle about “counter-abductions within hours” should Risha remain abducted. Risha was abducted Wednesday in the Bekaa town of Qab Elias as he was closing his wholesale foodstuffs shop.

Arab League Head Holds Talks with Top Lebanese Officials
Naharnet/January 20/17/Arab League chief Ahmed Abul Gheit held talks Friday with President Michel Aoun after he arrived in Lebanon for a several-hour official visit. “Lebanon holds onto Arab solidarity and the Arab League must remain an authority to refer to despite the divides,” Aoun told Abul Gheit during their meeting at the presidential palace. The Arab League chief later held talks with Speaker Nabih Berri and Prime Minister Saad Hariri. He also inspected a Syrian refugee encampment in the country.

Cabinet to Tackle Electoral Commission, Interior Ministry Begins Logistic Preparations
Naharnet/January 20/17/Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq has launched logistic preparations for the organization of the parliamentary elections and the Cabinet is expected to discuss the issue of forming an electoral supervisory commission, media reports said on Friday. “Political contacts have managed to put the issue of forming the electoral supervisory commission on the agenda of the next Cabinet session,” al-Joumhouria newspaper reported.
Mashnouq had on Thursday sent a memo to all governors, asking them to “inspect polling stations and verify their capacity for the organization of parliamentary elections within a deadline not exceeding 20 days.”The minister has clarified that he is obliged to finalize electoral rolls 90 days prior to the date of the elections.In order for the elections to be held on May 21, the minister must call for elections and complete all preparations before February 21, Mashnouq says.

2 Rockets Hit al-Nabi Othman, Army Bombs Militant Posts
/Naharnet/January 20/17/Two rockets landed Friday in the heights of the northern Bekaa town of al-Nabi Othman, causing no casualties, state-run National News Agency reported. The rockets were fired by militants positioned in the outskirts of the northern Bekaa border town of Arsal, NNA said. The attack prompted the army to fire heavy artillery and multiple rocket launchers at the posts of the militants, the agency added. A similar rocket attack took place on Wednesday when al-Nabi Othman's plain was struck by a projectile also fired from Arsal's outskirts. Militants from the Islamic State organization and the rival jihadist group Fateh al-Sham Front are entrenched in Arsal's outskirts and in mountainous areas along the undemarcated Lebanese-Syrian border. The Lebanese army regularly shells their posts while Hizbullah and the Syrian forces have engaged in clashes with them on the Syrian side of the border. The two groups overran the eastern border town of Arsal in 2014 before being ousted by the army after days of deadly battles.

Franjieh Holds Talks with Nasrallah on Latest Developments
Naharnet/January 20/17/Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah has met with Marada Movement chief MP Suleiman Franjieh, a Hizbullah statement said on Friday. The meeting was attended by Public Works Minister Youssef Fenianos of Marada, Hizbullah secretary-general's political aide Hussein Khalil and head of Hizbullah's Liaison and Coordination Committee Wafiq Safa. The conferees “evaluated the current political situations in the country and discussed a lot of current files and challenges, including the electoral law and the governmental situation,” the Hizbullah statement said. They also “stressed the firmness of the relation and alliance between the two parties and agreed to maintain coordination and cooperation in all fields,” the statement added.

Jumblat Renews Rejection of 'Proportional Representation under Sectarian System'
Naharnet/January 20/17/Druze leader MP Walid Jumblat on Friday reiterated his rejection of an electoral law based on proportional representation. “Proportional representation under a sectarian system will create imbalanced representation and a state of instability,” Jumblat warned in a tweet. He had on Thursday stressed that the electoral law “must ensure a delicate balance in political and regional representation,” calling on President Michel Aoun, Speaker Nabih Berri, Premier Saad Hariri and the various political forces to “understand the demands of the Democratic Gathering that are in line with the Taef Accord.”Jumblat's Progressive Socialist Party believes that a law fully based on proportional representation would marginalize the minority Druze community, whose presence is concentrated in the Chouf and Aley districts. The PSP's concerns has pushed the party to renounce a law that mixes proportional representation with the winner-takes-all system that it had drafted together with al-Mustaqbal Movement and the Lebanese Forces.

Arab Officials to Visit Beirut, Aoun to Receive Letter from Kuwait's Emir

Naharnet/January 20/17/Lebanon will witness visits by several Arab officials in the coming days which will begin Friday with a visit by Arab League chief Ahmed Abul Gheit, a media report said on Friday. Abul Gheit's visit is aimed at “congratulating the president on his election and discussing the Arab situations and the preparations for the Arab Summit that will be held in Amman on March 29,” al-Joumhouria newspaper reported. Iraqi Foreign Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari is meanwhile scheduled to arrive in Lebanon on Saturday. A Kuwaiti official will also visit Lebanon in the coming days to hand President Michel Aoun a letter from Kuwait's emir Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmed al-Sabah, the daily said. The letter contains congratulations for Aoun over his election and an invitation to visit Kuwait, al-Joumhouria added.

U.S. Congress delegation visits Patriarch Rahi, says Mideast policy to change with Trump
Fri 20 Jan 2017/NNA - Maronite Patriarch Cardinal Mar Beshara Boutros Rahi welcomed, at Bkerki on Friday, a delegation of U.S. Congress, with whom he discussed latest developments on the regional and international scenes. The delegation comprised Democratic Paty Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, former U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich, as well as Elie and Bassam Khawam. "This is my first visit in Lebanon and the region and it has been a great experience, because I listened to the viewpoints of the political and spiritual leaders, among whom Cardinal Rahi, who are still working on enhancing religious freedom and preserving free and diversed communities, where people can live in peace regardless of their religious beliefs," Gabbard told reporters following the meeting. "This is a very important message, not just for this region, but also for the entire world. This why we must work together to assume this mission of peace," she said. For his part, Kucinich indicated that he believed in the "leading role" assumed by the Maronite Patriarch worldwide. He also highlighted the necessity that Congressmen visit Lebanon to take note of the situation, "and carry back with them a message to the country on the necessity to work on fighting terrorism and supporting pluralism in which the U.S. strongly believes." "The diversified communities in Syria and Lebanon rely on our respect for sovereignty and religious freedoms," he stressed. In turn, Elie Khawam underlined that the U.S policy towards the region would "completely change" with the election of President Donald Trump and his new administration.
He also explained that their mission was to form a clear idea on the situation in Lebanon. "Priority remains for fighting and eradicating the Islamized takfiri terrorism sweeping the region," he concluded. Rahi has earlier met with Kataeb's Deputy Head, former minister Salim Sayegh, who explained to the prelate his party's viewpoint on the election law.

Army: Rocket fired by gunmen fell in Nabi Othman

Fri 20 Jan 2017 /NNA - A rocket fell in the outskirts of Nabi Othman town at 6:35 pm today, with gunmen sites in the Anti-Lebanon region as its source, a communiqué by the Lebanese army indicated on Friday. "Army units deployed in the area took necessary field measures and targeted the gunmen with heavy artillery," it added. The army is working on identifying the rocket type.

Kataeb chief follows up on Bekaa citizen abduction
Fri 20 Jan 2017/NNA - Kataeb party's chief, MP Sami Gemayel, followed up Friday on the fresh abduction of citizen Saad Richa in Bekaa, during contacts he held with the concerned authorities.Accordingly, Gemayel tasked Zahle MP Elie Marouni to intensify contacts with the family of the kidnapped and the security services.

Zarif: We cooperated with Saudi Arabia in Lebanon
Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/January 20/17
Iran and Saudi Arabia managed to end the obstruction of the presidential election process in Lebanon, and we succeeded.” This is what Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said at the World Economic Forum at Davos. He also told the participants that his country desires to cooperate with Saudi Arabia to resolve issues in Syria, Yemen, Bahrain and other countries. The Iranian minister made his proposal to Saudi Arabia from an open forum. His proposal to work together to end conflicts in the region is a new call made by Iranian officials recently. Why so? Are we witnessing a change in Iran’s hostile policy designed to besiege Saudi Arabia and its allies? Or is Iran making preemptive moves to address developments at the global stage, especially considering change expected in American policy?
Their friend Barack Obama is set to exit power and there will be a new administration that has frankly expressed its intention to confront Iran. This is in addition to Russian signs that it does not want to remain an ally and partner in the war with Iran and Syria. The other possibility is that Zarif’s statements about his country’s desire to work with Saudi Arabia may just aim to serve public relations purposes to improve the image of Iran at the Davos meeting.
Zarif’s proposal about cooperation between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and particularly cooperation to end conflicts in the region, is not condemned. However, it is strange that Iran makes such a proposal. It’s a positive development but the Iranian regime’s interpretation of the term “cooperation” here is to politically accept what Iran imposes through wrongdoing and aggression, such as the case is in Syria and Yemen. Tehran is now seeking to impose its concept of “cooperation” in Syria at the Astana conference and it has previously tried to do so in Bahrain before Gulf countries thwarted its attempts. Has there really been cooperation between the two countries in Lebanon and is this cooperation a model that can be followed?
Their friend Barack Obama is set to exit power and there will be a new administration that has frankly expressed its intention to confront Iran
Election of Michel Aoun
The process of agreeing to elect Michel Aoun as president in Lebanon went through several phases among Lebanese parties themselves. After years of presidential vacuum that obstructed the functioning of the government and state institutions, Iran’s agents had nothing to achieve especially after Saudi Arabia announced it will not deal with Lebanese affairs.
The Lebanese could not even remove trash from their streets. As long as the new president does not adopt hostile stances against Saudi Arabia and does not allow anyone to have such stances in the country and as long as the Lebanese parties are satisfied, Riyadh’s reservations will end and this is what happened. As for Zarif’s statements about cooperation regarding oil matters, this cooperation actually happened between Saudi Arabia and Russia and Iran was not a direct party in it. The Russian government obligated the Iranians to respect production of their share of oil as previously agreed on. This does not mean that what Zarif said in principle is wrong. He said: “I don’t see a reason for hostile policies between Iran and Saudi Arabia. Truth be told, we can work together to end the tragic situations of people in Syria, Yemen, Bahrain and other countries in the region.”There is one country in the region that has hostile policies and that would be Iran. Gulf countries, and other countries in the region, resort to a defensive policy against Iran. Zarif does not need to have his country launch wars that kill thousands of people and displace millions to realize there is no reasonable reason for hostility with Iran’s neighbors. Tehran has succeeded at creating militias gathered from across the region to launch wars and carry out terrorist operations. But this policy has now backfired on Iran because it has led to the creation of opposing sectarian and ethnic conflicts and forced the region’s countries to go ahead and participate in wars to defend themselves. All this was caused by Iran which is directly engaged in the fighting in Iraq and Syria and which militarily funds rebels in Yemen.
Does it suit countries in the region, particularly Gulf countries, to cooperate with Iran? I think it is unlikely amid this Iranian military attack. All we have seen so far is that Iran is sabotaging all reconciliation attempts. Iranian powers on the ground tried to sabotage the Aleppo agreement between Russia and Turkey and they are pressurizing the Houthi rebels in Yemen to reject the political solution after they had accepted it.
**This article was first published in Asharq Al-Awsat on January 19, 2017.

Aoun vows to pump new blood into state institutions
Joseph Haboush/he Daily Star/January 20/17/BEIRUT: President Michel Aoun ramped up rhetoric on combatting corruption in Lebanon, promising Thursday to pump new blood into state institutions. “Work is underway to approve new appointments, formations and changes in state administrations and public institutions to pump new blood and combat corruption,” Aoun said during a meeting with mayors and mukhtars from Kesrouan in Mount Lebanon. During the meeting at the Baabda Palace, Aoun said that this was not targeting anyone, but “rather it is a procedure to save state institutions from corrosion.”Aoun promised to continue on the road to reform by cutting the misallocation and misappropriation of budgeted funds. “[This] will no longer happen without anyone being held accountable,” the president added. Lebanon’s 13th president cited Kesrouan as setting an example for other municipalities. “It will be the first district implementing decentralization for waste management, while funds allocated for this and other projects in other municipalities was misused,” he said. Meanwhile, Lebanese Forces chief Samir Geagea fired back at claims by the Iranian foreign minister that cooperation between Iran and Saudi Arabia played a vital part in the election of Aoun. “With all due to respect, the Iranian foreign minister’s comments that Saudi-Iranian cooperation led to the election of a president in Lebanon is not true,” Geagea tweeted Thursday morning in response to Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif’s comments earlier this week. Geagea added, “The Lebanese presidential elections took place through a step by step Lebanese initiative this time, and refused any foreign intervention.”
He questioned the credibility of Zarif’s recent comment, saying there was a lack of signs of foreign involvement before or during Aoun’s election. “His Excellency, the Iranian foreign minister is free to take credit for what he wants; however, this does not mean that it is what happened,” Geagea tweeted before adding that the sour relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia were widely known. “The entire world knows that there is no form of communication between Saudi Arabia and Iran at this point,” he said. Zarif’s comments came in a speech made Wednesday at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland where he claimed Iranian-Saudi Arabian collaboration had ended impediments to the election of a president in Lebanon. He referenced Aoun’s election in October as a success story before suggesting that the Islamic Republic and the Saudi Kingdom should work together for a political solution to halt fighting in Syria and Yemen. “We have a success story,” he said, referring to the end of the presidential void. Tensions in Lebanon flared in recent years between the coalitions of March 8, traditionally backed by Iran, and the Saudi Arabian backed March 14. The two coalitions were the main political alliances in Lebanon prior to Aoun’s election, which has led to newly defused tensions and calmer rhetoric between the two sides as new alliances took shape. 

Lebanon Launches New Plan to Respond to Refugee Crisis
Asharq Al-Awsat/January 20/17/Beirut – Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri said that the Syrian refugee influx was one of the “severest crises faced in Lebanon”.The crisis was “complicated and destructive” Hariri said, “pressure on the Lebanese economy due to the conflict in Syria is tremendous and unprecedented” he added. Hariri’s remarks came during the launching of the Lebanon Crisis Response Plan 2017-2020 at the Grand Serail on Thursday, in the presence of U.N. Special Coordinator for Lebanon Sigrid Kaag and U.N. Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator Philippe Lazzarini. Hariri stressed that Lebanon would need between $8 billion and $10 billion over the next three years to improve infrastructure, invest in new projects and make up for the financial loss. “In the coming three years, Lebanon needs no less than eight to ten billion dollars worth of new investments,” Hariri noted. He added that international contributions “while appreciated … are not proportional to the large needs of displaced Syrians and host communities”. The prime minister said that economic growth dropped from 8 percent to one percent since the beginning of the crisis in Syria. He added in this regard that the slow economic progress has decreased the country’s ability to deal with the refugee influx. “A key priority for my government is to contain budget deficits, upgrade infrastructure and boost growth. This effort will be weakened by the heavy presence of displaced Syrians,” Hariri said. “Even though we cannot attribute slow growth to the presence of displaced Syrians alone, the slow growth in recent years has curtailed our ability to deal with the displaced”, he added. According to Reuters, at least 1 million people fleeing Syria’s war have poured into Lebanon since the conflict began in 2011, making up a quarter of the small country’s population and seriously straining its public services. Lebanon, Syrian refugees, Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri, U.N. Special Coordinator for Lebanon Sigrid Kaag, U.N. Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator Philippe Lazzarini

Lebanon gets a new government, now it needs a new economy
Reuters/January 20/17/After years of political deadlock, Lebanon finally has a new government. Now it needs a new economy. Battered by war in neighboring Syria, neglected by wrangling politicians and caught in rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran, the pillars of the economy - remittances from overseas workers, tourism and real estate - are not what they were. Long-term, Lebanon is searching for new sources of growth, which fell from 8-9 percent to below 2 percent when Syria's civil war began in 2011. Beirut is working to start oil and gas exploration, offering support to technology start-ups and urging its vast diaspora to bring their brains and bank accounts home. But before these dreams can be realized, the government, which started work in the new year after the country spent 2-1/2-years without a president, has an urgent to-do list. The country's infrastructure has been awaiting repair since the 15-year civil war ended in 1990: roads are clogged with cars, beaches are littered with waste, internet links are slow or patchy and cuts to power and water supplies are frequent. Reams of legislation, such as a hydrocarbon industry tax law and the privatization of the stock market, await completion. Top of Prime Minister Saad Hariri's list is a budget, which the country has not had since 2005, and a better environment for business, his economic adviser Mazen Hanna told Reuters. The cabinet encompasses most sides of the country's political spectrum and all of its religious sects, making any agreement a challenge. "The first sign of the government's seriousness is if they will pass a new budget," Hanna said.
"This is the priority now."
Without one, there will be little chance of tackling Lebanon's growing fiscal deficit and debt-to-GDP ratio, forecast by the World Bank at 155 percent this year, the third highest in the world. The government's term may be as short as five months if long-overdue parliamentary elections take place on time, but Hanna said it can work on telecoms and the electricity shortages that drive people to hook up to expensive private generators. It also plans to resolve problems with rubbish disposal which spurred anti-government protests last year and the cabinet includes an anti-corruption minister for the first time. The fate of Lebanon's economy is important not only for the livelihoods of 4 million Lebanese, but for avoiding even more chaos in the Middle East: the country is home to more than one million Syrian refugees and half a million Palestinian refugees, and has its own history of instability.
CENTRAL BANK ROLE
Following its 1975-90 civil war, much of Lebanon's reconstruction focused on reestablishing its tourism image as "the Paris of the Middle East", particularly for wealthy Gulf Arabs.
Beirut's cooler climate and less restrictive social mores are a big draw for people from conservative Saudi Arabia, but bouts of civil strife, assassinations, deadlocked government and regional rivalries are still taking their toll. An executive at a luxury hotel in Beirut last summer lamented the dearth of wealthy Gulf Arabs and their $3,000 room service bills. Saudi Arabia advised citizens last February against travel to Lebanon, part of a dispute over the powerful role of the Iranian-backed Lebanese Shi'ite group Hezbollah. President Michel Aoun, a Christian ally of Hezbollah, said after a fence-mending visit to Riyadh this month he was confident Gulf tourists would return.
In the absence of political leadership, the central bank has quietly steered policy, using stimulus packages and financial engineering to keep foreign reserves stable and growth ticking over. It has also guaranteed housing, energy and business loans, testing the globally accepted principle of central bank distance from political decisions. "This has kept the economy growing for the last five to ten years," said Marianne Hoayek, an executive director at the central bank. "The government sometimes is not capable of doing what it wants to do."A central bank directive in 2013 called Circular 331 made $600 million available for investment in the "knowledge economy" and Lebanon now markets itself as the Middle East and North Africa's technology and start-up hub, a title to which the UAE and Jordan also aspire.Hoayek said around $100 million had been taken up so far.Marwan Kheireddine, chairman of Mawarid Bank which invests in tech businesses, said ten years ago entrepreneurs would have had to leave Lebanon to find funding and other support.
"Today we have all the building blocks required (for) those entrepreneurs to develop locally," he said.
At least eight new investment funds, four new fund managers and multiple jobs have been created, those in the sector say. "I wouldn't have come back without Circular 331," said Sami Abou Saab, who returned from the United States and now heads SPEED, an accelerator which helps small business grow with advice, contacts and other services.
Also In World News
Trump admin targets violent Islamist groups as foreign policy priority
In Trump We Trust: Inauguration prompts celebration in Russia
EXPAT FIREPOWER
An estimated 14-16 million people of Lebanese citizenship or descent live outside the country, driven out by the sectarian strife that fueled the civil war and still disrupts the peace. Many send money home, although remittances have been hit by the effect of the low oil price on Gulf economies. "We can sell, we are creative and we are engineers," said Nicolas Sehnaoui, chairman of the UK-Lebanon Tech Hub, which says it created around 240 jobs in its first two years and aims for 25,000 by 2025. "Instead of shipping our people out we want to ship our digital products out." But a tech-based economy needs fast internet and reliable electricity and the stock market needs to be privatized so smaller companies can go public, a process already two years behind schedule. Both the World Bank and the Association of Banks in Lebanon have said the central bank cannot hold the fort alone.
"The Bank of Lebanon and the country's banks have spent enough time, sometimes at great cost, preserving monetary stability. It is time to support this stability with fiscal and economic policies which favor real growth," ABL's head Joseph Torbey said.
Hanna told Reuters he hopes the new government can itself eventually provide such stimulus measures. In the meantime, Foreign Minister Gibran Bassil toured South America late last year to try to persuade Lebanese there to return home. Real estate company Demco Properties has widened the effort. Its "Lebanon is calling" advert broadcast on U.S. television shows a Lebanese businessman in an office with a commanding view of a U.S. city receiving a call from a deep-voiced Lebanon, which tells him: "I'm back on my feet again" and "Home is waiting".Lebanon's residents have waited a long time for effective government and the stakes are high.
"The solutions are there, today we have a political will," Hanna said. "Let's hope it materializes into tangible results for the Lebanese."
(Reporting by Lisa Barrington; Editing by Tom Perry and Philippa Fletcher)

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on January 20-21/17
The Full Transcript of President Trump's Inauguration Speech
 January 20/2017
 http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/01/20/the-full-transcript-of-president-trumps-inauguration-speech/
 Chief Justice Roberts, President Carter, President Clinton, President Bush, President Obama, fellow Americans and people of the world, thank you.
 We, the citizens of America, are now joined in a great national effort to rebuild our country and restore its promise for all of our people.
 Together, we will determine the course of America and the world for many, many years to come. We will face challenges, we will confront hardships, but we will get the job done.
 Every four years, we gather on these steps to carry out the orderly and peaceful transfer of power, and we are grateful to President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama for their gracious aid throughout this transition. They have been magnificent. Thank you.
 Today's ceremony, however, has very special meaning because today, we are not merely transferring power from one administration to another or from one party to another, but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the people.
 For too long, a small group in our nation's capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost. Washington flourished, but the people did not share in its wealth. Politicians prospered, but the jobs left and the factories closed. The establishment protected itself, but not the citizens of our country. Their victories have not been your victories. Their triumphs have not been your triumphs. And while they celebrated in our nation's capital, there was little to celebrate for struggling families all across our land.
 That all changes starting right here and right now because this moment is your moment, it belongs to you.
 It belongs to everyone gathered here today and everyone watching all across America. This is your day. This is your celebration. And this, the United States of America, is your country.
 What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people.
 January 20th, 2017 will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again.
 The forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer.
 Everyone is listening to you now. You came by the tens of millions to become part of a historic movement, the likes of which the world has never seen before.
 At the center of this movement is a crucial conviction, that a nation exists to serve its citizens. Americans want great schools for their children, safe neighborhoods for their families, and good jobs for themselves. These are just and reasonable demands of righteous people and a righteous public.  But for too many of our citizens, a different reality exists: mothers and children trapped in poverty in our inner cities; rusted out factories scattered like tombstones across the landscape of our nation; an education system flush with cash, but which leaves our young and beautiful students deprived of all knowledge; and the crime and the gangs and the drugs that have stolen too many lives and robbed our country of so much unrealized potential.
 This American carnage stops right here and stops right now.
 We are one nation and their pain is our pain. Their dreams are our dreams. And their success will be our success. We share one heart, one home, and one glorious destiny. The oath of office I take today is an oath of allegiance to all Americans.
 For many decades, we've enriched foreign industry at the expense of American industry; subsidized the armies of other countries, while allowing for the very sad depletion of our military. We've defended other nations' borders while refusing to defend our own.
 And spent trillions and trillions of dollars overseas while America's infrastructure has fallen into disrepair and decay. We've made other countries rich, while the wealth, strength and confidence of our country has dissipated over the horizon.
 One by one, the factories shuttered and left our shores, with not even a thought about the millions and millions of American workers that were left behind. The wealth of our middle class has been ripped from their homes and then redistributed all across the world.
 But that is the past. And now, we are looking only to the future.
 We assembled here today are issuing a new decree to be heard in every city, in every foreign capital, and in every hall of power. From this day forward, a new vision will govern our land. From this day forward, it's going to be only America first, America first.
 Every decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign affairs will be made to benefit American workers and American families. We must protect our borders from the ravages of other countries making our products, stealing our companies and destroying our jobs.
 Protection will lead to great prosperity and strength. I will fight for you with every breath in my body and I will never ever let you down.
 America will start winning again, winning like never before.
 We will bring back our jobs. We will bring back our borders. We will bring back our wealth. And we will bring back our dreams.
 We will build new roads and highways and bridges and airports and tunnels and railways all across our wonderful nation. We will get our people off of welfare and back to work, rebuilding our country with American hands and American labor.
 We will follow two simple rules; buy American and hire American.
 We will seek friendship and goodwill with the nations of the world, but we do so with the understanding that it is the right of all nations to put their own interests first. We do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone, but rather to let it shine as an example. We will shine for everyone to follow.  We will reinforce old alliances and form new ones and unite the civilized world against radical Islamic terrorism, which we will eradicate from the face of the Earth.
 At the bedrock of our politics will be a total allegiance to the United States of America, and through our loyalty to our country, we will rediscover our loyalty to each other. When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.
 The bible tells us how good and pleasant it is when God's people live together in unity. We must speak our minds openly, debate our disagreements honestly, but always pursue solidarity. When America is united, America is totally unstoppable.
 There should be no fear. We are protected and we will always be protected. We will be protected by the great men and women of our military and law enforcement. And most importantly, we will be protected by God.
 Finally, we must think big and dream even bigger. In America, we understand that a nation is only living as long as it is striving. We will no longer accept politicians who are all talk and no action, constantly complaining, but never doing anything about it.
 The time for empty talk is over. Now arrives the hour of action.
 Do not allow anyone to tell you that it cannot be done. No challenge can match the heart and fight and spirit of America. We will not fail. Our country will thrive and prosper again.
 We stand at the birth of a new millennium, ready to unlock the mysteries of space, to free the earth from the miseries of disease, and to harness the energies, industries and technologies of tomorrow. A new national pride will stir ourselves, lift our sights and heal our divisions.
 It's time to remember that old wisdom our soldiers will never forget, that whether we are black or brown or white, we all bleed the same red blood of patriots.
 We all enjoy the same glorious freedoms and we all salute the same great American flag.
 And whether a child is born in the urban sprawl of Detroit or the wind-swept plains of Nebraska, they look up at the same night sky, they will their heart with the same dreams, and they are infused with the breath of life by the same almighty creator.
 So to all Americans in every city near and far, small and large, from mountain to mountain, from ocean to ocean, hear these words. You will never be ignored again.
 Your voice, your hopes, and your dreams will define our American destiny. And your courage and goodness and love will forever guide us along the way.
 Together, we will make America strong again. We will make America wealthy again. We will make America proud again. We will make America safe again. And yes, together we will make America great again.
 Thank you. God bless you. And God bless America.

Donald Trump sworn in as US president
Ismaeel Naar/Al Arabiya English Friday, 20 January 2017
Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 45th United States President in an event that drew nearly 900,000 people to Washington D.C. while millions watched worldwide. The inauguration saw former presidents Jimmy Carter, George Bush, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama as Trump took his oath of office on Friday. “This moment is your moment; it belongs to you. We are transferring power from Washington D.C. and giving it back to you. We’ve spent many years and money defending other countries’ borders, while ignoring our own. From this day forward a new vision will govern our land,” Trump said after taking his oath of office.
 Violent protests
 Protests near the Capitol building turned violent on as some members of the anti-Trump marchers started vandalizing stores in Washington, forcing police to use pepper spray and other crowd-control measures. Masked activists ran through the streets smashing windows with hammers at a McDonald's restaurant, a Starbucks coffee shop and Bobby Van's Grill steakhouse several blocks from the White House. They carried black anarchist flags and signs that said, "Join the resistance, fight back now."“There is no doubt that there so much divide among Americans today but today is a show of democracy as Obama transitions power to Trump,” Vice President for Policy and Research at The Middle East Institute Paul Salem told Al Arabiya.“This inauguration had a much different feel compared to Obama’s in 2008 and 2012. Back then, we were seeing a lot of celebrations but in the run up to today’s events we are seeing a lot of protests in and around the capital,” Nabeel Khoury, Nonresident Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council, told Al Arabiya
 Trump's Middle East policy
 While Trump’s inauguration speech focused most on domestics without giving specific policies, he did mention the threat of what he called “radical Islamic terrorism”.“I pledge to unite world against radical Islam and promise that we will eradicate radical Islamic terrorism from the face of the earth,” Trump said during his speech. Trump has said he wants to move the US embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, at the risk of angering Arabs. He has yet to sketch out how he plans to carry out a campaign pledge to “knock the hell out of” Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) militants. “Trump’s policies on the Middle East is more mysterious than it is clear in the run up to his presidency. He has said he would go at ISIS but how he will do it still remains a question,” Khoury said. 

Trump keeps Obama's envoy for countering Islamic State
 The New Arab & agencies/20 January, 2017/US president Donald Trump will retain his predecessor's special envoy to the coalition fighting the Islamic State group, Brett McGurk, his spokesman said on Thursday. As "Special Presidential Envoy", McGurk coordinates with around 70 allied states and with regional militia on the ground in the battle to destroy the extremist group in Iraq, Syria and beyond. A veteran diplomat, he was appointed in November 2015, working out of an office in the State Department and making regular trips to the region. Trump's administration made it clear that it expected former president Barack Obama's political appointees across the US government to clear their desks on Friday after Trump was sworn in. But on Thursday, Trump press secretary Sean Spicer said that around 50 high-level names would stay on, including McGurk and some others in vital national security roles. McGurk was appointed to his current coalition role by Obama, but had previously served former Republican president George W. Bush as his special assistant and senior director on Iraq and Afghanistan. The other officials staying on include the highest-ranking career officials at key national security agencies like the Pentagon and State Department. Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work and America's third-ranking diplomat, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Thomas Shannon, will serve as acting chiefs of their agencies until successors for the top jobs are confirmed by the Senate. 

Islamic State increases oil and gas sales to Assad, officials say
Foxnews/January 20/17
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/20/islamic-state-increases-oil-and-gas-sales-to-assad-officials-say.html
Islamic State has ramped up sales of oil and gas to the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, U.S. and European officials said, providing vital fuel to the government in return for desperately needed cash.
The regime’s purchases are helping sustain Islamic State amid unprecedented military pressure on the militant group in both Syria and Iraq. It is also helping the group despite the regime’s insistence that it is dedicated to eradicating the militant group with the help of its top allies Russia and Iran. Oil and gas sales to Mr. Assad’s regime are now Islamic State’s largest source of funds, replacing revenue the group once collected from tolls on the transit of goods and taxes on wages within its territory, the officials said. Their information comes from the monitoring of oil-truck traffic routes, which have changed from carrying oil to Turkey and Iraq to transporting it to Syria. Islamic State has found some relief from U.S. airstrikes targeting their oil-smuggling operations in central and western Syria, where the Russian military has a heavy air presence, a Western official said. The group is also harder to hit in Syria because the pockets of territory it controls are smaller, the official said. Although Islamic State is a regular target of Mr. Assad’s pronouncements against terrorism, his government depends on the militant group for oil and natural gas to the extent that the Syrian capital Damascus “relies on gas produced in ISIS territory in the Palmyra area for a large part of its power generation,” a European counterterrorism official said. Western officials said the Assad regime has fallen behind on payments to Islamic State for the gas. They said they suspect that Islamic State blew up a separate Syrian gas plant on Jan. 8 to send a message demanding payment. Donald Trump, who is being sworn in as president on Friday, has said that the U.S. campaign to destroy Islamic State would be a higher priority than toppling Mr. Assad and suggested that might mean joining with Russia and the Syrian government in the undertaking.

US air strike in Syria kills more than 100 al Qaeda members
Reuters, Washington Friday, 20 January 2017/A US air strike on Thursday targeting an al Qaeda camp in Syria killed more than 100 members of the militant group, a US defense official said on Friday. The official, who was speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the air strike was primarily carried out by a B-52 bomber and dropped 14 munitions. The official added that the strike against the camp took place in Idlib province, west of Aleppo.

Russia sees positive signs in Syria peace process
Reuters Friday, 20 January 2017/Russia has observed positive signs in the Syria peace process and sees a meeting in the Kazakh capital next week as an important step toward establishing a framework for talks taking place in Geneva, Russian news agencies cited Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov as saying on Friday. Lavrov was also quoted as saying by RIA news agency that Moscow was ready to do its part to move to a constructive dialogue with the United States.

Russia, Syria sign deal on expanding Tartus naval base

Reuters, Moscow Friday, 20 January 2017/Russia and Syria have signed an agreement on expanding and modernizing Russia's Tartus naval base in Syria, a Russian government document showed. The agreement envisages that 11 Russian warships can be located in the Tartus base at one time, the document showed.

Over 40 Fateh al-Sham Jihadists Killed in North Syria Air Strikes
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 20/17/More than 40 fighters of former al-Qaida affiliate Fateh al-Sham Front were killed in air strikes on their camp in northern Syria late on Thursday, a monitoring group said. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said it could not immediately specify who carried out the strikes in the western part of Aleppo province. A U.S.-led coalition as well as the Syrian government and its ally Russia have carried out strikes against Fateh al-Sham targets in recent weeks. "Warplanes, which may have been Russian or coalition aircraft, struck a Fateh al-Sham camp in Jabal al-Sheikh Suleiman," the Britain-based Observatory said. The jihadist group, formerly known as al-Nusra Front, is not party to a Russian- and Turkish-brokered ceasefire that went into effect on December 30 and has sustained major losses in air strikes in recent weeks. Around 100 of its fighters have been killed since the start of the year, according to the monitor. Fateh al-Sham is allied with Islamist rebel groups that are party to the ceasefire and together they control virtually all of Idlib province in the northwest as well as parts of Aleppo province. Their alliance has scuppered previous attempts to broker a ceasefire between the government and non-jihadist rebel groups, with Damascus and its allies citing the Fateh al-Sham presence as grounds for continuing hostilities in areas they control.

ISIS destroys part of ancient Roman theater in Palmyra
The Associated Press, Beirut Friday, 20 January 2017/ISIS militants destroyed a landmark ancient Roman monument and parts of the theater in Syria’s historic town of Palmyra, the government and opposition monitoring groups said Friday. Maamoun Abdulkarim, the head of Syria’s antiquities department, said the militants destroyed the facade of the second-century theater along with the Tetrapylon, a cubic-shaped ancient Roman monument that sits in the middle of the colonnade road that leads to the theater. Abdulkarim told The Associated Press that reports of the destruction first trickled out of the ISIS-held town late in December. But satellite images of the damage were only available late Thursday, confirming the destruction. The imagery, provided by the US-based American Schools of Oriental Research, show significant damage to the Tetrapylon and the theater. The ASOR said the damage is likely caused by intentional destruction from IS but they were unable to verify the exact cause. Also read: Syrian regime troops looting Palmyra: German expert. Abdulkarim said only two of the 16 columns of the Tetrapylon remain standing. The stage backdrop has sustained damage, according to ASOR. State-run news agency SANA reported the damage Friday and Syrian opposition monitors also confirmed but gave no immediate details. The militants also blew up the Arch of Triumph, which had been built under Roman emperor Septimius Severus between A.D. 193 and A.D. 211. A UNESCO world heritage site, Palmyra boasts 2,000-year-old towering Roman-era colonnades and priceless artifacts. Syrians affectionately refer to it as the “Bride of the Desert.”

Khamenei’s uncle asks him to change his policies before it is too late
Ramadan al-Saadi, Al Arabiya English Friday, 20 January 2017/Hossein Mirdamadi, the uncle of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has addressed a warning to Khamenei through a public letter saying that social and political stability in Iran is at risk unless Khamenei reviews and modifies his current policies and practices. In the letter that was published on Thursday by “Kalima” website that is close to Iran’s Green opposition, Mirdamadi criticized the behavior of Khamenei towards prominent figures like Hashami Rafsanjani, Mohammad Khatami, Mehdi Karroubi, Mir Hossein Mousavi and his wife Zahra Rahnavard. They were all repressed by Khamenei just because they had different opinions regarding internal issues. Mirdamadi said in his letter that there is still time to make changes and there is still hope. He asked his nephew to install love, peace and dignity instead of violence, hatred and killings. One of Mirdamadi’s specific demands is that Khamenei end the imprisonment of Mir Hossein Mousavi, Mehdi Karroubi, and Zahra Rahnavard, the leaders of Iran’s Green opposition movement that have been under house arrest since the 2009 protests. He also criticized Khamenei for his decision to prevent Mohammad Khatami, Iran’s former president from attending the funeral of Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani.Former Iranian president, Mohammad Khatami, had called on the supreme guide Ali Khamenei, to reconcile with the internal opposition after the departure of Rafsanjani. Observers believe that the death of Rafsanjani is a setback for the moderate and reformist currents in all political, social and economic fields, especially that presidential elections are looming in the horizon.

ISIS car bomb kills 5 Turkish soldiers near Syria's al-Bab
Reuters, Istanbul Friday, 20 January 2017/Five Turkish soldiers were killed and nine wounded on Friday in a car bomb attack by ISIS militants in the Suflaniyah area near the northern Syrian town of al-Bab, the Turkish military said in a statement.
The Turkish army and Syrian rebels launched an operation in August to drive the extremists away from the border region and have besieged the ISIS-controlled town of al-Bab for weeks.

Rocket fired near Istanbul police headquarters
Reuters, Istanbul Friday, 20 January 2017/A rocket was fired near the police headquarters in Turkey’s largest city of Istanbul on Friday but missed the building, broadcaster CNN Turk said. Turkey has been hit by a series of gun and bomb attacks in recent months, some claimed by Kurdish PKK militants, others blamed on ISIS. The police headquarters is located in the Fatih district of Istanbul, on the European side of the city. A gunman killed 39 people in an Istanbul nightclub on New Year’s Day in an attack claimed by ISIS. On Dec. 10, two bombs claimed by Kurdish militants exploded outside a soccer stadium in the city, killing 44 people.

US air strike in Syria kills more than 100 al Qaeda members
Reuters, Washington Friday, 20 January 2017/A US air strike on Thursday targeting an al Qaeda camp in Syria killed more than 100 members of the militant group, a US defense official said on Friday. The official, who was speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the air strike was primarily carried out by a B-52 bomber and dropped 14 munitions. The official added that the strike against the camp took place in Idlib province, west of Aleppo.

Arab coalition intercepts two ballistic missiles over Marib
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Friday, 20 January 2017/The air defense system of the Arab coalition intercepted two ballistic missiles launched by the Houthi militias around the province of Marib, Al Arabiya reported. This comes as coalition warplanes launched a series of raids on Houthi camps south of Sanaa. Coalition aircrafts also targeted a checkpoint in al Hudaydah governorate, killing 18 militias. Additionally, in the port city of Hudaydah, the coalition targeted a Houthi camp site, killing and injuring several militias.
Meanwhile, local sources reported that the Popular Resistance made major advancements against Houthis militias.
 
Iran summons Danish envoy over embassy attack
By Associated Press January 19/17/TEHRAN, IranIran’s Foreign Ministry has summoned the Danish ambassador over an attack on its Copenhagen embassy. The official IRNA news agency said the attack on Thursday involved four Iranian dissidents, without providing further details. IRNA said the Foreign Ministry condemned the attack and reminded the Danish government that it is responsible for protecting the embassy. The ministry called on Danish authorities to pursue the perpetrators and notify it of the results.
 Danish officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

Iran Regime's President: JCPOA Is Also Beneficial for America
Friday, 20 January 2017/NCRI - The conference by Iranian regime’s president, Hassan Rouhani, on Monday, was overshadowed by the latest statement of the U.S. President-elect Donald Trump who described the JCPOA as the most stupid agreement.
Rouhani in a fearful and defensive reply said: The (JCPOA) agreement is a win-win and also beneficial for the U.S.”The regime’s so-called moderate president Rouhani displaying the feuding among the regime’s factions at top levels, in a response to the rival faction’s attacks against JCPOA said: “They should use glasses in order to see its achievements.”Responding to the claims by Khamenei’s faction, Rouhani emphasized that Khamenei himself supports JCPOA. Rouhani, who implicitly took back his previous statements in which he had said the renewal of the U.S. sanctions for 10 years was violation of JCPOA, said they should enter negotiations with the U.S. to remove sanctions in other areas (human rights violation and terrorist activities…).Rouhani’s press conference not only faced attacks by the rival faction but also criticism by some of his own bloc’s media. The state-run Jahan San’at (world industry) affiliated to Rouhani’s band wrote: “This press conference did not have anything for the public opinion. Doesn’t Rouhani know that in the (regime of) Islamic Republic there are people who demand of the state and government not plants and animal life but human life?”The state-run Tasnim news agency, affiliated with the IRGC, wrote: “The most engineered press conference of Rouhani was the last one by public and particular people’s admission. Yet, the string of his speech was disrupted for a few moments when in response to Trump who said he ‘doesn’t like JCPOA’ Rouhani instead of giving legal reasons started to read Quran verses and said ‘JCPOA is beneficial for the U.S.’, a sentence which will remain in the history.”Keyhan newspaper belonging to Khamenei wrote: “Almost all the media that took the stage (microphone) to ask Rouhani a question were chosen from the (so-called) moderate newspapers and news agencies (affiliated to Rouhani).”
Another newspaper affiliated to Khamenei’s faction wrote: “Hassan Rouhani’s response to the «criticism and protests regarding the economic situation» was «use glasses ».”

John Kerry: I Am Very Proud of the Effort We Made to Get MEK out of Camp Liberty to Places They Are Safe...
Friday, 20 January 2017
On January 19, 2017 John Kerry secretary of state in his farewell remarks in the C Street Lobby, regarding the relocation of MEK members mentioned the following words.
“…And one of the things that I am very proud of is the effort we made – I remember going to hearing after hearing, and you remember all those folks you’d see up there in those yellow jackets representing the Mujahedin-e Khalq – MEK as we’ve known them – and we got 3,000 of them out of Camp Liberty and to places where they are safe and their lives are saved from being attacked regularly, as they were. I thank Jonathan Winer, our special envoy, and others for that kind of effort. It’s been enormous.”
It is noteworthy that on September 12, 2016 following the successful relocation of the last group of MEK members from Iraq, John Kerry in his remarks before the Daily Press Briefing stated: “Second, let me make a quick comment about good news, because obviously we know we live in a turbulent era and too often there are (coughs) one challenge or another about conflict that, unfortunately, doesn’t bring good news. But I believe it’s important to note a very important humanitarian accomplishment from late last week. I was going to mention it but it was so late – or early in the morning in Geneva – that I didn’t. But on Friday of last week, the last 280 members of the exiled Iranian opposition group, the Mujahedin e-Khalq, or MEK, as they’re known, were moved out of Camp Liberty in Iraq. And their departure concludes a significant American diplomatic initiative that has assured the safety of more than 3,000 MEK members whose lives have been under threat. And as everybody remembers, the camp they were in had on many occasions been shelled. There were people killed and injured. And we have been trying to figure out the way forward. Well, the last 10 years have been filled with reminders of this challenge. I first became involved in this effort when I was in the Senate, and that is why during my first year as Secretary I appointed Jonathan Winer, one of my longest-serving and most trusted advisers, as our emissary to find a way to help the MEK be able to leave Iraq. After steady progress over a period of months, I visited Tirana earlier this year and I discussed with the Albanian Government how to assist in facilitating the transfer and the resettlement of the last group of MEK members from Camp Liberty. Albania has a proud tradition of protecting vulnerable communities, as it did during the Kosovo conflict and in sheltering large numbers of Jews during World War II. I am very grateful that in this case too Albania was willing to play an important humanitarian role. I also want to thank the governments of Germany, Norway, Italy, the U.K., Finland, and other EU countries for helping to save the lives of the MEK. And this is a major humanitarian achievement, and I’m very proud that the United States was able to play a pivotal role in helping to get this job done.”NCRI - United States Secretary of State John Kerry made remarks to reporters on Monday on the successful relocation of the final group of members of the main Iranian opposition group People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI or MEK) from Camp Liberty in Iraq to Albania. Secretary Kerry made the announcement at the State Department Daily Briefing in Washington.
The following is the text of Secretary Kerry's remarks on the PMOI’s relocation from Iraq to Europe:
Remarks before the Daily Press Briefing
Remarks
John Kerry
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
September 12, 2016
Second, let me make a quick comment about good news, because obviously we know we live in a turbulent era and too often there are (coughs) one challenge or another about conflict that, unfortunately, doesn’t bring good news. But I believe it’s important to note a very important humanitarian accomplishment from late last week. I was going to mention it but it was so late – or early in the morning in Geneva – that I didn’t.
But on Friday of last week, the last 280 members of the exiled Iranian opposition group, the Mujahedin e-Khalq, or MEK, as they’re known, were moved out of Camp Liberty in Iraq. And their departure concludes a significant American diplomatic initiative that has assured the safety of more than 3,000 MEK members whose lives have been under threat. And as everybody remembers, the camp they were in had on many occasions been shelled. There were people killed and injured. And we have been trying to figure out the way forward.
Well, the last 10 years have been filled with reminders of this challenge. I first became involved in this effort when I was in the Senate, and that is why during my first year as Secretary I appointed Jonathan Winer, one of my longest-serving and most trusted advisers, as our emissary to find a way to help the MEK be able to leave Iraq.
After steady progress over a period of months, I visited Tirana earlier this year and I discussed with the Albanian Government how to assist in facilitating the transfer and the resettlement of the last group of MEK members from Camp Liberty. Albania has a proud tradition of protecting vulnerable communities, as it did during the Kosovo conflict and in sheltering large numbers of Jews during World War II. I am very grateful that in this case too Albania was willing to play an important humanitarian role. I also want to thank the governments of Germany, Norway, Italy, the U.K., Finland, and other EU countries for helping to save the lives of the MEK. And this is a major humanitarian achievement, and I’m very proud that the United States was able to play a pivotal role in helping to get this job done.
Source: http://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2016/09/261776.htm

Iran: Four Patients Die in Hospital Due to Contaminated Drinking Water

Friday, 20 January 2017/NCRI - A health official of Khuzestan Province (southwest Iran) announced that contaminated drinking water caused several patients die in Sina Hospital in Ahwaz this summer. According to the state-run IRNA news agency, Shokrollah Salman Zadeh, health deputy of Ahwaz university medical sciences, on Tuesday, January 17, said according to expert studies, the reason for the death of Dialysis patients in Sina hospital in Karoun County, a suburb of Ahwaz, is contaminated drinking water. “A main recent challenge in a hospital in Khuzestan Province (Sina Hospital) is the death of several dialysis patients where after investigation it was found that the reason was dysentery caused by E. Coli 957 bacteria transmitted to these patients through (contaminated) drinking water,” he said. He was pointing out the death of four Dialysis patients in Karoun County earlier in August this year following fever, diarrhea and vomiting. The hospital, which is nearly 50 years old, is located at the entrance of Ahwaz-Abadan road in Kout Abdollah area. Contamination of drinking water is one of the main health problems in Ahwaz and some other cities in Khuzestan and has a history of several years. While the drinking water in the citiesis supplied from Karoun and some other rivers in Kuzestan, agricultural, industrial and domestic sewage sometimes find way in some parts of the river.

The Message of a Prominent Political Prisoner in Iran
Friday, 20 January 2017/NCRI - Political prisoner Arzhang Davoudi, incarcerated in Zabol prison in exile, in a message on the occasion of January 20 and freedom of the last group of political prisoners from the Shah’s prisons in 1979 in Iran wrote:
Dear Compatriot,
This week reminds me of three events in the history of our country:
First, the Persian date 26th of Dey 1357 (16 January 1979) is reminder of the day when after the uprising of revolutionary people of Iran, the tyrant Mohammad Reza Shah fled the country with tears in his eyes.
Second, this year 26th of Dey is also the day when accursed Rafsanjani who was known as the typhus of the 1979 revolution died. The treacherous behavior of this criminal was effective more than anyone else in the corrupt regime of the supreme leader in leading astray the revolution and failure of its noble aspiration.
The Third event, however, is connected to a brave man who stood up to death against the oppression of the Shah (monarchial regime) and when as the result of the flood of masses roaring against the regime, the Shah was forced to, in an unwanted retreat, release political prisoners, and despite the pressure and begging by the Shah’s intelligence service, SAVAK, and prison officials, that brave man did not accept to leave the prison and with a memorable strength and solidity said he will not leave the prison as long as even one political prisoner remain in the prisons across the country.
And that is how this man, Massoud Rajavi or as the Mojahedin-e Khalq (PMOI / MEK) sincerely and heartfelt call him Brother Massoud, left the prison on the 30 Dey 1357 (20 January 1979) along with the last group of political prisoners and activists and was warmly welcomed by the risen people.
Compatriots,
Escape of the cruel Shah and death of the wicked and oppressive Rafsanjani is painful for me here because each one of them were able to somehow escape public trial and clear disgrace in public opinion, and as the result, more ambiguity remains in the history of political struggle and counter-campaigns in Iran.
However, each time when I remember the “Third event,” the pride in my struggle becomes more prosperous. And even now that I am in Zabol prison in exile, I am proud of Massoud and all others who love freedom for Iran and Iranians, and as always, their memory and path makes my determination to fight the oppression by Khamenei’s bandit and Co. even greater.

Iran: Rafsanjani and Me
NCRI Iran News/ Friday, 20 January 2017
‘THE DIPLOMAT’ on January 19, 2017, published a real story concerning a victim of state-sponsored terrorism who has a different take on the death of one of the Iran regime’s leaders. The following is the full text.
The minute I heard about the death of Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the number two man in the theocracy ruling Iran for decades, I had a flashback to Istanbul, Turkey, on March 14, 1990.
No, Rafsanjani was not in Turkey on that day. But his henchmen were. And that is when I encountered them directly.
I am a member of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, the coalition of Iranian opposition movements, with the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran, the principal Iranian opposition movement at its core.
It was mid-afternoon and I was sitting next to the driver taking me to the Istanbul airport. As the driver and I were discussing ways to evade the traffic jam that was caused by an accident, a car carrying four men suddenly blocked our path. And then came a bang. Another car pinned us in from behind.
Seconds later, two strange men, one from the front car and one from the car behind, jumped out with automatic weapons. As the assailants approached, I had a few seconds to decide how to avoid becoming sitting ducks. I opened the car door and rushed at them carrying only a small Samsonite briefcase. One of the men fired nine bullets; the other man’s gun jammed. I was shot in the chest and stomach and gravely wounded. The assailants fled. I fell unconscious, my battle for survival just begun.
Luckily, we were close to Istanbul’s International Hospital, to which I was rushed. I was in a deep coma for 40 days, and unconscious for three months. With 80 percent of my liver gone, I was written off by my doctors several times. One bullet hit very close to my heart. I went through 14 operations and was given 154 pints of blood. In one of the operations, the odds for my survival were one to one hundred.
The assailants were acting at the behest of the clerical regime, the main state sponsor of terrorism. Ironically, as later became evident, the hitmen weren’t after me. The real target was Mohammad Mohaddessin, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the NCRI, as Iranian state radio confirmed a few days later.
When the regime found out that they have failed, they tried twice to finish me off in the hospital. Once, assassins disguised as Turkish police approached the hospital; by pure coincidence, the Turkish police arrived at the hospital at the same time and foiled the plot. Another time, two men pretended that they were my friends and found my room in the hospital. In reality, they were the mullahs’ men. Once again, I was fortunate; several real friends came to visit me at the same time, and the would-be murderers fled.
Actually, I am one of very few who has survived the mullahs’ assassination attempts.
All this took place while Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani was the clerical regime’s president.
It is very relevant and pertinent to know his real legacy. While some in the West have portrayed him as a “moderate,” “pragmatic”, etc. for the past three decades, in reality he was cut from the same cloth as the rest of the mullahs.
The assassination of Iranian dissidents abroad and the regime’s terror attacks skyrocketed during Rafsanjani’s tenure as the president and as the head of the Supreme National Security Council, a body that oversees and authorizes the regime’s terrorist operations.
Professor Kazem Rajavi, Iran’s most renowned human-rights activist, was gunned down in broad daylight by the mullahs’ hitmen while driving near his house in Geneva in 1990. The Swiss implicated 13 Iranian officials with passports stamped “Special Mission.” Several Iranian Kurdish leaders were murdered in Vienna in 1989 and in Berlin in 1992. The list goes on. The mullahs’ terror targets were not only Iranians. The FBI established undeniable evidence that Tehran had masterminded the bombing of Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia in 1996, resulting in the deaths of 19 American servicemen. The Jewish center in Argentina was bombed in Buenos Aires on July 18, 1994. Rafsanjani was directly implicated by Interpol.
Rafsanjani played a key role in the massacre of 30,000 political prisoners, primarily activists of the MEK, in summer of 1988, an incident that has been described as one of the worst crimes against humanity since the Second World War.
Nor was Mr. Rafsanjani’s mischief-making limited to terrorism and murder at home. The secret drive to acquire nuclear weapons got a real boost during his tenure, particularly after the first Persian Gulf War in 1991.
Make no mistake, Rafsanjani had no impulse toward moderation. But his death was a major development insofar as it pertains to the future of the theocracy ruling Iran. As Maryam Rajavi, President-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran underscored, with the death of Rafsanjani, “one of the two pillars and key to the equilibrium of the regime has collapsed and the regime in its entirety is approaching overthrow.” Rafsanjani who had always been the regime’s number two, acted as its balancing factor and played a decisive role in its preservation. After Rafsanjani’s death, the regime will lose its internal and external equilibrium. In light of other crises Tehran faces, that means the outlook for the regime’s future has become significantly bleaker.
**Hossein Abedini is a member of the Parliament in exile of the Iranian resistance (NCRI) and belongs to the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Council of Resistance of Iran.

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 20-21/17
Question: "What does it mean that Jesus fulfilled the law, but did not abolish it?"

GotQuestions.org/Answer: In Matthew’s record of what is commonly called the Sermon on the Mount, these words of Jesus are recorded: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17-18).
It is frequently argued that if Jesus did not “abolish” the law, then it must still be binding. Accordingly, such components as the Sabbath-day requirement must be operative still, along with perhaps numerous other elements of the Mosaic Law. This assumption is grounded in a misunderstanding of the words and intent of this passage. Christ did not suggest here that the binding nature of the law of Moses would remain forever in effect. Such a view would contradict everything we learn from the balance of the New Testament (Romans 10:4; Galatians 3:23-25; Ephesians 2:15).
Of special significance in this study is the word rendered “abolish.” It translates the Greek term kataluo, literally meaning “to loosen down.” The word is found seventeen times in the New Testament. It is used, for example, of the destruction of the Jewish temple by the Romans (Matthew 26:61; 27:40; Acts 6:14), and of the dissolving of the human body at death (2 Corinthians 5:1). The term can carry the extended meaning of “to overthrow,” i.e., “to render vain, deprive of success.” In classical Greek, it was used in connection with institutions, laws, etc., to convey the idea of “to invalidate.”
It is especially important to note how the word is used in Matthew 5:17. In this context, “abolish” is set in opposition to “fulfill.” Christ came “...not to abolish, but to fulfill.” Jesus did not come to this earth for the purpose of acting as an opponent of the law. His goal was not to prevent its fulfillment. Rather, He revered it, loved it, obeyed it, and brought it to fruition. He fulfilled the law’s prophetic utterances regarding Himself (Luke 24:44). Christ fulfilled the demands of the Mosaic law, which called for perfect obedience under threat of a “curse” (see Galatians 3:10, 13). In this sense, the law’s divine design will ever have an abiding effect. It will always accomplish the purpose for which it was given.
If, however, the law of Moses bears the same relationship to men today, in terms of its binding status, then it was not fulfilled, and Jesus failed at what He came to do. On the other hand, if the Lord did accomplish His goal, then the law was fulfilled, and it is not a binding legal institution today. Further, if the law of Moses was not fulfilled by Christ—and thus remains as a binding legal system for today—then it is not just partially binding. Rather, it is a totally compelling system. Jesus plainly said that not one “jot or tittle” (representative of the smallest markings of the Hebrew script) would pass away until all was fulfilled. Consequently, nothing of the law was to fail until it had completely accomplished its purpose. Jesus fulfilled the law. Jesus fulfilled all of the law. We cannot say that Jesus fulfilled the sacrificial system, but did not fulfill the other aspects of the law. Jesus either fulfilled all of the law, or none of it. What Jesus' death means for the sacrificial system, it also means for the other aspects of the law.

Lessons Trump Can Learn From Obama
Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/January 20/17
As Donald Trump takes over as the 45th president of the United States, speculation is rife regarding what he might do with the power that history, via the American electorate, has put at his disposal.
As a student of American politics since the 1960s I don’t recall any US president to have started his tenure with more negative comments from the pundits than Trump. To put it mildly, the American great and the good, the literati and the glitterati don’t like Trump and openly hope that he would produce another failed presidency.
Paradoxically, that could be good news for Trump as it sharply reduces expectations. Even now, the fact that Trump manages to provide more or less coherent answers in an interview with the London Times is hailed an achievement in itself.
Low expectations for a Trump presidency comes after insanely high expectations inspired by Barack Obama at the start of his first term. During eight years in the White House, Obama was obliged to constantly lower those expectations, each time failing to meet the lower targets he set. Having started at the peak of expectations, symbolized by the Nobel Peace prize offered to him as an appetizer, Obama had nowhere to go but down until he hit the bottom. Even his most ardent supporters now agree that, as president, he was a failure, but insist that, though a bad president, he was a good man just as the Wizard of Oz had been.
In contrast, Trump, starting from the bottom, as far as expectations are concerned, has nowhere to go but up. Trump’s chief asset, as far as his support base is concerned, is that he is not Obama.
But is not being Obama enough to secure Trump a successful presidency? I think the answer is: no, although Trump could learn a great deal from Obama’s mistakes.
Obama built his presidency on being anti-Bush. His obsessive anti-Bushism, or non-Bushism to put it mildly, was at the root of his disastrous mistakes in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Egypt, Iran, Cuba, North Korea, Georgia and Ukraine among other places and in dealing with Russia, the NATO allies, the Arab allies and even Israel. Obama followed a simple formula: those who hated the US should be wooed and flattered while US allies should be vilified, insulted and even stabbed in the back.
Though Trump should undo some of Obama’s misdeeds as fast as procedure allows, he should not fall in the trap of thinking that whatever Obama did must be undone. If he did that he would emerge as a caricature of the outgoing president.
Another lesson that Trump could learn from Obama’s failure is to keep his ego well under control. Obama had an inflated high opinion of himself, symbolized by the “Yes, We Can” slogan which he had borrowed from his Iranian counterpart Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, another politician with a giant ego. (Ahmadinejad’s slogan in his 2005 presidential campaign was “Ma Mitavanim” (We Can) three years before Obama appeared on the US national scene.) Americans might be taken in by a Boasting Billy for a time but always end up booing him towards the exit.
Another lesson for Trump is not to replicate Obama’s disdain for the rules and working traditions of the American democratic system. The new president would be well advised not to marginalize his own Cabinet members, and, above all, not try and circumvent the Congress. Obama surrounded himself by yes-men, in fact mostly yes-women, and mediocre apparatchiki such as Joe Biden and John Kerry who had no experience of life outside Washington politics. Trump, however, has recruited people who have impressive CVs of their own and are unlikely to regard massaging the chief’s ego as their sole mission in life.
More importantly, perhaps, Trump should learn from Obama’s failure to control his logorrhoea. As Hillary Clinton once observed, Obama simply couldn’t resist hearing the sound of his own voice, making a speech reading from a teleprompter. So far, Trump has shown a similar weakness by failing to moderate his twittering tendencies.
In politics, however, keeping one’s mouth shut is at times the sanest policy. Not all problems have readily available solutions and, if they did, not applying the solution is within the gift of the United Sates in every instance.
Remember Obama saying “Assad must Go!” and that the massacre of Syrians with chemical weapons was a “red line” even when he knew that he didn’t mean any of that? And what about all those “options on the table” that Obama made a song and dance about if Iran were to enrich uranium, while telling the mullahs in secret talks that they could enrich uranium to their hearts’ content, and that for non-existent nuclear power stations.
The lesson for Trump is: If you don’t mean it, don’t say it! Yet another lesson that Trump can learn from Obama is not to mislead the American people, even if only by omission. Obama spent much time and energy telling Americans that when facing adversaries and foes the US had no choice but to either launch a full-scale invasion or to surrender in an appeasement-plus posture. Since a majority of Americans were no longer prepared for another full-scale war anywhere, they swallowed Obama’s appeasement-plus policy which has made America’s enemies and adversaries bolder and more brazen. Casting himself as a Messiah-like figure Obama’s claimed mission was to “change America”, a silly slogan to justify his hasty and ultimately counter-productive posturing. Trump should not repeat that mistake. Aspects of American political and economic life need to be reformed, they always did and always will; but America isn’t a blank page on which a new president can doodle as he pleases.
Obama, as indicated in the two books he published before winning the presidency saw himself as a man in a hurry if only because he believed that he could “make history”. Trump should avoid that mistake by steering clear of fast-food ideological gimmicks and learn to make haste slowly.
Obama had nothing worthwhile to say but said his nothing eloquently. Trump, already safe from the sin of eloquence, should go for substance rather than form. Trump has a phrase that I much appreciate: “What is going on?” Yes, on every issue first let’s see what is going on, and then decide what is best to do, the opposite of the Obama method.

Do We Have a Place in the Future?
Abdulrahman Al-Rashed/Asharq Al Awsat/January 20/17
One of the most exciting activities that took place at the World Economic Forum that is currently being held in Davos was the United Arab Emirates’ presentation about the future which is being manufactured in the world’s laboratories. It differed from the wars and conflicts in our region that were being discussed in other halls in the same building. During the next four years, people will be able to detect any signs of a cancerous tumour through a saliva test that costs twenty dollars. The report reviewed the progress made in the field of eliminating blindness. In the middle of the century, science will have achieved its ambition through laboratory experiments that are currently being held regarding the fashioning of the human race including the addition of muscles, increasing height and delaying ageing. There are clinical trials that are taking place today and their results will decide the future of the next few years. One of these trials is the transfer of blood from those who are under the age of 25 to those over 35 to see the improvements of important cells.
I read the presentation that Mohammed bin Abdullah Al Gergawi and his team made at the forum and it reflects our desire to establish a place for us in the new world through working with major scientific and research institutions in the world. He delivered an optimistic presentation about the future that various organisations participated in with things that they have produced or that they are working on producing. Some of these products include three-dimensional printing, solar aeroplanes and ultrafast Hyperloop trains have already been tested.
What is going on in the kitchen of today for tomorrow shows the frightening difference between communities that are planning and working to progress, and those that are still living in the past and are refusing to open up to the world which will bury us in its products and with the speed of its changes.
The report was prepared by a prominent group of experts and specialists on the future of the world which includes the largest group of people generating ideas and initiatives related to the future in light of the fourth industrial revolution, Al Gergawi says. 21 specialists from around the world contributed to this report on strategic sectors such as energy, health and education. “The report announces 112 predictions that we will see in the next forty years such as floating farms, body parts that are printed by 3D printers, the challenges of climate change and classrooms in the virtual world.”In my view, making progress in educational technology is most important for us in order to shorten the time that it will take for us to catch up with the world as we are riding the last carriage of the progression train. Although the report did not elaborate enough to understand modern educational techniques, it encourages us to make a new cognitive transformation. Having virtual schools and classrooms, using virtual reality in general to teach science and the willingness of the best scientific universities in the world to make part of their research and curriculum available to anyone who wants it, providing additional teaching methods and focussing on the four most important educational areas; science, technology, engineering and mathematics will help us achieve this. Scientific developments in education will help us to catch up as the concept of education for adults and children is changing today. Developments in the sciences are the achievements of the human mind which differentiates between one nation and another.

UAE’s kindness will not be deterred by Kandahar’s crime
Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/January 20/17
What the United Arab Emirates is doing in the world to strengthen stability, spread peace and support the needs of human beings is unique. The UAE does this based on human values and political traditions that have been solid throughout the years. The UAE has preciously contributed to the Arab coalition to restore legitimacy in Yemen and sacrificed young heroes in the process. Meanwhile, five Emirati diplomats were killed in a gruesome assassination in Afghanistan, which the UAE supported since the 1970’s and until today. Diplomats Mohammad Ali Zainal al-Bastaki, Abdullah Mohammad Essa Obaid al-Kaabi, Ahmad Rashid Salem Ali al-Mazroui, Ahmad Abdulrahman Ahmad Kulaib al-Tunaiji, and Abdulhamid Sultan Abdullah Ibrahim Al Hammadi were tasked with carrying out humanitarian, educational and developmental plans in Afghanistan. Commenting on the tragedy, His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid said: “We proudly mourn the martyrs of humanitarian Emirati work in Afghanistan. Five martyrs concluded their lives while seeking to help the weak, the needy and children.” His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed said: “Treacherous terrorist attacks will not undermine the UAE’s determination and will, under the command of the president His Highness Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al Nahyan, to resume good deeds, plant hope, give and help needy countries and people.” His Highness Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed had pledged that the UAE will pay $250 million to rebuild Afghanistan. Sheikh Abdullah said the UAE will provide this aid to Afghanistan as a financial donation managed by the Abu Dhabi Fund for Development. The aid aims to support development projects, particularly in housing widows, orphans and disabled people, and rehabilitate Kabul and other districts. The UAE’s support to Afghanistan has not been limited to financial or food supplies. The Emirati government has also provided political support to Afghanistan in international arenas
A country in need
The UAE cares about Afghanistan because it’s a country in need and its society shares identity and mutual religious characteristics with the Emirati society. This is the reason behind the UAE’s exceptional and generous support. However, evil elements did not want this support. Extremists, through their cells in Afghanistan, Pakistan and neighboring countries, have tried to set this ambush against diplomatic mission carrying out humanitarian activities. It’s sad that they try to cut off the hand that feeds them and take away the lives of kind men who want to do good deeds. The UAE’s support to Afghanistan has not been limited to financial or food supplies. The Emirati government has also provided political support to Afghanistan in international arenas. Here’s one example of Emirati diplomacy. At the UN, the UAE confirmed its support of international efforts to achieve security, peace and stability in Afghanistan, and it called for empowering the UN’s role to include enhancing all developmental sectors in Afghanistan.
Peace and reconciliation
The UAE has also participated in Afghanistan’s peace and reintegration program, which was launched by the international contact group on Afghanistan. The meeting was held at the UN. It also organized a conference for investment in Afghanistan. The conference was held at the UAE and it aimed to attract public and private investments from all over the world. By mourning these martyrs and bidding them farewell, it’s important to remember what the UAE has done. This reminds the world that terrorists target the UAE because it is one of the major countries that combat violence and hatred and is the first country that has a ministry of tolerance. Its law against terrorism and incitement to violence is one of the most stringent in the region. Therefore, what the UAE is doing across the world is not only being envied by rival or hostile countries but also by dangerous militias that lurk with their bloody ambushes. God bless the martyrs and protect this country from the evil acts of terrorists and the treacherous.
**This article was first published in al-Bayan on Jan 17, 2017.

Of Opera, taste for music and social hierarchy
Fahad Suleiman Shoqiranl/Al Arabiya/January 20/17
Christmas and end of the year celebrations typically spark contentious debates between various groups in the Gulf countries. The controversy took a new turn late last year after calls for ban on the Opera houses in the region from hosting celebratory events and musical concerts, as one Kuwaiti demanded. The debate became more heated following the events in Istanbul, and lame justifications emerged. There were further arguments over Majida al Roumi’s concert in the Kuwait Opera house, as well as the one held by Mohammad Abdou in Jeddah. It is apparent that some segments in the Gulf, with social, political, and religious clout, have serious reservations about music and general entertainment programs. They feel particularly aggrieved by public celebrations and blissful moments. This incessant anger and anxiety caused by music is bewildering even though, I believe, it is pertinent to a society. Opera houses in Dubai, Kuwait, and Muscat are mirrors of political stability, social equilibrium, and intellectual engagement. It is imperative to classify all sorts of arts as an option available to society. The traditional celebration of Christmas was banned by various Christian parties, such as the Puritan Oliver Cromwell in England during the 17th century, as well as the Calvins in Scotland, according to author Malory Nye on his book “Religion the Basic”.
This incessant anger and anxiety caused by music is bewildering even though it is relevant to a society
Religion and cultural enrichment
In his book, Nye analyzes the association between religion and cultural enrichment of societies. He argues that “the essence and appreciation of music varies greatly from one individual to another based on their cultural sophistication and evolution”. For example, he cites Mozart’s music as an embodiment of the prevailing European culture during the 18th century in Austria. Nye believes that musical taste noticeably differs depending on social and cultural diversity. For instance, fans of Britney Spears will certainly differ from Mozart fans. The latter are the “cultured” elites, the privileged and moneyed white-collared middle and upper classes with their privately educated children. They are different from the working classes who are more likely to follow to popular music and culture. Nye assortments fit well with other types of music; Rap and the skin complexion; Jazz and socialism, resistance and revolutions, as described on “Jazz History” book authored by Eric Hobsbawm. In the book, Hobsbawm describes a concert he attended for Duke Ellington, where the band underrated the massively growing number of fans from South London. He described Jazz as music that carries an “undisputed silent dimension and a range of physical emotions”. That gives us a glimpse of the interconnection between a society and its musical tastes in accordance with its social hierarchy.

Trump could smash the old world order — and replace it with what?
David Ignatius/The Washington Post/January 19/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/01/19/david-ignatiusthe-washington-post-trump-could-smash-the-old-world-order-and-replace-it-with-what/
Donald Trump’s inauguration marks a global inflection point: He takes office at a moment when many analysts see a transition to a new economic and political order — one where the risks for the United States and its allies are likely to increase.
Trump’s promise to “make America great again” resonated with many disaffected voters at home. But abroad, it created fear that the United States’ global power is receding, with China and Russia moving to fill the vacuum. Analysts forecast a new era in which the U.S.-led, post-1945 global order, which brought unparalleled economic growth, will be replaced by a structure whose rules and rewards aren’t yet clear.
Financial markets have so far been surprisingly steady, given the rising uncertainty and risk levels. But outgoing Treasury Secretary Jack Lew cautioned in a recent interview: “In an economy where confidence is one of the factors that leads to investment, and uncertainty and political instability undermine confidence, there is a real risk that the cumulative amount of political instability in the world slows down investment.”
Trump has embraced the breakup of the old order. He has criticized NATO as “obsolete” and predicted the European Union’s demise — challenging two crucial allies in America’s network of power. He has talked of imposing tariffs on imports not just from China, but from Germany, too, raising fears of a global trade war. He has promised a revival of U.S. manufacturing jobs that many economists argue can’t be restored without disrupting other parts of the economy.
“Wait and see” is always a good rule on Inauguration Day, but we’ve never had a president quite like Trump, with so many disruptive ideas and so little experience. Change is his political brand. If he carries through on what he has talked and tweeted about, he will reshape the framework of global economic and security relationships — for the worse, I fear.
Trump was elected with a minority of the popular vote, and his behavior since Election Day has lowered his popularity. But with Republican control of the House and Senate, he’ll probably be able to enact major changes quickly. He has proposed big infrastructure spending but also large tax cuts. The result could produce a sharp increase in the deficit similar to what happened during the early Ronald Reagan years.
Lew cautions about the financial consequences of such populist economics: “We know from history that decisions that are made to pursue a less disciplined path can sometimes take place very quickly, but they tend to have very long tails.” Restoring discipline requires a bipartisan cooperation in Congress that was present during Reagan’s tenure but has now disappeared.
Trump’s vision that the old order is cracking is shared by many leading foreign policy analysts. But they’re less sanguine about its consequences. The revolt against economic globalization has boosted right-wing nationalist politicians in the United States and Europe. The real beneficiaries may be Russia and China, which seek to replace the U.S.-led system.
This theme of risky transition was explored in “Global Trends,” a report published this month by the National Intelligence Council. “The next five years will see rising tensions within and between countries. . . . An era of American dominance following the Cold War [is ending]. So, too, perhaps, is the rules-based international order that emerged after World War II. It will be much harder to cooperate internationally and govern in ways publics expect.”
A similar grim assessment was offered this month by the Rand Corp. In a study titled “Strategic Choices for a Turbulent World,” Rand described a global tipping point: “The post-Cold War period is over. While historians may argue about the timing, it has become clear to most foreign-policy practitioners that the world has entered a new era, a complex age of turbulence and opportunity.”
A “Come Home America” strategy similar to what Trump proposes would narrow U.S. goals and influence “in exchange for limiting U.S. exposure to a more unstable world,” the Rand report argued. Russia and China would seek to benefit, and although Russia has long-term economic troubles, “declining powers can sometimes be the most dangerous.”
Trump has a big vision of deals with Russia, China and Europe that could redraw the terms of trade and rebalance an unstable world, to America’s benefit. And he’s the leader, now, of a worldwide movement against a globalization that disproportionately benefited elites in the United States and Europe. But as Lew says, this “anti-expert, anti-elite mood . . . doesn’t change classical economics.”
Trump now owns responsibility for shaping a world in turmoil. And the United States owns the stark reality that Trump is president.

First Trump era war? Serbia versus Muslim Kosovo
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report January 20, 2017
Just six days before Donald Trump’s inauguration as US President, a Serbian train took up position on the Kosovo border. It was painted ostentatiously with the slogan “Kosovo is Serbian” in several languages along with national Serbian and Orthodox Christian emblems.
The train has been stationary since Friday, Jan. 14. Kosovan security authorities are blocking its advance along the new 213km long rail link from Belgrade to Mitrovica, a town in Muslim Kosovo which has a large Serbian population.
This is more than a symbolic reminder of the brutal Balkan wars of the 1990s. Two armies are already poised for battle: 60,000 Serbian troops, including armored, artillery and air force units, are on war preparedness, facing a much smaller Kosovo security force which, after calling up reserves, numbers around 6,000 combatants.
Serbian President Tomislav Nikolic beat a war drum this week when he declared: “If Serbians are killed, we’ll send our army to Kosovo.”
It was 19 years ago that Serbia signed an agreement for ending its war with Kosovo after NATO forces intervened and US warplanes bombed the Serbian capital of Belgrade into capitulation. The West recognized Kosovan independence, but Russia and China still view the country as an integral part of Serbia.
The Kosovo war was the sequel to the 1992-1995 conflict between Christian Serbia and Croatia, on one side, and Muslim Bosnia, on the other. This war was brought to a close after President Bill Clinton’s intervention forced Serbia to sign the Dayton Accords and cede broad areas of Bosnia to Muslim rule.
In sum, the Balkan conflicts of the 1990s saw many horrors, but also ended in American support for the establishment of independent Muslim enclaves in southern Europe. Orthodox Christian rule and territory, which were under Russian military, religious and national influence, were substantially downsized.
This policy was pursued systematically for 15 years by Presidents Clinton and Obama with the support of Chancellor Angela Merkel. It is widely seen today as the key which in recent years unlocked continental Europe to the influx of millions of Muslim migrants and refugees from the Middle East and Africa.
Four south European nations, Turkey, Bosnia, Kosovo and Albania, provided the arrivals with their gateway into West Europe.
The Serbian train parked on the Kosovo border marked the end of the Obama era and underlined Belgrade’s non-acceptance of the borderline imposed in the last century on Serbia. The train is expected to cross that border after the Trump inauguration Friday, Jan. 20. If it is attacked by Kosovan security forces, the Serbian army will march in. And even if it is not attacked, the Serbian army plans to march behind the train across the border in a bid to eradicate one of President Clinton’s proudest achievements.
Indeed, a statue of Bill Clinton stands at the center of Pristina’s main square, in appreciation of his gift of Muslim independence and liberation from Serbian rule.
When it starts moving, the Serbian train will pose the new US president with his first test in dealing with an international crisis involving the Muslim issue before he has a chance to settle in at the Oval Office.
He will find on his desk an urgent note to the US and members of the European Union from Kosovo’s Foreign Minister Enver Hoxhaj asking for assistance against Serbian aggression. A similar SOS in 1998 brought a NATO elite force, consisting mainly of British units, rushing to Kosovo. In 2017, Kosovo can forget about help from any European government, even sympathetic Germany and France.
This is not just about the presidential transition in Washington. A harsh relic remains from the old wars: On June 12, 1999, Russian President Boris Yeltsin landed an army contingent at Pristinia airfield to put the brakes on Kosovo’s takeover by the West. That contingent was never withdrawn. It is still available in case his successor, Vladimir Putin, chooses to back the Serbian train as it rolls into Kosovo. His response will offer an important insight into the secret understandings reached between Trump and Putin for collaboration in the war on Islamist terror and the prevention of further Muslim expansion in Europe.

Europe's Jihad against Israel
Salim Mansur/Gatestone Institute/January 20/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9799/europe-jihad-israel
Resolution 2334 was as sickening a surrender to the Arab-Muslim jihad in the name of "peace," as was the surrender of UK Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain to Adolf Hitler at Munich in September 1938.
The UN before 1967 did not refer to the West Bank and Gaza as "occupied" territories when they were "occupied" by Egypt and Jordan after the 1948-49 war, which the Arab states launched against Israel. The Arab states then were the "occupiers" of parts of Palestine west of Jordan until 1967, and rejected any notion of Jews having a historic connection with Palestine, which they claimed was an integral part of Arab lands.
From the time of the Balfour Declaration and the League's Mandate for Palestine until the UN Resolution 181 (1947), reference to Palestine meant land with historic connection to the Jewish people. It was on this basis that the Jews' (Zionist) claim to reconstitute their national home was given legal recognition by the League, which the UN, as its successor, was legally bound to protect.
From the Arab perspective of religion and politics there never was a "Palestinian" people, or nation, distinct and separate from Arabs as a people or nation. The jihad called by the Mufti Haj Amin el-Husseini against Jews in Palestine after 1921 was in the name of "Arabs" and Islam, and it has so remained since. According to the Hamas charter, "the land of Palestine is an Islamic Waqf [Trust] upon all Muslim generations till the day of Resurrection."
Jerusalem, its principal city, was built by King David, a Jew, some ten centuries earlier.
For the past nine decades and more, however, Arabs and Muslims, with 56 Muslim states in the OIC, have been waging jihad to destroy the one and only state of the Jews. And Christendom, as if oblivious of its own shameful past history of anti-Semitism, has even more shamefully supported the falsification of history. Now, with Security Council Resolution 2334, the UN, with the enthusiastic the backing of Europeans and the prodding of U.S. President Barack Obama, is complicit in this jihad against Israel.
UN Security Council Resolution 2334, adopted as a result of the United States abstention, on the instructions of outgoing President Barack Obama, confirmed the historic bigotry against Jews and Israel entrenched within the United Nations, just as it was within its predecessor, the League of Nations. As previously indicated, Arab and Muslim states could not move a single anti-Israel resolution in the Security Council without the complicity of the Western powers, representing the historically Christian nations.
The collusion of the Western powers and the Islamic countries against Jews and Israel is now ostentatious, without any subterfuge. Resolution 2334 was as sickening a surrender to the Arab-Muslim jihad in the name of "peace," as was the surrender of UK Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain to the Adolf Hitler at Munich in September 1938.
The gathering in Paris on January 15, at the invitation of French President François Hollande, was further evidence of appeasing the Arab-Muslim world's jihad against Israel.
The timing of the Paris gathering – five days short of the 75th anniversary of the notorious Wannsee Conference of 20 January 1942, held in the suburbs of Berlin, in which top-ranking Nazi officials finalized the preparation for the "Final solution to the Jewish problem" in Europe – could not have been more overtly insulting to Israel. Members of the European Union plotted shafting the Jewish state in accordance with the wishes of their Arab and Muslim friends of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) – 56 Muslim states, plus "Palestine," and the biggest bloc at the UN.
"Fake news" and writing "fake" history have long been the modus operandi of tyrants; nothing new. The "big lie," repeatedly broadcast so that people might succumb to believing it, was an art that Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's minister for propaganda, practiced to devastating results. The most notorious Arab ally of Hitler, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Mohammed Amin al-Husseini, as an admiring student of Goebbels, passed on the art of "fake" history and "big lie" to his allies.
It is grotesque and criminal that the EU and the UN, together in "ganging up," insist that Israel comply with their resolutions – Israeli withdrawal to pre-June 1967 boundaries – without having shown any attempt to have the "Palestinians" of the so-called "occupied territories" end their jihadi terrorism.
It was not an oversight in the Security Council Resolution 242 of November 22, 1967 that there was no mention of "Palestinian" people, or "Palestinian Arabs," or "Palestinians."
In the decades after the passage of Res. 242, there was a systematic push by the OIC states in the UN, supported by the EU and its predecessor, the European Community (EC), to refer to disputed territories taken by Israel in a defensive war initiated by Egypt, Syria, and Jordan as "occupied" territories. The Egyptians had closed the Strait of Tiran at the mouth of the Red Sea, an act that was a casus belli, legal cause for war.
The UN, before 1967, did not refer to the West Bank and Gaza as "occupied" territories when they were "occupied" by Egypt and Jordan after the 1948-49 war, which the Arab states launched against Israel. The Arab states then were the "occupiers" of parts of Palestine west of Jordan until 1967, and rejected any notion of Jews having a historic connection with Palestine, which they claimed was an integral part of Arab lands.
The entire jihad of Mufti Haj Amin el-Husseini, and since, is based on the argument that Jews have no historic rights.
From the Arab perspective of religion and politics, there never was a "Palestinian" people, or nation, distinct and separate from Arabs as a people or nation. The jihad called by Husseini against Jews in Palestine after 1921 was in the name of "Arabs" and Islam, and it has so remained since. According to the Hamas charter, "the land of Palestine is an Islamic Waqf [Trust] upon all Muslim generations till the day of Resurrection" (Article 11).
Hence, that there ever had been a "Palestinian people" was a "big lie," pushed by Arab states after 1967, and that the Western nations unquestioningly swallowed.
"Palaestina" – in a still earlier effort to strip the area of its Jewish roots, this time by the ancient Romans – was the name the Emperor Hadrian gave to territory on both sides of the River Jordan – Judea and Samaria – after crushing the Jews in the Bar Kokhba Rebellion in 135 CE.
Jerusalem, its principal city, was built by King David, a Jew, some ten centuries earlier.
In the seventh century CE, Arabs seized "Palestine" from the Christian Byzantine Empire and it became part of the Arab, later Ottoman Empire.
The Crusaders conquered Jerusalem in 1099 during the First Crusade, and subsequently the surrounding area, to establish the Kingdom of Jerusalem in the twelfth century. Arab armies evicted the Crusaders from Palestine at the end of the thirteenth century. For the next six centuries, in the name of Islam Arabs, then Turks under the Ottoman Empire, ruled over Palestine until 1917, when the British Expeditionary Forces arrived during World War I.
The defeat of the Ottoman Empire left its former Arab territories between Egypt and the Persian Gulf, including Palestine, under the control of the victorious Allied Powers, Britain and France. In the Balfour Declaration of 2 November 1917, the British government committed itself to "the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people," while noting that this should not "prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities" therein.
At the San Remo Conference of April 1920, the Allied Powers agreed that Britain, under the authority of the League of Nations, would be the Mandatory Power over Palestine. The League officially handed the Mandate for Palestine to Britain as a trust in London on 24 July 1922.
The Balfour Declaration was incorporated into the Palestine Mandate; the twenty-eight articles of the Mandate stipulated how Palestine would be governed until, as everyone understood, the Jews were capable of "reconstituting their [Jewish] national home" – meaning the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine. There was no mention of a "Palestinian" people in the Balfour Declaration or in the Palestine Mandate, since speaking about Palestine primarily meant everyone there. Everyone born there at the time – Jews, Muslims and Christians – were Palestinians; that was what was stamped on everyone's passport.
From the time of the Balfour Declaration and the League's Mandate for Palestine until the UN Resolution 181 (1947), reference to "Palestine" meant land with a historic connection to the Jewish people. It was on this basis that the Jews' (Zionist) claim to reconstitute their national home was given legal recognition by the League, which the UN, as its successor, was legally bound to protect.
Britain's record as the Mandatory Power in Palestine between the two world wars was nothing short of shameful. British administrators of the Colonial Office, sent to Palestine, devised policies limiting Jewish immigration and favoring Arabs, as the first of a series of decisions that undermined the primary objective solemnly pledged in the Balfour Declaration and incorporated into the Mandate.
The subversion began with Sir Herbert Samuel, an English Jew, appointed the High Commissioner for Palestine in 1920, after the San Remo Conference. As the author William B. Ziff, documents in The Rape of Palestine – published in 1938 to the consternation of the British – Britain's "stiffing" of Jews under the specious policy of treating the demands of both Jews and Arabs "equally" was in effect deliberately prejudicial against Jews.
The British historian of the Middle East, Elie Kedourie, born in Baghdad, Iraq, also documented in The Chatham House Version (1970), how Samuel's policy, designed to conciliate Arabs, increasingly hurt Jews. Similarly, Pierre Van Paassen, a Dutch-American Unitarian minister, documented in The Forgotten Ally, (1943), the "stiffing" of Jews in Europe by the Western nations, and especially Britain as the Mandatory power in Palestine.
Britain's perfidy over Palestine took root with the election in 1921 of a known felon, Haj Mohammed Amin al-Husseini, a younger brother of the deceased Mufti (religious head) and known to be a rabble-rouser, as the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.
Husseini, despite the notoriety surrounding him, was the preferred candidate of Samuel for the position. The Grand Mufti, when World War II began, enthusiastically embraced the Third Reich, Hitler and his "Final Solution" for the Jews, and found his way to Nazi Berlin.
The poisonousness of Samuel's choice of Amin al-Husseini as the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, however, was exceeded by his role in creating the Emirate of Transjordan (present-day Kingdom of Jordan) at the expense of the Palestine Mandate. This was done at the behest of the Colonial Office under Winston Churchill, reputedly the most ardent English friend and supporter of Zionists, to appease Arabs.
In 1922, the chunk of Palestine east of the River Jordan, amounting to about two-thirds of the Mandated territory, was sliced off and gifted to Abdullah, son of Sharif Hussein of Hejaz, under whose name the flag of the 1916 "Arab Revolt" against Ottoman rule was raised.
After the 1922 partition of Palestine, which gave most of the land promised to the Jews to Transjordan, the substantially reduced Mandated territory remained only west of the River Jordan. Transjordan, as an Arab state, became closed to Jewish immigration.
Consequently, the policy of allowing Jewish immigration, according to the formula of "absorptive capacity" adopted during Samuel's tenure in Palestine, turned increasingly restrictive. Arab opposition, with incitement to violence against Jews by the Mufti and his supporters, escalated, and Britain's appeasement of the Arabs became routine.
The sordid legacy of Britain, as the Mandatory authority in Palestine, was the restriction of Jewish immigration from Europe when it turned out to be most urgently needed. As the desperation of European Jewry mounted after Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, the response of the Western powers was completely to deny entrance to Jewish refugees who had started fleeing the Nazis.
Finally, a meeting of the Western nations to consider the Jewish plight was called at the initiative of U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt. Thirty-eight countries attended this meeting in July 1938, known as the Evian Conference, held in France.
The Evian Conference was doomed even before it convened. Among the countries attending, not one – not even Canada, Argentina or Australia, with vast open spaces – was prepared to accept Jewish refugees from Austria and Germany. Even worse, the United States and Britain refused to open their doors to Jewish refugees from Hitler, while at the same time Britain also prohibited Jews from entering Palestine.
The Evian Conference was the last gasp of Western powers to lend assistance to a people threatened with extinction by their enemies. The spectacle of the Evian Conference as a charade, according to the historian Robert Wistrich, could only have firmed the resolve of Hitler to proceed with his plans for the "Final Solution." In his book, Hitler and the Holocaust, Wistrich wrote:
"If Nazi Germany could no longer expect to export, sell, or expel its Jews to an indifferent world that plainly did not want them, then perhaps they would have to do something even more drastic."
After the defeat of the Nazis, and after their crimes against Jews were no longer disputed or hidden, the Western powers, through the UN, could have established Israel, as justice demanded, in what was left of the Palestine Mandate on the entire territory west of the River Jordan.
But the subsequent history of Palestine, approached by the Western powers with a second partition under the UN resolution of November 1947, turned out predictably as sordid as that of the Mandate under Britain's supervision during the period 1922-48.
The Arab states, in failing to achieve their objective of defeating Israel during the 1948-67 period, adopted the unconventional means of jihadi terrorism backed by the repeated broadcast of the "big lie" that the Western nations, or Christendom, willfully accepted. The "big lie" is that the "Palestinians," as a people under a supposed "occupation" by Israel – to which the Arabs had agreed in the Oslo II Accord (section: Land) – deserve a state of their own.
The state for the "Palestinian" people (Muslims and Christians) in two-thirds of Palestine was created arbitrarily by Britain in creating Transjordan in 1922. The "two-state" solution in Palestine therefore has been in existence for the past ninety-five years.
For the past nine decades and more, however, Arabs and Muslims, with 56 Muslim states in the OIC, have been waging jihad to destroy the one and only state of the Jews. And Christendom, as if oblivious of its own shameful past history of anti-Semitism, has even more shamefully supported the falsification of history. The first time it was done by UNESCO, in calling ancient Biblical sites (including Jerusalem) Islamic, when Islam did not even exist at the time.
Now, with UN Security Council Resolution 2334, the UN, with the enthusiastic manipulations of U.S. President Barack Obama and the backing of most European leaders, is complicit in this jihad against Israel.
**Salim Mansur is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Gatestone Institute. He teaches in the department of political science at Western University in London, Ontario. He is the author of "Islam's Predicament: Perspectives of a Dissident Muslim" and "Delectable Lie: A Liberal Repudiation of Multiculturalism."
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.