LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

January 28/17

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins17/english.january28.17.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
If you abide in me, and my words abide in you, ask for whatever you wish, and it will be done for you.
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 15/01-08/:"‘I am the true vine, and my Father is the vine-grower. He removes every branch in me that bears no fruit. Every branch that bears fruit he prunes to make it bear more fruit. You have already been cleansed by the word that I have spoken to you. Abide in me as I abide in you. Just as the branch cannot bear fruit by itself unless it abides in the vine, neither can you unless you abide in me. I am the vine, you are the branches. Those who abide in me and I in them bear much fruit, because apart from me you can do nothing. Whoever does not abide in me is thrown away like a branch and withers; such branches are gathered, thrown into the fire, and burned. If you abide in me, and my words abide in you, ask for whatever you wish, and it will be done for you. My Father is glorified by this, that you bear much fruit and become my disciples." 
 
Do not neglect to do good and to share what you have, for such sacrifices are pleasing to God.
Letter to the Hebrews 13/07-17/:"Remember your leaders, those who spoke the word of God to you; consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith. Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and for ever. Do not be carried away by all kinds of strange teachings; for it is well for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by regulations about food, which have not benefited those who observe them. We have an altar from which those who officiate in the tent have no right to eat. For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the sanctuary by the high priest as a sacrifice for sin are burned outside the camp. Therefore Jesus also suffered outside the city gate in order to sanctify the people by his own blood. Let us then go to him outside the camp and bear the abuse he endured. For here we have no lasting city, but we are looking for the city that is to come. Through him, then, let us continually offer a sacrifice of praise to God, that is, the fruit of lips that confess his name. Do not neglect to do good and to share what you have, for such sacrifices are pleasing to God. Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they are keeping watch over your souls and will give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with sighing for that would be harmful to you."

Question: "What does it mean to have the fear of God?"
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/01/27/what-does-it-mean-to-have-the-fear-of-god/
GotQuestions.org?
Answer: For the unbeliever, the fear of God is the fear of the judgment of God and eternal death, which is eternal separation from God (Luke 12:5; Hebrews 10:31). For the believer, the fear of God is something much different. The believer's fear is reverence of God. Hebrews 12:28-29 is a good description of this: “Therefore, since we are receiving a kingdom that cannot be shaken, let us be thankful, and so worship God acceptably with reverence and awe, for our ’God is a consuming fire.’” This reverence and awe is exactly what the fear of God means for Christians. This is the motivating factor for us to surrender to the Creator of the Universe.
Proverbs 1:7 declares, “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge.” Until we understand who God is and develop a reverential fear of Him, we cannot have true wisdom. True wisdom comes only from understanding who God is and that He is holy, just, and righteous. Deuteronomy 10:12, 20-21 records, “And now, O Israel, what does the LORD your God ask of you but to fear the LORD your God, to walk in all his ways, to love him, to serve the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul. Fear the LORD your God and serve him. Hold fast to him and take your oaths in his name. He is your praise; he is your God, who performed for you those great and awesome wonders you saw with your own eyes.” The fear of God is the basis for our walking in His ways, serving Him, and, yes, loving Him.
Some redefine the fear of God for believers to “respecting” Him. While respect is definitely included in the concept of fearing God, there is more to it than that. A biblical fear of God, for the believer, includes understanding how much God hates sin and fearing His judgment on sin—even in the life of a believer. Hebrews 12:5-11 describes God’s discipline of the believer. While it is done in love (Hebrews 12:6), it is still a fearful thing. As children, the fear of discipline from our parents no doubt prevented some evil actions. The same should be true in our relationship with God. We should fear His discipline, and therefore seek to live our lives in such a way that pleases Him.
Believers are not to be scared of God. We have no reason to be scared of Him. We have His promise that nothing can separate us from His love (Romans 8:38-39). We have His promise that He will never leave us or forsake us (Hebrews 13:5). Fearing God means having such a reverence for Him that it has a great impact on the way we live our lives. The fear of God is respecting Him, obeying Him, submitting to His discipline, and worshipping Him in awe.

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 27-28/17
Dr. Walid Phares: “Iran’s nuclear deal needs to be revised/US New Policy Is to Support Arab Allies Against Iran Regime's Threats/January 27/17
Ministers In Lebanon were stunned by Aoun’s tough stand on vote law/ Hasan Lakkis/The Daily Star//January 27/17
On Hamra Street, airport seagulls and wolf in the city/ Fahad Suleiman Shoqiran/Al Arabiya/January 27/17
Astana talks: Counting Iran’s gains and losses/ Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya/January 27/17
The Yemeni army inside Houthi territories/Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/January 27/17
Of Trump and political dystopia at Davos 2017/Trisha de Borchgrave/Al Arabiya/January 27/17
Getting ready for the impossible: A head transplant/Khales Jalabi/Al Arabiya/January 27/17
Hamas and Israel: Can they do a deal/Al Jazeera News/January 27/17/
6 Years After The Revolution, Egyptians Still Face Abuse And Repression/Jesselyn Cook World News Reporter, The Huffington Post/January 27/17
Trump signs "new vetting measures" to guard against terror/KEN THOMAS and JULIE PACE,Associated Press /January 27/17
There’s a key difference between the U.S. and Mexican statements about the border wall/Hunter Walker/Yahoo News/January 27/17
Immigration Priorities: Translators, and Victims of Genocide/Shoshana Bryen/Gatestone Institute/January 27/17
Germany Downplayed Threat of Jihadists Posing as Migrants/Soeren Kern/Gatestone Institute/January 27/17

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on January 27-28/17
Dr. Walid Phares: “Iran’s nuclear deal needs to be revised/US New Policy Is to Support Arab Allies Against Iran Regime's Threats
Ministers In Lebanon were stunned by Aoun’s tough stand on vote law
Aoun Firm, Says Inaugural Speech Won't be Transgressed
Aoun Pushes for Approval of New 'Just' Electoral Law
Hizbullah MP Says Parties Serious to Agree on Election Law
Report: Jumblat Observes Four-Party Election Talks in Silence, Awaits Outcome
Progress Reported after Shiite Duo, FPM, Mustaqbal Hold 2nd Electoral Law Meeting
Mashnouq to UK, German Envoys: Ministry Obliged to Respect Vote Deadlines
Bassil, Khalil and Abbas Ibrahim Discuss 'Boosting Ties between FPM, AMAL'
Mustaqbal Sources Criticize Aoun's Threats over Vacuum
Massage Vest' Sparks Panic in Tripoli
Bomb Explodes outside Shop in Kfar Rumman
Hasbani, Bonne tackle bilateral relations
On Hamra Street, airport seagulls and wolf in the city

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on January 27-28/17
Clashes across the Tigris as battle for west Mosul looms
UN-hosted Feb 8 Geneva talks on Syria postponed
Extremists, rebels in heavy clashes in northwest Syria
Date for Next Syria Talks Thrown into Question
The Exclusive Interview About the Results of Astana Summit
The Iran Regime Should Not Play Any Role in Syria
Syrian presidency confirms Assad in 'excellent' health
Trump says Syrian Christian refugees will be given priority
Trump’s Mideast immigration ban excludes GCC, Egypt
Mexico, U.S. agree not to talk publicly about wall payment
Britain's May says Queen Elizabeth invited Trump for state visit
Trump wants good relationship with Russia, May says sanctions should stay
Trump Meets UK's May, Hails 'Most Special Relationship' with Britain
Pentagon chief Mattis assures European counterparts over NATO
Is US ‘terror tag’ likely for Muslim Brotherhood?
20 years in prison for the US on charges of conspiring with Daesh
French Foreign Minister to visit Tehran next week
New U.S. UN envoy warns allies have our back or we'll respond accordingly
Two Ukrainian soldiers killed in fresh clashes
Canada: Statement by Minister Freeland on International Holocaust Remembrance Day
Iran: Inhumane Pressure on Prisoners and Their Families
Knights of Malta insist on sovereignty amid papal takeover

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on January 27-28/17
Trump signs executive order for “extreme vetting” to “keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the USA”
Trump says Syrian Christian refugees will be given priority
Texas officials warn of Islamic State threat to U.S.-Mexican border
Hugh Fitzgerald: “I’m a Muslim — Ask Me Anything”
Muslim writer Haroon Moghul says calling someone “kafir” is announcing a death sentence, calls Trump “kafir
UK: Muslim taxi driver refuses to carry a guide dog because it is against Islam
Trump: “The FBI has over 1,000 investigations going on…these are people that we let in…we can’t take chances”
UK’s Theresa May, speaking in Philadelphia, lauds “the peaceful religion of Islam” and “internationalism”
NY Muslim who plotted Islamic State machete attack screams out in court: “There’s going to be more of us”
Washington Post claims declaring Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist group will put academics who study it at risk of arrest
Madeleine Albright “ready to register as Muslim” over Trump’s immigration policies
UK: Sharia court hands down sentence approving of honor killing
Muslim writer claims Trump’s immigration policies are “racism and Islamophobia at its most basic level”
AFDI Women’s March Video Reveals Leftists’ Ignorance and Indifference Regarding Sharia Oppression of Women
Make “The Establishment” Obsolete
Germany: Muslim migrant killed “infidel” landlady, scrawled Qur’an verses on wall

Links From Christian Today Site for on January 27-28/17
Church Of England Refuses To Budge On Gay Marriage
Pakistan TV Host Banned For 'Hate Speech' Accusations Of Blasphemy
First Baptist Dallas Responds To IS Threat: 'If We Surrender To Fear ISIS Wins'
Opposites Attract': Theresa May Calls On Trump To Renew Special Relationship
CofE Stands Firm On Gay Marriage: Here Is How Christians On All Sides Reacted
Let's Work Together For Russian Traditional Values, Patriarch Kirill Urges
Queen's Former Chaplain Warns 'Dying' Church Of England Is Capitulating To Liberal Culture
India And UAE Say Countries Must Do More To Tackle Religious Terrorism
Franklin Graham Defends Trump's Ban On Refugees: 'It's Not A Bible Issue'
Christians In Australia Fight For Retention Of Controversial 'Gay Panic' Defence In Violence And Murder Cases
The Church Of England And Gays: A Brave Attempt To Walk The Biblical Line
Atheists Aren't As Rational As They Think – But We Should Join The Conversation, Not Shout
We Have Sadly Failed': Lessons From Auschwitz For Holocaust Memorial Day

Latest Lebanese Related News published on January 27-28/17
Dr. Walid Phares: “Iran’s nuclear deal needs to be revised/US New Policy Is to Support Arab Allies Against Iran Regime's Threats

ترامب والمناطق الآمنة في سوريا ... تفاصيل الحكاية الكاملة
Thursday, 26 January 2017/http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/01/27/dr-walid-phares-irans-nuclear-deal-needs-to-be-revisedus-new-policy-is-to-support-arab-allies-against-iran-regimes-threat-%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A8-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84/
NCRI - In response to the question ‘could the Trump’s White House commitment to deal with the Iranian regime’s missile threat be regarded as the beginning of a new confrontation with the Iranian regime?”, Dr. Walid Phares said in his interview with Sky News that “ it’s still too soon to talk about a confrontation, but Donald Trump has said that if this situation continues and is in conflict with the national security of the United States or its allies in the region, United States will deal with that.”“Iranian regime’s forces, whether the Revolutionary Guards or the intelligence agents, are present in Iraq and are interfering there,” added Phares, ”They’re interfering in Syria as well. Their interfering activities in Lebanon and Yemen are also quite a lot. There’s already some sort of confrontation between the Iranian regime and US allies in the region, namely Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and other (Persian) Gulf states. The new logic dictates that we shouldn’t abandon our allies and partners when they’re being threatened by the Iranian regime.”“Iran’s nuclear deal needs to be revised”, said Dr. Walid Phares, “Donald Trump has stressed on revisions. He has warned that if the Iranian regime violates the nuclear deal, United States will pull out of it, bringing it to the Congress or referring it to the UN Security Council.”Dr. Walid Phares added that the new US government has quite a lot of tools to deal with the Iranian regime
 
Ministers In Lebanon were stunned by Aoun’s tough stand on vote law
Hasan Lakkis/The Daily Star//January 27/17/
Prime Minister Saad Hariri and some ministers were surprised by President Michel Aoun’s stance at this week’s Cabinet session in which he declared that he would prefer a vacuum in Parliament over the extension of the legislative body’s term, ministerial sources said Friday. Hariri and some ministers were also astonished by Aoun’s rejection of the formation of a 10-member commission to oversee the upcoming parliamentary elections before an agreement was reached on a new vote law to replace the disputed 1960 system, the sources said.They added that the ball was now in the court of political parties that had declared they would not accept a new extension of Parliament’s mandate, but they did nothing to translate their position into action.
 Political sources told The Daily Star that a meeting was held between Aoun and Hariri at the end of the Cabinet session Wednesday during which the prime minister asked the president about the motives and consequences of his unexpected stance.
 Aoun told Hariri that everyone must shoulder their responsibilities, adding that a four-man committee representing the Free Patriotic Movement, the Future Movement, the Amal Movement and Hezbollah, which met at Baabda Palace after the Cabinet session to explore a new electoral law acceptable to all the parties, should be given a chance, the sources said.
 The committee, made up of FPM leader and Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil; Finance Minister Ali Hasan Khalil from the Amal Movement; Nader Hariri, chief of Hariri’s staff; and Hezbollah MP Ali Fayyad, held another meeting at the Finance Ministry Friday.
 Ministerial sources that participated in the Baabda meeting stressed that any electoral law that might be reached must take Druze leader MP Walid Jumblatt’s concerns into account.
 The sources said that Khalil, Bassil and Nader Hariri would make strenuous efforts to find a voting formula that satisfies the Druze sect.
 The ministerial sources said that a decree to call for elections is a normal decree that does not bind the president with a one-month deadline to sign it, or else it becomes effective.
 But the decree to form the commission to supervise the elections is a ministerial decree that requires a one-month deadline as stipulated by the Constitution and becomes effective if it is not signed by the president, the sources said.
 They added that Aoun would refuse as he did during the Cabinet session to put the decree concerning the formation of the election supervisory committee on the agenda before an agreement was reached on a new voting system.
 Parliamentary sources said that Aoun’s declared stance that he would prefer a vacuum over the extension of Parliament’s term is a pre-emptive position designed to counter plans by some politicians who are dragging their feet over an agreement on a new electoral law in order to force the president to conduct the elections, scheduled for May, under the 1960 majoritarian system.
 The sources said that Aoun’s stance might be in response to a declaration by Jumblatt’s parliamentary Democratic Gathering bloc that no electoral law can be approved to which Jumblatt does not agree.
 Jumblatt, according to his recent declared position, upholds his support for the 1960 law.
 Although there are so far no serious indications about an agreement on any of the proposed draft electoral laws, rival factions are expected to make concessions during upcoming meetings over a new voting system to avert a major crisis in Lebanon: the possibility of a vacuum in the legislative branch.
 But Speaker Nabih Berri, who has welcomed Aoun’s stance, Thursday ruled out this possibility, saying a parliamentary vacuum will never happen.
 The same ministerial sources warned that the failure to agree on a new electoral law would lead to a political flare-up which none of the political parties would be able to tolerate.
 As these parties had agreed to solve the presidential vacuum problem with the election of Aoun as president on Oct. 31, they are duty-bound to find a solution to the electoral law dilemma, the sources said.
 The sources denied that Aoun’s remarks during the Cabinet session on the president’s exclusive right to negotiate with foreign countries were linked to the issue of the country’s offshore oil and gas reserves. They said that the oil issue can be discussed between the Energy Ministry and companies that wish to participate in the oil exploration tenders.
 It appeared later that Aoun’s comments were linked to a $100 million loan agreement between Lebanon and an international agency to build schools in areas where the majority of Syrian refugees are settled, the sources said. The loan agreement had been approved by Parliament during its last legislative session after gaining the Cabinet’s consent.
 
Aoun Firm, Says Inaugural Speech Won't be Transgressed
 Naharnet/January 27/17/President Michel Aoun emphasized that warning to use his constitutional powers to obstruct the parliamentary elections if they were to be staged on basis of the controversial 1960 law is serious, and assured that he will not go against his oath of office, al-Akhbar daily reported on Friday. In an interview with the daily, Aoun said he was decisive when he told the ministers during a cabinet session last week “what I stated in my inaugural speech, are words under oath that can not be undone.” The President asked: “How could the parliament continue for eight years and not be able to approve a new law for the parliamentary elections? “I was clear to say and I reiterate that there is no need for maneuvering over the deadline issue or any other issue. We all know that these technical matters, including the potential for technical postponement, are matters addressed in the text of the new law,” Aoun continued saying. He voiced calls on all parties to make good management of time “in order to formulate a new law that corrects popular representation for all Lebanese.”“I am with an absolute proportional representation system. Everybody knows that this law will make my party lose parliamentary seats in favor of other blocs. However, the just and proper representation compel for serious sacrifices from those who regard a better future for their country,” stressed the President. Referring to the election law proposals suggested by political parties, he added: “Despite that, they proposed a hybrid law that mixes proportional representation system and the winner-takes-all system. We told everyone that we are ready to discuss what paves way for the approval of a new law instead of wasting time.”Aoun concluded: “There is no justification whatsoever for not drafting a new law as soon possible. If some believe that wasting time would push the need to staging the elections based on the 1960 law, then they do not know me. My words are clear and decisive. From my position as president I am entrusted to protect the constitution.”
 
Aoun Pushes for Approval of New 'Just' Electoral Law
 Naharnet/January 27/17/President Michel Aoun stressed on Friday the need to approve a new electoral law that ensures just representation for all parties before the parliamentary polls deadline, the National News Agency reported. Aoun assured that his stance was not against any sect or political faction, NNA added. “The aim of my position is to respect the National Pact, the Constitution and to strengthen national unity,” Aoun said, speaking in front of guests at the Presidential Palace in Baabda. He called on all parties to do their best in order to formulate a new law that would ensure proper representation for all Lebanese. “If there is an electoral law format that ensures justice more than proportional representation does, let it be placed for discussion,” concluded Aoun.
 
Hizbullah MP Says Parties Serious to Agree on Election Law
Naharnet/January 27/17/Hizbullah MP Ali Fayyad stressed that political forces in Lebanon are serious and eager to find an election law that will govern the parliamentary elections slated for May. In an interview with al-Joumhouria daily, Fayyad said: “All parties are serious to find an election law. The meetings' atmospheres are constructive and serious. They reflect everybody's will to find a law as soon as possible. Our meetings are open.”On Wednesday, a meeting between Hizbullah, al-Mustaqbal, Free Patriotic Movement and AMAL Movement took place at the Baabda Palace and discussed the controversial election issue. The meeting was attended by Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil of the AMAL Movement, Free Patriotic Movement chief and Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil, Hizbullah MP Ali Fayyad and Prime Minister Saad Hariri's aide Nader Hariri. “I can't say I am optimistic or pessimistic. There are daily and constant efforts. The subject requires strenuous efforts and this is what we are doing,” continued Fayyad as saying.
 
Report: Jumblat Observes Four-Party Election Talks in Silence, Awaits Outcome
 Naharnet/January 27/17/After the recent four-party meeting at the Baabda Palace which deliberated the controversial issue of an election law, Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat is watching with caution what outcome will these meetings bring, al-Joumhouria daily reported Friday. “Jumblat is carefully watching the path of the election law. He still insists on his position which rejects any law that hints at an abolition, exclusion or marginalization of the Druze community,” sources close to Jumblat told the daily.
 The Druze leader is silently watching what the four-party meetings between Hizbullah, al-Mustaqbal, Free Patriotic Movement and AMAL Movement will yield, so that he would take a stance. On Wednesday, a meeting between the said parties was held at the presidential palace in Baabda where talks focused on the stalled electoral law for the upcoming parliamentary elections. The meeting was attended by Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil of the AMAL Movement, Free Patriotic Movement chief and Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil, Hizbullah MP Ali Fayyad and Prime Minister Saad Hariri's aide Nader Hariri.The interlocutors assured afterwards, that they discussed a number of formats and it has become certain that there won't be a law that eliminates any of the parties.They also assured that the four parties have not formed “an alliance or a front.”Political parties are bickering over amending the current election law which divides seats among the different religious sects. Jumblat's PSP has backed down from its previous support for a hybrid law that mixes the proportional representation and winner-takes-all systems. The PSP, which is now in favor of the winner-takes-all system, has recently warned that any law containing proportional representation would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah has repeatedly called for an electoral law fully based on proportional representation but other political parties, especially Mustaqbal and the Progressive Socialist Party, have rejected the proposal, arguing that Hizbullah's weapons would prevent serious competition in the Iran-backed party's strongholds. Mustaqbal, the Lebanese Forces and the PSP had proposed a hybrid electoral law that mixes the proportional representation and the winner-takes-all systems but the PSP eventually withdrew its support for the proposal.
 Speaker Nabih Berri has also proposed a hybrid law. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.
 
 Judge Saqr Charges Coffee Shop Would-Be Suicide Bomber
 Naharnet/January 27/17/Military Prosecutor Judge Saqr Saqr charged on Friday the Costa cafe would-be suicide bomber, Omar al-Assi, and referred him to First Military Investigative Judge Riad Abu Ghaida, the state-run National News Agency reported. Saqr charged al-Assi and all those proven by investigations to be involved with the Islamic State extremist group and Ahmed al-Asir group, in the attempt of carrying out a suicide attack in Beirut’s Hamra neighborhood, NNA said. Security forces arrested would-be suicide bomber, al-Assi, inside the Costa cafe in one of the busiest neighborhoods in the capital Beirut on Saturday night. Wearing an explosive bomb belt, the man had been detained by authorities after entering the coffee shop in the upscale Hamra neighborhood in west Beirut.
 
Progress Reported after Shiite Duo, FPM, Mustaqbal Hold 2nd Electoral Law Meeting
Naharnet/January 27/17/Hizbullah, AMAL Movement, the Free Patriotic Movement and al-Mustaqbal Movement on Friday held their second meeting over the electoral law after which progress was reported. The meeting was held at the Finance Ministry in the presence of Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil of AMAL, FPM chief Jebran Bassil, Hizbullah MP Ali Fayyad and Prime Minister Saad Hariri's aide Nader Hariri. “Differences are narrowing and there is an inclination to agree on a hybrid electoral law format that combines the proportional representation and winner-takes-all systems,” sources told LBCI television. “Today we discussed the tiniest details that could lead to an agreement and the differences have narrowed,” other sources told MTV. The four parties had held their first meeting on Wednesday at the Baabda Palace, after which they announced that had not formed “an alliance or a front.”“We have contacts with the other parties,” Khalil said after Wednesday's meeting. President Michel Aoun had warned earlier this week that he favors “vacuum” over a new extension of the parliament's term or a return to the 1960 electoral law. The political parties have intensified their efforts in recent days in a bid to agree on a new electoral law before the expiry of the deadlines. They are discussing several formats of a so-called “hybrid” electoral law that combines the proportional representation and winner-takes-all systems. One of the main obstacles is the Progressive Socialist Party's rejection of proportional representation. The party has warned that any law containing proportional representation would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah has repeatedly called for an electoral law fully based on proportional representation but other political parties, especially Mustaqbal and the PSP, have rejected the proposal, arguing that Hizbullah's weapons would prevent serious competition in the Iran-backed party's strongholds. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.
 
Mashnouq to UK, German Envoys: Ministry Obliged to Respect Vote Deadlines
Naharnet/January 27/17/Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq stressed Friday that he does not fear a parliamentary “vacuum, seeing as the president is the protector of the constitution and the regulator of the work of state institutions.”In meetings with British Ambassador to Lebanon Hugo Shorter and German Ambassador to Lebanon Martin Huth, Mashnouq also hoped the current political efforts will lead to a new electoral law, emphasizing that “the Interior Ministry is obliged to implement the (electoral) law that is in effect with all its deadlines.”The two ambassadors for their part underlined the importance of holding the parliamentary elections on time to ensure respect for democracy and the work of state institutions, state-run National News Agency reported. Shorter also warned against any vacuum in state institutions, cautioning that democracy without an elected parliament is not real democracy, NNA added. President Michel Aoun had warned earlier this week that he favors “vacuum” over a new extension of the parliament's term or a return to the 1960 electoral law. The political parties have intensified their efforts in recent days in a bid to agree on a new electoral law before the expiry of the deadlines.
 They are discussing several formats of a so-called “hybrid” electoral law that combines the proportional representation and winner-takes-all systems. One of the main obstacles is the Progressive Socialist Party's rejection of proportional representation. The party has warned that any law containing proportional representation would “marginalize” the minority Druze community. Hizbullah has repeatedly called for an electoral law fully based on proportional representation but other political parties, especially al-Mustaqbal Movement and the PSP, have rejected the proposal, arguing that Hizbullah's weapons would prevent serious competition in the Iran-backed party's strongholds. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.
 
Bassil, Khalil and Abbas Ibrahim Discuss 'Boosting Ties between FPM, AMAL'
 Naharnet/January 27/17/Free Patriotic Movement chief Jebran Bassil, Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil of AMAL Movement and General Security head Maj. Gen. Abbas Ibrahim met Friday over a lunch banquet at the Finance Ministry, a media report said. “The meeting was part of efforts aimed at boosting ties between the FPM and AMAL,” MTV said. President Michel Aoun, the founder of the FPM, and Speaker Nabih Berri, the leader of AMAL, have had lukewarm ties throughout their political history. After the two parties reached an agreement over the issue of offshore oil and gas exploration last year, relations were strained again after Berri declined to endorse Aoun's presidential nomination. Some officials of Berri's AMAL Movement had also accused Aoun and Prime Minister Saad Hariri of seeking a “bilateral” agreement that would marginalize Shiites in power, allegations that Aoun and the FPM eventually denied.
 Lebanon
 
Mustaqbal Sources Criticize Aoun's Threats over Vacuum
Naharnet/January 27/17/A warning voiced by President Michel Aoun on his willingness to obstruct the parliamentary elections and keep the legislative body vacant, were criticized by al-Mustaqbal ministers who described the stance as “unacceptable,” al-Akhbar daily reported on Friday. Prominent Mustaqbal ministerial sources told the daily: “Threats launched by President of the Republic about vacuum are unacceptable. “Aoun's rhetoric will engage the country in a constitutional debate over the jurisdictions of the President. In addition to that, the President is behaving with everyone as if he is the sole decision maker and as if the reins are in his hands alone,” they said. The sources that spoke on condition of anonymity pointed out: “Aoun's speech that vacuum in the legislative body is better than keeping the 1960 law or extending the parliaments term have annoyed PM Saad Hariri who believes that vacuum at an state institution is unacceptable.”During a cabinet meeting on Wednesday, Aoun said he favors vacuum over an extension of the parliament's term. “If I'm to choose between the extension of parliament's term or vacuum, my stance is clear in this regard -- I will choose vacuum,” he was quoted as saying. Political parties are bickering over amending the current election law which divides seats among the different religious sects.Hizbullah has repeatedly called for an electoral law based on proportional representation but other political parties, especially al-Mustaqbal Movement, have rejected the proposal and argued that the party's controversial arsenal of arms would prevent serious competition in regions where the Iran-backed party is influential. Mustaqbal, the Lebanese Forces and the Progressive Socialist Party have meanwhile proposed a hybrid electoral law that mixes the proportional representation and the winner-takes-all systems. Speaker Nabih Berri has also proposed a hybrid law. The country has not voted for a parliament since 2009, with the legislature instead twice extending its own mandate. The 2009 polls were held under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next elections are scheduled for May 2017.
 
Massage Vest' Sparks Panic in Tripoli
Naharnet/January 27/17/A suspicious vest left near the wall of the al-Beddawi state-run school in Tripoli sparked panic Friday in the northern city. The object turned out to be a “massage vest” after it was examined by police intelligence agents, media reports said. The discovery had prompted the Internal Security Forces to cordon off the area and prevent the entry of vehicles and pedestrians. An investigation has been launched into the matter. Tripoli and the North had already been on alert since Thursday after security forces obtained information about a possible pickup truck bombing against a military post. A would-be suicide bomber had been arrested wearing an explosive vest on Saturday inside Costa cafe in Beirut's Hamra street.
 
Bomb Explodes outside Shop in Kfar Rumman
 Naharnet/January 27/17/An explosive device went off Friday outside a shop that sells coffee and pastries in al-Maydaneh plain in the southern town of Kfar Rumman, state-run National News Agency reported. The bomb, which was connected to a detonator chord, damaged the shop's facade, NNA said. Policemen from the Nabatiyeh police station arrived on the scene and launched a probe into the incident, the agency added.
 The town had recently witnessed tensions over the selling of liquor.
 
Hasbani, Bonne tackle bilateral relations
 Fri 27 Jan 201/NNA - Vice Prime Minister, Health Minister Ghassan Hasbani, received on Friday French Ambassador to Lebanon, Emmanuel Bonne, with talks touching on bilateral relations.
 
On Hamra Street, airport seagulls and wolf in the city
 Fahad Suleiman Shoqiran/Al Arabiya/January 27/17
 When you arrive at Hamra Street in West Beirut, you get a feeling that this stretch, which is no more than 1,300 meters, embraces all of Lebanon’s components. The street is full of libraries and booths that sell magazines and dailies, and it is abuzz with coffee shops.
 Once the sun rises, the street becomes packed. It used to be a patch of agricultural land five centuries ago. People did not know that their street will one day become an arena of diversity. The resin of the Sebestena trees, which they planted there, did not prevent birds from standing on the branches and chirping. When the sun sets, the neon lights shine through the darkness of wakeful nights. Its sidewalks hide the secrets of lovers as they head to poetry readings or to cinemas.
 A coffee shop may be playing Fairuz as she sings “hide all my secrets.” The trees saturated with the night’s dew are witnesses to the many authors, Buland al-Haidari, Mohammad Maghut, Badr al-Sayyab, Adonis and Abdullah al-Qasemi, who walked the streets of the city. It’s a vibrant street that’s full of life at day and night. The history of Hamra street has not withered away although it has lost plenty of its glory since the 1970s when the civil war erupted. It continued to stand out as a center of fun and frolic. Even with the rise of tourist sites at the seaside, Zaitunay Bay, Ain al-Maryseh, Beirut Souqs and Ashrafieh, Hamra remained an attractive area as each corner has a history and each cafe has a story thanks to legends who turned the places they visited into history worth narrating.
 Afif Dayab wrote about Hamra’s old, or perhaps extinct, coffee shops and reminded of the Horse Shoe Cafe which opened in 1959. It was the first sidewalk cafe in the street and it was the most important gathering place for Lebanese and Arab intellectuals who had different views, beliefs and dreams. Then there were L’Express Cafe, Manhattan and Negresco and cinemas like Eldorado and The Strand. These cafes are from the past now while other places shut down due to modern development projects. The history of Hamra street has not withered away although it has lost plenty of its glory since the 1970s when the civil war erupted
 Lebanese spirit
 Hamra Street sums up Lebanon’s spirits. Terrorist groups still see this street as their favorite target to harm the cheerful country. Members of al-Qaeda have been arrested there. Most recently, a suicide bomber was arrested in Costa Cafe at night. Security forces and members of the Information Branch facilitated the task of arresting him before he blew himself up. If he had pressed that button, there would have been a massacre in Hamra as the time of the operation was during peak time. It was a Saturday night and the streets were packed with people and cars. Restaurants and cafes are usually crowded with customers who are either reading a book or working on their tablets or who are with a partner and a lover seeking warmth in the intimate darkness of Hamra.
 Terrorists tried to repeat Istanbul’s New Year crime. Their aim was to target the heart of the city and to inflict a wound that’s difficult to heal. Extremists’ anger of Lebanon’s joy is nothing new and they have a history of condemning Beirut. Security forces’ vigilance and focus facilitated overcoming these threats. Lebanon is threatened by the repercussions of the Syrian crisis and by the terrorist pockets in hiding. There are certainly sleeper cells which await orders to attack. There is a big number of Syrian refugees and it’s therefore easy for those who wish evil for Lebanon to infiltrate them.
 Security forces are well-aware of this possibility. When launching the “new era,” Lebanese President Michel Aoun expressed his increasing concerns of the asylum situation as, unlike other countries, the number of refugees which Lebanon hosts is around half of its population.
 Challenges galore
 Lebanon confronts terrorist and environmental challenges. Environmental challenges are due to the seagulls at the Costa Brava landfill near Beirut’s airport while terrorist challenges are due to lone wolves who threaten innocent people in places like Costa Cafe.
 Declaring war on Hamra Street brutally targets Lebanon’s diversity of religions and sects. It clearly intends to destroy the culture which the joyful Lebanon has spread to Arabs and the Gulf since the 1950’s when the Gulf society and the Lebanese society began to interact and influence one another.
 Lebanon has played an influential role in fields such as media and literature and it contributed to diversity as it embraced different identities. This influence competed with Egypt’s influence of arts and aesthetics at the time.
 In his book “History of Beirut,” Samir Kassir writes: “The world of magazines widely intersected with the world of cinema which ever since the 1920’s became one of the major windows from which Beirut saw the outside world. The network of cinemas which nothing like existed in the entire near East witnessed a steady expansion and it guaranteed to its visitors that they will not miss watching any of the important works produced by Hollywood, Cinecittà, Paris and Cairo. Ever since the 1950’s, many cinemas were built in the areas surrounding downtown and they were built near the old cinemas. Beirut became a magnificent theatre, especially Hamra Street which was soon full of cinemas and theatres.” Kassir also writes about the history of cinemas such as the Hamra Cinema, Crystal, Opera and Empire. (Page 414)
 Lebanon is facing some major challenges. Unilateral groups do not favor this Lebanese identity and diversity as the country.
 British author Eric Ambler clearly describes that when he says: “Everything hints of the atmosphere which paved way for great legends. The images you see with the eyes of the soul seem more real than any stillness around you.”
 *This article was first published in Asharq al-Awsat on January 27, 2017.

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on January 27-28/17
Clashes across the Tigris as battle for west Mosul looms
Reuters, Mosul Friday, 27 January 2017/An Iraqi soldier stared patiently through a high-powered scope until he spotted a bulldozer across the Tigris River. He alerted his elite unit, which fired a missile with a boom so loud it blew a metal door behind the soldiers off its hinges. The target, which was being used to dig earth berms to fortify ISIS positions, exploded into a blaze that sent white smoke into the sky. Militants could be seen gathering at the bulldozer as it burned. Some arrived on foot, others in a pickup truck or on a motorcycle, seemingly unfazed by the prospect of another rocket landing. “The terrorist driving that bulldozer is burning. He is cooked,” said Mostafa Majeed, the soldier manning the scope. In three months of Iraq's biggest military operation since the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003, government forces have seized most of east Mosul.But they have yet to cross the Tigris, leaving the western half of the city still firmly in the hands of the extremists, who declared their caliphate here two and a half years ago. Now, the troops are firing across the river to harass the militants and disrupt their fortifications, in preparation for the next phase of the campaign: the fight for the other side. “The idea is to keep making life tough for them from our position, to kill them and prevent them from escaping as other forces surround them from other directions,” Major Mohamed Ali told Reuters. The methodical advance of Iraqi forces is a sharp contrast to 2014, when the army collapsed and fled in the face of a force of only an estimated 800 ISIS militants that swept into Mosul and swiftly seized a third of Iraq. The soldiers appear disciplined as they position themselves on rooftops behind green sandbags, painstakingly watching the militants' every move through binoculars and scopes, hoping to get a clear shot with sniper rifles. To get a closer look, the men send up a computer-operated white drone aircraft, propelling it over Islamic State territory for more accurate intelligence.ISIS militants are gathered at their stronghold of Abu Seif village below steep hills and Mosul Airport, just beyond the Tigris.
The group is expected to put up fierce resistance when the next phase of the offensive kicks off, possibly within days. If the militants lose Mosul, that would probably mark the end of their self-proclaimed caliphate that has ruled over millions of people in Iraq and Syria. Iraqi authorities and their US allies still expect the fighters to wage an insurgency in Iraq and inspire attacks against the West. Militants could be seen, through a scope, monitoring the rapid reaction force from the other side of the river. “They watch us, we watch them,” said Majeed as he spotted a vehicle on the move. Although there are plenty of rockets like the one that took out the bulldozer, the Iraqi forces say they use the heavy weapons only against important targets or when there is a substantial gathering of extremists in one spot. “If it is fewer than nine terrorists we hold fire,” said one soldier. Snipers are used more freely. One hid a few hundred feet from the east bank of the Tigris and opened fire every ten minutes or so. Hours after the rocket demolished the bulldozer, ISIS retaliated, firing a series of mortars towards the rapid reaction force.One crashed a few streets away. Another landed closer. A third hit the river about 200 meters away.

UN-hosted Feb 8 Geneva talks on Syria postponed
AFP, Beirut Friday, 27 January 2017/UN-hosted negotiations on the Syrian conflict planned for February 8 in Geneva have been postponed until the end of that month, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Friday. “The date of February 8 has been put back until the end of next month,” Lavrov told a meeting with minor Syrian opposition representatives in Moscow to discuss peace talks in Kazakhstan that ended on Tuesday without a major breakthrough. There was no confirmation from the United Nations on the latest plans for the next round of talks between the Syrian regime and opposition. The main opposition groups stayed away from the Moscow meeting with Lavrov, as the Kremlin seeks to impose its influence as the key powerbroker in Syria on the back of its game-changing military support for leader Bashar al-Assad.
Opposition turns down invitation
It was earlier reported that Syria’s main opposition leaders on Thursday turned down an invitation from Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov for talks in Moscow. High Negotiations Committee spokesman Riyad Naasan said that HNC coordinator Riyad Hijab had “received a personal invitation” to attend Friday’s talks “but declined”. But “no invitation has yet been sent to the High Negotiations Committee”, he added. The HNC is the main Syrian opposition umbrella group and has taken part in peace talks brokered by Syria regime allies Russia and Iran and rebel backer Turkey in the Kazakh capital, Astana, this week. The Turkey-based opposition National Coalition also declined to meet with Lavrov, said spokesman Ahmad Ramadan. He said invitations were sent to the current and past heads of the National Coalition and to the deputy of the sitting chief. On Wednesday Lavrov told Russian lawmakers that he had invited “all the opposition representatives from the political opposition that wish to come to Moscow” for talks on Friday. He said “we will brief them about what happened in Astana”.The peace talks in the Kazakh capital ended on Tuesday without a major breakthrough. Russia, Iran and Turkey agreed in Astana to establish a joint “mechanism” to shore up a shaky three-week truce in Syria, but offered few concrete details on how it would work.
‘Blocking help to neediest’
The UN humanitarian chief accused the Syrian government on Thursday of blocking aid to hundreds of thousands of the country’s neediest people despite a nationwide cease-fire. Undersecretary-General Stephen O’Brien told the Security Council that a two-step approval process that the government agreed to for humanitarian convoys to cross conflict lines to get to besieged and hard to reach areas “has become, in practice, a 10-step process.” Despite the Dec. 30 cease-fire and a humanitarian task force whose sole purpose is to ensure access, he said, “we continue to be blocked at every turn, by lack of approvals at central and local levels, disagreements on access routes, and violation of agreed procedures at checkpoints by parties to the conflict.”O’Brien said the result is that only one convoy delivered aid to 6,000 people in December, when the UN asked for approval to help 930,250 people – and he criticized the removal of over 23,000 medical items from the trucks that did get through. So far in January, he said, the situation isn’t much better with just a single convoy reaching 40,000 people. O’Brien said the Syrian government did respond to the UN’s monthly convoy plans within the agreed seven working days. “But subsequent administrative delays on the part of the government, including in the approval of facilitation letters, approval by local governors and security committees, as well as broader restrictions by all parties continue to hamper our efforts,” he said. (With inputs from the Associated Press)

Extremists, rebels in heavy clashes in northwest Syria
Reuters, Beirut Friday, 27 January 2017/Extremists from al Qaeda’s former Syria branch and rebels who have recently joined forces against them fought in heavy clashes in the northwest of the country on Friday, a rebel official and a monitoring group said. Fighting between Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, formerly the al Qaeda-affiliated Nusra Front, and more moderate, foreign-backed factions erupted this week in areas west of Aleppo and the adjacent rebel-held province of Idlib. The clashes, which are taking place separately to the main battle in Syria’s conflict - that between rebels and the Syrian government - threaten to further weaken opposition to President Bashar al-Assad in the insurgents’ biggest territorial stronghold. A rebel source said Fateh al-Sham launched fierce new attacks on Friday.
“A short while ago there was tank bombardment of the base of the headquarters of our brothers in the Jaish al-Islam (faction) in Babsiqa,” a rebel source in one of the groups involved in the fighting told Reuters. “Activists are reporting casualties in a camp for women nearby from the tank and mortar bombardment.”The clashes appeared to take place in two areas of Idlib - one west of Aleppo and close to the Turkish border, and the other south of Idlib city, close to the main highway linking Aleppo to Damascus. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group said each side was using “heavy weaponry”, and reported a number of civilian casualties. In towns close to the fighting, several hundred people protested against Fateh al-Sham for targeting rebel factions, or called for the clashes to stop so civilians would not get hurt, the British-based Observatory said. Fateh al-Sham, which routed at least one Free Syrian Army rebel faction this week, is now fighting against a number of groups that have joined forces under the powerful Ahrar al-Sham to fend off the assault. Ahrar al-Sham sided with the FSA groups and said Fateh al-Sham had rejected mediation attempts. Fateh al-Sham said on Tuesday it had been forced to act preemptively to “thwart conspiracies” being hatched against it. The groups it has attacked include factions that attended peace talks in Kazakhstan sponsored by Damascus allies Russia and Iran, and rebel backer Turkey.

Date for Next Syria Talks Thrown into Question
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 27/17/The timing of the next Syria talks in Geneva was thrown into doubt on Friday after the U.N. said it could not confirm a Russian announcement that they had been postponed. Meeting in Moscow with minor Syrian opposition figures, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said the U.N.-hosted talks planned for February 8 had been "put back" until the end of the month. But a spokeswoman for U.N. special envoy Staffan de Mistura said there was "no confirmation" the talks had been postponed. Lavrov's remarks were made three days after talks between Damascus and rebel representatives wrapped up in the Kazakh capital Astana without tangible progress. Ahead of the Geneva meet, de Mistura was scheduled to head to New York on Monday for talks with U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres and would also update the Security Council, his spokeswoman said. "We're going to be sure when the special envoy is back," she said. U.N. spokeswoman Alessandra Vellucci also said the list of those invited to Geneva had not been finalized. Last month, the U.N. said it "intended" to hold the next negotiations on February 8, and de Mistura has since referred to that date as the "target" for the next round of talks. Key players Russia, Turkey and Iran backed the Astana talks and the main result was an agreement by the three sides to try to shore up a shaky ceasefire on the ground. Representatives from the two sides had been expected to hold their first face-to-face talks in the Kazakh capital, but the rebels refused and mediators had to shuttle between the two sides. The latest peace initiative comes after President Bashar Assad's regime, with the help of Russian and Iranian firepower, dealt rebels a crushing blow by ousting them from eastern Aleppo last month. The main opposition groups stayed away from Friday's meeting in Moscow as the Kremlin seeks to impose its influence as the key powerbroker in Syria. Russia has sidelined the West with its diplomatic push to find a political settlement to the war in Syria, after its military support for Assad transformed the situation on the battlefield.
On Thursday, Britain, one of the harshest critics of Moscow's actions in Syria, signaled a possible policy shift, with Foreign Minister Boris Johnson saying Assad could be allowed to run for re-election and mentioning a possible "arrangement" with Russia.
More than 310,000 people have been killed in the Syrian conflict since 2011.

The Exclusive Interview About the Results of Astana Summit
NCRI/ Friday, 27 January 2017 /The member of the political delegation of the Syrian National Coalition in Astana Summit Naser al-Hariri called on the international community to strongly defy against the criminal interference of the Iranian regime in Syria as well as fostering solidarity with Syrian revolutionaries. In an interview with IranNTV, Naser al-Hariri referred to the sabotages of the Iranian regime and said: “In Astana Summit, Iran's stance was like its position on the ground; a bad and negative stance."He also discussed the sectarian policies of the Iranian regime and stated: “in the conference, the Iranian authorities talked about the harms inflicted on the Syrian people but they actually forgot the fact that the Syrians are killed and displaced by them. They helped the Assad regime in committing these crimes. The sectarian and vicious policy of the Iranian regime has also targeted the other countries of the region. The Mullahs' regime is involved in the delay of the trilateral statement which was issued in the summit. They insisted that any phrase that refers to the political transition shall be removed from the statement. They wanted that the international resolutions on Syria must be ignored since it does not meet their demands. The Iranian regime and its militias are responsible for the violation of the ceasefire. In our opinion, the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) and the militias of the Iranian regime do not differ from other terrorist militias such as ISIS and Al-Qaida because all of them have the same ideology."Naser al-Hariri also talked about the demands of the Syrian opposition before the next round of talks which is going to be held in Geneva. He stated: “the international community must take firm and serious steps against the terrorism of the Mullahs in Tehran; The Mullahs' regime that destroyed Iraq and it has now ruined Syria. The Iranian regime is playing with the security of the region and it interferes in different countries including Yemen and Bahrain. The Security Council should take measures in order to stop the Iranian regime. The Security Council should pass transparent resolutions in order to restrain the militias who are fighting in the countries of the region in the name of the Iranian regime."At the end, Naser al-Hariri stressed the solidarity between the Syrian Revolution, Syrians and the Iranian Resistance. He stated:"the coordination and cooperation with the Iranian Resistance are going very well. We support their legitimate demands for the freedom of Iran. The Iranian Resistance plays a prominent role in the future of Iran; a country that respects its citizens and creates equality among them. A country that makes efforts to create social and economic prosperity in all areas in Iran ;that establishes a friendly relationship with all of the neighboring countries and acts in favor of Iranians and people of the region in the international community and regional alliance."

The Iran Regime Should Not Play Any Role in Syria
NCRI/ Friday, 27 January 2017 /In response to the question ‘what were the positive and negative aspects of Astana’s two-day talks?’, Dr. Hadi Al-Bahra told Al Arabiya TV that “the positive aspect of the talks, was the international community’s willingness and desire to find a solution to stop the killing and bloodshed in Syria. And its negative aspect was that the negotiations should have been conducted between the parties involved in Syrian conflict and their sponsoring countries.”“As with the ceasefire, the opposition is still committed to the agreement signed in Turkey with participation of the two sponsoring countries, namely Turkey and Russia”, added al-Bahra. On Iranian regime’s role as one of the ceasefire monitoring sides, the former President of Syrian National Coalition said that “the opposition announced in Astana peace talks that it would be impossible for them to accept the Iranian regime as a ceasefire monitoring side, since the Iranian regime is by itself a destabilizing element as well as Assad’s accomplice in the killing of the Syrian people. So, it’s actually a side and not a mediator, since a mediator must be neutral. So it would be impossible to accept this regime as a mediator.”“The Iranian regime is responsible for all the sectarian militias who are committing crimes every day against the Syrian people”, added al-Bahra, ”So, the Iranian regime should give Turkey and Russia necessary guarantees to control the militias and oblige them to implement the ceasefire.”On the ceasefire and the violation of it by the Iranian regime’s agents, the former President of Syrian National Coalition said that “we’re definitely seeking to stabilize a ceasefire that is provided with enforcement mechanisms for monitoring and surveillance. Mechanisms for dealing with and controlling the violators of the ceasefire. But all our commitments are contained within the agreement signed by Turkey, Russia and the opposition’s military units. The Iranian regime is not neutral as its sectarian militias are committing crimes against the Syrian people right now.”al-Bahra concluded his remarks by saying that “the agreement between the three countries is aimed at supporting the Geneva talks, which by itself is monitored by the United Nations and initiated by Friends of Syria Group. So, the three countries are part of this package. The political process has been supported by this group of countries and is monitored by the United Nations.”

Syrian presidency confirms Assad in 'excellent' health

Fri 27 Jan 2017/NNA - The Syrian presidency flatly denied on Friday "all rumors and news speaking of the President's health, adding that Bashar al-Assad is "in "excellent health and assuming his tasks in a completely normal way." "The Syrian people have become lie-proof," the presidency maintained, stressing that the source of rumors is well-known sides and newspapers.

Trump says Syrian Christian refugees will be given priority
Fri 27 Jan 2017/NNA - President Donald Trump said on Friday that Syrian Christians will be given priority when it comes to applying for refugee status in the United States. "If you were a Muslim you could come in, but if you were a Christian, it was almost impossible and the reason that was so unfair, everybody was persecuted in all fairness, but they were chopping off the heads of everybody but more so the Christians," Trump said in an excerpt of an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network. Pew Research Center said last October 38,901 Muslim refugees entered the United States in fiscal year 2016 from all countries - almost the same number of Christian refugees, 37,521. Trump was expected to sign an executive order on Friday that would temporarily halt refugees from some Muslim-majority nations, a White House official said. ---Reuters

Trump’s Mideast immigration ban excludes GCC, Egypt
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Friday, 27 January 2017/US President Donald Trump’s proposed ban on immigrants from Muslim-majority nations has caused controversy worldwide. The ban would suspend all entry of immigrants from Muslim countries to the US. However, the ban only affects seven states in the Middle East, according to Bloomberg News, Trump’s proposed list bans immigrants from Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, yet excludes Egypt, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
In May last year Trump called for a temporary ban on Muslims entering the US back in December, in response to a shooting spree by two radicalized Muslims in California that killed 14 people.

Mexico, U.S. agree not to talk publicly about wall payment
Fri 27 Jan 2017/NNA /Reuters/Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto and his U.S. counterpart Donald Trump on Friday agreed not to talk publicly for now about payment of the wall the American wants to build on the United States' southern border and that he says Mexico should finance. In a statement, Mexico's government said that during a phone call on Friday, the two had held "constructive and productive" talks and broached issues including the U.S. trade deficit with Mexico and the flow of illegal arms and drugs across the border. "Regarding payment of the border wall, both presidents recognized their clear and very public differences of opinion on this sensitive subject, and agreed to resolve their differences as part of a comprehensive discussion on all aspects of the bilateral relationship," the statement said. "The presidents also agreed for now to not talk publicly about this controversial issue." ---

Britain's May says Queen Elizabeth invited Trump for state visit
Fri 27 Jan 2017/NNA/Reuters/Britain's Queen Elizabeth has invited U.S. President Donald Trump for a state visit later this year and he has accepted, British Prime Minister Theresa May said on Friday. May was speaking at a news conference in Washington during the first visit to the White House by a foreign leader since Trump's inauguration a week ago.

Trump wants good relationship with Russia, May says sanctions should stay
Reuters, Washington Friday, 27 January 2017/US President Donald Trump said on Friday he wanted to have good relations with Russia and declined to say whether he was ready to lift sanctions on Moscow, which visiting British Prime Minister Theresa May said must stay in place. Speaking at a news conference after his first meeting with a foreign leader at the White House since becoming president, Trump said he hoped to have a “fantastic relationship” with Russian President Vladimir Putin, but he said it was possible that would not occur. Any move by the White House to lift sanctions against Russia for its actions in Ukraine would likely cause consternation among European allies who believe sanctions should be lifted only if Moscow complies with the West's conditions on Ukraine.
Those concerns would be compounded at home, where many in the US Congress are vehemently opposed to Putin's actions in Ukraine and Syria as well as what US intelligence agencies have concluded was Russian meddling in the US election campaign.
May told the news conference she believed sanctions against Russia should stay in place until Moscow fulfilled its obligations under the Minsk agreement.She also made a point of emphasizing that during their talks, Trump had given strong backing to NATO, an alliance that the president has previously called obsolete.Putin and Trump are likely to discuss the sanctions when the two leaders speak by telephone on Saturday, a senior White House aide said.
Trump has 'friendly' call with Mexican leader but demands change.Trump said he had a friendly phone call with Mexico's president on Friday but asserted he will renegotiate trade deals and other aspects of the countries' ties because Mexico has “beat us to a pulp” in the past. Mexico's peso extended gains on news of the call. The two men spoke for about an hour on Friday, a day after President Enrique Pena Nieto scrapped a planned meeting in Washington next week over Trump's instance that Mexico pay for a multibillion-dollar border wall. “It was a very, very friendly call,” Trump told a joint news conference. “We are going to be working on a fair relationship and a new relationship” with Mexico, Trump added. “But the United States cannot continue to lose vast amounts of business, vast amounts of companies and millions and millions of people losing their jobs. “That won't happen with me.”Trump's fresh insistence that Mexico pay for the wall and Pena Nieto's cancellation of his visit deepened a crisis between the two countries in the first week of Trump's presidency. Trump said Mexico has “out-negotiated us and beat us to a pulp through our past leaders. They've made us look foolish.” He said the United States will “renegotiate our trade deals and we're going to renegotiate other aspects of our relationship with Mexico. And in the end I think it will be good for both countries.”The Republican president views the wall, a major promise during his election campaign, as part of a package of measures to curb illegal immigration. Mexico has long insisted it will not heed Trump's demands to pay for the construction project. An official at the Mexican president's office confirmed the call and said a statement would be issued later with more details.

Trump Meets UK's May, Hails 'Most Special Relationship' with Britain

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 27/17/President Donald Trump hailed a "most special relationship" with Britain and threw his support behind Brexit Friday, as he hosted British Prime Minister Theresa May for his debut on the diplomatic stage. At a tense moment in trans-Atlantic relations, Trump tried to recast the "deep bond" as a meeting of ideological minds: two countries embracing populist policies and taking an uncompromising view of the national interest. Trump pointed to Britain's exit from the European Union as a "wonderful thing" and said: "When it irons out, you're going to have your own identity, and you are going to have the people that you want in your country." "You're going to be able to make free trade deals without having somebody watching you and what you are doing," he added.
May brushed aside deep-seated differences on issues from torture to Russia, to pursue a diplomatic charm offensive aimed at securing commitments on trade and mutual defense. May conveyed an invitation from Queen Elizabeth II for Trump to come to Britain for a state visit later this year. The pair even briefly held hands as they walked down the West Wing colonnade. Trump greeted May himself upon her arrival at the White House and then they went to the Oval Office, posing and shaking hands in front of a bust of Winston Churchill. Behind closed doors, May was expected to give Trump an engraved quaich -- a ceremonial cup exchanged by Scottish highland chiefs -- in a nod to Trump's Scottish ancestry. His mother was born on the island of Lewis. For First Lady Melania Trump, May was to gift a hamper of apple juice, damson plum jam, marmalade, Bakewell tarts and cranberry and white chocolate shortbread cookies. But May also came with a diplomatic shopping list. Trans-Atlantic relations have been rocked by Trump's election and his willingness to rethink NATO, the UN and other foundation blocks of the liberal world order. With Trump largely silent on these issues during a joint press conference, May conveyed what had been said in private. "We've reaffirmed our unshakeable commitment to this alliance," she said. "Mr. President, I think you confirmed that you were 100 percent behind NATO." Much of Britain's military power, including its nuclear deterrent, depends on U.S. equipment and systems. In private, European diplomats worry about the influence of top Trump advisor Steve Bannon, who has made common cause with right-wing nationalists and populists in France, Britain and beyond. Many in European capitals are conscious of the continent's previous embraces of nationalism -- the Balkan wars and the horrors of World War II, which left millions dead.
Post-Brexit trade
Trump's break with decades of U.S. support for multilateral trade deals and his preference for bilateral accords did offer May one opening as she seeks to navigate Britain's complex exit from the European Union. Faced with exit from the European single market, the British government is scrambling to secure bilateral deals around the world. Trump nevertheless offered no firm commitment to negotiate a free trade agreement, but did say: "We look forward to working closely with you as we strengthen our mutual ties and commerce, business and foreign affairs."That could pose problems for May at home. Her decision to meet Trump just one week after his inauguration has caused considerable controversy. Trump has been condemned by European politicians of all stripes for his comments about women, Muslims and the use of torture.May was not helped Thursday when the White House misspelled her name multiple times when announcing her visit.
'I think we're going to get along'
The reserved daughter of a vicar had promised to be "frank" in her dealings with the unpredictable billionaire. The pair laughed off questions about their personal compatibility. Trump joked that he was "not as brash as you might think" and, turning to May, said: "I think we're going to get along very well."Throughout the long US election campaign, Trump showed little interest in foreign policy except through the prism of his image at home and a pledge to put "America First."His first week in office has been marked by a war of words with Mexico over the building of a border wall, and his vow to make Mexico pay for it. On Thursday, Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto called off a planned trip to Washington in protest. But the pair spoke by telephone on Friday and agreed to try to resolve their differences, the two sides said. May arrived in the United States on Thursday and received a rapturous welcome from Republican lawmakers gathering in Philadelphia with a speech urging them to "beware" of Russia, and warning U.S. allies to "step up" and play a greater role in global security. On Friday, Trump said it was "too early" to talk about whether he might lift sanctions against Moscow. May took a much sterner line, saying the sanctions should continue.

Pentagon chief Mattis assures European counterparts over NATO
Fri 27 Jan 2017/NNA -Agencies/ US Defense Secretary James Mattis has assured European counterparts about Washington's commitment to NATO, officials said Friday, as President Donald Trump plans to speak to the leaders of France, Germany and Russia.
Mattis spoke by phone to the defense ministers of France, Germany and Israel on Thursday, Pentagon spokesman Navy Captain Jeff Davis said. Speaking to German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen, he "assured the minister of the United States' enduring commitment to the NATO alliance," Davis said in a statement. "He thanked Minister von der Leyen for her country's leadership in NATO activities on the Eastern Flank and in Afghanistan, and acknowledged the role that Germany plays in fighting terrorism, specifically in the counter-ISIL coalition," he added, using an acronym for the Islamic state jihadist group. "He also cited the strategic importance of Germany as the host to 35,000 US personnel, the largest US force presence in Europe," Davis said.
Mattis also stressed NATO's importance to his French counterpart Jean-Yves Le Drian, with whom he discussed "the long-time allies' security cooperation, which is stronger than ever as both countries engage side-by-side in the fight against terrorism," he added.
As the European Union's leading members, both countries have been rattled by Trump's denigration of NATO, which he has called "obsolete," and his praise of Russian President Vladimir Putin, whom they accuse of seeking to undermine Western unity.
Trump, who has often praised Putin, is expected to speak to him, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Francois Hollande on Saturday, the White House said. Trump took office last week with US relations with Russia at new Cold War-level lows amid accusations by American intelligence agencies that the Kremlin leaked hacked Democratic Party emails as part of a campaign to influence November's election.
Trump -- who has raised the prospect of easing sanctions imposed against Russia after its annexation of Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014 -- has cast doubt on whether Russia meddled in the election. Mattis also spoke by phone with Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman on Thursday "to underscore his unwavering commitment to Israel's security," Davis said.----AFP

Is US ‘terror tag’ likely for Muslim Brotherhood?
Reuters, Washington Friday, 27 January 2017/A debate is under way in the Trump administration about whether the United States should declare the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization and subject it to US sanctions, according to US officials and people close to President Donald Trump’s transition team. A faction led by Michael Flynn, Trump’s National Security Advisor, wants to add the Brotherhood to the State Department and US Treasury lists of foreign terrorist organizations, the sources said. “I know it has been discussed. I’m in favor of it,” said a Trump transition advisor, who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue. The advisor said Flynn’s team discussed adding the group to the US list of terrorist groups but said it was ultimately unclear when or even if the administration ultimately would go ahead with such a move. Other Trump advisors, as well as many veteran national security, diplomatic, law enforcement and intelligence officials argue the Brotherhood has evolved peacefully in some countries, according to officials and people close to Trump’s entourage. The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, the country’s oldest Islamist movement, was designated as a terrorist organization in that country in 2013. It is not clear which faction within the US administration has the upper hand, and Senator Ted Cruz and Representative Mario Diaz-Balart this month introduced legislation to add the Brotherhood to the terrorist list. There was no immediate comment from the White House.
Mixed record
Trump’s nominee for Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, described the Brotherhood an “an agent of radical Islam”, during his Senate confirmation hearing. US criminal law prohibits people in the United States from knowingly providing “material support” to designated terrorist organizations, and members of such groups are banned from entering the United States. Some conservative and anti-Muslim activists have argued for years that the Brotherhood has been a breeding ground for terrorists. Some branches of the Brotherhood, including the Palestinian group Hamas, have engaged in anti-government violence and provoked violent government reactions. Ayman al-Zawahiri, the leader of al-Qaeda, was once a member of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. Sisi and Trump spoke by phone this week and the two leaders discussed ways to boost the fight against terrorism and extremism. A US official who declined to be identified told Reuters there had been discussions at the State Department which looked at intelligence and information on the group in which it was thought “it would be difficult to justify legally, in terms of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, to meet the criteria”. “It’s one thing to say one group’s ideology has been used to influence a terrorist organization and another thing to say that this group is a terrorist organization,” said the US official. A British government review into Egypt’s outlawed Muslim Brotherhood published in December 2015 concluded that membership of or links to the political group should be considered a possible indicator of extremism but stopped short of recommending that it should be banned.

20 years in prison for the US on charges of conspiring with Daesh

Fri 27 Jan 2017/NNA - US judge Thursday sentenced 20 - year - old man from New York after admitting conspiracy to provide material support to organize Daesh. The US Department of Justice that " the Chief Justice Frank Guirassy in federal court sentenced Emmanuel Watchman , 26, of Rochester after pleading guilty as charged in the August 11 / August."The judge put the Watchman under surveillance after his release for 50 years as ordered. The ministry added that the accused confessed Ptamrh with Abu Issa , a member of the American Bdaash in Syria who have been killed during the last period. This is the maximum sentence possible period of imprisonment for the charge attributed to Chman about his role in preparing for an attack on a nightclub on the eve of the new year in 2015, knowing that he was held since his arrest on December 30 / December 2015.--AFP

French Foreign Minister to visit Tehran next week
Fri 27 Jan 2017/NNA - French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault will arrive in Tehran with a delegation next week, Iranian Ambassador to France Ali Ahani has announced. Ayrault will preside over the commission along with his Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif. The P5+1 group of countries, comprising the United States, Russia, China, France and the United Kingdom plus Germany, signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran in July 2015, ensuring the peaceful nature of Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. Ahani said on Thursday that Iran now has the potential to become France’s permanent economic partner. ---Sputnik

New U.S. UN envoy warns allies have our back or we'll respond accordingly

Fri 27 Jan 2017/Reuters/NNA - - New U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, pledged on Friday to overhaul the world body and warned U.S. allies that if they do not have Washington's back then she is "taking names" and will respond. Haley made brief remarks to the press as she arrived at U.N. headquarters in New York to present her credentials to U.N. chief Antonio Guterres. "Our goal with the administration is to show value at the U.N. and the way that we'll show value is to show our strength, show our voice, have the backs of our allies and make sure that our allies have our back as well," Haley said. "For those that don't have our back, we're taking names, we will make points to respond to that accordingly," she added. -

Two Ukrainian soldiers killed in fresh clashes
Fri 27 Jan 2017/NNA - Two Ukrainian soldiers were Friday reported killed in an upsurge of fighting in the country's rebel east, as international monitors said "little has changed" to halt violence despite a supposed truce. Ukrainian military spokesman Oleksandr Motuzyanyk said the two servicemen were killed over the past day as Russian-backed insurgents stepped up attacks along the volatile frontline. The deaths are the first Ukrainian losses for almost two weeks and come despite the warring sides announcing an "indefinite" ceasefire in December that has failed to stop the violence entirely.

Canada: Statement by Minister Freeland on International Holocaust Remembrance Day
January 27, 2017 - Ottawa, Ontario - Global Affairs Canada
The Honourable Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Foreign Affairs, today issued the following statement:
“One of the darkest chapters in human history unfolded at the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration and extermination camp, liberated 72 years ago today.
“The systematic murder of 6 million Jews during the Holocaust, or Shoah, and of millions of others, all killed by the brutal Nazi regime, is a story of tragedy, loss and unimaginable suffering. Today, we honour their memory and pay tribute to the brave survivors. From Auschwitz-Birkenau and other Nazi camps emerged inspirational stories of strength and courage, including many told by Jewish-Canadian survivors, which remain a powerful reminder of the resilience of the human spirit.
“Last year I visited Auschwitz-Birkenau with the prime minister. It was an experience that forever changed me and will remain with me throughout my life.
“The lessons learned from the Holocaust must guide our efforts to fight antisemitism and prevent mass atrocities globally. Canada has learned that the first step is to reject narratives of fear and exclusion. As Canadians, we must stand up for the values that bind us. We must uphold human dignity, respect diversity and ensure inclusion for all.
“It is important for Canada to make its voice heard and to increase Holocaust awareness and knowledge. As a proud member of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, Canada last year adopted the Alliance’s definition of antisemitism. There is no place for manifestations of antisemitism toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals or their property, or Jewish community institutions or religious facilities.
Canada also rejects any denial of the Holocaust. We are working with others to ensure that the stories of the victims and the important lessons of the Shoah are never forgotten, that victims and families are properly compensated for the assets confiscated by the Nazis and that Nazi war criminals continue to be brought to justice.
“It is our solemn duty to honour all victims and ensure that justice is served. May the distance of time never dull our memory of the unspeakable evil committed during the Holocaust.”

Iran: Inhumane Pressure on Prisoners and Their Families
 NCRI/ Friday, 27 January 2017 /Following the escape of 6 prisoners from Zabol Prison Southeastern Iran, the Prosecutor of Zabol issued an order to arrest their families. The father, mother, and sister of one of the prisoners called Siahook were arrested, tortured and interrogated in order to reveal the whereabouts of their son who was accused of committing a crime at the age of 16. According to the sources, this prisoner has never accepted the allegations despite severe tortures. On the same issue, the prison guards have also chained one of the prisoners called Hashem Sanjouri to one of the columns of this custodial under the charge of helping Siahook to escape. This measure is one of the most common brutal tortures which are being implemented in Zabol Prison.
 As a few prisoners escaped from Zabol Prison last week, all wards of this prison have been closed and the prisoners are prohibited from taking walks.
 
Knights of Malta insist on sovereignty amid papal takeover
By Nicole Winfield | AP January 27/17/ROME — The Knights of Malta is still insisting on its sovereignty in its showdown with the Vatican, even after Pope Francis effectively took control of the ancient religious order and announced a papal delegate would govern it through a “process of renewal.”The Knights’ current grand master, Fra’ Matthew Festing, was at work Friday at the order’s swanky Rome palazzo near the Spanish Steps, pending a meeting of his governing council to either accept or reject his resignation.
The Saturday meeting is no rubber-stamp formality: It’s evidence of the order’s sovereign status under international law, which is recognized by the more than 100 countries that have diplomatic relations with the Knights of Malta and essentially consider it a state.
Festing, a 67-year-old British aristocrat, met Tuesday with Francis and said he would resign after he lost an internal power struggle that started with a scandal over condoms. Festing sacked the Knights’ foreign minister, Albrecht von Boeselager, over the condom scandal. But the Vatican intervened on Boeselager’s behalf and announced this week that the pope had accepted Festing’s resignation and would name a papal delegate to run the order. The Knights of Malta is an ancient chivalric order that runs hospitals and clinics around the world. It counts 13,500 Knights, Dames and chaplains, 80,000 permanent volunteers and 25,000 employees, most of them medical personnel who lend first aid in war zones, natural disasters and conflict areas.The Knights are questioning the pope’s right to name a delegate to govern the order, since its sovereign constitution clearly sets out the process for selecting interim leadership and the election of a new grand master. “Festing is the grand master,” order spokesman Eugenio Ajroldi di Robbiate told The Associated Press. “If he resigns, the sovereign council will take the appropriate decisions.”The saga has sown chaos within the Knights, but the Vatican’s actions have added to the tumult. For starters, Francis named a commission to gather information about Boeselager’s ouster, and packed it with Boeselager allies. They were essentially asked to report back objectively on a power struggle between a friend and the religious superior — Festing — who removed him. Then, the Vatican seemed to ignore the order’s sovereign status altogether in announcing Festing’s resignation and that a papal delegate would be named to govern. And finally, Francis’ deputy, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, said in a letter this week that all of Festing’s decisions since Boeselager’s Dec. 6 ouster were “null and void” and that the papal delegate would “assist the order in the renewal process which is seen as necessary.” The tone of the letter, reported by the National Catholic Register and confirmed by the order, made clear that Parolin believes he is now calling the shots. It was addressed to the sovereign council and said the order’s No. 2 would govern temporarily “until the papal delegate is appointed.” No mention was made of the order’s laws that call for the No. 2 to organize an election for a new grand master within three months. The order’s spokesman, Ajroldi di Robbiate, said Parolin’s letter represented the Vatican’s interpretation of events, but nothing more.
“Every decision concerning this must be taken by our sovereign council,” he said.  

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 27-28/17
Astana talks: Counting Iran’s gains and losses
 Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya/January 27/17
 Media and officials in Iran have hailed the two days of talks in Astana, capital of Kazakhstan, between the Islamic Republic, Russia, and Turkey over the Syrian civil war. The talks were mostly collection of words rather than actions. However, Iran’s state mouthpieces projected the meetings as a success and emphasized Iran’s positive role in nearly six years of the Syrian civil war. Iran’s Press TV wrote that Bashar Ja’afari “brushed aside Syrian opposition’s anger about Iran’s presence at the talks, praising Tehran for its positive role in Syria”. The distinction between Astana talks and the Geneva process, led by the United Nations and the US, was the exclusiveness of the Astana talks that included a cherry-picked number of parties. The Iranian government and its staunchest ally, Bashar al-Assad, scored a victory, and Tehran had more to gain than to lose from the Astana talks.
 Iran showcases its power and legitimacy.
 First of all, the Astana talks were a critical platform for Iranian leaders to showcase their power, increasing influence and predominant role in Syria’s political affairs, and further advance their regional hegemonic ambitions.
 Secondly, Iranian leaders achieved their main objective of giving legitimacy to Bashar al-Assad and Tehran. From the perspective of Iranian leaders, the fact that opposition groups and heads of states sat on the same table with the Syrian government officials and Iranian officials, grants Assad’s forces and Iran more legitimacy. It also recognizes Assad’s delegate as official representatives.
 Ali Akbar Velayati, a senior adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and head of the Expediency Council’s Center of Strategic Research, emphasized this issue in his remarks to reporters in Tehran.
 “The Astana meeting showed that all sides, including Turkey and those groups, which follow this country and even countries not present there (in Astana), have acknowledged the Syrian government’s legitimacy either directly or indirectly,” Velayati pointed out.
 Even if Russia shows a willingness to accept a political transition to serve its interests in Syria, Iran’s Shiite militias would more likely continue the war to totally ensure the hold on power of the Alawite-dominated state of Assad.
 Third, Iran has used the talks to firm up its “diplomatic” role at a global stage in resolving the Syrian conflict. But, Iran attempted to conceal its role in the humanitarian tragedies that occurred recently in Aleppo, or its role in other humanitarian catastrophes unfolding on a daily basis in various parts of Syria.Furthermore, by not inviting the US, European countries, or other regional Arab powers, Tehran is sending a signal that no other players have stakes in what direction the Syrian civil war takes. Iran is stating that Syria is its red line.
 Supporting Assad
 The meeting ended with a final joint statement, which is mainly a collection of words rather than a plan of action. The Syrian government, Iran, or other parties did not sign the agreement. There were no nuances laid out on what mechanism would be used to enforce the final joint statement regarding Iran’s military role in Syria.
 The joint statement is aimed at increasing Assad’s and Iran’s legitimacy. It is also ironic that Iran holds the conviction “that there is no military solution to the Syrian conflict and that it can only be resolved through a political process.”
 The Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and its proxies have been militarily involved in the Syrian civil war. Since the nuclear agreement, Iran has been publicly acknowledging its military, intelligence, advisory, financial and political assistance to the forces of the Syrian government.
 Iran used the Astana talks to justify its military adventurism in Syria by arguing that it is fighting “terrorism”. The Iranian government also attempted to increase the significance of Astana talks by claiming that all sides of the conflicts were presents at the talks. Nevertheless, only handpicked number of opposition groups and state supporters of Bashar al-Assad attended the meeting.
 The final joint statement stated that it would “observe and ensure full compliance with the ceasefire, prevent any provocation and determine all modalities”. But, the proposed ceasefire would mainly preserve Iran’s strategic and geopolitical interests.
 Iran tends to advocate for a short-term orientated ceasefire after its forces, with the assistance of Assad and pro-government forces, make significant territorial gains through hard power, shelling and bombings. This kind of timely ceasefire allows Iran and its Shia militia forces to consolidate power, reorganize, recruit, and hold on to the gained territories.
 A political game
 Iran is exploiting these talks to increase its leverage and strengthen Assad’s and Tehran’s position in the upcoming Geneva talks. The Astana talks reaffirmed Iran and Russia’s strategic and tactical cooperation in Syria as well.
 Even if Russia shows a willingness to accept a political transition to serve its interests in Syria, Iran’s Shiite militias would more likely continue the war to totally ensure the hold on power of the Alawite-dominated state of Assad.
 Finally, Iran used a much harder line in the talks in comparison to Russia. The rebels appeared more hopeful about Moscow listening to their grievances.
 Iran highlighted the fact that it will not politically compromise, but will use every opportunity to robustly support Assad, strengthen his position, and advance Tehran’s regional ambitions.
 
The Yemeni army inside Houthi territories

Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/January 27/17
Supported by the Saudi- coalition forces, the Yemeni army surprised everyone by entering and expanding in Saada, the land and province that are considered under the Houthi control. This is a very important development. Yemen’s Vice President, Ali Mohsen al-Ahmar, has even travelled to Saada, which confirms that the battle is very important and symbolic. A year and a half ago, the militias considered that General Ali Mohsen al-Ahmar has left Yemen on a one-way ticket, announcing the collapse of the Republic.
 However, the many developments related to the military situation on the ground in Yemen are simultaneous and important; the coalition forces and the Yemeni legitimate forces are scoring victories on various fronts. According to the recent reports, Mocha was liberated in the west of the country with an air and sea support, enabling it to regain control of Bab al-Mandab. These reports mentioned a significant progress in the city of Taiz, where battles are taking place from one neighborhood to another. The same applies to Bayda province. The Yemeni army is now in control of most of the east coast, which was a gateway to smuggle weapons coming to the militias from Iran.
 The militias faced difficulties in penetrating through the naval blockade, after the intensified activity of the naval forces that is stopping ships and boats smuggling weapons. These simultaneous victories are very important on the political level as they encourage major powers that are still reluctant about supporting the legitimate powers. Yemen will be a test for the policies of the newly elected US president, Donald Trump, in the face of Iran.
 On the political level, we are witnessing quick actions; UN envoy returned to propose a long-term truce and negotiations for a peaceful solution. The Houthi militias and former President Ali Saleh forces, wanted to maneuver and hence did not accept yet the international peace initiative. Recent military gains have led to significant breakthroughs in the war in Yemen that has been ongoing for a year and a half, which indicates that this conflict will be shorter than others
 All the president’s powers
 Houthis insist on transferring all of the president’s powers to his deputy, and not just a part of them. This will weaken and disrupt the initiative, which will make them lose the opportunity to participate in the government. Their intransigent attitude is probably tutored by Iran, which has a primary role in igniting the war and supporting all the militant activities targeted at the military, diplomatic and propaganda levels. The Iranians insist on their participation in the negotiations, in order to sell their allies in Yemen within the regional barter basket. Since the legitimate government recovered nearly 80 percent of the lands and the militias’ choices got limited, they still have a narrowed opportunity to take advantage of a peaceful solution to end the war through political reconciliation and partnership. This opportunity will not remain available once the military takeover becomes imminent.
 The losses suffered by the militias affected their internal relations, where most of their troops located now in the capital Sanaa, have now different opinions regarding the management of their government, including their slogan that Houthis borrowed from the Iranian militias: “Death to America, Death to Israel”.
 Saleh’s militias had another opinion and chose a different slogan that is as distrustful as the Houthis’: “One Yemen and one people”, but all they had done was to divide the country. Sanaa will be the last battle, and I am not saying the decisive one because the draft project of the militias has failed when they lost the majority of the cities and were unable to manage the alternative government and transfer the last governmental institutions, i.e. the central bank, to Aden. Aden had become the capital upon the transition of President Hadi’s government after returning from exile in Saudi Arabia. Recent military gains have led to significant breakthroughs in the war in Yemen that has been ongoing for a year and a half, which indicates that this conflict will be shorter than others, when compared with those of the region. The conflicts in Syria and Libya have lasted for 5 years now, and the struggle in Afghanistan has been going on for 15 years now. Yemeni people have suffered a lot due to the coup, the destruction of the political regime, the breakdown of legitimate authority, and the militias seizing the resources of the state and the entire country. *This article was first published in Asharq Al-Awsat on January 27, 2017.
 
Of Trump and political dystopia at Davos 2017
Trisha de Borchgrave/Al Arabiya/January 27/17
 It was a week of metaphors and symbolism for the snowy retreat that annually caters to the communication skills and networking needs of the world’s influencers, including prime ministers, business leaders, policy analysts and philosophers. In the five intense days that hermetically seal this elite, energies connect and collide as four thousand A-types vie for first place in airplane boarding, coat checks, security lines, shuttle bus rides and access to the rock stars of the event, from the IMF’s Christine Lagarde to Shakira, the Bank of England’s Governor Mark Carney and favored couple George and Amal Clooney.
 At a sensitive time for exponents of critical thinking and with a large segment of Davos participants unfamiliar with having to make their own bed every morning, there was, nevertheless, a significant number of attendees who often sleep on makeshift mattresses in refugee camps and under mosquito nets as workers of NGO’s, researchers, scientists and journalists. Pushing for salves to remedy the ills and injustices of the everyday, they are powered not by apps that help them cure their addiction to technology but by three quarters of a world that is desperate for what the west takes for granted materially and politically. Looming over this year’s theme; “Responsive and Responsible Leadership”, was the impending inauguration of the 45th US president. So in true Davos style, legitimate concerns over the spread of fake news were discussed within the psychological context of what is bias.
 The post-truth phenomenon
 Our cravings for the reward mechanisms of social media, the search for solidarity of collective moral outrage, and preference for subjective fact-gathering that suits our preconceptions are helping to define our personal beliefs, and in some cases re-placing the sense of belonging to a broader community. That night, at an evening session analyzing the role of mainstream media, a Fox News reporter had never heard of the term “post-truth”.
 Political dystopia enveloped most sessions with the uncertainty of an unstable president who is more likely to unleash black swans of chaos, in the name of making America great again, than allow innovation to tackle climate change with the input of a diverse, multi-ethnic America of global reach. Metaphors prevailed in the farewell speech given by Obama’s Vice-President Joe Biden, who would not have looked out of place in a floor length robe, spiked crown and hand-held torch, looking out towards the Atlantic.
 It was evident that the fissures along the sacred valley of the last 70 years of western-led stability, opened up by the seismic populist movements of Donald Trump and Britain’s referendum vote to leave the European Union, are causing deep disquiet
 In mid flow, defending the shared values of the international order, he was plunged into gloom when the lighting system of an otherwise technically perfect conference hall suddenly failed. He resumed speaking from the shadows of a stage that looked like an abandoned theatre, and provided Davos 2017 with the subtitle; “Filling America’s void”.
 It was evident that the fissures along the sacred valley of the last 70 years of western-led stability, opened up by the seismic populist movements of Donald Trump and Britain’s referendum vote to leave the European Union, are causing deep disquiet.
 Central and Eastern European leaders appealed for European unity, leadership and solidarity in the face of Russian aggression. Middle Eastern and North African leaders talked constructively of business opportunities that now need to lift their prospects from a dried-up river-bed. And emerging from the penumbra in a clear, unblinking light was China’s premier, Xi Jinping, bringing with him the re-building materials of bond and friendship through free trade and globalization, albeit tethered and conditional.
 Enemies of globalization
 Outlining the real enemies of globalization – hunger, poverty, superstition and prejudice – and the consequences of tragic regional conflict – refugees, terrorism, and cybercrime – he compared the act of protectionist retrenchment to locking oneself in a darkened room that might well keep out the rain and wind, but also the light and air of progress.
 Poetic proverbs about sweet dates growing on thistles and thorns, and analogies of having to swim in whirlpools and choppy waves lest we drown in fear, drove home his message with the punch of 1.3 billion people.
 In contrast British Prime Minister Theresa May’s speech left some questioning her hard-to-read character and her quick in-out intervention at Davos, as if still unsure of her tenure, or position, now that digging for trade deals is forcing her too to pitch GB as a global brand. Davos came to a close on the day of Trump’s inauguration, sobered by the vitriol of the new president’s bombastic assertions of superiority. It had been a difficult week to focus with the usual excitement on scientific breakthroughs; the hologram that can unlock the mysteries of the universe, the composite of an aluminum car light enough to be carried to work, “electroceutical” treatments that jam brains from developing Alzheimer’s, or indeed economic innovation that experiments with the notion of a basic global income.
 And yet, while Trump spoke those thirty-five words of assuming command as the earth’s most powerful political leader, no one in the hallowed halls of the World Economic Forum paid attention. Heads were bowed in conversation, writing up reports, checking emails and sipping coffee. The world goes on, despite indications to the contrary.
 
Getting ready for the impossible: A head transplant
Khales Jalabi/Al Arabiya/January 27/17
 The idea of organ transplant is an old dream that was achieved in 1954 when the first kidney transplant was successfully performed between two siblings. When South African surgeon Christiaan Barnard transplanted the first heart for his patient Louis Washkansky in 1967, the world was shocked and couldn’t believe what happened. They said the heart is the center of one’s understanding and the patient’s feelings must have changed.
 The recipient’s character did not change although he did not live longer than 18 days after the surgery. Some accused the surgeon of lying just like they’re currently accusing Italian neurosurgeon Sergio Canavero who plans to transplant the head of a terminally ill man called Valery Spiridonov on the body of a man who is classified brain dead.
 However, we’re talking about the head here. How will they cut it at the C5 cervical vertebrae and block the blood flow when it cannot bear that for more than five minutes? The second problem is not in connecting veins, arteries, joints, bones, muscles and tendons. All these must be connected with one another again but this is not the problem.
 The problem is in cutting the spinal cord which is like a cable comprising millions of sensitive neurological ropes which control man’s muscles and joints. How will they solve this problem when all information that we have states that it is not possible to mend nerve endings and connect them with one another as they resemble spaghetti?
 In theory, each nerve fiber must be accurately joined with its corresponding nerve fiber; sensory fibers must be joined with sensory fibers; motor fibers must be joined with motor fibers and so on. Will it afterwards be possible to treat a cancer patient by transplanting his head on the body of a boy who became brain dead after a car crash? Will it be possible to resort to this method to treat terminally ill people like the famous physicist Stephen Hawking?
 Japanese breakthrough
 According to theory and medical knowhow, this is impossible. However, they are planning to do so through cooperating with a Japanese doctor called C-Yoon Kim who developed a chemical called polyethylene glycol and which was tried on mice and dogs after cutting their cords and then reconnecting them like one does with electrical copper wires which are as thin as hair locks. They injected this material that connects the cords together - just like one does with electrical copper wires - and they worked shortly after and were restored. Efforts are underway to plan this operation. The team will consist of 80 people and will include surgeons, nurses and anesthetists. The operation will last 36 hours and there will be two teams, one team will cut the neck of Spiridonov at the C5 cervical vertebrae and another team will cut the head of the donor who is brain dead.
 Afterwards, they will work on anastomosis between arteries and veins, sew muscles, put bones in place and connect tendons. Meanwhile, Spiridonov’s body will be cooled until it is 10 degrees Centigrade and finally and quickly the cord will be cut using a sharp blade.
 The cord here will not mend on its own quickly. The cords of the donor and the recipient will be reconnected using polyethylene glycol, and the operation will end a day and a half later. The 51-year-old Sergio Canavero is ambitious and aspires to achieve much more than this as he says he will resist death and he hopes he will succeed at that. Will it afterwards be possible to treat a cancer patient by transplanting his head on the body of a boy who became brain dead after a car crash? Will it be possible to resort to this method to treat terminally ill people like the famous physicist Stephen Hawking?
 Many of these ideas are mad, as many doctors say. But weren’t doctors and scientists accused of madness before? We must wait until the end of 2017 to see the surprise.
 **This article is also available in Arabic. 
 
Hamas and Israel: Can they do a deal?
Al Jazeera News/January 27/17/
Hamas spokesman Osama Hamdan on the new unity government and Trump, and Guy Verhofstadt discusses the EU and Brexit. In this week's UpFront, Mehdi Hasan speaks to Hamas senior leader and spokesman Osama Hamdan, who discusses the new Palestinian unity government and how Hamas will "very soon" be releasing a new charter. In the Reality Check, we examine the rising tide of populism and the elitist conservatives who have hijacked it. And in a discussion on the European Union, we are joined by former Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt, who is now the lead EU parliament negotiator on Brexit. In mid-January, rival Palestinian groups Hamas and Fatah announced the creation of a new unity government. But can the two groups, who have reconciled before only to fall out again, make it work this time? "In politics, no one can say that 'I'm sure 100 percent', but you have to try," says Hamdan, who is also a spokesman for Hamas. "Now we came to this crash point and we both understand we need as Palestinians a national unity government."
Hamdan says that US President Donald Trump, who has talked about moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, needs to choose between making peace or adding "more oil to the fire".
"He knows that Jerusalem is the key for peace," Hamdan tells UpFront. "He has to make his choice: If he wants to be the president who creates peace in the region, or the president who added more oil to the fire." In this week's Headliner, we talk to Hamas senior leader Osama Hamdan.
Across the US and Europe, waves of people are rallying behind so-called populist leaders. But are these leaders "men and women of the people", or right-wing elitists masquerading under the guise of populism?In this week's Reality Check, we reveal how some of their backgrounds and positions put them closer to "fake" populists than ordinary folk.
Can the EU survive the populist wave?
With the eurozone still an economic mess, the rise of anti-EU parties and the UK on the way out, the European Union may be in trouble.
So, with populist leaders expressing disdain for the EU, Brexit and an assertive Russia, what does the future hold for the European Union?
Guy Verhofstadt, a member of the European Parliament and its chief negotiator for Brexit, in addition to being the former prime minister of Belgium, says he is optimistic about the future of the EU, but that it faces an "existential threat".
"We are squeezed, for the moment, between an American president - a populist - saying, 'Oh, I believe in the further disintegration of the European Union'," says Verhofstadt, "and on the other hand, an autocrat - Putin - who wants to destroy the European Union."
Faced with these threats, the EU must "get its act together" and become a "real union", or else disappear, he says. "People need a vision, a project, that shows them how we can escape the challenges that they are facing: Migration flows, economic fallout, and so on," says Verhofstadt. "You have to recognise weaknesses of the current European Union before you can launch a new vision for the future." "I believe we can get our act together, and then we can build up a European Union that can be an example of a supernational organisation worldwide."
MEP and lead Brexit negotiator for the EP, Guy Verhofstadt, discusses the future of the European Union.

6 Years After The Revolution, Egyptians Still Face Abuse And Repression

Jesselyn Cook World News Reporter, The Huffington Post/January 27/17
This week marks six years since the start of the Egyptian revolution, when 18 days of demonstrations by millions of protesters nationwide ousted autocratic President Hosni Mubarak from power and ended nearly three decades of his tyrannical leadership.
But the anniversary of this historic uprising bears little cause for celebration in Egypt, as President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has continued ― and in some ways, intensified ― Murabak’s legacy of repression.
Egyptians’ post-revolutionary hopes for greater freedom were quickly doused as governance transitioned in 2012 from the military to Mohammed MorsiEgypt’s first ever democratically-elected leader ― who effectively granted himself temporary unlimited authority without judicial oversight months after taking office. Morsi belonged to the Muslim Brotherhood, a U.S.-supported Islamist social, political and religious opposition movement that was founded in Egypt. Just a year after Morsi’s election, millions of Egyptians filled the streets yet again to demand his resignation amid growing anti-Brotherhood sentiment and accusations of oppression. In July 2013, he was deposed through a military coup led in part by el-Sisi, who was head of the nation’s armed forces at the time. Months later, the Muslim Brotherhood was outlawed and declared a terrorist organization in Egypt.
Morsi was found guilty of crimes that included ordering the torture and unlawful detention of protesters who opposed his regime. Human rights group Amnesty International called the verdict the result of a “sham trial,” and sharply criticized the Egyptian criminal justice system. Morsi was later sentenced to death, but the sentence was overturned in Nov. 2015 and he faces retrial.
Since rising to power in 2014, el-Sisi has expanded an alarming nationwide crackdown on dissent and purported terrorism-related threats in Egypt, which recently resulted in retired Egyptian soccer icon Mohamed Aboutrika being added to the country’s rapidly growing ‘terror list’ over alleged ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. El-Sisi has widened government surveillance abilities and authorities’ powers as part of his sweeping counterterrorism movement. Public criticism of his regime remains effectively banned.
Rights groups have documented hundreds of death sentences and unfair trials, extrajudicial killings of protesters, enforced disappearances and abductions of journalists and activists, torture of political prisoners, evictions and building destruction by state officials under el-Sisi’s leadership.A security official explained one of his agency’s methods of suppressing dissent to Reuters in January 2016.
“We have taken several measures to ensure activists don’t have breathing space and are unable to gather, and several cafes and other meeting places have been closed, while some have been arrested in order to scare the rest,” he said.
Amnesty International has called the unfolding situation an “unprecedented human rights crisis” in Egypt.
“Enforced disappearance has become a key instrument of state policy in Egypt,” Philip Luther, Amnesty’s Middle East and North Africa director, explained in a 2016 situation report. “Anyone who dares to speak out is at risk, with counter-terrorism being used as an excuse to abduct, interrogate and torture people who challenge the authorities.”
In April 2016, el-Sisi, whose failed promise of economic revival was already causing domestic tensions, announced that Egypt would be giving two Red Sea islands to Saudi Arabia. The shocking move baffled and outraged many in the country and sparked huge protests. When el-Sisi was asked a question about the transfer during a subsequent policy speech before a group of parliamentarians, he snapped back: “I did not give anyone permission to speak.” An Egyptian court ultimately rejected the controversial plan on Jan. 16.
El-Sisi’s internationally condemned fight against terror was recently fortified by apparent support from newly sworn-in U.S. President Donald Trump.
While former President Barack Obama strongly denounced post-revolutionary violence and oppression against Egyptian civilians ― which has included tens of thousands of detentions and arrests ― the ongoing issue appears, so far, to be less of a concern for Trump. In a phone call with el-Sisi on Jan. 23, he praised and vowed to back Egypt’s counterterrorism efforts with continued military support, but made no mention of the regime’s widespread human rights abuses.
Cairo has received an annual $1.3 billion in American aid for its armed forces, but relations between the two countries were deeply strained by Egyptian military violence against the Muslim Brotherhood and its supporters in August 2013, prompting Obama to cancel joint military exercises.
“We deplore violence against civilians,” said Obama, triggering angry backlash from Egypt’s interim government at the time. “While we want to sustain our relationship with Egypt, our traditional cooperation cannot continue as usual when civilians are being killed in the streets and rights are being rolled back.”El-Sisi has also used the front of national security interests to exert his influence over the Egyptian media. In 2015, his administration approved an anti-terrorism law that threatens massive fines against journalists who report “false” news that strays from government statements. Freedom of information advocacy group Reporters Without Borders ranks Egypt 159th out of 180 countries for its 2016 press freedom scores list. Since the revolution, successive governments have attempted to muzzle reporters and steer the media, the group notes, adding: “Authorities are orchestrating a ‘Sisification’ of the media and a witchhunt (sic) against the now-banned Muslim Brotherhood.”
Six years after a revolution that sought greater freedom and liberty for the Egyptian people following decades of repression, the country is back in the hands of an autocratic regime, facing a deteriorating human rights crisis.
Luther says responsibility now falls on the international community to intervene. “All states, particularly EU member states and the USA, must use their influence to pressure Egypt to end these appalling violations, which are being committed under the false pretext of security and counter-terrorism,” he said in the Amnesty report. “They should cease all transfers of arms and equipment that have been used to commit serious human rights violations in Egypt until effective safeguards against misuse are established, thorough and independent investigations are conducted and those responsible are brought to justice.”

Trump signs "new vetting measures" to guard against terror
KEN THOMAS and JULIE PACE,Associated Press /January 27/17
WASHINGTON (AP) — Pushing full-speed into international controversies, President Donald Trump on Friday ordered "new vetting measures" to keep "radical Islamic terrorists" out of the United States and alternated tough talk with kind words in his diplomatic standoff with Mexico. Trump traveled to the Pentagon where he joined Defense Secretary James Mattis for the signing of an executive action to bring sweeping changes to the nation's refugee policies and put in motion his plans to build up the nation's military.
"I'm establishing new vetting measures to keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the United States of America. We don't want 'em here," Trump declared. "We want to ensure that we are not admitting into our country the very threats our soldiers are fighting overseas. We only want to admit those into our country who will support our country and love deeply our people." During his election campaign against Hillary Clinton, Trump pledged to put in place "extreme vetting" procedures to screen people coming to the U.S. from countries with terrorism ties. The White House did not immediately release details on the order that Trump signed, but a draft of the order called for suspending the issuing of visas to people from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen for at least 30 days.
Joined earlier in the day at the White House by British Prime Minister Theresa May, Trump reaffirmed the United States' "special relationship" with Great Britain. But he was also asked about a more contentious issue: his recent statements that torture "does work" in prying information out of terror suspects. Giving ground, he said his defense secretary's opposition would override his own belief. Hours later he stood at the Pentagon as retired Gen. James Mattis was sworn in as the military's chief.
Trump held firm on another controversy — trade and illegal immigration from Mexico. He told reporters at a joint news conference with May that he had a "very good call" with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto earlier in the day, but he reaffirmed his belief that Mexico has "outnegotiated and beat us to a pulp" on trade — and that would change. "We're no longer going to be the country that doesn't know what it's doing," he declared a day after the Mexican leader canceled his visit to Washington in response to Trump's plans to build a border wall and have Mexico pay for it. The flurry of national security moves and foreign policy outreach capped a hectic first week for Trump at the White House, giving Americans an initial look at how Trump intends to position the United States around the globe.

There’s a key difference between the U.S. and Mexican statements about the border wall
Hunter Walker/Yahoo News/January 27/17
The White House released what it billed as a “Joint Statement on U.S.-Mexico Relations” after President Trump and Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto had a telephone call on Friday morning. However, the version of the statement distributed by the Mexican government contained one big difference. “The presidents also agreed for now not to speak publicly on this controversial topic,” the Mexican government statement said, in Spanish. That line was missing from the American version, which was otherwise identical.
The statements followed a spat between the two countries that started Wednesday, when Trump signed an executive order calling for “the immediate construction of a physical wall on the southern border.” The wall was one of his signature campaign promises. Trump has repeatedly said that he will get Mexico to finance the wall, but Peña Nieto has stressed that his country will not pay for the project.
Peña Nieto then signaled that he was rethinking a scheduled meeting with Trump next Tuesday. Trump responded by saying that it might be better to scrap the meeting, and then the Mexican president did exactly that. Both statements about Friday morning’s call said that the presidents spoke “for an hour” and that the conversation was mutually arranged by both of their teams. The two statements also said that the leaders discussed Trump’s promise to have Mexico pay for a border wall and that “both presidents recognize their clear and very public differences of positions on this issue but have agreed to work these differences out as part of a comprehensive discussion on all aspects of the bilateral relationship.”
Yahoo News has asked both the White House and the Mexican government why the two statements were different. As of this writing, we have not received responses from either Mexico or the White House. Foreign governments sometimes give different accounts of their communications with the White House, but in this case, Trump’s team billed their announcement as a “joint statement.”
Both the White House statement and the Mexican one described the conversation as “a productive and constructive call regarding the bilateral relationship between the two countries.” The two statements said that Trump and Peña Nieto discussed “the current trade deficit the United States has with Mexico, the importance of the friendship between the two nations, and the need for the two nations to work together to stop drug cartels, drug trafficking and illegal guns and arms sales.” “Both presidents have instructed their teams to continue the dialogue to strengthen this important strategic and economic relationship in a constructive way,” the statements concluded. The executive order described the planned wall as a “contiguous, physical wall or other similarly secure, contiguous, and impassable physical barrier.” Trump held a brief news conference alongside British Prime Minister Theresa May on Friday to discuss her visit to the White House. Trump took four questions and then departed, which is customary for joint appearances with presidents and a foreign leader. As he left, Yahoo News asked if he could describe how the wall would look. Trump did not respond.

Immigration Priorities: Translators, and Victims of Genocide
Shoshana Bryen/Gatestone Institute/January 27/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9848/immigration-translators-genocide
Prioritize two groups from the Middle East: those who have worked for the U.S. military as translators (and their families); and Middle East Christians who, according to then-Secretary of State Kerry, were being subjected to genocide in Syria and Iraq.
In 2008, Congress authorized 20,000 special visas for Iraqis who served the U.S. for a year or more; and in 2009, authorized 7,500 visas over seven years for Afghan translators. The idea was to get allies who had risked their lives for American troops out as quickly as possible, but thousands have waited for years.
Iraq and Afghanistan are countries in which being tagged as helpful to the U.S. military can be, and has been, a death sentence. And worse, in July 2016, an extension of the visa program failed to make it out of the Senate.
Of the 10,801 refugees accepted in fiscal 2016 from Syria, only 56 (0.5 percent) were Christian.
Making a concerted effort to bring those two desperately threatened groups to the United States would meet our commitment to the translators, give concrete expression to our revulsion at genocide, protect the interests of the American people, and ensure that America remains hospitable to immigrants and refugees.
If you want security clearances in the United States, the government "vets" you quite thoroughly. They begin by asking you questions and then ask for a list of people to interview -- family, friends, employers, etc. They take your list and ask those people for more people who will talk about you, then take that list and ask those people for more people who will talk about you -- and so on until the lists have the right number and combination of names that overlap. If you have a vindictive ex-wife, watch out. They do a credit check, a criminal background check, a motor vehicle records check, and a medical records check. Psychiatrist? That too.
When discussing visas for people coming to the U.S. from countries with terrorism issues, it is useful to know what it means to "vet" and why there is no possibility of vetting (or "extreme vetting," whatever that means) refugees and potential immigrants who have no links to their former lives. Vetting -- whether for security clearances or visas -- is all about your life to this point.
President Trump's executive order halting immigration from seven countries for 30 days -- for a start -- is a reasonable response to the increasing understanding that people from certain countries can pose more of a security risk than people from other countries, even when all the countries are Muslim-majority. The seven are Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, Sudan, Libya and Somalia; the U.S. government, under previous presidents, had cited all for terror links. Countries such as Kuwait, Egypt, Jordan, Indonesia, Oman and Tunisia and other Muslim-majority countries are not affected.
A "Muslim ban" would be racist, wrong, and a violation of deeply held American principles; but the claim by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) that visa restrictions are tantamount to slavery and denying women the right to vote is slanderous, exaggerated, inaccurate and anti-American. Restrictions -- and post-fact checks -- on people who enter the United States from countries with clear links to terrorism, and to which we cannot turn for record-checks and interviews, are simply something the United States does.
In 1979, the U.S. Embassy in Tehran was occupied by radical Islamists bent on war with the United States. The Carter Administration ordered all Iranians with student visas to report physically to U.S. immigration officials or face possible deportation. Ten months later (Carter's order had to go through the courts), the New York Times, citing an Immigration and Naturalization Service spokesman, reported that nearly 60,000 students had registered as required, about 430 had been deported, and 5,000 had left voluntarily. In the interim, Carter ordered federal officials to:
"invalidate all visas issued to Iranian citizens for future entry into the United States, effective today. We will not reissue visas, nor will we issue new visas, except for compelling and proven humanitarian reasons or where the national interest of our own country requires. This directive will be interpreted very strictly."
Iran remains at war with the United States and al Qaeda and ISIS are no less at war simply because they lack a central government.
In 2015, the assistant secretary of state for the Bureau of Consular Affairs told a House hearing that the U.S. government had revoked more than 9,500 visas over terrorism concerns since 2001 (the number is now more than 13,000). The attacks of 9/11 were followed by more attacks and plots against symbols of American military, law, justice, and governance as well as trains, bars, and shopping centers that are symbols of everyday life. Mass-casualty attacks in San Bernardino and Orlando were only the latest catalysts for Americans' underlying concern that have been growing for years about terrorism and the government's ability to protect us.
If "vetting" is not possible and American security requirements are real, is there a way to bring together our historic sympathy for refugees and historic welcome of immigrants with our reasonable concerns?
Yes.
Prioritize two groups from the Middle East: those who have worked for the U.S. military as translators (and their families); and Middle East Christians who, according to then-Secretary of State Kerry, were being subjected to genocide in Syria and Iraq.
In 2008, Congress authorized 20,000 special visas for Iraqis who served the U.S. for a year or more; and in 2009, authorized 7,500 visas over seven years for Afghan translators. The idea was to get allies who had risked their lives for American troops out as quickly as possible, but thousands have waited for years. Iraq and Afghanistan veteran Spencer Case wrote early in 2016:
"State Department numbers show that an Iraqi applying for a special visa could expect to wait for 292 business days before hearing back -- and hearing back may just be another delay or a denial. In Afghanistan, the average wait time is 417 business days."
Iraq and Afghanistan are countries in which being tagged as helpful to the United States military can be, and has been, a death sentence. And worse, in July 2016, an extension of the visa program failed to make it out of the Senate.
Secretary Kerry described his understanding that Christian women were sold as sex slaves, and both women and men were massacred in areas of Syria and Iraq controlled by ISIS. But of the 10,801 refugees accepted in fiscal 2016 from Syria, only 56 (0.5 percent) were Christian.
When a few persecuted Iraqi Christians crossed the border into the U.S., they were thrown in prison for several months and then sent back to the countries persecuting them, possibly to be enslaved, raped, or murdered. Pictured above: Members of California's Iraqi Christian community and their supporters protest the months-long detention of Iraqi Christian asylum-seekers at the Otay Mesa detention center. (Image source Al Jazeera video screenshot)
Making a concerted effort to bring those two desperately threatened groups to the United States would meet our commitment to the translators, give concrete expression to our revulsion at genocide, protect the interests of the American people, and ensure that America remains hospitable to immigrants and refugees.
**Shoshana Bryen is Senior Director of the Jewish Policy Center.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute. 

Germany Downplayed Threat of Jihadists Posing as Migrants
Soeren Kern/Gatestone Institute/January 27/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9837/germany-migrants-jihadists
More than 400 migrants who entered Germany as asylum seekers in 2015 and 2016 are being investigated for links to Islamic terrorism, according to the Federal Criminal Police.
The German experience with jihadists posing as migrants serves as a case study on errors for other countries to avoid. German authorities allowed hundreds of thousands of migrants, many lacking documentation, to enter Germany without a security check. German authorities admitted they lost track of some 130,000 migrants who entered the country in 2015.
German authorities knew in early 2015 that Walid Salihi, an 18-year-old Syrian who applied for asylum in Germany in 2014, was recruiting for the Islamic State at his asylum shelter in Recklinghausen, but they did nothing.
Anis Amri, the Tunisian jihadist who attacked the Christmas market in Berlin, used at least 14 different identities, which he used to obtain social welfare benefits under different names in different municipalities.
"We have probably forgotten to take into account what political opponents such as the Islamic State are capable of doing and how they think." — Rudolf van Hüllen, political scientist.
German political leaders and national security officials knew that Islamic State jihadists were entering Europe disguised as migrants but repeatedly downplayed the threat, apparently to avoid fueling anti-immigration sentiments, according to an exposé by German public television.
German officials knew as early as March 2015 — some six months before Chancellor Angela Merkel opened German borders to more than a million migrants from the Muslim world — that jihadists were posing as refugees, according to the Munich Report (Report München), an investigative journalism program broadcast by ARD public television on January 17.
More than 400 migrants who entered Germany as asylum seekers in 2015 and 2016 are now being investigated for links to Islamic terrorism, according to the Federal Criminal Police (Bundeskriminalamt, BKA).
The revelations come amid criticism of U.S. President Donald J. Trump's plans to suspend immigration from select countries until mechanisms are in place to properly vet migrants entering the United States. The German experience with jihadists posing as migrants serves as a case study on errors for other countries to avoid.
Based on leaked documents and interviews with informants, the Munich Report revealed that German authorities knew in early 2015 that Walid Salihi, an 18-year-old Syrian who applied for asylum in Germany in 2014, was recruiting for the Islamic State at his asylum shelter in Recklinghausen, but they did nothing. Some six months later, a search of Salihi's accommodation produced a shotgun. Salihi was not deported.
It later emerged that between 2011 and 2015, Salihi had used seven aliases to apply for asylum not only in Germany, but also in Austria, Italy, Romania, Sweden and Switzerland. He had also been charged in several countries with a laundry list of crimes, including physical assault, robbery and weapons offenses.
In February 2014, for example, Salihi was arrested for sexually assaulting women at a discotheque in Cologne. That same month, he physically assaulted a homeless man, attacked a random passerby and attempted to strangle a fellow resident at his asylum shelter. Police later traced his cellphone to downtown Cologne on December 31, 2015, when hundreds of German women were sexually assaulted by mobs of Muslim migrants.
On January 7, 2016, Salihi stormed a police station in the 18th district of Paris while shouting "Allahu Akbar." He was carrying a butcher knife, an Islamic State flag and was wearing what appeared to be an explosive belt. Police opened fire and shot him dead.
A former roommate described Salihi: "He was very aggressive, especially when it came to religion. To him, all unbelievers were worthless and had to die."
Salihi was not an isolated case. According to the Munich Report, in early 2015 American intelligence agencies warned German authorities that Islamic State jihadists posing as migrants were making their way through southern Europe with the aim of reaching Germany.
The warnings, however, were ignored, and in the summer of 2015, German authorities allowed hundreds of thousands of migrants, many lacking documentation, to enter Germany without a security check.
At the time, leading German security experts insisted that the Islamic State would not send jihadists to Europe. In October 2015, for example, Holger Münch, President of the Federal Criminal Police (Bundeskriminalamt, BKA), said: "We do not have a single case yet in which it has been confirmed that members of a terrorist group from Syria or Iraq have come here to Germany specifically to commit attacks."
Münch also said: "If you look at the risks you face by coming to Germany via the Mediterranean Sea, I think there are simpler ways to get here if you plan to do so, and you do not need a stream of refugees."
Gerhard Schindler, President of the Federal Intelligence Service (Bundesnachrichtendienst) said: "It is unlikely that terrorists will use the dangerous boat route across the Mediterranean to get to Europe."
German political scientist Peter Neumann, who is Director of the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence at King's College in London, said:
"There is not a single shred of evidence, proven evidence, that an Islamic State sympathizer has been smuggled to Europe. There is even less evidence that this has been an active strategy of the Islamic State. It is important that politicians do not express their own opinions and strengthen the public's fears."
Neumann also said:
"In recent weeks there have been a series of Islamic State videos in which it was quite clearly stated that supporters of the Islamic State should remain in the Islamic State and that they should not try to emigrate, and that this active infiltration strategy, about which is sometimes reported, is non-existent."
Less than a month later, on November 13, 2015, Islamic State jihadists, the majority of whom entered Europe by posing as migrants, carried out the coordinated Paris attacks in which 137 people died and nearly 400 were injured.
On July 19, 2016, a 17-year-old Afghan asylum seeker seriously injured five people on a train in Germany, while shouting "Allahu Akbar." He is shown at left in an Islamic State video saying, "In the name of Allah, I am a soldier of the Caliphate and am launching a martyrdom operation in Germany... I will slaughter you in your own homes and in the streets." Right: The attacker's body is removed from the place where police shot him, after he charged at them with the axe.
In 2016, the true scale of the German problem of jihadists posing as migrants began to come into focus:
February 4. German police arrested four members of a cell allegedly planning jihadist attacks in Berlin. The ringleader — a 35-year-old Algerian who was staying at a refugee shelter in Attendorn with his wife and two children — posed as an asylum seeker from Syria. He had reportedly received military training from the Islamic State.
February 5. Hans-Georg Maassen, the head of Germany's BfV domestic intelligence agency, revealed that more than 100 Islamic State fighters may be living in Germany as refugees, some of whom are known to have entered the country with fake or stolen passports.
February 8. German police arrested an alleged Islamic State commander, living at a refugee shelter in Sankt Johann. The 32-year-old jihadist, posing as a Syrian asylum seeker, entered Germany in the fall of 2015.
February 29. German authorities admitted they lost track of some 130,000 migrants who entered the country in 2015. The revelation raised concerns that unaccounted migrants could include jihadists who entered the country posing as refugees.
June 2. German police arrested three suspected Islamic State members from Syria on suspicion of preparing an attack in Düsseldorf.
June 3. The head of the German police union, Rainer Wendt, said that budget cuts in the public sector made it impossible to vet all of the migrants coming into Germany. He was responding to demands that all migrants undergo immediate security checks.
July 19. A 17-year-old Afghan asylum seeker brandishing an axe and shouting "Allahu Akbar" seriously injured five people on a train in Würzburg. The assailant was shot dead by police after he charged at them with the axe. The teenager had been placed with a foster family just two weeks before the attack as a reward for being "well integrated."
July 24. Mohammed Daleel, a 27-year-old migrant from Syria whose asylum application was rejected, injured 15 people when he blew himself up at a concert in Ansbach. The suicide bombing was the first in Germany attributed to the Islamic State.
July 25. The Federal Criminal Police revealed that more than 400 migrants who entered Germany as asylum seekers in 2015 and 2016 were being investigated for links to the Islamic State.
September 13. German police arrested three Syrian jihadists in Schleswig-Holstein and Lower Saxony. Prosecutors said the three came to Germany in November 2015 posing as migrants and with the intention of "carrying out a previously determined order from Islamic State or to await further instructions."
September 17. Bavarian Interior Minister Joachim Herrmann accused the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) of failing to root out potentially tens of thousands of fake passports. Many migrants who entered Europe as Syrians are, in fact, from another country of origin. Almost 40% of all Moroccans who entered Greece falsely represented themselves as Syrians, according to one study.
October 10. The BAMF knowingly allowed more than 2,000 asylum seekers with fake passports to enter Germany.
October 27. Public prosecutors charged Shaas Al-M, a 19-year-old Syrian jihadist who arrived in Germany posing as a refugee, with plotting to bomb popular tourist sites in Berlin, including the Brandenburg Gate and the Reichstag, for the Islamic State.
December 19. At least 12 people were killed and dozens injured after a truck rammed into a Christmas market in Berlin. The main suspect in the attack was Anis Amri, a 23-year-old migrant from Tunisia who arrived in Germany in July 2015 and applied for asylum in April 2016. Although Amri's application for asylum was rejected in June 2016, he was not deported because he did not have a valid passport.
On January 5, 2017, it emerged that Amri used at least 14 different identities, which he used to obtain social welfare benefits under different names in different municipalities.
German political scientist Rudolf van Hüllen concluded:
"We have probably forgotten to take into account what political opponents such as the Islamic State are capable of doing and how they think. We have not tried to understand their mentality, and therefore we have overlooked the fact that for the Islamic State it was an obvious option to use the safe refugee routes. This is a quite logical matter."
**Soeren Kern is a Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute. He is also Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group. Follow him on Facebook and on Twitter.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.