LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

January 30/17

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins17/english.january30.17.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
One sows and another reaps. I sent you to reap that for which you did not labour. Others have laboured, and you have entered into their labour
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 04/31-38/:"Meanwhile the disciples were urging Jesus, ‘Rabbi, eat something.’But he said to them, ‘I have food to eat that you do not know about.’So the disciples said to one another, ‘Surely no one has brought him something to eat?’Jesus said to them, ‘My food is to do the will of him who sent me and to complete his work. Do you not say, "Four months more, then comes the harvest"? But I tell you, look around you, and see how the fields are ripe for harvesting. The reaper is already receiving wages and is gathering fruit for eternal life, so that sower and reaper may rejoice together. For here the saying holds true, "One sows and another reaps." I sent you to reap that for which you did not labour. Others have laboured, and you have entered into their labour.’

But sin, seizing an opportunity in the commandment, produced in me all kinds of covetousness. Apart from the law sin lies dead
Letter to the Romans 07/07-13/:"What then should we say? That the law is sin? By no means! Yet, if it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin. I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, ‘You shall not covet.’ But sin, seizing an opportunity in the commandment, produced in me all kinds of covetousness. Apart from the law sin lies dead. I was once alive apart from the law, but when the commandment came, sin revived and I died, and the very commandment that promised life proved to be death to me. For sin, seizing an opportunity in the commandment, deceived me and through it killed me. So the law is holy, and the commandment is holy and just and good. Did what is good, then, bring death to me? By no means! It was sin, working death in me through what is good, in order that sin might be shown to be sin, and through the commandment might become sinful beyond measure.

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 29-30/17
That ’60s Show: Lebanon struggles to adopt an election law/Makram Rabah/The Arab Weekly/January 29/17
Batroun, Lebanon’s ancient coastal city waiting to be unearthed/Khalil Jahshan/The Arab Weekly/January 29/17
Moscow’s message is clear: Russia is in Syria for the long haul/Khairallah Khairallah/The Arab Weekly/January 29/17
The man in charge of Lebanese women’s affairs speaks out/ Samar Kadi/The Arab Weekly/January 29/17
A Post-National Framework for Peace and Stability in the Middle East/ Sam Farah /For Syria Comment /29January 2017
Islam Strengthening in Europe with the Blessing of the Church"/ Giulio Meotti/Gatestone Institute/January 29/17
Turkey: Erdogan's Grab for Absolute Power/Burak Bekdil/Gatestone Institute/January 29/17
Austria: Does the Church Really Care about Terrorism/ Judith Bergman/Gatestone Institute/January 29/17
Counting down to Doomsday with Donald Trump/Maria Dubovikova/Al Arabiya/January 29/17
Oman’s participation in the Islamic coalition: What are the benefits/Dr. Ibrahim Al-Othaimin/Al Arabiya/January 29/17
Entertainment in Saudi Arabia and the meaning of city living/Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/January 29/17
The first seven lean days of Donald Trump/Hisham Melhem/Al Arabiya/January 29/17
Israel, Egypt emerging as Trump’s top allies in the Middle East/Thomas Seibert/The Arab Weekly/January 29/17
Trump administration debates designating Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group/Reuters/January 29/17

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on January 29-30/17
Aoun tells LCI: No one shall be stronger than state
Aoun Adamant to Use 'Constitutional Powers' to Block 1960 Law, Extension
Aoun: No One Should be Stronger than State and I'm Not Thinking of a 2nd Term
Bassil: Winning Presidency Doesn't Mean Giving Up Partnership in Parliament, Govt.
Geagea: Hybrid Law Achieves Correct Representation for All Political Forces
Syrians Denied Entry at Philadelphia Airport, Sent Back to Lebanon
Palestinian Security Official Hurt in Sidon Assassination Attempt
MP Aoun Says Electoral Law Discussions Have Entered 'Final Stage'
Lebanese Car Dealers in Benin Hit by Nigeria Import Ban
Army raids refugee camps in Zgharta, arrests 15 persons for illegal entry into Lebanon
Sleiman to Officials: Mixed electoral law unconstitutional, open to challenge
Kanaan: Government delayed budget discussion but time still available, financing salary series can be through reducing waste expenditure
Anonymous persons set fire to a vehicle along Akkar Highway
In Lebanon Camps, Syria Refugees Slam Trump Bar
Beirut Airport puts into effect travel ban set by US Administration
Hariri returns to Beirut
Hasbani: I do not think Lebanon is a main target of terrorism, but there are cases to be vigilant and deterrent against
Kassem: Prolonging discussion of electoral law to preserve certain leaderships is illogical
Palestinian official survives assassination attempt in Sidon
Syrian family returns to Beirut following Trump’s decision
That ’60s Show: Lebanon struggles to adopt an election law
Batroun, Lebanon’s ancient coastal city waiting to be unearthed
Moscow’s message is clear: Russia is in Syria for the long haul
The man in charge of Lebanese women’s affairs speaks out

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on January 28-29/17
It’s not a Muslim ban... it’s working out very nicely’
Federal judge bars deportations under Trump ban
Netanyahu backs US embassy move to Jerusalem though signals no urgency
Amid refugee ban, Trump recruits Saudis, Emiratis to support Syria safe zones
‘Welcome to Canada,’ Trudeau tells refugees
Syrian regime ‘retakes control’ of Wadi Barada
US raid in Yemen kills 57 people, including militants
Israeli troops kill Palestinian in West Bank
Iran Regime Can't Be Trusted
Iran Regime's Judiciary Has Been Profiting From Bank Deposits
The Coup De Grace on Iran's Domestic Productions by Rouhani's Government
Rouhani's Adviser Warned: If Rouhani's Government Fall, Its Rivals Will Fall Too
Iran: The Capital City Is Only Ten Percent Prepared for Possible Earthquake
Arab Countries Should Defy Iran Regime and Its Interference
Iraq Shi'ite paramilitary calls for ban on U.S. nationals
Philippines: Airstrikes killed 15 IS group-linked militants
Giuliani says Trump asked him how to legally enact ‘Muslim ban’


Links From Jihad Watch Site for
on January 29-30/17
Trump: “This is not about religion — this is about terror and keeping our country safe”
Conway explains that immigration ban targets not Muslims, but countries with history of harboring terrorists
Video: Robert Spencer on Hamas-linked CAIR’s Hussam Ayloush Longing for Infidel Deaths
Canada’s Trudeau on Trump’s immigration ban: “Diversity is our strength #WelcomeToCanada
Netanyahu: “President Trump is right. I built a wall along Israel’s southern border….Great idea.”
Priebus says more countries could be added to the immigration ban
Merkel tells Trump that global fight against terrorism no excuse for banning Muslim migrants
France and Germany, intent on national suicide, “concerned” over Trump immigration policy
DHS “will continue to enforce all of President Trump’s Executive Orders” on immigration
Trump bans Canadian/British dual citizens from 7 Muslim countries from U.S.
The Hill: Trump’s immigration ban is “the perfect ISIS recruiting tool”
Fort Lauderdale airport shooter indictment doesn’t mention that he did it for the Islamic State
Federal judge blocks Trump immigration order for those detained at airports
Trump orders “a comprehensive strategy and plans for the defeat of ISIS”
Cancel your vacation plans: Iran bans US citizens, says US ban is “obvious insult to the Islamic world”

Links From Christian Today Site for on January 29-30/17
Pakistan Acquits 112 In Case Of Torching Christian Homes
Chaos And Anger As Trump Ban For Muslim Countries Begins
The Pope And The Knights Of Malta: High Profile Catholic Feud Explained
Myanmar: Two Baptist Pastors Reportedly Charged With 'Unlawful Association'
Iraqi MPs Says Trump Muslim Ban Harms The Fight Against ISIS
Trump Refugee Order Dashes Hopes Of Iraqis Who Helped The U.S.
President Trump: What Will It Take For Christians To Disown Him?

Latest Lebanese Related News published on January 29-30/17
Aoun tells LCI: No one shall be stronger than state
Sun 29 Jan 2017/NNA - President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, said that Lebanon was standing in front of its last opportunity to build a strong state through institutions that work in favor of the country and its citizens, expressing his refusal for anyone to be stronger than the state, in order not to enter into chaos. President Aoun’s fresh words came on Sunday during a Television interview with LCI, the French TV news channel, at Baabda Palace, in his first TV appearance to France and the Francophone world. “We should have a strong, ready and vigilant security force to defend the national sovereignty,” General Aoun underscored, adding that the army should be strengthened. “Lebanon cannot receive displaced Syrians for an indefinite period in its territories, it hosted them for humanitarian reasons, and they should return to their country,” Aoun pointed out. In a question regarding most recent developments in Syria, he said that Aleppo’s battle changed the balance of power in favor of the Syrian government, “constituting a new start for the dialogue and negotiation path in order to reach a political solution, because there is no winner and vanquished in this kind of war.”He said that President Assad will stay, and those who called for his departure ignore Syria, noting that the situation in Syria would have become like Lybia had it not been for Assad. As for relations with Saudi Arabia and Qatar, notably his visit to both countries, President Aoun indicated that said states can help today in supporting the building of the state in Lebanon. “We are working on returning relations to their previous status, and we should work with confidence not with conflict.”“The future Lebanon will be the example followed by the country, in spite of existing extremism nowadays.”“Unilateral parties, one religion and ethnicity unilateral systems will no longer exist, and the world of pluralism is the one that will triumph.”At the personal level, the Lebanese President was asked if politics were for him "to put ourselves at the service of others," and he went on saying “the service of the others, the state, the nation the people, and the beautiful environment.”“I am not considering a second mandate, I want to have a good succession,” he pointed out. “With age the person gains more experience, becomes wiser and works to avoid major mistakes,” President Michel Aoun concluded.

Aoun Adamant to Use 'Constitutional Powers' to Block 1960 Law, Extension
Naharnet/January 29/17/President Michel Aoun is still adamant to use his “constitutional powers” to block any attempt to return to the 1960 electoral law or to extend the parliament's term, a media report said on Sunday. “President Aoun's stance on rejecting the 1960 law and extension for the incumbent parliament is conclusive and irreversible, because it is unacceptable to keep the current law, and thus the political forces are asked to reach consensus over a new law,” ministerial sources close to Aoun told al-Joumhouria newspaper. The sources stressed that Aoun “is committed to the implementation of his oath of office and he will not back down from it.”“He will use his constitutional powers to block holding the parliamentary elections under the 1960 law and to prevent the extension of parliament's term,” the sources warned. Aoun had openly announced during a cabinet session on Wednesday that he prefers parliamentary “vacuum” over extension. The president has insisted on an electoral law containing proportional representation, which he believes is a system that ensures balance and correct representation for all parties.

Aoun: No One Should be Stronger than State and I'm Not Thinking of a 2nd Term
Naharnet/January 29/17/President Michel Aoun stressed Sunday that “no one should be stronger than the State” in Lebanon as he ruled out running for a second presidential term.“Lebanon is facing the last chance to build a strong State in it through creating institutions that work for the welfare of the country and its citizens,” Aoun said in an interview with French news channel LCI. “No one should be stronger than the State, because that would lead us into chaos,” Aoun warned. Asked whether he is considering a second presidential term, Aoun said: “I'm not thinking of a second term and I prefer to have a good successor.”

Bassil: Winning Presidency Doesn't Mean Giving Up Partnership in Parliament, Govt.

Naharnet/January 29/17/Free Patriotic Movement chief Jebran Bassil announced Sunday that the election of FPM founder Michel Aoun as Lebanon's president will not push the movement to give up “full partnership” in the parliament and government. “Mistaken are those who thought that winning the presidency would mean giving up full partnership in the electoral law,” Bassil said at the Mar Mikhail Church in Shiyyah, where the FPM and Hizbullah marked the 11th anniversary of their memorandum of understanding in the presence of Loyalty to Resistance bloc MP Ali Ammar. “Mistaken are those who believe that winning the presidency would push us to give up partnership in the parliament and government,” Bassil added. “The Mar Mikhail understanding brought down the walls of civil war, the Maarab agreement removed the lines of confrontation inside neighborhoods and homes, and our agreement with al-Mustaqbal Movement demolishes the walls of marginalization for the sake of partnership,” the FPM chief went on to say. Ammar for his part said Hizbullah “rejects extension and the 1960 law,” calling for “a modern electoral law that does not eliminate anyone and takes everyone's concerns into consideration.”

Geagea: Hybrid Law Achieves Correct Representation for All Political Forces
Naharnet/January 29/17/Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea has announced that the political parties have almost reached an agreement over a new electoral law, stressing that a hybrid electoral law that mixes the proportional representation and winner-takes-all systems would ensure “correct representation” for everyone. “We're on the verge of realizing the awaited dream, which is the approval of a new electoral law,” Geagea told the Central News Agency, hailing what he called the “mighty efforts that were exerted by the LF and the other political forces.”“The hybrid law that we proposed together with al-Mustaqbal Movement and the Progressive Socialist Party has proved to be the appropriate law, in light of the support it enjoyed from most parties and the consensus that made it the starting point in the electoral consultations,” Geagea added.“I'm very happy because we are on the brink of agreeing of an amended version of the hybrid law. “What the Lebanese have been looking for since many years is about to become a reality through the drafting of a new law that ensures correct representation and involves reforms that would make the anticipated electoral juncture more transparent and the subject of the region and the world's attention,” the LF leader went on to say. Asked about cries that the latest law formula has been tailored to fit the sizes and interests of the political forces and that it is “a copy of the 1960 law that incorporates deformed proportional representation,” Geagea dismissed the claims, emphasizing that the political parties that drafted the latest suggestion had shown “great responsiveness and openness to the political formulas that improve representation.”“The hybrid format ensures correct representation for all parties and those who believe that they have no place in it will not find their place under any other format,” the LF leader went on to say. Accordingly, Geagea called on those who reject the hybrid law to propose a feasible alternative. As for President Michel Aoun's remarks that he prefers parliamentary “vacuum” over another extension of the parliament's term, which indicate that he might refrain from signing certain decrees, Geagea noted that “what President Aoun is doing is part of his powers.” Had he not issued his warning, “we would not have been on the brink of producing a new electoral law,” he explained. Geagea also pointed out that three factors have contributed to pushing the solution forward: “the clarity of President Michel Aoun's stance and his firmness; the alliance between the LF and the Free Patriotic Movement and their coordination with the president in this regard; and al-Mustaqbal Movement's positive stance.”

Syrians Denied Entry at Philadelphia Airport, Sent Back to Lebanon
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 29/17/Six Syrians including Christians were turned away from Philadelphia International Airport in the United States and sent back to Lebanon, an official at Beirut airport told AFP on Sunday. U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Friday prohibiting entry to the United States to all nationals of seven Muslim-majority states -- Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. The ban also prohibits entry to all refugees, regardless of origin, for 120 days and indefinitely for refugees from Syria, which has been ravaged by a deadly war since 2011. "Six people, including Syrian Christians, were turned back at Philadelphia airport on Saturday and were back in Beirut on Sunday," the source in Lebanon said, speaking on condition of anonymity. They then headed back to Syria. The Lebanese official said three children were among those turned away at Philadelphia. Their journey had taken them via Doha in the absence of direct flights between Beirut and the United States since the 1980s, when Lebanon was in the middle of a civil war. The U.S. ban stipulates that at the end of the 120-day period, however, priority for entry to the U.S. will be given to refugees persecuted for their religion, an implicit reference to Christians in Syria and Iraq.

Palestinian Security Official Hurt in Sidon Assassination Attempt
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 29/17/A senior Palestinian security official on Sunday survived an assassination attempt in the southern city of Sidon. “Brig. Gen. Ismail Sharrouf, a security official at Palestine's embassy, survived an assassination attempt as he was passing in his car near the building of the central bank in Sidon,” state-run National News Agency reported. “Sharrouf's car came under a hail of bullets, one of which penetrated the glass and left him lightly injured,” NNA said. “He was rushed to a hospital in Sidon and the Palestinian embassy has requested that he be transferred to Beirut under Lebanese security protection,” the agency added. Al-Jadeed television said the official was making a visit near the city's central bank branch.A Palestinian source told LBCI TV that Sharrouf is “the head of intelligence at Palestine's embassy.”

MP Aoun Says Electoral Law Discussions Have Entered 'Final Stage'
Naharnet/January 29/17/MP Alain Aoun of the Change and Reform bloc has announced that the electoral system that the parties are mulling is based on a Free Patriotic Movement proposal, noting that 64 MPs would likely be elected under the proportional representation system and the other 64 according to the winner-takes-all system. In remarks to Asharq al-Awsat newspaper, Aoun said a “technical extension” of the parliament's term is probable, revealing that “discussions have entered the final stage and are focused on the distribution of seats and other details.” The MP accordingly called on political parties to “review their calculations and give up the choices of the 1960 law and term extension.”“The meetings will continue next week after communicating with the other parties who were not represented in the meeting,” Aoun added, referring to four-party meetings that were held earlier this week between representatives of Hizbullah, AMAL Movement, al-Mustaqbal Movement and the FPM.
The parties had reported major progress after their last meeting on Friday.

Lebanese Car Dealers in Benin Hit by Nigeria Import Ban
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 29/17/Surveying his sprawling car dealership on the fringes of Benin's commercial hub Cotonou, Kassem Hijazi alternates between chainsmoking Marlboro cigarettes and puffing on a hookah. He and his colleagues don't have much else to do. There hasn't been a single customer since December, when neighboring Nigeria banned car imports by land as part of a wave of protectionist policies that are strangling Benin's economy. "We spend our days smoking, it's our life now," Hijazi sighs, sitting in a gazebo beside his stock of thousands of cars steadily accumulating the dry winter dust. This afternoon, Hijazi -- who, like the vast majority of car dealers in Benin, is Lebanese -- called in his Beninese accountant to help close up shop. Debts are accumulating and the stress is becoming too much. "I lost in one year what I have earned in 16," Ali Assi, another car dealer, told AFP. Of the 2,500 Lebanese dealers in Cotonou, 1,600 have packed up and left in the last six months, shutting down businesses that employed dozens of drivers, cleaners and security staff. "Unemployed people used to come here to find work," said Vincent Gouton, who represents a group of car dealership managers in Cotonou. The Benin car market began its free fall last year when neighboring Nigeria entered its first recession since 1994.
Nigeria, an economic behemoth of 190 million people, gobbles up "99 percent of car exports" in Benin, according to Gouton. Benin, a tiny country with scarce natural resources, relies on its port business to survive. From the port city of Cotonou, imported cars, fabrics, and food from all over the world get distributed across west Africa. But since the Nigerian economy crashed following the collapse in global oil prices, Benin has been suffering knock-on effects. Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari's protectionist policies -- his government has banned a slew of items including cars imported by land -- has only aggravated the situation.
'Encourage smuggling'
"This decision will encourage smuggling, it's back to square one," Gouton said. Several agreements were signed in the past between Benin and Nigeria to facilitate legal trade. But Nigeria accuses Beninese customs of failing to monitor the exported goods and collect taxes. Buhari hopes that closing land borders will revitalize Nigerian industries and attract business to the port at Lagos, Nigeria's economic capital and largest city. Today over 20 products -- the list has never been officially published -- are banned from being imported overland. "For the past 18 months, we have seen a lot of policies that are not market friendly", said Nigerian economist Nonso Obikili. "The self-sufficiency policy has led the government to create all sorts of hostile environments around import", Obikili said. "The government wants to ban palm oil (imports) but our plantations are not ready to meet local demand, and it takes two years to get oil from trees. It's a mess," Obikili told AFP."And this will encourage illegal trade."
'Killing business'
It isn't just Benin which is hurting. Nigerian car dealer Olabanji Akinola said he had to fire half of his employees last week as a result of the ban. Business used to be brisk at Akinola's car dealership, located on the outskirts of Lagos. Yet now he can't pay any wages. "In Cotonou, they tax 35 percent of the value of an imported car. In Lagos, it's 70 percent", Akinola said. "It's killing the business." "The price of cars will go up, and the smuggling will increase. There are 200 roads through the bush to come to Nigeria, the borders are porous," Akinola said. "This morning, customers begged me on my knees to lower my prices, but I cannot," Akinola said. Ultimately, it may only be the Nigerian government who benefits from the import ban. In 2016, customs seized 307 contraband vehicles, worth nearly 5 billion naira (about 15 million euros). The figure is expected to rise in 2017.

Army raids refugee camps in Zgharta, arrests 15 persons for illegal entry into Lebanon
Sun 29 Jan 2017/NNA - Lebanese Army patrol raided, on Sunday, refugee camps in a number of villages and towns in the district of Zgharta, arresting 15 Syrians for illegal entry into Lebanese territories, NNA correspondent reported.

Sleiman to Officials: Mixed electoral law unconstitutional, open to challenge
Sun 29 Jan 2017/NNA - Former President Michel Sleiman warned, on Sunday, of "the seriousness of adopting any unconstitutional electoral law, such as the mixed law, since it would be challenged by the Constitutional Council.""This would cause disappointment for the Lebanese people after waiting so long for the Parliament to pass a modern law of relativity, which provides proper and fair representation," added Sleiman. In a letter addressed to President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, House Speaker Nabih Berri, and Prime Minister Saad Hariri, as well as various heads of political parties and parliamentary blocs, Sleiman pointed to the "gravity of resorting to unconstitutional options."He attached a copy of the bill prepared by the "Republic Gathering" that adopts total relativity within the province and preferential vote within the judiciary. Sleiman stressed that the "mixed law is unconstitutional, because it does not ensure equality between candidates, and not even between voters themselves."He hoped that "with the beginning of the new presidential era and following the renewal of constitutional life through holding of parliamentary elections, a national defense strategy would be endorsed for Lebanon that would serve to enhance chances for the State."

Kanaan: Government delayed budget discussion but time still available, financing salary series can be through reducing waste expenditure

Sun 29 Jan 2017/NNA - Finance and Budget Parliamentary Committee Head, MP Ibrahim Kanaan, stated that "the cabinet has delayed its discussion and reference of the annual budget to Parliament, yet there is still time for said discussion," adding that "financing of the ranks and salary series can be ensured through reducing waste expenditure."Speaking in an interview to the "Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation" on Sunday, Kanaan indicated that "the draft budget should include the reform recommendations made by the Finance and Budget Committee, following the discussion of the draft budget in the year 2010."He stressed that "any additional taxes are rejected with regards to the salary series," adding that "its financing can be through revenues resulting from the reduction of waste expenditure, application of transparency, and resorting to resources that do not directly affect and burden citizens."

Anonymous persons set fire to a vehicle along Akkar Highway
Sun 29 Jan 2017/NNA - An "Opel Ascona" vehicle was set on fire on Sunday evening by anonymous persons along the international highway to Akkar, nearby the vegetable market junction, following which they fled to an unknown destination, NNA correspondent reported. Civil Defense units arrived immediately at the scene to extinguish the fire while investigations were initiated into the incident.

In Lebanon Camps, Syria Refugees Slam Trump Bar
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 29/17/Shivering in their makeshift homes in camps in eastern Lebanon, Syrian refugees ask what they have done to deserve being barred from the United States. On Friday, US President Donald Trump signed a sweeping new executive order to suspend refugee arrivals and impose tough controls on travellers from seven Muslim countries, including Syria. More than one million Syrians have sought refuge in Lebanon from the devastating conflict in their homeland that has killed more than 310,000 people. Over a third live in makeshift housing in the Bekaa valley near the Syrian border, where temperatures have dropped below freezing in recent days. "What on earth have the Syrian people done to deserve this?" asks Abu Mahmoud al-Ghol, standing in the cold at one informal camp in the Marj area. "And to think it's a democratic country doing it," says the 44-year-old, who fled the Syrian town of Quseir with his six children to seek refuge in Lebanon. "We reject the decision. But what can we do about?" he says, his face appearing tired and drawn above a salt-and-pepper beard. Nearly six years of conflict in Syria have driven more than half the population from their homes, with many fleeing abroad. 'Show some solidarity' -Trump's executive order cuts the number of refugees the United States plans to resettle in fiscal year 2017 -- which is calculated from last October -- from 110,000 to 50,000. The United States has only let in 18,000 Syrian refugees since the war began in 2011, a former US official has said. The United Nations on Saturday urged Trump to continue his country's "long tradition" of welcoming refugees, regardless of race, nationality or religion. At another informal camp in the Bekaa, a Syrian mother-of-four says Trump's order is unjust. "He has no right to take such a decision," says Ibtisam Yusef, 41, her face wrapped in a green scarf. "What's his problem if we enter the United States legally? What have we done to him?" she asks as stands outside her tent in the Bar Elias area. Because Lebanon has not signed the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, it treats Syrians as foreigners, not refugees. Syrian refugees struggle to get by in Lebanon despite aid from international organisations. Those who register for residency must pledge not to work. "He should come and see how we live in the camps," says Yusef, who fled her home in the rebel bastion of Eastern Ghouta outside Damascus. "He and European countries should show us some solidarity."

Beirut Airport puts into effect travel ban set by US Administration
Sun 29 Jan 2017/NNA - Airlines operating at Beirut Rafik Hariri International Airport began executing on Sunday the travel ban set by the US Administration on seven countries, forbidding them from entering the US. All US-bound flights were under strict scrutiny to ban holders of passports from the seven countries from boarding flights. The countries are Somalia, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Iran, Libya and Sudan.

Hariri returns to Beirut
Sun 29 Jan 2017/NNA - Prime Minister, Saad Hariri, returned to Beirut on Sunday evening, following a 3-day personal visit to the French capital, Paris.

Hasbani: I do not think Lebanon is a main target of terrorism, but there are cases to be vigilant and deterrent against
Sun 29 Jan 2017 /NNA - Deputy Prime Minister, Public Health Minister Ghassan Hasbani, ruled out, on Sunday, any belief that Lebanon could be a main target of terrorism, adding however, that "there are cases which entail our vigilance and deterrence."Hasbani stressed on "the strength of security in Lebanon," adding that "security apparatuses are cautious and alert despite the risks posed to the region," while highlighting "the need to put an end to terrorism."Speaking in an interview to "Al-Arabia Al-Hadath" Channel, Hasbani asserted that "security work will continue in a systematic manner to prevent any terrorist attacks."Referring to the electoral law issue, Hasbani noted that "we have come a long way in terms of reaching a new electoral law that takes into account proper and equal representation."He stressed that the main objective is to come up with a law that ensures fair representation. "Priority today is to resolve outstanding issues and reach the parliamentary elections the soonest possible, since the goal is to put an end to tension prevailing at the political and social level in the country," Hasbani underscored.

Kassem: Prolonging discussion of electoral law to preserve certain leaderships is illogical

Sun 29 Jan 2017/NNA - Hezbollah Deputy Secretary General, Sheikh Naim Kassem, considered that "the attempt to prolong discussions of the parliamentary elections law in order to preserve certain leaderships in the country is an illogical matter," proposing instead "to return to the relativity law based on 13 districts.""We have repeatedly called for an impartial electoral law based two major pillars, namely ensuring wide representation and unifying standards between regions and communities for fairness and equity purposes," Kassem explained. Speaking at a memorial ceremony held in the area of Jiyye on Sunday, Kassem stressed on his Party's priority in fighting the Israeli enemy, noting that "our combating of Takfiris is a branch of our fight against Israel, since they represent Israeli tools."He stressed that "were it not for the Resistance's fighting against Takfiris in Syria and defending the eastern borders in the face of such terrorists, Lebanon would have been in complete disarray, and bombings would have included all regions and communities without exception, and we would have been in a complex situation of political, economic, social and security suffering.""Our confrontation of Takfiris in Syria has safeguarded Lebanon, our people and our nation," Kassem underscored.

Palestinian official survives assassination attempt in Sidon
Sun 29 Jan 2017/ NNA - The official, Ismail Sharrouf, at the Embassy of Palestine survived an assassination attempt while he was in his car near the Central Bank in Sidon, National News Agency reported on Sunday.A hail of bullets were fired on Sharrouf's car and he got slightly injured. He was transferred to one of Beirut hospitals under a Lebanese security guard, the same reporter concluded.

Syrian family returns to Beirut following Trump’s decision
Sun 29 Jan 2017/NNA - A Syrian family comprised of 6 members returned to Beirut, after it was barred from travelling from Doha Airport in Qatar, in implementation of US President Donald Trump’s decision to prevent certain nationals from entering the United States, NNA correspondent at Rafik Hariri International Airport reported on Sunday. It is to note that President Trump's decision includes nationals of seven countries, in particular Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Iran, Libya, Somalia and Sudan.

That ’60s Show: Lebanon struggles to adopt an election law

Makram Rabah/The Arab Weekly/January 29/17
Beirut - For many, the 1960s brought about radical sociopoliti­cal change, culminating in May 1968 with what be­came commonly known as the youth revolt in Europe and beyond. In Lebanon, however, the 1960s are at the centre of a radical de­bate over the adoption of a new electoral law to be implemented in parliamentary elections scheduled for May. The law to elect the 128 members of parliament adopts a majoritarian system, which would run elections according to 26 dis­tricts, each of which would choose its representatives based on sectar­ian affiliation.In essence, this majoritarian sec­tarian system of voting, with dif­ferent variants, has been practised since 1929, the first time the Leba­nese went to the polls. While the country’s political elite have always promised a departure from this somewhat backward practice, no one has taken serious steps to bring about a more modern inclusive sys­tem of voting, one that would break the monopoly of the traditional sec­tarian leadership.
Many of the objections to this 1960 law, as it is commonly known, were championed by Christian par­ties that equated their decline from power to the adoption of the laws, especially after the end of the civil war in 1990 and the Syrian tutelage in 2005, which was clearly partial towards their Muslim compatriots. Be that as it may, much of the pro­posed alternatives to these defunct laws brought about other challeng­es that were never fully acceptable to Lebanese Muslims, who achieved parity with the adoption of the 1989 Taif agreement. It curtailed the Maronite president’s previously un­checked powers.
The recent election of Michel Aoun as president in Lebanon promises to reinstate the so-called rights of the Christians by adopting an ostensibly modern hybrid pro­portional electoral law. While many of his allies, chiefly among them the Lebanese Forces and Hezbollah, have publicly supported this hybrid law, Walid Jumblatt, the leader of the Progressive Socialist Party, has come out against it. He views it as an invention far removed from the foundations set forth by the Taif agreement but more obviously dis­enfranchising to the Druze commu­nity he heads. He has been demand­ing what he thought was fair within a Lebanese political structure that already brands people according to their predisposed sectarian belong­ing.
The antagonistic manner in which many Lebanese factions are trying to push through these chang­es reveals a different reality. Recent statements by Interior Minister Nouhad Machnouk, who is tasked with supervising the election pro­cess, exposed the pretence of many of the supposed champions of the hybrid law. For more than six years, it was ignored by all the Lebanese political classes, which refused on various occasions to discuss it in parliament.
Instead of devising ways to ger­rymander and twist legitimate elec­toral laws to serve personal narrow agendas, the Lebanese political par­ties are better off practising what they preach by adopting key re­forms that are required for any fair election, regardless of its model.
Allowing competent women to hold office does not require a sanc­tioned female quota nor a law; adopting a single ballot list and stopping vote rigging merely re­quire a conscious decision from the so-called champions of reform. Adopting a modern law, unlike the 1960 one, might be a solution to one of Lebanon’s many problems but the country at the end of the day is essentially a sectarian apartheid state that is still stuck in the 19th century, a reality no election law can hide.
**Makram Rabah is a doctoral candidate at Georgetown University’s history department. He is the author of A Campus at War: Student Politics at the American University of Beirut, 1967-1975.

Batroun, Lebanon’s ancient coastal city waiting to be unearthed
Khalil Jahshan/The Arab Weekly/January 29/17
Batroun - It has Phoenician ruins, Roman artefacts, a medieval castle, Byzantine-style churches and arcaded Ottoman souks; how­ever, its heritage is still wait­ing to be uncovered. The origins of Batroun, one of Lebanon’s ancient coastal cities, is still not known but is believed to date to before the time of the Phoenicians who ruled much of the eastern Mediterranean from 1,500BC to 300BC. “There is a controversy over Ba­troun’s origins. Some say it is Phoe­nician; others say it is Roman, and others say it dates from the time of the Crusaders. The truth is we don’t know. There is a civilisation un­derneath the ground that we have not discovered yet,” said Georges Mubarak, an excavator and former Greenpeace activist from Batroun.
“Under the old castle, there are vestiges and structures that I per­sonally visited. If we don’t uncover this heritage, we cannot say that Batroun has a civilisation and, with­out civilisation, the city has no in­ternational value,” Mubarak added, noting that of all ancient cities on the Lebanese shores, Batroun is not listed by the UN cultural agency, UNESCO.
Mubarak said he has tried for many years to engage Lebanon’s Directorate of Antiquities and the Ministry of Culture to excavate be­neath the seafront medieval castle, which was heavily damaged by an earthquake. A lack of funds has pre­vented archaeological excavation.
“This entire region is an archaeo­logical area,” Mubarak said. “We are sitting on huge treasures. You name it: Potteries, jade artefacts, glass… There is a lot. I, myself, retrieved several pieces.”
Nonetheless, Batroun, 50km north of Beirut, boasts enough an­cient vestiges and edifices — in ad­dition to tree-shaded beach resorts, seafood restaurants and bustling nightlife — to woo large numbers of local and foreign visitors, especially during summer.
“With its many archaeological and historical sites, its old souks and churches, Batroun is a tourist desti­nation par excellence,” said Batroun Mayor Marcellino al-Hark. “The city was the biggest trade centre on the Lebanese coastline in the early 19th century. Today, most investments are centred on tourism-oriented projects.”
Batroun’s beaches are popular for their crystal-clear waters. “It has been tested. It is the only stretch of coast in Lebanon that has zero pol­lution because we have always had a proper infrastructure for sewers. Our efforts are geared towards pro­viding good services. We are not an industrial area or an agricultural city. Most investments are in the tourism sector,” Hark said.
The city of 20,000 inhabitants has undergone some face-lifting in the past decade. A large part of the old vaulted souks has been renovated and floored, red-tiled old houses — some turned into motels — and restaurants restored and churches revamped. Restoration work is on­going at the site of the Crusaders’ castle.
“We have strict laws on how to deal with old structures,” Hark said. “You cannot do any restoration or touch any old house without a spe­cial permit and we have a list of specifications that one has to follow. This is our wealth; we do not want to waste it. It is for us and for our children.”
The old part of Batroun was built from sandstone chipped out of the “Phoenician wall”, which was sculpted by its inhabitants more than 2,000 years ago to protect them from storms and invaders. People quarried stone to build temples, houses and churches. Only 225 me­tres remain from the original wall, which was more than 1km long, about 5 metres tall and 1 metre wide.
Typical to any coastal city, the sea has traditionally contributed to Ba­troun’s wealth. Since ancient times, merchandise was imported and exported through its port. The sea produced fish, salt and high-quality sponge and its warehouses store im­ported food items.
Batroun and its surroundings prospered from agriculture, includ­ing mulberry trees — whose leaves provided the staple food of silk­worms — olive trees, vines, almond trees, wheat and barley. However, none of these activities has sur­vived.
“We had the best quality of sponge in Batroun’s sea. I used to dive 15 to 30 metres to fish for sponge when I was a boy. Sponge was exported to the United States for use in medical industries. Un­fortunately, the sponge animals are extinct now because of random fishing, pollution and dynamite use in fishing (during the 1975-90 civil war),” noted Mubarak, who said he was keen on reviving Phoenician heritage by building bronze replicas of Phoenician ships that departed from Batroun and other cities on the Lebanese coast to cross the Mediter­ranean for trade.
With its many old churches, tradi­tional houses and ancient relics, in addition to services and entertain­ment facilities, Batroun is claiming a place on Lebanon’s tourist map, though it is not listed as a UNESCO heritage like its renowned neigh­bour, Byblos.
However, for the veteran exca­vator, what is above the ground is much less than what is buried un­derneath. “What we care for the most is our heritage, our civilisation. We want to know our origin,” Mubarak said.
***Khalil Jahshan is executive director of the Arab Center in Washington.

Moscow’s message is clear: Russia is in Syria for the long haul
Khairallah Khairallah/The Arab Weekly/January 29/17
Russia seems adamant about its continued presence in Syria and can effectively impose its own terms.
While waiting to see what US President Donald Trump will do, Russia seems to be in a hurry. This explains its agreement with the Syrian regime regarding the expansion of a Russian presence in Tartus.
The deal was signed just 48 hours before Trump’s arrival in the White House. Russia was quick to publicise the articles of the agreement, using its official media outlets. The agreement stipulates a renewable lease period of 49 years.
In the end, Moscow’s message is clear: Russia is in Syria for the long haul, its naval base at Tartus is of paramount importance and any deal in Syria must take Russia’s interests into account.
The US Senate has confirmed Trump’s appointee for secretary of Defense, James Mattis. Unlike Trump, Mattis has a clear vision of what needs to be done in the Mid­dle East. A former US Marine Corps general, Mattis knows the Middle East and the Gulf region very well and is fully aware of Iran’s role there. He says that it is possible to deal with the Russian presence in the region without underestimat­ing its negative impact, but the biggest threat comes from Iran’s destabilising policies.
No one really believes Iran’s anti-terrorism rhetoric; certainly not Mattis. He does not want to throw out the P5+1 nuclear deal with Iran. He simply wishes to have Iran respect its borders and limits, behave like a normal state and certainly not use the agreement as cover for unacceptable practices in the region.
Worldwide military bases are useless in the absence of a strong economy. Still, Russian President Vladimir Putin is attached to past practices and is building up Russian presence in the Mediterranean, hence the agreement regarding the base at Tartus.
The deal builds on the 1980 friendship and cooperation accords between Syria and the former Soviet Union. At that time, the Syrian government felt threatened by popular opposition and was engaged in an open confrontation with the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria, a confrontation that culmi­nated in a bloodbath at Hama in February 1982.
Some of the articles of the agree­ment show the extent to which the Syrian regime has surrendered to Russia. It is equalled only by the regime’s surrender to Iran in Da­mascus and its environs, especially along the Syrian-Lebanese border.
The Russian side can send tax-free all sorts of weapons, ammuni­tion and equipment needed for the duties and security of the base and ship personnel and their families. The Syrian customs and border police cannot inspect and control all personnel arriving at Tartus naval base on war vessels. Finally, the new agreement grants full civil and administrative immunity to Russian personnel.
Are Russia’s plans in Syria justi­fied? The answer to this question is complex. The Syrian regime knows that it cannot rely on Russia alone to guarantee its survival. This is why it is maintaining the Iranian card. It has recently signed a series of accords with the Iranians, includ­ing a third licence for mobile phone networks.
Russia seems adamant about its continued presence in Syria and can effectively impose its own terms. What is important now is to make sure that the Trump administration is still interested in the Syrian card regardless of who is holding it.
Among the objectives in the Middle East that seem to interest the new US president is pleasing Israel. Syria is important to Trump’s administration only from an Israeli angle. This would explain the ex­tremely close relationship between Putin and Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. Their coor­dinated efforts will likely go a long way in facilitating the eventual US-Russian deal regarding Syria. In this deal, there will be no room for Syrian President Bashar Assad and his tricks once they have served their purpose.
Turkey seems to have read cor­rectly the situation. Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Shimshek recently declared: “We have to be pragmatic, realistic. The facts on the ground have changed dramati­cally. Turkey can no longer insist on a settlement without Assad. It is not realistic.”
Such talk reveals that Turkey is preparing for the next phase in Syria. It remains to be seen how Iran will react to the forthcoming deal.
*Khairallah Khairallah is a Lebanese writer. The commentary was translated and adapted from the Arabic. It was initially published in middle-east-online.com.

 The man in charge of Lebanese women’s affairs speaks out
 Samar Kadi/The Arab Weekly/January 29/17
 Beirut - The appointment of a man to head Lebanon’s Ministry of Women’s Affairs has been greeted with sarcasm and criticism, but former army colonel Jean Ogasapian said women’s rights were as much a matter for men.
 “Women’s issues are not a concern for women only but are a concern for the whole society. It is important to include men in achieving equal gender rights. Men should get involved in the struggle for equitable gender rights as much as women,” Ogasapian told The Arab Weekly in an interview.
 Ogasapian, from Prime Minister Saad Hariri’s centre-right Future Movement party, is still new to his job. His big office was mostly empty, except for the main desk and a seating area to the side. Boxes and files were stacked in one corner under a photo of Lebanese President Michel Aoun, next to a large national flag.
 Strong interest and greater focus by international organisations, including the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, World Bank and other donors in women’s empowerment are among key reasons for creating the new portfolio.
 “The prime minister also reckoned that there should be a ministry to follow up on women’s affairs because it is a matter in which he is keen on having a positive input,” Ogasapian said.
 He explained that improving women’s status in the Arab world, especially in times of conflicts and refugee crises, is a tool for fighting terrorism.
 “Educating women, improving their conditions and giving them an effective role in society helps in combating poverty and ignorance and consequently in combating extremism that could eventually lead to terrorism,” he said.
 Ogasapian said Lebanon needs a ministry to look after women’s issues for a transitional period, until the patriarchal mentality of the society starts to change.
 “In Lebanon, women’s associations are old and have a long history in the struggle to achieve equal gender rights but we need to accomplish equality not only in the texts but also in the minds.”
 Lebanon generally fares well in terms of human rights protection and women enjoy greater autonomy than in many nearby countries, but they are still woefully under-represented in politics. Notably, there are only four women serving in Lebanon’s 128-member parliament — meaning less than 4% of elected seats go to women, a low figure even in the Middle East. Only one member of the new cabinet is a woman: Inaya Ezzeddine, state minister for Administrative Development Affairs.
 Sexism is entrenched in Lebanese law, although the country is becoming increasingly liberal. For instance, marriage and divorce laws in Lebanon heavily favour men.
 “Today, Lebanese women have big capacities, education and skills and have succeeded in imposing themselves in the private sector and in different professions, including the judiciary, medical, business and even information technology. Their potentials are big. Nonetheless, they are not able to reach leading public and political positions,” Ogasapian noted.
 “The problem is in the culture and in the patriarchal mentality of the society.”
 Hariri’s government is expected to implement an electoral law before parliamentary elections scheduled for May that may include a quota for women.
 “We are aiming for a 30% female quota and hope in any case to have no less than 20% of parliament seats. However, it should be a provisional measure,” Ogasapian said.
 Drawing a comparison between gender equality in Lebanon and Tunisia, which enshrined women’s legal rights as early as the 1950s, Ogasapian said: “In Tunisia, the laws gave women a significant role, whereas in Lebanon and because of the social structure, women have advanced and now play an important role in society, especially at the professional level.”
 Challenges awaiting Ogasapian are big and the list of issues under scrutiny is long. Feminist movements have been pressing for Lebanese women’s right to give their nationality to children with non-Lebanese fathers and for the amendment of Article 522 in the Lebanese Penal Code, which allows rapists to get away with their crime if they marry the woman they raped.
 “We are seeking the complete elimination of Article 522 but women’s nationality right is a complicated issue, many women are against it because it pertains to the country’s demographic structure. Christians consider this subject an existential matter. It will create discrepancies in the confessional balance,” the minister noted.
 Officials argue that such a right would allow Palestinian refugees as well as Syrians, who are mostly Sunni Muslims, to gain Lebanese nationality if they marry Lebanese women, thus upsetting the delicate sectarian balance.
 “We will raise the voice and carry women’s cause at home and abroad. Political leaders are becoming more receptive to women’s issues. It is my cause now, so let’s hope for the better,” Ogasapian said.

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on January 29-30/17
It’s not a Muslim ban... it’s working out very nicely’
 Agencies Sunday, 29 January 2017/President Donald Trump on Saturday defended his executive order barring travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the US. "It's not a Muslim ban," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office as he signed several executive orders. In the executive order signed Friday, Trump halted the arrival of refugees for at least 120 days and imposed tough new controls on travelers from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen for the next three months. "It's working out very nicely. You see it at the airports, you see it all over," Trump told reporters, after travelers from those countries were stopped from boarding US-bound planes, triggering angry protests at airports. "We're going to have a very, very strict ban and we're going to have extreme vetting which we should have had in this country for many years."
 Outrage in France
 French President Francois Hollande on Saturday warned his new US counterpart against adopting a protectionist stance and called on him to respect the principle of accepting refugees. During a telephone conversation between the two leaders Hollande stressed the "economic and political consequences of a protectionist approach", the Elysee Palace said in a statement. "Faced with an unstable and uncertain world, withdrawal into oneself is a dead-end response," Hollande was quoted as saying.He added that defending democratic principles required compliance with "the principles on which it is founded, in particular the acceptance of refugees".
 British disagreement
 British Prime Minister Theresa May does "not agree" with the restrictions on immigration imposed by Trump and will intervene if they affect UK nationals, Downing Street said Sunday. "Immigration policy in the United States is a matter for the government of the United States, just the same as immigration policy for this country should be set by our government," a spokesman said. "But we do not agree with this kind of approach and it is not one we will be taking. If there is any impact on UK nationals then clearly we will make representations to the US government about that."
 May had sparked controversy in Britain on Saturday after refusing to condemn the order by Trump to suspend refugee arrivals, saying Washington was responsible for its own immigration policy. "The United States is responsible for the United States’ policy on refugees. The United Kingdom is responsible for the United Kingdom’s policy on refugees," May said at a news conference during a trip to Ankara. Meanwhile an MP from May’s Conservative Party on Saturday revealed he would be barred from entering the US under Trump’s clampdown.
 Spicer responds
 But White House press secretary Sean Spicer on Sunday defended Trump’s latest executive order on immigration and refugee vetting, arguing that the Obama administration originally flagged the seven “countries of particular concern.”“The Obama administration put these first and foremost,” Spicer told ABC’s This Week. In February, 2016, the Obama administration added Libya, Yemen and Somalia to a list of “countries of concern” with respect to its visa waiver program. The release from the Department of Homeland Security notes that Iran, Syria, Iraq and Sudan were already included in the list. Spicer said on Sunday there were many other Muslim-majority countries not included in the ban.  “There’s 46 Muslim-majority countries that are not in this seven,” he said.(With AFP, AP and Reuters) 

Federal judge bars deportations under Trump ban
The Associated Press, Washington Sunday, 29 January 2017/A federal judge issued an emergency order Saturday night temporarily barring the US from deporting people from nations subject to President Donald Trump's travel ban. US District Judge Ann Donnelly in New York issued the emergency order after lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union filed a court petition on behalf of people from seven predominantly Muslim nations who were detained at airports across the country as the ban took effect.
As the decision was announced, cheers broke out in crowds of demonstrators who had gathered at American airports and outside the Brooklyn courthouse where the ruling was issued. The order barred US border agents from removing anyone who arrived in the US with a valid visa from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It also covered anyone with an approved refugee application. It was unclear how quickly the order might affect people in detention.
Under Trump's order, it had appeared that an untold number of foreign-born US residents now traveling outside the US could be stuck overseas for at least 90 days even though they held permanent residency "green cards" or other visas. However, an official with the Department of Homeland Security said Saturday night that no green-card holders from the seven countries cited in Trump's order had been prevented from entering the US.
No longer welcome
Some foreign nationals who were allowed to board flights before the order was signed Friday had been detained at US airports, told they were no longer welcome. The DHS official who briefed reporters by phone said 109 people who were in transit on airplanes had been denied entry and 173 had not been allowed to get on their planes overseas.
Trump billed his sweeping executive order as a necessary step to stop "radical Islamic terrorists" from coming to the US Included is a 90-day ban on travel to the US by citizens of Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia or Yemen and a 120-day suspension of the US refugee program. Trump's order singled out Syrians for the most aggressive ban, indefinitely blocking entry for anyone from that country, including those fleeing civil war.
The directive did not do anything to prevent attacks from homegrown extremists who were already in America, a primary concern of federal law enforcement officials. It also omitted Saudi Arabia, home to most of the Sept. 11 hijackers.
'Extreme vetting'
As a candidate Trump pledged to temporarily ban Muslims from coming to the US, then said he would implement "extreme vetting" for people from countries with significant terror concerns. Trump told reporters Saturday the order is "not a Muslim ban."
"It's working out very nicely," Trump said of the implementation of his order. "We're going to have a very, very strict ban and we're going to have extreme vetting, which we should have had in this country for many years."The order sparked protests at several of the nation's international airports, including New York's Kennedy and Chicago's O'Hare and facilities in Minneapolis and Dallas-Forth Worth. In San Francisco, hundreds blocked the street outside the arrival area of the international terminal. Several dozen demonstrated at the airport in Portland, Oregon, briefly disrupting light rail service while hoisting signs that read "Portland Coffee Is From Yemen" and chanting anti-Trump slogans. Among the dozens showing support for refugees at Denver's airport were those who sang "refugees are welcome here."US lawmakers and officials around the globe also criticized the move. Sen. Ben Sasse, a Nebraska Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said while Trump is right to focus on border security, the order is "too broad."
"If we send a signal to the Middle East that the US sees all Muslims as jihadists, the terrorist recruiters win by telling kids that America is banning Muslims and that this is America versus one religion," Sasse said. "Our generational fight against jihadism requires wisdom."In Tehran, Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said Iran would stop issuing new visas to US citizens in response to Trump's ban, but that anyone already with a visa to Iran wouldn't be turned away.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took to Twitter Saturday afternoon to say that refugees were welcome in Canada, "regardless of your faith."Two of the first people blocked from entering the United States were Iraqis with links to the US military.
Hameed Khalid Darweesh and Haider Sameer Abdulkhaleq Alshawi were detained by immigration officials after landing at New York's Kennedy airport Friday night. Both had been released by Saturday night after their lawyers intervened. Darweesh had worked as an interpreter for the US Army when it invaded Iraq in 2003 and later worked as a contract engineer. In their court filing, his lawyers said Alshawai's wife had worked for a US security contractor in Iraq. Members of her family had been killed by insurgents because of their association with the US military. The government can exempt foreign nationals from the ban if their entry is deemed in the national interest. But it was not immediately clear how that exemption might be applied. Diplomats from the seven countries singled out by Trump's order would still be allowed into the US
Those already in the US with a visa or green card would be allowed to stay, according to the official, who wasn't authorized to publicly discuss the details of how Trump's order was being put in place and spoke only on condition of anonymity. Trump's order also directed US officials to review information as needed to fully vet foreigners asking to come to the US and draft a list of countries that don't provide that information. That left open the possibility that citizens of other countries could also face a travel ban.
'Case by case'
The US may still admit refugees on a case-by-case basis during the freeze, and the government would continue to process requests from people claiming religious persecution, "provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country." The Council on American-Islamic Relations said it would challenge the constitutionality of Trump's order.
"There is no evidence that refugees - the most thoroughly vetted of all people entering our nation - are a threat to national security," said Lena F. Masri, the group's national litigation director. "This is an order that is based on bigotry, not reality."
John Cohen, a former Department of Homeland Security counterterrorism official who worked under Democratic and Republican administrations, said the order didn't address America's "primary terrorism-related threat" - people already in the US who become inspired by what they see on the internet.
Trump's order drew support from some Republican lawmakers who have urged more security measures for the refugee vetting program, particularly for those from Syria.
"We are a compassionate nation and a country of immigrants. But as we know, terrorists are dead set on using our immigration and refugee programs as a Trojan Horse to attack us," House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Michael McCaul said in a statement Friday. "With the stroke of a pen, he is doing more to shut down terrorist pathways into this country than the last administration did in eight years."
It is unclear how many people would be immediately impacted by the non-refugee travel ban. According to the statistics maintained by the Homeland Security Department, about 17,000 students from the seven designated countries were allowed into the US for the 2015-2016 school year. In 2015 more than 86,000 people from those countries arrived in the US on other, non-immigrant visas and more than 52,000 others became legal permanent residents.
Last year the US resettled 85,000 people displaced by war, political oppression, hunger and religious prejudice, including more than 12,000 Syrians. Before leaving office President Barack Obama announced that the US would accept 110,000 refugees in the coming year, but Trump's order cut that by more than half to 50,000.
No refugees were in the air when the travel ban was signed Friday, but about 350 people were in transit in Nairobi, Kenya, and were now stuck there, said Melanie Nezer, vice president of policy and advocacy for HIAS, a refugee resettlement aid agency. She said several hundred more people who were booked on US-bound flights in the next week were now stranded around the globe.
"This in effect could be a permanent ban," she said. "Many of these people may never be able to come."

Netanyahu backs US embassy move to Jerusalem though signals no urgency
Sun 29 Jan 2017/NNA - Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu voiced support on Sunday for moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem but mentioned no time frame, after a Republican activist accused Israel of pressing the Trump administration to delay the pledged step. In an interview with Israel's Haaretz newspaper, Marc Zell, head of the Republicans Overseas Israel branch, said new U.S. President Donald Trump was "proceeding cautiously because of concerns raised by Israeli officials". Trump's team spoke often during the presidential campaign about shifting the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, Israel's self-proclaimed capital and a holy city at the heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But a week ago, Trump's press secretary, Sean Spicer, lowered expectations of an imminent announcement about an embassy move that would anger the Arab world and possibly touch off violence. Palestinian officials said the embassy's relocation would kill off any prospects for peace.The Palestinians want East Jerusalem - which Israel captured in a 1967 war and annexed in a move not recognised internationally - for the capital of a state they seek in the occupied West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Israeli officials said last Sunday the embassy issue was barely discussed in a 30-minute telephone call between Trump and Netanyahu, who are to meet in Washington early next month. Netanyahu addressed the matter in general terms in public remarks to his cabinet on Sunday that were described by Israeli media as a response to Zell's accusation of foot-dragging. "I want to take the opportunity to make it unequivocally clear that our position has always been, and remains so now and at all times, that the U.S. embassy should be here, in Jerusalem," Netanyahu said, without directly mentioning Zell. Currently, no country has its embassy in Jerusalem, the Israeli foreign ministry said. Costa Rica and El Salvador did until a few years ago, but they are now in Tel Aviv."Jerusalem is Israel's capital and it is right and proper that all of the foreign embassies, and not only the American embassy, move here. I believe that in time, most of them will indeed come to Jerusalem," Netanyahu told the cabinet. ---REUTERS
 
Amid refugee ban, Trump recruits Saudis, Emiratis to support Syria safe zones
ByMichael Wilner/Jerusalem Post/29 January 2017/In their call, Trump also expressed his view that an international nuclear agreement brokered with Iran in 2015 should be "rigorously enforced.
WASHINGTON -- US President Donald Trump and Saudi Arabian King Salman bin Abd Al-Aziz "agreed to support safe zones in Syria" in a phone call on Sunday, the White House said, marking a potentially dramatic shift in Washington's posture toward the civil war there. The White House cast Trump's support for safe zones in Syria as just one of many policy ideas that will "help the many refugees who are displaced" from the war, which has prompted the worst refugee crisis since World War II. The two leaders also agreed to support similar humanitarian corridors in Yemen, where Riyadh has been waging a proxy war with Iran.  The president is facing protests at home for banning Syrian refugees from entering the US homeland, as well as all nationals from seven predominantly Muslim nations: Syria, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Sudan, Somalia and Libya. In their call, Trump also expressed his view that an international nuclear agreement brokered with Iran in 2015 should be "rigorously enforced"– a departure from his rhetoric during the campaign, in which he promised to shred the deal altogether. In a separate call with the crown prince of the United Arab Emirates, Sheikh Muhammad bin Zayid Al Nuhayyan, Trump also "raised the idea of supporting safe zones for the refugees displaced by the conflict in the region," the White House said in a statement. According to the administration, the crown prince agreed to support the initiative. 

‘Welcome to Canada,’ Trudeau tells refugees
AFP, Ottawa Sunday, 29 January 2017/Prime Minister Justin Trudeau welcomed Canadian immigrants Saturday in a sunny Twitter message written in stark contrast to Donald Trump's order temporarily banning all refugees and many Muslims from traveling to the United States.
"To those fleeing persecution, terror & war, Canadians will welcome you, regardless of your faith. Diversity is our strength #WelcomeToCanada," Trudeau posted on Twitter.The message comes one day after Trump signed a sweeping executive order to suspend the arrival of refugees for at least 120 days and impose tough new controls on travelers from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen for the next three months. Since then, travelers from those countries have been stopped from boarding US-bound planes, triggering angry protests and detentions at airports.
Some who were already in the air when Trump signed the executive order were detained on arrival, The New York Times reported. On Saturday, Canadian airline WestJet said it would reimburse passengers prevented from traveling to the United States under the new policy. "WestJet will comply with this executive order," the company said in a statement. "In the event there are foreign nationals from these countries on WestJet who are denied entry, we will be providing them with a full refund." The airliner has already had to refuse one passenger transport to the United States, a spokeswoman said, without specifying the passenger's origin. According to the latest Canadian census, from 2011, one out of five people in the country are foreign-born. Canada has welcomed more than 39,670 Syrian refugees between November 2015 and the beginning of this January, according to government figures.

Syrian regime ‘retakes control’ of Wadi Barada
 Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Sunday, 29 January 2017/The Syrian army said on Sunday that it had recaptured a flashpoint area from rebels near Damascus that supplies water to the capital. Wadi Barada had been the scene of fierce fighting in recent weeks between regime and rebel forces that tested a fragile nationwide truce and left millions in Damascus facing water shortages. “Our armed forces... have accomplished their mission by restoring security and stability in the region of Wadi Barada”, the army said in a statement carried by state television. The announcement came a day after the army entered the water pumping station in Wadi Barada for the first time in four years. Syrian government soldiers drink from a water pumping station in the village of Ain al-Fija in the Wadi Barada valley near Damascus. (Reuters). Under a deal with the authorities, rebels can choose to stay in the area but hand over their weapons, or leave to the northern province of Idlib, last major bastion of the armed opposition. Hundreds of rebels began to leave Wadi Barada on Sunday for Idlib, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group. Around 5.5 million people in Damascus and its suburbs have been without water since fighting intensified in the Wadi Barada area in late December.
 
 US raid in Yemen kills 57 people, including militants
 Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Sunday, 29 January 2017
 Helicopter-borne commandoes launched a raid in southern Yemen at dawn on Sunday that killed around 57 people which included 41 al-Qaeda militants and 16 civilians. Residents and officials as well as al-Qaeda itself said the attack was carried out by the United States, which did not immediately acknowledge the operation. The gunbattle in the rural Yakla district of al-Bayda province killed a senior leader in Yemen’s al-Qaeda branch, Abdulraoof al-Dhahab, along with other militants, the local witnesses said. Medics at the scene said 40 people were killed, including 6 women and three children. If confirmed, the raid would be the first in the country by the American military since Yemen descended into civil war nearly two years ago. It would also be the first such operation during Donald Trump’s presidency. In a message on its official Telegram account, al Qaeda mourned al-Dhahab as a “holy warrior” and other slain militants, without specifying how many of its fighters were killed. “The operation began at dawn when a drone bombed the home of Abdulraoof al-Dhahab and then helicopters flew up and unloaded paratroopers at his house and killed everyone inside,” one resident said, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “Next, the gunmen opened fire at the US soldiers who left the area, and the helicopters bombed the gunmen and a number of homes and led to a large number of casualties.”A Yemeni security officer and a local official corroborated that account. Fahd, a local resident who asked that only his first name be used, said several bodies remained under debris and that houses and the local mosque were damaged in the attack. US special forces attempted to rescue an American and a South African hostage held by al Qaeda in another part of the country in December 2014. The captives were killed in the subsequent firefight. The United States conducted dozens of drone strikes in Yemen throughout Barack Obama’s presidency to combat al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, regarded as one of the global militant group’s most dangerous branches. The local al Qaeda unit organized the Charlie Hebdo magazine attack in Paris in 2015 and has repeatedly tried to down US airliners.[With Reuters]
 
Israeli troops kill Palestinian in West Bank
AFP, Nablus Sunday, 29 January 2017/A Palestinian was shot dead Sunday and five others were wounded by Israeli soldiers at the Jenin camp in the occupied West Bank, Palestinian medical sources said. The person who was killed at the camp located in the northern West Bank was identified as 19-year-old Mohammed Abu Khalifa, the sources said. The shooting occurred after an incursion into the camp by Israeli forces sparked clashes with young Palestinians, Palestinian security officials said. An Israeli army spokeswoman said the soldiers had opened fire after entering the camp and being attacked with explosive devices. “Faced with immediate danger, the soldiers fired at the main instigators of the violence,” she told AFP. None of the soldiers were hurt, she added.
 A wave of Palestinian attacks that erupted in October 2015 has resulted in the deaths of 252 Palestinians, 40 Israelis, two Americans, a Jordanian, an Eritrean and a Sudanese. Most of the Palestinians killed were carrying out knife, gun or car-ramming attacks, according to Israeli authorities, with others killed during protests, in clashes or air raids on Gaza. Israel blames incitement by Palestinian leaders and media as a leading cause of the violence. Israeli authorities have confiscated the bodies of killed Palestinians since the violence began, often keeping them for many months as a means of deterrence and to prevent clashes during funerals.

Iran Regime Can't Be Trusted
NCRI /Sunday, 29 January 2017/In an interview with Aljazeera TV, London-based author and political analyst Dr. Mohammad Ghawas talks about the outcomes of Astana peace talks as well as the Iranian regime’s destructive violation of the ceasefire.
Part of the interview is as follows: The Syrian opposition reiterated its commitment to the ceasefire in Astana peace talks, calling on Russia and Turkey to take tough measures against violators of the ceasefire. The Syrian opposition believes that the Iranian regime can’t at any stage of the negotiations be regarded as a ceasefire monitoring side, or a neutral element, for that matter. This regime can’t be trusted. One of the factors causing distrust of the Iranian regime is its role in the evacuation of Aleppo during which they made their best to lead the process to a failure. Despite minor shortcomings, Astana peace talks was promising overall, since the participating countries referred to the UN Security Council resolutions 2254 and 2363 as well as to the Geneva Statement. In this regard, Russia wanted to send a clear message to Donald Trump’s government by holding Astana peace talks. What’s new this time, however, is that the world has accepted the fact that the fighter groups in Syria are an opposition side that needs to be participated in international negotiations. That’s why the delegation representing Assad’s regime was forced to use the word ‘opposition’. Another important issue is that the parties accepted that Astana peace talks were actually technical talks aimed at stabilizing the ceasefire, with the main talks to be held in Geneva. I believe that the opposition’s attitude this time was a technical, smart and high-level one. The opposition delegation kept in mind all the time that they were legal members of a high negotiating committee, with the fighter groups being part of that.

Iran Regime's Judiciary Has Been Profiting From Bank Deposits
NCRI /Sunday, 29 January 2017/Following the clashes between regime’s rival bands over the bank accounts belonging to head of Iranian regime’s judiciary, making bank deposits and using its profit by the judiciary has been banned. According to state-run ISNA news agency, Gholamreza Tajgardoon, head of joint commission on 2017 budget bill, spoke of a commission’s directive according to which the judiciary will be obliged to transfer all its received funds to the treasury, thus being disallowed to deposit them in banks and use their profit. The judiciary and its head Sadegh Larijani have for years been depositing the received funds in banks instead of transferring them to the treasury, thus taking advantage of the huge profits associated with these bank deposits. This type of plundering has not been limited to regime’s judiciary alone. “We have seen such approach being followed in some organizations and universities as well”, confesses Tajgardoon, “depositing their resources into bank accounts and using the resulting profit for administering their relevant organizations. This had also happened in government departments. The recent joint commission ruling, however, applies to all the departments operating under the judiciary or the government.”The issue of judiciary’s bank accounts had turned into a political controversy between MPs and the judiciary in recent months. A while ago, regime’s media reported on 63 bank accounts belonging to Sadegh Amoli Larijani with nearly 250 billion tomans in annual profit. Afterwards, Mahmoud Sadeghi, a member of regime’s parliament, asked for clarification in this regard, calling on the judiciary to make public the report of its bank accounts’ operations in the past five years. Mahmoud Sadeghi’s remarks was faced with a backlash by Tehran’s Prosecutor Abbas Jafari-Dolatabadi, who sent his agents to the representative’s house to arrest him overnight.

The Coup De Grace on Iran's Domestic Productions by Rouhani's Government
NCRI /Sunday, 29 January 2017/The Council of Ministers of the Iranian regime reduced the tariffs of 8 basic and primary commodities from 5 up to 50 percent. The terrorist Qods Force News agency wrote: “as the Council of Ministers ratified the law, the rate of different types of white and brown rice was reduced from 32 to 5 percent. Additionally, the rate of butter and meat sheep decreased respectively from 20 and 26 to 5 percent. The reduction in tariffs endangers the production of commodities in Iran. The farmers and ranchers will also incur losses. The tariffs reduction, on the one hand, increases the commercial benefits for merchants and the plunderers affiliated to the regime, and on the other hand, it is in favor of foreign manufacturers of these items. Rouhani's government provides a pretext for tariffs reduction that it intends to reduce the prices in the market. Nevertheless, this measure absolutely harms domestic producers."The head of the farmers union referred to the negative impact of tariff cuts of meat sheep on the breeding sector of the country. He stated:"not only are we currently self-sufficient in producing meat but we also export them to other countries. As a result, the tariff reduction on the imported red meat is a sort of paying subsidies to foreign manufacturers. This issue considerably harms the livestock industry of the country."
The member of the Iranian Parliament Committee on Agriculture, Abbas Papizadeh said that the independence of the country in the field of food security will be lost with Rouhani's decision (the sate-run Fars News Agency, 25th of January 2017). Abbas Papizadeh said that the tariffs reduction on the aforementioned commodities ends the domestic manufacturing. It is actually in favor of importers such as the merchants of the Iranian regime and it also supports the foreign productions. The head of the union of agricultural products also stated:"the government enactment to reduce tariffs on the imports of agricultural products will increase the imports and we are concerned about the future of Agriculture in Iran."(IRIB 2, January 26th, 2017) The tariff reductions on the imported agricultural products increase the corruption, rent-seeking and the smuggling of these products. An Iranian MP on 14th of October 2016 addressed the Minister of Agriculture and said:"apart from smuggling, you import rice into the country twice the need of country's capacity every year. The 400 tons of rice imported into the country has provided benefit to specific people. Rouhani's decision has caused the uncontrolled import of agricultural products, especially rice with poor quality and in some cases a mixture of rice and plastic.
Rouhani's government has implemented the dirty policy of tariffs reduction on foreign commodities in other fields including textile products as well." Regarding this matter, the state-run ISNA News Agency writes that Rouhani's government has simultaneously reduced tariffs on the import of clothes and fabrics (ISNA News Agency, 12th December 2016). As a matter of fact, these are the instances of government measures in destroying the national production as well as the proliferation of unemployment among youths and people. These policies are also in favor of the looters affiliated with the Iranian regime.

Rouhani's Adviser Warned: If Rouhani's Government Fall, Its Rivals Will Fall Too
NCRI /Sunday, 29 January 2017/ By publishing several tweets Hessamedin Ashna the cultural advisor to the Iranian president, warned Khamenei’s faction that: “If Rouhani's Government Fall, Its Rivals Will Fall Too.Referring to the recently collapsed high rise (Plasco building) from within, he added: not always the buildings and infostructures collapse vertically and straight down. Sometimes there are serious damages to the adjacent buildings and to owner-occupied buildings with glass facades (pointing to Khameneis faction) so it is recommended to refrain from throwing stones at others'.

Iran: The Capital City Is Only Ten Percent Prepared for Possible Earthquake
NCRI /Sunday, 29 January 2017/ Pointing to the country’s poor preparedness for natural disasters, the head of Iranian regime’s Crisis Management Organization said that “Tehran is only ten percent prepared for a possible earthquake.”According to the state-run Mehr news agency on January 27, Mohammad-Esmaeil Najjar said that nearly 175 earthquakes above 4 on the Richter scale occur in Iran every year.“When the country’s capital is only ten percent prepared against an earthquake, we should not expect a miracle. Today, the world has secured itself (against such disasters) using collaborative knowledge, whereas we’re still lacking a full preparedness.”Iranian regime’s Deputy Interior Minister said that the country is faced with a crisis at any moment. “We are too poorly prepared for incidents, particularly in Tehran”, he added, “In other words, one can say that our preparedness is based on probabilities and events, whereas we need to take preemptive measures in order to avoid damages.”“Unlike Bam, you can’t pull bodies out of the rubble using shovels and picks”, said Najjar, “Today, Tehran’s skyscrapers are like mountains of metal, cement and building materials that dozens of people together are not able to move even a small piece of them, needing world’s modern equipments in order to do so. The question is, do we have such equipments having built such tower blocks?”“Following the Bam earthquake, ordinary people were working on the ruins with their shovels and picks, playing a role in the relief operation. But is it possible to do the same in Tehran with such primitive tools?”, he added. “As everyone knows, debris removal operation of Plasco Building is still going on nine days after its collapse”, said Najjar, “with so far only reaching the final stages. And it should be noted that compared to many other buildings in Tehran, Plasco is considered a relatively small one.”
“More than 80 percent of regions in Iran are prone to natural disasters”, said Najjar.

Arab Countries Should Defy Iran Regime and Its Interference
NCRI /Sunday, 29 January 2017/ The former Minister of National Education to combat illiteracy and the member of the National Rally of Independence (RNI) of Morocco, Najima Tai Tai in an interview with Al-Jazeera newspaper stated:"the meddling of the Iranian regime in the internal affairs of some Arabic countries like Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and Yemen has made me very sorry. The meddling has caused disaster and destruction for all countries of the region including Iraq, Syria, and Yemen. Thousands of people were killed and tens of thousands of civilians including women and children were displaced and suffered from pain and agony. I think these countries should altogether defy the Iranian regime and its interference. They should also support the demands of Iranians to separate religion from government and to establish democracy in Iran as well as peaceful relations with other countries without any violence and terrorism." She also talked about the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) and Mrs. Maryam Rajavi and said:"I would like to give my salute to those efforts made by NCRI and to the President Maryam Rajavi with her considerable attempts to preach peace, friendship and the genuine Islamic thoughts without any distortion." The former Minister of Education of Morocco in response to a question about NCRI's relation with the countries of the region said:"NCRI and Mrs. Maryam Rajavi are the representatives of the will and aspirations of the Iranian people. They call for the entitlement of Iranians to establish democracy in their country. The religion shall not be applied in political and commercial deals and the countries of the region should have peaceful and friendly relations with each other. NCRI is against the meddling of the Iranian regime in the countries of the region and this resistance assures a peaceful and prosperous future for the region."
A reporter asked Najima Tai Tai:"the UN General Assembly with 105 participating countries has recently passed a resolution to prosecute the perpetrators of killings in Aleppo. Will this resolution lead to taking them to trial in the International Court of Justice?"
Mrs.Tai Tai replied: “this is the smallest thing the international community and the UN could do for the Syrians. The Western countries and the UN are the spectators of the war crimes in Syria. The massacre of the Syrian people especially the women and children is the biggest calamity of history after World War II. The cities, hospitals, and schools are destroyed in Syria and this issue has embarrassed every conscientious person in the world. Therefore, the perpetrators of war crimes against Syrians especially the Iranian regime, Khamenei, and their Major General Qasem Soleimani should be prosecuted and brought to trial."

Iraq Shi'ite paramilitary calls for ban on U.S. nationals
BAGHDAD (Reuters)/January 29/17 - Iraq's Popular Mobilization on Sunday called on the Iraqi government to ban U.S. nationals from entering Iraq and to expel those who are already in the country, in a reaction to the new U.S. travel curbs on Iraqis.
Popular Mobilization is mainly a coalition of Shi'ite paramilitary groups armed and trained by Iran to fight Islamic State. It became an Iraqi government-approved body last year. The call to ban U.S. nationals came in a statement published by its spokesman, Ahmed al-Assadi. (Reporting by Ahmed Rasheed; writing by Maher Chmaytelli; editing by Larry King)

Philippines: Airstrikes killed 15 IS group-linked militants
Associated Press/JIM GOMEZ/January 29, 2017
MANILA, Philippines (AP) — Philippine airstrikes have killed 15 Muslim militants linked to the Islamic State group, including a suspected Indonesian militant, while one of Southeast Asia's top terror suspects was seriously wounded in the country's south, the military chief said Sunday. Military Chief of Staff Gen. Eduardo Ano said the body of the suspected Indonesian militant, known by his nom de guerre Mohisen, was recovered by troops along with three dead Filipino followers of militant leader Isnilon Hapilon, who was seriously wounded in the hilly outskirts of Butig town in Lanao del Sur province. Eleven other militants were reportedly killed, Ano said, citing intelligence, but added their bodies have not been found. Hapilon was wounded in the arm and was losing blood after air force aircraft, including FA50 supersonic fighter jets, dropped six 500-pound (225-kilogram) bombs Wednesday night and Thursday on a militant encampment in an ongoing offensive, Ano and another air force official said. It was the first time that the FA50s, which were acquired from South Korea in late 2015 as the military's only fighter jets, were deployed in a combat mission. Four FA50s have been delivered and the rest of 12 jets are to be delivered by July, air force officials said. President Rodrigo Duterte has criticized the FA50s as being inadequate for counterinsurgency operations and good only as fly-by aircraft for ceremonies. Hapilon was being moved around by his men on a makeshift stretcher but could not escape from Lanao, about 830 kilometers (520 miles) south of Manila, because artillery-backed troops have blocked possible exit points, Ano said. "We're making it very difficult for them to move around and survive," Ano told The Associated Press by telephone. The military will ask Indonesian authorities for help in confirming the identity and background of Mohisen, who was not among the foreigners previously monitored as having joined Filipino militant groups in the south.
Hapilon reportedly was designated to lead an Islamic State group branch in Southeast Asia and is on the U.S. Department of Justice list of most-wanted terrorists worldwide with a reward of up to $5 million for his capture. He moved to Butig from his stronghold on southern Basilan island a month ago with about 30 fighters to look for a base, Ano said. IS group commanders apparently wanted Hapilon to set up a base in Lanao, a vast region that offers more security than his mountain base on Basilan island, so foreign militants could have a springboard to expand their influence, he said. The ongoing offensive "is significant because it will derail their plan to expand the IS presence to mainland Mindanao," said Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana, referring to the southern Philippine region, the scene of decadeslong uprisings by minority Muslims.
Duterte has repeatedly warned the emergence of Islamic State-influenced militant groups is fast looming as a major national security threat. While pursuing peace talks with two large Muslim rebel groups in the predominantly Roman Catholic nation, he has ordered the military to destroy smaller but brutal extremist groups like the Abu Sayyaf, which is dreaded for cross-border kidnappings, beheadings and bombings.
Duterte has asked the two Muslim rebel groups in talks with the government not to help extremists under attack by troops, warning that may bring them in a new conflict with Manila. The elusive Hapilon, an Arabic-speaking Islamic preacher known for his expertise on commando assaults, pledged allegiance to the IS group in 2014. He then organized an alliance called Dawlatul Islam Wilayatul Mashriq, which is now believed to include at least 10 small militant groups including some Abu Sayyaf factions and the Maute armed group, which he was meeting in Lanao when the military launched the airstrikes using the FA50s and OV-10 bomber planes. The Maute and the Ansar Al Khilafah Philippines, another group under Hapilon's nascent alliance, have been linked to a Sept. 2 bombing of a night market that killed 15 people and wounded 69 others in southern Davao city, the president's hometown, and a failed bombing at Manila's popular Rizal Park and a promenade near the U.S. Embassy last year.

Giuliani says Trump asked him how to legally enact ‘Muslim ban’
Dylan Stableford/Yahoo/January 29/17
Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani says President Trump tasked him with coming up with a way to legally implement his controversial executive order banning immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries.
“I’ll tell you the whole history of it,” Giuliani said in an interview with Fox News’ Jeanine Pirro on Saturday night. “When he first announced it, he said ‘Muslim ban.’ He called me up. He said, ‘Put a commission together. Show me the right way to do it legally.'”
Giuliani, a former U.S. attorney, said he consulted with U.S. Reps. Mike McCaul, R-Texas, and Peter King, R-N.Y., and “a group of very expert lawyers” on the plan.
“And what we did was, we focused on — instead of religion, danger,” Giuliani said. “The areas of the world that create danger for us. Which is a factual basis, not a religious basis. Perfectly legal, perfectly sensible. And that’s what the ban is based on.”
Giuliani and Trump head into the clubhouse for their meeting at Trump International Golf Club, November 20, 2016 in Bedminster Township, N.J., on Nov. 20, 2016. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Giuliani and Trump head into a meeting in November. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
On Friday, Trump signed an executive order barring people from seven countries — Syria, Sudan, Yemen, Iran, Iraq, Libya and Somalia — from entering the United States for 90 days. It also stopped all refugees from entering the U.S. for 120 days and indefinitely suspended the entry of refugees from Syria. During his presidential bid, Trump called for a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims” entering the United States. That proposal subsequently evolved into a vague promise of “extreme vetting,” with the help of Giuliani.
“I think it’s a good idea to tighten the vetting process,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday. “But I also think it’s important to remember that some of our best sources in the war against radical Islamic terrorism are Muslims, both in this country and overseas.“I think we need to be careful,” McConnell added. “We don’t have religious tests in this country.”
The Trump administration insists the ban doesn’t constitute one.
“It’s not based on religion,” Giuliani said. “It’s based on places where there is substantial evidence that people are sending terrorists into our country.”
“It’s not a Muslim ban, but we were totally prepared,” Trump said while speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Saturday. “It’s working out very nicely. You see it at the airports, you see it all over.”
On Saturday night, a federal judge in Brooklyn issued an emergency stay temporarily halting the removal of immigrants and refugees detained following Trump’s order.
The decision came after the American Civil Liberties Union and other activist groups filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of two Iraqis who were held at New York City’s John F. Kennedy International Airport.
“There is imminent danger that, absent the stay of removal, there will be substantial and irreparable injury to refugees, visa holders, and other individuals from nations subject to [Trump’s] executive order,” Judge Ann Donnelly said in her ruling.
“President Trump’s executive order is simply un-American,” New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said on CNN’s “State of the Union” Sunday. “It is suggesting that people’s civil liberties can be taken away, even if they are green card holders, even if they’re permanent residents on the pathway to citizenship. … It makes no distinction if someone has a green card and is already recognized on the pathway to citizenship. It makes no distinction if you have served in the U.S. military previously. You still can be detained. In this country, the notion of detention without due process, without probable cause or a charge against you, violates our constitutional norms.”
But Giuliani, who currently serves as a White House cybersecurity adviser, said the ban is simply an example of Trump “negotiating in the best interests of the United States of America — not the rest of the world.” 

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 29-30/17
 A Post-National Framework for Peace and Stability in the Middle East

 Sam Farah /For Syria Comment /29January 2017
 The Syrian crisis, about to enter its sixth year, has created the largest humanitarian disaster since the Cold War, causing hundreds of thousands of deaths and creating the worst refugee crisis of our generation. Yet, the Syrian crisis is hardly the only fire burning in the Middle East. Since the beginning of the 20th century, the Middle East has been stuck in endless wars and an ever-worsening cycle of violence and extremism.
 Beyond the devastating human cost of these conflicts, instability in the Middle East has the potential to destroy the global order. In his recent article “Toward a Global Realignment,” Zbigniew Brzezinski warns that if not contained the current violence in the Middle East can spread to Russia’s southern and eastern territories as well as the western portion of China.[1] Mr. Brzezinski is not the only one sounding alarms about the increasing instability in the Middle East. General David Petraeus has described the Syrian conflict as a “Chernobyl, a potential geo-strategic catastrophe.”[2] The flood of refugees into Europe was a major driver behind Brexit and the rise of nationalism across Europe, which threatens to unravel the continent’s post-nationalistic framework.
 Mr. Brzezinski warns that America’s quest for a one-sided militarily and ideologically imposed outcome in the Middle East is an act of prolonged and self-destructive futility. Instead Mr. Brzezinski encourages the United States to forge a cooperative relationship with Russia, China, and the EU, who can partner with more established and historically rooted countries in the Middle East to shape a wider framework for regional stability.
 The Current Framework of the Middle East
 The framework for the Middle East was laid out at the beginning of the 20th century with the fall of the Ottoman Empire, mostly on a nationalistic basis.
 Nationalism is defined as a political movement to unite people into nations based on shared language, race or religion. This idea emerged in Europe in the 19th century, and spread to the Middle East in the early 20th. Nationalism held that the boundaries of a nation should as much as possible coincide with one culture.
 The Armenians and Assyrians were the first victims of nationalism in the Middle East. The Young Turks, in an effort to Turkify the new republic, executed a systematic campaign to exterminate the Assyrians and Armenians from eastern Turkey, a plateau they had inhabited for 3,000 years. As many as 1.5 million people were killed in what is today known as the Armenian Genocide.
 Two other nationalist movements, Arab nationalism and Zionism, were also gathering strength and about to collide. Zionism was born in Europe in the 19th century. Its founder, Theodore Herzl, was once a member of the German nationalist fraternity (Burschenschaft). Zionism’s founding was not a reaction to the Holocaust, which occurred 40 years after the Zionist movement emerged. It was a nationalist movement to build a nation for the Jewish people. David Ben-Gurion, who was born in Poland, and then immigrated to Israel in 1906, wrote (quoted in Wikiquote, 2016), “For many of us, anti-Semitic feeling had little to do with our dedication to Zionism. I personally never suffered anti-Semitic persecution. We emigrated not for negative reasons of escape but for the positive purpose of rebuilding a homeland.”[3]
 European-educated Arab intellectuals from the Levant were also eager to establish an Arab homeland. In 1911, they founded the Young Arab Society, Al Fatat, in Paris. Their goal was to gain independence and unify Arab territory under the Ottoman Empire.
 In 1919, Ben-Gurion (quoted in Wikiquote, 2016) wrote, “We, as a nation, want this country to be ours; the Arabs, as a nation, want this country to be theirs.”[4] Tensions between Arabs and Jews grew. In 1947, the Arabs rejected the UN partition plans for Palestine, and Arab nationalists vowed to eradicate the new Zionist entity. Between 1947 and 1949, more than 700,000 Palestinians were expelled from their homes. Later, a series of laws in the newly declared state of Israel prevented them from returning to their homes or claiming their properties. Towns and streets, which had traditionally carried Arabic names, were given Hebrew ones. Against this backdrop, the Arab-Israeli conflict has continued for 67 years.
 Kurdish nationalists have demanded a homeland partitioned out of territories in parts of Iraq, Iran, Turkey, and Syria. The Kurdish-Turkish war, which has escalated with the Syrian crisis, has caused tens of thousands of deaths and created masses of refugees. Turkey, in its effort to combat Kurdish nationalism, has restricted the use of the Kurdish language in Turkey. At one point the Kurdish language, dress, folklore, and names were prohibited.
 Today, the Arab countries of the Levant have collapsed into proxy, sectarian and civil wars. In the Middle East there are three competing regional projects, all exacerbating the regional conflicts and contributing to the radicalization of the population. Turkey’s Neo-Ottomanists are trying to extend Turkey’s influence in the Middle East; Iran cloaked in a Shia theocracy is extending its regional influence through a network of proxies and regional allies; and Israel remains strongly nationalist and is becoming increasingly right wing. In the middle of this regional dysfunction, ISIS has sprung up with an appalling mix of fascism and religious extremism, and Al Qaeda has gained a foothold on the Mediterranean.
 Religious radicalism and terrorism thrive in the Middle East today. These conflicts are polarizing and each side rallies its base using the most divisive issues, often religion. The governments of Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia have all been accused or are at least suspected of supporting the most sectarian, often-terrorist groups, even ISIS, in their bid for regional influence.
 While the Middle East is becoming increasingly unstable, its strategic importance as an oil supplier to the United Stated is diminishing. According to the International Energy Agency’s World Energy Outlook, the United States will surpass Saudi Arabia as the biggest oil producer by the end of this decade, and will become self-sufficient in energy production by 2035.[5] The United States’ shift away from the Middle East started during the Obama administration as it pivoted to Asia. An estimated $5 trillion, $1.2 trillion of which is in American goods, is traded through the South China Sea shipping lanes each year, which is a vital national security interest for the United States. President Donald Trump also campaigned with the promise that the United States would disengage from the Middle East and prioritize fighting terrorism. The continued crises in the region however, risks sucking the United States back into the Middle East.
 A stable Middle East is of vital importance to China. It is estimated that there are around 5000 Chinese from the Uighur region fighting alongside radical Islamic groups in Syria. The recent suicide attack against the Chinese embassy in the Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan was ordered by Uighur militants active in Syria.[6] China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are, and will be for the foreseeable future, heavily dependent on the flow of oil passing through the Strait of Hormuz. The E.U. is in desperate need of stability in the Middle East as well. They are struggling to deal with the flood of immigrants coming from the region and with the threat of radicalized European Jihadists fighting in Syria. In many proxy wars, regional players manipulate their external backers and not the other way around.[7] None of these major powers wants to be dragged into these conflicts in the Middle East as long as their geostrategic interests are protected.
 A New Framework
 Many blame the current arbitrary borders of the Middle East for its many troubles. The British and the French drew up these borders after the defeat of the Ottoman Empire. In the early 1900s under Ottoman rule there were provinces – Baghdad, Basra, and Mosul – that corresponded to today’s Iraq. The other provinces were those of Damascus, Beirut, Aleppo, and Deir al Zor, plus the district of Jerusalem, which had special administrative status. These areas included today’s Syria, Lebanon, and much of Jordan, Israel and Palestine. Mixed communities with a myriad number of religions, sects, and ethnicities populated these provinces. The new colonial borders divided communities and restricted the movement of people and commerce, but they were not a cause of war. It was the nationalists who caused wars. The territorial claims of the different nationalist movements that sprung up in the late 19th and early 20th century overlapped and set the stage for conflict.
 Nationalism as a cause of war, authoritarianism, and racism is well established. The role of nationalism in European wars, including the two world wars, is well documented. After decades of war, Europe had to build a new framework for a lasting peace. It began with the Schuman Declaration in 1950. It laid the foundation of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) the first supra-nationalist organization in history. Pooling coal and steel production – in the words of the Declaration – made war between historic rivals “not merely unthinkable, but materially impossible.”[8]Then through successive steps including de-emphasized borders, Europe led the world in pioneering a post-nationalist experiment and established peace.Post-nationalism is also the best framework to resolve the myriad conflicts in the Middle East.
 Candidate Countries
 The selection of countries for this new framework aims to defuse existing tensions that exacerbate the current conflicts and fuel extremism. These countries are Turkey, Iran, Israel, Syria, Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq, and Jordan. Membership in the bloc would be available on a rolling basis and might include other countries like Egypt, whose membership could provide a tripartite peace with Iran and Turkey to anchor the new bloc. Alternatively, Egypt could be part of a North African bloc. Armenia should be considered for membership in this new bloc as well. Armenians were the first victims of nationalism in the Middle East and deemphasizing its border with Turkey would give Armenians peaceful access to areas they have been forced out of including the revered Mount Ararat.
 The Gulf Cooperation Council countries (GCC) would continue to develop their own relationships and would not be part of this proposed post-nationalist bloc. Historically, the GCC’s main strategic threats have been Arab nationalism, pan-Islamic movements, and Iran. All these risks would be reduced with the creation of the proposed post-nationalist bloc.
 The Pillars of the New Framework
 While this proposed framework borrows heavily from the European experience, it is not a proposed union. This proposed framework is built with a series of multilateral agreements between the named countries aimed at replacing the current framework which is built of nationalistic bases with a post nationalist framework built on three pillars, deemphasizing borders, multiculturalism, and regional projects.
 In this new bloc, borders would be frozen where they are and deemphasized, with the ultimate goal of guaranteeing the free movement of capital, people, goods and service within the bloc. Borrowing from the example of the ECSC, a regional body would be created to manage the region’s water and energy resources, as well as transit roots for energy from the Gulf area and Russia to the West. All these, especially water rights, are a source of conflict, and are best managed on a regional basis. According to scientists with the World Resource Institute (WRI), water shortages are expected to intensify and will exacerbate conflicts. Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Syria and Turkey will all be facing severe water stress by 2040, according to the WRI.[9] Combating terrorism will likewise be a focus of cooperative police forces in the region. Multiculturalism is the third pillar of this new framework, and is the antithesis of nationalism. Where nationalists aim for the primacy of their culture and language in specific regions, often to the exclusion of others, multiculturalism is the celebration of all cultures and religions as equals. Multiculturalism is not meant to mix different cultures and religions together to create a new identity, nor does it weaken people’s connection to their religion and traditions. The Europeans paid special attention to this issue when structuring their post nationalist framework. They made multiculturalism a foundation of their new post-nationalist framework. In contrast with the nationalistic fervor of old Europe that emphasized language as a central part of national identity, in the E.U. there is no official language. All of the 24 languages spoken in the E.U. region are official E.U. languages.[10] Post-nationalism is a different polity than pre-nationalists empires many of which were also composed of many cultures and religions like the Ottoman empire. Those Empires were governed by one religious group or one clan.
 This new proposed framework for the Middle East would not simply replicate the E.U.; greater autonomy would be granted to local governments, and a single currency is not necessary for a post-nationalist framework. This is also not a proposed military pact, and is not an invitation to disarmament. Countries in this new proposed bloc will maintain their military treaties with non- member countries, such as Russia’s agreements with Syria and the United States’ agreements with Turkey.
 Creating a new bloc with deemphasized borders, regional projects, and multiculturalism should defuse most of the regional conflicts. Since Iran is a majority Shia country, and Turkey is a majority Sunni country, the focus of the countries in this new-shared bloc will be on the shared values of both religions. Christianity and Judaism also share the values that are common to these two forms of Islam. This should defuse religious extremism as well. The conflicts of the Middle East today are regional, the Kurdish question, the Israel-Palestinian conflict, and the Syrian crisis are all regional, zero-sum conflicts. Regional conflicts require regional solutions.
 A Prerequisite for Peace not a Product of Peace
 Some believe that post nationalism will be the result of peace and that creating a post-nationalist bloc would be putting the cart before the horse. The European experience proves otherwise. After decades of conflicts and two world wars, Europeans sought an escape from the nationalism that had devastated the continent. The political elite took the lead in the search for a new structure for governance. The result was the E.U., a pioneering experiment in interdependence and multiculturalism. In 2012, the E.U. was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Explaining the Nobel Committee’s decision, Chairman Thorbjorn Jagland argued that the E.U. has transformed Europe, “from a continent of wars to a continent of peace.”[11] While it is possible to argue about the economics of the project, such arguments ignore the fact that the purpose of the E.U. was to prevent war. The Middle East has transitioned from a religious empire to a region torn by nationalism, now it needs to move toward post nationalism as its third political act, to bring stability to the region.
 The Alternative
 Many have argued that the promotion of liberal democracies is a precondition to peace in the Middle East, and the neoconservatives have pushed for regime change in many countries in the region, only to see violence, and extremism reach new heights. Peace building by focusing individual conflict has yielded precious little despite decades of international efforts. Alternately, the region could undergo further segregation and population transfer as proposed by people such as Michael Bernstam.[12] This approach will lead to ethnic cleansing and the creation of small warring, unsustainable states.
 How do we get there?
 It took Europe a cataclysmic war to abandon nationalism and seek an alternative framework. Moving the Middle East to a post nationalist structure will require that the regional actors be exhausted by and realize the futility of the current wars. It will also require a paradigm shift in thinking both inside and outside the region.
 Post nationalism in Europe remains a deeply misunderstood process in the Middle East. Many on the left believe that the E.U. is a capitalistmanifestation to create open markets and help big business. Islamists see it as areconstitution of Christendom. And nationalists are still attached to their dreamsand view the E.U. as a union of mature nations that have already achieved theirnationalist aspirations. Middle Eastern nationalists also argue thattheir brand of nationalism is different than the European variety. Arabs argue that theirnationalism is rooted in liberation nationalism and that the Zionists use the Holocaustas a reason to hold on to their nationalist project. But all these views ignore the history of the development of post nationalism in Europe, and the history ofnationalism in the Middle East.
 Work on the new framework should be initiated by local politicians, most likely from Iran and Turkey, with the consent of the major global powers. It would involve direct negotiations between potential member nations on the first steps toward and the overall parameters of the new structure. The E.U. can provide technical expertise, drawing on it vast experience in regional post nationalist frameworks. Other countries, most importantly Israel and Syria, can join these negotiations. It will be an evolving project that will be built one treaty at a time with an overarching goal of replacing the current zero sum structure with a new post nationalist framework. Peace-building institutes, like the Carter Center and The Norwegian Center for Conflict Resolution (NOREF), can take a leading role by hosting politicians and activists from the region to explore and promote this new solution.
 Potential Obstacles
 There will be resistance to such new framework from Islamists and nationalists inside the region. There are also potential obstacles from outside the region; the U.S might want to continue to isolate Iran. Russia is increasingly suspicious of post nationalism, and U.S.- Russian rivalry and mutual suspicion has the potential to prevent this project from moving forward.
 For those who see too much chaos in the Middle East to even ponder post-nationalism, it is worth keeping in mind that the E.U. was born in the aftermath of World War II when war, genocide and religious rivalry had swept the continent. The E.U. has been an evolving, contentious project that took shape in the shadow of the Cold War, in a divided Europe governed by many right-wing military dictatorships well into the 1970s. The E.U. was a top-down project engineered by a few visionary statesmen that allowed Europe to develop into what it is today: peaceful, democratic, and liberal. All of this human progress is at risk today by the escalating violence and dysfunction in the Middle East.
 Considering the decreasing strategic importance of the region to the U.S., and the potential seismic geopolitical impact of the continued instability in the Middle East, the U.S. should aim to stabilize the region as it continues to disengage from it. Patiently guided by long-range vision, The U.S. and in partnership with China, Russia and the E.U., should help guide local countries to seek a new post nationalist regional framework.
 Bibliography
 Beehner, Lionel.
“How Proxy Wars Work: And What That Means for Ending the Conflict in Syria.” Foreign Affairs. Nov. 12, 2015. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-11-12/how-proxy-wars-work
 Bernstam, Michael. “Redraw Country Lines in the Middle East.” Forbes. Dec. 23, 2015. http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2015/12/23/redraw-country-lines-in-the-middle-east/#78181fda7765
 Brzezinksi, Zbigniew.“Toward a Global Realignment.” The American Interest 11, No. 6, (April 17, 2016). http://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/04/17/toward-a-global-realignment/
 Dzyubenko, Olga. “Kyrgystan says Uighur militant groups behind attack on China’s Embassy.”Reuters. Sept. 7, 2016. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-kyrgyzstan-blast-china-idUSKCN11C1DK
 Mackey, Peg. “U.S. to overtake Saudi as Top Oil Producer: IEA.” Reuters. Nov. 12, 2012. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iea-oil-report-idUSBRE8AB0IQ20121112
 Noren, Alexander. 2012 Nobel Prize Award Ceremony. video. 80 min. 2012. http://www.lectoro.com/index.php?action=search&ytq=2012%20Nobel%20Prize%20Award%20Ceremony
 Petraeus, Gen. David (ret.). Address to the Senate Armed Services Committee on Syria. Sep 22, 2015. Youtube video. 1 min. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScBrQaDzgpA
 Prospero, a blog published by The Economist. http://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero.
 Schuman, Robert. “The Schuman Declaration – 9 May 1950.” European Union. Last updated Dec. 12, 2016. https://europa.eu/european-union/abouteu/symbols/europe-day/schuman-declaration_en
 WikiQuote. David Ben-Gurion.Last updated on July 1, 2016.
 https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/David_Ben-Gurion. Originally published in David Ben-Gurion, Memoirs (The World Publishing Company, 1970), 36.
 WikiQuote. David Ben-Gurion. Last updated on July 1, 2016. https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/David_Ben-Gurion.
 World Resources Institute Blog. http://www.wri.org/blog
 [1] Zbigniew Brzezinski, “Toward a Global Realignment,” The American Interest, 11, no. 6 (April 17, 2016), http://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/04/17/toward-a-global-realignment/.

 [2] Gen. David Petraeus (ret.), Address to Senate Armed Services Committee on Syria, Youtube video, 1 min, September 22, 2015, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScBrQaDzgpA.
 [3] Wikiquote, David Ben-Gurion. Last updated on July 1, 2016. https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/David_Ben-Gurion.
 [4] Ibid.
 [5] Peg Mackey, “U.S. to overtake Saudi as Top Oil Producer: IEA,” Reuters, Nov. 12, 2012,
 http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iea-oil-report-idUSBRE8AB0IQ20121112.
 [6] Olga Dzyubenko, “Kyrgystan says Uighur militant groups behind attack on China’s Embassy,”
 Reuters, Sept. 7, 2016, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-kyrgyzstan-blast-china-idUSKCN11C1DK.
 [7] Lionel Beehner, “How Proxy Wars Work: And What That Means for Ending the Conflict in Syria,” Foreign Affairs, Nov. 12, 2015, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-11-12/how-proxy-wars-work.
 [8] Robert Schuman, The Schuman Declaration – 9 May 1950, European Union, last updated Dec. 12, 2016, https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/symbols/europe-day/schuman-declaration_en.
 [9] Andrew Maddocks, Robert Samuel Young and Paul Reig, “Ranking the World’s Most Water Stressed Countries in 2040,” World Resources Institute (blog), Aug. 26, 2015, http://www.wri.org/blog/2015/08/ranking-world’s-most-water-stressed-countries-2040.
 [10] “Multiculturalism and the E.U.,” Prospero (blog) The Economist, April 30, 2015, http://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2015/04/multilingualism-and-eu-0.
 [11] Alexander Noren, 2012 Nobel Prize Award Ceremony, video, 80 min, 2012, http://www.lectoro.com/index.php?action=search&ytq=2012%20Nobel%20Prize%20Award%20Ceremony.
 [12] Michael Bernstam, “Redraw Country Lines in the Middle East,” Forbes, Dec. 23, 2015, http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2015/12/23/redraw-country-lines-in-the-middle-east/#78181fda7765.
 The post A Post-National Framework for Peace and Stability in the Middle East – by Sam Farah appeared first on Syria Comment.

Islam Strengthening in Europe with the Blessing of the Church"
 Giulio Meotti/Gatestone Institute/January 29/17
 https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9835/church-strengthening-islam
 There are now many Catholic commentators who are questioning the Church's blindness about the danger Europe is facing.
 "Islam has every chance massively to strengthen its presence in Europe with the blessing of the Church.... the Church is not only leading Europe to an impasse, it is also shooting itself in the foot." — Laurent Dandrieu, cultural editor of the French magazine Valeurs Actuelles.
 "It is clear that Muslims have an ultimate goal: conquering the world...Islam, through the sharia, their law...allows violence against the infidels, such as Christians....And what is the most important achievement? Rome." — Cardinal Raymond Burke, interview, Il Giornale.
 "[T]hey are not refugees, this is an invasion, they come here with cries of 'Allahu Akbar', they want to take over." — Laszlo Kiss Rigo, head of the Catholic Hungarian southern community.
 François Fillon published a book entitled, Vanquishing Islamic Totalitarianism, and he rose in the polls by vowing to control Islam and immigration: "We've got to reduce immigration to its strict minimum," Fillon said. "Our country is not a sum of communities, it is an identity!"
 Everyone in Italy and the rest of Europe will "soon be Muslim" because of our "stupidity", warned Monsignor Carlo Liberati, Archbishop Emeritus of Pompei. Liberati claimed that, thanks to the huge number of Muslim migrants alongside the increasing secularism of native Europeans, Islam will soon become the main religion of Europe. "All of this moral and religious decadence favours Islam", Archbishop Liberati explained.
 Décadence is also the title of a new book by the French philosopher Michel Onfray, in which he suggests that the Judeo-Christian era may have come to an end. He compares the West and Islam: "We have nihilism, they have fervor; we are exhausted, they have a great health; we have the past for us; they have the future for them".
 Archbishop Liberati belongs to a growing branch of Catholic leaders who refuse to see the future belonging to Islam in Europe. They speak in open opposition to Pope Francis, who does not seem too impressed by the collapse of Christianity due to falling birth rates, accompanied by religious apathy and its replacement by Islam.
 Monsignor Carlo Liberati, Archbishop Emeritus of Pompei (left) belongs to a growing branch of Catholic leaders who refuse to see the future belonging to Islam in Europe, and who speak in open opposition to Pope Francis (right).
 Pope Francis's official vision is personified by Bishop Nunzio Galantino, who was appointed by the Pontiff as the Secretary General of Italy's Bishops. Last December, Galantino gave an interview in which he dismissed any religious motivation behind jihadist attacks and claimed that, instead, "money" is what is behind them.
 There are now many Catholic commentators who are questioning the Church's blindness about the danger Europe is facing. One is the cultural editor of the French magazine Valeurs Actuelles, Laurent Dandrieu, who writes:
 "Islam has every chance massively to strengthen its presence in Europe with the blessing of the Church. The Church is watching the establishment of millions of Muslims in Europe... and Muslim worship in our continent as an inescapable manifestation of religious freedom. But the civilizational question is simply never asked .... By breaking away from the Europe's indigenous peoples and their legitimate concerns, the Church is not only leading Europe to an impasse, it is also shooting itself in the foot".
 Dandrieu lists Pope Francis' gestures and speeches in favor of Islam and migrants:
 "On October 1, 2014, the Pope received Eritrean survivors of a shipwreck off Lampedusa; on 8 February 2015, he made a surprise visit to a refugee camp in Ponte Mammolo, northeast of Rome; on April 18, he used the first official visit of the new Italian president, Sergio Mattarella, to demand 'a much larger commitment' for migrants; on 6 September 2015, at the conclusion of the Angelus in St Peter's Square, he called for 'every parish, religious community, monastery and sanctuary in Europe to host a family' of refugees; on March 24, 2016, he chose to celebrate the Holy Thursday in a structure housing 900 refugees, and to wash the feet to twelve asylum seekers; on May 28, he received children whose parents died in a boat that sank, filled with migrants; during the general audience of June 22, Francis went down to the crowd to bring back fifteen refugees".
 But as Liberati's case demonstrates, resistance to Pope Francis' vision of Europe is growing inside the Catholic Church.
 "It is clear that Muslims have an ultimate goal: conquering the world", Cardinal Raymond Burke said.
 "Islam, through the sharia, their law, wants to rule the world and allows violence against the infidels, like Christians. But we find it hard to recognize this reality and to respond by defending the Christian faith (...) I have heard several times an Islamic idea: 'what we failed to do with the weapons in the past we are doing today with the birth rate and immigration'. The population is changing. If this keeps up, in countries such as Italy, the majority will be Muslim (...) Islam realizes itself in the conquest. And what is the most important achievement? Rome".
 The first to denounce this dramatic trend was Italy's most important missionary, Father Piero Gheddo, who said that, due to falling fertility and Muslim fervor, "Islam would sooner rather than later conquer the majority in Europe". These concerns do not belong only to the Conservative wing of the Catholic Church.
 Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, Archbishop of Vienna and a candidate tipped to be the next Pope, is very close to Pope Francis, and is a centrist. Last September, on the anniversary of the Siege of Vienna, when Turkey's Ottoman troops nearly conquered Europe, Schönborn delivered a dramatic appeal to save Europe's Christian roots. "Many Muslims want and say that 'Europe is finished'", Cardinal Schönborn said, before accusing Europe of "forgetting its Christian identity". He then denounced the possibility of "an Islamic conquest of Europe".
 After a Tunisian, who arrived among a flood of migrants into Germany, murdered 12 people at a Christmas market in Berlin, the Catholic archbishop of the German capital, Heiner Koch, another "moderate" Catholic leader appointed by Pope Francis, also sounded a warning: "Perhaps we focused too much on the radiant image of humanity, on the good. Now in the last year, or perhaps also in recent years, we have seen: No, there is also evil".
 The head of the Czech Roman Catholic Church, Miloslav Vlk, also warned about the threat of Islamization. "Muslims in Europe have many more children than Christian families; that is why demographers have been trying to come up with a time when Europe will become Muslim", Cardinal Vlk claimed. He also blamed Europe itself for the Islamic takeover:
 "Europe will pay dearly for having left its spiritual foundations; this is the last period that will not continue for decades when it may still have a chance to do something about it. Unless the Christians wake up, life may be Islamised and Christianity will not have the strength to imprint its character on the life of people, not to say society".
 Cardinal Dominik Duka, Archbishop of Prague and Primate of Bohemia, has also questioned Pope Francis' "welcoming culture".
 Among the Eastern Catholic bishops there are many voices raising concerns about Europe's demographic and religious revolution. One belongs to the leader of the Catholics in Lebanon, who paid an extremely high price for the Islamization of their own country, including murder and exile, and now see the danger coming to Europe itself. "I have heard many times from Muslims that their goal is to conquer Europe with two weapons: faith and the birth rate", Cardinal Bechara Rai said.
 Another voice belongs to the French-born Bishop Paul Desfarges, who heads the diocese of Constantine in Algeria: "It's no surprise that Islam has taken on such importance", Desfarges said. "It's an issue that concerns Europe". Sydney Cardinal George Pell then urged "a discussion of the consequences of the Islamic presence in the Western world". Pell was echoed by Laszlo Kiss Rigo, the head of the Catholic Hungarian southern community, who said that "they are not refugees, this is an invasion, they come here with cries of 'Allahu Akbar', they want to take over".
 On the political level, there is another a tendency, that of strong Catholic leaders who challenge Pope Francis on the Islamic question and immigration. The most important is the French presidential candidate François Fillon, one of the first politicians who "doesn't hide the fact that he's Catholic". Fillon published a book entitled, Vanquishing Islamic Totalitarianism, and he rose in the polls by vowing to control Islam and immigration: "We've got to reduce immigration to its strict minimum," Fillon said. "Our country is not a sum of communities, it is an identity!"
 These politicians, bishops and cardinals might convince Pope Francis not to abandon Europe, the cradle of Christianity and Western civilization, to a looming dark fate. Michel Onfray wrote at the end of his book: "Judeo-Christianity ruled for two millennia. An honorable period for a civilization. The boat now sinks: we can only sink with elegance". It is urgent now to prevent that.
 *Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.
 © 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Turkey: Erdogan's Grab for Absolute Power
Burak Bekdil/Gatestone Institute/January 29/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9849/erdogan-absolute-power
Erdogan will effectively consolidate the power of three legislative bodies into one powerful executive office: himself.
Erdogan's "Turkish-style presidency" is already a presidency with too much power held by one man. If approved at the referendum, the changes will make Erdogan head of government, head of state and head of the ruling party -- all at the same time.
It would transfer powers traditionally held by parliament to the presidency, thereby rendering the parliament merely a ceremonial, advisory body.
The opposition looks fragmented and helpless in telling the masses that reforms would concentrate excessive powers in the hands of a leader who has increasingly displayed authoritarian tendencies.
At the moment, Erdogan is effectively the absolute ruler. If he wins the vote he becomes the absolute ruler. If he loses, he remains effectively the absolute ruler until he tries again to become the absolute ruler.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's one-man show goes on; he may soon progress from effectively having absolute authority to actually having absolute authority. He would apparently like to put an official seal on his increasingly autocratic regime. If a simple majority of Turks vote "yes" in a national referendum on proposed constitutional amendments in April, Erdogan will effectively consolidate the power of three legislative bodies into one powerful executive office: himself. He would then be installed as a leader with virtually unlimited authority.
Although the current constitution grants him largely symbolic powers, Erdogan has acted as the effective head of the executive branch since he became Turkey's first elected president in August 2014. He has explicitly -- and, it appears, happily -- violated the constitution by acting as an absolute head of government. In May 2016, he forced Ahmet Davutoglu, his own confidant and prime minister, out of office; Erdogan evidently suspected that the man was not working hard enough to push for the absolute executive presidential system Erdogan has evidently been craving. Only seven months ago, Davutoglu had won a parliamentary election with 49.5% of the national vote.
Erdogan replaced Davutoglu with Binali Yildirim, who has proven to be more enthusiastic about terminating the prime minister's office and transferring all powers to an all-powerful president. As Erdogan's (and Yildirim's) ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) lacked the parliamentary majority to put any constitutional amendment to public vote, the proposed changes therefore required support from the opposition benches. (A minimum of 330 votes is required in the country's 550-member assembly, as opposed to 317 seats controlled by the AKP.)
A year ago, that would have looked unimaginable. But a nationalist opposition party, the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), made a U-turn from its public pledges of "never letting Erdogan become the executive president," and decided to support the reform bill. Political observers are still trying to figure out what may have pushed the MHP from one extreme to the other; there is not yet a clear explanation.
Erdogan's "Turkish-style presidency" is already a presidency with too much power held by one man. If approved in the referendum, the changes will make Erdogan head of government, head of state and head of the ruling party -- all at the same time. Erdogan would have the power to appoint cabinet ministers without requiring a confidence vote from parliament, propose budgets and appoint more than half the members of the nation's highest judicial body. He would also have the power to dissolve parliament, impose states of emergency and issue decrees. Alarmingly, the proposed system lacks the safety mechanisms of checks and balances that exist in other countries such as the United States. It would transfer powers traditionally held by parliament to the presidency, thereby rendering the parliament merely a ceremonial, advisory body.
With support from MHP, the reform bill passed in parliament with 339 votes in favor -- nine more than required to put it to a national vote.
The way the Turkish parliament debated the bill looked like a prelude to the way Erdogan's totally autocratic presidency will fuel tensions in the months ahead. Several rounds of fist-fighting broke out. Brawls were daily scenes in parliamentary sessions. Screaming matches and physical altercations sent lawmakers to hospitals.
In one instance, an independent female lawmaker handcuffed herself to the microphone on the lectern for an hour to protest the presidential bill. Deputies from the government benches tried to remove her but opposition deputies sprang to her defense, while punches and kicks were exchanged. The assembly saw its first-ever brawl between female lawmakers who punched each other and pulled one another's hair. One female opposition deputy was thrown to the floor and her prosthetic artificial arm knocked off, injuring her severely.
Several brawls recently broke out in Turkey's parliament during debate on a bill for constitutional amendments. (Image source: CBS News)
Nevertheless, Erdogan is happy. He will soon launch his "yes" campaign together with the nationalists in the opposition (MHP). He is confident that he will win -- he has not lost a single election or referendum since he came to power in November 2002. Observers expect that a clear majority of his party loyalists (around 40% of 50%) will vote "yes" in addition to around half of the nationalists in opposition (around 6% of 12%). That makes a combined 46% of the vote. Some of the splinter Islamist parties and non-AKP voters who favor a presidential system, too, are expected to vote "yes," lifting the pro-Erdogan vote to a range of 50% to 55%. There is a sizeable group of "undecided" whose preferences may be influenced by Erdogan's huge propaganda machinery or by the argument that a strong president would strengthen Turkey as it confronts a broad array of internal and external security threats.
The opposition (Kurds and secular and liberal Turks), on the other hand, looks fragmented and helpless in telling the masses that reforms would concentrate excessive powers in the hands of a leader who has increasingly displayed authoritarian tendencies. There are concerns that the opposition, under the state of emergency Erdogan's government declared in 2016, may find it too difficult effectively and freely to campaign against the proposed amendments.
Even in the unlikely event of a win for the "no" campaign it will not be the end of the world for Erdogan. He would be bruised, perhaps badly. But he would play another card: a snap election. He would win new parliamentary elections and push for similar amendments, once again trying his chances. He would have nothing to lose. He appears to rely on a popular support keeping him afloat.
From a policy-making point of view, however, a "yes" or a "no" vote will not fundamentally change the dynamics under which Turkey is being ruled. At the moment, Erdogan is effectively the absolute ruler. If he wins the vote, he becomes the absolute ruler. If he loses he remains effectively the absolute ruler until he tries again to become the absolute ruler.
**Burak Bekdil, one of Turkey's leading journalists, was just fired from Turkey's leading newspaper after 29 years, for writing what was taking place in Turkey for Gatestone. He is a Fellow at the Middle East Forum.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Austria: Does the Church Really Care about Terrorism?
 Judith Bergman/Gatestone Institute/January 29/17
 https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9760/austria-church-migrants-terrorism
 The Austrian Military Intelligence Service has predicted that up to 15 million migrants from Africa could arrive in the EU by 2020.
 Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, Archbishop of Vienna, recently admitted on Austrian television that he had come to "rethink" his approach to the migrant crisis: Instead of accepting all the refugees, aid should be given in the Middle East and Africa, so that migrants could stay there.
 "Will there be an Islamic conquest of Europe? Many Muslims want that and say: Europe is at the end." — Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, Archbishop of Vienna, Festival of the 'Holy Name of Mary', September, 2016.
 Cardinal Schönborn subsequently backtracked, saying that his words had been misinterpreted as an attack against Muslims and refugees: "Europe's Christian legacy is in danger, because we Europeans have squandered it. That has absolutely nothing to do with Islam nor with the refugees. It is clear that many Islamists would like to take advantage of our weakness, but they are not responsible for it. We are."
 In his Christmas sermon, broadcast live on Austria's ORF and Germany's ZDF TV channels, Catholic diocesan Bishop Aegidius Zsifkovics of St. Martin's Cathedral in Eisenstadt, Austria, pontificated that tightening borders is an "erroneous opinion":
 "Barbed wire, fences and walls are now many people's answer to the refugees [coming into] Europe. The terror of a few, as last seen in Berlin, reinforce many of us in this erroneous opinion".
 Bishop Zsifkovics declared that we cannot let "Cowardly terror attacks, like that in Berlin, succeed in destabilizing our society, making us colder and less solidary. Let us not allow the terrorists this triumph -- we will not be ice cold like them!"
 Since the bishop's speech, the Austrian Military Intelligence Service has predicted that up to 15 million migrants from Africa could arrive in the EU by 2020. The report predicts that a sharp rise in unemployment across the African continent will create a new wave of economic migrants, which will dwarf the current one, which has brought over a million migrants to Europe since the migrant crisis began.
 Austrian diocesan Bishop Aegidius Zsifkovics. (Image source: Catholic Church of Austria)
 In November 2016, Austria's interior ministry indicated that of the 287 Islamic radicals identified in the country in the past few years, 40 percent arrived as migrants looking for asylum. The data covers a period from early 2011 until 1 July 2016.
 Bishop Zsifkovics' sermon was broadcast only five days after Anis Amri, an illegal immigrant from Tunisia, rammed a hijacked truck through the crowd at a busy Christmas market in Berlin, murdering 12 people and injuring many others.
 Bishop Zsifkovics is Austria's representative in the Commission of the Bishops' Conferences of the European Union (COMECE). According to the organization's website, "The COMECE Secretariat works for the rights of migrants, refugees and hosting societies to be harmonised and respected in the EU for the sake of the common good in the Christian spirit of welcoming the stranger".
 The Archbishop of Vienna, Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, tipped to become the next Pope, appears to have a more realistic take on developments in Austria. His recent comments represent a sharp departure from the virtually unanimous view of the migrant crisis in the Catholic Church, represented by Bishop Zsifkovics. Cardinal Schönborn recently admitted on Austrian television that he had come to "rethink" his approach to the migrant crisis: Instead of accepting all the refugees, aid should be given in the Middle East and Africa, so that migrants could stay there, Schönborn said. He added that he was becoming "more cautious" in his attitude, as migrants had arrived in "unbelievable number" and "We have had to learn, this [crisis] goes well beyond our capacity and ability."
 His statements made big headlines, and were described by one Austrian commentator as:
 "unusual words for a representative of the Church... But they are also words which prove the cardinal's [sense of] reality. Yes, the enormous onslaught of asylum seekers has overwhelmed us -- yes, you can admit that."
 That such a view is considered "unusual" says it all.
 Cardinal Schönborn has clearly harbored doubts about the migrant situation for a while. In September 2016, he made headlines when speaking at the festival of the "Holy Name of Mary," which was introduced 333 years ago to celebrate the Western victory over Ottoman forces at the Battle of Vienna, in 1683. In his speech, Cardinal Schönborn asked, "Will there be an Islamic conquest of Europe? Many Muslims want that and say: Europe is at the end."
 He subsequently backtracked, saying that his words had been misinterpreted as an attack against Muslims and refugees:
 "Europe's Christian legacy is in danger, because we Europeans have squandered it. That has absolutely nothing to do with Islam nor with the refugees. It is clear that many Islamists would like to take advantage of our weakness, but they are not responsible for it. We are.... One must not take my homily to be a call to defend ourselves against the refugees, this was not at all my intention."
 Already in February 2015, the British anti-extremist think tank, the Quilliam Foundation, translated an ISIS document, which detailed plans to use Libya as a gateway to Europe, sending terrorists masquerading as refugees, and urging ISIS fighters to flood into Libya from Syria and Iraq to then head for Italy and elsewhere[1].
 What the ISIS document describes is known as a hijra, which means spreading Islam, or jihad, by emigration. According to the Quran:
 "And whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find on the earth many locations and abundance. And whoever leaves his home as an emigrant to Allah and His Messenger and then death overtakes him, his reward has already become incumbent upon Allah. And Allah is ever Forgiving and Merciful." (Quran 4:100).
 Unfortunately, national decision makers all over Europe ignored the news contained in this ISIS document -- an ironic result considering the current hysteria over "fake news".
 One can think of many valid reasons for Cardinal Schönborn to "rethink" his approach to the migrant crisis. One of them is the inability of Austrian police to protect Austrian women from sexual assaults by migrants. In a pathetic move to cover up their helplessness, Austria's police distributed 6,000 rape alarms on New Year's Eve to prevent a repeat of the mass sex attacks in Germany a year ago. If activated, the complimentary gadgets emit a shrill sound aimed at chasing away potential aggressors.
 The precaution does not seem to have been very effective, especially not in Innsbruck. According to the Express, on New Year's Eve, "Vienna's emergency services were inundated with calls across the country as reports of multiple sex attacks emerged, reportedly committed by dark-haired men with beards". In the city of Innsbruck alone, some 18 women reported having been groped by up to 10 men on Innsbruck's main square, where around 25,000 gathered. Senior police official Ernst Kranebitter said:
 "We have not had anything like this happen here before. They were dancing around the victims and then suddenly grabbed their breast or stuck their hands between their legs. That's what made it hard for others to notice what was going on -- it all happened amid festivities."
 In Oberdorf, Upper Austria, during the annual Christmas performance by the local kindergarten, a 24-year-old Somali man suddenly appeared on the stage during the performance, took a Koran from a plastic bag and began to preach. When he was arrested, he began yelling "Allahu Akhbar" ["Allah is the Greatest"]. "We were petrified and had tremendous fear for our children," said one of the kindergarten teachers. The Austrian news outlet, OE24, speculated: "What the African wanted to achieve with his Koran action... is still unclear". Indeed, after so many years, the battle cry of "Allahu Akhbar" continues to baffle Europeans. What could it possibly mean?
 Then there is a 72-year old grandmother refusing to eat and dying in hospital, after apparently losing the will to live. On September 1, 2015, she had offered her hand to a 17-year-old asylum seeker from Afghanistan to pull him out of a canal where he was swimming; he then raped her. He is due for release from prison in a few months, after serving a 20-month sentence, and will not be deported.
 Are these events what Bishop Zsifkovics had in mind when he preached that accepting migrants from the Middle East and Africa must continue, as doing otherwise would destabilize society and give the terrorists the victory of making Austrians "ice cold like them"?
 Since New Year's, in the Innviertel region, statues have been beheaded, prayer books burned and sacred images destroyed. Police have said the attacks could be religiously motivated, but they have not yet identified any suspects. On New Year's Eve, a chapel in the village of St. Radegund was attacked, and damage done to a statue of the Virgin Mary. Prayer books and wooden objects from the chapel were burned in a nearby wood. Another chapel at the nearby town of Auerbach was also attacked, with vandals smashing the glass guarding two Virgin Mary statues and stealing at least 22 murals, which they burned in the woods. A few days later, in Braunau am Inn, a third chapel was attacked. A figure of Jesus was stolen from a cross, as well as several other objects, and a statue of St. Barbara was beheaded.
 In the past year, Innviertel has witnessed an influx of migrants as part of Europe's ongoing crisis.
 While it remains to be seen who did this, the beheading of religious statues certainly raises the legitimate suspicions of a religiously motivated attack. If so, might Bishop Zsifkovics and others in the church who think the same way be persuaded to rethink their stance?
 Bishop Zsifkovics, unlike Cardinal Schönborn, but with so many of his peers in Western Europe, seems to view reality as something they can bend to their wishes and discard at will, especially if it offers the opportunity for moral posturing. The destabilization of Europe has already begun. Bishops such as Zsifkovics are unfortunately helping to speed it along.
 *Judith Bergman is a writer, columnist, lawyer and political analyst.
 [1] The ISIS document states:
 "... It has a long coastline and looks upon the southern Crusader states, which can be reached with ease by even a rudimentary boat and note that the number of 'illegal immigration' trips from this coast is massive, estimated to be as high as 500 people a day, as a low estimate. According to many [of these immigrants], it is easily possible to pass through Maritime Security Checkpoints and arrive in cities. If this was even partially exploited and developed strategically, pandemonium could be wrought in the southern Europe. It is even possible that there could be a closure of shipping lines because of the targeting of Crusader ships and tankers".
 In September 2015, Newsweek Europe also reported on ISIS making calls for hijrah to Libya on social media.
 © 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Counting down to Doomsday with Donald Trump
Maria Dubovikova/Al Arabiya/January 29/17
So welcome to the epoch of two-and-a- half minutes to Midnight. The Doomsday clock has never ever been so close to midnight. Even in the worst days of the US -USSR confrontation, the Doomsday clock had not been beating so dramatically.
Considered populist during his presidential campaign, Donald Trump since the first days of his presidentship proves that he is not. Now many the world over are having doubts about Trump being a harmless populist rather than an unpredictable activist.
Trump during his presidential campaign gave many promises that were looking as traits of his epatage image, populist declarations, whatever, but not the realistic pre-election campaign promises. But what is happening is that all of them appear to be put into action one by one. The withdrawal of the US from international organizations no longer seems unrealistic. And being realistic, his promises are about to spread panic.
Cutting UN funding
The draft order entitled ‘Auditing and Reducing US Funding of International Organisations’ and obtained by The New York Times, even though it is being kept on hold by the Administration is quite shocking. And in case of the UN even dramatic. The draft order is to terminate funding to the UN and its bodies where Palestine holds its membership and to all international organizations recognizing its statehood. The tragedy here is multidimensional. Firstly, his intentions pose existential threat to the UN. Secondly, it is an open blackmailing of the most preeminent international organization. Thirdly, this order nullifies years of attempts to settle the Israeli-Palestine conflict on the basis of an internationally recognized two-state solution.
The UN appears to be in a very strange situation regarding this order in case it is finally signed. In case the UN yields to Trump, it will lose its credibility in the eyes of the international community. In case it does not yield to Trump’s pressure it has to face enormous, hardly resolvable financial crisis and crisis of credibility.
The UN appears to be in a very strange situation regarding this order in case it is finally signed. In case the UN yields to Trump, it will lose its credibility in the eyes of the international community. In case it does not yield to Trump’s pressure it has to face enormous, hardly resolvable financial crisis and crisis of credibility. Trump is putting the final charge to blow up the rest of the shaky remains of the world order founded by the international community following the World War II. And thus setting the stage for uncontrollable chaos in the world.
The Palestine issue is another bloody red mark. Together with the racist and discriminating order not to let citizens of seven Muslim countries into the US, it reveals the outlines and course of the new US Administration’s Middle Eastern policy. In case Trump stays in office for the whole presidential term, we are heading towards the extreme regional turbulence, to shake the foundations of the whole international community.
The resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict that has been simmering for over 60 years, lies exclusively in the two-state solution. With Trump, this issue takes on totally new and dangerous dimensions. On December 23, 2016, the Security Council has unanimously voted for the 2334 resolution reaffirming that Israel’s Settlements have no legal validity and constitute flagrant violation of international law. The resolution that gave hope, is now turning to be useless rubbish, especially regarding Trump’s attitude towards the institution and the existing rules. The further development of the conflict is directly depended on the deeds of the American administration. What Trump is doing now with the conflict can be compared to the taking out of the safety pin from a grenade. In case the US moves its embassy to Jerusalem, also bringing to life one of Trump’s pre-election promises – this would be compared to the toss of the grenade. Explosion will be imminent. The stated position on the Palestine matter will significantly damage the existing ties with Arab allies as well, pushing them more and more to minimize their dependency on Washington and make them look for new partnerships. The Muslim world, in case the xenophobic and Islamophobic course continues, at is probable, will turn its face against the US.
Iran policy
Another significant worry stems from Trump’s position on Iran. The Iranian nuclear deal was somehow the guarantee of stability and certitude that Iran will fulfill its obligations and the country will not join the club of nuclear powers.
And at the first signs as Iranians were banned from traveling to the US, was the symmetrical response by Tehran which banned American citizens’ entry to Iran. This promises to lead to further deterioration of the situation and collapse of the deal that was reached after a lengthy and tedious process. Any uncontrolled developments around the Iranian nuclear program can result in enormous global catastrophe. Despite all expectations that these were idle talk from Trump, he really intends to go ahead with what he has planned. He is not used to follow someone’s rules. He has got used to establish and impose his own. Alliances and international organizations serving non-commercial causes do not exist in business, so for Trump there is no need for the US to take part in them if they put limitations on his intentions, and especially if they do not bring evident profit and instead grabs US money. In Trump’s world everything is counted in dollars. The term of value exists mostly when it refers to the dollar, with rare exceptions for some Christian values the current administration intends to promote. Moving back to a bipolar world  He will build an alliance with Russia if he considers this to be a profitable deal. After Saturday’s phone call it is turning from possibility to probability. And it is looking like Trump intends to move back to the bipolar world, but where the poles are not confronting, but cooperating in dealing with global challenges together. Just because it is profitable and less expensive.
With the notorious Christian rhetoric, renunciation of support for the LGBT community, of NGOs dealing with abortions, Trump is moving closer to Russia where the Church has started to drastically influence social and political life.
He will bring American factories and plants back home, damaging the existing global economic system, just because this according to him, will be better for the home politics and home economy. He will kick out all the immigrants, if this gives jobs for the Americans and permits to cut state expenses. And this can be proclaimed racist, discriminative, inhumane. For Trump it is not. Nothing personal. Just business. But for the rest of the world – it is a countdown to Doomsday.

Oman’s participation in the Islamic coalition: What are the benefits?
Dr. Ibrahim Al-Othaimin/Al Arabiya/January 29/17
The announcement by the Sultanate of Oman that it will join the Saudi-led Islamic military counter-terrorism coalition has been widely welcomed in the Gulf, throughout the Arab world and by the wider Muslim community. Oman said in a statement that such a move comes “within the framework of the Muslim world’s mutual understanding of the leading role played by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in bringing peace, security and stability to areas dominated by terrorist violence.”Oman’s participation in the coalition raises the number of its member states to 41, which represents 72 percent of the members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. The coalition was initially formed by 34 member states on December 15, 2015, rising to 40, with the Chiefs of Staff taking part in a founding meeting held in Riyadh. Various methods of counter-terrorism have been set by the coalition including military, ideological and financial confrontation. Oman’s presence will certainly enhance the capability of the coalition to face the said challenges.
Experience
The accumulated experience of Omani security agencies, including its highly qualified and competent foreign intelligence agency, will provide significant assistance to the coalition due to its deep-rooted experience in combating terrorism and extremism.
The coalition can collaborate with the Omani security agencies regarding information exchange and the unification of vision and mechanisms to combat terrorism and extremism. Likewise, Oman can benefit from the coalition securing its land ports, seaports and airports from terrorist organizations and preventing them from infiltrating its territories from neighboring Yemen. The announcement that Oman is joining the coalition indicates shared visions and attitudes to deter any threat to the region. It expresses Oman’s support for the attitudes of the GCC states in particular and Arab and Muslim attitudes in general. Oman’s efforts in the field of social peace, combating terrorism and the consolidation of tolerance and co-existence among its citizens form a significant tributary to the coalition.
Global Peace Index
According to the third report of the Global Peace Index, issued by the Institute of Economics and Peace in 2015, “Oman scored ‘zero’ in the index of terrorism, a mark that represents the pinnacle of security from terrorist threats.” The report attributes this success to “the efforts exerted by the Sultanate in the strict regulation of any issue that is relevant to extremism or sectarian intolerance.” Many reports have shown that not a single Omani has ever joined ISIS, which reflects the awareness of the people of Oman and their government’s efforts in combating terrorist ideology. On the financial level, Oman is rich in its experience in anti-money laundering and terrorism financing. Oman came 29th out of 162 countries, according to the Basel Governance report on money laundering in 2014. The Basel report is highly credible as it uses data issued by the International Financial Action Task Force on money laundering and terrorism financing. Hence, the coalition can benefit from Oman’s efforts in this area through prolonged coordination and by sharing its experience with the financial institutes of the member states. Finally, the announcement that Oman is joining the coalition indicates shared visions and attitudes to deter any threat to the region. It expresses Oman’s support for the attitudes of the GCC states in particular and Arab and Muslim attitudes in general. The efforts of Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, second deputy premier and minister of defense, in bringing about Oman’s decision cannot be overlooked, as they are an extension of his efforts in forming the coalition to create an Islamic deterrent force to combat terrorism, enhance international peace and security and promote Islamic coherence and brotherhood.
**This article was first published in Saudi Gazette on Jan. 26, 2017.

Entertainment in Saudi Arabia and the meaning of city living
Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/January 29/17
Cultural, entertainment and art events in Saudi Arabia have stirred a loud controversy despite the fact that there has been very few of them. The disagreement is not between those who support them and oppose them or between those who desire them and fear them or between those who interact with them or keep away from them. Rejection is no longer limited to one's personal choice, as some have imposed their opinions on others by rejecting the arts entirely. On the other hand, the Saudi commission for recreation has not forcefully obliged those who oppose arts to attend any of these events. imposing opinions on others and turning this opinion into a law violates one's right to choose from the recreational events that have been made available. It's is one’s right to choose not to listen to music or to hate movies, because they are conservative and think the entertainment is lewd or because they are a communist and think the entertainment is imperialist. However, imposing opinions on others and turning this opinion into a law violates one's right to choose from the recreational events that have been made available. The modern interpretation of city living means making options available for others and paving the way for all people with different tastes to choose what they like. The city is like a big market where all options are made available and the shopper takes what he wants. This is simply an act of civilization but the buyer cannot convince others around him to buy the same merchandise he buys. This should be the workings of city living.
**This article was first published in Okaz on Jan 29, 2017.

The first seven lean days of Donald Trump
Hisham Melhem/Al Arabiya/January 29/17
He stormed Washington like a vengeful ill-wind. Donald Trump came to tame and to conquer Washington, like a Roman General entering the Eternal City. He saw, and desperately wanted to be seen by his adoring multitudes that came to see him and listen to him from the faraway provinces and to watch his coronation. He darkly spoke about a dangerous world, telling the people that he came to disrupt traditions and observed customs, not to preserve them or live by them. He used his words sparingly not to elucidate facts but to obfuscate them, not to reveal truths but to conceal them. This was the dawn of a not so brave new world, in which words and facts keep melting and changing their contours and meanings like the melting clocks in Salvador Dali’s painting The Persistence of Memory. In the days that followed he would spew fire and brimstone, lashing out at would-be conspirators within and hostiles beyond the seas. Trump did not see his realm as a 'shining city upon a hill', but rather a city with crumbling walls that could not withstand the repeated assaults of the modern day Visigoths. His walls, which will bear his name, will be tall, mighty and impenetrable.
“The world is a mess”
In his first seven days, Trump wielded his pen like a sword slashing previous decisions, undermining settled laws, and signing new executive orders proclaiming new policies that are likely to create new adversaries and enemies. In the city where Trump reigned, Executive Orders were raining daily; he signed them with relish under the limelight, pretending that his signature will render them concrete realities. He may not know, or even care that some of them may not muster the inevitable legal challenges. He signed them with the abandon that only the head of a Junta could display after a successful coup, signing military communiques introducing the new post-coup political reality. For what Donald Trump and his new lieutenants have wrought is nothing short of a political coup. Yet beyond the glee and the arrogant braggadocio, President Trump could not hide the fact that most of his executive orders related to international trade and security, were rooted in the fear and loathing of a hostile world. In his first television interview with the ABC network, president Trump was asked about the impact of his decision to suspend immigration from seven majority Muslim countries; his answer mirrored the gloomy world he invoked in his inaugural speech. “The world is a mess. The world is as angry as it gets. What, you think this is going to cause a little more anger? The world is an angry place.”
It was ironic that President Trump signed his order banning Muslim immigrants and refugees on Holocaust Remembrance Day. The symbolism was powerful and poignant
One of the most enduring and disturbing vignettes of President Trump’s first week at the White House was the joint brief press conference at the conclusion of his talks with visiting British Prime Minister Theresa May. A surreal moment came in the middle of the press conference when president Trump extolled the benefit of torture, oblivious to the fact that American law prohibits torture. Trump stated that his defense secretary retired General James Mattis had stated publicly that he is against torture, specifically waterboarding, then he added “I don’t necessarily agree” but that in this case Mr. Mattis “will override” him. Before this encounter, president Trump emphatically told an interviewer that he believes that torture “works”.
In seven days, President Trump began to upend the complex political, economic and strategic architecture that Democratic and Republican presidents have built and preserved in the world and at home since the end of the Second World War. Even before his inauguration, Mr. Trump succeeded in alienating America’s traditional allies in Europe and Asia, by questioning the validity of an “obsolete” NATO alliance, and by dismissing the importance of the European Union, and calling into question the benefits of maintaining strong alliances with countries like Japan and South Korea. Mr. Trump’s strange admiration of Russian president Vladimir Putin, his refusal to condemn his domestic repression and occupation and annexation of Crimea, threaten to undermine 70 years of special Trans-Atlantic relations.
Globalization and its discontents
By withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal, designed to deepen and expand economic ties among the twelve countries bordering the Pacific Ocean, minus China, Trump dealt a blow to an old established and bipartisan American economic orthodoxy: open, free trade. The president of the United States, the mother of globalization, instead of deepening America’s economic heft in Asia, was beating a retreat while threatening trade protection measures and ceding the Asia-Pacific theatre to a rising China.
Trump’s decision to act on his xenophobic pledge to build a wall separating the United States from Mexico, its third largest economic partner and a country with which America is linked in so many complex ways, is disconcerting to say the least. Mr. Trump came to undermine the policies of his three predecessors towards Mexico which were based on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) enacted in 1994 among the United States, Canada and Mexico, creating a major economic zone without tariff barriers among the three countries. Mr. Trump wants to renegotiate NAFTA, which has been on the whole a positive agreement for the US From the beginning of his untraditional campaign, Mr. Trump treated Mexico as a free loader, a country that exports drugs and rapists and what he sees as human refuse to America. And to deepen the humiliation of America’s southern neighbor, Trump wants to build his wall and demand that Mexico foot the bill. It is as if Mexico is expected to deliver on an edict issued by a colonial master. When Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto called off his trip to Washington protesting president Trump’s decision to start building the wall, the White House threatened to slap Mexico with a 20% import tax on Mexican goods to finance the wall. Thus, in less than a week Mr. Trump was threatening a gratuitous trade war with a close friend, a neighbor and a major trading partner.
President Trump’s position on the Mexican wall is bizarre and embarrassing, but his views on Iraqi oil that he repeated during the campaign and during his first week in office are downright dangerous and illegal. Mr. Trump has been criticizing the Obama administration because it withdrew from Iraq early, and did not seize, control and exploit Iraq’s oil fields. When he visited the CIA on his second day as president he repeated the old lament but added flippantly, “so we should have kept the oil. But, okay, maybe we’ll have another chance.” Trump kept insisting on his position and claimed that his critics are “fools”. The president of the United States, circa 2017 was thinking out loud about the possibility of using America’s armed forces to violate International Law and act like pirates by occupying and stealing the natural resources of another country.
The Muslims are not coming
And on the seventh day, it was the Muslims’ turn to get Trump’s angry attention. During a visit to the Pentagon, president Trump brandished his pen and signed another executive order suspending admission of all refugees for 120 days pending the establishment of a rigorous system of vetting the backgrounds of applicants from majority Muslim countries, while giving, for the first time preference to religious minorities, namely the Christians. The order also halts the admission of refugees from Syria indefinitely, and bars entry into the United States for 90 days of citizens from seven “terror-prone” majority Muslim states in the Middle East and North Africa. Those countries are Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. What was especially shocking was the announcement from the Department of Homeland Security that the executive order will, in fact, stop Green Card holders (permanent residents) from the seven countries from returning to the United States if they traveling abroad. As expected, lawyers representing civil rights groups and affected individuals began writing their legal briefs challenging the legality of the president’s executive order.
The order was called “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States”. The new vetting system will be designed to weed out “radical Islamic terrorists”. President Trump said “we don’t want them here;” referring to Islamist terrorists “We only want to admit those into our country who will support our country and love deeply our people.” In an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network, before he signed the order, Trump was asked if he would give priority to persecuted Christians in the Middle East for admission as refugees, and his answer was an emphatic “Yes”. The president of the US was engaging in illegal religious discrimination. During president Obama’s administration admission was based on the merit and not on religious or sectarian basis. Trump said the Christians in Syria have been “horribly treated,” he added. “Do you know if you were a Christian in Syria it was impossible, at least very tough, to get into the United States? If you were a Muslim you could come in, but if you were a Christian it was almost impossible. And the reason that was so unfair — everybody was persecuted, in all fairness — but they were chopping off the heads of everybody, but more so the Christians. And I thought it was very, very unfair. So we are going to help them.” But, Trump’s implied discrimination against the entry of Christian refugees during the Obama administration was totally baseless, according to numerous independent investigations.
When drafts of the order were leaked to some newspapers earlier in the week they contained a section calling for the establishment of safe zones inside Syria and neighboring states to protect civilians fleeing violence pending their return to their homes or resettlement in other countries. It is not clear why this section was removed.
“The voyage of the damned”
What followed the day after the order was issued, were countless tales of woes, by immigrants, refugees and permanent residents who were stranded at airports all over the world; families were ejected from planes waiting to take-off from overseas airports, others detained after landing in the US and others were send back to their original homes. By one stroke of a pen, president Trump debased the ideals of America and left a trail of international tears. Americans all over the country staged protests at airports, denouncing the order as illegal, discriminatory and un-American.
It was ironic that President Trump signed his order banning Muslim immigrants and refugees on Holocaust Remembrance Day. The symbolism was powerful and poignant. In the spring of 1939, the United States refused to allow more than 900 Jewish refugees on board the transatlantic liner St. Louis fleeing Germany to enter the country. The “voyage of the damned” as the plight of the refugees became known later, was covered extensively by the European and American media while the ship was sailing off the Florida coast, but America remained inhospitable. The ship returned to Europe and the passengers found refuge in 4 countries. When Germany conquered Western Europe in May 1940, most of the refugees were trapped, and 254 of them were killed in the Holocaust. In 1939, America was not kind to strangers, even those whose lives were in peril. The Great depression which victimized many Americans, hardened the hearts of many more; in one poll 83 percent of Americans were opposed to easing the restrictions on the immigration quotas imposed in 1924. In those bleak years, America was swept by an unforgiving wave of nativism and isolationism that sought to keep the country out of the coming war in Europe. The current wave of xenophobia, Islamophobia and nativism unleashed by Donald J. Trump, echoes the fear of the 1930’s.
Brick walls and virtual walls
President Trump’s first week, saw him dueling with journalists and pundits and politicians including members of his own party who criticized his obsession with his image as a strong and popular leader, and his insistence contrary to the facts that his inauguration was the most watched in history. Mr. Trump even defended his senior advisor Stephen Bannon who accused the American media of being the “opposition party”. Mr. Bannon went as far as demanding the silence of the media since it failed to understand the Trump phenomenon, saying to a reporter from the New York Times “the media should be embarrassed and humiliated and keep its mouth shut and just listen for a while”. The next time a journalist in an autocratic country is kicked in the teeth, the tormentor will be quoting Stephen Bannon, telling the journalist to keep his mouth shut. Never before, a senior official in the White House dared to insult and intimidate the American media as Mr. Bannon did. It is as if Mr. Bannon was putting another brick in a virtual wall separating the media from president Trump’s White House.
Throughout history, great civilizations and great cities mastered the art of erecting walls to fend off “the barbarians”. Magnificent walls were built to protect China from northern invaders, the emperor Hadrian built the wall named after him in Britain to separate the Romans from the barbarians, and Constantinople’s famed wall repulsed many an invader for many centuries until it succumbed to the Ottoman Turks in 1453. But history is replete with many examples where walled empires and cities declined and fell because of corrosive threats from within even when the walls deterred the threats from without. It is doubtful that president Trump would understand or appreciate this historic truism.

Israel, Egypt emerging as Trump’s top allies in the Middle East
Thomas Seibert/The Arab Weekly/January 29/17
Washington - Israel and Egypt are emerging as US President Donald Trump’s top allies in the Middle East as he tries to strengthen US ties in the region with a focus on countering Iran’s influence and fighting Islamic extremists.
In his first few days in office, Trump had separate telephone con­versations with Israeli Prime Minis­ter Binyamin Netanyahu and Egyp­tian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. He invited both leaders to visit him in Washington, with Netanyahu’s trip scheduled for early February, a White House statement said. With Sisi, Trump “discussed a visit to the United States in the future” but ap­parently did not fix a date, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said.
Netanyahu and Sisi were the first leaders from the Middle East to have direct contact with Trump since the inauguration. From what is publicly known, the new president has yet to speak with leaders of other US allies such as Turkey, Jordan or the Gulf countries.
Trump and Netanyahu “agreed to continue to closely consult on a range of regional issues, including addressing the threats posed by Iran”, the White House said. “The president affirmed his unprec­edented commitment to Israel’s security and stressed that counter­ing ISIL and other radical Islamic terrorist groups will be a priority for his administration”, the statement added, using a different acronym for the Islamic State (ISIS).
Following Trump’s inauguration, Israel announced a major expan­sion of settlements on Palestinian territory in the West Bank and in East Jerusalem. Trump’s prede­cessor, Barack Obama, who had a rocky relationship with Netanyahu, saw the settlements as a factor pre­venting a peaceful solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and in December allowed the UN Security Council to pass a resolution con­demning the practice.
In contrast, Trump did not com­ment on the settlement expansion, which is considered illegal under international law. The new admin­istration’s stance is seen as an en­couragement for unilateral Israeli action. “The president emphasised that peace between Israel and the Palestinians can only be negotiated directly between the two parties,” the White House said.
In his conversation with Sisi, Trump discussed “military assis­tance to Egypt and working with Egypt to ensure that assistance most effectively supports the Egyp­tian military’s fight against terror­ism”, Spicer said in reference to Egypt’s battles with Islamic mili­tants on the Sinai peninsula. In ad­dition, Trump “offered to discuss ways the United States could sup­port Egypt’s economic reform pro­gramme”, the spokesman said.
US media reported that Trump was planning to designate the Muslim Brotherhood — Sisi’s main political adversary — a terrorist or­ganisation. The Egyptian president came to power in 2013 after top­pling Muhammad Morsi, a senior Brotherhood member.
Trump’s overtures to Israel and Egypt are partially motivated by a perceived need to reassure tra­ditional US partners in the Middle East. During last year’s presiden­tial campaign, Trump argued that Obama was weak on terrorism and had abandoned key US allies, Eric Trager of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy said. “So it’s not surprising that Trump is mov­ing very quickly” to re-establish close ties with Israel and Egypt,” he added.
Trager said Israel and Egypt fit Trump’s priority of fighting terror­ism in the Middle East and were seen as trusted “local partners”. Egypt can expect that US military aid under Trump will not be tied to political issues, including demo­cratic reforms, but the Sisi govern­ment is likely to be under an ob­ligation to deliver results. So far, reports on that front were “mixed”, Trager said. Egypt’s security forces have been fighting ISIS and other militant groups in the Sinai but are yet to assert control over the terri­tory.
Trump’s US-Israel-Egypt triangle could face other challenges as well. The new president’s foreign policy agenda foresees a decidedly pro- Israel approach to the Israeli-Pales­tinian conflict, which could anger Egypt. “Egyptians have a soft spot for the Palestinians,” said Hisham Fahmy, chief executive officer of the American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt.
One controversial issue could be Trump’s plan to move the US em­bassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jeru­salem, a project pushed by his nom­inee for the post of US ambassador to Israel, David Friedman. Moving the embassy would be a strong sig­nal of US support for Israel’s claim to the whole of the city, which is seen by Palestinians as the capital of a future Palestinian state.
CNN reported that Trump’s team had informed US allies that it was moving the embassy to Jerusalem but Spicer said no decision had been taken. “We’re at the very early stages of that decision-making pro­cess,” the White House spokesman said. Israeli broadcaster Channel 2 has reported that, under a com­promise deal, Friedman could live in Jerusalem but the embassy itself would remain in Tel Aviv.
Fahmy expressed hope that the “reality of the situation” in the Mid­dle East as well as objections raised by Egypt and other US partners would influence the Trump admin­istration’s stance. “Sisi will bring the Palestinians into the equation,” he said.

Trump administration debates designating Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group
Reuters/January 29/17
Washington - A debate is under way in the Trump administra­tion about whether the United States should de­clare the Muslim Broth­erhood a terrorist organisation and subject it to US sanctions, officials and people close to President Don­ald Trump’s transition team said.
A faction led by Michael Flynn, Trump’s national security adviser, wants to add the Brotherhood to US State Department and US Treasury lists of foreign terrorist organisa­tions, the sources said.
“I know it has been discussed. I’m in favour of it,” said a Trump transition adviser, who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue.
The adviser said Flynn’s team discussed adding the Muslim Brotherhood to the US list of ter­rorist groups but said it was unclear when — or even if — the adminis­tration ultimately would go ahead with such a move.
Other Trump advisers and vet­eran national security, diplomatic, law enforcement and intelligence officials argue the Brotherhood has evolved peacefully in some coun­tries, officials and people close to Trump’s entourage said.
They worry that a US move to designate the entire Brotherhood a terrorist group would compli­cate relations with Turkey, a key American ally in the fight against the Islamic State (ISIS), and where the Islamist-rooted Justice and Development Party (AKP), which dominates the Turkish government of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is in power. Tunisia’s Islamist En­nahda Party has also participated in democratic elections.
The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, the country’s oldest Islamist movement, was designated as a ter­rorist organisation in that country in 2013.
It is not clear which faction with­in the US administration has the upper hand, and US Senator Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and US Representa­tive Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Florida, have introduced legislation in Con­gress to add the Brotherhood to the terrorist list.
There was no immediate com­ment from the White House.
Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, among others, have designated the group on their ter­rorist lists and Trump’s nominee for secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, described the Brotherhood as “an agent of radical Islam” during his Senate confirmation hearing.
US criminal law prohibits people in the United States from knowing­ly providing “material support” to designated terrorist organisations and members of such groups are banned from entering the United States.
Some conservative and anti- Muslim activists have argued for years that the Brotherhood, which was founded in Egypt in 1928 and sought to establish a worldwide Is­lamic caliphate by peaceful means, has been a breeding ground for ter­rorists.
Some branches of the Brother­hood, including the Palestinian group Hamas, have engaged in anti-government violence and provoked violent government reactions. Ayman al-Zawahiri, the leader of al- Qaeda, was once a member of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood.
Other offshoots in Turkey and Tunisia have forsworn violence and come to power by democratic means. Former Muslim Brother­hood leader Muhammad Morsi became Egypt’s first freely elected president in June 2012 in the after­math of the ousting of long-time ruler Hosni Mubarak. An army take­over stripped Morsi of power in 2013 following mass protests against his rule. Hundreds of Islamists have since been killed or arrested.
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and Trump spoke by phone recently and discussed ways to boost the fight against terrorism and extremism.
A US official who declined to be identified said there had been dis­cussions at the State Department that looked at intelligence and in­formation on the group in which it was thought “it would be difficult to justify legally, in terms of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, to meet the criteria”.
“It’s one thing to say one group’s ideology has been used to influence a terrorist organisation and another thing to say that this group is a ter­rorist organisation,” said the US of­ficial.
Following the September 11th, 2001, al-Qaeda attacks on the United States, the George W. Bush administration investigated the Brotherhood and related Islamist movements.
After years of investigations, however, the United States and other governments, including Swit­zerland’s, closed investigations of Brotherhood leaders and financial groups for lack of evidence and removed most of the leaders from sanctions lists.
A British government review into Egypt’s outlawed Muslim Brother­hood, published in December 2015, concluded that membership of or links to the political group should be considered a possible indicator of extremism but stopped short of recommending that it should be banned.