LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

January 31/17

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins17/english.january30.17.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
But he turned and rebuked them.Then they went on to another village
 Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 09/51-56/:"When the days drew near for Jesus to be taken up, he set his face to go to Jerusalem. And he sent messengers ahead of him. On their way they entered a village of the Samaritans to make ready for him; but they did not receive him, because his face was set towards Jerusalem. When his disciples James and John saw it, they said, ‘Lord, do you want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them?’But he turned and rebuked them.
 Then they went on to another village."
 
Even Simon himself believed. After being baptized, he stayed constantly with Philip and was amazed when he saw the signs and great miracles that took place
Acts of the Apostles 08/04-13/:"Those who were scattered went from place to place, proclaiming the word. Philip went down to the city of Samaria and proclaimed the Messiah to them. The crowds with one accord listened eagerly to what was said by Philip, hearing and seeing the signs that he did, for unclean spirits, crying with loud shrieks, came out of many who were possessed; and many others who were paralysed or lame were cured. So there was great joy in that city. Now a certain man named Simon had previously practised magic in the city and amazed the people of Samaria, saying that he was someone great. All of them, from the least to the greatest, listened to him eagerly, saying, ‘This man is the power of God that is called Great.’ And they listened eagerly to him because for a long time he had amazed them with his magic. But when they believed Philip, who was proclaiming the good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women. Even Simon himself believed. After being baptized, he stayed constantly with Philip and was amazed when he saw the signs and great miracles that took place." 

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 30-31/17
The Terrorist attack on the Quebec City mosque is strongly deplored/Elias Bejjani January 30/17
Assad will stay and refugees must go, says Lebanon president/Karim El-Bar/Middle East Eye/Monday 30 January 2017
Trump defends travel ban amid fierce backlash
Dylan Stableford/Yahoo News/January 30/17
Trump's heartland voters shrug off global uproar over immigration ban/Laila Kearney,Reuters /January 30/17
Trump and blacklisting of Muslim Brotherhood/Abdullah bin Bijad Al-Otaibi/Al Arabiya/January 30/17
Trump’s first seven days and MENA issues/Dr. Theodore Karasik/Al Arabiya/January 30/17
How do we eliminate ‘traffic terrorism/Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/January 30/17
The heresy called cinema/Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/January 30/17
What comes first, the state or the ‘group/Sawsan Al Shaer/Al Arabiya/January 30/17
Turkey: The Purges Continue/Burak Bekdil/Gatestone Institute/January 30/17
The Telos Group: The True Identity of the "American Pro-Israeli, Pro-Palestinian, Pro-Peace Movement "/Noah Summers/Gatestone Institute/January 30/17
Palestinians' Fort of Torture/Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/January 30/17
Reports In Arab Media: Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad Is Gravely Ill/MEMRI/January 30/17

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on January 30-31/17
The Terrorist attack on the Quebec City mosque is strongly deplored
Phares to Judge Jeanine: "Trump's executive order is about geopolitics not religion"
Assad will stay and refugees must go, says Lebanon president
Aoun: New Waste Management Plan to be Announced Soon
Berri Laments Lack of Progress on Election Law
MP Alain Aoun Says Amendments to Hybrid Law Uninvited, Discussions Might Relapse
Houri Says Hybrid Law Adequate at Current 'Transitional' Stage
PSP, Kataeb Reject Hybrid Law Say it 'Excludes Other Parties'
Foreign Ministry Slams Attempt on Palestinian Official's Life, Urges Arms Control
Qahwaji: Rights of Army Martyrs, Abductees Won't be Abandoned
5 Hurt in Lebanese-Syrian Knife Fight in Akkar
Syrian Held in Akkar on Suspicion of Ties to Militant Groups
AUB President Criticizes Trump's Immigration Ban
Abu Zeid after meeting Bogdanov: Russian leadership welcomes President Aoun in Russia

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on January 30-31/17
Quebec mosque suspect charged with murdering six people: court
Six Killed in 'Terrorist' Attack on Quebec Mosque
Israel PM Netanyahu to meet with Trump on Feb 15: White House
Merkel slams antiMuslim bias in US travel ban
Pope Francis expresses condolences following Quebec attack
US official: Iran conducts another ballistic missile test
IRAN: Public Execution of Four Young Men of 22-26 Years Old in One Day/87 executions since the beginning of January/ US official: Iran conducts another ballistic missile test
American values are at stake’: Barack Obama ‘heartened’ by resistance to Donald Trump
Top ISIS executioner shot dead in ambush
White House 'Aware' of Iran Missile Test
Young Syrian Couple Separated by Trump's Travel Ban
Iraq Calls on U.S. to Review 'Wrong' Travel Ban as Parliament Urges Tit-for-Tat Move
Netanyahu Denounces Iran Missile Test ahead of Trump Meeting
Syrian FM Calls on Refugees to Return Home
Migrants in Libya Face 'Catastrophic' Rights Situation, Says Germany
Drone Strike Kills 2 Qaida Suspects in Yemen
Saudi Arabia Condemns Israeli Settlements
Israel Seeking Clarity over U.S. Travel Ban

Links From Jihad Watch Site for
on January 30-31/17
Dubai’s Head of Security: “We completely support Trump in ban on entry to those who may cause breach in America’s security”
Quebec cops now say Alexandre Bissonnette sole suspect in “Allahu akbar” shooting at mosque
Fake news: Daily Beast falls for Quebec mosque attack hoax, blames ‘white supremacists’
UK: No more weekend Changing of the Guard ceremonies due to fears of jihad attacks
Hugh Fitzgerald: “I’m a Muslim — Ask Me Anything,” Answers 1-6
Robert Spencer: Trump Protects U.S., World Gets Enraged
Robert Spencer: Leftists Determined to Stop Trump from Defending America
New York City: ISIS recruiter convicted for sending Muslim college student to wage jihad in the Islamic State
20 “vetted” Muslim refugees who turned to jihad terrorism after being allowed into the U.S.
Video: Robert Spencer on Muslim immigration’s effect on Christmas in the West
Dissent memo circulating in the State Department over Trump’s policy on refugees and immigrants
Robert Spencer: President Trump Moves to Protect U.S., Media in Uproar

Links From Christian Today Site for on January 30-31/17
Christian Families Among First To Be Sent Back Home Under Trump Travel Ban
Christian Humanitarian Charities Horrified At Trump's Refugee Ban
President Trump, Please Think Again: Evangelical Leaders Plead For Rethink On Refugee Ban
Southern Baptist Russell Moore Warns Trump Actions Could Harm US Interests Overseas
Bishop Angaelos Condemns Refugee Policies That Discriminate
Baptist Minister Challenges Franklin Graham Over Donald Trump Refugee Policy
Trump Will Announce Supreme Court Nomination Tuesday
Trump's Supreme Court Pick: Who Are The Frontrunners And What Do They Believe?
Bishop Vows To Continue Campaigning For Change On Gays In Church Of England
Trump Refugee Ban 'A Dark Moment In US History', Warns Catholic Archbishop
Southern Baptist Mission Trustee Resigns Rather Than 'Support False Religion'
Czech Missionary Jailed After Helping Local Christians
As Doomsday Draws Near And The Devil Seeks To Swallow Us Up, The Only Answer Is In Jesus

Latest Lebanese Related News published on January 30-31/17
The Terrorist attack on the Quebec City mosque is strongly deplored

Elias Bejjani January 30/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/01/30/elias-bejjani-the-terrorist-attack-on-the-quebec-city-mosque-is-strongly-deplored/
What happened yesterday evening, (Sunday, January 29/2007) in the Canadian Quebec City is brutal, barbaric and a mere terrorist act par excellence. In accordance to all humanitarian, constitutional, common living, tolerance, human rights, religious and ethical standards, the armed attack on the mosque in the Quebec City is totally unacceptable and loudly and by all means condemned. Canada is a secular, peaceful and civilized country. The Canadian constitution totally adopts and respects, freedom, democracy, equality, pluralism, and safeguards all religious- faith beliefs for all its multicultural and multi ethnical citizens. In this context the armed and blatant terrorist attack on the Quebec Mosque that killed and injured several worshipers is actually an attack on all the Canadian people, on the Canadian security and stability, and on the Constitution of Canada. It is also an attack on all the Canadian values of ​​tolerance, freedom, democracy, peace, and the multicultural and pluralistic life style. We strongly support all legal and security actions taken by the Canadian authorities, which are certainly and as always will force law and bring the terrorist assailants to justice.
In conclusion, The deplorable and vicious Mosque terrorist attach and no matter who planed or executed it remains an Isis like education, mentality and barbarism.
We extend our condolences to the families of the victims, and wish the injured a speedy recovery.
May Almighty God save and protect our beloved Canada and its citizens from all forms of terrorism, fanaticism, fundamentalism, and kept it secure stable, peaceful, free and democratic.

Phares to Judge Jeanine: "Trump's executive order is about geopolitics not religion"
Walid Phares/Face Book/January 30/17/In an interview with Judge Jeanine on Fox News, Dr Walid Phares said "President Trump's executive order is part of a new policy, a start not a single step, to address geopolitical challenges in the region. It is not about religion, it doesn't mention religion, it focuses on threats and announces measures." Phares added: "Trump is communicating with the President of Egypt, the ruler of the UA and the King of Saudi Arabia. As far as I know these leaders are not Catholics..."

Assad will stay and refugees must go, says Lebanon president
Karim El-Bar/Middle East Eye/Monday 30 January 2017
Lebanon's president has insisted that President Bashar al-Assad of Syria will remain in office, saying he wants Syrian refugees currently in his country to go home.
“President Assad will stay, and those who are asking for his departure are ignoring Syria,” newly elected Lebanese President Michel Aoun told French TV channel LCI on Monday.
Aoun, a former army general during the country’s civil war, was elected president in October, ending a 29-month presidential vacuum as part of a political deal that made Sunni leader Saad al-Hariri prime minister. “We were facing the prospect of a second Libya here, but for the Assad regime that represents the only power that through its capacities restored the regime, a restoration that has united everyone and the government,” Aoun said. Aoun is an ally of Hezbollah, Lebanon's Iran-backed party, which is fighting in Syria on Assad’s behalf. The Lebanese militia and political party were critical to Aoun’s ascendancy to the presidency, and he was their candidate of choice due to his pro-Assad position. “Lebanon cannot take in Syrian refugees indefinitely on its territory,” the 81-year-old said. “We hosted them for humanitarian reasons, and they must return to their country.” He said that Lebanon was now at a crossroads, with this being its last chance to build a strong state with institutions that work for the country.
“We must have security forces who are always ready and aware, and must work to strengthen the army.” On Trump, Aoun said: “This issue is concerning for Americans first most, and Lebanon is a part of this world. He is the one who wants to look again at the (nuclear) agreement with Iran, and considering to move his embassy to Jerusalem.”
Aoun, a Maronite Christian, said he predicted as far back as 1994 that Islamist groups would eventually reach power in the region – but fail. He said the solutions they proposed were from the past in an era that needed contemporary solutions.
 “Single-party, and single-religion, and single-race regimes will all not last, and the world of pluralism is the one that will win,” he said. Aoun’s presidency will be largely symbolic, as all decisions must be approved by the prime minister. Hariri, the son of assassinated former prime minister Rafik Hariri, was endorsed by parliament in November. 
 
Aoun: New Waste Management Plan to be Announced Soon
Naharnet/January 30/17/President Michel Aoun revealed Monday that a new waste management plan for the country will be “announced soon.”“A new waste management plan will be devised and its implementation will relieve the Lebanese regions of this crisis,” Aoun told a delegation comprising the heads of Lebanon's municipal unions. “This plan takes into consideration the interests of both municipalities and citizens,” Aoun added, hoping it will be announced “soon.”A judge had recently ordered the closure of the Costa Brava rubbish dump near Beirut airport after warnings that birds attracted by the garbage were threatening aircraft safety. Costa Brava was opened in March last year as one of three "temporary" tips intended to provide an interim solution after the closure of the Naameh landfill that was receiving waste from Beirut and Mount Lebanon. The dumps were eventually intended to have waste processing facilities, but that has not happened. As a result, garbage has piled up in Costa Brava, on the coastline close to the airport runways, reaching nine meters in some places. Environmentalists have for months warned that the dump is attracting rodents and increasing numbers of birds. A permanent solution for the waste produced by Beirut and its surroundings has yet to be found, months after the Naameh landfill was shuttered. The closure of the Naameh site had led to the accumulation of garbage on the streets of the capital and Mount Lebanon, sparking months of protests against the entire political class that involved clashes between police and demonstrators.
 
Berri Laments Lack of Progress on Election Law
Naharnet/January 30/17/Speaker Nabih Berri said the political parties have not recorded a progress in their discussions as for endorsing a new electoral law for the upcoming polls, and stressed that he would reject any law that involves “defects in standards,” al-Joumhouria daily reported on Monday. “There isn't any progress. We are still at the beginning of discussions. I will not approve of any electoral project that involves defects in standards,” Berri told the daily. “I have taken it upon myself to provide ideas and formats to stipulate a just and equitable law based on precise criteria, but it was not taken into consideration. Accordingly, I can say that I have provided everything I have got, and have nothing else to offer. The ball is now in the government’s court,” he added.
 Political parties are bickering over amending the current 1960 majoritarian election law which divides seats among the different religious sects. Four-party meetings were held earlier this week between representatives of Hizbullah, AMAL Movement, al-Mustaqbal Movement and the FPM. The parties had reported major progress after their last meeting on Friday. Reports have said that odds are in favor of a hybrid election law under which 64 MPs would be elected under the proportional representation system, and 64 MPs under the winner-takes-all system. However, some other parties have expressed rejection of the unsettled outcome of discussions. Berri added that shall discussions fail, political parties have to resort to the constitution, he said: “The solution is simple, let them abide by the constitution which states that a Senate must be formed, in addition to other issues. “Anyway, I will not violate the constitution, let someone else do. I am waiting for you (political parties) to approve a law.” Voicing rejection for the 1960 law, he remarked: “The 1960 law must not have room in Lebanon's political life. My position is well known, the salvation of our country is through endorsing proportional representation system. I will always voice calls for adopting proportional representation.” He concluded saying that “regularity of political life in Lebanon can not be achieved without a comprehensive and genuine political will in this direction.”
 
MP Alain Aoun Says Amendments to Hybrid Law Uninvited, Discussions Might Relapse
Naharnet/January 30/17/Change and Reform bloc MP Alain Aoun said on Monday that shall discussions to endorse an amended version of the hybrid electoral law fail this time, then discussions would go back to square one to look for another format that meets the approval of all. “If the hybrid election law does not work this time, we would be back to square one and we would have to look into another format,” said Aoun in an interview with VDL (100.5). “We are waiting for the next four-party meeting to see what the next amendments are. But, the indicators so far are negative,” he added. Four-party meetings were held earlier this week between representatives of Hizbullah, AMAL Movement, al-Mustaqbal Movement and the FPM. The parties had reported major progress after their last meeting on Friday. Reports have said that odds are in favor of an amended version of a hybrid election law under which 64 MPs would be elected under the proportional representation system, and 64 MPs under the winner-takes-all system.
 However, political parties including the Progressive Socialist Party and the Kataeb, have expressed initial rejection. In reference to the amendments, Aoun said they did not meet broad approval, pointing to Speaker Nabih Berri who expressed dissatisfaction on Monday.
 
 Houri Says Hybrid Law Adequate at Current 'Transitional' Stage
 Naharnet/January 30/17/Al-Mustaqbal Movement MP Ammar Houri stressed on Monday that endorsing a new election law is essential because it draws the political road map for Lebanon's future. In an interview to VDL (93.3), Houri said: “The election law is political par excellence. It precedes the majority of other laws because it draws the future road map of Lebanon.”Pointing out that it is difficult to reach a consensual law that meets approval of all political parties, he said: “We will not reach a law that garners consensus, but we will definitely come up with a format supported by the majority of the political components.”“The hybrid election law is the most adequate in light of the transitional stage,” he concluded. Political parties are bickering over amending the current 1960 majoritarian election law which divides seats among the different religious sects. Four-party meetings were held earlier this week between representatives of Hizbullah, AMAL Movement, al-Mustaqbal Movement and the FPM. The parties had reported major progress after their last meeting on Friday. Reports have said that odds are in favor of a hybrid election law under which 64 MPs would be elected under the proportional representation system, and 64 MPs under the winner-takes-all system. However, some other parties have expressed rejection of the unsettled outcome of discussions.
 
 PSP, Kataeb Reject Hybrid Law Say it 'Excludes Other Parties'
 Naharnet/January 30/17/Former Minister Akram Shehayyeb of the Democratic Gathering bloc, criticized on Monday a suggested hybrid electoral law saying it shows “superiority and a wish to exclude others,” while Kataeb Party chief Sami Gemayel urged the “ruling party not to “tailor” an electoral law that suits its interests. “The suggested electoral law has elements of superiority and an intent to exclude other parties,” said Shehayeb, speaking on behalf of a delegation of the Progressive Socialist Party after holding talks with Gemayel in al-Saifi. He announced that an agreement was reached with the Kataeb chief on partnership and the reactivation of meetings, he said: “It is said that the worst kind of injustice is to claim that there is justice. We have never closed a door, not on dialogue nor on participation (in political life) because we believe in Lebanon as one entity.”Referring to the latest talks to endorse a new election law for the upcoming polls, he said: “What we see is a hybrid law with superiority and a wish to exclude others. This is out of question.”“The Democratic Gathering seeks balance, consultation and joint efforts in order to reach a law that does not eliminate anyone.”For his part, Gemayel assured that the meeting was an opportunity to discuss and understand the concerns that each party has. “We must find a law that ensures proper representation, partnership, democracy and diversity. Each party must be represented without any exclusion. We understand the concerns of some parties,” said Gemayel. He stressed: “The ruling party should not tailor an electoral law that suits it while excluding others from power.”Four-party meetings were held earlier this week between representatives of Hizbullah, AMAL Movement, al-Mustaqbal Movement and the FPM. The parties had reported major progress after their last meeting on Friday. Reports have said that odds are in favor of an amended version of a hybrid election law under which 64 MPs would be elected under the proportional representation system, and 64 MPs under the winner-takes-all system. However, political parties including the Progressive Socialist Party and the Kataeb, have expressed initial rejection.
 
 Foreign Ministry Slams Attempt on Palestinian Official's Life, Urges Arms Control
 Naharnet/January 30/17/Lebanon's Foreign Ministry on Monday strongly condemned “the assassination attempt that the security official at Palestine's embassy, Brig. Gen. Ismail Sharrouf, faced in the city of Sidon” on Sunday. The ministry “categorically rejects attacks on diplomats and officials who are part of foreign diplomatic missions in Lebanon,” it said in a statement. The ministry and the Lebanese security forces are “keen on protecting them and preventing any harm or attack against them,” it added. And as it rejected that “Lebanese territory be used for settling scores,” the Foreign Ministry stressed “the need to strictly implement the resolutions of the successive Lebanese governments on controlling and removing illegitimate and rampant arms inside and outside Palestinian camps in order to protect Lebanon's security and the camps' stability.” Sharrouf was lightly injured on Sunday when his car came under a hail of bullets near the the central bank branch in Sidon.
 
Qahwaji: Rights of Army Martyrs, Abductees Won't be Abandoned
Naharnet/January 30/17/Army Commander General Jean Qahwaji emphasized that the army is keen on its martyrs' and abductees' rights, and assured that most of the perpetrators who were found to be involved in the abduction and manslaughter of servicemen, were either killed or arrested, Ad Diyar daily reported on Monday. “The army does not neglect the rights of its martyrs or prisoners, even if it took us some time to get that right,” said Qahwaji in an interview to the daily. “Most of those found involved in the killing and kidnapping of the servicemen, over different stages in the area of Arsal, were either killed or arrested respectively,” he added. Recently, Qahwaji said he is determined to find a solution for the thorny file of servicemen who were abducted by the Islamic State extremist group in 2014. The IS group and al-Nusra Front, which re-branded itself as Jabhat Fateh al-Sham in July when it split from the al-Qaida movement, abducted over 30 servicemen in clashes with the Lebanese army in the northeastern border town of Arsal in August 2014. Sixteen held by the Jabhat Fateh al-Islam were freed in December 2015 through a Qatari-mediated deal that also included a prisoner swap to release a number of inmates from Lebanese jails. The two groups had previously executed four of the hostages. Nine hostages are still being held by the IS and their families do not know much about their fate. Two mediators are said to negotiate their release. Qahwaji added pointing out that the army has become a genuine institution that works as a harmonious system, which contributed to the activation of its performance. On the outspread of terrorism, Qahwaji likened it to the “cancer” disease. He said it must be uprooted and controlled from expanding any further.
 
5 Hurt in Lebanese-Syrian Knife Fight in Akkar
Naharnet/January 30/17/Five people, mostly Syrians, were injured when a personal dispute escalated into a knife fight between Lebanese and Syrian young men in the Akkar town of Mashha on Monday, state-run National News Agency reported. Lebanese Red Cross ambulances transferred the wounded to hospitals in the region for treatment as security forces arrived on the scene and started working on restoring calm. An investigation has been launched into the incident to unveil the circumstances, the agency added.
 
Syrian Held in Akkar on Suspicion of Ties to Militant Groups
Naharnet/January 30/17/A Syrian national was arrested Monday in the northern Akkar district on suspicion of having ties to terrorist groups, state-run National News Agency reported. “General Security intelligence agents arrested the Syrian Sh. A. in the outskirts of the Akkar town of Aidamoun,” NNA said. It added that the man is a bakery worker and that he is suspected of “communicating with militant groups.”Security forces have intensified a crackdown on suspects in recent weeks in the wake of the arrest of a would-be suicide bomber at Costa cafe in Beirut's Hamra area. The North district had on Thursday and Friday witnessed a massive security mobilization involving checkpoints, patrols and raids after information was obtained about a possible pickup truck bombing against a military post in the region.
 
AUB President Criticizes Trump's Immigration Ban
Associated Press/Agence France Presse/January 30/17/The president of the American University of Beirut has criticized U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order to indefinitely bar refugees from Syria and keep individuals from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the U.S. for 90 days. Fadlo Khuri, a dual Lebanese-American citizen, said in a statement released Monday that the AUB community has watched the fallout at America's airports with "growing concern" in the last 72 hours. The university is one of the oldest and most prestigious educational institutions in the Middle East. Khuri says: "We find this action and its implications to be in conflict with the enduring values of liberty and justice for all, which the original framers of the U.S. constitution fought to protect." Founded in 1866, AUB enrolls around 8,500 students from all over the world. Trump on Friday signed an executive order suspending the arrival of all refugees for at least 120 days, Syrian refugees indefinitely -- and barring citizens from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen for 90 days.
 
Abu Zeid after meeting Bogdanov: Russian leadership welcomes President Aoun in Russia
 Mon 30 Jan 2017/NNA - Member of the Bloc of Reform and Change, Amal Abu Zeid, on Monday met with the personal representative of Russia's President in MENA region, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister, Mikhael Bogdanov, and discussed with him the current situation in Lebanon and the region, with MP Abu Zeid being informed that the Russian leadership welcomes President Michel Aoun in Russia. It is expected that a Russian official will visit Beirut soon to forward an invitation to President Aoun to visit the country. 

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on January 30-31/17
Quebec mosque suspect charged with murdering six people: court
By Allison Lampert and Anna Mehler Paperny,
QUEBEC CITY/TORONTO (Reuters) - A French-Canadian university student was the sole suspect in a shooting at a Quebec City mosque and was charged with the premeditated murder of six people, Canadian authorities said on Monday, in what Prime Minister Justin Trudeau called "a terrorist attack."Court documents identified the gunman in the attack on Sunday evening prayers as Alexandre Bissonnette. He was also charged with five counts of attempted murder, according to court papers. Among the six men killed were a butcher, a university professor, a pharmacist and an accountant, according to police and Canadian media. Police declined to discuss possible motives for the shooting at the Centre Culturel Islamique de Québec. "They consider this a lone wolf situation," the source said. In Washington, U.S. government security experts were leaning to the view that the gunman most likely was motivated by hatred for Muslims, a U.S. government source familiar with official reporting said. A man of Moroccan descent who had also been arrested was now considered a witness, although his nationality was not immediately known, a source familiar with the situation said. Trudeau, who has made a point of welcoming refugees and immigrants from Muslim-majority countries, told parliament in Ottawa: "Make no mistake, this was a terrorist attack."
He added a personal message to Canada's 1 million Muslims: "Know that we value you. You enrich our shared country in immeasurable ways. It is your home. Last night's horrible crime against the Muslim community was an act of terror committed against Canada and against all Canadians. We will grieve with you. We will defend you. We will love you. And we will stand with you."
Somber parliamentarians observed a moment of silence. Trudeau was scheduled to visit Quebec City later on Monday.
The attack was out of character for Quebec City, a city of just over 500,000 which reported just two murders in all of 2015. Mass shootings are rare in Canada, where gun control laws are stricter than in the United States. In addition to the six killed, five people were critically injured and 12 were treated for minor injuries, a spokeswoman for the Quebec City University Hospital said. Federal Safety Minister Ralph Goodale told reporters in Ottawa there was no change to "the national terrorism threat level" from medium because "there is no information known to the government of Canada that would lead to a change at this time." U.S. President Donald Trump called Trudeau to express his condolences "and offered to provide any assistance as needed," said Trudeau spokesman Cameron Ahmad. Over the weekend, Trudeau said Canada would welcome refugees, his response to an executive order by Trump on Friday to halt the U.S. refugee program and to temporarily bar citizens from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States.
Trump's action, which the president said was "not about religion - this is about terror and keeping our country safe," was widely condemned in the United States and abroad as targeting Muslims.
On Monday, White House spokesman Sean Spicer told reporters that the Quebec shooting was "a terrible reminder of why we must remain vigilant, and why the president is taking steps to be proactive, rather than reactive, when it comes to our nation's safety and security."
FATHER OF FOUR KILLED
A father of four, the owner of a halal butcher near the mosque, was among those killed, said Pamela Sakinah El-hayet, a friend of one of the people at the mosque. The mosque concierge was killed, as was Ahmed Youness, a 21-year-old student, El-hayet told Reuters. One of El-hayet’s friends, Youness’ roommate, was in the mosque at the time of the shooting. He was unharmed, she said, but in total shock. Ali Assafiri, a student at Université Laval, said he had been running late for the evening prayers at the mosque, near the university in the Quebec City area. When he arrived, the mosque had been transformed by police into a crime scene. "Everyone was in shock," Assafiri said by phone. "It was chaos." Université Laval is the oldest French-language university in North America, with 42,500 students. Vigils were planned for Montreal and Quebec City, the provincial capital, as well as in Edmonton. There was an outpouring of support for the mosque on social media. "Last night's shooting, targeting people of faith during their worship and prayer, is a deplorable attack on all Canadians and our most deeply-held values," said Joe Gunn, executive director of Citizens for Public Justice, a group of Canadian Christians, churches and other religious congregations. Incidents of Islamophobia have increased in Quebec in recent years. The face-covering, or niqab, became an issue in the 2015 Canadian federal election, especially in Quebec, where the majority of the population supported a ban on it at citizenship ceremonies.
(Additional reporting by Kevin Dougherty in Quebec City,; Alastair Sharp and Anna Mehler Paperny in Toronto; David Ljunggren in Ottawa; Mark Hosenball in Washington; Writing by Andrea Hopkins, Frances Kerry, Grant McCool; Editing by Jeffrey Benkoe and Alan Crosby)

Six Killed in 'Terrorist' Attack on Quebec Mosque
Naharnet/Associated Press/January 30/17/Gunmen stormed into a mosque in Quebec during evening prayers and opened fire on dozens of worshippers, killing six and wounding eight in what Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau condemned as a "terrorist attack."Police arrested the two assailants following the shooting Sunday in the Islamic Cultural Center in a busy district of Quebec City, police spokeswoman Christine Coulombe said.She gave no indication of the identities or nationalities of the two suspects. One witness told Radio Canada that "the two men were wearing black cagoules," and one of them "had a "strong Quebecois accent." Coulumbe said around 50 people were in the mosque when the shooting began at around 7:30 pm on Sunday (0030 GMT Monday) toward the end of evening prayers. A few minutes later police descended on the Saint-Foy district -- an area packed with offices and shops some 10 kilometers (six miles) west of the city's historic center. The mosque has already been the target of hate: a pig's head was left on the doorstep last June during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. Other mosques in Canada have been targeted with racist graffiti in recent months. The attack comes as Canada has vowed to open its arms wide to Muslims and refugees after US President Donald Trump's controversial immigration ban Friday sparked travel chaos and outrage around the world. - 'Senseless violence' -Trudeau said in a statement that "we condemn this terrorist attack on Muslims in a center of worship and refuge.""Muslim-Canadians are an important part of our national fabric, and these senseless acts have no place in our communities, city and country. "It is heart-wrenching to see such senseless violence," Trudeau said. "Diversity is our strength, and religious tolerance is a value that we, as Canadians, hold dear." Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard said in a series of Twitter posts that the government was "mobilized to ensure the security of the people of Quebec.""Quebec categorically rejects this barbaric violence," he wrote. "Solidarity with Quebec people of Muslim faith." After condemning what he called an "odious attack" French President Francois Hollande said "it's the spirit of peace and openness of the people of Quebec that the terrorists wanted to hit."Police stationed near the mosque told AFP that they had feared this type of attack "because it's happening all over the world.""For us Muslims, Quebec and Canada had been a safe zone," said Hamid Nadji, who learned of the shooting from a friend and rushed to the mosque area. - Policy of compassion -The immigration ministry said Sunday that Canada would offer temporary residence permits to people stranded in the country as a result of Trump's order."Let me assure those who may be stranded in Canada that I will use my authority as minister to provide them with temporary residency if needed as we have done in the past," Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen told a news conference. Trump has suspended the arrival of all refugees to the US for at least 120 days and barred entry for 90 days to people from seven Muslim-majority countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Hussen, who is of Somali origin, did not condemn the US measure but stressed that Canada would continue to pursue an immigration policy based on "compassion" while at the same time protecting the security of its citizens. "We welcome those fleeing persecution, terror and war," he said, echoing a welcoming Twitter post by Trudeau on Saturday. According to the latest Canadian census, from 2011, one out of five people in the country are foreign-born. Canada has welcomed more than 39,670 Syrian refugees between November 2015 and early January 2017, according to government figures.

Israel PM Netanyahu to meet with Trump on Feb 15: White House
Mon 30 Jan 2017/NNA - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will meet with President Donald Trump on Feb. 15 for talks covering a range of security issues, the White House said on Monday. "Our relationship with the only democracy in the Middle East is crucial to the security of both our nations, and the president looks forward to discussing continued strategic, technological, military and intelligence cooperation with the prime minister," White House spokesman Sean Spicer told reporters as he announced the visit. ---Reuters
 
Merkel slams antiMuslim bias in US travel ban

Mon 30 Jan 2017/NNA - German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Monday stepped up her criticism of a US travel ban slapped on travelers from seven countries, saying it smacked of anti-Muslim bias. "The essential and also resolute fight against terrorism in no way justifies general suspicion against people of a specific faith, in this case people of the Muslim faith or people of a certain background," she told reporters in unprompted remarks about measures enacted by US President Donald Trump. "This approach in my view contradicts the basic tenets of international aid to refugees and international cooperation," she said ahead of talks with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko.
Merkel said her office and the German foreign ministry would do "everything in their power" to clarify the legal situation "in particular for those with dual citizenship" of Germany and the blacklisted countries.--AFP
 
Pope Francis expresses condolences following Quebec attack
Mon 30 Jan 2017/NNA - On Monday morning, following the usual Mass at the Pope’s residence in the Casa Santa Marta, the Holy Father met with Cardinal Gérald Cyprien LaCroix, assuring the Archbishop of Quebec City of his prayers for the victims of the attack on a mosque there on Sunday night. Pope Francis stressed the importance of for all, Christians and Muslims, to be united in prayer. Following his meeting with the Pope, Cardinal Lacroix returned immediately to Canada.The Holy Father also formally expressed his condolences for the victims of the terrorist attack in a telegram addressed to Cardinal Lacroix, and signed by the Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal Pietro Parolin. The full text of the telegram, written in French, is provided below in an English translation:
"Telegram concerning the attack on a mosque in Quebec City: Most Eminent Cardinal Gérald Cyprien LaCroix
Having learned of the attack which occurred in Quebec in a prayer room of the Islamic Cultural Centre, which claimed many victims, His Holiness Pope Francis entrusts to the mercy of God the persons who lost their lives and he associates himself through prayer with the pain of their relatives. He expresses his profound sympathy for the wounded and their families, and to all who contributed to their aid, asking the Lord to bring them comfort and consolation in the ordeal. The Holy Father again strongly condemns the violence that engenders such suffering; and, imploring God for the gift of mutual respect and peace, he invokes upon the sorely tried families, and upon all persons touched by this tragedy, as well as upon all Quebecers, the benefits of the divine Blessing." ---Vatican Radio 

US official: Iran conducts another ballistic missile test
Iran conducted its first ballistic missile test under Donald Trump's presidency, in yet another apparent violation of a United Nations resolution, U.S. officials told Fox News exclusively on Monday. The launch occurred at a well-known test site outside Semnan, about 140 miles east of Tehran, on Sunday. The Khorramshahr medium-range ballistic missile flew 600 miles before exploding, in a failed test of a reentry vehicle, officials said. Iran defense minister Brigadier Gen. Hossein Dehqan said in September that Iran would start production of the missile. U.N. resolution 2231 -- put in place days after the Iran nuclear deal was signed -- calls on the Islamic Republic not to conduct such tests. However, this is at least Iran's second such test since July. The resolution bars Iran from conducting ballistic missile tests for eight years and went into effect July 20, 2015. Iran is "called upon not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology," according to the text of the resolution.
 
IRAN: Public Execution of Four Young Men of 22-26 Years Old in One Day/87 executions since the beginning of January/ US official: Iran conducts another ballistic missile test
87 executions since the beginning of January
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2017/01/30/iran-public-execution-of-four-young-men-of-22-26-years-old-in-one-day87-executions-since-the-beginning-of-januaryus-official-iran-conducts-another-ballistic-missile-test/
NCRI Statements/January 30/17
The Iranian regime hanged four young men, aged 22 to 26, in Mashhad and Bandar Abbas (northeast and southern Iran respectively) on Sunday, January 29. The two hanged in Mashhad had been charged with Moharebeh, or “waging war on God.”
Two days earlier, two inmates, 26 and 39, were hanged in Lakan Prison in the northern city of Rasht. As such, the total number of executions since the start of year stands at 87, two-and-a-half times the figure for December. The victims, mostly young, included two women and two adolescents. Seven were hanged in public. Engulfed by increasing international and domestic crises and fearful of the rise in popular protests and uprisings by the deprived segments of society and the army of the hungry, the clerical regime has found the only recourse in stepping up these criminal executions. The Iranian Resistance urges the Iranian people, especially the young, to protest the barbaric mass executions and support the families of the victims. It also calls on international human rights bodies to undertake immediate and effective measures to end the systematic and egregious human rights violations in Iran, particularly the mass executions. Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/January 29, 2017 
 
Iran's Water Crisis and Expansion of the Country's Uninhabitable Areas

NCRI/30 January 2017/Berlin was hosting a summit on Wednesday January 25, held by two science foundations ‘Heinrich Boll’ and ‘Small Media’ to discuss Iran’s critical water situation.In their 160-page joint report on Iran’s water crisis, the two science foundations have warned that “ever more regions in Iran are becoming uninhabitable.”Participated by more than 30 German environmentalists as well as academics from both Germany and Iran, the summit was aimed at discussing the 160-page report and the Iranian regime’s role in such a major environmental disaster. The joint report by the two European foundations begins with “ever more lakes and rivers are threatened by drought.. There’s also an increasing reduction in the depth of the country’s groundwater resources”, and while pointing to the drying of Lake Urmia, the report adds that “Lake Urmia, the biggest lake in the Middle East, has lost 12 percent of its area in recent years. This amount is equal to the area of Lake Constance (Bodensee) located in Southern Germany which, with an area of 240 square kilometers, is divided between three countries of Germany, Switzerland and Austria.” According to this report, what is referred to as Iran’s environmental crisis is actually a manmade crisis. The report says that the main cause of the current crisis is the indifference and inaction of regime’s officials and incorrect exploitation of the country’s water resources. On the other hand, Iran’s too outdated irrigation technique, has caused the farmers and poor peasants to suffer the most from water scarcity.”Later in their report on Iran’s water situation, Heinrich Boll and Small Media foundations add that “the rise of civil movements and grassroots activities in social media in recent years has raised the social awareness in this regard. The environmental activists, however, tend to intentionally hide their identities in cyberspace as there’s oppressive restrictions in these areas as well.” 
 
American values are at stake’: Barack Obama ‘heartened’ by resistance to Donald Trump
Michael Walsh/Yahoo/January 30/17/Former President Barack Obama broke his postpresidential silence on Monday, issuing a cautious statement about President Trump’s travel ban and the protests against it. Before leaving the White House, Obama repeatedly emphasized how important the role of citizen is in American democracy. Now, he says he is inspired that so many citizens have heeded his call by protesting drastic measures that Trump took that many have criticized as antithetical to common American values. Kevin Lewis, a spokesperson for Obama, released a statement on behalf of the former president praising the protesters for exercising their constitutional right of assembly and rejecting the notion that his antiterrorism vetting policies resemble Trump’s. It is Obama’s first public statement since leaving office Jan. 20: “President Obama is heartened by the level of engagement taking place in communities around the country. In his final official speech as President, he spoke about the important role of citizen and how all Americans have a responsibility to be the guardians of our democracy — not just during an election but every day.
Citizens exercising their Constitutional right to assemble, organize and have their voices heard by their elected officials is exactly what we expect to see when American values are at stake. With regard to comparisons to President Obama’s foreign policy decisions, as we’ve heard before, the President fundamentally disagrees with the notion of discriminating against individuals because of their faith or religion.”  The political and personal differences between Obama and Trump are well known. Obama was highly critical of Trump’s policy proposals during the general election but indicated his intention to facilitate a peaceful transfer of power — widely considered a hallmark of American democracy — and offer his guidance as needed. Obama has cited former President George W. Bush’s graciousness to his incoming administration despite their political differences as an example he sought to follow. Bush famously avoided criticizing Obama publicly, though his vice president, Dick Cheney, frequently blasted the president during television and print interviews. During his final press conference, Obama said he would speak out in the Trump era if he felt “our core values are at stake.”Among the threats to those values, he said, are “systematic discrimination,” voter suppression, “institutional efforts to silence dissent or the press” and the deportation of children who immigrated into the country illegally with their parents.

Top ISIS executioner shot dead in ambush
New York Times?January 30/17/One of the Islamic State’s chief executioners — who beheaded more than 100 people with a long ceremonial sword — was shot to death during an ambush in Iraq, according to published reports. Abu Sayyaf, infamous for his beefy physique and pitch-black clothing that covered him from head to toe, was gunned down Sunday by several shooters who rode up to him in a car near Mosul, ARA News reported. The gunmen then sped away. Sayyaf’s executions were infamously videotaped as part of ISIS’s propaganda campaign and posted online to attract new recruits. “He was killed along with another militant who was accompanying him during the attack,” local media activist Abdullah al-Mallah told ARA News.“The ISIS-led Hisba Police was unable to identify the perpetrators.”Iraqi journalist Muhammad Yawar who has long covered ISIS dubbed Abu Sayyaf “one of the scariest executioners in Nineveh,” a region outside Mosul. “He was known for his huge body and heavy arms. He was one of the renowned faces in the ISIS propaganda videos,” Yawar told ARA News. “Abu Sayyaf was a reflection of the brutality of this terrorist group.”

White House 'Aware' of Iran Missile Test
Naharnet/January 30/17/The White House said Monday it was aware that Iran had recently carried out a missile test, but refrained from offering details or criticism."We are aware that Iran fired that missile. We are looking into the exact nature of it," said White House spokesman Sean Spicer. Earlier, Fox News -- citing unnamed U.S. officials -- reported that Tehran had carried out a ballistic missile test on Sunday. Such a test could be in violation of U.N. resolutions and could pave the way for sanctions. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also publicly confirmed the test and said the launching of a ballistic missile constitutes a "flagrant violation" of U.N. rules. In a statement on his Facebook page, Netanyahu said he intended to "raise the renewal of sanctions against Iran in this context and in other contexts" in his upcoming meeting with US President Donald Trump on February 15. Both Trump and Netanyahu have strongly opposed a nuclear deal with Iran that saw Tehran curb its nuclear program in return for sanctions relief. Any new sanctions would severely test the durability of the accord.

Young Syrian Couple Separated by Trump's Travel Ban
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 30/17/When Syrian law graduate Adel first saw the visa for the United States in his passport, he could hardly believe he would finally be joining his wife in New York. "I kept wiping my eyes to make sure I wasn't dreaming," says Adel. But Adel's life was turned upside down when U.S. President Donald Trump issued a 90-day ban on Friday on travelers from several countries including Syria. "It was such a shock. I never thought it would be so hard to get a visa for the United States. I got it, but now it's not worth anything," says the 25-year-old from Damascus, whose name has been changed to protect his identity. It took Adel a year of phone calls and five trips to the U.S. embassy in neighboring Lebanon to obtain the visa after his wife Lamia sent him an official invitation. The U.S. embassy in Syria closed after the start of the nearly six-year war that has killed more than 310,000 people. After receiving the visa two weeks ago, he was supposed to finally travel to reunite with her in the United States a year after their wedding in Syria. Lamia, 22, lives in New York city by herself after her American father and Syrian mother separated.
'Nightmare'
"I'm so confused. My feet were supposed to touch down in the land of my dreams in just days, but now I'm still here," says Adel. Adel says he fell in love with the country by watching Hollywood films and hearing stories from relatives. "Going to America is a dream for any young guy my age". Adel says he follows the news avidly, hoping the order will be canceled, and speaks to Lamia every day. "My wife is the other one who's depressed. A whole year of efforts and waiting, and now we won't even meet," he says.
"The distance between us has become enormous." Trump faced fresh protests on Monday over his ban on travelers from seven Muslim majority countries entering the United States. Besides Syria, the other countries included in the ban are Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Trump says the measures, introduced just a week after he became president, will make America safe from "radical Islamic terrorists.""I hope the decision will be suspended -- even if just for a day," says Adel. "I'll go that day however much it costs.""I can't bear it here anymore. I had bigger hopes," he adds."I hope this nightmare will end soon."

Iraq Calls on U.S. to Review 'Wrong' Travel Ban as Parliament Urges Tit-for-Tat Move
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 30/17/Baghdad called Monday for the United States to review its "wrong decision" to prevent Iraqis from entering the country as parliament backed reciprocal restrictions if Washington does not change course. The responses from Baghdad are part of a growing backlash against President Donald Trump's executive order barring citizens of Iraq, Iran, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya and Yemen from entering the U.S. for at least 90 days, a decision he billed as an effort to make America safe from "radical Islamic terrorists." The travel restrictions, which come on the heels of repeated assertions by Trump that the U.S. should have stolen Iraq's oil before leaving in 2011, risk alienating the citizens and government of a country fighting against militants the president has cast as a major threat to America. "We reject... the decision to prevent the reception of Iraqis in the United States of America, and call for its review," Foreign Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari told U.S. ambassador Douglas Silliman, according to a statement on his website. But "we (also) confirm our commitment to establishing better relations between Baghdad and Washington," Jaafari said. The foreign ministry also issued a statement calling on the U.S. to "review this wrong decision." "It is very unfortunate that this decision was issued towards an allied state linked by strategic partnership with the United States," it said. The ministry noted the U.S. move "coincides with victories achieved by (Iraq's) brave fighters and with the support of the international coalition against the Daesh terrorist gangs in Mosul," referring to the battle to retake the city from the Islamic State jihadist group.  Parliament, meanwhile, urged the government to take similar measures against Americans if Washington does not reconsider its position. Lawmakers voted for "a policy of reciprocity with the American decision in the event that the American side does not withdraw its decision," according to text read out before the vote. It also called for the U.S. Congress to pressure the Trump administration to reconsider its decision, and for the .UN., Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to oppose the measure.
Security ramifications
And it said that if the U.S. does not roll back the move, this "will push Iraq to take policies and decisions commensurate with the preservation of its interests.""We are against this stance from the new administration," lawmaker Sadiq al-Laban told AFP. "We hope that the American administration will rethink... this decision," he added. Trump's decision led to the detention of incoming refugees at U.S. airports, sparking protests, legal challenges and widespread condemnation from rights groups. he parliamentary vote came a day after its foreign affairs committee made a similar call for Iraq to respond in kind to the U.S. measure. Hassan Shwairid, the deputy head of the committee, said the committee's call did not apply to the thousands of American military personnel in the country as part of the US-led coalition against IS. But U.S. senators John McCain and Lindsay Graham said Trump's ban could impact military cooperation and security in other ways. "This executive order bans Iraqi pilots from coming to military bases in Arizona," where they have received training, they said in a joint statement. "Ultimately, we fear this executive order will become a self-inflicted wound in the fight against terrorism."The Hashed al-Shaabi, a powerful paramilitary umbrella organization that includes Iran-backed Shiite militias that fought against American forces in past years, appealed Sunday for U.S. citizens to be banned from the country.Both units from the Hashed and American troops are deployed in the Mosul area as part of the operation to retake the city from IS, and heightened anti-U.S. sentiment among militiamen could increase the danger to Washington's forces. Trump's travel restrictions also drew condemnation from populist Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, America's bete noir for much of its 2003-2011 war in Iraq. "Get your nationals out before removing expatriates," said Sadr, scion of a powerful clerical family who rose to widespread fame due to his condemnation of and violent resistance to the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq.

Netanyahu Denounces Iran Missile Test ahead of Trump Meeting

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 30/17/Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Iran on Monday of launching a ballistic missile in what he said constitutes a "flagrant violation" of a U.N. Security Council resolution. In a statement on his Facebook page, Netanyahu said he intended to "raise the renewal of sanctions against Iran in this context and in other contexts" in his upcoming meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump. The White House said on Monday that Trump will host Netanyahu on February 15. Israel's archfoe Iran has carried out a number of missile tests in recent months, which the United States and European governments have said are a breach of its commitments under the 2015 nuclear deal. Western powers say the missiles are capable of carrying nuclear warheads and therefore go against the deal, while Iran says its missile program is "non-negotiable."Israel had opposed the deal between Iran and major powers, which lifted a wide range of international sanctions in exchange for limits on Iran's nuclear program. "Iranian aggression must not go unanswered," Netanyahu wrote on Monday.

Syrian FM Calls on Refugees to Return Home
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 30/17/Syria's foreign minister on Monday called on the country's refugees to return home, official media reported, without directly commenting on a U.S. ban targeting them. Walid Muallem "renewed the invitation of the government to Syrian refugees living in neighboring countries to return to their country," the SANA news agency said. The minister "stressed the country was ready to receive them and grant them a dignified life," the agency reported, as Muallem met U.N. refugee agency chief Filippo Grandi. On Friday, US President Donald Trump issued an executive order to suspend Syrian refugee arrivals indefinitely and impose tough controls on travelers from seven countries, including Syria, for 90 days. The minister spoke after President Bashar Assad's forces on Sunday retook control of a key region that supplies water to the capital. The army's recapture of Wadi Barada from rebels comes a month after Assad's forces pushed the armed opposition out of east Aleppo, taking back control of the whole of the northern city. Syria's rebels still hold to the northwestern province of Idlib, the Western Ghouta area outside the capital and areas in the south of the country. Syria's conflict has killed more than 310,000 people since it erupted in 2011 with the brutal repression of anti-government protests. The war has forced 4.8 million people to flee Syria, according to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Turkey has taken in more than 2.7 million Syrians, the UNHCR says, and is now the main host country. It is followed by Lebanon with more than one million Syrian refugees, according to the U.N. The UNHCR says Jordan has taken in 655,000 Syrians, but Amman says the number is much higher at 1.4 million. At least another 228,000 Syrians have taken refuge in Iraq and 115,000 in Egypt, the refugee agency says. Syrian refugees have in increasing numbers traveled to, or tried to reach, Europe, making the perilous journey overground or by sea.

Migrants in Libya Face 'Catastrophic' Rights Situation, Says Germany
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 30/17/Germany on Monday criticized the "catastrophic" human rights situation for migrants held captive by traffickers in Libya, ahead of an EU summit set to discuss migrant flows through North Africa. Media reports Sunday said that Germany's foreign ministry had warned of "concentration camp-like" conditions in the de facto "private prisons" run by people smugglers in Libya, in a cable to Chancellor Angela Merkel's office. Foreign ministry spokesman Martin Schaefer on Monday did not confirm or deny the diplomatic cable, which had reportedly alleged regular killings, torture and rape in those camps in the highly unstable country. "But, in general, of course it is correct to say that the human rights situation is catastrophic in Libya," Schaefer said, adding that this was the case especially for illegal migrants, "the weakest of the weakest."Hundreds of thousands of West Africans were still heading through the Sahel zone and Sahara to the Mediterranean coast, bound for what they see as "their promised land Europe," he said. Some became victims of "the private prisons mentioned in some weekend press reports, where the human rights situation is indeed a disaster," he said, with others reporting "terrible" experiences from Libya. The report, said to be compiled by the German embassy in Niger, mentioned systematic "executions, torture and rape". It also said smartphone pictures and video footage supported claims of "concentration-camp-like conditions in the so-called private prisons," reported the newspaper Welt am Sonntag and news weekly Stern. Merkel said in her weekly podcast Saturday that the EU needed to take steps to stop the migrant flight, after more than 4,000 people drowned last year in the Mediterranean Sea, most of them en route from Libya to Italy. Europe needed to work with the fragile government in Libya, she said, ruling out however for now a deal like the one the EU reached with Turkey early last year to stop migrant flows. An agreement to repatriate rejected asylum seekers could only be reached when its government is in control of the whole country, Merkel said. People smugglers have exploited the chaos gripping Libya since the 2011 uprising that overthrew strongman Moammar Gadhafi. Libya was also among the mainly Muslim countries affected by U.S. President Donald Trump's executive orders that on Friday barred refugees from entry for 120 days. Smuggling is big business for gangs who cram migrants into boats that are small and unsafe for the perilous journey to Italy just 300 kilometers (190 miles) from Libya. European countries are trying to curb the flow of illegal migrants and have boosted their support for the Libyan coastguard. In the absence of an army or a regular police force in Libya, several militias act as coastguards but are often being accused of complicity or even involvement in the lucrative trade.

Drone Strike Kills 2 Qaida Suspects in Yemen
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 30/17/A US drone strike killed two suspected al-Qaida members in southern Yemen on Monday, a day after elite American forces killed 14 suspected militants in a nearby province, a security official said. The unmanned aircraft struck a vehicle in Bayhan district, on the border between Shabwa and Marib provinces, killing two people on board, the official said. On Sunday, elite US forces launched a dawn raid some 60 kilometres (40 miles) northwest of Bayhan, the first major US military operation against jihadists in Yemen since President Donald Trump took office on January 20. At least 14 suspected members of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) were killed in the attack, while one American soldier was killed and four others wounded, the US military said. A Yemeni provincial official gave a higher toll of 41 presumed militants and 16 civilians killed in the raid, including eight women and eight children.  Although the US only sporadically reports on its long-running bombing campaign against AQAP, it is the only force known to operate armed drones over Yemen. Al-Qaida and the Islamic State jihadist group have exploited a power vacuum created by the two-year-old conflict in Yemen between the government and Shiite Huthi rebels, especially in the country's south and southeast.

Saudi Arabia Condemns Israeli Settlements
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 30/17/The Saudi cabinet on Monday condemned Israeli settlement-building in the occupied West Bank, as the Jewish state prepared to vote on legalizing wildcat communities. Approval of the new construction on Palestinian land is "aimed at Judaization of large parts of East Jerusalem", the cabinet said, according to the official Saudi Press Agency. It added that the settlements contradict the will of the international community "and prevent the opportunity for peace and stability in the region". Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said a new bill would be submitted for parliament's approval on Monday "to allow us to regularize once and for all settlements in (the West Bank) and prevent repeated attempts to damage them". The international community considers all Israeli settlements in Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem and the occupied West Bank to be illegal, whether they are authorized by state institutions or not. They are also seen as a major stumbling block to peace efforts as they are built on land the Palestinians see as part of their future state. Since U.S. President Donald Trump's inauguration on January 20, Israel has approved about 3,000 settler homes in the occupied West Bank and in annexed east Jerusalem, signaling a sharp change of pace from such projects during the Barack Obama years. The previous U.S. administration under Obama had viewed such building as "illegitimate" and warned that settlements could derail hopes of a negotiated two-state solution.

Israel Seeking Clarity over U.S. Travel Ban
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 30/17/Israel said Monday it was seeking clarification of whether U.S. President Donald Trump's travel ban applies to tens of thousands of elderly Israeli Jews born in Middle Eastern countries. The executive order signed on Friday banned nationals of seven mainly Muslim countries for 90 days but has sparked confusion in its interpretation with people unsure whether they can travel. Israel is home to around 140,000 people born in the seven countries covered by the decree, including around 45,000 Iranians and 53,000 Iraqis, according to official statistics. The majority are over the age of 65 and many fled persecution. Their Israeli passports say where they were born. The U.S. Consulate in Jerusalem referred a question by AFP to the U.S. State Department, which several hours after being asked to respond was still unable to clarify whether the ban includes Israeli Jews. The Israeli authorities were also seeking clarification, foreign ministry spokesman Emmanuel Nahshon told AFP. Michael Wildes, a partner at the Wildes and Weinberg immigration law firm in the U.S. and a former public prosecutor, said the wording of Trump's order was unclear. He explained that the order refers to "aliens from countries" but does not explain how citizenship is defined. "Either Congress is going to legislate or the president is going to clarify the executive order but until then I advise anybody who hails from those countries against traveling." David Bier, an immigration policy analyst at the Cato Institute, agreed it was unclear how the law would be enforced.Meir Javedanfar, an Iranian-born Israeli and professor of Iranian politics at Israel's IDC Herzliya University, said Israelis born in those countries were "concerned" by the uncertainty. "It shows the chaos and lack of preparation (in the U.S.)." Britain announced late Sunday its citizens had been given a partial exemption from the ban, allowing them to travel even if they originally come from one of the seven countries.The clarification came after Mo Farah, a Somali born four-time British Olympic gold medalist, was advised he might not be able to return to his home in the U.S. despite not having Somali citizenship. Israeli ministers remained tightlipped over the ban, but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stirred controversy by publicly supporting Trump's plan to build a wall along the southern border with Mexico. "President Trump is right. I built a wall along Israel's southern border. It stopped all illegal immigration. Great success. Great idea," Netanyahu tweeted Saturday, referring to a barrier built to stop refugees and migrants. The statement sparked ire in Mexico, including among the Jewish population.  

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 30-31/17
Trump defends travel ban amid fierce backlash

Dylan Stableford/Yahoo News/January 29, 2017
President Trump lashed out on Sunday over those challenging his controversial executive order temporarily banning immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries.
America is a proud nation of immigrants and we will continue to show compassion to those fleeing oppression, but we will do so while protecting our own citizens and border,” Trump said in a statement issued late Sunday afternoon. “America has always been the land of the free and home of the brave. We will keep it free and keep it safe, as the media knows, but refuses to say.”
“The seven countries named in the executive order are the same countries previously identified by the Obama administration as sources of terror,” Trump continued. “To be clear, this is not a Muslim ban, as the media is falsely reporting. This is not about religion — this is about terror and keeping our country safe. There are over 40 different countries worldwide that are majority Muslim that are not affected by this order.”
He added: “We will again be issuing visas to all countries once we are sure we have reviewed and implemented the most secure policies over the next 90 days. I have tremendous feeling for the people involved in this horrific humanitarian crisis in Syria. My first priority will always be to protect and serve our country, but as President I will find ways to help all those who are suffering.”
On Friday, Trump signed an executive order barring people from seven countries — including Syria, Sudan, Yemen, Iran, Iraq, Libya and Somalia — from entering the United States for 90 days. It also stopped all refugees from entering the U.S. for 120 days and indefinitely suspended the entry of refugees from Syria. But critics, including several Republican lawmakers, say the policy goes too far.
“I think it’s a good idea to tighten the vetting process,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday. “But I also think it’s important to remember that some of our best sources in the war against radical Islamic terrorism are Muslims, both in this country and overseas.
“I think we need to be careful,” McConnell added. “We don’t have religious tests in this country.” Trump was apparently unmoved.
“Our country needs strong borders and extreme vetting, NOW,” Trump tweeted earlier Sunday. “Look what is happening all over Europe and, indeed, the world — a horrible mess!”
“Christians in the Middle-East have been executed in large numbers,” he added. “We cannot allow this horror to continue!”Others criticized Trump for issuing the travel ban without warning, a move that led to chaos at some U.S. airports.
“It is clear from the confusion at our airports across the nation that President Trump’s executive order was not properly vetted,” Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said in a joint statement. “We are particularly concerned by reports that this order went into effect with little to no consultation with the Departments of State, Defense, Justice and Homeland Security.”
On NBC’s “Meet the Press,” White House chief of staff Reince Priebus said the administration’s lack of advance notice was by design.
“I don’t think you want a grace period,” Priebus said. “Because then people who want to do bad things to Americans would just move up their travel date two days in order to get into the country before the grace period is over. … And if you ask, a lot of the people at the customs and border patrol would just tell you you’ve got to just rip off the Band-Aid and you have to move forward.”
Trump was more forceful in his response.
“The joint statement of former presidential candidates John McCain & Lindsey Graham is wrong — they are sadly weak on immigration,” Trump wrote on Twitter. “The two [senators] should focus their energies on ISIS, illegal immigration and border security instead of always looking to start World War III.”
The executive order sparked a wave of protests at airports around the country after more than 100 people, including some with current visas, were detained or turned around.
“We’ve got a couple dozen more that remain,” Priebus said. “And I would suspect as long as they’re not awful people that they will move through before another half a day today and perhaps some of these people should be detained further, and if they’re folks that shouldn’t be in this country, they’re going to be detained. So apologize for nothing here.”
On Saturday night, a federal judge in Brooklyn had issued an emergency stay temporarily blocking part of the order. The decision, which will affect people who have been detained in airports, came after the American Civil Liberties Union and other activist groups filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of two Iraqis who were held at New York City’s John F. Kennedy International Airport.
“There is imminent danger that, absent the stay of removal, there will be substantial and irreparable injury to refugees, visa holders, and other individuals from nations subject to [Trump’s] executive order,” Judge Ann Donnelly said in her ruling.
Kellyanne Conway, a senior adviser to Trump, said the chaos caused by the executive order was a “small price to pay” for greater security.
Conway said those who were detained represent just 1 percent of the 325,000 who flew into the United States on Saturday.
“I was stopped many times … after 9/11,” she added. “I didn’t resemble, or share a name with or be a part of any type of terrorist conspiracy. But this is what we do to keep a nation safe.”
Conway added: “This whole idea that they’re being separate and ripped from their family … it’s temporary.”
 
Trump's heartland voters shrug off global uproar over immigration ban
By Laila Kearney,Reuters /January 30/17
(Reuters) - Many of President Donald Trump’s core political supporters had a simple message on Sunday for the fiercest opponents of his immigration ban: Calm down.
The relaxed reaction among the kind of voters who drove Trump’s historic upset victory - working- and middle-class residents of Midwest and the South - provided a striking contrast to the uproar that has gripped major coastal cities, where thousands of protesters flocked to airports where immigrants had been detained.
 In the St. Louis suburb of Manchester, Missouri, 72-year-old Jo Ann Tieken characterized the president as bringing reason into an overheated debate.
 “Somebody has to stand up, be the grown up and see what we can do better to check on people coming in,” she said. “I’m all for everybody to stop and take a breath … Just give it a chance.”
 By executive order on Friday, Trump banned immigration from seven Muslim-majority countries – Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen – and temporarily halted the entry of refugees.
 In the electoral strongholds for Trump, residents seemed unbothered about the uproar flashing across their television screens. They shrugged off concerns about botched execution, damage to foreign relations and legal challenges across the country.
 In New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco and other cities, Trump's action set off an outpouring of anger.
 House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat from California, evoked an image of the Statue of Liberty weeping. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York teared up himself on camera as he seethed over the “mean-spirited and un-American” immigration ban. Veterans in government agencies, including the Homeland Security and State departments, blasted Trump's team for what they called slipshod planning and scant interagency communication, criticism the White House rejected.
 At airports, security officials also struggled to consistently enforce vague rules.
 But allegations of operational or administrative blunders may do little to dampen enthusiasm for a president who rose to power on a populist and protectionist platform, political analysts said.
 Louise Ingram, a 69-year-old retiree from Troy, Alabama, said she forgave the new administration a few "glitches," such as widespread confusion over treatment of green card holders, as it moved to protect U.S. citizens from attacks.
 "I'm not opposed to immigrants," she said. "I just want to make sure they are safe to come in."
 FEAR OF EUROPE
 A senior Trump administration official said political considerations had little to do with the executive orders. They rather represent a reaction to the 2015 mass shooting in San Bernardino, California; the Boston Marathon bombing; and multiple attacks by radicalized groups in Europe. “The reality is that the situation that exists today in parts of France, Germany and parts of Belgium is not a situation that we want replicated inside the United States,” one official told Reuters. Candace Wheater, a 60-year-old retired school cafeteria worker from Spring Lake, Michigan, also referenced the attacks in Brussels and Paris. "Look at what’s happening in Europe," she said. "I don’t dare travel there, out of fear.” Steve Hirsch, 63, from Manassas, Virginia, drove to Washington’s Dulles airport on Sunday to pick somebody up, rather than to protest as hundreds of others did. He said he supported Trump's order. "A country is not a country if it doesn't have borders," he added. He lauded Trump’s actions as a calculated step toward the larger goal of tightening border security. “He probably went as far as he thought he could,” Hirsch said. "You can't ban everybody in the world, but I think it's prudent considering the conditions in certain places in the world."
 FIRM BASE OF SUPPORT
 Trent Lott, a former Senate Republican leader from Mississippi who is now a lawyer in Washington, D.C., said the orders made sense to "working-class Americans in the real world.”
 “Out in the rest of the country, people are excited to see the president moving forward with securing the border," he said.
 University of Virginia political science professor Larry Sabato agreed that the weekend protests over the executive orders would not hurt Trump politically.
 “His base is as firm as ever,” he said. “What he’s lost in the very early polls is the Republicans who were never Trumpers and ended up voting for Trump.”
 Trump opponents have succeeded in winning some early court decisions that could undermine the practical impact of his executive orders, but Sabato said his base would perceive those as attacks from liberal elites.
 Trump could eventually lose support if he fails to keep promises important to regions that supported him, such as delivering jobs to the so-called Rust Belt, the Midwestern states dotted by dying factory towns.
 DEEP DIVISIONS
 Whatever Trump ultimately accomplishes, his election has ushered in a new extreme of political polarization to an already deeply divided country.
 “I just have not found a single person who has any neutrality at all about Donald Trump,” Sabato said.
 In Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 40-year-old teacher Trista Carles said she had been ordered to keep her views about Trump out of the classroom.
 “We were told to be Switzerland," she said. "We’re not allowed to take any sides or views.”
 She has her own opinions, of course, and said she appreciated that Trump, in his blunt way, gave voice to them “with no sugar-coating.”
 “I think it’s just too easy to get into our country and stay illegally," she said. "I feel like he is going to – to the best of his abilities – make a lot of things he said happen.”
 **(Reporting by Laila Kearney in New York; Additional reporting by Diane Bartz, Doina Chiacu, Steve Holland and Lacey Ann Johnson in Washington and Curtis Skinner in San Francisco; Writing by Brian Thevenot; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn

Trump and blacklisting of Muslim Brotherhood
Abdullah bin Bijad Al-Otaibi/Al Arabiya/January 30/17
Terrorism is a harmful phenomenon. It has been spreading, and its presence has worsened because many of the solutions addressing it across the world lack the right vision. They fail to go beyond dealing with the moment of the terrorist act and therefore do not tackle terrorism’s ideological and organizational roots and origins. The roots of ideological terrorism lie in the religious extremist rhetoric and hate, incitement and justification speeches delivered after each terrorist act. Some hide these justifications under the pretext of interpretation. Therefore, one must strike all sources of religious extremism with an iron fist. Everyone must perform their roles in this comprehensive war against concepts that support extremism and ideas and symbols related to it. The organizational roots of terrorism which are manifested in the form of groups, organizations and networks are also as important in this war as it is these organizations which enable extremism and plant it, spread it and market it. These groups also guarantee the permanent revival of terrorism thanks to their multipurpose organizational capabilities. Islam as a heavenly religion has not been harmed by anyone as much as it’s been harmed by extremist speeches and groups which claim to talk on its behalf. Terrorism certainly has no religion but at this moment in history, it’s almost limited to Islam due to the rise of terrorist groups and organizations and their rising brutality.
In the royal letter to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Nayef, Saudi King Salman wrote: “We are very delighted by our sons, the loyal security forces’ heroic acts and sacrifices to serve their religion, country, nation and sanctities.” This is royal praise of the long successful journey in fighting terrorism inside and outside the kingdom. It also commends the magnificent model of fighting terrorism, Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, and the heroes from among security forces and soldiers - with all their ranks - who participated in the success of this model.
The roots of ideological terrorism lie in the religious extremist rhetoric and hate, incitement and justification speeches delivered after each terrorist act. Some hide these justifications under the pretext of interpretation
Sinful, misguided aggressive men. Security forces are confronting “a category of sinful, misguided and aggressive men who violated the commands of God and the Sunna of his prophet (prayer and peace be upon him) and followed the paths of the devil who lured them and embellished their bad acts for them and they thus deemed it permissible to shed blood which God prohibited. They did not even spare God’s houses and their harm and criminality targeted those near and afar. Fathers, brothers, friends and relatives were not spared from their acts. God has exposed their shame. Their acts have been thwarted thanks to God and the efforts of the heroes, the security forces,” the king added in the letter.
Confronting terrorism through security forces is effective, and before that, confronting it via legislations, laws and rules proved to be more comprehensive as it provides lasting results. This is why the Muslim Brotherhood was categorized as a terrorist group in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt. American President Donald Trump’s administration is currently debating the importance of listing the group as a terrorist organization. In last Friday’s edition, Ash-Sharq al-Awsat newspaper reported that a “group led by Michael Flynn, Trump’s national security advisor, desires to include the group in the terror lists of the American State Department and Treasury.” This orientation - if approved - will have significant effects in targeting the organizational roots of modern terrorism and extremism.
The Muslim Brotherhood has received great support during Barack Obama’s eight years in power. His administration had spoiled the group and submitted to it during the phase known as the Arab Spring. Saudi Arabia and the UAE acted against the desire of the Obama administration and took a historical stance in supporting the Egyptian people and army get rid of the Brotherhood’s rule. However, the US is now going back to acting according to its strategic interests away from that arrogance of the wrong vision of the previous administration. Any serious confrontation to eliminate terrorism must be preceded and accompanied with the establishment of a coherent and comprehensive strategic vision to confront extremism. If the strategy and vision are not complete and strict, terrorism will continue to exist and terrorist groups will spread. Even if half solutions yield results on the short run, they worsen the problem on the long run. The time of confrontation came a long time ago, and what’s left to be done is to create an effective international integrated framework to dry out the sources of terrorism, cut its funding and attack its roots.
New strongholds
If America follows suit and categorizes the Brotherhood as a terrorist group - like Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt did - many countries will also do the same and some of these countries which have become the Brotherhood’s new strongholds will have to reconsider their calculations especially that few of these countries have altered their policies regarding some major issues in the region, therefore they must be capable of doing the same in terms of their stance from terrorist groups.
Is the Muslim Brotherhood the only source of extremist rhetoric? Is the Brotherhood alone responsible for this extremist rhetoric and the terrorist groups that have branched from it? The answer is certainly no. Some Salafist speeches, particularly those known as jihadist Salafism and some traditional extremist speeches which are cited to create hate speech that represents a source for modern terrorism are also responsible.
Political Islam groups which resemble the Muslim Brotherhood are all terrorist groups, like the Sururi, Qutb groups or parties like Hizb ut-tahrir. All terrorist groups are completely related to political Islam groups. Al-Qaeda and ISIS are the close sons of these groups. Abdullah Azzam was a venerable Brotherhood member and Osama bin Laden was an orderly Brotherhood member. There are dozens like them. The rhetoric of Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, formerly al-Nusra Front, belongs to the same structure.
Establishing tolerant religious speeches accompanied by efforts over a long time are a must and without them, there will be no significant difference in this war against extremist rhetoric. There will be no significant difference unless the concepts of tolerance and co-existence are more spread than the concepts of governance, ignorance, takfir and hatred. Without these concepts of tolerance and co-existence, the extremism machine will continue to produce terrorism in droves.
Finally, many European countries have been a haven for Muslim Brotherhood and other terrorist groups for decades and they will have to reconsider their policies amid the new reality they’re living through. The major transformation in the American stance - if approved - will play a role in helping these countries figure out where they stand in this long battle against extremism and terrorism.

Trump’s first seven days and MENA issues
Dr. Theodore Karasik/Al Arabiya/January 30/17
Nobody should be surprised by President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (EO) actions. He is doing exactly what he promised to do. Just last week, in his Inaugural Address, Trump stated: “We assembled here today are issuing a new decree to be heard in every city, in every foreign capital and in every hall of power. From this day forward, a new vision will govern our land. From this day forward, it's going to be only America first — America first…. The time for empty talk is over. Now arrives the hour of action.”What Trump is doing by Executive Order is to set a new bar in order to negotiate real, near term immigration issues that isolates potential illicit crime and terrorist pathways by literally halting the physical movement of peoples and services. He is implementing American nationalism fast and furious, with both physical and non-physical walls and barriers.
The Wall
“The Wall” on the US-Mexico border may become relevant as a symbol in Europe and in other locations in the future. As the European Union falls apart borders will become required across the continent. In the first wave of migrants between 2015-2016, Hungary and the Balkans built fences. Given European alarm at migrant issues, coupled with the high probability of an EU meltdown over 2017 election results and the Brexit, European borders may very well find walls and barriers sprouting up too with rigorous physical and biometric methods. Trump’s Wall is a model for other borders issues regarding migrants specifically in Europe. In theory, the entire wall concept promotes greater intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance to become stronger and to stop criminal transit and transport.
From this thinking, The Wall will become relevant in the coming years as a symbol of steps that must be taken to preserve national integrity and promote national patriotism. These methods and technologies will help secure borders and prevent smuggling and other illicit activity. It should be noted that walls and other high tech monitoring exist on the Arabian Peninsula where protecting national resilience is key.
EO 14 is a violent earthquake in migrant policy with further implications for not only American and European liberalism’s waning hours and the rise of European borders but also fodder for militants – and sympathizers – everywhere
With specific implications for the MENA region, Trump said at his inauguration: “We will reinforce old alliances and form new ones -- and unite the civilized world against radical Islamic terrorism, which we will eradicate completely from the face of the Earth.”
This week’s EO 14 (“Muslim Ban:) falls under the Trump Administration’s potent and uncomfortable rearrangement of global, regional, and local politics surrounding immigration. For Trumpists, America’s model of governance and ideological outlook is antiquated and needs to be updated to a new global reality.
This American president intends to turn the United States from a beacon of hope and support, a home to foreign despair, to a country that is resetting its priorities based on perceptions surrounding what is now a new global uncertainty in order to protect its homeland security. The list of targeted countries may expand despite the uproar within the United States and abroad over this sudden Executive Order. According to CNN, 134,000,000 are now banned from entering the United States in this possible first wave. We live in a world where MENA’s dysfunction and warfare is manipulated and cajoled by a number of parties in multiple conflicts. No finger-pointing is necessary since everyone is guilty. Indeed, The New Thirty Year War is about two years old. With Barack Obama’s Administration over, Trump is moving forward with a quick and dirty filtration campaign based on the former administration’s “Muslim-ban” paperwork.
Fodder for militants
EO 14 is a violent earthquake in migrant policy with further implications for not only American and European liberalism’s waning hours and the rise of European borders but also fodder for militants – and sympathizers – everywhere.
Trump Administration foreign policy with Muslim majority countries not mentioned in EO 14 is telling. These are Trump’s partners- Egypt and the GCC. What Trump has done is put a cleavage between those countries mentioned and those not. This fact puts Egypt and the GCC in a tough situation. Not only does Trump’s immigration action put attention of fundamentalists on America but also the Arab countries who are not. However, nothing is static for long with Trump: Trump officials are now suggesting an expansion of EO 17 to include two major countries in the Middle East. That fact is a significant alert marker and serves notice to all Muslim majority countries. Question that remains is will Muslim-majority countries be subjected to President Trump’s EO 14 ever react in unison? To be sure, Iran’s response to EO 14 illustrates the “tit-for-tat” mentality of the Islamic Republic. Iraq’s response — duplicating Iran’s reaction – can be interpreted in a number of ways from backing Tehran to exerting some muscle to gain concessions from Washington as Americans in Iraq depend on Iraqi visas. Last but not least, EO 17, Trump’s order for the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) is to present a concrete plan to destroy Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) within thirty days. With Defense Secretary James Mattis at the helm of the Pentagon, the JCS action plan is going to contain military options with Arab partners in varying, forward leaning roles, with looser rules of engagement. According to a Jordanian security official “there is likely to be a robust coordination with Russia along the military spectrum (information sharing, humanitarian aid, etc. plus boots on the ground.” Perhaps Jordanian King Abdullah’s forthcoming visit to Washington DC is notable as Amman is now more than ever a key to destroying ISIS. The past week was only the beginning of Trump’s vision where EOs rage. More are likely to come that will impact MENA issues.

How do we eliminate ‘traffic terrorism’?
Mshari Al Thaydi/Al Arabiya/January 30/17
An infuriating and stubborn threat exists today that is as lethal and harmful to peace as and wellbeing as the terrorism attributed to extremist groups. Yes, that would be “traffic terrorism” that exists in more than one Arab city. Frankly though, when we talk about Saudi cities, Riyadh suffers the most from this phenomenon. It is infuriating. Every day, we hear about horrific incidents that kill children, women and young men almost. Unfortunately, most of these are caused by people who were not taught the right values by their parents. Speed cameras of the Saher system have not succeeded in curbing some mad young men even though they provide some deterrence. Recently, many of were witness to a group of reckless drivers drifting their cars at breakneck speed amid hundreds of cars that were being driven safely in one of Riyadh’s streets. Saher has helped limit this madness but so far it has only contributed a little. This is evident in the fact that many drifters continue to cause horrific accidents on a daily basis. This is in addition to other traffic violations such as driving down a one-way roadway, not abiding by traffic signals and much more. Just yesterday it was reported that six people from one family were killed and one other was critically injured in a car crash on al-Janadriyah road, east of Riyadh. A few days ago, Dr Salman al-Ouda’s wife and son were killed in a car accident on the Shaqaraa-Riyadh road. In the past, five sons of Dr Ismail bin Mohammed Al-Bishri, director of al-Jouf University, were killed in a horrific car accident in the eastern province. May they all rest in peace. I am not suggesting that this problem is limited to Saudi Arabia or just to Arab countries. However, unfortunately, we suffer more from it
‘Traffic terrorism’
Describing what’s happening as “traffic terrorism” is not a media exaggeration but a term used by an expert. Colonel Dr. Zuhair bin Abdul Rahman Sharf, director of regulations at the Madinah traffic department, used the term while delivering a lecture in March 2014.
According to the Saudi daily Al-Eqtisadiah, he said the number of victims of traffic recklessness in Saudi Arabia has exceeded the number of victims of many wars, including the Croatian war of independence which number of victims reached 82,000.
According to the statistics provided by the General Authority for Statistics in 2015, the number of traffic accidents in Riyadh – which incidentally is more than the rest of Riyadh’s administrative regions – reached more than 145,000 in one year. I am not suggesting that this problem is limited to Saudi Arabia or just to Arab countries. It’s a global problem. However, unfortunately, we suffer more from it. We know there are legislative efforts, with the use of technology, to combat this menace but we want more and more.
This article was first published in Asharq al-Awsat on January 30, 2016.

The heresy called cinema
Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/January 30/17
Some call the talk of cinema in Saudi Arabia as strange as it is impossible for them to imagine the presence of this form of art in our country. However, history actually contradicts this perception. Dr Abdullah al-Madni tells us a lot in his memoirs of cinema. He narrates them in an article – “This is my experience with Saudi cinema.”Al-Madni wrote about the residential neighborhoods of middle class Saudis and Arab bachelors in Dhahran, Abqaiq, Ras Tanura and other modern oil-driven cities. He also talks about the air base in Dharan, which included a cinema for entertainment purposes. If by cinema they mean watching a movie on television, then eastern province may have been luckier than other parts of the kingdom due to Aramco TV, which started broadcasting in Dhahran on September 16, 1957
Cinema on television
If by cinema they mean watching a movie on television, then eastern province may have been luckier than other parts of the kingdom due to Aramco TV which started broadcasting in Dhahran on September 16, 1957.This was the first television channel in the Arabian Gulf and the second in the Middle East after Baghdad TV, which had begun broadcasting few months earlier. Cinema has been part of the Saudi history of recent decades. The medium has had critics, investors as well as consumers. They don’t see anything wrong with that.
Their contribution to Arab cinema has led to visual evolution of this mode of entertainment and spread of joy in life. This is just a small part of the story.This article was first published in Okaz on Jan 30, 2017.

What comes first, the state or the ‘group’?
Sawsan Al Shaer/Al Arabiya/January 30/17
Dr Nadir Khadim, born in a village in Bahrain, puts spotlight in his book – Outside the Grouping – on the “group” suppressing those attempting to defect to join the authority. Even though most of our authors are not audacious enough to delve into realism, this book is indeed worth reading. The author boldly highlights the individual desire to desert the “group”. He even refers to Jews during the Nazi era and Arab Palestine during the Zionist regime as precedents. However, he missed pointing out about groups in the GCC, which include the Shiites, the sect he belongs to. This is a reality witnessed by majority of Shiites in rural Bahrain and Kuwait. Those who attempted to join the states without abandoning the “group” are persecuted. There are several examples of how the “group” denied its members the right to combine the two.
Though the book was published in 2009, the violent clashes that rocked Bahrain at the time clouded discussions. On Wednesday, the author attended a press conference organized by “Wa’ad” opposition party during which he refrained from talking about the complexity of the situation in Bahrain. This somehow mirrors the dilemma of the willfully ignorant educated elite.
The party’s headquarters are in close proximity to the High Criminal Court and the High Court of Appeal. The two Bahraini courts are scheduled next month to try 20 of those accused of multiple charges including torturing young men from al-Daraz and Sanabis villages. These areas have majority Shiite populations, some of whom are accused of being state security agents.
There is little doubt that the author of the book would have never imagined that the coercion practiced by “group” could ever amount to serious crimes such as those committed by the defendants facing trial. The most telling example of “group” oppression, illustrated by Dr Nadir in his book, was the exclusion of members swearing allegiance to the group – or what he called it “loyalty”. We believe that the silence of those willing to break away following oppression – and the elite unwilling to counter the “group” and refusing to face reality – has culminated in escalation of suppression leading to kidnapping, torturing and killing.
Escalation of suppression
We believe that the silence of those willing to break away following oppression – and the elite unwilling to counter the “group” and refusing to face reality – has culminated in escalation of suppression leading to kidnapping, torturing and killing.
These are not the first cases whereby Bahraini citizen have been abducted by gangs who claim to be protecting areas under the control of religious men or the “group”. On the 10th of August 2015, a 16-year-old boy from Al-Sanabis was abducted by seven masked men. He was suspended from a tree and tortured.
The next day, he was told by a member of the Mukhtar brigade that he was being tortured for being an informer. He was threatened that he will be filmed if he doesn’t confess. He was eventually driven in a car and dumped near Bin Khamees cemetery in Sanabis. It is known that Mohamed Habib Al-Muqdad, a religious cleric member of the Al-Wafaq Group, was among those convicted. This “group” has since been dissolved by the authorities for committing a number of crimes.
The latest case being considered by the High Criminal Court begins on the 9th of February 2017. The victim, in this case, is Ahmed Musa an 18-year-old inhabitant of Al-Shakoura district. Two of the four defendants were arrested following investigations and witness statements. The four defendants are being charged with “torture leading to death and false imprisonment and the misdemeanors of theft and vandalism”.
This case relates to the events of the 4th of October 2016 in the Al-Daraaz district where an unidentified person was found unconscious and in a critical condition with multiple wounds. He remained in coma for a number of days and then succumbed to injuries. The victim was identified by the father who found his son’s picture published on social media. Following investigations, it was revealed that the fourth criminal – who was a friend of the one murdered – had taken the victim to the defendant named Isa Qasim’s house. He then led him to the al-Daraaz district in order for more assailants to interrogate him and force him to confess to being a police informant.
Aren’t these crimes an extension of the call for “loyalty”?
This article first appeared in Asharq Al-Awsat on Jan. 29, 2017.

Turkey: The Purges Continue

Burak Bekdil/Gatestone Institute/January 30/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9856/turkey-purges
What makes Turkey look more like North Korea than a European democracy is the legal authorities' reflex to launch probes into anyone accused, without evidence, of terrorist activity or insulting the president.
Philipp Schwartz was a Hungarian-born neuropathologist who worked for the Goethe University in Frankfurt for 14 years until he was fired in 1933 for being Jewish. After his -- and other scholars' -- dismissal, he convinced the then decade-old modern Turkish Republic to admit persecuted German professors to positions at Turkish universities. Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the secular founder of the Turkish state, enthusiastically agreed to Schwartz's proposal. Turkey quickly admitted 150 German Jewish professors. Schwartz was appointed as director of the Department of Pathology at the University of Istanbul. More than seven decades after, a German initiative that bears Schwartz's name is returning the favor.
In the first week of 2017, another 631 Turkish researchers and professors were dismissed from their universities, adding to thousands who were purged during the second half of 2016. Several Turkish scholars are now reversing Schwartz's path: In the fall of 2016, the Philipp Schwartz Initiative received more applications from Turkey than war-torn Syria or any other country. Turks now account for 46% of all applicants worldwide. As the Brussels-based European affairs weekly newspaper Politico put it: "Turkey loses its brains."
Turkey's problem is bigger than just literally losing its brains. The country apparently is also figuratively losing its brains. News headlines are so confusing that often one cannot decide whether he is reading a real newspaper or the Turkish version of The Onion, reflecting a collective, socio-pathological frenzy -- ironically Schwartz's work of science.
An Islamist and militantly pro-Erdogan newspaper, Yeni Akit, ran the photo of what looks like a main battle tank, claiming that this weapons system had been developed by Aselsan, a state-controlled defense company, and was capable of "even stopping an atomic bomb." Yeni Akit belongs to an "elite" group of media outlets whose editors often find a seat aboard Erdogan's private jet when he travels abroad for state visits. What is more worrying than the absurdity of Yeni Akit's claim is that few Turks would question the story's authenticity.
Erdogan-mania can take other weird forms, too. Another news story recently revealed that a legal investigation has been launched into 18 residents of a small village in southern Turkey, after the village headman informed authorities that the men engaged in "terrorist activity" and insulted President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. It became clear that the 18 suspects were merely the village headman's election rival and his relatives and friends. The village headman's behavior can be explained by "human psychology and political greed." What makes Turkey look more like North Korea than a European democracy is the legal authorities' reflex to launch probes into anyone accused, without evidence, of terrorist activity or insulting the president.
In Turkey, village headmen, like most villagers in Anatolia, are generally known to be Erdogan loyalists. After the Turkish lira's unprecedented depreciation against major currencies since the beginning of 2017, the president blamed the slide on "manipulators and terrorists" who keep foreign currency portfolios. "There is no difference between a terrorist who has a weapon or bomb in his hand and a terrorist who has dollars, euros and interest rates in terms of aim," Erdogan said on January 12. In a show of support for Erdogan, a group of village headmen in Turkey's southeastern city of Adiyaman burned stacks of one dollar bills, protesting the U.S. currency's sharp rise against the lira. Nice show. But the angry village chiefs were not generous enough in expressing their wrath for the dollar: During their show, they burned fake dollar bills.
Elsewhere, the headline "Top press rights defender in Turkish court for terror propaganda" was another Turkish peculiarity. Erol Onderoglu, the Turkey representative for Reporters Without Borders, along with rights activist Sebnem Fincanci and journalist Ahmet Nesin, has been charged with "making pro-Kurdish terror propaganda and aiding terrorists," risking years in prison. The indictment proposes as evidence only the fact that the suspects had guest-edited a pro-Kurdish newspaper after its editors were put in prison.
Erol Onderoglu (left, meeting with European Parliament President Martin Schulz), is the Turkey representative for Reporters Without Borders. He was recently arrested in Turkey, with rights activist Sebnem Fincanci and journalist Ahmet Nesin. They are charged with "making pro-Kurdish terror propaganda and aiding terrorists," because they guest-edited a pro-Kurdish newspaper after its editors were jailed. (Image source: European Parliament)
On January 16, Turks sighed with relief when, after a 16-day manhunt, Turkish police caught the jihadi terrorist who gunned down and killed 39 people at an upscale nightclub in Istanbul shortly after midnight on New Year's Eve. The man was caught alive in a special-forces operation, together with an Iraqi man and three women from Somalia, Senegal and Egypt -- all believed to be members or supporters of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). He confessed to the attack, and his fingerprints matched with those at the scene of crime. His four-year-old son was missing from the safe-house where he and others were caught. The poor toddler is believed to have been sent to another safe-house in Istanbul. Wherever he is being kept, he will never have a safe life in Turkey despite his innocence. The Turks treat him as a terrorist in absentia. Cemil Barlas, a pro-Erdogan journalist, tweeted that "... in whatever way he should be used [implying torture], that child should be used to make the killer talk. There is no moral harm in that."
**Burak Bekdil, one of Turkey's leading journalists, was just fired from Turkey's leading newspaper after 29 years, for writing what was taking place in Turkey for Gatestone. He is a Fellow at the Middle East Forum.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

The Telos Group: The True Identity of the "American Pro-Israeli, Pro-Palestinian, Pro-Peace Movement "

Noah Summers/Gatestone Institute/January 30/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9826/telos-group
In 2014, the Telos Group was outed as an anti-Israel organization not living up to its "pro-Israeli, pro-Palestinian, and pro-peace" self-description.
Instead of building substantive bridges between Palestinians and Israelis, the bridge Telos appears most intent on building is a financial one between America and Ramallah. Telos's actions demonstrate the organization is pro-PLO/Palestinian Authority, not pro-Palestinian.
Telos is focusing its efforts on enabling a corrupt, oppressive PLO/PA government that has opposed peace on multiple occasions, oppressed its citizens by denying them freedom of speech and protection from religious persecution, and jailed journalists who dare to criticize the PA's undemocratic government and its abuses of its citizenry -- certainly not a pro-Israeli/pro-Palestinian/pro-peace agenda.
Peace with Israel is premised on Palestinians no longer supporting their children engaging in terrorist acts against Israel.
While Khalil appeals to UN Resolution 242's "inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war" to justify his position on Israeli settlements, he neglects to mention that this "land-for-peace" resolution was premised on the Palestinians halting all violence against Israelis and recognizing the State of Israel.
It is time to call the Telos Group for what it really is: Anti/Anti/Anti: anti-Israeli, anti-Palestinian, and anti-peace.
At least one person was pleased about the Obama Administration's decision to abstain from the UN Security Council (UNSC) vote on Resolution 2334, effectively establishing the boundaries of a Palestinian state. For Gregory Khalil, the current president and co-founder of the Telos Group, an organization posing as "pro-Israeli, pro-Palestinian, and pro-peace," it was 12 years coming. His 2004 New York Times op-ed encouraged the US to abstain from exercising their UNSC veto in defense of Israel. In December 2016, the Obama Administration finally acted upon the advice of this former Palestinian negotiation-team lawyer by abstaining from -- instead of vetoing -- Resolution 2334.
Founded in 2009 with the original name of the "Kairos Project," the Telos Group described itself as:
"... a non-profit educational initiative that seeks to educate America's mainstream faith leaders and their communities about the causes of -- and solutions to -- the modern conflict that currently ravages the Holy Land."
A "bio" for Telos Group President and Co-Founder Gregory Khalil reveals:
"Mr. Khalil spent the summer of 2000 in East Jerusalem researching refugee rights under international law -- as well as other issues related to final status negotiations -- with renowned Palestinian legislator, negotiator, and spokesperson Dr. Hanan Ashrawi."
By his own account, Khalil later advised the Palestinian leadership on negotiations with Israel, and served four years on the Palestinian negotiating team.
In 2014, the Telos Group was outed as an anti-Israel organization not living up to its "pro-Israeli, pro-Palestinian, and pro-peace" self-description. The following year, Telos doubled down, rebranding with that slogan as their central theme. Their rebranding efforts included unveiling a new logo, revamping their website,[1] and developing a more active presence on Facebook and Instagram. In July 2015, Telos announced on their blog the launch of their newly redesigned website "and a slightly new direction," with the stated goal to "grow and direct the pro/pro/pro movement in America."
While the old Telos website originally emphasized the slogan of "Educating America's Faith Communities for Holy Land Peace," its new website prominently displays its "Pro/Pro/Pro Peacemaking" slogan and an updated mission:
"By resourcing leaders at the nexus of culture, faith and enterprise, we equip Americans to build a transformative pro-Israeli, pro-Palestinian, pro-peace movement."
While its leaders originally defined their target audience as "mainstream faith leaders and their communities" and then "American evangelicals," they now define their target audience as "Americans."
Telos's rebranding efforts were quickly undermined by its own actions; its agenda remained unchanged. Khalil facilitated meetings with the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) / Palestinian Authority (PA), Palestinian companies, and the chairman of the organization behind the PayPal4Palestine campaign. In 2011 (before its rebrand), Telos posted a picture with Hanan Ashrawi on the Telos Facebook page in a photo album titled, "Conservative Leaders Trip." Now, in 2016, the PLO posted on Facebook two press releases[2] on Ashrawi's meetings with "a Telos Group," featuring pictures of both meetings (one picture included Khalil). Palestinian media also reported on the meetings.[3]
Notably, Telos social media accounts did not post about the two PLO/Telos meetings. In contrast to the rebranding's emphasis on a "pro-Israeli, pro-Palestinian, pro-peace" slogan, Telos met with an organization and government (PLO/PA) that has monetarily supported the families of terrorists who have murdered Israeli civilians.
On the same day as their second meeting with Ashrawi, Telos met with Palestinian companies that are part of a larger Palestinian push seeking to establish a Palestinian high-tech economy in both the West Bank and Gaza. These companies pressured PayPal in an unsuccessful attempt to secure PayPal tools reportedly necessary to accomplish this goal. The PLO/PA expressed support for the PayPal4Palestine movement. Khalil also tweeted the Palestinian PayPal letter from his personal Twitter account and retweeted #Paypal4Palestine messages. Telos then facilitated a meeting between the Women Donors Network's Middle East and Peace Democracy Circle (WDN's MEPDC) and Sam Bahour, Chairman of Americans for a Vibrant Palestinian Economy. Bahour, whose organization is coordinating the #PayPal4Palestine campaign, letter, and hashtag, posted about the meeting and thanked Khalil for it on Bahour's Google+ account. Again, the Telos social media accounts were strangely silent.
While every pro-Israeli, pro-Palestinian, and pro-peace American longs for the day when Palestinians experience genuine economic freedom, they undoubtedly understand that money is fungible, and that in the West Bank and especially in Gaza, financial resources and economic products often end up in the hands of government and terrorist organizations instead of in the hands of impoverished Palestinians. The PayPal4Palestine movement (supported by the Palestinian companies who met with Telos) offered its assistance to PayPal to work around any legal issues by working with "officials." But those PA and Hamas officials are part of the very regimes responsible for stealing resources from the Palestinian people. The unsuccessful PayPal4Palestine movement did not call for the serious internal Palestinian reforms necessary to enable genuine economic prosperity to reach the average Palestinian suffering under an oppressive government.
Khalil's December 2016 New York Times op-ed provides a key insight into what could potentially be driving Telos's and his private economic advocacy efforts: "They [leaders] should also help avert collapse of the partly dependent Palestinian economy by enabling greater access of goods and people to Jerusalem's global marketplace."
On January 10, 2017, Telos shared a Jerusalem Post op-ed by Gershon Baskin, asking, "Is the Palestinian Authority an effective government? What challenges does it face? Check out this opinion piece to learn more about the PA."
In the piece, Baskin, who claimed to have worked to bring "tens of millions of dollars of private-sector investments into Palestine," blamed Israel for the failures of the Palestinian Authority. He dismissed PA corruption, excused the lack of democratic elections, justified PA nepotism, and suggested that Palestinians have more freedom under the Palestinian Authority "than in any other Arab country." Baskin urged Israelis and Palestinians alike not to give up on the PA, and argued:
"Investment in the private sector and especially direct foreign investment in Palestine is way too low. Part of that comes from the donor mentality that has been created and fostered whereby Palestinians have learned to expect projects to be supported by free money rather than having to risk investing their own money in expanding the economy."
Instead of building substantive bridges between Palestinians and Israelis, the bridge Telos appears most intent on building is a financial one between America and Ramallah. Telos's actions demonstrate the organization is pro-PLO/Palestinian Authority, not pro-Palestinian. At a time when Telos has a tremendous opportunity to advance genuine peace between Israelis and Palestinians, it is focusing its efforts on enabling a corrupt, oppressive PLO/PA government that has opposed peace on multiple occasions, oppressed its citizens by denying them freedom of speech and protection from religious persecution, and jailed journalists who dare to criticize the PA's undemocratic government and its abuses of its citizenry.
While operating as a pro-PLO/PA-narrative non-profit, the Telos Group masquerades as a pro-Israeli/pro-Palestinian/pro-peace non-profit. Based on its leadership and their behavior to date, its ultimate objective would appear to be an economically viable Palestinian state on terms more favorable to the PLO/PA than to Israelis, Palestinians, or peace -- certainly not a pro-Israeli/pro-Palestinian/pro-peace agenda.
Given the recent UN vote, Khalil's New York Times op-ed from 12 years ago is still relevant. Khalil's 2014 hour-long presentation to students participating in a model UN cleverly presented the pro-Palestinian narrative as the historical perspective. His choice of language during his history review and his version of the Israeli and Palestinian narratives cast Palestinians in a sympathetic light and Israelis in an unsympathetic and historically inaccurate light.
Gregory Khalil addresses students participating in a model UN, in Jackson, Wyoming, on November 16, 2014. (Image source: InterConnections21 video screenshot)
During the presentation, Khalil told the audience:
"I see different conversations emerging, among key populations in Israel, in Palestine, and in the international community who's been a full party to this conflict all along -- it's not half a world away. I see different conversations that aren't about silly talking points anymore like, 'Oh, if Palestinians just learned to love their own kids more than they love killing Jews.' Like, you know, racist sentiments like that. Or 'Oh, if Israelis just didn't want to just wipe all Palestinians off the map and just trying to just completely kill us and get rid of us.'"
Paraphrasing a quote popularly attributed to former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir, Khalil labeled it a "racist sentiment." While there is now some question whether Golda Meir did in fact say the original quote ("Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us"), his criticism of the quote's message was misleading. Peace with Israel is premised on Palestinians no longer supporting their children engaging in terrorist acts against Israel. Khalil's choice of a parallel Palestinian talking point is strange, considering that talk of wiping Israel -- not Palestinians -- off the map is the anti-Israel rallying cry popularly attributed to Iran then President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (although the exact translation is disputed).
Talking to the model UN students, Khalil promoted the narrative that the State of Israel came into existence primarily as a result of the Holocaust, and that Palestinians were unjustly punished for what the Jewish people endured during the Holocaust:
"Palestinians on the ground were like, 'Wait a second! What are you talking? Why should we be responsible for what happened over there in Europe in this massive war. Like we're connected to this land too.' Just as my family would tell you or Palestinian Christian, their first Christians were, of course, here in the Holy Land. And Muslims have family trees that go back 1,500 years."
Khalil's narrative misconstrues the history of the region during, and immediately following, the Holocaust. By suggesting that Palestinians were innocent bystanders during the Holocaust, Khalil is misleading his student audience. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum has documented how the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin Al Husseini, met with Adolf Hitler, sought to assist the Nazis in murdering Jews in Europe, and expressed his desire to destroy Jews and the Jewish homeland. By inaccurately seeking to establish Palestinians as the indigenous people of the Holy Land, Khalil's speech does not address that the first Christians of the Holy Land 2,000 years ago were Jewish disciples of Jesus, a Jewish carpenter whose Jewish family tree dates back thousands of years.
On at least two occasions, Khalil has misrepresented the legal situation of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, also known as historic Judea and Samaria. Both in his 2014 model UN speech and during a January 2, 2017 Global Immersion webinar, Khalil used the analogy of a foreign country invading the United States to describe the settlements. For his model UN speech, he equated Israeli settlements to Canada building towns in the United States. During the webinar, he used the analogy of Mexico invading and building towns in San Diego.
While Khalil appeals to UN Resolution 242's "inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war" to justify his position on Israeli settlements, he neglects to mention that this "land-for-peace" resolution was premised on the Palestinians halting all violence against Israelis and recognizing the State of Israel. Historically, when Israel has withdrawn from territory in exchange for peace, Palestinians have continued to launch both verbal (incitement to violence) and physical attacks on Israel's sovereignty and security. Since Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, Israeli communities have lived under constant threat of Hamas rocket fire. And as recently as January 2017, Hanan Ashrawi reiterated the PLO/PA's unwillingness to recognize Israel as a Jewish state.
So how is the Telos Group continuing its anti-Israel narrative and advocacy under the guise of a new direction? Demonstrating that its rebranding is nothing more than a facade for its real agenda, the Telos Group cleverly packages and disseminates PLO/Palestinian Authority talking points -- creating a generation of misinformed anti-Israel activists in America while the PLO/PA does the same in the Middle East. The key is Telos and Khalil's choice of language, construction of narrative, and questionable public relations efforts.
In 2010, at a Capitol Hill event, Gregory Khalil laid out the reasoning behind the Telos Group's (then known as the Kairos Project) values-oriented language:
"For many years, we've sort of ceded the language that relates to values, and fundamental human rights, and social justice in favor of a more sort of pragmatic political language. Now, I don't mean to diminish the role of politics, because this conflict is not a theological conflict; it's a political problem. But I'm trying to say that there are ways to engage new voices who can be helpful rather than harmful."
As someone of Christian Palestinian descent, Khalil should be familiar with the fact that Islamic radicals such as Hamas and Hezbollah cite Islamic texts to justify theologically their attempts to destroy the Jewish people and the State of Israel. Many Christians and Jews also view this conflict not in strictly political terms, but in theological terms. While secularists in both Israeli and Palestinian societies may view this conflict only in political terms, to deny the theological underpinnings of the conflict is to ignore the root causes of the conflict and to be ignorant of potential real-world consequences of proposed conflict solutions.
As a result of this misguided perspective on the conflict, the Telos Group is indoctrinating "new voices" (the younger generation and their influencers) on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through the storytelling method that builds empathy for the Palestinian cause while using language that appeals to this generation's values, sense of social justice, and dedication to protecting human rights. Khalil's model UN speech was a prime example of this process and agenda. Through his language and narrative, he builds support among his model UN audience for taking action and upsetting the status quo.
Four articles published since the Telos rebranding, and shared on Telos's social media accounts, vividly demonstrate that while the organization's public relations efforts were supposed to establish the rebranding, they in fact revealed the organization's efforts to disseminate PLO/PA talking points.
After going on a Telos Group tour, Washington Post religion writer Sarah Pulliam Bailey wrote a glowing piece in December 2015 entitled, "How some evangelicals are challenging a decades-long stance of blanket support for Israel's government." Bailey's article title is of note, since in describing their tours, the Telos website states tour participants "encounter multiple Israeli and Palestinian narratives," and that "Telos guides expertly balance and interpret these meetings..."
Former Telos trip participant Justin Kron is a Christian tour guide, leading Israel tours emphasizing the Christian faith's Jewish roots. Researching Palestinians' access to water after his 2013 Telos tour, he found the tour had provided him with only one side of the story on that hot button topic -- the pro-PLO/PA narrative. In 2014, another Telos Group trip participant, Cameron Strang, Founder and CEO of the Relevant Media Group, wrote an article on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict presenting only the pro-PLO/PA narrative on a host of topics, including Palestinian water access.
In her Washington Post piece, Bailey had observed, "The trip focused mostly on Israel as a modern state, rather than Israel as a biblical land." The pro-PLO/PA narrative promoted by Telos focuses on Israel's current existence and the conflict, while willfully ignoring thousands of years of Jewish presence in the land and seeking to replace it with the false narrative of an indigenous Palestinian population. Writing in the Middle East Quarterly, author and professor Dr. David Bukay explained:
"Rewriting the history of the Land of Israel by erasing Jewish history and replacing it with a fabricated Palestinian history is a central goal of the Palestinian Authority (PA).... In the official Palestinian narrative, the Palestinian people are authentic and indigenous while it is the Israelis who are the foreigners, invented, and sown in a land that is not theirs."
December 2016, Khalil was quoted in a Washington Post article about Palestinian Christians, and also authored a New York Times op-ed about moving the United States embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Both articles illustrated that the Telos Group, Khalil, and their friends in the media are regrettably shilling for the PLO/PA through the use of language and storytelling which mirror the language and narrative of an oppressive, undemocratic, often genocidal group.
In the Washington Post piece, Bethany Allen-Ebrahimian (Assistant Editor of Foreign Policy) inaccurately blamed Israel as the cause of Palestinian Christians' suffering. She quoted Khalil misrepresenting the Holy Land's history:
"I and many other Americans of Palestinian Christian ancestry will often get asked: When did you convert? '2,000 years ago, when did you convert?' is a standard response."
In words eerily similar to those of the PLO's Hanan Ashrawi, Allen-Ebrahimian reprimands American Evangelical Christians for supporting "Israeli security policies" that "have...made life difficult for Christians in Palestine and have cut them off from parts of their homeland." Allen-Ebrahimian goes on to claim:
"Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), an outspoken conservative Christian politician and proponent of Israel, demonstrated that particular myopia when he gave the keynote speech at a 2014 conference hosted by [In Defense of Christians] IDC. A contingent of Arab Christians booed Cruz off stage after he declared 'Christians have no better ally than the Jewish state.' For Palestinian Christians, that simply isn't true."
Expressing similar sentiments, Hanan Ashrawi recently rebuked Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem Theophilos III (whose title is "Patriarch of Jerusalem and All Palestine") over his description of Israel as a "democracy" with "freedom of worship." Launching into the PLO/PA narrative, she libeled Israel, inaccurately claiming the Jewish State is the cause of Palestinian Christians' suffering. Ashrawi disingenuously referred to "the impact of the Israeli occupation of East Jerusalem" and preposterously declared "thousands of Palestinian Christians cannot access their own Holy Sites in Occupied East Jerusalem due to Israel's illegal annexation Wall and other movement restrictions."
In contrast to the PLO/PA narrative, both the Arab journalist Khaled Abu Toameh and Pierre Rehov have described the heartbreaking causes of Palestinian Christian suffering under both the PLO/PA and Hamas.
In Khalil's December 2016 New York Times op-ed, he claimed, without citing statistics or historical precedent to back up his claims, that violence would be the likely result of moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Interestingly, but not surprisingly, Khalil's comments mirror, in part, those of Fatah Central Committee official Sultan Abu Al-Einein, who reportedly said on January 1, 2017:
"We must prepare for a new confrontation with the new US administration, which has declared, clearly and audaciously, that Israel and its settlements are legitimate and legal, and has sent a delegation in order to move its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. I believe that any American act of stupidity will ignite the Palestinian territories, and that the US administration, along with the Israeli arrogance in continuing its settlement activity, will bear responsibility for the return of bloodshed in the Palestinian territories."
On January 15, 2017, the day of the Paris conference on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Telos posted and article by its Executive Director and Co-Founder Todd Deatherage, in Christianity Today, about the Security Council resolution vote, Secretary Kerry's speech, and the incoming Trump Administration's stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Deatherage's Christianity Today "bio" stated that Telos "aims to build a pro-Israeli, pro-Palestinian, pro-peace movement." In contrast to his organization's pro-PLO/PA actions, Deatherage admonished Christians:
"any community steeped in the Sermon on the Mount must seek ways to reject the fictions of a winner-takes-all world, and embrace things like working for security, dignity, and freedom for Israelis and Palestinians."
Considering the current Middle-East turmoil, his dismissal of "the fictions of a winner-takes-all world" shows a profound disconnect from current Middle East reality facing Israelis and Palestinians -- the PLO/PA and Hamas both pose an existential threat to Israelis' safety and security and obstruct Palestinians' pursuit of freedom and prosperity.
Deatherage claimed:
"Any just end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict requires an honest diplomatic process, accompanied by vigorous bridge-building and reconciliation at the grassroots level. Christians in the US often envision their role in this as taking one side against the other. But there is a third way, one that takes seriously Jesus' admonition that 'blessed are the peacemakers' and seeks to live that out by indentifying [sic] with those on both sides who are working for peace."
Unfortunately, Telos and Deatherage's unwillingness to hold the PLO/PA accountable for their corruption and oppression, and their willingness instead to spout PLO/PA talking points about the conflict and proposed conflict solutions, undermine their credibility to lead the bridge-building, reconciliation, and peacemaking efforts of Christians genuinely seeking to ensure peace and security for all Israelis and Palestinians.
So why was the Telos Group facilitating meetings with the very government and organization that oppresses its own people and, through their actions, limits Palestinians' freedom of speech and economic activity? Why was the Telos Group, through its public relations efforts, participating in gaslighting Israel and its Christian supporters right before Christmas? Unfortunately, the Telos slogan of "pro-Israeli, pro-Palestinian, and pro-peace" is misleading: that is not its true identity behind the facade. The Telos Group's most recent blog post by Deatherage, "How can we be Pro-Pro-Pro Right Now?", confirms what research has shown. Gregory Khalil's model UN speech and his New York Times op-ed demonstrate the organization's attempts to use deceptive language and the storytelling method to disguise its true agenda.
Facilitating meetings among those seeking to revitalize the Palestinian economy without necessary Palestinian reforms, Telos plans to use congressional lobbying and their ties with philanthropists and activists to upset the status quo and disrupt peace. Its false narrative currently targets grassroots Americans who are genuinely pro-Israeli, pro-Palestinian, and pro-peace. Given that the upcoming 2017 Telos Leadership Gathering's theme is "Disrupting the Status Quo: Pro/Pro/Pro in Action," Americans should be aware of this organization's true intentions and agenda. It is time to call the Telos Group for what it really is -- Anti/Anti/Anti: anti-Israeli, anti-Palestinian, and anti-peace.
*Noah Summers is a specialist on Middle East affairs and American foreign policy.
[1] Updated April 8, 2015 according to the Telos Group's WhoIs record
[2] April 6, 2016 PLO Facebook post, press release, and picture. September 26, 2016 PLO Facebook post, press release, and picture.
[3] Palestinian media report on April 6, 2016 meeting and on September 26, 2016 meeting.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Palestinians' Fort of Torture
Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/January 30/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9854/palestinians-torture
Because it is not Israelis who are perpetrating the abuse, the reports are ho-hum to these journalists.
Hamas is an extremist Islamist movement that does not consider itself obliged to abide by international laws and treaties concerning basic human rights. Indeed, the concept of human rights simply does not exist under Hamas in the Gaza Strip, where public freedoms, including freedom of speech and of the press, are non-existent.
In 2013, two Palestinian detainees reportedly died of torture in the Jericho Central Prison.
A London-based human rights organization reported 3,175 cases of human rights violations, including arbitrary detentions, by the Palestinian Authority (PA) security forces in the West Bank during 2016. Hundreds of those detained include university students and lecturers, as well as schoolteachers. During the same year, the PA security forces also detained 27 Palestinian journalists.
Unfortunately for them, they are not going on hunger strikes in an Israeli prison, where such actions garner the immediate interest of the mainstream media.
Many are willing to tell their stories. But who is willing to listen? Not Western governments, human rights organizations and journalists. Most of them seek evil in Israel, and Israel alone.
As Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas and his cronies occupied themselves in the past two weeks issuing warnings to President Trump against moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, reports resurfaced concerning the brutal conditions and human rights violations in a Palestinian prison in the West Bank.
These reports, however, were buried, along with the abuse, in favor of attention to rhetoric directed against the Trump Administration. Anything uttered by Abbas and senior PA officials regarding the possible transfer of the US embassy to Jerusalem made it to the headlines of major newspapers and TV networks around the world.
At one point, it actually appeared as if the mainstream media in the West was interested in highlighting and inflating these statements in a bid to pressure Trump into abandoning the idea of moving the embassy to Jerusalem. Western journalists ran to provide platforms for any Palestinian official interested in threatening the Trump Administration.
The threats included warnings that the transfer of the embassy to Jerusalem would "destroy the peace process," "jeopardize regional and international security" and "plunge the entire region into anarchy and violence." Some Palestinian officials went so far as to state that such a move would be considered an "assault on all Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims." They also threatened to "revoke" Palestinian recognition of Israel's right to exist.
Regrettably, as Palestinian officials from across the political spectrum joined forces to broadcast sensational headlines in the mainstream media around the world, the reports about torture of Palestinian detainees in a PA prison failed to attract the interest of the many journalists covering the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The torture that takes place in PA-controlled prisons and detention centers is not new.
Over the past few years, Palestinians have become accustomed to hearing horror stories about what is happening within the walls of these structures. Yet, because it is not Israelis who are perpetrating the abuse, the reports are ho-hum to these journalists.
A Palestinian who points a finger at Israel is guaranteed a sympathetic ear among journalists. When a Palestinian complains of torture at the hands of Palestinian interrogators or security officers, it is seen as just more of the same. Worse: It is seen as "Oh those Arabs, what can anyone expect from them?"
Ironically, it is the Hamas and Palestinian Authority media outlets that publish such reports. The two sides regularly report about the abuse of human rights and torture in each other's prisons and detention centers as part of the smear campaign they have been waging against each other for the past decade.
Hamas-affiliated media outlets are teeming with reports documenting cases of torture in PA detention facilities in the West Bank. Similarly, PA media organizations are always happy to hear from any Palestinian who is prepared to recount his or her ordeal in a Hamas prison in the Gaza Strip.
The bottom line: both Hamas and the PA, according to testimonies and reports, are practicing torture in their prisons. Neither cares a fig for the rights of detainees and prisoners, and both scoff at the values of international human rights. But because human rights organizations, lawyers and relatives are so often denied access to the Palestinian prisoners and detainees held by Hamas and the PA, they cannot get any first-hand information from the prisoners themselves. They are people -- being tortured in prison!
All of this makes perfect sense, of course: Hamas is an extremist Islamist movement that does not consider itself obliged to abide by international laws and treaties concerning basic human rights. Indeed, the concept of human rights simply does not exist under Hamas in the Gaza Strip, where public freedoms, including free speech and media, are non-existent.
Then how does the Western-funded PA, which has long attempted to join international bodies such as the United Nations, explain its systemic barbarity?
For years, the PA has been acting as an "independent state" that is recognized by more than 100 countries. As such, foreign governments, especially American and European taxpayers, are entitled, or rather obliged, to hold the PA accountable for human rights violations and demand transparency and accountability. This right derives from the fact that the PA is asking to become part of the international community by winning recognition for a Palestinian state. Unless, of course, the international community is willing to welcome yet another Arab state that tramples upon human rights, and practices torture in its prisons.
The most recent evidence of torture in the West Bank was disclosed in a report by a Hamas-affiliated online website. The report sheds light on some of the torture methods employed by PA interrogators and offers a unique insight into the conditions detainees are held under. The report refers specifically to the notorious Jericho Central Prison, which is controlled by various security branches of the PA.
Entitled "Jericho Prison -- A Fort of Torture?" the report describes conditions inside the prison as similar to those sensational films aired on TV screens to draw the attention of viewers.
A Palestinian who was recently released from the Jericho Central Prison is quoted as saying that anyone who arrives at the facility is first blindfolded and his hands tied behind his back before he is severely beaten by five to 10 security officers. One of the most common forms of torture in the PA prison, he recounted, is called the "shabah" position, where a prisoner's hands are shackled and he is hung from the ceiling for several hours. During this time, the detainee is beaten on all parts of his body. If the detainee tries to move or change his position, the beating gets worse. Sometimes, the "shabah" takes place inside the prison lavatories.
Another infamous form of torture in the Jericho Central Prison is the "falaka," where the victims are whipped on their bare feet. According to the testimony of another former detainee, who is identified only as Abu Majd, he was subjected to the "falaka" with a plastic hose for several hours each session. Sometimes, one of the "interrogators" would also slap him on the face while he was being whipped on his bare feet.
Abu Majd reported that he was also subjected to another well-known form of torture, where he would be asked to "climb" a non-existent ladder on a wall. Because there is no ladder and the detainee cannot "climb" it, he is punished with more beatings.
Other former detainees recounted sleep deprivation, solitary confinement and being locked up in a small closet with powerful air-conditioning as common practices of torture in the same prison. This is in addition to verbal abuse, of course, and forcing detainees to sleep on the floor without mattresses or blankets.
In 2013, two Palestinian detainees reportedly died from torture in the Jericho Central Prison five days apart from each other. They were identified as Arafat Jaradat and Ayman Samarah.
Earlier this month, the father of Ahmed Salhab, who was recently detained by PA security forces and taken to the Jericho prison, complained that his son's health was seriously harmed as a result of torture. The father said that his son was suffering from acute pain after being hit on the head by his interrogators.
Detainees in Palestinian prisons have reportedly gone on hunger strikes to protest their incarceration and torture. Unfortunately for them, they are not going on hunger strikes in an Israeli prison, where such actions garner the immediate interest of the mainstream media.
A London-based human rights organization reported 3,175 cases of human rights violations, including arbitrary detentions, by the PA security forces in the West Bank during 2016. According to the report, hundreds of those detained include university students and lecturers, as well as schoolteachers.
During the same year, the PA security forces also detained 27 Palestinian journalists, the report revealed.
PA political and security officials dismiss these reports as Hamas-orchestrated "propaganda." But one does not need wait for Hamas to tell the world about torture and human rights abuses at the hands of PA security officers. Among the thousands of Palestinians who have experienced incarceration in PA prisons and detention facilities during the past two decades, many are willing to tell their stories. But who is willing to listen?
Not Western governments, human rights organizations and journalists. Most of them seek evil in Israel, and Israeli alone. Yet such a policy aids and abets the emergence of yet another Arab dictatorship in the Middle East. For now, the residents of Jericho will continue to hear the screams of the tortured detainees in their city. The rest of the world will close its eyes and ears and continue to pretend that all is rosy in the land of Abbas.
*Khaled Abu Toameh, an award-winning journalist, is based in Jerusalem.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Reports In Arab Media: Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad Is Gravely Ill

MEMRI/January 30/17
In the last few days, news and rumors have been circulating in the media that Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad is gravely ill or critically wounded. The rumors – whose credibility is unclear and which were initially posted on social media – said that one of his bodyguards had made an attempt on his life, or else that he had suffered a stroke or had a brain tumor. Some also stated Maher Al-Assad, the president’s brother, was filling in for Bashar while he was receiving treatment.
Reports to the same effect later appeared in the Arab media, including in a Lebanese daily close to Assad, as well as in the non-Arab media. It is interesting to note that many of the Arab press reports on this matter were removed from the papers’ websites shortly after their publication.
The stream of reports about Assad’s health in the Arab media and on social media led writers on Syrian opposition websites to discuss the issue, and particularly to speculate on possible scenarios if the news is accurate.
The Syrian regime and its supporters, for their part, denied the rumors of Assad’s illness, calling them ridiculous lies and stressing that Assad is in excellent health.
The following are excerpts from some of the reports on Assad’s illness that appeared in the non-Arab and Arab media, and from the articles on the opposition websites speculating about what happens post-Assad.
French Le Point Daily: Assad Rumored To Have Been Shot By His Bodyguard
An early report on the state of Assad’s health appeared in the French daily Le Point on January 24, 2017. The daily reported that, according to rumors circulating on Arab social media, Assad was shot by his Iranian bodyguard on January 21 and was taken to hospital in Damascus under heavy guard, and some even claimed he was dead.[1]
Saudi Official Daily ‘Okaz: Assad Has A Brain Tumor Or Has Suffered A Stoke
The Saud daily ‘Okaz reported on January 27 that, according to “exclusive information” it had received, Assad had a brain tumor and was trying unsuccessfully to conceal the visible symptoms of his disease. Citing “sources,” the report noted that, although Assad had met recently (on January 26) with Amir Abdollahian, an advisor to Iran’s Majlis Speaker Ali Larijani, he had been absent from other major meetings with decision-makers. Furthermore, he had been undergoing regular tests at the Al-Shami hospital in Damascus, especially in the recent period, and his case was being handled by a team of Russian doctors. The sources also assessed that Assad underwent medical tests in Moscow when he last visited there. The daily also mentioned that, according to a different unconfirmed report, Assad has suffered a stroke, adding that the goings-on in the presidential palace were shrouded in heavy secrecy because it was under the control of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). [2]
The report on ‘Okaz:[3] “Has Assad Suffered a Stroke?”
Gulf Papers Publish And Then Remove Reports About Assad’s Illness
Reports on Assad’s health situation also appeared in the Gulf press, only to be removed from the papers’ websites after a short time; it is unclear whether they were removed due to their unconfirmed nature or for some other reason. On January 27, the Khalij Online news website posted a report headlined “Has Assad Been Assassinated? Paper Claims His Bodyguard Shot Him,”[4] and on the next day the Kuwaiti daily Al-Qabas carried a report headlined “Has Assad Suffered a Stroke or Been Shot by One of his Bodyguards?” [5] Both reports were subsequently deleted.
The Kahlij Online report: “Has Assad Been Assassinated? Paper Claims His Bodyguard Shot Him”
Report In Pro-Assad Lebanese Daily: Assad Has Suffered A Stroke, His Brother Maher Is Running The War
The Lebanese press also addressed the issue of Assad’s health. In a January 27 report, likewise removed after its posting, the pro-Assad Lebanese daily Al-Diyar stated, citing “semi-official sources in Damascus,” that Assad had been hospitalized following a stroke that affected one of his eyes and part of his body, and had been brought about by a state of exhaustion. The report claimed that the Syrian president was out of danger but was being kept in the hospital for observation; that the doctors had warned him to rest, lest he suffer another, more serious stroke, and that Russian President Putin had sent three brain specialists to oversee his treatment. According to the report, the Syrian security apparatuses had instructed the hospital to divulge no information about Assad’s condition, but he was expected to return to full activity within a week or two.
Later that day, the daily’s website reported that Assad’s brother Maher was acting as president while Bashar was undergoing treatment and would continue to fulfill this role until Bashar recovered. Maher Al-Assad, said the daily, was overseeing the movement of the Syrian forces and the fighting on the ground, in coordination with the Syrian chief-of-staff and defense minister, as well as the Russian experts and the Iranian and Hizbullah commanders in Syria.[6]
Interestingly, in the two days following this, Al-Diyar published reports denying the “absurd rumors” regarding Assad’s health and assessed that he would make a television appearance to dispel the rumors.[7]
The Lebanese daily Al-Mustaqbal, known for its opposition to the Syrian regime, quoted a prominent Syrian oppositionist as saying that reliable sources confirm that Assad has suffered a stroke and was taken to Al-Shami hospital under heavy guard.[8]
On Social Media, Posts About Assad’s Illness And His Possible Replacement By His Brother Maher Al-Assad
As noted, on social media there are a great many reports on Assad’s health situation. For example, leading Al-Jazeera Syrian journalist Faisal Al-Qassem, a vehement opponent of the Assad regime, posted yesterday on his Facebook page, along with a large red “Breaking News” notice: “I have been trying for several days to verify information about the illness of the tyrant Bashar Al-Assad. I have received conflicting information about this. Yesterday, I received information that was 90% certain that he has had a stroke… At this point, I can say, based on information from my personal sources, that Bashar Al-Assad is lying in bed but is conscious, and that he is in 70% danger of dying…”[9]
Faisal Al-Qassem’s Facebook post, January 29, 2017.
Political commentator Amjad Taha, who resides in the UK, wrote, in a series of tweets, that “a source inside occupied Damascus” has confirmed that Assad is seriously ill and that there is a Russian military presence there. He also tweeted that a large number of doctors had arrived from Iran and from an Eastern European country in order to treat Assad, and that Russia was refusing to provide medical treatment and was only handling security for him.[10]
Amjad Taha’s tweet about the arrival of doctors from Iran, January 29, 2017.
Another tweet, from the “Abu Rakan Al-Dafari” account, stated: “There is news that Assad is seriously ill and that for this reason there is a security alert and Russian forces presence and doctors from Iran.”[11]
Twitter user @90Drkurdy tweeted: “It appears that [the news that] Bashar Al-Assad has had a cerebral infarction is correct. Russian military police have surrounded Damascus and pictures of Maher Al-Assad are appearing all over Al-Latakia.”[12]
Drkurdy’s tweet about Assad’s cerebral infarction, January 29, 2017.
Private individuals also tweeted news about the appointment of Assad’s brother Maher as acting Syrian president.[13]
Muhammad Darkoushi, vice president of the Syrian Writers’ Union, tweeted: “Is a revolution led by Maher Al-Assad being organized in Syria on instructions from Russia[?] In another few days the smoke will clear.”[14]
Muhammad Darkoushi’s tweet, January 28, 2017.
Syrian Presidency And Lebanese Officials Close To Assad Regime Deny Reports About Assad’s Illness
On January 27, 2017, the office of the Syrian presidency denied the rumors of Assad’s illness. A statement issued by the Syrian government news agency SANA and tweeted by the Syrian presidency’s official Twitter account stated: “The presidency of the Republic denies outright the rumors and news about the health of President Bashar Al-Assad and emphasizes that they are completely untrue and that President Assad is in excellent health and is carrying out his functions absolutely naturally.”
The statement added: “The Syrian people have become immune to such lies, of which there have been many from the beginning of the war on Syria to this day. These lies are no more than dreams and an attempt to raise the low morale [of the Syrian opposition and its supporters], and they prompt only mockery and ridicule… The source of these rumors are elements and newspapers whose affiliation, funding, and bias are known to all. These lies come at the same time as changes that began in the field and on the political level, that are opposed to everything that they [the rumormongers] have wanted for Syria in recent years.”[15] It should be noted that Russian news agencies also tweeted SANA’s denial.
Tweets by the office of the Syrian presidency, January 27, 2017
Denials came also from senior Lebanese officials known to be close to the Assad regime. For example, Gen. (ret.) Jamil Al-Sayyed, an Assad affiliate who once headed the Lebanese general security apparatus and who was once arrested on suspicion of involvement in the assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq Al-Hariri, tweeted: “Rumors that President Assad has a brain tumor! They are bankrupt in the war against him [and now] have moved on to fortunetelling and wishes [for] a fateful [event to take place]. Rest assured! [Assad] will continue to trouble you…”[16]
Al-Sayyed’s tweet, January 26, 2017.
On his Facebook page, former Lebanese minister Wiam Wahhab, also known to be close to President Assad, denied the reports of Assad’s illness, writing, on January 29: “To all those who are in anticipation, President Assad feels fine. He is overseeing the battles and monitoring the restoring of the [drinking] water [supply] to the residents of Damascus.”[17]
Wahhab’s Facebook post, January 29, 2017.
Following Reports On Assad’s Health, Articles On Opposition Websites Discuss What Happens Post-Assad
The stream of reports about Assad’s health in the Arab media and on social media led writers on Syrian opposition websites to discuss the issue, and particularly to speculate on possible scenarios if the news is accurate.
For example, writer Ayman Muhammad, in an article headlined “Is Assad’s Death Sufficient [to Declare that] the Regime Has Fallen?” on the Baladi-news.com opposition website, stated that even if the rumors that Assad was either dead or paralyzed were true, and even if the regime and its allies acknowledged this, “this will not be sufficient [in order to declare that] the regime has fallen.” He said that the Alawites had a firm grip on the regime, and that a successor for Assad would quickly be found, in order to ensure its continuation. Muhammad added that Assad’s death would not mean that much for the Syrian rebels, and certainly would not assure the revolution’s victory, because of the rebels’ dreadful situation on the battlefield. He noted that even if Assad is neutralized, Russia can only alter the face of the regime superficially: it will remove several figures and bring in several others from the opposition with whom it is comfortable working, and thus create a situation in which those who are voted in in “democratic” elections that will be held in Syria will be people that the Russians want and who will allow the Russians to control them. He concluded by stating: “Even if there is a change in the external [image] of the regime after Bashar Al-Assad’s death, his nucleus, which is based on the Syrian security apparatuses, will remain” and it will serve as a means for Russia to rule Syria.[18]
Similarly, journalist FuadAbd Al-‘Aziz, in an article titled “What Will Happen If Bashar Dies?” on the Zamanalwsl.net opposition website, analyzed what awaits Syria if the news of Assad’s death turned out to be true. He presented two scenarios he said were likely in such a situation: Either Iran and Russia take over the region, or Syria is divided into regions of international influence, with each region controlled by a different state – the U.S., Russia, Turkey, or Iran. He concluded with a call for the opposition to appeal to Western Europe for help.[19]
[1] Lepoint.fr, January 24, 2017.
[2] ‘Okaz (Saudi Arabia), January 27, 2017.
[3] Twitter.com/OKAZ_online, January 27, 2017.
[4] Alkhalijonline, January 27, 2017.
[5] Alqabas.com, January 28, 2017.
[6] Al-Diyar (Lebanon), January 27, 2017.
[7] Al-Diyar (Lebanon), January 28, 29, 2017.
[8] Al-Mustaqbal (Lebanon), January 27, 2017.
[9] Facebook.com/falkasim, January 29, 2016.
[10] Twitter.com/amjadt25, January 29, 30, 2017.
[11] Twitter.com/zaaaz41114, January 29, 2017.
[12] Twitter.com/90Drkurdy, January 29, 2017.
[13] Twitter.com/L00n7 ,Twitter.com/aboyosha3homs, January 29, 2017.
[14] Twitter.com/Mohamedarkoushi, January 28, 2017.
[15] Twitter.com/presidency_sy?lang=en, SANA news agency (Syria), January 27, 2017.
[16] Twitter.com/jamil_el_sayyed?lang=en, January 26, 2017.
[17] Facebook.com/wiammwahhab, January 29, 2017.
[18] Baladi-news.com, January 30, 2017.
[19] Zamanalwsl.net, January 30, 2017.